Parera Clay Assignmentfirstfinal2
Parera Clay Assignmentfirstfinal2
Parera Clay Assignmentfirstfinal2
students to be aware of what they are doing and why they are doing it. I believe if
students are not aware of and are not being taught why they are doing what they are
doing, there will be just a collection of mini assessment of learning which are then
used as the foundation for a final mark or a final grade. I believe assessment for
learning is really about asking ourselves what is it that we really want students to
learn and how can students use what they have learnt to further enhance their
learning.
I believe assessment for learning should be focused on the typical and predictable
misunderstandings that students are most likely to stumble upon. If teachers assess
for those misunderstandings that they are aware of that will most likely get in a
students way, they can structure the learning environment in ways that contribute to
those students learning (Clarke & Pittaway, 2014). For instance, this can be done
through grouping students in different ability groups or pairing students with different
abilities that help support each other. One of my goals for assessment for learning is
to not only ensure students develop an understanding of what is being taught but to
also ensure the process of learning for students that experience
difficulty/misunderstandings is quickened. Not only by the end will you have students
that have done better and understand more so than others, but have also moved the
students who experience difficulty by providing them with alternative patterns that will
move them forward. This is why I believe assessment for learning when done right is
very powerful.
Assessment practices and techniques I intend to use
I believe in order to choose the most appropriate assessment techniques for
assessment, the most important question every teacher should have in their mind
whenever they are doing assessment is what is this for? What do I need to find out
from it? And how am I going to use this information that I get from it? Doing
assessment is very similar process to assessment for learning as you are gathering
evidence for student learning (McTighe, 2013). If a teacher for assessment of
learning were to report to a students parent about the status of their childs learning,
the teacher will need to be gathering a whole body of evidence from a variety of
places. The teacher will be gathering it formally (essays, journal writings, portfolios),
informally (projects, tests, assignments), and by noting down students behaviours
and attitudes in the classroom. To ensure that the status report of a students
learning is accurate it is important that all teachers can justify their assessment. This
is why a whole body of evidence is gathered in order to justify what evidence we
used and how we used it.
Understanding by Design (UbD)
Throughout my teaching I intend to use the Understanding by Design (UbD) by
Wiggins and McTighe (2004) for improving student achievement. UbD works within
the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA, 2013)
achievement standards to help teachers clarify learning goals, devise revealing
assessments of student understanding, and create effective and engaging learning
activities. UbD assesses understanding, meaning just because students know things
does not mean they understand it (McTighe, 2013). UbD is important because it
doesnt just include tests, facts and basic skills but also assessments that allow
students to demonstrate their understanding. For instance, assessing students if
they can use what they have learnt, if they can explain what they have learnt in their
own words, if they can teach it to someone else.
Backward Design
My goal is to improve student achievement and for students to be able to transfer
their learning. I believe working in a Backwards Design will help achieve this goal.
According to Wiggins (2013) Backward Design means to know where youre going
so that you better understand where you are now so that the steps you take are
always in the right direction. The Backward Design has three stages as shown in
Figure 1. Stage 1 is focused on planning what students should know, understand,
and be able to do. It is also focuses on deciding what is worthy of understanding and
what enduring understandings are desired (McTighe and Wiggins, 2004). In this first
stage the teacher will consider goals, examine content standards and review
curriculum expectations.
Stage 2 addresses how we know if students have achieved the desired results, if
students have met the curriculum standards, and what evidence of student
understanding will be accepted. The backward design approach encourages
teachers to think like an assessor before designing a unit of work. This encourages
teachers to consider straight away how they will determine whether students have
attained the desired understandings. When planning to collective evidence of
understanding, it is important to consider a range of assessment methods shown in
figure 2. McTighe and Wiggins (2004) suggests that it is important that a backward
design process incorporates a balanced use of different types of assessments. This
is because by having collection of evidence over time our assessments can be
justified which is what is increasingly becoming a requirement from teachers.
Once the teacher has decided on what evidence of student understanding will be
accepted, planning instructional activities can commence. As shown in figure 3,
McTighe and Wiggins (2004) provide several key questions that must be considered
at this stage of the backward design. It is important to consider what knowledge and
skills students will need to perform effectively and achieve desired results. Activities
must be designed carefully including the materials and resources to ensure students
will equip the knowledge and skills needed.