2 - 4GHz MIMO Patch Antenna On Microstrip Technology PDF
2 - 4GHz MIMO Patch Antenna On Microstrip Technology PDF
2 - 4GHz MIMO Patch Antenna On Microstrip Technology PDF
E S C U E L A P O L I TE C N I C A S U P E R I O R D E G AN D I A
I.T. Telecomunicacin (Sist. de Telecomunicacin)
Director/es:
Ross, Murch
GANDIA, 2009
ii
The following Final Year Project has been carried out in the Department of Electronic and
Computer Engineering of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology within the
Promoe Exchange Program from the Escola Politcnica Superior de Gandia of the Universitat
Politcnica de Valencia.
iii
iv
HEREBY CERTIFIES:
that the Stutent Jess Escriv Muoz under the INTERUNIVERSITY EXCHANGE
AGREEMENT, from Escola Politcnica Superior de Gandia of the UNIVERSITAT
POLITCNICA DE VALNCIA, has carried out at this Institution during the Spring semester
(January May 2008), his Final Year Project obtaining a final grade of ____ out of 10 points.
vi
INDEX
1. Introduction ................................................................................................... page 1
2. MIMO Wireless Communication Systems ................................................... page 5
2.1 Shannons Capacity Formula .................................................................. page 5
2.2 Extended Capacity Formula for MIMO Channels ................................... page 5
2.3 Remarks on the Extended Shannon Capacity Formula ............................ page 9
2.4 Capacity of SIMO MISO Channels .................................................... page 11
2.5 Stochastic Channels ................................................................................ page 11
2.6 MIMO Capacity and Channel Models ..................................................... page 12
3. Microstrip Antenna Technology ................................................................... page 15
3.1 Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antennas .................................................. page 17
3.1.1 Transmission-line model ............................................................... page 18
3.1.2 Cavity model ................................................................................ page 19
3.1.3 Full-wave models .......................................................................... page 22
3.1.4 Design considerations ................................................................... page 22
3.1.5 Probe-Fed Microstrip Rectangular Patch Antenna for 2.4 GHz...... page 26
3.2 Triangular Microstrip Patch Antennas ..................................................... page 29
4. Dual-Frequency and Broad-Band Triangular MSPA.................................. page 31
4.1 Design .................................................................................................... page 32
4.2 Results.................................................................................................... page 39
5. MIMO antennas ............................................................................................ page 41
5.1 Antenna Simulation ................................................................................ page 41
5.1.1 Two-Port Antenna Configuration .................................................. page 41
5.1.2 Four-Port Antenna Configuration .................................................. page 43
5.1.3 Six-Port Antenna Configuration .................................................... page 45
5.2 Four-Port Antenna Configuration ........................................................... page 48
6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... page 55
vii
viii
ABSTRACT
In this work, we have analyzed triangular and rectangular microstrip patches and their use in
MIMO communication systems. Triangular patches have demonstrated a great capability of
miniaturization due to its geometrical shape. Etching some slots in the patches changes the
antenna frequency response so that dual-band and broadband designs are easily conceived.
Several configurations are analyzed using the HFSS simulation software and a 2.4 GHz four-port
MIMO antenna is fabricated on a FR-4 substrate. Simulation results and some graphics are also
included.
ix
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
Wireless
Com.
We can observe in Figure 1.1 the expected performance gains from the use of MIMO
Benefits of technology by plotting the data rate versus the receive signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a 100
MIMO
kHz channel for an MM (i.e., M receive and M transmit antennas) fading link with M=1, 2,
Technology
4. Assuming a target receives SNR of 25 decibels (dB), a conventional single-input singleoutput (i.e., M=1) system can deliver a data rate of 0.7 Mbps (where Mbps denotes Mbits
per second). With M=2 and 4 we can realize data rates of 1.4 and 2.8 Mbps respectively.
This increase in data rate is realized for no additional power or bandwidth expenditure
compared to the single-input single-output system.
Figure 1.1
Fig. 1.1: Average data rate versus SNR for different antenna configurations.
The benefits of MIMO technology that help achieve such significant performance gains
are array gain, spatial diversity gain, spatial multiplexing gain and interference reduction.
These gains are described in brief below.
Array gain. That is the increase in receive SNR that results from a coherent combining
effect of the wireless signals at a receiver. The coherent combining may be realized through
spatial processing at the receive antenna array and/or spatial pre-processing at the transmit
antenna array. Array gain improves resistance to noise, thereby improving the coverage and
the range of a wireless network.
Spatial diversity gain. As mentioned earlier, the signal level at a receiver in a wireless
system fluctuates or fades. Spatial diversity gain mitigates fading and is realized by
providing the receiver with multiple (ideally independent) copies of the transmitted signal in
space, frequency or time. With an increasing number of independent copies (the number of
copies is often referred to as the diversity order), the probability that at least one of the
copies is not experiencing a deep fade increases, thereby improving the quality and
reliability of reception. A MIMO channel with Mtx transmit antennas and Mrx receive
antennas potentially offers Mtx x Mrx independently fading links, and hence a spatial
diversity order of Mtx x Mrx.
2
Spatial multiplexing gain. MIMO systems offer a linear increase in data rate through
spatial multiplexing, i.e., transmitting multiple, independent data streams within the
bandwidth of operation. Under suitable channel conditions, such as rich scattering in the
environment, the receiver can separate the data streams. Furthermore, each data stream
experiences at least the same channel quality that would be experienced by a single-input
single-output system, effectively enhancing the capacity by a multiplicative factor equal to
the number of streams. In general, the number of data streams that can be reliably supported
by a MIMO channel equals the minimum of the number of transmit antennas and the
number of receive antennas, i.e., min{MT, MR}. The spatial multiplexing gain increases the
capacity of a wireless network.
Interference reduction and avoidance. Interference in wireless networks results from
multiple users sharing time and frequency resources. Interference may be mitigated in
MIMO systems by exploiting the spatial dimension to increase the separation between users.
For instance, in the presence of interference, array gain increases the tolerance to noise as
well as the interference power, hence improving the signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio
(SINR). Additionally, the spatial dimension may be leveraged for the purposes of
interference avoidance, i.e., directing signal energy towards the intended user and
minimizing interference to other users. Interference reduction and avoidance improve the
coverage and range of a wireless network.
In general, it may not be possible to exploit simultaneously all the benefits described
above due to conflicting demands on the spatial degrees of freedom. However, using some
combination of the benefits across a wireless network will result in improved capacity,
coverage and reliability.
