2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... // פרשת זדורוב: בית המשפט העליון מתמיד בהונאות וזיופים...

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
Fax: 077-3179186
"
6133301 ",33407 "
Email: [email protected]
2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... //

... :
View in blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/11/2016-11-02.html

[]
Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery
Repeat inquiry (fourth or fifth) was filed yesterday with Supreme Court Chief Clerk,
requesting duly signed and certified copies of decision records in Zadorovs case:
Purported Decision by Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, which denied access to inspect
the original paper decision records from Zadorovs trial with under the ruse of a
jumble in the court file, and purported Judgment by Justice Salim Joubran, which
denied an appeal from such Decision
All previous forgeries of decision records were committed by Mr Danny Levy, staff
member of the Office of the Clerk of no authority at all. However, the latest series of
falsified, fraudulent records were produced under the name of Chief Clerk Idit Melul
(a pretender). The latest series is also characterized by the complex fraud
Roman Zadorov is confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years. The last 6 of them
as purported convict, who was purportedly found guilty in the murder of 13 yo Tair
Rada. However, following intensive search, it is obvious by now that there is no
valid judgment record in his case. Attorney Feldman, who was his pro bono counsel
in the appeal, wrote that the judgment record were lost in the wailing wind across
the vast Jezreel Valley
The fraud by judges of the Nazareth District Court and the Supreme Court in the
Zadorov affair are uniquely despicable. The case of the Ukrainian Roman Zadorov
in Israel is the mirror image of the Jewish Mendel Beillis affair in the Ukraine a
century ago!
Read in blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/11/2016-11-02.html
Figures 1: Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, Justice Salim Joubran, Chief Clerk Idit
Melul (a pretender). There is no reasonable explanation for conduct of the
Supreme Court, except for fraud, which is aimed at withholding the evidence of
1/10
fraud by the Nazareth Court judges in the Zadorov trial.

_____
OccupyTLV, November 02 repeat inquiry was filed yesterday with Supreme
Court Chief Clerk Idit Melul for obtaining duly signed and certified copies of
decisions in the Zadorov affair: [1]
a) June 02, 2016 Decision by Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, under Zadorov v
State of Israel (7939/10), which denied access to inspect the original paper
decision records in State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07), with the
reasoning of a jumble in the court file. That - when the law in Israel says that
"any person is permitted to inspect decisions that tare not lawfully prohibited
for publication", and the Supreme Court declared the right to inspect "a
fundamental principle in any democratic regime... constitutional, suprastatutory..."
b) June 26, 2016 Decision and August 04, 2016 Judgment by Justice Salim
Joubran, under Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16), which denied an
appeal from Magistrate Lubinskys Decision.
Regardless of a series of requests for duly signed and certified copies of such
decision records, the Supreme Court consistently provides only falsified,
fraudulent records. Previous forgeries of falsified decision records were
perpetrated by Mr Danny Levy of the Criminal Division, a staff member of no
authority at all to certify court records.
However, the latest series of forgeries, [2] which were received in response on a
previous inquiry and request, [3] were perpetrated by Ms Idit Melul, Chief
Clerk of the Supreme Court. The latest series of forgeries is also characterized
by the complex pattern of fraud:
1. Chief Clerk Idit Melul continues to refuse to provide documentation
of her lawful appointment.
In response on Freedom of Information request for documentation of Ms Idit
Meluls lawful appointment as Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, the
Administration of Courts provided invalid records.
In a previous meeting in Ms Meluls office, she also refused to answer: Under
whose authority was she appointed Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court?
Therefore, the previous inquiry contained a special article, which asked for
documentation of Ms Idit Melul if she were to sign the certification on behalf of
the Supreme Court. Ms Melul provided none.
Ms Idit Melul should be deemed a Pretender, falsely appearing as Chief Clerk
of the Supreme Court.
2. Chief Clerk Idit Melul answered in a letter with no reference
number.
Such letter should be deemed an informal, off the record document, or simply
put a fabrication.
3. Chief Clerk Idit Melul answered in a lawfully unsigned letter.
The letter, which was received by mail, shows a graphic signature instead of
an authentic hand-signature. As explicitly clarified in Ombudsman of the
Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda Alshech Fabricated Protocols scandal,
such record has no validity at all. Varda Alshech and the Ombudsman were in full
agreement that such record was merely a Draft.
2/10
Figure 2: Chief Clerk Idit Melul September 08, 2016 response letter was
received by paper mail. The letter fails to be lawfully signed by a hand
signature. Instead, it bears an invalid graphic signature. Ombudsman of the
Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda Alshech Frabricated Protocols scandal
makes it clear: Court records, which are signed by graphic signature only are
invalid, merely drafts.
_____
4. Chief Clerk Idit Melul refused to provide a lawfully signed and
certified copy of Magistrate Lubinskys Decision, pertaining to the
jumble in Zadorovs file, using an incredible ruse.
The requests to inspect the original decision records in the trial paper court file
State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07) - was filed I the Supreme Court under
the appeal court file Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) since the Supreme
Court held the Nazareth District Court file at that time. Ms Idit Melul refused to
provide a lawfully signed and certified copy of Magistrate Lubinsky Decision,
which denied access to inspect the trial court file with the reasoning of a
jumble in the court file. Ms Idit Melul provide an incredible ruse as the
justification for her refusal:
Since you are not a party to criminal appeal court file 7939/10, you
would not be able to receive copies of any decisions in the case.
According to such incredible ruse, Requester of Inspection is not permitted to
obtain a valid copy of the court decision on his own request in the courts of the
State of Israel
5. Chief Clerk Idit Melul provided perverted, invalid records as
purported certified copies of Justice Salim Joubrans Decisions,
originating from Magistrate Lubinskys jumble Decision
The August 16, 2016 request, which was filed with both the Supreme Court (in
the court file) and with Chief Clerk Idit Melul, explicitly stated that the certified
copies of the Supreme Courts decision records are required for filing outside the
State of Israel (as an appendix to the Complaint, which was filed with the UN
Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention). Therefore, the
Supreme Court was asked to provide copies of its records, which would be
deemed pursuant to the Hague-Apostille Convention (1961). According to the
Convention, of which Israel is a party, valid copies of court decision records must
show the signature of the appropriate judicial authority and certification, True
Copy of the Original by the Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.
3/10
However, the copies of Justice Salim Joubrans Decisions, which were provided
by Chief Clerk Idit Melul, bear the certification, True Copy of the Original, on
copies that do not show Justice Joubrans signatures (Figures 3).
Figures 3: False certifications, True Copy of the Original, of Decision and

