Estadisticas de Salud Mundial

WORLD
HEALTH
STATISTICS
MONITORING
HEALTH FOR THE
SDGs
S U S T A I N A B L E
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
WORLD
HEALTH
STATISTICS
MONITORING
HEALTH FOR THE
SDGs
S U S T A I N A B L E
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals.
1.Health Status Indicators. 2.Global Health. 3.Health Priorities. 4.Mortality. 5.Universal Coverage. 6.Life Expectancy. 7.Statistics. I.World Health
ISBN 978 92 4 156526 4
(NLM classification: WA 900.1)
E-ISBN 978 92 4 069569 6 (PDF)

World Health Organization 2016
All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World
Health Organization, 20Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]).
Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution should be addressed to WHO Press
through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html).
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World
Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization
in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial
capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material
is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader.
In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use.
Photo credits: page 1 UN Photo/Kibae Park; page 3 WHO/SEARO/David Orr; page 7 WHO/Sergey Volkov; page 15 WHO/Chris de Bode; page 23 WHO/SEARO/Karen
Reidy; page 29 WHO/Christopher Black.
Design and layout by LIV Com Srl, Villars-sous-Yens, Switzerland.
Printed in France.
CONTENTS
Executive summary. .
Abbreviations.
Introduction. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
vi
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. The 2030 Agenda a new impetus for health monitoring..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Implications of the SDGs for health monitoring a challenge and an opportunity for all countries.
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
Scope an agenda for all countries.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contents all major health areas are included. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity the need for disaggregated data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multisectoral data health-related risk factors and determinants.
Country monitoring data gaps and capacity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Regional and global monitoring mechanisms and estimates. . . .
Review using data for improved implementation. . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Monitoring the health goal indicators of overall progress. .

3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
10
12
12
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
17
17
21
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sex major differences between men and women for many indicators. . . . . . . . . . . .
Age data should cover the full life course. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Socioeconomic status major disadvantages for the poorest and the least educated. .
Place of residence focus on geographical differences within countries. . . . . . . . . . . .
Migrants and minorities requiring special efforts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Data gaps disaggregation is a crucial data challenge.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. SDG health and health-related targets.

6.1
6.2
6.3

6.4
3
4
4
4
4
5
6
UHC coverage index of essential health services a new summary measure. .

Inequalities in coverage towards an integrated assessment.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial protection measuring the impact of out-of-pocket payments. . . . .
Data gaps regular UHC monitoring is possible. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Equity leave no one behind. .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Life expectancy major gains but still large differences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Healthy life expectancy gaining healthy life years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premature mortality focusing on deaths among those under 70 years of age. .
Data gaps most deaths not registered. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Universal health coverage at the centre of the health goal.

4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
viii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
25
25
26
26
28
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29
Health targets 13 targets and 26 proposed indicators. . . . . . . . . . . .

Health-related targets in other goals many targets linked to health. .
Situation in 2016 a sketch based on global data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Infectious diseases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncommunicable diseases and mental health. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Injuries and violence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Health systems.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Data gaps need for strong country health information systems. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MONITORING HEALTH FOR THE SDGs
29
30
30
30
35
36
37
38
39
iii
Annex A: Summaries of the SDG health and health-related targets. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explanatory notes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.1 Maternal mortality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.1 Births attended by skilled health personnel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.2 Child mortality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.3 HIV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.3 Tuberculosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.3 Malaria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.3 Hepatitis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.3 Neglected tropical diseases.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.4 Noncommunicable diseases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.4 Suicide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.5 Substance abuse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.6 Road traffic injuries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.7 Sexual and reproductive health. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.9 Mortality due to air pollution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.9 Mortality due to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene..
Target 3.9 Mortality due to unintentional poisoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.a Tobacco use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.b Essential medicines and vaccines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.c Health workforce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 3.d National and global health risks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 2.2 Child stunting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 2.2 Child wasting and overweight. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 6.1 Drinking-water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 6.2 Sanitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 7.1 Clean household energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 11.6 Ambient air pollution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 13.1 Natural disaster. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 16.1 Homicide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target 16.1 Conflicts.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
43
44
. 46
. 48
. 50
. 52
. 54
. 56
. 58
. 60
. 62
. 64
. 66
. 68
. 70
. 72
. 74
. 76
. 78
. 80
. 82
. 84
. 86
. 88
. 90
. 92
. 94
. 96
. 98
100
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
103
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
103
Annex B: Tables of health statistics by country, WHO region and globally. .

Explanatory notes. .
Annex C: WHO regional groupings..
iv
43
WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
121
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
he 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda integrate all three dimensions of sustainable
development (economic, social and environmental) recognizing that eradicating poverty and inequality, creating
inclusive economic growth and preserving the planet are inextricably linked. Health is centrally positioned
within the 2030 Agenda, with one comprehensive goal (SDG 3) and its 13 targets covering all major health
priorities, and links to targets in many of the other goals.
The 2030 Agenda has major implications for health monitoring. Monitoring will need to reflect the fact that the SDGs
are relevant for all countries. In order to accommodate a much broader range of health and health-related issues, country,
regional and global monitoring systems will have to adapt. This will mean, at the very least, undertaking health data
collection, analysis and communication in an integrated manner. The SDG focus on leaving no one behind means that
much greater attention will have to be given to disaggregated data. Health monitoring will have to look beyond the health
sector and consider economic, social and environmental indicators, as well as intersectoral actions. The 2030 Agenda also
puts strong emphasis on country follow-up and review processes as the basis for accountability. Strengthening country
health information systems should therefore be a priority.
This report brings together the most recent data on the proposed health and selected health-related SDG indicators to
assess the current situation and describe crucial data gaps. In the current absence of official goal-level indicators, summary
measures of health such as (healthy) life expectancy are used to provide a general assessment of the situation. As universal
health coverage (UHC) is a central concern, statistics are presented on a service-coverage index and on measures of
financial protection using the WHO/World Bank UHC monitoring framework. In relation to equity, special attention is given
to describing the statistical situation disaggregated by key demographic, geographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
Because the 2030 Agenda emphasizes the interlinked nature of all the various goals, this report also includes indicators
of selected health determinants and risk factors in relation to other SDG targets. More work is required to fully integrate
monitoring the health dimension in other goals.
Available data show that in spite of the major progress during the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era, major
challenges remain in terms of reducing maternal and child mortality, improving nutrition, and achieving further progress
in the battle against infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases and hepatitis.
The situation analysis also provides evidence of the importance of addressing noncommunicable diseases and their risk
factors such as tobacco use, mental health problems, road traffic injuries, and environmental health issues. Data on water
and sanitation and air quality show that much more needs to be done to reduce risks to health. Weak health systems are
a major obstacle in many countries, resulting in major deficiencies in UHC for even the most basic health services and
inadequate preparedness for health emergencies.
This report shows that for most SDG health and health-related targets it is possible to provide an overview of the global
situation and trends using a limited number of indicators. It, however, also shows that there are major data gaps for many
indicators. For instance, several health and health-related indicators require regular, quality data on mortality by age,
sex and cause of death, which are still lacking in most countries. The demand for comparable disaggregated statistics is
particularly challenging for almost all indicators. These deficiencies will require major investments in strengthening country
health information and statistical systems.
ABBREVIATIONS
ABR
AFR
AIDS
AMR
ART
CRD
CRVS
CVD
DHS
EML
EMR
EPPM
EUR
FCTC
GDP
GHO
GSHRH
HAT
HBV
HCV
HepBOT
HIV
HLE
HLPF
HRH
IAEG-SDGs
ICD
IGME
IHR
ITN
LMIC
MDG
MICS
MMEIG
MMR
NCD
NHA
NHWA
NTD
ODA
vi
adolescent birth rate

WHO African Region
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
WHO Region of the Americas
antiretroviral therapy
chronic respiratory disease
civil registration and vital statistics
cardiovascular disease
Demographic and Health Survey
essential medicines list
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
ending preventable maternal mortality
WHO European Region
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
gross domestic product
Global Health Observatory
Global strategy on human resources for health
human African trypanosomiasis
hepatitis B virus
hepatitis C virus
HBV vaccine birth dose administered in a timely way
human immunodeficiency virus
healthy life expectancy
High-Level Political Forum
human resources for health
Interagency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators
International Classification of Diseases
Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (United Nations)
International Health Regulations
insecticide-treated net
low- and middle-income countries
Millennium Development Goal
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey
Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group (United Nations)
maternal mortality ratio
noncommunicable disease
national health account
national health workforce accounts
neglected tropical disease
official development assistance
OECD
OOP
PM
PPP
R&D
SDG
SEAR
STH
TB
THE
UHC
UN
UNAIDS
UNDESA
UNESCO
UNICEF
UNODS
WASH
WHA
WPR
YLD
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

out-of-pocket
particulate matter
purchasing power parity
research and development
Sustainable Development Goal
WHO South-East Asia Region
soil-transmitted helminthiases
tuberculosis
total health expenditure
universal health coverage
United Nations
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
United Nations Childrens Fund
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
water, sanitation and hygiene
World Health Assembly
WHO Western Pacific Region
years of healthy life lost due to disability
vii
INTRODUCTION
he World Health Statistics series is WHOs annual compilation of health statistics for its 194 Member States.
World Health Statistics 2016 focuses on the proposed health and health-related Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) and associated targets. It represents an initial effort to bring together available data on SDG health and
health-related indicators. In the current absence of official goal-level indicators, summary measures of health
such as (healthy) life expectancy are used to provide a general assessment of the situation.
The series is produced by the WHO Department of Information, Evidence and Research, of the Health Systems and
Innovation Cluster, in collaboration with all relevant technical departments of WHO. As in previous years, World Health
Statistics 2016 has been compiled primarily using publications and databases produced and maintained by WHO or United
Nations groups of which WHO is a member, such as the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (IGME).
A number of statistics have been derived from data produced and maintained by other international organizations, such
as the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) and its Population Division.
Unless otherwise stated, all estimates have been cleared following consultation with Member States and are published
here as official WHO figures. Where necessary the estimates provided have been derived from multiple sources, depending
on each indicator and on the availability and quality of data. In many countries, statistical and health information systems
are weak and the underlying empirical data may not be available or may be of poor quality. Every effort has been made
to ensure the best use of country-reported data adjusted where necessary to deal with missing values, to correct for
known biases, and to maximize the comparability of the statistics across countries and over time. In addition, statistical
modelling and other techniques have been used to fill data gaps. However, these best estimates have been derived using
standard categories and methods to enhance their cross-national comparability. As a result, they should not be regarded
as the nationally endorsed statistics of Member States which may have been derived using alternative methodologies.
Because of the weakness of the underlying empirical data in many countries, a number of the indicators presented here
are associated with significant uncertainty. It is WHO policy to ensure statistical transparency and to make available to
users the methods of estimation and the margins of uncertainty for relevant indicators. However, to ensure readability
while covering such a comprehensive range of health topics, printed versions of the World Health Statistics series do not
include the margins of uncertainty which are instead made available through online WHO databases such as the Global
Health Observatory (GHO).1
While every effort has been made to maximize the comparability of the statistics across countries and over time, users
are advised that country data may differ in terms of the definitions, data-collection methods, population coverage and
estimation methods used. More information on indicator metadata is available through the Global Health Observatory.
1 The Global Health Observatory (GHO) is WHOs portal providing access to data and analyses for monitoring the global health situation. See: http://www.who.int/gho/en/,
accessed 16 April 2016.
viii
THE 2030 AGENDA

A NEW IMPETUS FOR
HEALTH MONITORING
In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly

adopted the new development agenda: Transforming
our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.1
Comprising 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the
2030 Agenda integrates all three dimensions of sustainable
development (economic, social and environmental) around
the themes of people, planet, prosperity, peace and
partnership. The SDGs recognize that eradicating poverty
and inequality, creating inclusive economic growth and
preserving the planet are inextricably linked, not only to
each other, but also to population health.
Intended to realize the vision of a world that is rights

based, equitable and inclusive, the 2030 Agenda is to be
implemented in a manner consistent with the existing
obligations of states under international law. Many
governments, institutions and organizations have already
started to translate the new agenda into their development
plans, strategies and visions.2 Encouraging stakeholders to
work together to promote sustained, inclusive economic
growth, social development and environmental protection,
the 2030 Agenda is designed to benefit all. Universal in
1 The future we want. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012.
A/RES/66/288. United Nations General Assembly, Sixty-sixth session, agenda item 19
(http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288, accessed 9 April
2016).
2 Mainstreaming the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Reference guide to UN
Country Teams. February 2016. New York (NY): United Nations Development Group;
2015 (https://undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/UNDG-Mainstreaming-the-2030Agenda-Reference-Guide-Final-1-February-2016.pdf, accessed 9 April 2016).
scope, the agenda will require a comprehensive, integrated

approach to sustainable development, as well as collective
action at all levels. Leaving no one behind will be an
overarching theme, and addressing inequalities and
discrimination a defining feature.
Health is centrally positioned within the 2030 Agenda, with
one comprehensive goal SDG3: Ensure healthy lives and
promote well-being for all at all ages and explicit links to
many of the other goals. The 2030 Agenda thus has major
implications for the health sector, and its realization will
entail the development of coherent, integrated approaches,
and an emphasis on equity and multisectoral action.
Each of these broad objectives will require debate and
the generation of new approaches at global, regional and
country levels.3
SDG3 includes 13 targets covering all major health priorities,
including four targets on the unfinished and expanded
Millennium Development Goal (MDG) agenda, four targets
to address noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), mental
health, injuries and environmental issues, and four meansof-implementation targets. The target for universal health
3 Preparing the Region of the Americas to achieve the Sustainable Development
Goal on health. Washington (DC): Pan American Health Organization; 2015 (http://
iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/10016/9789275118634_eng.
pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, accessed 9 April 2016).
coverage (UHC) underpins, and is key to, the achievement of

all the other targets and the development of strong resilient
health systems. Achieving the UHC target will require an
integrated approach to the provision of health services
that minimizes fragmentation and the competing agendas
that characterized the MDG period. Comprehensive in
scope, the health targets build upon a wide array of recent
World Health Assembly (WHA) and Regional Committee
resolutions, WHO and other global plans of action and
current country health strategies.1
Tracking progress was vital in maintaining momentum
towards the MDGs and in identifying areas that required
greater efforts. It will be no less important in the context of
the SDGs. The 2030 Agenda places considerable emphasis
on the systematic follow-up and review of SDG-related
implementation at country, regional and global levels.
Health-related monitoring will occur in the context of
overall assessment of progress towards the SDGs, and will
need to be comprehensive, comprising the monitoring of:
(a) overall progress towards SDG3; (b) the UHC target;
(c) other health targets; and (d) health-related targets in
other goals all of which will be undertaken with a strong
emphasis on equity.
In March 2016, the United Nations Statistical Commission
discussed the proposed global indicator framework of its
Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEGSDGs). 2 IAEG-SDGs members represent 28 national
statistical offices, with United Nations agencies acting as
observers and the United Nations Statistical Division as
the secretariat. The United Nations Statistical Commission
agreed as a practical starting point with the global
indicator framework proposed by the IAEG-SDGs subject
to further technical refinement.3
The indicator framework will be presented for adoption
to the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) for Sustainable
Development, under the auspices of the United Nations
Economic and Social Council in mid-2016.2 The indicator
framework comprises 230 indicators, including several
dozen requiring further development. The framework is
focused on indicators for the 169 SDG targets, and does not
include goal-level or thematic indicators that cut across goals
to assess the overall achievements of the 2030 Agenda.
A complex and intensive reporting, follow-up and review
process is planned, and will include an annual SDG Progress
Report by the United Nations Secretary-General with
support from the United Nations system. The report will
1 Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
www.who.int/gho/publications/mdgs-sdgs/en/, accessed 9 April 2016).
2 Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal
Indicators. E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1. 19 February 2016. Presented to the Forty-seventh
session of the United Nations Statistical Commission, 811 March 2016 (http://unstats.
un.org/unsd/statcom/47th-session/documents/2016-2-IAEG-SDGs-Rev1-E.pdf,
accessed 18 April 2016).
3 Report of the Commission on its 47th session. Draft decisions. 11 March 2016. New
York (NY): United Nations Statistical Commission; 2016 (http://sd.iisd.org/events/47thsession-of-un-statistical-commission/, accessed 9 April 2016).
2
serve to inform the HLPF, which will also receive a Global

Sustainable Development Report from the United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Follow-up and
review will possibly focus on a small number of themes each
year with the intention of covering all SDGs over a period
of 4 years. Every 4 years, starting in 2019 and under the
auspices of the United Nations General Assembly, the HLPF
will review overall progress and provide high-level political
guidance on the SDG agenda and its implementation.4
Review mechanisms will also be established at regional and
national level, and are likely to be more active and relevant
than was the case for the MDGs.
This World Health Statistics report represents an initial
effort to bring together available data on the SDG health
and health-related indicators to provide an assessment of
the situation in 2016 and to take stock of data gaps. Data
are presented on the proposed indicators for health targets
in goal 3 and selected health-related targets in other SDG
targets, revealing the crucial linkages between health and
the other SDGs. The two-page summaries in Annex A
provide more detailed information on the epidemiological
situation, set out what is needed to achieve the 2030
targets, and indicate what is currently known about the key
aspects of equity and the extent of data gaps for each target.
In addition, this report presents summary measures of health
such as life expectancy to assess the situation and trends
which can be used to monitor health goal-level progress.
UHC is one of the health targets. As stated above, because
it underpins the achievement of all other health targets
under SDG3, a separate section presents statistics on a
UHC service-coverage index and on measures of financial
protection using the WHO/World Bank UHC monitoring
framework.5 Finally, as equity is central to the realization
of the SDGs, special attention is given to describing the
statistical situation disaggregated by key demographic,
geographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
The report does not address issues related to monitoring the
global partnership that will be crucial in advancing the 2030
Agenda. Future monitoring will have to include the extent
to which a revitalized global partnership is delivering the
means of implementation. SDG17 is specifically devoted
to strengthening the means of implementation and a set
of indicators has been drawn up to monitor progress in
achieving that end. This also includes monitoring the extent
to which data are disaggregated by relevant inequality
dimensions and the extent to which countries are making
progress in implementing a regular census and succeed in
achieving high levels of birth and death registration.
4 Critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow-up and review at
the global level. Report of the Secretary-General. A/70/684. 15 January 2016. New York
(NY): United Nations; 2016 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%20
/70/684&Lang=E, accessed 9 April 2016).
5 Tracking universal health coverage: first global monitoring report. Geneva and
Washington (DC): World Health Organization and World Bank; 2015. (http://www.who.
int/healthinfo/ universal_health_coverage/report/2015/en/, accessed 9 April 2016).
IMPLICATIONS OF THE
SDGs FOR HEALTH
MONITORING
A CHALLENGE AND
AN OPPORTUNITY
FOR ALL COUNTRIES
Tracking progress towards the health-related MDGs led to

substantial developments in monitoring capacity. Notable
advances included the focus on a small set of indicators
and targets, and the increased investment in health data
for priority health programmes. At the same time, major
efforts were directed at compiling statistics on progress
at regional and global levels. It can be argued that without
the galvanizing influence of the MDGs on promoting
measurement and the development of monitoring systems
the world would not be in a position to track progress
with the degree of confidence that is now possible. The
MDG monitoring effort also brought key issues to the fore,
encouraging political leaders in several countries to make
public commitments to achieving specific targets in areas
such as maternal and child mortality. Such commitments
not only put pressure on governments to deliver, but also
provide a way for civil society, parliaments and the media
to hold health providers to account.
The 2030 Agenda differs from the MDGs in several ways,
with important implications for global, regional and country
health monitoring. Key differences include the broader
scope of the 2030 Agenda in terms of the health targets
set, as well as the emphasis placed on equity, the links
between health and other sectors, and the centrality of
country monitoring and review. This section discusses the
main differences and their implications for monitoring.
2.1 Scope an agenda for all countries

The SDGs are not solely focused on developing countries.
Thus, while some targets and indicators may be more
relevant for developing countries, SDG monitoring should,
in principle, cover all. At present, there are multiple regular
global mechanisms for health monitoring and reporting, but
most are focused on specific health topics (such as annual
reports on tuberculosis or malaria) or on a limited numbers
of countries (for example, regional WHO reports or the
Health at a Glance series of the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development OECD).1 The WHO World
Health Statistics series, supported by the web portal Global
Health Observatory (GHO), is currently the only regular
United Nations mechanism that presents comparable
data on a large range of health topics from all countries.2
Because many countries still do not have adequate health
information systems data availability and quality varies
greatly between countries. For example, only 70 countries
currently provide WHO with regular data on mortality by
age, sex and cause of death which are required for more
than a dozen SDG indicators. There are also important data
1 Health at a Glance provides the latest comparable data and trends on different aspects
of the performance of health systems in OECD countries. See: http://www.oecd.org/
health/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm, accessed 22 April 2016.
2 The Global Health Observatory (GHO) is WHOs portal providing access to data and
analyses for monitoring the global health situation. See: http://www.who.int/gho/en/,
gaps for indicators other than mortality. This is a challenge

for all countries, including high-income countries, and is a
particular concern with regard to disaggregated data.
2.2 Contents all major health areas are

included
The SDGs cover a much broader set of topics than
the MDGs, notably with regard to health. The SDG3
targets cover virtually all major health topics, including
reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious
diseases, NCDs, mental health, road traffic injuries, UHC,
environmental health consequences and health systems
strengthening. In addition, many other SDGs include healthrelated targets and indicators such as targets for nutrition,
water, sanitation, air quality and violence, as well as for the
key determinants of health such as education and poverty.
In order to accommodate a much broader range of health
and health-related issues, country, regional and global
monitoring systems will have to adapt. This will mean, at
the very least, undertaking data collection in an integrated
manner, and avoiding the fragmentation and duplication
of investment and effort that often characterized MDGrelated efforts. At the same time, data analyses will need
to assimilate multiple areas of health and provide clearly
articulated syntheses for diverse audiences. Progress and
performance review processes will provide an opportunity
to take a more holistic approach to the interpretation of
results on a wide range of targets and indicators, and to
translate comprehensive analysis into effective action.
Finally, closer collaboration between health and other
sectors will be required to ensure that health monitoring
takes into account data on determinants and risk factors for
health, and that other sectors give due attention to health
statistics. Health stakeholders will need to work closely with
the statistical community to enhance the quality of health
monitoring, ensure strong inputs from other sectors and
align with the overall SDG monitoring processes.
2.3 Equity the need for disaggregated

data
Much of the focus on the MDGs was based on aggregate
global, regional and national achievements. Going
forward, and in order to reflect the SDGs emphasis on
equitable development, there is a need for much greater
disaggregation of data, including statistics disaggregated
by sex, age, income/wealth, education, race, ethnicity,
migratory status, disability and geographic location, or
by other characteristics, in order to identify and track
disadvantaged populations within countries. SDG Target
17.18 specifically calls for countries to increase the availability
of data disaggregated by all relevant inequality dimensions.
4
Data disaggregation presents a major challenge for many

countries and for global and regional monitoring. Household
surveys are the primary source of disaggregated health data
on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and can
be used to identify disadvantaged populations. However,
they often lack the sample sizes required to allow for the
computation of reliable subnational statistics beyond the
provincial or regional level, or to measure health indicators
in smaller disadvantaged or difficult-to-survey populations
such as migrants, mobile populations and minorities. Data
from health facilities and administrative sources can be
used to fill the local information gap, but the quality of
such data still requires considerable improvement in many
countries. In several situations special data collection efforts
are required.
2.4 Multisectoral data health-related risk

factors and determinants
Because the SDGs address the full range of economic,
environmental and social factors that underpin sustainable
development, monitoring progress towards them requires a
high degree of integrated analysis. Health-related targets in
the SDGs must be included in health monitoring, including
risk factors for health that are the primary domain of other
sectors (for example, water and sanitation, air quality
and nutrition). Determinants of health that have a major
indirect influence on health, such as income/wealth,
education, gender, peace and security, should also be
considered. Because the health sector often does not have
primary responsibility for tracking these determinants,
effective monitoring will depend upon more integrated
and collaborative approaches. In addition, monitoring
should aim to track multisectoral action. While this may be
measured through quantitative process indicators outside of
the global SDG indicator framework, qualitative information
is often required to obtain a clear picture of what is really
happening.
2.5 Country monitoring data gaps and

capacity
The 2030 Agenda puts considerable emphasis on
country follow-up and review processes as the basis for
accountability. With so many global SDG indicators such
follow-up and review will inevitably be challenging for
many countries, especially those facing major data gaps.
Strengthening country health information systems should
therefore be a priority. In future, the overall data picture
may improve as a result of innovative approaches based
on information and communication technology and the
trend towards open data that is, the release of data by
government agencies, businesses, non-profit organizations,
researchers and other private entities that can be easily
accessed and used by all. Open data is not only facilitating
broader scrutiny, but also allowing for the use of different

kinds of data.
2.6 Regional and global monitoring

mechanisms and estimates
National statistical offices will lead the country SDG

monitoring processes. Enhanced collaboration between
health and other sectors with statistical offices will be
vitally important in constructing a coherent narrative
regarding national health status and trends. According to
the proposals of the United Nations Statistical Commission,
the global indicators will be the core of all other sets of
indicators, based upon internationally agreed standards
of collection, analysis and reporting.1 In addition, WHO
Member States will develop indicators (and targets for
the indicators) at regional, national and subnational levels,
according to national priorities and requirements, and
standardized in accordance with international guidelines.
While global monitoring will continue to be vital to the

overall SDG monitoring effort, the 2030 Agenda envisages
a greater role for regional monitoring and reporting
mechanisms. Most discussions on regional monitoring
processes for the SDGs are still ongoing. Globally, the
United Nations Secretary-General has been mandated to
produce an annual progress report on the SDGs to support
follow-up and review at the HLPF. The report is to be
based on data produced by national statistical systems and
information collected at the regional level. It is expected
that the global reporting of progress on the 2030 Agenda
will be based on global and regional aggregates of data on
indicators as compiled by international agencies based on
their respective existing mandates and/or expertise.4 United
Nations agencies will continue to play a critical role in the
validation of data and statistics produced by countries.
The need for global reporting has often led to the

overburdening of countries with reporting requirements
related to programme-specific monitoring and grant
mechanisms. It is therefore essential that reporting be
focused on informing national review processes. The SDG
agenda offers an opportunity to rationalize global reporting
requirements. In health, the global reference list of 100
health indicators provides an example of an initial multiagency effort to reduce the reporting burden on countries
and improve the quality of what is reported.2 Such initiatives
should be accompanied by further harmonization and
alignment of international reporting requirements, and by
efforts to maximize the use of country mechanisms. For the
health targets, many existing reporting systems can be used
to monitor individual targets.
Global and regional reviews cannot be conducted without

comparable data for the indicators. Most health indicators
are well developed with good metadata and proven
methods of data collection, analysis and use. In particular,
the indicators inherited from the MDG era, and other
indicators used to measure progress within governing
bodies in the United Nations system, are well developed.
Others are more difficult to quantify because of the scarcity
of underlying data.
Closer collaboration between health and statistical

constituencies in countries (and globally) is essential.
Health investments can play a vital role in supporting the
strengthening of country statistical capacity, while statistical
offices can do much to support the health sector, notably in
the area of high-quality data collection and analysis. Public
health and academic institutions also have a role to play,
working in collaboration with ministries of health and other
stakeholders. Recent global initiatives in this area include
the establishment of a Health Data Collaborative in which
global health actors have joined forces with the aim of
providing more effective and efficient support to countries
in strengthening country health statistical capacity to
monitor progress towards the SDGs.3
Given the large data gaps, and the lack of timely data for
many indicators, it is often necessary to use statistical
models to obtain a picture of the global and regional
situation, including comparable statistics for use by
countries. These estimates differ from country-reported
data which are often not adjusted or do not refer to the
same year(s). Further efforts should be made to reconcile
data provided at the global level with the data published
by national statistical authorities and, where possible, to
resolve or carefully explain any discrepancies.4 Improving
the situation with regard to estimates will require major
investments to support interaction between United
Nations agencies and countries, with a focus on capacity
strengthening in developing countries. It is important to
bear in mind that better data and standardized analyses are
the best way to minimize discrepancies between reported
statistics and estimates.

2 2015 Global reference list of 100 core health indicators. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/173589/1/WHO_HIS_
HSI_2015.3_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 9 April 2016).
3 The Health Data Collaborative is an informal, inclusive partnership of international
agencies, governments, philanthropies, donors and academics. (See: http://www.
healthdatacollaborative.org/, accessed 9 May 2016.)

2.7 Review using data for improved

implementation
Countries will develop their own review processes which
should be based on objective assessments that include
quality statistics as well as complementary qualitative
information that captures the complexity of the agenda and
may offer insights into why progress is or is not being made.
SDG progress assessments are likely to be comprehensive
and complex, and thus have the potential to become very
unwieldy. One of the biggest challenges faced will be
keeping the focus on the big picture of the SDGs, rather
than the details related to individual targets. The health
sector can contribute to the overall SDG review process by
formalizing its own review of progress and performance in
health and health-related areas, and feeding a synthesis of
such assessments into overall reviews.
One of the many benefits derived from augmented
monitoring during the MDG era was greater scrutiny by civil
society and others of national government performance.

It is likely therefore that the SDGs, in addition to being
the subject of country-level monitoring of specific health
targets, will be used to initiate and/or drive debate regarding
a countrys position on health, or on factors that impact
health. Regional and global reviews can also be used
to enhance learning and improve implementation. For
example, regional mechanisms such as WHO Regional
Committee meetings could conduct voluntary peer reviews
of country progress, much along the lines of the proposed
functioning of the HLPF.
Furthermore, regional mechanisms could provide
syntheses to be used in a global review at the WHA. In
turn, the WHA could conduct regular evidence-based
reviews of global progress, taking into account regional
syntheses and discussing the implementation and
financing implications. The WHA could also play a role
in providing inputs into the overall global follow-up and
review process for the SDGs.
MONITORING THE
HEALTH GOAL
INDICATORS OF
OVERALL PROGRESS
Thus far, the SDG indicator and monitoring framework

developed by the United Nations Statistical Commission has
focused on finding indicators for the 169 targets. Monitoring
of the 17 goals themselves and cross-cutting themes has
not yet been discussed, but will certainly be required to
help produce easily legible summaries of situations and
trends at national, regional and global levels. Framed in very
general terms, the overall health SDG is: Ensure healthy
lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. WHO has
considered several overarching indicators that might serve
to monitor this goal, including: life expectancy; healthy
life expectancy; and number of deaths before age 70.1 As
such indicators are not only affected by progress towards
the targets under the health SDG but also by advances
made towards the health-related targets in other goals,
they truly reflect the multisectoral nature of health. This
section presents the current situation with regard to these
indicators, including data gaps.
3.1 Life expectancy major gains but still

large differences
Life expectancy is a summary measure of mortality rates
at all ages, and all health and health-related programmes
1 For reports of WHO technical meetings, see: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/sage/
meeting_reports/en/ (accessed 9 April 2016).
contribute to it. Despite large gaps in the coverage of global

mortality data systems, mortality is more amenable to
accurate measurement than disease or disability.
Globally, life expectancy has been improving at a rate
of more than 3 years per decade since 1950, with the
exception of the 1990s.2 During that period, progress on
life expectancy stalled in Africa because of the rising HIV
epidemic; and in Europe because of increased mortality
in many ex-Soviet countries following the collapse of the
Soviet Union. Life expectancy increases accelerated in most
regions from 2000 onwards, and overall there was a global
increase of 5.0 years in life expectancy between 2000 and
2015, with an even larger increase of 9.4 years observed in
the WHO African Region (Fig.3.1).
The global average increase in life expectancy at birth since
2000 exceeds the overall average rate of life expectancy
increase achieved by the best-performing countries over
the past century.3 The world as a whole is catching up with
those countries and improvements in outcomes for all major
causes of deaths have contributed to these huge gains.
2 World Population Prospects, the 2015 revision (WPP2015). New York (NY): United
Nations DESA, Population Division; and WHO annual life tables for 19852015 based
on the WPP2015, on the data held in the WHO Mortality Database and on HIV mortality
estimates prepared by UNAIDS.
3 Oeppen J, Vaupel JW. Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science
2002;296(5570):102931.
The gap between African life expectancy and European life

expectancy has narrowed by 4.9 years since the year 2000.
Figure 3.1
Regional and global gains in average life expectancy per decade, 19702015
19701990
19902000
20002015 (MDG)
20152030 (SDG)
Life expectancy at age 60 has also been increasing globally

from 18.7 years in 2000 to 20.4 years in 2015. Regional increases
ranged from 0.7 years in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean
Region to 2.5 years in the WHO European Region.
Gain per decade (years)
6
5
4
Several cause-specific mortality targets are proposed for

the post-2015 agenda, with many focusing on reducing
or ending preventable deaths.1 According to provisional
estimates, achievement of the major SDG child, maternal,
3
2
1
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Global
1 For instance, SDG Target 3.1 (maternal mortality), Target 3.2 (neonatal and child
mortality), Target 3.4 NCD mortality (due to four leading causes of death) and Target
3.6 (road traffic injuries).
Figure 3.2
Life expectancy at birth and healthy life expectancy at birth (years),a both sexes, 2015
Figure 3.2
AFR
AMR
Algeria
Mauritius
Cabo Verde
Seychelles
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Rwanda
Gabon
Namibia
Botswana
Madagascar
Ethiopia
Eritrea
Congo
Comoros
Kenya
Mauritania
South Africa
Ghana
Uganda
United Republic of Tanzania
Zambia
Niger
Liberia
Gambia
Zimbabwe
Benin
Burkina Faso
Togo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Burundi
Guinea
Swaziland
Guinea-Bissau
Malawi
Mali
Equatorial Guinea
Mozambique
South Sudan
Cameroon
Nigeria
Lesotho
Cte d'Ivoire
Chad
Central African Republic
Angola
Sierra Leone
75.6
74.6
73.3
73.2
67.5
66.7
66.1
66.0
65.8
65.7
65.5
64.8
64.7
64.7
63.5
63.4
63.1
62.9
62.4
62.3
61.8
61.8
61.8
61.4
61.1
60.7
60.0
59.9
59.9
59.8
59.6
Canada
Chile
Costa Rica
United States of America
Cuba
Panama
Uruguay
Mexico
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Jamaica
Ecuador
Bahamas
Peru
Barbados
Saint Lucia
Brazil
Nicaragua
Colombia
Honduras
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Paraguay
Dominican Republic
Grenada
El Salvador
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Guatemala
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Belize
Guyana
Haiti
EUR
82.2
80.5
79.6
79.3
79.1
77.8
77.0
76.7
76.4
76.3
76.2
76.2
76.1
75.5
75.5
75.2
75.0
74.8
74.8
74.6
74.1
74.0
73.9
73.6
73.5
73.2
71.9
71.6
71.2
70.7
70.1
66.2
63.5
59.0
58.9
58.9
58.3
SEAR
58.2
58.2
57.6
57.3
57.3
54.5
53.7
53.3
53.1
52.5
52.4
50.1
Maldives
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Bangladesh
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
Bhutan
Nepal
Indonesia
Timor-Leste
India
Myanmar
78.5
74.9
74.9
71.8
70.6
69.8
69.2
69.1
68.3
68.3
66.6
Switzerland
Spain
Italy
Iceland
Israel
France
Sweden
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Malta
Austria
Ireland
United Kingdom
Portugal
Finland
Belgium
Germany
Greece
Slovenia
Denmark
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Croatia
Albania
Estonia
Poland
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Slovakia
Montenegro
Hungary
Turkey
The
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
TheFormer
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
Serbia
Romania
Armenia
Latvia
Bulgaria
Georgia
Lithuania
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Republic of Moldova
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Russian Federation
Kazakhstan
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
EMR
83.4
82.8
82.7
82.7
82.5
82.4
82.4
82.0
81.9
81.8
81.7
81.5
81.4
81.2
81.1
81.1
81.1
81.0
81.0
80.8
80.6
80.5
78.8
Qatar
United Arab Emirates
Bahrain
78.2
77.1
76.9
Oman
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Tunisia
Lebanon
Kuwait
Saudi Arabia
Morocco
Jordan
Libya
Egypt
Iraq
Pakistan
Yemen
Syrian Arab Republic
Sudan
Djibouti
Afghanistan
Somalia
76.6
75.5
75.3
74.9
74.7
74.5
74.3
74.1
72.7
70.9
68.9
66.4
65.7
64.5
64.1
63.5
60.5
55.0
78.0
77.8
77.6
77.5
77.4
76.7
76.1
75.9
75.8
75.7
75.6
75.0
74.8
74.6
74.5
74.4
73.6
72.7
72.3
72.1
71.3
71.1
70.5
70.2
69.7
69.4
66.3
WPR
Japan
Singapore
Australia
Republic of Korea
New Zealand
Brunei Darussalam
China
Viet Nam
Malaysia
Samoa
Tonga
Vanuatu
Fiji
Micronesia (Federated States of)
Solomon Islands
Mongolia
Cambodia
Philippines
Kiribati
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Papua New Guinea
83.7
83.1
82.8
82.3
81.6
77.7
76.1
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.5
72.0
69.9
69.4
69.2
68.8
68.7
68.5
66.3
65.7
62.9
a Values shown refer to life expectancy at birth. Light blue bars represent provisional estimates of healthy life expectancy at birth. Dark blue bars represent lost health expectancy, defined as the difference between life expectancy
and healthy life expectancy.
infectious diseases and NCD targets would result in an

increase in global average life expectancy of around 4 years
by 2030. The gap between high- and low-income countries
would narrow from around 17.5 years in 2015 to around 13
to 14 years in 2030.1
Japan, Singapore, Australia, and the Republic of Korea in

the WHO Western Pacific Region; and Canada in the WHO
Region of the Americas. At the lower end of the range there
are still 22 countries with life expectancies below 60 years
all of them in sub-Saharan Africa.
Global life expectancy in 2015 was 71.4 years. Life expectancy

estimates by country for 2015 (both sexes combined) are
shown in Fig.3.2. Twenty-nine countries have an average life
expectancy of 80 years or higher. Life expectancy exceeds
82 years in 12 countries: Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Iceland,
Israel, France and Sweden in the WHO European Region;
On average, women live longer than men in every country

of the world and in every WHO region (Fig.3.3). Overall,
female life expectancy is 73.8 years and male life expectancy
is 69.1 years. Globally, female life expectancy at birth passed
male life expectancy at birth in the 1970s and the difference
reached 4.6 years in 2015. Among high-income OECD
countries, the male-female gap peaked at 6.9 years in the
1990s and has been declining since to reach 5.2 years in
2015. Countries with the highest and lowest life expectancy
1 An overarching health indicator for the post-2015 development agenda. Brief summary
of some proposed candidate indicators. Background paper for expert consultation,
1112 December 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.
int/healthinfo/indicators/hsi_indicators_SDG_TechnicalMeeting_December2015_
BackgroundPaper.pdf?ua=1, accessed 9 April 2016).
Figure 3.3
Life expectancy by sex, by WHO region, 2015a
AFR
Female
AMR
Male
Female
SEAR
Male
Female
EUR
Male
Female
EMR
Male
Female
WPR
Male
Female
Male
85
81
80
78
75
Years
75
72
70
65
60
76
75
72
71
71
68
63
59
55
50
a Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table 3.1
Countries with the highest and lowest life expectancy at birth (in years), by sex, 2015
Male
Country
Female
Years
Highest
Country
Years
Highest
Switzerland
81.3
Japan
86.8
Iceland
81.2
Singapore
86.1
Australia
80.9
Spain
85.5
Sweden
80.7
Republic of Korea
85.5
Israel
80.6
France
85.4
Japan
80.5
Switzerland
85.3
Italy
80.5
Australia
84.8
Canada
80.2
Italy
84.8
Spain
80.1
Israel
84.3
Singapore
80.0
Iceland
84.1
Lowest
Lowest
Lesotho
51.7
Chad
54.5
Chad
51.7
Cte dIvoire
54.4
50.9
54.1
Angola
50.9
Angola
54.0
Sierra Leone
49.3
Sierra Leone
50.8
3.2 Healthy life expectancy gaining

healthy life years
Healthy life expectancy (HLE) provides an indication of
overall health for a population, representing the average
equivalent number of years of full health that a newborn
could expect to live if they were to pass through life subject
to the age-specific death rates and average age-specific
levels of health states for a given period.1
If it could be measured reliably, HLE would be an ideal
indicator that captures both mortality and years of life
lived in less than good health that is, in the case of a
disability, years lost due to disability (YLD). There is
increasing interest in the accurate measurement of health,
disability and well-being, particularly given the context of
ageing populations and the growing prominence of chronic
diseases as causes of disability and premature mortality.
WHO has reported on HLE for Member States in recent
years based on Global Burden of Disease analyses. 2,3
Estimates have now been updated for the year 2015

using the WHO life tables for year 2015 and updated YLD
estimates drawing on WHO statistical inputs and the Global
Burden of Disease 2013 analyses using the same methods
as previously applied.4,5 Globally, HLE in 2015 is estimated
at 63.1 years for both sexes combined. In general, HLE
varies between countries in line with life expectancy (see
Fig.3.2) but is on average 11.7% shorter than life expectancy
(ranging from 9.3% to 14.7% between countries).
Regional and global average life expectancies and HLE at
birth for 2015 are shown in Fig.3.4. The total height of the
bar represents life expectancy at birth and the bottom part
of the bar represents HLE at birth. The gap between life
expectancy and HLE are the equivalent healthy years lost
through morbidity and disability. The contributions of each
of the major causes of this loss of healthy years are also
shown. The main contributors are musculoskeletal disorders
(with back and neck pain being a major contributor), mental
and substance-use disorders (particularly depression
and anxiety disorders), neurological disorders, vision and
hearing loss, and cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.
The prevalence of most of these conditions rises with age,
and, for most conditions, the age-standardized rates are not
declining. As life expectancy increases, the proportion of the
life span spent with these conditions increases HLE thus
increases more slowly than life expectancy.
Figure 3.4
Regional and global life expectancy and healthy life expectancy at birth, with cause
decomposition of lost health expectancy,a 2015
Injuries
Other NCD
Musculoskeletal disorders
Vision and hearing loss
CVD and diabetes
Neurological disorders
Mental disorders
Group 1 (MDG) causes
Healthy life expectancy
80
Life expectany or healthy life expectancy (years)
by sex are shown in Table3.1. In developed countries,

Scandinavian countries have among the lowest male-female
life expectancy gaps (Iceland 3.0 years; Sweden 3.4 years)
with some former Soviet countries having among the
highest (Russian Federation 11.6 years; Ukraine 9.8 years).
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Global
a Lost health expectancy is calculated as life expectancy minus healthy life expectancy. Horizontal dotted line
indicates global health life expectancy.
2 World Health Statistics [20052015]. Geneva: World Health Organization (series
available at: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/en/,
3 WHO methods for life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. Global Health Estimates
Technical Paper WHO/HIS/HSI/GHE/2014.5. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014
(http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/LT_method.pdf?ua=1&ua=1, accessed 9 April
2016).
10
4 WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 20002011.
Global Health Estimates Technical Paper WHO/HIS/HSI/GHE/2013.4. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2013 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/
GlobalDALYmethods_2000_2011.pdf?ua=1, accessed 4 March 2016).
5 Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national
incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic
diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 19902013: a systematic analysis for the
Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):743800.
Figure 3.5
Healthy life expectancy at birth, by sex and WHO regiona
AFR
Female
AMR
Male
Female
SEAR
Male
Female
EUR
Male
Female
EMR
Male
Female
WPR
Male
Female
Male
75
72
70
68
Years
65
68
67
64
65
63
63
63
61
60
55 54
52
50
45
Globally, male and female HLEs are 61.5 and 64.6 years
respectively with substantial differences between male
and female HLE in all WHO regions (Fig.3.5). The largest
difference is observed in the WHO European Region where
women can expect 5 more healthy life years than men.
The smallest difference is found in the WHO South-East
Asia Region, where women have only one extra year of
healthylife.
In terms of SDG monitoring purposes, determining the
usefulness of HLE estimates is complex. The YLD-based
approach to calculating HLE relies on extensive modelling
of disease and injury sequelae prevalence and distribution,
and on aggregating these to population levels in order to
calculate the healthy proportion of years lived at each age.
Because the approach relies heavily on statistical modelling
and the use of predictive variables to produce estimates
of disease incidence and prevalence, it is less suitable for
detecting short-term changes and monitoring progress,
especially at the country level. Additionally, the YLD-based
component is dominated by causes such as musculoskeletal
conditions, depression and neurological conditions for
which country-specific data are sparse and infrequent. Such
data are also often based on self-reporting, and there are
significant comparability problems across countries. There
are also substantial data gaps on severity distributions
within populations. In addition, there was only limited
variation (<2 years) across the WHO regions in lost health
expectancy at birth in 2015, with considerable statistical

uncertainty associated with the estimates, especially at
country level.
Other methods for measuring population health status,
such as monitoring of the European Union target of gaining
2 healthy life years by 2020, also present challenges
in terms of the availability of data on population-level
functional status that are comparable over time and
across populations, and that are collected through regular
surveys.1,2 To date there is no generally accepted standard
survey instrument and methodology that allows for the
comparable measurement of health-state distributions in
populations.3,4,5
1 Europe 2020 for a healthier EU [website]. Brussels: European Commission (http://

ec.europa.eu/health/europe_2020_en.htm, accessed 16 September 2015).
2 Advanced research on European health expectancies [website]. EurOhex (http://www.
eurohex.eu/, accessed 16 September 2015). Includes the Joint Action: European Health
& Life Expectancy Information System (JA:EHLEIS).
3 Romieu I, Robine JM. World atlas of health expectancy calculations. In: Mathers CD,
McCallum J, Robine JM, editors. Advances in health expectancies. Canberra: Australian
Institute of Health and Welfare; 1994.
4 King G, Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Tandon A. Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural
comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review.
2003;97(4):56783.
11
3.3 Premature mortality focusing on

deaths among those under 70 years of
age
Also warranting consideration is a proposal for a measure
of premature mortality with a target of reducing the number
of deaths before age 70 by 40% by 2030 globally and
in every country.1 Numbers of deaths before age 70 is a
more readily measurable indicator than life expectancy,
and can decrease more rapidly than life expectancy can
increase as it is more sensitive to interventions. Countries
at different stages of development could, depending on
their epidemiological priorities, achieve this kind of gain by
bringing down mortality due to HIV, malaria, tuberculosis
or child mortality, or to NCD deaths between ages 30 and
70. Concerted action to reduce NCD deaths before age
70 would also reduce NCD death rates for people age 70
and over.
The impact of attaining the SDG health-related targets
on numbers of deaths under age 70 can be approximated
by applying the SDG target impact on mortality rates to
provisional estimates of deaths in 2015 by cause, age and
sex.2 There were an estimated 30 million deaths under
age 70 in 2015, and if the SDG mortality targets had
been achieved in 2015, 3 this would have been reduced
to 19million deaths. This represents a 36% reduction
(almost 11 million averted premature deaths) close to the
proposed 40% target. Of these averted deaths, 5 million
Figure 3.6
Regional and global premature deaths and deaths that would have been averted by
achievement of SDG mortality targets, 2015
Remaining deaths
MDG prevented
NCD prevented
Injury prevented
would have been due to infectious diseases, malnutrition,

and child and maternal mortality (the MDG causes), with
a further 5 million and 0.9 million due to NCDs and injuries
respectively. Fig.3.6 shows the regional and global rates
of premature deaths (under 70 years of age) per 1000
population in 2015, together with estimates of the deaths
that would have been averted by achievement of the
SDG mortality targets in 2015. It is worth noting that the
achievement of SDG mortality targets dramatically narrows
regional variations in the premature death rate.
3.4 Data gaps most deaths not registered

As noted, many countries still lack adequate deathregistration capacity. An estimated 53% of deaths go
unregistered worldwide, and progress in improving
death registration in developing countries has been
slow. Nevertheless, a number of countries have made
considerable progress in recent years, with notable
examples including Brazil, China, the Islamic Republic of
Iran, South Africa and Turkey. There are also indications
of a new momentum to improve civil registration and vital
statistics (CRVS) systems, backed by significant political
interest in Asia and Africa and supported by global and
regional agencies. One of the two indicators for SDG Target
17.19: By 2030, build on existing initiatives to develop
measurements of progress on sustainable development
that complement gross domestic product, and support
statistical capacity-building in developing countries is the
proportion of countries that have: (a) conducted at least
one population and housing census in the last 10 years;
and (b) have achieved 100% birth registration and 80%
death registration.
Deaths under age 70 (per 1000 population)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Global
1 Norheim OF, Jha P, Admasu K, Godal T, Hum RJ, Kruk ME et al. Avoiding 40% of
the premature deaths in each country, 201030: review of national mortality
trends to help quantify the UN Sustainable Development Goal for health. Lancet.
2015;385(9964):23952 (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS01406736%2814%2961591-9/fulltext, accessed 9 April 2016).
2 Provisional estimates based on all-cause mortality from WHO life tables for 2015;
WHO estimates for MDG causes, cancers, child causes of death, road injury, homicide,
disasters and conflict; death-registration data reported to WHO; and analyses from the
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study.
3 Targets for maternal mortality ratio, neonatal and under-five mortality rates; 90%
reduction in HIV, TB, malaria and NTD death rates, one third reduction in hepatitis,
cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic respiratory disease; 50%
reduction in road injury deaths; 50% reduction in diarrhoea deaths (through
achievement of WASH target); and one third reductions (arbitrary interpretation of the
SDG target of substantial reduction) in deaths due to homicide, conflict and disasters.
These estimated mortality reductions are conservative and do not include the mortality
impacts of suicide, pollution and drug and alcohol targets (beyond their contribution to
the NCD mortality target).
12
For countries with inadequate death-registration capacity,

mortality data from the population census and household
surveys are used to obtain mortality estimates. A substantial
amount of survey information is available for mortality
for children aged under 5 years, usually based on the
collection of birth histories,4 while adult mortality levels
can be estimated from census and survey data on deaths
in households, orphanhood and sibling survival histories.
However, there are considerable problems in assessing the
reporting completeness and biases of such data, and the
availability of consistent data sources over time is an issue
for many countries. Information on older child and older age
mortality is also less often available from survey sources.
Model life tables and other statistical models are used to
fill data gaps (Table3.2).
4 Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2015. UNICEF, WHO, the World Bank, United
Nations Population Division. New York: UNICEF on behalf of the UN Inter-agency Group
for Child Mortality Estimation; 2015 (http://www.childmortality.org/files_v20/download/
IGME%20report%202015%20child%20mortality%20final.pdf, accessed 9 April 2016).
Table 3.2
Data availability for all-cause mortality
Number
of WHO
Member
Statesa
Percentage
of global
deaths in
2015 b
Complete death-registration
datac
59
28
Observed death rates
Incomplete deathregistration data
38
25
Adjusted death rates
Other populationrepresentative data on

age-specific mortalityd
18 (3)
25
Estimated death rates and

model life table systems
Data on child (under 5 years)

and adult (1559 years)
mortality onlyd
30 (18)
12
Estimated death rates and

model life table systems
Data on child mortality onlyd
37 (22)
10
Model life table systems
<1
Projected from data for

years before 2005
Available recent data

(since 2005)
No recent data
Methods
a Only includes 183 Member States with population above 90 000 in 2015.
b Percentage of global deaths that occur in the countries included in each category not the percentage registered
or included in datasets.
c Completeness of 90% or greater for de facto resident population; as assessed by WHO and the United Nations
Population Division, 2016.
d Numbers in parenthesis show the number of high HIV prevalence countries for which multistate epidemiological
modelling for HIV mortality was also carried out.
13
UNIVERSAL HEALTH
COVERAGE AT THE
CENTRE OF THE
HEALTH GOAL
The main text of the SDG declaration endorsed by heads of

government in February 2015 puts UHC at the centre of the
overall health goal, and makes progress towards the UHC
target a prerequisite for the achievement of all the others.1
Under SDG3, UHC is also assigned the specific Target
3.8: Achieve universal health coverage (UHC), including
financial risk protection, access to quality essential health
care services, and access to safe, effective, quality, and
affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all. The goal
of UHC (all people and communities receiving the needed
quality services, including health protection, promotion,
prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and palliation without
financial hardship) is relevant to all countries and offers an
unprecedented opportunity to increase coherence in healthrelated actions and initiatives.
Accountability defined as a cyclical process of monitoring,

review and remedial action2 will be critically important
in ensuring progress towards UHC. WHO and the World
Bank have developed a UHC monitoring framework
based on a series of country case studies and technical
1 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution
adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1. United Nations
General Assembly, Seventieth session, agenda items 15 and 116; paragraph 26 (http://
www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E, accessed 10 April
2016).
2 As per the framework of the Commission on Information and Accountability for
Womens and Childrens Health (http://www.who.int/woman_child_accountability/
about/coia/en/index5.html, accessed 10 April 2016).
reviews, and on consultations and discussions with country

representatives, technical experts and global health and
development partners. 3 The framework focuses on the
two core components of UHC: coverage of the population
with quality, essential health services; and coverage of the
population with financial protection, the key to which is
reducing dependence on payment for health services outof-pocket (OOP) at the time of use. The proposed indicators
are a coverage index of essential services, disaggregated
by key stratifiers where possible, and a measure of the lack
of financial protection against the costs of health services.
These two indicators need to be interpreted together to
assess the state of UHC, both nationally and globally.
4.1 UHC coverage index of essential health

services a new summary measure
The proposed SDG indicator for services is a UHC coverage
index of essential health services. While recognizing that
countries may have different health priorities, and will
develop their own indicators accordingly, it is possible to
3 World Health Organization and World Bank Group. Monitoring progress towards
universal health coverage at country and global levels. Framework measures
and targets. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development/World Bank; 2014 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/112824/1/WHO_HIS_HIA_14.1_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 10 April
2016).
15
identify a set of tracer indicators that can be combined into

an index suitable for the purposes of regional and global
UHC monitoring. The set of tracer indicators for service
coverage was selected following extensive review and
discussion of potential indicators.1 These are grouped into
four main categories, each with four indicators (Table 4.1):
(1) reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health; (2)
infectious diseases; (3) NCDs; and (4) service capacity and
access, and health security. Statistics for the tracer indicators
are then combined into a UHC service coverage index.2
The resulting 16 tracer indicators spread across the four
categories are then used to track health service coverage.
All indicators are defined so that they range between 0%
and 100%, with 100% implying full coverage. Data for
these indicators come from a mix of household surveys
and administrative data. Ten of the 16 tracer indicators
of health service coverage are supported by recent,
comparable estimates of national coverage. For another four
(pregnancy care, care seeking for suspected pneumonia
in children, hospital inpatient admission rates and health
worker density) well-maintained databases of country
data points from either survey or administrative data are
available, with comprehensive estimates for pregnancy
care expected within the next year. For the remaining two
indicators (cervical cancer screening and access to essential
medicines) there are currently no comprehensive databases
or comparable estimates available. As a result, these two
indicators are, for now, left out of the calculation of the
index in this report.
To provide a summary measure of coverage of essential
health services, an index of national service coverage is
computed for each country by averaging service-coverage
values across the 16 tracer indicators. This is performed in
two steps: first, computing the average coverage in each of
the four categories; and second, computing the average of
these four category-level scores. Geometric means are used
to increase sensitivity to very low coverage levels for any
indicator, and to reduce the impact of re-scaling indicators
on the rankings implied by the index. These computations
are simple and straightforward.
However, a small but necessary series of adjustments are
made for a few indicators. To obtain greater spread in values
across countries, the NCD indicators for hypertension,
diabetes and tobacco are re-scaled based on minimum
values observed across countries. Hospital inpatient
admission rates and health-worker density values are
capped at a threshold, as overuse and oversupply can be
an issue in high-income countries. These two indicators
are capped at 100% once rates reach minimum values
1 Boerma T, AbouZahr C, Evans D, Evans T. Monitoring intervention coverage in the
context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001728. Also see: http://
www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/en/, accessed 25 April 2016.
2 Hogan D, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Developing an index for the coverage of essential
health services. Technical Note. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http:// www.
who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/en/).
16
Table 4.1
Tracer indicators for UHC service coverage, with data availability
Indicator
Data
sources
Number of
countries
with
national
data since
2010
Number of
countries
with
comparable
estimates
Measurability
of key
dimensions
of
inequalitya,b
Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health

Family planning
coverage
Surveys
98
184
W,E,R,(A)
Antenatal and delivery

care
Surveys
121
194
W,E,R,(A)
Full child immunization
Surveys,
Admin
193
194
W,E,R,S
Health-seeking
behaviour for child
pneumonia
Surveys
72
None
W,E,R,S
Tuberculosis effective
treatment
Admin
190
190
(R)
HIV antiretroviral
treatment
Admin,
Surveys,
Surveillance
118
118
(R)
ITN coverage for

malaria prevention
Surveys,
Admin
40c
40c
W,E,R,S
Improved water source

and adequate sanitation
Surveys
156
192
W,R
Infectious diseases
Noncommunicable diseases
Prevalence of raised
blood pressure
Surveys
86
192
(E),(R),S,A
Prevalence of raised
blood glucose
Surveys
76
192
(E),(R),S,A
Cervical cancer
screening
Surveys
<30
None
Tobacco (non-use)
Surveys
146
123
(W),(E),(R),S,(A)
Service capacity and access

