The Sociology of Gambling
The Sociology of Gambling
The Sociology of Gambling
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
American Journal of Sociology.
http://www.jstor.org
THE AMERICAN
JOURNALOF SOCIOLOGY
VolumeLVII
NOVEMBER1951
Number3
A. BLOCH
ABSTRACT
Widespreadresentment
againstgamblingmaybe explainedby thefailureofgamblersto perform
normally
expectedproductivefunctions.The degreeof antipathydiffersaccordingto class. The chance elementin
human lifeis particularlyexploitedin those societieswhere status is largelycompetitiveand dependent
upon pecuniarystandards.The stabilizingand routinizedmechanismsof social livingare antitheticalto
gambling,whichresistsarbitrarysocial control.
devicein order
employedas an explanatory
upon the
order
of
sense
some
impose
to
ancienthisGamblinghas an extremely
Card-playand informal unknownand theunpredictable.
tory.As an institutionalized
history,manyoftheforms
pastime,it is not necessarilyan evil and inghas a lengthy
card
games predatingthe
modern
our
of
may,infact,as ithas in thepast,serveas an
history.
European
in
era
medieval
and
Artifacts
formofrecreation.
important
Gamblingemergesas a formof social
to variousgamesofchance,
relicspertaining
restones,draw- pathologyonlywhenthereis widespread
suchas pairedcubes,throwing
psychoof
the
because
it
against
sentment
ing sticks,gamingboards,and similarcontrivances,have been foundin the archeo- logicaland socialproblemswhichit creates.
logicalremainsof the Sumerian,Egyptian, In thefirstplace,in theinveterategambler
becomesan addiction,as in the
and Chinesecultures.The Greekswerepar- it frequently
familiarwithgamesofchance,and celebratedcharacterof Dostoevski'sminor
ticularly
thecastingofpairedand multiplecubeswas classic, The Gambler,who neglectedperan especiallyfavoredpastime among the sonal, family,and social responsibilities.
Romans. Primitivecultures,fromthe an- The gambleris condemnedlargelyforhis
cientPeruvianto the Bantu in Africaand failureto performthe normalproductive
expectedofhimrather
ordinarily
theEskimoin NorthAmerica,have regaled functions
ofthegambling
the
nature
because
of
than
as matchwithsuchamusements
themselves
itself.
obing fingersor rollingpebblesor other
Leisure may be respectablyenjoyed in
jects,in whichtheelementsof chanceconsocietiesonlywhenworkis put first.
most
stitutedone of the principalattractions.
the recreationmust not be
Furthermore,
Early magic and religiousrituals relied
orunproducdestructive
socially
considered
the
of
heavilyuponchance,as in thestudy
while
entrailsof sacrificialanimals among the tivein itself.This latterconsideration,
of"antisocial"
was nota universalcharacteristic
Romans,althoughdivineintervention
GAMBLING AND SOCIAL PATHOLOGY
2I5
2I6
2I7
2I8
predictableroutinesof employmentare
In summary,gamblingprovidesa funcsharplyseparatedfrom"leisure"-the time tion in well-organized
societieswherethe
whentheindividualreally"lives." The de- stressof competition(withits lack of premakes dictability)is great,and where,in contrast,
newexperience
sireforthrillsthrough
the publicreadilyopen to exploitationby the regimenof economicand social lifeis
professionalgamblinginterests,as Moore rigorous.Sucha society,placinga premium
and Tuminpointout:
upon "risk" and "takinga chance,"proofmanygames videsthroughgamblingan outletformany
theattractiveness
Certainly
of chance,as wellas thosegamesand sports individualswho,hedgedin by socialrestricwould
wherechancemay equalizeor offsetknown tionsand limitedor no opportunity,
restsin otherwise
in skilland performance,
differences
fortheneed
findlittlesatisfaction
outcome. fornew experienceand pecuniarysuccess.
largemeasureon theirunpredictable
In fact,thereis some roughevidencethat This penchantfor takinga chance is exactivities pressedin the popular cliche: "Why not?
