Cimt in Children WTH CP: Sample Measures/ Findings
Cimt in Children WTH CP: Sample Measures/ Findings
Cimt in Children WTH CP: Sample Measures/ Findings
Author/Date
Design/ Variables
Measures/
Sample
Findings
Data Collection
Gordon, 2011
Geerdink, et al.,
2012
Review
RCT
Comparing CIMT-BiT to
conventional therapy, two
groups
Accessing learning curve.
IV: conventional therapy
received or participated in
the mCIMT-BiT Pirate
group
DV: unimanual capacity
(studied progression of
manual dexterity and
factors affecting the motor
learning curve)
Sakzewski, et al.,
2011
64 children with
unilateral cerebral
palsy, mean age is
10.2 +2.7years, 52%
male
1.) At high intensities CIMT and bimanual training improve dexterity and bimanual UE
use. 2.) Bimanual training may allow direct practice of functional goals that is
transferred to unpracticed goals and improve bimanual coordination. 3.) 90 hours leads to
greater improvements than 60 hours of same Tx. 4.) higher doses may be required for
bimanual training 5.) increased dosing frequency may be needed for older children. 6.)
combined CIMT/bimanual approaches may be useful but requires sufficient intensity.
1. Age was found to significantly affect the learning-curve. 2. Long term retention of
effects was not influenced by age. 3. Children five years and older may profit from more
than 54 hours of mCIMT training.
1. Both groups had changes in range of motion. 2. Bimanual training group changed most
in grasp and release items. 3. CIMT group changed most in hand-to-hand transfer and
target accuracy. 4. Nearly 70% of the kids achieved best response for perceived
occupational performance (as assessed by the COPM) with no difference between
groups. 5. Kids with left hemiplegia were more likely to achieve a best response. 6.
Children who were older selected their own goals and were that much more engaged and
motivated in the therapy processbest achievement of favorable individualized
outcomes. 7. Long term retention effects are more likely with CIMT
Author/Date
Design/ Variables
Measures/
Sample
Findings
Data Collection
Choudhary, et al.,
2012
Modified CIMT
combined with
Bimanual
Aarts, et al., 2010
52 children with
unilateral spastic CP
with Manual Ability
Classification System
(MACS) scores I, II
or III and aged 2.58
years
RCT follow up
Non-experimental
Observation of tasks
(muffin decorating and
beading)
-Found the modifications of CIMT to fit childrens needs were feasible, effective, and
well tolerated
- Increase activity rather than addressing impairments to improve activity limitations
-Significant improvement in dissociated movements in the mCIMT group
-improved in the peg-test by 60 seconds with mCIMT compared to 5 seconds in the
control group
- The results of this single blind, randomized controlled trial suggest that the modified
constraint induced movement therapy of 4 weeks duration is effective in improving
upper limb functions in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
-The improvement in upper limb functions was sustained 8 weeks after discontinuation
of intervention.
-This study indicate that the observed improvements of upper limb capacity and
performance after 8 weeks mCIMTBiT in children with unilateral spastic CP are based
on a better utilization of existing motor functions of the affected extremity, rather than on
true restoration of muscle strength or motor selectivity.
-In contrast with current definitions of developmental disregard that focus on the amount
of use, the quality of upper limb control may be an equally important aspect of learned
non-use
-Their improvement of hand capacity did not reach a level of sufficient automaticity in
order to enhance the overall amount of spontaneous use.
Gordon, et al.,
2005
Started in 1997
Pilot and
experimental testing
with 38 children
between ages 4 and
14 with congenital
hemiplegia
Authors also
referenced other
studies
Author/Date
Non-experimental
Describes methodology of
mCIMT as a child-friendly
intervention and seeks to
define mCIMT more
specifically in literature.
Measures/
Findings
Design/ Variables
Sample
Data Collection
Brandao et al.,
(2012)
16 children with
hemiplegia due to
cerebral palsy
between the ages of
3-10 yo
10 males
6 females
9 with left side
hemiplegia
7 with right side
hemiplegia
RCT
CIMT vs HABIT to
effectively increase upper
limb function affected by
hemiplegia
IV- CIMT intervention or
HABIT intervention
DV- Self care performance
& functional performance
of UE
Both CIMT and HABIT were significantly effective treatments to help increase upper
limb function
No significant evidence that one is better than the other
Wu et al. (2013)
Sutcliffe et al.
(2007)
8 children with
hemiplegia die to
cerebral palsy
between ages 2-11
4 girls
4 boys
1 8 yo male child
with right congenital
hemiplegic cerebral
palsy
Quasi experimental
CIMT in a group setting
IV- group CIMT
intervention
DV- Functional
performance
Author/Date
Design/ Variables
Measures/
Sample
Findings
Data Collection
Gelkop et al.
(2015)
12 children with
cerebral hemiplegia.
Age range between 1
- 7 yo
CIMT group
1 male
5 females
3 left hemiplegia
DV- Functional
Found that improvements in affected upper limb can be achieved when the amount of
time used for intervention is modified and incorporated into the regular school day.
They did not find any significant difference between CIMT and HABIT
3 right hemiplegia
performance of UE
and Performance of
bimanual tasks
25 children with
cerebral hemiplegia
age range between
Randomized crossover
design with a washout
period
18 months and 4 yo
Group 1
9 males
3 females
Group 2
9 males
4 females
Eco-CIMT intervention on
upper in affected upper
limb function
46 children with
cerebral palsy
hemiplegia
Quasi RCT
CIMT vs HABIT
intervention as effective
intervention for upper limb
function of affected side
HABIT group
1 male
5 females
3 left hemiplegia
3 right hemiplegia
Eliasson et al.
(2011)
Gordon et al.
(2011)
CIMT
9 male
12 female
15 right hemiplegia
6 left hemiplegia
HABIT
11 male
10 Female
9 right hemiplegia
Results showed that CIMT and HABIT both show significant increases in the affected
upper limb function, but did not do so in the manner they hypothesized of each treatment
having specificity to it.
Results were obtained in only three weeks time and still maintained at the 6 month
follow up
Still more research to be done
12 left hemiplegia