The document discusses 5 discussion questions about pricing strategies for LCBSL, a city bus service in Ludhiana, India. The questions address how LCBSL should respond to changes in competitors' positioning, options for generating non-transportation revenue like some airports, calculating the price increase needed to achieve a 4% return on capital, determining optimal route distances given new prices, and pricing strategies to consider over different stages of the product life cycle as expansion continues.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
261 views1 page
Discussion Questions LCBSL
The document discusses 5 discussion questions about pricing strategies for LCBSL, a city bus service in Ludhiana, India. The questions address how LCBSL should respond to changes in competitors' positioning, options for generating non-transportation revenue like some airports, calculating the price increase needed to achieve a 4% return on capital, determining optimal route distances given new prices, and pricing strategies to consider over different stages of the product life cycle as expansion continues.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
LUDHIANA CITY BUS SERVICE LIMITED: PRICING FOR PROFITS
1. The proposed intention to reposition LCBSL on the value map may lead to change in competitors positioning strategies. How should LCBSL respond to these changes? 2. The percentage of non-core business revenue has been growing at various airports. Do you see a similar trend for city bus services such as LCBSL? What are some feasible options for non-transportation revenue that may immediately be implemented by LCBSL? 3. An average of INR10 from each customer generates return on capital of 1.9 per cent. Management plans to increase the return on capital to 4 per cent. By how much should LCBSL increase the average price so as to bring the return on capital to 4 per cent? 4. Following the average price increase required to achieve a return on capital of 4 per cent, draw a new approximate fare matrix and define which of the following distance routes LCBSL should focus on based on cost-benefit analysis: up to five kilometres (km), five to 10 km, 10 to 15 km, or 15 km and above? 5. With only 10 per cent of the project operational, LCBSL is still in the introductory stage of its product life cycle (PLC). With plans to achieve 100 per cent execution by the end of 2013, what are the different pricing strategies it should consider over the different PLC stages?