Basic hospital access
Facility data
105
None
(R)
Health-worker density
Administrative
data
166
None
(R)
Access to essential
medicines
Facility
surveys
<30
None
(R)
Health security: IHR

compliance
Country
reported
191
None
a W = household wealth quintile; E = educational attainment; R = place of residence (typically urban vs.
rural); S = sex; and A = age. Letters in parentheses indicate that data sources exist to estimate coverage by
the indicated dimension but that more analytical work is needed to prepare disaggregated estimates.
b Information to estimate coverage across key inequality dimensions typically comes from population-based
surveys. Standardized population-based surveys are typically only conducted in developing countries, and
therefore there is currently a lack consistent data sources to characterize equity for service coverage in many
high-income countries.
c Only pertains to countries with highly endemic malaria.
observed in OECD countries. Additionally, as comparable

antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage estimates are
currently not available for high-income countries, this
input is set at the average value of 44% for these countries;
country-level estimates of ART coverage for high-income
countries are expected in 2017.
The distribution of countries by coverage index in quintiles
is presented in Fig. 4.1. The UHC index values based on
national coverage levels show substantial differences across
WHO regions. The WHO European Region, WHO Region
of the Americas and WHO Western Pacific Region all have
more than 30% of their countries in the upper quintile of
UHC index values globally, whereas the WHO Eastern
Mediterranean Region and WHO African Region have no
countries in the upper quintile. The WHO African Region
accounts for 30 of the 37 countries in the lowest quintile.
Figure 4.1
UHC service coverage index quintiles, by WHO region
Lowest
2nd
3rd
4th
between the poor and the national average, while several

countries have relative differences of more than 40%.
Highest
Fraction of countries in the region (%)
100
4.3 Financial protection measuring the

impact of out-of-pocket payments
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
EUR
AMR
WPR
EMR
SEAR
AFR
The dashboard (Fig. 4.2) shows the coverage levels for each
of the indicators used in the computation of the index in this
report. The range of country values varies by indicator and
between regions. Such a dashboard will also be useful when
presented for a single country with the UHC coverage index.
4.2 Inequalities in coverage towards an

integrated assessment
Ensuring that all people who need health services receive
them is a UHC imperative, which makes tracking inequalities
in health-service coverage a central UHC monitoring goal.
Ideally, the UHC index described above would be computed
for both the national population and for disadvantaged
groups, and then combined to reflect the degree of inequity
in service-coverage indicators across key inequality
dimensions such as socioeconomic status.
This approach is currently not feasible for many countries
due to data limitations. For most indicators, disaggregated
data are only partially available or present comparability
issues. The most extensive standardized disaggregated
data are available for indicators in the first category
(reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health). This
is especially the case for developing countries. These data
are used to compute a relative inequality score based
on the ratio of the mean coverage among the poorest
populations1 to the national average. A value of 100 means
no difference at all; and the smaller this value, the greater
the gap between the poorest and the national average.
A summary of these scores is presented in Fig.4.3 for
countries that have conducted an international household
health survey (Demographic and Health Survey DHS or
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey MICS) since 2005. It is
apparent that large differences exist in the relative inequality
score of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health
intervention coverage across countries, with many countries
having relative differences of less than 10% in coverage
1 Computed as the average of twice the coverage among the poorest quintile and that
among the second poorest quintile ((2*Q1+Q2)/3).
With regard to tracking levels of financial protection,

the global WHO and World Bank monitoring framework
proposes the use of two indicators: the incidence of
disproportionate spending on health which is labelled
catastrophic; and the incidence of poverty resulting from
health expenditures paid directly by households which is
labelled impoverishing. 2 This section presents data on
these two indicators for a selected number of countries.
Updated estimates by the World Bank and WHO of both
catastrophic and impoverishing health spending for all
countries will be published in 2016. This report also presents
data from all countries on the related macro-level indicator
of OOP payments on health.
At the health system level, the fraction of total health
expenditure (THE) that comes from OOP health
expenditures is a measure of the extent to which households
contribute towards financing the provision of all health
services in a country. The lower this fraction, the greater
the likelihood that households are protected from financial
hardship when accessing health services. Estimates of
OOP health expenditure as a share of THE are generated
annually by WHO using national health accounts (NHAs)
and other sources.3
Figure4.4 presents the OOP health expenditure as fraction
of THE.4 Health financing systems in low-income and lower
middle-income countries rely heavily on OOP payments
implying that households are the major contributors to
the health financing system (42.3% and 40.6% in 2013,
respectively). Such countries face particular challenges
as they have inadequate service delivery systems and
additionally struggle to raise domestic revenues to pay for
such services. In contrast, OOP health expenditure as a
fraction of THE in high-income countries is much lower, at
21.2%. At regional level, this fraction is highest in the WHO
South-East Asia Region and WHO Eastern Mediterranean
Region (40.8% and 39.5%, respectively).
2 In the context of the SDG indicator framework a very different indicator has initially
been proposed: coverage by health insurance or a public health system. Because
health insurance means very different things in different countries, no global data are
currently compiled and the indicator is not presented in this report.
3 Not all countries maintain or update NHAs. In such cases, data are obtained through
technical contacts in the country or from publicly available documents and reports.
Missing values are estimated using various accounting techniques depending upon the
data available for each country.
4 To avoid bias towards countries at either end of the population scale, and to avoid bias
towards countries which represent a large share of global health spending, regional
and income-group aggregates are estimated using unweighted averages and excluding
countries with a population of less than 150000.
17
Figure 4.2
Dashboard of indicators for the UHC coverage index, WHO, 2015a
Family planning
Pregnancy care
Child immunization
Care seeking for child pneunomia
100
Coverage (%)
80
60
40
20
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR
HIV treatment
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
TB treatment
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
Use of insecticide treated bed nets
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Improved water and sanitation
100
Coverage (%)
80
60
40
20
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
Non-elevated blood pressure
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR
Non-elevated blood glucose
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Non-use of tobacco
Coverage (%)
100
80
60
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
Inpatient admission rate (rescaled)
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Health worker density (rescaled)
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
Implementation of International Health Regulations
UHC service coverage index
100
Coverage (%)
80
60
40
20
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
a Each circle represents a country value.
18
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Figure 4.3
Relative inequality score for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health intervention coverage in 83 countries, 20052013a
AFR
Country
Swaziland
Malawi
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Burundi
Rwanda
Sierra Leone
Ghana
Gambia
Liberia
Gabon
Uganda
Namibia
Lesotho
Congo
Kenya
Comoros
Niger
Benin
Togo
Burkina Faso
Madagascar
Cte d'Ivoire
Mozambique
Senegal
Mali
Guinea
Mauritania
Guinea-Bissau
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Nigeria
SEAR
Year
2010
2008
2010
2010
2007
2010
2010
2013
2011
2005
2013
2012
2011
2006
2010
2009
2011
2008
2012
2013
2012
2011
2010
2010
2008
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2007
2006
2011
2011
2010
2013
40
94
93
91
91
91
91
91
90
87
87
86
86
85
84
83
83
80
79
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
69
69
66
64
62
60
59
59
55
50
AMR
Country
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Guyana
Colombia
Honduras
Belize
Peru
Suriname
Haiti
Year
2011
2007
2009
2010
2011
2011
2012
2010
2008
2012
82
80
98
95
95
94
93
92
92
91
Country
Maldives
Thailand
Bhutan
Indonesia
Nepal
Bangladesh
Timor-Leste
India
Year
2009
2005
2010
2012
2011
2011
2009
2005
79
78
76
70
88
87
99
99
EUR
Country
Uzbekistan
Kyrgyzstan
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Ukraine
Armenia
Albania
Tajikistan
The
formerYugoslav
Yugoslav
Republic
of Ma..
The Former
Republic
of Macedonia
Georgia
Republic of Moldova
Montenegro
Serbia
Azerbaijan
Year
2006
2012
2012
2010
2007
2010
2008
2012
2011
2011
2005
2005
2005
2010
2006
100
99
96
96
91
90
89
89
86
86
85
84
83
82
78
EMR
Country
Jordan
Egypt
Iraq
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Yemen
Somalia
Year
2012
2008
2011
2006
2012
2010
2006
2006
34
57
73
67
90
89
85
98
WPR
Country
Mongolia
Cambodia
Philippines
Viet Nam
Vanuatu
Year
2010
2010
2013
2010
2007
2011
69
91
88
87
84
99
a Based on the results of DHS and MICS.
Figure 4.4
Out-of-pocket health expenditure as fraction of total health expenditure, by country
income groupa and WHO region, 2013
OOP health expenditure as fraction of THE (%)
50
42.3
40
40.8
40.6
39.5
34.6
31.3
31.0
30
29.0
29.5
21.2
20
10
Low
income
Lower Upper
High
middle income income
income
Whether such OOP payments cause financial hardship or

not requires comparing household levels of OOP health
expenditure in relation to total household expenses. OOP
payments are judged to be catastrophic when they exceed a
given proportion (25%) of the total household budget or of
the capacity to pay (40%).1 They are labelled impoverishing
when OOP payments push a households other spending
below a minimum socially recognized living standard
such as that identified by a poverty line. The poverty line
should be defined according to national standards and also
against an international poverty line, consistent with SDG
targets 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. The global framework recommends
that countries, as a minimum, track the proportion of the
AFR AMR SEAR EUR EMR WPR
a Based on the World Bank analytical income classification of economies.
1 Capacity to pay is defined as households expenditure net of subsistence spending (for

example on food).
19
population with large household expenditures on health as

a share of their budget (for example, >25%).
Estimates for catastrophic and impoverishing health
expenditures come from a sample of 36 countries which
have conducted a nationally representative survey
between 2002 and 20121 following established methods
in the literature.2,3 Figure4.5 shows the national rates of
catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditure across

these countries using comparable data.4 The median
percentage of people experiencing catastrophic health
spending defined as OOPs exceeding 25% of household
total consumption across these countries was 1.8%. The
median incidence of impoverishing health expenditures was
1.0% using different poverty lines for countries at different
levels of economic development.5
1 Sample composed of countries for which nationally representative, publicly available

and comparable survey data with information on total consumption and OOP payments
on health are available.
2 Distribution of health payments and catastrophic expenditures: methodology. Discussion
Paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004 (http://www.who.int/health_financing/
documents/cov-dp_05_2_health_payments/en/, accessed 10 April 2016).
3 Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Catastrophe and impoverishment in paying for health
care: with applications to Vietnam 199398. Health Econ. 2003;12(11):92134 (https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/9023646_Catastrophe_and_Impoverishment_in_
Paying_for_Health_Care_With_Applications_to_Vietnam_1993-98, accessed 10 April
2016).
4 WHO and the World Bank. Tracking universal health coverage: First global monitoring
report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/
universal_health_coverage/report/2015/en/, accessed 9 April 2016).
Figure 4.5
Incidence of catastrophica and impoverishingb health expenditure among 36 countries with comparable data, 20022012
Figure 4.5 Incidence of catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditure amont 37 countries, 2002-2012
Impoverishing health
Catastrophic
Malawi
Panama
Ukraine
Niger
Pakistan
Zambia
Rwanda
Senegal
Turkey
Jordan
Philippines
Kyrgyzstan
Ghana
France
Latvia
Bulgaria
Russian Federation
Tunisia
Viet Nam
Nicaragua
Uganda
Estonia
Cambodia
Kenya
Mongolia
Republic of Moldova
Egypt
Argentina
Republic of Korea
Georgia
Tajikistan
2
(%)
3
(%)
a Defined as 25% of total expenditure.

b Regional poverty lines: US$ 1.25 for low-income countries, US$ 2 for lower middle-income countries, US$ 4 for upper middle-income countries, and US$ 5 for high-income countries.
20
4.4 Data gaps regular UHC monitoring is

possible
Data availability for the tracer indicators that make up
the service coverage index, including the dimension for
disaggregation, is summarized in Table4.1. In the coming
years, measurement in several areas will need to improve
in order to boost global and country capacity to track UHC
progress. Most indicators for the essential services coverage
index are estimated consistently across most countries,
but there are still data gaps for key indicators such as
cervical cancer screening and access to essential medicines.
Where coverage data are available, there is rarely sufficient
information to monitor levels of effective coverage. Such
a measure, of the degree to which evidence-based health
services achieve desirable outcomes, is a key component
of quality health care and a core UHC concern.
Data scarcity is also an issue with regard to coverage equity.
For example, comparable estimates of service coverage
across key inequality dimensions are dominated by
reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health indicators
in countries that have conducted DHS or MICS surveys.
Perhaps surprisingly, the lack of standardized surveys across
high-income countries is a particular problem, hampering
the ability to monitor equity in coverage in such countries.
It could be argued that the current UHC index is most
relevant for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC),
as the selected indicators tend to have coverage rates
near or at 100% in most high-income countries. This is
not only a consequence of the MDG-related investments
in comparable methods to monitor indicators related to
reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, and to
infectious diseases, but also a result of a lack of comparable
data for interventions with greater relevance for more
advanced health systems.
With regard to financial risk protection data, there are also

a number of data challenges. Indicators of exposure to
financial hardship, such as catastrophic and impoverishing
health spending, rely on data from household surveys.
Although there were over 500 surveys during the period
19852014 in 88 countries, representative of about 90%
of world population, too few countries have recent data
(for example, only 58 countries have data from 2010 or
later). An increasing number of surveys include a module
that facilitates computation of the micro-level indicators
which are direct measures of financial burden due to the
cost of health care. Similarly, as more countries conduct
regular NHAs, the data needed for the annual estimation of
indirect measures of financial protection (that is, OOP health
expenditure as a percentage of THE) are going to improve.
Finally, country UHC monitoring needs to be integrated into
broader health systems performance assessment if it is to
realize its full potential as actionable intelligence. Monitoring
service coverage and financial protection which should
always go hand-in-hand does not in itself reveal which
policy levers can be used to improve results. For this reason,
the monitoring of UHC indicators needs to be embedded
within health systems performance assessment frameworks
that link changes in coverage to potential drivers of progress
caused by changes in inputs, structures and processes. These
will include: (a) structural elements related to investments in
health; (b) process elements such as health system reforms
(such as changes in provider payment mechanisms) designed
to improve service quality or health service utilization; and
(c) determinants of health. While understanding a countrys
health system reforms are important in determining the
causes of change in health-service coverage measures, it is
also essential to assess changes in non-health-system social
determinants of health (such as educational attainment and
poverty rates) as such changes also greatly influence service
coverage and health outcomes.
21
EQUITY LEAVE
NO ONE BEHIND
Equity is at the heart of the SDGs, which are founded on

the concept of leaving no one behind. SDG3 calls for
healthy lives for all at all ages, positioning equity as a core
cross-cutting theme, while SDG10 calls for the reduction
of inequality within and between countries. Equity is also
a key consideration with regard to UHC, which as noted
earlier is both central to the health goal and founded on the
principle of equal access to health services without risk of
financial hardship.
A movement towards equity in health depends, at least
in part, on strong health information systems that collect,
analyse and report disaggregated data covering all health
areas. This is recognized in SDG Target 17.18, which calls
for efforts to build capacity to enable data disaggregation
by a number of stratifying factors, including income, sex,
age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic
location and other characteristics relevant in national
contexts. The proposed indicator for tracking progress
towards this target is the proportion of sustainable
development indicators with full disaggregation produced
at the national level, where this is relevant to the target.
Disaggregated data enable policy-makers to identify
vulnerable populations in the context of reforms towards
UHC and to direct resources accordingly. This has relevance

for all of the health-related SDG targets, which require
equity-oriented approaches that support accelerated
progress among the disadvantaged to reduce health
inequalities. While important at the global and regional
level where they can be used to measure progress towards
the goal of reaching all, and to provide countries with
comparative data on their relative position in terms of
health inequalities equity data are most relevant within
countries as they not only support targeted policy initiatives
but can be used by civil society and other stakeholders to
hold governments to account.
Health inequalities within countries are associated with
a variety of factors, several of which are encountered
uniformly across all countries. Examples include sex, age,
economic status, education and place of residence. Other
factors may be more specific to a regional or country
situation, such as migrant status, race, ethnicity, caste,
religion or other characteristic that can differentiate
minority subgroups.1
1 Handbook on health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low- and middleincome countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/85345/1/9789241548632_eng.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016).
23
5.1 Sex major differences between men

and women for many indicators
gaps being smaller in the WHO American Region and WHO

European Region (Fig.5.1a). In relation to HIV incidence,
African women have a considerably higher incidence than
men (Fig.5.1b). For deaths due to road traffic injuries, rates
are much higher among males than females in all regions
(Fig.5.1c).
The sex of an individual has a range of biological,

behavioural, social and economic consequences for health.
Sex-disaggregated statistics are needed for many of the
health and health-related SDG indicators. Major differences
between males and females may exist in mortality and
causes of death, morbidity, coverage of interventions, risk
factors and determinants. For example, in section 3, Fig.3.3
and Fig.3.5 present differences in life expectancy and HLE
showing that on average women live longer than men. In
most cases, the gaps between males and females differ
between regions and between countries. Sex differences
also vary by indicator, and are often linked to gender
norms, roles and relations. For example, tobacco smoking
is generally much more prevalent among men aged 15 years
and older than women. However, there is also considerable
variation between regions in this respect, with male-female
The health-related SDGs also include a number of targets

and indicators that are focused on gender issues. Examples
are SDG targets 5.2 and 5.3 which in The Global Strategy
for Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030
are combined into Eliminate all harmful practices and all
discrimination and violence against women and girls.1
This is monitored by SDG indicator 5.2.1: Proportion of
ever-partnered women and girls aged 15 years and older
subjected to physical, sexual or psychological violence by
1 The Global Strategy for Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030.
Every Women Every Child; 2015 (http://globalstrategy.everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/
EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_FINAL_WEB.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
Figure 5.1a
Prevalence of tobacco smoking among adults >15 years of age, by sex and by WHO region, 2015a
AFR
Female
AMR
Male
Female
SEAR
Male
Female
EUR
Male
Female
EMR
Male
Female
WPR
Male
Female
Male
100
90
80
70
Prevalence (%)
60
50
45
40
43
37
37
28
30
22
20
20
9
10
3
0
a Based on household surveys in 123 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile
range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Figure 5.1b
Percentage of adult population aged 1549 years newly infected with HIV in Africa, by sex, 2014a
Female
0.13
Male
0.09
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Incidence (%)
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
a Based on UNAIDS/WHO estimates. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and vertical lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for
each subgroup.
24
Figure 5.1c
Mortality rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex and WHO region, 2013a
AFR
Female
AMR
Male
Female
SEAR
Male
Female
EUR
Male
Female
EMR
Male
Female
WPR
Male
Female
Male
120
110
Mortality rate (per 100 000 population)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
38
32
30
24
24
20 16
10
12
4
16
9
0
a Based on WHO provisional estimates. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle
50%) for each subgroup.
a current or former intimate partner, in the last 12months,

by form of violence and by age group. In addition, several
SDG indicators aim to capture the increased health risks
specifically associated with reproduction for women
that may result in a significant burden of mortality and
disability. Examples are the indicators for the health
targets on maternal mortality, and on access to sexual and
reproductive health-care services.
5.2 Age data should cover the full life

course
SDG3 aims for health and well-being for all at all ages. It
is thus vital to monitor health developments using agedisaggregated data. In some areas, such monitoring is
already improving. For example, newborn care became
a health priority when evidence emerged that rates of
child mortality during the neonatal period were declining
much more slowly than those during subsequent periods.
Adolescent health is also receiving more attention because
of alarming data regarding risk factors such as tobacco
use, harmful use of alcohol, HIV incidence and obesity
prevalence. Older people do not figure prominently in
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, but their
numbers are rapidly increasing and evidence is emerging
that much more can be done to promote their well-being.1
1 WHO report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf, accessed 10
April 2016).
Improving the monitoring of health indicators of older

populations should thus be prioritized.
5.3 Socioeconomic inequalities major

disadvantages for the poorest and the
least educated
Socioeconomic inequalities exist in all countries and have
important impacts on health. Data from high-income
countries show that in almost all countries, higher death
rates and poorer self-assessments of health are observed
in groups of lower socioeconomic status compared with
those who are better off.2,3 In half of the 66 national surveys
conducted in LMIC, stunting prevalence in children aged
less than 5 years was at least 15% higher in the children of
mothers with no education compared with those children
whose mothers had attended secondary school or higher.4
Socioeconomic inequalities also have implications for
health behaviours. For example, smoking among men
is reported to decrease across education subgroups
moving from least-educated to most-educated across the
2 Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M et al.
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med.
2008;358:246881.
3 Zack MM. Health-related quality of life United States, 2006 and 2010. MMWR Suppl.
2013;62(3):10511 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6203a18.htm,
4 WHO and International Center for Equity in Health/Pelotas. State of inequality.
Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2015. (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/164590/1/9789241564908_eng.pdf,
accessed 10 April 2016.)
25
globe.1,2,3 In LMIC, coverage of reproductive and maternal

health interventions is lower among socioeconomically
disadvantaged subgroups. For example, the proportion
of births attended by skilled health personnel differed by
up to 80% between the richest and poorest subgroups in
83 study countries, and the use of modern contraception
was at least twice as high among women with secondary
schooling or higher than among women with no education
in almost half of 71 study countries.4
5.4 Place of residence focus on

geographical differences within
countries
The world is rapidly urbanizing and this has profound
implications for population health. Between 2000 and 2014
more than 1 billion people were added to urban areas and
by 2015 more than half of the worlds population was living
in cities. The proportion of the worlds population living in
urban areas is projected to increase from 54% in 2015 to
60% in 2030.5 Almost all projected urban growth will occur
in developing countries.
Within cities, poor social and living conditions, such as
those encountered in ghettoes and slums, lead to greater
health problems among the poorest compared with betteroff city dwellers. The poorest run higher risks of diseases
and injuries, and have less access to health services. To
unmask the full extent of urban health inequities, it is
important to disaggregate health and health-determinant
data within cities.6
Health systems tend to be weaker in rural and remote areas.
Rural populations also carry a disproportionate burden of
disease and death, and are generally the most disadvantaged
within LMIC. For example, a recent study of 73 countries
found that children living in urban areas (including those
living in slums) have better health outcomes than children
living in rural areas.7 Under-five mortality rates are higher in
1 Tackling health inequalities in Europe: an integrated approach. EUROTHINE. 2007.

2 Garrett BE, Dube SR, Winder C, Caraballo RS. Cigarette Smoking United States,
20062008 and 20092010. MMWR Suppl. 2013;62(3):814 (http://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6203a14.htm, accessed 10 April 2016).
3 Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Kunst A, Harper S, Guthold R, Rekve D et al.
Socioeconomic inequalities in risk factors for non communicable diseases in
low-income and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey.
BMC Public Health. 2012;12:912 (http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/
articles/10.1186/1471-2458-12-912, accessed 10 April 2016).
2015. (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/164590/1/9789241564908_eng.pdf,
accessed 10 April 2016.)
5 World Urbanization Prospects. The 2014 Revision. Highlights. New York (NY): United
Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2014 (ST/ESA/SER.A/352) (http://
esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf, accessed 10 April
2016).
6 WHO and United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT). Hidden cities.
Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2010 (http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/publications/hiddencities_media/
who_un_habitat_hidden_cities_web.pdf?ua=1, accessed 10 April 2016).
7 Fink G, Gnther I, Hill K. Slum residence and child health in developing countries.
Demography. 2014;51:117597 (https://www.popcenter.umd.edu/resources/scholardev/working-groups/jc_papers/meeting_01, accessed 10 April 2016).
26
rural areas than in urban areas in most countries (median

values of 54 LMIC: 84 deaths per 1000 live births in rural
areas versus 61 deaths per 1000 live births in urban areas)
with the magnitude of this difference varying by country
(Fig.5.2).4 Another study found that rural children were
more likely to be stunted than urban children, and that
overall improvements in child nutrition usually did not
decrease the rural/urban disparities.8
There are also major differences in intervention coverage
rates. For example, need for family planning satisfied and
births attended by skilled health personnel, as well as access
to improved water and sanitation, are all lower in rural areas
than in urban areas (Fig.5.3).9
Addressing regional or district inequalities is critically
important for effective health planning and resource
allocation. From a monitoring perspective, regions and
districts can also be used as a proxy for populations that share
similar conditions or characteristics, such as high exposure
to vector-borne diseases, environmental conditions and
ethnicity. Thus, monitoring health inequalities between
regions can generate important evidence and support for
the targeting of health programmes and policies, especially
when disparities are substantial.
5.5 Migrants and minorities requiring

special efforts
In almost every country in the world, minorities and
indigenous peoples are among the poorest and most
vulnerable of groups, suffer greater ill health and receive
poorer quality health care than other segments of the
population.10 More often than not, this ill health and poorer
health care are the result of poverty and discrimination.
The SDGs, with their broad commitment to leaving no
one behind, offer hope that development efforts will be
focused on minority groups in the coming years, with
SDG10 which aims to: Reduce inequality within and
among countries making specific reference to indigenous
peoples, pastoralists and other marginalized groups.
Tracking progress in this area will depend upon ensuring
the collection of standardized and comparable data,
disaggregated by context-specific inequality dimensions.
8 Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Finucane MM, Ezzati M on behalf of the Nutrition Impact
Model Study Group (Child Growth). Childrens height and weight in rural and urban
populations in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic analysis of
population-representative data. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(5):e3009 (http://www.
thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(13)70109-8/abstract, accessed
10 April 2016).
2015; (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/164590/1/9789241564908_eng.
pdf, accessed 10 April 2016) and UNICEF and WHO. Progress on sanitation and
drinking water 2015 update and MDG assessment. 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/177752/1/9789241509145_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 10 April 2016).
10 Minority Rights Group International (2013). State of the worlds minorities and
indigenous peoples 2013.
Figure 5.2
Under-five mortality rate in LMIC, by rural/urban residence, 20052013a
Rural
84
Urban
61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 110 120
Mortality rate (per 1000 live births)
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
a Based on the results of DHS in 54 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and vertical lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle
50%) for each subgroup.
Figure 5.3
Selected intervention indicators, by place of residencea
Births attended by skilled health

personnel (%) (85 countries)
Rural
Need for family planning

b
satisfied b (%) (61 countries)
Rural
Urban
Population using improved drinking

water sources (%) (180 countries)
Urban
Rural
Urban
89
81
80
Coverage (%)
Rural
92
91
90
60
Urban
98
100
70
Population using improved sanitation

facilities (%) (179 countries)
72
71
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
b Need for family planning satisfied with either modern or traditional methods among married or in-union women of reproductive age.
The situation faced by migrants is another major concern.

It is estimated that around 244 million people are living
outside their countries of origin,1 having left their homes for
a variety of reasons, including conflict; natural disasters or
environmental degradation; political persecution; poverty;
discrimination; and lack of access to basic services and in
search of new opportunities, particularly in terms of work or
education. Within this group, refugees and asylum seekers
(defined as those who did not make a voluntary choice
to leave their country of origin and cannot safely return
home) require particular attention. The recent increase
in the displacement of populations around the world is
unprecedented. Over the past 4 years, countries in the
Middle East have become host to more than 4.2 million new
1 Trends in international migrant stock: the 2015 revision [online database]. United
Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (http://www.un.org/en/
development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates15.shtml, accessed
1 April 2016).
refugees. About 2.5 million refugees have arrived in Turkey

since 2012, and more than 700000 new migrants and
refugees have arrived in Europe since June 2015.2 Many of
these people have higher risks of health problems and lack
access to health services and financial protection for health.
The topic of migration is included in the SDGs, which have
a number of goals and targets related to migration issues,
including SDG Target 10.7 on planned and well-managed
migration policies. 3 As with minorities, the effective
monitoring of migrant health will be crucial to making
progress, and was identified as one of four priority areas
for action at the Global Consultation on Migrant Health
held in Madrid in March 2010, at which stakeholders
2 Promoting the health of migrants. Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly. Provisional
agenda item 14.7 (A69/27). 8 April 2016 (http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/
EB138/B138_26-en.pdf, accessed 8 May 2016).
3 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. International Organization for Migration
(https://unobserver.iom.int/2030-agenda-sustainable-development, accessed 10 April
2016).
27
called for health information systems to be strengthened

to ensure the standardization and comparability of data on
migrant health, and for the appropriate disaggregation and
assembling of migrant health information.1
5.6 Data gaps disaggregation is a crucial

data challenge
The emphasis on disaggregated data called for in the
SDGs will be a major challenge for countries and at the
global level. Household surveys are the best instrument
for obtaining data by socioeconomic and demographic
characteristics. They are less suitable for obtaining local
data and for use in populations that are small or more
difficult to include in household survey samples (as this
requires very large survey sample sizes). Nevertheless,
surveys will remain the mainstay of disaggregated data
collection for many indicators. A good example is the extent
to which DHS and later MICS have provided standardized
disaggregated data for reproductive, maternal and child
health indicators.
household surveys and electronic facility reporting systems

(either in aggregated format or individual level data).
Whenever possible, data collection should include smallarea markers (such as postal codes) or individual identifiers
(such as personal identification numbers) that permit
cross-linkages between different data sources. Countries
should move towards implementing standardized electronic
record-keeping systems, while ensuring that personal
data are protected and used appropriately. In addition,
inequality, by its very nature, is a complex concept and can
be calculated using different measurements. Countries
should therefore also focus on developing the technical
expertise needed to conduct health inequality analyses.
Disaggregation also implies a major challenge for the users
of data. For example, the volume of data will increase and
become more difficult to interpret. For this reason, it is
essential that the needs and technical expertise of the target
audience are taken into account when communicating
health inequality analysis results. Presentation of such
results should include, for example, interactive data
visualizations, which can facilitate the interpretation of
large or complex datasets.2
For many indicators, however, overall data availability

remains poor. Investments are thus needed in regular
1 International Organization for Migration, the World Health Organization and the United
Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International migration,
health and human rights. Geneva: International Organization for Migration; 2013 (http://
www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Migration/WHO_IOM_UNOHCHRPublication.pdf,
28
2 Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A. Promoting health equity: WHO

health inequality monitoring at global and national levels. Global Health Action.
2015;(8):29034 (http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/29034,
SDG HEALTH AND

HEALTH-RELATED
TARGETS
Even though the indicators for the health and health-related

SDG targets are still at the proposal stage, it is possible to
provide an overview of the current situation broken down
by country, region and globally. This not only provides initial
information on the challenges ahead but also allows for
assessment of the data gaps that exist for the proposed
indicators.
6.1 Health targets 13 targets and 26

proposed indicators
The health goal (SDG3) comprises 13 targets, including four
listed as means-of-implementation targets. Each target
has one or two proposed indicators, with the exception
of SDG Target 3.3: By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS,
tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases
and combat hepatitis, waterborne diseases and other
communicable disease which has five indicators; and SDG
Target 3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of
deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air,
water and soil pollution and contamination which has
three. With a total of 26 indicators, the health goal has the
largest number of proposed indicators of all the 17 SDGs.
SDG3 targets cover a great deal of ground. Almost all of
them can be linked to strategies and global action plans
that have been adopted by the WHA in recent years, or are

under development. Given that there are 13 health targets
covering most national health concerns and the majority of
international programmes, any approach to national health
development that focuses on individual programmes in
isolation will be counterproductive, and risk causing even
greater fragmentation and competition than has been seen
in the past. More crucially, it will fail to address the many
cross-cutting issues that do not fit neatly into programme
areas. The emphasis on UHC as a cross-cutting goal for
the health sector should contribute to overcoming these
challenges.1
The need for cross-cutting approaches to the health
challenges faced should also inform the monitoring of
individual targets; which needs to be done in a way that
keeps the broader issues in focus. This includes very broad
elements such as UHC and health systems, as well as
the links to risk factors and determinants that are often
considered external to the health sector. The SDGs provision
of a framework for more-integrated action is of considerable
importance in this regard.
Robust, reliable monitoring of progress and performance is
of fundamental importance to all major programmes. The
1 Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
www.who.int/gho/publications/mdgs-sdgs/en/, accessed 10 April 2016).
29
sets of indicators proposed for the SDG targets provide

critical information, but more information is often needed
to understand why progress is or is not being made. In
particular, more data are often needed on direct programme
performance using coverage indicators and related qualityof-care measures.
6.2 Health-related targets in other goals

many targets linked to health
The SDGs are founded on the principle that they are
integrated and indivisible progress in one area is
dependent upon progress in many others. Translating
this idea into practical action is going to be one of the key
challenges for the new agenda. With regard to health,
deliberate action will be required to influence governance
in many policy arenas to achieve health-sector goals. The
health of people is not solely a health-sector responsibility;
it is also impacted by issues such as transport, agriculture,
housing, trade and foreign policy. To address the
multisectoral nature of health determinants, the health
sector should promote Health in All Policies an approach
to public policies across sectors that systematically takes
into account the health implications of decisions, seeks
synergies and avoids harmful health impacts in order to
improve population health and health equity, and address
the social determinants of health.1,2 Well over a dozen
targets in other goals can be considered to be health related
and should be given special attention in strategies, policies
and plans to achieve the health goal, and in monitoring
progress. Examples include targets related to nutrition,
environmental risk factors and violence.
The SDGs provide a new and exciting opportunity to
strengthen governance for health the underlying
assumption of which is that deliberate action is needed
to influence governance in other policy arenas to promote
and protect health. Areas of particular relevance include
trade and intellectual property, sustainable energy, income
inequality, migration, food security, and sustainable
consumption and production. While much of the
attention on governance for health has focused on global
issues, the SDG declaration underlines the importance
of governance for health at national and regional levels.
While the integrated nature of the SDG agenda presents
opportunities for new approaches to old problems, it also
presents challenges. For example, it will require revisiting
and reshaping the architecture for global health, particularly
in relation to health security and the development of global
public goods.
1 The Helsinki Statement on Health in All Policies. The 8th Global Conference on
Health Promotion, Helsinki, 1014 June 2013 (http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/
conferences/8gchp/8gchp_helsinki_statement.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016).
2 Outcome of the World Conference on Social Determinants of Health. Resolution
WHA65.8. In: Sixty-fifth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 2126 May 2012.
Resolutions and decisions, annexes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012:1517
(WHA65/2012/REC/1; http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA65-REC1/A65_
REC1-en.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016).
30
6.3 Situation in 2016 a sketch based on

global data
This section provides a brief overview of the situation in key
areas, drawing on the health and health-related indicators
presented in Fig.6.1. Countries in this dashboard are
grouped by WHO region, with each country represented by
a circle. The areas of focus are: (a) reproductive, maternal,
newborn and child health; (b) infectious diseases; (c) NCDs
and mental health; (d) injuries and violence; and (e) health
systems. As the dashboard clearly shows, there are marked
differences both between and within regions, as well as
variations in the pattern for each indicator.
A more-extensive analysis is presented for the main
indicators in the form of a series of two-page summaries
(Annex A). These summaries cover the current situation,
a brief discussion of what is needed to achieve the 2030
target, the equity dimension and the data gaps. Annex
B then provides the latest country-level estimates for
the indicators. Further information is available from the
full database and SDG sections of the Global Health
Observatory.3
Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health

Multiple targets in SDG3 and other goals refer to
reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. These
include targets for mortality, service coverage, risk factors
and health determinants (Table6.1). The Global Strategy for
Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030 is
fully aligned with the SDG targets, and is organized around
Table 6.1
Selected SDG targets and proposed indicators linked to reproductive, maternal,
newborn and child health, by type of indicator
Type of
indicator
Impact
Coverage
SDG
target
Maternal mortality
3.2
Under-five mortality
3.2
Neonatal mortality
3.7
Adolescent birth rate
3.9
Mortality due to unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene;

Mortality due to air pollution (household and ambient)
3.1
Births attended by skilled health personnel
3.7
Family planning coverage
3.8
UHC: RMNCHa tracers (family planning, antenatal and delivery

care, full immunization coverage, health-seeking behaviour
for suspected child pneumonia)
37 (22)
Risk factors/
determinants
Proposed indicator
3.1
Model life table systems
2.2
Child stunting, child wasting, child overweight
6.1
Access to safely managed drinking-water source
6.2
Access to safely managed sanitation
7.1
Clean household energy
11.6
Ambient air pollution
Other
Part of targets in goals on poverty, education, gender etc.
a RMNCH = reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health.
3 The Global Health Observatory (GHO) is WHOs portal providing access to data and
analyses for monitoring the global health situation. See: http://www.who.int/gho/en/,
Figure 6.1
Dashboard of SDG health and health-related indicators, by proposed indicator and WHO regiona
Health indicators
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
Maternal mortality ratio
Proportion of births attended by

skilled health personnel
Under-five mortality rate
Neonatal mortality rate

50
150
20
40
60
500
100
per 1000 live births
per 1000 live births
40
(%)
per 100 000 live births
1000
30
20
50
80
10
100
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
New HIV infections among adults

15-49 years old
TB incidence
Malaria incidence
Infants receiving three doses of

hepatitis B vaccine
20
20
800
40
400
300
(%)
10
600
per 1000 population at risk
15
per 100 000 population
per 1000 uninfected population
400
200
100
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
60
200
80
100
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
3.3
3.4
3.4
Reported number of people

requiring interventions against
NTDs
Probability of dying from any of

CVD, cancer, diabetes, CRD between
age 30 and exact age 70
Suicide mortality rate
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
3.5
Coverage of treatment interventions
(pharmacological, psychosocial and
rehabilitation and aftercare services) for
substance use disorders
600
40
500
30
300
30
(%)
people (millions)
400
20
200
20
10
100
10
0
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR
WPR
a Each circle represents a country value; horizontal lines indicate the median value for each group. See Annex B for more details on each indicator.
31
Figure 6.1
Healthandindicators
Dashboard of SDG health and health-related indicators, by proposed indicator
WHO regioncontinued
continueda
3.5
Total alcohol per capita (> 15 years
of age)
3.6
3.7
3.7
Road traffic mortality rate
Proportion of married or in-union women

of reproductive age who have their need
for family planning satisfied with
modern methods
per 1000 women aged 15-19 years
150
40
40
(%)
10
200
20
60
consumption, in litres of pure alcohol
15
100
60
20
80
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
100
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
50
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.9
UHC service coverage index
Financial protection
Mortality rate attributed to

household and ambient air pollution
Mortality rate attributed to

exposure to unsafe WASH services
300
20
100
80
40
200
100
60
60
40
20
80
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR
WPR
0
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
3.9
3.a
3.b
3.b
Mortality rate from unintentional

poisoning
Age-standardized prevalence of
tobacco smoking among persons 15
years and older
Proportion of population with access

to affordable essential medicines on a
sustainable basis
Total net official development

assistance to the medical research
and basic health sectors
50
10
(%)
40
30
5
20
10
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
a Each circle represents a country value; horizontal lines indicate the median value for each group. See Annex B for more details on each indicator.
32
EMR
WPR
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR
WPR
Health indicators continued

3.c
3.d
2.2
2.2
Skilled health professional density
Average of 13 International Health

Regulations core capacity scores
Prevalence of stunting in children

under 5
Prevalence of wasting in children

under 5
60
50
20
50
20
40
15
40
(%)
100
(%)
Health-related indicators
30
10
60
150
20
5
80
200
10
100
250
0
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR
WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
2.2
6.1
6.2
7.1
Prevalence of overweight in
children under 5
Proportion of population using

improved drinking-water sources
Proportion of population using

improved sanitation
Proportion of population with

primary reliance on clean fuels
25
40
(%)
(%)
20
40
40
(%)
60
15
20
10
(%)
20
60
60
80
80
100
100
80
5
100
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
11.6
13.1
16.1
16.1
Annual mean concentrations of

fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in
urban areas
Average death rate due to natural

disasters
Mortality rate due to homicide
Estimated direct deaths from major

conflicts
300
100
6
(g/m3)
50
80
60
40
100
200
100
20
0
0
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
AFR AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR
33
the broad themes of Survive Thrive Transform.1 It is

an example of how a range of health and health-related
goals and targets must be addressed to improve health
and well-being of women, children and adolescents. The
monitoring framework for this global includes proposed
SDG indicators and further expands the set of indicators
to provide more specificity.
The indicators for SDG targets 3.1 and 3.2 include the
MDG indicators of maternal and under-five mortality. In
2015, the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) the number of
maternal deaths per 100000 live births was estimated
at 216 globally. Almost all of these deaths occurred in
low-resource settings and could have been prevented.
The global MMR declined by 44% during the MDG era,
representing an average annual reduction of 2.3% between
1990 and 2015.2 In order to achieve the SDG target of 70
per 100000 live births by 2030, the global annual rate of
reduction will need to be at least 7.3%. Attaining that rate
requires a marked acceleration in progress in this area. SDG
Target 3.1 also includes skilled attendance at birth. Globally,
coverage of skilled attendance at birth was estimated to
have reached 73% in 2013.3 However, more than 40% of
births in the WHO African Region and WHO South-East
Asia Region were not attended by skilled health personnel,
and within countries large access disparities associated with
differences in socioeconomic status persist.
An estimated 5.9 million children under 5 years died in
2015, with a global under-five mortality rate of 42.5 per
1000 live births. Child mortality is highest in sub-Saharan
Africa, where 1 child in 12 dies before their fifth birthday,
followed by South-East Asia where 1 in 19 dies before
reaching 5 years. The annual rate of reduction in under-five
mortality was 3.9% between 2000 and 2015.4 Currently, 79
countries have under-five mortality rates above the SDG
target of 25 under-five deaths per 1000 live births, and 24
countries have rates that are three times higher than that.
However, if the momentum established during the MDG
era can be maintained, the world will meet the 2030 target.
To reflect the importance of neonatal mortality as part
of overall child mortality, a specific target of 12 neonatal
deaths per 1000 live births in 2030 was included in the
SDG. Between 2000 and 2015, there was a 3.1% decline in
such deaths, and this rate of improvement would need to
be maintained in order to achieve the child mortality target.
1 The Global Strategy for Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030.
Every Women Every Child; 2015 (http://globalstrategy.everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/
EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_FINAL_WEB.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
2 WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division.
Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA,
World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/
maternal-mortality-2015/en/, accessed 25 March 2016).
4 Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015. Estimates Developed by the UN Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. New York (NY), Geneva and Washington
(DC): United Nations Childrens Fund, World Health Organization, World Bank and United
Nations; 2015 (http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2015_
Web_9_Sept_15.pdf, accessed 26 March 2016).
34
SDG Target 3.7 on universal access to sexual and

reproductive health-care services is to be monitored by
two proposed indicators: the adolescent birth rate; and
coverage of modern family planning services. Both of these
were also part of MDG global monitoring. The global
adolescent birth rate is estimated at 44 per 1000 women
aged 1519, but is five times higher in low-income countries
than in high-income countries.5 In addition, within LMIC,
the adolescent birth rate was four times higher among the
poorest quintile than among the richest quintile. Much of
early childbearing is related to early marriage (SDG Target
5.3). Globally, more than 700 million women alive in 2014
had been married before their 18th birthday, with about
250 million of these entering into marriage or union before
age 15.6 Other targets and indicators related to sexual and
reproductive health are included in SDG5 (gender), such
as female genital mutilation/cutting, reproductive health
decision-making and sexual or other types of violence by
intimate partners or others.
With regard to modern family planning services, globally
in 2015, 76% of women of reproductive age who were
married or in a union had their need for family planning with
a modern method satisfied. As with other indicators, there
was considerable regional variation, with, for example, 9 out
of 10 married or in-union women of reproductive age in the
WHO Western Pacific Region having their family planning
needs met, compared with less than half of those in the
WHO African Region.7
Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health is
one of the four categories of the UHC coverage index
(see section 4, Table4.1). This category includes four
coverage indicators: family planning; antenatal care (four
visits or more) with skilled attendance at birth; full child
immunization coverage; and health-seeking behaviour for
suspected child pneumonia. Major coverage gaps for all
four of these indicators persist in many countries, especially
among disadvantaged populations.
The indicators for SDG Target 2.2 on ending all forms
of malnutrition are focused on stunting, wasting and
overweight among children under 5 years of age. Globally in
2015, almost one in four children under 5 years of age (23%,
or 156 million children) were affected by stunting, with the
highest prevalence observed in the WHO African Region
(38%), followed by the WHO South-East Asia Region
(33%). Children are at greater risk of stunting if they are
born in rural areas, poor households or to mothers denied
5 World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. DVD Edition. New York (NY): United
Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015 (http://
esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Fertility/, accessed 13 April 2016).
6 Ending child marriage. Progress and prospects. New York (NY): United Nations
Childrens Fund; 2014 (http://www.unicef.org/media/files/Child_Marriage_
Report_7_17_LR..pdf, accessed 10 April 2016).
7 Model-based Estimates and Projections of Family Planning Indicators 2015. New York
(NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division;
2015 (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/theme/family-planning/
cp_model.shtml , accessed 21 April 2016). Special tabulations were prepared for
estimates by WHO region.
basic education. Wasting affected 50 million children

under 5 years of age (around 7%) globally in 2015. The
highest prevalence of wasting was observed in the WHO
South-East Asia Region (13.5%, or 24 million children).
Regarding overweight, prevalence increased globally and in
most regions between 2000 and 2015, to 6% or 42 million
children under 5 years of age in 2015, with the highest
prevalence observed in the WHO European Region.
Several environmental targets and indicators are also
relevant to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child
health, including water and sanitation, and air pollution
(discussed below). Diarrhoea is among the leading causes
of deaths in children under 5 years of age, and household air
pollution is estimated to cause half of all pneumonia deaths
among the same group.
Infectious diseases
The main target relating to infectious diseases is SDG
Target 3.3, which refers to ending the epidemics of AIDS,
tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases,
and combating hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other
communicable diseases. Several other SDG targets address
aspects of infectious disease control, including the UHC
target (3.8); reduction of mortality due to environmental
factors (3.9); and strengthening of country capacity for
early warning, risk reduction and management of national
and global health risks (3.d). The targets on improving water
and sanitation under SDG6 are also relevant, as are the
targets under SDG1 (poverty), SDG4 (education), SDG11
(cities), SDG13 (climate change) and others (Table6.2).
Table 6.2
Selected SDG targets and proposed indicators linked to infectious diseases, by type
of indicator
Type of
indicator
Impact
Coverage/
system
Risk factors/
determinants
SDG
target
Proposed indicator
3.3
HIV incidence
3.3
Tuberculosis incidence
3.3
Malaria incidence
3.3
Hepatitis B incidence
3.3
People requiring interventions against neglected tropical

diseases
3.9
Mortality due to unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene;

mortality due to air pollution (household and ambient)
3.8
UHC: infectious diseases tracer (ART coverage, tuberculosis

treatment, use of insecticide-treated nets, access to safely
managed drinking-water source and sanitation)
3.d
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity and health

emergency preparedness
6.1
Access to safely managed drinking-water source
6.2
Access to safely managed sanitation
7.1
Other
Part of targets in goals on poverty, education, cities, climate

change etc.
The incidence rates for HIV, tuberculosis (TB), malaria and

hepatitis are SDG indicators:
In 2014, the global HIV incidence rate among adults aged
1549 years was 0.5 per 1000 uninfected population,
with 2 million people becoming infected. HIV incidence
was highest in the WHO African Region at 2.6 per 1000
uninfected population in 2014, as compared with other
WHO regions where incidence among adults aged 1549
years ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 per 1000 uninfected.1
In 2014, there were 9.6 million new TB cases (133
per 100000 population) and 1.5 million TB deaths,
including 0.4 million deaths among HIV-positive people.
In 2014, the largest number of new TB cases occurred in
the WHO South-East Asia Region and WHO Western
Pacific Region, accounting for 58% of new cases globally.
However, Africa carried the most severe burden, with 281
cases per 100000 population.2
In 2015, the malaria incidence rate was 91 per 1000
persons at risk, with an estimated 214 million cases
and 438000 deaths (more than two thirds of which
occurred in children under 5 years of age). Sub-Saharan
Africa has the highest burden, with an incidence rate of
246 per 1000 persons at risk, accounting for roughly
90% of all cases and deaths globally.3
For viral hepatitis no estimates of incidence are available
yet. Global coverage of hepatitis B vaccination was 82%
in 2014.4
Progress towards the target of ending the epidemic of
neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) is monitored through
the SDG indicator: People requiring interventions against
NTDs. In 2014, at least 1.7 billion people in 185 countries
required mass or individual treatment and care for NTDs.
The risk of acquiring infectious diseases varies greatly
depending on socioeconomic determinants such as poverty
and housing conditions, sex (for example, in the case of
HIV infection in women, and tuberculosis in men) and
environmental conditions which are influenced by different
factors, including climate and climate change. Mortality
caused by exposure to unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene
(WASH) services is an indicator under SDG Target3.9. In
2012, an estimated 871000 deaths (mostly from infectious
diseases) were caused by the contamination of drinking1 How AIDS changed everything. MDG 6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the
AIDS response. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2015 (http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/
documents/2015/MDG6_15years-15lessonsfromtheAIDSresponse, accessed 10 April
2016) and UNAIDS/WHO estimates; 2015.
2 Global tuberculosis report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 11
April 2016).
3 World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.
who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2015/report/en/, accessed 10 April
2016).
4 WHO/UNICEF coverage estimates 2014 revision. July 2015 (see: http://www.who.int/
immunization/monitoring_surveillance/routine/coverage/en/index4.html).
35
water, bodies of water (such as rivers and reservoirs) and

soil, and by inadequate hand-washing facilities and practices
resulting from inadequate or inappropriate services. Almost
half (45%) of these deaths occurred in the WHO African
Region; where 13% of the global population lived.1,2
SDG6 on water and sanitation provides the targets and
indicators for monitoring progress towards universal and
equitable access to safe and affordable drinking-water, and
to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene. In 2015,
91% of the worlds population used an improved drinkingwater source and 68% used an improved sanitation facility.3
The SDG targets and indicators are more ambitious, and
focus on the use of a safely managed drinking-water service,
defined as an improved water source which is located on
premises, available when needed and free from faecal (and
priority chemical) contamination. The SDGs also target
safely managed sanitation coverage, which includes access
to a hand-washing facility with water and soap. Preliminary
estimates for safely managed water coverage are low and
suggest that such coverage will be much lower than that
for improved drinking-water sources.4
SDG Target 3.d: Strengthen the capacity of all countries,
in particular developing countries, for early warning, risk
reduction and management of national and global health
risks concerns more than infectious diseases. The indicator
of this target is the International Health Regulations (IHR)
capacity and health emergency preparedness index. The IHR
require countries to report certain disease outbreaks and
other public health events (such as those related to chemical
and radio nuclear hazards) to WHO. Despite progress in the
implementation of IHR core capacities in recent years, the
situation in 2015 is still far from satisfactory.
Noncommunicable diseases and mental health

As shown in Table6.3, SDG3 includes targets for the reduction
of NCD-related mortality and promotion of mental health
(3.4); for reducing substance abuse, including the harmful use
of alcohol (3.5); for the reduction of deaths and illnesses from
air pollution (3.9); and for tobacco control (3.a).
In 2012, NCDs were responsible for around 38 million
deaths per year, accounting for 68% of all deaths worldwide.
Of deaths under the age of 70 years, commonly referred to
as premature deaths, an estimated 52% were due to NCDs.
Over three quarters of those premature deaths were caused
by cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes and chronic
1 Preventing disease through healthy environments. A global assessment of the burden
of disease from environmental risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204585/1/9789241565196_eng.pdf?ua=1,
2 Preventing diarrhoea through better water, sanitation and hygiene. Exposures and
impacts in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization,
2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/150112/1/9789241564823_eng.
pdf?ua=1&ua=1, accessed 19 April 2016).
3 Progress on sanitation and drinking water 2015 update and MDG assessment. New
York (NY) and Geneva: UNICEF and World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.
int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmp-2015-update/en/, accessed 5 April 2016).
4 Hutton, G, Varughese M. The costs of meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals
targets on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016.
36
respiratory disease. Globally, premature mortality from

these four main NCDs declined by 15% between 2000 and
2012.5 This rate of decline is insufficient to meet the 2030
target of a one third reduction.
Table 6.3
Selected SDG targets and proposed indicators linked to noncommunicable diseases
and mental health, by type of indicator
Type of
indicator
Impact
Coverage/
risk factors
Risk factors/
determinants
SDG
target
Proposed indicator
3.4
NCD mortality
3.4
Suicide mortality
3.9
Mortality due to air pollution (household and ambient)
3.8
UHC: NCDs tracers (hypertension treatment coverage;

diabetes treatment coverage; cervical cancer screening;
tobacco use)
3.a
Tobacco use
3.5
Substance abuse (harmful use of alcohol)
7.1
11.6
Ambient air pollution
Other
Part of targets in goals on poverty, education, cities, etc.
Mental disorders occur in all regions and cultures of the

world with the most prevalent being depression and anxiety,
which are estimated to affect nearly one in 10 people on
the planet (676 million). At its worst, depression can lead
to suicide. In 2012, there were over 800000 estimated
suicide deaths worldwide, with 86% of these occurring in
people under the age of 70. Globally, among young adults
aged 1529 years suicide accounts for 8.5% of all deaths
and is the second leading cause of death in this group after
road traffic injuries.5
Substance use and substance-use disorders cause a
significant public health burden, including through the
harmful use of alcohol. Worldwide alcohol consumption in
2015 was projected to be 6.3 litres of pure alcohol per person
aged 15 or older.6 In 2010, 38% of the worlds population
aged 15 or older had drunk alcohol in the past 12 months,
with 16% of them engaged in heavy episodic drinking.7 There
is considerable global variation in alcohol use.
SDG3.a addresses the implementation of the WHO
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC); with
tobacco use selected as the indicator of progress. Tobacco
use is a leading risk factor for NCDs. In 2015, over 1.1 billion
people used tobacco, with far more males (945 million)
than females (180 million) smoking. Even though the
prevalence of smoking is declining worldwide and in many
countries, it appears to be increasing in the WHO Eastern
Mediterranean Region and the WHO African Region.8
5 Global Health Estimates 2013: deaths by cause, age and sex; estimates for
20002012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/
global_burden_disease/en/).
6 Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization. (http://www.
who.int/gho/en/)
7 Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2014 (http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/en/,
accessed 29 March 2016).
8 WHO global report on trends in tobacco smoking 20002025 (http://www.who.int/
tobacco/publications/surveillance/reportontrendstobaccosmoking/en/index4.html).
Air pollution is a major risk factor for NCDs, causing

cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease and lung cancer, as well as increasing the
risks for acute respiratory infections. In 2012, ambient (or
outdoor) air pollution (for example, from traffic, industrial
sources, waste burning or residential fuel combustion)
caused 3 million deaths. SDG Target 11.6 focuses on urban
environmental risks and includes an indicator on the annual
mean levels of fine particulate matter (such as PM2.5 and
PM10) in cities. In 2014, up to 90% of the population in cities
were exposed to fine particulate matter in concentrations
exceeding WHO Air Quality Guidelines, with exposure rates
varying considerably by region.1
Table 6.4
Selected SDG targets and proposed indicators linked to injuries and violence, by type
of indicator
In addition, household air pollution caused by cooking with

unclean fuels or using inefficient technologies caused an
estimated 4.3 million deaths from NCDs and childhood
pneumonia.2 In 2014, some 3.1 billion people relied primarily
on polluting fuels (that is, solid fuels and kerosene) for
cooking.3 The smoke or household air pollution arising from
this inefficient energy use in the home for cooking, heating
and lighting is laced with health-damaging pollutants.
SDG Target7.1 addresses access to affordable, reliable and
modern energy services, and is to be monitored with an
indicator on the reliance on clean fuels and technologies at
the household level.
from unintentional poisonings occur in children under 5

years of age and adults over 55 years. The mortality rate is
also 50% higher in men than in women.5
Injuries and violence

Injuries and violence are included in multiple SDG targets.
Road traffic injuries and unintentional injuries are included
in the health goal (SDG3) with targets related to violence
and disasters part of other goals (Table6.4).
According to the latest WHO estimates around 1.25 million
people died from road traffic injuries in 2013, and another
2050 million people sustained non-fatal injuries as a result
of road traffic collisions or crashes.4 Halving the number
of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents
by 2020 (SDG Target3.6) is an ambitious goal given the
dramatic increase in vehicle numbers (up by 90% between
2000 and 2013). However, the past decade has shown that
the increase in numbers of deaths due to road traffic injuries
has been much smaller than the increase in number of
registered vehicles, suggesting that interventions to improve
global road safety have had some impact on mortality.
Worldwide in 2012, an estimated 193000 deaths were
caused by unintentional poisonings, which is a proposed
indicator for SDG Target3.9. The highest mortality rates
1 Air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2016. Forthcoming.
2 Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.
who.int/gho/en/).
3 Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and
wellbeing of women and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204717/1/9789241565233_eng.pdf, accessed 3
April 2016).
4 Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
(http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en/,
Type of
indicator
Impact
SDG target
Deaths due to road traffic injuries
3.9
Mortality due to unintentional poisoning
1.5, 11.5, 13.1

