Regulation Monitoring Promotion of Mining Sector - Auditor General's Report

T
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
www.oag.go.ug | E-mail: [email protected]
REGULATION, MONITORING AND PROMOTION

OF THE MINING SECTOR BY MINISTRY OF
ENERGY AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT
A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL
D E C E M B EBY UGANDA
R , POLICE
2 0FORCE
1 |5A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL
VALUE FOR MONEY AUDIT REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EXPRESS PENALTY SCHEME (EPS)
THE
REPUBLIC
OF
UGANDA
REGULATION, MONITORING AND

PROMOTION OF THE MINING
SECTOR BY MINISTRY OF ENERGY
AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT
A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL
DECEMBER, 2015
REGULATION, MONITORING AND PROMOTION OF THE MINING SECTOR BY MEMD | A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL
AUDITOR GENERAL
AUDITOR GENERALS MESSAGE
31st December 2015

The Rt. Hon. Speaker of Parliament
Parliament of Uganda
Kampala
REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REGULATION,

MONITORING AND PROMOTION OF THE MINING SECTOR BY
MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT (MEMD)
In accordance with Article 163 (3) of the Constitution of the Republic
of Uganda 1995 (as ammended), I hereby submit my report on the
audit undertaken on the Regulation, Monitoring and Promotion of
the Mining Sector by Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development
(MEMD).
My office intends to carry out a follow up at an appropriate time
regarding actions taken in relation to the recommendations in this
report.
I would like to thank my staff who undertook this audit and the staff
of Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development for the assistance
offered to my staff during the period of the audit.
John F. S. Muwanga
AUDITOR GENERAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................... ii
LIST OF FIGURES AND PICTURES......................................................................................... ii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS....................................................................................... iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................iv
KEY FINDINGS.........................................................................................................................iv
RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 2
1.1
Background..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2
Motivation........................................................................................................................ 2
1.3. Description Of The Audit Area........................................................................................ 3

1.4
Audit Objectives.............................................................................................................. 5
1.5
Audit Scope..................................................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER TWO
2.0
AUDIT METHODOLOGY................................................................................................... 7
2.1
Sampling......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2
Data Collection Methods................................................................................................ 7
CHAPTER THREE
3.0
SYSTEM AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION..................................................................... 11
3.1
Roles and responsibilities of key players................................................................... 11
3.2.
Process description..................................................................................................... 12
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0
FINDINGS..................................................................................................................... 15
4.1
Adequacy of the mining regulatory frame work......................................................... 15
4.2
Licensing and mineral rights...................................................................................... 18
4.3
Advisory services......................................................................................................... 23
4.4.
Inspection and monitoring of mining operations....................................................... 27
4.5
Provision of laboratory services.................................................................................. 30
4.6
Generation and dissemination of the geological data............................................... 30
GLOSSARY OF TERMS........................................................................................................... 32
APPENDICES
APPENDIX (I): DGSM Organization structure...................................................................... 33
APPENDIX (II): Documents reviewed.................................................................................... 34
APPENDIX (III): Officers interviewed.................................................................................... 35
APPENDIX (IV): Staffing of the Inspection and Monitoring Division as at August 2015...... 37
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Category of Licences issued by DGSM................................................................... 13
Table 2: Aging of uncollected NTR over the period (2011 - 2015)....................................... 21
Table 3: Mining Leases with no returns.............................................................................. 22
Table 4: Extracts of budgeted and actual release for awareness, sensitization and
training on health and safety.................................................................................. 24
Table 5: Licensing and inspection budget and actual releases to the DGSM.................... 28
LIST OF FIGURES AND PCTURES

Figure 1: Conformity of the 36 mining leases to application requirements............... 19
Figure 2: Budget and actual releases for licensing and inspection and number of
inspections conducted.......................................................................................... 28
Picture 1: Status of sampled artisan mining sites............................................................ 25
ii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CAO
Chief Administrative Officer
DEO
District Environment Officer
DGSM
Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines
EL
Exploration License
EMP
Environment Management Plan
LL
Location License
MEM
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development
ML
Mining License
MR
Mineral Right
NEMA
National Environment Management Authority
OHS
Occupational Health and Safety
PL
Prospecting License
RL
Retention License
URA
Uganda Revenue Authority
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The mining industry plays a central role in the socio-economic development of any country
by providing raw materials for local industries, employment and export earnings1. The
Government of Uganda established the Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines (DGSM)
under the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development as the lead government agency
technically responsible for the administration and management of the mineral sector2.
The Office of the Auditor General undertook a value for money audit to assess the extent to
which government is regulating, monitoring and promoting the mining sector through the
DGSM.
KEY FINDINGS
a. Regulation of commercialised building materials
The DGSM did not regulate the mining of sand, clay, murram and stone quarrying contrary
to the definition of industrial minerals as spelt out in the Mining Act and as a result
could not levy royalties on these activities. The National Environment and Management
Authority (NEMA) and the National Forestry Authority (NFA) only issued extraction permits
to operate in wetlands and forest reserves, respectively, without levying royalties. The
sampled districts of Tororo, Kasese, Bushenyi and Shema also indicated that they were
not collecting any fees from such activities, either.
By failing to regulate the extraction of commercialised building materials, extraction
permits are issued without conducting due diligence on the level of technology to be used
and corresponding royalties lost by government. Commercialised industrial building
materials remained inappropriately regulated leading to loss of government revenue
and siltation of the lakes for sand mining.
b. Formalisation and regularisation of Artisan and Small scale Mining (ASM) Activities
Whereas the mineral policy provided for formalizing and regularizing mining operations
of Artisan and Small scale Miners (ASM) activities, the DGSM did not implement and
enforce it. In addition, the Directorate was to ensure health and safety standards for all
mining operations in coordination with Ministry of Gender , Labour and Social Development
(MoGLSD) Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) department. However, there was no
evidence of coordination taking place between the two ministries in this regard.
The inadequacy of the prevailing mining regulatory framework creates challenges in
regulating the mining sector thus hindering realisation of the sectors intended objectives.
iv
Page 2 , Mineral Policy of Uganda, 2001
Page 10, Mineral Policy of Uganda 2001

The DGSM has not been effective in administering the mining industry as issues of ASM,
commercialized building materials, environmental, health and safety standards remain
inadequately addressed.
c. Conformity to set application requirements & working obligations
Much as the Mining Act, 2003 laid down requirements to be met by all applicants of mining
licenses, fulfilment of which would form a basis for granting a mining lease; none of the
36 mining companies issued with mining leases fully complied with this requirement.
Eleven (11) of these companies had abandoned operations with no evidence of the
Commissioner either engaging the concerned parties to furnish him with explanations
to that effect, suspend or cancel their licenses as per the provisions of the prevailing
regulatory framework.
Failure by the licensing department to enforce compliance with the set requirements led
to issuance of mining rights to firms that could have lacked capacity to undertake mining
operations. Accordingly, the issuance of mining rights in the sector has not been effective
in promoting mineral development. The Directorates mission to establish, promote the
development, strategically manage and safeguard the rational and sustainable utilization
of mineral resources for economic and social development cannot be achieved.
d. Payment of fees
It was observed that Non-Tax Revenue (NTR) outstanding as at 30th September 2015
totaled to UGX 4.4 billion for the period July 2011 to September 2015. Although the Mining
Act, 2003, provided for a penalty of 2% over and above the prevailing commercial banking
rate to be charged on unpaid royalties and the Commissioner was to prohibit any mineral
right holders with unpaid royalties from disposing of minerals exploited from the sites
for which they have a license, there was no evidence for enforcement of these provisions.
By failing to collect all the mineral fees that fell due and imposing the 2% penalty on
the outstanding royalties, there is a risk that this money may never be recovered yet
this revenue could have been used to further develop and promote the minerals sector.
e. Advisory Services
Field inspections of sampled districts with high concentrations of Artisan and Small scale
miners of Mubende, Moroto, Buhweju, Namayingo, Busia and Kabale, it was established
that artisan and small scale miners use rudimentary and labour intensive mining methods
like heating up iron ore using firewood. There were no occupational health and safety
measures undertaken by these ASM. Miners were found using mercury and cyanide to
recover fine gold from the crashed rock with no safety gear such as helmets and gloves.
Although Uganda signed the Minamata Convention on Mercury in 2013 to curb use of
mercury in mining operations, Uganda had not operationalised its provisions.
The ASM operations remain unregulated thereby distorting established recoverable
mineral target endowments as their technologies do not fully recover mineral extracts,
loss of mineral revenue and posing environment risk.
f. Inspection and monitoring of mining operations
and results report. However, it was
It was observed that much as the mines
established that potential applicants
department of DGSM planned to make thirty-
were not able to apply and submit their
six (36) inspections that is twelve (12) per year
applications online.
and three (3) for every quarter, conducted
Ugandas mineral sector remains
inspections remained low as per inspection
underdeveloped with a variety of mineral
and monitoring reports availed to audit.
endowments remaining unexploited
By not conducting adequate inspection and
partly due to failure to attract potential
monitoring, the DGSM could not track the
investors.
performance of all the mineral licences issued

and enforce compliance of mining regulatory
RECOMMENDATIONS
framework.
i. The DGSM should consider regulating

