0% found this document useful (0 votes)

69 views36 pages

Fe Teamwork1

rubrics

Uploaded by

draqbhatti

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

69 views36 pages

Fe Teamwork1

rubrics

Uploaded by

draqbhatti

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 36

ISL

AMI
C
UNI
VER
SIT
Y

F
A
C

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

FOREWORD BY AUTHOR
DATE: Nov 17th 2015
Programs typically face difficulty in measuring several affective domain outcomes like
the ABET student outcome Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams.
Faculty are challenged with issues like the information to collect, evidence to show and
evaluation of collected data for audit and continuous improvement purposes.
With extensive research coupled with practical experience of working in teams A very
practical instrument has been developed that streamlines faculty effort to collect critical
information for the measurement of teamwork and professional ethics performance
indicators using easily applicable rubrics. This instrument also provides valuable
feedback to different stake holders like students, program faculty, management and IAB
for continuous improvement.
I am confident that complete or part implementation of various sections of this
instrument will facilitate easy measurement of team work and professional ethics
outcomes by the faculty members of various programs especially for the capstone
design courses projects.

WAJID HUSSAIN
QUALITY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY

Page 1 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Table of Contents
A.Team Contract........................................................................................................................... 3
B.1 Team Contract Rubric............................................................................................................. 4
B.2 Team Contract PI Assessment................................................................................................ 5
B.3 Team Contract PI Evaluation.................................................................................................. 6
C.1 Team Work Rubrics................................................................................................................ 7
C.2 Mid-Project PIs Assessment.................................................................................................... 8
C.3 Completed Project PIs Assessment...................................................................................... 18
C.4 Student Teamwork PIs Evaluation........................................................................................ 28
D.1 Student Information Reporting Credibility Rubric................................................................31
D.2 Student Information Reporting Credibility PI Assessment....................................................32
D.3 Student Information Reporting Credibility Assessment PI Evaluation..................................33
E. Faculty Team Meetings Attendance Form............................................................................... 34
F. Faculty Team Work Feedback Form......................................................................................... 35

Page 2 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey on the several aspects of team work exhibited by
yourself and your other team members. Faculty of Engineering welcomes your feedback and your
answers will be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of team work for your group project. Thank
you for your participation.

A. Team Contract
1. Was a team contract executed and a copy submitted to your course instructor?
Yes

2. What was your contribution in preparation of the team contract?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Did you provide your CV for evaluation and assignment of your role in the team project?
Yes

4. List your team members:

Team member 1:__________________________

Team member

2:___________________________
Team member 3:__________________________

Team member 4:

__________________________
5. What is the definition of the problem for the project and what role have you been assigned?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY
Team Contract Evaluation Problem definition, Team members CVs, Roles, Resources,
Communication, Meetings
Copyright 2015

Page 3 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
Complete

Partial

Incomplete

Not

submitted
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

B.1 Team Contract Rubric

PERFORMANC
E INDICATOR

EXCELLENT

ADEQUATE

MINIMAL

UNSATISFACTORY

Contribute
actively to
prepare the
team contract
with
collaboration
of team
members and
faculty

Actively involved in
discussions with faculty
and colleagues
regarding individual and
team member strengths
and weaknesses related
to definition of team
roles. Elaborate CV
submitted related to
role sought. Excellent
understanding of
problem definition,
possible solutions, time
lines and associated
roles for project
fulfillment.

Semi actively
involved in
discussions with
faculty and
colleagues regarding
individual and team
member strengths
and weaknesses
related to definition of
team roles.
Moderately elaborate
CV submitted related
to role sought. Good
understanding of
problem definition,
possible solutions,
time lines and
associated roles for
project fulfillment.

Prompted
Involvement in
discussions with
faculty and
colleagues regarding
individual and team
member strengths
and weaknesses
related to definition
of team roles.
Submitted CV
minimally related to
role sought. Limited
understanding of
problem definition,
possible solutions,
time lines and
associated roles for
project fulfillment.

Negligible
Involvement in
discussions with
faculty and
colleagues regarding
individual and team
member strengths
and weaknesses
related to definition
of team roles.
Submitted CV not
related to role
sought. No
understanding of
problem definition,
possible solutions,
time lines and
associated roles for
project fulfillment.