16.1
Coverage/
risk factors/
determinants
Proposed indicator
3.6
Deaths due to disasters

Homicide
16.1
Conflict-related deaths
5.2
Women and girls subjected to physical, sexual or

physiological violence
16.1
Population subjected to physical, sexual or

physiological violence
Other
Part of targets in goals on peaceful and inclusive

societies, cities, poverty, education, etc.
SDG Target13.1: Strengthen resilience and adaptive

capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in
all countries,6 is linked to the SDG Target3.d to: Strengthen
the capacity of all countries, in particular developing
countries, for early warning, risk reduction and management
of national and global health risks. The proposed indicator
for SDG Target13.1 is the number of deaths, missing and
persons affected by disaster per 100000 people.7 Globally,
331 natural disasters were registered in 2015, causing
22662 deaths and affecting 90.2 million people. Both the
number of reported disasters and total number of people
affected have been declining over the last 15 years, with
2014 witnessing the lowest number of deaths due to
natural disasters. However, the long-term mortality trend
is dominated by major events, such as the Asia tsunami
in 2004; the Myanmar cyclone in 2008; and the Haiti
earthquake in 2010.8
SDG Target16.1 aims to: Significantly reduce all forms of
violence and related death rates everywhere. The first
indicator proposed for this target is: Number of victims
of intentional homicide per 100000 population, by age
group and sex. It is estimated that homicide and collective
violence account for around 10% of global injury-related
deaths. In 2012, there were an estimated 475000 murders.
There are very large differences between different regions of
the world in this respect, with the highest rates occurring in
the WHO Region of the Americas. Four fifths of homicide
5 Global Health Estimates 2013: deaths by cause, age and sex; estimates for
20002012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/
global_burden_disease/en/).
6 The same indicator is also proposed for the following two SDG targets relating to
disasters: (a) SDG Target 1.5: By 2030, build the resilience of the poor and those in
vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related
extreme events and other economic, social and environmental shocks and disasters;
and (b) SDG Target 11.5: By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the
number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses
relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related
disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations.
7 This indicator may be revised to reflect the future revision of indicators for monitoring
in the context of the Sendai Framework.
8 The International Disaster Database [online database]. Brussels: Centre for Research
on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED (http://www.emdat.be/database, accessed 11
February 2016).
37
victims are men, and 65% of victims are males aged 1549
years. Among women, intimate partner homicide accounts
for almost 38% of all murders, as compared with 6% of
all murders of men. Between 2000 and 2012, there was a
marked decline in homicide rates, with an estimated 17%
fall globally (from 8.0 to 6.7 per 100000 population).1
A second proposed indicator for SDG Target16.1 is conflictrelated deaths per 100000 population. In 2015, it is
provisionally estimated that 152000 people (uncertainty
range: 89500234600) were killed in wars and conflicts,
corresponding to about 0.3% of global deaths. 2 These
estimates do not include deaths due to the indirect effects
of war and conflict on the spread of diseases, poor nutrition
and collapse of health services. Between around 1990 and
2011, there was a decline in the number and intensity of
wars and conflicts.3 Although WHO estimates of global
direct conflict deaths (injury deaths) vary substantially by
year, there was a statistically significant average decline
during the period 19902010 of 2% per year, if the Rwandan
genocide of 1994 is excluded.
Health systems
Health systems strengthening is a core focus of the SDGs.
This is reflected by the fact that UHC is central to the
overall health goal as set out in the SDG declaration, and is
assigned a specific target (3.8) under the SDG health goal.
With its focus on coverage of quality essential health-care
services with financial protection for all, UHC underpins
the achievement of the other health targets, and takes into
account the interconnectedness of health with risk factors
and determinants of health that are part of many other SDG
targets (Table 6.5). More details on the UHC indicators are
provided in section 4.
In order to move towards the UHC goal, country health
systems need to be strengthened as well as adapted to meet
the shifting health priorities associated with demographic
and epidemiological transitions, rapidly developing
technologies and changing public expectations. Several
health targets (notably 3.b, 3.c and 3.d) address health
system issues, mostly focusing on strengthening health
systems in least-developed and developing countries.
Access to affordable medicines and vaccines on
a sustainable basis is an indicator for SDG Target3.b,
which focuses on support for research and development,
1 Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Geneva, New York and Vienna: World
Health Organization, United Nations Development Programme and United Nations
Office on Drugs and Crime; 2014 (http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/
violence/status_report/2014/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).
2 Global Health Estimates: deaths by cause, age and sex, with provisional update to
2015 using methods and data sources found at: http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/
global_burden_disease/GlobalCOD_method_2000_2012.pdf?ua=1 , accessed 22
February 2016).
3 Human security report 2013. The decline in global violence: evidence, explanation,
and contestation. Vancouver: Human Security Press; 2014 (http://www.hsrgroup.org/
docs/Publications/HSR2013/HSRP_Report_2013_140226_Web.pdf, accessed 10 April
2016).
38
Table 6.5
Selected SDG targets and proposed indicators linked to health systems, by type of
indicator
Type of
indicator
SDG
target
Coverage/
financial
protection
3.8
UHC index: tracer indicators on service access (hospital

access, health workforce density by specific cadres, access
to medicines and vaccines, IHR capacities)
3.8
UHC: financial protection (catastrophic and impoverishing

out-of-pocket health spending)
3.b
Access to medicines and vaccines
3.b
Research and development on health issues that primarily

affect developing countries, including official development
assistance (ODA)
3.c
Health workforce density and distribution
3.d
IHR capacity and health emergency preparedness
System
Proposed indicator
17.18
Data disaggregation
17.19
Coverage of birth and death registration; completion of

regular population census
and on the affordability of medicines and vaccines for

communicable diseases and NCDs that primarily affect
developing countries. Despite improvements in recent
decades, the availability of essential medicines at public
health facilities is often poor. Even when available, medical
products are not necessarily affordable to patients. Studies
have shown that in some LMIC where patients have to
pay for medicines in the public sector, the prices of some
generic medicines are on average 2.9 times higher than
international reference prices, and 4.6 times in private
facilities.4
A second proposed indicator under SDG Target3.b aims to
capture the level of research and development investments.
By combining the indicators under targets 3.b and 9.5
(research and development in general), it is possible to
evaluate the amount and proportion of public, private
and not-for-profit research and development investments
directed towards health problems that primarily affect
developing countries. In 2014, such funding reached
US$3.4billion, and was directed at medical product
development.5 This constitutes approximately 0.004%
of the global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014.6
Furthermore, less than 2% of all clinical trials addressed
such issues in 2012 and only 1% of 336 newly approved
chemical entities between 2000 and 2011 were primarily
intended for tackling developing country health problems.7,8
The lack of research capacity in many developing countries
is also an important factor.
4 Millennium Development Goal 8: taking stock of the global partnership for

development. MDG Gap Task Force Report 2015. New York (NY): United Nations; 2015
(http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/mdg_gap/mdg_gap2015/2015GAP_
FULLREPORT_EN.pdf, accessed 23 April 2015).
5 Moran M, Chapman N, Abela-Oversteegen L et al. Neglected disease research and
development: the ebola effect. Policy Cures. 2015.
6 The World Bank. Data, GDP ranking (http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDPranking-table, accessed 22 February 2016).
7 Rttingen J-A, Regmi S, Eide M et al. Mapping available health R&D data: whats there,
whats missing and what role for a Global Observatory. Lancet. 2013;382:1286307.
8 Pedrique B, Strub-Wourgaft N, Some C et al. The drug and vaccine landscape for
neglected diseases (2000-11): a systematic assessment. Lancet Global Health.
2013;1:e3719.
SDG Target3.c: Substantially increase health financing

and the recruitment, development, training and retention
of the health workforce in developing countries, especially
in least-developed countries and small island developing
States has one proposed indicator for workforce density
and distribution. Major shortages of physicians and nurses/
midwives are a matter for concern in most countries in
the WHO African Region, WHO South-East Asia Region
and WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, where densities
per 1000 population are only a fraction of what they are
elsewhere in the world.1 It has been estimated that there
was a deficit of approximately 17.4 million health workers
in 2013 of which almost 2.6 million were physicians and
over 9 million were nurses and midwives. Regionally, the
largest deficit of health workers was in South-East Asia (6.9
million) followed by Africa (4.2 million).
Statistics on health financing show that total health
expenditure per capita is still low in many developing
countries. Most developing countries spent less than 8%
of their gross domestic product (GDP) on health, and many
less than 5%. In 2013, per capita total health expenditure
at average exchange rate was less than US$50 in 27
countries and less than US$100 in 46 countries. Positive
trends are discernible, however. Per capita government
health expenditure globally increased by about 40% in
real terms between 2000 and 2013, with major increases
in all regions. This may simply reflect economic growth,
but in several countries is also the result of an increased
prioritization for health in government budget allocations.
On average, across countries, global OOP health spending
is down slightly (from 35% of THE in 20002004 to 31%
in 20102013), which suggests an improvement in financial
protection. However, average levels in low-income countries
remain high (42%).
SDG Target 3.d: Strengthen the capacity of all countries,
in particular developing countries, for early warning,
risk reduction and management of national and global
health risks has obvious implications for health system
strengthening. All national and global health risks require
full implementation of the IHR; the core capacities of
which are basic health system functions that focus on
issues related to health security, and require: (a) strong
health systems with good information and surveillance
infrastructures; (b) an adequate health workforce; and (c)
effective service delivery, including access to medicines
and vaccines. As noted above, despite progress in the
implementation of IHR core capacities in recent years, the
situation in 2015 remains far from satisfactory.
6.4 Data gaps need for strong country

health information systems
The SDG agenda presents a major monitoring challenge
for all countries. The global set of indicators is large and
includes many indicators with considerable measurement
issues. Countries will also have to add indicators to ensure
that the most relevant aspects of the goals and targets are
adequately monitored. Finally, addressing the emphasis
on disaggregation of all indicators, where relevant, will
be a major challenge for all data collection, analysis and
communication efforts.
The monitoring of the health and health-related targets is
fairly robust, relative to many other targets. This is partly
due to the investments made in monitoring the health
MDGs, and partly due to the general emphasis placed on
the importance of data and evidence in the health sector.
However, there are still major data gaps for most health
indicators that need to be addressed in order to improve
the ability to track global progress.
Table6.6 presents a summary of country data availability
for a selection of the proposed indicators. More detail is
provided in Annex A, which contains short sections on
data gaps for each indicator. It is important to distinguish
between the availability of global estimates and the strength
of the underlying data. Country data availability was
assessed based on the underlying data available to WHO
or other international agencies producing estimates for
global monitoring. The table also presents an assessment of
the availability of disaggregated data for global monitoring
purposes. An indicator is classified as having good data
availability/disaggregation if more than 75% of countries
where the indicator is relevant have recent data for the
indicator (2010 or later); fair if 4074% had recent
data; and poor if less than 40% of countries had recent
data. This does not take into account data quality. For
example, cause-of-death information generated by CRVS
systems is considered more reliable for NCDs and road
traffic injuries than for suicide and unintentional poisoning.
Some indicators may have different definitions in different
countries, making them less comparable.
Comparable estimates are now produced for every country
on a regular basis for most indicators, driven by advances
in statistical modelling and a demand for up-to-date
comparable statistics at the global level. These global
estimates have considerable uncertainty which is greater
if data availability is poor. Uncertainty is also greater if
more steps are involved in the estimation process. For
example, mortality due to air pollution involves not only
establishing mortality rates due to specific causes of death
(such as respiratory conditions), but also requires data on
the proportion of deaths attributable to this risk factor.
1 Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Draft December
2015 (http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/WHO_GSHRH_DRAFT_05Jan16.pdf?ua=1,
39
Table 6.6
Summary of the availability and degree of disaggregation of country data on proposed health and selected health-related SDG indicatorsa
Indicator topic
Country data
availability
Disaggregation
Comparable
estimates
Source estimates
3.1.1
Maternal mortality
Fair
Poor
Annual
3.1.2
Skilled birth attendance
Good
Fair
In preparation
3.2.1
Under-five mortality rate
Good
Fair
Annual
UN IGME
3.2.2
Neonatal mortality rate
Good
Fair
Annual
UN IGME
3.3.1
HIV incidence
Fair
Fair
Annual
UNAIDS, WHO
3.3.2
Tuberculosis incidence
Fair
Poor
Annual
WHO
3.3.3
Malaria incidence
Fair
Fair
Annual
WHO
3.3.4
Hepatitis B incidence
Poor
Poor
In preparation
WHO
3.3.5
People requiring interventions against NTDs
Good
Poor
Annual
WHO
3.4.1
Mortality due to NCDs
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.4.2
Suicide mortality rate
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.5.1
Treatment substance use disorders
Poor
Poor
Not available
3.5.2
Harmful use of alcohol
Good
Fair
Annual
WHO
3.6.1
Road traffic injury deaths
Good
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.7.1
Family planning
Fair
Fair
Annual
UN Population Division
3.7.2
Good
Fair
Annual
UN Population Division
3.8.1
Coverage index UHC
Fair
Poor
In preparation
WHO, World Bank
3.8.2
Financial protection
Poor
Poor
In preparation
WHO, World Bank
3.9.1
Mortality due to air pollution
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.9.2
Mortality due to WASH
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.9.3
Mortality due unintentional poisoning
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
WHO
3.a.1
Tobacco use
Good
Fair
Every 23 years
WHO
3.b.1
Access to medicines and vaccines
Poor
Poor
Not available
WHO
3.b.2
ODA for medical research
Good
Not applicable
In preparation
OECD, WHO
3.c.1
Health workers
Fair
Poor
Not available
WHO
3.d.1
IHR capacity and emergency preparedness
Good
Not applicable
Not applicable
WHO
2.2.1
Stunting among children
Good
Good
Annual
UNICEF, WHO, World Bank
2.2.2
Wasting and overweight among children
Fair
Fair
Annual
UNICEF, WHO, World Bank
6.1.1
Drinking-water services
Good
Good
Every 23 years
UNICEF, WHO
6.2.1
Sanitation services
Good
Good
Every 23 years
UNICEF, WHO
7.1.1
Good
Good
Every 23 years
WHO
11.6.1
Air pollution
Good
Good
Annual
WHO
13.1.1
Mortality due to disasters
Good
Poor
Every 23 years
UNISDR, WHO
16.1.1
Homicide
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
UNODC, WHO
16.1.2
Mortality due to conflicts
Fair
Poor
Every 23 years
OCHCR, WHO
UN MMEIG
UNICEF, WHO
UNODC, WHO
a Country data availability and disaggregation were assessed based on the data available to WHO or other international agencies producing estimates for global monitoring. An indicator is classified as having good data availability/
disaggregation if data were available for more than 75% of countries where the indicator is relevant (2010 or later); fair if data were available for 4074% of countries; and poor if data were available for less than 40% of
countries.
It is clear that investments in data generation, analysis,

communication and use are needed for almost all
indicators. This includes investing in CRVS systems, regular
standardized household surveys on health, well-functioning
routine health facility reporting systems with regular healthfacility surveys, and comprehensive administrative data
sources such as NHAs and health workforce accounts.
Innovative approaches, using advances in information
and communication technology, can also greatly facilitate
40
progress. Priorities for such investment were agreed upon

by the participants of the Global Summit on Measurement
and Accountability for Health, Washington, DC, June 2015,
and by global health agency leaders. Box 6.1 shows the
corresponding five-point call to action with a set of targets
for better data systems in support of health-related SDG
monitoring. The workplan of the Health Data Collaborative,
based on this call to action, was launched in March 2016.
Box 6.1
Five-point call to action on strengthening country health information systems, with targets1
1 Increase the level and efficiency of investments to strengthen country health information system in line with international standards
and commitments:
By 2030, countries are investing adequately in health information and statistical systems;
By 2020, government and development partner investments are fully aligned with a single country platform for information and
accountability.
2 Strengthen country capacity to collect, compile, share, disaggregate, analyse, disseminate, and use data at all levels of the health
system:
By 2020, countries have annual transparent reviews of health progress and system performance, based on high-quality data and
analyses led by country institutions;
By 2025, countries have high quality, comprehensive, disaggregated data to review progress against national plans and report on
progress against health-related SDGs;
By 2020, countries have health information flows that include regular feedback and local use of data locally to improve services and
programmes.
3 Ensure that countries have well-functioning sources for generating population health data in line with international standards:
By 2025, countries have in place a regular, comprehensive programme of health surveys tailored to country needs, and have completed
the 2020 round of census, in line with international standards;
By 2030, all births are registered by civil registration as soon as possible; 80% of deaths are reported, registered, medically certified,
and disaggregated by age and sex; causes of death are reported using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) by all hospitals,
with verbal post-mortem ascertaining causes of death in communities.
4 Maximize effective use of the data revolution, based on open standards, to improve health facility and community information
systems empowering decision-makers at all levels with real-time access to information:
By 2020, countries are compliant with IHR national core functions for surveillance and response and have effective, real-time systems
in place, including the capacity to analyse and link data using interoperable, interconnected electronic reporting systems within the
country;
By 2025, countries have in place electronic systems for real-time reporting of health statistics from at least 80% of facilities and
communities, including data quality assurance;
By 2030, countries have regular maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response mechanisms at the national, subnational,
and facility levels;
By 2030, at least 90% of countries have complete, up-to-date system of health and workforce accounts using international standards.
5 Promote country and global governance with citizen and community participation for accountability through inclusive, transparent
reviews of progress and performance at facility, subnational, national, regional and global levels, linked to the health-related SDGs:
By 2016, a global coordination and accountability mechanism produces regular reports and reviews the progress of the health measurement
roadmap and action plan;
By 2017, countries have established mechanisms to make health data available to users through electronic dissemination and easy
access to a central data repository;
By 2020, civil society organizations in countries are actively and meaningfully participating in country reviews of progress and performance
at all levels.
1 Health measurement and accountability post 2015: Five-point call to action (http://
www.healthdatacollaborative.org/fileadmin/uploads/hdc/Documents/5-point-call-toaction.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016).
41
ANNEX A
SUMMARIES OF THE SDG HEALTH AND HEALTH-RELATED TARGETS
Explanatory notes
This annex presents a series of two-page summaries of health and selected health-related SDG indicators. These summaries
outline the current situation, briefly set out what is needed to achieve the 2030 target, highlight the equity dimension
and identify the key data gaps.
The statistics shown below represent official WHO statistics based on the evidence available in early 2016. They have
been compiled primarily using publications and databases produced and maintained by WHO or United Nations groups
of which WHO is a member. A number of statistics have been derived from data produced and maintained by other
international organizations.
Wherever possible, estimates have been computed using standardized categories and methods in order to enhance
cross-national comparability. This approach may result in some cases in differences between the estimates presented
here and the official national statistics prepared and endorsed by individual WHO Member States. It is important to stress
that these estimates are also subject to considerable uncertainty, especially for countries with weak statistical and health
information systems where the quality of underlying empirical data is limited.
The tables shown on the right-hand side of most sections provide the latest available set of country values. For indicators
with a reference period expressed as a range, country values refer to the latest available year in the range unless otherwise
noted. Within each WHO region, countries are sorted in ascending order for mortality, incidence and risk-factor indicators,
and in descending order for coverage and capacity indicators. Countries for which data are not available or applicable are
sorted alphabetically at the bottom of each region, unless otherwise noted.
Country income grouping is based on the World Bank analytical income classification of economies1 corresponding to
the year of the data.
More details on the indicators and estimates presented here are available at the WHO Global Health Observatory.2
1 For more information, see: Country classification. Washington (DC): World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/topics/19280-country-classification, accessed
16April 2016).
2 The Global Health Observatory (GHO) is WHOs portal providing access to data and analyses for monitoring the global health situation. See: http://www.who.int/gho/en/, accessed
16April 2016.
43
MATERNAL MORTALITY
SDG Target 3.1
By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100 000 live births
Indicator 3.1.1: Maternal mortality ratio
SITUATION
ACHIEVING THE 2030 TARGET
In 2015, the maternal mortality ratio (MMR)

defined as the number of maternal deaths per
100000 live births was estimated at 216
globally.1 This translates into approximately
830 women dying every single day due to the
complications of pregnancy and childbirth.
Almost all of these deaths occurred in lowresource settings, and most could have been
prevented. The WHO African Region bore the
highest burden with almost two thirds of global
maternal deaths occurring in the region (Fig.
A.1.2). The probability of a 15 year-old girl in
the region eventually dying from a maternal
cause was as high as 1 in 37 compared to 1
in 3400 in the WHO European Region.
During the course of the MDG era the global

MMR declined by 44% equating to an average
annual reduction of 2.3% between 1990 and
2015. Accelerated progress is now needed
as achieving the SDG Target 3.1 will require a
global annual rate of reduction of at least 7.3%.
Countries with an MMR of less than 432 deaths
per 100 000 live births in 2015 will need to
achieve an annual continuous rate of reduction
of 7.5%. For the 30 countries with MMRs greater
than 432 deaths per 100 000 live births in 2015,
even higher annual continuous rates of reduction
are needed to reduce the MMR to less than 140
deaths per 100 000 live births in 2030.3
The primary causes of maternal deaths are

haemorrhage (mostly bleeding after childbirth),
hypertension during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia
and eclampsia), sepsis or infections, and indirect
causes mostly due to interaction between preexisting medical conditions and pregnancy
(Fig. A.1.1).2
Figure A.1.1.
Global estimates for causes of maternal mortality
20032009
Pre-existing medical conditions
exacerbated by pregnancy
(such as diabetes, malaria,
HIV, obesity)
28%
Severe
bleeding
27%
Blood
clots
3%
Abortion
complications
8%
Obstructed
labour and
other direct
causes
9%
Infections
(mostly after
childbirth)
11%
Pregnanyinduced
high blood
pressure
14%
Most maternal deaths are preventable as the

health-care solutions for preventing or managing
the complications of pregnancy and childbirth
are well known. All women need access to goodquality antenatal, childbirth and postpartum care.
It is also crucially important to ensure access
to contraception in order to prevent unintended
pregnancies. Factors that prevent women from
receiving adequate health care during pregnancy
and childbirth include limited availability and poor
quality of health services, a lack of information
on available services, certain cultural beliefs
and attitudes, and poverty.
44
The SDG target on maternal mortality forms an

integral part of The Global Strategy for Womens,
Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030.4
The required acceleration in reducing maternal
mortality will not be possible without clinical and
non-clinical interventions, as well as political
and policy action. Although each country will be
different, the Strategies toward ending preventable
maternal mortality (EPMM) 5 initiative suggests
adaptive and highly effective interventions to
improve womens health before, during and after
pregnancy. Key EPMM strategic objectives are:
to address inequities in access to and quality
of sexual, reproductive, maternal and newborn
health information and services;
to ensure UHC for comprehensive sexual,
reproductive, maternal and newborn health
care;
to address all causes of maternal mortality,
reproductive and maternal morbidities, and
related disabilities;
to strengthen health systems to respond to
the needs and priorities of women and girls;
and
to ensure accountability to improve quality
of care and equity.
EQUITY
Maternal mortality is a health indicator that
shows very wide variations between rich and
poor, and between urban and rural areas both
between countries and within them. Poor women
in remote areas are the least likely to receive
adequate health care.
DATA GAPS
Maternal mortality is a relatively rare event and
therefore difficult to measure. Civil registration
systems in most developing countries where
most maternal deaths occur are weak and
cannot therefore provide an accurate assessment
of maternal mortality. Even estimates derived
from complete civil registration systems, such

as those in developed countries, may not be
accurate, for example due to the misclassification
of maternal deaths.
Furthermore, although the 2015 MMR estimates
made by the United Nations Maternal Mortality
Estimation Inter-Agency Group were based on
data available for 171 countries, no data had been
provided since 2010 from 55 of these countries,
or since 2005 in the case of nine others.3
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text, table and figures are
taken from: WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United
Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015.
Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United
Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
(http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/
maternal-mortality-2015/en/, accessed 25 March 2016).
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunalp , Moller AB, Daniels JD et al. Global

causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health
2014;2(6):e323e333 (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/
article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70227-X/fulltext, accessed 25 February 2016).
Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A et al. Global,

regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between
1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic
analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group.
Lancet. 2016;387(10017):46274 (Online version published 12
November 2015: http://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/
pdfs/S0140673615008387.pdf, accessed 25 March 2016).
The Global Strategy for Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health,

20162030. Every Women Every Child; 2015 (http://globalstrategy.
everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_
FINAL_WEB.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM).

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/153544/1/9789241508483_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed
11 April 2016).
Figure A.1.2.
Maternal deaths, by WHO region, 2015
AFR
(195 000)
AMR
(7900)
SEAR
(61 000)
EUR
(1800)
EMR
(28 000)
WPR
(9800)
Table A.1.1.
Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births), 2015a
Table A.1.1. Maternal mortality ratio (per 100000 live births), 2015
AFR
Cabo Verde
Canada
Mauritius
Botswana
53
129
South Africa
Algeria
138
140
156

Zambia
Namibia
EUR
7
United States of America 14

Uruguay 15
Chile 22
Costa Rica 25
Barbados 27
224
265
Grenada
27
Belize
28
Rwanda
Gabon
290
291
Mexico 38
Cuba 39
Senegal
Ghana
315
319
335
Brazil 44
Comoros
Equatorial Guinea
Uganda
Ethiopia
Madagascar
Togo
Burkina Faso
Swaziland
Benin
Congo
Zimbabwe
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 45

Saint Lucia 48
342
343
353
353
368
371
389
398
405
442
443
Angola
Lesotho
477
487
Mozambique
Eritrea
489
501
510
Kenya
Guinea-Bissau
Niger
549
553
Argentina
52
El Salvador
54
Trinidad and Tobago

Colombia
63
Ecuador
64
Peru
68
Bahamas
80
Guatemala
88
Jamaica
Dominican Republic
89
Panama
94
95
64
92
Honduras
129
Paraguay
132
Nicaragua
Suriname
150
155
206
229
Mali
Cameroon
587
596
Guyana
Mauritania
Malawi
602
634
645
SEAR
Thailand
20
679
693
Sri Lanka
Maldives
30
706
712
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
82
Indonesia
126
725
789
814
Bhutan
148
India
174
Bangladesh
Myanmar
176
Timor-Leste
215
Nepal
258
Cte d'Ivoire
Guinea
Gambia
Burundi
Liberia
South Sudan
Nigeria
Chad
Sierra Leone
a
AMR
42
359
Haiti
856
882
1360
68
178
Finland
Greece
Iceland
Poland
Austria
Belarus
Czech Republic
Italy
Sweden
Israel
Norway
Spain
Switzerland
Denmark
Germany
Slovakia
Belgium
Cyprus
Montenegro
Netherlands
Croatia
France
Ireland
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
Estonia
Malta
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Portugal
Bulgaria
Kazakhstan
Turkey
Hungary
Serbia
Latvia
Republic of Moldova
Ukraine
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Russian Federation
Albania
Romania
Tajikistan
Georgia
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
EMR
3
3
3
3
Kuwait 4
Libya
Saudi Arabia
12
Qatar
13
Bahrain
15
Lebanon
15
Oman
17
25
Egypt
33
Iraq
50
Jordan
58
Tunisia
62
68
Morocco
121
Pakistan
178
5
5
5
7
7
8
229
Djibouti
311
Sudan
Yemen
385
Afghanistan
396
Somalia
9
9
732
WPR
Japan
Australia
Singapore
10
New Zealand
11
11
Republic of Korea
11
11
Brunei Darussalam
23
12
China
27
16
Fiji
30
17
Malaysia
40
Mongolia
44
Samoa
51
24
Viet Nam
54
25
Vanuatu
78
25
Kiribati
90
25
100
29
Philippines
114
Solomon Islands
114
Tonga
124
36
Cambodia
161
42
197
76
Papua New Guinea
215
10
10
10
17
18
23
31
32
36
WHO Member States with a population of less than 100 000 in 2015 were not included in the analysis.
45
BIRTHS ATTENDED BY SKILLED HEALTH PERSONNEL

SDG Target 3.1
By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100 000 live births
Indicator 3.1.2: Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel
SITUATION
The global coverage of skilled attendance at
birth was estimated to have reached 73% in
2013. However, despite steady improvement
globally and within regions, millions of births
were not assisted by a midwife, a doctor or a
trained nurse. More than 40% of births in the
WHO African Region and WHO South-East Asia
Region were not attended by skilled health
personnel (Fig. A.2.1).1
Figure A.2.1.
Births attended by skilled health personnel, by WHO
region, 20131
Births attended by skilled health personnel (%)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Along with adequate antenatal and postpartum

care, high-quality childbirth care by a skilled health
provider is paramount in preventing maternal
and newborn deaths. Timely management and
treatment of complications during childbirth can
make the difference between life and death for
both mother and baby.

This indicator is a measure of the ability of a
health system to provide adequate care during
birth a period of greatest risk of mortality
and morbidity for both mother and newborn.
46
It is therefore a key indicator for monitoring

progress toward the achievement of the SDG
target of reducing maternal mortality.
As outlined in The Global Strategy for Womens,
Childrens and Adolescents Health, 20162030 2
good quality of care at childbirth produces a
triple return on investment, saving mothers
and newborns and preventing stillbirths. The
provision of effective care for all women and
babies at the time of birth in facilities could
prevent an estimated 113 000 maternal deaths,
531 000 stillbirths and 1.3 million neonatal deaths
annually by 2020 at an estimated running cost
of US$ 4.5 billion per year (US$ 0.9 per person).
Various factors prevent pregnant women from
receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and
childbirth, including limited availability and poor
quality of health services, a lack of information
on available services, certain cultural beliefs
and attitudes, and poverty. Such barriers must
be identified and addressed at all levels of the
health system. For example, from the supply
side, attracting, training, deploying, motivating,
managing and retaining skilled, committed and
caring health workers are fundamental health
system challenges faced by many countries.
Addressing these challenges requires, among
other things, strong political will, long-term
planning and sustainable financing.
EQUITY
In many countries, the delivery care women
receive is strongly associated with their income,
whether they live in an urban or rural area,
and their level of education. As shown in Fig.
A.2.2, disparities across these economic, urban/
rural and education gradients are particularly
pronounced in low-income countries, where
only among the most advantaged groups does
median coverage reach more than 80%. Among
the most disadvantaged groups the corresponding
median coverage is below 50%.3
DATA GAPS
In high-income countries, virtually all births
are attended by skilled health personnel. For
most LMIC, the main data source is household
surveys, which are typically conducted every 5
years. Since 2010, 103 countries have generated
data from at least one household survey, while
some other countries using health-facility data
to estimate coverage on an annual basis.
Standardizing the definition of a skilled health
attendant is difficult because of differences in the
training of health personnel in different countries.
Although efforts have been made to standardize
the definitions of doctors, nurses, midwives
and auxiliary midwives used in most household
surveys, it is likely that the ability of many skilled
attendants to provide appropriate care in an
emergency depends upon the environment in
which they work.
REFERENCES
WHO, World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: First global
monitoring report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/report/2015/
en/, accessed 25 March 2016).
The Global Strategy for Womens, Childrens and Adolescents Health,

20162030. Every Women Every Child; 2015 (http://globalstrategy.
everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_
FINAL_WEB.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
WHO and International Center for Equity in Health/Pelotas. State

of inequality. Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/164590/1/9789241564908_eng.pdf, accessed 10
April 2016.).
Figure A.2.2.
Births attended by skilled health personnel in low-income countries, by multiple dimensions of inequality,
20052013a
Economic status
Quintile 1
(poorest)
Quintile 2
Place of residence
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5
(richest)
Rural
Urban
Education
No education
Primary school
Secondary school
+
100
89
90
84
84
80
70
Coverage (%)
70
63
60
55
50
40
45
43
39
34
30
20
10
0
a
Based on the results of DHS and MICS in 30 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate
the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each
subgroup.
Table A.2.1.
a
Proportion
of births
attended by
personnel
(%), 20062014
Table A.2.1.
Proportion
of skilled
birthshealth
attended
by skilled
health personnel
(%)
AFR
AMR
Botswana
Mauritiusbb
Seychellesbb
100
100
99
Algeria
Congo
South Africa
Sao Tome and Principebb
Cabo Verde
Rwandabb
Gabonbb
97
94
94
93
92
91
89
Namibia
Swazilandbb
Malawibb
Comoros
Zimbabwe
88
88
87
82
80
80
78
Lesotho
Beninbb
Ghana
Equatorial Guineabb
Burkina Faso
Cameroonbb
Mauritania
77
71
68
66
65
65
Zambia
Kenya
Liberiabb
Burundi
Sierra Leone
Senegal
Uganda
64
62
61
60
60
59
58
Gambia
Mali
Cte d'Ivoire
Mozambiquebb
Angola
57
57
56
54
49
47
45
Guinea b
Guinea-Bissaubb
Togo
Madagascar
Nigeria
Eritrea
b
Niger
Chad
South Sudan
Ethiopia
45
45
44
40
Antigua and Barbudabb

Argentina
Chile
Dominicabb
Saint Kitts and Nevisbb
Trinidad and Tobagobb
Barbados
Brazilbb
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Grenadabb
Jamaica
Mexico
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadinesbb
Bahamasbb
Canadabb
Dominican Republicbb
El Salvadorbb
Uruguay
Ecuador
Paraguaybb
Belize
Guyanabb
Panama
Peru
Suriname
Nicaraguabb
Honduras
Guatemala
Haiti
EUR
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
98
98
98
98
98
96
96
95
92
91
90
90
88
85
83
66
37
SEAR
Democratic
RepublicofofKorea
K..
Democratic People's
Peoples Republic
100
Thailand
100
Sri Lanka
99
96
Maldives
87
Indonesia
Myanmarbb
78
34
Bhutan
75
29
Indiabb
74
35
24
48
Nepalbb
17
Bangladeshbb
16
Timor-Lestebb
42
29
Armenia
Belarus
Croatia
Cyprusbb
Czech Republicbb
Finlandbb
Georgia
Irelandbbb
Italybb
Kazakhstan
Lithuaniabb
Luxembourgbb
Maltabb
Polandbb
Russian Federationbb
Slovakiabb
Sloveniabb
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Albania
Austriabb
Estoniabb
Germanybb
Hungarybb
Montenegro
Norway
Portugal
Republic of Moldova
Romaniabb
Ukraine
Denmarkbb
Francebb
Kyrgyzstan
Latviabb
Serbia
Azerbaijanbb
Turkeybb
Bulgaria
Tajikistan
Andorra
Belgium
Greece
Iceland
Israel
Monaco
Netherlands
San Marino
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
EMR
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
98
98
98
98
98
97
97
94
87
Bahrainbb
Jordan
Kuwaitbb
Libya
Qatar
United Arab Emiratesbb
Oman
Saudi Arabiabb
Syrian Arab Republicbb
Egypt
Iraq
Djiboutibb
Morocco
Tunisia
Pakistanbb
Afghanistan
Yemen
Sudan
Somalia
Lebanon
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
98
96
96
92
91
87
74
74
52
45
43
20
9
WPR
Brunei Darussalambb
China
Cook Islandsbb
Japanbb
Micronesia (Federated States of)bb
Niuebb
Palau
Republic of Koreabb
Singaporebb
Australiabb
Fiji
Malaysiabb
Mongoliabb
Naurubb
New Zealandbb
Tonga
Viet Nam
Tuvalu
Marshall Islands
Cambodiabb
Vanuatu
Solomon Islands
Samoabb
Kiribati
Philippines
Papua New Guineabb
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
97
97
96
94
93
90
89
89
86
83
80
73
43
40
WHO global database on maternal health indicators, 2016 update [online database]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/en/). Data shown are the latest available for 20062014.
Data from 20062009 are shown in pale green.
Non-standard definition. For more details see the WHO Global Health Observatory at: http://www.who.int/gho/en/.
47
CHILD MORTALITY
SDG Target 3.2
By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per
1000 live births and under-five mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1000 live births
Indicator 3.2.1: Under-five mortality rate
Indicator 3.2.2: Neonatal mortality rate
SITUATION
Figure A.3.2.
Coverage of selected child health interventions in LMIC3
An estimated 5.9 million children under 5 years

of age died in 2015, with a global under-five
mortality rate of 42.5 per 1000 live births.1
Of those deaths, 45% were newborns, with
a neonatal mortality rate of 19 per 1000 live
births. Levels of child mortality are highest in
sub-Saharan Africa, where 1 child in 12 dies
before their fifth birthday, followed by South Asia
where 1 in 19 dies before age five. As shown
in Fig. A.3.1, the major causes of neonatal
mortality in 2015 were prematurity, birth-related
complications (birth asphyxia) and neonatal
sepsis, while leading causes of child death
in the post-neonatal period were pneumonia,
diarrhoea, injuries and malaria.
Antenatal care (4+ visits)

IPTp for malaria during pregnancy
Neonatal tetanus protection
Skilled attendant at birth
Postnatal visit for mothers
Postnatal visit for babies
Exclusive breastfeeding (<6 months)
DTP3 immunization
Vitamin A supplementation (2 doses)
Children sleeping under ITNs
Careseeking for pneumonia
First line antimalarial treatment
Oral rehydration salts treatment
Figure A.3.1.
Major causes of under-five mortality, 20152
Injuries
Other
noncommunicable
diseases
HIV
Diarrhoea
Malaria
Measles
Congenital
anomalies
Tetanus
Meningitis/
encephalitis
Other
group 1
conditions
Sepsis and
other
neonatal
infections
Intrapartum-related
complications
Pneumonia
Prematurity

The annual rate of reduction in under-five
mortality was 3.9% between 2000 and 2015.
If this momentum can be maintained, the global
under-five mortality rate could be less than 25
under-five deaths per 1000 live births by 2030.
However, substantially more rapid progress is
needed to meet the SDG targets for underfive mortality and neonatal mortality in many
countries. Currently, 79 and 83 countries do
not meet the 2030 SDG targets for under-five
and neonatal mortality respectively, and 24 and
nine respectively have rates that are three times
higher. In the WHO African Region, the under-five
mortality rate must be reduced by 70% in order
48
55
24
85
65
58
28
39
87
88
38
54
34
l
0
l
10
l
20
l
30
to reduce under-five mortality to less than 25

deaths per 1000 live births, followed by the WHO
Eastern Mediterranean Region (50% reduction
required) and the WHO South-East Asia Region
(40% reduction required).
The Global Strategy for Womens, Childrens and
Adolescents Health, 20162030 emphasizes the
importance of ensuring health and well-being for
all at all ages. An important focus of this strategy
is the scaling up of priority intervention areas and
of specific high-impact interventions to address
major gaps in the continuum of care (Fig. A.3.2).
Reducing newborn mortality will require better
prevention and management of preterm births,
inpatient supportive care of ill and small newborn
babies, the management of severe infections and
the promotion of kangaroo mother care. For the
post-neonatal period, greater efforts are needed
to scale up the coverage of new vaccines, and
to improve treatment coverage for pneumonia
and diarrhoea. The prevention and treatment of
noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and injuries
also requires attention, with more than one in
four deaths in children aged 159 months now
caused by non-infectious conditions.
EQUITY
Children are at greater risk of dying before age
five if they are born in poor households (Fig.
A.3.3),4 rural areas, or to mothers denied basic
education. Poorer regions within countries typically
have an under-five mortality rate 1.52.5 times
higher than richer regions.
39
l
l
l
40
50
60
Coverage (%)
l
70
l
80
l
90
l
100
DATA GAPS
Only 59% of infants younger than 12 months
have their births registered, with around 33%
registered in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
National estimates of child mortality rates are
derived from data collected through CRVS
systems or during household surveys. Many
neonatal deaths occur in the first day of life
and differences in the definition of a live birth
can complicate between-country comparability.
While data availability is reasonably good
for estimating national child mortality rates,
disaggregating according to key equity stratifiers
is challenging. Socioeconomic disaggregation
is typically not possible from CRVS data, while
sample-size limitations in household surveys
make the reliable estimation of neonatal mortality
by wealth quintiles challenging.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in text, table and figures are taken
from: Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015. Estimates Developed
by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. New York (NY),
Geneva and Washington (DC): United Nations Childrens Fund, World Health
Organization, World Bank and United Nations; 2015 (http://www.unicef.
org/publications/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2015_Web_9_Sept_15.
pdf, accessed 26 March 2016).
WHO-MCEE child causes of death. Estimates for 20002015 [website].

Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/
global_burden_disease/estimates_child_cod_2015/en/, accessed 26
March 2016).
Countdown to 2015 [website]: http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/,

accessed 26 March 2016. Fig. A.3.2 shows median national coverage of
75 countries, based on most recent survey (2009 or later).

April 2016.)
Figure A.3.3.
Under-five mortality rate in LMIC, by wealth quintile, 20052013a
Quintile 1 (poorest)
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5 (richest)
200
Mortality rate (deaths per 1000 live births)
180
160
140
120
100
90
88
81
80
64
60
46
40
20
0
Based on the results of DHS in 54 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median
value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table A.3.1.
Under-five mortality and neonatal mortality rates (per 1000 live births), 2015a
Table A.3.1. Under-five mortality (green bar)and neonatal mortality (grey line) rates per 1000 live births, 2015
AFR
Mauritius
Seychelles
Cabo Verde
Algeria
South Africa
Rwanda
Botswana
Congo
Namibia
Eritrea
Senegal
Kenya
Madagascar
Gabon
Uganda
Ethiopia
Swaziland
Ghana
Malawi
Zambia
Gambia
Liberia
Zimbabwe
Comoros
Togo
Mozambique
Burundi
Mauritania
Cameroon
Burkina Faso
Lesotho
Guinea-Bissau
Cte d'Ivoire
South Sudan
Guinea
Equatorial Guinea
Niger
Benin
Nigeria
Mali
Sierra Leone
Chad
Angola
a
AMR
13.5
13.6
24.5
25.5
40.5
41.7
43.6
45.0
45.4
46.5
47.2
47.3
48.7
49.4
49.6
50.8
54.6
59.2
60.7
61.6
64.0
64.0
68.9
69.9
70.7
73.5
78.4
78.5
81.7
84.7
87.9
88.6
90.2
92.5
92.6
92.6
93.7
94.1
95.5
98.3
99.5
108.8
114.7
120.4
130.1
138.7
156.9
EUR
Canada 4.9
Cuba 5.5
United States of America 6.5
Antigua and Barbuda 8.1
Chile 8.1
Costa Rica 9.7
Uruguay 10.1
Saint Kitts and Nevis 10.5
Grenada 11.8
Bahamas 12.1
Argentina 12.5
Barbados 13.0
Mexico 13.2
Saint Lucia 14.3
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 14.9
Jamaica
15.7
Colombia
15.9
16.4
Brazil
Belize
16.5
16.8
El Salvador
16.9
Peru
17.0
Panama
18.3
20.4
Honduras
20.4
Trinidad and Tobago
20.5
Paraguay
21.2
Dominica
21.3
Suriname
21.6
Ecuador
22.1
Nicaragua
29.1
Guatemala
30.9
Dominican Republic
38.4
39.4
Guyana
69.0
Haiti
SEAR
Maldives
8.6
Sri Lanka
9.8
Thailand
12.3
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
24.9
Indonesia
27.2
Bhutan
32.9
Nepal
35.8
Bangladesh
37.6
India
47.7
Myanmar
50.0
Timor-Leste
52.6
Luxembourg
Iceland
Finland
Norway
Slovenia
Cyprus
Andorra
Estonia
San Marino
Sweden
Czech Republic
Austria
Denmark
Italy
Monaco
Ireland
Portugal
Germany
Netherlands
Switzerland
Israel
Belgium
Spain
United Kingdom
Croatia
France
Belarus
Greece
Montenegro
Lithuania
Poland
The former
of ..
The Former
YugoslavYugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Hungary
Malta
Serbia
Slovakia
Latvia
Ukraine
Russian Federation
Bulgaria
Romania
Georgia
Turkey
Albania
Armenia
Kazakhstan
Republic of Moldova
Kyrgyzstan
Azerbaijan
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
EMR
1.9
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.6
4.6
4.7
5.2
5.2
5.4
5.5
5.9
6.4
6.7
7.3
7.9
9.0
9.6
10.4
11.1
11.9
13.5
14.0
14.1
14.1
15.8
21.3
31.7
39.1
44.8
51.4
Bahrain
Qatar
Lebanon
Kuwait
Oman
Libya
Tunisia
Saudi Arabia
Jordan
Egypt
Morocco
Iraq
Yemen
Djibouti
Sudan
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Somalia
6.2
6.8
8.0
8.3
8.6
11.6
12.9
13.4
14.0
14.5
15.5
17.9
24.0
27.6
32.0
41.9
65.3
70.1
81.1
91.1
136.8
WPR
Japan
Singapore
Republic of Korea
Australia
New Zealand
Malaysia
Cook Islands
Brunei Darussalam
China
Palau
Tonga
Samoa
Viet Nam
Fiji
Mongolia
Niue
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Philippines
Solomon Islands
Cambodia
Nauru
Marshall Islands
Kiribati
Papua New Guinea
2.7
2.7
3.4
3.8
5.7
7.0
8.1
10.2
10.7
16.4
16.7
17.5
21.7
22.4
22.4
23.0
27.1
27.5
28.0
28.1
28.7
34.7
35.4
36.0
55.9
57.3
66.7
Under-five mortality rates are shown as bars and in numbers. Neonatal mortality rates are shown as vertical grey lines.
49
HIV
SDG Target 3.3
By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases and combat hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other communicable
diseases
Indicator 3.3.1: Number of new HIV infections per 1000 uninfected population, by sex, age and key populations
SITUATION
In 2014, the global HIV incidence rate among
adults aged 1549 years was 0.5 per 1000
uninfected population, with 2 million people
becoming infected that year.1,2 HIV incidence
is highest in the WHO African Region (2.6 per
1000 uninfected population in 2014) compared
to other WHO regions where incidence among
adults aged 1549 years ranges from 0.1 to
0.4 per 1000 uninfected population.2 Incidence
rates are much higher in key populations. For
example, in 2014 the incidence rate was 17per
1000 among people who inject drugs, 8 per 1000
among men who have sex with men and 5 per
1000 among female sex workers (Fig. A.4.3).
Forty percent of those living with HIV are receiving
antiretroviral therapy, with 1.2 million dying from
HIV-related causes in 2014. A little over half of
the 37 million people living with HIV are aware
that they are HIV positive.
New HIV infections
In addition to the wider initiation of antiretroviral

therapy, key interventions to interrupt HIV
transmission include testing and counselling
for HIV and other sexually transmitted
infections, condom use, communication and
behavioural interventions, voluntary medical
male circumcision, pre- and post-exposure
prophylaxis, harm reduction among drug users,
universal screening of blood donations and the
elimination of mother-to-child transmission.
Figure A.4.2.
Progress required to reach key 2020 and 2030 targets5
2.0 million
2014
Figure A.4.1.
Global new HIV infections by age and sex, 20142
Male
the HIV response, intensified efforts in settings

of greatest HIV transmission and burden, better
use of data to support programme decisionmaking, a transition to sustainable programmes
with domestic funding of essential HIV services
and the integration of the HIV response into
health systems.
< 500 000

2020
Female
< 500 000

2020
400 000
< 200 000

2030
300 000
Annual number of people

newly infected with HIV
200 000
100 000
0
014
1524 2534 3549
50+

The 90-90-90 targets call for 90% of people
with HIV being aware of their infection, 90% of
people aware they have HIV initiating antiretroviral
treatment and 90% of those receiving antiretroviral
treatment having undetectable levels of HIV in
their blood by 2020.3 Milestone targets also
include a 75% reduction in new HIV infections
between 2010 and 2020, and reducing annual
HIV-related deaths to less than 500 000 by 2020
(Fig.A.4.2). Informed by global goals and targets,
countries should, as soon as practicable, adopt
and implement policies such as the WHO Treat
All policy,4 and develop ambitious national
goals and targets for 2020 and beyond. This
will require taking into consideration the country
context, including the nature and dynamics of
country HIV epidemics, populations affected,
the structure and capacity of health-care and
community systems, and the resources that
can be mobilized.
The main areas of strategic focus in the SDG era
include populations that have been left behind by
50
1.2 million
2014
< 400 000

2030
Annual number of people

dying from HIV-related
causes
Obstacles to higher treatment coverage occur

at each stage of the cascade of services. More
effort is needed to increase outreach and testing
(almost half of HIV-positive people are unaware
of their status), to routinely link people testing
HIV positive to treatment, to simplify treatment
protocols, and to improve patient monitoring.
Taken together, such efforts would increase the
number of those starting treatment, reduce loss
to follow up and improve treatment adherence.
Given the variability in infection rates among
different populations, services also need to
be focused effectively according to population
group, geography, age and gender.
EQUITY
Many highly affected populations have been left
behind by the HIV response (Fig. A.4.3), including
adolescent girls, sex workers, men who have sex
with men, people who inject drugs, transgender
people and prisoners. Men who have sex with
men are 19 times more likely to be HIV positive
than the general population; 13% of people who
inject drugs are infected; and adolescent girls
in sub-Saharan Africa are almost twice as likely
as adolescent boys to be living with HIV. The
provision of antiretroviral therapy is relatively
equitable across income groups in high-burden
countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Figure A.4.3.
Global new HIV infections among key populations,
20146
Other adults
Sex workers
People who
inject drugs
Men who
have sex
with men
Partners of
these key
population
groups
DATA GAPS
Currently, national HIV incidence is rarely
measured directly. In generalized epidemics,
HIV incidence and mortality are estimated
from mathematical models fitted to prevalence
data routinely collected from antenatal care
clinics and from less frequent nationally
representative seroprevalence surveys that
occur every 35 years. The number of people
receiving antiretroviral therapy is obtained from
administrative data. In countries with concentrated
epidemics, routine surveillance data are less
available making monitoring more difficult
and requiring alternative modelling strategies.
Generating point estimates for prevalence
disaggregated across socioeconomic stratifiers
is possible based upon national survey results,
but modelling assumptions are currently needed
to derive approximate estimates of incidence
and mortality by age and sex.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text are taken from: How AIDS
changed everything. MDG 6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the AIDS
response. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2015 (http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/
documents/2015/MDG6_15years-15lessonsfromtheAIDSresponse, accessed
10 April 2016).
UNAIDS/WHO estimates; 2015.
90-90-90. An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic.

Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2015 (http://www.
unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/90-90-90_en_0.pdf, accessed
26 March 2016).
Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure

prophylaxis for HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186275/1/9789241509565_eng.
pdf?ua=1, accessed 3 May 2016).
Global health sector response to HIV, 20002015. Focus on innovations

in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/
iris/bitstream/10665/198065/1/9789241509824_eng.pdf, accessed 26
March 2016).
Updated analysis from: How AIDS Changed Everything. Geneva: Joint

United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2015 (http://www.unaids.org/
sites/default/files/media_asset/MDG6Report_en.pdf).
Figure A.4.4.
HIV prevalence among adults 1549 years old, 20142
Prevalence (%)
By WHO region
by
Western Pacific Region 0.1 [0.10.1]
Eastern Mediterranean Region 0.1 [0.10.1]
South-East Asia Region 0.3 [0.30.3]
European Region 0.4 [0.40.5]

Region of the Americas 0.5 [0.40.6]
African Region 4.5 [4.34.8]
Global prevalence: 0.8% [0.70.9]

0
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.4.1.
New HIV infections among adults 1549 years old (per 1000 uninfected population), 20142
Table A.4.1. HIV infections per 1000 uninfected population, 2014

AFR
AMR
Algeria <0.1
Niger <0.1
Senegal <0.1
Burundi 0.1
Sao Tome and Principe 0.1
Eritrea
Madagascar
Mauritania
Mauritius
Burkina Faso
Benin
Liberia
Ghana
Sierra Leone
Cabo Verde
Togo
Gambia
Guinea
Rwanda
Mali
Congo
Gabon
Chad
Nigeria
Angola
Cte d'Ivoire
Kenya
Guinea-Bissau
South Sudan
Equatorial Guinea
Cameroon
Malawi
Uganda
Mozambique
Zambia
Namibia
Zimbabwe
South Africa
Botswana
Swaziland
Lesotho
Comoros
Ethiopia
Seychelles
Honduras
Mexico
Peru
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
El Salvador
Nicaragua
Argentina
Cuba
Guatemala
Panama
Dominican Republic
Uruguay
Belize
Paraguay
Suriname
Jamaica
Haiti
Guyana
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Brazil
Canada
Dominica
Grenada
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Trinidad and Tobago
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.9
3.8
4.5
EUR
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
1.0
1.1
2.0
SEAR
6.0
7.4
7.5
9.1
9.2
12.7
14.0
18.9
20.1
Bangladesh
Nepal
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Myanmar
Indonesia
Bhutan
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
India
Maldives
Timor-Leste
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
Poland
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
Uzbekistan
Denmark
Norway
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Ireland
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Georgia
Tajikistan
Belarus
Republic of Moldova
Albania
Andorra
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Israel
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
San Marino
Serbia
Spain
Switzerland
former
Yugoslav
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
United Kingdom
EMR
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.6
Afghanistan
Egypt
Lebanon
Tunisia
Yemen
Morocco
Oman
Pakistan
Sudan
Somalia
Djibouti
Bahrain
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
1.1
WPR
Cambodia
Philippines
Fiji
Malaysia
Viet Nam
Papua New Guinea
Australia
Brunei Darussalam
China
Cook Islands
Japan
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Nauru
New Zealand
Niue
Palau
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
51
Figure A.5.2
TB case fatality ratioa in 2014
TUBERCULOSIS
SDG Target 3.3
diseases
Indicator 3.3.2: Tuberculosis incidence per 1000 population
SITUATION
EQUITY
Figure A.5.1.
Trajectories of TB incidence and number of TB deaths
required to achieve the targets set out in the WHO End
TB Strategy
Tuberculosis (TB) is a treatable and curable

disease, but remains a major global health
problem. In 2014, there were 9.6 million new
TB cases (133 per 100 000 population) and 1.5
million TB deaths, including 0.4 million deaths
among HIV-positive people.1
1.5
20%
20% reduction
reduction
1.0
75
75
50%
reduction
50% reduction
50
50
0.5
80% reduction
reduction
80%
25
Target 2035
90% reduction
Target
2035= =90%
reduction
l
2015
1.5
1.5
l
2020
2020
l
2025
2025
l
2030
2030
Target 2035 = 95% reduction
l
2030
0.0
2035
20% reduction
2015
2020
Deaths (Million)
75
50% reduction
Deaths (millions)
Rate per 100,000/year
2025
2030
2035
0.5 0.5
50
75%reduction
reduction
75%
80% reduction
90%
reduction
90% reduction
25
Target 2035 = 90% reduction
2015
2020
2025
2030
With timely diagnosis and correct treatment,

almost all TB cases can be cured. Globally,
the treatment success rate among new cases
reported by national TB programmes has been
sustained at around 85% for several years. In all
settings, cases of multidrug-resistant TB (about
0.5 million new cases per year) are harder to
treat since current treatment options require
lengthy treatment with less effective and more
costly drugs globally the cure rate in such
cases is about 50%.

The 2030 targets set out in the WHO End TB
Strategy2,3 include an 80% reduction in the
TB incidence rate and a 90% reduction in the
number of TB deaths, compared with levels in
2015 (Fig. A.5.1). Achieving these targets will
require that between 2015 and 2025: (a) the
annual decline in the global TB incidence rate
must accelerate from 2% per year to 45% per
year by 2020 and then to 10% per year by 2025;
(b) the global case fatality ratio must fall to 10%
by 2020 and then to 6% by 2025.
A decline in incidence of 10% per year is
equivalent to historically best-ever performances
at national level (for example, in countries in
52
DATA GAPS
35%
35% reduction
reduction
Target 2035
95% reduction
Target
2035= =95%
reduction
2035
0.0
l
2015
2015
l
2020
2020
l
2025
2025
l
2030
2030
l
2030
2035
Western Europe during the 1950s and 1960s).

Universal coverage of essential services to
detect and treat TB must be achieved by 2025
to reduce the global case fatality ratio to 6%
which implicitly means that all people with TB
access diagnosis and treatment.
Acceleration in the rate at which TB incidence
falls after 2025 will require a technological
breakthrough in particular a post-exposure
vaccine or a short, efficacious and safe treatment
for latent TB infection. The risk of TB disease
developing among the approximately 23
billion people who are already infected with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis could then be
substantially reduced.
In order to achieve both the 2030 targets and
earlier milestones, the WHO End TB Strategy
consists of three pillars:
1. Integrated, patient-centred TB care and
prevention
2. Bold policies and supportive systems
3. Intensified research and innovation.
Although the data available to estimate TB disease

burden improved considerably during the MDG
era, data gaps remain. Direct measurement of
TB incidence requires that notifications of TB
cases are a good proxy of TB incidence. Currently,
this is the case only in countries that have both
high-performance surveillance systems and
high levels of access to quality health care.
Elsewhere, notification data are not a good
proxy for TB incidence, and adjustments have
to be made to correct for under-reporting and
under-diagnosis. National TB-prevalence surveys
and other special studies can help to measure
the level of under-reporting of detected cases.
Improved reporting and estimation of TB deaths
requires the development or strengthening of
CRVS systems, especially in Africa.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text, table and figures are taken
from: Global tuberculosis report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_
eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 11 April 2016).
The End TB Strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.

who.int/tb/strategy/end-tb/en/, accessed 27 March 2016).
Resolution WHA67.1. Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis

prevention, care and control after 2015. In: Sixty-seventh World Health
Assembly, Geneva, 1924 May 2014. Resolutions and decisions. Annexes.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (WHA67/2014/REC/1; http://
apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67-REC1/A67_2014_REC1-en.
pdf, accessed 27 March 2016).
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Calculated as TB mortality, including TB deaths among HIV-positive people, divided by TB incidence.
90% reduction
100
1.0 1.0
<5.0
5.09.9
10.014.9
15.019.9
20.0
75% reduction
2015
Case fatality ratio (%)
35% reduction
125
In 2014, the TB incidence rate in low-income

countries was over 10 times greater than that
in high-income countries, while the TB mortality
rate (among HIV-negative people) was almost
20 times higher. In high-income countries, the
case fatality ratio (mortality divided by incidence)
averages about 6%. Worldwide, the case fatality
ratio varies widely between countries, indicating
large inequities in access to health services,
including those for TB detection and treatment
(Fig. A.5.2).
25
Deaths (Million)
TB occurs in every part of the world. In 2014,

the largest numbers of new TB cases occurred
in the WHO South-East Asia Region and WHO
Western Pacific Region, accounting for 58% of
new cases globally. Five countries accounted
for 54% of all new cases India, Indonesia,
China, Nigeria and Pakistan. However, Africa
carried the most severe burden, with 281 cases
per 100 000 population more than twice the
global average of 133.
100 100
Rate per 100,000/year
Incidence
(per 100 000 population per year)
125 125
In theory, equity in access to diagnosis and

treatment within countries can be assessed
using subnational estimates of the case fatality
ratio. Unfortunately, subnational estimates of
TB incidence and mortality are not available
for most countries. An alternative is to use the
ratio of TB deaths (recorded in a vital registration
system of sufficient geographical coverage and
quality) to case notifications as a proxy for the
case fatality ratio. Examples of such analyses
will be included in WHO global TB reports
from 2016 onwards. The best recent data on
within-country equity in high TB burden settings
were produced from 19 national TB-prevalence
surveys completed in Africa and Asia during
20092015. These consistently indicate higher
detection and reporting gaps for men than for
women, and higher detection and reporting
gaps in specific age groups such as the elderly
in some countries.
Table A.5.1.
TB incidence (per 100 000 population), 2014
Table A.5.1. TB incidence per 100 000 population, 2014

AFR
AMR
Mauritius 22
Seychelles 26
Comoros 35
Burkina Faso
Mali
Togo
Benin
Rwanda
Algeria
Eritrea
Niger
Mauritania
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Senegal
South Sudan
Chad
Uganda
Equatorial Guinea
Cte d'Ivoire
Ghana
Gambia
Guinea
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Malawi
Madagascar
Kenya
Zimbabwe
Liberia
Sierra Leone
Nigeria
Guinea-Bissau
Angola
Congo
Botswana
Zambia
Gabon
Mozambique
Namibia
Swaziland
South Africa
Lesotho
Dominica
Barbados
Grenada
Jamaica
Canada
Antigua and Barbuda
Saint Lucia
Cuba
Costa Rica
Bahamas
Chile
Mexico
Trinidad and Tobago
Argentina
Uruguay
Colombia
Belize
Suriname
El Salvador
Honduras
Paraguay
Brazil
Panama
Ecuador
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Dominican Republic
Guyana
Peru
Haiti
54
58
58
61
63
78
78
97
98
111
126
138
138
146
159
161
162
165
165
174
177
207
220
227
235
246
278
308
310
322
325
EUR
0.7
0.9
1.3
3.1
4.7
5.2
7.2
7.6
9.1
9.4
11
12
16
21
22
24
24
24
30
33
37
38
41
43
43
44
46
54
57
58
60
103
120
120
200
SEAR
327
369
370
375
381
385
406
444
Maldives
41
Sri Lanka
65
Nepal
158
Bhutan
164
India
167
Thailand
171
227
551
Bangladesh
561
Myanmar
369
Indonesia
399
733
834
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
852
Timor-Leste
442
498
San Marino
Monaco
Iceland
Czech Republic
Greece
Cyprus
Finland
Israel
Netherlands
Italy
Germany
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Slovakia
Denmark
Ireland
Sweden
Slovenia
Austria
Norway
France
Belgium
Andorra
Croatia
Hungary
Malta
Spain
United Kingdom
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Turkey
Albania
Estonia
Montenegro
Poland
Serbia
Portugal
Bulgaria
Armenia
Latvia
Belarus
Lithuania
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
Romania
Uzbekistan
Russian Federation
Tajikistan
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Georgia
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Moldova
EMR
1.6

Jordan
Oman
Saudi Arabia
Bahrain
Egypt
Lebanon
Kuwait
Qatar
Tunisia
Libya
Iraq
Yemen
Sudan
Morocco
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Somalia
Djibouti
2.2
3.3
4.6
4.8
5.3
5.6
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.3
6.6
6.7
7.1
7.4
7.5
7.7
7.8
8.1
8.7
9.0
9.2
1.6
5.5
9.6
12
14
15
16
17
21
22
29
33
40
43
48
94
106
189
270
274
619
WPR
12
12
12
12
12
15
18
19
20
21
21
24
25
27
42
45
49
58
62
64
77
81
82
84
91
94
99
106
142
153
Niue
Australia
New Zealand
Cook Islands
Tonga
Japan
Samoa
Palau
Singapore
Brunei Darussalam
Vanuatu
Fiji
China
Nauru
Republic of Korea
Solomon Islands
Malaysia
Viet Nam
Mongolia
Tuvalu
Philippines
Marshall Islands
Cambodia
Papua New Guinea
Kiribati
0.0
6.4
7.4
12
14
18
19
42
49
62
63
67
68
73
86
86
103
140
170
189
190
195
288
335
390
417
497
53
Figure A.5.2
TB case fatality ratioa in 2014
Case fatality ratio (%)

<5.0
5.09.9
10.014.9
15.019.9
20.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Calculated as TB mortality, including TB deaths among HIV-positive people, divided by TB incidence.
Table A.5.1.
TB incidence (per 100 000 population), 2014
Table A.5.1. TB incidence per 100 000 population, 2014

AFR
AMR
Mauritius 22
Seychelles 26
Comoros 35
Burkina Faso
Mali
Togo
Benin
Rwanda
Algeria
Eritrea
Niger
Mauritania
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Senegal
South Sudan
Chad
Uganda
Equatorial Guinea
Cte d'Ivoire
Ghana
Gambia
Guinea
Ethiopia
Cameroon
Malawi
Madagascar
Kenya
Zimbabwe
Liberia
Sierra Leone
Nigeria
Guinea-Bissau
Angola
Congo
Botswana
Zambia
Gabon
Mozambique
Namibia
Swaziland
South Africa
Lesotho
Dominica
Barbados
Grenada
Jamaica
Canada
Antigua and Barbuda
Saint Lucia
Cuba
Costa Rica
Bahamas
Chile
Mexico
Trinidad and Tobago
Argentina
Uruguay
Colombia
Belize
Suriname
El Salvador
Honduras
Paraguay
Brazil
Panama
Ecuador
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Dominican Republic
Guyana
Peru
Haiti
54
58
58
61
63
78
78
97
98
111
126
138
138
146
159
161
162
165
165
174
177
207
220
227
235
246
278
308
310
322
325
EUR
0.7
0.9
1.3
3.1
4.7
5.2
7.2
7.6
9.1
9.4
11
12
16
21
22
24
24
24
30
33
37
38
41
43
43
44
46
54
57
58
60
103
120
120
200
SEAR
327
369
370
375
381
385
406
444
Maldives
41
Sri Lanka
65
Nepal
158
Bhutan
164
India
167
Thailand
171
227
551
Bangladesh
561
Myanmar
369
Indonesia
399
733
834
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
852
Timor-Leste
442
498
San Marino
Monaco
Iceland
Czech Republic
Greece
Cyprus
Finland
Israel
Netherlands
Italy
Germany
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Slovakia
Denmark
Ireland
Sweden
Slovenia
Austria
Norway
France
Belgium
Andorra
Croatia
Hungary
Malta
Spain
United Kingdom
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Turkey
Albania
Estonia
Montenegro
Poland
Serbia
Portugal
Bulgaria
Armenia
Latvia
Belarus
Lithuania
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
Romania
Uzbekistan
Russian Federation
Tajikistan
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Georgia
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Moldova
EMR
1.6

Jordan
Oman
Saudi Arabia
Bahrain
Egypt
Lebanon
Kuwait
Qatar
Tunisia
Libya
Iraq
Yemen
Sudan
Morocco
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Somalia
Djibouti
2.2
3.3
4.6
4.8
5.3
5.6
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.3
6.6
6.7
7.1
7.4
7.5
7.7
7.8
8.1
8.7
9.0
9.2
1.6
5.5
9.6
12
14
15
16
17
21
22
29
33
40
43
48
94
106
189
270
274
619
WPR
12
12
12
12
12
15
18
19
20
21
21
24
25
27
42
45
49
58
62
64
77
81
82
84
91
94
99
106
142
153
Niue
Australia
New Zealand
Cook Islands
Tonga
Japan
Samoa
Palau
Singapore
Brunei Darussalam
Vanuatu
Fiji
China
Nauru
Republic of Korea
Solomon Islands
Malaysia
Viet Nam
Mongolia
Tuvalu
Philippines
Marshall Islands
Cambodia
Papua New Guinea
Kiribati
0.0
6.4
7.4
12
14
18
19
42
49
62
63
67
68
73
86
86
103
140
170
189
190
195
288
335
390
417
497
53
MALARIA
SDG Target 3.3
diseases
Indicator 3.3.3: Malaria incidence per 1000 population
SITUATION
Figure A.6.2.
Proportion and number of people not receiving key malaria interventions, sub-Saharan Africa, 2014
Almost half the worlds population, living in

nearly 100 countries and territories, are at
risk of malaria. In 2015, the malaria incidence
rate was 91 per 1000 persons at risk, with
an estimated 214 million cases and 438 000
deaths more than two thirds of these deaths
occurring in children under 5 years of age. SubSaharan Africa bears the highest burden with
an incidence rate of 246 per 1000 persons at
risk, accounting for roughly 90% of cases and
deaths globally.1
Figure A.6.1.
Percentage of deaths caused by malaria in children
under 5 years of age in sub-Saharan Africa, 2015
2015
2015
20242000
25
<5
2024
Not malaria 59
endemic25
Not malaria endemic
1014
0
850 1700
Not applicable
Not applicable
1519
2000
1014
1519
2024
25
Not malaria endemic
Not applicable
850
1700
3400 Kilometres
850
1700
3400 Kilometres
3400 Kilometres
The Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite is

responsible for the majority of malaria deaths.
However, P. vivax caused nearly 14 million
cases in 2015, accounting for about half of the
total number of malaria cases outside Africa,
and can also cause severe disease and death.

