Oxidation Methods of Activated Carbon
Oxidation Methods of Activated Carbon
Oxidation Methods of Activated Carbon
Dpto. de Ingeniera Qumica y Qumica Fsica, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz 06071, Spain
Dpto. de Qumica Orgnica e Inorgnica, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz 06071, Spain
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 March 2010
Received in revised form 22 July 2010
Accepted 24 July 2010
Keywords:
Activated carbon
Dry and wet oxidations
Surface chemistry modication
Textural changes
a b s t r a c t
The effects of dry and wet oxidation treatments of activated carbon (AC) on the surface chemistry and
porous structure are studied. Using cherry stones (CS), AC was rst prepared by carbonization at 900 C for
2 h in N2 and activation at 850 C for 2 h in CO2. Then, the resulting AC was oxidized in O2(air) or O3
atmosphere and with HNO3 and H2O2 solutions. The acidicbasic surface sites were analyzed by FT-IR
spectroscopy, Boehm method, and pH of the point of zero charge (pHpzc) and the porous structure by N2
adsorption and mercury porosimetry. It has been found that the oxidizing agent, under specic reaction
conditions, rather than whether it was a gas or a solute in aqueous solution, is the main factor that controls
the changes produced in the surface chemistry and porous structure of AC. O3 and HNO3 are the most
effective oxidants to form acidic oxygen surface groups. However, the content of basic groups decreases for
the four oxidants, the effect being much stronger for HNO3. A microporosity reduction is also observed,
which is more important for O2(air) and especially for HNO3 than for O3 and H2O2. The percentage of
microporosity loss is as high as 43.3 for HNO3. Mesoporosity signicantly develops, whereas macroporosity
usually remains practically unchanged. Dry oxidation of AC at 100 C in O3 has proved to be the most
promising method to increase the content of acidic oxygen surface groups in the material without greatly
decreasing the content of basic sites and microporosity and with a signicant mesoporosity development.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Activated carbon is a carbon porous material with a large number
of present-day and potential industrial applications related to the
energy and fuel storage and use. Such applications include the use in
cells [18], supercapacitors [912], batteries [13,14] and canisters
[15], fuel storage [1622], production [2325] and beneciation [2631],
gas separation [32,33], and environmental protection [3437]. Since the
performance of AC in most applications is inuenced by its surface
chemistry [22,28,3844], the modication of this AC property has
been frequently the target of a variety of AC beneciation treatments.
Oxidation is one of the most conventional modications used for ACs.
It is mainly used to introduce carbonoxygen surface groups in AC.
Oxidation methods involve the utilization of oxidizing gases (i.e. oxygen, steam, carbon dioxide, etc.) or oxidizing solutions (i.e., nitric acid,
hydrogen peroxide, chlorine water, etc.) [45]. However, the oxidation
of AC from the gas phase or liquid phase may produce changes in
the porous structure of the material which may also affect its behavior.
As a result, research aiming at modifying the surface chemistry of
activated carbon must be coupled with a parallel study of the porous
1769
Table 1
Methods of oxidation of AC. Values of burn-off percentage. Sample codes.
Oxidant
Flow/L h1
Concentration
T/C
t/h
Burn-off %
Codes
O2(air)
O3
HNO3
H2O2
20
20
Air
1.25 wt.%
5N
5N
300
100
9095
20
24
1
10
10
15.7
1.3
1.7
1.1
ACO2
ACO3
ACHNO3
ACH2O2
1770
oxidant (see Table 1). Thus, such a mass was much smaller for H2O2
and HNO3 than for O2(air) and O3 and the oxidation temperature was
higher for HNO3 than for H2O2. This is so because in a series of
exploratory experiments, which were carried out at rst by using the
same mass of AC (i.e. 10 g) for the four oxidizing agents and by
effecting the treatments with the H2O2 and HNO3 solutions at 20 C, it
was observed that the burn-off percentage was very low for both wet
oxidation treatments (i.e. 0.52, H2O2 and 0.94, HNO3) and also that the
treatment with HNO3 was not effective to form oxygen surface groups
in AC, as shown by the FT-IR spectra registered for the resulting
products. These results advised to lower the mass of the sample used
in the wet oxidations and to raise the temperature in the case of the
treatment with the HNO3 solution. In addition, by taking into account
the strong thermal effect on the decomposition rate of H2O2 to H2O
and O2 in aqueous solution (i.e. the rate of the aforesaid process is
roughly doubled by every 10 C increase) and the results obtained in
previous studies on the oxidation of carbonaceous materials in O2(air)
[70] and O3 [63], the heating conditions for the oxidation of AC with
the various chemical agents were chosen.
