EEG Spectral Analysis On Muslim Prayers
EEG Spectral Analysis On Muslim Prayers
EEG Spectral Analysis On Muslim Prayers
DOI 10.1007/s10484-011-9170-1
Introduction
The brain is an electrochemical organ, which functions as
the portal for integrating and processing information, as
well as the controlling center (Applegate 1995; Schlogl
et al. 2002). There were also several studies that showed
that the brain frequency rhythm may have correlation with
spiritual activities, such as yoga (Vialatte et al. 2009;
Arambula et al. 2001), tai chi (Field et al. 2010), and Zen
meditation (Fumoto et al. 2004). One of the most commonly studied brain wave is alpha wave, which is indicative of relaxation or mental inactivity. The production of
alpha waves is normally promoted by the parasympathetic
nervous system with suppression of the symphathetic system. (Applegate 1995; Takahashi et al. 2005).
Religious meditations and prayers have been found to
possibly promote relaxation, as well as a healthier, more
balanced condition to the human mind and body (Lee et al.
2007; Reibel et al. 2001). Banquet (1973) performed a
spectral analysis during transcendental meditation and
discovered that the frequency rhythm of both alpha and
theta waves increased during meditation. Kasamatsu and
Hirai (1966) demonstrated the appearance of alpha and
theta waves during Zen meditation. In addition, Arambula
et al. (2001) investigated whether the physiological
response correlated with a well-trained Kundalini yoga
meditator, and found that alpha wave EEG activity was
enhanced during meditation when compared to the pre-and
123
12
(C3, C4), parietal (P3, P4) and occipital (O1, O2) sites)
according to the International 1020 system of electrode
placement, referenced to the linked ear lobe electrode
(Fig. 1). These electrode sites selections were based on
previous studies that recorded EEG during meditations or
relaxation techniques (Surwillo and Hobson 1978; Uebaba
et al. 2005; Sim and Grewal 1989; Takahashi et al. 2005).
Electrode impedance was less than 5 k ohm. The signals
were sampled at a frequency of 250 Hz and recorded using
the MP150 EEG acquisition system (BIOPAC Systems
Inc., California, USA).
The experimental protocol for each of the subjects
consisted of three sessions. The rst sessions commenced
with the subjects sitting on a chair in a relaxed position
with their eyes opened for 1 min then they were asked to
close their eyes for another minute; and nally to open their
eyes for another minute. The EEG was subsequently
recorded and the data were used as a baseline for consecutive analyses. The subjects were asked to relax for an
additional 3 min prior to the commencement of the second
sessions.
In the second sessions, the subjects performed the
Dhuha prayer for four cycles. The prayer began with the
upright standing position, which took approximately
3060 s to complete. It was followed by bowing; with the
trunk of the body being fully horizontal at 90-degree angle
with the legs, and both hands pressing down on the knees.
The subject then recited a specic supplication during this
position that took approximately 5 s to complete. The
subject then briey stood up for approximately 2 s, before
subsequently prostrating with both palms and the knees
touching the oor. This position lasted for about 10 s, with
123
13
Results
Signal Analysis
Brain signals from all the nine subjects were analyzed. The
average prayer duration performed in this study was
7.29 1.73 min. Figure 3 shows the mean RPa for all four
prayer positions during the complete actual salat cycle, and
also during the resting condition. The results clearly
depicted the increase of mean RPa at parietal and occipital
electrode positions during the prostration position, suggesting that the subject is experiencing the highest level of
Stand
Bow
Sit
123
22.87 14.18
24.86 15.07
23.13 11.97
26.88 15.96
28.39 14.37
13.52 7.44
12.16 7.53
Rest
21.59 9.66
22.42 11.65
38.58 25.08
20.24 17.25
20.18 15.61
22.48 10.63
39.65 24.33
27.22 13.80
38.16 25.49
18.73 13.34
20.44 15.89
26.07 11.74
37.62 22.76
17.04 6.19
19.05 13.29
14.79 11.00
15.41 12.03
17.12 5.53
17.40 9.90
7.20 2.69
7.56 2.04
10.38 4.94
6.93 1.94
7.83 2.75
10.10 4.36
Bowing
9.39 1.52
9.56 2.52
Standing
Sitting
Prostrating
22.61 9.39
24.99 11.62
25.54 10.08
17.64 5.26
P3
C4
C3
F4
F3
Positions
18.67 5.63
O1
123
RPa
Table 1 Mean and standard deviation (SD) for the alpha relative power (RPa) of the actual salat positions
Fig. 4 Mean alpha relative (RPa) during resting and acted salat: for
the standing, bowing, sitting and prostrating positions
P4
Fig. 3 Mean alpha relative (RPa) during resting and the actual salat
for the standing, bowing, sitting and prostrating positions
21.15 9.18
O2
14
13.52 7.44
12.16 7.53
Rest
21.59 9.66
21.40 13.88
20.28 13.30
11.11 3.16
15.82 6.40
C3
28.39 14.37
27.22 19.43
24.19 18.40
11.52 2.93
15.49 7.15
C4
26.88 15.96
48.19 24.61
29.34 20.86
15.57 6.86
23.97 11.50
P3
23.13 11.97
50.57 30.59
30.05 24.92
15.67 5.67
22.71 14.15
P4
24.86 15.07
54.36 25.03
28.08 20.34
16.89 6.64
23.64 10.14
O1
22.87 14.18
51.82 28.13
27.96 22.42
15.93 7.50
21.35 9.81
O2
21.35 9.81
21.1 9.18
O2
8.31
7.78
8.73
7.83
5.77
4.5
2.68
2.37
SE
0.99
Sig.