Global targets towards malaria elimination
include 90% reductions by 2030 in the 2015
global malaria case incidence and mortality
rates, the elimination of malaria from at least
35 more countries and the prevention of malaria
re-establishment in all countries identified as
malaria free.2
54
Do not receive
269 million people
IPTp: Pregnant women receive at

least one dose of IPTp
15 million pregnant women
Treatment for malaria: Children

with malaria receive an ACT
6880 million children with malaria

l
0%
l
20%
The Global Technical Strategy for Malaria

20162030 involves: (a) ensuring universal
access to malaria prevention, diagnosis and
treatment; (b) accelerating efforts towards
elimination and the attainment of malaria-free
status; and (c) transforming malaria surveillance
into a core intervention. Key interventions against
malaria include sleeping under insecticidetreated mosquito nets (ITNs), indoor residual
spraying of insecticides, intermittent preventive
treatment in pregnancy, and increasing careseeking, diagnostic testing and treatment with
artemisinin-based combination therapies.
2015
2015
<5
59
Receive intervention
Vector control: Live in a household
with at least one ITN or covered
by IRS
Major obstacles to achieving the 2030 target

include inadequate funding, with an estimated
funding gap of US$ 2.4 billion (53%) in 2013,3
resulting in gaps in intervention coverage
(Fig.A.6.2), resistance of malaria mosquitoes
to the insecticides used in ITNs and for indoor
residual spraying, and resistance of P. falciparum
to artemisinin and other treatments.
l
40%
l
60%
l
80%
l
100%
challenges, security concerns, language barriers,

traditional beliefs and political considerations.
DATA GAPS
In evaluating trends in reported malaria incidence
between 20002015, only 13 out of 44 countries
in the WHO African Region had data sufficient for
monitoring without the need for mathematical
modelling. In other WHO regions, 53 out of 61
countries at risk of malaria had sufficient reported
data for monitoring trends. In the absence of
reliable data a geostatistical model is used to
derive incidence estimates in Africa. Estimates of
deaths due to malaria in high-burden countries
are also derived from models, which for children
in Africa rely upon verbal autopsy studies, which
in turn largely rely upon the presence of fever
to identify malaria deaths. Monitoring malaria
incidence by key equity stratifiers will require a
much greater investment in surveillance systems
than is currently made.
EQUITY
Use of ITNs among vulnerable groups such
as young children and pregnant women is
higher than in the population as a whole, while
children aged 519 years have lower rates of
use (Fig.A.6.3). As malaria incidence falls, the
disease often becomes increasingly concentrated
in marginalized population groups, including
high-risk occupational groups; ethnic, religious
and political minorities; and communities living
in hard-to-reach areas and border regions. The
provision of services to these groups may be more
difficult and more costly due to infrastructural
REFERENCES
from: World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2015 (http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malariareport-2015/report/en/, accessed 28 March 2016).
Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 20162030. Geneva: World

Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/
atoz/9789241564991/en/, accessed 28 March 2016).
Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization;

2015 (http://www.who.int/gho/publications/mdgs-sdgs/en/, accessed
28 March 2016).
Figure A.6.3.
Proportion of people sleeping under an ITN in the WHO African Region, 20052014a
Children under 5 years
Children 5-19 years
Pregnant women
Non-pregnant adults
100
90
80
70
Coverage (%)
60
50
40
30
42
41
36
29
20
10
0
Based on the results of household surveys in 33 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers
and horizontal lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate
the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table A.6.1. Malaria incidence (per 1000 population at risk), 2013

AFR
Table A.6.1.
<0.1
Malaria incidence (per
1000 population
at risk), 2013
Algeria
AMR
Table A.6.1. Malaria incidence (per 1000 populationArgentina

at risk),
0.0 2013
Table A.6.1. Malaria
incidence
(per
1000
population
at
risk),
0.0 2013
Cabo Verde 0.7
AFR incidence (per 1000 populationParaguay
AMR
Table A.6.1. Malaria
at risk),
2013
Costa Rica <0.1
Botswana 1.1
AFR
AFR
Algeria
Swaziland
AFR
Algeria
CaboAlgeria
Verde
South
Africa
Algeria
Cabo
Verde
Cabo
Verde
Botswana
Namibia
Cabo
Verde
Botswana
Botswana
Swaziland
Eritrea
Botswana
Swaziland
Swaziland
South
Africa
Mauritania
Swaziland
South
Africa
South
Africa
Namibia
Madagascar
South
Africa
Namibia
Namibia
Eritrea
Namibia
Eritrea
Eritrea
Mauritania
Guinea-Bissau
Eritrea
Mauritania
Mauritania
Madagascar
Ethiopia
Mauritania
Madagascar
Madagascar
Sao Tome and
Principe
Rwanda
Madagascar
Sao Tome
TomeGuinea-Bissau
and
Principe
Sao
and
Principe
Senegal
Sao TomeGuinea-Bissau
and Ethiopia
Principe
Guinea-Bissau
United Republic
of Tanzania
Guinea-Bissau
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Rwanda
Zimbabwe
Ethiopia
Rwanda
Rwanda
Senegal
Angola
Rwanda
Senegal
Senegal
South Sudan
Senegal
United Republic
Republic of
ofZimbabwe
Tanzania
United
Tanzania
Chad
United Republic ofZimbabwe
Tanzania
Zimbabwe
Angola
Comoros
Zimbabwe
Angola
Angola
South
Sudan
Congo
SouthAngola
Sudan
South
Sudan
Chad
Gabon
South
Sudan
Chad
Chad
Comoros
Equatorial Guinea
Chad
Comoros
Comoros
Congo
Zambia
Comoros
Congo
Congo
Gabon
Malawi
Congo
Gabon
Gabon
EquatorialUganda
Guinea
Gabon
Equatorial Zambia
Guinea
Equatorial
Guinea
Gambia
EquatorialZambia
Guinea
Zambia
Malawi
Kenya
Zambia
Malawi
Malawi
Uganda
Burundi
Malawi
Uganda
Uganda
Gambia
Cameroon
Uganda
Gambia
Gambia
Kenya
Gambia
Kenya
Kenya
Burundi
Benin
Kenya
Burundi
Burundi
Cameroon
Niger
Cameroon
Democratic Republic of Cameroon
theBurundi
Congo
Ghana
Cameroon
Democratic
Republic
of
the
Congo
DemocraticCentral
Republic
of theRepublic
Congo
Benin
African
Benin
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Benin
Niger
Niger
Ghana
Mozambique
Niger
Ghana
Ghana
Liberia
Ghana
Central African
African Republic
Republic
Central
Nigeria
Togo
Central African
Republic
Nigeria
Nigeria
Mozambique
Cte
d'Ivoire
Nigeria
Mozambique
Mozambique
Liberia
Guinea
Mozambique
Liberia
Liberia
Togo
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Togo
Togo
Cte d'Ivoire
Burkina Faso
Togo
Cte d'Ivoire
d'Ivoire
Cte
Guinea
Mali
Cte
d'Ivoire
Guinea
Guinea
SierraLesotho
Leone
Guinea
Sierra
Leone
Faso
Sierra
Leone
Burkina
Mauritius
Sierra Leone
Faso
Burkina
Faso
Mali
Burkina
Seychelles
Faso
Burkina
Mali
Mali
Lesotho
Mali
Lesotho
Lesotho
Mauritius
Lesotho
Mauritius
Mauritius
Seychelles
Mauritius
Seychelles
Seychelles
Seychelles
<0.1
3.6
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
5.0
<0.1
0.7
0.7
1.1
5.4
0.7
1.1
1.1
3.6
17.4
1.1
3.6
3.6
5.0
24.9
3.6
5.0
5.0
5.4
83.3
5.0
5.4
5.4
17.4
93.0
5.4
17.4
17.4
24.9
112.1
17.4
24.9
24.9
83.3
117.8
24.9
83.3
83.3
93.0
121.1
83.3
93.0
93.0
112.1
128.1
93.0
112.1
112.1
117.8
130.6
112.1
117.8
117.8
121.1
138.9
117.8
121.1
121.1
128.1
145.7
121.1
128.1
128.1
130.6
153.8
128.1
130.6
130.6
138.9
157.9
130.6
138.9
138.9
145.7
170.6
138.9
145.7
145.7
153.8
187.5
145.7
153.8
153.8
157.9
210.6
153.8
157.9
157.9
170.6
211.1
157.9
170.6
170.6
187.5
214.2
170.6
187.5
187.5
210.6
217.8
187.5
210.6
210.6
211.1
231.8
210.6
211.1
211.1
214.2
233.1
211.1
214.2
214.2
217.8
266.3
214.2
217.8
217.8
231.8
269.4
217.8
231.8
231.8
233.1
271.8
231.8
233.1
233.1
266.3
295.2
233.1
266.3
266.3
269.4
303.0
266.3
269.4
269.4
271.8
317.1
269.4
271.8
271.8
295.2
318.5
271.8
295.2
295.2
303.0
325.0
295.2
303.0
303.0
317.1
342.9
303.0
317.1
317.1
318.5
352.3
317.1
318.5
318.5
325.0
368.8
318.5
325.0
325.0
342.9
378.9
325.0
342.9
342.9
352.3
385.2
342.9
352.3
352.3
368.8
403.4
352.3
368.8
368.8
378.9
406.0
368.8
378.9
378.9
385.2
418.4
378.9
385.2
385.2
403.4
460.9
385.2
403.4
403.4
406.0
403.4
406.0
406.0
418.4
406.0
418.4
418.4
460.9
418.4
460.9
460.9
460.9
AMR
AMR
Argentina
Ecuador
AMR
Argentina
Paraguay
ElArgentina
Salvador
Argentina
Paraguay
Costa
Rica
Paraguay
Belize
Costa
Rica
Paraguay
Rica
Ecuador
DominicanCosta
Republic
Rica
Ecuador
Ecuador
ElCosta
Salvador
Mexico
Ecuador
Salvador
ElEl Salvador
Belize
Panama
El Salvador
Belize
Dominican
Republic
Belize
Nicaragua
Dominican Republic
Republic
Belize
Dominican
Mexico
Guatemala
Dominican Republic
Mexico
Mexico
Panama
Honduras
Mexico
Panama
Panama
Bolivia (PlurinationalNicaragua
State
of)
Panama
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Colombia
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Honduras
Brazil
Guatemala
Honduras
Honduras
Bolivia (Plurinational
State of)
Suriname
(PlurinationalHonduras
State of)
of)
Bolivia
State
Colombia
Haiti
Bolivia (PlurinationalColombia
State
of)
Colombia
Brazil
Peru
Brazil
Colombia
Brazil
Suriname
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic
of)
Brazil
Suriname
Suriname
Haiti
Guyana
Suriname
Haiti
Haiti
Peru
Antigua and Barbuda
Haiti
Peru
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic
of)
Peru
Bahamas
Venezuela (Bolivarian
(Bolivarian Republic
Republic
of)
Peru
Venezuela
of)
Guyana
Barbados
Republic
of)
Guyana
Guyana
Antigua and
Barbuda
Canada
Guyana
Antigua and
andBahamas
Barbuda
Antigua
Barbuda
Chile
Antigua andBarbados
Barbuda
Bahamas
Bahamas
Cuba
Barbados
Bahamas
Barbados
Canada
Dominica
Barbados
Canada
Canada
Chile
Grenada
Canada
Chile
Chile
Cuba
Jamaica
Chile
Cuba
Dominica
Cuba
Dominica
Cuba
Dominica
Grenada
Saint Lucia
Dominica
Grenada
Grenada
Jamaica
Grenada
Jamaica
Jamaica
Saint
Kittsand
and
Nevis
Trinidad
Tobago
Saint Kitts
KittsSaint
andJamaica
Nevis
Lucia
Saint
and
Nevis
United
States of
America
Saint
Lucia
KittsGrenadines
and Nevis
Saint
Lucia
Saint VincentSaint
and the
Uruguay
Saint
Lucia
Saint Vincent
VincentTrinidad
and the
the and
Grenadines
Saint
and
Grenadines
Tobago
Saint Vincent
and
the and
Grenadines
Trinidad
and
Tobago
Trinidad
Tobago
United
States
of America
SEAR
Trinidad
Tobago
United
Statesand
of Uruguay
America
United
States
of
SriAmerica
Lanka
Uruguay
United States ofUruguay
America
Bhutan
SEAR
Uruguay
Nepal
SEAR
Sri
Lanka
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of
Korea
SriSEAR
Lanka
Sri
Lanka
Bhutan
Thailand
SriBhutan
Lanka
Bhutan
Nepal
India
Nepal
Nepal
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
ofBhutan
Korea
Indonesia
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ....
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Nepal
Korea
Democratic
People's
Republic
of
Thailand
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of
Korea
Myanmar
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Thailand
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of India
Korea
Thailand
Bangladesh
Thailand
India
Indonesia
India
Timor-Leste
Indonesia
India
Indonesia
Myanmar
Maldives
Indonesia
Myanmar
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Bangladesh
Timor-Leste
Bangladesh
Timor-Leste
Maldives
Timor-Leste
Maldives
Timor-Leste
Maldives
Maldives
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.0
<0.1
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.2
<0.1
0.0
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.5
<0.1
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
3.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
1.6
5.1
0.5
1.6
2.2
1.6
8.9
2.2
1.6
2.2
3.2
9.9
2.2
3.2
3.2
5.1
12.6
3.2
5.1
5.1
8.9
13.6
5.1
8.9
9.9
8.9
30.4
9.9
8.9
9.9
12.6
40.7
9.9
12.6
12.6
13.6 129.3
12.6
13.6
13.6
30.4
13.6
30.4
40.7
30.4
40.7129.3
30.4
40.7
40.7129.3
129.3
129.3
0.0
<0.1
1.2
0.0
2.1
0.0
0.0
<0.1
6.5
0.0
<0.1
1.2
<0.1
23.7
1.2
<0.1
1.2
2.1
41.8
1.2
2.1
2.1
6.5
45.0
2.1
6.5
6.5
23.7
68.7
6.5
23.7
41.8
23.7
89.7
41.8
23.7
41.8
45.0
41.8
45.0
45.0
68.7
45.0
68.7
89.7
68.7
89.7
68.7
89.7
89.7
EUR
Armenia
Azerbaijan
EUR
Georgia
EUR
Armenia
Kyrgyzstan
EUR
Armenia
Russian Federation
Azerbaijan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia
Armenia
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
Georgia
Kyrgyzstan
Uzbekistan
Azerbaijan
Georgia
Kyrgyzstan
RussianKyrgyzstan
Federation
Tajikistan
Georgia
Russian
Federation
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Russian
Federation
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Russian
Federation
Albania
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Andorra
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Turkey
Austria
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Turkey
Belarus
Albania
Tajikistan
Turkey
Albania
Andorra
Turkey
Belgium
Albania
Andorra
Austria
Albania
Andorra
Austria
Belarus
Bulgaria
Andorra
Austria
Belarus
Croatia
Belgium
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Belarus
Cyprus
Belgium
Bosnia and
andCzech
Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Republic
Belgium
Bosnia
Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Denmark
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Bulgaria
Estonia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Croatia
Finland
Cyprus
CzechDenmark
Republic
France
Cyprus
Czech
Republic
Denmark
Germany
Estonia
CzechDenmark
Republic
Estonia
Finland
Denmark
Greece
Estonia
Finland
France
Hungary
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Iceland
Finland
France
Germany
Ireland
Greece
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Germany
Israel
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Kazakhstan
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Latvia
Israel
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Ireland
Lithuania
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Luxembourg
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Malta
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Lithuania
Kazakhstan
Monaco
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Latvia
Montenegro
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Norway
Monaco
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Malta
Poland
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
Portugal
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
RepublicNetherlands
of Moldova
Montenegro
Norway
Romania
Poland
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Norway
SanPortugal
Marino
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Portugal
Moldova
Serbia
Poland
Republic of
of Romania
Moldova
Slovakia
Portugal
Republic
Moldova
Romania
Slovenia
Marino
Republic San
of Romania
Moldova
SanRomania
Marino
Serbia
Spain
San
Marino
Serbia
Sweden
SanSlovakia
Marino
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Switzerland
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
former
Yugoslav
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Spain
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Ukraine
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United
Kingdom
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
former
Yugoslav
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Sweden
Switzerland
The
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ....
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Macedonia
Ukraine
Switzerland
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of
The
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of
Ukraine
United
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Kingdom
Macedonia
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Kingdom
Ukraine
United
United Kingdom
EMR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
0.0
<0.1
4.3
0.0
<0.1
4.3
<0.1
4.3
4.3
Iraq
Oman
EMR
EMR
Iran (Islamic RepublicIraq
of)
EMR
Iraq
Oman
Iraq
Saudi Arabia
Oman
Iraq
Syrian Arab Pakistan
Republic
Oman
Syrian
Arab
Republic
Oman
IranSyrian
(IslamicArab
Republic
of)
Republic
Afghanistan
IranSyrian
(IslamicArab
Republic
of)
Republic
Saudi
Arabia
Iran
(Islamic
Republic
of)
Djibouti
Saudi
Arabia
Iran (IslamicSaudi
Republic
of)
Pakistan
Arabia
Yemen
Pakistan
Saudi
Arabia
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Sudan
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Djibouti
Afghanistan
Somalia
Djibouti
Afghanistan
Yemen
Djibouti
Bahrain
Yemen
Djibouti
Sudan
Yemen
Egypt
Sudan
Yemen
Somalia
Sudan
Jordan
Somalia
Sudan
Bahrain
Somalia
Kuwait
Bahrain
Somalia
Egypt
Bahrain
Lebanon
Egypt
Bahrain
Jordan
Egypt
Libya
Jordan
Egypt
Kuwait
Jordan
Morocco
Kuwait
Jordan
Lebanon
Kuwait
Qatar
Lebanon
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Tunisia
Lebanon
Libya
Morocco
Libya
Morocco
Libya
Qatar
Morocco
Qatar
Morocco
WPR
Tunisia
Qatar
Tunisia
Qatar
Tunisia
China
United Arab
Arab Emirates
United
Republic Emirates
ofTunisia
Korea
WPR
United Arab
Emirates
Philippines
WPR
VietChina
Nam
WPR
China
Republic of Korea
China
Malaysia
Republic
of Korea
Korea
China
Philippines
Republic
of
Cambodia
Philippines
Republic
of
Korea
Viet
Nam
Philippines
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
Viet
Nam
Philippines
Malaysia
Viet
Nam
Vanuatu
Malaysia
Viet
Nam
Cambodia
Malaysia
Solomon Islands
Cambodia
Malaysia
Republic
Cambodia
Papua New
Guinea
Lao People's
People's Democratic
DemocraticCambodia
Republic
Lao
Republic
Vanuatu
Australia
Republic
Vanuatu
Solomon
Islands
Vanuatu
Brunei
Darussalam
Solomon
Islands
Papua
NewVanuatu
Guinea
Solomon
Islands
Cook
Papua
NewAustralia
Guinea
Solomon
Islands
Papua
New
Guinea
Fiji
Australia
Papua Darussalam
New
Guinea
Brunei
Australia
Japan
BruneiCook
Darussalam
Australia
Islands
Brunei
Darussalam
Kiribati
Cook
Islands
Brunei
Darussalam
Fiji
Cook
Islands
Marshall
Fiji
Cook
Islands
Japan
Fiji
Micronesia (Federated
States
of)
Japan
Fiji
Kiribati
Japan
Mongolia
Kiribati
Japan
Marshall Kiribati
Islands
Nauru
Marshall
Islands
Kiribati
of)
Marshall
Islands
NewStates
Zealand
(Federated
States
of)
Marshall
Islands
Mongolia
Micronesia
States
of)
Niue
Mongolia
Micronesia (Federated States
of)
Nauru
Mongolia
Palau
Nauru
NewMongolia
Zealand
Nauru
Samoa
NewSingapore
Zealand
Nauru
New
Zealand
Niue
New Zealand
Niue
Palau
Niue
Tonga
Palau
Niue
Samoa
Palau
Tuvalu
Samoa
Palau
Singapore
Samoa
Singapore
Samoa
Tonga
Singapore
Tonga
Singapore
Tuvalu
Tonga
Tuvalu
Tonga
Tuvalu
Tuvalu
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.0
12.8
0.0
<0.1
0.0
15.7
<0.1
0.0
<0.1
25.0
<0.1
<0.1
12.8
34.7
<0.1
12.8
15.7
12.8
37.7
15.7
12.8
25.0
15.7
78.8
25.0
15.7
34.7
25.0
34.7
25.0
37.7
34.7
37.7
34.7
78.8
37.7
78.8
37.7
78.8
78.8
<0.1
0.2
0.4
<0.1
0.9
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
3.2
0.2
<0.1
0.4
0.2
10.6
0.4
0.2
0.9
0.4
29.8
0.9
0.4
3.2
0.9
31.3
3.2
0.975.4
10.6
3.2
10.6
3.2
29.8 185.1
10.6
29.8
10.6
29.8
31.3
29.8
31.3
75.4
31.3
75.4 185.1
31.3
75.4
185.1
75.4 185.1
185.1
55
HEPATITIS
SDG Target 3.3
diseases
Indicator 3.3.4: Hepatitis B incidence per 100 000 population
SITUATION
Viral hepatitis is caused by five different viruses
with transmission occurring either through
contaminated food or water (hepatitis A and
E) or through exposure to blood or body fluids
(hepatitis B, C and D). Viral hepatitis infection
kills an estimated 1.45 million people per year.1
Approximately 90% of deaths are due to chronic
HBV and HCV infections that cause cirrhosis
and hepatocellular carcinoma (Fig. A.7.1). The
majority (85%) of viral hepatitis deaths occur in
Asia, East Africa, North Africa and West Africa.
Despite the high disease burden and available
prevention and treatment interventions, hepatitis
has not received the same attention as other
diseases with a comparable burden of disease,
such as HIV, TB or malaria.
Figure A.7.1.
Global deaths due to hepatitis, by virus type and
sequela, 20131
Acute infection
Liver cancer
Liver cirrhosis
Hepatitis A
Table A.7.1.
Key interventions of the Global Health Sector Strategy
for viral hepatitis
Prevention
interventions
1. Three-dose hepatitis B vaccine for

infants
2. Prevention of HBV mother-to-child
transmission using hepatitis B birth
dose or other approaches
3. Blood safety and injection safety,
including use of engineered devices
4. Harm reduction for persons who use
drugs
Treatment
interventions
5. Diagnosis of HBV and HCV

6. Treatment of HBV and HCV
The WHO Global Health Sector Strategy 2016

2021 for viral hepatitis2 focuses on HBV and
HCV. It proposes to increase the coverage of
preventive interventions and to scale up testing
and treatment (Table A.7.1). The specific targets
are a 90% reduction in new cases of chronic
HBV and HCV infection and a reduction in
hepatitis deaths from 1.4 million to fewer than
500 000 by 2030.
EQUITY
Hepatitis C
Hepatitis E
l
0
l
200
l
400
l
600
l
800
Deaths (thousands)

Vaccination will remain a priority preventive
intervention. Three-dose HBV vaccine coverage
among infants is a coverage indicator that is a
leading determinant of the number of new HBV
infections per 100 000 population in a given
year which is the selected SDG indicator. HBV
vaccination coverage has increased dramatically
in recent years (Figure A.7.3). Other preventive
interventions include expanding blood and
injection safety within and beyond health-care
settings, and taking harm-reduction programmes
to scale for people who use drugs. Effective
treatment can cure more than 90% of patients
with chronic HCV infection and suppress viral
replication for most patients with chronic HBV
infection. The expansion of treatment coverage
will require innovations in diagnostics, including
point-of-care technologies, reductions in prices
of medicines and a public health approach to
treatment and care.
Efforts to combat hepatitis should be implemented

in a way that reduces inequities within countries.
For example, in China, the coverage of HepBOT
(HBV vaccine birth dose administered in a
timely way within 24 hours) was highest
in the wealthier Eastern provinces. Between
2002 and 2010, a pro-poor strategy provided
HBV vaccine free of charge in the Western area
and in poverty-affected regions of the Central
area leading to a marked reduction in national
coverage gaps (Fig. A.7.2).
REFERENCES
Global Burden of Disease 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death
Collaborators. Global, regional and national age-sex specific all-cause
and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 19902013: a
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet.
2015;385(9963):11771 (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/
article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2961682-2/fulltext, accessed 28 March
2016).
Draft global health sector strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and STIs,
20162021. Geneva: World Health Organization. In preparation. These
three draft strategies will be finalized for consideration by the Sixty-ninth
World Health Assembly, 2328 May 2016 (draft versions available at:
HYPERLINK wlmailhtml:-CSCO-3h--UrlBlockedError.aspx\o http://
www.who.int/hiv/strategy2016-2021/en/ \t _blankhttp://www.
who.int/hiv/strategy2016-2021/en/, accessed 16 April 2016).
WHO/UNICEF coverage estimates 2014 revision. July 2015 (see: http://

www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/routine/coverage/
en/index4.html).
Cui F, Liang X, Gong X, Chen Y, Wang F, Zheng H et al. Preventing hepatitis

B though universal vaccination: Reduction of inequalities through the
GAVI China project. Vaccine. 2013;31:J2935.
Progress towards meeting the 2012 hepatitis B control milestone: WHO

Western Pacific Region, 2011. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011:86(19):18088.
Figure A.7.2.
Coverage of HepBOT in the Eastern, Central and
Western areas of China, 20022009, 2010 survey4
Eastern
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Central
Western
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
56
In order to address the important data gaps on

hepatitis that exist in most countries, WHO in
2016 published its Technical Considerations
and Case Definitions to Improve Viral Hepatitis
Surveillance, along with a new framework for
the monitoring and evaluation of viral hepatitis
programmes. The proposed key impact indicator
is the number of new hepatitis B infections per
100 000 population in a given year, and will be
based on biomarker surveys as described in
the WHO guidance. In 2005, the WHO Regional
Committee for the Western Pacific adopted a
resolution for hepatitis B control that (among
other things) called for biomarker surveys, with
many countries in the Region having already
conducted such surveys to evaluate the impact
of universal hepatitis B vaccination.5
Coverage (%)
Hepatitis B
DATA GAPS
Figure A.7.3.
Infants receiving three doses of hepatitis B vaccine, by WHO region, 198920143
Coverage (%)
AFR
AMR
SEAR
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
l
1989
EUR
EMR
WPR
l
1994
l
1999
l
2004
l
2009
l
2014
Table A.7.2.
Infants receiving three doses of hepatitis B vaccine, 20143
Table A.7.2. Infants receiving three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (%), 2014
AFR
AMR
Rwanda
Seychelles
Ghana
Swaziland
Mauritius
99
99
98
98
97
97

Gambia
Lesotho
Algeria
Botswana
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Eritrea
Burkina Faso
Malawi
Zimbabwe
96
96
95
95
95
95
95
94
91
91
91
90
Congo
Senegal
Namibia
Cameroon
Togo
Zambia
Mauritania
Sierra Leone
Kenya
Angola
Comoros
89
88
87
87
86
84
83
81
80
80
80
Guinea-Bissau
Mozambique
Uganda
Ethiopia
Mali
South Africa
Madagascar
Benin
Gabon
Niger
Cte d'Ivoire
Nigeria
Guinea
Liberia
Chad
Equatorial Guinea
South Sudan
80
78
78
77
77
Antigua and Barbuda

Saint Lucia
Guyana
Nicaragua
Dominica
Grenada
Bahamas
Brazil
Cuba
Belize
Uruguay
Argentina
Barbados
El Salvador
Chile
Jamaica
Trinidad and Tobago
Costa Rica
Colombia
Dominican Republic
Peru
Paraguay
Honduras
Suriname
Mexico
Ecuador
Panama
Canada
Guatemala
Haiti
74
73
70
70
68
67
66
51
50
47
46
24
SEAR
Bhutan
Maldives
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Bangladesh
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
Nepal
Indonesia
Timor-Leste
Myanmar
India
EUR
Czech Republic
Monaco
99
Uzbekistan
98
Albania
98
Belgium
98
Portugal
98
Belarus
97
Israel
97
Russian Federation
96
Slovakia
96
Tajikistan
96 The Former
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Turkmenistan
95
Andorra
95
Cyprus
94
Greece
94
Kyrgyzstan
94
Poland
93
Spain
92
Turkey
92
Bulgaria
92
Croatia
Ireland
91
Kazakhstan
90
Netherlands
90
Azerbaijan
89
Italy
88
Lithuania
87
Luxembourg
85
Romania
85
Armenia
84
Estonia
83
Latvia
Republic of Moldova
80
Serbia
78
Georgia
75
Malta
73
48
Germany
Montenegro
Austria
99
France
99
San Marino
99
Ukraine
Sweden
99
Denmark
95
Finland
93
Hungary
92
Iceland
78
Norway
77
Slovenia
75
Switzerland
70
United Kingdom
EMR
99
99
99
99
98
98
98
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
95
95
95
95
95
94
94
94
94
94
93
93
92
92
92
91
90
89
87
87
83
82
80
46
42
Bahrain
Morocco
Qatar
Jordan
Oman
Saudi Arabia
Tunisia
Kuwait
Egypt
Libya
Sudan
Yemen
Lebanon
Djibouti
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Iraq
Somalia
99
99
99
99
98
98
98
98
96
94
94
94
94
88
81
78
75
73
71
62
42
WPR
Brunei Darussalam
China
Cook Islands
Fiji
Mongolia
Niue
Palau
Republic of Korea
Cambodia
Singapore
Malaysia
Nauru
Viet Nam
New Zealand
Australia
Samoa
Tuvalu
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Marshall Islands
Philippines
Kiribati
Vanuatu
Papua New Guinea
Japan
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
97
97
96
95
95
93
91
91
90
88
88
83
82
79
79
75
64
62
57
NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES

SDG Target 3.3
diseases
Indicator 3.3.5: Number of people requiring interventions against neglected tropical diseases
SITUATION
Key interventions against neglected tropical
diseases (NTDs) include mass treatment;
individual treatment and care; water, sanitation
and hygiene (WASH); vector control; and veterinary
public health, as well as supportive interventions
to strengthen health systems.
The end of the epidemic will be first evidenced
by reductions in the number of people requiring
mass or individual treatment and care, as diseases
are eliminated or controlled. Treatment and care
are the interventions covered in this section.
Some of the other wide-ranging interventions
listed above can be addressed by SDG targets
and indicators for UHC (Target 3.8) and access
to water and sanitation (Targets 6.1 and 6.2).
NTDs: lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis,

schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases
(STH) and trachoma. More than 2.7 million people
needed individual treatment and care for other
NTDs such as Buruli ulcer, dengue, guinea-worm
disease, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT),
leprosy, the leishmaniases and yaws (Fig. A.8.2).

In 2014, 50 countries had achieved national
elimination or were under surveillance for
elimination of at least one NTD. For example,
the number of people requiring mass treatment
for lymphatic filariasis has decreased from a
high of 1.4 billion in 2011 to 1.1 billion in 2014.
In 2014, at least 1.7 billion people required

mass or individual treatment and care for NTDs
in 185 countries.1 Of these, 1.1 billion were
in lower-middle-income countries (Fig. A.8.1).
The 520 million people requiring treatment
in low-income countries represented 60% of
their populations.
For NTDs targeted for elimination or eradication

in World Health Assembly (WHA) resolutions,2
ending the epidemic implies a reduction in the
number of people requiring treatment and care
towards zero. The control of other NTDs means a
reduction in the frequency of intervention. Taken
together, existing WHA-endorsed targets should
lead to a 90% reduction in the average number
of people requiring treatment and care per year.
Almost all of these 1.7 billion people required

mass treatment for at least one of the following
Reducing the number of people requiring

treatment and care does not depend solely
Figure A.8.1.
Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs, by country income group, 2014a
Lower middle
income
Low income
Upper middle
income
High income
l
10
l
100
l
1000
l
10 000
100 000
Number in thousands (logarithmic scale)

Horizontal line reflects 95% uncertainty intervals around missing values in 2014.
Figure A.8.2.
Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs, by disease, 2014a,b
l
1 000 000
on the actions of the health sector: controlling

STH requires universal access to water and
sanitation; controlling dengue requires vector
control as an adaptive response to urbanization
and climate change.
Disaggregation by disease will be an important
element in monitoring successes and failures.
EQUITY
People requiring interventions against NTDs
are poor and marginalized. Monitoring NTDs
and intervention coverage is therefore key to
ensuring that the least well off are prioritized
from the beginning of the path towards UHC and
universal access to safe water and sanitation.3,4
Indeed, NTD monitoring can help the health and
WASH sectors to achieve their universal access
goals by better targeting the poorest and most
marginalized populations.
DATA GAPS
Gaps in NTD reporting systems include the
number of people requiring treatment and
care for dengue in the WHO African Region,
for Chagas disease and for zoonotic NTDs, as
well as the number of new cases requiring and
requesting surgery or rehabilitation. Based on
reporting systems for donated medicines, data
disaggregation by sex and by urban or rural area
is optional or dependent upon which diseases
are co-endemic. Some disaggregation by age
is available.
Figures A.8.1 to A.8.3 present conservative
estimates of the number of people requiring
treatment and care for NTDs, assuming perfect
co-endemicity of some NTDs at the level of the
smallest available unit and age group. By 2030,
improved co-endemicity data and models will
be used to validate this approach. Any changes
over time in case detection rates will have to be
taken into account when making comparisons
to the baseline.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text and figures are taken from:
Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization
(http://www.who.int/gho/en/), and the Preventive Chemotherapy and
Transmission Control (PCT) databank. Geneva: World Health Organization
(http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/
databank/en/).
Eradication of guinea-worm disease (2015) and yaws (2020); global

elimination of leprosy (2020), lymphatic filariasis (2020), trachoma
(2020), onchocerciasis (2025) and HAT (2020, with zero incidence in
2030); regional elimination of schistosomiasis (2020), rabies (2020) and
visceral leishmaniasis (2020); regional interruption of intra-domiciliary
transmission of Chagas disease (2020).
Tracking universal health coverage: first global monitoring report. Geneva

and Washington (DC): World Health Organization and World Bank;
2015 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/
report/2015/en/, accessed 25 March 2016).
Horizontal lines reflect 95% uncertainty intervals around missing values in 2014.
Data for dengue are not available from the WHO African Region; data for echinococcosis are available from some countries of the WHO
European Region only; data for other NTDs including Chagas disease and zoonotic NTDs are not currently available.
58
Water sanitation & hygiene for accelerating and sustaining progress on

neglected tropical diseases. A global strategy 20152020. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/
publications/wash-and-ntd-strategy/en/, accessed 29 March 2015).
Figure A.8.3.
Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs, by country, 2014a
Horizontal lines reflect 95% uncertainty intervals around missing values in 2014. A country is shown as not having available data when the uncertainty interval exceeds two orders of magnitude.
59
NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES
SDG Target 3.4
By 2030, reduce by one third premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being
Indicator 3.4.1: Mortality rate attributed to cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory disease
In 2012, NCDs were responsible for around 38

million deaths per year, accounting for 68%
of all deaths worldwide.1 Of deaths under the
age of 70 (commonly referred to as premature
deaths) an estimated 52% were due to NCDs.
Over three quarters of those premature deaths
were caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD),
cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory disease
(CRD) (Fig A.9.1).
In terms of mortality the leading NCD is CVD
which claimed 17.5 million lives in 2012 (46%
of all NCD deaths) 6 million of which were
under age 70. Of the 17.5 million deaths, 7.4
million were due to coronary heart disease and
6.7 million to stroke. Cancers kill around half
as many people as CVD (8.2 million, with 4.3
million under age 70), while CRD and diabetes
account for 4.0 million and 1.5 million deaths,
respectively. Diabetes is also a risk factor for
CVD, with about 10% of cardiovascular deaths
caused by higher-than-optimal blood glucose.2
Figure A.9.1.
Causes of premature (under age 70) NCD mortality,
2012
Respiratory
diseases
8%
Diabetes
4%
Cardiovascular
diseases
37%
Other
NCDs
23%
Cancer
27%
Figure A.9.2.
Probability of dying from any of the four main NCDs
between ages 30 and 70, by WHO region and globally,
2000 and 2012
2000
2012
2030 target (SDG)
30
25
Probability of dying (%)
SITUATION
20
15
10
5
0
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
The United Nations Political Declaration on NCDs

adopted at the United Nations General Assembly
in 2011, and the United Nations Outcome
Document on NCDs adopted at the United Nations
General Assembly in 2014 include a roadmap of
commitments made by governments. The WHO
Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control
of NCDs 20132020 endorsed by the WHA in
May 2013 sets priorities and provides strategic
guidance on how countries can implement the
roadmap of commitments. The Global Action Plan
includes targets that focus on risk factors such
as tobacco use, alcohol consumption, physical
inactivity, high salt intake, obesity, diabetes
and hypertension, as well as targets on access
to essential NCD medicines and technologies,
and to drug therapy and counselling for those
with existing NCDs.
Major obstacles to reducing NCD mortality include:
(a) a lack of planning (around a quarter of all
countries did not have a policy or an operational
plan and/or strategy for addressing NCDs in 2015);
(b) the marketing of harmful products such as
tobacco; (c) rapid, unplanned urbanization; and
(d) the increased size of the ageing population.
EQUITY
Globally, premature mortality from the four

main NCDs declined by 15% between 2000
and 2012 (Figure A.9.2). This rate of decline
is insufficient to meet the 2030 SDG target.
Achieving the target for NCDs will require major
interventions in a context characterized by
ageing populations, rapid unplanned urbanization
and the globalization of markets that promote
tobacco use, physical inactivity and unhealthy
diets. Efforts will focus on the development
and implementation of strong national plans
that emphasize the prevention of key NCD risk
factors and treatment access for all.
Overall declines in NCD mortality can mask

increasing inequalities within countries.3 Where
data are of sufficient quality to measure NCD
mortality by socioeconomic status, those with
lower status generally have higher mortality than
those with higher status.4 In many countries, NCD
inequalities are the most important source of
inequalities in total mortality and life expectancy.
Achieving global targets for NCDs will increasingly
depend upon the ability of governments to
implement policies and services that work
effectively across all social groups.
60
DATA GAPS
National estimates of NCD mortality are primarily
derived from data collected in CRVS systems.
Only around one third of deaths worldwide are
recorded in civil registry systems with cause-ofdeath information based on medical certification.5
Alternative data sources may be used as a first
step, countries may set up sample registration
systems using verbal autopsy to determine
causes of death. However, distinguishing among
noncommunicable causes of death using verbal
autopsy remains challenging. Disaggregating on
key socioeconomic stratifiers is also a challenge
even in high-income countries with gold-standard
data-collection systems. Instead, CRVS data
may be disaggregated geographically to identify
disparities in NCD mortality.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all mortality statistics in the text, table and
figures are taken from: Global Health Estimates 2013: Deaths by Cause, Age
and Sex, Estimates for 20002012. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2014 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/).
World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World

Health Organization; 2016 (http://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/
en/).
Wang H, Schumacher AE, Levitz CE, Mokdad AH, Murray CJL. Left behind:
widening disparities for males and females in US county life expectancy,
19852010. Population Health Metrics. 2013;11:8.
Di Cesare M, Khang Y-H, Asaria P, Blakely T, Cowan MJ, Farzadfar F et

al. Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses.
Lancet. 2013;381(9866):58597.
World Health Statistics 2012. Part II. Civil registration and vital statistics
systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 (http://apps.who.int/
iris/bitstream/10665/44844/1/9789241564441_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1,
Figure A.9.3.
Probability of dying from any of the four main NCDs between ages 30 and 70 (%), 2012a
Probability of dying (%)

<15
1519
2024
25
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
WHO Member States with a population of less than 250 000 in 2012 were not included in the analysis. Estimate for Guyana is provisional.
Table A.9.1.
Probability of dying from any of the four main NCDs between ages 30 and 70 (%), 2012a
Table A.9.1 Probability of dying from any of the four main NCDs between ages 30 and 70 (%), 2012
AFR
AMR
EUR
Gabon
15.0
Canada
10.7
Cabo Verde
Ethiopia
15.1
Peru
11.2
15.2
Chile
11.9
Mauritania
15.8
Ecuador
11.9
16.1
Costa Rica
12.2
Senegal
16.7
Colombia
12.4
Mozambique
Kenya
17.3
Panama
12.5
18.1
Guatemala
13.5
Zambia
18.1
Suriname
13.6
18.5
Bahamas
13.8
Malawi
18.7
Barbados
13.8
Gambia
Rwanda
19.1
14.3
19.1
Belize
14.4
Zimbabwe
19.3
Dominican Republic
14.8
Niger
19.6
Honduras
15.7
Congo
19.8
15.7
Nigeria
South Sudan
19.8
Mexico
15.7
Cameroon
Cuba
16.5
19.9
20.0
El Salvador
16.9
Namibia
Jamaica
17.0
Uruguay
17.1
Argentina
17.5
18.3
Paraguay
18.5
Brazil
19.4
Nicaragua
19.4
19.8
Togo
20.2
Ghana
Botswana
20.3
Guinea
20.9
20.9
Liberia
21.2
Uganda
21.2
Swaziland
Algeria
21.4
Benin
22.1
Guinea-Bissau
22.4
Chad
23.2
Cte d'Ivoire
Equatorial Guinea
23.3
Madagascar
23.4
SEAR
Comoros
23.5
Maldives
15.9
23.6
Thailand
16.2
Burkina Faso
Lesotho
23.8
Bangladesh
17.5
23.9
Sri Lanka
17.6
Mauritius
24.0
Bhutan
20.5
Angola
24.2
Nepal
21.6
Eritrea
24.2
Indonesia
23.1
Burundi
Mali
24.3
Timor-Leste
23.7
25.6
Myanmar
24.3
South Africa
26.8
India
26.2
Sierra Leone
27.5
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
27.1
22.1
23.4
Haiti
23.9
26.2
Trinidad and Tobago
28.4
Guyanabb
Switzerland
Cyprus
Israel
Italy
Sweden
Iceland
Norway
Spain
Ireland
Finland
France
Luxembourg
Malta
Portugal
Austria
United Kingdom
Belgium
Netherlands
Germany
Slovenia
Greece
Denmark
Czech Republic
Croatia
Turkey
Albania
Estonia
Slovakia
Poland
Georgia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Montenegro
Lithuania
Romania
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Hungary
Latvia
Serbia
Belarus
Republic of Moldova
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Armenia
Russian Federation
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
EMR
9.1
Kuwait
11.8
Lebanon
12.4
9.8
Bahrain
13.3
9.9
Qatar
14.2
9.5
9.5
10.2
Saudi Arabia
16.7
10.7
Tunisia
17.2
17.3
11.2
Sudan
17.4
11.4
Libya
17.6
11.4
Oman
17.8
Djibouti
18.8
12.0
18.9
12.0
Somalia
19.1
12.2
19.1
12.2
Jordan
19.8
Pakistan
20.5
10.8
11.1
11.6
11.9
12.3
12.6
12.9
Morocco
22.8
13.3
Yemen
23.1
Iraq
23.7
Egypt
24.5
17.0
17.5
17.7
Afghanistan
18.4
30.5
18.8
18.8
19.4
WPR
20.0
21.6
22.1
Japan
9.3
22.2
Republic of Korea
9.3
22.4
Australia
9.4
22.6
Singapore
10.5
New Zealand
10.7
23.3
24.0
24.0
Brunei Darussalam
16.8
24.1
Viet Nam
17.4
24.5
Cambodia
17.7
26.2
China
19.4
28.2
Malaysia
19.6
28.5
Solomon Islands
24.1
28.8
24.2
29.7
Papua New Guinea
26.4
Philippines
27.9
26.5
29.9
31.0
33.9
40.8
Fiji
30.8
Mongolia
32.0
Provisional estimate.
61
SUICIDE
SDG Target 3.4
By 2030, reduce by one third premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being
Indicator 3.4.2: Suicide mortality rate
SITUATION
Mental disorders occur in all regions and
cultures of the world. The most prevalent of
these disorders are depression and anxiety,
which are estimated to affect nearly one in 10
(676 million) people. At its worst, depression can
lead to suicide. Other key risk factors for suicide
include previous attempts and easy access to
means of suicide, such as pesticides or firearms.
In 2012, there were over 800 000 estimated
suicide deaths worldwide, with 86% of these
occurring in people under 70 years of age.1
Globally, among young adults aged 1529 years,
suicide accounts for 8.5% of all deaths and is
ranked as the second leading cause of death, after
road traffic injuries. In high-income countries,
three times as many men die by suicide than
women, while globally the corresponding figure
is 1.8 times as many (Figure A.10.1).
Figure A.10.1.
Suicide mortality rates, by sex, by WHO region and
globally, 2012
Male
Female
25
20
15
10
5
0
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
There has been a 9% decrease globally in the

number of suicide deaths between 2000 and
2012, at the same time as the global population
has increased. The global suicide mortality rate
has fallen 21% over the same period, which is
mostly driven by decreases among both sexes
in the WHO European Region and WHO Western
Pacific Region. However, after controlling for
population ageing, increases have been observed
in around 50 individual countries, including
some high-income countries, where some of
the highest rates remain (Figure A.10.2)
In the past half century, the decriminalization of
suicide in many countries has made it possible
for those with suicidal thoughts to seek help,
if available. Comprehensive national strategies
or action plans, especially in high-income
countries,2 and the restricting in some countries
of access to the means of suicide (such as
pesticides or firearms) have also contributed to the
improvements observed.3 New treatments have
also become available for depression, for both
62
acute episodes and relapse prevention, based

on medications and psychological interventions
that are effective and produce fewer side-effects.
However, rates of recognition of depression
remain low, both by those suffering from it and
by health care providers. According to the World
Mental Health Surveys,4 even in high-resource
settings only around half of those with depression
receive any treatment, with about 40% receiving
treatment considered to be minimally adequate.
In low-income countries coverage is much
lower. In Nigeria, for example, only one fifth of
those with a depressive episode receive any
treatment and only 1 in 50 receives treatment
that is minimally adequate.

Moderate and severe depression are both
included within the Mental Health Action Plan
20132020 target to increase service coverage
for people with severe mental disorders by 20%
by 2020.5 WHO Member States have committed
to developing and providing comprehensive,
integrated and responsive mental health and
social services in community-based settings.6
Suicide prevention is also an integral component
of the Action Plan, with the target of reducing
the rate of suicide in countries by 10% by 2020.
For national responses to be effective, a
comprehensive multisectoral suicide-prevention
strategy is needed. This should include the
early identification and effective management
of suicidal behaviours, as well as follow-up and
community-based support for those who attempt
suicide, reducing the harmful use of alcohol and
restricting access to the most common means of
suicide (including pesticides, firearms and certain
medications). In addition to suicide-mortality
data, suicide-attempt data equally needs to be
part of a surveillance system.
EQUITY
The stigma surrounding depression and suicide,
which impedes the seeking of help and service
provision, is exacerbated for marginalized and
discriminated-against groups. Additionally, many
facilities in LMIC do not have the capacity to
provide basic treatment for depression, as health
workers are not trained in mental health issues
and medicines are not available.7
DATA GAPS
The complete recording of suicide deaths in
death-registration systems requires good linkages
with coronial and police systems, but can be
seriously impeded by stigma, social and legal
considerations, and delays in determining cause
of death. Less than one half of WHO Member
States have well-functioning death-registration

systems that record causes of death. In particular,
very few low-income and African countries have
functioning death-registration systems.
While depression is known to be prevalent,
the available data are not adequate to provide
reliable estimates of global and regional trends.
Country health information systems do not
routinely collect data on a core set of mental
health indicators in over two thirds of countries,
and are unable to provide reliable information on
the extent of service coverage, even for severe
mental disorders.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all mortality statistics in the text, tables and
The CASP blueprint for a Canadian National Suicide Prevention Strategy.

Second edition. Winnipeg: Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention;
2009 (http://suicideprevention.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/
SuicidePreventionBlueprint0909.pdf, accessed 29 March 2016).
Preventing suicide: a global imperative. Geneva: World Health Organization;

2014 (http:// www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/
world_report_2014/en/, accessed 29 March 2016).
The World Mental Health Survey Initiative [website]. Boston: Harvard

Medical School (http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/wmh/, accessed 29
March 2016).
Mental Health Action Plan 20132020. Geneva: World

Health Organization; 2013 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
March 2016).
Resolution WHA66.8. Comprehensive mental health action plan

20132020. In: Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 2027
May 2013. Resolutions and decisions, annexes.Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2013:123 (WHA66/2013/REC/1; http://apps.who.int/
gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA66-REC1/A66_REC1-en.pdf, accessed 29
March 2016).
Mental Health Atlas 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
pdf?ua=1&ua=1, accessed 29 March 2016).
Figure A.10.2.
Age-standardized suicide mortality rate, 2012a
Suicide rate
(per 100 000 population)
<5.0
5.09.9
10.014.9
15.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.10.1.
Suicide mortality rate (per 100 000 population), 2012a
TableA.10.1. Suicide mortality rates (per 100000 population), 2012

AFR
EUR
1.8
Jamaica
1.2
Mauritania
Niger
1.8
Belize
2.2
1.8
Bahamas
2.3
Namibia
2.0
Haiti
2.3
Ghana
2.3
Barbados
2.6
Liberia
2.6
2.6
Chad
South Africa
2.7
Peru
3.1
2.7
Dominican Republic
3.6
Mali
2.8
Mexico
4.1
Burkina Faso
2.9
Panama
4.4
Guinea-Bissau
3.1
Honduras
4.9
Botswana
Gambia
3.2
Paraguay
5.3
3.2
Colombia
5.5
Senegal
3.2
Brazil
6.0
Guinea
3.3
Costa Rica
6.9
Benin
3.7
7.3
Togo
Cabo Verde
3.7
Guatemala
Ecuador
8.9
Nicaragua
9.1
3.9
Nigeria
4.3
Cameroon
4.9
Swaziland
5.3
Cte d'Ivoire
Lesotho
5.4
Sierra Leone
5.6
5.4
Argentina
10.8
Canada
11.4
11.7
El Salvador
12.8
Chile
13.0
13.7
Gabon
7.0
Madagascar
7.3
Ethiopia
Rwanda
7.5
Congo
7.8
7.9
8.0
Eritrea
Mauritius
8.3
Malawi
8.6
SEAR
Zambia
9.6
Indonesia
3.7
Comoros
10.5
Maldives
5.0
Angola
Kenya
10.6
Timor-Leste
5.4
10.8
Bangladesh
6.6
Uganda
11.9
Myanmar
12.4
Thailand
13.1
South Sudan
AMR
Algeria
7.6
Uruguay
13.8
Trinidad and Tobago
14.4
Cuba
14.6
28.3
Suriname
34.8
Guyana
8.5
13.6
Equatorial Guinea
13.9
Bhutan

Burundi
15.1
Nepal
16.4
India
Zimbabwe
16.6
Sri Lanka
Mozambique
17.3
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
16.0
20.3
20.9
29.2
EMR
Azerbaijan 1.7
Tajikistan 3.2
Armenia 3.3
Georgia 3.8
Greece 4.9
Cyprus 5.1
6.2
Israel
6.4
Italy
6.5
Albania
6.7
former
Yugoslav
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
6.8
Malta
7.0
Spain
7.0
United Kingdom
7.7
Uzbekistan
8.0
Turkey
8.9
Kyrgyzstan
10.0
Netherlands
10.2
Norway
10.9
Luxembourg
11.2
Denmark
11.5
Ireland
12.2
Switzerland
12.5
Portugal
12.6
Slovakia
12.8
Romania
13.0
Germany
13.2
Sweden
13.9
14.5
Bulgaria
15.1
Iceland
15.6
Austria
15.6
Czech Republic
15.8
France
16.5
Croatia
16.7
Finland
16.8
Serbia
17.0
Republic of Moldova
17.1
Slovenia
17.8
Belgium
18.7
Estonia
18.9
Montenegro
19.4
Turkmenistan
20.1
Ukraine
20.5
Poland
21.8
Belarus
21.8
Latvia
22.3
Russian Federation
24.2
Kazakhstan
25.4
Hungary
33.5
Lithuania
Saudi Arabia
0.3
0.4
Lebanon
0.9
Kuwait
1.0
Oman
1.0
Iraq
1.1
Libya
1.5
Egypt
1.6
Jordan
1.6
Tunisia
2.4
3.0
Yemen
3.1
Afghanistan
4.0
Qatar
4.7
Morocco
5.0
5.3
Bahrain
7.2
Pakistan
7.5
Somalia
8.0
Djibouti
10.7
Sudan
11.5
WPR
Malaysia
2.6
Philippines
2.6
Viet Nam
5.1
Fiji
5.9
Brunei Darussalam
6.2
Solomon Islands
6.3
6.4
Papua New Guinea
7.7
China
8.7
Cambodia
9.0
Singapore
9.0
Mongolia
9.3
New Zealand
10.3
Australia
11.6
Japan
Republic of Korea
23.1
36.8
63
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
SDG Target 3.5
Strengthen the prevention and treatment of substance abuse, including narcotic drug abuse and harmful use of alcohol
Indicator 3.5.1: Coverage of treatment interventions (pharmacological, psychosocial and rehabilitation and aftercare services) for substance-use disorders
Indicator 3.5.2: Harmful use of alcohol, defined according to the national context as alcohol per capita consumption (aged 15 years and older) within a calendar year in litres
of pure alcohol
Substance use and substance use disorders cause

a significant public health burden. In 2012, 3.3
million deaths 5.9% of all deaths worldwide
were attributable to alcohol consumption, with
a significant proportion of alcohol-attributable
deaths from NCDs and injuries (Fig A.11.1).1
Worldwide alcohol consumption in 2015 was
projected to be 6.3 litres of pure alcohol per
person aged 15 or older. In 2010, 38% of the
world population aged 15 or older had drunk
alcohol in the past 12 months, with 16% of
them engaged in heavy episodic drinking. There
is considerable global variation in alcohol use.
Consumption is increasing in the WHO Western
Pacific Region and WHO South-East Asia Region,
while remaining stable or slightly decreasing in
other WHO regions.
Figure A.11.1.
Distribution of alcohol-attributable deaths, by disease
or injury cause, 2012
Intentional
injuries
8.7%
Neonatal
conditions
0.1%
Unintentional
injuries
17.1%
Cancers
12.5%
Infectious
diseases
8.0%
Gastrointestinal
diseases
16.2%
Neuropsychiatric
disorders
4.0%
Cardiovascular
diseases and
diabetes
33.4%
About 5% of the global population between the

ages of 15 and 64 used illicit drugs in 2013.
It is estimated that in 2013, some 27 million
people in the world suffered from drug use
disorders. Almost half of them (12.2 million)
injected drugs, an estimated 1.65 million of
whom were living with HIV.2
Substance use disorders, primarily alcohol use
disorders, constitute a significant disease burden
in most WHO regions with the exception of the
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region where
alcohol consumption is very limited. Available
data indicate that treatment coverage for alcohol
and drug use disorders is inadequate (Fig A.11.2),
though further work is needed to improve the
measurement of such coverage.
64
Figure A.11.2.
Treatment coverage for substance dependence based on assessment by national focal points4
High (more than 40%)
Substantial (2140%)
Limited (1120%)
Very limited (110%)
Close to none (around 0%)
Unknown
100
90
80
Percentage of countries
SITUATION
41.7
43.2
44.9
4.8
3.4
5.3
16.3
8.1
15.2
8.2
14.0
8.8
8.8
52.9
70
60
50
40
30
20
19.9
13.7
10
0
7.5
11.0
Cannabis
dependence
(N=146)
7.4
9.3
8.8
9.9
Cocaine
dependence
(N=136)
Alcohol
dependence
(N=150)
18.4
Opioid
dependence
(N=146)
18.5
EQUITY
Key cost-effective policy options for reducing

the harmful use of alcohol include public
health oriented pricing policies, restricting the
availability of alcoholic beverages, comprehensive
restrictions or bans on alcohol advertising and
marketing, anti-drink-driving policies and
effective health services responses. The effective
implementation of alcohol-control measures
requires: (a) commitment and appropriate
infrastructure in governments; (b) technical
capacity to create, enforce and sustain the
necessary policy and legal frameworks; (c)
strengthened international activities regarding the
production and dissemination of knowledge on
trends in alcohol consumption, alcohol-attributable
harm and societal responses; and (d) mobilization
and pooling of available resources to support
global and national actions to reduce the harmful
use of alcohol in identified priority areas.3
Surveys and mortality studies, particularly from

the developed world, suggest that there are
more drinkers, more drinking occasions and
more drinkers with low-risk drinking patterns in
higher socioeconomic groups, while abstainers
are more common in the poorest social groups.
However, people with lower socioeconomic status
may be more vulnerable to the tangible problems
and consequences of alcohol consumption,
as well as of drug use, due to differential
exposure to multiple risk factors, differential
psychosocial support and barriers in access to
quality healthcare.5
With regard to drug use disorders, action will

be based upon strengthening public health
responses to the world drug problem. Such
responses include public health measures to
prevent drug use and reduce vulnerability and
risks, treatment and care for people with drug
use disorders, prevention and management of the
harms associated with drug use, ensuring access
to controlled medicines for medical and scientific
purposes, and appropriate monitoring and
evaluation procedures. Evidence-based treatment,
care and rehabilitation services for people with
drug use disorders are an essential element of
a comprehensive drug policy. A continuum of
treatment services should be available, from
screening and brief interventions through early
diagnosis and formal treatment, to rehabilitation
and social reintegration programmes and mutual
help organizations.
DATA GAPS
Data on alcohol consumption, health
consequences and policy responses are regularly
collected and recorded, though the estimation
of unrecorded alcohol consumption continues to
present challenges for many countries. Improving
data on patterns of drug use and their health
consequences and on treatment coverage for
substance-use disorders will require intensified
international collaboration and the strengthening
of national monitoring systems in many countries.
REFERENCES
Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/
global_alcohol_report/en/, accessed 29 March 2016).
2
World drug report 2015. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime;
2015 (http://www.unodc.org/wdr2015/, accessed 29 March 2016).
3
Global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2010 (http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/
alcstratenglishfinal.pdf?ua=1, accessed 29 March 2016).
4
ATLAS on substance use 2016: Resources for the prevention and
treatment of substance use disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Forthcoming.
5
Equity, social determinants and public health programmes.
March 2016).
6
WHO Global Information System on Alcohol and Health [online database].
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/gho/
data/node.main.GISAH?showonly=GISAH).
1
Figure A.11.3.
Total alcohol per capita (>15 years of age) consumption, in litres of pure alcohol, projected estimates, 20156
Projected estimated
consumption (litres)
<2.5
2.55.4
5.58.4
8.511.9
12.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.11.1.
Total alcohol per capita (>15 years of age) consumption, in litres of pure alcohol, projected estimates, 20156
Table A.11.1. Total alcohol per capita (> 15 years of age) consumption, in litres of pure alcohol, projected estimates, 2015
AFR
Mauritania
Comoros
Niger
AMR
Antigua and Barbuda
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Bahamas
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Jamaica
Peru
Cuba
Haiti
Ecuador
Barbados
Suriname
Colombia
Dominica
Trinidad and Tobago
Mexico
Uruguay
Argentina
Dominican Republic
Panama
Belize
Guyana
Brazil
Chile
Paraguay
Canada
Grenada
Saint Lucia
0.1
0.2
0.3
Senegal 0.5
Algeria 0.6
Guinea 0.7
Mali 1.0
Eritrea 1.4
Madagascar 1.9
Togo 1.9
Mozambique
Benin
Malawi
Gambia
Congo
Kenya
Mauritius
Zambia
Ethiopia
Guinea-Bissau
Chad
Zimbabwe
Liberia
Ghana
Lesotho
Swaziland
Cte d'Ivoire
Seychelles
Cabo Verde
Burkina Faso
Angola
Botswana
Cameroon
Equatorial Guinea
Sierra Leone
Burundi
Rwanda
Uganda
Nigeria
South Africa
Gabon
Namibia
South Sudan
2.0
2.2
2.5
3.2
3.4
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.8
5.2
5.4
6.4
6.4
6.5
6.7
6.8
7.2
7.4
7.6
EUR
3.2
3.5
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.6
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.5
5.8
5.9
6.1
6.5
6.5
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.6
7.6
7.7
8.3
8.3
8.6
9.0
9.1
9.3
9.6
10.3
10.4
10.4
SEAR
7.7
7.7
Bangladesh
0.2
Indonesia
0.6
Myanmar
0.7
Maldives
1.0
Bhutan
1.1
10.5
Timor-Leste
1.2
11.3
Nepal
2.1
11.5
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
4.4
11.8
Sri Lanka
4.5
India
4.6
8.1
8.1
8.2
9.8
10.0
11.8
Thailand
8.3
Azerbaijan
Tajikistan
Turkey
Israel
Kyrgyzstan
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Armenia
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Italy
Albania
Georgia
Iceland
Norway
Malta
Kazakhstan
Austria
Sweden
Andorra
Cyprus
Greece
Netherlands
Denmark
Switzerland
Germany
Latvia
Spain
Belgium
Ireland
Slovenia
Luxembourg
Bulgaria
Montenegro
Poland
France
Croatia
Ukraine
Finland
United Kingdom
Hungary
Portugal
Slovakia
Romania
Serbia
Czech Republic
Russian Federation
Lithuania
Belarus
Republic of Moldova
Estonia
Monaco
San Marino
EMR
2.1
Libya
Kuwait
Pakistan
Saudi Arabia
Yemen
Egypt
Iraq
Somalia
Jordan
Morocco
Djibouti
Oman
Afghanistan
Tunisia
Qatar
Lebanon
Bahrain
Sudan
2.4
2.4
3.1
3.9
4.8
5.0
5.5
5.7
6.1
6.6
6.7
6.9
7.0
7.2
7.5
8.2
8.5
8.7
9.1
9.1
9.3
9.6
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.2
2.4
4.3
WPR
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.8
10.9
10.9
11.2
11.3
11.5
11.5
11.6
11.7
11.8
11.9
12.0
12.4
12.5
12.5
12.9
12.9
14.1
14.5
16.2
17.1
17.4
Brunei Darussalam
Vanuatu
Tuvalu
Solomon Islands
Malaysia
Tonga
Kiribati
Singapore
Nauru
Papua New Guinea
Fiji
Cook Islands
Philippines
Cambodia
Japan
China
Niue
Mongolia
Viet Nam
Republic of Korea
New Zealand
Australia
Marshall Islands
Palau
Samoa
0.8
1.2
1.3
1.6
1.7
2.1
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.5
4.8
5.6
6.1
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
8.7
10.9
11.2
12.6
65
ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES

