Field Failures Analysis: Heribert
Field Failures Analysis: Heribert
Field Failures Analysis: Heribert
Qualitts-Management-Systeme
Heribert Nuhn
8D
QMS
Qualitts-Management-Systeme
Germany
D-56587 Strassenhaus
Deutschland
Tel.: ++ 49 2634 9560 71
Fax.: ++ 49 2634 9560 72
Mobil: + 49 171 315 7768
eMail: [email protected]
Version 2009.1
5y
Wh
FMEA
RGA/ A
ISO/ TS
1
Schadteilanalyse
PQ P
6 949
P
DV
A
VD
P
PA
P
/
2
Inte
rn
tor
i
d
u
al A
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
Source:
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
enduser/
repair shop
Scope
customer
complaint
request for
warranty
OEM
supplier
repair shop
process
claims
process
warranty
process
exchange
of parts
Quality
process:
Field Failure
Analysis
agreement
invoice
Schadteilanalyse
Supplier
introduction of a
planning process for
field failure analysis
precise definition of intial
inspection (standard
inspection and testing
and functional testing)
initial definition of NTFProcess
NTF-Process is basis for
audits related to field
failure analysis
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
evaluation
standard
inspection
and testing
mutually
agreed
inspections
and tests
ok
after
standard
inspection
not ok.
acc. to standard inspection
functional
testing
1. evidence of
defect:
defect oriented
2. acc. to agreed
inspection
?
Criteria
for release
are met
yes
?
NTF-Process
collecting
data
Warranty Parts
inspection of
systems
and
ok
after
functional
testing
not ok.
acc. to functional testing
evaluating
data
evaluation of
processes
not ok
acc. to systems and/ or processes
Schadteilanalyse
Evaluation
Stand. Inspection
and Testing
Functional Testing
yes
mutually agreed
and defined Inspecevidence
tion & Testing
of
mutually
agreed
no
defect
oriented
mutually
agreed
defect
Test S.1
Test S.2
Test S.n
no
n. ok
according
to standard
inspection
Test F/B.1
Test D/F.1
Test F/B.2
Test D/F.2
Test F/B.n
Test D/F. n
n.ok
according
functional
testing
no
criteria
for
release
?
NTFcustomer
Process
complaint
feasible
?
yes
yes
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
ok
acc. to
evaluation
Schadteilanalyse
NTF-Process
Collecting and Evaluating Data:
it is a prerequisite that both parties continuously
evaluate the data in their field of responsibility
initially only data and information readyly available
is evaluated during the NTF-Process the objective
being to attain further information in the future
if collecting and evaluating data generates new
findings the NTF-Process must continue by
inspecting systems and/ or evaluating processes
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
NTF-Process
Finalization of NTF-Processes:
Where a problem was identified during the NTF-Process
problem solving will be carried out according to the
agreed problem solving process.
Where a problem was not identified during the NTFProcess the initiator will decide if further analyses are
promising.
Where further analyses are not promising positive
results the finalization of the NTF-Process must be
documented.
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
10
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
11
Schadteilanalyse
12
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
13
Guideline
A guideline must be established for the NTF-Process
for groups of product and
to assure a systematic and methodical implementation
Prerequesits for procedures and work instructions must be met.
Criteria for release must be defined.
Requirements for inspection and test documentation and
equipment must be met.
A cost effective planning of capacities and estimate of
expenditure must be performed.
Results from the Field Failure Analysis Process are part of the
Production Part Approval Process (VDA 2/ PPAP).
Changes in respective control plans or changes by steps for
inspections and tests are subject to applicable approval
procedures.
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
14
Implement field
failure analysis
process according
to planning
Eliminate
identified
deviations and
introduce
measures to
improve the defect
part analysis process
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
15
Schadteilanalyse
16
Version 2009.1
Schadteilanalyse
17