The potential to provide the next major leap forward for wireless communications has led
Situation of this technology to becoming the next frontier of wireless communications. As a result, it has
MIMO
received the attention not only of the international research and development community,
Technology
but also of the wireless communications industry. This is evidenced from the international
standardization efforts in the context of UMTS (e.g., 3GPP) and IEEE 802.11 (for wireless
LANs) and also in the context of proposals for next generation (4G and beyond) wireless
systems [4].
For example, the third-generation cellular system specification (3GPP) currently supports
only an optional two antenna space-time transmit diversity scheme and does not require the
handsets to have more than one antenna element [3]. Sophisticated techniques that employ
spatial multiplexing or support more antenna elements have met with considerable
opposition in 3GPP. While the adoption of MIMO has made headway in the next-generation
wireless local area network (WLAN) standard IEEE 802.11n, which aims to transfer raw
information at rates greater than 100 Mbps over a 20-MHz bandwidth, complexity
considerations are likely to make the adopted MIMO scheme an elementary one that
supports a small number of antenna elements.
In this report, we aim to design and construct a MIMO antenna for wireless
communications by using microstrip technology. In Chapter II, the theoretical aspects of
MIMO communication systems are reviewed. Afterwards, in Chapter III we find an
introduction to the microstrip antenna patch technology and a study of the rectangular and
the triangular patch is carried out. In Chapter IV, the former theoretical introduction allows
us to design a single broadband triangular patch antenna by using slots. This structure is
used in Chapter V for the MIMO antenna, whose performance is then analyzed.
This chapter introduces the principles of MIMO systems employing the necessary
mathematical analysis to consider the achieved capacity performance.
The mathematical representation of the MIMO system is performed through a complex
matrix, which depends on the scenario considered each time. The capacity achieved by the
MIMO channel in all the above cases is studied with the use of the Shannon extended
capacity formula. The capacity performance results, developed from the simulations
performed, are related to the number of the multiple antenna elements that the receiver and
the transmitter are equipped with, the distance between them and the degree of correlation
evidenced [4].
In practice, this is considered to be a SISO scenario (single input, single output) and
Equation 2.1 gives an upper limit for the achieved error-free SISO transmission rate. If the
transmission rate is less than C bps, then an appropriate coding scheme exists that could lead
to reliable and error-free transmission. On the contrary, if the transmission rate is more than
C bps, then the received signal, regardless of the robustness of the employed code, will
involve bit errors.
Equation 2.2
The matrix elements are complex numbers that correspond to the attenuation and phase
shift that the wireless channel introduces to the signal reaching the receiver with delay .
The input-output notation of the MIMO system can now be expressed by the following
equation:
Equation 2.3
where H is the
channel matrix,
is the covariance matrix of the transmitted
vector s,
is the transpose conjugate of the H matrix and p is the maximum normalized
transmit power.
and
accordingly, while
. The diagonal elements of matrix
The operations that lead to the linear transformation of the channel into
SISO subchannels are described as follows: First, the transmitter multiplies the
signal to be transmitted x with the matrix V, the receiver multiplies the received signal r and
noise with the conjugate transpose of the matrix U as follows:
Equation 2.7
Equation 2.8
Equation 2.9
hence:
Equation 2.10
where
above.
are the singular values of matrix H according to the transformation that took place
It was proven in [1] that the total capacity of n SISO subchannels is the sum of the
individual capacities and as a result the total MIMO capacity is:
Equation 2.12
where
is the power allocated to the kth subchannel and
is its power gain. We notice
that according to the singular value decomposition algorithm
are the
eigenvalues of the
matrix, which are always non-negative. Furthermore, regardless of
the power allocation algorithm used,
must satisfy
Equation 2.13
At this point, there are two cases of particular interest that need further consideration: the
knowledge (or not) by the transmitter of the Channel State Information (CSI).
or
Equation 2.15
The difference between Equation 2.14 and Equation 2.15 is the coefficient
that
corresponds to the amount of power that is assigned to the kth subchannel. This coefficient
is given by:
Equation 2.17
degrees of freedom.
9
This equation practically shows that this bound is defined by the sum of the capacities of
independent subchannels with power gains that follow the chi-square distribution with
degrees of freedom.
The upper bound of the capacity is the sum of the capacities of n t independent
subchannels, with power gains chi-squared distributed and with degrees of freedom
The last equation indicates that the capacity of an orthogonal MIMO channel is n times
the capacity of the SISO channel.
10
Equation 2.24
Equation 2.25
11
Consequently, under the stochastic channel consideration, the capacity achieved becomes
a random variable, and in order to study its behavior, we use stochastic quantities, as
described below.
When there is no CSI at the transmitter, we can substitute Equation 2.13 into Equation
2.26, so the ergodic capacity is given by
Equation 2.27
Whereas with CSI at the transmitter we use Equation 2.15, and the ergodic capacity is
given by:
Equation 2.28
12
13
14
Figure 3.1
15
The reasons why this class of antennas has become so popular include the following [14-15]:
Characteristics
of MSPA
Applications
of MSPA antennas. The most popular microstrip antenna is certainly the rectangular patch. The
Global Positioning System (GPS) has become ubiquitous in its applications. GPS
applications such as the asset tracking of vehicles as well as marine use have created a large
demand for antennas. The majority of these are rectangular patches which have been
modified to produce right hand circular polarization (RHCP) and operate at 1.575 GHz.
Numerous vendors offer patches designed using ceramics with a high dielectric constant ( =
6, 20, 36) to reduce the rectangular microstrip antenna to as small a footprint as possible for
a given application. The patches are provided ready for circuit board integration with low
noise amplifiers. Rectangular patch antennas are also used for Bluetooth automotive
applications (2.4GHz) with RHCP.
In recent years Satellite Digital Audio Radio Services (SDARS) have become a viable
alternative to AM and FM commercial broadcasts in automobiles. The system has strict
radiation pattern requirements which have been met with a combination of a printed
monopole and TM21 mode annular microstrip antenna which has been altered with notches
to produce left hand circular polarization at 2.338 GHz [16].
Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) provide short range high-speed data connections
between mobile devices (such as a laptop computer) and wireless access points. The range
for wireless data links is typically around 100 to 300 feet indoors and 2000 feet outdoors.