Page 4 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Attachments:

Team contract form A

Student CV

B.2 Team Contract PI Assessment

PI_0: Contribute actively to prepare the team contract with collaboration of team
members and faculty
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

1. Rate whether the student was actively involved in discussions with faculty and colleagues regarding
individual and team member strengths and weaknesses related to definition of team roles.
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate whether the student submitted an elaborate CV related to the role sought.
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate whether the student has an Excellent understanding of problem definition, possible solutions,
time-lines and associated roles for project fulfillment.
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Copyright 2015

Page 5 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

B.3 Team Contract PI Evaluation

PI_0: Contribute actively to prepare the team contract with collaboration of team
members and faculty
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

Page 6 of 36

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Student actively involved in

Student submitted an

Student has an Excellent

discussions with faculty and

elaborate CV related to the

understanding of problem

colleagues regarding

role sought

definition, possible solutions,

individual and team member

time lines and associated

strengths and weaknesses

roles for project fulfillment

related to definition of team

roles

Score1 =

Score2 =

Score3 =

Average score for PI_0 (5.0 scale) = {5/3}*{(Score1+Score2+Score3)/3} =

Page 7 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
C.1 Team Work Rubrics
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR

EXCELLENT

ADEQUATE

MINIMAL

UNSATISFACTORY

Listen to others
in the team and
create a
supportive team
environment

Almost always listens

to, shares with and
supports the efforts of
others. Tries to keep
people working well
with others.

Usually listens to,

shares, with, and
supports the efforts
of others. Does not
cause waves in the
group.

Often listens to,

shares with, and
supports the efforts
of others, but
sometimes is not a
good team member.

Rarely listens to,

shares with, and
supports the efforts
of others. Often is
not a good team
player

Contribute to the
overall critical
thinking, problem
solving process
for team project
fulfillment

Routinely provides
useful ideas when
participating in the
group and in individual
discussion. A definite
leader who contributes
a lot of effort

Usually provides
useful ideas when
participating in the
group and in
individual discussion.
A strong group
member who tries
hard!

Sometimes provides
useful ideas when
participating in the
group and in
individual
discussion. A
satisfactory group
member who does
what is required.

Rarely provides
useful ideas when
participating in the
group and in
individual
discussion. May
refuse to
participate.

Manage timely
completion of
personal tasks
contributing to an
effective
streamlined team
project execution

Routinely uses time

well throughout the
project to ensure
things get done on
time. Group does not
have to adjust work
responsibilities
because of members
time wasting

Usually uses time

well throughout the
project, but may
have procrastinated
on one thing. Group
does not have to
adjust work
responsibilities
because of the
members time
wasting.

Tends to
procrastinate, but
always gets things
done by the
deadlines. Group
does not have to
adjust work
responsibilities
because of the
members time
wasting.

Rarely gets things

done by the
deadline and group
has to adjust work
responsibilities
because of the
members
inadequate time
management.

Complete
assigned duties
and provide work
of high quality to
promote
excellent
standards of
overall project
fulfillment

Provides work of the

highest quality with
great credential and
intellectual impact that
directly helps others in
their tasks by
optimizing solutions to
the final fulfillment of
team project.

Provides high quality

work which may help
optimize others tasks
to promote
fulfillment of the
final team project.

Provides work that

occasionally needs
to be
checked/redone by
the other group
members to ensure
quality

Provides work that

usually needs to be
checked/redone by
others to ensure
quality

Participate
regularly in
appointed team
meetings

100% attendance and

on time participation in
team meetings

100% attendance
with some lapses in
on-time participation
in team meetings

Less than 100%

attendance with ontime participation in
team meetings

Less than 100%

attendance with
significant number
of lapses in on-time
participation in
team meetings

Page 8 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
C.2 Mid-Project PIs Assessment
STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

PI_1: Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team environment
1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team
environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team
environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team
environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 9 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

4. Rate yourself for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team

environment

Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

Page 10 of 36

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
PI_2: Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for team
project fulfillment
1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process
for team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process
for team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process
for team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Rate yourself for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for team
project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 11 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for
team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Page 12 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an
effective streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an
effective streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Rate yourself for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an effective
streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Page 13 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
Rate the student for PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an effective
streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

PI_4: Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to promote excellent
standards of overall project fulfillment
1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to
promote excellent standards of overall project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to
promote excellent standards of overall project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to
promote excellent standards of overall project fulfillment
Excellent
Support with comments:
Copyright 2015

Page 14 of 36

Adequate

Minimal

Unsatisfactory

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

4. Rate yourself for the PI Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to promote
excellent standards of overall project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to promote
excellent standards of overall project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________
___
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
Copyright 2015

