New Methodology For Scaling Hydrodynamic Data From A 2D - Uidized Bed
New Methodology For Scaling Hydrodynamic Data From A 2D - Uidized Bed
New Methodology For Scaling Hydrodynamic Data From A 2D - Uidized Bed
www.elsevier.com/locate/ces
Abstract
We present a new method of scaling hydrodynamic data obtained from a 2D gassolid uidized bed, establishing links between 2D and
3D geometries. The methodology proposed may also be useful for verifying 3D3D dynamic scaling. According to the chaos scale-up
methodology proposed by Van den Bleek and Schouten [1993. Chemical Engineering Science 48, 23672373], the information balance is
taken into account. The complexity shown by these systems is measured as the Kolmogorov entropy. Fluidized beds of different geometry
(2D, 3D) performing under the bubbling regime were operated at different bed height and bed aspect ratios by uidizing several particle
groups belonging to Geldart groups B and D. Finally, an empirical correlation is proposed to compare uidized bed hydrodynamics. This
correlation relates the global information ow of the system KG = KF r r to the relative Reynolds particle number.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Fluidization; Scale-up; Multiphase ow; Non-linear dynamics; 2D dynamic scaling; Free surface uctuation
1. Introduction
Gassolid uidized bed systems are widely used for industrial processes. They can be used as reactors in processes
such as the catalytic production of vinyl acetate, polymerization of olens, etc., and may also serve a physical function
in drying and coating particles. However, the complexity
of their hydrodynamics makes the scale-up of these systems difcult, to the extent that many research efforts have
focused on scaling and modeling gassolid uidized beds
(Glicksman, 1984; Matsen, 1996; Moses, 1996; Glicksman
et al., 1994; Glicksman and Yule, 1995; Levenspiel, 2002).
Moreover, since the non-linear hydrodynamic behavior of
uidized beds may be of a chaotic nature, in this past decade
or so, some authors (Van den Bleek and Schouten, 1993;
Schouten et al., 1996, 1999) have tried to develop a chaos
scale-up methodology. This type of method needs to take
Corresponding author.
5152
2. Similarity theory
Table 1
Scaling parameters
Dimensionless
parameters
Author
f s dp3 f U0 dp
H
U0
,
,
, s,
, , etc.
f
2f
(gd p )0.5 f D
C1 =
U0 Umf
(gD)0.5
, C2 =
Umf
(gD)0.5
(U0 Umf )dp f
U0 Umf
KG = K F r r m = K
m, Rer =
0.5
f
(gd p )
5153
60
2
40
1
0
25
50
f [Hz]
0.1
-1/
K [bits/s]
Log[E]
10
20
0.01
Exponential region
E~e-f/
potential region
E~f
0.001
3D1
3D2
3D3
2D1
2D2
2D3
0
0
10
20
30
f[Hz]
40
50
60
5154
K'
[bit/s]
Rer
Fr'r
Yes
KG = KFrr
KG = m0.5 KG' ?
No
K
[bit/s]
Rer
Fr'r
Dynamic
similarity
KG = KFrr [bits/s]
Rer
As indicated in Table 1, the need to compare the two systems on a similar length scale means that although mesoscale effects of bubbles would probably be better accounted
for by db , the need to estimate db for 3D systems led us to
nally use dp as a representative length to dene F r r . Further, the well-known particle size effect on uidization quality and thus on the macrostructure of ow supports the use of
dp . Thus, F r r measures the balance between inertia to gravity forces in the system, responsible for ow macrostructure
irrespective of column design.
To diminish the relative inuence of column design on
the Kolmogorov entropy value, the Froude number relative
to the excess gas ow, F r r dened in Table 1 will be used
as a geometric factor by its product to K.
Now, the overall information ow of the system, KG , can
be dened as
KG = K F r r .
