Case Diary
Case Diary
Case Diary
SUBMITTED BY
MD ABID HUSSAIN ANSARI
1ST SEMESTER
LLM FAMILY LAW
1|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Firstly, I would like to express my profound sense of gratitude towards the Almighty
ALLAH for providing me with the authentic circumstances which were mandatory for the
completion of progressive case report.
I would like to extend my sincere thanks to YOUNG ARENA LITIGATORS for giving me
the opportunity to intern in their law firm as a regular intern commencing from 16 th January
2016 to till date.
I would take this opportunity to thank Ms. Suparna Sinha, Ms. Smarika Azad and Mr.
Arun Kumar Rai (Partners and Counsels) at Young Arena Litigators (Law Firm) under
whom I interned, guided me throughout this journey and supported me in all my endeavors
and has been an encouraging mentors and a primary source of guidance throughout the
internship period.
Among those who have sustained me over the years with their loyalty and friendship, I would
particularly mention my friends; Harsh Narayan, Aman Jain and Namrata Khurana have
always taken a special interest in my work and unconditional support at each turn of the life. I
express my deep sincere gratitude towards my parents for their blessing, patience, and moral
support during this LLM course. I express my gratitude to my all teachers and friends who
has supported and encouraged me during my study at Amity Institute of Advanced Legal
Studies, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
Signature
Date
___________________________________
_________________________________
2|Page
PREFACE
This progressive case diary report is an outcome of the Friday placement Programme of
Amity Institute of Advanced Legal Studies for LLM students. The main constituents of this
progressive case diary are the report on cases observed at the trial court during the internship,
the research on related issues and the weekly Friday report of my work. I have tried my best
to do justice with my activities and put it in black and white with the same effort as I did it
during the interns.
As a post-graduate student majoring in Family Law, this semester I had to do an internship
under an advocate. I was a little bit confused because I did not have a clear idea of what I
would be expected to do. As I joined the Law firm, however, things became clearer and I
realized that I had an incredible opportunity in the sense that I would work in an environment
that is closer to my major.
3|Page
character and started abusing the petitioner. In 2013 the respondent asked the petitioner to
take her to parental home. Mental harassment started and made a defamatory complaint to
place and neighbour of the locality at Faridabad. Also the conduct and behaviour of the
respondent clearly displays the violent temper, deliberate refusal to cooperate which resulted
into unwarrantable indifference to petitioners health and happiness. The respondent had file
a petition under section 9 HMA, for restitution of Conjugal rights but the same was dismissed
as withdrawn by the respondent on 24/11/15 by the court of Ms. Anu malhotra, ADJ, Tis
Hazari, Delhi. The next hearing is in December for the finality of the case.
26TH AUGUST 2016
After this assignment, I found it extremely interesting and the kind of work I was required to
do was to go over the file and see the important legal provisions, steps and procedures taken
as a useful link to the particular case. I made this pretty much clearer through the
chronological arrangement of the file and then I started examining the brief and the plaint of
the both sides. Beside this, I was asked to do a search on some terms as Sapind, prohibited
degree of relationship, essentials of section 5 of Hindu Marriage Act..etc this is because
they appear constantly on the brief and plaint and without a prior understanding of the
concept I would miss the most important part of my work. For that very reason, I have
consulted Dr. Kshitij Kumar Singh and Ms. Ankita Shukla for more clarity over the subjects.
Later on my senior asked me to look closely at the file and do a summary of the important
points and then I had to answer a couple of questions which she gave me later.
2ND SEPTEMBER 2016
Case Study: Jyoti Sharma v. Pawan Narayan
Civil miscellaneous appeal under section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against the
judgment and decree passed by the learned Judge.
Whereby petition under section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent is allowed
previous disposition:
1. That a previous petition under section 11 of H.M.A, 1955 came to be filed by the
respondent on 18.08.2010 before the learned District Judge.
2. In the petition, it was submitted that the respondent got married to the appellant on
25.07.2010 and they were blessed with a male child named Vishal on 06.07.2003,
who is the custody of wife. Father of the appellant and the respondent were having
business relationships and later on certain misunderstanding developed which have
had impact on the marital status. On 30.12.2013 a document of dissolution of
marriage was executed between the parties and since then the partied were not
residing together.
