Project Fund Performance
Project Fund Performance
MUTUAL FUNDS
IN
RELALINCE
VISAKAPATANAM
A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED FOR THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Under the Guidance of
Ms .BHAVYA KUMARI P MBA
(Asst Professor)
Submitted by
UPPALA.PURNIMA
(H.T.NO: 14HQ1E0088)
(2014-2016)
1
CERTIFICATE
AVANTHIS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL ACADEMY
This is to certify that Ms .UPPALA PURNIMA Regd. No: 14HQ1E0088 project report title A study on
FUND
PERFORMOUNCE
to
AVANTHIS
RESEARCH
AND
TECHNOLOGICAL
PROJECT GUIDE
DECLARATION
I
UPPALA PURNIMA Regd. No: 14HQ1E0088, student MBA, AVANTHIS RESEARCH AND
TECHNOLOGICAL ACADEMY is here by declare that the Project Report submitted by me to the
Head of management studies A STUDY ONFUND PERFORMONCE in RELIANCEat
VISHAKAPATANAM was submitted by me to the JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL
UNIVERSITY KAKINADA in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Degree MASTER OF
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION is a record of a bondified research carried out by me. I further
declare that this project is a genuine bondified work done by me and is not submitted to any other
University published anytime before.
Station :
Date
Date : 14.06.2015
CERTIFICATE
CHAPTERS
PG.NOS
CHAPTER 1
1. INTRODUCTION TO MUTUAL FUND
2. NEED FOR THE STUDY
3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
4. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
5. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
CHAPTER 2
1. INDUSTRY PROFILE
2. COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER 3
1. FUND PERFORMANCE
CHAPTER 4
1. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER 5
1. FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS
SUMMARY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER - I
INTORDUCTION
NEED FOR THE STUDY
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
METHODOLOGY
LIMITATIONS
On the basis of their structure and objective, mutual funds can be classified into
following major types:
Closed end funds
Open end funds
Large cap funds
Mid-cap funds
Equity funds
Balanced funds
Growth funds
No load funds
Exchange traded funds
value funds
Money market funds
International mutual funds
Regional mutual funds
Sector funds
Index funds
Fund of funds
Closed-end funds:
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares issued to the public through
an initial public offering.
Open-end funds:
Open end funds are operated by a mutual fund house which raises money from
shareholders and invests in a group of assets.
Mid-cap funds:
Mid cap funds are those mutual funds, which invest in small / medium sized
companies. As there is no standard definition classifying companies.
Equity funds:
Equity mutual funds are also known as stock mutual funds. Equity mutual funds
invest pooled amounts of money in the stocks of public companies.
Balanced funds:
Balanced fund is also known as hybrid fund. It is a type of mutual fund that buys a
combination of common stock, preferred stock, bonds, and short-term bonds.
Growth funds;
Growth funds are those mutual funds that aim to achieve capital appreciation by
investing in growth stocks.
No load funds:
Mutual funds can be classified into two types - Load mutual funds and No-Load
mutual funds.
Value funds:
Value funds are those mutual funds that tend to focus on safety rather than growth,
and often choose investments providing dividends as well as capital appreciation.
Sector funds:
Sector mutual funds are those mutual funds that restrict their investments to a
particular segment or sector of the economy.
Index funds:
An index fund is a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund) that aims to replicate the
movements of an index of a specific financial market.
Fund of funds:
A fund of funds (FoF) is an investment fund that holds a portfolio of other
investment funds rather than investing directly in shares, bonds or other securities.
10
11
Primary Data:
It is the information collected directly without any references. In this study it is gathered
through interviews with concerned officers and staff, either individually or collectively, some of
the information has been verified or supplement with personal observation conducting personal
interviews with the concerned officers of finance department of dredging corporation of India
ltd.
Secondary Data:
The secondary data was collected from already published sources such as pamphlets of
annual reports, returns and internal records, reference from textbooks and journals relating to
financial management.
The data collection includes.
1) Most of the computations are made from the figures contained in the financial statements
provided by the company.
2) Collection of some of the information regarding theoretical aspects by referring standard
texts and referred books.
3.)Collection of required data from annual records of Dredging corporation of India
12
13
CHAPTER - II
INDUSTRY PROFILE
14
INDUSTRY PROFILE
The origin of mutual fund industry in India is with the introduction of the
concept of mutual fund by UTI in the year 1963. Though the growth was slow, but it accelerated
from the year 1987 when non-UTI players entered the industry.
In the past decade, Indian mutual fund industry had seen a drastic
improvement, both qualities wise as well as quantity wise. Before, the monopoly of the market had
seen an ending phase; the Assets under Management (AUM) were Rs.67bn. the private sector
entry to the mutual fund family raised the AUM to Rs.470bn in March 1993 and till April 2004; it
reached the height of Rs.1540bn. Putting the AUM of Indian mutual fund industry into
comparison, the total of it is less than the deposits of SBI alone, industry. The main reason for its
poor growth is that the mutual fund industry in India is new in the country. Large sections of
Indian investors are yet to be informed about the concept. Hence it is the responsibility of all the
mutual fund companies to market the product correctly abreast of selling.
The mutual fund industry can be broadly put into four phases according to
the development of the sector.
