Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology (SJET)

Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2014; 2(2A):123-127

ISSN 2321-435X (Online)

ISSN 2347-9523 (Print)

Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher

(An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources)
www.saspublisher.com

Research Article
Determination of Scaling and corrosion tendencies of water through the
use of Langelier and Ryznar Indices
Dr. Shankar. B.S
Professor & HOD in Civil Engineering Department, Alliance College of Engineering and Design, Alliance University,
Chikkahagade Cross, Chandapura Anekal main Road, Anekal, Bangalore-560 068, Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding author
Dr. Shankar. B.S
Email:
Abstract: The present study aims to evaluate the Langeliersaturation index and Ryznar stability index for the
groundwaters of K.R.Puram area in Bangalore, India. Thirty groundwater samples were drawn from the area and
subjected to physico-chemical analysis and the analysis results were used to evaluate the two indices. Based on Langelier
index, 26.67% of the samples were found to be scale forming, 13.33% slightly scale forming, 6.67% were slightly
corrosive, 13.33% indicated serious corrosion and 40% intolerable corrosion, while based on Ryznar stability index,
13.33 % of the samples were found to little scale or corrosive,13.33 % indicated significant corrosion ,6.67 % heavy
corrosion and a whopping 66.67% of the samples showed intolerable corrosion.It is very clear that the results of LSI are
reasonably comparable with the RSI values and the samples show the same property more or less with respect to the two
indices.
Keywords: Corrosion, Langelier saturation index,Ryznar stability index, scaling.
INTRODUCTION
While most people in urban cities of
the developing countries have access to piped water,
several others still rely on groundwater for domestic use
[1]. Industrial effluents, if not treated and properly
controlled can pollute ground water [2]. Therefore, the
groundwaters generally have poor quality water in the
affected areas. Depending upon its specific chemistry,
water can promote scaling, corrosion or both. Scaling is
one of the most critical water quality issues in India.
Scale can be formed from a variety of dissolved
chemical species but two reliable indicators are
hardness and alkalinity. Calcium carbonate is the most
common form of scale deposition attributable to ground
water used in residential geothermal heat pump (GHP)
systems. Two indices commonly used in the water
treatment industry to evaluate the nature of a water
source are the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI or
Saturation index) and the Ryznar Stability Index (RSI
or Stability index). In both cases these indices are based
upon a calculated pH of saturation for calcium
carbonate (pHs). The pHs value is then used in
conjunction with the waters actual pH to calculate the
value of the index as follows:
LSI = pH - pHs
RSI = 2pHs - pH
Calcium carbonate saturation index (Langelier
index) is commonly used to evaluate the scale forming

and scale dissolving tendencies of water [3, 4].

Assessment of these tendencies is useful in corrosion
control programme and in preventing calcium carbonate
scaling in piping systems and equipments such as
industrial heat exchanger or domestic water heater [5].
In the recent past, works on similar lines have
been carried out [6-7]. Evaluation of the saturation
index is as indicated in Table 1. The Ryznar stability
index (Table 2) produces a slightly different value
numerically but is interpreted in a similar fashion.
Langelier Saturation Index
The Langelier Saturation index (LSI) is an
equilibrium model derived from the theoretical concept
of saturation and provides an indicator of the degree of
saturation of water with respect to calcium carbonate. It
can be shown that the Langelier saturation index
approximates the base 10 logarithm of the calcite
saturation level. The Langelier saturation level
approaches the concept of saturation using pH as a main
variable. Thus, the LSI can be interpreted as the pH
change required to bring water to equilibrium.
Water with a Langelier saturation index of 1.0
is one pH unit above saturation. Reducing the pH by 1
unit will bring the water into equilibrium. This occurs
because the portion of total alkalinity present as CO32
decreases as the pH decreases, according to the
123

Shankar BS., Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2014; 2(2A):123-127

equilibria describing the dissociation of carbonic acid:
The equation developed by Langelier
expresses the effects of pH, calcium, total alkalinity,
dissolved solids and temperature as they relate to the
solubility of calcium carbonate for waters in the 6.5 9.5 pH range [8]. The equation is written as: pHs =
(pK2 - pKs) + pCa + pAlk.
The left side of the equation represents the pH
at which water with given calcium content and
alkalinity is in equilibrium with calcium carbonate. The
terms K2 and Ks symbolize the second dissociation
constant and the solubility product constant for calcium
carbonate, respectively. These terms are functions of
temperature and total mineral content. Their values for
any given condition can be computed from the known
thermodynamic constants. Both the calcium and the
alkalinity terms are the negativelogarithms of their
respective concentrations. The calcium content is molar,
while the alkalinity is an equivalent concentration. That
is, it is the titratable equivalence of alkaline base per
litre.
The algebraic difference between the actual pH
of a sample of water and its computed pHs is called the
Calcium Carbonate Saturation Index. Hence, Saturation
Index equals pH minus pHs.
Langelier Index (LSI) = pH - pHs
Calculation of the value for pHs can be done
using the nomograph [8, 9] or through the use of the
following equation
pHs = (9.3 + A + B) - (C + D) [10] Where: A = [log
(TDS) -1)/10], TDS in ppm