and levying mineral fees from
g. Provision of Laboratory Services
commercialized building materials.
It was established that the national mineral
ii. The Directorate should ensure that the
laboratory capacity in Entebbe only addresses a
review process of the mineral regulatory
few tests and analysis as it is not yet accredited
framework is fast-tracked so as to
by International Standard Organisation (ISO).
enhance administration of the mineral
Mining companies operating in Uganda were
sector for improved mineral exploitation
compelled to export samples abroad for
and development.
complex mineral tests and analysis. There
iii. The DGSM should be more vigilant during
were no measures to track the results of tests
verification of applications and checks
conducted abroad.
and balances instituted to improve the
Lack of comprehensive laboratory services
due diligence process so that licences are
at the directorate results into additional cost
issued to competent and economically
by the investors in testing samples abroad.
sound applicants if the mining sector
These affect Ugandas comparative advantage
is to develop. Close monitoring and
to attract potential investors in the sector.
supervision of the licensee operations
The directorate is deprived of information
should be done and prompt action
regarding new discoveries that would have
taken against mineral right holders who
been beneficial for the mining sector.
contravene the terms and conditions of

the secured licences.
h. Generation and dissemination of the geological

data
vi
iv. The DGSM should liaise with the other

agencies like Uganda Revenue Authority
Government through the Sustainable
and devise a mechanism for enforcing the
Management of Mineral Resources Project
penalty and following up the defaulters
(SMMRP), established a cadaster system at
for recovery.
a total cost of USD1.2million. This was to be
v. The DGSM should consider implementing
used for data processing, dissemination of geo-
and enforcing the ASM, encourage
logical information and allowing for electronic
them to form associations, enhance
submission of mining right applications and
awareness, sensitization and enforce
tracking as per the SMMRP implementation
adoption of acceptable mining practices.
manual and implementation completion
vi. The DGSM should consider enhancing
inspection and monitoring activities by streamlining their planning and budgeting, indicating
sites to visit per region, setting KPIs with regional inspectors and ensuring adherence.
vii. The MEMD through its DGSM should expedite the process of formulating the laboratory
policy, adequately equip the mineral laboratory and pursue its ISO certification.
viii. The DGSM should address the shortfalls within the cadaster so as to provide an adequate
infrastructure that can be used by potential investors in the sector.
OVERALL CONCLUSION
Government of Uganda put in place the Mining Policy in 2001 and subsequently the enabling
legislation in 2003 to guide the DGSM under the MEMD in overseeing the mineral sector. However
regulating, monitoring and promoting the sector has not been effective as commercialized
building materials and artisan and small scale mining operations producing over 90% of
the national mineral output and employing about 200,000 Ugandans remain informal and
unregulated. Whereas the number of issued mining licencees increased from 157 in 2002
to 818 (192%) in 2015, the inspection and monitoring coverage geared towards enforcing
compliance with the prescribed conditions and the regulatory framework remained low at
only 4%.This has led to many non-compliant licences not being followed up resulting in loss
of revenue to Government.
As Government embarks on the process of the review of the legal framework, it is important
that the existing gaps in the regulatory and operational framework are addressed.
vii
CHAPTER ONE
CHAPTER ONE
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND
The mining industry plays a central role in the socio-economic development of any country. It provides
raw materials for local industries, employment and export earnings3. Ugandas mineral potential is very
high given the existence of a variety of geological formations, many of which have yielded exploitable
mineral deposits of both metallic (e.g. copper, gold, diamond) and non-metallic (e.g. clay, sand, slates,
rock salt, limestone, asbestos and phosphates) across the country. The Directorate of Geological Survey
and Mines (DGSM) under the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development is the lead government agency
technically responsible for the administration and management of the mineral sector4.
1.2
MOTIVATION
The Government commissioned a study in 1999 to review the mining sector performance with a view of
revamping the industry. This study identified several constraints namely lack of: a mineral policy, modern
internationally competitive law and regulation to steer the industry, and adequate geo-information to
attract significant mining investment. In light of the above, a Mineral Policy was established in 2001 with
the aim of stimulating the sectors development, promoting private sector participation, adding value to
mineral ores and increasing mineral trade5. This was followed by the enactment of the Mining Act and
Mining Regulations in 2003 and 2004 respectively.
The Government with the help of the World Bank, African Development Bank and Nordic Development
Fund committed funds amounting to USD 48.3 million6 under the Sustainable Management of Mineral
Resources Project (SMMRP). The overall objective of the project was to assist the Government of Uganda
in implementing its mineral sector strategy to i.e. accelerate sustainable development; reduce poverty
and to promote socially and environmentally sound development of the minerals sector based on private
investment7.
In addition, the Government embarked on implementing a Comprehensive Mineral Sector Reform Program
(CMSRP) in 2005 with a primary goal of harmonising the legal, policy and institutional framework within
the sector and enhancing its contribution to GDP, foreign exchange and employment. This resulted in
increased number of investors licensed in the sector from 91 in 2003 to 517 in 2008 and an increase in
production volumes and exports8.
3
4
5
6
7
8
Mineral Policy of Uganda, Page 2 2000

Page 10, Mineral Policy of Uganda 2000
Address by Hon. Minister Hillary Onek, then Minister for Energy and Mineral Development, 4th May, 2010
Report no: ICR00002166 of the World Bank: Implementation Completion and Results Report for the Sustainable Management of Mineral
Resources Project, November 28th 2012 page 12
Chapter 2 SMMRP PROJECT implementation manual pg.2
Section 285, National Development Plan 2010/11-2014/15; Page 107
Furthermore, new discoveries of over 256 million
the black market leading to loss of
tonnes of iron ore reserves were reported in
government revenue14.
southern Uganda at Muko, Buhara, Nyamiraga
The purpose of this audit was to assess
and Kisoro; over 300 million tonnes of marble/
the extent to which government is
limestone projected in Karamoja and 80 targets of
regulating, monitoring and promoting
uranium of which 10 were demarcated for detailed
the mining sector,identify the
exploration to establish the reserves in the districts
performance gaps, possible causes
of Arua, Kitgum, Kabalore, Hoima and Ntungamo.
and suggest recommendations to
Deposits of nickle, cobalt, copper and platinum
improve its performance.
were confirmed in different parts of the country

and rare earth elements stretching 2kms long
and 250 metres wide were also reported around
Karuma. Also, economically viable deposits of
1.3. DESCRIPTION OF
THE AUDIT AREA
230 million tonnes of phosphates at Sukulu in

Tororo have been proven. However, despite the
1.3.1 General Description
above government interventions, massive mineral
The Directorate of Geological Survey
endowments remain unexploited and the sectors
and Mines (DGSM), which prior to
contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
2015 was a department, is the lead
was reported at 0.3%9.
government agency operating under
Mining has become a principal livelihood for
the Ministry of Energy and Mineral
many Ugandans living as artisan and small
Development (MEMD) which is
scale miners using manual and labour intensive
technically responsible for the
methods10. This informal sector produces over
administration and management of
90% of national production and employs almost
the mineral sector.Thepurpose of this
200,000 Ugandans11. Whereas the mineral policy
directorateis to promote and ensure
had provided for formalising and regularising their
rational and sustainable development
operations, its implementation and enforcement did
and utilization of mineral resources for
not take effect thereby rendering them illegal due
socio-economic enhancement of the
to lack of mining licences12. Illegal gold mining in
people of Uganda. The directorate has
Kamalenge area in Kitumbi Sub County, Mubende
three departments namely; Geological
district 13 of 282.9 sq km and the Namayingo
Survey, Mines and Geothermal.The
district gold rush on Nakudi village, Banda sub-
department of geological surveys and
county were reported in the media, where an
mines conducts airborne geophysical
estimated 70,000 and 20,000 people respectively
and geological surveys to acquire
were extracting gold illegally and trading it on
basic geo-scientific data and generate
9 National Development Plan 2015/2016 2019/2020

10 NDP section 286 ,pg,109
11 Page 10, IISD, Supporting Implementation of the Mining Policy
Framework in Member States of the Intergovernmental Forum
on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development
UGANDA: ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION READINESS,
March 2015.
12 The Daily Monitor 25/3/2015 Government stuck with illegal
miners
13 New vision May 29th 2013 - Uganda losing millions in illegal
gold mining
maps of anticipated prospective areas;

manage and make them available to
the mining department and the private
sector.The major function of the mines
department is to administer licensing
of mineral rights guided bythe Mining
14
The Daily Monitor 25/3/2015 Government

stuck with illegal miners
Act and Mining Regulations and
of mineral resources for the socio-economic
also provide advice to mineral right
enhancement of the people of Uganda.
holders and monitor mining operations

through regular inspections. While
1.3.3. Vision and Mission of the mineral sector
DGSM only does preliminary surveys
Vision15:
to track mineral traces across the
Ugandas vision for the mineral sector is To
country, detailed surveys and actual
attract investment, build capacity for acquisition
mining activities are undertaken by the
and utilisation of Geo-data and increase mineral
private investors in the sector under
production for Economic and Social Development
the supervision and monitoring of the
of Uganda
mines department.The department

of mines is required to coordinate
Mission of DGSM:
with the National Environment
The mission of the DGSM is to establish, promote
Management Authority (NEMA) in
the development of, strategically manage and
assessing and approving Environment
safeguard the rational and sustainable utilisation
Impact Assessments (EIAs) submitted
of mineral resources for economic and social
by the mining license applicants before
development. To collect, process, analyse, archive
issuance of the mining lease. It is
and disseminate geoscience data; monitor
also required to cooperate with the
mining operators and enforce regulations in the
department of Occupational Safety and
mineral sector as well as develop and maintain
Health (OSH) of the Ministry of Gender,
professionals capable of generating and utilising
Labour and Social Development in
geo-science data.
assessing safety and health measures

proposed by the mining lease applicant
1.3.4 Objectives of the Directorate of Geological

Survey and Mines
against labour standards set for the

mining sector.
The objectives of the Directorate of Geological
The department of Geothermal
Survey and Mines are:
resources is charged with formulating
a) To systematically collect, interpret, preserve
legal framework on geothermal
and disseminate geological information that is
exploration and development, carry out
required to maintain the national geo-science
geothermal surveys and promotional
database.
activities, license, inspect and evaluate
b) To maintain a body of expertise that can use

this data to advise Government, the private
geothermal license holders.
sector and the general public.