PHASE 1: Establishment and Growth of UTI-1964-87
Unit trust of India enjoyed complete monopoly when it was
established in the year 1963 by an act of parliament. UTI was set up by the RBI and it continued to
operate under the regulatory control of the RBI until the two were delinked in the year 1978 and
the entire control was transferred into the hands of Industrial Development Bank of India. UTI
launched its first scheme in the year 1964, named as Unit scheme 1964 (US-1964), which attracted
the largest number of investors in any single investment scheme over the years.
UTI launched more innovative schemes in 1970s and 80s to
suit to the needs of different investors. It launched ULIP in 1971, six more schemes during 19811984, Childrens gift growth fund and India fund in 1986, Master share and Monthly income
schemes during 1990s. By the end of 1987, UTIs assets under management grew ten times to
Rs.6700 crores.
15
Amount mobilized
Assets Under
Management
Mobilization as % of
domestic savings
UTI
11,057
38,247
5.2%
Public Sector
1,964
8,757
0.9%
Total
13,021
47,004
6.1%
UTI Mutual Fund. Presently Unit Trust of India operates under the name of UTI Mutual Fund
and its past schemes (like US-64, Assured Return Schemes) are being gradually wind up.
However, UTI Mutual Fund is still the largest player in the industry.
AS 0N
UTI
31-March-99
53,320
PUBLIC
SECTOR
8,292
PRIVATE
SECTOR
6,860
TOTAL
68,472
18
Regulatory Authorities:
To protect the interest of the investors, SEBI formulates
policies and regulates the mutual funds. It notified regulations in 1993 and issues guidelines from
time to time. Mutual funds either promoted by public or private sector entities including one
promoted by foreign entities is governed by these regulations.
SEBI approved Asset Management Company (AMC) manages the funds
by making investments in various types of securities. Custodian, registered with SEBI, holds the
securities of various schemes of the fund in its custody.
According to SEBI regulations, 2/3rd of the directors of the Trustee
Company or board of trustees must be independent. The Association of Mutual Funds in India
(AMFI) reassures the investors in units of mutual funds that the mutual funds function within the
strict regulatory framework. Its objective is to increase public awareness of the mutual fund
19
industry. AMFI is also engaged in upgrading professional standards and in promoting best industry
practices in diverse areas such as valuation, disclosure, transparency etc.
20
BY STRUCTURE
Open-end fund:
The term mutual fund is the common name for what is classified as an open-end
investment company by the SEC. Being open-ended means that, at the end of every day, the fund
issues new shares to investors and buys back shares from investors wishing to leave the fund.
Mutual funds must be structured as corporations or trusts, such as business trusts, and any
corporation or trust will be classified by the SEC as an investment company if it issues securities
and primarily invests in non-government securities. An investment company will be classified by
the SEC as an open-end investment company if they do not issue undivided interests in specified
securities (the defining characteristic of unit investment trusts or UITs) and if they issue
redeemable securities. Registered investment companies that are not UITs or open-end investment
companies are closed-end funds. Neither UITs nor closed-end funds are mutual funds (as that term
is used in the US).
22
Interval Schemes:
Interval Schemes are that scheme, which combines the features of openended and close-ended schemes. The units may be traded on the stock exchange or may be open
for sale or redemption during pre-determined intervals at NAV related prices.
The risk return trade-off indicates that if investor is willing to take higher risk then
correspondingly he can expect higher returns and vice versa if he pertains to lower risk
instruments, which would be satisfied by lower returns. For example, if an investors opt for bank
FD, which provide moderate return with minimal risk. But as he moves ahead to invest in capital
protected funds and the profit-bonds that give out more return which is slightly higher as compared
to the bank deposits but the risk involved also increases in the same proportion.
Thus investors choose mutual funds as their primary means of investing,
as Mutual funds provide professional management, diversification, convenience and liquidity. That
23
doesnt mean mutual fund investments risk free. This is because the money that is pooled in are
not invested only in debts funds which are less riskier but are also invested in the stock markets
which involves a higher risk but can expect higher returns. Hedge fund involves a very high risk
since it is mostly traded in the derivatives market which is considered very volatile.
BY NATURE:
The idea is to classify funds based on both the size of the companies
invested in and the investment style of the manager. The term value refers to a style of investing
that looks for high quality companies that are out of favor with the market. These companies are
characterized by low P/E and price-to-book ratios and high dividend yields. The opposite of value
is growth, which refers to companies that have had (and are expected to continue to have) strong
growth in earnings, sales and cash flow. A compromise between value and growth is blend, which
24
simply refers to companies that are neither value nor growth stocks and are classified as being
somewhere in the middle.
Debt funds:
The objective of these Funds is to invest in debt papers. Government authorities,
private companies, banks and financial institutions are some of the major issuers of debt papers.
By investing in debt instruments, these funds ensure low risk and provide stable income to the
investors. Debt funds are further classified as:
Gilt Funds:
Invest their corpus in securities issued by Government, popularly known as
Government of India debt papers. These Funds carry zero Default risk but are associated with
Interest Rate risk. These schemes are safer as they invest in papers backed by Government.
Income Funds:
Invest a major portion into various debt instruments such as bonds, corporate
debentures and Government securities.