Wireless data links use the IEEE Standards 802.11a,b,g. The majority of WLANs use the
16
unlicensed 2.4 GHz band (802.11b and 802.11g). The 802.11a standard uses the 5 GHz
unlicensed frequency band. We can find several variations of the WLAN antenna such as
multiband printed antennas which are integrated into ceiling tiles use a microstrip diplexer to
combine the signal from GSM cell phones (860 MHz band), PCS cell phones (1.92 GHz
band) and 802.11a wireless LAN service (2.4 GHz band) provided by two integrated
microstrip dipoles [17].
The rectangular microstrip patch antenna (RMSPA) is by far the most widely used
configuration. Figure 3.2 shows the geometry of this antenna type. A rectangular metal
patch of width
and length
is separated by a dielectric material from a ground
plane by a distance h. The two ends of the antenna (located at 0 and b) can be viewed as
radiating edges due to fringing fields along each edge of width
. The two radiating
edges are separated by a distance
. The two edges along the sides of length L are often
referred to as non-radiating edges.
Figure 3.2
Methods of
Analysis
There are many methods of analysis for microstrip antennas, which can be divided into
three categories:
Line-transmission model: it is the easiest of all, it gives good physical insight but is less
accurate and it is more difficult to model coupling.
Cavity model: it is more accurate but also more complex. However, it also gives good
physical insight and is rather difficult to model coupling.
Full-wave models: these are very accurate, very versatile, and can teat single elements,
finite and infinite arrays, stacked elements, arbitrary shaped elements and coupling and
thus they are the most popular and practical. However, they are the most complex models
and usually give less physical insight.
17
TL
model of
a
RMSPA
Figure 3.3
It should be considered that because of dimensions of the patch are finite along the length
and width, the fields at the edges of the patch undergo fringing, i.e. the field exists outside
the dielectric thus causing a change in the effective dielectric constant. It is a function of the
ratio of the dimensions of the patch and the height of the substrate. A typical microstrip line
is a non-homogeneous line of two dielectrics (substrate and air). Most of the electric field
lines reside in the substrate but parts of some lines exist in air. Fringing in this case makes
the microstrip line look wider electrically compared to its physical dimensions. Since some
of the waves travel in the substrate and some in air, an effective dielectric constant
is
introduced to account for fringing and the wave propagation in the air.
18
Effective
dielectric
constant
and length
This effective dielectric constant is defined as the dielectric constant of the uniform
dielectric material so that the line inserted in this dielectric behaves the same way as it does
in the actual microstrip line with two dielectrics. Therefore, the microstrip line behaves more
like a homogeneous line of one dielectric (only the substrate), and the effective dielectric
constant approaches the value of the dielectric constant of the substrate.
Equation 3.1
Because of the fringing effects, the patch of the microstrip antenna looks electrically
greater than its physical dimensions. The extension width can be computed as follows:
Equation 3.2
The resonant frequency and associated modes will be analyzed in the next section, but we
Resonant
Frequency can already assert that for the dominant TM010 mode, the resonant frequency of the
By using this model, we can derive other characteristic, such as the parallel equivalent
admittance for the slots or the resonant input impedance.
Physics of
the cavity and radiation through its side walls. When the microstrip patch is energized, a
the Cavity
charge distribution is established on the upper and lower surfaces of the patch, as well as on
Model
the surface of the ground plane, as shown in Figure 3.4. The charge distribution is then
controlled by two mechanisms: an attractive and a repulsive mechanism. The attractive
mechanism is between the corresponding opposite charges on the bottom side of the patch
and the ground plane, which tends to maintain the charge concentration on the bottom of the
patch. The repulsive mechanism is between like charged on the bottom surface of the patch,
19
which tends to push some charges from the bottom of the patch, around its edges, to its top
surface.
Figure 3.4
The movement of these charges creates corresponding current densities and , at the
bottom an top surfaces of the patch, respectively. Since the height-to-width ratio is very
small, the attractive mechanism dominates and most of the charge concentration and current
flow remain underneath the patch. A small amount of current flows around the edges of the
patch to its top surface. However, this current flow decreases as the height-to-width ratio
decreases. In the limit, this would allow the four side walls to be modeled by perfect
magnetic conducting surfaces which ideally would not disturb the magnetic or electric field
distributions.
If the microstrip antenna were treated only as a cavity, it would not be sufficient to find
the absolute amplitudes of the electric and magnetic fields. In fact, by treating the walls of
the cavity and the material within it as lossless, the cavity would not radiate and its input
impedance would be purely reactive. Also, the function representing the impedance would
only have real poles. To account for radiation, a loss mechanism has to be introduced: the
radiation and loss resistance, which are taken into account by the effective loss tangent.
Because of the thickness of the microstrip is usually very small, the waves generated
TM modes
within the dielectric substrate undergo considerable reflections when they arrive at the edge
in
rectangular of the patch. Thus only a small fraction of the incident energy is radiating (a very inefficient
antenna). The fields beneath the patch form standing waves that can be represented by
MSPA
sinusoidal wave functions. Since the height of the substrate is very small compared to the
wavelength within the dielectric, the field variations along the height will be considered
constant. In addition, because of the very small substrate height, the fringing of the fields
along the edges of the patch are also very small whereby the electric field is nearly normal to
the surface of the patch. Therefore, only TM field configurations will be considered (no
magnetic field in the direction of propagation).
Due to all this considerations, the volume beneath the patch can be treated as a
rectangular cavity loaded with a dielectric material truncated and not extended beyond the
edges of the patch.
A complete analysis implies the resolution of the vector potential that satisfies the
homogeneous wave equation in order to find the electric and magnetic fields subject to the
boundary conditions.
20
and
Equation 3.5
Equation 3.6
To determine the dominant mode, we need to examine the resonant frequencies. For
all microstrip antennas
and
. Then, if
, the mode with the lowest
frequency (dominant mode) is the TM010 whose resonant frequency is given by
Equation 3.7
Equation 3.9
If, however,
, the dominant mode is the TM010 whose resonant frequency is given
by Equation 3.8 while if
, the second order mode is the TM020. The distribution of
the tangential electric field along the side walls of the cavity for the TM 010, TM001, TM020
and TM002 is shown in Figure 3.5.
Figure 3.5
21
By using this approach, we can also obtain other parameters, i.e., the equivalent current
densities, directivity, fields radiated, quality factor of the resonator
Most of the limitations listed here can be overcome in the full-wave techniques, which
maintain rigor and accuracy at the expense of numerical simplicity. The three most
popular full-wave techniques are called the spectral-domain full-wave solution, the
mixed-potential electric field integral equation approach, and the finite-difference timedomain technique. Their principal assumption of the integral equation is that the substrate
and ground plane are infinite in lateral dimensions. The formulation of the solution is based
on rigorously enforcing the boundary conditions at the air-dielectric interface by using the
exact Greens function for the composite dielectric.
