Water Treatment Process
Water Treatment Process
Water Treatment Process
Water Purification
1. Overview
2. Sedimentation
3. Flotation
4. Coagulation and flocculation
5. Coagulation chemicals
6. Coagulation: Important factors and the beaker test
Disinfection
7. Overview
8. Chlorination
9. UV Treatment
10.Ozone
Residual Handling and Treatment
Package Plants
Water purification
Sedimentation
Sedimentation is the process in which the flocs that have been formed during coagulation and flocculation are allowed
to settle from the water.
Sedimentation is a suitable process for the removal of flocs formed from silt and clay particles that are relatively heavy
and settle readily. However, certain flocs are relatively light and do not settle readily and a process such as flotation
must be used for their removal. Light flocs are formed when algae or organic matter is flocculated.
The flocs collect as sludge at the bottom of the sedimentation tank from where it must be removed on a regular
basis. The clean water leaves the sedimentation tank through collection troughs located at top of the tank.
There are a variety of designs for sedimentation tanks available. These include:
Large rectangular tanks in which the water enters one side and leaves at the other end. This type id
normally used at large conventional treatment tanks.
Circular tanks with flat or cone shaped bottoms are also used, especially at smaller works.
Flocculated water enters the tank at a central distribution section and clarified water leaves the tank at
collection troughs at the circumference of the tank. The design and flow conditions in a sedimentation
tank must be such that the minimum amount of flocs leaves with the clarified water.
The flocs that settle in the sedimentation tank collect at the bottom of the tank as sludge from where it must be
removed on a regular basis to prevent accumulation in the tank. If sludge is not withdrawn regularly according to
operating schedules, the quality of the clarified water may deteriorate due to re-entrainment.
The sludge from the sedimentation tank has a large pollution potential because it contains all the suspended material
removed from the water together with the chemicals used for coagulation. It must therefore be disposed of in a proper
manner to prevent contamination of water source. The sludge is withdrawn from the sedimentation tank in a diluted
form (2-5% solids) and is sometimes thickened (Excess water removed) before disposal. At smaller treatment works
sludge is disposed of in sludge lagoons. The lagoons are large holding dams in which the sludge compacts and clear
water accumulates on top of the sludge. The clear water may be recycled to the inlet of the plant.
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk
Water purification
Flotation
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk
Water purification
Coagulation and flocculation
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk
Water purification
Coagulation chemicals
Different chemicals can be used as coagulants. The most common coagulants are aluminium sulphate, ferric chloride,
lime and polyelectrolytes. Coagulant-aids are also sometimes used. These are substances added in very small
quantities to improve the action of the primary coagulant. The characteristics of the different coagulants and the way in
which they function are as follows:
Aluminium sulphate (Al2(SO4)3.16H2O) is commonly used as a coagulant. The alum is dissolved in the water and
3+
the aluminium ions (Al ) that form, have a high capacity to neutralise the negative charges which are carried by the
colloidal particles and which contribute to their stability. The aluminium ions hydrolyse and form aluminium hydroxide
(Al(OH)3), which precipitates as a solid. During flocculation when the water is slowly stirred, the aluminium hydroxide
flocs catch or enmesh the small colloidal particles. The flocs settle readily and most of them can be removed in a
sedimentation tank.
Ferric chloride (FeCl3) is commonly used as a coagulant. When added to water, the ion precipitates as ferric
hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) and the hydroxide flocs enmesh the colloidal particles in the same way as the aluminium
hydroxide flocs do. The optimum pH for precipitation of iron is not as critical as with aluminium and pH values of
between 5 and 8 give good precipitation.
Lime can also be used as coagulant, but its action is different from that of alum and ferric chloride. When lime is
added to water the pH increases, resulting in the formation of carbonate ions from the natural alkalinity in the water.
The increase in carbonate concentration together with calcium added in the lime results in the precipitation of calcium
carbonate (CaCO3). The calcium carbonate crystals enmesh colloidal particles in the same way as alum or ferric
flocs. When lime is used as a coagulant, the pH has to be lowered in order to stabilise the water chemically. Carbon
dioxide is normally used for this purpose.
Polyelectrolytes are mostly used to assist the flocculation process and are often called flocculation aids. They are
polymeric organic compounds of long polymer chains that act to enmesh particles in the water. Polyelectrolytes can
be cationic (carrying a positive charge), anionic (carrying a negative charge) or non-ionic (carrying no net charge).
Aluminium polymers, such as poly-aluminium chloride that give rapid flocculation, efficient removal of organics
and less alum under certain conditions, but at a higher cost.
Using a world first technique, CSIRO has found convincing evidence that the use of alum - aluminium sulphate - to treat drinking
water is safe.
"We found that the aluminium we get from alum-treated drinking water is such an insignificant amount we don't need to worry. Only 1-2% of our
daily intake of aluminium comes from water and of this, only the barest trace is absorbed. Much of the aluminium that is absorbed is then
excreted in urine," CSIRO scientist Dr Jenny Stauber says. The results have significance for water authorities around the world who use alum to
clarify drinking water as part of the water treatment process. Alum is later filtered from the water, but a small fraction dissolves and is not
removed. The cause of Alzheimer's disease is subject to international research. A variety of possible causes have been considered however
no link between aluminium intake and Alzheimer's has been established. However some conflicting evidence in earlier studies suggested that
aluminium that is left in treated drinking water may be more readily taken up by the body than aluminium from other sources.