In accordance with the molecule/ion size of the oxidants (i.e. O2 and
O3 are signicantly smaller chemical species than H2O2 and NO
3 [71])
and with the fact that capillarity phenomena likely occurred when the
aqueous solutions were brought into contact with AC, the diffusion of
the oxidizing agent in pores of AC and the associated degree of
gasication of carbon atoms should be greater, and hence the burn-off
percentage should be higher, for a dry oxidation process than for a wet
oxidation process. Moreover, a greater mass loss was expected with the
decrease in the mass of the sample and with the increase in the
oxidation temperature. As seen in Table 1, the burn-off percentage is
much higher for the oxidation of AC in O2(air) than in O3 and with the
HNO3 and H2O2 solutions. Also, it varies by HNO3 N O3 N H2O2. Accordingly, the higher burn-off percentage for HNO3 than for O3 suggests that
factors other than the mass of the sample and the temperature
inuenced the decrease produced in the mass of AC due to its oxidation.
The relatively high burn-off percentage obtained for O2(air) is
consistent with the heating conditions, i.e. 300 C and 24 h. Thus, as
reported elsewhere [70], the mass of a carbonized product prepared
from CS at 600 C progressively decreased with the increase in
maximum treatment temperature when the material was heated at
250325 C for 24 h in O2(air). At 350 C the initial mass of the sample
was almost entirely gasied-off, yielding ashes [70]. With regard to the
degree of AC gasication by O2(air) action it should be also borne in
mind that the O2 molecule possesses a small size and is linear in shape
and that as a result its access to narrow porosity of AC should be
facilitated, as compared to the rest of the oxidizing agents. In practice, O2
should access even to smaller size pores than those created by partial
gasication of the carbonized product in CO2 during the preparation of
AC (i.e. pores originated as a result of the pyrolysis suffered by CS in the
carbonization stage) on account of the smaller molecular size of O2
(internuclear distance OO, 1.207 ) than of CO2 (internuclear distance
OCO, 2.326 ) [71]. However, the diffusion of O2(air) in pores of AC
was in all likelihood hindered by N2 present in the air stream. In fact, the
N2 molecule (internuclear distance NN, 1.098 ) [71] is smaller than
the O2 molecule and the presence of these molecules in the air stream
was much greater for N2 than for O2. Furthermore, prevention of the
oxidizing action of O2 by N2 should not be ruled out.
The signicantly higher burn-off percentage for HNO3 than for O3
and chiey H2O2 (Table 1) may be surprising since, as an oxidant,
HNO3 is a much less powerful chemical agent than H2O2 and especially
O3 (i.e. E0 at acid pH is equal to + 0.803 V for NO
3 /N2O4, +1.776 V for
H2O2/H2O, and + 2.07 V for O3/O2) [72]. Nevertheless, it should be
taken into account that the oxidation power of the HNO3 solution was
stronger with the increase in temperature during the treatment of AC
because of the larger degree of HNO3 dissociation. Furthermore, this
process was favored by the simultaneous adsorption of the H3O+ ion
on basal planes of AC [73] and by the possible participation of the H3O+
CGa
Lb
HGc
CaGd
TAGe
TBGf
pHpzcg
AC
ACO2
ACO3
ACHNO3
ACH2O2
16
21
487
639
76
6
27
14
72
49
74
84
98
86
93
42
92
63
69
82
138
224
662
866
300
385
344
302
175
327
8.8
6.7
4.3
3.5
5.3
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
Carboxylic groups.
Lactones.
Hydroxyl groups.
Carbonyl groups.
Total acidic groups.
Total basic groups.
pH of the point zero charge.
1771
1772
Fig. 3. Curves of cumulative pore volume against pore diameter (mercury porosimetry)
for AC and oxidized products.
1773
Table 3
Textural parameters of AC and oxidized products.