In the first approach, the integral equation is written and solved in the spectral approach.
In the other approach, the spectral domain is used for calculating the Greens function, but
inverse transforms are taken at this stage and the integral equation is solved in the space
domain.
Substrate
permittivity
properties
22
and lower efficiency than a thin substrate of high permittivity. A high permittivity reduces
the patch size and the extent of the fringing fields. Consequently, the radiation is due to a
narrow magnetic current ring around the patch periphery. A thicker substrate, on the other
hand, does not reduce the patch size significantly, but extends the zone of the fringing fields,
thus resulting in a broad a radiation ring. The most popular substrate materials are
honeycomb (
), Duroid (
), quartz (
), FR-4 (
) and
aluminia (
).
Antenna
losses
Antenna losses. We can identify three types of losses in MSPA. In the first place, the
existence of a dielectric substrate over a conducting ground plane can cause the excitation of
surface waves along the air-dielectric interface and within the substrate. These surface
waves propagate parallel to the interface without attenuation and radiate some of their
energy as the reach the microstrip discontinuity. A grounded dielectric layer always supports
a finite number of surface wave modes, but since the lowest order TM-type mode has a zero
cutoff frequency, a MSPA will, in general, always excite some surface-wave power. Except
for very thin substrates, conductor and dielectric losses are quite small. The dielectric loss
displays strong dependence on frequency and is independent of surface roughness, and can
be minimized by choosing a low-loss substrate. The conductor losses, however, depend on
frequency and substrate surface roughness, and are more difficult to control.
23
Guney [27] analyzed the dependence of the patch length and width on antenna parameters.
A model for the patch length and width expressions is chosen first, then the unknown
coefficient values of the model are obtained by using a curve-fitting technique (CFT). The
theoretical patch length and width results obtained using the expressions derived in his study
agree well with the measured results:
Equation 3.11
Equation 3.12
Furthermore, in Ali Akdagli s work [28-29] the formulas are developed by utilizing a
differential evolution, which is a simple, fast, and robust evolutionary algorithm that has
proven effective in determining the global optimum for general type of numeric
optimization. His formulas provide < 0.16% and 0.22% error on average for the patch length
and patch width, respectively:
Equation 3.13
Equation 3.14
The Feed. Power can be coupled into or out of the antenna element by two primary
methods, namely, the direct contact and the electromagnetic induction. The first method uses
a transmission line contact either by a microstrip line or by a coaxial probe from underneath
the substrate. In the electromagnetic induction or the noncontact method, there is no direct
physical or electrical contact between the patch and the feeding structure, and the coupling
to the antenna element is made strictly by electromagnetic induction, either directly from the
feeding microstrip or through an intermediate aperture.
Coaxial
Feed
The coaxial feed, also called the probe feed, can be used to feed patch elements through
the ground plane from a parallel feed substrate. Its location is usually selected to provide a
perfect match between the antenna and the transmission line. The resonant resistance
increases as the feed moves away from the center of the patch. The variation of input
resistance at resonance with feed position essentially follows that of the cavity field. For the
lowest mode, it is usually large when the feed is near the edge of the patch, and decreases as
the feed moves inside the patch. The 50- input resistance point may be obtained by varying
the distance from the radiating edge of the antenna element to the feed location, as shown in
24
Equation 3.15
Equation 3.15. The input impedance at the center of a patch is zero because the voltage is
zero and the current is a maximum. If the feed is located at
and
, the
input resistance at resonance for the dominant TM10 mode can be expressed as
Microstrip
Line Feed
For the case of a microstrip line feed, the patch can be notched to provide an inset feed
point. Such direct conducting feeding methods have the advantage of simplicity, but also
have several disadvantages. These configurations suffer from the bandwidth feed radiation
tradeoff, where an increase in substrate thickness for the purpose increasing of bandwidth
leads to an increase in spurious feed radiation, increased surface wave power, and possibly
increased feed inductance.
In Basilios work [26], the impedance was measured for the inset microstrip fed patches.
As with the probe-fed case, the maximum input resistance occurs at the edge of the patch
and decreases as the inset distance is increased toward the center of the radiator, while the
reactance remains reasonably constant. However, the rate at which the resistance decreases
with changing feed position is seen to be much more rapid, and the resistance is also seen to
rise slightly as the inset approaches the center of the patch. The latter behavior is in contrast
to the probe-fed case, where the resistance became essentially zero near the center.
Empirically, a
would seem to be the best fit for the experimental data, but
there is no real theoretical justification.
Ground
Plane, Input
Impedance
and
Bandwitdth
Ground Plane. Microstrip antennas are shielded by a ground plane which limits the
radiation to a half plane and combined with an effective two-slot radiation from adjacent
edges. Its size controls the back radiation, and also affects the excitation efficiency of nonresonant modes. The thickness of the ground plane affects the reflection coefficients of
various modes, at its terminal edge, and also their excitation efficiency.
Input Impedance. The input impedance of an antenna directly affects the efficiency of
energy transfer to or from the antenna. It varies according to the antenna properties such as
the excitation frequency, the permittivity and thickness of the substrate, patch length and
width, and the location of the feed point. Owing to its effects on the efficiency of energy
transfer, it should be determined accurately in order to provide a good match between the
patch and the feed.
Due to the resonant nature of the investigated antenna element, its resonant input
resistance is related to the quality factors associated with the system losses. A properly
chosen patch shape may result in an impedance versus frequency behavior that approximates
a parallel RLC circuit. The operating frequency is determined when the impedance becomes
purely real.
Bandwidth. Since the cavity under the patch is basically a resonator, the total quality
factor Q and the impedance bandwidth are dependent on the thickness of the substrate and
its permittivity. This implies that the quality factor of a patch antenna on a thin substrate is
25
large, and that the bandwidth is small. Bandwidth improves as the substrate thickness is
increased, or as the permittivity of the substrate is reduced.
Radiation
Patterns,
Efficiency
and
Polarization
A probe-fed microstrip rectangular patch antenna functioning at 2.4 GHz is design with
HFSS software, printed on a FR4 board and its performance is tested and discussed in
comparison with the software simulation.
