Scribd
Upload
73 views1 page

Report Evaluation Score Sheet

This document provides a score sheet for evaluating a student's laboratory report. It lists various criteria such as the title page, summary, theory, procedures, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each criteria is judged on a scale from unsatisfactory to excellent. The student is given an overall score out of 100 based on how well they addressed each criteria. For example, they could receive up to 5 marks for their title page and 10 marks each for clearly explaining the problem statement and objectives. The instructor provides an overall evaluation and total score at the end.

Uploaded by

VanessaYanjanHarry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views1 page

Report Evaluation Score Sheet

This document provides a score sheet for evaluating a student's laboratory report. It lists various criteria such as the title page, summary, theory, procedures, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each criteria is judged on a scale from unsatisfactory to excellent. The student is given an overall score out of 100 based on how well they addressed each criteria. For example, they could receive up to 5 marks for their title page and 10 marks each for clearly explaining the problem statement and objectives. The instructor provides an overall evaluation and total score at the end.

Uploaded by

VanessaYanjanHarry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL LAB (CDB 3062) REPORT EVALUATION SCORE SHEET

May-16

Semester:
Students Name:

Students ID:

Group:

Experiment:
Criteria for
Judging Quality
Title Page (3)

Good

Excellent

Incomplete title page

Acceptable

Comprehensive and complete title page

Marks

Sufficient summary (Sufficient objective and


problem statement)
2 to <3

Substantial summary (Substantial objective


and problem statement)
3 to <4

Comprehensive summary (Comprehensive


objective and problem statement)
4 to 5

Insufficient theory of the experiment topic

Sufficient theory of the experiment topic

Comprehensive theory of the experiment topic

3 to <6

6 to <8

8 to 10

Insufficient problem statement and objectives

Sufficient problem statement and objectives

Substantial problem statement and objectives

Comprehensive problem statement and objectives

<3
Incomplete explanation
of procedure and the in-detail steps not
written
<3

3 to <6
Incomplete explanation
of procedure and the in-detail steps poorly
written
3 to <6

6 to <8
Sufficient explanation
of procedure and the steps appropriately
written
6 to <8

Thorough explanation
of procedure and the steps closely written

Wrong calculatiuon and Little


description of what
occurred in experiment
and no graph

Inaccurate calculatiuon. Little


description of what
occurred in experiment
and graph unclear

Sufficient calculatiuon. Description of


what occurred in
experiment and graph
showing results acceptably
7 to <9
Discussion is sufficient to meet objectives, and
results are analyzed but does not link to the
theory
10 to <15

Theory (10)

Procedure (10)

Results/
Calculations (12)

Discussion (20)

Conclusion (10)

Satisfactory

No title page
0
Poor summary (Insufficient objective and
problem statement)
<2
Unclear theory of
the experiment topic
<3

Summary (5)

Problem statement
and objectives (10)

Unsatisfactory

<4

4 to <7

Data are poorly discussed, and limited


discussion of theory or relevance of result

Discussion is not sufficient, and results are not


critically analyzed with respect to the theory

<5

5 to <10

8 to 10

8 to 10
In-detail and correct calculatiuon.
Thorough description of
what occurred in
experiment and labeled
graph clearly showing
9 to <12
Discussion is closely fulfilled, and results are
critically analyzed with respect to the theory
15 to 20

Conclusions are not logical or are completely Some of the conclusions are logical but are not
Conclusions are logical, attempt to relate them
Conclusions are logical and related to the
unrelated to the objectives, and there is limited necessarily related to the objectives, and there
to objectives, attempt to evaluate significance objectives, clearly evaluate significance and quality
evaluation of significance and quality of
is limited evaluation of significance and
and quality of results
of results
results
quality of results
<3

3 to <6
All sources used are
listed, but not in proper
format

6 to <8

8 to 10

Most sources used are


listed in proper format

All sources used are listed


in proper format

3 to <4

4 to 5
Expertly completes the lab
report

Reference (5)

Incomplete list of
sources

Writing skills (5)

<2
Demonstrates little or no
awareness of lab report
<2

2 to <3

3 to <4

Organization (5)

Does not present ideas


in a clear order

Attempts to present
ideas in a clear order

Presents ideas in a clear


and appropriate order

<2

2 to <3

3 to <4

4 to 5
Presents ideas in clear
thoughtful order; Makes
smooth transitions
4 to 5

Language (5)

Errors in vocabulary, grammar and sentence


structure make writing hard to understand

Errors in vocabulary, grammar and sentence


structure make writing sometimes hard to
understand

Few errors in vocabulary, grammar


and sentence structure; Writing is easy to
understand

Almost no errors in grammar and sentence


structure; control of language and rich
vocabulary

<2

2 to <3

3 to <4

4 to 5

2 to <3
Attempts to complete
lab report

Completes the labreport appropriately

Total (of 100) =


Comments:

Instructor's Signature:

Name:

Date

You might also like