Information On Charts
Information On Charts
Here you see the surveying country as Singapore and the IHO emblem on the right of the
emblem of Singapore.
The charts that are published anywhere follow the rules as laid down by the IHO, thus learning to
use a chart of one country makes one proficient in using other charts.
The above picture is self explanatory if read in conjunction with the following picture:
Prior taking a new chart for use the following must be checked:
a
The source table would give the type of survey that was carried out and when. Many charts are
published with some areas being surveyed recently while in other areas the data is taken from
previous surveys (which may be quite old).
All International series charts have the International number beside the national number of the
chart.
Learning the symbols printed on the Charts:
While charts are published, the abbreviations, the symbols and the colour code is not mentioned
on the charts and the mariner is expected to know of such things prior to using the charts.
The above symbols and the abbreviations are printed in another publication called Chart 5011 by
the UK Hydrographic office. Other countries do have such books.
To give an example of a few items:
The above shows a compass rose. The circle is always projected in the above manner, the top of
the rose pointing to the top of the chart.
The outer ring is the one from where the true bearings are plotted.
Within the outer ring there is an inner ring graduated in the same way but slightly off with
reference with the outer ring. This inner ring is the one that has not been compensated with the
variation.
Thus if the bearings that are plotted are corrected only for deviation then these may be drawn
using this ring graduation.
The variation is again written on the north marking line in this case is written as:
415 W 1985 (6E)
Meaning that in 1985 the variation at that place, where the rose is printed was 415West and that
the yearly change is 6E. Now to get the variation for 2004, we have to multiply the number of
years since 1985 19 years with 6 and get 114. So 154 have to be subtracted from 415W.
Subtract since the change was E.
Passage Planning
Passage Planning is a way of minimising the risk of navigational error. In areas of high traffic
density and restricted available water, the requirement for pre-planning becomes even more
necessary.
The aim of passage planning is to prepare for the navigation of the ship so that the intended
passage can be executed in a safe manner in respect of both the vessels and the protection of the
environment, by ensuring the proper and positive control of the ship at all times. Without such
planning, the time to process essential information may not be available at critical times when
the bridge team is occupied in confirming a landmark, altering course, avoiding or monitoring
traffic and carrying out other bridge duties, such as external communications and internal
communications within the ship. Under these circumstances, unless there is an effective plan in
place, mistakes and errors may go undetected leading to disastrous consequences.
The construction of an effective passage plan encourages all those concerned to foresee potential
problems and plan a strategy to minimise the risk.
No specific courses are laid down as it is necessary for all vessels to plan, and lay down on the
chart, their own course.
Where alterations of course are required, the latitude or longitude or approximate bearing to a
navigational mark, which ever is more appropriate, is used singly to indicate an obvious change
of direction in the traffic separation scheme. This to ensure that navigators are not using a set of
advised, fixed positions thus avoiding vessels using exactly the same courses in their individually
developed plans.
Checklists
The Checklists are a basis for individual ships either amending or drawing up their own
checklists. They should not be considered to be definitive but the basis for individual ships to
expand upon. The checklists incorporate checks for readiness for transit and reporting.
Parallel Indexing
This is the simplest and quickest pilotage technique that gives continuous monitoring of the track
that the ship is making good. Parallel indexes should be used, whenever practicable, while
transiting through coastal areas. To this end, for every leg, suggested reference points should be
included into the Passage Notes. These points are known to be radar conspicuous and likely to be
available at all times. Buoys, especially buoys known to be prone to damage or movement,
should never be used.
Wheel Over Positions
Course alteration positions should be chosen to allow for proper monitoring during ship turns.
Ships using a plan would have their maneuvering characteristics and the ships data must thus be
consulted when planning a wheel over position.
Where possible, techniques for monitoring the turn should be used. This may be using a rate of
turn indicator, parallel indexing or other suitable techniques.
Emergency / Contingency Plans
By preparing in advance for possible contingencies, a quick and effective response can be made
when the unexpected happens. Plans should be considered for coping with, amongst others,
steering failure, power loss, loss of propulsion or any other type of accident or emergency that
may occur on a ship that will affect the navigational ability.
To this end, the Passage Notes, for each leg, should indicate the available depth of water.
Additionally, when compiling the passage plan the availability and reliability of the following
have to be considered at the early part of the planning phase:
main propulsion system
steering gear
navigational equipment
anchors
thrusters (if equipped)
auxiliaries
trim and draught of vessel
transverse stability
the availability of manpower.