Judgment by Justice Salim Joubran in the appeal Zernik v Zadorov and State of
Israel (4650/10), which were mailed by Supreme Court Chief Clerk Idit Melul.
The appeal in this court file originated in Supreme Court Magistrate Lubinskys
Decision, which denied access to inspect the original paper decision records in
Zadorovs trial court file with the reasoning of a jumble in the court file The
copies, which were mailed by Chief Clerk Melul fail to show any signature by
Justice Salim Joubran. The request, which was filed with Ms Melul explicitly
stated that the certified record were required for filing outside the State of Israel,
as an appendix to Complaint, which was filed with the UN Human Rights Council
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Therefore, the request explicitly asked
for copies that would be deemed valid pursuant to the Hague-Apostille
Convention (1961) showing signatures of the corresponding judges and
certification by a Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.
_____
Roman Zadorov: The poster child of fraud and fabrications by Israeli
judges
Roman Zadorov has been confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years, of
which the last 6 as purported Tair Rada murder convict, who was purportedly
sentenced to life in prison. However, regardless of intensive searches with
Zadorovs defense counsel and repeat inspections in the Nazareth District Court
and the Supreme Court no lawful, valid Verdict and Sentencing records
have been discovered to this date (Figure 4).
In contrast with the decision records in the paper court file, the 2010 Verdict and
Sentencing records were purportedly issued in Net-HaMishpat case management system,
following its implementation in the Nazareth District Court in January 2010.
Attorney Avigdor Feldman, Zadorovs pro bono defense counsel in the Supreme Court
appeal, wrote that the 2010 Nazareth judgment records were lost in the wailing wind across
the vast Jezreel Valley [which Nazareth overlooks jz]
Attorney Galil Spiegel, Zadorovs defense counsel in the Nazareth District Court trial, has
not provided to this date a reasonable explanation for the filing of unsigned judgment
records with the Notice of Appeal in the Supreme Court, and the loss of the valid, signed
judgment records, which purportedly were in her possession in 2010 [4]
4/10
Figure 4: Regardless of intensive searches, no valid Verdict of the Nazareth