MIPs:
Invests maximum of their total corpus in debt instruments while they take minimum
exposure in equities. It gets benefit of both equity and debt market. These scheme ranks slightly
high on the risk-return matrix when compared with other debt schemes.
Liquid Funds:
Also known as Money Market Schemes, These funds provides easy liquidity and
preservation of capital. These schemes invest in short-term instruments like Treasury Bills, interbank call money market, CPs and CDs. These funds are meant for short-term cash management of
25
corporate houses and are meant for an investment horizon of 1day to 3 months. These schemes
rank low on risk-return matrix and are considered to be the safest amongst all categories of mutual
funds.
Balanced funds:
As the name suggest they, are a mix of both equity and debt funds. They invest in
both equities and fixed income securities, which are in line with pre-defined investment objective
of the scheme. These schemes aim to provide investors with the best of both the worlds. Equity
part provides growth and the debt part provides stability in returns.
BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE:
Growth Schemes:
Growth Schemes are also known as equity schemes. The aim of these schemes
is to provide capital appreciation over medium to long term. These schemes normally invest a
major part of their fund in equities and are willing to bear short-term decline in value for possible
future appreciation.
Income Schemes:
Income Schemes are also known as debt schemes. The aim of these schemes is to provide regular
and steady income to investors. These schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such
as bonds and corporate debentures. Capital appreciation in such schemes may be limited.
Balanced Schemes:
Balanced Schemes aim to provide both growth and income by periodically
distributing a part of the income and capital gains they earn. These schemes invest in both shares
and fixed income securities, in the proportion indicated in their offer documents (normally
50:50).
26
OTHER SCHEMES:
Index Schemes:
Index schemes attempt to replicate the performance of a particular index such as
the BSE Sensex or the NSE 50. The portfolio of these schemes will consist of only those stocks
that constitute the index. The percentage of each stock to the total holding will be identical to the
stocks index weight age. And hence, the returns from such schemes would be more or less
equivalent to those of the Index.
27
28
29
KMAMC started its operations in December 1998. Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund offers schemes
catering to investors with varying risk - return profiles. It was the first company to launch
dedicated gilt scheme investing only in government securities.
30
29th April 1994. The Trustees of LIC Mutual Fund have appointed Jeevan Bima Sahayog Asset
Management Company Ltd as the Investment Managers for LIC Mutual Fund.
2. Diversification
Purchasing units in a mutual fund instead of buying individual stocks or bonds,
the investors risk is spread out and minimized up to certain extent. The idea behind
diversification is to invest in a large number of assets so that a loss in any particular
investment is minimized by gains in others.
3. Economies of Scale
Mutual fund buy and sell large amounts of securities at a time, thus help to
reducing transaction costs, and help to bring down the average cost of the unit for their
investors.
4. Liquidity
Just like an individual stock, mutual fund also allows investors to liquidate
their holdings as and when they want.
5. Simplicity
Investments in mutual fund are considered to be easy, compared to other
available instruments in the market, and the minimum investment is small. Most AMC also
have automatic purchase plans whereby as little as Rs. 2000, where SIP start with just
32
6. Affordability
A mutual fund invests in a portfolio of assets, i.e. bonds, shares, etc.
depending upon the investment objective of the scheme. An investor can buy into a
portfolio of equities, which would otherwise be extremely expensive. Each unit holder thus
gets an exposure to such portfolios with an investment as modest as Rs.500/-. This amount
today would get you less than quarter of an Infosys share! Thus it would be affordable for
an investor to build a portfolio of investments through a mutual fund rather than investing
directly in the stock market.
2. Costs
The biggest source of AMC income is generally from the entry & exit load which
they charge from investors, at the time of purchase. The mutual fund industries are thus
charging extra cost under layers of jargon.
3. Dilution
Because funds have small holdings across different companies, high returns from a
few investments often don't make much difference on the overall return. Dilution is also
the result of a successful fund getting too big. When money pours into funds that have had
strong success, the manager often has trouble finding a good investment for all the new
money.
4
Taxes
When making decisions about your money, fund managers don't consider your personal tax
situation. For example, when a fund manager sells a security, a capital-gain tax is triggered,
33
which affects how profitable the individual is from the sale. It might have been more
advantageous for the individual to defer the capital gains liability.
34
COMPANY PROFILE
Reliance mutual fund, promoted by the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani (ADAG) group, is
one of the fastest growing mutual funds in India having doubled its assets over the last one year.
In March, 2006, the Reliance mutual fund emerged as the largest private sector fund house in the
country, overtaking Prudential ICICI which has been holding that position for many years.
The sponsor of the fund is Reliance Capital Limited, the financial services arm of ADAG.
Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliance Capital
Limited, acts as the AMC to the fund. Directors of the company include Amitabh Jhunjhunwala,
a senior executive of ADAG. Amitabh Chaturvedi is the managing director of the AMC.
As on end August 2006, Reliance mutual fund has Rs 28,753 crore of assets under management.
Reliance Equity Fund, launched by Reliance MF in early 2006, is the largest mutual fund scheme
in the country with a fund size of over Rs 5,500 crore.
