Physical and Mechanical Properties of Mango PDF
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Mango PDF
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
a,*
Agriculture Structure and Process Engineering Division, Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology,
PO-PAU, Ludhiana 141 004, India
b
Horticulture Crop Processing Division, CIPHET, Abohar 152 116, Punjab, India
Received 15 March 2004; accepted 8 November 2004
Available online 25 December 2004
Abstract
The measurement of maturity is of paramount importance to harvest good quality mango. Changes in size, sphericity, total soluble solids (TSS) content, surface color and rmness of mango were studied during growth and storage at ambient temperature. Size
and sphericity were measured using the standard methods. Surface color was determined using a HunterLab colorimeter and the
rmness by texture analyzer. The size of the fruits increased gradually during growth and the sphericity remained in the range of
0.670.70. Size and sphericity decreased due to shrinkage during storage. The rmness of the fruits remained almost constant over
the period of growth and it decreased after attaining the maturity, whereas yellowness of fruits increased during both growth and
storage. Maturity of mango could be predicted by measuring size, color and rmness.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Color values; Firmness; Maturity; Size; Sphericity; Total soluble solids
1. Introduction
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is an important tropical
fruit having heavy demand in world market. It is consumed both as fresh and in processed form. The storage
life of the mango depends on the stage of maturity at
which the fruit is harvested. Mango fruits are generally
harvested at physiologically matured stage to get optimum fruit quality. Immature fruits display erratic ripening behaviour, may not develop full avour and aroma,
which ultimately leads to their rejection. Usually harvesting is initiated when a few mango fruits on the tree
begin to ripen and fall (Kalra, Tandon, & Singh,
1995). The chemical or physiological determination of
maturity involves very laborious laboratory techniques.
Corresponding author. Tel.: + 91 161 257 2039; fax: +91 161 280
8670.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S.N. Jha).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.020
74
2.2. Experimentation
3. Results and discussion
1=3
2.2.2. Color
The color of mangoes in terms of L, a, b values was
determined using HunterLab miniScan XE Plus colourimeter (HAL, USA, Model 45/0-L). L denotes the lightness or darkness, a, green or red and b, blue or yellow
color of the samples. The nose cone was positioned in
the surface of the mango such that the light thrown by
the colourimeter is not leaked. The color was measured
in four places of each sample and average values were
recorded for the study. Before measuring, the colourimeter was standardized with black and white calibration
tiles provided with the instrument.
2.2.3. Firmness
Change in rmness during the period of maturity and
storage was measured using the texture analyzer
(TA-Hdi, Stable Micro systems, UK) with the 2 mm
75
Size, mm
70
65
60
0
48
96
144 216 264 312 384 432 480 552 600 648 720 768
Harvesting period, h
75
First batch
second batch
TSS, Brix
20
Sphericity
0.70
0.68
15
10
5
0
0
0.66
72
120
168
240
288
Storage period, h
48
96
144 216 264 312 384 432 480 552 600 648 720 768
Harvesting period, h
First batch
Second batch
Size, mm
75
70
65
60
55
0
72
120
168
240
288
Storage period, h
First batch
Sphericity
Second batch
0.70
0.68
0.66
0.64
0.62
0.60
3.3. Color
0
72
120
168
240
288
Storage period, h
50
15
Color values
13
TSS, Brix
The TSS content of stored fruits (Fig. 6) generally increased due to ripening (up to 19.73 Brix), but at the
end of storage period it decreased slightly and remained
around 15 Brix. Decrease in TSS may be due to excessive ripening and then rotting of mango during storage.
The mangoes harvested at or above 8 Brix showed better shelf life and maintained the quality. So, 552 h from
the rst day of harvest may be taken as suitable time of
harvest when majority of mangoes have attained full
maturity. No signicant dierence was noticed in the
TSS content of both batches of stored mangoes (Fig.
6) except that increase in TSS of second batch was almost linear, which is due to the fact that it was harvested
late when majority of mangoes were matured and thus
ripening was gradual and smooth.
11
9
40
30
20
10
-10
5
0
48
96
144 216 264 312 384 432 480 552 600 648 720 768
Harvesting period, h
48
96 144 216 264 312 384 432 480 552 600 648 720 768
Harvesting period, h
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
L
a
b
72
(a)
120
168
240
288
Storage period, h
Firmness, N
Color values
76
second batch
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
Color values
72
120
168
240
288
Storage period, h
60
40
20
-20
0
48
(b)
120
168
240
288
Storage period
4. Conclusions
Zero harvesting time on 6/6/03
Firmness, N
36
32
28
24
20
0
48
96
144 216 264 312 384 432 480 552 600 648 720 768
Harvesting period, h
References
Jha, S. N., & Matsuoka, T. (2000). Non-destructive techniques for
quality evaluation of intact fruits and vegetables. Food Science and
Technology Research, 6(4), 248251.
Jha, S. N., & Matsuoka, T. (2002). Surface stiness and density of
eggplant during storage. Journal of Food Engineering, 54, 2326.
Kalra, S. K., Tandon, D. K., & Singh, B. P. (1995). In D. K. Salunkhe
& S. S. Kadam (Eds.), Handbook of Fruit Science and Technology:
Production, Composition, Storage and Processing (pp. 123170).
New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Mohsenin, N. N. (1980). Physical properties of plant and animal
materials. New York: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
Rameshwar, A. (1993). In K. L. Chadha & O. P. Pareek (Eds.).
Advances in horticulturefruit crops (Vol. 4, pp. 16611702). New
Delhi: Malhotra Publishing House.