District Court, pertaining to Roman Zadorov has been discovered to this date: a)
The signature box of the purported Verdict record, which was filed by Attorney
Galil Spiegel with the Notice of Appeal in the Supreme Court in 2010
(discovered during inspection of the original records paper court file in the
Supreme Court), instead of a lawfully signed and certified, True Copy of the
Original, record. b) The signature box in the purported Verdict record, which
was discovered in the Office of the Clerk of the Nazareth District Court in 2016,
but which fails to appear in the Decisions Docket, or the Judgment Docket in
the electronic court file. The Chief Clerk of the Nazareth District Court refuses to
certify such record, True Copy of the Original.
______
The fraud by the Nazareth District Court judges and the Supreme Court justices in the case
of Roman Zadorov is uniquely despicable.
The Ukrainian Roman Zadorov case in Israel is the mirror image of the Jewish Mendel Beilis
case in the Ukraine a century ago.
Israeli judges in general are routinely engaged in fraud by fabricating court process
and court records a la Varda Alshech they imagined up for themselves immunity for
criminality on the bench...
Over the past 20 years, integrity of the Israeli courts has dramatically deteriorated. In a free
discussion by Senior Legal Scholars, which was recently published, one of them describes
the situation as a total jungle in the court. Do anything you can not to get there. Others
described the judges as such that disregard the facts and the law on a routine basis. [5]
The Senior Legal Scholars discussed the total jungle as originating from a decline in
formalism and increase in values. In fact, the circumstances originate in routine fraud by the
judges conduct of simulated process and publication of simulated court records. This type
of fraud was documented in details in the Judge Varda Alshech Fabricated Protocols
scandal. Net-HaMishpat system and IT systems of the Supreme Court are the fraud tools.
The Zadorov affair demonstrates this condition in a particularly serious fashion.
The Israeli judges made up for themselves immunity for criminality on the bench
The Israeli court today are patently incompetent courts!
5/10
LINKS: below
: ...
) (
" :"
,
"" ," " ' , ...
,
.
" " ) ( .
...
. -
" . ,
." "
"...

.
!
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/11/2016-11-02.html :
:1 , '" , " -

.
_____
" 02 , - " "

[1] :
( "" 02 ,2016 , )
,( 7939/10
) ,(502/07 "" . , "
" , ,
" ... ,-"...
( "" 26 " -" 04 ,2016 ,
) ,(4650/16
"
,
.
, -
.
[2] , [3] , '
" , " .
:
6/10
" .1 " .
' " "
, .
' , : "
" ?
, , " " -
.
' " " .
" .2 " .
, , "".
" .3 " .
, , " " .
" "
, .
"" .
:2 " " , .
, " " .
_____
" .4 "
"" .
, ) ,(502/07
, ) ,(7939/10
.'
"" "" ,
:
" 7939/10
.
,

" .5 "
' "" .
, , " "
, ) ,
" - ( .,
- ) .(1961
, ,
," , "
.
7/10
' , ' , ,
" , ' ) .(3
:3 " ,
" , " "
,
-
)
.(4650/16
,
,
"" ...
',
- )
.(1961
,
,.

.
_____
: ""
10 , 6
, " .
, -
" " " " ) .(4
" , " " "
- , .2010
" , , ,
" "...
" , ,
" " ,
, [4] ...2010
8/10
:4 , " "
: . " " , "
" 2010 " ) -
- ( , " " . .
" " , -
,2016 - - -
" " " " .
" ".
______

.

!

- ...
.
" " , , " :'
. " .
[5] ...
" " . ,
-
. , " "
, - .
.
, ...
!
:
[1] 2016-11-01 Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) and Zernik v Zadorov and
State of Israel (4650/16) in the Supreme Court repeat request for duly signed
and certified copies of decision records, filed with Supreme Court Chief Clerk
Idid Melul
) (7939/10 ) (4650/16
, " "

https://www.scribd.com/document/329732548/
?https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YzNNZTFQSVkwWk0/view
usp=sharing
[2] 2016-09-08 Response by Supreme Court Chief Clerk Idit Melul: a) Zadorov
v State of Israel (7939/10) refusal to certify Magistrate Lubinsky June 02
Decision denying inspection of paper decision records in State of Israel v
Zadorov (502/07) with the reasoning of a jumble in the court file; b) Zernik v
Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) - perverted certifications of Justice
Joubran's decisions on appeal from Lubinskys decision; //
" " :( )
- (7939/10 02 , "
) (502/07 "" ; ( )
- ( 4650/16 '
[3] 2016-08-16 RE: Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) and Zernik v Zadorov
and State of Israel (4650/16) request for duly signed and certified copies of
decision records, filed with Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court //
9/10
) (7939/10 ) (4650/16
, " "
[4] 2016-10-30 Zadorov affair: Correspondence with Zadorovs trial defense
counsel, Part II - Non-existence of valid 2010 judgment records //
: , -
2010
' . " ." ][5
http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001153449
10/10

2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... // פרשת זדורוב: בית המשפט העליון מתמיד בהונאות וזיופים...

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... // פרשת זדורוב: בית המשפט העליון מתמיד בהונאות וזיופים...

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... // פרשת זדורוב: בית המשפט העליון מתמיד בהונאות וזיופים...

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD

2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery... //

View in blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/11/2016-11-02.html

fraud by the Nazareth Court judges in the Zadorov trial.

Figures 3: False certifications, True Copy of the Original, of Decision and

Figure 4: Regardless of intensive searches, no valid Verdict of the Nazareth

You might also like