inrecreational
ofthefuture
ignorance
role where
assumesan especiallysignificant
and bore- What have you got to lose?" The implicapredictability)
routine(read:perfect
of workassignmentstionsare twofold.
dom are characteristic
ofbeing
In thefirstplace,theprobability
workandwhere
thereis a sharpbreakbetween
entera
in
gaming
or
the
loser
winner
the
ingtimeandleisuretime.6
newexpriseprovidessuspense,insecurity,
There remain,finally,the conditionsof perience,and hope,servingimportant
emoand
association,"opportunity,
"differential
tionalneedsin individualswhoselives are
thelargeblocksofunplannedleisure,which increasingly
Althoughcertain
regularized.7
modernsocietypermits.Games of chance culturalfactorsand conditions
mustalso be
found,and even encour- takenintoconsideration,
are traditionally
thismay account
aged,in theplay of childrenin modernso- in part fortheheavy gamblingin cardsin
ciety,rangingfromtraditionalchildren's certainclasses,such as the landed English
guessingand matchinggames to the early gentryof theeighteenth
century.Although
ofadultgamblingand cardgames. highlystableand securelyensconcedin the
imitation
In manyfamilies,on all class levels,card- social structurethroughspecial favorand
playingand otherformsof gambling,even privilege,
as judgedby
"lifein thecountry,"
whenthestakesarelow,havebecomedeeply descriptive
accounts,diaries,and lettersof
Thereareethnic,class,and even the period, was extremelyboring.8Gamintrenched.
in thesecommonformsof
sex differentials
as did
diversion,
blingprovideda precarious
is largelya mid- therisksof fox-hunting:
recreation.Bridge-playing
a man wouldrisk
whilepokeris tradition- his entireestate upon the turnof a card.
dle-classdiversion,
ally considereda "man's game," and the This aristocratictraditionhad its countergam- partin thiscountry
castingofdice,asidefromprofessional
in theantebellumSouth
blinginterest,is commonamongNegroes. amongwealthyplantationowners.
For many young men of the lower and
In thesecondplace,thebeliefthatchance
middleclass,learningto playcardsis partof
worksequally in favorof each one of the
growingup and becomingidentifiedwith contestantsin a gamblingventuresustains
adultsand theirstandards.For theindivid- thehopeforstatusorrewards,
whichtheinwhoseemployual withfewinnerresources,
dividualfeelsmaynotbe achievedthrough
forprogressive
littleopportunity
mentoffers
andacceptablechannels.(Who
conventional
challengeand advancementand is tedious hasn't dreamedof whathe woulddo if he
and boring,and in whoseearlyexperience
7The familylivesof a smallselectedgroupof
in someformhas playeda part,to
gambling
who wereexaminedby the authorwere
gamblers
natural
and
is
as
a
be gambler
commonplace
ofregimentation.
byan extreme
characterized
as to becomean ardentbaseball fan or a
8 Cf.,e.g.,David Matthew,TheSocialStructure
addict.
moving-picture
of CarolineEngland(London:OxfordUniversity
6 Op.cit.,P. 794.
Press,I948).
219
220
face" of the inveteratecard-player.More- loser will pay his debts. Chance itselfbein thecertainty,
viz.,
over,justas thealcoholicsecretesliquorand comesinstitutionalized
fundsfor a potentialdrinkingbout, the the certaintythat if he wins,he will be
offunds-his paid.Io
gamblerwillretaina reservoir
"bettingmoney"-which he will lnotuse
GAMBLING: A DILEMMA OF MODERN SOCIETY
personalneedsor theneeds
evenforpressing
of his family.Finally,thereis interesting The practiceand organizationof gamofcompensation bling seems to followa cycle. So well inevidenceofthemechanisms
and so
is it as a formofrecreation,
formsofpsychologi- trenched
and othercharacteristic
devices:forexample,he propitiousare thevariousculturalelements
cal tension-reducing
realor in modernsocietywhichpromoteit, that,
boastsabouthiswinnings,
frequently
like the prohibitionof alcohol,legislation
bemoans
he
while
to nongamblers,
fictitious,
the exaggeratedextentof his losses to his and otherformsof arbitrarysocial control
consideredan infringement
are frequently
fellow-gamblers.