(1)
1000
(3)
Now, when we examine the relationship KG vs the operating conditions (Rer ) for a set of uidized beds of different
geometry operating with the solid group 1 in Table 2, the
loglog plot of KG vs Rer , (Fig. 4) shows how, in this case,
the dynamics of the 2D and 3D systems are characterized
Table 2
Properties of the uidized bed material
Group no.
d p (m)
p (kg/m3 )
Geldart group
1
2
3
4
229
458
647
772
2650
2650
2650
2650
B
B
D
D
0.03
0.11
0.18
0.21
3D 2D
2D
Log (KGm0.5)
KG1 =
5155
100
3D 2D
T1 L/D = 1.4
B2 L = 6
B2 L = 7
B2 L = 8
B2 L = 9
10
B2 L = 10
1
0.1
1
Log Rer
10
6. Experimental
6.1. Fluidized beds and experimental conditions
The experimental time series were collected from a set
of 2D and 3D uidized beds. The 2D systems (B1, B2)
were 1 and 2 cm wide, respectively, and the 3D uidized
beds (T1, T2) had internal diameters of 5.38 and 8.38 cm,
respectively. The beds were operated with a porous plate
distributor. They were lled to varying bed heights (from
4 to 9 cm for the 2D systems) and bed aspect ratios (from
0.7 to 2 for the 3D systems). The solid group was uidized
with air (atmospheric conditions) at relative gas velocities
ranging from 1.3 < Ur < 2.7.
Once the steady state is achieved, time series are obtained
by measuring the uctuations of the free bed surface. These
are measured when a laser sheet previously focused using
an ORIEL 12743 convergent lens, perpendicularly crosses
the bed, interacting with the bed top particles. The output
signal obtained from laserparticle interactions is collected
by a photodiode PSD, 4 cm in height, and is later amplied
before A/D conversion in the PC controlled by a software
package supplied by Monocrom S.A. (Barcelona, Spain).
The sample frequency used was 175 Hz and a low-pass
lter with a cut-off frequency of 60 Hz was simultaneously
applied over the signal, satisfying Nyquist criteria to avoid
possible aliasing problems. The length of the experimental
time series was 42 000 points (4 min). The time series was
divided into four blocks of 10 500 points before state space
1000
3D - 2D
2D
Log (KGm0.5)
5156
100
T1 L/D = 0.7
3D
B1 L = 4
10
B1 L = 5
2D
B1 L = 6
B1 L = 7
B1 L = 8
1
0.1
1
Log Rer
10
the same particle group. Hence, the need arises for a criterion
that will indicate when hydrodynamic data collected from a
2D uidized bed can be appropriately scaled to a 3D system.
At this point, let us establish a practical case to apply
our methodology for comparing 2D and 3D dynamics. To
gain information on its hydrodynamics, several experiments
were performed using a 3D uidized bed of bed aspect ratio L/H = 1.4 and internal diameter 5.38 (T1 system). To
model its dynamics, a set of 2D experiments (i.e., B2 system) at varying bed heights were performed to estimate the
bubble size distribution. As far as we are aware, there are
no indications in the literature of the operational conditions
that will give rise to closest 2D3D dynamics.
We therefore monitored uidized bed hydrodynamics in
both systems by measuring free bed surface uctuations over
a broad range of uidizing conditions. Subsequently, KG
was used as the criterion for dynamic similarity according to
the dynamic similarity hypothesis (Fig. 4). Then, following
data-scaling methodology (points 1, 2), the KG values for the
3D and the 2D systems were compared within the common
operational range in the information ow diagram (Fig. 4).
In the end, the 2D-system showing a KG value closest to
the 3D bed at the same Rer will be dynamically the most
similar.
7.1. Evaluating the data-scaling method by comparing
2D3D dynamics
According to the data-scaling methodology described, the
B1, B2, T1 and T2 systems were used to evaluate the similarity hypothesis. Several comparisons of dynamics in the
experimental conditions described in Section 6 were made.
Fig. 6 shows the corresponding power spectral analysis
(Fig. 6a) (the abscissa has been properly scaled according to
the time factorEq. (1)therefore f2 =m0.5 f1 ) and the frequency histogram (Fig. 6b) for two uidized beds (2D3D)
of similar KG values. The beds were operated using the
5157
second solid group (Table 2) in the same uidizing conditions (see caption). The frequency histogram (Fig. 6b) indicates that the statistical distribution of the time series is
qualitatively similar for the two systems. Complementary
power spectral densities were well matched. As shown in
Fig. 6a, the energy value and energy distribution across the
frequency range were very similar in both systems.