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) is one of Indias leading Mutual Funds, with Average Assets
Under Management (AAUM) of Rs. 1, 11,819 Crores and an investor count of over 74 Lakh
folios. Reliance Mutual Fund, a part of the Reliance - Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, is one of
the fastest growing mutual funds in the country. RMF offers investors a well-rounded portfolio
of products to meet varying investor requirements and has presence in 159 cities across the
country. Reliance Mutual Fund constantly endeavors to launch innovative products and customer
service initiatives to increase value to investors. "Reliance Mutual Fund schemes are managed by
Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited., a subsidiary of Reliance Capital Limited, which
holds 93.37% of the paid-up capital of RCAM, the balance paid up capital being held by
minority shareholders."
Reliance Capital Ltd. is one of Indias leading and fastest growing private sector financial
services companies, and ranks among the top 3 private sector financial services and banking
companies, in terms of net worth. Reliance Capital Ltd. has interests in asset management, life
and general insurance, private equity and proprietary investments, stock broking and other
financial services.
35
STRUCTURE OF RELIANCE
VISION STATEMENT
To be a globally respected wealth creator, with an emphasis on customer care and a culture of
good corporate governance.
MISION STATEMENT
To create and nurture a world-class, high performance environment aimed at delighting their
customers.
36
Equity/Growth Schemes
The aim of growth funds is to provide capital appreciation over the
medium to long- term. Such schemes normally invest a major part of their corpus in equities.
Such funds have comparatively high risks. These schemes provide different options to the
investors like dividend option, capital appreciation, etc. and the investors may choose an option
depending on their preferences. The investors must indicate the option in the application form.
The mutual funds also allow the investors to change the options at a later date. Growth schemes
are good for investors having a long-term outlook seeking appreciation over a period of time.
Debt/Income Schemes
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors.
Such schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate debentures,
Government securities and money market instruments. Such funds are less risky compared to
equity schemes. These funds are not affected because of fluctuations in equity markets.
However, opportunities of capital appreciation are also limited in such funds. The NAVs of such
funds are affected because of change in interest rates in the country. If the interest rates fall,
NAVs of such funds are likely to increase in the short run and vice versa. However, long term
investors may not bother about these fluctuations.
37
ExchangeTradedFunds (ETFs)
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are usually passively managed mutual fund
schemes tracking a benchmark index and reflect the performance of that index. These schemes
are listed on the stock exchange and therefore have the flexibility of trading like a share on the
stock exchange. It can also be looked as a security that tracks an index, a commodity or a basket
of assets like an index fund, but trades like a stock on an exchange, thus experiencing price
changes throughout the day as it is bought and sold.
which are available in the derivatives segment from time to time and the secondary objective is
to generate consistent returns by investing in debt and money market securities.
The primary investment objective of the scheme is to generate long term capital
appreciation by investing predominantly in equity and equity related instruments of companies
engaged in infrastructure and infrastructure related sectors and which are incorporated or have
their area of primary activity, in India and the secondary objective is to generate consistent
returns by investing in debt and money market securities.
DEBT/INCOME SCHEMES
41
The primary investment objective of the scheme is to generate optimal credit risk-free
returns by investing in a portfolio of securities issued and guaranteed by the Central Government
and State Government.
Government securities and other fixed income/ debt securities normally maturing in line with the
time profile of the plan with the objective of limiting interest rate volatility.
46
CHAPTER III
47
FUND PERFORMANCE
For the majority of investors, investment performance is ultimately the most important
factor in determining which mutual fund to invest in. A mutual fund's performance can be
measured in several different ways, depending on its investment objectives. Whether a fund aims
for long term growth, current income, or a combination of the two, investors can track fund
performance and judge profitability by:
Figuring yield
While each calculation enables investors to compare a fund's performance to similar funds
offered by different companies, there is no simple calculation for comparing funds to individual
securities, because each return is figured differently depending on the type of investment.
As individual investors, we are all investment managers- of our own portfolios! Therefore, to
accurately answer the question of how are my investments doing we need to gauge our
investment performance at the portfolio level, rather than by each individual security. Utilizing
the net asset value (NAV) method of performance tracking allows us to measure the performance
of our entire portfolio and accurately compare our results with the universe of professionally
managed funds.
The NAV method is also the only accurate means of accounting for cash placed into, or taken out
of, an investment portfolio. New investments in the portfolio are made at the closing NAV on the
day of the investment. Similarly, money taken out of a portfolio is taken out at the NAV on the
day of the withdrawal. In either case, because a funds shares increase or decrease with the flow
of investments, accurate performance measurement is assured. Remember, the net asset value
equals the value of the fund investments divided by the shares outstanding.
48
Sample calculation:
Portfolio
Value
Fund
Shares
NAV
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,205,000
100,000
100,000
100,416.67
100,416.67
$10.00
$12.00
$12.00
$17.43
NAV = Portfolio
$5000 invested at
shares reflected
$7.43 ($17.43-$10.00)
Day 4
$1,750,000
$5000 / $12.00 =
Performance: up 74.3%
Notice the new investment on day 2 increases both the funds total portfolio value and shares
outstanding. To calculate investment performance, find the difference between the beginning and
ending net asset values and divide that number by the beginning NAV.
To use this method of performance tracking for your own portfolio, choose an arbitrary number
of shares outstanding and calculate your NAV. Note that in getting started, it is not important
what number you choose. Here at Marketocracy, for example, we choose 100,000.