Sample
Sext/m2 g1
SBET/m2 g1
Vmi-AI/cm3 g1
Vme-AI/cm3 g1
Vme-P/cm3 g1
Vma-P/cm3 g1
VT/cm3 g1
AC
ACO2
ACO3
ACHNO3
ACH2O2
35
37
46
50
50
604
469
603
399
591
0.30
0.21
0.28
0.17
0.26
0.069
0.056
0.105
0.090
0.087
0.055
0.062
0.073
0.097
0.084
0.34
0.34
0.36
0.35
0.35
0.70
0.61
0.71
0.62
0.69
3.8 [84] for ACs reacted with HNO3 under a solution reux and that, as
a last resort, microporosity modications were only small for HNO3
treatments at room temperature [57,61]. With HNO3, also, the
reduction of microporosity was greatly favored with the increase in
oxidation time and concentration of the HNO3. PML was 18.4 and 56.7
for 4 and 48 h treatment times [104] and 16.3 and 69.2 when 2 and
5 M HNO3 solutions were used. It was also observed that the
detrimental effect of HNO3 concentration on microporosity was
dependent on treatment time [62]. In the case of O3 treatments,
PMLs ranging between 0.42 and 37.3 were obtained for 10120 min
ozonation [83]. For the treatment of two CO2 and steam-activated
carbons with O3, PML was 7.0 and 0.8, respectively [85]. Finally, the
changes caused in the surface area and micropore volume of ACs by
H2O2 oxidation were generally of little signicance (i.e. PML b ~10)
[52,57,84,9193], becoming more important when the treatment was
effected at temperatures higher than room temperature [55,56] or
during prolonged time periods [53]. Microporosity decreased with the
rise of the oxidation temperature [55,56], whereas the surface area
developed with a long reaction time [53]. With the increase of both
process variables, the opposite effects on the porous structure seemed
to balance [96]. An increase in the concentration of the H2O2 solution
had no signicant effect on microporosity [95]. In brief, by taking
mainly into consideration the heating conditions used in the oxidation
of different ACs, it may be concluded that the results obtained in the
present study on textural changes originated in AC by oxidation with
HNO3, O3 and H2O2 are well in agreement with those previously
reported in literature. The strong detrimental effect of the oxidation of
AC in O2(air) at 300 C for 24 h on microporosity and surface area is
attributable to the very long reaction time as the treatment was
performed at a relatively low temperature.
4. Conclusions
From the above results the following conclusions may be drawn:
(1) The oxidation of AC (i.e. an activated carbon prepared from cherry
stones by CO2 activation) with dry O2(air) and O3 and with wet
HNO3 and H2O2 increases the content of acidic oxygen surface
groups, the most effective chemical agents being HNO3 and O3.
(2) The treatments of AC with O3 and HNO3 result in the formation
of mostly carboxylic acid groups.
(3) The content of basic sites greatly decreases for HNO3.
(4) The oxidation treatments of AC cause a decrease of microporosity which is more important for O2(air) and especially for
HNO3. However, as a rule, mesoporosity signicantly develops
and macroporosity remains unchanged.
(5) The dry oxidation of AC at 25 C in O3 is the most promising
treatment to form acidic oxygen groups in the carbon surface
without greatly altering its content of basic groups and volume
of micropores.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the Junta de Extremadura
(Spain) through project PDT08-A012. Dr. J. Jaramillo also thanks the
Consejera de Educacin of Junta de Extremadura for providing her a
1774
[30] G. Yu, S. Lu, H. Chen, Z. Zhu, Diesel fuel desulfurization with hydrogen peroxide
promoted by formic acid and catalyzed by activated carbon, Carbon 43 (2005)
22852294.
[31] V. Selvavathi, V. Chidambaram, A. Meenakshisundaram, B. Sairan, B. Sivasankar,
Adsorptive desulfurization of diesel on activated carbon and nickel supported
systems, Catal. Today 141 (2009) 99102.
[32] T.C. Drage, O. Kozynchenko, C. Pevida, M.G. Plaza, F. Rubiera, J.J. Pis, C.E. Snape, S.
Tennison, Developing activated carbon adsorbents for pre-combustion CO2
capture, Energy Procedia 1 (2009) 599605.
[33] D. Cao, J. Wu, Modelling the selectivity of activated carbons for efcient
separation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide, Carbon 43 (2005) 13641370.
[34] T.J. Bandosz, Removal of inorganic gases and VOCs on activated carbon,
Adsorption by Carbons, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008.
[35] A. Somy, M.R. Mehmia, H.D. Amrei, A. Ghanizadeh, M. Safari, Adsorption of
carbon dioxide using impregnated activated carbon promoted by zinc, Int. J.
Greenhouse Gas Control 3 (2009) 249253.
[36] M. Pellerano, P. Pr, M. Kacem, A. Delebarre, CO2 capture by adsorption on
activated carbons using pressure modulation, Energy Procedia 1 (2009)
647653.
[37] H. Yang, Z. Xu, M. Fan, R. Gupta, R.B. Slimane, A.E. Bland, I. Wright, Progress in
carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review, J. Environ. Sciences 20 (2008)
1427.
[38] D. Lozano-Castell, J. Alcaiz-Monge, M.A. de la Casa-Lillo, D. Cazorla-Amors, A.
Linares-Solano, Advances in the study of methane storage in porous carbonaceous materials, Fuel 81 (2002) 17771803.