1.3.2 Mandate
c) To carry out geological investigations and
The Directorate of Geological Survey
promotional activities to attract investment
and Mines (DGSM) is mandated by
in exploration and development of mineral
the Mineral Policy 2001, the Mining
resources.
Act 2003 and the Mining Regulations
d) To carry out engineering geology investigation,
2004 to:
monitor earthquakes and other related natural
Promote and ensure rational
disasters such as landslides and volcanic
development and utilisation in a
effects and advice the public on remedies.
safe and sustainable environment
15
Page 5 of the Mineral Policy, 2000
e) To provide reliable and effective laboratory

services in the mineral sector for institutional
and public use.
f) To administer the Mining Act and Regulations,
and provide advisory services to miners on
mining methods and environment protection.
1.3.5 Organizational structure
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development
under the leadership of the Permanent Secretary
1.5 AUDIT SCOPE

The audit focused on the regulation,
monitoring and promotion of the
mining sector by the Ministry of Energy
and Mineral Development through
the Directorate of Geological Survey
and Mines (DGSM)and covered five (5)
financial years, namely: 2010/2011 2014/2015.
offers policy direction to the Directorate. The

Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines is
comprised of three main departments namely;
the Geological and Survey, Mines and Geothermal
Resources departments. These are headed by
Commissioners who report to the Director of the
DGSM. The directorate coordinates with the National
Environment Management Authority (NEMA),
MoGLSD and the District Local Governments in
implementing its mandate. Refer to Appendix (i).
1.4
AUDIT OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of the audit was to assess

the extent to which government is regulating,
monitoring and promoting the mining sector.
The specific objectives of the audit were:
i. To assess the adequacy of the regulatory
framework of the mining sector.
ii. To assess whether licensing is in line with the
set requirements; and fees timely paid and
followed up.
iii. To establish whether DGSM provides advisory
services to artisan and small scale miners.
iv. To ascertain whether the inspection and
monitoring of the mining industry has been
effective in tracking mining operations.
v. To assess whether DGSM provides effective
and reliable laboratory services in the mineral
sector for institutional and public use.
vi. To establish whether a national geoscience
database is maintained.
CHAPTER TWO
CHAPTER TWO
CHAPTER TWO
AUDIT METHODOLOGY
The audit was conducted in accordance with the International Organization of Supreme
Audit Institutions Auditing Standards and the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) VFM audit
manual. The standards require that the audit is planned in a manner which ensures that an
audit of high quality is carried out in an economic, efficient and timely manner.
2.1
SAMPLING
Samples included: exploration, location, mineral dealer licences and mining leases, and
artisan and small scale miners across the country to execute the audit.Thirty six (36)mining
leases, seven (7)exploration license sites, five (5) location licences, (5) mineral dealer
licences and five (5) artisan sites, were selected. All the issued thirty-six mining leases
were covered, artisan sites were randomly selected while for location and exploration
sites, a mix of companies that had paid annual rents and those that defaulted as per DGSM
account records were chosen. The prospecting and retention license sites were not visited
as prospecting activities had no defined location of operation while operations for the latter
were on halt over the audit scope period.
2.2
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
Document review, interviews, and physical inspections were used to obtain necessary
information for the audit as follows:
(i) To assess the adequacy of the regulatory framework of the mining sector
The Mineral Policy 2001, Mining Act 2003, Mining Regulations 2004 and the draft green paper
were reviewed to establish the comprehensiveness of the current regulatory framework;
its shortcomings and how these affect operations of the sector.
Corroborative information was gathered through interviews with the Director, Acting Assistant
Commissioners and regional mining inspectors of DGSM to obtain their evaluation of the
adequacy of the prevailing framework, challenges faced andmeasures (if any) put in place
to address them. Inspection and monitoring reports prepared by the directorate over the
period of audit were also reviewed.
(ii) To assess whether licensing is in line with set requirements, fees paid/followed-up
This was assessed by:
Reviewing the Mining Act and Regulations to understand the provisions of the law.
Administration files were reviewed to understand the terms of operations for the
licences and to evaluate the extent to which the licensing division under the mines
department complied with laid procedures. Return files were also reviewed to assess
the extent to which mining lease holders met their obligation of remitting returns to
DGSM on a monthly basis as provided for in the Act and Regulations.
Ascertaining whether all laid requirements needed to apply for a mining right as
spelt out in the Mining Act and issued based on adherence.
Establishing measures in place to address applications that do not contain all the
requirements.
Enquiring for cases where licences were issued despite non availability of all application
requirements causes of such instances.
Establishing whether mineral fees were levied, Payment Reference Numbers (PRNs)
issued to effect payments and follow ups made for delayed payments. For outstanding
mineral fees, enquiries were made as to whether the provisions of the Mining Act were
enforced or not. Commissioner Domestic and Customs Taxes in the Uganda Revenue
Authority (URA) were interviewed to ascertain their role in collecting mineral fees.
Establishing through interviews with licensing division personnel and review of
monitoring reports whether all mining rights holders execute mineral operations
as per their respective submitted mineral site development plans. In case of noncompliance, whether explanations are submitted to the Director DGSM as provided
for by the prevailing regulatory framework and followed up during site inspections.
Ascertaining whether the regional inspectors collect data pertaining to quantities
extracted by mining lease holders within their areas of jurisdiction, make assessments
after reconciling the submitted returns from mining lease holders.
(iii) Establishing whether DGSM provides advisory services to Artisanal andSmall
scale Miners (ASM)
Interviews were conducted with the Ag Assistant Commissioner mines to determine
services that were given by DGSM to regularise and improve artisanal and small
scale mining.
Documents relating to provision of extension services, awareness campaigns to the
artisan and small scale miners associations were reviewed to assess the geographical
coverage, extent to which these services were provided and progress made in
formalising and regularising artisanal and small scale mining.
Interviews were held with leaders of the sampled artisan mining association sites
during inspections to corroborate information provided through the interviews and
document review. Actual working conditions of the artisan and small scale miners
and the state of their sites were also attained.
(iv)Ascertaining whether inspection and monitoring of the mining industry has been
effective in tracking mining operations
Work plans, budgets, releases and expenditures for DGSM were reviewed to ascertain
whether inspection and monitoring activities were budgeted and planned for, funds
released, activities executed as envisioned.
(vi) To establish whether a national
Inspection and monitoring reports were reviewed
geoscience database is maintained
to ascertain their scope of coverage, frequency
Established whether geological,
of execution, issues raised, recommendations
geochemical and geophysical
and follow-ups made to track performance of
surveys were conducted and
various mining sites reported on.
information processed, analysed
Established whether regional officers were
and used to update and maintain
involved in developing the inspection and
the national geoscience database.
monitoring work plans clearly indicating mining
Enquiries were made through
sites to inspect with stated timelines and Key
interviews on how often geo
Performance Indicators (KPIs) agreed upon
database is updated.
with the Principal inspector of mines.
Ascertained whether dissemination
Interviews were held with the Ag. Commissioner
of the geological data was done to
mines, Principal inspector of mines and regional
the potential users and reviewed
inspectors of mines to established actions taken
the dissemination channels such
by DGSM on mining right holders not complying
as publications and the DGSM
with the mining regulatory framework. Physical
website and how accessible this
inspections were conducted to interview
information was to the intended
managers of sampled mining sites, establish
users.
the number of the inspection and monitoring
Established whether a body of
visits made by DGSM, and observe the working
expertise was in existence and
conditions of workers in those sites and their
to what extent it was using the
status as corroborative evidence of information
geological data to advise the
collected through interviews and document
government, the private sector
reviews. Audit noted that for LSM, issues of
and the general public.
OSH were being adhered to.

Details of specific documents reviewed
(v) Ascertaining whether DGSM provides effective
and persons interviewed are shown
and reliable laboratory services in the mineral
in Appendix (ii) and (iii).
sector for institutional and public use

Interviews were held with the Director and the
Ag Assistant Commissioner laboratory to assess
the performance of the DGSM laboratory and
its reliability in carrying out mineral tests and
analysis. Enquiries were made as to whether
the established laboratory was able to carry
out all the necessary mineral tests and where
gaps were noted, established measures taken
(if any) to address gaps in testing and analysis.
Reviewed the laboratory equipment inventory
register and physical inspection of selected
equipment to verify their existence and status
of functionality of such equipment.
9
CHAPTER THREE
CHAPTER THREE
10
CHAPTER THREE
SYSTEM AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION

3.1
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF KEY PLAYERS
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD)

The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD) is charged with the overall responsibility for
the Mineral Sector. TheMinister is responsible for the policy direction and accountable for the sectors
performance16.
Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines (DGSM)
The DGSM is the technical arm of MEMD and directly responsible for the implementation of the mineral
policy. DGSM is responsible for administering, supervising, regulating, monitoring, enforcing, training,
providing extension services and promoting mineral activities.
National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA)
This is responsible for reviewing and approving environmental impact assessments, advising the director
DGSM on environmental issues, issuing wetland resource use permits and monitoring mining activities
to assess their impact on the environment.
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) department of the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social
Development
Provide guidelines to the DGSM regarding appropriate Health and Safety measures to be enforced with
in the industry. The Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) department:
Evaluates and controls the physical, chemical, physiological, social and technical factors that affect
a person at work places and the working environment.
Inspects all work places to ascertain good working conditions and safe guards against occupational
injuries, accidents and diseases.
Performs risk assessment, hazard identification and analysis to control their occurrences/reoccurrences.
Mineral Rights Holders (MRH)
These are obliged to pay mineral levies, namely: license prescribed fees, royalties, mineral rent fees
and taxes provide employment opportunities to nationals and promotion of the Ugandan minerals sector
on the international market. These MRH form an umbrella called the Uganda Chamber of Mines and
Petroleum which lobbies Government for improved services to the sector.
16
11
Mineral Policy of Uganda; pg22-23
3.2.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Data capture, processing, analysis and dissemination