Preparing the plan
When preparing the plan the navigating officer will need to take account of the following:
a
Adequate under keel clearance at all times, including allowances for squat, pitch, roll, swell,
predicted tidal height and possible increase of draught due to heel and trim
safe distances off dangers, allowing for weather, tidal stream, anticipated traffic, availability of
safe water and navigational systems in use
management of chart changes, which should not occur at critical points of the passage
predicted tidal stream information, leading to the pre-working of allowances for set
visibility of lights (especially in the Malacca Straits), rising/dipping distances, arcs and colours
of light sectors
envisaged safe speeds along the route, taking into consideration recommended area of reduced
speed, leading to a speed plan for the transit, and an ETA plan at the pilot station or
storing position, making due allowance for possible reduced visibility. A plan for reducing speed
under control should be considered
selection of depths for comparison with the echosounder, taking note of the predicted height of
tide may be desirable for certain routes
reporting points, VHF frequencies, VTS requirements, areas of special concern and pilot station
frequencies if either requiring a pilot or areas of increased traffic density.
abort positions for specific sections and contingency plans in case of accident or emergency or
bad visibility
equipment status
taken in identifying and confirming reference points on the chart and on the radar; and also in
verifying the radar range when using the parallel index.
Preparing the Chart
1 .The first step when preparing a passage plan is to identify and mark the 'no-go' areas on the
chart.
The charts supplied to ships are the same for everyone, whether for use on board a VLCC at 25
metres draught or on a coaster sailing at 3 metres draught. It is therefore imperative that the chart
is made suitable for the specific condition of your vessel. This should be done by marking the
'limiting danger lines' - often referred to as marking out the 'no-go areas.'
These are valuable safety limits to any plan for a coastal. Lines must be drawn on the chart to
highlight where the vessel cannot go. Proper allowance must be made for maximum draft and
predicted tidal height and any other limiting condition. The concept of marking no-go areas has
the following benefits:
a
it forces consideration of the factors affecting under keel clearance, which is always the high risk
element
it forces a concentrated study of the chart, rather than just a glance it immediately highlights to
anyone who looks at the chart the, often large, areas that must be avoided.
It is not enough to depend on, say, printed depth contour lines. The lines have to be prominent in
order to highlight the immediate danger quickly and effectively at any time under any light
condition.
It is important to draw the no-go boundaries as accurately as possible. They should show, for
example, that the vessel can pass the wrong side of a mark, in an emergency, although this may
not normally be desirable. It can be seen from the study of some recent incidents that had this
information been immediately available, then a grounding or collision would most probably not
have occurred. In this context passing the wrong side of a buoy is nothing compared with the
consequences of even a minor incident.
Insert the 'limits of safety'. Normally this will be an area either side of the vessels intended track
that may be acceptable to deviate within, under normal circumstances. In the approaches to ports
as well as in some areas, however, this may be the traffic lanes already on the chart. However in
certain areas, additional lines should be marked on the chart to highlight where it has been
considered that it is only safe to navigate under normal circumstances.
After these considerations have been made the vessels intended track should be inserted.
The wheel over positions should then be marked on the chart. When marking the wheel over
positions consideration should be given to the amount of rudder that will be applied, the expected
speed of the ship at the alteration position and also the depth of water due to the effect on the
turning circle of shallow water,
It is often valuable to insert the speed that is to be maintained along certain sections of a leg. This
is especially true if an accurate ETA is required at a certain point, e.g. for picking up pilots or
rendezvousing for stores.
The methods to be used for fixing the vessels position on different parts of the intended track
should be entered onto the chart. The prime method should be by visual fix, whenever possible,
backed by radar or electronic means. If, from experience, it is known that there are conspicuous
landmarks or points for position fixing it is often worthwhile to identify these.
The timing of fixing the vessels position should be considered when passing though the
congested waters. The requirement for fixing the vessels position will vary considerably, based
on the nearness of the most imminent danger and also while executing and completing a turn. As
a back up to frequent fixing, the use of parallel indexing techniques will assist in ensuring the
vessel is maintaining the intended track and should be considered, especially in the more
constricted parts.
From experience it will become evident what identifiable marks are radar conspicuous. It is of
value to mark these radar conspicuous targets on the chart for future reference. Weaker targets
that may be usefully used in clear weather may disappear in heavy rain and thus may not be
available.
