Ethyl Acetate Kinetics 2011
Ethyl Acetate Kinetics 2011
Ethyl Acetate Kinetics 2011
Saponification of Ethyl
Acetate Using an Innovative
Conductivity-Monitoring
Instrument with a Pulsating
Sensor
KUHELI DAS, P. SAHOO, M. SAI BABA, N. MURALI, P. SWAMINATHAN
Electronics and Instrumentation Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam 603 102, India
Received 24 February 2010; revised 16 June 2011; accepted 3 July 2011
DOI 10.1002/kin.20597
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
INTRODUCTION
In our laboratory, we have taken up a project to study
the effect of temperature on oscillatory chemical reactions using our in housebuilt pulsating sensors. The
primary objective of this activity is to develop a suitable methodology to use the oscillatory reaction as a
platform for rapid chemical assay. Before augmenting
the pulsating sensor to study the kinetics of the oscillatory reaction, we preferred to study the kinetics
of a well-known nonoscillatory reaction using a pulsating sensor to verify the reliability of our measurement technique for kinetic investigation of an unknown
system. Hence, we chose one of the most popular
DAS ET AL.
PRINCIPLE OF CONDUCTIVITY
MEASUREMENT
For the kinetic study using a conductometric measurement approach, a high-performance (high precision,
high sensitivity, and very fast response) conductivity
meter is the best choice. Fortunately, in our laboratory, such type of a conductivity-monitoring unit has
already been developed and is used for many miscellaneous applications [1518]. The working principle and
the design of this conductivity meter are entirely different from the conventional conductivity monitoring
instruments available in the market. The conductivity
meter is designed in such a way that the conductivity
cell forms a part of a specially designed logic gate oscillator (LGO) circuit. Once the cell is disconnected
from the rest of the electronics, it will not act as an
oscillator. This conductivity sensor is operated at 5 V
DC with very low power consumption. When it is powered, the oscillator oscillates between two logic states
(max: 1, min: 0). The output of the sensor is a train
of rectangular pulses of 5-V amplitude from which the
pulse frequency can be determined. The frequency of
the LGO changes with the change in the ionic conductivity of the solution taken in the cell. This frequency is
directly related to the conductivity of the solution. Prior
to the deployment of a conductivity probe for a particular application, it is calibrated using a series of standard
KCl solutions to establish a relationship between frequency and conductivity of solution following a multipoint calibration technique developed in-house. From
the calibration plot, a polynomial equation (either in
second degree or in third degree) is generated, the coefficients of which are loaded in the software to give
a direct display of conductivity during measurement.
In the present case, the instrument is designed in such
a way that with a change in the conductivity of the
solution by 1 S cm1 , there is a change of about
20 Hz in pulse frequency. Even in some specific applications such as online radiation dosimetry, assay of
boron in heavy water, and assay of the heavy water
content in a mixture of light water and heavy water,
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics
DOI 10.1002/kin
EXPERIMENTAL
Chemicals
All chemicals used for this work are of AR grade.
The stock solutions of NaOH (1 M) and glacial
acetic acid (1 M) were prepared using high-purity
distilled water (Millipore water conductivity less than
1 S cm1 ), whereas ethyl acetate (Fisher Scientific,
Mumbai, India; Qualigen, Mumbai, India; density:
0.898 g cm3 ) was directly used as stock solution.
Stock solution of NaOH was standardized against
freshly prepared standard oxalic acid. All working
standards used in this work were freshly prepared before continuing the experimental campaign.
DOI 10.1002/kin
Experimental Setup
Initial kinetic studies were conducted at room temperature to determine the order of the reaction in saponification of ester. A fixed volume of desired solution was
taken in a beaker in which the conductivity probe was
mounted vertically. A commercially available magnetic stirrer was used to mix the solution homogeneously. A series of experiments were conducted at
prevailing solution temperature to determine the order
of the reaction.
Further experiments were carried out at desired solution temperatures with the goal of determining the
rate constant of the reaction at different temperatures.
An experimental facility was designed and made in our
laboratory to carry out the experiments at a fixed solution temperature. A high-precision constant temperature bath (Siskin Julabo VPC, which could maintain
temperature of 0.1 C) was used for this application.
A microcontroller-based vertical-type stirrer using a dc
stepper motor was made in-house. Arrangement was
made to mount a beaker holder in the temperature bath.
The reaction vessel containing solution was placed inside it. The vertical stirrer was fixed in the reaction
vessel to mix the solution homogeneously throughout
the experiment. The conductivity probe was also vertically placed in the solution to monitor the conductivity
of solution during the experiment. Figure 1 shows a
schematic diagram of experimental setup.
Methodology
Twenty-five milliliter of distilled water was taken
in the reaction vessel and kept in the constant
DAS ET AL.
Figure 1 Experimental setup for the kinetic study (1: conductivity probe; 2: logic gate oscillator; 3: vertical stirrer;
4: reaction vessel; 5: speed control unit; 6: reaction vessel
holder; and 7: temperature bath).
Figure 2 Demonstration of response time of the pulsatingtype conductivity-monitoring instrument (t1 : time in seconds
when the reagent was added; t2 : time in seconds corresponding to 63% of an increase in signal).
DOI 10.1002/kin
It is well known from the literature that the saponification of ethyl acetate in the presence of a strong
base (NaOH) is a second-order reaction, in which both
the reactants are consumed to form sodium acetate and
ethyl alcohol.
