Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 104 views

    References

    Uploaded by

    kim wright
    The document discusses research on the effects of value-added teacher evaluation systems on teacher job satisfaction and autonomy. It reviews literature showing that high-stakes testing and accountability measures have narrowed curriculum and instruction, and reduced teacher autonomy in the classroom. However, some studies also find positive relationships between working conditions, including administrative support, and teacher satisfaction. The document analyzes policies like Race to the Top that promoted the use of student test scores in teacher evaluations, and changes to teacher autonomy over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    References

    Uploaded by

    kim wright
    104 views2 pages
    The document discusses research on the effects of value-added teacher evaluation systems on teacher job satisfaction and autonomy. It reviews literature showing that high-stakes testing and accountability measures have narrowed curriculum and instruction, and reduced teacher autonomy in the classroom. However, some studies also find positive relationships between working conditions, including administrative support, and teacher satisfaction. The document analyzes policies like Race to the Top that promoted the use of student test scores in teacher evaluations, and changes to teacher autonomy over time.

    Original Description:

    References

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses research on the effects of value-added teacher evaluation systems on teacher job satisfaction and autonomy. It reviews literature showing that high-stakes testing and accountability measures have narrowed curriculum and instruction, and reduced teacher autonomy in the classroom. However, some studies also find positive relationships between working conditions, including administrative support, and teacher satisfaction. The document analyzes policies like Race to the Top that promoted the use of student test scores in teacher evaluations, and changes to teacher autonomy over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    104 views2 pages

    References

    Uploaded by

    kim wright
    The document discusses research on the effects of value-added teacher evaluation systems on teacher job satisfaction and autonomy. It reviews literature showing that high-stakes testing and accountability measures have narrowed curriculum and instruction, and reduced teacher autonomy in the classroom. However, some studies also find positive relationships between working conditions, including administrative support, and teacher satisfaction. The document analyzes policies like Race to the Top that promoted the use of student test scores in teacher evaluations, and changes to teacher autonomy over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    The Effects of Value-Added Teacher Evaluation on Teacher Job

    Satisfaction and Autonomy


    Kim B. Wright
    References
    Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Teachers views of their school climate and its
    relationship with teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Learning Environments
    Research, 19, 291-307.
    Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking value-added models in education: Critical perspectives
    on tests and assessment-based accountability. New York: Routledge.
    Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age
    of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512-535.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E. H., & Rothstein, J. (2011, September).
    Getting teacher evaluation right: A background paper for policy makers. (American
    Education Research Association, National Academy of Education). Retrieved from
    https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/getting-teacherevaluationright-challenge-policy-makers.pdf
    Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 (2015).
    Faulkner, S., & Cook, C. (2006). Testing versus teaching: The perceived impact of assessment
    demands on middle grades instructional practices. Research in Middle Level Education,
    29, 113
    Goldhaber, D., Gabele, B. & Walch, J. (2012). Does the model matter? Exploring the
    relationship between different achievement-based teacher assessments. CEDR Working
    Paper 2012-6. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation
    using micro-data. American Economic Review, 61(2), 280-288.
    Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalization about using value-added measures of
    teacher quality. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 100, 267-271.
    Hinchey, P.H. (2010). Getting teacher assessment right: what policymakers can learn from
    research. National Education Policy Center, School of Education, University of Colorado
    at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
    Huss, J. A., & Eastep, S. (2011). A tri-state study: Is the middle school movement thriving or
    barely surviving? Research in Middle Level Education, 34(9), 1-13.
    Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools:
    the effects of teachers working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their
    students achievement. Teachers College Record, 114, 1-39.

    Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective
    teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. Research
    report for the Measures of Effective Teaching Project, January.
    National Council on Teacher Quality. (2015). Texas teacher evaluation and support system FAQ.
    Retrieved from
    http://www.nctq.org/docs/Texas_Teacher_Evaluation_and_Support_System_FAQ_June_
    5.pdf
    Rapp, D. (2001). National Board-certified teachers in Ohio give state education policy,
    classroom climate and high-stakes testing a grade of F. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 215 218.
    Sparks, D., Ralph, J., & Malkus, N. (2015). Public school teacher autonomy in the classroom
    across school years 2003-04, 2007-08, and 2011-12. U. S. Department of Education, Stats
    in Brief [NCES 2015-089]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015089.pdf
    Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching?
    Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U. S. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy
    Institute.
    U. S. Department of Education. (2010). Race to the Top Fund: Phase one resources. Retrieved
    from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/phase1-resources.html
    U. S. Department of Education. (2011). Race to the Top Fund: Phase three resources. Retrieved
    from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/phase3-resources.html
    U. S. Department of Education. (2012). ESEA flexibility. Retrieved from
    http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/index.html
    U. S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2015). Higher Education
    Act Title II Reporting System. Retrieved from
    https://title2.ed.gov/Public/44077_Title_II_Issue_Brief_Enrollment_V4a.pdf

    You might also like