"Aluminium is the Earth's third most common element and occurs naturally in food and water. Most of the aluminium we consume in our food
and drinking water is not absorbed and goes straight through our bodies to be excreted in faeces. What we were interested in was the trace that
is absorbed into our blood," Dr Stauber says. "If aluminium from water were to significantly increase the total amount of aluminium in the human
body, it would have to be in a form that is much more easily absorbed into our bloodstream ( i.e. more bioavailable) than aluminium in food
(which has low bioavailability). This is because a greater proportion of our daily intake of aluminium comes from food," Dr Stauber says. "We
were able to calculate that aluminium from alum-treated drinking water would contribute less than 1 per cent to our body burden of aluminium
over a lifetime. However the good news is that a related study on food shows that even what we get from food is well within the safe limits
determined by the World Health Organisation," Dr Stauber says.
CSIRO, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Media Release: Ref 98/258. 2 November 1998
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk
Is disinfection still necessary after suspended and colloidal matter has been removed?
A large fraction of bacteria and larger micro-organisms are removed during clarification processes, especially by sand
filtration. However, many bacteria and viruses still remain in clarified water even at low turbidity levels.
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk.
Advantages:
Chlorination is a well-established technology.
Presently, chlorine is more cost-effective than either UV or ozone disinfection.
Chlorine disinfection is reliable and effective against a wide spectrum of pathogenic organisms.
Chlorine is effective in oxidizing certain organic and inorganic compounds.
Chlorine can eliminate certain noxious odors while disinfecting.
ETI (Environmental Technology Initiative). Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652
Disadvantages:
All forms of chlorine are highly corrosive and toxic. Thus, storage, shipping, and handling pose a risk, requiring increased safety regulations.
ETI (Environmental Technology Initiative). Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk.
UV disinfection is a physical process rather than a chemical disinfectant; thus eliminating the need to generate, handle, transport, or store
toxic/hazardous or corrosive chem
There is no residual effect that can be harmful to humans or aquatic life.
UV disinfection has a shorter contact time when compared with other disinfectants (approximately 20 to 30 seconds with low-pressure lamps).
UV disinfection equipment requires less space than other methods.
ETI (Environmental Technology Initiative). Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652
The main disadvantage of UV disinfection is the fact that there is no residual protection against re-contamination. It
also has a high operating cost and it must be kept in mind that anything which blocks UV light from reaching the water
will result in a lack of treatment.
Low dosages may not effectively inactivate some viruses, spores, and cysts.
Turbidity and total suspended solids (TSS) in the wastewater can render UV disinfection ineffective. UV disinfection with low-pressure lamps
is not as effective for secondary effluent with TSS levels above 30 mg/L.
UV disinfection is not as cost-effective as chlorination, but costs are competitive when chlorination-dechlorination is used.
here is no measurable residual to indicate the efficacy of UV disinfection.
ETI (Environmental Technology Initiative). Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk.
Disadvantages:
Ozone is a very powerful oxidant
The initial set-up is costly
High electricity consumption
Unlike chlorine and iodine, ozone does not protect the water after application.
Ozonation is more complex than other disinfection technologies.
Ozone is very reactive and corrosive, thus requiring corrosion-resistant material, such as stainless steel.
Ozone is extremely irritating and possibly toxic, so off-gases from the contactor must be destroyed to prevent worker exposure.
The cost of treatment is relatively high, being both capital- and power-intensive.
There is no measurable residual to indicate the efficacy of ozone disinfection.
ETI (Environmental Technology Initiative). Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk.
PACKAGE PLANTS
What is a package treatment plant?
The term package treatment plant is used to denote relatively small-scale treatment plants (usually less than 500
k/d), that are not constructed as permanent structures, but rather as movable units. Typically a package plant is preassembled and transported to site or assembled on site on a structure such as a container. Package plants can be
made up of conventional, as well as advanced treatment processes.
The concept of a package plant is that it must be a self-contained unit that is capable of producing water of the
required quality from the raw water source. Package treatment plants have been developed as a rapid way of
meeting the demand for treated water in situations where treated water is not available or where there is a temporary
need for water, e.g. construction sites.
Package plants are more and more used to meet the needs of rural or isolated communities for water supply where
the construction of a conventional treatment plant would not be feasible. This type of plant is also used to provide an
emergency water supply in crisis situations.
Disclaimer: This fact sheet was produced, primarily to distribute general knowledge on water (uses, users, information, management) to people in South
Africa. You use this at your own risk.
REFERENCES
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, p. 16.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, p. 24.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, p. 26.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 1181/02, pp. 22 to 23.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, pp. 21 to 22.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, pp.32 - 37.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, pp. 33 - 36.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, p. 37.
Canada Health (2005). Water treatment Devices for disinfection of drinking water
www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/water-eau/drink-potab/disinfect-desinfection_e.html
Aurozon (2007). Air and water treatment consultants. www.aurozon.com/index1.html
WISA (2002). Handbook for the operation of waste water treatment works. Ed. Phiilip Pybus.
DWAF (2002). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02, p. 83.
DWAF (1998). Quality of domestic water supplies. Vol. 4: Treatment Guide. WRC No. TT 181/02
This e-book may be copied and distributed to others, but may not be sold.
This e-book must be fully referenced wherever it may be used.
www.ewisa.co.za