Original Article Elaboration of A Fruit Wine From Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) Pulp
Original Article Elaboration of A Fruit Wine From Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) Pulp
Original Article Elaboration of A Fruit Wine From Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) Pulp
319
Original article
Elaboration of a fruit wine from cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) pulp
Disney Ribeiro Dias,1 Rosane Freitas Schwan,1* Evandro Sena Freire2 & Rogerio dos Santos Serodio3
1 Biology Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. Postal 37, 37.200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil
2 Departamento de Ciencias Exatas e Tecnologicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Km 16 da Rodovia Ilheus/Itabuna, BA. 45650-000,
Ilheus, BA, Brazil
3 Cocoa Research Centre, CEPLAC, Km 22 Rodovia Ilheus, Itabuna, 45.600-000, Itabuna, BA, Brazil
(Received 8 August 2005; Accepted in revised form 20 March 2006)
Summary
The objectives of this study were the selection of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the elaboration of a
fermentative process using cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) fruit pulp, and the assessment of the acceptance of
the elaborated beverage. Three S. cerevisiae strains (CA116, CA1162 and CA1183) were assessed while
growing in a fruit pulp medium at dierent temperatures. The ethanol:biomass and glycerol:biomass ratios
showed that there were no signicant dierences among the three strains at dierent temperatures. However,
the strain CA1183 reached a higher ethanol production and yield and it was chosen as a starter to produce
the cocoa beverage. The concentration of higher alcohols, methanol, esters and acetaldehyde found in the
elaborated beverage was in accordance with the standards established for table wine. Sensory analysis
revealed a high degree of acceptance amongst the great majority of tasters. It can be concluded that pulp
processing into an alcoholic beverage is a realistic additional way of utilisation of the cocoa fruit.
Keywords
Introduction
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01226.x
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
320
Viability determination
Yeast strains
Dry mass
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
Chemical analysis
Cocoa must
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
321
Sensory evaluation
220
Yeast selection
CA116
18 C
CA1162
200
322
CA1183
180
22 C
160
25 C
140
120
100
80
60
4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 56 64
4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 56 64
Time (h)
4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48 56 64
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
323
324
Table 1 Results (mean SE) of chemical compounds and pH value produced by three strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation at
dierent temperatures in FFM medium
CA116
Temperature of
incubation
Ethanol
(g L)1)
Glycerol
(g L)1)
Acetic acid
(g L)1)
Succinic
acid (g L)1)
Acetaldehyde
(g L)1)
pH
Ethanol yield*
Time of maximum
population (h)
18 C
CA1162
22 C
25 C
18 C
CA1183
22 C
25 C
18 C
22 C
25 C
89.0 0.1155 87.0 0.1528 78.0 0.1764 92.0 0.2000 91.0 0.1453 90.5 0.2082 92.5 0.1463 92.0 0.2333 90.5 0.2423
5.53 0.0590 6.09 0.0546 7.00 0.0721 7.90 0.0797 8.10 0.0321 7.90 0.0504 9.00 0.0902 8.90 0.0643 9.00 0.0623
0.08 0.0018 0.10 0.0015 0.10 0.0012 0.12 0.0025 0.14 0.0044 0.16 0.0023 0.05 0.0009 0.07 0.0017 0.07 0.0015
0.92 0.0219 0.79 0.0153 0.71 0.0186 0.89 0.0176 0.77 0.0208 0.70 0.0145 0.95 0.0176 0.84 0.0145 0.79 0.0153
0.05 0.0011 0.05 0.0012 0.04 0.0006 0.09 0.0015 0.08 0.0009 0.09 0.0015 0.03 0.0007 0.02 0.0003 0.02 0.0002
4.1 0.0343 3.9 0.0882 3.6 0.0667 4.0 0.0284 3.8 0.0422 3.7 0.0333 4.0 0.0577 3.9 0.0326 3.7 0.0234
44.5 0.0577 43.5 0.0764 39.5 0.0882 46.0 0.1000 45.5 0.0726 45.3 0.1041 46.3 0.0726 46.0 0.1167 45.3 0.1267
12
16
16
12
16
16
24
16
12
Results are the mean of four replicates and did not vary more than 3%.
*Ethanol yield Ethanol produced (g L)1) 100/initial sugars (g L)1).