When new investments are made, look at the closing NAV on that day and divide the amount of
your new investment by it. This will give you the correct number of shares to add to your
portfolio shares outstanding. Do the same calculation when you take money out of your
investment portfolio, but subtract the equivalent number of shares from the total portfolio shares
outstanding. For instance, if you were to withdrawal $20,000 from the above portfolio on day 4,
the shares of the portfolio would be reduced by 1,147.45 ($20,000 divided by $17.43 =
1,147.45). The shares outstanding would then be 99,269.22.
Total Return % = (Change in Value + Dividends) / Cost of Initial Investment
49
Standard deviation:
Standard deviation is a statistical measure of the range of a fund's performance, and is
reported as an annual number. When a fund has a high standard deviation, its range of
performance has been very wide, indicating that there is a greater potential for volatility.
Beta:
50
Another way to assess the Funds up and down movement is its Beta measure. Beta
measures the volatility of a fund relative to a particular market benchmark i.e. how sensitive the
fund is to market movements.
A Beta greater than 1 means that the fund is more volatile than the benchmark. A Beta less than
1 means that the fund is less volatile than the benchmark. For example, a Beta of 1.1 would
indicate that if the market goes up 10%, the fund might rise 11% and vice versa in a down
market.
Sharpe:
The most common measure that combines both risk and reward into a single indicator is
the Sharpe Ratio. A Sharpe Ratio is computed by dividing a funds return in excess of a risk-free
return (usually a 90-day Treasury Bill or SBI fixed deposit rate) by its standard deviation. This
measures the amount of return over and above a risk-free rate against the amount of risk taken to
achieve the return. So if a fund produced a 20% return while the SBI fixed deposit rate returned
6.5% and its standard deviation is 10%, its Sharpe Ratio would be
(20 6.5) / 10 = 1.35.
Generally, there is no right or wrong Sharpe Ratio. The measure is best used to compare one
funds ratio with another, or to its peer group average. For similar funds, the higher the Sharpe
Ratio, the better a funds historical risk-adjusted performance.
Sharpe ratio = (Fund Average Return - Risk Free Return) / Standard Deviation of the Fund
R-Squared (R2):
The R-Squared measure reveals what percentage of a funds movements can be related
to movements in its benchmark index. An R-Squared of 100 would mean that all of the funds
movements are perfectly explained by its benchmark; Index funds normally achieve this ideal. A
high R-squared means the beta on a fund is actually a useful measurement. A low R-squared
means ignore the beta.
Alpha:
The Alpha measure is less about risk than it is about "value added." Alpha represents
the difference between the performance you would expect from a fund, given its Beta, and the
51
actual returns it generates. A high alpha (more than 1) means that the fund has performed well. A
negative alpha means the fund under performed.
Mathematically, Alpha= fund return - [Risk free rate + Beta of fund (Benchmark return - Risk
free return)]
Trey nor:
The neither Trey nor ratio is similar to the Sharpe ratio. Instead of comparing the funds
risk adjusted performance to the risk free return, it compares the funds risk adjusted
performance of the relative index.
The following AMCs have been selected for comparing the fund performance and for analyzing
the portfolio of RELIANCE MUTUAL FUND.
52
As of end August 2006, Reliance mutual fund has Rs 28,753 crore of assets under management.
Reliance Equity Fund, launched by Reliance MF in early 2006, is the largest mutual find scheme
in the country with a fund size of over Rs 5,500 crore.
Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management Company Limited is the fund manager to the mutual
fund. BNP Paribas acquired a 49 per cent in the AMC in August, 2006, with Sundaram Finance
holding the balance.
T. P. Raman is the managing director and CEO of the AMC. Fund management function is
headed by N Prasad, chief investment officer. As of end August 2006, the fund has assets of over
Rs.5, 808 crore under management.
53
HSBC is one of the world's leading banking giants and boasts of a 140-year history in
banking services. HSBC operates in more than 70 countries across the globe and has assets of
over $1.2 trillion on the consolidated group balance sheet. The investment banking and fund
management businesses of the group is handled by HSBC Investments.
HSBC Asset Management India Private Limited acts as the Asset Management Company to the
HSBC Mutual Fund. HSBC Securities and Capital Markets India Private Limited, an affiliate of
the HSBC group, is the sponsor of the fund and owns 75 percent stake in the AMC.
The AMC is headed by its chairman Niall S Booker, who is also the head of HSBC Bank in
India. The operations of the AMC are headed by Sanjay Prakash, director and CEO. As of Aug
2006, the fund has assets of over Rs.10, 684 crore under management.
J M Mutual Fund
One of India's first private sector mutual funds, JM mutual fund was launched by
the one of the best-known domestic brokerages, JM Financial, owned by the Kampani family.
The Nilesh Kampani-led JM Group played a pivotal role in the development of India's nascent
capital markets in the 1950s. JM mutual fund is not a part of JM Morgan Stanley, JM Financial's
joint venture with Morgan Stanley for investment banking and other financial services. The fund
is sponsored by JM Financial and Investment Consultancy Services Private Limited and JM
Financial Limited.
The AMC of the fund is JM Financial Asset Management Private Limited. The AMC started
operations in December 1994 with a simultaneous launch of three funds-JM Liquid Fund (now
JM Income Fund), JM Equity Fund and JM balanced Fund. The company is headed by Vijay
Kelkar, former finance secretary and advisor to the government of India, as chairman of the
board. As on Aug 2006, the fund has assets of over Rs.4,241 crore under management.
India. The investment manager for the mutual fund, Jeevan Bima Sahayog Asset Management
Company Limited, was formed on April 20, 1994 in compliance with the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1993. The operations of the company are
headed by M. S. Suryanarayana, chief executive officer.
56
CHAPTER - IV
57
BANKING FUND
RELIANCE BANKING FUND
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
6.5
3 mths
4.9
6 mths
-6.8
1 year
33.5
2 year
62.4
3 year
27.0
5 year
24.1
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
58
2014-15
3.8
9.6
29.9
-3.4
44.2
2013-14
-14.4
65.5
20.1
-0.2
79.5
2012-13
-24.1
-18.2
16.2
-13.6
-39.3
2011-12
-5.0
36.1
19.8
19.8
75.5
2010-11
-0.3
-21.0
37.9
7.2
18.3
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
9.0
3 mths
12.8
6 mths
-6.6
1 year
29.5
2 year
53.8
3 year
22.9
5 year
24.1
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
59
2014-15
6.1
4.0
29.7
-6.4
35.7
2013-14
-13.3
63.1
17.6
-0.2
74.9
2012-13
-30.8
-20.6
16.5
-12.9
-46.3
2011-12
-5.6
29.9
18.5
22.1
65.9
2010-11
1.0
-17.8
34.1
16.3
30.8
Fig: 4(a)
INTERPRETATION:
From the above graph we can know that the Reliance banking fund has been performing well
when compared with UTI banking sector fund for the past 5years. Taking from 2010to 2015 the
performance of the reliance banking fund has shown a very high growth when compared with
UTI banking fund.
60
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
1.1
25
3 mths
1.7
99
6 mths
2.2
116
1 year
4.2
105
2 year
5.8
20
3 year
9.3
5 year
9.3
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.3
1.5
0.7
0.2
3.8
2014-13
-5.2
6.3
0.1
1.2
2.9
61
2013-12
2.8
1.7
2.7
15.2
23.7
2012-11
2.0
1.6
1.5
2.6
8.3
2011-10
1.5
1.6
2.2
2.5
8.4
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
0.6
72
3 mths
1.9
72
6 mths
3.3
69
1 year
6.2
49
2 year
5.6
32
3 year
13.5
5 year
10.3
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
0.3
2.5
0.6
1.3
4.9
2013-14
5.0
0.5
1.1
6.9
2012-13
1.5
2.7
10.2
12.8
29.9
2011-12
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.5
6.4
62
2010-11
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.3
4.6
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
1.1
3 mths
2.1
36
6 mths
2.8
102
1 year
5.3
86
2 year
6.4
12
3 year
8.7
5 year
8.9
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.6
1.5
0.9
0.6
4.9
2013-14
2.3
2.9
1.2
-0.2
9.4
2012-13
2.2
2.0
2.1
5.6
12.4
2011-12
1.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
9.8
2010-11
0.6
2.1
1.8
1.6
6.5
63
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
0.8
43
3 mths
2.1
29
6 mths
3.7
42
1 year
6.9
12
2 year
6.2
14
3 year
9.4
5 year
8.9
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.0
1.6
1.3
1.4
5.5
2013-14
1.2
2.0
1.0
1.7
6.1
2012-13
2.1
1.7
1.9
10.6
17.1
2011-12
1.6
2.1
2.1
2.6
9.0
64
2010-11
1.0
1.2
1.8
1.6
6.0
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
0.9
36
3 mths
2.0
72
6 mths
3.1
89
1 year
5.5
80
2 year
6.0
16
3 year
8.5
13
5 year
8.6
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.2
1.4
0.9
1.2
5.0
2013-14
2.5
2.8
1.1
-0.2
8.9
2012-13
1.9
1.4
2.0
6.2
12.0
2011-12
1.7
2.3
2.6
2.4
9.7
65
2010-11
1.2
1.7
1.8
1.9
6.9
Fig: 4(b)
INTERPRETATION:
From the above graph we can interpret that the performance of Reliance short term fund has
been decreasing due to the fund portfolio allocation made by the fund manager. The
performance was declining due to the allocation of 99 per cent of fund in debt where as Canara
Robeco has allocated only 55.60 per cent of funds into debt and the remaining in money
market.
66
EQUITY DIVERSIFIED
RELIANCE GROWTH FUND
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
6.2
212
3 mths
-3.4
244
6 mths
-11.4
195
1 year
2.9
183
2 year
41.2
67
3 year
10.6
60
5 year
14.6
21
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.8
3.4
11.6
-3.4
16.1
2013-14
-6.2
54.7
19.9
-0.2
93.5
2012-13
-30.0
-9.2
-3.6
-23.6
-54.6
2011-12
-3.9
22.1
12.5
33.2
74.7
67
2010-11
20.4
-14.9
17.4
13.8
39.8
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
7.3
127
3 mths
-3.3
242
6 mths
-10.5
178
1 year
4.6
174
2 year
42.7
52
3 year
11.4
50
5 year
20.9
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.8
2.6
13.2
-1.9
18.3
2013-14
-4.3
55.9
18.9
-0.2
97.8
2012-13
-27.8
-15.6
0.7
-23.7
-54.8
2011-12
-8.5
24.5
12.1
51.8
91.1
2010-11
18.3
-9.0
27.1
9.9
55.9
68
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
6.9
161
3 mths
4.6
15
6 mths
-4.5
47
1 year
18.4
2 year
48.6
40
3 year
17.3
10
5 year
17.7
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.3
5.2
16.5
-1.0
24.4
2013-14
-2.0
53.7
18.2
-0.2
91.0
2012-13
-22.7
-11.8
6.2
-22.8
-45.5
2011-12
-5.7
20.3
15.8
20.2
53.2
2010-11
20.5
-12.8
16.9
9.7
37.6
69
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
8.2
63
3 mths
-0.4
198
6 mths
-11.2
190
1 year
11.0
93
2 year
49.5
16
3 year
14.0
29
5 year
13.9
27
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
-2.3
4.5
16.1
-2.0
18.6
2013-14
-13.1
71.5
24.5
-0.2
109.3
2012-13
-34.2
-12.8
-4.8
-22.2
-58.9
70
2011-12
-7.4
18.0
13.2
31.2
62.3
2010-11
29.1
-4.4
11.3
10.4
56.8
Fig: 4(c)
INTERPRETATION:
From the above graph the performance of both Reliance Growth and Reliance Regular savings
fund are slightly equal from the past 5 years and they could perform better if more per cent of
investments are allocated into equity sector.
71
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
1.9
18
3 mths
1.2
33
6 mths
0.4
26
1 year
6.9
2 year
13.9
3 year
15.4
5 year
11.1
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.1
2.2
4.2
0.3
8.7
2013-14
-3.1
10.0
5.8
-0.2
20.8
2012-13
-6.3
-0.1
1.4
13.6
9.4
2011-12
-3.0
2.5
3.3
5.6
8.3
72
2010-11
4.2
-0.5
5.0
4.3
14.7
HDFC MIP
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
2.6
3 mths
2.5
6 mths
1.4
12
1 year
9.1
2 year
17.2
3 year
12.7
5 year
11.1
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.7
2.5
4.7
0.6
10.7
2013-14
0.7
17.4
5.5
3.3
30.5
2012-13
-7.1
-3.5
2.3
0.6
-8.6
2011-12
0.6
5.8
4.1
7.1
18.0
73
2010-11
4.7
-2.1
5.6
3.2
12.6
HSBC MIP
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
2.4
3 mths
1.2
34
6 mths
-0.9
35
1 year
3.3
26
2 year
11.8
3 year
8.4
5 year
9.4
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
1.0
0.4
3.9
0.4
6.8
2013-14
-2.5
9.2
5.4
3.1
18.1
2012-13
-4.9
-2.7
-0.4
5.3
-2.9
74
2011-12
-0.8
7.1
5.6
6.7
19.4
2010-11
2.9
-1.0
4.3
4.0
11.2
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
2.4
3 mths
2.5
6 mths
1.8
1 year
7.0
2 year
10.7
3 year
8.1
11
5 year
8.8
10
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
2.0
1.8
3.1
0.8
8.1
2013-14
9.0
3.6
1.4
15.1
75
2012-13
-4.2
-2.0
2.1
-0.3
-4.0
2011-12
-0.5
6.0
6.0
6.9
19.3
2010-11
6.1
-3.1
4.4
3.7
12.1
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
2.8
3 mths
2.4
6 mths
1.1
16
1 year
6.7
10
2 year
12.4
3 year
9.1
5 year
9.0
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
0.7
1.7
3.3
0.4
6.8
2013-14
0.6
11.8
4.5
2.2
21.2
2012-13
-5.8
-4.0
0.5
2.8
-7.2
76
2011-12
-1.7
6.6
4.2
8.5
17.8
2010-11
5.6
-2.9
4.1
4.3
12.3
PERFORMANCE OF MIP
Fig: 4(d)
INTERPRETATION:
From the above graph we can find that Reliance MIP has never given negative returns since 5
years and also started performing extraordinarily by providing better dividends to the small
investors when compared with the MIPs of other AMCs.