Page 15 of 36

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
:_______________TERM:_____

PI_5: Participate regularly in appointed team meetings

1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Rate yourself for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings

Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 16 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
How many meetings were scheduled and when?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment:
Team Meetings Attendance Form E

C.3 Completed Project PIs Assessment

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Page 17 of 36

Adequate

Minimal

Unsatisfactory

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team
environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team
environment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 18 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team

environment

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

PI_2: Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for team
project fulfillment
1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process
for team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process
for team project fulfillment
Excellent
Support with comments:

Page 19 of 36

Adequate

Minimal

Unsatisfactory

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for
team project fulfillment
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
Copyright 2015

Page 20 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

PI_3: Manage personal and group tasks related time effectively for a streamlined team
project execution
1. Rate your team member 1 for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an
effective streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an
effective streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an
effective streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Support with comments:

Page 21 of 36

Adequate

Minimal

Unsatisfactory

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an effective
streamlined team project execution
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____
Copyright 2015

Page 22 of 36

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Page 23 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

PI_5: Participate regularly in appointed team meetings

Page 24 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
2. Rate your team member 2 for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate your team member 3 for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Rate yourself for the PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Rate the student for PI Participate regularly in appointed team meetings
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
How many meetings were scheduled and when?
Copyright 2015

Page 25 of 36

Unsatisfactory

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

C.4 Student Teamwork PIs Evaluation

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

1. PI_1: Listen to others in the team and create a supportive team environment

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

STUDE
NT SELF
RATING

STUDENT
SELF
RATING

TEAM
MEMBE
R1
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 1
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R2
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 2
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R3
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 4
RATING OF
STUDENT

FACULT
Y
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

FACULTY
RATING OF
STUDENT

Average1 =

Average2 =

10% weightage

15% weightage

Average3 =
15% weightage

Average4 =
15% weightage

Average5 =
45% weightage

Final score for PI_1 on 5.0 scale = {5/3}

*{(Avg1*10+Avg2*15+Avg3*15+Avg4*15+Avg5*45)/100} =

Page 26 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
2. PI_2: Contribute to the overall critical thinking, problem solving process for team
project fulfillment

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

STUDE
NT SELF
RATING

STUDENT
SELF
RATING

TEAM
MEMBE
R1
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 1
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R2
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 2
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R3
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 4
RATING OF
STUDENT

FACULT
Y
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

FACULTY
RATING OF
STUDENT

Average1 =

Average2 =

10% weightage

15% weightage

Average3 =
15% weightage

Average4 =
15% weightage

Average5 =
45% weightage

Final score for PI_1 on 5.0 scale = {5/3}

*{(Avg1*10+Avg2*15+Avg3*15+Avg4*15+Avg5*45)/100} =

3. PI_3: Manage timely completion of personal tasks contributing to an effective

streamlined team project execution

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

STUDE
NT SELF
RATING

STUDENT
SELF
RATING

TEAM
MEMBE
R1
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 1
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R2
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 2
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R3
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 4
RATING OF
STUDENT

FACULT
Y
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

FACULTY
RATING OF
STUDENT

Average1 =

Average2 =

10% weightage

15% weightage

Average3 =
15% weightage

Average4 =
15% weightage

Average5 =
45% weightage

Final score for PI_1 on 5.0 scale = {5/3}

*{(Avg1*10+Avg2*15+Avg3*15+Avg4*15+Avg5*45)/100} =

Page 27 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
4. PI_4: Complete assigned duties and provide work of high quality to promote
excellent standards of overall project fulfillment

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

STUDE
NT SELF
RATING

STUDENT
SELF
RATING

TEAM
MEMBE
R1
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 1
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R2
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 2
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R3
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 4
RATING OF
STUDENT

FACULT
Y
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

FACULTY
RATING OF
STUDENT

Average1 =

Average2 =

10% weightage

15% weightage

Average3 =
15% weightage

Average4 =
15% weightage

Average5 =
45% weightage

Final score for PI_1 on 5.0 scale = {5/3}

*{(Avg1*10+Avg2*15+Avg3*15+Avg4*15+Avg5*45)/100} =

5. PI_5: Participate regularly in appointed team meetings

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

MID
PROJE
CT

COMPLET
ED
PR0JECT

STUDE
NT SELF
RATING

STUDENT
SELF
RATING

TEAM
MEMBE
R1
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 1
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R2
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 2
RATING OF
STUDENT