The department of Geological Survey under the DGSM is charged with collecting, organizing,
processing, and analysing basic geological data by conducting airborne and geo-physical
surveys, picking samples for testing in the laboratory and confirming mineral existence.
Generated information is archived in a central geo-database managed by the Ag Assistant
Commissioner Geo-data. Geological maps are generated basing on the confirmatory tests
performed on the geological data obtained. Preliminary information giving mineral traces
such as geo-logical maps and basic geo-logical information is disseminated through
publications and uploading it on the DGSM website while the geophysical information and
geo-logical explanatory notes are accessed upon payment of a prescribed fee by interested
potential investors.
Licensing
The licensing division under the department of mines headed by the Ag Assistant Commissioner,
Mines receives applications from potential investors, reviews them and issues licences
applied for by respective applicants. These include: Prospective License (PL), Exploration
License (EL), Mining License (ML), Retention License (RL), Location License (LL), Mineral
Dealers License (MDL) or Mineral Export License (MEL).
Licensing of mineral rights follows defined procedures. The process involves filling forms
which are available at the DGSM office in Entebbe and or can also be downloaded from
the website of the Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines. The forms other than for
Prospecting License (PL) are filled by the applicant, endorsed by the Chief Administrative
Officer (CAO) of the respective districts where the applied site(s) lies. The Chief Administrative
Officer certifies each copy of the application and includes the date and time at which the
application has been received; appends his or her signature and an official stamp to the
application; and endorses each page of the application and any accompanying documents.
These are then submitted by the applicant to the licensing division of the mines department
to assess if the application conforms to the set requirements. Once it conforms, a Payment
Registration Number (PRN) form including the amounts to be paid is issued to the applicant
to effect payment to Uganda Revenue Authority (URA). On getting a URA receipt, its taken to
the cashier of the MEMD at Amber House for issuance of a general receipt applicant. This
is then submitted theto the Commissioner for grant of the license.
The licences issued are as follows:
12
Table 1: Category of Licences issued by DGSM
Type of licence
Purpose
Period
(years)
Remarks
Exploration (EL)
To explore for minerals in

an area not more than 500 3
sq.km
Renewablefor 2 terms
of 2 yearseach,with 50%
areadropped on each
renewal.
Mining
(ML)
For mining operations
Renewable for 15 years
Lease
Location (LL)
21
For
mining
operations
of asmaller investment
whereexpenditure
to 2
achieveproduction will not
exceed500 currency points
Granted to citizensof
Uganda or in case
ofcorporate, citizen of
Uganda holds >50% of
ownership
Source: DGSM flyer 2012
All persons dealing in minerals are issued with annual Mineral Dealers Licences (MDLs)
which do not cover exportation permits. For a mineral dealer to export any mineral, an
application for an export license is sought for every consignment.
Inspection and Monitoring
The mines department inspection and monitoring division through its regional mining
inspectors is required to conduct inspections, prepare and submit monthly reports to the
Director of the DGSM through the Principal inspector of mines. This is supplemented by
a monitoring team convened from the DGSM headquarters on a quarterly basis. All these
are aimed at generating information on quantities extracted by each mining lease, tracking
progress of activities under the various licences and assessing actual status for all mining
right sites. The data obtained through the inspection and monitoring activities would aid
comparison with data submitted by the respective mining leases. Through its inspection
and monitoring activities, the mining department is required to encourage artisan and
small scale miners (ASM) to form associationsthrough holding sensitization workshops in
order to improve their production and marketing capacities. The formed associations would
be encouraged to apply for location licences to easy regulating of their operations by the
Directorate of GSM.
13
CHAPTER FOUR
CHAPTER FOUR
14
CHAPTER FOUR
FINDINGS
The Government of Uganda has endeavoured to establish interventions in the mining industry since 1999
and significant amounts committed to the sector. However, most of the countrys mineral endowments
remain unexploited and the sectors contribution to GDP remains low at 0.3%. Whereas issuance of
licences adhered to most of the laid down procedures as per the Mining Act and Regulations, audit noted
several factors responsible for the underperformance of the sector as detailed here under.
4.1. ADEQUACY OF THE MINING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

4.1.1. Regulation of commercialised building materials
Article 244 (3) of the Constitution, provides that minerals do not include clay, murram, sand or any
stone commonly used for building or similar purposes. The Mining Act 2003 defines building material
as rock, clay, gravel, laterite, murram, sand, sandstone and slate, mined by a person from land owned
or lawfully occupied by him or her for his or her own domestic use in Uganda for building, or mined by
a person for his or her own use for road-making.
The same Act defines industrial minerals to include barite, rock, clay, dolomite, feldspar, granite, gravel,
gypsum, laterite, limestone, mica, magnesite, marble, phosphate rock, sand, sandstone, slate and talc,
which is commercially mined by a person for use in Uganda or industrially processed into finished or
semi-finished products.
Interviews with the Director, GSM, revealed that the DGSM did not administer the mining of sand;
murram; clay and stone quarrying used for commercial purposes but were regulated by NEMA, NFA and
the district local governments. Audit interaction with National Environment and Management Authority
(NEMA) and the National Forestry Authority (NFA) revealed that these only issue extraction permits to
operate in wetlands and forest reserves, respectively, but did not levy royalties. The sampled districts
of Tororo, Kasese, Bushenyi and Shema also indicated that they were not collecting any fees from such
activities either.
Accordingly, NEMA issues extraction permits for sand and clay in wetlands in accordance with Section
12 and 23(2) of the National Environment (Wetlands, River Banks and Lake Shores Management)
Regulations, 200017 and monitors conformity with the EIAs.
Review of Section 23(2) of the National Environment (Wetlands, River Banks and Lake Shores Management)
Regulations, 2000 revealed that the Executive Director was expected to grant a permit after consultations
with the lead agency18. However, through interviews, it was noted that there were no consultations
17
18
15
Section 12 (4) The Executive Director may issue a permit in Form B specified in the First Schedule permitting the use of wetland
resources. Section 23 (1) A person who intends to carry out any of the following activities shall make an application to the executive
Director in Form A set out in the First Schedule to these Regulations;
Section 23 (2) The Executive Director may, after considering the application submitted under sub-regulation (1) and after consultations
with the lead agency, grant a permit in Form B set out in the First Schedule to these Regulations on such conditions as he or she
between NEMA and DGSM concerning the mining of sand, clay, murram and stone quarrying.
Through the interviews conducted with the Director, DGSM, audit established that the
DGSM did not regulate the mining of sand, clay, murram and stone quarrying contrary to
the definition of industrial minerals as spelt out in the Mining Act and as a result could not
levy royalties on these activities.
Failure to levy royalty on these commercialised building materials was due to DGSMs
interpretation of the exclusion of building materials in the Mining Act without making an
assessment as to whether they were mined by the individual for their respective domestic
use or used for commercial purposes.
By failing to regulate the extraction of commercialised building materials, extraction
permits are issued without conducting due diligence on the level of technology to be used
and corresponding royalties lost by government.
Management response
The Ministry agrees with the audit observation; but in consideration of the bigger picture in
the sector; the information that was used at that time was old. After acquisition of new data,
more discoveries and new findings revealed more information on minerals and earth materials.
In addition, the limitation has been the legal drafting of the law which did not expound the
definition of commercialized building materials, referred to in the law as Industrial Minerals
in the main body. This limitation will now be addressed in the proposed amendment of the
law and shall ensure regulation and levying of mineral fees from commercialized building
materials. The proposed amendment will also seek to enhance and promote public sector
interventions, such as, the licensing and regulation of the commercial exploitation of clay,
murram, sand or any other stone, to increase revenue generation and to ensure that health
safety and environmental concerns are adequately addressed.
Conclusion
Commercialised industrial building materials remained inappropriately regulated, leading
to loss of government revenue and uncontrolled siltation of the lakes for sand mining.
Recommendation
The DGSM should consider regulating and levying mineral fees from commercialised
building materials.
4.1.2. Formalisation and regularisation of Artisan and Small scale Mining (ASM) Activities
The Mining Act and Regulations are meant to operationalize the Policy. Accordingly, objective
(iii) under paragraph 2.2 of the Mineral policy aimed at regularizing and improving artisanal and
small scale mining. This was to be attained by providing information on available production
and marketing facilities, carrying out awareness campaigns, targeting the artisanal and
small-scale miners and regularize and formalize their operations.
Through the review of the Mining Act, 2003 and Mining Regulations 2004, audit noted that
may deem fit.
16
whereas the mineral policy provided for formalizing
guidance developed so as to improve
and regularizing the mining operations of artisanal
regulation in the mining sector may
activities, it was never implemented and enforced.
not be enforceable since it may not
In addition, the DGSM was to ensure health and
be rooted in the law.
safety standards for all mining operations were