Mean SE
4.5826
0.2216
0.3512
0.2186
1.3077
0.8386
0.1528
0.0088
0.1880
0.0167
0.1155
0.0577
0.0012
0.0023
0.0186
0.012
0.0070
0.0012
0.0011
0.0009
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
FRUIT PULP
22 Brix, pH 3.8
Must Preparation
Ultrazym
(0.7 mL L1)
Enzymatic treatment
Addition of sulphur
dioxide (100 mg L1)
Addition of
Bentonite (1 g L1)
106 cells mL1
Yeast inoculation
22 C, 10 days
ALCOHOLIC
FERMENTATION
10 C, 10 days
First decant
10 C, 30 days
Second decant
Cellulose plate
Filtration
FRUIT WINE
Chemical analysis
Sensory analysis
Alcoholic fermentation
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
325
326
Table 3 Concentration (mean SE) of organic compounds determined with HPLC and GC (acids, sugars and alcohols) in the
fermented beverage from cocoa pulp
Compounds
HPLC analyses (g L )
Carbohydrates
Sucrose
Glucose
Fructose
Alcohols
Ethanol
Glycerol
Acids
Acetic
Citric
Lactic
Malic
Oxalic
Succinic
Tartaric
GC analyses (mg L)1)
Aldehydes
Acetaldehyde
Esters
Methyl acetate
Ethyl acetate
Alcohols
Methanol
Higher alcohols
Propanol
Isobutanol
Butanol
Isoamyl alcohol
Amylic alcohol
Hexanol
Total of higher alcohols
12.3 0.0110
4.6 0.0068
0.0058
0.0306
0.0137
Indicators
Maximum Minimum
10.0
()
55.0
()
()
()
()
()
20.1
()
Cocoa alcoholic
beverage
(mean SE)
12.5
n.d.
98.5
6.5
n.d.
n.d.
0.06
0.0667
0.8192
0.0500
0.0006
n.d.
()
3.6 0.0173
0.0120
0.0067
n.d.
n.d.
350.7 0.1342
n.d.
44.8
90.4
n.d.
498.8
n.d.
n.d.
634
Limits*
Ethyl alcohol % (v v)
13.0
0.35
Methyl alcohol (g L)1)
Total acid (mEq L)1)
130.0
20.0
Volatile acids (mEq L)1)
1.0
Total sulphate, as K2SO4 (g L)1)
0.20
Total chloride, as NaCl (g L)1)
Total SO2 (g L)1)
0.35
Total sugars
5.0
Dry wine (g L)1)
()
Sweet wine (g L)1)
pH
()
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
1.1
5.5
n.d.
1.4
n.d.
2.0
0.7
0.0338
0.0153
0.1337
0.1193
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
analysis
Frequency and average notes
Attribute
Mean SE
Appearance
Aroma
Taste
Overall
3
1
1
5
1
5
4
14
14
9
11
12
11
17
19
12
16
11
8
7.6
7.7
7.5
7.5
0.17
0.20
0.24
0.17
like very much the beverage (Table 5). The taste of the
beverage reached the lesser average (7.5) what reected
that the tasters had moderately liked the beverage.
According to Rapp & Mandery (1986), the trend is that
the beverage loses sensorial qualities when the total
concentration of higher alcohols is over 400 mg L)1. In
the evaluation of the cocoa beverage, according to the
methodology used, the 633.0 mg L)1 of high alcohols
had not brought about a negative inuence on aroma, as
aroma was the most appreciated attribute.
The expression of acceptance and non-acceptance of
the beverage is presented in Table 6, in function of the
grades attributed by the tasters. It can be observed
that in relation to the appearance, none of the tasters
was displeased with the beverage and the percentage
of acceptance of this attribute (they had at least liked
very much) was of 53%. For the attributes aroma
and avour, about 7% of the tasters were displeased
with the beverage, while, also for both, about 60%
liked it much. Table 6 also shows that, in relation to
the general aspects, 60% of the tasters had liked the
beverage much, while 2% was displeased. A nonparametric test known as faces of Cherno was
carried out to establish the approval of the beverage
with the tasters (Fig. 3). This test made clearer the
dierences reached among the attributes of the beverage by using a visual recognition. The values
attributed to the cocoa beverage had been compared
with a standard scale normal. From the presented
diagrams a homogeneity in conferred grades to each
one of the attributes and in relation to the global
Cocoa
Normal
Attribute
14 (rejection)
(% of tasters)
89 (acceptance)
(% of tasters)
Appearance
Aroma
Taste
Overall
0.0
6.7
6.7
2.2
53.3
60.0
62.2
60.0
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
327
328
References
Akubor, P.I. (1996). The suitability of African bush mango juice for
wine production. Plant Foods and Human Nutrition, 49, 213219.