Using the above-presented equations, we have designed the patch antenna with
mm (Equations 2.10-14) and
mm.
It has been shown that similar results for finite and infinite ground plane can be obtained
if the size of the ground plane is greater than the patch dimensions by approximately six
times the substrate thickness all around the periphery.
26
Hence, for this design, the ground plane dimensions would be given in Equations 16 and
17:
Equation 3.16
Equation 3.17
A coaxial probe type feed is to be used in this design. As shown in Figure 4.1, the center
of the patch is taken as the origin and the feed point location is given by the co-ordinates
from the origin. The feed point must be located at that point on the patch, where
the input impedance is 50 ohms for the resonant frequency. Although the feed point can be
selected anywhere along the patch width, it is better to choose
so that other
modes are not excited along with the TM10 mode. Determination of the exact feed point
requires an iterative solution but it has been suggested [6-8] an approximation as shown in
Equation 18:
Equation 3.18
where
For this configuration we have obtained a center frequency of 2.55 GHz. By increasing
the patch width W until 28.12 mm we have reached the 2.4 GHz. Broader bandwidth (2.372.43 GHz) and impedance approximately 50-60 have been achieved by tuning the patch
length to 30.4 mm. The simulation shows the following:
The last modification introduced has been increasing the ground in order to achieve a
better return loss (14 mm have been added to both ground width and length in order to
obtain -29 dB return loss).
27
Once the patch antenna has been fabricated, a network analyzer has been used to measure
the antenna return loss characteristic. We have can see a shift in the frequency of the
fabricated antenna in comparison with the simulation (see Figure 3.8).
Most fabrication errors arise because of inaccuracy in etching; etching accuracy depends
on the process and the materials used in the photo-etching process, the substrate surface
finish, and metallization thickness. Because of fabrication errors, tolerances and other
effects, the electromagnetic characteristics of a microstrip antenna may deviate from the
Errors,
Corrections design specifications. Dimensional tolerances and substrate inhomogeneitites can result in
and Final amplitude and phase errors, and also in variation in the resonant frequency of the antenna.
Results
-5
-15
HFSS simulation
-20
Network Analyzer
-25
-30
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
f (GHz)
-5
-10
R.L. (dB)
R.L. (dB)
-10
-15
Modificated Antenna
Initial HFSS Simulation
-20
X: 2.4
Y: -21.2
-25
28
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
f (GHz)
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
The field distribution in a triangular patch can be found using the cavity model, in which the
triangle
is surrounded by a magnetic wall along the periphery as was done for the rectangular
Field
Distribution configuration.
and Resonant
Frequencies
Consider a triangular resonator with magnetic side walls filled with a dielectric material of
relative permittivity and thickness h. Since
there is no variation of the fields along the z
direction (normal direction to the patch surface), therefore, the structure supports TM modes.
The resonant frequency corresponding to the various modes is:
Equation 3.19
where m,n,l cannot be zero at the same time and satisfy the condition that
velocity of light in the free space, and a is the side length of the equilateral triangle.
, c is the
The above expression is valid when the triangular resonator is surrounded by a perfect magnetic
wall. The effect of a non-perfect wall on the resonant frequency has been widely discussed. Most of
the suggestions are about replacing the side length a by an effective value
and leaving the
substrate dielectric constant unchanged. The other set of suggestions proposes replacing both a and
with their effective values. An expression for
has been arrived at by curve fitting the
experimental and theoretical results for the resonant frequency for TM 10 mode, which corresponds to
the dominant mode [33]. It is given by
Equation 3.20
29
Knowing
from above, the resonant frequency for higher modes is calculated as follows
Equation 3.21
Effective
Side
Length
Equation 3.22
Chen and Lee [33] proposed a value for the effective side length that is claimed to be within 0.5%
when compared with the value obtained from the moment method analysis:
Equation 3.23
Among the solutions that propose replacing both a and with their effective values, Gang [35]
suggested that the side length in should be replaced by the same effective value given in Equation
4 but he replaced with the following effective value:
Equation 3.24
where
Equation 3.25
with
Equation 3.26
Gney [36], used the last Equations 6-8 to calculate the effective side length as follows:
Equation 3.27
This new effective side length has been found to be the measured and theoretical data closely [36].
By using the same cavity model, the input impedance of an equilateral triangular patch antenna
has been determined using the cavity model and integral equation approach and has been seen to
vary sharply with frequency, indicating a high value of resonator Q.
30
Patch antennas are popular for their well-known attractive features, such as low profile,
light weight, and compatibility with monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs).
Their main disadvantage is an intrinsic limitation in bandwidth, which is due to the resonant
nature of the patch structure.
In the design following, we place two resonant frequencies near each other in order to
obtain a broadband antenna functioning at 2.4GHz with a final bandwidth of 110 MHz
(4.58%). This has been achieved using a technique characteristic in dual-frequency patch
antennas.
Modern communication systems, such as those for satellite links (GPS, vehicular, etc.), as
well as emerging applications, such as wireless local networks (WLAN), often require
antennas with compactness and low-cost, thus rendering planar technology useful, and
sometimes unavoidable. From this applications, a new motivation is given for research on
innovative solutions that overcome the bandwidth limitations of patch antennas, an a valid
alternative to the broadening of total bandwidth is represented by dual-frequency patch
antennas. Dual-frequency antennas exhibit a dual-resonant behavior in a single radiating
structure [38].
There are three main approaches to design dual-frequency antennas, which will be
identified as 1) orthogonal-mode dual-frequency patch antennas, 2) multi-patch dualfrequency patch antennas, and 3) reactively-loaded dual-frequency patch antennas.
The most popular technique for obtaining the dual-frequency behavior is to introduce a
reactive loading to a single patch. A kind of reactive loading can be introduced by etching
slots on the patch. This allows for a strong modification of the resonant mode of the patch,
particularly when the slots are oriented to cut the current lines of the unperturbed mode.
In the designed we are concerned with, we start creating a single-feed triangular patch
antenna working at around 2.40 GHz. Afterwards, we load the antenna with two pairs of
narrow slots in the triangular patch, with one pair of the slots embedded close to the side
edges of the patch and the other pair inserted at the bottom edge of the patch. The two
operating in this case are associated to the resonant modes of TM10 and TM20. It is found
that due to the slots embedded close to the side edges, the radiation pattern of the TM 20
mode, which usually exhibits a slight dip in the broadside direction [36-37], is removed and
become similar to that of the TM10 mode. As for inserting the pair of slots at the bottom
edge of the patch, various frequency ratios of the two operating frequencies can be obtained
by varying the length and position of the inserted slots.