B = [-13.12 log (T + 273)) + 34.55],

Temperature, T in oC,
C = [log (calcium hardness) - 0.4], Ca hardness
in ppm (as CaCO3)
D = log (alkalinity), alkalinity in ppm as
(CaCO3)
It is apparent that the temperature at which the
calculation is made has considerable impact upon the
results. This index is a qualitative indication of the
tendency of calcium carbonate to deposit or dissolve. If
the index is positive, calcium carbonate tends to
deposit. If it is negative, calcium carbonate tends to
dissolve. If it is zero, the water is at equilibrium. The
LSI was not intended as an indicator of corrosivity
towards mild steel or other metals of construction. The
LSI describes only the corrosivity of water towards an
existing calcium carbonate scale or other calcium
carbonate bearing structure. The LSI does describe the
tendency of water to dissolve (corrode) calcite scale. It
has also been used to control the corrosion of asbestosconcrete-board (ACB) fill which uses calcium
carbonate as part of the binder. But the interpretation of
corrosivity towards metals is not explicit in the LSI.
Ryznar Stability index The Ryznar Stability
index (RSI) is an empirical method for predicting
scaling tendencies of water based on a study of
operating results with water of various saturation
indices. Stability index = 2pHs - pH = pHs - Langelier's
Saturation pH
This index is often used in combination with
the Langelier index to improve the accuracy in
predicting the scaling or corrosion tendencies of water.

Table 1: Interpretation of the Langelier Saturation Index

Langelier saturation index
Tendency of water
LSI <- 2
Intolerable corrosion
-2.0 <LSI < -0.5
Serious corrosion
-0.5 <LSI < 0
Slightly corrosive but non-scale forming
LSI = 0
Balanced but pitting
Corrosion
possible
0 < LSI < 0.5
Slightly scale
forming and corrosive
0.5 < LSI < 2
Scale forming but non corrosive
Table 2: Interpretation of Ryznar Stability Index
Ryznar Stability Index
Tendency of water
RSI 4.0 5.0
Heavy scale
Light scale
RSI 5.0 6.0
Little scale or corrosion
RSI 6.0 7.0
Corrosion significant
RSI 7.0 7.5
Heavy corrosion
RSI 7.5 9.0
Intolerable corrosion
RSI >9.0

124

Shankar BS., Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2014; 2(2A):123-127

Details of the study area
The K.R.Puram industrial area, is located at a
distance of about 20kms from the city and covered in
part of the Survey of India toposheet No. 57 G/12.This
is one of the oldest industrial areas in Karnataka State,
spread over an area of 44 sqkm with over 800 industries
of all sizes and types and a population of 2.8 lakhs.
Drinking water shortage is said to be the bane of
K.R.Puram area. While Cauvery water supply pipelines
from the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board
(BWSSB) are still being laid, many a deadline for
completing the same have elapsed. As a result, the 286
borewells and 50 hand pumps meet the larger part of the
City Municipal Corporation (CMC)s water supply
needs. A certain part of the needs is met through bulk
purchase from the BWSSB. As for sanitation,

soak/percolation pits are still the order of the day

resulting in groundwater contamination from the
community as well as effluent disposal from the
industries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty water samples were collected from the
groundwaters (borewells, open wells and hand pumps)
in and around the area, in two litre PVC containers,
sealed and were analyzed for 20 major physicochemical parameters in the lab. Figure 1 shows the
location map of study area with the sampling stations.
The chemical characteristics including metals were
determined as per the Standard methods for
examination of water and wastewater of American
Public Health Association [11].

Figure 1: GIS map of K.R.Puram area showing the sampling locations

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The groundwater samples were analysed for 20
physico-chemical parameters. However table 3 presents
the analysis data for only those parameters which are
required for calculating the two indices. From the
analysis, based on Langelier index, it is seen that 26.67
% of the samples are found to be scale forming, 13.33%
slightly scale forming, 40 % showing intolerable

corrosion, 13.33% showing serious corrosion and

6.67% slightly corrosive, while based on Ryznar
stability index, none of the samples are found to be
heavy scaling in nature, 13.33% little scale or slightly
corrosive, 13.33% indicating significant corrosion and
6.67% heavy corrosion. An alarming 66.67% of the
samples are found to be of intolerable corrosion.
According to LSI,most of the samples exhibiting scale
125

Shankar BS., Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2014; 2(2A):123-127

forming tendency have a pH on the alkaline side (pH
>7) .It is very clear that the results of LSI reasonably
comparable with the RSI values and the samples show
the same property more or less with respect to the two
indices. From the view point of corrosion, it is seen that
the groundwaters exhibiting corrosive / significant
corrosive property are the ones which are on the acidic
side (pH <7). Based on LSI, nearly 73.33 % of the
samples are corrosive, while the RSI values indicate
that nearly 87% of the samples exhibit significant to
heavy corrosion. The correlation of pH and LSI

presented in fig 2, indicate clearly that alkaline waters

are scale forming and acidic waters corrosive in nature.
Waters with high corrosive property cannot be
transported in metallic pipes and non-corrosive PVC
pipes may have to be used. Thus, both the scaling as
well as corrosive nature of groundwater render them
unfit for regular domestic use, unless otherwise
properly treated, and it thus becomes highly imperative
for the civic authorities to pay due attention to this and
reduce the adverse effects that may be caused.

