Chapter 9 - Answer
Chapter 9 - Answer
Chapter 9 - Answer
CHAPTER 9
SYSTEMS DESIGN: ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING
AND MANAGEMENT
I.
Questions
1. The three levels available are: Level 1, in which a company uses a
plantwide overhead rate; Level 2, in which a company uses departmental
overhead rates; and Level 3, in which a company uses activity-based
costing.
2. New approaches to costing are needed because events of the last few
decades have made drastic changes in many organizations. Automation
has greatly decreased the amount of direct labor required to manufacture
products; product diversity has increased in that companies are
manufacturing a wider range of products and these products differ
substantially in volume, lot size, and complexity of design; and total
overhead cost has increased to the point in some companies that a
correlation no longer exists between it and direct labor.
3. The departmental approach to assigning overhead cost to products relies
solely on volume as an assignment base. Where diversity exists between
products (that is, where products differ in terms of number of units
produced, lot size, or complexity of production), volume alone is not
adequate for overhead costing. Overhead costing based on volume will
systematically overcost high-volume products and undercost low-volume
products.
4. Process value analysis (PVA) is a systematic approach to gaining an
understanding of the steps associated with a product or service. It
identifies all resource-consuming activities involved in the production
process and labels these activities as being either value-added or nonvalue-added. Thus, it is the beginning point in designing an activity-based
costing system since management must know what activities are involved
with each product before activity centers can be designated and cost
drivers established. Also, PVA helps management to eliminate any nonvalue-added activities and thereby streamline operations and minimize
costs.
5. The four general levels of activities are:
11-1
11-2
11-3
1. True
2. True
3. False
4. True
5. False
6. False
7. True
8. True
III. Exercises
Exercise 1
Activity
Activity
Classification
Examples of
Traceable
Costs
Labor cost;
depreciation
Examples of
Cost
Drivers
Batch-level
Unit-level
Direct labor
cost; indirect
labor cost;
labor benefits
Direct laborhours
c. Ongoing training is
Facility-level*
Space cost;
training costs;
administration
costs
Hours of
training time;
number trained
d. A product is
designed by a
specialized design
team
Product-level
Space cost;
supplies used;
depreciation of
design
equipment
Hours of
design time;
number of
engineering
change orders
e. Equipment setups
are performed on a
regular basis
Batch-level
Labor cost;
supplies used;
depreciation of
equipment
Number of
setups; hours
or setup time
f. Numerical control
(NC) machines are
used to cut and
shape materials
Unit-level
Power;
supplies used;
maintenance;
depreciation
Machinehours; number
of units
of equipment;
space cost
provided to all
employees in the
company
Number of
receipts;
pounds handled
Exercise 2
11-4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Batch-level
Product-level
Facility-level
high-volume, low-volume, low-volume
activity centers
Exercise 3
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
Product-level
Batch-level
Organizationsustaining
Organizationsustaining
Unit-level
Product-level
Batch-level
Organizationsustaining
Note: Some of these classifications are debatable and may depend on the
specific circumstances found in particular companies.
Exercise 4
Sales (P1,650 per standard model glider 10 standard
model gliders + P2,300 per custom designed glider 2
custom designed gliders)......................................................................................
P21,100
Costs:
Direct materials (P462 per standard model glider 10
standard model gliders + P576 per custom
designed glider 2 custom designed gliders).................................................
P5,772
Direct labor (P19 per direct labor-hour 28.5 direct
labor-hours per standard model glider 10 standard
model gliders + P19 per direct labor-hour 32 direct
labor-hours per custom designed glider 2 custom
designed gliders)..............................................................................................
6,631
Supporting manufacturing (P18 per direct labor-hour
6,282
28.5 direct labor-hours per standard model glider
11-5
Exercise 5
Requirement 1
The predetermined overhead rate is computed as follows:
Predetermined
overhead rate
P290,000
50,000 DLHs
The unit product costs under the companys traditional costing system are
computed as follows:
Special
Regular
Direct materials................................................................................................................
P60.00
P45.00
Direct labor......................................................................................................................