Moreover, it is found that by further protruding a narrow slot out of the embedded slots
close to the side edges, the frequency ratio of the two frequencies can be adjusted to be close
to unity, which means broad-band radiation is obtained. This broad-band operation is
especially important for the triangular microstrip antenna. This is because although the
31
conventional triangular microstrip antenna has the advantage of physically smaller for
operating at a given frequency, as compared to the rectangular or circular microstrip
antennas, it also exhibits a smaller antenna bandwidth than the rectangular or circular ones.
With the present design technique, the proposed triangular microstrip antenna can have a
wider operating bandwidth with a smaller antenna size as compared to the conventional
rectangular or circular microstrip antennas. Details of the proposed antenna designs are
described and experimental results for the obtained dual-frequency and broad-band
performance are presented and discussed.
4.1 Design
The initial patch consists of a equilateral triangular patch of a=36.5 mm of side length
mounted on a FR-4 substrate board of
and
mm. According to the equations
seen in last chapter, this should provide a resonant frequency of approximately 2.5GHz for
the TM10 mode and around 5GHz for the TM20 mode.
Next, the feed location d is calculated such that the input resistance of the antenna
matches the characteristic impedance of the feed line. The patch is feed by a coaxial probe
situated in the median of the triangle. Different feed positions are investigated for better
matching. The simulations show that varying the feed position only causes a change in
impedance and return loss, but not in the resonant frequencies.
32
For both cases, the pair of slots (denoted as slot 1 in this study), having dimensions
, are placed in parallel to the side edges of the triangular patch, with a small distance
away from the side edges and separated with a distance between them. In Fig.4.2, another
pair of slots (denoted as slot 2 here) with dimensions
are inserted at the bottom edge
of the triangular patch and centered with respect to the center line of the patch with a
spacing of . These two pairs of slots are also of narrow width. The length of slot 1 is
selected to be about 0.8 times the side length of the patch, and the distance between slot 1
and the side edge is chosen to be 1 mm approximately in this study.
Due to the presence of these slots, the fundamental resonant frequency of the triangular
patch is found to be slightly affected, because slot 1 is mainly in parallel to the excited patch
surface current density of the TM10 mode and slot 2 is placed near the bottom edge of the
patch, where the patch surface current distribution of the TM10 mode is relatively very weak
(see the related simulated results shown below).
33
The TM10 frequency first decreases with the introduction of the slot 1 with
but it
increases again as does. This had already been foreseen since the main single triangular
patch has been designed initially for working at 2.5 GHz so that the decrease introduced in
the first resonant frequency helps to reach the 2.4 GHz or even better, slightly less.
However, with the presence of slot 1, the surface current distribution of the TM20 mode
is modified such that the small dip in the broadside direction of the radiation pattern is
removed [36-37].
-2
s=0
s=1
-4
s=2
s=3
s=3.5
s=4
R.L.(dB)
-6
-8
-10
-12
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.2
3.4
f (GHz)
Once chosen the separation between the two type-1 slots, any change in the feed position
will: 1) not change the first resonant frequency but only its impedance, and 2) sometimes
change slightly the second resonance (depending on the separation). This latter effect will
have to be considered when we discuss the more complicated arrays of triangular antennas.
-2
-4
-6
-2
-1
initial feed position
+1
+2
-8
-10
-12
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.2
34
3.4
By inserting slot 2 at the bottom edge of the patch, the excited surface current paths of the
TM20 modes are lengthened, which effectively lowers the resonant frequency of the TM20
mode. This suggests that by varying the positions and lengths of slot 2, the frequency ratio
of the two operating frequencies can be adjusted. A single probe feed for the excitation of
the TM10 and TM20 modes can also be easily located along the center line of the patch in
this design.
In all the simulations, the slot-2 width has remained constant and we have changed the
separation and lengths of the slots. It has been shown that as both the separation and
length increase, the first resonant frequency decreases a little, but this effect can be almost
neglected with some exceptions. On the other hand, this really affects the second resonant
frequency, decreasing it much faster than in the latter case. As for the relation between the
slot length and the separation between slots, we can assert that the bigger the is, the
more quickly the decrease isof the second resonant frequency due to the increase of . Some
graphics are included for reference:
-2
0
-4
-6
-8
-10
l=0
l=4
l=5
l=6
l=7
l=8
R.L. (dB)
R.L. (dB)
-5
l=0
l=5
l=6
l=7
l=8
-10
-12
-15
-14
-16
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
f (GHz)
3.2
3.4
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
f (GHz)
3.2
3.4
-2
0
-4
-6
R.L. (dB)
-5
-8
l=0
l=3
l=4
l=5
l=6
l=7
l=8
-10
-15
l=4
l=5
l=6
l=7
l=8
l=9
-10
-12
-14
-16
-20
-18
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
f(GHz)
3.2
3.4
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
35
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
R.L. (dB)
-5
l=0
l=4
l=5
l=6
l=7
l=8
-10
-15
-20
-25
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
f(GHz)
2.7
2.8
2.9
Graphic 4.4. Return Loss for Different Slot Lengths when w2=18
As we can see in the figures, dual-frequency triangular antenna can be achieved by using
this technique.
Third slot: broad-band design
The next step is to make the first two broadside-radiation modes (TM10 and TM20) of
the triangular patch [36-37] to be excited at frequencies close to each other to form a wider
operating bandwidth. For this purpose, as referred to the antenna structure in Fig. 4.5, a pair
of slots (denoted as slot 3 here) with dimensions
is protruded from slot 1 at a distance
away from the bottom edge of slot 1. When is selected to be less than 0.2 times the
patchs side length , the perturbation of slot 3 on the fundamental resonant frequency can be
greatly reduced, because in this case slot 3 will be in the region near the bottom edge of the
patch where the patch surface current distribution of the TM mode is relatively very weak.
On the other hand, it is expected that with the presence of slots 1, 2, and 3, the equivalent
patch surface current path of the TM mode is strongly meandered and, thus, the resonant
frequency can be significantly lowered and it occurs at a frequency close to the first resonant
frequency.
36
After designing this antenna, we can compare the patch current distributions in the
models with and without the slot 3 for the two resonant frequencies. The final results are
also shown in the graphics below.
37
As we can see in the above figure, theres been an unwanted shift in the response in
frequency in the triangular antenna, in such a way that the broadband extends from 2.41
until 2.52 GHz. In the case we want to fix this without redesigning the entire antenna we
will have to consider the different approaches which can be applied.
In the first place, the easiest way to decrease the first resonant frequency is to increase the
patch side length. Doing this by 2 mm, we manage to decrease the first resonance frequency
which was settled in 2.44 GHz down to 2.38 GHz while the second resonant frequency
remains at around 2.52 GHz.
Now, the bandwidth is 2.36 2.50 GHz but there is a part from 2.42-2.46 where the
antenna stops resonating properly (Graphic 4.6). This is because the two resonant
frequencies are too far apart from each other. In order to reduce the second resonant
frequency we can change the dimension and position of slot 2. A graphic will show this
effect better.
0
-5
-10
s2=16
s2=17
s2=18
s2=18.5
-15
-20
-25
2.2
2.25
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
38
2.6
4.2 Results
Choosing a separation of
match the input impedance.
As we can observe in Graphic 4.8, the final antenna has a bandwidth of 4.6% (110 MHz)
which extends from 2.36 GHz (marker 1) until 2.47 (marker 2). The first resonance
frequency occurs at 2.385 GHz (marker 4, R.L -48.67 dB). The second resonance frequency
occurs at 2.445 GHz (marker 4, R.L. -31.93 dB). In the worst case, that is, the transition
between both resonant frequencies, a return loss of -15.85 dB is achieved (at 2.42 GHz,
marker 5). Other results are depicted below.
39
40
41
It is interesting to study the coupling between the two patches as we vary the separation
between them.
-15
15 mm
16 mm
17 mm
18 mm
19 mm
20 mm
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
f (GHz)
As we can infer from the graphic, coupling deteriorates by 0.6 dB per each millimeter
both patches are nearer (Graphic 5.1). In the extremes, we reach a coupling of -16.61 dB and
-18.38 when the separation is 15 and 20 mm, respectively.
A comparison between the coupling in the case of an array of two rectangular patches and
the triangular case has been performed. As it can be seen in Graphics 4.2 and 4.3, in terms of
coupling there is no particular reason for choosing a triangular design instead of a
rectangular design. Nevertheless, we should consider the fact that a triangular patch implies
less space and it is easier to place in an array configuration.
-15
Triangular 15 mm
Triangular 20 mm
Rectangular 15 mm
Rectangular 20 mm
-20
-25
-30
-35
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
f (GHz)
42
Finally, the best design achieved corresponds to such of two triangular patches inverted
and separated 15 mm between them. However, a shift between the patches return loss
performance has been detected, which would not fit the initial supposition of the array being
completely symmetric.
Let us number the patches from left (1) to right (4). Frequency responses of patches 1 and
4 are quite similar (
), while those of patches 2 and 3 are very related to each other
(
). Return losses are around -40 dB in the resonant frequencies, except from patch 1
that only reaches -30 dB. In the worst case, that is, 2.42 GHz (in the middle of both resonant
frequencies), the return loss does not deteriorate beyond -15 dB.
Three different coupling rates can be identified in Figure 5.4. The first coupling rate is
produced by patches 2 and 3 as a result of their contact with their neighboring patches
(
and
). This is set at -16 dB. The opposite pairs show the same results
43
(
). The second coupling rate is set at around -24 dB and it is due to the interference
between the same patches 2 and 3 with their non-neighboring patches (
). Again,
same results are shown for their opposites (
). Finally, the most efficient couplings are
found to be in the patches which are most remote from each other. Thus,
and
are
around -32 dB.
The input impedance remains constant at about 50 in all the bandwidth as we can
observe in the Smith Chart.
44
It is also interesting to analyze the radiation patterns. All the related figures are referred
to port number one. As it can be noticed from the 3-D radiation pattern, the total gain
achieved is not high at all (only -0.26 dB). Besides, the radiation pattern shows to be quite
uniform and pointing in the vertical direction and the back lobe is found to be quite small.
1
6
5
2
4
46
The input impedance is also maintained during all the bandwidth of the antenna, although
it has deteriorated a little in respect of the four-port case:
With respect to the radiation patterns, all the characteristics found in the four-port
configuration have been maintained. Again, the most remarkable characteristic is the low
gain attained.
47
For MIMO antenna design, two kinds of measurements need to be considered. They are
conventional antenna performance characteristics and also the potential channel capacity.
The measured S-parameters of the proposed antenna structure are shown in Fig.5.15.
They were obtained with a four-port Vector Network Analyzer (Rohde & Schwarz, ZV8)
and therefore, the mutual couplings between all 4 ports are all measured simultaneously. The
results are in good agreement with the HFSS simulations. The antennas operate from 2.39
GHz to 2.49 GHz, if the impedance bandwidth requirement is less than -10 dB.
48
The measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna are given in Figure 5.16, which
are measured in an Anechoic Chamber. During each measurement, only one port is
connected to the Vector Analyzer, while the other three ports are terminated by 50 . The
measured gain is, as commented before, really low (-1.14 dB). However, we should add
some 0.5-1 dB to the mentioned gain as the cable introduced to make the measurements is
not included in the initial calibration.
Only the data related to the first and second patches are included, since patches three and
four are supposed to be equal to ports two and one, respectively.
Trc17
Trc18
Trc19
Trc22
S22
S33
S44
S11
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
5 dB /
5 dB /
5 dB /
5 dB /
Ref -20 dB
Ref -20 dB
Ref -20 dB
Ref -20 dB
Cal int
Cal int
Cal int
Cal int
1 of 16 (Max)
S44
0
Trc2
Trc28
Trc31
Trc34
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
Trc26
Trc29
Trc32
Trc35
S13
S23
S32
S42
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
Trc27
Trc30
Trc33
Trc36
S14
S24
S34
S43
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
dB Mag
2 of 16 (Max)
S23
10
-5
M1
M1
-10
-10
-15
-20
-20
-30
-25
-40
-30
-50
-35
-60
-40
-70
Ch1
S12
S21
S31
S41
Pwr 0 dBm
4/20/2009, 3:24 PM
Ch1
M1
M1
Pwr 0 dBm
4/20/2009, 3:21 PM
Notable Markers:
Trc6
Trc23
Trc24
Trc25
S11
S22
S33
S44
Smith
Smith
Smith
Smith
Ref 1 U
Ref 1 U
Ref 1 U
Ref 1 U
Cal int
Cal int
Cal int
Cal int
6 of 16 (Max)
M 1 2.421500 GHz
S11
0.2
0.5
M1
MM12
Ch1
Pwr 0 dBm
50.310
j383.24
25.189
M 2 2.409500 GHz 43.001
-j14.018
4.712
M 1 2.421500 GHz 50.801
-j87.513
751.04
M 1 2.402000 GHz 40.890
-j13.094
5
5.060
m
pH
pF
m
pF
pF
4/20/2009, 3:25 PM
49
Fig.5.15:
- M1: -10 dB @ 2.39 GHz
- M1: -10 dB @ 2.49 GHz
Fig.5.16
- M1: -16.3 dB @ 2.465 GHz
Fig.5.17
- M1: 50.30 + j383 m @ 2.42 GHz
- M1: 43.00 j14.01 @ 2.40 GHz
- M1: 50.80 + j87.51 m @ 2.42 GHz
- M1: 40.89 j13.09 @ 2.40 GHz
50
51
5.
