Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Ong, Et Al. VS Palad, Et Al.

    Uploaded by

    thedoodlbot
    The title serves as evidence of indefeasible and incontrovertible title to the property in favor of respondents, whose names appear therein. As registered owners, respondents are entitled to possession of the subject property and their certificate of title prevails over possession claimed by petitioners. Petitioners are mere intruders with respect to the subject property and have no right to own or possess it, while respondents have the right to exercise all attributes of ownership including possession.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ong, Et Al. VS Palad, Et Al.

    Uploaded by

    thedoodlbot
    11 views1 page
    The title serves as evidence of indefeasible and incontrovertible title to the property in favor of respondents, whose names appear therein. As registered owners, respondents are entitled to possession of the subject property and their certificate of title prevails over possession claimed by petitioners. Petitioners are mere intruders with respect to the subject property and have no right to own or possess it, while respondents have the right to exercise all attributes of ownership including possession.

    Original Description:

    G.R. 203397, December 9, 2015

    Original Title

    ONG, ET AL. VS PALAD, ET AL.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The title serves as evidence of indefeasible and incontrovertible title to the property in favor of respondents, whose names appear therein. As registered owners, respondents are entitled to possession of the subject property and their certificate of title prevails over possession claimed by petitioners. Petitioners are mere intruders with respect to the subject property and have no right to own or possess it, while respondents have the right to exercise all attributes of ownership including possession.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    11 views1 page

    Ong, Et Al. VS Palad, Et Al.

    Uploaded by

    thedoodlbot
    The title serves as evidence of indefeasible and incontrovertible title to the property in favor of respondents, whose names appear therein. As registered owners, respondents are entitled to possession of the subject property and their certificate of title prevails over possession claimed by petitioners. Petitioners are mere intruders with respect to the subject property and have no right to own or possess it, while respondents have the right to exercise all attributes of ownership including possession.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    ONG, ET AL. VS PALAD, ET AL.

    G.R. 203397, December 9, 2015


    TORRENS TITLE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE OF OWNERSHIP
    The title serves as evidence of indefeasible and incontrovertible title to the property in favor of
    respondents, whose names appear therein; and that as registered owners, they are entitled to
    possession of the subject property. As against possession claimed by the petitioners, respondents'
    certificate of title prevails. "[M]ere possession cannot defeat the title of a holder of a registered
    [T]orrens title x x x."
    Petitioners are mere intruders with respect to the subject property; they have no right to own or
    possess the same. On the other hand, as registered owners of the subject property, respondents have
    the right to exercise all attributes of ownership including possession which they cannot do while
    petitioners remain there.

    You might also like