F A (where F is the force applied and A is the cross-sectional area of the δl l l Fl A Δl
F A (where F is the force applied and A is the cross-sectional area of the δl l l Fl A Δl
The objective of this experiment was the calculation of the Youngs modulus of steel. For this
purpose, a steel wire was hung from a beam attached to the laboratory ceiling. A series of
weights with increasing mass were attached to the wire, causing it to stretch downwards. The
distance from the weight to the floor was measured each time.
E , is defined as the ratio of the stress applied to the
F
A
(where
l
l , which is just the fractional change in its length,
l
E=
Fl
A l
(1)
N m2 , (the same units as the stress, as the
Experimental
The steel wire was measured to be 1m long, with an estimated mean diameter of 0.30 mm. A
range of data using weights from 0.5 kg to 6.0 kg is presented in the table below; when a 6.5
kg load was attached it broke the wire. The distance measurements were estimated to be
accurate to 0.04 mm, and the possible variations in the wire diameter along its length were
estimated to be up to plus or minus 0.005 mm, while the error in the wire length and the
masses used was negligibly small.
Mass (kg)
Distance (mm)
0.5
9.70
1.0
9.26
1.5
8.96
2.0
8.64
2.5
8.38
3.0
8.00
3.5
7.62
4.0
7.36
4.5
7.04
5.0
6.60
5.5
6.00
6.0
5.22
Results
Eq. (1) can be written as
l=
l
F
AE
(2)
The force applied to the wire is equal to the weight of the object attached to it, therefore
F=mg and
l=
If
and
li +1
and
mi+1
(3)
are the extensions of the wire caused by the weights with masses
mi
, respectively, then
li +1l i=
But
gl
m
AE
with masses
mi
and
, where
mi+1
di
gl
( m mi)
A E i +1
and
d i+1
(4)
gl
(m mi) ,
A E i +1
(5)
gl
(m m1 )
AE n
measurements. Defining
th
(6)
m=mnm1
E .
A plot of the effective extension (in mm) versus the effective mass (in kg) is shown in Fig. 1
FIGURE 1 Plot of