9.60
7.20
Manufacturing overhead (0.8 DLH P5.80 per DLH;
0.6 DLH P5.80 per DLH)........................................................................................
4.64
3.48
Unit product cost..............................................................................................................
P74.24
P55.68
Requirement 2
The activity rates are computed as follows:
(a)
Estimated
Overhead
Activities
Cost
Supporting direct labor...............................
P150,000
Batch setups...............................................
P60,000
Safety testing..............................................
P80,000
(b)
Total
Expected Activity
50,000 DLHs
250 setups
100 tests
(a) (b)
Activity Rate
P3 per DLH
P240 per setup
P800 per test
11-6
(b)
Activity
8,000 DLHs
200 setups
80 tests
(a) (b)
ABC Cost
P24,000
48,000
64,000
P136,000
Regular Product:
(a)
Activity Cost Pool
Activity Rate
Supporting direct labor..........................................................
P3 per DLH
Batch setups..........................................................................
P240 per setup
Safety testing.........................................................................
P800 per test
Total
(b)
Activity
42,000 DLHs
50 setups
20 tests
(a) (b)
ABC Cost
P126,000
12,000
16,000
P154,000
Regular
P45.00
7.20
2.20
P54.40
IV. Problems
Problem 1
Cost
Systems
Traditional cost system
ABC system
Labor
Machining
Setup
Production order
Material handling
Parts administration
Pool
Rate
350%
Cost Driver
Consumption
P10,000
Cost
Assignment
P35,000
10%
P25/hour
P10/hour
P100/order
P20/requisition
P40/part
P10,000
800 hours
100 hours
12 orders
5 requisitions
18 parts
P 1,000
20,000
1,000
1,200
100
720
P24,020
Problem 2
Requirement 1
(a)
11-7
Total overhead
Overhead rate
P 6,000
9,040
P25,040
Requirement 2
(a) Maintenance :
P200,000 / 20,000
Materials handling: P32,000 / 1,600
=
Setups:
P100,000 / 2,500 =
Inspection:
P120,000 / 4,000 =
P5,000
240
80
300
P5,620
P 6,000
5,620
P21,620
= P25,944
The bid price of P25,944 was determined as follows:
Direct materials
Direct labor
Overhead assigned:
Maintenance (P10 x 500)
Material handling (P20 x 12)
Setups (P40 x 2)
Inspections (P30 x 10)
Total overhead assigned to job
Total cost
Markup
Bid price
P6,000
10,000
P5,000
240
80
300
5,620
P21,620
120%
P25,944
Assemblin
g Units
Manufacturing
overhead
Selling and
administrative
overhead
Total cost
Total
P250,000
P175,000
P25,000
P50,000
P500,000
30,000
P280,000
135,000
P310,000
75,000
P100,000
60,000
P110,000
300,000
P800,000
Requirement 2
The activity rates for the cost pools are:
Assembling units
Processing orders
Supporting customers
(a)
Total Cost
P280,000
P310,000
P100,000
11-9
(b)
Total Activity
1,000 units
250 orders
100 customers
(a) (b)
Activity Rate
P280 per unit
P1,240 per order
P1,000 per customer
Requirement 3
The overhead cost attributable to Lucky Sale would be computed as follows:
(a)
Activity Rate
P280 per unit
P1,240 per order
P1,000 per customer
(b)
Activity
80 units
4 orders
1 customer
(a) x (b)
ABC Cost
P22,400
P4,960
P1,000
Requirement 4
The customer margin can be computed as follows:
Sales (P595 per unit x 80 units)
Costs:
Direct materials (P180 per unit x 80 units)
Direct labor (P50 per unit x 80 units)
Unit-related overhead (above)
Order-related overhead (above)
Customer-related overhead (above)
Customer margin
P47,600
P14,400
4,000
22,400
4,960
1,000
P
46,760
840
=
=
b.
Model
HY5
Direct materials......................................................................
P35.00
Direct labor:
P20 per hour 0.2 DLH, 0.4 DLH....................................
4.00
Manufacturing overhead:
P74 per hour 0.2 DLH, 0.4 DLH....................................