-26.77
-25.91
-25.65
-23.49
-16.29
-11.54
-10.07
-7.41
Lower
CI
26.37
23.85
30.2
26.62
20.59
17.24
7.01
7.73
Upper
SE standard error, Sig. signicance difference of actual and acted salat, CI condence interval
22.71 14.15
23.64 10.14
24.9 11.62
22.6 9.39
P4
23.97 11.50
25.5 10.08
P3
O1
15.82 6.40
15.49 7.15
18.6 5.63
17.6 5.26
9.39 1.52
F4
C3
9.56 2.52
F3
C4
9.4 3.19
10.88 2.63
Actual
Electrodes
Acted
Standing
Positions
RPa
20.24 17.25
20.18 15.61
18.73 13.34
20.44 15.89
14.79 11.00
15.41 12.03
7.20 2.69
6.93 1.94
Actual
Bowing
15.9 7.50
16. 6.64
15. 5.67
15. 6.86
11.5 2.93
11. 3.16
7.3 2.26
6.2 1.97
Acted
8.31
7.78
8.73
7.83
5.77
4.5
2.68
2.37
SE
0.99
Sig.
-22.26
-21.6
-24.86
-23.49
-19.14
-10.09
-8.73
-6.88
Lower
CI
30.88
28.17
30.98
26.62
17.74
18.69
8.43
8.26
Upper
Table 3 Mean and standard deviation (M SD), standard error and condence interval of alpha relative power (RPa) between standing and bowing positions of the actual and the acted salat
15.49 11.31
14.51 7.59
12.16 7.73
13.92 7.71
Sitting
7.35 2.26
Prostrating
10.88 2.63
9.40 3.19
6.24 1.97
F4
Standing
F3
Bowing
Positions
RPa
Table 2 Mean and standard deviation (SD) for the alpha relative power (RPa) of the acted salat positions
123
123
10.18
13.33
-39.59
-39.81
0.8
SE standard error, Sig. signicance difference of actual and acted salat, CI condence interval
0.62
7.78
8.31
51.82 28.13
54.36 25.03
39.65 24.33
38.58 25.08
21.04
19.29
-30.48
-32.11
0.99
0.99
27.96 22.42
8.31
28.08 20.34
22.42 11.65
O2
O1
22.48 10.63
7.78
10.28
14.48
15.52
-26.6
-35.63
-40.33
0.91
0.89
0.89
5.77
7.83
8.73
48.19 24.61
50.57 30.59
27.22 19.43
19.05 13.29
37.62 22.76
38.16 25.49
21.78
25.09
11.3
-25.58
-28.33
-30.75
1
1
0.95
24.19 18.40
29.34 20.86
30.05 24.92
5.77
Discussion
17.04 6.19
7.83
8.73
26.07 11.74
27.22 13.80
C4
P3
P4
10.38
-18.4
4.5
20.28 13.30
C3
17.12 5.53
0.99
-17.55
11.23
17.40 9.90
21.40 13.88
4.5
0.99
3.75
4.44
-11.39
-12.71
0.83
0.8
2.37
2.68
14.51 7.59
13.92 7.71
10.10 4.36
10.38 4.94
0.65
3.24
-11.9
-16.5
0.09
0.66
2.37
2.68
12.16 7.73
15.49 11.31
7.83 2.75
7.56 2.04
F3
F4
Upper
Lower
Lower
Acted
Actual
Electrodes
Positions
RPa
Sitting
SE
Sig.
CI
Upper
Actual
Prostrating
Acted
SE
Sig.
CI
16
Conclusion
The results showed that a signicantly higher alpha wave
activity was recorded during the prostration position of the
Muslim prayer. Although the sample size was comparably
small, the ndings were in accordance with previously
17
Fig. 5 EEG from channel (O1) during different actual and acted salat positions for one subject
References
Amodio, P., Orsato, R., Marchetti, P., Schiff, S., Poci, C., Angeli, P.,
et al. (2009). Electroencephalographic analysis for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy: comparison of non-parametric
123
18
abdominal breathing in an eyes-closed condition. Neuroscience
Research, 50, 307317.
Ibrahim, F., Wan Abas, W. A. B., & Ng, S. C. (2008). Salat: Benet
from science perspective. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Malaya.
Kasamatsu, A., & Hirai, T. (1966). An electroencephalographic study
on the Zen meditation. Folia psychiatrica et neurologica
japonica, 20, 315336.
Lee, S. H., Ahn, S. C., Lee, Y. J., Choi, T. K., Yook, K. H., & Suh, S.
Y. (2007). Effectiveness of a meditation-based management
program as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy in patients with
anxiety disorder. Journal of Psychomatic Research, 62,
189195.
Murata, T., Takahashi, T., Hamada, T., Omori, M., Kosaka, H.,
Yoshida, H., et al. (2004). Individual trait anxiety levels
characterizing the properties of Zen meditation. Neuropsychobiology, 50, 189194.
Oishi, N., Mima, T., Ishii, K., Bushara, K. O., Hiraoka, T., Ueki, Y.,
et al. (2007). Neural correlates of regional EEG power change.
NeuroImage, 36, 13011312.
Peper, E. (1971). Reduction of efferent motor commands during alpha
feedback as a facilitator of EEG alpha and a precondition for
changes in consciousness. Kybernetik, 9(6), 226231.
Reibel, D. K., Greeson, J. M., Brainard, G. C., & Rosenzweig, S.
(2001). Mindfullness-based stress reduction and health-related
quality of life in a heterogeneous patients population. General
Hospital Psychiatry, 23, 183192.
Schlogl, A., Slater, M., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2002). Presence research
and EEG. Retrieved July 1, 2007 from http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
research/equator/papers/Documents2002/Mel_presence_2002.
pdf.
123