6.
7.
8.
After getting the results from MIMO test bed we export the data to MATLAB program
for better analysis and comparison on Tx, Rx co-relation coefficients, power (dB) and most
importantly the channel capacity. The above measurements are carried out in a
comparatively fast fading channel with the designed antenna connected to MIMO
transmitter (similar results are expected for transmitter and receiver positions) and the
receivers are simple dipole antennas. To ensure these channel conditions, the measurements
have been taken while the transmitter antenna was in movement.
The most interesting results we obtain with this method are the correlation matrix and the
graphic that shows the capacity improvement that the MIMO system offers:
52
Finally, we can easily observe the increase in the channel capacity in the next figure:
50
SISO
2x2 iid
3x3 iid
4x4 iid
Measurement
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
10
15
20
SNR[dB]
25
30
53
35
40
54
55
56
References
1.Wiesbeck, W., Kuhnet, C., Srgel, W., Smart Antennas for MIMO Applications, Institut
fr Hchstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik Universitt Karlsruhe, Germany
2. Biglieri, E., Chapter I. Introduction, MIMO Wireless Communications, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2007
3. Holma, H., Toskala, A., WCDMA for UMTS, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000
4. Tsoulos, G., MIMO System Technology for Wireless Communications, Boca Ratn,
Florida, USA, 2006
5. Shiu, D.S., Foschini, J., Gaus, J., Kahn, J.M., Fading Correlation and its Effects on the
Capacity of Multi-Element Antenna System, IEEE Trans. on Com., 48, 502, 2000
6. Telatar, I.E., Capacity of Multi-Antenna Gaussian Channels, European Trans. on
Telecom., Vol. 10, No. 6, December 1999
7. Paulraj, A., Nabar, R., Gore, D., Introduction to Space-Time Wireless Communications,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003
8. Foschini, G.J., Layered Space-Time Architecture for Wireless Communications in a
Fading Environment When Using Multi-Element Antennas, Bell Labs Tech., Autumn 1996
9. Proakis, J.G., Digital Communications, 4th Ed., Chapter 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983
10. Verme, R., Mahajan, S., Rohila, V., Classification of MIMO Channel Models, 16th
IEEE International Conference on Networks 2008 (ICOV 2008), December 2008
11. Grieg, D.D., and Englemann, H. F., "Microstrip: A New Transmission Technique for the
Kilomegacycle Range," Proceedings of The IRE, 1952, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 16441650
12. Deschamps, G.A., "Microstrip Microwave Antennas," The Third Symposium on The
USAF Antenna Research and Development Program, University of Illinois, Monticello,
Illinois, October 18-22, 1953
13. Gutton, H., and Baissinot, "Flat Aerial for Ultra High Frequencies," French Patent no.
703113, 1955
14. James,R.J. and Hall,P.S, Handbook of Microstrip Antennas, Eds., Peter Pereguinus,
London, U.K., 1989
15. Greg,G., Bhartia,P., Bahl,I. and Ittipiboon,A., Microstrip Antenna Design Handbook,
Artech House, London
57
16. Licul, S., Petros, A., and Zafar, I., "Reviewing SDARS Antenna Requirements,"
Microwaves & RF September 2003
17. US Patent No: US 6,307,525 B1
18. James,R.J. and Hall,P.S, Handbook of Microstrip Antennas, Eds., Peter Pereguinus,
London, U.K., 1989
19. Greg,G., Bhartia,P., Bahl,I. and Ittipiboon,A., Microstrip Antenna Design Handbook,
Artech House, London
20. Balanis, C.A., Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, Eds.John Wiley & Sons, INC.,
USA, 1982
21. Carver, K.R. and Mink, J.W., Microstrip Antenna Technology, IEEE Trans. on
Antenna and Propagation, Vol.AP-29, No.1, January 1981
22. Pozar, D.M., Microstrip Antennas, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol.80, No.1, January
1992
23. Kara, M., Effective Permittivity of Rectangular Microstrip Antenna Elements with
Various Thickness of Substrates, Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters, Vol.10, November
1995
24. Kara, M., Empirical Formulae for the Computation of the Physical Properties of
Rectangular Microstrip Antenna Elements with Thick Substrates, Microwave and Opt.
Tech. Letters, Vol.14, February 1997
25. Kara, M., Design Considerations for Rectangular Microstrip Antenna Elements with
Various Substrate Thicknesses, Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters, Vol.19, No.2, October
1998
26. Basilio, I.L., Khayat, M.A., Williams, J.T. and Long, S.A., The Dependence of the
Input Impedance on Feed Position of Probe and Microstrip Line-Fed Patch Antennas,
Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters, Vol.49, No.1, January 2001
27. Guney, K., Simple and Accurate Formulas for the Physical Dimensions of Rectangular
Microstrip Antenna with Thin and Thick Substrates, Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters,
Vol.44, No.3, February 2005
28. Akdagli, A., A Closed-Form Expression for the Resonant Frequency of Rectangular
Microstrip Antennas, Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters, Vol.49, No.8, August 2007
29. Akdagli, A., CAD Formular for Patch Dimensions of Rectangular Microstrip Antennas
with Various Substrate Thicknesses, Microwave and Opt. Tech. Letters, Vol.49, No.9,
September 2007
30. Siddiqui, J.Y., Guha, D., Applications of Triangular Microstrip Patch: Circuit Elements
to Modern Wireless Antenna, Microwave Review, Vol.13, No.1, June 2007
58
59
60