SDG Target 3.6
By 2020, halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents
Indicator 3.6.1: Death rate due to road traffic injuries
According to the latest WHO estimates, around

1.25 million people died from road traffic injuries
in 2013, with another 2050 million people
sustaining non-fatal injuries as a result of road
traffic collisions or crashes.1 Road traffic injuries
are the ninth leading cause of death globally,
and the leading cause among people age 1529
years. Almost 60% of road traffic deaths occur
among people aged 1544 years.
While the number of registered vehicles increased
by 90% between 2000 and 2013, the increase
in numbers of deaths due to road traffic injuries
was much less dramatic (Fig. A.12.1), suggesting
that interventions to improve global road safety
have had some impact on mortality. Indeed,
79 countries reduced the number of deaths on
their roads between 2010 and 2013, showing
that improvements are possible and that many
more lives could be saved if countries took
further action.
Figure A.12.1.
Trends in road traffic deaths and vehicle numbers in
high-income countries and in LMIC, 20002013
Deaths HIC
Vehicles HIC
Deaths LMIC
Vehicles LMIC
Deaths (thousands), Vehicles (millions)
1200
1000
800
2000
2013
30
-6%
25
0%
20
0%
15
10
-2%
0%
-3%
-32%
5
0
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
investments in road safety strategies. Additionally,

in most LMIC, a much higher proportion of
road users are pedestrians, cyclists and users
of motorized two- or three-wheeled vehicles
compared to high-income countries. Half of
the worlds road traffic deaths occur among
motorcyclists (23%), pedestrians (22%) and
cyclists (4%).
While some countries have recently enacted
laws relating to key risk factors for road traffic
injuries, their enforcement is lacking in the vast
majority of countries. For example, only one
quarter of countries rate their enforcement of
seat-belt laws as good.1
600
400
200
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Over 90% of road traffic deaths occur in LMIC,

which account for 82% of the worlds population,
but only 54% of the worlds registered vehicles.
Several factors are at work, including poor or
poorly implemented regulations, inadequate
road and vehicle quality, a higher proportion of
vulnerable road users and increasing vehicle
numbers. Increasing rates of road traffic deaths
in some regions are partly attributable to the
rapid rate of motorization in many developing
countries that has occurred without concomitant
66
Figure A.12.2.
Trends in road traffic death rates, by WHO region and
globally, 20002013
SITUATION
SDG Target 3.6 aims to halve the global number

of road traffic deaths by 2020. This is much more
ambitious than the target set at the Decade of
Action for Road Safety 20112020, which was
endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly
in 20102 and which aimed to avoid the predicted
increase in current levels. However, if current
trends continue, with a projected 47% increase
in road vehicles by 2030, then global road traffic
deaths will increase. Under a more optimistic
scenario, where increases in vehicles per capita
are associated with fatality rates falling to those
observed in high-income countries over the last
two decades, global deaths would decrease to
around 1 million per year by 2030.
target of reducing deaths to 625 000. There is a

strong evidence base on the types of interventions
and government actions that are effective the
key is to ensure their implementation.3 Key
interventions include enacting and enforcing
comprehensive legislation on key risk factors,
improving road infrastructure (particularly with
regard to the safety of vulnerable road users),
improving vehicle standards and improving
post-crash health care.
EQUITY
Road traffic crashes, injuries and deaths occur
mostly in poorer countries with vulnerable users
pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, as well
as children, the aged and disabled being at
increased risk. Those in the workforce are also
at increased risk, and road injury can impoverish
some families.
DATA GAPS
Information on road injury deaths is available from
death registration systems for 93 countries and
from police and transport authority databases and
surveillance systems for around 180 countries.
There is generally substantial under-reporting
in both data sources for most LMIC. Very few
low-income countries have functioning death
registration systems. Additionally, the lack of
harmonized definitions for road injury deaths,
the use of different data sources and the quality
of reporting systems all contribute to difficulties
in accurately assessing the number of road
injury deaths.
WHO will prioritize the provision of technical
support to countries, capacity-building and
working in partnership over the next 5 years
to help Member States achieve the ambitious
SDG target by 2020.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text, table and figures are taken
from: Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/
road_safety_status/2015/en/, accessed 3 April 2016).
Resolutions and UN Secretary-Generals reports [website]. United Nations

Road Safety Collaboration. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://
www.who.int/roadsafety/about/resolutions/download/en/index.html,
A/RES/68/269. Improving global road safety. Resolution adopted by

the Sixty-eighth United Nations General Assembly, New York, 10 April
2014 (http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/
RES/68/269, accessed 3 April 2016).
Substantial additional efforts will therefore be

required to make progress towards the SDG
Figure A.12.3.
Road traffic mortality rate (per 100 000 population), 2013a
Mortality rate
<10.0
10.019.9
20.024.9
25.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
WHO Member States with a population of less than 90 000 in 2015 who did not participate in the survey for the Global status report on road safety 2015 were not included in the analysis.
Table A.12.1.
Road traffic mortality rate (per 100 000 population), 2013a
TableA.12.1.Road traffic mortality (per 100000 population), 2013

AFR
Seychelles
Mauritius
Nigeria
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
12.2
20.5
22.9
22.9
Botswana
Algeria
Namibia
Chad
Eritrea
Cte d'Ivoire
Swaziland
Mauritania
Zambia
South Africa
Ethiopia
Mali
23.6
Cabo Verde
Ghana
Congo
Niger
Angola
Senegal
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Uganda
Guinea-Bissau
Cameroon
Benin
26.1
South Sudan
Comoros
Lesotho
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Kenya
Gambia
Burkina Faso
Togo
Burundi
Mozambique
Rwanda
Liberia
Malawi
a
AMR
8.6
23.8
23.9
24.1
24.1
24.2
24.2
24.5
24.7
25.1
25.3
25.6
26.2
26.4
26.4
26.9
27.2
27.3
27.3
27.4
27.5
27.6
27.7
27.9
28.0
28.2
28.2
28.4
29.1
29.4
30.0
EUR
Canada
6.0
Antigua and Barbuda

Barbados
6.7
Cuba
7.5
6.7
8.2
Panama
10.0
Jamaica
Mexico
11.5
Chile
Argentina
Bahamas
12.4
Costa Rica
Peru
13.9
Trinidad and Tobago

Haiti
14.1
Dominica
Nicaragua
15.3
Uruguay
Colombia
16.6
10.6
12.3
13.6
13.8
13.9
15.1
15.3
16.8
Guyana
Honduras
Saint Lucia
17.3
Guatemala
Suriname
19.0
Ecuador
Paraguay
20.1
17.4
18.1
19.1
20.7
El Salvador
21.1
Brazil
Belize
23.4
23.2
24.4
29.3
Dominican Republic
45.1
SEAR
Maldives
3.5
Bangladesh
Bhutan
13.6
Indonesia
India
15.3
Timor-Leste
Nepal
16.6
17.4
33.2
Sri Lanka
Myanmar
33.7
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
35.0
Thailand
31.1
31.1
31.3
31.6
32.1
32.4
32.9
15.1
16.6
17.0
20.3
20.8
36.2
Monaco
Sweden
United Kingdom
San Marino
Switzerland
Netherlands
Denmark
Israel
Spain
Norway
Ireland
Germany
Iceland
Finland
France
Malta
Cyprus
Austria
Czech Republic
Italy
Slovenia
Slovakia
Belgium
Estonia
Andorra
Hungary
Serbia
Portugal
Bulgaria
Luxembourg
Romania
Turkey
Greece
Croatia
former
Yugoslav
of ..
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Azerbaijan
Latvia
Poland
Lithuania
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Georgia
Montenegro
Republic of Moldova
Belarus
Albania
Turkmenistan
Armenia
Tajikistan
Russian Federation
Kyrgyzstan
Kazakhstan
EMR
0.0
Bahrain
Egypt
Pakistan
Qatar
2.8
2.9
3.2
3.3
3.4
8.0
10.9
12.8
14.2
15.2
Afghanistan
Kuwait
Iraq
Morocco
Yemen
Lebanon
Sudan
Tunisia
Djibouti
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
4.1
4.3
4.6
4.8
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.4
15.5
18.7
20.0
20.2
20.8
21.5
22.6
24.3
24.4
24.7
25.4
Oman
Somalia
Jordan
Saudi Arabia
Libya
6.1
6.1
6.4
6.6
6.7
7.0
7.6
25.4
26.3
27.4
32.1
73.4
WPR
7.7
7.7
7.8
8.3
8.7
8.7
8.9
9.1
9.2
9.4
10.0
10.0
10.3
10.6
10.6
11.2
11.8
11.9
12.5
13.7

Kiribati
Singapore
Japan
Palau
1.9
Australia
Marshall Islands
Fiji
New Zealand
Tonga
Brunei Darussalam
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Vanuatu
Papua New Guinea
5.4
15.1
2.9
3.6
4.7
4.8
5.7
5.8
6.0
7.6
8.1
Cambodia
China
Solomon Islands
Mongolia
Malaysia
Cook Islands
Viet Nam
17.4
17.7
18.3
18.8
18.9
22.0
24.2
10.5
12.0
14.3
15.8
16.6
16.8
17.4
18.8
19.2
21.0
24.0
24.2
24.5
WHO Member States with a population of less than 90 000 in 2015 who did not participate in the survey for the Global status report on road safety 2015 were not included in the analysis.
67
SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

SDG Target 3.7
By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including for family planning, information and education, and the integration of
reproductive health into national strategies and programmes
Indicator 3.7.1: Proportion of women of reproductive age (aged 1549 years) who have their need for family planning satisfied with modern methods
Indicator 3.7.2: Adolescent birth rate (aged 1014 years; aged 1519 years) per 1000 women in that age group
SITUATION
DATA GAPS
Globally in 2015, 76% of women of reproductive

age who were married or in-union had their
need for family planning with a modern method
met (Fig. A.13.1). While 9 out of 10 women of
reproductive age who were married or in-union
in the WHO Western Pacific Region had their
family planning need satisfied, less than half of
those in the WHO African Region did.1
The level of demand for family planning

satisfied by modern methods is below 75%
in 93 predominantly LMIC with survey data for
20052015. Eighty-five countries with data for
the same period have an ABR of 50 or more per
1000 women aged 1519 years.
Household surveys are the main source of data

on use of contraceptives. Ninety-eight countries
have such data from surveys conducted in
2010 or more recent. Although the majority of
estimates of met need for family planning follow
the standard method of calculation, there can be
differences in the precise definition or method of
calculation of this indicator. Data for adolescent
births among 1519 year-olds for 2010 or more
recent are available from CRVS, censuses or
household surveys from 149 countries. In the
absence of CRVS systems, data on births among
1014 year-olds are limited.
Figure A.13.1.
Need for family planning satisfied with modern
methods among married or in-union women of
reproductive age, by WHO region and globally, 2015
100
Need for family planning satisfied (%)
90
Since high fertility rates are correlated with an

increased lifetime risk of dying from maternal
causes, improvements in sexual and reproductive
health-care services are expected to reduce
maternal mortality, as well as improve the health
of adolescent girls.
80
70
60
50
40
EQUITY
30
20
10
0
Ensuring access to sexual and reproductive

health information and services by all who
need them, including adolescents, is among the
components of the Global Strategy for Womens,
Childrens and Adolescents Health, launched
by the Secretary-General of the United Nations
in September 2015.
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
Among adolescents in particular, access to

contraception is only one part of the picture
determining pregnancy rates. In some settings,
important cultural factors are in play, including
traditions of child marriage. Globally, more than
700 million women alive in 2014 had been
married before their 18th birthday. About 250
million of these had entered into union before
the age of 15.2
Early childbearing poses increased health risks
to adolescent mothers. Maternal causes are a
leading cause of death among girls aged 1519
years globally.3
REFERENCES
Model-based estimates and projections of family planning indicators
2015. New York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and
Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015 (http://www.un.org/en/
development/desa/population/theme/family-planning/cp_model.
shtml, accessed 21 April 2016). Special tabulations were prepared for
estimates by WHO region.
Ending child marriage: progress and prospects. New York: United

Nations Childrens Fund; 2014 (http://www.unicef.org/media/files/
Child_Marriage_Report_7_17_LR..pdf, accessed 3 April 2016).
Health for the worlds adolescents [multimedia online report].

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015(http://www.who.int/
maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/second-decade/en/,
accessed 5 May 2016).
In more than half of the 71 LMIC with data for

20052013, the median met need for family
planning with either modern or traditional methods
was at least 16 percentage points higher among
women with secondary or higher education level
than among those with no education.5
Over the same period, the median ABR of the
poorest quintile was four times higher that of
the richest quintile in 54 LMIC (Fig. A.13.2).5
Girls who become mothers frequently miss out
on education and socioeconomic opportunities.
Thus, high ABRs may contribute to a large gender
gap in education and perpetuate a vicious cycle
of poverty.
World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. DVD Edition. New

York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
Population Division; 2015 (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/
Standard/Fertility/, accessed 13 April 2016). Estimates refer to the
average of two five-year periods, 2010-2015 and 2015-2020.
Health Equity Monitor, Global Health Observatory [online database].

Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/gho/
health_equity/en/), accessed 2 May 2016).
World Fertility Data 2015. New York (NY): United Nations, Department
of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015. (http://www.
un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/fertility/
wfd2015.shtml, accessed 13 April 2016).
World Contraceptive Use 2016. New York (NY): United Nations, Department
of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2016. Forthcoming.
Figure A.13.2.
Adolescent fertility rate in LMIC, by wealth quintile, 20052013a
Globally, the adolescent birth rate (ABR) in 2015

was 44 per 1000 women aged 1519 years.
The ABR in low-income countries (97 per 1000
women aged 1519 years) was five times higher
than in high-income countries (19 per 1000
women aged 1519 years).4
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Adolescent fertility rate (per 1000 women aged 1519 years)
250
200
157
150
123
100
96
75
50
40
Based on the results of DHS in 54 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the
median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
68
Figure A.13.3.
Adolescent birth rate, 200520156,a

(per 1000 women aged 1519 years)
<15.0
15.049.9
50.099.9
100.0199.9
200.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Data refer to the latest available for 20052015.
Table A.13.1.
7,a
Table A.13.1.
Proportion
of married
or in-union
womenage
of reproductive
ageneed
whoforhave
theirplanning
need forsatisfied
family with
planning
satisfied
with20052015
modern methods,
20052015 7,a
Proportion
of married
or in-union
women
of reproductive
who have their
family
modern
methods,
AFR
AMR
Zimbabwe
Swaziland
Algeria
86.0
80.6
77.2
Lesotho
Kenya
Namibia
Malawi
Cabo Verde
Rwanda
Zambia
76.1
75.4
75.1
73.6
73.2
65.0
63.8
Ethiopia
Madagascar
Senegal
Uganda
57.6
50.3
49.6
46.3
45.9
44.7
44.6
Ghana
Mauritius
Niger
Cameroon
Congo
Guinea-Bissau
Sierra Leone
40.8
40.8
40.2
38.5
37.6
37.5
Liberia
Burkina Faso
Gabon
Burundi
Togo
Cte d'Ivoire
Nigeria
37.2
37.1
33.7
32.6
32.2
30.9
28.8

Mozambique
Comoros
Mali
Benin
Gambia
Mauritania
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Chad
Guinea
South Sudan
Angola
Botswana
Seychelles
South Africa
28.7
28.2
27.8
27.3
24.5
23.9
23.8
20.5
19.6
17.5
15.7
15.6
5.6
Brazil
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Paraguay
Nicaragua
Colombia
Jamaica
El Salvador
Mexico
Ecuador
Honduras
Panama
Suriname
Belize
Saint Lucia
Barbados
Guatemala
Peru
Trinidad and Tobago
Guyana
Haiti
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Canada
Chile
Dominica
Grenada
Uruguay
EUR
89.3
89.1
88.4
84.1
84.1
84.0
83.7
83.4
83.0
81.9
81.9
80.7
76.0
75.9
73.2
73.1
72.4
70.0
65.5
62.7
55.1
52.5
44.8
42.8
SEAR
89.2
Thailand
84.6
Bhutan
Indonesia
78.8
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
76.7
Bangladesh
72.5
Sri Lanka
69.4
63.9
India
Nepal
56.0
Maldives
42.7
Timor-Leste
38.3
Myanmar
France
Czech Republic
Kazakhstan
Belarus
Russian Federation
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Moldova
Turkey
Georgia
Tajikistan
Armenia
Montenegro
Serbia
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
former
Yugoslav
of ..
Azerbaijan
Albania
Andorra
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
San Marino
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkmenistan
United Kingdom
Uzbekistan
EMR
95.5
85.7
79.6
74.2
72.4
68.0
62.1
60.4
59.7
52.8
50.8
39.2
34.2
25.1
22.3
21.9
21.5
12.9
Egypt
Morocco
Tunisia
Qatar
Iraq
Jordan
Pakistan
Yemen
Sudan
Libya
Oman
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Djibouti
Kuwait
Lebanon
Saudi Arabia
Somalia
80.0
74.8
73.2
68.9
68.6
59.3
58.0
53.3
47.0
47.0
30.2
29.6
19.1
WPR
Marshall Islands
Viet Nam
Mongolia
Solomon Islands
Cambodia
Philippines
Vanuatu
Tonga
Nauru
Tuvalu
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Kiribati
Australia
Brunei Darussalam
China
Cook Islands
Fiji
Japan
Malaysia
New Zealand
Niue
Palau
Republic of Korea
Singapore
80.5
69.7
68.3
61.3
60.0
56.4
51.5
50.7
47.9
42.5
41.0
40.6
39.4
35.8
The latest available data for 20052015 are shown. Data from 20052009 are shown in pale green.
69
MORTALITY DUE TO AIR POLLUTION

SDG Target 3.9
By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination
Indicator 3.9.1: Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution
SITUATION
DATA GAPS
Globally in 2012, household air pollution

from cooking with unclean fuels or inefficient
technologies caused 4.3 million deaths.1 Ambient
(or outdoor) air pollution (for example, from traffic,
industrial sources, waste burning or residential
fuel combustion) caused 3.0 million deaths during
the same year.2 Jointly, air pollution caused an
estimated 6.5 million deaths, or 11.6% of all
global deaths in 2012, making it the largest
single environmental health risk. Mortality rates
from air pollution varied among WHO regions
(Fig. A.14.1).
Although the proportion of households cooking

with polluting fuels and technologies is decreasing,
their absolute number has remained stable over
the last 30 years due to population growth.
Exposure to ambient air pollution is decreasing
in most high-income countries, but increasing
in many LMIC. As the number of older adults
increases worldwide, more people are at risk
from air pollution.
National estimates of mortality from air pollution

are calculated using country data on the proportion
of households using polluting fuel or technology
combinations, mean levels of particulate matter
in the ambient air, and estimates of deaths by
cause. Data on household fuel use for cooking
are available from household surveys for most
LMIC and there is ongoing work with national
surveying agencies and country statistical offices
to gather data on other household energy end
uses (such as space heating and lighting; see
the section on clean household energy for more
details). Concentrations of particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter of < 10 m or <
2.5 m (PM10 and PM2.5 respectively) are being
measured in 3000 cities around the world and
modelled globally using satellite remote sensing
(see the section on ambient air pollution). Data
on deaths by cause are most limited: useable
death-registration data cover only about one
third of global deaths, mainly in high-income
countries. There is also a need for more studies
on the effectiveness of interventions in reducing
air pollution and improving health, especially
in LMIC.
Figure A.14.1.
Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air
pollution, by WHO region, 2012
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Air pollution is a major risk factor for NCDs in

adults, causing cardiovascular diseases, stroke,
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung
cancer, as well as increasing the risks for acute
respiratory infections. Among children under 5
years of age, household air pollution is estimated
to cause half of all pneumonia deaths. Fig. A.14.2
shows the distribution of deaths attributable to
air pollution by disease type.
Figure A.14.2.
Distribution of deaths attributable to household and
ambient air pollution by disease type, 2012
Lower
respiratory
infections
9%
Stroke
35%
Chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease
17%
As countries develop there will be a pressing

need for the large-scale implementation of
policies and measures that address the main
sources of air pollution, such as improving
access to cleaner household fuels, implementing
clean and efficient city transport systems and
regulating industrial and other emissions, and
for the monitoring of results in terms of air
quality and health. International initiatives,
including the United Nations Secretary-Generals
Sustainable Energy for All, the Global Alliance for
Clean Cookstoves, and the Climate and Clean
Air Coalition, along with numerous civil society
organizations, have been mobilizing efforts and
support for reducing the main sources of air
pollution. International agreements on climate
change, such as the recent COP21 in Paris and
the SDGs can stimulate action on air pollution
reduction and yield further health benefits.
Major obstacles to reducing the levels of mortality
caused by air pollution include: (a) lack of access
to clean fuels and efficient technologies for the
poor, and lack of smart financial incentives for
using clean fuels or substitutes for fossil fuels;
(b)lack of integration of health considerations
into decision-making in sectors such as transport,
waste management and industry, and failure to
harness the considerable benefits and savings
for health that could be achieved by better
engagement with other sectors; (c) lack of
monitoring of air pollution levels, sources and
consequences on public health needed to help
direct action by the health sector and other
sectors to improve health and health equity.
EQUITY
Older adults are at greatest risk from air pollution,
followed by children under 5 years of age. Women
and children are at a particularly high risk of
disease caused by exposure to household air
pollution accounting for 60% of all premature
deaths attributed to such pollution.1
Lung cancer
9%
70
Ischaemic heart
disease
30%
REFERENCES
from: Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health
Organization. (http://www.who.int/gho/en/)
Air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Forthcoming.
Figure A.14.3.
Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, by WHO region, 2012a
Mortality rate
<25
2549
5074
7599
100
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.14.1.
Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (per 100 000 population), 2012a
TableA.14.1.Mortality rate (per 100000 population) attributed to household and ambient air pollution, 2012
AFR
EUR
21.2
Canada
Algeria
Botswana
31.5
12.1
38.1
Ecuador
15.0
Senegal
43.2
Barbados
18.1
South Africa
44.2
Belize
18.6
Gabon
47.0
Costa Rica
18.8
Namibia
47.9
Bahamas
20.3
50.5
20.9
Zimbabwe
52.6
Brazil
21.3
Ethiopia
56.8
Chile
22.4
Kenya
57.1
Suriname
22.7
Cabo Verde
Swaziland
58.2
Uruguay
22.7
62.7
Colombia
23.6
Comoros
63.4
Mexico
24.1
Zambia
64.1
Panama
25.4
Mauritania
64.5
26.2
Mozambique
Rwanda
65.1
Argentina
Trinidad and Tobago
27.9
Dominican Republic
29.4
Peru
32.6
Guatemala
42.5
Guyana
42.7
Jamaica
42.9
El Salvador
44.6
Cuba
50.5
52.0
Honduras
53.2
Paraguay
56.6
Nicaragua
62.3
68.3
Liberia
69.9
Uganda
70.0
Gambia
70.9
Malawi
Lesotho
72.0
Eritrea
75.8
Ghana
80.8
Togo
81.0
Madagascar
Guinea
84.4
74.5
87.9
5.4
Cameroon
89.6
Cte d'Ivoire
89.8
Congo
90.2
Nigeria
Benin
90.4
South Sudan
95.0
SEAR
95.9
Maldives
Burkina Faso
96.4
Bhutan
59.9
Equatorial Guinea
Angola
98.3
Thailand
65.3
104.4
Bangladesh
68.2
Guinea-Bissau
105.2
Indonesia
Burundi
106.0
Timor-Leste
Niger
109.7
Nepal
104.2
Mali
116.0
Sri Lanka
119.4
116.4
Myanmar
127.4
Chad
121.8
India
130.0
Sierra Leone
a
AMR
Mauritius
92.0
142.3
112.6
Haiti
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
20.5
83.9
89.6
234.1
Sweden
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Spain
Israel
Portugal
France
Ireland
Switzerland
Cyprus
Luxembourg
Denmark
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Belgium
Malta
Germany
Austria
Italy
Slovenia
Greece
Turkey
Estonia
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Azerbaijan
Poland
Turkmenistan
Lithuania
Uzbekistan
Croatia
Kazakhstan
Tajikistan
Kyrgyzstan
Belarus
Russian Federation
Republic of Moldova
Latvia
Hungary
Montenegro
Armenia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Serbia
Romania
Ukraine
Albania
Bulgaria
Georgia
EMR
0.4
United Arab Emirates 7.5
6.0
Qatar 9.0
6.4
12.7
Bahrain
11.1
14.7
Oman
13.5
15.8
Kuwait
14.2
16.8
Jordan
21.7
Saudi Arabia
28.1
18.5
Morocco
28.8
19.8
Lebanon
29.7
19.8
30.9
20.3
Iraq
32.2
25.7
Libya
33.2
30.2
35.3
31.1
Djibouti
40.5
32.5
Tunisia
43.7
Egypt
52.1
41.9
Yemen
57.4
45.1
Sudan
64.3
51.0
Pakistan
17.2
17.3
24.0
34.2
35.3
54.2
59.5
66.3
88.8
Afghanistan
112.6
Somalia
116.8
68.0
68.9
72.9
WPR
73.4
83.2
Brunei Darussalam 0.2
89.5
93.3
Australia
0.4
97.6
New Zealand
0.5
99.5
Singapore
20.5
Malaysia
22.4
114.5
Republic of Korea
23.7
115.1
Japan
24.2
123.0
Papua New Guinea
44.3
Solomon Islands
52.9
103.8
110.0
123.5
125.4
Cambodia
71.4
137.2
Fiji
76.9
138.2
Philippines
82.7
139.1
Viet Nam
84.0
128.9
171.4
174.8
223.6
292.3
Mongolia
China
107.6
132.2
163.1
71
MORTALITY DUE TO UNSAFE WATER, UNSAFE SANITATION AND LACK OF HYGIENE

SDG Target 3.9
Indicator 3.9.2: Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (exposure to unsafe WASH services)
SITUATION
Worldwide in 2012, an estimated 871 000 deaths

were caused by contamination of drinkingwater, water bodies and soil, inadequate handwashing facilities, and by practices resulting from
inappropriate or inadequate services.1 Unsafe
water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services
mainly cause deaths from diarrhoeal diseases, but
also from protein-energy malnutrition, intestinal
nematode infections, and schistosomiasis 2
(Fig. A.15.1).
Reducing the burden of disease from inadequate

WASH services requires: (a) improved coverage of
safe drinking-water supply to prevent consumption
of contaminated water and enable personal
hygiene; (b) adequate sanitation in households and
other setting (such as schools and health facilities)
and safe management of faecal waste to reduce
human excreta in the environment; (c)adequate
hygiene practices such as hand-washing after
defecation, or before food preparation and
consumption; and (d) improved access to
health care and proper case management of
diarrhoea. Ensuring the availability and sustainable
management of water and sanitation for all is
covered by SDG 6 (see the sections on drinkingwater services and sanitation). This goal contains
targets addressing all the elements required to
sustainably reduce the health impacts resulting
from inadequate WASH services.
Figure A.15.1.
Major causes of WASH-service-related mortality, 2012
Protein-energy Intestinal nematode
malnutrition infections
Diarrhoeal
diseases
Almost half (45%) of the deaths in 2012 occurred

in the WHO African Region (Figure A.15.2),
where 13% of the global population lived. This
resulted in a disproportionately high burden
to the Region, with a mortality rate of 43 per
100 000 population attributed to unsafe WASH
services more than triple the 2012 global rate
of 12 per 100 000 population.
Figure A.15.2.
Number of deaths attributed to unsafe WASH services,
by WHO region, 2012
400
Deaths (thousands)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
72
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EMR
EUR
WPR
Major obstacles to reducing mortality resulting

from inadequate WASH services and related
lack of hygiene include: (a) natural threats
such as water scarcity due to climate change;
(b) inappropriate governance, institutional
arrangements and financing in water supply
and sanitation; (c)rapid expansion of unplanned
settlements; (d) depletion of water resources
through pollution and environmental degradation;
and (e) lack of access to health-care services.
EQUITY
Within countries, inequalities in mortality rates
exist between urban and rural areas, between
slums and formal settlements, and between highsocioeconomic status and low-socioeconomic
status population groups.3,4
DATA GAPS
National estimates of mortality from inadequate
WASH services are based on the prevalence of
use of inadequate water and sanitation, along
with hand-washing prevalence, in combination
with relevant health statistics and epidemiological
data. Data on access to water and sanitation are
available from household surveys for most LMIC.
Data on hand-washing prevalence observations
are available for only about 20 countries and
require additional assessments, but show
consistently low hand-washing prevalences. For
many LMIC only limited quality data are available
on causes of death. Extensive modelling is thus

required to obtain estimates for this SDG indicator.
Improved evidence of the links between water and
sanitation service levels and hygiene practices
and health, and the systematic assessment of
adequate indicators, would increase the accuracy
of current estimates.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in text, table and figures are
taken from: Preventing disease through healthy environments. A
global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks.
3 April 2016) and from: Preventing diarrhoea through better water,
sanitation and hygiene. Exposures and impacts in low- and middleincome countries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015 (http://
pdf?ua=1&ua=1, accessed 19 April 2016).
Although most schistosomiasis deaths may be attributed to unsafe

WASH services, the proportion attributed has not been quantified using
epidemiological methods.
Stevens GA, Dias RH, Ezzati M. The effects of 3 environmental risks on

mortality disparities across Mexican communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 2008;105(44):168605 (http://www.pnas.org/content/105/44/16860.
full, accessed 3 April 2016).
Gakidou E, Oza S, Vidal Fuertes C, Li AY, Lee DK, Sousa A et al. Improving
child survival through environmental and nutritional interventions.
The importance of targeting interventions toward the poor. JAMA.
2007;298(16):187687 (http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.
aspx?articleid=209285, accessed 3 April 2016).
Figure A.15.3.
Mortality rate attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services (per 100 000 population), 2012a
Mortality rate
<5
514
1539
4069
70
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.15.1.
Mortality rate attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services (per 100 000 population), 2012a
Table A.15.1. Mortality rate (per 100 000 population) attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services, 2012
AFR
EUR
0.9
Bahamas
0.1
Algeria
Cabo Verde
2.4
Barbados
0.2
4.5
Chile
0.2
Botswana
9.2
Trinidad and Tobago
0.2
Namibia
9.8
Uruguay
0.3
12.1
Canada
0.6
South Africa
Rwanda
Ghana
19.4
0.6
20.0
Argentina
0.7
Gambia
21.0
Costa Rica
0.7
Swaziland
22.7
Cuba
0.7
Zambia
24.5
Colombia
0.8
Liberia
Senegal
25.0
Suriname
0.8
25.4
Brazil
1.1
Malawi
26.1
Mexico
1.1
Madagascar
26.6
Belize
1.2
Zimbabwe
27.1
1.3

Gabon
27.6
Peru
1.3
1.8
Lesotho
28.3
Ecuador
Dominican Republic
1.9
Jamaica
1.9
Paraguay
2.3
El Salvador
2.4
Nicaragua
3.5
28.1
Comoros
28.6
Mauritania
28.9
Ethiopia
Uganda
29.6
Benin
32.2
Kenya
32.5
Eritrea
34.9
Mozambique
Togo
37.9
30.3
37.9
Guinea
40.7
Burkina Faso
40.9
Cameroon
40.9
Cte d'Ivoire
Congo
44.1
Guinea-Bissau
48.9
South Sudan
50.0
Nigeria
50.9
Equatorial Guinea
Mali
AMR
Mauritius
Guyana
4.0
Panama
4.1
7.0
Honduras
7.9
Guatemala
9.2
28.5
Haiti
48.1
SEAR
Maldives 0.6
57.3
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
1.4
Thailand
1.9
Sri Lanka
3.3
Burundi
68.4
Indonesia
3.6
Niger
69.2
Bangladesh
6.0
Bhutan
7.1
61.1
Sierra Leone
90.4
Chad
92.8
Timor-Leste
10.3
Myanmar
10.4
107.8
Nepal
12.9
Angola
111.2
India
102.3
27.4
Hungary
Bulgaria
Croatia
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Latvia
Lithuania
Malta
Montenegro
Poland
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Austria
Italy
Luxembourg
Portugal
Albania
Belarus
Finland
Georgia
Netherlands
Russian Federation
Cyprus
Ireland
Serbia
Spain
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Belgium
Czech Republic
France
Israel
Norway
Denmark
Turkey
Germany
Armenia
Sweden
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Azerbaijan
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Tajikistan
EMR
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Kuwait <0.1
Qatar <0.1
United Arab Emirates <0.1
<0.1
Bahrain
0.1
<0.1
Saudi Arabia
0.2
<0.1
Lebanon
0.4
Oman
0.4
<0.1
Libya
0.6
<0.1
Tunisia
0.8
<0.1
0.9
Jordan
1.0
<0.1
Egypt
1.6
<0.1
1.8
<0.1
Morocco
3.4
Iraq
3.9
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
13.0
Yemen
0.1
Pakistan
20.7
0.2
Djibouti
26.4
0.2
Afghanistan
34.6
Sudan
34.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
Somalia
98.8
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
WPR
Australia
<0.1
Brunei Darussalam <0.1
0.4
Japan
0.1
0.5
Singapore
0.1
Republic of Korea
0.2
0.5
China
0.4
0.5
Malaysia
0.4
0.8
New Zealand
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.9
Viet Nam 2.0
1.1
Fiji
3.0
1.1
Mongolia
3.1
1.2
Philippines
5.1
1.8
Cambodia
5.6
2.1
Solomon Islands
10.4
5.8
Papua New Guinea
12.4
7.5
13.9
2.4
73
MORTALITY DUE TO UNINTENTIONAL POISONING

SDG Target 3.9
Indicator 3.9.3: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning
SITUATION
Worldwide in 2012, an estimated 193 000 deaths
were caused by unintentional poisonings.1 In
LMIC, pesticides, kerosene, household chemicals,
carbon monoxide and drugs are common
causes of poisoning. In high-income countries,
substances involved mainly include drugs, carbon
monoxide, and personal care and cleaning
products in the home. Poisoning can also arise
from environmental contamination, for example
mass lead poisoning resulting from informal
recycling or gold extraction, or from industrial
emissions. Occupational exposures to heavy
metals, pesticides, solvents, paints, cleaning
substances, various vapours and gases, and
other chemicals used in industrial production
may also occur.2

Globally, the mortality rate attributed to
unintentional poisonings decreased by 34%
between 2000 and 2012. The most important
decreases during that period (of approximately
50%) were achieved in the WHO South-East
Asia Region and the WHO European Region
(Fig. A.16.1).
Figure A.16.1.
Mortality rate from unintentional poisonings, by WHO
region, 2000 and 2012
2000
...the sound management of chemicals

throughout their life cycle so that, by
2020, chemicals are used and produced
in ways that lead to the minimization of
significant adverse effects on human
health and the environment.
At its Fourth session in 2015, the Conference
endorsed the overall orientation and guidance
provided as a voluntary tool that will assist in
the prioritization of efforts for achieving the
above goal.3
Major obstacles to reducing the rates of mortality
due to unintentional poisonings include the
large number of chemicals available on the
market not all of which have been tested
for toxicity or are covered by comprehensive
regulations. The perceived lack of effective safer
alternatives and lack of incentives to use them
are further obstacles to reducing exposure to
toxic chemicals. Many countries still lack the
necessary regulatory and policy frameworks and
institutional capacities needed to assess and
prevent the negative health impacts of chemicals.
More than half of WHO Member States do not
have a poisons-information centre. A greater
emphasis on prevention would also contribute
to the more-effective management of chemicals
and a reduction in poisonings.
EQUITY
Globally, the highest mortality rates from

unintentional poisonings occur in children under
5 years of age and adults over 55 years. The
mortality rate is also 50% higher in men than in
women (Fig. A.16.2). Higher levels of exposure
in men may occur in occupational settings.
4
3
2
1
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Safe storage, labelling and restricting access

to hazardous chemicals and drugs, adequate
information about product hazards, personal
protection and limiting the use of medications to
doses prescribed by health-care professionals all
contribute to preventing unintentional poisonings.
Other approaches include ensuring the availability
and use of less-toxic and less-hazardous
alternatives where possible, and, in occupational
settings, the implementation of engineering
controls and training.
Figure A.16.2.
Global mortality rate from unintentional poisonings,
by sex, 2012
Male
Female
3.5
2012
The Strategic Approach to International Chemicals

Management was adopted by the International
Conference on Chemicals Management in 2006,
with its overall objective being to achieve:
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
74
DATA GAPS
National estimates of mortality due to unintentional
poisonings are primarily derived from data
collected in CRVS systems. In countries with
high-quality CRVS systems, accurate registration
of deaths from unintentional poisonings, and in
particular distinguishing these from intentional
poisonings, remains a challenge. Nevertheless,
only around one third of deaths worldwide are
recorded in civil registry systems with cause-ofdeath information based on medical certification.
Alternative data sources may be used. As a first
step, countries may set up sample registration
systems using verbal autopsy to determine
cause of death.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all mortality statistics shown in the text, table and
Preventing disease through healthy environments. A global

assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks.
3 April 2016).
International Conference on Chemicals Management. Fourth session.

Meeting document SAICM/ICCM.4/6 (http://www.saicm.org/index.
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=525&Itemid=700,
Figure A.16.3.
Mortality rate from unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population), 2012a
Mortality rate
<1
23
45
6
a
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.16.1.
Mortality rate from unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population), 2012a
Table A.16.1. Mortality rate from unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population), 2012
AFR
AMR
EUR
Cabo Verde
0.3
Brazil
0.1
Mauritius
Algeria
0.3
Colombia
0.3
1.1
Costa Rica
0.3
Namibia
1.1
Honduras
0.3
Senegal
1.5
Paraguay
0.3
Gabon
1.8
Trinidad and Tobago
0.3
Gambia
Mauritania
1.8
Belize
0.5
1.8
Dominican Republic
0.5
Liberia
1.9
El Salvador
0.5
Benin
2.2
Nicaragua
0.5
Ghana
2.2
Chile
0.6
Lesotho
Nigeria
2.2
Panama
0.6
2.4
Suriname
0.6
South Africa
2.5
0.6
Swaziland
2.5
Ecuador
0.7
Botswana
2.7
0.7
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
2.7
Guyana
Peru
0.7
Congo
Barbados
0.8
2.8
2.8
Mexico
0.8
Togo
Guinea-Bissau
Argentina
0.9
3.0
3.1
Bahamas
0.9
Guinea
Cte d'Ivoire
Uruguay
0.9
Malawi
3.3
2.7
3.2
Rwanda
3.3
Comoros
3.5
Ethiopia
Kenya
3.5
Niger
4.0
3.8
Madagascar
4.1
Jamaica
1.0
Guatemala
1.2
Cuba
1.3
1.7
Haiti
1.9
Canada
2.0
4.3
Mali
4.1
Zimbabwe
Chad
4.4
4.7
SEAR
Eritrea
4.7
Thailand
Equatorial Guinea
5.0
Maldives 0.3
Uganda
Angola
5.1
Sri Lanka
0.4
5.5
Timor-Leste
0.8
Sierra Leone
5.7
Indonesia
1.1
6.2
6.6
South Sudan
Burundi
6.9
4.6
Myanmar
0.1
1.1
India
3.2
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
3.3
Bangladesh
5.7
Zambia
7.9
Nepal
5.9
Mozambique
8.1
Bhutan
7.0
8.1
Israel
Netherlands
Germany
Malta
Armenia
Austria
Portugal
Cyprus
Iceland
Italy
Serbia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Slovakia
Turkey
Estonia
Greece
Azerbaijan
Croatia
Georgia
Hungary
Luxembourg
Spain
Montenegro
Norway
Slovenia
Sweden
United Kingdom
Belgium
Czech Republic
Denmark
Uzbekistan
Bulgaria
Switzerland
Albania
Finland
Ireland
Poland
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
France
Romania
Latvia
Kyrgyzstan
Belarus
Republic of Moldova
Lithuania
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
EMR
0.1
Bahrain
0.4
Oman
0.4
0.3
Kuwait
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
Qatar
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Iraq
0.7
0.6
Lebanon
0.7
0.6
Saudi Arabia
0.8
0.6
Morocco
1.1
0.7
Jordan
1.2
0.8
Tunisia
1.2
0.8
Libya
1.4
0.9
Egypt
2.1
0.9
2.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
Djibouti
3.7
0.9
Yemen
4.2
0.9
Pakistan
5.4
1.0
Sudan
5.6
0.9
1.0
7.4
Afghanistan
1.0
Somalia
1.0
10.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
WPR
1.1
1.1
1.2
Philippines
0.2
1.2
Singapore
0.2
1.4
New Zealand
0.4
1.5
Republic of Korea
0.6
Malaysia
0.7
1.7
Japan
0.8
1.9
Viet Nam
0.9
2.0
Cambodia
1.0
1.0
Brunei Darussalam
1.2
4.4
Australia
1.3
5.0
China
5.3
Mongolia
1.5
1.7
2.3
2.4
2.7
5.7
6.3
6.4
7.5
2.9
3.8
Fiji
4.7
Solomon Islands
5.2
Papua New Guinea
11.9
75
TOBACCO USE
SDG Target 3.a
Strengthen the implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in all countries, as appropriate
Indicator 3.a.1: Age-standardized prevalence of current tobacco use among persons aged 15 years and older
SITUATION
In 2015, over 1.1 billion people smoked tobacco.1
Far more males than females currently smoke
tobacco (Fig. A.17.1). Even though the prevalence
of tobacco smoking is declining worldwide and
in many countries, it appears to be increasing
in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region and
WHO African Region. In other regions, such as
the WHO European Region and WHO Western
Pacific Region, tobacco smoking is still prevalent
and efforts must be intensified to reduce it.
Number (millions)
Bangladesh 2009
China 2010
Egypt 2009
India 2009-10
Mexico 2009
Philippines 2009
Poland 2009-10
Russian Federation 2009
Thailand 2009
Turkey 2008
Figure A.17.1.
Number of current tobacco smokers, by sex and
WHO region, 2015
Female
Figure A.17.2.
Prevalence of current tobacco use among people aged 15 years and above, by wealth quintile in 13 countries3
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Ukraine 2010
Uruguay 2009
Viet Nam 2010
0
Male
10
20
30
400
350
challenge tobacco-control measures in countries.

The key to success of global implementation
of the WHO FCTC is its integration in broader
health and development agendas, including to
ensure that sufficient and sustained resources
are available for its implementation. Over the past
ten years the Convention evolved significantly and
has provided an example of how an international
legal regime can become an appropriate response
to the effects of globalization on health. More
than 80% of Parties have either adopted new
or strengthened their existing tobacco control
laws and regulations. Although implementation
is uneven across articles to the Convention,
progress continues to be made (Fig. A.17.3).
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control (WHO FCTC), the United Nations
Tobacco Control Treaty ratified by 180 Parties
representing 90% of the global population is
the first public health treaty negotiated under
the auspices of WHO and is designed to counter
the tobacco epidemic. The WHO FCTC requires
its Parties to implement policies designed to
reduce both the demand for tobacco products
and their supply, using an intersectoral approach
to ensure buy-in from different sectors, including
civil society. These policies include, among
others: (a) raising taxes on tobacco; (b) banning
smoking in public places; (c) use of pictorial health
warnings; (d) bans on tobacco advertising; (e)
controlling the illicit trade in tobacco products; (f)
identifying alternative crops to tobacco farming;
(g) preventing sales to and by minors; and (h)
collecting and sharing data on tobacco use and
prevention efforts.
The main obstacle to implementation of the
WHO FCTC is industry interference. For example,
the tobacco industry is fiercely challenging the
implementation of pictorial health warnings and
plain packaging in multiple countries, arguing
that the packaging regulations impinge upon
trademark and intellectual property rights.
International trade and investment agreements
are also being used by the tobacco industry to
76
Quintile 2
40
50
Prevalence (%)
Quintile 3
EQUITY
Analyses of the association between smoking
prevalence and socioeconomic status within
countries using multi-country surveys have found
that current smoking is often more prevalent
in lower socioeconomic strata (Fig. A.17.2),
regardless of the country income level, gender,
age group or other stratifier considered.2
DATA GAPS
Quintile 4
60
70
80
90
100
146 Member States. In 20 countries, no data

are available since 2005.
The global progress reports on the implementation
of the WHO FCTC are based on the information
obtained from each Party to the Convention,
who is obligated to report on its implementation
every two years.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in text, table and figures are taken from:
Data on current tobacco smoking derived from: WHO global report on trends
in tobacco smoking 20002025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
(http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/156262/1/9789241564922_
eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 4 April 2016).
(a) Inequalities in young peoples health: HBSC international report from

the 2005/2006 Survey. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional
Office for Europe; 2008 (http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/
pdf_file/0005/53852/E91416.pdf?ua=1, accessed 4 April 2016); (b)
Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, Tursan dEspaignet E, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic
inequality in smoking in low-income and middle-income countries:
Results from the World Health Survey. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42843; (c)
Sreeramareddy CT, Pradhan PM, Sin S. Prevalence, distribution, and social
determinants of tobacco use in 30 sub-Saharan African countries. BMC
Med. 2014;12(1):1.
Palipudi KM, Gupta PC, Sinha DN, Andes LJ, Asma S, McAfee T. Social
determinants of health and tobacco use in thirteen low and middle
income countries: evidence from Global Adult Tobacco Survey. PLOS one.
2012;7(3):e33466.
Global Adult Tobacco Survey Collaborative Group. Tobacco questions for

surveys: a subset of key questions from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey
(GATS). Second edition. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention; 2011 (http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/tqs/en/,
Nationally representative household surveys

commonly include questions about tobacco use.
However, there are differences in the questions
asked, including differences in the type of
tobacco use assessed (for example, cigarette
smoking, any tobacco smoking or any tobacco
use) and frequency of use (for example, daily
use or current use). The prevalence estimates
presented in this report were calculated using
a statistical model that adjusts the survey data
to obtain comparable estimates. To minimize
this issue in the future, WHO has developed
a standard set of tobacco survey questions
which may be used in any survey.4 The WHO
database on tobacco contains recent data (since
2010) from nationally representative surveys for
2016 Global progress report on implementation of the WHO FCTC.

Forthcoming.
Figure A.17.3.
Average implementation rate of substantive WHO FCTC articles (%), 201420165
2014
90
2016
70
60
50
40
30
b
20
Table A.17.1.
TableA.17.1. Age-standardized prevalence of tobacco smoking among persons 15 years and older, by sex, 2015
Age-standardized prevalence of tobacco smoking among persons 15 years and older, by sex, 2015a
Males
Article 17: Alternative livelihoods
Article 19: Liability
Article 22: International cooperation
Article 18: Protecting the environment
Article 13: Advertising, promotion and

sponsorship
Article 9: Content regulation
Article 20: Research, surveillance
Article 14: Tobacco cessation
Article 10: Disclosure of content
Article 15: Illicit trade
Article 6: Taxation
Article 5: General obligations
Article 12: Education and communication
Article 16: Sales to and by minors
Article 11: Packaging and labelling
10
Article 8: Smoke free environments
Average implementation rate (%)
80
Females
AFR
AMR
EUR
EMR
Ethiopia
Ghana
Uganda
Nigeria
Benin
Niger
Swaziland
Cabo Verde
Comoros
Senegal
Kenya
Malawi
Zambia
Liberia
Zimbabwe
Mozambique
South Africa
Burkina Faso
Mali
Namibia
Mauritius
Seychelles
Congo
Cameroon
Mauritania
Lesotho
Sierra Leone
Algeria
Angola
Botswana
Burundi
Chad
Cte d'Ivoire
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Gabon
Gambia
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Madagascar
Rwanda
South Sudan
Togo
Panama
Barbados
Ecuador
Colombia
Canada
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Brazil
United States of Americabb
Mexico
Peru
Haiti
Uruguay
Paraguay
Argentina
Jamaica
Honduras
Chile
Cuba
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Belize
Dominica
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Nicaragua
Saint Lucia
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Iceland
Denmark
United Kingdombb
Sweden
Slovenia
Irelandbb
Norway
Finland
Uzbekistan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Belgium
Switzerland
Italy
Malta
France
Spain
Portugal
Hungary
Germany
Poland
Romania
Andorra
Czech Republic
Lithuania
Croatia
Turkey
Slovakia
Estonia
Israel
Bulgaria
Serbia
Kazakhstan
Republic of Moldova
Belarus
Azerbaijan
Latvia
Ukraine
Kyrgyzstan
Albania
Armenia
Greece
Georgia
Russian Federation
Austria
Cyprus
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
Tajikistan
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Turkmenistan
Oman
Saudi Arabia
Pakistan
Lebanon
Morocco
Bahrain
Egypt
Jordan
Afghanistan
Djibouti
Iraq
Kuwait
Libya
Qatar
Somalia
Sudan
Tunisia
Yemen
SEAR
India
Sri Lanka
Myanmar
Nepal
Bangladesh
Thailand
Indonesia
Bhutan
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
Maldives
Timor-Leste
WPR
Australia
New Zealand
Niue
Singapore
Brunei Darussalam
Japanbbb
Fiji
Samoa
Malaysia
Nauru
Philippines
Cambodia
Viet Nam
Tonga
China
Mongolia
Republic of Koreabb
Kiribati
Cook Islands
Marshall Islands
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Solomon Islands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Darker green bars represent the prevalence among males. Pale green bars represent the prevalence among females.
Cigarette use only.
77
ESSENTIAL MEDICINES AND VACCINES

SDG Target 3.b
Support the research and development of vaccines and medicines for the communicable and noncommunicable diseases that primarily affect developing countries,
provide access to affordable essential medicines and vaccines, in accordance with the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, which affirms
the right of developing countries to use to the full the provisions in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights regarding flexibilities to
protect public health, and, in particular, provide access to medicines for all
Indicator 3.b.1: Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis
Indicator 3.b.2: Total net official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors1
Despite improvements in recent decades, the

availability of essential medicines at public health
facilities is often poor. Recent data show that, for
selected essential medicines, median availability
was only 60% and 56% in the public sector
of low-income and middle-income countries
respectively. Availability may be better in the
private sector but is still suboptimal at 66%
and 67% respectively.2 In addition, median
availability data hide significant disparities and
inequities in both access and affordability within
a region or within a country. Access to medicines
for chronic conditions and NCDs is even worse
than that for acute conditions. In nine low-income
countries with recent facility surveys, median
availability was 56% for 12 antibiotics and 35%
for 17 NCD essential medicines.3
Even when available, medical products are not
necessarily affordable to patients. Studies have
shown that in some LMIC where patients have to
pay for medicines in the public sector, the prices
of some generic medicines are on average 2.9
times higher than international reference prices,
and 4.6 times in private facilities.2 Treatments
for NCD in particular are simply beyond reach
in many countries.
The availability of medical devices is also a critical
issue. Most countries do not have the capacity
to regulate those products. As a consequence,
national procurement and reimbursement
mechanisms for medical devices are often
weak or hazardous. Only 43% of countries have
a national list of approved medical devices for
procurement or reimbursement, while 41% do
not have national standards or recommended
lists of medical devices for different types of
health-care facilities or specific procedures.4
The lack of research and development (R&D)
for health issues primarily affecting populations
in developing countries was first brought into
the international spotlight 25 years ago, by the
Commission on Health Research for Development.
The Commission showed that less than 10% of
global health research expenditure was spent on
the health issues of developing countries which
at that time represented more than 90% of the
global burden of preventable mortality (referred
to as the 10/90 gap).5 Recent studies have
shown that such gaps remain, with only 1% of
all health R&D investments in 2010 allocated
to health issues primarily affecting developing
countries. Such health issues were addressed
in less than 2% of all clinical trials in 2012
and were targeted by only 1% of 336 newly
78
approved chemical entities between 2000 and

2011.6,7 Such gaps are partially attributable to
the lack of research capacity in low-income
countries which accounted for: (a) 0.1% of all
health research expenditures in 2010; (b) less
than 1% of all clinical trial participants in 2012;
and (c) less than 1% of all biomedical research
publications authored in 2011.6
These indicators sketch a clear picture of the gap
in health R&D for health issues that primarily affect
populations in developing countries. At present,
little data are available for the indicators specified
under the relevant health-related SDGs. However,
a general picture can be obtained by considering
the amount and proportion of public, private and
not-for-profit R&D investments that target health
issues that primarily affect developing countries.
In 2014, US$ 3.4 billion in public, private and
not-for-profit R&D investments were allocated
to medical product development addressing
health issues that primarily affect developing
countries8 representing approximately 0.004%
of the global gross domestic product (GDP) that
year.9 In 2014, 64% of all R&D investments in
these health issues were made by the public
sector, 20% by the not-for-profit sector and
16% by the private sector.10

A major obstacle to ensuring access to qualityassured medical products is the lack of capacity
to regulate the domestic market. Promoting the
exchange of information and looking at greater
convergence and harmonization of regulatory
systems will create favourable conditions for
accelerating the availability of safe and effective
medicines and medical products. Countries
should also maintain an essential medicines list.
Figure A.18.1.
Proportion of countries with an available essential
medicines list, by WHO region, 201111
100
90
80
70
Proportion (%)
SITUATION
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
New medical products, such as biotherapeutic

products, anti-cancer medicines, new vaccines
and NCD medicines, are becoming increasingly
more expensive. WHO promotes collaboration
with key partners (such as WTO and WIPO) to
support Member States in the areas of intellectual
property management, innovation and access
to medical products by increasing transparency
on the patenting of essential medicines and
addressing patent barriers to access.
Addressing antimicrobial resistance and promoting
the responsible use of medicines are also crucial
activities. The Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial
Resistance adopted in 2015 pointed out that
equitable access to, and appropriate use of,
existing and new antimicrobial medicines are
needed to preserve the ability to treat serious
infections and diseases.12
The WHA has adopted multiple resolutions that
have laid out the key strategies closely related
to SDG Target 3.b. For example, continued
support is essential for improving access to
interventions for priority diseases. Understanding
global and national demand, especially for
some vulnerable products that are in short
supply globally, is a critical issue, especially
given the experience of market shaping by
global organizations. Using this experience to
develop a systematic approach to assessing
demand will be important in retaining these
products on the global market and preventing
shortages and stock outs.
In its 2012 report, the WHO Consultative Expert
Working Group on Research and Development:
Financing and Coordination proposed a target
amount equal to 0.01% of GDP for government
funding in R&D for health issues that primarily
affect developing countries. 13 According to
data derived from Policy Cures 2014 G-FINDER
survey14, no country has achieved this target,
with one country, the United States of America,
close to reaching this level. Total spending on
health R&D in general is much larger: a dozen
countries spent more than 0.4% of GDP, half
of them spent more than 0.6% (Figure A.18.2).
The WHO Global Observatory on Health R&D15
is being established to obtain more detailed
information to better assess the investments
in health R&D for health issues that primarily
affect developing countries. This should improve
priority setting for R&D and eventually lead to
significant improvements in affordable access to
new interventions based on needs, including for
diseases with a high potential to cause epidemics.
Figure A.18.2.
Gross domestic expenditure on health R&D as percentage of GDP, 20092013a
EQUITY
Switzerland
Iceland
Denmark
Belgium
Sweden
Slovenia
Israel
Republic of Korea
Japan
United Kingdom
Canada
Germany
Australia
France
Hungary
Austria
Finland
Netherlands
Singapore
Norway
Bulgaria
Ireland
Spain
Malta
Portugal
Italy
Croatia
Greece
Kenya
Estonia
Czech Republic
New Zealand
Turkey
South Africa
Luxembourg
Qatar
India
Poland
Latvia
Mozambique
Serbia
Uganda
Slovakia
Argentina
Botswana
Thailand
Romania
Chile
Cyprus
Ethiopia
Malaysia
Russian Federation
Republic of Moldova
Uruguay
Lithuania
Ukraine
Belarus
Costa Rica
Montenegro
Mongolia
Togo
Paraguay
Colombia
Bahrain
Kyrgyzstan
Guatemala
Azerbaijan
Kazakhstan
Ecuador
Panama
Sri Lanka
El Salvador
Mauritius
Tajikistan
Madagascar
Oman
Armenia
Iraq
Trinidad and Tobago
l
0%
People who can afford private facilities may have

better access than people who have to rely on
public services in countries where public services
face major challenges. There are also specific
inequalities for example, major efforts are
needed to improve and increase the availability
of paediatric medicines. In addition to more
investment in the development of paediatric
formulations, there is also a need to ensure
that existing medicines for children are made
available in all countries.
DATA GAPS
Most countries do not have a regular reliable
system for monitoring access to affordable
medicines and vaccines. Monitoring access
to essential medicines and vaccines requires
regular facility surveys or a routine and wellfunctioning reporting system that includes a
quality control component. All countries need
to develop systems that routinely monitor the
availability, quality and prices of medicines.
The Global Observatory on Health R&D15 is a new
platform that collates information on health R&D
from multiple sources to help identify gaps and
opportunities for health R&D and to help define
priorities for new R&D investments based on
public health needs. However, the data gaps
remain large with data on funding for health
R&D not available for many countries and not
for all of the health issues that primarily affect
developing countries.
REFERENCES
l
0.2%
l
0.4%
l
0.6%
l
0.8%
l
1.0%
l
1.2%
l
1.4%
The data shown correspond to the latest year reported by country within the period 20092013. Source: OECD, Eurostat, Ibero-American and InterAmerican Network on Science and Technology Indicators, UNESCO.
The section below also discusses related indicator 9.5.1 on research and
development expenditure as a proportion of GDP.
2
Millennium Development Goal 8: taking stock of the global partnership
for development. MDG Gap Task Force Report 2015. New York (NY):
United Nations; 2015.
3
Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2015 (http://www.who.int/gho/publications/mdgs-sdgs/en/, accessed
9 April 2016).
4
Baseline country survey on medical devices, 2014 update. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2016 (http://www.who.int/gho/health_technologies/
medical_devices/en/, accessed 29 April 2016).
5
Commission on Health Research for Development. Health research:
essential link to equity in development. New York: Oxford University
Press; 1990.
6
Rttingen J-A, Regmi S, Eide M et al. Mapping available health R&D data:
whats there, whats missing and what role for a Global Observatory.
Lancet. 2013;382:1286307.
7
Pedrique B, Strub-Wourgaft N, Some C et al. The drug and vaccine
landscape for neglected diseases (2000-11): a systematic assessment.
Lancet Global Health. 2013;1:e3719.
8
Moran M, Chapman N, Abela-Oversteegen L et al. Neglected disease
research and development: the ebola effect. Policy Cures. 2015.
9
The World Bank. Data, GDP ranking. http://data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/GDP-ranking-table (accessed 22 Feb 2016).
10
G-FINDER Public Search Tool(https://gfinder.policycures.org/
PublicSearchTool/, accessed 6 May 2016).
11
WHO. Pharmaceutical Sector Country Profiles Global Report, 2012. (http://
www.who.int/medicines/areas/policy/monitoring/en/, accessed 1 May
2016).
12
Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
11 April 2016).
13
Research and development to meet health needs in developing
countries: strengthening global financing and coordination. Report of
the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development:
Financing and Coordination. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
14
G-FINDER. Sydney: Policy Cures (http://policycures.org/gfinder.html,
15
WHO Global Observatory on Health R&D portal. Geneva: World Health
Organization (http://www.who.int/research-observatory/portal/en/,
1
79
HEALTH WORKFORCE
SDG Target 3.c
Substantially increase health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce in developing countries, especially in
least-developed countries and small-island developing States
Indicator 3.c.1: Health worker density and distribution
SITUATION
EQUITY
A 2015 analysis estimated the global health

workforce to be slightly above 43 million workers,
including 20.7 million nurses/midwives, 9.8 million
physicians and approximately 13 million other
health workers.1 Relative to population density,
the WHO Africa Region and WHO South-East
Asia Region, which bear the greatest burdens of
preventable disease, have the lowest density of
health workers compared to the wealthier regions
of Europe and the Americas by a significant
magnitude (Table A.19.1).
Evaluating inequalities in access to health workers

requires indicators of the distribution of health
workers within and between countries. Where
data are available, physician densities within
countries vary considerably. For urban and
rural areas this ranges from equality in Japan,
the Republic of Korea and Turkey4 to up to twofold greater density in urban areas in European
OECD countries. Between-country inequalities
can be assessed using the level of dependency
on foreign-trained health professionals. A 2015
Table A.19.1.
Median density of health workforce (per 10 000 population) among the top five cadres, by WHO region, 20002013
Region
Physicians
Nursing and midwiferya
Dentistry
Pharmaceutical
AFR
2.4
10.7
0.5
1.0
AMR
20.0
24.1
4.1
3.2
SEAR
6.1
9.0
1.0
3.9
EUR
32.3
41.7
5.6
8.6
EMR
10.3
10.7
1.5
5.6
WPR
13.5
24.1
0.2
3.5
Global
12.3
17.6
0.8
3.6
In many countries the distinction between nursing and midwifery personnel is difficult to disaggregate given the way data are reported.
Mediterranean Region and eight in 10 in the WHO

European Region. HRH data are seldom available
in a comprehensive and inclusive manner, even
in well-developed health information systems.
Such data are also often confined to the public
sector and to a small number of health cadres
(namely, dentists, midwives, nurses, pharmacists
and physicians). The GSHRH puts forward the
implementation of national health workforce
accounts (NHWA) as a structured, labourmarket-driven approach to collecting HRH data.
This involves measuring a minimum dataset
on every health worker (on cadre, location of
practice, qualification and salary), on national
educational capacities (graduates, financing)
and on the mobility (internal and international)
and performance of the health workforce. The
progressive implementation of NHWA would
enable countries to develop evidence-informed
solutions to drive equitable access to a health
worker and thus make progress towards achieving
UHC and the SDGs.
REFERENCES
Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Draft
December 2015 (http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/WHO_GSHRH_
DRAFT_05Jan16.pdf?ua=1, accessed 11 April 2016).
Primarily nurses/midwives and physicians.
Refers to the seven other broad categories of the health workforce as

defined by the WHO Global Health Workforce Statistics database (see:
http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/hwfstats/en/) namely: dentistry
personnel; pharmaceutical personnel; laboratory health workers;
environment and public health workers; community and traditional
health workers; health management and support workers; and other
health workers. A multiplier for all other cadres was developed based
on the values of countries with available data.