Table 3 : Results of physic-chemical analysis of samples along with their saturation indices
Sample number
Calcium
TDS,
Alkalinity,
Temperature,
hardness,
0C
LSI
pH
mg/L as
mg/L
mg/L
CaCo3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

8.21
7.20
8.05
7.95
8.23
6.95
8.25
7.35
8.05
7.45
6.50
6.56
7.95
6.26
7.52
7.67
7.22
8.43
7.53
7.56
7.69
8.23
8.05
6.52
7.31
6.89
6.11
7.91
6.93
7.23

125
226
394
225
548
145
183
207
639
117
1060
195
510
328
382
405
440
163
227
127
620
95
137
699
333
258
393
180
100
187

500
650
1085
765
1510
765
725
1095
2150
510
2545
760
1070
1695
1840
1295
1490
515
1780
440
2340
365
535
1930
1095
1010
1220
620
340
690

208
140
287
141
266
327
146
294
431
211
246
247
139
320
440
278
390
248
280
191
237
154
82
193
200
186
330
229
172
139

25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

0.45
-3.10
0.88
-3.07
0.92
-25.8
0.57
-0.53
0.96
-4.38
-4.01
-29.44
-0.84
13.51
0.19
-0.18
0.35
0.54
-1.44
-4.38
0.15
-0.05
0.08
-7.98
-1.21
-25.33
-8.75
-2.11
-82.88
-3.26

RSI

7.31
13.40
6.29
14.09
6.39
58.55
7.11
8.41
6.13
16.21
14.52
65.44
9.63
33.28
7.14
8.03
6.52
7.35
10.41
16.32
7.39
8.33
7.89
22.48
9.73
57.55
23.61
12.13
172.69
13.75

126

Shankar BS., Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2014; 2(2A):123-127

2.00
1.50

LSI

1.00
0.50
0.00
6.40
-0.50

6.90

7.40

7.90

8.40

-1.00
-1.50
pH

Figure 2: Correlation of pH and Langelier saturation index for the groundwaters of K.R.Puram area
Acknowledgements
The author is extremely grateful to Dr.
MadhukarAngur, Chancellor, Alliance University,
Bangalore, for his perpetual support, encouragement
and inspiration along with the excellent
library
facilities provided to the author during the course of this
work.
REFERENCES
1. Phiri O, Mumba P, Moyo BHZ , Kadewa W ;
Assessment of the impact of industrial effluents on
water quality of receiving rivers in urban areas of
Malawi. International Journal of Environmental
Science and Technology, 2005; 2 (3): 237- 244.
2. Olayinka KO; Studies on industrial pollution in
Nigeria: The effect of textile effluents on the
quality of groundwater in some parts of Lagos.
Nigerian Journal of Health and Biomedical
Sciences, 2004; 3(1): 44-50.
3. Mahadev J, Hosamani SP; Langelier saturation
index and its relation to phytoplankton in two lakes
of Mysore city. Nature Environment and Pollution
Technology Journal, 2002; 1(1): 19-20.
4. Kanchan GBA, Anantha Murthy KS ,Anand R;
Langelier saturation index for thegroundwaters of
Bangalore city. Nature Environment and Pollution
Technology Journal, 2002; 1(4): 415- 417.

5.

Meenakumari HR, Hosamani SP; Corrosive and

scale forming properties of groundwater of Mysore
city, India. Indian Journal of Environmental
Toxicology, 2002; 12(2): 73-75.
6. Adak DM, K.M.Purohit; Status of surface and
groundwater quality of Mandiakudar- part 1:
Physico-chemical parameters. Pollution Research,
2001; 20 :103-110.
7. Indirabai WPS, George S; Assessment of drinking
water quality in selected areas of Tiruchanapalli
town after floods. Pollution Research, 2002, 21:
209-214.
8. Carrier Air Conditioning Company; Handbook of
Air Conditioning System Design.McGraw-Hill
Books, New York, 1965.
9. ASHRAE, Corrosion Control and Water
Treatment, Handbook of HVAC- Applications,
American Society of heating refrigeration and Air
conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, 1995.
10. Edstrom Industries; Citing online sources: Scale
Forming
Tendency
of
Water.http://www.edstrom.com/lab/bulletins/mi
4710.thm, 1998.
11. APHA; Standard methods for the examination of
water and wastewater, twentieth edition, American
Public and Health Association, Washington D.C,
USA, 2002.

127