The specializedhumorof gamblingand upon personal prerogativeand privilege.
the jokes whichgamblersexchangeamong Consequently,it is a widespreadpractice
themselvesreflecttheirtensionsand their which, in its disorganizingeffectsupon
thelatteran evidence groupsand personalitiesand the possibilicynicism,
underlying
thattheyare aware of thefutilityof gam- tiesforexploitationit offersto lawlesseleAndwhencontrol
bling.Strikingis the paradoxbetweenthe ments,goesuncontrolled.
is
impossibleto
it
virtually
attempted,
is
"beat
that
can
he
hope
gambler'sperennial
thegame" and his realisticknowledgethat maintainbecauseof thesecureplace which
As a result,
enjoysin thefolkways.
gambling
it is virtuallyimpossibleto do so.
legislationand othercontrolsare onlyparTHE GAMBLER'S CODE OF ETHICS
tial.Suchmeasuresprovidean incentivetothe opening-upof formsof gambling
ward
Gamblingover manycenturieshas propavingthe way towardirstill
proscribed,
duceda traditionalcode of ethics.Primary
control
by lawlessand corrupt
responsible
is the "gentleman'scode"-that gambling
This
further
invites
legalcontrol,
elements.
debtsmustbe paid and givenpriorityover
to
and
leadingto
enforce
impossible
again
otherformsof obligation.This may be in
that
with
the
result
further
corruption,
part a survivalof the eighteenth-century
is
considerable
pressure
popular
eventually
aristocrat'scode of the "debt of honor."
of
all
forms
gambling.
to
legalize
exerted
in
chicanery
indulge
individual
may
The
in orderto satisfyhis gam- Whenthisoccurs,thedangersofwidespread
and dishonesty
invitehazardsfortheenso deeplyis the obligation legalizedgambling
blingcreditors,
theneedforpartire
reintroducing
society,
felt.
again.This
the
begins
cycle
and
control;
tial
soanother
significant
Thereis,however,
which
cycle
of
the
phase
the
is
apparently
ciologicalelementin thispractice.The basic
reached.
have
we
presently
thrillin gamblingrestsin the expectation
From the standpointof social control,
that the individualmay make a "killing."
thuspresentstwomajorproblems:
gambling
the
or
This,ofcourse,dependsuponchance
may
the
to
what
outcome
inability predict
'OIn the hierarchyof gamblers' values, failure
be. This, however,is premisedupon a cer- to "pay off"when a debt is due is the cardinalsin,
the continuanceof the entireinvolved structhattheloserwillpay since
tainty-thecertainty
ture of professionalgambling interests depends
thegamingventureit- upon the honoringof the debt. So clearly is this
hisdebts.Otherwise,
selfhas novalidity."To win"without"win- recognizedby professionalgamblersthat gambling
reluctant to advance each
ning"makesno sense.Hence, to make the syndicates, ordinarily
other's interests,will neverthelessextendcreditto
there each other so that the confidenceof the gambling
gamblingworthwhileand profitable,
mustbe the continuedassurancethat the public may remainunjeopardized.
individualgambler
thatof thedisorganized
control.
and thatofwidespreadeffective
The extreme
gambler,a sociopathicdeviation, requiresconcertedtherapeuticand
care.
psychiatric
The social controlof gamblingpresents
two alternatives:(i) Gamblingmay be diorremovedonlyto thedegreethat
minished
22I
choicesare cultivated-a
otherrecreational
probleminvolvingwidespreadsocial reappraisal. (2) As a morefeasiblecourse,gamin accordancewith
blingmaybe regularized
conventionalsocial practicethroughadeand controlling
legislation.
quatepermissive
ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY