Bassai Sampler
Bassai Sampler
Bassai Sampler
Masters Series
Bassai
This Book
The purpose of this document is to remind practitioners of the Bassai kata and how to get
the best from them. No publication can teach a kata and its applications; this can only be
done by a qualified instructor in a time set aside for tuition.
This document can help to jog the memory and provide inspiration for further study of one of the greatest exercises in karate.
The Bassai kata is one of the most prevalent in martial arts. It
occurs in many different styles with only slight differences.
This in itself shows a common root to the traditions which
share Bassai. Known variously as Patsai, Passai, Bassai Dai,
or other variations, this kata can be seen in Taekwondo, Shito
Ryu, Goju Ryu, Kyokushinkai, Wado Ryu, and many other
styles of karate. Different Sokes have placed the emphasis
on different techniques, but truthfully, they are all Bassai.
The version shown within heralds from Shotokan, nominally
the style of Funakoshi Gichin, credited by many as the father
of modern karate-do. Certainly, many movements within
Shotokan have become homogenised and made safe for
practice by school children. This does not mean that the old,
dangerous techniques are removed, just that their applications
have merely been overlooked in favour of simplistic
explanations and hidden in order to favour the aesthetic
required for competition.
The writing shown here is the Kanji for Bassai Dai. Originally
it would have been written differently, but Funakoshi chose to
write it in Japanese (which was a foreign language to him).
The term is made up of three characters:
the last one is Dai, meaning the greater part, major (as
opposed to minor), or great (as in Great Britain).
The first character is Batsu, meaning to extract or re- Bassai Dai, written with
move.
Japanese Calligraphy
The second character is Sai which is usually translated as Fortress but more likely means obstacle or blockage.
The usual given translation in the west is To Storm a Fortress, Major Version. We
might think of it more literally as the major way of removing obstacles.
The tate shutouke which seems to precede a punch which is then followed by a block
makes a mockery of the idea that kata would decisively end a conflict.
Firstly, the distance is clearly incorrect for the attacker to attack. This punch did not have
to be blocked.
If you hit someone then why do you need to subsequently block their next attack? Did
you fail to hit them properly? This is, of course possible, but not something that the masters of old would codify for us to remember as a core article of their teaching. Yes, if you
fail to end the confrontation with one defence/retaliation then you must be prepared to
continue; but this isnt a good reason for moves like this in kata. Students should practice
for success, not failure.
This combination ignores the starting position of the hands placed at the hip. This ready
position is apparently redundant. Why keep it then? (Answers over the page.)
If the attacker is able to attack again (necessitating your subsequent block) then why
doesnt he just hit you again? If your blows are this ineffective why arent you presented
with an alternative strike which might do better (and not lead to you having to block fur61
3) Though often overlooked, the starting cup and saucer position is actually an effective defence all on
its own!
62
95