The vision of the Global strategy on human
resources for health (GSHRH): Workforce 20301
is to accelerate progress towards UHC and the
SDGs by ensuring equitable access to health
workers within strengthened health systems.
Needs-based estimates, relative to an SDG
threshold of 44.5 skilled health professionals2
per 10 000 population indicated a shortage
of approximately 17.4 million health workers
in 2013 (Fig. A.19.1) corresponding to almost
2.6 million physicians, over 9 million nurses
and midwives, and around 5.8 million other
health-care cadres.3
80
analysis indicated that foreign-born physicians

accounted for 22% of active physicians in
OECD countries in 2010/11 (up from 20% in
20002001), with India accounting for the largest
share of foreign-born physicians.5
DATA GAPS
A shortage of timely, good-quality, comparable and
disaggregated data impedes full understanding of
the state of the health workforce at national and
sub-national levels. Only one in four countries in
the WHO African Region have published human
resources for health (HRH) data since 2010,
compared to one in two in the WHO Eastern
Ono T, Schoenstein M, Buchan J. Geographic imbalances in doctor

supply and policy responses. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 69.
Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014 (available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.
org/social-issues-migration-health/geographic-imbalances-in-doctorsupply-and-policy-responses_5jz5sq5ls1wl-en).
International Migration Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014

(available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migrationhealth/international-migration-outlook-2015_migr_outlook-2015-en).
Figure A.19.1.
Estimates of health worker needs-based shortages,a by WHO region, 2013
Needs-based shortages (in millions)

South-East Asia Region (6.9)
African Region (4.2)
Western Pacific Region (3.7)
Eastern Mediterranean Region (1.7)

Region of the Americas (0.8)
European Region (0.1)
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Needs-based shortage ais estimated as the difference between need and supply by country for those with current supply below the SDG threshold.
Needs-based shortage is estimated as the difference between need and supply by country for those with current supply below the SDG threshold.
Table A.19.2.
Skilled health professionals density (per 10 000 population), 20052013a
Table A.19.2. Skilled health professional density (per 100 000 population), All
AFR
South Africa
Seychelles
Botswana
Algeria
Namibia
Nigeria
Angola
Swaziland
Uganda
Zimbabwe
Kenya
Ghana
Gambia
Zambia
Congo
Cabo Verde
Benin
AMR
58.9
58.8
37.5
31.5
31.5
20.1
18.3
17.7
14.2
14.2
10.6
10.2
9.7
9.6
9.2
8.6
8.3
Mauritania
Rwanda
Guinea-Bissau
Cte d'Ivoire
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Mali
Madagascar
Senegal
Mozambique
Malawi
8.0
Togo
Liberia
Ethiopia
Chad
Sierra Leone
Niger
Guinea
Burundi
Comoros
Equatorial Guinea
3.3
Eritrea
Gabon
Lesotho
Mauritius
South Sudan
7.5
6.6
6.3
6.1
5.2
5.1
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.5
3.6
3.1
2.9
2.8
2.3
Cuba
Canada
Brazil
Uruguay
Bahamas
Barbados
Trinidad and Tobago
Mexico
Grenada
Argentina
Ecuador
Panama
Dominican Republic
Belize
Peru
Nicaragua
Paraguay
Saint Lucia
Colombia
El Salvador
Costa Rica
Guatemala
Jamaica
Honduras
Chile
Guyana
Antigua and Barbuda
Dominica
Haiti
Suriname
EUR
157.8
122.7
113.6
94.9
92.8
69.6
66.7
47.4
46.2
44.9
43.4
38.8
30.5
28.2
27.9
26.5
22.6
22.3
21.3
20.9
20.0
18.8
18.3
15.0
14.8
14.5
11.7
7.5
1.9
1.6
1.4
SEAR
64.5
Maldives
Thailand 24.7
India 24.1
Sri Lanka 23.2
Myanmar 16.2
Indonesia 15.9
Bhutan 12.4
Timor-Leste 11.9
Bangladesh 5.7
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Nepal
Monaco
Belgium
Norway
Switzerland
Denmark
Iceland
Ireland
Luxembourg
Sweden
Belarus
Uzbekistan
San Marino
Finland
Germany
France
Kazakhstan
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Malta
Slovenia
Spain
Portugal
Azerbaijan
Estonia
Hungary
Slovakia
Republic of Moldova
Italy
Andorra
Bulgaria
Poland
Israel
Kyrgyzstan
Romania
Armenia
Montenegro
Georgia
Latvia
Tajikistan
Cyprus
Albania
Lithuania
Turkey
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Serbia
Austria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Greece
Netherlands
Russian Federation
Turkmenistan
EMR
243.8
216.5
215.5
214.1
202.7
190.7
178.7
155.1
149.7
145.6
144.7
139.3
137.7
136.1
124.9
118.7
116.1
112.1
109.8
109.8
106.1
102.1
99.4
96.2
95.6
93.9
93.8
92.0
87.6
86.4
83.8
83.0
81.9
80.6
75.3
75.3
75.3
74.9
70.1
69.4
67.9
49.9
41.2
41.1
26.2
21.1
196.1
Qatar
87.0
Libya
78.1
Oman
73.6
Saudi Arabia
66.1
Jordan
63.5
Egypt
63.4
Kuwait
59.2
Lebanon
56.9
45.0
Tunisia
Syrian Arab Republic 33.2
Bahrain 32.9
Iran (Islamic Republic of) 23.0
Morocco 15.1
Pakistan 14.0
Sudan 11.2
Djibouti 10.3
Yemen 8.7
Afghanistan 7.7
Iraq 6.1
Somalia 1.5
WPR
Niue
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Brunei Darussalam
Cook Islands
Singapore
Republic of Korea
Palau
Tuvalu
Mongolia
Nauru
Malaysia
Tonga
Kiribati
China
Fiji
Viet Nam
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Marshall Islands
Vanuatu
Cambodia
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
190.0
139.2
137.9
136.1
94.9
77.8
77.1
71.5
71.0
69.1
64.6
56.4
44.7
44.5
40.8
35.0
31.5
26.7
24.3
23.0
22.8
21.8
18.1
10.6
9.6
6.2
For countries, the latest available data for 20052013 are shown. Data from 20052009 are shown in pale green. Skilled health professionals refer to the latest available values (2005-2013) in the WHO Global
Health Workforce Statistics database (http://who.int/hrh/statistics/hwfstats/en/) aggregated across physicians and nurses/midwives.
81
NATIONAL AND GLOBAL HEALTH RISKS

SDG Target 3.d
Strengthen the capacity of all countries, in particular developing countries, for early warning, risk reduction and management of national and global health risks
Indicator 3.d.1: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity and health emergency preparedness index
SITUATION
All communities face the risk of emergencies
and disasters and, in an increasingly connected
world, many of these events can go global.
The most common emergencies and disasters
are caused by floods, transport accidents,
storms, industrial accidents and epidemics
(Fig.A.20.1).1 Emergencies and disasters account
for a large number of deaths, injuries, illnesses
and disabilities. In addition to their devastating
health impacts, such events also disrupt health
services, impose a heavy economic burden and
threaten development gains. Emergencies caused
by natural disasters alone cost over US$ 100
billion annually.2 The natural disasters section
in this Annex discusses the SDG targets and
indicator relating specifically to natural disasters.3
Figure A.20.1.
Cumulative number of reported disasters, by type,
20062015
Others
1299
Floods
1666
Epidemics
331
Industrial
accidents
366
Storms
945
Transport
accidents
1615
The continued and increasing risks of emerging

and re-emerging infectious disease outbreaks
due to virulent, drug-resistant and lethal
microorganisms are a major concern, as is the
risk of bioterrorism for example, involving a
deliberately dispersed pathogenic biological agent.
To help the international community prevent and
respond to acute public health risks that have the
potential to become global threats, the revised
International Health Regulations (IHR) entered
into force in 2007. These require countries to
report certain disease outbreaks and other
public health events to WHO. The IHR cover
five categories of hazards: infectious, zoonoses,
food safety, chemical and radio nuclear. Other
types of hazards (such as hydrometeorological,
geophysical and societal) are not included
under the IHR.
82
Despite progress in the implementation of IHR

core capacities in recent years, the situation in
2015 was far from satisfactory, particularly in the
WHO African Region (Fig. A.20.2). In fact, 84 of
the 196 IHR States Parties (43%) have requested
and obtained an extension up to 2016 to meet
IHR core capacity requirements. Limitations
remain in preparedness, surveillance, response
capacity and other critical capacities. The Ebola
virus disease outbreak in West Africa, the Middle
East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, the 2009
H1N1 influenza pandemic and several cholera
outbreaks have repeatedly demonstrated that
the world remains unprepared to rapidly and
effectively respond to serious public health
events. The Ebola epidemic in West Africa has
stimulated in-depth reflections on the state of
global health security, not least in terms of the
inadequate global capacity for quick response.
The epidemic also revealed weaknesses in the
funding mechanisms used to finance outbreak
responses. It is essential for all countries to
evaluate their level of preparedness and to
enhance their capacity to respond to all hazards
based upon a whole-of-society approach.
SDG Target 3.d provides an impetus for

strengthening the implementation of IHR core
capacities, and increasing national and community
emergency and disaster risk management
capacities. The overall global strategic direction for
strengthening national and community capacities
for emergency and disaster risk management for
health in the post-2015 era is supported by the
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
20152030. Enhancing the resilience of national
health systems, including through the integration
of disaster risk management into health care
and strengthening IHR implementation in all
countries, will be a central element. Effective
emergency and disaster risk management
policies and programmes should be guided by
comprehensive all-hazards and whole-of-society
approaches across the emergency management
cycle prevention/mitigation, preparedness,
response and recovery. Further integration into
an all-hazards emergency risk approach with
indicators will be desirable.
EQUITY
Emergencies disproportionately affect vulnerable
populations, including the poor, children, women,
the elderly, disabled and displaced populations.
During emergencies, continuity of care is often

disrupted, leaving behind fragmented health
infrastructures. Inequalities are often poorly
addressed in disaster-response and recovery
planning.
DATA GAPS
The current IHR monitoring process involves
a self-assessment questionnaire sent to State
Parties on the implementation status of 13 core
capacities. Since 2010, 194 countries have
responded with an annual average of 71%
reporting completeness. While the questionnaire
itself is standard, the nature of self assessment
may limit the quality and comparability of data and
monitoring across countries. Therefore, a new IHR
monitoring and evaluation framework has been
developed comprising the four comprehensive
components of annual reporting to the WHA,
joint external evaluation and after action review
and exercises.
One hundred countries have also responded
to a global survey of country capacities for
emergency and disaster risk management for
health most recently conducted by WHO in 2015.
The survey covers the capacities required for
integrating health with multisectoral disaster
risk management arrangements, as well as the
health-sector capacities required for all-hazards
emergency and disaster risk management.
Data for reporting on the indicators used for the
Sendai Framework global targets will need to be
enhanced to take account of the broad range of
hazards (including infectious diseases) that are
within the scope of the Framework, and aligned
with the SDGs.
REFERENCES
The International Disaster Database [online database]. Brussels: Centre
for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED (http://www.
emdat.be/database, accessed 5 April 2016).
2015 disasters in numbers. Geneva: United Nations Office for

Disaster Risk Reduction (http://www.unisdr.org/files/47791_
infograph2015disastertrendsfinal.pdf, accessed 5 April 2016).
Including SDG Targets 1.5, 11.5 and 13.1.
Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization.

(http://www.who.int/gho/en/).
Figure A.20.2.
IHR implementation: annual average of 13 core capacity scores,4 by WHO region, 20102015a
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
90
80
70
Score (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Global
A regional annual average is not shown if the number of State Parties reporting for the respective year is fewer than half of the total number of State Parties in the region.
Table A.20.1.
IHR implementation: average of 13 core capacity scores,4 20102015a,b
Table A.20.1. Proportion of attributes of 13 IHR core capacities that have been attained at a specific point in time
AFR
AMR
South Africa
Zambia
Cameroon
Cte d'Ivoire
Seychelles
100
92
91
87
87
79
Niger
Ethiopia
Togo
Algeria
Eritrea
Uganda
Ghana
Kenya
Mozambique
Mauritius
Zimbabwe
78
75
74
73
73
73
69
69
69
68
68
67
Nigeria
Namibia
Sierra Leone
Lesotho
Botswana
Cabo Verde
Guinea
Burundi
Swaziland
Mali
Burkina Faso
Guinea-Bissau
South Sudan
Gabon
Rwanda
Benin
Chad
Malawi
Gambia
Senegal
Comoros
Madagascar
Mauritania
Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Liberia
Angola
a
67
66
64
63
62
58
57
56
56
55
50
50
50
48
46
44
43
Cuba
Brazil
Canada
Mexico
El Salvador
Barbados
Ecuador
Peru
Antigua and Barbuda
Guatemala
Colombia
Costa Rica
Guyana
Uruguay
Argentina
Paraguay
Jamaica
Chile
Nicaragua
Honduras
Suriname
Dominican Republic
Trinidad and Tobago
Panama
Dominica
Grenada
Bahamas
Saint Lucia
Belize
Haiti
SEAR
40
33
30
29
29
29
28
27
26
24
18
18
Thailand
Indonesia
India
Bangladesh
Myanmar
Nepal
Democratic
People'sRepublic
Republic
of K..
Democratic Peoples
of Korea
Sri Lanka
Timor-Leste
Bhutan
Maldives
EUR
Germany
Ukraine
99
Norway
99
Armenia
97
Finland
95
Slovakia
93
Netherlands
91
Portugal
90
France
90
Tajikistan
89
Spain
88
Sweden
Czech Republic
87
Denmark
86
Hungary
85
Switzerland
85
Belarus
84
Latvia
83
Luxembourg
83
Austria
81
Russian Federation
79
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
Azerbaijan
78
Iceland
75
Turkmenistan
72
Lithuania
71
Uzbekistan
71
Belgium
71
Georgia
70
Republic of Moldova
66
Monaco
66
Ireland
61
Kazakhstan
Romania
60
Turkey
58
Italy
55
Greece
48
Malta
35
Slovenia
Poland
Estonia
98
Croatia
96
Israel
94
Bulgaria
Cyprus
88
Montenegro
86
77
Kyrgyzstan
73
Serbia
71
San Marino
71
Andorra
68
United Kingdombb
61
Albania
EMR
99
100
99
98
96
96
96
95
95
94
94
92
92
91
91
91
91
90
90
88
87
87
86
84
84
84
83
83
82
81
80
79
78
78
78
78
77
76
76
75
74
72
71
71
69
62
59
55
50
47
40
29
Saudi Arabia
Jordan
Qatar
Bahrain
Oman
Morocco
Egypt
Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Sudan
Tunisia
Libya
Djibouti
Yemen
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Somalia
99
97
97
97
96
96
95
93
91
86
85
76
71
65
64
63
46
46
45
43
6
WPR
Australia
Japan
Republic of Korea
China
Malaysia
Singapore
Viet Nam
Fiji
New Zealand
Brunei Darussalam
Palau
Philippines
Tuvalu
Mongolia
Samoa
Tonga
Papua New Guinea
Cook Islands
Niue
Kiribati
Solomon Islands
Cambodia
Marshall Islands
Vanuatu
Nauru
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
98
98
92
91
89
89
86
75
74
74
64
64
63
61
60
57
52
51
43
42
Country values are the average of 13 core capacity scores for the latest available year.
Data provided in a format that could not be included in the analysis.
83
CHILD STUNTING
SDG Target 2.2
By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age,
and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons
Indicator 2.2.1: Prevalence of stunting (height for age < -2 standard deviation from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age
SITUATION
Globally in 2015 an estimated 156 million

children (23% of all children) were affected by
stunting.1 Stunting prevalence was highest in
the WHO African Region (38%) followed by the
WHO South-East Asia Region (33%). Over three
quarters of all stunted children under 5 years of
age lived in either the WHO African Region (60
million children) or WHO South-East Asia Region
(59 million children) (Fig. A.21.1).
Key strategies and actions to achieve the global

nutrition targets have been identified in the WHAendorsed Comprehensive Implementation Plan
on Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition,
the Global Nutrition Targets Policy Briefs2 and
the Second International Conference on Nutrition
(ICN2) Framework for Action.3 These strategies
indicate that actions are needed across different
sectors (including health, agriculture, water and
sanitation, education, trade and social protection)
to sustainably improve nutrition. Accordingly,
countries should develop national multisectoral
nutrition plans and have multisectoral platforms
for nutrition.4 Achieving the global nutrition
targets thus relies upon achieving a number of
SDGs such as universal access to safe and
healthy food, and UHC while also playing a
key role in the achievement of others.
Figure A.21.1.
Children under 5 years of age affected by stunting (in
millions), by WHO region, 2015
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
8
20
4
59
Child stunting, a chronic outcome of poor

nutrition and poor environmental conditions,
can be prevented under a life-course approach
through interventions that enhance nutritional
status in adolescents and women of reproductive
age, that ensure appropriate infant and young
child feeding, and that improve access to safe
water and adequate sanitation, immunization
and treatment for infectious diseases.
60
Global:
156
The global nutrition target on stunting aims to

achieve a 40% reduction between 2012 and
2025 in the number of affected children. Although
the prevalence of stunting is decreasing in all
regions, Africa faces a rise in the absolute number
of stunted children (Fig. A.21.2). In the WHO
South-East Asia Region the estimated number
of stunted children decreased between 2000
and 2015 from 88 million to 59 million while
in Africa the number increased from 52 to 60
million over the same period.
Figure A.21.2.
Childhood stunting prevalence and numbers affected,a
by WHO region, 2000 and 2015
2000
2015
Numbers affected
(millions)
100
Prevalence
(%)
60
90
50
80
70
40
60
50
30
40
20
10
10
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Prevalence are shown as points, with vertical lines representing 95%

uncertainty intervals. Numbers affected are shown as bars.
84
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text and figures are taken
from: UNICEF-WHO-The World Bank Group. Joint child malnutrition
estimates Levels and trends (2015 edition) (see: http://www.who.
int/nutgrowthdb/estimates2014/en/).
Global Targets 2025. To improve maternal, infant and young child nutrition
[website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/
nutrition/global-target-2025/en/).
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health
Organization. From commitments to action. Framework for action. Outcome
document of the Second International Conference on Nutrition, Rome, 1921
November 2014. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations; 2014 (ICN2 2014/3 Corr. 1; http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.
pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
Scaling up nutrition (SUN). SUN Movement annual progress report. September

2015 (http://scalingupnutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/
SUN_AnnualReport2015_EN.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
See Nutrition and the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Technical

note. United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition (http://www.
unscn.org/files/Publications/Briefs_on_Nutrition/Final_Nutrition%20
and_the_SDGs.pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
WHO provides updated guidance on effective

actions to address the multiple forms of
malnutrition,6 including the promotion, protection
and support of breastfeeding, advice on adequate
complementary feeding, management of acute
malnutrition, and the provision of vitamins
and minerals to different age groups through
supplementation or fortification of staple foods.
Such actions need to be implemented on a
sufficiently large scale to have an impact on
the nutritional status of target groups.
EQUITY
Children are at greater risk of stunting if they
are born in rural areas, poor households or to
mothers denied basic education. For example,
in 66 national surveys from LMIC from 2005 or
later, the median survey prevalence of stunting
in children born to mothers with no education
was 38.7% compared with a median survey
prevalence of 23.4% among children whose
mothers had completed at least secondary
school (Fig. A.21.3).7
20
30
a nutrition surveillance system. To interpret and

compare stunting rates, data should be analysed
based on the WHO Child Growth Standards, which
have now been adopted in over 130 countries.
However, there are countries where survey or
surveillance data are not reported in a standard
format. Guidance on minimum data-quality criteria
and standardized reporting are under development.
The WHO Global Database on Child Growth and
Malnutrition8 contains recent stunting data (since
2010) from nationally representative surveys in
103 Member States. In 61 countries most of
which are high-income countries with a small
burden of stunting there are no data available
since 2005.
DATA GAPS
Child length or height is commonly measured in
household surveys in LMIC, with a typical frequency
of every 35 years. In a number of countries, length
or height are more routinely collected as part of
The WHO e-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA) [website].

Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/elena/en/,

bitstream/10665/164590/1/9789241564908_eng.pdf, accessed 10 April
2016)
Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition [online database].

Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/
database/en/).
Figure A.21.3.
Prevalence of stunting in children under 5 years of age in LMIC, by maternal educational level, 20052013a
No education
Primary school
Secondary school +
70
60
Prevalence (%)
50
40 39
33
30
23
20
10
0
a
Based on the results of DHS and MICS in 66 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and
horizontal lines indicate the median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the
interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table A.21.1.
Prevalence of stunting in children under 5 years of age, 200520158,a
Table A.21.1. Prevalence of stunting in children under 5, All

AFR
Seychelles
Algeria
Gabon
Ghana
Senegal
Congo
Mauritania
Namibia
South Africa
Gambia
Swaziland
Kenya
Equatorial Guinea
Togo
Guinea-Bissau
Zimbabwe
Angola
Cte d'Ivoire
South Sudan
Guinea
Botswana
Cameroon
Comoros
Liberia
Burkina Faso
Nigeria
Lesotho
Benin
Uganda
Rwanda
Sierra Leone
Mali
Chad
Zambia
Ethiopia
Malawi
Niger
Mozambique
Madagascar
Eritrea
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Mauritius
AMR
Chile
Saint Lucia
Costa Rica
Jamaica
Brazil
Dominican Republic
Barbados
Argentina
Suriname
Uruguay
Paraguay
Guyana
Colombia
Mexico
El Salvador
Peru
Panama
Belize
Haiti
Honduras
Nicaragua
Ecuador
Guatemala
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Canada
Cuba
Dominica
Grenada
Trinidad and Tobago
7.9
11.7
17.2
17.5
18.8
19.4
21.2
22.0
23.1
23.9
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.2
27.5
27.6
27.6
29.2
29.6
31.1
31.3
31.4
31.7
32.1
32.1
32.9
32.9
33.2
34.0
34.2
34.7
37.9
37.9
38.5
39.9
SEAR
40.0
40.4
40.7
42.4
42.6
43.0
43.1
49.2
50.3
57.5
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Maldives
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
Bhutan
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Nepal
India
Timor-Leste
EUR
Germany 1.3
Belarus 4.5
2.1
The former
Yugoslav
of .. 4.9
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
2.5
Serbia 6.0
5.6
Republic of Moldova 6.4
5.7
8.9
7.1
9.4
Montenegro
7.1
9.5
Turkey
7.7
11.3
Georgia
8.2
12.9
Kyrgyzstan
13.1
8.8
Kazakhstan
18.0
10.7
Azerbaijan
18.9
Turkmenistan
10.9
19.6
Uzbekistan
12.0
20.8
Armenia
12.7
23.1
Albania
13.4
26.8
Tajikistan
13.6
Andorra
14.0
Austria
14.6
Belgium
18.1
Bulgaria
19.1
Croatia
Cyprus
19.3
Czech Republic
21.9
Denmark
22.7
Estonia
23.0
Finland
25.2
France
48.0
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Netherlands
Norway
14.7
Poland
16.3
Portugal
20.3
Romania
Russian Federation
27.9
San Marino
33.6
Slovakia
35.1
Slovenia
36.1
Spain
36.4
Sweden
37.4
Switzerland
38.7
Ukraine
50.2
United Kingdom
1.8
EMR
Kuwait
Jordan
Saudi Arabia
Tunisia
Oman
Morocco
Libya
Egypt
Iraq
Somalia
Djibouti
Sudan
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Yemen
Bahrain
Lebanon
Qatar
5.8
6.8
7.8
9.3
10.1
14.1
14.9
21.0
22.3
22.6
25.3
27.5
33.5
38.2
40.9
45.0
46.8
WPR
Australia 2.0
Republic of Korea 2.5
Japan 7.1
8.1
Tonga
9.4
China
10.0
Tuvalu
10.8
Mongolia
17.2
Malaysia
19.4
Viet Nam
19.7
Brunei Darussalam
24.0
Nauru
28.5
Vanuatu
30.3
Philippines
32.4
Cambodia
32.8
Solomon Islands
43.8
49.5
Papua New Guinea
Cook Islands
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
New Zealand
Niue
Palau
Samoa
Singapore
Data shown are the latest available for 20052015. Data from 20052009 are shown in pale green.
85
CHILD WASTING AND OVERWEIGHT

SDG Target 2.2
By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age,
and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons
Indicator 2.2.2: Prevalence of malnutrition (weight for height > +2 or < -2 standard deviation from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards) among children under
5 years of age, by type (wasting and overweight)
SITUATION
Overweight refers to a child who is too heavy for

their height. This form of malnutrition results from
consuming more calories than are needed and
increases the risk of NCDs later in life. Globally,
42 million children under 5 years 6% of all
children were estimated to be overweight in
2015, with the highest prevalence observed in
the WHO European Region (Fig. A.22.1).1 Between
2000 and 2015, the prevalence of overweight in
children under 5 years increased both globally
and in most WHO regions.
The 2025 global targets for wasting and

overweight are:2
Figure A.22.1.
Prevalence of overweight and wasting among children
under 5 years,a by WHO region, 2015
Prevalence
(%)
20
18
Overweight
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
0
2
4
6
8
to reduce and maintain childhood wasting

to less than <5%
no increase in childhood overweight.
Childhood wasting needs to be addressed in
vulnerable or marginalized groups as well as in
humanitarian crises. Moderate acute malnutrition
needs to be addressed in addition to severe acute
malnutrition. Effective early-warning systems that
include disease surveillance can help prevent
widespread hunger and morbidity by triggering an
alert linked to immediate intervention. Functional
data collection and analysis to detect changes
in the prevalence of childhood wasting are key
elements of such systems.
Effective prevention strategies include sustainable
solutions to improve year-round access to an
appropriate diet, strengthening of safety nets
(including cash transfers or the distribution of
specific nutrient-dense food supplements),
and improved access to safe water, adequate
sanitation and health-care services. Improved
coverage of community and facility management
of severe acute malnutrition is needed, as the
implementation of treatment guidelines has
proven to be effective in lowering child morbidity
and mortality.3
14
16
Wasting
18
20
Vertical lines represent 95% uncertainty intervals.
Wasting refers to a child whose weight is too

low for their height. This is usually caused by
sudden weight loss due to acute disease or
inadequate food intake. Wasting increases a
childs risk of dying. Because wasting can be
reversed with appropriate food and medical
attention, the prevalence of wasting can change
rapidly from year to year. Wasting affected
50million children under 5 years (7% of all
children) globally in 2015. Both the highest
prevalence of wasting (13.5%) and number of
wasted children (24 million) were found in the
WHO South-East Asia Region.
86
DATA GAPS
The prevalence of wasting and of overweight are
both calculated from measurements of childrens
length/height and weight, which are commonly
measured in household surveys in LMIC with a
typical frequency of every 35 years. Surveys
measuring child length/height and weight are not
conducted frequently in high-income countries,
where overweight may be a problem. In some
cases, data are not analysed using the WHO
Child Growth Standards, thus limiting their
comparability, or one or both indicators are not
reported. Data on overweight among school-age
children and adolescents (aged 519 years) a
complementary outcome indicator are collected
less often and less systematically than data on
children under 5 years of age.
REFERENCES
taken from: UNICEF-WHO-The World Bank Group. Joint child malnutrition
estimates Levels and trends (2015 edition) (see: http://www.who.
int/nutgrowthdb/estimates2014/en/).
10
12
households. However, the degree of withincountry economic-related inequality varies from

country to country. In half of the 76 surveys
in LMICs (Fig. A.22.2), there was little or no
difference in the prevalence of wasting between
the richest and poorest quintiles (2percentage
points or less). On the other hand, noticeable
levels of inequality (differences of at least 5
percentage points between the richest and
poorest quintiles) existed in one quarter of the
study countries.5
Although the global target is no increase in child

overweight prevalence, when translated into
country-specific settings this may imply more
intense efforts for many countries to reverse
their rising trends. Childhood overweight can
be prevented through actions such as the
promotion of exclusive breastfeeding and
adequate complementary feeding, the regulation
of marketing of complementary foods and of
foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children,
and the promotion of physical activity from
the early stages of life to address sedentary
lifestyles.4 To address overweight in school-age
children, the school food environment should
also be improved.
EQUITY
Children from poorer households are more
likely to be wasted than children from richer
Global Targets 2025. To improve maternal, infant and young child nutrition
[website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/
nutrition/global-target-2025/en/).
Ashworth A, Chopra M, McCoy D, Sanders D, Jackson D, Karaolis N et al.

WHO guidelines for management of severe malnutrition in rural South
African hospitals: effect on case fatality and the influence of operational
factors. Lancet. 2004;363(9415):11105 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/15064029, accessed 11 April 2016).
Global nutrition targets 2025: childhood overweight policy brief. Geneva:

World Health Organization; 2014 (WHO/NMH/NHD/14.6; http://apps.
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149021/2/WHO_NMH_NHD_14.6_eng.
pdf, accessed 11 April 2016); and Report of the Commission on Ending
Childhood Obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://
pdf, accessed 11 April 2016).
WHO and International Center for Equity in Health/Pelotas. State of

inequality. Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2015.
Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition [online database].

Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/
database/en/).
Figure A.22.2.
Prevalence of wasting in LMIC, by household wealth quintile, 20052013a
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
25
Prevalence (%)
20
15
10
6.8
6.4
5.8
5.2
4.8
0
a
Based on the results of DHS and MICS in 76 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the
median value (middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
TableA.22.1.Prevalence of wasting (left-hand side) and of overweight (right-hand side) in children under 5
Table A.22.1.
Prevalence of wasting (blue bar) and of overweight (green bar) in children under 5 years of age, 200520156,a
Overweight - 2010 onwards
Overweight - prior to 2010
Wasting - 2010 onwards
Wasting - prior to 2010
AFR
AMR
EUR
EMR
Mauritania
Senegal
Benin
Nigeria
Eritrea
Togo
Guinea-Bissau
Chad
Ethiopia
Ghana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Niger
Cte d'Ivoire
Gambia
Liberia
Zimbabwe
Guinea
Kenya
Namibia
Mali
Malawi
Uganda
Congo
South Sudan
Zambia
Cameroon
Lesotho
Gabon
Rwanda
Mozambique
Sierra Leone
Swaziland
Equatorial Guinea
Seychelles
Comoros
Botswana
Algeria
South Africa
Angola
Cabo Verde
Madagascar
Mauritius
Haiti
Suriname
Colombia
Guatemala
Honduras
Guyana
El Salvador
Nicaragua
Saint Lucia
Peru
Uruguay
Brazil
Ecuador
Dominican Republic
Jamaica
Belize
Costa Rica
Mexico
Chile
Argentina
Paraguay
Barbados
Panama
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Canada
Cuba
Dominica
Grenada
Trinidad and Tobago
Germany
Turkmenistan
Republic of Moldova
Tajikistan
Kyrgyzstan
Belarus
Turkey
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Uzbekistan
Azerbaijan
Kazakhstan
Serbia
Armenia
Georgia
Montenegro
Albania
Andorra
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
San Marino
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Yemen
Somalia
Sudan
Oman
Jordan
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Saudi Arabia
Djibouti
Kuwait
Morocco
Iraq
Tunisia
Egypt
Libya
Bahrain
Lebanon
Qatar
SEAR
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Sri Lanka
Bangladesh
Timor-Leste
India
Nepal
Myanmar
Maldives
Bhutan
Thailand
Indonesia
WPR
Japan
Cambodia
Solomon Islands
Nauru
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Philippines
Tuvalu
China
Republic of Korea
Australia
Brunei Darussalam
Mongolia
Papua New Guinea
Tonga
Cook Islands
Fiji
Kiribati
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
New Zealand
Niue
Palau
Samoa
Singapore
Data shown are the latest available for 20052015. Data from 20052009 are shown in pale green (overweight) or pale blue (wasting). Within each WHO region, countries are sorted in order of ascending
overweight prevalence.
87
DRINKING-WATER SERVICES
SDG Target 6.1
By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking-water for all
Indicator 6.1.1: Proportion of population using safely managed drinking-water services
Due to the limited availability of direct data, the

proxy measure use of an improved drinkingwater source was used to monitor progress
towards the relevant MDG target. This proxy
measure included piped water on premises,
public standpipes, boreholes, protected wells
and springs, or rainwater. By 2010, the MDG
target of 88% coverage had been met (Fig.
A.23.1) and in 2015, 6.6 billion people used an
improved drinking-water source, with 0.7 billion
using unimproved sources or surface water.1
Figure A.23.1.
Drinking-water sources used globally, 2015
Unimproved
water sources
7%
Figure A.23.2.
Use of improved drinking-water sources, by WHO
region, 2015
100
99
92
91
95
91
80
70
60
68
30
20
10
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
is located on premises, available when needed,

and free from faecal (and priority chemical)
contamination. Preliminary estimates available
for 140 countries (representing 85% of the global
population) indicate that the coverage of safely
managed drinking-water services is much lower
than the coverage of improved sources, at 68%
in urban areas and only 20% in rural areas.3

Public standpipes,
boreholes,
protected wells
and springs,
rainwater
34%
Piper water on
premises
57%
However, it is estimated that globally one quarter

of improved sources are faecally contaminated,
and that approximately 1.8 billion people drink
water containing such contamination.2 Improved
water sources may also be distant from home.
In many sub-Saharan African countries people
usually women and girls must travel long
distances to haul water from community sources.
The coverage of safely managed drinking-water

services will be well below that of improved
water sources for many countries, and rates of
progress will need to be faster than they were
during the MDG period to reach the target of
universal coverage by 2030. The increased focus
on water quality will require greater attention to
hazard identification and risk management in
drinking-water supply. Water Safety Planning, as
introduced in the 2004 Guidelines for Drinking
Water Quality, can play a key role in reducing
and eliminating microbial contamination of
drinking-water. Drinking-water suppliers will
also need to ensure that water sources are not
contaminated with toxic chemicals such as
arsenic and fluoride which can occur naturally,
especially in groundwater.
For the SDGs a more ambitious indicator has

been selected the proportion of population using
safely managed drinking-water services, which
is defined as an improved water source which
The recent emergence of drinking-water regulators

has resulted in at least 136 such regulatory
authorities being established globally. These
will increasingly contribute to the improvement
By 2015, there were only three countries with

less than 50% coverage, with coverage of >90%
estimated in all WHO regions with the exception
of the WHO African Region (Fig. A.23.2).
88
of drinking-water services required to meet the

SDG target, and regulatory data will be crucial
for monitoring SDG Target 6.1. As regulatory
oversight does not always extend to rural water
supplies, it will need to be complemented with
information from household surveys on the
availability and quality of water, both at source
and in the home.
EQUITY
50
40
0
Surface water
2%
96
90
Coverage (%)
SITUATION
Rural areas have consistently lower improvedwater coverage than urban areas. Within both
rural and urban areas, rich households have
greater access to improved water supplies than
poor households. The median gap between the
richest and poorest quintiles is nine percentage
points in urban areas, and 20 percentage points
in rural areas (Fig. A.23.3). Achieving the SDGs
will require a more systematic approach to
monitoring inequalities in access by location and
wealth, as well as by other inequality stratifiers.
DATA GAPS
Nationally representative data on water quality
are scarce, and tracking compliance will be
complicated by differences in drinking-water
standards between countries and regions.
Monitoring the SDG indicator for drinking-water
will require new sources of data on water quality
and availability, and the first global baseline
estimates are expected to be produced in 2017.
Assessing affordability and disaggregating access
by different disadvantaged population groups
will present additional challenges.
REFERENCES
taken from: Progress on sanitation and drinking water 2015 update and
MDG assessment. New York (NY) and Geneva: UNICEF and World Health
Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/
monitoring/jmp-2015-update/en/, accessed 5 April 2016).
Bain R, Cronk R, Hossain R, Bonjour S, Onda K, Wright J et al. Global

assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water
based on a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(8):91727.
Hutton, G, Varughese M. The costs of meeting the 2030 Sustainable

Development Goals targets on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene.
Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016.
Figure A.23.3.
Access to improved drinking-water in rural areas, by wealth quintilea
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
100
90
86
78
80
70 66
Coverage (%)
73
69
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Based on data from 75 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median value
(middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table A.23.1.
Proportion of population using improved drinking-water sources, 2015
Table A.23.1. Proportion of population using improved drinking-water sources, 2015

AFR
AMR
Mauritius
Botswana
Seychelles
Gabon
100
97
96
96
93
93
South Africa
Cabo Verde
Namibia
Comoros
Gambia
Malawi
Ghana
Algeria
Burkina Faso
Cte d'Ivoire
Lesotho
Guinea-Bissau
92
91
90
90
90
89
84
82
82
82
79
79
Senegal
Uganda
Benin
Congo
Guinea
Mali
Zimbabwe
Burundi
Cameroon
Liberia
Rwanda
Swaziland
Nigeria
Zambia
Kenya
Sierra Leone
Togo
South Sudan
Eritrea
Mauritania
Niger
Ethiopia
Madagascar
Chad
Mozambique
Angola
Equatorial Guinea
79
78
77
77
77
77
76
76
76
76
74
69
69
65
63
63
Barbados
Belize
Canada
Uruguay
Argentina
Chile
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Brazil
Costa Rica
Guyana
Paraguay
Grenada
Mexico
Saint Lucia
Cuba
Panama
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
El Salvador
Jamaica
Guatemala
Colombia
Honduras
Ecuador
Nicaragua
Peru
Dominican Republic
Haiti
Dominica
63
59
58
58
58
57
56
52
52
51
51
49
48
SEAR
Bhutan
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
Maldives
Thailand
Sri Lanka
India
Nepal
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Myanmar
Timor-Leste
EUR
Andorra
Armenia
100
Austria
100
Belarus
100
Belgium
99
99
Croatia
99
Cyprus
98
Czech Republic
98
Denmark
98
Estonia
98
Finland
France
98
Georgia
98
Germany
98
Greece
97
Hungary
96
Iceland
96
Israel
95
Italy
95
Luxembourg
95
Malta
Monaco
95
Montenegro
95
Netherlands
94
Norway
94
Portugal
93
Romania
93
Slovakia
91
Slovenia
91
Spain
90
Sweden
87
Switzerland
Turkey
87
United Kingdom
87
Bulgaria
85
Latvia
58
Serbia
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Ireland
Poland
100
Lithuania
100
Russian Federation
99
Ukraine
Albania
98
Kazakhstan
96
Kyrgyzstan
94
Republic of Moldova
92
Azerbaijan
87
Tajikistan
87
San Marino
81
Turkmenistan
72
Uzbekistan
EMR
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
98
98
97
97
96
95
93
90
88
87
74
100
Bahrain
Qatar
Egypt
Kuwait
Lebanon
Tunisia
Jordan
Saudi Arabia
Oman
Pakistan
Djibouti
Iraq
Morocco
Afghanistan
Libya
Somalia
Sudan
Yemen
100
100
99
99
99
98
97
97
96
93
91
90
90
87
85
55
WPR
Australia
Cook Islands
Japan
New Zealand
Singapore
Tonga
Niue
Samoa
Malaysia
Tuvalu
Viet Nam
Nauru
China
Fiji
Marshall Islands
Vanuatu
Philippines
Solomon Islands
Cambodia
Kiribati
Mongolia
Papua New Guinea
Brunei Darussalam
Palau
Republic of Korea
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
98
98
98
97
96
96
95
95
92
89
81
76
76
67
64
40
89
SANITATION
SDG Target 6.2
By 2030, achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls
and those in vulnerable situations
Indicator 6.2.1: Proportion of population using safely managed sanitation services, including a hand-washing facility with soap and water
The indicator used to track progress towards

the MDG target for sanitation was use of an
improved sanitation facility, which included
piped sewerage, septic tanks, pit latrines with
slabs or composting toilets not shared with other
households. The coverage of improved sanitation
facility use rose from 54% to around 68%
globally between 1990 and 2015 (Fig. A.24.1)
missing the MDG target by nine percentage
points, equating to almost 700 million people.1
In 2015, 946 million people practised open
defecation worldwide.
Figure A.24.2.
Use of improved sanitation facilities, by WHO region,
2015
32
100
90
93
89
80
78
70
Coverage (%)
SITUATION
79
68
60
50
30
20
32
10
Figure A.24.1.
Sanitation facilities used globally, 2015
Open
defecation
13%
AFR
AMR SEAR EUR
EMR WPR Global
and water) available. The coverage of safely

managed sanitation services is likely to be well
below improved sanitation coverage for many
countries. Preliminary coverage estimates for
140 countries (representing 85% of the global
population) indicate that safely managed sanitation
coverage is only 26% in urban areas compared
to 34% in rural areas.2
Unimproved
sanitation
10%

Shared
sanitation
9%
Improved
sanitation
68%
Sanitation coverage varies widely in developing

countries in 46 countries, less than 50% of the
population use an improved sanitation facility.
Countries with the lowest coverage are now
concentrated in Africa and South-East Asia (Fig.
A.24.2). Data from 57 countries, mostly in Africa,
show that the median coverage for hand-washing
facilities in the home was only 26%.1
The indicator for tracking SDG Target 6.2
builds on the MDG indicator. A safely managed
sanitation service is defined as an improved
sanitation facility which is not shared with
other households, and in which excreta is
safely disposed of in situ or treated offsite. To
fully meet the target, households must also
have hand-washing facilities (including soap
90
An estimated 70% of people without access to

improved sanitation and 90% of those practising
open defecation live in rural areas. There are
also strong inequalities by wealth, especially in
urban settings where the median gap between the
richest and poorest quintiles is over 50percentage
points (Fig. A.24.3).
DATA GAPS
49
40
EQUITY
To achieve the SDG target, unprecedented

improvements will need to be made in reducing
open defecation, promoting hand-washing, and
improving the management and treatment of
faecal wastes from both sewered and onsite
facilities, especially in urban settings. Sanitation
Safety Planning is a step-by-step risk-based
approach which can help to improve faecal waste
management in both onsite and offsite systems.
The approach underscores the leadership
role of the health sector in bringing together
stakeholders from different sectors to identify
health risks in the sanitation system and to agree
upon improvements and regular monitoring
approaches, in order to maximize the health,
economic and environmental gains of safely
managed sanitation services. These gains
will contribute to achieving the SDG targets
for reducing death and diseases (including
neglected tropical diseases) related to a lack
of WASH services.
Household surveys collect data on the types of

sanitation facilities, as well as the presence of
hand-washing materials as a proxy for hygiene.
Monitoring the coverage of safely managed
sanitation services will be based upon combined
information derived from household surveys
with additional data on the emptying of onsite
sanitation, and treatment of sewerage and faecal
sludge, obtained from administrative or other
national sources. Global data on the management
of faecal wastes remain scarce, particularly for
onsite sanitation systems. However, relevant data
in global databases such as UNSD, EUROSTAT,
IB-NET, AquaStat and Global Water Intelligence
show the promise of availability of national data.
Hand-washing data from DHS and MICS surveys
will need to be complemented by comparable
data for high-income countries. A first global
baseline for SDG Target 6.2 will be prepared
by 2017.
REFERENCES
taken from: Progress on sanitation and drinking water 2015 update and
MDG assessment. New York (NY) and Geneva: UNICEF and World Health
Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/
monitoring/jmp-2015-update/en/, accessed 5 April 2016).
Hutton, G, Varughese M. The costs of meeting the 2030 Sustainable

Development Goals targets on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene.
Washington, DC: World Bank; 2016.
Figure A.24.3.
Access to improved sanitation in urban areas, by wealth quintilea
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
100
90
90
80
68
Coverage (%)
70
60
51
50
40
42
34
30
20
10
0
a
Based on data from 75 countries. Each circle represents a country value; numbers and horizontal lines indicate the median value
(middle point) for each subgroup; light grey bands indicate the interquartile range (middle 50%) for each subgroup.
Table A.24.1.
Proportion of population using improved sanitation, 2015
Table A.24.1. Proportion of population using improved sanitation, 2015

AFR
AMR
Seychelles
Mauritius
Algeria
Equatorial Guinea
Cabo Verde
98
93
88
75
72
66
South Africa
Botswana
Rwanda
Gambia
Swaziland
Angola
Burundi
Senegal
Cameroon
Zambia
Gabon
Malawi
63
62
59
58
52
48
48
46
44
42
41
40
Mauritania
Zimbabwe
Comoros
Namibia
Kenya
Lesotho
Nigeria
Ethiopia
Mali
Cte d'Ivoire
37
36
35
34
30
30
29
29
28
25
23

Guinea-Bissau
Mozambique
Benin
Burkina Faso
Guinea
Uganda
Liberia
Eritrea
Congo
Ghana
Sierra Leone
Chad
Madagascar
Togo
Niger
South Sudan
22
21
21
20
20
20
19
17
16
16
15
15
13
12
12
12
11
7
Canada
Chile
Grenada
Argentina
Barbados
Uruguay
Costa Rica
Cuba
Bahamas
Trinidad and Tobago
Belize
Saint Lucia
Paraguay
Ecuador
Mexico
Dominican Republic
Guyana
Brazil
Honduras
Jamaica
Colombia
Suriname
Peru
El Salvador
Panama
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Haiti
Antigua and Barbuda
Dominica
EUR
100
100
99
98
96
96
96
95
94
93
92
92
91
91
89
85
85
84
84
83
83
82
81
79
76
75
75
68
64
50
28
SEAR
Maldives
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
Myanmar
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Bhutan
Nepal
Timor-Leste
India
98
95
93
82
80
61
61
50
46
41
40
Andorra
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
Denmark
Israel
Italy
Malta
Monaco
Portugal
Spain
Switzerland
Uzbekistan
Czech Republic
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
United Kingdom
Finland
Hungary
Kazakhstan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Croatia
Estonia
Poland
Montenegro
Serbia
Ukraine
Tajikistan
Turkey
Belarus
Albania
Kyrgyzstan
Lithuania
Ireland
TheFormer
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
The
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Latvia
Bulgaria
Georgia
Romania
Republic of Moldova
Russian Federation
San Marino
Turkmenistan
EMR
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
98
98
98
98
98
98
97
97
97
96
96
96
95
95
95
94
93
93
92
91
91
90
89
88
86
86
79
76
72
100
Kuwait
Saudi Arabia
Bahrain
Jordan
Qatar
Libya
Oman
Egypt
Tunisia
Iraq
Lebanon
Morocco
Pakistan
Djibouti
Afghanistan
Somalia
Sudan
Yemen
100
99
99
98
98
97
97
96
95
92
90
86
81
77
64
47
32
WPR
Australia
Japan
Niue
Palau
Republic of Korea
Singapore
Cook Islands
Malaysia
Samoa
Fiji
Tonga
Viet Nam
China
Marshall Islands
Philippines
Nauru
Mongolia
Vanuatu
Cambodia
Kiribati
Solomon Islands
Papua New Guinea
Brunei Darussalam
New Zealand
Tuvalu
100
100
100
100
100
100
98
96
92
91
91
78
77
77
74
71
66
60
58
57
42
40
30
19
91
CLEAN HOUSEHOLD ENERGY

SDG Target 7.1
By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services
Indicator 7.1.2: Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology
In 2014, some 3.1 billion people relied primarily

on polluting fuels (solid fuels and kerosene) for
cooking (Fig. A.25.1).1 The smoke or household
air pollution arising from inefficient energy use
in the home for cooking, heating and lighting is
laced with health-damaging pollutants like fine
particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen
dioxides and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons.
In 2012, exposure to such household air pollution
from the inefficient use of energy for cooking
is estimated to have caused around 4.3 million
deaths from ischaemic heart disease, stroke,
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung
cancer and childhood pneumonia.2
Figure A.25.1.
Percentage of population cooking with clean fuels, by
WHO region, 2014
Population cooking with clean fuels (%)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR

Although significant progress is being made
the global transition to clean household energy
use is proceeding slowly. To date, international
and national policies, programmes and targeted
interventions have put forward solutions, but have
had difficulty in substantially altering long-term
trends. There is a need for further investment
and innovation in household energy technologies,
such as advanced combustion cookstoves, or
cleaner fuels, to ensure that affordable, acceptable
and healthy solutions are available for even the
poorest households. Currently there are a number
of global initiatives working to ensure access
to clean household energy. These include the
United Nations Secretary-Generals Sustainable
Energy for All initiative, the Integrated Global
Action Plan for the Prevention and Control
of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea, and the Global
Alliance for Clean Cookstoves.
92
Recent WHO guidelines3 provide the normative

guidance to help drive such innovation and ensure
that interventions that bring health benefits are
disseminated. These guidelines: (a) provide
health-based recommendations on which fuels
should not be used in the home (unprocessed
coal, kerosene); (b) set out technical specifications
in the form of emission-rate targets on which
fuels and technology combinations at point of
use can be considered clean for health; and (c)
emphasize the importance of addressing all main
household energy end-uses, including space
heating and lighting, in addition to cooking.
Recommendations are also provided on how to
maximize health and other co-benefits during
the transition to universal access to clean and
modern energy services in order support the
development and implementation of effective
energy policies with health benefits.
EQUITY
Figure A.25.2.
Percentage of population cooking with clean fuels, by
WHO region and area of residence, 2014
Urban
100
Rural
99
95
90
93
87
81
80
70
67
60
50
49
47
40
30
32
20
10
0
19
15
6
AFR
DATA GAPS
Nationally representative household surveys
and censuses are the primary data sources for
deriving estimates of household energy use
and its health impacts over time. Data on main
cooking fuel are quite comprehensive, with
recent surveys available for all but two LMIC
(a total of 103 countries). Monitoring of the
fuels and technologies mainly used for space
heating and lighting (in addition to the type of
technology or device used for cooking) is more
limited. Accordingly, WHO is leading an ongoing
effort, in cooperation with surveying agencies,
national statistical offices, international agencies
and associated initiatives, to enhance and
harmonize multi-purpose household-survey
instruments to more comprehensively assess
household energy use.
REFERENCES
Reliance on polluting fuels and technologies in

the home is closely linked to poverty and social
inequity. Urban families are far more likely to use
clean fuels than rural families (Fig. A.25.2). In
homes that use polluting fuels and technologies,
women and children typically bear the largest
burden from inefficient household energy use.
Further adding to this unequal burden are the
additional health and safety risks from household
energy use that mainly impact women and
children such as burns, unintentional childhood
poisoning (from kerosene use) and injuries, as
well as the time loss and drudgery associated
with fuel collection.
Percentage (%)
SITUATION
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text, tables and figures are
taken from: Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health,
sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children.
bitstream/10665/204717/1/9789241565233_eng.pdf, accessed 3 April
2016).
Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization.