[39] A. Silvestre-Albero, J. Silvestre-Albero, A. Seplveda-Escribano, F. RodrguezReinoso, Ethanol removal using activated carbon: effect of porous structure and
surface chemistry, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 120 (2009) 6268.
[40] T.J. Bendosz, Effect of pore structure and surface chemistry of virgin activated
carbons on removal of hydrogen sulde, Carbon 37 (1999) 483491.
[41] P. Davini, Adsorption of sulphur dioxide on thermally treated active carbon, Fuel
68 (1989) 145148.
[42] P. Davini, Adsorption and desorption of SO2 on active carbon. The effect of
surface basic groups, Carbon 28 (1990) 565571.
[43] N. Karatepe, I. Orbak, R. Yavuz, A. zyuguran, Sulfur dioxide adsorption by
activated carbons having different textural and chemical properties, Fuel 87
(2008) 32073215.
[44] A. Lisvskii, R. Semiat, C. Aharoni, Adsorption of sulfur dioxide by active carbon
treated by nitric acid: I. Effect of the treatment on adsorption of SO2 and
extractability of the acid formed, Carbon 35 (1997) 16391643.
[45] J.T. Cookson Jr, Adsorption mechanisms: the chemistry of organic adsorption on
activated carbon, in: P.N. Cheremisinoff, F. Ellerbusch (Eds.), Carbon Adsorption
Handbook, Ann Arbor Sci, Ann Arbor, 1980, pp. 241279.
[46] W.M.A.W. Daud, A.H. Houshamnd, Textural characteristics, surface chemistry
and oxidation of activated carbon, J. Natur. Gas Chem. 19 (2010) 267279.
[47] H.P. Boehm, Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment,
Carbon 40 (2002) 145149.
[48] M. Acedo-Ramos, V. Gomez-Serrano, C. Valenzuela-Calahorro, A.J. LopezPeinado, Oxidation of activated carbon in liquid phase. Study by FT-IR, Spectrosc.
Lett. 26 (1993) 11171137.
[49] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.A. Ferro-Garca, J.P. Joly, I. Bautista-Toledo, F. CarrascoMarn, J. Rivera-Utrilla, Activated carbon surface modications by nitric acid,
hydrogen peroxide, and ammonium peroxydisulfate treatments, Langmuir 11
(1995) 43864392.
[50] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.V. Lpez-Ramn, F. Carrasco-Marn, Changes in surface
chemistry of activated carbons by wet oxidation, Carbon 38 (2000) 19952001.
[51] I.I. Salame, T.J. Bandosz, Surface chemistry of activated carbons: combining the
results of temperature-programmed desorption, Boehm, and potentiometric
titrations, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 240 (2001) 252258.
[52] M.F.R. Pereira, S.F. Soares, J.J.M. rfao, J.L. Figueiredo, Adsorption of dyes on
activated carbons: inuence of surface chemical groups, Carbon 41 (2003)
811821.
[53] Y. Xue, Y. Guo, Z. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Wang, G. Lu, The role of surface properties of
activated carbon in the catalytic reduction of NO by carbon, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255
(2008) 25912595.
[54] A.H. El-Sheikh, Effect of oxidation of activated carbon on its enrichment
efciency of metal ions: comparison with oxidized and non-oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Talanta 75 (2008) 127134.
[55] C.-C. Huang, H.-M. Chen, C.-H. Chen, J.-C. Huang, Effect of surface oxides on
hydrogen storage of activated carbon, Sep. Purif. Technol. 70 (2010) 291295.
[56] X. Song, H. Liu, L. Cheng, Y. Qu, Surface modication of coconut-based activated
carbon by liquid-phase oxidation and its effects on lead ion adsorption,
Desalination 255 (2010) 7883.
[57] M. Molina-Sabio, M.A. Muecas-Vidal, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, Modication in
porous texture and oxygen surface groups of activated carbons by oxidation,
Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 62 (1991) 329339.
[58] J.A.C. Alves, C. Freire, B. de Castro, J.L. Figueiredo, Anchoring of organic molecules
onto activated carbon, Colloids Surf. A 189 (2001) 7584.
[59] V. Strelko Jr., D.J. Malik, M. Streat, Characterisation of the surface of oxidised
carbon adsorbents, Carbon 40 (2002) 95104.
[60] Y.H. Li, C.W. Lee, B.K. Gullet, Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface
functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption, Fuel 82 (2003) 451457.
[61] L.J. Lemus-Yegres, I. Such-Basez, M.C. Romn-Martnez, C. Salinas-Martnez de
Lecea, Catalytic properties of a RH-diamine complex anchored on activated
carbon: effect of different surface oxygen groups, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 331 (2007)
2633.
1775