History of Formation Evaluation: Petroleum Petroleum
History of Formation Evaluation: Petroleum Petroleum
History of Formation Evaluation: Petroleum Petroleum
blowouts has drawbacksmud filtrate soaks into the formation around the borehole and a mud
cake plasters the sides of the hole. These factors obscure the possible presence of oil or gas in
even very porous formations. Further complicating the problem is the widespread occurrence of
small amounts of petroleum in the rocks of many sedimentary provinces. In fact, if a sedimentary
province is absolutely barren of traces of petroleum, it is not feasible to continue drilling there.
The formation evaluation problem is a matter of answering two questions:
1. What are the lower limits for porosity, permeability and upper limits for water saturation
that permit profitable production from a particular formation or pay zone; in a particular
geographic area; in a particular economic climate.
2. Do any of the formations in the well under consideration exceed these lower limits.
It is complicated by the impossibility of directly examining the formation. It is, in short, the
problem of looking at the formation indirectly.
"In addition to delineating subsurface structures, seismic data can be computer processed for
'attributes' such as Amplitude Versus Offset, or AVO, which can serve as a Direct Hydrocarbon
Indicator (DHI)," said Carl Lothringer, a petroleum geologist at St. Mary Land and Exploration.
AVO shows the lithology and fluid content variations in rocks, allowing geologists to model other
fluid contents. "Such DHIs are as close to directly identifying oil or gas in the subsurface as
geophysicists can get."
reveal the previously mentioned DHIs, which indicate the presence of hydrocarbons, rather than
merely the structural elements, which could possibly contain hydrocarbons.
Because of advances in computer power and recording ability, 3D is very commonplace today.
While more expensive than traditional 2D seismic, the increased effectiveness and reliability of
3D seismic usually make it well worth the price.
An advance on the premise of 3D seismic is called 4D seismic. This method involves 3D
seismic acquired on a given area multiple times over an extended period of time. This enables
companies to track depletion in a field and allows the identification of areas in a mature field that
have not yet been tapped.
Exploration geophysics is an applied branch of geophysics, which uses physical methods (such
as seismic, gravitational, magnetic, electrical and electromagnetic) at the surface of the Earth to
measure the physical properties of the subsurface, along with the anomalies in those properties. It
is most often used to detect or infer the presence and position of economically useful geological
deposits, such as ore minerals; fossil fuels and other hydrocarbons; geothermal reservoirs; and
groundwater reservoirs.
Exploration geophysics can be used to directly detect the target style of mineralization, via
measuring its physical properties directly. For example, one may measure the density contrasts
between iron ore and silicate wall rocks, or may measure the electrical conductivity contrast
between conductive sulfide minerals and barren silicate minerals.
GEOPHYSICAL METHODS
The main techniques used are:
1. Seismic methods, such as reflection seismology, seismic refraction, and
seismic tomography.
2. Geodesy and gravity techniques, including gravity gradiometry.
3. Magnetic techniques, including aeromagnetic surveys.
4. Electrical techniques, including electrical resistivity tomography and induced
polarization.
5. Electromagnetic methods, such as magnetotellurics, ground penetrating
radar and transient/time-domain electromagnetics.
6. Borehole geophysics, also called well logging.
7. Remote sensing techniques, including hyperspectral imaging.
Many other techniques, or methods of integration of the above techniques, have been developed
and are currently used. However these are not as common due to cost-effectiveness, wide
applicability and/or uncertainty in the results produced.