(http://www.who.int/gho/en/).
WHO guidelines for indoor air quality. Household fuel combustion.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/
indoorair/guidelines/hhfc/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).
Figure A.25.3.
Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels (%), 2014
Percentageofofpopulation
population(%)
(%)
Proportion
<5
530
3150
5195
>95
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.25.1.
Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels (%), 2014
Table A.25.1. Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels, 2014
AFR
AMR
Algeria
Mauritius
Seychelles
South Africa
Gabon
>95
>95
>95
82
73
71
Cabo Verde
Botswana
Angola
Namibia
Mauritania
Senegal
Swaziland
Lesotho
Zimbabwe
Equatorial Guinea
Ghana
Cameroon
Congo
Cte d'Ivoire
Zambia
Eritrea
Benin
Burkina Faso
Comoros
Guinea
Kenya
Togo
63
48
46
45
36
35
32
31
30
22
21
18
18
18
16
14
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
Burundi
Chad
Ethiopia
Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mozambique
Niger
<5
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sierra Leone
South Sudan
Uganda
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
EUR
Andorraaa
Armenia
>95
Austriaaa
>95
Azerbaijan
>95
Belarus
>95
Belgiumaa
>95
Cyprusaa
>95
Czech Republic
>95
Denmarkaa
>95
Finlandaa
>95
Franceaa
>95
Germanyaa
Greeceaa
>95
Hungaryaa
>95
Icelandaa
>95
Irelandaa
>95
Israelaa
>95
Italyaa
93
Latvia
93
Lithuaniaaa
92
Luxembourgaa
92
Maltaaa
Monacoaa
91
Netherlandsaa
91
Norwayaa
87
Polandaa
87
Portugalaa
86
Russian Federation
86
San Marinoaa
83
Slovakia
79
Slovenia
68
Spainaa
64
Swedenaa
Switzerlandaa
61
Turkmenistan
49
Ukraine
48
United Kingdomaa
36
Croatia
9
Republic of Moldova
Estonia
SEAR
Kazakhstan
>95
Maldives
Uzbekistan
76
Romania
Thailand
68
Bulgaria
Bhutan
Kyrgyzstan
57
Indonesia
Montenegro
34
India
Tajikistan
26
Nepal
Serbia
19
Sri Lanka
Albania
Bangladesh 10
The former
Yugoslav
of ..
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Myanmar 9
Georgia
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of .. 7
Timor-Leste <5
Turkey
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamasaa
Barbados
Canadaaa
Chile
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Grenada
Saint Kitts and Nevisaa
Saint Lucia
Trinidad and Tobago
United States of Americaaa
Uruguay
Brazil
Jamaica
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Colombia
Suriname
Belize
Cuba
Mexico
Panama
El Salvador
Peru
Paraguay
Guyana
Nicaragua
Honduras
Guatemala
Haiti
EMR
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
94
93
92
92
90
82
79
76
74
72
71
67
61
55
40
Bahrainaa
Egypt
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwaitaa
Lebanon
Morocco
Omanaa
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Tunisia
Yemen
Pakistan
Sudan
Afghanistan
Djibouti
Somalia
Libya
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
62
45
23
17
10
9
WPR
>95
Australiaaa
>95
Brunei Darussalamaa
>95
Japanaa
>95
Malaysia
>95
Nauru
>95
New Zealandaa
>95
Republic of Korea
>95
Singaporeaa
91
Niue
80
Cook Islands
63
Tonga
58
Palau
57
China
51
Viet Nam
45
Philippines
41
Marshall Islands
37
Fiji
32
Mongolia
31
Papua New Guinea
30
Tuvalu
27
Samoa
25
16
Vanuatu
Cambodia 13
Solomon Islands 9
Kiribati <5
Lao People's Democratic Republic <5
For high-income countries with no information on clean fuel use, usage is assumed to be >95%.
93
AMBIENT AIR POLLUTION

SDG Target 11.6
By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste
management
Indicator 11.6.2: Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter in cities (population weighted)
SITUATION
Worldwide in 2012, an estimated 3.0 million
deaths were caused by exposure to outdoor
pollution, specifically ambient particulate matter.1
Globally, no improvement in outdoor air quality
has been made over the last decade. As shown
in Fig. A.26.1, 90% of the population living
in cities in 2014 was exposed to particulate
matter in concentrations exceeding the WHO
air quality guidelines.2 There are, however,
important regional variations. For example,
in many high-income countries, including in
Europe and North America, air pollution has
decreased markedly in recent decades due to
efforts to reduce smog-forming emissions and
particulate matter. In contrast, air pollution has
increased in LMIC, including in South-East Asia,
largely as a result of population growth and
increasing industrialization without adequate
control measures.
Ambient air pollution is caused by inefficient
energy production, distribution and use, especially
in the industrial, transportation and building
sectors (both residential and commercial), and
by poor waste management. Transport systems
based primarily on individual motorized transport
can lead to further deterioration in air quality.
efficient industry, all lead to reductions in air

pollution levels. These sustainable policies
incorporate both improved technologies and
non-technological measures to reduce demand
and consumption, increase levels of recycling
and improve efficiency. For example, in many
high-income countries, including in Europe
and North America, air pollution has decreased
because of efforts to reduce both smog-forming
emissions (for example by requiring cleanerburning transportation fuels) and particulate
matter (for example by requiring particle filters
on diesel trucks). Setting standards, regulation
and monitoring of air quality to track results have
all contributed to the adoption of policies and
technologies that have resulted in cleaner air.
Resolution WHA68.8 on Health and the
environment: addressing the health impact of
air pollution was adopted unanimously by all
194 WHO Member States in May 2015, and
calls on WHO and its Member States to further
strengthen efforts and international cooperation
to address air pollution. Such efforts include
monitoring and evaluating the health impacts of
air pollution, developing health-based guidance
for sector-specific policies, and building national
capacity for intersectoral collaboration to address
air pollution as a serious threat to public health.
Figure A.26.1.
Distribution of worlds urban population by concentration of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of
2.5 m or less (PM2.5), 2014
4%
WHO air quality guideline
3%
2%
1%
0%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Annual mean PM2.5 concentration (g/m3)

Investments in sustainable policy options in
transport (public transport, walking and cycling),
clean and renewable energy, efficient buildings,
waste reduction and recycling (to avoid burning
solid and agricultural waste) and energy-
94
help plan for efficient, healthier and cleaner urban

futures. In addition, working across the many
sectors that relate to health and air pollution
presents challenges. The polluting sectors are
largely unaware of the potential health benefits
that cleaner policies could bring, while the health
sector often lacks access to the knowledge,
tools and skills needed to support intersectoral
action to tackle air pollution. Health research has
focused on demonstrating the health impacts
of air pollution and less on the assessment of
effective interventions, or ways of engaging with
other sectors in defining the best policy options
for health. Scaling up health-sector efforts to
enhance the global response to the adverse
health effects of air pollution, as proposed in
resolution WHA68.8, could prevent this major
cause of avoidable deaths.
EQUITY
Within cities, air pollution affects all income
groups, as particulate matter travels long
distances and everyone breathes the same
air. However, people living near busy roads or
other pollution sources may be more affected.
DATA GAPS
The monitoring of air pollution in cities has
improved in some parts of the world, and WHO
currently accesses data from about 3000 cities
in 108 countries. However, air quality remains
unmeasured in many cities, and information
on the sources of air pollution is still lacking
in many countries, thus limiting the ability of
decision-makers to assess risk, set targets and
measure progress. Remote satellite sensing along
with air-pollution models derived from emission
inventories have allowed for the estimation of
exposure to particulate matter in data-scarce
regions. All data are brought together in the
estimates of exposure to air pollution reported in
WHO databases. Nevertheless, monitoring data
are still widely lacking for other pollutants and for
differentials of exposure by different population
groups, thus limiting the assessment of related
inequalities. There is also a lack of systematic
tracking of the adoption of policies that lead to
reduced air pollution.
REFERENCES
Major obstacles to improving ambient air quality

include the continued adoption of outdated
models of urban and city development that lead
to pollution and ill health. For example, urban
sprawl is inefficient and very difficult to alter.
Sustainability and health benefits therefore need
to be mainstreamed into urban development to
from: Air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of
disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Forthcoming.
For more information on the WHO air quality guidelines see: http://
www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/outdoorair_aqg/en/
Figure A.26.2.
Concentration of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 m or less (PM10) in nearly 3000 urban areas (g/m3), 20082015a
3
Annual mean PM10 (ug/m3)
<20
2029
3049
5099
100149
150
750
1500
3000 Kilometres
a The mean
annual
concentration
particles
of less than
10 microns
in diameters
is a common measure of air pollution.
The mean annual concentration
of fine
suspended
particlesofoffine
lesssuspended
than 10 microns
in diameter
is a common
measure
of air pollution.
Table A.26.1. Annual mean concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in urban areas (g/m3), 2014
Table A.26.1.
Annual mean concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in urban areas (g/m3), 2014
AFR
Seychelles
Liberia
Comoros
Mauritius
Sierra Leone
Kenya
Namibia
Botswana
Cte d'Ivoire
Guinea
Swaziland
Lesotho
Ghana
Mozambique
Zimbabwe
Malawi
Togo
Algeria
Benin
Guinea-Bissau
Zambia
Equatorial Guinea
Madagascar
South Sudan
South Africa
Mali
Eritrea
Gabon
Ethiopia
Burkina Faso
Nigeria
Angola
Gambia
Senegal
Burundi
Rwanda
Niger
Congo
Chad
Cameroon
Uganda
Mauritania
Cabo Verde
AMR
Canada
Uruguay
Brazil
Panama
Trinidad and Tobago
Ecuador
Argentina
Antigua and Barbuda
Barbados
Guyana
Dominica
Suriname
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Grenada
Paraguay
Jamaica
Saint Lucia
Colombia
Costa Rica
Mexico
Belize
Bahamas
Haiti
Chile
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Peru
El Salvador
Honduras
5.0
6.1
7.0
14.3
16.8
16.9
18.8
19.3
19.3
19.4
19.9
21.7
22.2
22.4
24.1
24.1
25.6
25.9
26.0
27.9
28.9
29.6
32.0
32.4
32.5
32.6
34.8
35.7
35.9
36.7
36.9
38.9
42.8
43.0
EUR
0.0
7.3
8.5
11.6
11.9
12.8
13.2
13.5
14.5
15.0
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.5
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.2
18.2
18.4
19.2
20.6
20.7
22.0
24.3
24.6
25.5
26.1
31.9
33.7
37.0
37.1
40.3
43.7
SEAR
49.4
50.6
51.8
56.2
57.6
61.8
63.2
64.0
80.3
86.2
Timor-Leste
Indonesia
Thailand
Sri Lanka
DemocraticPeoples
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Republic
of Korea
Bhutan
Myanmar
India
Nepal
Bangladesh
Maldives
15.0
18.1
27.5
28.6
31.6
39.0
56.7
73.6
75.7
89.7
Sweden
Finland
Iceland
Estonia
Norway
Portugal
Ireland
Monaco
Spain
Andorra
Denmark
United Kingdom
Switzerland
France
Greece
Germany
Malta
Netherlands
Kyrgyzstan
Belgium
Luxembourg
Ukraine
Albania
Republic of Moldova
Russian Federation
Austria
Cyprus
Belarus
Italy
Israel
Slovenia
Lithuania
Latvia
Slovakia
Romania
Croatia
Czech Republic
Serbia
Kazakhstan
Hungary
Georgia
Montenegro
Armenia
Poland
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Turkey
Uzbekistan
Yugoslav
of ..
The former
The Former
Yugoslav
RepublicRepublic
of Macedonia
Tajikistan
San Marino
EMR
5.9
Somalia
Morocco
Lebanon
Tunisia
Jordan
Yemen
Djibouti
Oman
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Bahrain
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Kuwait
Egypt
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
7.1
7.7
8.5
9.1
9.6
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.5
10.5
12.5
12.6
12.7
12.7
14.5
14.5
14.9
15.7
16.0
16.6
17.0
17.1
16.9
19.3
31.3
34.3
36.4
38.3
41.1
42.2
46.0
47.4
52.0
53.1
58.5
60.1
64.1
64.5
68.7
78.8
101.8
105.3
131.6
WPR
17.1
17.1
17.2
17.2
18.1
18.6
19.3
19.4
19.5
20.2
20.3
20.4
20.5
20.9
21.5
21.9
22.9
23.3
24.3
25.1
25.8
26.3
26.4
30.5
35.7
39.1
43.0
51.2
56.0
Cook Islands 0.0

New Zealand 5.3
Australia 5.8
Micronesia (Federated States of) 8.0
Fiji 11.4
Papua New Guinea 12.1
Japan 13.0
Vanuatu 13.0
Malaysia 16.7
Singapore 17.0
25.0
Cambodia
27.6
Philippines
27.9
Republic of Korea
28.7
Viet Nam
33.5
Mongolia
33.6
61.8
China
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Nauru
Niue
Palau
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
95
NATURAL DISASTERS
SDG Target 13.1
Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries1
Indicator 13.1.2: Number of deaths, missing and persons affected by disaster per 100 000 people2
SITUATION
Globally, 331 natural disasters were registered
in 2015, causing 22 662 deaths and affecting
90.2 million people.3 Technological disasters,
including industrial and transport disasters,
accounted for one third of all types of disaster
in 2015 but affect smaller numbers of people
as they tend to be more localized. Biological
hazards, including epidemics, are addressed
separately in the section on natural and global
health risks.
Both the number of reported disasters and total
number of people affected have been declining
over the last 15 years. The total number of deaths
due to natural disasters was the lowest in 2014,
but the long-term mortality trend is dominated
by major events (Fig. A.27.1). Since 2000, three
major natural disasters have been associated
with more than 100 000 deaths the Asia
tsunami in 2004; the Myanmar cyclone in 2008;
and the Haiti earthquake in 2010. Deaths due
to extreme temperatures in Europe exceeded
50 000 in 2003 and 2010.
Hydrological and meteorological disasters
accounted for 51% and 30% respectively of
all natural disasters in 2015. Of the 1.4 million
disaster-related deaths that occurred during the
period 20002015, 58% occurred in Asia and
19% in the Americas. In Africa and Europe the
corresponding percentage was 11% in each case.
The Hyogo Framework for Action 20052015
has been instrumental in stimulating countries,
development partners and other agencies to take
action to reduce disaster risk,4 and may have
helped decrease mortality rates in the case of
Figure A.27.1.
Number of people reported killed in natural disasters,
20002015
350
Deaths (thousands)
300
250
Haiti
earthquake
Indian
Ocean
tsunami
Myanmar
cyclone
200
150
100
50
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
some hazards, such as floods.5
96
Many countries (81%) have national multisectoral

legislation or policies for emergency and disaster
risk management, with two thirds having a policy
in place for health sector emergency and disaster
risk management.6

Many countries are struggling to provide the
financial, human and logistical resources required
to strengthen capacities and manage risks before,
during and after disasters. Continuing progress
in health and other sectors will be needed for
early-warning systems, safe health facilities, and
disaster preparedness, response and recovery
in order to reduce health consequences and
strengthen resilience.
DATA GAPS
Estimates of deaths and of people affected may
vary widely due to technical challenges; limited
resources for disaster-related data collection and
reporting; inadequate vital registration systems;
and political and other reporting biases.
Given the data-management challenges and the
volatility of country-specific disaster impacts,
WHO recommends that the relevant indicators
are reported as averages for the last 5 years
when monitoring progress towards the SDG
Target 13.1.
REFERENCES
The same indicator is also proposed for the following two SDG targets
relating to disasters: (a) SDG Target 1.5: By 2030, build the resilience of
the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure
and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic,
social and environmental shocks and disasters; and (b) SDG Target 11.5:
By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of
people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses
relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including
water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people
in vulnerable situations.
Health is central to the Sendai Framework

for Disaster Risk Reduction 20152030, 7
and is explicitly mentioned in the goal and
expected outcome. As part of the post-2015
development agenda, the Sendai Framework
aims to substantially reduce disaster risk and
the loss of lives, livelihoods and health through
integrated and multisectoral actions to: (a) prevent
new risks; (b) mitigate existing disaster risks;
(c) reduce hazard exposure; and (d) enhance
preparedness for response and recovery.
The WHO Six-year strategic plan to minimize the
health impact of emergencies and disasters 2014
2019 8 outlines the policies and programmatic
implications for the health sector. Effective
emergency and disaster risk management health
policies and programmes should be guided by a
comprehensive approach across the emergencymanagement cycle of prevention/mitigation;
preparedness; and response and recovery.
EQUITY
Within affected populations, the impact of
disasters is usually greater among vulnerable
and lower socioeconomic status groups. For this
reason the INFORM natural disaster risk index
(Fig. A.27.2) includes a vulnerability dimension.9
Further efforts are needed to reduce exposure
and vulnerability, and to tackle underlying
disaster risk drivers, such as the consequences
of poverty and inequality, climate change and
variability, unplanned and rapid urbanization,
and poor land management.
This indicator may be revised to reflect the future revision of indicators

for monitoring in the context of the Sendai Framework.
from: The International Disaster Database [online database]. Brussels:
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED (http://
www.emdat.be/database, accessed 11 February 2016).
Hyogo Framework for Action 20052015: Building the resilience of

nations and communities to disasters. Extract from the final report of
the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (A/CONF.206/6). Geneva:
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction; 2007 (http://www.
unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/1037, accessed 6 April 2016).
Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Quin D et al. editors. Managing the risks
of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation.
Special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
WHO Global survey of country capacities for emergency and disaster

risk management 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Forthcoming.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 20152030. Geneva:

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction; 2015 (http://www.
unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/43291, accessed 6 April 2016).
Policy and strategies. Humanitarian Health Action [website]. Geneva:

World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/
preparedness/policy_and_strategies/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).
Inter-Agency Standing Committee and the European Commission. INFORM

Index for Risk Management. 14 December 2015; v. 0.2.7 (http://www.
inform-index.org, accessed 29 February 2016). Natural disaster risk
index computed as the geometric mean of natural disaster exposure,
socioeconomic and disadvantaged group vulnerability, and national
coping capacity.
Figure A.27.2.
INFORM natural disaster risk index, 2014
Natural disaster risk index

<2.0
2.03.4
3.54.9
5.05.9
6.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.27.1.
Average death rate due to natural disasters (per 100 000 population), 20112015a
Table A.27.1. Average death rate due to natural disasters (per 100 000 population), 20112015
AFR
0.0
Gabon
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Seychelles
Togo
Zambia
Algeria
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Chad
Congo
Cte d'Ivoire
Gambia
Mali
Mauritania
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Sierra Leone
South Africa
<0.1
Uganda
Angola
Botswana
Comoros
Kenya
Burundi
Ghana
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
<0.1
Mozambique
Niger
Swaziland
Zimbabwe
South Sudan
Namibia
a
AMR
Cabo Verde
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
Antigua and Barbuda

Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Grenada
Guyana
Jamaica
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Uruguay
Argentina
Canada
Chile
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Honduras
Mexico
Panama
Paraguay
Brazil
El Salvador
Peru
Colombia
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Haiti
Saint Lucia
EUR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.7
2.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.9
SEAR
Bhutan
Maldives
Timor-Leste
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Myanmar
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
India
Thailand
Sri Lanka
Nepal
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
7.2
Albania
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Cyprus
Estonia
Finland
Hungary
Iceland
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Montenegro
Republic of Moldova
Slovakia
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
Turkmenistan
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Uzbekistan
Serbia
Georgia
Turkey
EMR
0.0
Bahrain
0.0
0.0
Djibouti
Egypt
Jordan
Kuwait
0.0
Lebanon
Qatar
0.0
Tunisia
Iraq
Libya
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<0.1
<0.1
Morocco
Oman
Saudi Arabia
<0.1
Yemen
Sudan
Pakistan
<0.1
Somalia
Afghanistan
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.8
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
WPR
Kiribati
Mongolia
Singapore
Tonga
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Australia
China
Malaysia
<0.1
Republic of Korea
Viet Nam
Papua New Guinea
<0.1
Fiji
Cambodia
New Zealand
Vanuatu
Solomon Islands
Samoa
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.3
Philippines
Japan
2.0
2.4
2.5
3.4
The death rate is an average over the period 20112015. WHO Member States with a population of less than 90 000 in 2015 were not included in the analysis.
97
HOMICIDE
SDG Target 16.1
Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere
Indicator 16.1.1: Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100 000 population, by sex and age
SITUATION
Figure A.28.2.
Trends in homicide rates, by WHO region, 20002012
Figure A.28.1.
Global agesex distribution of homicide deaths, 2012
Male
Female
180
160
Deaths (thousands)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
014
1529
3049
5069
70+
Age group
During the period 20002012 there was a marked

decline in homicide rates with estimated falls
of around 17% globally (from 8.0 to 6.7 per
100 000 population), and 39% in high-income
countries (from 6.2 to 3.8 per 100 000 population).
In the WHO European Region, homicide rates
fell by more than one half since 2000. In other
regions, modest declines were observed with
the exception of the WHO Region of the Americas
where homicide rates continued to be very high
(Fig. A.28.2).
Prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence
are substantially higher in the WHO African Region,
the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region and the
WHO South-East Asia Region, compared to other
regions of the world, but only half of countries
in these regions are implementing wide-scale
social and cultural norm-change strategies to
address sexual and intimate partner violence.2,3
98
2000
Homicide and collective violence account for

around 10% of global injury-related deaths.
In 2012, there were an estimated 475 000
murders. Four fifths of homicide victims are
men, and 65% are men aged 1549 years (Fig.
A.28.1).1 The WHO Region of the Americas had
the highest rate of homicides (19.4 per 100 000
population); in the LMIC in this region, the rate
reached 28.5 per 100 000 population. The WHO
Western Pacific Region had the lowest murder
rate (2.0 per 100 000 population). One of the main
drivers of homicide rates is access to guns, with
approximately half of all homicides committed
with a firearm. Among women, intimate partner
homicide accounts for almost 38% of all murders
compared to 6% of all murders among men.
2012
25
20
15
10
5
0
AFR
AMR
SEAR
EUR
EMR
WPR
reporting in both data sources for most LMIC,

and methods need to be developed to assess
the completeness of police and/or justice system
data. Very few low-income and African countries
have functioning death-registration systems.
Additionally, the lack of consistent definitions
for homicides in justice system databases, the
use of different data sources, and the quality
of the reporting systems all contribute to the
difficulty of accurately assessing homicide rates.
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in the text, tables and figures
are taken from: Global status report on violence prevention 2014.
Geneva, New York and Vienna: World Health Organization, United
Nations Development Programme and United Nations Office on Drugs
and Crime; 2014 (http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/
violence/status_report/2014/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).

The vision of the global violence-prevention
community for the post-2015 era is to cut
worldwide levels of interpersonal violence by
half within the next 30 years.4,5 While not as
ambitious as the SDG targets, which aim to
eliminate several forms of violence in the next
15 years, this vision aligns well with SDGs 5
and 16 that explicitly target violence reduction.
Several United Nations agencies have focused
on violence reduction as a priority, including
WHO,6 UNESCO, UNODC, UNDP, UNICEF and
United Nations Women, as well as the United
Nations General Assembly. A 15-year global plan
of action for strengthening the role of the health
system in addressing interpersonal violence, in
particular against women and girls, and against
children, will be considered by WHO Member
States at the 2016 World Health Assembly.
EQUITY
Physical or sexual violence against women,
harmful practices such as child marriage and
female genital mutilation, and violence against
children are common in many countries and
specific SDG targets to address these issues
have been set for 2030. Homicide and most
forms of interpersonal violence are strongly
associated with social determinants such as
social norms, gender inequality, poverty and
unemployment, along with other cross-cutting
risk factors such as easy access to, and misuse
of, alcohol and firearms.
DATA GAPS
At present, 102 countries have data from death
registration systems or police data that are
sufficient for estimating levels and trends in
homicide rates with around two thirds of these
countries having information from both sources
and 30% having only police and/or justice system
data. There is generally substantial under-
Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Prevalence

and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual
violence. Geneva, London and Tygerberg: World Health Organization,
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and South African Medical
Research Council; 2013 (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/
publications/violence/9789241564625/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).
This is addressed by SDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all
women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking
and sexual and other types of exploitation.
Krisch M, Eisner M, Mikton C, Butchart A. Global strategies to reduce

violence by 50% in 30 years: Findings from the Global Violence Reduction
Conference 2014. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 2015 (http://
www.vrc.crim.cam.ac.uk/vrcpublications/cambridgewhoreport, accessed
6 April 2016).
Eisner M, Nivette A. How to reduce the global homicide rate to 2

per 100,000 by 2060. In: Loeber R, Welsh BC, editors. The Future
of Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012:21928
(Abstract: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/
acprof:oso/9780199917938.001.0001/acprof-9780199917938-chapter-28,
Resolution WHA67.15. Strengthening the role of the health system in

addressing violence, in particular against women and girls, and against
children. In: Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly, Geneva, 1924
May 2014. Resolutions and decisions, annexes. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2014:3034 (WHA67/2014/REC/1; http://apps.who.int/
gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67-REC1/A67_2014_REC1-en.pdf, accessed
6 April 2016).
Figure A.28.3.
Mortality rate due to homicide (per 100 000 population), 2012
Homicide rate
<2.0
2.04.9
5.09.9
10.019.9
20.0
Data not available

Not applicable
750 1500
3000 Kilometres
Table A.28.1.
Mortality rate due to homicide (per 100 000 population), 2012
TableA.28.1.Homicide rates (per 100000 population), 2012

AFR
AMR
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Equatorial Guinea
Algeria
2.0
South Sudan
Rwanda
Benin
Burundi
Kenya
Eritrea
Senegal
Comoros
Ethiopia
Madagascar
4.8
Cabo Verde
Guinea
Gabon
Togo
Chad
Gambia
Seychelles
Burkina Faso
Ghana
Guinea-Bissau
Nigeria
Niger
8.8
Congo
Zambia
Angola
Mali
Liberia
Mauritania
Cameroon
Uganda
Cte d'Ivoire
Botswana
Sierra Leone
Zimbabwe
Swaziland
Namibia
South Africa
Lesotho
Canada
Antigua and Barbuda
Chile
Cuba
Argentina
Grenada
Dominica
Uruguay
Costa Rica
Suriname
Paraguay
Barbados
Peru
Nicaragua
Ecuador
Saint Lucia
Panama
Guyana
Mexico
Dominican Republic
Haiti
Bahamas
Brazil
Trinidad and Tobago
Guatemala
Colombia
El Salvador
Belize
Jamaica
Honduras
2.7
3.4
3.5
4.4
5.8
6.3
6.7
7.2
7.4
7.7
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.8
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.4
9.5
9.8
10.0
10.1
10.1
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.7
11.0
11.2
EUR
1.8
4.4
4.6
5.0
5.4
6.0
6.2
6.8
7.9
8.5
9.4
9.7
9.8
11.0
13.0
13.8
13.8
13.9
14.0
15.3
19.3
20.2
22.0
25.4
26.6
32.1
32.4
35.3
39.9
43.9
43.9
44.7
45.1
57.6
103.9
11.3
SEAR
11.7
12.0
12.2
12.4
13.0
13.3
13.5
15.1
19.4
19.7
35.7
37.5
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Nepal
Maldives
Sri Lanka
Myanmar
India
Democratic
People's
Republic
of ..
Democratic
Peoples
Republic
of Korea
Indonesia
Timor-Leste
Thailand
1.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.8
4.2
4.3
4.7
4.7
4.9
5.5
Luxembourg
Iceland
Norway
Switzerland
San Marino
Slovenia
Andorra
Germany
Spain
Sweden
Austria
Czech Republic
Denmark
Italy
Netherlands
France
Belgium
Monaco
Poland
Ireland
Croatia
Finland
Portugal
Slovakia
Hungary
United Kingdom
Greece
Serbia
Tajikistan
TheThe
Former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
former
Yugoslav
Republic
of ..
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Armenia
Israel
Romania
Azerbaijan
Turkey
Malta
Montenegro
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Georgia
Albania
Ukraine
Estonia
Belarus
Lithuania
Latvia
Republic of Moldova
Kyrgyzstan
Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
EMR
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.4
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.2
3.4
4.3
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
6.2
6.7
7.0
7.5
9.1
9.2
13.1
Bahrain 0.8
Tunisia 1.8
Morocco 2.5
Syrian Arab Republic 2.5
Libya 2.6
Jordan 2.9
Kuwait 3.1
Iran (Islamic Republic of) 4.8
Oman 4.8
Egypt 5.1
Lebanon 5.4
Yemen 5.4
Somalia 5.5
Saudi Arabia 6.5
Sudan 6.5
Djibouti 7.0
Qatar 7.1
Afghanistan 7.3
Pakistan 8.9
18.6
Iraq
WPR
Japan
Singapore
Australia
China
New Zealand
Nauru
Republic of Korea
Brunei Darussalam
Fiji
Cambodia
Niue
Vanuatu
Cook Islands
Palau
Samoa
Viet Nam
Tuvalu
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
Tonga
Solomon Islands
Kiribati
Mongolia
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
0.4
0.6
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.4
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.7
4.0
4.2
4.3
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.9
7.1
8.2
10.1
10.8
12.4
99
CONFLICTS
SDG Target 16.1
Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere
Indicator 16.1.2: Conflict-related deaths per 100 000 population, by sex, age and cause
SITUATION
In 2015, it is provisionally estimated that 152 000

people (90% uncertainty range 89 500234 600)
were killed in wars and conflicts, corresponding to
around 0.3% of all global deaths.1 This estimate
does not include deaths due to the indirect effects
of war and conflict on the spread of diseases,
poor nutrition and collapse of health services.
To break cycles of insecurity and reduce the risk

of their recurrence, national reformers and their
international partners need to build the legitimate
institutions that can provide a sustained level
of citizen security, justice and employment
offering a stake in society to groups that may
otherwise receive more respect and recognition
from engaging in armed violence than in lawful
activities, while punishing infractions capably
and fairly.4 SDG 16 provides a global framework
for greater focus and action in conflict and
post-conflict countries. This will require greater
integration of the efforts of the health sector
with other sectors, and of humanitarian and
development support.
Between around 1990 and 2011 there was

a decline in both the number and intensity of
wars and conflicts.2 Although WHO estimates of
global direct conflict deaths (injury deaths) vary
substantially by year, there was a statistically
significant average decline during 19902010
of 2% per year if the Rwandan genocide of 1994
is excluded (Fig. A.29.1).
Since 2011, however, there has been an upturn
in the number of conflict deaths, notably due
to the increased level of conflict in the Middle
East1,3 (Fig. A.29.2). It appears likely that conflict
mortality levels for 2015 may be similar to or
exceed those for 1990. It is estimated that
in 2014, there were at least 17 conflicts that
killed more than 1000 people each, compared
to 15 in 2013. Ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan,
Iraq and the Syrian Arab Republic account for
significant numbers of conflict-related deaths,
with these three countries accounting for an
estimated two thirds of global conflict deaths
in 2014. Nigerias ongoing conflicts were the
fourth deadliest double the previous years
figure as conflict with the militant group Boko
Haram intensified. Sudan and South Sudan are
also suffering from conflict as are an increased
number of African countries.
Although factors contributing to specific conflicts
differ from conflict to conflict, important broader
factors include the longstanding and intractable
Middle East crisis, remnants of the Cold War
and sectarian religious divisions. Many conflicts
are also driven by underlying causes, including
poverty, poor governance and neglect, and local
grievances.
EQUITY
While men account for the large majority of
injury deaths in conflicts, there is increasing
documentation and evidence of high rates
of sexual violence against women in conflict
situations. A recent review suggested that
approximately one in five refugees or displaced
women in complex humanitarian settings
experienced sexual violence.5 This is likely to be
an underestimation of the true prevalence given
the stigma often associated with disclosure. A
high prevalence of rape has been documented
for the Liberian civil war (with estimates ranging
from 915% of Liberian women) and for the
Rwandan genocide.6
Fragile and conflict or post-conflict situations
present the most profound challenges to
development in the world today. In both fragile
and conflict-affected states, poverty levels are
usually high and welfare levels low. The stability
and social cohesion necessary for development
are frequently lacking. And often there are no
strong and legitimate institutions to address
poverty and manage conflict. Violent conflict
is also more likely to re-emerge in such areas,
leading to further impoverishment, undercutting
social cohesion and eroding institutions.
1000
900
Deaths (thousands)
800
700
Rwandan
genocide
500
Recent
increase
400
300
200
100
0
100
l
1990
l
1995
l
2000
DATA GAPS
High-intensity conflicts usually result in the
complete breakdown of death registration and
other statistical monitoring systems, if these
existed previously. Conflict mortality estimates
tend to rely on body counts,7 reporting by
nongovernmental organizations and groups8,9,10
or on surveys or retrospectively reported
deaths in households or sibships.11 All of these
methods are potentially subject to substantial
measurement problems, possible advocacy biases
and limitations due to danger and the security
situation. As a result, there is wide variation in
reported estimates of global conflict deaths from
various sources, and wide uncertainty levels
in such estimates.1,2,12 There is even greater
potential uncertainty for statistics on sexual
violence during conflicts as these are prone to
both undercounting and overcounting.6
REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all statistics in text and figures are taken
from: Global Health Estimates: deaths by cause, age, and sex with
provisional update to 2015 using methods and data sources found
at: http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/
GlobalCOD_method_2000_2012.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 6 April 2016).
2
Human security report 2013. The decline in global violence: evidence,
explanation and contestation. Vancouver: Human Security Press;
2014 (http://www.hsrgroup.org/docs/Publications/HSR2013/HSRP_
Report_2013_140226_Web.pdf, accessed 16 September 2015).
3
Death toll in 2014s bloodiest wars sharply up on previous year. Project
for the Study of the 21st Century; March 2015 (https://projects21.
files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ps21-conflict-trends.pdf, accessed 17
September 2015).
4
World development report 2011. Washington (DC): World Bank;
2011 (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/
WDR2011_Full_Text.pdf, accessed 17 September 2015).
5
Vu A, Atif A, Wirtz A, Pham K, Rubenstein L, Glass N et al. The prevalence
of sexual violence among female refugees in complex humanitarian
emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos Curr. March
2014 (http://currents.plos.org/disasters/article/the-prevalence-ofsexual-violence-among-female-refugees-in-complex-humanitarianemergencies-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/, accessed 17
September 2015).
6
Palermo T, Peterman A. Undercounting, overcounting and the longevity
of flawed estimates: statistics on sexual violence in conflict. Bull World
Health Organ. 2011;89(12):92425.
7
Iraq Body Count. Iraqi deaths from violence 20032015. Available at:
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
8
Lacina B, Gleditsch NP. Monitoring trends in global combat: a new
dataset of battle deaths. Eur J Popul. 2005;21:14566.
9
Price M, Klingner J, Ball P. Preliminary statistical analysis of documentation
of killings in the Syrian Arab Republic. UN OHCHR commissioned report,
January 2013. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/
SY/PreliminaryStatAnalysisKillingsInSyria.pdf (accessed 6 April 2016).
10
BTselem The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied
Territories [online database]. Statistics on injuries and deaths suffered
by both sides in the conflict (http://www.btselem.org/statistics).
11
Iraq Family Health Survey Study Group. Violence-related mortality in
Iraq from 2002 to 2006. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:48493.
12
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. UCDP Datasets v. 5-2015, 19892014.
Oslo: Uppsala University; 2015. Available at: http://www.pcr.uu.se/
research/ucdp/datasets/ (accessed 8 July 2015).
1
Figure A.29.1.
Trends in global injury deaths due to conflicts, 19902015
600
War and conflict impede the maintenance of

public health interventions and health services
and are major obstacles in efforts to eradicate,
eliminate or control diseases such as malaria
and HIV infection. Polio is a particularly telling
example the battle against the virus has now
become entirely focused on conflict zones such
as those in Afghanistan and Pakistan. War and
conflict also adversely affect the economy and
peoples livelihoods and may cause serious
malnutrition and famines.
l
2005
l
2010
l
2015
Figure A.29.2.
Trends in global injury deaths due to conflicts, by WHO region, 19902015
EMR
AFR
SEAR
EUR
WPR
AMR
700
Deaths (thousands)
600
500
400
300
200
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
100
Figure A.29.3.
Estimated direct deaths from major conflicts (per 100 000 population), 20012015a
20112015
20062010
20012005

Iraq
Afghanistan
Somalia
South Sudan
Libya
Yemen
Sudan
Ukraine
Chad
Burundi
Georgia
Nepal
Sri Lanka
Angola
Liberia
l
0
l
50
l
100
l
150
l
200
l
250
l
300
l
350
l
400
l
450
l
500
Crude death rate (per 100 000 population)

Countries with estimated conflict deaths exceeding 5 per 100 000 population in 20112015 or 10 per 100 000 population in earlier 5 year periods. The death rate is an average over each five year period.
101
ANNEX B
TABLES OF HEALTH STATISTICS BY COUNTRY, WHO REGION AND GLOBALLY
Explanatory notes
The statistics shown represent official WHO statistics based on the evidence available in early 2016. They have been
compiled primarily using publications and databases produced and maintained by WHO or United Nations groups of which
WHO is a member. A number of statistics have been derived from data produced and maintained by other international
organizations.
Wherever possible, estimates have been computed using standardized categories and methods in order to enhance
cross-national comparability. This approach may result in some cases in differences between the estimates presented
here and the official national statistics prepared and endorsed by individual WHO Member States. It is important to stress
that these estimates are also subject to considerable uncertainty, especially for countries with weak statistical and health
information systems where the quality of underlying empirical data is limited.
For indicators with a reference period expressed as a range, figures refer to the latest available year in the range unless
otherwise noted.
Unless otherwise stated, the WHO regional and global aggregates for rates and ratios are weighted averages when relevant,
while for absolute numbers they are the sums. Aggregates are calculated only if data are available for at least 50% of the
population within an indicated group. For indicators with a reference period expressed as a range, aggregates are for the
reference period shown in the heading unless otherwise noted. Some WHO regional and global aggregates may include
country estimates that are not available for reporting.
More details on the indicators and estimates presented here are available at the WHO Global Health Observatory.1
indicates data are not available or not applicable.
1 The Global Health Observatory (GHO) is WHOs portal providing access to data and analyses for monitoring the global health situation. See: http://www.who.int/gho/en/, accessed 16
April 2016.
103
Health SDGs
3.1
ANNEX B
PART 1
Total
populationa
(000s)
Member State
Male
Female
2015
Afghanistan
3.2
3.3
Life expectancy at birtha,b (years)
Both sexes
2015
Healthy life
expectancy at
birtha,b (years)
Maternal
mortality
ratioc (per
100 000 live
births)
2015
2015
New HIV
infections
among adults
Proportion of
Under-five
Neonatal
1549 years
births attended mortality ratee mortality ratee oldf (per 1000
by skilled health (per 1000 live (per 1000 live
uninfected
personneld (%)
births)
births)
population)
20062014
2015
2015
2014
32 527
59.3
61.9
60.5
52.2
396
45
91.1
35.5
Albania
2 897
75.1
80.7
77.8
68.8
29
99
14.0
6.2
Algeria
39 667
73.8
77.5
75.6
66.0
140
97
25.5
15.5
<0.1
Andorra
<0.1
70
2.8
1.4
25 022
50.9
54.0
52.4
45.8
477
47
156.9
48.7
2.1
92
74.1
78.6
76.4
67.5
8.1
4.9
43 417
72.7
79.9
76.3
67.6
52
100
12.5
6.3
0.3
Armenia
3 018
71.6
77.7
74.8
66.8
25
100
14.1
7.4
0.2
Australia
23 969
80.9
84.8
82.8
71.9
99 ab
3.8
2.2
Austria
8 545
79.0
83.9
81.5
72.0
99 ab
3.5
2.1
Azerbaijan
9 754
69.6
75.8
72.7
64.7
25
97 ab
31.7
18.2
0.2
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
100 ab
388
72.9
79.1
76.1
66.6
80
98 ab
12.1
6.9
1 377
76.2
77.9
76.9
67.0
15
100 ab
6.2
1.1
160 996
70.6
73.1
71.8
62.3
176
42 ab
37.6
23.3
<0.1
284
73.1
77.9
75.5
66.6
27
99
13.0
8.0
Belarus
9 496
66.5
78.0
72.3
65.1
100
4.6
1.9
0.6
Belgium
11 299
78.6
83.5
81.1
71.1
4.1
2.2
Belize
359
67.5
73.1
70.1
62.3
28
95
16.5
8.3
0.5
Benin
10 880
58.8
61.1
60.0
52.5
405
77 ab
99.5
31.8
0.6
775
69.5
70.1
69.8
61.2
148
75
32.9
18.3
10 725
68.2
73.3
70.7
62.2
206
85
38.4
19.6
0.2
Bhutan
State of)
3 810
75.0
79.7
77.4
68.6
11
100
5.4
4.0
Botswana
2 262
63.3
68.1
65.7
56.9
129
100
43.6
21.9
14.0
Brazil
207 848
71.4
78.7
75.0
65.5
44
99 ab
16.4
8.9
423
76.3
79.2
77.7
70.4
23
100 ab
10.2
4.3
7 150
71.1
78.0
74.5
66.4
11
94
10.4
5.6
Burkina Faso
18 106
59.1
60.5
59.9
52.6
371
66
88.6
26.7
0.5
Burundi
11 179
57.7
61.6
59.6
52.2
712
60
81.7
28.6
0.1
521
71.3
75.0
73.3
64.4
42
92
24.5
12.2
0.9
Cambodia
15 578
66.6
70.7
68.7
58.9
161
89 ab
28.7
14.8
<0.1
Cameroon
23 344
55.9
58.6
57.3
50.3
596
65 ab
87.9
25.7
3.8
Canada
35 940
80.2
84.1
82.2
72.3
98 ab
4.9
3.2
4 900
50.9
54.1
52.5
45.9
882
40
130.1
42.6
2.7
Chad
14 037
51.7
54.5
53.1
46.1
856
24
138.7
39.3
1.5
Chile
17 948
77.4
83.4
80.5
70.4
22
100
8.1
4.9
0.2
China
1383 925
74.6
77.6
76.1
68.5
27
100
10.7
5.5
48 229
71.2
78.4
74.8
65.1
64
99
15.9
8.5
0.2
788
61.9
65.2
63.5
55.9
335
82
73.5
34.0
4 620
63.2
66.3
64.7
56.6
442
94
45.0
18.0
1.4
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Cabo Verde
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
21
100 ab
8.1
4.4
4 808
77.1
82.2
79.6
69.7
25
99
9.7
6.2
0.2
2.1
22 702
52.3
54.4
53.3
47.0
645
56
92.6
37.9
4 240
74.7
81.2
78.0
69.4
100
4.3
2.6
11 390
76.9
81.4
79.1
69.2
39
99
5.5
2.3
0.3
1 165
78.3
82.7
80.5
71.3
100 ab
2.7
1.5
Czech Republic
10 543
75.9
81.7
78.8
69.4
100 ab
3.4
1.8
Democratic People's
Republic of Korea
25 155
67.0
74.0
70.6
64.0
82
100
24.9
13.5
Democratic Republic of
the Congo
77 267
58.3
61.5
59.8
51.7
693
80
98.3
30.1
0.6
5 669
78.6
82.5
80.6
71.2
98
888
61.8
65.3
63.5
55.8
73
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
104
ab
3.5
2.5
0.1
229
87 ab
65.3
33.4
1.1
100 ab
21.2
15.6
Health SDGs
3.3
3.4
TB incidence
(per 100 000
population)
Malaria
incidenceh
(per 1000
population at
risk)
Infants
receiving
three doses
of hepatitis B
vaccinei (%)
2014
2013
2014
189
3.5
Probability of
Reported
dying from any
number
of CVD, cancer,
of people
diabetes, CRD
Suicide
requiring
between age 30 mortality ratek
interventions and exact age (per 100 000
against NTDsj
70k (%)
population)
2014
2012
15.7
75
13 406 517
19
98
78
<0.1
95
9.2
370
2012
3.6
3.7
Total alcohol
per capita
(>15 years
of age)
consumption,
in litres of
pure alcohol,
projected
estimatesl
Road traffic
mortality
ratem (per
100 000
population)
Proportion
of married
or in-union
women of
reproductive
age who have
their need
for family
planning
Adolescent birth
satisfied
rateo (per 1000
with modern
women aged
n
methods (%)
1519 years)
2015
2013
20052015
20052015
Member State
30.5
4.0
1.0
15.5
51.9
Afghanistan
42
18.8
6.5
6.6
15.1
12.9
19.7
Albania
22.1
1.8
0.6
23.8
77.2
12.4
Algeria
96
9.1
7.6
4.4
Andorra
145.7
80
17 668 111
24.2
10.6
7.6
26.9
190.9
7.6
99
1 395
3.2
6.7
24
0.0
94
3 948
17.5
10.8
7.6
13.6
68.1
Argentina
45
0.0
93
38 929
29.7
3.3
5.5
18.3
39.2
22.7
Armenia
6.4
91
18 843
9.4
11.6
12.6
5.4
14.2
Australia
7.8
83
14
12.0
15.6
8.5
5.4
7.9
77
0.0
94
1 678 393
23.3
1.7
2.1
10.0
21.5
47.2
Azerbaijan
12
96
146
13.8
2.3
4.2
13.8
34.6
Bahamas
14
99
13.3
7.2
2.4
8.0
13.8
Bahrain
227
68.7
95
49 873 889
17.5
6.6
0.2
13.6
72.5
113.0
0.9
94
2 689
13.8
2.6
6.5
6.7
70.0
49.7
Barbados
58
97
26.2
21.8
17.1
13.7
74.2
21.6
Belarus
9.0
98
15
12.2
17.8
10.8
6.7
7.2
Belgium
37
0.2
95
12 254
14.4
2.2
8.3
24.4
73.1
64.0
Belize
61
303.0
70
4 358 651
22.1
3.7
2.2
27.7
24.5
94.0
Benin
164
<0.1
99
107 867
20.5
16.0
1.1
15.1
84.6
28.4
Bhutan
120
5.1
94
2 129 328
18.3
11.7
5.8
23.2
42.8
115.6
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Austria
Bangladesh
State of)
42
89
17.5
13.9
7.5
17.7
21.9
11.0
385
1.1
95
252 373
20.9
3.2
7.7
23.6
39.0
Botswana
44
9.9
96
18 680 873
19.4
6.0
9.1
23.4
89.3
64.8
Brazil
62
99
9 339
16.8
6.2
0.8
8.1
16.6
Brunei Darussalam
27
95
379
24.0
14.5
11.3
8.3
40.8
Bulgaria
54
418.4
91
14 961 395
23.8
2.9
7.4
30.0
37.1
130.0
126
269.4
95
5 332 985
24.3
16.4
9.8
31.3
32.6
85.0
138
0.7
95
135 100
15.1
3.9
7.2
26.1
73.2
390
10.6
97
5 566 529
17.7
9.0
6.1
17.4
56.4
57.0
Cambodia
220
271.8
87
19 449 659
19.9
4.9
7.7
27.6
40.2
119.0
Cameroon
5.2
75
10.7
11.4
10.3
6.0
12.6
375
325.0
47
4 050 725
18.5
7.9
3.8
32.4
28.7
229.0
159
157.9
46
10 477 490
23.2
2.7
4.4
24.1
17.5
203.4
Chad
16
92
30
11.9
13.0
9.3
12.4
51.5
Chile
68
<0.1
99
26 227 888
19.4
8.7
7.6
18.8
6.2
China
33
8.9
90
4 524 693
12.4
5.5
6.6
16.8
83.7
84.0
Colombia
35
170.6
80
523 106
23.5
10.5
0.2
28.0
27.8
70.0
Comoros
381
187.5
90
3 568 201
19.8
7.8
3.9
26.4
38.5
147.0
12
99
22
4.8
24.2
56.0
Cook Islands
11
<0.1
91
41 518
12.2
6.9
5.1
13.9
89.1
61.2
Costa Rica
165
385.2
67
18 131 745
23.3
5.4
6.5
24.2
30.9
125.0
12
95
31
17.7
16.5
11.7
9.2
11.8
Croatia
9.4
96
52 997
16.5
14.6
5.5
7.5
88.4
52.5
Cuba
5.3
96
9.5
5.1
9.1
5.2
4.2
4.6
99
17.0
15.6
14.1
6.1
85.7
11.1
442
2.1
93
5 643 102
27.1
4.4
20.8
76.7
0.7
325
295.2
80
57 568 918
23.6
8.0
3.4
33.2
15.6
138.0
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Canada
Congo
Cte d'Ivoire
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic People's
Republic of Korea
the Congo
7.1
13.3
11.2
10.2
3.5
2.4
Denmark
619
25.0
78
107 995
18.8
10.7
0.9
24.7
20.6
Djibouti
0.7
97
8 063
6.6
15.3
47.2 ac Dominica
105
Health SDGs
3.1
ANNEX B
PART 1
Total
populationa
(000s)
Member State
3.2
3.3
Male
Female
2015
Both sexes
2015
Healthy life
expectancy at
birtha,b (years)
Maternal
mortality
ratioc (per
100 000 live
births)
2015
2015
New HIV
infections
among adults
Proportion of
Under-five
Neonatal
1549 years
uninfected
personneld (%)
births)
births)
population)
20062014
2015
2015
2014
Dominican Republic
10 528
70.9
77.1
73.9
65.1
92
98 ab
30.9
21.7
0.4
Ecuador
16 144
73.5
79.0
76.2
67.0
64
96
21.6
10.8
0.2
Egypt
91 508
68.8
73.2
70.9
62.2
33
92
24.0
12.8
<0.1
6 127
68.8
77.9
73.5
64.1
54
98 ab
16.8
8.3
0.2
845
56.6
60.0
58.2
51.2
342
68 ab
94.1
33.1
2.9
5 228
62.4
67.0
64.7
55.9
501
34
46.5
18.4
0.2
Estonia
1 313
72.7
82.0
77.6
68.9
Ethiopia
99 391
62.8
66.8
64.8
56.1
353
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Fiji
99 ab
2.9
1.5
16
59.2
27.7
892
67.0
73.1
69.9
62.9
30
99
22.4
9.6
0.2
Finland
5 503
78.3
83.8
81.1
71.0
100 ab
2.3
1.3
France
64 395
79.4
85.4
82.4
72.6
98 ab
4.3
2.2
Gabon
1 725
64.7
67.2
66.0
57.2
291
89 ab
50.8
23.2
1.4
Gambia
1 991
59.8
62.5
61.1
53.8
706
57
68.9
29.9
1.1
Georgia
4 000
70.3
78.3
74.4
66.5
36
100
11.9
7.2
0.3
Germany
80 689
78.7
83.4
81.0
71.3
3.7
2.1
Ghana
27 410
61.0
63.9
62.4
55.3
319
61.6
28.3
0.7
Greece
10 955
78.3
83.6
81.0
71.9
4.6
2.9
107
71.2
76.1
73.6
65.0
27
99 ab
11.8
6.0
Guatemala
16 343
68.5
75.2
71.9
62.1
88
66
29.1
13.4
0.3
Guinea
12 609
58.2
59.8
59.0
51.7
679
45 ab
93.7
31.3
1.1
1 844
57.2
60.5
58.9
51.5
549
45 ab
92.5
39.7
2.5
767
63.9
68.5
66.2
58.9
229
92 ab
39.4
22.8
2.0
10 711
61.5
65.5
63.5
55.4
359
37
69.0
25.4
1.1
Honduras
8 075
72.3
77.0
74.6
64.9
129
83
20.4
11.0
0.1
Hungary
9 855
72.3
79.1
75.9
67.4
17
99 ab
5.9
3.5
329
81.2
84.1
82.7
72.7
2.0
0.9
Grenada
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Iceland
India
99 ab
71
1311 051
66.9
69.9
68.3
59.5
174
74 ab
47.7
27.7
257 564
67.1
71.2
69.1
62.2
126
87
27.2
13.5
0.5
79 109
74.5
76.6
75.5
66.6
25
96
15.5
9.5
0.2
Iraq
36 423
66.2
71.8
68.9
60.0
50
91
32.0
18.4
4 688
79.4
83.4
81.4
71.5
100 ab
3.6
2.3
0.2
Israel
8 064
80.6
84.3
82.5
72.8
4.0
2.1
Italy
59 798
80.5
84.8
82.7
72.8
100 ab
3.5
2.1
2 793
73.9
78.6
76.2
66.9
89
99
15.7
11.6
1.0
Japan
126 573
80.5
86.8
83.7
74.9
100 ab
Jordan
7 595
72.5
75.9
74.1
65.0
58
100
Kazakhstan
17 625
65.7
74.7
70.2
63.3
12
100
14.1
7.0
0.2
Kenya
46 050
61.1
65.8
63.4
55.6
510
62
49.4
22.2
2.3
Kiribati
112
63.7
68.8
66.3
59.1
90
80
55.9
23.7
Kuwait
3 892
73.7
76.0
74.7
65.8
100 ab
8.6
3.2
Kyrgyzstan
5 940
67.2
75.1
71.1
63.8
76
98
21.3
11.5
0.2

Republic
6 802
64.1
67.2
65.7
57.9
197
40
66.7
30.1
0.2
Latvia
1 971
69.6
79.2
74.6
67.1
18
98
7.9
5.2
Lebanon
5 851
73.5
76.5
74.9
65.7
15
8.3
4.8
<0.1
Lesotho
2 135
51.7
55.4
53.7
46.6
487
78
90.2
32.7
20.1
Liberia
4 503
59.8
62.9
61.4
52.7
725
61 ab
69.9
24.1
0.6
Libya
6 278
70.1
75.6
72.7
63.8
13.4
7.2
Lithuania
2 878
68.1
79.1
73.6
66.0
10
100 ab
5.2
2.5
Luxembourg
567
79.8
84.0
82.0
71.8
10
100 ab
1.9
0.9
Madagascar
24 235
63.9
67.0
65.5
56.9
353
44
49.6
19.7
0.2
Malawi
17 215
56.7
59.9
58.3
51.2
634
87 ab
64.0
21.8
4.5
Malaysia
30 331
72.7
77.3
75.0
66.5
40
99 ab
7.0
3.9
0.3
Maldives
364
76.9
80.2
78.5
69.6
68
96
8.6
4.9
17 600
58.2
58.3
58.2
51.1
587
57
114.7
37.8
1.3
Indonesia
Ireland
Jamaica
Mali
106
ab
100
2.7
0.9
17.9
10.6
Health SDGs
3.3
3.4
TB incidence
(per 100 000
population)
Malaria
incidenceh
(per 1000
population at
risk)
Infants
receiving
three doses
of hepatitis B
vaccinei (%)
2014
2013
2014
3.5
Probability of
Reported
dying from any
number
of CVD, cancer,
of people
diabetes, CRD
Suicide
requiring
against NTDsj
70k (%)
population)
2014
2012
2012
3.6
3.7
Total alcohol
per capita
(>15 years
of age)
consumption,
in litres of
pure alcohol,
projected
estimatesl
Road traffic
mortality
ratem (per
100 000
population)
Proportion
of married
or in-union
women of
reproductive
age who have
their need
for family
planning
Adolescent birth
satisfied
rateo (per 1000
with modern
women aged
n
methods (%)
1519 years)
2015
2013
20052015
20052015
0.2
89
1 192 636
14.8
3.6
7.6
29.3
84.1
54
<0.1
83
1 806 145
11.9
8.9
6.1
20.1
80.7
15
94
1 117 250
24.5
1.6
0.3
12.8
80.0
56.0
Egypt
41
<0.1
93
874 565
16.9
12.8
3.5
21.1
81.9
72.0
El Salvador
162
211.1
24
465 062
23.4
13.9
8.1
22.9
20.5
176.0
78
17.4
94
976 756
24.2
8.3
1.4
24.1
19.6
76.0
Eritrea
20
93
18.8
18.7
7.0
15.6
Estonia
207
117.8
77
67 843 988
15.2
7.5
4.3
25.3
57.6
71.2
Ethiopia
67
99
899 436
30.8
5.9
3.2
5.8
27.5
Fiji
5.6
11.2
16.7
11.9
4.8
7.3
Finland
8.7
82
178
11.4
15.8
11.6
5.1
95.5
6.2
France
444
210.6
70
1 534 672
15.0
7.0
11.8
22.9
33.7
115.0
Gabon
174
233.1
96
1 200 503
19.1
3.2
3.2
29.4
23.9
88.0
Gambia
106
0.0
91
79
21.6
3.8
6.7
11.8
52.8
41.5
Georgia
6.2
87
265
12.3
13.0
10.6
4.3
7.8
Germany
165
318.5
98
18 697 745
20.3
2.3
5.4
26.2
44.6
65.0
Ghana
4.8
96
73
12.9
4.9
9.3
9.1
8.3
Greece
1.3
97
39
10.4
57
2.2
73
3 255 245
13.5
7.3
3.9
19.0
65.5
177
403.4
51
8 842 314
20.9
3.3
0.7
27.3
15.7
146.0
Guinea
369
112.1
80
1 884 916
22.4
3.1
4.3
27.5
37.6
136.7
Guinea-Bissau
103
129.3
98
720 357
34.8
8.6
17.3
52.5
101.0
Guyana
200
13.6
48
11 358 721
23.9
2.3
5.9
15.1
44.8
66.0
43
3.2
85
2 709 120
15.7
4.9
4.0
17.4
76.0
101.0
Honduras
12
24.0
25.4
12.4
7.7
19.8
Hungary
3.3
10.2
15.1
6.9
4.6
7.1
Iceland
167
23.7
70
577 240 673
26.2
20.9
4.6
16.6
63.9
28.1
India
399
41.8
78
127 979 175
23.1
3.7
0.6
15.3
78.8
47.0
Indonesia
22
<0.1
99
14 373
17.3
5.3
1.0
32.1
68.6
37.7
43
0.0
62
2 044 142
23.7
1.1
0.5
20.2
59.3
82.0
Iraq
7.4
95
11.1
11.5
10.9
4.1
9.2
Ireland
5.8
97
471
9.5
6.2
3.1
3.6
10.2
Israel
6.0
94
418
9.8
6.4
6.1
6.1
5.8
Italy
4.7
92
411 692
17.0
1.2
5.1
11.5
83.0
45.7
18
9.3
23.1
7.5
4.7
4.4
Japan
5.5
98
236
19.8
1.6
0.7
26.3
58.0
26.0
Jordan
99
95
33.9
24.2
8.2
24.2
79.6
36.4
Kazakhstan
246
266.3
81
12 294 911
18.1
10.8
4.0
29.1
75.4
96.0
Kenya
497
75
115 336
2.9
2.9
35.8
49.9
Kiribati
21
96
29
11.8
1.0
0.1
18.7
7.1
Kuwait
142
0.0
96
111 553
28.5
8.9
3.9
22.0
62.1
42.1
Kyrgyzstan
189
29.8
88
2 183 445
24.2
6.4
7.5
14.3
61.3
94.0

Republic
49
92
13
24.1
21.8
10.6
10.0
15.3
Latvia
16
81
12.4
0.9
2.2
22.6
Lebanon
852
96
517 204
23.9
5.4
6.4
28.2
76.1
94.0
Lesotho
308
368.8
50
3 892 705
21.2
2.6
5.2
33.7
37.2
147.0
Liberia
40
94
1 634
17.6
1.5
0.0
73.4
29.6
6.0
62
94
22
22.4
33.5
16.2
10.6
13.9
6.6
94
11.4
10.9
11.2
8.7
6.4
Luxembourg
235
83.3
73
20 491 358
23.4
7.3
1.9
28.4
49.6
148.0
Madagascar
227
217.8
91
11 136 578
18.7
8.6
2.5
35.0
73.6
143.0
Malawi
103
3.2
96
225 248
19.6
2.6
1.7
24.0
12.7
Malaysia
41
99
747
15.9
5.0
1.0
3.5
42.7
13.7
Maldives
58
460.9
77
19 462 713
25.6
2.8
1.0
25.6
27.3
172.0
28.4 ad
90.0
Member State
60
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Equatorial Guinea
Grenada
91.0 ac Guatemala
Haiti
Jamaica
Libya
Lithuania
Mali
107
Health SDGs
3.1
ANNEX B
PART 1
Total
populationa
(000s)
Member State
Male
Female
2015
Malta
3.2
3.3
Both sexes
2015
Healthy life
expectancy at
birtha,b (years)
Maternal
mortality
ratioc (per
100 000 live
births)
2015
2015
New HIV
infections
among adults
Proportion of
Under-five
Neonatal
1549 years
uninfected
personneld (%)
births)
births)
population)
20062014
2015
2015
2014
419
79.7
83.7
81.7
71.7
100 ab
6.4
4.4
53
90
36.0
16.7
Mauritania
4 068
61.6
64.6
63.1
55.1
602
65
84.7
35.7
0.4
Mauritius
1 273
71.4
77.8
74.6
66.8
53
100 ab
13.5
8.4
0.4
127 017
73.9
79.5
76.7
67.4
38
99
13.2
7.0
0.1
104
68.1
70.6
69.4
62.5
100
100 ab
34.7
18.8
38
3.5
1.9
2 959
64.7
73.2
68.8
62.0
44
99 ab
22.4
11.1
626
74.1
78.1
76.1
67.9
99
4.7
3.1
Morocco
34 378
73.3
75.4
74.3
64.9
121
74
27.6
17.6
0.1
Mozambique
27 978
55.7
59.4
57.6
49.6
489
54 ab
78.5
27.1
7.4
Myanmar
53 897
64.6
68.5
66.6
59.2
178
78 ab
50.0
26.4
0.3
Namibia
2 459
63.1
68.3
65.8
57.5
265
88
45.4
15.9
9.1
Nauru
10
97 ab
35.4
22.7
Nepal
28 514
67.7
70.8
69.2
61.1
258
48 ab
35.8
22.2
<0.1
Netherlands
16 925
80.0
83.6
81.9
72.2
3.8
2.4
New Zealand
4 529
80.0
83.3
81.6
71.6
11
97 ab
5.7
3.1
Nicaragua
6 082
71.5
77.9
74.8
63.7
150
88 ab
22.1
9.8
0.2
Marshall Islands
Mexico
States of)
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norway
Oman
19 899
60.9
62.8
61.8
54.2
553
29
95.5
26.8
<0.1
182 202
53.4
55.6
54.5
47.7
814
35
108.8
34.3
2.0
100 ab
23.0
12.5
5 211
79.8
83.7
81.8
72.0
99
2.6
1.5
0.1
99
11.6
5.2
0.1
52 ab
81.1
45.5
0.2
4 491
75.0
79.2
76.6
66.7
17
188 925
65.5
67.5
66.4
57.8
178
21
100
16.4
9.0
Panama
3 929
74.7
81.1
77.8
68.1
94
91
17.0
9.6
0.3
Papua New Guinea
7 619
60.6
65.4
62.9
56.4
215
43 ab
57.3
24.5
0.4
Paraguay
6 639
72.2
76.0
74.0
65.2
132
96 ab
20.5
10.9
0.5
31 377
73.1
78.0
75.5
65.6
68
90
16.9
8.2
0.1
Pakistan
Palau
Peru
Philippines
100 699
65.3
72.0
68.5
61.1
114
Poland
38 612
73.6
81.3
77.5
68.7
Portugal
10 350
78.2
83.9
81.1
71.4
2 235
77.4
80.0
78.2
67.7
50 293
78.8
85.5
82.3
4 069
67.9
76.2
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
73
28.0
12.6
0.1
100 ab
5.2
3.1
<0.1
10
99
3.6
2.0
13
100
8.0
3.8
73.2
11
100 ab
3.4
1.6
72.1
64.8
23
99
15.8
11.9
0.6
19 511
71.4
78.8
75.0
66.8
31
99 ab
11.1
6.3
143 457
64.7
76.3
70.5
63.3
25
100 ab
9.6
5.0
11 610
60.9
71.1
66.1
56.6
290
91 ab
41.7
18.7
1.1
56
100 ab
10.5
6.5
Saint Lucia
185
72.6
77.9
75.2
66.1
48
99
14.3
9.3
Saint Vincent and the