77
PHARMA FUND
FRANKLIN PHARMA FUND
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
6.7
3 mths
-1.5
6 mths
0.1
1 year
15.2
2 year
60.8
3 year
31.8
5 year
16.2
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
13.0
7.3
3.9
6.1
36.6
2013-14
-0.8
37.5
31.6
19.7
111.2
2012-13
-13.3
4.8
1.2
-20.8
-27.4
78
2011-12
-1.9
11.9
-11.8
10.0
5.6
2010-11
17.0
-21.6
14.9
6.7
13.5
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
7.8
3 mths
-1.1
6 mths
1.1
1 year
17.2
2 year
50.1
3 year
13.1
5 year
3.3
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
4.6
9.8
-0.3
9.5
29.6
2013-14
-11.3
43.8
26.2
-0.2
81.2
2012-13
-27.0
6.7
-10.5
-27.8
-50.2
79
2011-12
-7.3
12.9
-9.7
11.7
5.6
2010-11
10.0
-17.8
14.9
4.1
11.1
Returns
Period
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
6.8
3 mths
-2.3
6 mths
1.4
1 year
15.5
2 year
44.0
3 year
22.0
5 year
11.1
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
11.8
8.9
1.4
9.9
37.4
2013-14
-1.3
18.2
25.1
-0.2
65.7
2012-13
-15.5
9.8
-0.4
-18.4
-26.4
80
2011-12
-4.4
13.4
-6.5
10.7
10.8
2010-11
14.1
-22.2
13.5
4.8
7.8
Returns (%)
Rank #
1 mth
8.4
3 mths
-1.9
6 mths
-1.1
1 year
12.2
2 year
67.3
3 year
32.7
5 year
22.2
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Annual
2014-15
11.0
8.7
0.9
6.6
32.0
2013-14
-5.4
33.0
40.9
-0.2
116.7
2012-13
-29.1
0.6
3.4
-10.6
-35.0
81
2011-12
-4.3
31.2
-2.7
18.5
47.8
2010-11
13.6
-23.2
21.9
4.9
15.7
Fig: 4(e)
INTERPRETATION:
82
From the above graph we can interpret that Reliance pharma fund has been performing well
since 5 years when compared with UTI, SBI, and Franklin.
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS
SUMMARY
SUGGESTIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
83
FINDINGS
1. The performance of the Reliance Banking Fund was comparatively much better when
compared with UTI Banking Fund since 5 years when we look in terms of returns.
2. Though Canara Robeco debt fund performed well in 2008 Reliance Banking fund stood in
better position in 2009.
3.Though Reliance regular savings fund growth showed a poor performance in 2008 the
performance picked up in 2009 but still it could not perform much better than Sundaram BNP
Paribas.
4. Performance of Reliance MIP was not good when compared with HDFC MIP.Because HDFC
allocated 23.75 per cent of its assets in equity whereas Reliance allocated only 17.38 per cent.
5. Reliance Pharma Fund has performed well with 116.7 percent absolute returns in 2009.
6. Only Reliance AMC has allocated its funds in other options whereas other AMCs allocated
only in equity.
7. Reliance has allocated 99.82 per cent of its funds in Debt and 40.58 per cent is concentrated in
Top5 holdings and 60.28 per cent in Top10 holdings for better fund performance.
84
8. Reliance AMC has 38.50 per cent of holdings in Top5 companies and 65.48 per cent in Top10
holdings which is very less when compared with UTI.
9. Reliance MIP has allocated 80.82 per cent of its assets in Debt and 17.38 per cent in equity
when compared with other AMCs.
SUGGESTIONS
1. Asset management companies need to proper educate the investor to increase the awareness
and break the myths about mutual fund.
2. Index Funds have delivered much less compared to actively managed Funds. Gilt and Income
Funds have performed very well during the last three years. They perform best in a falling
interest environment. Since interest rates are now much lower, short term Funds are preferable.
3. Diversified equity has done very well while sectorial categories have fared poorly in Indian
market.
4. Mutual fund distributors like Reliance Mutual Fund should start a campaign to educate the
investors: there is a need of advertisement also to attract the investor.
5. Sales force should be well educated about every aspect of mutual fund so that they can solve
the queries of the investors.
6. AMCs should target rural market as a potential hub of customer. In rural area people are
getting wealth gradually and need a guidance to shift their portfolio from old sources to new and
modern sources
85
SUMMARY
Indias mutual fund industry suffered one of its worst crises in recent times during 2008-2009 as
the US originated housing market crises, which rocked the global financial markets towards
October 2008, hit domestic financial market as well. Equities crashed, bond markets went into a
tailspin, exports suffered, and India Inc.s sentiment was hit badly for the first time in many years,
possibly 2000. But the industry made a comeback of a sort led by a strong revival in equities,
worldwide, towards the beginning of the fiscal 2009-10, as investor sentiment in equities revived
as they left behind memories of the shocks from the banking sector turmoil and shrugged off fears
of long recessionary period. The sustained rally in equities since then saw the fortunes of the fund
industry change for the better. A slew of factors like a benign interest rate regime, improved
liquidity, revival in the job market, and moderate inflation among others helped revive investor
sentiment in mutual funds. The period also saw the market regulator introducing a slew of reforms
aimed at furthering the growth of the industry. Against this backdrop, the industry looks all set to
cross many more milestones in the years to come, provided it addresses certain concerns.
The previous fiscal year marked a major watershed in the history of the mutual funds industry in
India as the market regulator SEBI introduced some really path breaking reforms which in the long
86
run could prove beneficial to the industry even as it hurts the industry in the short run in terms of
investment inflows.
Investing in mutual funds purely on the basis of return is a decision that investors often regret later.
The credit quality of the fund is a key risk parameter, without which no meaningful analysis of the
fund performance can be done.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. MUTUAL FUNDS IN INDIA
Nalini Prava Tripathy
WEBSITES
www.mutualfundsindia.com
www.valueresearchonline.com
www.nseindia.com
87
www.reliancemutualfund.com
JOURNALS
The Analyst Mutual Funds July 2010
(Pages 26, 28, 72)
88