Case Study 3 Starting Right Corporation: Payoff Table
Case Study 3 Starting Right Corporation: Payoff Table
Case Study 3 Starting Right Corporation: Payoff Table
Payoff Table
State of Nature
Alternative
Favorable
unfavorable
55273
120000
240000
Max
Equally
Likely
Min
Hurwicz
0.11
$0
-10000
55273
-10000
$22,637 -2819.963908
-15000
120000
-15000
$52,500
-150
-30000
240000
-30000
$105,000
-300
Decision Criterion
Maximax
Minimax
Equal Likelihood
Hurwicz
Maximum regret
Regret Table
Favorable
Unfavorable
240000
240000
240000
184727
10000
184727
EOL
Not Applicable
120000
15000
120000
EV
Not Applicable
30000
30000
EVPI
Not Applicable
Alternative
Max
1. I recommend that Sue Pansky may use the maximum decision approach. She is very conservative and is a risk avoider, otherwise she should
do nothing and not consider to have an investment in Starting Right.
2. Ray Cahn should use a probability of success of 0.11. The best decision is to do nothing.
3. I recommend that Lila Battle should remove alternative 1 (do nothing) and use the maximin criterion. The result is to make investment
in the corporate bonds.
4. George Yates should use the equally likely criterion and the best decision is to invest in Common stock.
5. I recoomend that Peter Metarko may have an investment in Common Stock. He is a risk seeker and optimistic about the market.
6. Julia Day can remove the stock alternatives and still offer alternatives to risk seekers(common stock) and risk avoiders (doing nothing or
investing in corporate bond)
Airframe Cost
Engine Cost
Average Age
Airframe Cost
Engine Cost
Average Age
Year
per Aircraft
per Aircraft
(Hours)
Year
per Aircraft
per Aircraft
(Hours)
2001
51.8
43.49
6,512
2001
13.29
18.86
5,107
2002
54.92
38.58
8,404
2002
25.15
31.55
8,145
2003
2004
69.7
51.48
11,077
2003
32.18
40.43
7,360
68.9
58.72
11,717
2004
31.78
22.1
5,773
2005
63.72
45.47
13,275
2005
25.34
19.69
7,150
2006
84.73
50.26
15,215
2006
32.78
32.58
9,364
2007
78.74
79.6
18,390
2007
35.56
38.07
8,259
SST = (Y-)
Sum of the squares total (SST) measures the total variability in Y about the mean
SSE =
Sum of squares error measures tha varianbility in Y about the regression line.
=(Y-)
IfIfthis
thisisistrend
trendanalysis
analysisthen
thensimply
simplyenter
enterthe
thepast
pastdemands
demandsin
inthe
thedemand
demandcolumn.
column.IfIfthis
thisisiscausal
causalregression
regressionthen
thenenter
enterthe
they,x
y,xpairs
pairswith
withyy
first
firstand
andenter
enteraanew
newvalue
valueof
ofxxat
atthe
thebottom
bottomin
inorder
orderto
toforecast
forecasty.y.
Forecast
Error
Absolute
Squared
Year 1
51.8
6,512
53.02
-1.22
1.22
1.49
2.36%
Year 2
54.92
8,404
57.94
-3.02
3.02
9.10
5.49%
Year 3
69.7
11,077
64.88
4.82
4.82
23.20
6.91%
Year 4
68.9
11,717
66.55
2.35
2.35
5.54
3.42%
Year 5
63.72
13,275
70.60
-6.88
6.88
47.28
10.79%
Year 6
84.73
15,215
75.64
9.09
9.09
82.67
10.73%
Year 7
78.74
18,390
83.89
-5.15
5.15
26.51
6.54%
0.00
32.52
195.79
46.24%
Total
Intercept
Slope
Forecast
36.0968244
Average
0.0025988
36.1176148
0.00
4.65
27.97
6.61%
Bias
MAD
MSE
MAPE
SE
6.26
Correlation
0.88
Coefficient of determination
0.77
Regression Line
90
80
Dependent Variable (Y)
70
y =0.0026x + 36.097
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000
Ind Variable
IfIfPeriod
this
column.