Grenadines
109
71.3
75.2
73.2
64.6
45
99 ab
18.3
11.5
Samoa
193
70.9
77.5
74.0
66.6
51
83
17.5
9.5
32
2.9
0.7
0.1
San Marino
ab
190
65.6
69.4
67.5
59.1
156
93 ab
47.3
17.1
Saudi Arabia
31 540
73.2
76.0
74.5
64.5
12
98 ab
14.5
7.9
Senegal
15 129
64.6
68.6
66.7
58.3
315
59
47.2
20.8
<0.1
98
Serbia
8 851
72.9
78.4
75.6
67.7
17
96
69.1
78.0
73.2
65.5
Sierra Leone
6 453
49.3
50.8
50.1
44.4
1 360
Singapore
5 604
80.0
86.1
83.1
73.9
10
Slovakia
5 426
72.9
80.2
76.7
68.1
Slovenia
2 068
77.9
83.7
80.8
71.1
100 ab
584
67.9
70.8
69.2
62.1
114
86
Seychelles
Solomon Islands
108
6.7
4.2
13.6
8.6
120.4
34.9
0.7
100 ab
2.7
1.0
100 ab
7.3
4.2
<0.1
2.6
1.4
<0.1
28.1
12.2
99 ab
60
Health SDGs
3.3
3.4
TB incidence
(per 100 000
population)
Malaria
incidenceh
(per 1000
population at
risk)
Infants
receiving
three doses
of hepatitis B
vaccinei (%)
2014
2013
2014
12
3.5
Probability of
Reported
dying from any
number
of CVD, cancer,
of people
diabetes, CRD
Suicide
requiring
against NTDsj
70k (%)
population)
2014
2012
2012
90
11.6
6.8
335
79
21 468
111
24.9
84
762 932
15.8
1.8
22
97
24.0
8.5
21
0.2
84
10 287 100
15.7
195
83
52 463
3.6
3.7
Total alcohol
per capita
(>15 years
of age)
consumption,
in litres of
pure alcohol,
projected
estimatesl
Road traffic
mortality
ratem (per
100 000
population)
Proportion
of married
or in-union
women of
reproductive
age who have
their need
for family
planning
Adolescent birth
satisfied
rateo (per 1000
with modern
women aged
n
methods (%)
1519 years)
2015
2013
7.2
20052015
20052015
Member State
5.1
13.1
Malta
5.7
80.5
85.0
Marshall Islands
0.1
24.5
23.8
71.0
Mauritania
4.0
12.2
40.8
29.4
Mauritius
4.1
6.8
12.3
81.9
70.9
Mexico
3.5
1.9
32.6
States of)
2.2
99
0.0
170
99
32.0
9.3
7.8
21.0
68.3
26.7
Monaco
Mongolia
21
87
22.2
18.9
11.5
11.9
34.2
13.4
Montenegro
106
99
4 025
22.8
5.0
0.7
20.8
74.8
32.0
Morocco
551
352.3
78
22 815 820
17.3
17.3
2.0
31.6
28.2
167.0
369
45.0
75
40 777 860
24.3
12.4
0.7
20.3
30.3
Myanmar
561
5.4
88
1 049 353
20.0
2.0
11.8
23.9
75.1
82.0
Namibia
73
95
2 751
3.0
42.5
158
1.2
92
21 352 583
21.6
20.3
2.1
17.0
56.0
71.0
5.8
95
30
12.2
10.0
9.6
3.4
4.5
Netherlands
7.4
93
10.7
10.3
11.2
6.0
19.1
New Zealand
58
1.6
98
1 214 110
19.4
9.1
4.6
15.3
84.0
92.0
Nicaragua
98
317.1
68
14 885 196
19.6
1.8
0.3
26.4
40.8
206.0
Niger
322
342.9
66
140 381 164
19.8
4.3
11.3
20.5
28.8
122.0
Nigeria
0.0
99
7.7
14.3
8.1
10.7
10.2
7.0
3.8
5.0
9.6
0.0
98
17.8
1.0
0.9
25.4
19.1
13.5
Oman
270
12.8
73
47 386 262
20.5
7.5
0.1
14.2
47.0
44.0
Pakistan
42
99
4.8
27.0
Palau
46
0.5
80
400 364
12.5
4.4
7.7
10.0
75.9
91.1
Panama
417
185.1
62
6 327 334
26.4
7.7
3.1
16.8
40.6
43
0.0
87
815 045
18.5
5.3
9.6
20.7
84.1
63.0
Paraguay
120
30.4
88
3 011 439
11.2
3.1
5.2
13.9
62.7
65.0
Peru
288
0.4
79
44 803 112
27.9
2.6
5.6
10.5
51.5
57.0
Philippines
21
96
48
20.0
20.5
11.5
10.3
14.0
Poland
25
98
75
11.9
12.5
12.5
7.8
10.5
Portugal
29
99
48
14.2
4.7
1.3
15.2
68.9
13.4
Qatar
86
0.2
99
9.3
36.8
10.9
12.0
1.7
153
92
26.5
17.0
17.4
12.5
60.4
26.7
Republic of Moldova
81
94
22.6
12.8
12.9
8.7
38.9
Romania
84
0.0
97
29.9
22.3
14.5
18.9
72.4
26.6
Russian Federation
63
121.1
99
4 148 711
19.1
7.6
10.0
32.1
65.0
45.0
Rwanda
7.2
98
7.0
9.1
99
36 119
10.4
18.1
72.4
42.5
Saint Lucia
24
98
7.2
8.2
70.0

Grenadines
19
91
182 172
15.8
39.4
44.0
Samoa
1.6
80
3.2
97
93.0
95
194 856
6.8
31.1
50.3
92.0
12
<0.1
98
1 968
16.7
0.3
0.2
27.4
17.6
Saudi Arabia
138
128.1
89
11 792 254
16.7
3.2
0.5
27.2
46.3
80.0
Senegal
24
92
24.5
16.8
12.9
7.7
25.1
22.0
Serbia
26
99
6.7
8.6
61.2
Seychelles
310
406.0
83
7 564 272
27.5
5.6
8.2
27.3
37.5
125.0
49
97
6 066
10.5
9.0
2.9
3.6
2.7
6.7
97
19.4
12.6
12.5
6.6
21.2
Slovakia
7.7
12.6
17.1
10.9
6.4
4.6
Slovenia
86
75.4
88
383 910
24.1
6.3
1.6
19.2
60.0
62.0
Mozambique
105.3 ac Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Norway
Papua New Guinea
Republic of Korea
1.3 ac San Marino
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Solomon Islands
109
Health SDGs
3.1
ANNEX B
PART 1
Total
populationa
(000s)
Member State
3.2
3.3
Male
Female
2015
Both sexes
2015
Healthy life
expectancy at
birtha,b (years)
Maternal
mortality
ratioc (per
100 000 live
births)
2015
2015
New HIV
infections
among adults
Proportion of
Under-five
Neonatal
1549 years
uninfected
personneld (%)
births)
births)
population)
20062014
2015
2015
2014
Somalia
10 787
53.5
56.6
55.0
47.8
732
136.8
39.7
0.5
South Africa
54 490
59.3
66.2
62.9
54.5
138
94
40.5
11.0
12.7
South Sudan
12 340
56.1
58.6
57.3
49.9
789
17
92.6
39.3
2.6
Spain
46 122
80.1
85.5
82.8
72.4
4.1
2.8
Sri Lanka
20 715
71.6
78.3
74.9
67.0
30
99
9.8
5.4
<0.1
Sudan
0.2
40 235
62.4
65.9
64.1
55.9
311
20
70.1
29.8
Suriname
543
68.6
74.7
71.6
63.1
155
90
21.3
11.5
0.6
Swaziland
1 287
56.6
61.1
58.9
50.9
389
88 ab
60.7
14.2
18.9
Sweden
9 779
80.7
84.0
82.4
72.0
3.0
1.6
<0.1
Switzerland
8 299
81.3
85.3
83.4
73.1
3.9
2.7
18 502
59.9
69.9
64.5
56.1
68
96 ab
12.9
7.0
<0.1
Tajikistan
8 482
66.6
73.6
69.7
62.1
32
87
44.8
20.5
0.4
Thailand
67 959
71.9
78.0
74.9
66.8
20
100
12.3
6.7
0.2
The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia
2 078
73.5
77.8
75.7
67.5
100
5.5
3.5
Timor-Leste
1 185
66.6
70.1
68.3
60.7
215
29
52.6
22.3
Togo
7 305
58.6
61.1
59.9
52.8
368
45
78.4
26.7
1.0
Tonga
ab
106
70.6
76.4
73.5
66.0
124
96
16.7
6.9
1 360
67.9
74.8
71.2
63.3
63
100 ab
20.4
13.2
Tunisia
11 254
73.0
77.8
75.3
66.7
62
74
14.0
8.2
<0.1
Turkey
78 666
72.6
78.9
75.8
66.2
16
13.5
7.1
5 374
62.2
70.5
66.3
59.8
42
100
51.4
22.6
Trinidad and Tobago
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
97 ab
10
93
27.1
17.6
Uganda
39 032
60.3
64.3
62.3
54.0
343
58
54.6
18.7
6.0
Ukraine
44 824
66.3
76.1
71.3
64.1
24
99
9.0
5.5
9 157
76.4
78.6
77.1
67.9
100 ab
6.8
3.5
United Kingdom
64 716
79.4
83.0
81.2
71.4
4.2
2.4
United Republic of
Tanzania
53 470
59.9
63.8
61.8
54.1
398
49
48.7
18.8
2.6

Uruguay
Uzbekistan
321 774
76.9
81.6
79.3
69.1
14
99
6.5
3.6
3 432
73.3
80.4
77.0
67.9
15
98
10.1
5.1
0.4
29 893
66.1
72.7
69.4
62.4
36
100
39.1
20.4
<0.1
265
70.1
74.0
72.0
64.6
78
89
27.5
11.6
Republic of)
31 108
70.0
78.5
74.1
65.2
95
100
14.9
8.9
0.3
Viet Nam
93 448
71.3
80.7
76.0
66.6
54
94
21.7
11.4
0.3
Yemen
26 832
64.3
67.2
65.7
57.7
385
43
41.9
22.1
<0.1
Zambia
16 212
59.0
64.7
61.8
53.6
224
64
64.0
21.4
7.5
Zimbabwe
15 603
59.0
62.3
60.7
52.3
443
80
70.7
23.5
9.2
African Region
989 173
58.2
61.7
60.0
52.3
542
54
81.3
28.0
2.6
Region of the Americas
986 705
74.0
79.9
77.0
67.3
52
96
14.7
7.7
0.3
South-East Asia Region
1 928 174
67.3
70.7
68.9
60.5
164
59
42.5
24.3
0.2
European Region
910 053
73.2
80.2
76.8
68.0
16
99
11.3
6.0
0.4
Eastern Mediterranean
Region
643 784
67.4
70.4
68.8
60.1
166
67
52.0
26.6
0.1
Western Pacific Region
1 855 126
74.5
78.7
76.6
68.7
41
95
13.5
6.7
0.1
Global
7 313 015
69.1
73.8
71.4
63.1
216
73
42.5
19.2
0.5
Vanuatu
WHO region
110
Health SDGs
3.3
3.4
TB incidence
(per 100 000
population)
Malaria
incidenceh
(per 1000
population at
risk)
Infants
receiving
three doses
of hepatitis B
vaccinei (%)
2014
2013
2014
3.5
Probability of
Reported
dying from any
number
of CVD, cancer,
of people
diabetes, CRD
Suicide
requiring
against NTDsj
70k (%)
population)
2014
2012
2012
3.6
3.7
Total alcohol
per capita
(>15 years
of age)
consumption,
in litres of
pure alcohol,
projected
estimatesl
Road traffic
mortality
ratem (per
100 000
population)
Proportion
of married
or in-union
women of
reproductive
age who have
their need
for family
planning
Adolescent birth
satisfied
rateo (per 1000
with modern
women aged
n
methods (%)
1519 years)
2015
2013
20052015
20052015
Member State
274
78.8
42
4 891 026
19.1
8.0
0.5
25.4
64.0
Somalia
834
5.0
74
6 645 340
26.8
2.7
11.5
25.1
54.0
South Africa
146
153.8
9 326 151
19.8
13.6
27.9
5.6
158.0
South Sudan
12
96
440
10.8
7.0
10.6
3.7
8.4
65
0.0
99
54 216
17.6
29.2
4.5
17.4
69.4
20.3
Sri Lanka
94
37.7
94
28 468 689
17.4
11.5
24.3
30.2
87.0
Sudan
38
12.6
85
51 774
13.6
28.3
6.5
19.1
73.2
65.3
Suriname
733
3.6
98
597 165
21.4
5.3
6.4
24.2
80.6
87.0
Swaziland
7.5
42
21
9.9
13.2
8.7
2.8
5.1
Sweden
6.3
9.1
12.2
10.4
3.3
2.0
Switzerland
17
0.0
71
43 885
19.1
0.4
1.4
20.0
53.3
54.0
91
<0.1
97
120 617
28.8
3.2
2.4
18.8
50.8
54.0
Tajikistan
171
6.5
99
41 360
16.2
13.1
8.3
36.2
89.2
60.0
Thailand
15
97
27
22.1
6.7
5.7
9.4
22.3
18.7
The former Yugoslav

498
89.7
77
1 108 842
23.7
5.4
1.2
16.6
38.3
50.0
Timor-Leste
58
378.9
87
4 613 894
20.2
3.7
1.9
31.1
32.2
85.0
Togo
14
82
36 738
2.1
7.6
47.9
30.0
Tonga
22
92
23 048
26.2
14.4
6.6
14.1
55.1
35.5
Trinidad and Tobago
33
98
3 737
17.2
2.4
1.2
24.4
73.2
18
0.0
96
1 215
18.4
8.0
2.4
8.9
59.7
29.0
Turkey
64
0.0
97
77
40.8
19.4
5.0
17.4
21.0
Turkmenistan
190
90
11 772
1.3
41.0
42.0
Tuvalu
161
231.8
78
25 344 345
21.2
11.9
10.5
27.4
44.7
140.0
Uganda
94
46
28.2
20.1
11.8
10.6
68.0
27.2
Ukraine
1.6
94
57
18.9
3.0
4.3
10.9
34.2
12
159
12.0
7.0
12.0
2.9
19.3
United Kingdom
327
130.6
97
33 868 257
16.1
15.1
8.1
32.9
45.9
72.1
United Republic of
Tanzania
3.1
90
712
14.3
13.7
9.0
10.6
83.4
26.6
30
95
17.1
13.8
7.0
16.6
63.5
Uruguay
82
0.0
99
394 573
31.0
7.7
4.8
11.2
29.5
Uzbekistan
63
31.3
64
268 165
1.2
16.6
50.7
78.0
Vanuatu
24
40.7
78
219 026
15.7
2.6
8.3
45.1
94.5
Republic of)
140
0.9
95
8 965 475
17.4
5.1
8.7
24.5
69.7
36.0
Viet Nam
48
34.7
88
15 458 773
23.1
3.1
0.2
21.5
47.0
67.0
Yemen
406
214.2
86
11 466 594
18.1
9.6
4.0
24.7
63.8
145.0
Zambia
278
138.9
91
7 044 670
19.3
16.6
4.8
28.2
86.0
120.0
Zimbabwe
281
268.6
77
610 719 989
20.7
7.0
6.3
26.6
45.5
100.3
28
10.1
88
63 845 195
15.4
8.9
8.1
15.9
81.4
51.7
211
26.0
75
824 180 314
24.5
17.1
3.7
17.0
73.5
33.9
37
<0.1
82
2 348 690
18.4
13.8
10.2
9.3
71.7
17.6
European Region
117
20.1
83
112 950 729
20.8
4.8
0.7
19.9
58.4
46.1
Region
85
4.2
92
96 316 570
18.0
9.9
7.6
17.3
89.7
15.3
133
98.6
82 1 728 493 416
19.4
11.4
6.3
17.4
76.0
44.1
Global
Spain
6.7 ac Tunisia
WHO region
African Region
111
Health SDGs
ANNEX B
PART 2
Member State
3.9
3.a
3.c
3.d
tobacco smoking among persons
15 years and olderr (%)
Mortality rate
attributed to
household
and ambient
air pollutionp
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality rate
attributed to
exposure to
unsafe WASH
servicesq
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality
rate from
unintentional
poisoningk
(per 100 000
population)
2012
2012
2012
Male
Female
2015
Skilled health
professionals
densitys
(per 10 000
population)
Average of 13
International
Health
Regulations core
capacity scorest
20052013
20102015
Afghanistan
112.6
34.6
7.4
7.7
Albania
171.4
0.2
1.4
51.2
7.6
49.9
Algeria
31.5
2.4
1.1
31.5
73
29
Andorra
45
37.2
27.8
87.6
104.4
111.2
5.5
18.3
18
88
Argentina
26.2
0.7
0.9
29.5
18.4
43.4
83
Armenia
125.4
1.1
0.4
52.3
1.5
75.3
96
Australia
0.4
<0.1
1.3
16.7
13.1
139.2
100
Austria
34.2
0.1
0.4
87
Azerbaijan
68.0
2.1
0.9
46.5
0.4
99.4
84
Bahamas
20.3
0.1
0.9
69.6
61
Bahrain
11.1
0.1
0.4
48.8
7.6
32.9
96
Bangladesh
68.2
6.0
5.7
39.8
0.7
5.7
88
Barbados
18.1
0.2
0.8
13.1
0.9
66.7
90
Belarus
103.8
0.2
4.4
46.2
10.6
145.6
90
Belgium
30.2
0.5
1.1
26.5
20.0
216.5
82
Belize
18.6
1.2
0.5
27.9
55
Benin
92.0
32.2
2.2
17.7
1.0
8.3
44
Bhutan
59.9
7.1
8.1
12.4
68
State of)
52.0
7.0
1.7
30.5
17.1
14.8
71
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
223.6
<0.1
7.5
47.2
30.0
75.3
55
Botswana
38.1
9.2
2.7
37.5
62
Brazil
21.3
1.1
0.1
19.3
11.3
94.9
99
0.2
<0.1
1.2
29.3
3.1
94.9
92
174.8
<0.1
1.2
42.4
28.2
86.4
69
96.4
40.9
2.7
36.0
4.5
6.1
50
106.0
68.4
7.0
56
Cabo Verde
58.2
4.5
0.3
22.2
3.5
8.6
58
Cambodia
71.4
5.6
1.0
44.1
2.8
9.6
52
Cameroon
89.6
40.9
2.7
43.8
0.9
5.2
91
5.4
0.6
2.0
17.7
12.2
113.6
99
95.9
102.3
4.7
3.1
24
Chad
121.8
92.8
4.6
2.3
43
Chile
22.4
0.2
0.6
40.0
36.0
11.7
79
China
163.1
0.4
2.9
47.6
1.8
31.5
99
Colombia
23.6
0.8
0.3
16.0
6.2
20.9
86
Comoros
63.4
28.6
3.5
23.1
6.0
29
Congo
90.2
48.1
2.8
43.2
1.7
9.2
28
77.8
63
Costa Rica
18.8
0.7
0.3
18.5
8.3
18.8
85
Cte d'Ivoire
89.8
44.1
3.2
6.3
87
Croatia
89.5
<0.1
0.9
39.4
33.5
71
Cuba
50.5
0.7
1.3
52.7
17.8
157.8
100
Cyprus
19.8
0.3
0.5
67.9
62
Czech Republic
59.5
0.5
1.1
37.4
29.0
91
Democratic People's
Republic of Korea
234.1
1.4
3.3
73
the Congo
116.4
107.8
6.2
75
91
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Canada
Cook Islands
Denmark
20.3
0.8
1.1
17.6
16.4
202.7
Djibouti
40.5
26.4
3.7
10.3
46
66
Dominican Republic
29.4
1.9
0.5
18.8
9.4
28.2
71
Ecuador
15.0
1.8
0.7
14.0
3.3
38.8
90
Dominica
112
Selected health-related SDGs

2.2
6.1
6.2
7.1
Prevalence
of stunting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence
of wasting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence of
overweight
in children
under 5u (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
drinkingwater
sourcesv (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
sanitationv
(%)
20052015
20052015
20052015
2015
2015
11.6
9.5
5.4
55
32
23.1
9.4
23.4
95
11.7
4.1
12.4
84
29.2
8.2
16.1
Annual mean
concentrations
of fine
Average
Proportion of
particulate
death rate
population with matter (PM2.5) due to natural
primary reliance
in urban
disastersy
on clean fuelsw
areasx (g/
(per 100 000
(%)
m3)
population)
2014
40.9
13.1
2014
20112015
17
64.1
93
67
88
>95
100
100
49
Mortality
rate due to
homicidez
(per 100 000
population)
Estimated
direct deaths
from major
conflictsaa
(per 100 000
population)
2012
20112015
Member State
0.8
7.3
40.9 Afghanistan
17.1
0.0
5.0
<0.1 Albania
26.0
<0.1
4.4
1.0 Algeria
>95 ae
10.5
0.8
52
48
42.8
0.1
10.7
Andorra
0.0 Angola
98
>95
15.0
0.0
4.4
8.2
1.2
9.9
99
96
>95
14.5
<0.1
6.0
Antigua and Barbuda
20.8
4.2
16.8
100
90
>95
25.1
0.0
2.1
0.0 Armenia
2.0
0.0
7.7
100
100
>95 ae
5.8
<0.1
1.1
<0.1 Australia
<0.1 Austria
0.0 Argentina
100
100
>95 ae
17.2
<0.1
0.9
18.0
3.1
13.0
87
89
>95
26.4
0.0
2.4
0.3 Azerbaijan
98
92
>95 ae
22.0
0.0
32.1
0.0 Bahamas
100
99
>95 ae
60.1
0.0
0.8
36.1
14.3
1.4
87
61
10
89.7
<0.1
3.1
7.7
6.8
12.2
100
96
>95
16.2
0.0
9.8
4.5
2.2
9.7
100
94
>95
18.1
0.0
6.2
<0.1 Belarus
<0.1 Belgium
2.0 Bahrain
<0.1 Bangladesh
0.0 Barbados
100
100
>95 ae
16.0
<0.1
1.1
19.3
3.3
7.9
100
91
87
20.7
0.0
44.7
0.0 Belize
34.0
4.5
1.7
78
20
27.9
<0.1
6.3
0.0 Benin
33.6
5.9
7.6
100
50
68
39.0
0.0
1.9
0.0 Bhutan
18.1
1.6
8.7
90
50
79
31.9
0.5
13.9
(Plurinational
0.0 Bolivia
State of)
8.9
2.3
17.4
100
95
40
56.0
0.1
3.4
31.4
7.2
11.2
96
63
63
19.3
0.1
12.4
<0.1 Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0 Botswana
7.1
1.6
7.3
98
83
93
11.9
0.1
32.4
0.2 Brazil
19.7
2.9
8.3
>95 ae
5.4
0.0
2.1
99
86
79
30.5
<0.1
1.9
<0.1 Bulgaria
32.9
10.9
2.8
82
20
36.9
<0.1
9.8
<0.1 Burkina Faso
57.5
6.1
2.9
76
48
<5
49.4
0.2
6.7
92
72
71
0.0
8.8
32.4
9.6
2.0
76
42
13
25.0
0.7
2.4
31.7
5.2
6.7
76
46
18
64.0
<0.1
11.7
100
100
>95 ae
7.3
<0.1
1.8
0.0 Brunei Darussalam
0.1 Burundi
0.0 Cabo Verde
<0.1 Cambodia
1.2 Cameroon
<0.1 Canada
40.7
7.4
1.8
69
22
<5
56.2
0.0
13.5
39.9
13.0
2.5
51
12
<5
61.8
<0.1
9.4
0.1 Chad
1.8
0.3
9.3
99
99
>95
25.5
<0.1
4.6
<0.1 Chile
<0.1 China
9.4
2.3
6.6
96
77
57
61.8
<0.1
1.1
12.7
0.9
4.8
91
81
91
18.4
0.2
43.9
32.1
11.1
10.9
90
36
7.0
0.1
8.0
21.2
8.2
5.9
77
15
18
57.6
<0.1
10.4
25.6 Central African Republic
0.8 Colombia
0.0 Comoros
0.0 Congo
100
98
80
0.0
3.1
5.6
1.0
8.1
98
95
>95
19.2
<0.1
8.5
Cook Islands
29.6
7.6
3.2
82
23
18
19.3
<0.1
12.2
100
97
94
20.5
<0.1
1.3
0.0 Croatia
95
93
87
16.5
<0.1
5.0
0.0 Cuba
100
100
>95 ae
17.2
0.0
2.0
100
99
>95
20.9
<0.1
0.9
27.9
4.0
0.0
100
82
31.6
0.2
4.7
42.6
8.1
4.4
52
29
63.2
<0.1
13.3
100
100
>95 ae
10.5
<0.1
0.9
<0.1 Denmark
33.5
21.5
8.1
90
47
10
46.0
0.0
7.0
0.1 Djibouti
92
16.3
6.8
7.1
2.4
7.6
85
84
92
17.0
<0.1
25.4
25.2
2.3
7.5
87
85
>95
13.5
<0.1
13.8
0.0 Costa Rica

0.5 Cte d'Ivoire
0.0 Cyprus
<0.1 Czech Republic
People's
0.0 Democratic
Republic of Korea
Republic of
1.8 Democratic
the Congo
Dominica
0.0 Dominican Republic
<0.1 Ecuador
113
Health SDGs
ANNEX B
PART 2
Member State
3.9
3.a
3.c
3.d
Mortality rate
attributed to
household
and ambient
air pollutionp
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality rate
attributed to
exposure to
unsafe WASH
servicesq
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality
rate from
unintentional
poisoningk
(per 100 000
population)
2012
2012
2012
Male
Female
2015
Skilled health
professionals
densitys
(per 10 000
population)
Average of 13
International
Health
Regulations core
capacity scorest
20052013
20102015
Egypt
52.1
1.6
2.1
49.9
0.3
63.5
El Salvador
44.6
2.4
0.5
20.0
93
Equatorial Guinea
98.3
57.3
5.0
27
Eritrea
75.8
34.9
4.7
73
Estonia
54.2
<0.1
0.8
41.2
24.9
96.2
72
Ethiopia
56.8
29.6
3.5
8.9
0.5
2.8
78
Fiji
76.9
3.0
4.7
38.7
12.4
26.7
98
Finland
6.0
0.2
1.5
23.2
18.5
137.7
96
France
17.2
0.5
2.0
29.8
25.6
124.9
94
Gabon
47.0
28.1
1.8
48
Gambia
70.9
21.0
1.8
9.7
33
Georgia
292.3
0.2
0.9
57.7
5.7
74.9
81
Germany
32.5
0.9
0.3
32.4
28.3
136.1
99
Ghana
80.8
20.0
2.2
13.1
0.4
10.2
69
Greece
45.1
<0.1
0.8
52.6
32.7
76
Grenada
93
44.9
66
Guatemala
42.5
9.2
1.2
18.3
87
Guinea
87.9
40.7
3.1
1.4
57
105.2
48.9
3.0
6.6
50
42.7
4.0
0.7
7.5
85
112.6
28.5
1.9
22.1
2.5
48
Honduras
53.2
7.9
0.3
33.3
2.1
14.5
75
Hungary
123.0
0.0
0.9
32.0
24.8
95.6
91
6.4
<0.1
0.5
17.0
15.1
190.7
84
130.0
27.4
3.2
20.4
1.9
24.1
94
Indonesia
83.9
3.6
1.1
76.2
3.6
15.9
96
35.3
0.9
2.5
21.5
0.7
23.0
85
Iraq
32.2
3.9
0.7
6.1
91
Ireland
17.3
0.3
1.5
22.4 af
21.9 af
178.7
78
Israel
15.8
0.5
0.1
41.2
19.3
83.0
71
Italy
35.3
0.1
0.6
28.3
19.7
92.0
77
Jamaica
42.9
1.9
1.0
29.9
5.9
15.0
81
Japan
24.2
0.1
0.8
33.7 af
10.6 af
137.9
100
Jordan
21.7
1.0
1.2
70.2
10.7
66.1
97
Kazakhstan
93.3
1.2
6.3
43.9
9.3
118.7
78
Kenya
57.1
32.5
3.8
24.6
2.1
10.6
69
Kiribati
63.9
40.9
40.8
60
Kuwait
14.2
<0.1
0.5
63.4
86
Kyrgyzstan
99.5
1.8
2.7
50.4
3.6
81.9
50
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Iceland
India

Republic
107.6
13.9
1.0
56.6
9.1
10.6
74
Latvia
115.1
<0.1
2.4
48.9
24.3
70.1
90
Lebanon
29.7
0.4
0.7
45.4
31.0
59.2
76
Lesotho
74.5
28.3
2.2
55.1
0.4
63
Liberia
69.9
25.0
1.9
27.6
2.4
2.9
26
Libya
33.2
0.6
1.4
87.0
64
Lithuania
73.4
<0.1
5.3
38.1
22.2
41.2
83
Luxembourg
19.8
0.1
0.9
25.8
21.4
155.1
88
Madagascar
84.4
26.6
4.1
4.8
29
Malawi
72.0
26.1
3.3
25.4
6.0
3.6
40
Malaysia
22.4
0.4
0.7
43.0
1.4
44.7
99
Maldives
20.5
0.6
0.3
64.5
61
Mali
116.0
61.1
4.1
36.8
3.2
5.1
55
Malta
31.1
<0.1
0.3
29.7
20.2
109.8
76
21.8
51
Mauritania
64.5
28.9
1.8
44.0
3.7
8.0
29
Mauritius
21.2
0.9
0.3
40.1
3.3
68
Marshall Islands
114

2.2
6.1
6.2
7.1
Prevalence
of stunting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence
of wasting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence of
overweight
in children
under 5u (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
drinkingwater
sourcesv (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
sanitationv
(%)
20052015
20052015
20052015
2015
2015
11.6
13.1
16.1
Annual mean
concentrations
of fine
Average
Proportion of
particulate
death rate
primary reliance
in urban
disastersy
on clean fuelsw
areasx (g/
(per 100 000
(%)
m3)
population)
2014
2014
20112015
Mortality
rate due to
homicidez
(per 100 000
population)
Estimated
direct deaths
from major
conflictsaa
(per 100 000
population)
2012
20112015
Member State
22.3
9.5
15.7
99
95
>95
101.8
0.0
5.1
0.4 Egypt
14.0
2.0
6.0
94
75
83
37.1
0.1
43.9
26.2
3.1
9.7
48
75
22
32.0
0.0
3.5
50.3
15.3
1.9
58
16
14
35.7
0.0
7.7
<0.1 Eritrea
0.0 El Salvador
0.0 Equatorial Guinea
100
97
92
8.5
0.0
5.4
<0.1 Estonia
40.4
8.7
2.6
57
28
<5
36.7
0.0
8.0
0.2 Ethiopia
96
91
37
11.4
0.4
2.3
100
98
>95 ae
7.1
0.0
1.4
<0.1 Finland
100
99
>95 ae
12.7
<0.1
1.0
<0.1 France
17.5
3.4
7.7
93
42
73
35.9
0.0
9.3
0.0 Gabon
25.0
11.1
3.2
90
59
<5
43.0
<0.1
9.4
0.0 Gambia
11.3
1.6
19.9
100
86
55
23.3
0.2
4.8
<0.1 Georgia
<0.1 Germany
0.0 Fiji
1.3
1.0
3.5
100
99
>95 ae
14.5
<0.1
0.8
18.8
4.7
2.6
89
15
21
22.2
0.2
10.0
0.0 Ghana
100
99
>95 ae
12.7
<0.1
1.6
<0.1 Greece
97
98
>95
17.0
0.0
6.2
Grenada
48.0
1.1
4.9
93
64
36
33.7
0.2
39.9
0.2 Guatemala
31.3
9.9
3.8
77
20
19.4
0.0
8.8
27.6
6.0
2.3
79
21
<5
28.9
0.0
10.1
12.0
6.4
5.3
98
84
61
16.2
0.0
20.2
21.9
5.2
3.6
58
28
24.6
0.4
26.6
22.7
1.4
5.2
91
83
48
40.3
<0.1
103.9
100
98
>95 ae
22.9
0.0
1.5
100
99
>95 ae
7.7
0.0
0.6
38.7
15.1
1.9
94
40
34
73.6
0.2
4.3
<0.1 India
36.4
13.5
11.5
87
61
57
18.1
<0.1
4.7
<0.1 Indonesia
6.8
4.0
96
90
>95
41.1
0.1
4.8
22.6
7.4
11.8
87
86
>95
52.0
<0.1
18.6
98
91
>95 ae
10.0
<0.1
1.2
<0.1 Ireland
100
100
>95 ae
19.3
<0.1
2.1
0.3 Israel
100
100
>95 ae
18.6
<0.1
0.9
0.0 Italy
5.7
3.0
7.8
94
82
93
17.2
0.0
45.1
7.1
2.3
1.5
100
100
>95 ae
13.0
3.4
0.4
<0.1 Japan
0.2 Guinea
<0.1 Guinea-Bissau
0.0 Guyana
0.0 Haiti
<0.1 Honduras
0.0 Hungary
0.0 Iceland
0.1 Iran (Islamic Republic of)

83.6 Iraq
0.0 Jamaica
7.8
2.4
4.7
97
99
>95
38.3
0.0
2.9
<0.1 Jordan
13.1
4.1
13.3
93
98
92
21.9
<0.1
9.2
<0.1 Kazakhstan
26.0
4.0
4.1
63
30
16.9
0.1
7.4
67
40
<5
0.0
8.2
Kiribati
5.8
2.4
8.7
99
100
>95 ae
78.8
0.0
3.1
0.1 Kuwait
12.9
2.8
7.0
90
93
76
15.7
0.0
9.1
43.8
6.4
2.0
76
71
<5
33.6
0.2
7.1
People's Democratic
0.0 Lao
Republic
99
88
>95
20.2
0.0
7.0
0.0 Latvia
99
81
>95
31.3
0.0
5.4
3.8 Lebanon
33.2
2.8
7.4
82
30
32
21.7
0.2
37.5
0.0 Lesotho
32.1
5.6
3.2
76
17
<5
6.1
0.0
11.2
21.0
6.5
22.4
97
58.5
<0.1
2.6
97
92
>95 ae
19.5
0.0
6.7
100
98
>95 ae
16.6
0.0
0.2
0.0 Luxembourg
49.2
52
12
<5
32.4
0.2
8.1
<0.1 Madagascar
42.4
3.8
5.1
90
41
<5
25.6
0.2
2.0
0.0 Malawi
17.2
98
96
>95
16.7
<0.1
4.3
<0.1 Malaysia
20.3
10.2
6.5
99
98
>95
0.0
3.5
0.0 Maldives
38.5
15.3
4.7
77
25
<5
34.8
<0.1
11.0
3.7 Mali
100
100
>95 ae
14.5
0.0
2.8
0.0 Malta
95
77
41
4.7
22.0
11.6
1.2
58
40
45
86.2
<0.1
11.3
0.3 Mauritania
100
93
>95
14.3
0.2
2.7
0.0 Mauritius
0.6 Kenya
<0.1 Kyrgyzstan
0.0 Liberia
19.6 Libya
0.0 Lithuania
Marshall Islands
115
Health SDGs
ANNEX B
PART 2
Member State
Mexico
States of)
Monaco
3.9
3.a
3.c
3.d
Mortality rate
attributed to
household
and ambient
air pollutionp
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality rate
attributed to
exposure to
unsafe WASH
servicesq
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality
rate from
unintentional
poisoningk
(per 100 000
population)
2012
2012
2012
Male
Female
2015
Skilled health
professionals
densitys
(per 10 000
population)
Average of 13
International
Health
Regulations core
capacity scorest
20052013
20102015
24.1
1.1
0.8
20.8
6.6
46.2
97
35.0
64
243.8
79
Mongolia
132.2
3.1
3.8
47.7
5.3
64.6
86
Montenegro
123.5
<0.1
1.0
75.3
59
Morocco
28.8
3.4
1.1
45.4
1.4
15.1
95
Mozambique
65.1
37.9
8.1
31.4
5.9
4.5
69
Myanmar
127.4
10.4
1.1
31.6
6.4
16.2
86
Namibia
47.9
9.8
1.1
38.9
11.4
31.5
66
Nauru
43.0
52.0
56.4
42
Nepal
104.2
12.9
5.9
37.1
11.1
77
Netherlands
24.0
0.2
0.2
26.2
23.3
95
New Zealand
0.5
0.6
0.4
17.2
15.4
136.1
98
62.3
3.5
0.5
22.6
78
109.7
69.2
4.0
18.6
0.2
1.6
79
90.4
50.9
2.4
17.4
1.1
20.1
67
20.3
11.4
190.0
61
Norway
12.7
0.5
1.0
22.4
22.1
215.5
98
Oman
13.5
0.4
0.4
21.0
1.0
78.1
96
Pakistan
88.8
20.7
5.4
41.9
3.0
14.0
43
71.0
91
Panama
25.4
4.1
0.6
10.6
2.6
30.5
70
Papua New Guinea
44.3
12.4
11.9
6.2
64
Paraguay
56.6
2.3
0.3
28.3
7.9
22.3
83
Peru
32.6
1.3
0.7
21.5
5.9
26.5
89
Philippines
82.7
5.1
0.2
43.0
8.5
89
Poland
68.9
<0.1
1.7
32.4
23.7
83.8
74
Portugal
16.8
0.1
0.4
31.5
13.7
102.1
95
9.0
<0.1
0.6
196.1
97
23.7
0.2
0.6
49.8 af
4.2 af
71.5
100
Republic of Moldova
114.5
<0.1
5.0
45.7
5.4
93.8
80
Romania
138.2
<0.1
2.3
36.9
22.7
80.6
78
Russian Federation
110.0
0.2
6.4
59.0
22.8
87
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Palau
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Rwanda
68.3
19.4
3.3
7.5
46
60
Saint Lucia
21.3
58

Grenadines
35
Samoa
41.0
18.9
23.0
75
San Marino
139.3
40
18
Saudi Arabia
28.1
0.2
0.8
27.9
2.9
73.6
99
Senegal
43.2
25.4
1.5
23.4
0.7
4.8
30
137.2
0.3
0.6
43.6
39.7
21.1
47
43.0
8.8
58.8
87
142.3
90.4
5.7
60.0
12.0
1.9
64
Singapore
20.5
0.1
0.2
28.0
5.0
77.1
99
Slovakia
66.3
<0.1
0.7
39.7
17.6
93.9
96
Slovenia
41.9
<0.1
1.0
22.3
18.1
109.8
75
Solomon Islands
52.9
10.4
5.2
22.8
57
116.8
98.8
10.0
1.5
South Africa
44.2
12.1
2.5
31.4
6.5
58.9
100
South Sudan
95.0
50.0
6.9
50
Spain
14.7
0.3
0.9
31.3
27.1
106.1
92
119.4
3.3
0.4
28.4
0.4
23.2
71
Sudan
64.3
34.6
5.6
11.2
71
Suriname
22.7
0.8
0.6
72
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Sri Lanka
116

2.2
6.1
6.2
7.1
Prevalence
of stunting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence
of wasting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence of
overweight
in children
under 5u (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
drinkingwater
sourcesv (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
sanitationv
(%)
20052015
20052015
20052015
2015
2015
11.6
13.1
16.1
Annual mean
concentrations
of fine
Average
Proportion of
particulate
death rate
primary reliance
in urban
disastersy
on clean fuelsw
areasx (g/
(per 100 000
(%)
m3)
population)
2014
2014
20112015
Mortality
rate due to
homicidez
(per 100 000
population)
Estimated
direct deaths
from major
conflictsaa
(per 100 000
population)
2012
20112015
Member State
13.6
1.6
9.0
96
85
86
20.6
<0.1
22.0
1.1 Mexico
89
57
25
8.0
1.3
4.6
100
100
>95 ae
10.0
1.1
Monaco
10.8
1.0
10.5
64
60
32
33.5
0.0
10.1
0.0 Mongolia
(Federated
Micronesia
States of)
9.4
2.8
22.3
100
96
74
24.3
0.0
2.8
14.9
2.3
10.7
85
77
>95
19.3
<0.1
2.5
<0.1 Morocco
43.1
6.1
7.9
51
21
<5
22.4
0.2
3.4
<0.1 Mozambique
35.1
7.9
2.6
81
80
56.7
0.1
4.2
1.6 Myanmar
23.1
7.1
4.1
91
34
46
18.8
0.9
19.7
0.0 Namibia
24.0
1.0
2.8
97
66
>95
1.3
Nauru
37.4
11.3
2.1
92
46
26
75.7
7.2
3.3
<0.1 Nepal
100
98
>95 ae
14.9
<0.1
0.9
100
>95 ae
5.3
0.9
1.2
23.0
1.5
6.2
87
68
49
26.1
0.2
13.0
43.0
18.7
3.0
58
11
<5
51.8
0.2
10.3
0.2 Niger
32.9
7.9
1.8
69
29
<5
38.9
<0.1
10.1
3.1 Nigeria
99
100
91
2.8
Niue
100
98
>95 ae
9.1
<0.1
0.6
0.3 Norway
14.1
7.5
4.4
93
97
>95 ae
47.4
<0.1
4.8
0.0 Oman
45.0
10.5
4.8
91
64
45
68.7
0.4
8.9
4.2 Pakistan
100
58
3.1
Palau
19.1
1.2
95
75
86
12.8
<0.1
19.3
0.0 Panama
49.5
14.3
13.8
40
19
31
12.1
0.2
10.8
10.9
2.6
11.7
98
89
64
17.0
<0.1
9.7
14.6
0.6
7.2
87
76
68
37.0
0.1
11.0
30.3
7.9
5.0
92
74
45
27.6
2.5
12.4
98
97
>95 ae
25.8
<0.1
1.1
0.0 Poland
100
100
>95 ae
9.6
<0.1
1.4
0.0 Portugal
100
98
>95
105.3
0.0
7.1
0.0 Qatar
2.5
1.2
7.3
100
>95
27.9
<0.1
2.0
0.0 Republic of Korea
6.4
1.9
4.9
88
76
93
17.1
0.0
7.5
0.0 Republic of Moldova
100
79
82
20.4
<0.1
2.1
0.0 Romania
97
72
>95
17.1
<0.1
13.1
37.9
2.2
7.7
76
62
<5
50.6
<0.1
5.8
98
>95 ae
0.0
13.8
2.5
3.7
6.3
96
91
>95
18.2
0.7
15.3
Saint Lucia
95
>95
2.2
14.0
Vincent and the

Saint
Grenadines
99
92
27
2.4
3.7
Samoa
>95 ae
0.7
San Marino
17.2
4.0
2.4
97
35
30
0.0
7.2
9.3
11.8
6.1
97
100
>95
131.6
<0.1
6.5
19.4
5.8
1.3
79
48
36
43.7
<0.1
7.9
6.0
3.9
13.9
99
96
71
21.5
0.1
1.6
0.0 Montenegro
0.0 Netherlands
0.0 New Zealand
<0.1 Nicaragua
0.2 Papua New Guinea

<0.1 Paraguay
<0.1 Peru
1.1 Philippines
0.5 Russian Federation

0.7 Rwanda

<0.1 Saudi Arabia
0.1 Senegal
<0.1 Serbia
7.9
4.3
10.2
96
98
>95
5.0
0.0
9.5
Seychelles
37.9
9.4
8.9
63
13
<5
16.8
<0.1
13.0
0.0 Sierra Leone
100
100
>95 ae
17.0
0.0
0.6
0.0 Singapore
100
99
>95
20.3
0.0
1.4
0.0 Slovakia
100
99
>95
19.4
<0.1
0.7
0.0 Slovenia
32.8
4.3
2.5
81
30
2.0
4.9
0.0 Solomon Islands
25.3
15.0
3.0
16.9
0.4
5.5
23.9
4.7
93
66
82
32.6
<0.1
35.7
31.1
22.7
6.0
59
<5
32.5
0.3
4.8
21.1 South Sudan
100
100
>95 ae
10.0
<0.1
0.8
<0.1 Spain
14.7
21.4
0.6
96
95
19
28.6
0.4
3.8
<0.1 Sri Lanka
38.2
16.3
3.0
23
53.1
0.1
6.5
7.0 Sudan
8.8
5.0
4.0
95
79
91
16.3
0.0
9.4
0.0 Suriname
35.8 Somalia
<0.1 South Africa
117
Health SDGs
ANNEX B
PART 2
Member State
Swaziland
3.9
3.a
3.c
3.d
Mortality rate
attributed to
household
and ambient
air pollutionp
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality rate
attributed to
exposure to
unsafe WASH
servicesq
(per 100 000
population)
Mortality
rate from
unintentional
poisoningk
(per 100 000
population)
2012
2012
2012
Male
Female
2015
Skilled health
professionals
densitys
(per 10 000
population)
Average of 13
International
Health
Regulations core
capacity scorest
20052013
20102015
62.7
22.7
2.5
19.0
2.2
17.7
56
0.4
1.1
1.0
20.4
20.8
149.7
92
Switzerland
18.5
0.3
1.2
26.9
19.7
214.1
91
30.9
1.8
0.5
33.2
63
Tajikistan
97.6
7.5
1.7
69.4
94
Thailand
65.3
1.9
0.1
41.4
2.3
24.7
98
128.9
<0.1
0.6
26.2
86
Timor-Leste
89.6
10.3
0.8
11.9
71
Togo
81.0
37.9
2.8
3.3
74
47.3
13.0
44.5
74
Trinidad and Tobago
27.9
0.2
0.3
47.4
71
Tunisia
43.7
0.8
1.2
45.0
65
Turkey
51.0
0.8
0.7
39.5
12.4
41.1
78
Turkmenistan
72.9
5.8
1.9
84
Sweden
The former Yugoslav

Tonga
Tuvalu
69.1
89
Uganda
70.0
30.3
5.1
16.4
2.9
14.2
73
Ukraine
139.1
0.4
5.7
49.4
14.0
112.1
99
7.5
<0.1
0.6
56.9
97
United Kingdom
25.7
0.4
1.0
19.9 af
18.4 af
United Republic of
Tanzania
50.5
27.6
6.6
27.5
3.8
12.1
0.6
4.3
19.5
Uruguay
22.7
0.3
0.9
26.7
19.4
Uzbekistan
83.2
2.4
1.1
24.9
Republic of)
20.9
1.3
Viet Nam
84.0
Yemen
57.4
Zambia
64.1
Zimbabwe
116.1
ag
4.7
67
122.7
91
92.8
84
1.3
144.7
83
18.1
43
0.6
95
2.0
0.9
47.1
1.3
24.3
99
13.0
4.2
8.7
46
24.5
7.9
26.5
4.6
9.6
92
52.6
27.1
4.4
31.2
2.1
14.2
68
African Region
77.4
43.1
3.8
12.7
57
21.7
1.5
1.8
32.3
78
117.1
20.1
3.0
12.5
80
64.9
0.6
2.3
71.9
80
Region
59.3
13.1
3.5
18.9
74
134.8
0.8
2.4
34.7
78
91.7
12.4
2.7
25.0
73
Vanuatu
af
15.0
af
WHO region
European Region
Global
118

2.2
6.1
6.2
Prevalence
of stunting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence
of wasting
in children
under 5u (%)
Prevalence of
overweight
in children
under 5u (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
drinkingwater
sourcesv (%)
Proportion of
population
using
improved
sanitationv
(%)
20052015
20052015
20052015
2015
2015
25.5
2.0
9.0
74
27.5
11.5
26.8
16.3
7.1
11.6
13.1
16.1
Annual mean
concentrations
of fine
Average
Proportion of
particulate
death rate
primary reliance
in urban
disastersy
on clean fuelsw
areasx (g/
(per 100 000
(%)
m3)
population)
2014
2014
58
35
100
99
100
100
17.9
90
9.9
6.6
6.7
10.9
4.9
1.8
50.2
27.5
20112015
Mortality
rate due to
homicidez
(per 100 000
population)
Estimated
direct deaths
from major
conflictsaa
(per 100 000
population)
2012
20112015
Member State
19.9
0.2
19.4
0.0 Swaziland
>95 ae
5.9
<0.1
0.8
>95 ae
12.6
<0.1
0.6
96
>95
34.3
0.0
2.5
74
95
72
51.2
<0.1
1.8
0.1 Tajikistan
98
93
76
27.5
0.3
5.5
0.7 Thailand
12.4
99
91
61
43.0
0.0
1.8
former Yugoslav
0.3 The
11.0
1.5
72
41
<5
15.0
0.0
4.9
0.0 Timor-Leste
6.7
2.0
63
12
25.9
0.0
9.3
0.0 Togo
8.1
5.2
17.3
100
91
63
0.0
4.7
95
92
>95
13.2
0.0
35.3
0.0 Sweden
0.0 Switzerland
309.1 Syrian Arab Republic
Tonga
0.0 Trinidad and Tobago
10.1
2.8
14.3
98
92
>95
36.4
0.0
1.8
9.5
1.7
10.9
100
95
35.7
0.2
2.7
0.3 Tunisia
18.9
7.2
4.5
>95
26.3
0.0
4.3
10.0
3.3
6.3
98
30
4.2
Tuvalu
34.2
4.3
5.8
79
19
<5
80.3
<0.1
12.0
1.9 Uganda
96
96
>95
17.0
<0.1
5.2
100
98
>95
64.5
0.0
4.1
<0.1 United Arab Emirates
100
99
>95 ae
12.5
<0.1
1.5
<0.1 United Kingdom
34.7
3.8
5.2
56
16
<5
24.1
<0.1
8.0
Republic of
<0.1 United
Tanzania
2.1
0.5
6.0
99
100
>95 ae
8.5
<0.1
5.4
<0.1 United States of America
10.7
1.3
7.2
100
96
>95
11.6
0.0
7.9
0.0 Uruguay
19.6
4.5
12.8
100
90
39.1
<0.1
3.2
0.0 Uzbekistan
28.5
4.4
4.6
95
58
16
13.0
0.9
2.9
Vanuatu
13.4
4.1
6.4
93
94
>95
24.3
<0.1
57.6
19.4
5.7
4.6
98
78
51
28.7
0.1
4.0
46.8
16.2
2.5
62
42.2
<0.1
5.4
40.0
6.3
6.2
65
44
16
29.6
0.0
10.5
0.0 Zambia
27.6
3.3
3.6
77
37
31
24.1
0.2
15.1
<0.1 Zimbabwe
37.8
9.3
5.2
68
32
16
36.7
<0.1
10.9
1.4 African Region
0.8 Turkey
<0.1 Turkmenistan
6.2 Ukraine
(Bolivarian
<0.1 Venezuela
Republic of)
0.0 Viet Nam
14.3 Yemen
WHO region
6.9
1.0
7.6
96
89
92
14.5
<0.1
19.4
0.2 Region of the Americas
32.9
13.5
5.1
92
49
35
60.2
0.3
4.3
0.1 South-East Asia Region
7.4
1.5
13.0
99
93
>95
18.4
<0.1
3.8
0.5 European Region
25.6
9.2
6.9
91
78
71
62.9
0.2
6.8
Mediterranean
19.5 Eastern
Region
6.3
2.3
5.2
95
79
61
49.2
0.4
2.0
<0.1 Western Pacific Region
23.2
7.4
6.2
91
68
57
38.4
0.2
6.7
2.0 Global
119
a. World Population Prospects, the 2015 revision (WPP2015). New York (NY): United Nations DESA, Population Division.
b.
WHO annual life tables for 19852015 based on the WPP2015, on the data held in the WHO Mortality Database and on HIV mortality estimates prepared by UNAIDS. WHO Member States with a population of less than 90 000
in 2015 were not included in the analysis.
c.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality-2015/en/, accessed 25 March 2016). WHO Member States with a population of less than 100
000 in 2015 were not included in the analysis.
d. WHO global database on maternal health indicators, 2016 update [online database]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/en/). Regional averages are estimates for the year 2013
based on comparable definition. For more details of these estimates see: WHO, World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: First global monitoring report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
e. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015. Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. New York (NY), Geneva and Washington (DC): United Nations Childrens Fund, World Health
Organization, World Bank and United Nations; 2015 (http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2015_Web_9_Sept_15.pdf, accessed 26 March 2016).
f.
UNAIDS/WHO estimates; 2015.
g. Global tuberculosis report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 11 April 2016).
h. World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malariareport-2015/report/en/, accessed 28 March 2016).
i.
WHO/UNICEF coverage estimates 2014 revision. July 2015 (see: http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/routine/coverage/en/index4.html).
j.
Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/gho/en/), and the Preventive Chemotherapy and Transmission Control (PCT) databank. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://
www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/databank/en/).
k. Global Health Estimates 2013: Deaths by Cause, Age and Sex, Estimates for 20002012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/). WHO Member States with a
population of less than 250 000 in 2012 were not included in the analysis.
l.
WHO Global Information System on Alcohol and Health [online database]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.GISAH?showonly=GISAH).
m. Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en/, accessed 3 April 2016). WHO Member States with a population
of less than 90 000 in 2015 who did not participate in the survey for the report were not included in the analysis.
n. World Contraceptive Use 2016. New York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2016. Forthcoming. Regional aggregates are estimates for the year 2015, taken from model-based
estimates and projections of family planning indicators 2015. New York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015 (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/
theme/family-planning/cp_model.shtml, accessed 21 April 2016).
o.
World Fertility Data 2015. New York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015. (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/fertility/wfd2015.
shtml, accessed 13 April 2016). Regional aggregates are the average of two five-year periods, 20102015 and 20152020, taken from: World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. DVD Edition. New York (NY): United Nations,
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015 (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Fertility/, accessed 13 April 2016).
p. Global Health Observatory [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/gho/en/). WHO Member States with a population of less than 250 000 in 2012 were not included in the analysis.
q. Preventing disease through healthy environments. A global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204585/1/9789241565196_
eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 3 April 2016), and Preventing diarrhoea through better water, sanitation and hygiene. Exposures and impacts in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/150112/1/9789241564823_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1, accessed 19 April 2016). WHO Member States with a population of less than 250 000 in 2012 were not included in the analysis.
r.
WHO global report on trends in tobacco smoking 20002025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/156262/1/9789241564922_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 4 April 2016).
s.
Skilled health professionals refer to the latest available values (20052013) in the WHO Global Health Workforce Statistics database (http://who.int/hrh/statistics/hwfstats/en/) aggregated across physicians and nurses/midwives.
Refer to the source for the latest values, disaggregation and metadata descriptors.
t.
International Health Regulations Monitoring Framework [online database]. Geneva: WHO (http://www.who.int/gho/ihr/en/).
u. Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition [online database]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/database/en). Regional estimates are for the year 2015 and taken from the
UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank Group Joint child malnutrition estimates Levels and trends (2015 edition) (http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/estimates2014/en/).
v.
Progress on sanitation and drinking-water: 2015 Update and MDG assessment. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. New York: UNICEF, and Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.
int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmp-2015-update/en/, accessed 5 April 2016).
w. Burning opportunity: Clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204717/1/9789241565233_
eng.pdf, accessed 3 April 2016).
x.
Air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease, WHO, 2016. Forthcoming.
y.
The International Disaster Database [online database]. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) (http://www.emdat.be/database, accessed 11 February 2016). The death rate is an average over the
period 20112015. WHO Member States with a population of less than 90 000 in 2015 were not included in the analysis.
z.
Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Geneva, New York (NY) and Vienna: World Health Organization, United Nations Development Programme and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2014 (http://www.
who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/status_report/2014/en/, accessed 6 April 2016).
aa. Global Health Estimates: deaths by cause, age, and sex with provisional update to 2015 using methods and data sources found at: http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalCOD_method_2000_2012.
pdf?ua=1 (accessed 6 April 2016). The death rate is an average over the period 20112015. WHO Member States with a population of less than 250 000 in 2012 were not included in the analysis.
ab. Non-standard definition. For more details see the WHO Global Health Observatory at: http://www.who.int/gho/en/.
ac. Updated, unpublished estimates.
ad. Provisional estimate.
ae. For high-income countries with no information on clean fuel use, usage is assumed to be >95%.
af. Cigarettes use only.
ag. Data provided in a format that could not be included in the analysis.
120
ANNEX C
WHO REGIONAL GROUPINGS1
WHO African Region: Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Central African
Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Cte dIvoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea*, Ethiopia,
Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius,
Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa,
South Sudan*, Swaziland, Togo, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
WHO Region of the Americas: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia (Plurinational State
of), Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada,
Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint
Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United States of America, Uruguay, Venezuela
(Bolivarian Republic of).
WHO South-East Asia Region: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, India, Indonesia, Maldives,
Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste*.
WHO European Region: Albania, Andorra*, Armenia*, Austria, Azerbaijan*, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina*,
Bulgaria, Croatia*, Cyprus, Czech Republic*, Denmark, Estonia*, Finland, France, Georgia*, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan*, Kyrgyzstan*, Latvia*, Lithuania*, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro*,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova*, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia*, Slovakia*,
Slovenia*, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan*, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia*, Turkey, Turkmenistan*,
Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Uzbekistan*.
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jordan,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia,
United Arab Emirates, Yemen.
WHO Western Pacific Region: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Cook Islands, Fiji, Japan, Kiribati, Lao
Peoples Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Marshall Islands*, Micronesia (Federated States of)*, Mongolia, Nauru*, New
Zealand, Niue*, Palau*, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Tonga,
Tuvalu*, Vanuatu, Viet Nam.
1 Member States indicated with an * may have data for periods prior to their official membership of WHO.
121
ISBN 978 92 4 156526 4

Estadisticas de Salud Mundial

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Estadisticas de Salud Mundial

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Estadisticas de Salud Mundial

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WORLD

WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

(NLM classification: WA 900.1)

E-ISBN 978 92 4 069569 6 (PDF)

1. The 2030 Agenda a new impetus for health monitoring..

Scope an agenda for all countries.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3. Monitoring the health goal indicators of overall progress. .

6. SDG health and health-related targets.

UHC coverage index of essential health services a new summary measure. .

5. Equity leave no one behind. .

Life expectancy major gains but still large differences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4. Universal health coverage at the centre of the health goal.

Health targets 13 targets and 26 proposed indicators. . . . . . . . . . . .

MONITORING HEALTH FOR THE SDGs

Annex A: Summaries of the SDG health and health-related targets. .

Annex B: Tables of health statistics by country, WHO region and globally. .

Annex C: WHO regional groupings..

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

MONITORING HEALTH FOR THE SDGs

adolescent birth rate

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

MONITORING HEALTH FOR THE SDGs

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

THE 2030 AGENDA

In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly

Intended to realize the vision of a world that is rights

scope, the agenda will require a comprehensive, integrated

MONITORING HEALTH FOR THE SDGs

coverage (UHC) underpins, and is key to, the achievement of

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

serve to inform the HLPF, which will also receive a Global

Tracking progress towards the health-related MDGs led to

2.1 Scope an agenda for all countries

gaps for indicators other than mortality. This is a challenge

2.2 Contents all major health areas are

2.3 Equity the need for disaggregated

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

Data disaggregation presents a major challenge for many

2.4 Multisectoral data health-related risk

2.5 Country monitoring data gaps and

broader scrutiny, but also allowing for the use of different

2.6 Regional and global monitoring

National statistical offices will lead the country SDG

While global monitoring will continue to be vital to the

The need for global reporting has often led to the

Global and regional reviews cannot be conducted without

Closer collaboration between health and statistical

1 Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal

4 Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal

2.7 Review using data for improved

WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS: 2016

society and others of national government performance.

Thus far, the SDG indicator and monitoring framework

3.1 Life expectancy major gains but still

contribute to it. Despite large gaps in the coverage of global

The gap between African life expectancy and European life

Life expectancy at age 60 has also been increasing globally

Gain per decade (years)

Several cause-specific mortality targets are proposed for