In contrast, Fig. 7 shows a dynamic comparison in which
the similarity hypothesis was not satised: the two uidized
beds (2D3D) had different KG values when performed with
the second solid group under the same operational conditions. In this case, despite the frequency histogram (Fig. 7b)
indicating a qualitatively similar trend, the power spectral
density conrmed that the systems were ruled by a markedly
different ow pattern. It can thus be concluded that when the
similarity hypothesis is satised, time and frequency domain
analyses of the compared systems show reasonable agreement, indicating dynamic similarity. However when the hypothesis criterion is not fullled, the dynamics under comparison substantially differ.
Figs. 810 show the power spectral densities and frequency histograms for several 2D3D comparisons, according to the similarity hypothesis. The beds were operated
with the 1, 3 and 4 solid groups (Table 2). As for the second solid group, time and frequency analyses indicate similar dynamic behavior for the 2D and 3D systems compared,
thus validating the similarity hypothesis. Moreover, it seems
that for the 2, 3 and 4 solid groups (B and D uidization
like behavior), both the time and frequency domain analyses were more closely matched than for the rst solid group
(A-like behavior). This is explained by the different uidization quality promoted by each solid group and the F r r used
to reduce the geometric dependence of K. Thus, according
to the two-phase model, it was assumed that excess gas velocity through the bed occurs as bubbles. However, it is well
known that visible bubble ow depends on the solid group
used (Kunii and Levenspiel, 1991) and that the two phase
theory tends to overestimate ow in the bubble phase (Grace
and Harrison, 1969). According to the analysis described in
Section 6.2, particles in the 2, 3 and 4 solid groups uidized
5158
5159
1.E+04
D
Log (KGm0.5)
B
A
1.E+03
dp
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+02
229
458
647
772
1.E+03
1.E+04
Log Rer
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+04
D
1.E+03
Log (KGm0.5)
A
1.E+02
1.E+01
dp
229
458
647
772
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
Log Rer
Fig. 11. Information ow diagram for the whole set of beds and particle
groups used.
5160
1000
Log (KGm0.5)
Log (KGm0.5)
100
10
1
T1
T2
0.1
0.1
(a)
1
Log Rer
10
T1
T2
1
1
10
(c)
100
10
Log Rer
Log (KGm0.5)
10
100
10
T1
T2
1
0.1
(b)
1
Log Rer
100
1000
T1 T2
Log (KGm0.5)
100
T1
T2
10
1
(d)
10
Log Rer
100
Fig. 14. Information ow diagram for a set of 3D uidized beds scaled according to conventional similarity rules performing under the following
conditions: (a) d p = 229 m, T1 (H /D = 1) vs T2 (H /D = 1); (b) d p = 229 m, T1 (H /D = 1.7) vs T2 (H /D = 1.7); (c) d p = 458 m, T1 (H /D = 0.7)
vs T2 (H /D = 0.7); (d) d p = 458 m, T1 (H /D = 1) vs T2 (H /D = 1).
5161
5162
Finally, we would like to point out that the measurement technique used has not yet been adapted for
measuring large-diameter 3D beds operating at large supercial gas velocities. It would be very interesting to
check our scale-up methodology on data collected using measurement techniques that are broadly applied
in uidization engineering such as pressure uctuation
measurements.
Acknowledgements
J. Villa-Briongos would like to thank Ruud van Ommen
and Professor Cor M. van den Bleek from TU DELFT
for their useful advices and inspiring work. Moreover, the
nancial support from project PPQ2003-08742 is kindly
acknowledged.
References
Notation
dp
dp
D
E
f
F
g
H
K
KG
m0.5
U0
Umf
Ur
particle diameter, m
particle mean diameter, m
bed diameter, m
power spectrum energy, dimensionless
spectral frequency, Hz
histogram frequency, dimensionless
gravity acceleration (9.81 m/s2 )
bed height, m
Kolmogorov entropy, bits/s
global information ow, bits/s
time scale factor, dimensionless
supercial gas velocity, m/s
minimum uidization velocity
relative gas velocity dened as U0 /Umf
Greek letters
f
f
S
Abbreviations
B1
B2
Bins
Cn
F rr
Rer
T1
T2
2D uidized bedwidth 1 cm
2D uidized bedwidth 2 cm
refers to normalized measure of surface uctuation, dimensionless
n = 1, 2, dimensionless parameters dened in
Table 1
Froude number relative to the excess gas velocity (U0 Umf )
Reynolds particle number relative to the excess
gas velocity (U0 Umf )
3D uidized bedinternal diameter 5.38 cm
3D uidized bedinternal diameter 8.38 cm
5163