causal
then
the
yyfirst
and
Forecast
Absolute
Squared
Abs
Pct
Err
thisisistrend
trendanalysis
analysisthen
thensimply
simplyenter
enterthe
thepast
pastdemands
demandsin
inthe
thedemand
demand
column.IfIfthis
thisisisError
causalregression
regression
thenenter
enter
they,x
y,xpairs
pairswith
with
first
and
Variable
(y)
(x) toforecast
enter
enteraanew
newvalue
valueof
ofxxat
atthe
thebottom
bottomin
inorder
orderto
forecasty.y.
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
43.49
6,512
38.58
8,404
51.48
11,077
58.72
11,717
45.47
13,275
50.26
Year 7
79.6
Intercept
20.5712256
Slope
0.00264336
Forecast
20.5923724
15,215
37.78
42.79
49.85
51.54
55.66
60.79
5.71
-4.21
1.63
7.18
-10.19
-10.53
5.71
4.21
1.63
7.18
10.19
10.53
32.55
17.69
2.65
51.50
103.87
110.88
13.12%
10.90%
03.16%
12.22%
22.41%
20.95%
18,390
69.18
10.42
10.42
108.52
13.09%
0.00
0.00
49.86
7.12
427.67
61.10
95.86%
13.69%
Total
Average
Bias
MAD
MSE
SE
Correlation
Coefficient of determination
Regression line
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4,000
y =0.0026x + 20.571
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000
MAPE
9.25
0.78
0.61
Southern Airframe
Data
Period
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
13.29
5,107
25.15
8,145
32.18
7,360
31.78
5,773
25.34
7,150
32.78
Year 7
35.56
Intercept
4.59663389
Slope
0.00320387
Forecast
4.62226485
Forecast
Error
Absolute
Squared
9,364
20.96
30.69
28.18
23.09
27.50
34.60
-7.67
-5.54
4.00
8.69
-2.16
-1.82
7.67
5.54
4.00
8.69
2.16
1.82
58.81
30.72
16.02
75.47
4.68
3.30
57.70%
22.04%
12.44%
27.34%
08.54%
05.55%
8,259
31.06
4.50
4.50
20.27
12.66%
146.26%
20.89%
Total
Average
Bias
MAD
SE
Correlation
Coefficient of determination
MSE
MAPE
6.4696514679
0.624867994
0.39046001
Regression line
40
35
30
25
dependent variable (y)
20
y =.0032x + 4.596
15
10
5
0
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000 10,000
Ind
Variable(x)
Forecast
Error
Absolute
Squared
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
18.86
enter
demands
demand
IfIfthis
regression
20.09
-1.23
1.23
1.52
06.53%
5,107IfIfthis
thisisistrend
trendanalysis
analysisthen
thensimply
simply
enterthe
thepast
past
demandsin
inthe
the
demandcolumn.
column.
thisisiscausal
causal
regressionthen
thenenter
enterthe
they,x
y,xpairs
pairswith
withyyfirst
firstand
and
31.55
Year 7
Intercept
Slope
Forecast
40.43
7,360
22.1
5,773
19.69
7,150
32.58
9,364
29.25
22.80
28.40
37.40
38.07
8,259
32.91
0.89
11.18
0.70
8.71
4.82
0.79
124.99
0.49
75.80
23.21
02.83%
27.65%
03.16%
44.22%
14.79%
5.16
5.16
26.68
13.57%
0.00
0.00
32.69
4.67
253.47
36.21
112.74%
16.11%
Total
Average
-0.67085414
0.00406537
-0.63833122
11.18
-0.70
-8.71
-4.82
Bias
MAD
SE
Correlation
Coefficient of determination
MSE
MAPE
7.1199914045
0.6781750964
0.4599214614
Regression line
45
40
35
30
25
dependent variable (y)
20
y =.0041x - .6709
15
10
5
0
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000