to be addressed in coordination with MoGLSD
Management response
OSH department. However, there were no
The Artisanal and Small Scale Mining
correspondences availed to audit to this effect.
operators (ASM) issues need to be
Interviews with the Assistant Commissioner Mines
addressed as a security issue and a
division revealed that the department uses the
sensitization challenge. As a security
sections in the Occupational Safety and Health
issue, enforcement is required. As a
Act, which are general and not tailored to the
sensitization issue, a national strategy
mining industry.
on mining livelihood diversification
Whereas the NDPs (2010/11- 2014/15 & 2015/16-
and ASM formalization is required.
2019/20) emphasises value addition as an area of
The two interventions will enable the
focus and a key driver for economic development,
gazetting of mineral trade markets
the prevailing Mining Act and Regulations did not
in various regions of Uganda. Once
provide for value addition of the raw minerals.
implemented, the strategy will enable
Through interviews and review of documents, it
the regulation of mineral trade and
was noted that the process to review the Minerals
enhance the collection of revenue
policy commenced in October 2013 and a green
easily from mineral traders. However,
paper
was drafted in 2015 a period of almost 2
additional resources will be required
(two) years. At the time of audit (December 2015),
to support markets establishment,
this document (green paper) was still with the
their management and sensitization
stakeholders for consultation and debate before
of local governments, miners and
general consensus; it is only after this process that
mineral business operators.
19
the official policy document- a white paper will be

prepared which will then be distributed for final
Conclusion
comments, before being sent to Parliament for
The inadequacy of the prevailing
debate and approval. It is only after the white paper
mining regulatory framework creates
has been approved that the Act and Regulations
challenges in regulating the mining
can be updated.
sector, thus hindering the realisation

of the sectors intended objectives.
Through interviews with the Acting Director, it was
The DGSM has not been effective in
noted that the delay was due to the challenge of
administering the mining industry
raising quorum among the various stakeholders
as issues of ASM, commercialized
involved so as to expedite the review process.
building materials, environmental,
In the absence of up to date regulations, some
health and safety standards, remain
activities may continue to be unregulated and any
inadequately addressed.
19
Green paper- First-draft document on a specific policy area

circulated among interested parties who are invited to join in
a process of consultation and debate. The objective of a green
paper is to arrive at a generalconsensus before drafting the
official policy document, the white paper
17
Recommendation
The Directorate should ensure that
the review process of the mineral
regulatory framework is fast-tracked so as to enhance the administration of the mineral

sector for improved mineral exploitation and development.
4.2. LICENSING OF MINERAL RIGHTS

4.2.1 Conformity to set application requirements & working obligations
Section 41, Section 108 and Section 110 of the Mining Act, 2003, provides that an application
for a mining lease should indicate and provide specific information (set requirements) which
includes:
Financial & technical resources
Feasibility study
Statement of mineral deposits in area covered
Statement of proposed development & mining operations
Report on goods & service required for mining operations
Statement of employment & training of Uganda citizens
Business plan
Environment Impact Assessment
Annual Environment Audits
Environment Restoration Plan
Audited annual accounts
On receipt of an application form for a license, the licensing division should review the
application form to verify its conformity with the set requirements.
In addition, Section 50 (2)(c) of the Mining Act, 2003 requires a holder of a mining lease to
submit an audited annual financial report to the Commissioner DGSM within ninety (90)
days. Furthermore, Section 90(1) (b) of the Mining Act provides that the Commissioner may
cancel or suspend a mineral right if the holder contravenes any provision of the Act, the
Regulations or the conditions of the mineral right or the provisions of any other written law
relating to mines and minerals.
From a review of the thirty-six (36) mining lease administrative files it was noted that some
documents and information required on application were not included in the files and this
could imply that due diligence was not adequately carried out before issuing of licences
to these mining lease holders. The results of the analysis are as shown in Figure 1. It was
noted that despite these companies not complying with the set requirements, DGSM went
ahead to issue them with mining licences.
18
Figure 1 Conformity of the 36 mining leases to application requirements

35
Financial & technical resources
30
Feasibility study
25
statement of mineral deposits
20
statement of proposed
developments
15
Report on goods & services

required
10
Statement of employment &

training of ugandans
Business plan
EIA
Annual environment audits

Application requirement
Source: Analysis of mining leases applications and application supporting documentation
Further analysis showed that one of the companies did not conform to any of the set
requirements. In addition, none of the companies conformed to all the 11 set requirements.
As shown in Figure 1, none of the companies submitted annual environmental audits and
audited accounts to DGSM and there was no evidence to show that DGSM followed up with
the applicants after issuing the licences. 35 of the 36 mining license (ML) holders submitted a
statement of employment and training of Ugandan citizens. 20 of the 36 ML holders included
business plans, financial and technical resources and feasibility studies upon application of
their mining lease applications.
Through comparison of the analysis on conformity to application requirements with information
on status of mining leases availed by the Mines Department, audit noted that 36% (11) of
the mining licences had their status of operations as either abandoned or inactive. Four
(4) of these companies had abandoned operations while the seven (7) were indicated as
inactive. There was no evidence of the Commissioner either engaging the concerned parties
to furnish him with explanations to that effect, suspend or cancel their licences. Through
interviews with the Acting Assistant Commissioner Monitoring and Inspection, it was noted
that DGSM was in the process of terminating the licences; however, documentary evidence
to corroborate this was not availed.
This was due to laxity by the DGSM to ensure that issuance of the mining rights licences
was conducted as per laid down provisions of the Mining Act and follow-up of the license
holders was done to comply with laid down terms and conditions of the secured licences.
19
Failure by the licensing department to enforce compliance with the set requirements led to
firms that may not have been competent enough to undertake mining operations acquiring
mineral rights.
Management response
In efforts to revitalize the mining sector in Uganda, the licencees in the mining business have
not been able to get support from banks here in Uganda because the mining industry has
just begun to pick up after acquisition of new geological data. This gap of lack of financial
support has a negative implication on the licensing process and mining operations, inhibiting
to enable the mining sector from developing as any other sector in the country. However,
the ministry will improve by sensitizing the banks on mining business to enable licences
to get access to financing of their mining investment projects. In addition, the Ministry will
take extra care in screening mining applications and plans.
Conclusion
The issuance of mining rights in the sector has not been effective in promoting mineral
development. The Directorates mission to establish, promote the development, strategically
manage and safeguard the rational and sustainable utilization of mineral resources for
economic and social development cannot be achieved.
Recommendations
The DGSM should be more vigilant during verification of applications and checks and
balances instituted to improve the due diligence process so that licences are issued to
competent and economically sound applicants if the mining sector is to develop.
Close monitoring and supervision of the licensee operations should be done and prompt
action taken against mineral right holders who contravene the terms and conditions of
the secured licences.
4.2.2 Levy and collection of fees
Under Section 98(1) and Section 103 of the Mining Act, royalties shall be paid on all minerals
obtained or mined in the course of prospecting, exploration, mining or in the process of
improving the grade or quality of mineral ores. Royalties shall be due within 30 days from
the date of assessment. Any unpaid royalty shall attract an interest of 2% pa above the
commercial bank lending rate. Furthermore, Section 104 of the Act provides that where
a mineral rights holder fails to pay the royalties due, the Commissioner shall prohibit the
holder from disposal of minerals from the area concerned or other area where the mineral
rights holder has a license until outstanding royalties have been paid or an arrangement
for settling the amounts due has been agreed upon by the two parties. Section 90(1) (a) of
the Mining Act states that; the Commissioner may suspend or cancel a mineral right if the
holder of such mineral right fails to make any of the payments required on the due date.
Section 70 of the Mining Regulations, 2004 requires all mineral rights holders, except
prospecting licences, to pay mineral rents upon grant of a license and thereafter on every
anniversary.
20
Section 69 of the Mining Regulations, 2004 provides that preparation fees for an exploration,
location and mining license shall be 30, 20 and 100 currency points which is equivalent to
Shs 20,000. The fees are payable on application for a license.
Through review of Mining Lease return files and Non Tax Revenue (NTR) records, the
following were observed:
Payment of fees
It was observed that Non-Tax Revenue (NTR) outstanding as at 30th September 2015 totaled
to UGX 4.4 billion and this amount related to the period July 2011 to September 2015 as
shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Aging of uncollected NTR over the period (2011 - 2015)
Year
License
type
Royalties
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
TOTAL
Figures in UGX millions
%age
of NTR
uncollected
per license
428.7
657.7
829.5
100
986.4
3002.3
68.20%
67
110.3
364
390.1
66.1
997.5
22.70%
2.2
1.6
5.8
0.10%
Preparation
0.1
38.9
28.1
41.9
25.7
134.7
3.1%
Mineral rent
18.4
43
6.7
61.5
132.3
261.9
5.90%
514.2
849.9
1230.5
595.5
1212.1
4,402.2
11.70%
19.30%
28%
13.50%
27.50%
100%
license fees
Renewals
TOTAL
%age of
uncollected
NTR per yr.
Source: OAG analysis of NTR records
From the analysis of the aging of the NTR debtors, 28% of these debtors relate to the year
2013 while 27.5% relate to the year 2015. The highest debtors (68.2%) relate to unpaid
royalties. Although the Mining Act, 2003 provided for a penalty to be charged on unpaid
royalties, and also for the Commissioner to prohibit any mineral right holders with unpaid
royalties from disposal of minerals exploited from the sites for which they have a license,
there was no evidence to show that penalties had been charged or that the Commissioner
had taken necessary steps including follow ups to recover the unpaid NTR.
This was due to lack of prioritization and commitment by DGSM to follow-up with licensed
mining operations despite the licensing and inspection divisions commendable staffing
proportion of 83% and 93% of actual funding to the total budgets over the audit period.
By failing to collect all the mineral fees that fell due and imposing the 2% penalty on the
21
outstanding royalties, there is a risk that this money may never be recovered yet this revenue
could have been used to further develop and promote the minerals sector.
Management response
The DGSM takes note of this observation. The DGSM especially recognizes the gap within the
revenue assessment and the collection system caused largely by assessed Bank Payment
Advise Forms and unpaid BPAFs. This issue is currently and concurrently being addressed
by the DGSM and URA. The Ministry has met some challenges in the levying and collection of
royalties which arise from the weakness in existing legal, fiscal and regulatory framework.
In the proposed amendment of the legal, fiscal and regulatory regimes the gaps will be
filled. In addition, the Ministry will establish a desk in Uganda Revenue Authority and use
electronic system for quick reconciliation of mineral revenue. Previously, the Ministry has
been using Manual based system.
Recommendation
The DGSM should liaise with the other agencies, namely: Uganda Revenue Authority, to
devise a mechanism for enforcing the penalty and following up the defaulters for recovery.
Submission of returns
Through interview with the DGSM staff, it was noted that for every mining lease granted, a
file known as a returns file was maintained which contains operation performance reports
and monthly returns of mineral quantities extracted upon which computation of mineral
royalties is based. This file thus helped to track the operations and payment of royalties of
the leaseholders.
However, through document review, it was noted that out of 36 mining leases, 13 did not have
corresponding return files maintained by the registry division. This was further confirmed
in writing by registry staff. Audit was not able to track or confirm filing and submission of
returns by these companies listed in Table 3. On further inquiry, it was noted that there
was no follow up correspondence between the department and the affected companies to
remind them of their obligation to comply with the Act. It was further noted that the current
regulatory framework did not provide for penalties for non-submission of returns which
could cause slackness in submitting returns by the license holders.
Without return files, coupled with the inadequate inspection and monitoring, the DGSM
cannot easily track the operational status of such companies. In case of abandoned sites,
the department GSMs remains uninformed of the justification to that effect which directly
affects the royalties that would accrue to government if such MLs were operational.
Table 3: Mining Leases with no returns
S/N.
License no
Date License was