Clearing bearings for hazards, and to assist in maintaining the track should be inserted onto the
chart. These give a very quick method of checking that the vessel is, at least, missing dangerous
or noteworthy points.
Clearing ranges are another technique used by some vessels to ensure that a minimum and
maximum distance is maintained from a identifiable mark. These should be considered on all
vessels where parallel indexing is not being employed and may especially beneficial when
completing a turn.
Prior to entering a restricted section abort points should be entered on the chart. At this point it
must be agreed that to proceed any further all systems etc. have to be fully operational and the
vessel is in readiness to proceed. As well as entering the abort point on the chart it is often
recommended that the action to be taken to abort is also entered onto the chart. E.g. When
reaching the abort point the engine speed is reduced and the direction of turn, with possibly the
helm order, entered so that all personnel involved in navigating the vessel are fully aware of the
agreed action to be taken.
In addition to the abort positions contingency planning should also take place whilst compiling
the passage plan. By marking the "no-go areas" on the chart, as suggested above, it should be
readily apparent if there is sufficient water outside the traffic lanes in which to anchor. By
preparing in advance for possible contingencies, a quick and effective response can be made
when the unexpected happens. Plans should be considered for coping with, amongst other things,
main engine failure, steering loss, port or channel closures, radar failure, reduction in visibility,
heavy traffic at crucial points, movement or closure of a pilot station, or any of the accidents and
emergencies that can occur to a ship on passage.
The tidal streams and heights at the time of expected transit should be marked on the chart. The
depth of water, in general, at sea should not pose a problem for vessels, but if the height of tide is
marked on the chart, in coastal waters it will assist in contingency planning. The direction and
strength of the tide and current in certain parts, can be very strong and should be marked on the
chart in prominent positions. This will assist, not only, in predicting and understanding the
movement of your own ship but also the movement of others, especially slow moving vessels
and tugs with tows.
In addition to the above it is suggested that the reporting points are clearly marked on the chart,
in addition to the positions where it is necessary to change VHF channels.
Also the position of expected high traffic density should be marked on the chart along with any
other relevant information.
Monitoring the Passage Plan
It is common practice to fix the ship's position and then make an allowance for set and drift
depending upon offset from the previous fix. This approach to navigation is REACTIVE, being
based upon past observations. If either of these is wrong, then any predictions using them will be
erroneous. When using fixes in this way, it is usually better to make the fixes at regular and
appropriately frequent intervals. This enables a simple check to be made with respect to speed. It
also helps the quick and effective calculation of short-term EPs (Estimated Positions), using the
latest course and speed made good, to warn of any immediate problems developing.
However, in narrow and restricted waters, techniques need to be used which enable the navigator
to maintain a forward outlook, that is to be PROACTIVE, whilst monitoring the deviation from
the intended track being made good. Frequent, hurried visits to the chart table to fix the vessel's
position may not be the most effective use of the time available. Also, whilst doing this the
overall sense of awareness can be interrupted and it is easy, during critical phases, to become
disorientated.
It is worth remembering to monitor the echo-sounder. This instrument can often provide the first
warning signs that the vessel is standing into danger, since in almost all situations the nearest
land is beneath the vessel.
PASSAGE PLANNING CHECKLIST
Charts
Are the charts the largest scale available?
Are they corrected for the latest Notice to Mariners and local navigational warnings?
Do the charts completely cover the area?
Sailing Directions
Is the planned track following recommended routes?
Is the plan following local regulations?
Are all potential hazards known?
Port / Storing Information
Are local conditions known?
Visibility of Lights:
Lights are placed on Light Houses at a height of the light houses, depending on the intensity of
the lights themselves, the lights are marked as visible up to a distance of a certain limit, the
height of the observer when declaring the above is taken to be 15 feet (4.5 metres).
However the visibility of the lights at the marked limit may be exceeded due to the height of the
ship also.
The expression for obtaining the raising of the light limit is given by:
Heights in feet:
Distance = (Height of observer x 1.15) + (Height of Object x 1.15)
Heights in metres:
Distance = (Height of observer x 2.083) + (Height of Object x 2.083)
Or Distance = (Height of observer x 2.1) + (Height of Object x 2.1)
Example:
Assume the following:
Height of eye (Bridge): 21 m
Height of Light House (from List of Lights): 60 m Range: 20 NM