Alves, R.E., Filgueiras, H.A.C. & Moura, C.F.H. (2000). In:
Caracterizacao de frutas nativas da America Latina (edited by R.E.
Alves, H.A.C. Filgueiras & C.F.H. Moura). Vol. 9 (Serie Frutas
Nativas). Pp. 1518. Brazil: Jaboticabal.
Amerine, M.A. & Cruess, W.V. (1960). The Technology of Winemaking. Pp. 213302. Westport, CT: Avi.
Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists (1990a). Ofcial Methods
of Analyses of AOAC. 15th edn, Vol. 2, Chapter 37. Pp. 915922.
Washington, DC: AOAC.
Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists (1990b). Ofcial Methods
of Analyses of AOAC. 15th edn, Vol. 2, Chapter 28. Pp. 744.
Washington, DC: AOAC.
Ayogu, T.E. (1999). Evaluation of the performance of yeast isolate
from Nigerian palm wine in wine production from pineapple fruit.
Bioresource Technology, 69, 189190.
Berry, D.R. & Watson, D.C. (1987). Production of organoleptic
compounds. In: Yeast Biotechnology (edited by D.R. Berry, I. Russell
& G.G. Stewart). London: Allen & Unwin.
Boscolo, M., Bezerra, C.W.B., Cardoso, D.R., Neto, B.S.L. & Franco,
D.W. (2000). Identication and dosage by HRGC of minor alcohols
and esters in Brazilian sugar cane spirit. Journal of Brazilian
Chemical Society, 11, 8690.
Brasil (1988). Leis, Decretos, etc. Lei n. 7678, de 08 de out. de 1988.
Bras lia: Ministerio da Agricultura e do Abastecimento, [Internet
document] URL http://oc4j.agricultura.gov.br/agrolegis/do/consultaLei?opviewTextual&codigo189. Accessed 7/08/2005.
Cappello, M.S., Bleve, G., Grieco, F., Dellaglio, F. & Zacheo, G.
(2004). Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated
from must of grape grown in experimental vineyard. Journal of
Applied Microbiology, 97, 12741283.
Cleto, F.G.V. & Mutton, M.J.R. (2004). Rendimento e composicao
das aguardentes de cana, laranja e uva com utilizacao de lecitina
no processo fermentativo. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 28, 577
584.
Colagrande, O., Silva, A. & Fumi, M.D. (1994). Recent applications of
biotechnology in wine production. Biotechnology Progress, 10, 218.
Demain, A.L. (2000). Microbial biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 18, 2631.
Dias, D.R., Schwan, R.F. & Lima, L.C.O. (2003). Metodologia para
elaboracao de fermentado de caja (Spondias mombin L). Ciencia e
Tecnologia de Alimentos, 23, 342350.
Eustace, R. & Thornton, R.J. (1987). Selective hybridization of wine
yeast for higher yields of glycerol. Canadian Journal of Microbiology,
33, 112117.
FAOSTAT Data (2005). FAOSTAT Database Collection: Agricultural
Data. [Internet document] URL http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/
servlet/XteServlet3?Areas%3E862&Items661&Elements51&
Years2004&FormatTable&XaxisYears&YaxisCountries&
Aggregateover_items&Calculate&DomainSUA&ItemTypes
Production.Crops.Primary&languageEN. Accessed 7/08/2005.
Fleet, G.H. & Heard, G.M. (1993). Yeast-growth during fermentation.
In: Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology (edited by G.H. Fleet). Pp.
2754. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Franco, G. (1999). Tabela de composicao qumica dos alimentos. 9th
edn. Pp. 307. Sao Paulo: Atheneu.
Freire, E.S., Schwan, R.F. & Mororo, R.C. (1999). The cocoa pulp
agroindustry and the use of its residues in Bahia: progress achieved
in the last ten years. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Cocoa
Research Conference. Pp. 10131020. Kuala Lumpur: Cocoa
Producers Alliance.
Fundira, M., Blom, M., Pretorius, I.S. & van Rensburg, P. (2002).
Selection of yeast starter culture strains for the production of marula
fruit wines and distillates. Journal of Agriculture and Food
Chemistry, 50, 15351542.
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund
329