3. The main plea taken by the respondent in his petition under section 11 of H.M.A was
that both the parties were Sapind and therefore the marriage is void and null.
5|Page
4. After conclusion of the trial, the learned district judge proceeded to allow the petition
under section 11 of H.M.A filed by the respondent husband and declare the marriage
solemnized between the parties null and void.
Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree the present appeal is preferred on
the following amongst other grounds without prejudice to each other.
Grounds for the appeal:
1. Impugned judgment is not tenable in the eyes of law.
2. District Judge proceeded with an assumption that sapind marriage is null and void
but the appellant was unable to prove that in her community such a marriage are done.
Thus, the marriage between parties cannot be said to be null and void, as custom or
usage permits such marriages. Husband want to blow the hot and cold at the same
time as he himself have solemnized the marriage between them with open eyes and
even have a son. The husband was also ready to take back the appellant if he be given
money.
3. Once being living as husband and wife for 5 years respondent is estopped from raising
grievance of the marriage being null and void on account of the parties being sapind
thus decree is liable to be set aside.
A miscellaneous application under section 5 of Limitation Act was also filed as when the
impugned order was passed on 20.07.2015, but the appellant could get the information about
the decision only on 15/10/2015, and the appeal due to unavailability of lawyer of the
appellant was filed on 7/11/2015. This delay was unintentional and bonafide. The appellant
was not going to receive any benefit from the delay.
9TH SEPTEMBER 2016
Today, I was asked to go to the chamber to find certain points for the case assigned to me. As
I was given the above mentioned case to research upon, I was reading through these plaints, I
learned how to frame my research work. Most importantly, I was lucky enough to find some
legal points to be used in the particular matter and submitted to my seniors for the same. To
this point, the internship was really good. I was given the chance and highly encouraged to
arise questions and express my reflections on the issues at hand. Interestingly, the various
duties that I was assigned exposed me to different areas of interests mainly in Hindu Law. As
I moved, I realized that I have developed systematic way of analysing the case files and
summarizing large amounts of information.
16TH SEPTEMBER 2016
In the seventh week of my internship I was asked to review another case which has been
assigned to me and to find out the related judicial precedents and section 24 of Hindu
Marriage Act. I started reading the case file along with all the applications. I had the
opportunity to meet the clients personally. The task was to note down the minute details
regarding the case. The primary purpose of this work is to provide mutual assistance relating
6|Page
sometimes I had to listen to my seniors explaining to me how and why some tasks are done in
a specific way. At this particular stage of internship, I learnt to be a good listener and it
helped me broaden my understanding and evaluate what I learnt. The reasons why I wanted
to examine this particular file was to learn something new about the issues related to family
law. My curiosity enabled me to understand that evolution of marriage, divorce and different
remedies and I learnt that the overall objective is the social well-being and for the
advancement of family system in our society.
21ST OCTOBER 2016
Every day at evening chamber, after seeing my growing concern regarding family law raised
my curiosity to acquire an idea about the family law then my seniors advised me to work on
the contemporary issues related to Family law topics. My seniors welcome me to discuss
them. Obviously, it gave me the chance to interact and communicate my ideas with them who
have had more than 15 years of experience. I wished I have done so many things during my
11 months internship but is said that Learning is a lifelong process.
28TH OCTOBER 2016
After the completion the research work for above mentioned cases, I asked for permission to
learn about the Saiyara Bano Case (Ban on Triple Talaq). In this particular task, I was
advised by one of senior counsel to get to know more about the issue of Saiyara Bano case.
My reading of and reflection on reports, news, facts was of great help for me in the sense that
I was able to see what All India Muslim Personal Board has done concerning this subject. In
this context, the concept of triple talaq is totally against the women right and it should be
struck down. To sum up, this internship was great on many levels in the sense that it gave me
a practical experience that helped me learn a number of things. The reason why I am
suggesting this is to have the opportunity to learn more and get to know as much as possible
about the working of court proceedings and court trials.
8|Page