Issued
Licensee
1.
ML 0112
6/4/06
V.E.K Global Mining Ltd
2.
ML 0594
13/06/2011
Kigezi Steel Company Ltd
22
3.
ML 1466
15/4/2015
Euro Minerals
4.
ML 3070
13/11/1994
Luhizha Mines Ltd
5.
ML 1209
14/03/2014
Sino Minerals Investments Co. Ltd
6.
ML 1047
First Mining
7.
ML 0886
Shaft Sinkers U Ltd
8.
18/12/2014
B.N.T Mining
Ml 1381
29/10/2014
Sun & Sand Mines And Minerals
10. ML 1297
14/03/2014
Sino Minerals Investments Co. Ltd
11. ML 1230
17/01/2014
Moroto Cement Industries
12. ML 1117
19/04/2013
Building Majesties Ltd
13. ML 0842
16/09/2011
Berkeley Reef Ltd
9.
ML 1413
Source: OAG analysis of return files for companies with mining leases.
Non maintenance of return files for thirteen (13) mining leases was a result of DGSMs licensing,
inspection and monitoring divisions laxity in making follow-up with the affected lease holders.
Management response
The DGSM takes note of this observation. The MEMD has continued to lobby the Ministry
of Finance, Planning and Economic Development and the Parliament of Uganda to make
available adequate budget allocations for monitoring and inspections of mining and exploration
operations to effectively manage enforcement of working obligations by licences. However,
the DGSM has made some efforts to follow-up and ensure compliance with limited resources.
The DGSM has proposed provisions in the amendment of the Act to institute commensurate
and progressive fiscal and administrative fines and penalties for non-compliance.
Recommendation
The DGSM should ensure that all mineral rights holders are followed up and comply with the
laid obligations as per issued licences. The DGSM should expedite the process of amending
the regulatory framework to include penalties for non-filing of returns.
4.3 ADVISORY SERVICES

One of the objectives of the mineral policy is to regularise and improve artisanal and small
scale mining20. In order to do this, government, through MEMD was to use the following
strategies21: apply light handed regulation in small scale mining by exercising leniency
, provide information on available production and marketing facilities; provide extension
services to the small scale miners through their associations; and carry out awareness
campaigns targeting the artisanal and small scale miners. Additionally, the Sustainable
Management of Mineral Resources Project (SMMRP) which spanned from 2004/2005 to
20
21
23
Policy objective iii of the Mineral Policy, 2000 page 17

Pg 19 of the Mineral Policy, 2000
2011/201222 aimed at regularising artisan and small scale miners (ASM) by strengthening
institutional capacity to support formalization and improving performance of ASM throughout
the country through sensitisation, trainings and formation of associations.23 Under the Project
a Small Scale Mining Handbook was developed as a guide for improving the performance
of artisanal and small scale mining in Uganda.
Through field inspections of sampled districts with high concentrations of Artisan and Small
scale miners of Mubende, Moroto, Buhweju,Namayingo, Busia and Kabale, audit established
that artisan and small scale miners use rudimentary and labour intensive mining methods,
such as heating up iron ore using firewood as shown in Picture 1. In addition, there were no
occupational health and safety measures undertaken by these ASM. In Busia and Namayingo
Districts, miners were found using mercury and cyanide in the gold mining process to recover
fine gold from the crashed rock tailings. However it was noted that although Uganda signed
the Minamata Convention on Mercury in 2013 to protect human health and the environment
from emissions and releases of mercury and mercury compounds, the country has not yet
operationalised the document and has no legislation in place specifically regulating mercury or
cyanide, which are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment24. In addition,
through the audit field inspections, abandoned pits were noted and it was also observed that
most of these small scale miners lacked safety gear such as helmets and gloves.
Review of the financial records of the MEMD relating to the DGSM revealed that UGX 719
million had been released for awareness, sensitisation and training of all mining operations
including artisan and small scale miners on health and safety measures over the period
2010/11 to 2014/15 as shown in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Extracts of budgeted and actual release for awareness, sensitization and training
on health and safety.
Financial Years
Awareness, sensitization and training on Health and Safety

Budget (UGX)
Releases (UGX)
2010/2011
102,550,000
65,212,578
2011/2012
166,904,000
112,518,000
2012/2013
130,000,000
61,300,000
2013/2014
298,000,000
191,264,000
2014/2015
298,000,000
288,949,342
TOTALS
995,454,000
719,243,920
Source: OAG analysis of MEMD financial records relating to DGSM over the financial years 2010/2011 2014/2015.
22
23
24
Supporting the Advancement of Artisanal and Small Scale Mining (ASM) in Uganda, Joshua Tuhumwire, Commissioner
DGSM
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Analysis of formalization approaches in the artisanal and small-scale
gold mining sector based on experiences in Ecuador, Mongolia, Peru, Tanzania and Uganda; Uganda Case Study June
2012.
Page 28, IISD, Supporting Implementation of the Mining Policy Framework in Member States of the
Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development UGANDA: ASSESSMENT OF
IMPLEMENTATION READINESS, March 2015.
24
However, field inspections revealed that the intervention had no impact on the way ASM
conduct their mining activities as they were found operating with no health and safety gear
and no evidence of follow up conducted by DGSM availed to audit.
There were no interventions by DGSM to encourage ASM to have their associations granted
Location Licences to ease tracking of their operations and no activity reports were availed
to audit.
Picture 1: Status of sampled artisan mining sites
Rudimentary technics:
Artisanal with no
personal protective
gear at an iron ore
mine using fire to crack
rocks with iron ore
Left-right: Open pits

dug and left open by
artisanal miners in
Namayingo district
and Kitumbi site in
Mubende district.
These pose a danger
to human safety
and environmental
degradation.
25
Left-right: artisans in
Namayingo District
mining gold from pits.
Source: OAG field inspections.
Audit attributed ASM sites operational status to failure by the DGSM to sensitise and train
this category of miners, inadequate awareness; and lack of enforcement measures to
ensure that ASM implement the regulations, actions and practices recommended during
awareness workshops.
As a result of largely informal artisanal and small scale mining activities, concerns on
environmental and land degradation due to indiscriminate excavation; and loss of revenue
due to non-declaration of minerals excavated have increased. Audit noted that the abandoned
pits posed a risk of injury to especially children and animals. According to UNEP, fatalities
and serious injuries due to collapse of pit walls or underground tunnels commonly occur
with between one and five deaths known to occur annually and many more are likely to go
unreported25. Furthermore, pollution from the use of mercury and cyanide plus the haphazard
release of tailings or residue into water bodies leads to pollution of water bodies which in
the long run is hazardous to flora and fauna.
Management response
The Ministry has met challenges in dealing with the Artisanal and Small Scale Mining
operators (ASM) issues. The ASM are a mixed group in two categories (a) the nationals and
(b) foreigners operating in illegal mining, for example, in Mubende, Namayingo and Karamoja
region in what the activity is termed as gold rush. During inter-ministerial consultations,
this was recognized as a national challenge arising from migrations of foreign nationals
and the mixing with the local population. The matter requires a full scale study to enable
(i) enforcement of the law. (ii) Sensitization of local governments and communities in the
mining districts. The implementation of (i) and (ii) above require additional resources.
In addition, the DGSM has been conducting comprehensive sensitization and awareness
campaigns in mining areas targeting, minerals rights holders, ASM and Local Governments.
25
Chapter 2,UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Analysis of formalization approaches in the artisanal and
small-scale gold mining sector based on experiences in Ecuador, Mongolia, Peru, Tanzania and Uganda; Uganda Case
Study June 2012.; page 9
26
Thematic areas include: appropriate mining and processing methods, minerals trade,
savings and cooperatives, mineral rights vs surface/land rights, environment, health and
safety, social and economic issues. The MEMD has also continued to engage in inter-agency
efforts to curb illegal mining and processing, smuggling, insecurity in ASM areas and to
render extension services.
Audit Comment
Much as management indicated that comprehensive sensitization and awareness campaigns
had been conducted, this could not be confirmed by audit as there was no evidence availed
to audit to that effect.
Conclusion
The ASM operations remain largely informal which adversely affects enforcement of the
law and monitoring of operations and ultimately encouraging illegal mining activities that
are not only a source of leakage of mineral revenue but also whose mining practices that
are not environmentally friendly.
Recommendation
The DGSM should liaise with the various stakeholders in the mining sector to further explore
ways of encouraging the formalization of ASM activities and enforcement of the regulatory
regime
4.4. INSPECTION AND MONITORING OF MINING OPERATIONS