TEAM
MEMBE
R3
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

TEAM
MEMBER 4
RATING OF
STUDENT

FACULT
Y
RATING
OF
STUDE
NT

FACULTY
RATING OF
STUDENT

Page 28 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
Average1 =

Average2 =

10% weightage

15% weightage

Average3 =
15% weightage

Average4 =
15% weightage

Average5 =
45% weightage

Final score for PI_1 on 5.0 scale = {5/3}

*{(Avg1*10+Avg2*15+Avg3*15+Avg4*15+Avg5*45)/100} =

Note:
Higher weightage of 20% maybe assigned to project lead evaluations
Project lead self-rating weightage should be just 10%
Weightage may change depending upon number of team member evaluations collected

Page 29 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
D.1 Student Information Reporting Credibility Rubric
PERFORMANC
E INDICATOR

EXCELLENT

ADEQUATE

MINIMAL

UNSATISFACTORY

Report
information
credibly
regarding the
performance,
interaction
and
cooperation of
team
members for
the fulfillment
of team
project

Entirely Candid, clear

and unbiased reporting
of performance,
interaction and
cooperation of team
members for the
fulfillment of team
project. Reporting style
is consistent for
different team
members. Reporting
style is very informative
and can be used for
improvement of team
project fulfilment
objectives.

Mostly Candid, clear

and unbiased
reporting of
performance,
interaction and
cooperation of team
members for the
fulfillment of team
project. Reporting
style is mostly
consistent for
different team
members with some
minor deviations.
Reporting style is
moderately
informative and can
be used for
improvement of team
project fulfilment
objectives

Partly Candid, clear

and unbiased
reporting of
performance,
interaction and
cooperation of team
members for the
fulfillment of team
project. Reporting
style is minimally
consistent for
different team
members with many
deviations. Reporting
style is minimally
informative and can
be used with
reservations for
improvement of
team project
fulfilment objectives

Forged, unclear and

biased reporting of
performance,
interaction and
cooperation of team
members for the
fulfillment of team
project. Reporting
style is inconsistent
for different team
members with major
deviations. Reporting
style totally lacks
information for
improvement of
team project
fulfilment objectives

Attachments:

Teamwork PIs form C.1, C.2 and C.3

Page 30 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

D.2 Student Information Reporting Credibility PI Assessment

PI_6: Report information credibly regarding the performance, interaction and
cooperation of team members for the fulfillment of team project
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

1. Rate whether the student has candid, clear and unbiased reporting of performance, interaction and
cooperation of team members for the fulfillment of team project.
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate whether the student reporting style is consistent for different team members.
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Rate whether the student reporting style is very informative and can be used for improvement of team
project fulfilment objectives
Excellent
Adequate
Minimal
Unsatisfactory
Support with comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 31 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
D.3 Student Information Reporting Credibility Assessment PI Evaluation
PI_6: Report information credibly regarding the performance, interaction and
cooperation of team members for the fulfillment of team project
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

STUDENT NAME
:________________________
STUDENT ID
:____________________________
CLASS/SECTION
:_______________TERM:_____

MEMBER 1:___________________________
MEMBER 2:___________________________
MEMBER 3:___________________________

Student reporting is candid,

Student reporting style is

clear and unbiased reporting

consistent for different team

very informative and can be

of performance, interaction

members

used for improvement of

and cooperation of team

team project fulfilment

members for the fulfillment

objectives

of team project

Score1 =

Score2 =

Score3 =

Average score for PI_0 (5.0 scale) = {5/3}*{(Score1+Score2+Score3)/3} =

Page 32 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
E. Faculty Team Meetings Attendance Form
Class/Section:_____________________________
Team member 1:__________________________

Term:___________
Team member

2:___________________________
Team member 3:__________________________

Team member 4:

__________________________
*
Indicate project lead

Meeting
date and
time
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
Meeting:
Date:
Time:

Team
Member
1

Team
Member
2

Team
Member
3

Team
Member
4

On-time
Late
Absent

Summary of Meeting

FOR FACULTY USE ONLY

Are the team meetings in accordance with the team contract?
Yes
No
Comments:

Page 33 of 36

Wajid Hussain Office of Quality & Accreditation, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - TEAM WORK

F. Faculty Team Work Feedback Form

Group or Individual Feedback Form*:
Group
Individual
Class/Section:_____________________________
Team member 1:__________________________
2:___________________________
Team member 3:__________________________

Term:___________
Team member
Team member 4:

__________________________
*
Indicate project lead

1. Mid-Project Observations
List any areas of weakness or strength.