CH3 COOC2 H5 + NaOH CH3 COONa + C2 H5 OH
In the present work, the concentration of each reactant in the bath has been taken as equimolar to avoid
the system to turn into an exponential decay after a
long time. With the progress of the reaction, highly
conducting OH ions (equivalent ionic conductance,
0OH -: 199.2 S cm2 gequiv1 [20]) in the solution were
replaced by an identical number of less conducting
acetate ions ( CH3COO -: 41 S cm2 gequiv1 [20]), resulting in a continuous decrease in conductivity of solution. From the onset of reaction, the decrease in conductivity was continuously monitored online using a
high-performance laboratory-made pulsating conductivity meter. Figure 4 shows an online graphic view of
conductivity with respect to time during the saponification reaction conducted at a constant temperature.
Such a smooth online plot was generated due to fast
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics
DOI 10.1002/kin
DAS ET AL.
Table I Data for the Computation of Rate Constant in the Saponification Reaction at a Constant Temperature
Time, t (s)
0
100.3
200.7
300.2
400.5
500.9
600.4
700.7
800.2
900.6
1001
Specific Conductance,
soln. (S/cm)
Specific Conductance
(Corrected), t (S/cm)
(0 t ) = A
(t ) = B
A/B
721.6
678.9
646.9
619.8
599.4
582.5
567.8
554.9
545.2
535.4
526.1
720.2
677.5
645.5
618.4
598.0
581.1
566.4
553.5
543.8
534.0
524.7
0
42.7
74.7
101.8
122.2
139.1
153.8
166.7
176.4
186.2
195.5
438.1
395.4
363.4
336.3
315.9
299.0
284.3
271.4
261.7
251.9
242.6
0
0.11
0.21
0.30
0.39
0.47
0.54
0.61
0.67
0.74
0.81
DOI 10.1002/kin
3.11e04 2.80e06
5.11e04 5.62e06
5.38e04 5.16e06
6.66e04 5.86e06
8.40e04 9.41e06
1.16e03 1.28e05
Temperature, T (K)
303
311.7
313.3
317.5
323
328.5
a
et al. [8], Jensen et al. [7], and Warder [14]. The value
reported by Smith et al. [4] is about 30% lower than
our value. They also reported a very high value of
activation energy (61.4 kJ mol1 ) [4] with respect to
the value reported in this work. Such a large deviation
in the values on the rate constant as well as activation
energy can be attributed to errors associated with a volumetric titration technique by withdrawal of aliquots of
the sample at a periodic interval (off-line techniques).
Recently, Schneider and Stoessel [9] used the commercial microcalorimeter integrated with a microreactor for kinetic investigation in the flowing system. In
their study, they used 0.8 M ethyl acetate and 1.0 M
NaOH and conducted the experiments at five different
temperatures ranging form 30 to 70 C. They obtained
the value of activation energy, 46.5 kJ mole1 , which
was about 10% higher than the present value. The authors have taken a number of precautions, such as (i)
good mass transfer using a small radius of microchannel, (ii) homogeneous mixing of reactants by designing
the microreactor as a plug-flow reactor for a continuous operation at steady state, and (iii) selection of a
calorimeter with high thermal sensitivity to carry out
the experiment. The measurement is based on the heat
Activation Energy
(kJ mol1 )
Activation Enthalpy
(kJ mol1 )
Activation Entropy
(J mol1 K1 )
G(298 K)
(kJ mol1 )
42.1
40.7
41.5
40.8
41.8
41.2
42.0
39.1
38.1
38.1
38.2
39.1
38.5
39.3
131.1
128.5
133.2
131.3
130.9
131.9
130.3
78.2
76.4
77.8
77.3
78.2
77.8
78.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DOI 10.1002/kin
DAS ET AL.
Rate Constants
at 30 C (L mol1 s)
Activation Energy
(kJ mol1 )
Technique
Adopted
0.11
0.15
0.16a
0.19a
0.14
0.16
61.4
48.4
46.1
41.4
Volumetric titration
High-frequency titrimetry
Conductivity measurement
Microcalorimetry
CONCLUSION
Pulsating sensors developed at the Innovative Instrumentation Section (of the Electronics and Instrumentation Group) have already been deployed in many
miscellaneous laboratory and field applications. With
this new approach of conductivity measurement, it was
possible to demonstrate the determination of the rate
constant of a well-known system at different temperatures with high degree of precision in a much simpler
way. This precise determination of the rate constant
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Glasstone, S. Textbook of Physical Chemistry, 2nd ed.;
McMillan: New Delhi, India, 1984; p. 1058.
2. Kapoor, K. L. A Textbook of Physical Chemistry;
McMillan: New Delhi, India, 2004; Vol. 5, p. 116.
3. Daniels, F.; Matthews, J.; Williams, J. Experimental
Physical Chemistry; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1941;
pp. 167169.
4. Smith, H. A.; Levenson, H. S. J Am Chem Soc 1939,
61, 11721175.
5. Walker, J. Proc R Soc A (London) 1906, 78, 157.
6. Stead, B.; Page, F. M.; Denbigh, K. G. Discuss Faraday
Soc 1947, 2, 263.
7. Jensen, F. W.; Watson, G. M.; Beckham, J. B. Anal Chem
1951, 23, 17701773.
8. Tsujikawa, H.; Inoue, H. Bull Chem Soc Japan 1966,
39, 18371842.
9. Schneider, M. A.; Stoessel, F. Chem Eng J 2005, 115,
7383.
10. Shui-yuan, S.; Xiang-rong, L.; Li-xia, P.; Lu-yao, M.
Xian Keji Xueyuan Xuebao 2004, 24, 196198.
11. Ge-li, K.; Wan-ying, H.; Li-li, M. Jinan Daxue Xuebao,
Ziran Kexueban (Jinan, China) 2007, 21, 361364.
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics
DOI 10.1002/kin
DOI 10.1002/kin