Section 64 of the Mining Act, 2003 empowers the commissioner/director geological survey
and mines to inspect all operations under mineral rights.The mines department inspection
and monitoring division through its regional mining inspectors is required to conduct
inspections, prepare and submit monthly reports (thus 12 reports per year) to the Assistant
commissioner Inspection and Monitoring. This is supplemented by a monitoring team convened
from the DGSM headquarters on a quarterly basis to give a total of 16 reports per annum.
Through review of the availed Ministerial Policy Statements (MPSs) for the 3 financial years
2012/13 to 2014/2015, it was noted that the DGSM planned to make 12 reports per year
instead of 16. Thus, for the three years they planned for thirty-six (36) inspections that is
twelve (12) per year and three (3) for every quarter. UGX 500 million was released for this
activity, over the period covered by the audit as shown in Table 5 below. Whereas the DGSM
indicated through interviews that they carried out a number of inspections and monitoring,
a few reports were availed to the audit team.
27
Table 5: Licensing and inspection budget and actual releases to the DGSM
LICENCING AND INSPECTION
FINANCIAL
YEAR
BUDGET (UGX)
RELEASES (UGX)
% RELEASE
NO OF INSPECTIONS
CONDUCTED
2010/2011
30,000,000
11,083,333
2011/2012
30,000,000
14,451,000
2012/2013
128,960,000
55,492,000
2013/2014
207,000,000
126,073,000
2014/2015
321,000,000
293,300,662
716,960,000
500,399,995
70%
23
Source: OAG analysis of DGSM financial records obtained from MEMD over the F/Y s 2010/2011 2014/2015
Figure 2: Budget and actual releases for licensing and inspection and number of inspections
conducted.
Figure 2: Budget and actual releases for licensing and inspection and number of inspections
conducted.
Source: OAG analysis of financial records and inspection and monitoring reports of the DGSM
In addition, only 23 (8%) inspections were conducted as per reports availed to the team.
Further analysis of the availed reports revealed that the inspection coverage was 35 out of
818 licences representing 4% of the total licences issued. The audit team also noted that
the DGSM did not prepare inspection and monitoring work plans but instead relied on the
forecasts laid in the MPS. However, review of the MPs revealed that projections were lumped
together basing on districts to be covered without clearly indicating the actual number of
sites to visit per region. There were no inspections and monitoring work plans prepared for
each regional office, target set, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) not agreed upon and no
follow-ups on the performance of the regional inspectors conducted. Through review of the
inspection reports availed, it was noted that coverage of the ASM sites were not reported
28
on. There were no inspection and monitoring guidelines to provide direction on how this
activity would be executed.
Failure to prepare budgets and work plans for each regional office, preparation of KPIs and
ensuring adherence to such plans led to the low inspection and monitoring coverage over
the audited period.
There is a risk that money was not put to the intended purpose.Failure to prepare inspection
and monitoring work plans for each regional inspection office led the inspection and monitoring
division to do haphazard and reactive rather than proactive inspections. Accordingly, the
division was unable to self-generate extracted quantities of minerals by different mining
operation sites but relied upon the submissions from the license holders. Since computations
of royalties are based on quantities mined, Government was left to solely rely on information
availed by the private companies on the quantities declared as mined with no mechanism
put in place to mitigate the risks of under declaration.
Management response
The Ministry has been undertaking inspections and monitoring of mining operations in the
country though with challenges. The increased number of licences; prospecting, exploration,
retention, location and mining operations for instance, at 31st December 2002, were 157 as
compared to 818 at 30th November 2015. However, the capacity of the Ministry at DGSM to
carryout inspections and monitoring is not matched with the above growth. In response to
this gap, the Ministry has created a division for inspections and monitoring at DGSM. The
division needs to be strengthened by (i) recruitment of more Mines Inspectors and Engineers
(ii) Manpower training in addition to strengthening time based diaries of staff.
Audit comment
Review of the staffing structure for inspection and monitoring division revealed that it had
ten (10) filled positions out of twelve (12) as shown in appendix (iv) indicating that the low
inspection and monitoring coverage could not be as a result of understaffing as per their
prevailing approved structure.
Conclusion
By not conducting adequate inspection and monitoring, the DGSM could not effectively
track the performance of all the mineral licences issued and enforce compliance of mining
regulatory framework.
Recommendation
The DGSM should consider enhancing inspection and monitoring activities by streamlining
their planning and budgeting, indicating sites to visit per region, setting KPIs with regional
inspectors and ensuring adherence.
29
4.5 PROVISION OF
LABORATORY SERVICES
Among the objectives of the DGSM
was to provide effective and reliable
laboratory services in the mineral
sector for institutional and public use.
Through interviews with the Assistant
commissioner and the Lab technician,
review of documents and inspection of
the laboratory, it was noted that MEMD
had carried out some renovation of the
laboratory buildings and purchased
some specialised lab equipment.
However, the national mineral
laboratory in Entebbe only addresses
preliminary test and analysis as it
is not yet accredited by ISO. Mining
companies operating in Uganda
were compelled to export samples
abroad for complex mineral tests and
analysis. This requires them to apply
for export permits from the Director
GSM which result into additional costs.
In addition, review of the laboratory
equipment inventory register and
physical inspections revealed that
34 (33%) out of the 104 equipment
were not functioning. The audit team
also established that there were no
measures put in place by the DGSM
to track the results of tests conducted
abroad.
Failure to equip the national
mineral laboratory and securing its
ISO certification was due to lack of
prioritisation of this activity by the
MEMD.
Lack of comprehensive laboratory
services at the Directorate results
into additional cost by the investors in
testing samples abroad. Such added
cost affects Ugandas comparative
advantage to attract potential investors in the

sector.
Management response
The Ministry has noted the need for ISO certification
to improve the mineral laboratorys analysis. Some
steps toward ISO certification have been taken by
improvement of laboratory buildings, acquisition
of specialized laboratory equipment for mineral
analysis and four (4) standards (periodic table)
used to calibrate equipment for mineral element
established. However, the challenges the laboratory
is facing to upgrade to ISO are (i) ISO certification
policy (ii) adequate staff and (iii) training of Staff
in ISO certification technologies. To undertake
these activities more resources will be needed.
Recommendation
The MEMD, through its DGSM, should expedite
the process of formulating the laboratory policy,
adequately equip the mineral laboratory and
pursue its ISO certification.
4.6 GENERATION AND

DISSEMINATION OF THE
GEOLOGICAL DATA
One of the DGSM objectives was to systematically
collect, interpret, preserve and disseminate
geological information that would be maintained in
the national geoscience database and to maintain a
body of expertise that could use this data to advise
the Government, the private sector and the general
public. In addition, the mineral policy provided
that, Government was to carry out geological,
geochemical and geophysical surveys of the
entire country at various scales; process, analyze
and interpret the geoscientific data; archive,
package and disseminate the data to potential
users through publications and electronic media.
Private operators in the sector were obliged to
provide acquired geoscientific data at appropriate
stages of exploration for enhancing the National
Geoscientific data bank.
30
Through review of documents, it was noted that
flexicadastre.com/uganda to facilitate
government through the SMMRP established
search for available geo information
a cadaster system at a total cost of USD1.2
related to geology, minerals and
million that would be fed with information,
mining in Uganda. Currently, the
process, disseminate geo-logical information
mineral rights applications processes
and allowing for electronic submission of mining
cannot be completed online though
right applications and tracking as per the SMMRP
the infrastructure was set up because
implementation manual and implementation
there is still deficiency in the existing
completion and results report. However, through
legal and regulatory frame work.
interviews with the Assistant Commissioner, geo-
However, the gap in the existing
data, it was noted that whereas users were able
legislation is being addressed.
to track and view the location and status of areas

licensed and those under application, potential
Audit Comment
applicants were not able to apply and submit their
The audit team, however, established
applications online. The current management
by browsing through the system that
information system would only allow the applicant
on line registration was not provided
print an application form but not apply online.
for.
The website was found to be lacking in several

fields, namely:
Conclusion
a) Mineral statistics: the statistics published on
Ugandas mineral sector remains
the website relate to the year 2011.

b) Mineral deposits: there was no information
available.
underdeveloped with a variety of

mineral endowments remaining
unexploited due to failure to attract
potential investors.
The short falls within the system were due

to failure by the users (DGSM) to engage the
Recommendation
consultant to align the provisions laid in the
The (DGSM) should engage the
project implementation manual to the equipments
consultant to align the provisions laid
installed capabilities.
down in the project implementation

manual to the equipments installed
As the system does not provide for online
capabilities so as to allow online
application, all interested parties have to be within
registration.
Uganda. In addition, since the website is not up

to date, it does not provide adequate information
to potential mining investors which impair the
directorates effort to promote the mineral sector
as had been envisaged the policy.
Management response
The Ministry provides basic mineral information
using geo-information systems and portals at
www.uganda-mining.go.ug; http://www.uganda
mining.go.ug:81/Uganda GMIS/ and http://www.
31
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Green Paper
First-draft document on a specific policy area circulated among interested parties

who are invited to join in a process of consultation and debate. The objective of a
green paper is to arrive at a general consensus before drafting the official policy
document, the white paper
Mining Lease
License granted to holder of exploration or retention license that has quantified a

mineral deposit of commercial significance to carry out mining operations
Exploration
license
License granted to explore for minerals in an area not more than 500 sq.km
Retention license
License granted to the holder of an EL when the identified mineral deposit cannot
be exploited due to economic reasons
Prospecting
License
License granted to prospect for all mineralsaround the country, it is not area
specific.
Mineral right
Means a Prospecting License, Exploration License, Retention License, a Mining

Lease or Location License
32
33
GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT
COMMISSIONER
NATIONAL ENIRONMENT
MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
DISTRICT LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS
COMMISSIONER
GEO-THERMAL RESOURCES
DIRECTOR - DGSM
COMMISSIONER
MINES DEPARTMENT
PERMANENT SECRETARY - MEMD
APPENDIX (I): - DGSM ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE:
APPENDICES
APPENDIX (II): DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Document
Purpose
Mining Policy 2001
To obtain a thorough understanding of the Mineral Policy and

conceptualize its provisions.
Mining Act 2003
To enrich ourselves with the provisions of the Mining Act, 2003

as well as internalize and extract its shortfalls in formalizing
and regulating the mineral sector.
Mining Regulations 2004
To conceptualize regulations of the mining sector and establish

their shortfalls.
Reports by DGSM i.e.