14.80
Total unit product cost............................................................
P53.80
AS2
P25.00
8.00
29.60
P62.60
Requirement 2
a. Predetermined overhead rates for the activity cost pools:
(a)
Estimated
Activity Cost Pool
Total Cost
Machine setups.................P180,000
Special milling..................P300,000
General factory.................
P1,000,000
(b)
Estimated
Total Activity
250 setups
1,000 MHs
20,000 DLHs
(a) (b)
Activity Rate
P720 per setup
P300 per MH
P50 per DLH
(b)
Activity
150 setups
1,000 MHs
4,000 DLHs
(a) (b)
Overhead
Applied
P108,000
300,000
200,000
P608,000
20,000
P30.40
Model AS2
Activity Cost Pool
(a)
Predetermined
Overhead Rate
11-11
(b)
Activity
(a) (b)
Overhead
Applied
P 72,000
0
800,000
P872,000
40,000
P21.80
b. The unit product cost of each model under activity-based costing would be
computed as follows:
Model
HY5
AS2
Direct materials........................................................................................................
P35.00
P25.00
Direct labor (P20 per DLH 0.2 DLH; P20 per DLH 04.DLH)...........................
4.00
8.00
Manufacturing overhead (above)..............................................................................
30.40
21.80
Total unit product cost...............................................................................................
P69.40
P54.80
Comparing these unit cost figures with the unit costs in Part 1(b), we find
that the unit product cost for Model HY5 has increased from P53.80 to
P69.40, and the unit product cost for Model AS2 has decreased from
P62.60 to P54.80.
Requirement 3
It is especially important to note that, even under activity-based costing, 68%
of the companys overhead costs continue to be applied to products on the
basis of direct labor-hours:
Machine setups (number of setups)............................P 180,000
Special milling (machine-hours)................................. 300,000
General factory (direct labor-hours)........................... 1,000,000
Total overhead cost.....................................................P1,480,000
12%
20
68
100%
Thus, the shift in overhead cost from the high-volume product (Model AS2) to
the low-volume product (Model HY5) occurred as a result of reassigning only
32% of the companys overhead costs.
The increase in unit product cost for Model HY5 can be explained as follows:
First, where possible, overhead costs have been traced to the products rather
than being lumped together and spread uniformly over production. Therefore,
11-12
the special milling costs, which are traceable to Model HY5, have all been
assigned to Model HY5 and none assigned to Model AS2 under the activitybased costing approach. It is common in industry to have some products that
require special handling or special milling of some type. This is especially true
in modern factories that produce a variety of products. Activity-based costing
provides a vehicle for assigning these costs to the appropriate products.
Second, the costs associated with the batch-level activity (machine setups)
have also been assigned to the specific products to which they relate. These
costs have been assigned according to the number of setups completed for
each product. However, since a batch-level activity is involved, another factor
affecting unit costs comes into play. That factor is batch size. Some products
are produced in large batches and some are produced in small batches. The
smaller the batch, the higher the cost per unit of the batch activity. In the
case at hand, the data can be analyzed as shown below.
Model HY5:
Cost to complete one setup [see 2(a)]......................................... P720
Number of units processed per setup
(20,000 units 150 setups)...................................................133.33
Setup cost per unit (a) (b)....................................................... P5.40
Model AS2:
Cost to complete one setup (above)............................................ P720
Number of units processed per setup
(40,000 units 100 setups)................................................... 400
Setup cost per unit (a) (b)....................................................... P1.80
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Thus, the cost per unit for setups is three times as great for Model HY5, the
low-volume product, as it is for Model AS2, the high-volume product. Such
differences in cost are obscured when direct labor-hours (or any other volume
measure) is used as the basis for applying overhead cost to products.
In sum, overhead cost has shifted from the high-volume product to the lowvolume product as a result of more appropriately assigning some costs to the
products on the basis of the activities involved, rather than on the basis of
direct labor-hours.
11-13
A
D
C
B
A
D
A
B
D
C
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
B
D
C
A
C
D
D
C
B
A
21.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
D
A
B
A
B
D
B
C
A
C
11-14