Sec. 76 NIRC Taxation

Taxation; Sec.
76 NIRC
REQUIREMENTS TO BE ENTITLED TO A REFUND; IRREVOCABILITY RULE; HORNBOOK
DOCTRINE
Commissioner Of Internal Revenue vs. Team [Philippines] Operations Corporation

[Formerly Mirant (Phils) Operations Corporation]
G.R. No. 179260
April 2, 2014
J. Perez
FACTS:
This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari by petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) seeking
to reverse and set aside the Decision and Resolution of the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) En Banc in which
affirmed in toto the Decision and Resolution of the First Division of the CTA (CTA in Division) granting
Team (Philippines) Operations Corporations (Team) claim for refund in the amount of P69,562,412.00
representing unutilized tax credits for taxable period ending 31 December 2001.
Respondent Team on 15April2012 filed its 2001 income tax return with the Bureau
of Internal Revenue (BIR), reporting an overpayment in the amount of
Php69,562,412.00 arising from unutilized credit taxes withheld. Team marked the
appropriate boxes manifesting its intent to have the said overpayment refunded.
Team also filed on 27March2003 with BIR a letter requesting for the refund or
issuance of a tax credit certificate in connection herewith.
CIR on its petition relies solely on the ground that CTA gravely erred on a question
of law in affirming the CTA in Divisions ruling despite not being supported by the
evidence on record.
ISSUE/s:
1. Is the respondent entitled to a refund?
2. Is the CTA correct in affirming the ruling of CTA in Division?
RULING:
1. YES, the respondent is entitled to a refund.
There are three essential conditions for the grant of a claim for refund of creditable
withholding income tax, to wit: (1) the claim is filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
within the two-year period from the date of payment of the tax; (2) it is shown on the return of the
recipient that the income payment received was declared as part of the gross income; and (3)
the fact of withholding is established by a copy of a statement duly issued by the payor to the
payee showing the amount paid and the amount of the tax withheld therefrom. The first requisite
is provided under Sections 204(C) and 229 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of
1997. The second and third requisites are anchored on Section 2.58.3(B) of Revenue
Regulation No. 2-98.
In addition, strict observance to the irrevocability rule under Section 76 of NIRC of 1997 is
required. The rule provides: Once the option to carry-over and apply the excess quarterly
income tax against income tax due for the taxable quarters of the succeeding taxable years has
been made, such option shall be considered irrevocable for that taxable period and no
application for cash refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate shall be allowed therefor.
In this case, it is found undisputed that Team complied with the above requisites. Counting
from 15April2002, Team had until 14April2004 to file for a refund and the 27March2003 claim
falls within said prescriptive period. Team also was able to present various certificated of
creditable tax withheld at source for year 2001. Lastly, Team opted for a refund as evinced by
the marked boxes in its return.
2. YES, the CTA was correct.
The Hornbook Doctrine provides that the findings and conclusions of the CTA are accorded
the highest respect and will not be lightly set aside. Consequently, its conclusions will not be
overturned unless there has been an abuse or improvident exercise of authority. Its findings can
only be disturbed on appeal when their findings are not supported by substantial evidence or the
showing of gross error or abuse.
In the instant case, there was no abusive or improvident exercise of authority on the part of
the CTA in Division. There was also no showing of gross error or abuse and the findings are
supported by substantial evidence. Hence, there was no cogent reason to disturb the same.
DOCTRINES
Requirements to be entitled to a refund or tax credit:
(1) the claim is filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue within the two-year period from
the date of payment of the tax;
(2) it is shown on the return of the recipient that the income payment received was declared as
part of the gross income; and
(3) the fact of withholding is established by a copy of a statement duly issued by the payor to the
payee showing the amount paid and the amount of the tax withheld therefrom.
Irrevocability Rule
Once the option to carry-over and apply the excess quarterly income tax against income tax
due for the taxable quarters of the succeeding taxable years has been made, such option shall
be considered irrevocable for that taxable period and no application for cash refund or issuance
of a tax credit certificate shall be allowed therefor.
Hornbook Doctrine
The findings and conclusions of the CTA are accorded the highest respect and will not be lightly
set aside.

Sec. 76 NIRC Taxation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sec. 76 NIRC Taxation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sec. 76 NIRC Taxation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Taxation; Sec.

Commissioner Of Internal Revenue vs. Team [Philippines] Operations Corporation

You might also like