(Annual reports, and
Field inspection /
monitoring reports
To understand the activities undertaken by the Ministry and

the directorate of geological surveys and mines. Establish
issues reported on, coverage of the reports, other agencies
coordinated with while executing the monitoring activities
and frequency of reporting. Ascertain whether inspection and
monitoring work plans are prepared and adhered too. Assess
their reporting mechanism of findings raised and actions taken.
Return files over the period

of audit
To establish the format, adherence to submission requirements

and track progress of performance for the different mining
lease sites.
Occupational Health and

Safety Act, 2006
To establish the prevailing occupational health and safety

guidelines issued for the mining industry.
Financial statements
for the FYs 2010/2011
2014/2015
To assess the level of funding released to the department

and utilization by the department in line with its mandate and
work-plans. To be able to compare the DGSMs funding with
other departments in the Ministry of Energy and Minerals
Development in proportional terms.
Organization structure
To obtain an understanding of the DGSM structure. Establish

the roles and responsibilities of the different positions within the
organogram.
Concession holders /
Licensed companies
documentations
Ascertain the number of licensed companies, their areas

of operation and the mineral commodities dealt in. Use the
information as a basis for preparing inspection plans.
34
APPENDIX (III): OFFICERS INTERVIEWED
35
1. Ag. Director DGSM
To get an understanding of the mineral industry and its

regulatory framework in Uganda. Ascertain measures to
ensure that all mining operations are regulated. How the
DGSM ensure that all provisions of the prevailing legal
framework is adhered to and how none-complying mineral
right holders are dealt with. Ascertain challenges faced and
possible ways of taking the sector forward.
2. Ag. Assistant Commissioner,

Geo-Science
To establish how the geological data is generated

disseminated and mechanisms used. Comprehensiveness
of the available data and frequency of updating the national
geo-data base. Ascertain challenges faced in generating the
data and way forward.
3. Ag. Assistant Commissioner

Licensing, Mines
Ascertain procedures for processing and assessing mineral

right license. Establish agencies coordinated with in
implementing the mining regulatory framework, duration
for processing mineral right applications, and mechanisms
in place to address applications that do not meet the laid
procedures. Appreciate challenges faced and way forward.
4. Ag. Assistant Commissioner

Monitoring and Inspection
Establish whether inspection and monitoring activities are

planned for and budgets prepared accordingly. Ascertain
whether work plans are prepared for each regional mining
inspection office, targets set Key Performance Indicators
(KPIs) agreed upon and measures to ensure that they are
achieved. Determine whether inspection and monitoring
schedules are prepared, sites to visit indicated with
timelines set and adhered to. Take note of measures in
place to ensure that all annual mineral rents and royalties
are timely assessed and payments followed up. Establish
penalties enforced against defaulters, note the level at
which accounts unit is involved i.e. as and when the right to
earn annual rents and royalties fall due or only when PRNs
are issued. Find out if demand notes are issued and follow
up measures to recover arrears. Appreciate challenges
faced and way forward.
5. Regional inspectors
Ascertain their level of participation in planning and

budgeting for inspection activities. Enquire into whether
inspection work plans for their respective regions are
prepared, targets set and adhered to. Find out frequency
of reporting to headquarters and how they are monitored
by their supervisors. Take note of the coverage of their
reports, funding and staffing levels on ground. Appreciate
the challenges faced and way forward.
6. Principal Geologist
(Exploration)
To obtain an understanding of the activities and processes

involved in the geological and survey division and the
interaction with the mines and geothermal divisions.
7. Kamuntu Investments Limited
To get an overview and an understanding of the mining

industry in the perspective of the private sector / licensed
companies. Appreciate the mineral dealers challenges and
way forward.
8. Mines Liason Officer, Tororo

Cement Limited
To obtain an evaluation of the royalty assessment process.

Find out if returns are timely submitted, challenges faced
and proposed solutions.
9. Chairpersons of small scale

miners (Moroto, Busia
united, Kasanda miners
association etc.
To assess the role of formation of artisan associations in the

mineral rich areas, progress of formalizing and regulating
their activities.
10. Chief Administrative officers of

Kabale, Shema, Tororo, Mbale,
Busia, Namayingo, Iganga,
Mbarara, Rubirizi, Ntungamo,
Bushenyi, Kasese, etc. districts
To obtain an understanding of the involvement of the district

in the licensing process and in monitoring of the licensed
companies.
11. Asst. commissioner, Natural

resources Dept. Uganda
Revenue Authority
To understand the role of URA in the mining industry and the

treatment of non-tax revenue.
12. Commissioner Customs and

domestic taxes at URA
Appreciate the coordination mechanism between URA and

DGSM. To understand the role of URA in the mining industry
and the treatment of non-tax revenue.
13. Principal environment officer NEMA
Ascertain the level of coordination with DGSM
14. Asst. Commissioner,

Laboratories, DGSM
To get an understanding of the mineral industry, background

to the industry in Uganda, challenges faced and the roles of
the department in the industry.
36
APPENDIX (IV): STAFFING OF THE INSPECTION AND MONITORING

DIVISION AS AT AUGUST 2015
Inspection And
Monitoring Division
Approved
Positions
Filled
Positions
Vacant
Positions
Scale
Assistant Commissioner
(Monitoring & Inspection)
U1E
Principal Inspector of
Mines
U2
C.B. Rudigizah
Senior Inspector of Mines
U3
Grace Deborah
Nakku Nvule
Inspector of Mines
U4
Sebagala David
Tabaaro Muheirwe
Morris
Senior Assistant Inspector

of Mines
U4
Senior Mines Warden
U4
Nathan Mushetsya
Assistant Inspector of
Mines
U5
Mathias Mugere
Mines Warden
U6
Eneku Gerald
Sub Total
12
10
Staff
SEX
Source: MEMD Staff structure as at August 2015
37
38
THE
REPUBLIC
OF
UGANDA
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
P.O.Box 7083, Kampala,

Tel: +256 414 344 340 Fax: +256 414 345 674
E-mail: [email protected]
VALUE FOR MONEY AUDIT REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EXPRESS PENALTY SCHEME (EPS)
BY UGANDA POLICE FORCE | A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL

Regulation Monitoring Promotion of Mining Sector - Auditor General's Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Regulation Monitoring Promotion of Mining Sector - Auditor General's Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Regulation Monitoring Promotion of Mining Sector - Auditor General's Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

T

OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL

www.oag.go.ug | E-mail: [email protected]

REGULATION, MONITORING AND PROMOTION

REGULATION, MONITORING AND

A REPORT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL

AUDITOR GENERALS MESSAGE

31st December 2015

REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REGULATION,

1.3. Description Of The Audit Area........................................................................................ 3

Data Collection Methods................................................................................................ 7

SYSTEM AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION..................................................................... 11

Roles and responsibilities of key players................................................................... 11

Adequacy of the mining regulatory frame work......................................................... 15

Licensing and mineral rights...................................................................................... 18

Inspection and monitoring of mining operations....................................................... 27

Provision of laboratory services.................................................................................. 30

Generation and dissemination of the geological data............................................... 30

LIST OF FIGURES AND PCTURES

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

Chief Administrative Officer

District Environment Officer

Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines

Environment Management Plan

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development

National Environment Management Authority

Occupational Health and Safety

Uganda Revenue Authority

Page 2 , Mineral Policy of Uganda, 2001

Page 10, Mineral Policy of Uganda 2001

f. Inspection and monitoring of mining operations

and results report. However, it was

It was observed that much as the mines

established that potential applicants

department of DGSM planned to make thirty-

were not able to apply and submit their

six (36) inspections that is twelve (12) per year

and three (3) for every quarter, conducted

Ugandas mineral sector remains

inspections remained low as per inspection

underdeveloped with a variety of mineral

and monitoring reports availed to audit.

endowments remaining unexploited

By not conducting adequate inspection and

partly due to failure to attract potential

monitoring, the DGSM could not track the

performance of all the mineral licences issued

i. The DGSM should consider regulating

g. Provision of Laboratory Services

commercialized building materials.

It was established that the national mineral

ii. The Directorate should ensure that the

laboratory capacity in Entebbe only addresses a

review process of the mineral regulatory

few tests and analysis as it is not yet accredited

by International Standard Organisation (ISO).

enhance administration of the mineral

Mining companies operating in Uganda were

sector for improved mineral exploitation