S. Hrg.

112196

THE HOMELAND SECURITY DEPARTMENTS

BUDGET SUBMISSION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012

HEARING
BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON
HOMELAND SECURITY AND
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES SENATE
OF THE

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION
FEBRUARY 17, 2011

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov

Printed for the use of the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

(
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON

66623 PDF

2012

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 5121800; DC area (202) 5121800
Fax: (202) 5122104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 204020001

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00001

Fmt 5011

Sfmt 5011

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman
SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine
CARL LEVIN, Michigan
TOM COBURN, Oklahoma
DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii
SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts
THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware
JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona
MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas
RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin
MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana
JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada
CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri
JON TESTER, Montana
ROB PORTMAN, Ohio
MARK BEGICH, Alaska
RAND PAUL, Kentucky
MICHAEL L. ALEXANDER, Staff Director
CHRISTIAN J. BECKNER, Associate Staff Director for Homeland Security
Prevention and Protection
MARY BETH SCHULTZ, Associate Staff Director and Chief Counsel for Homeland
Security Preparedness and Response
BRANDON L. MILHORN, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel
BRENDAN P. SHIELDS, Minority Director of Homeland Security Policy
LUKE P. BELLOCCHI, Minority Counsel
TRINA DRIESSNACK TYRER, Chief Clerk
PATRICIA R. HOGAN, Publications Clerk and GPO Detailee
LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Hearing Clerk

(II)

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00002

Fmt 5904

Sfmt 5904

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

CONTENTS
Opening statements:
Senator Lieberman ...........................................................................................
Senator Collins .................................................................................................
Senator Landrieu ..............................................................................................
Senator McCain ................................................................................................
Senator Johnson ...............................................................................................
Senator Tester ..................................................................................................
Senator Portman ..............................................................................................
Senator Akaka ..................................................................................................
Senator McCaskill ............................................................................................
Prepared statements:
Senator Lieberman ...........................................................................................
Senator Collins .................................................................................................

Page

1
2
12
14
17
19
22
24
29
33
35

WITNESS
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2011
Hon. Janet A. Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security:
Testimony ..........................................................................................................
Prepared statement ..........................................................................................
Responses to post-hearing questions for the Record .....................................

4
38
49

APPENDIX
Department of Homeland Security Budget-in-Brief, Fiscal Year 2012 ...............

129

(III)

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00003

Fmt 5904

Sfmt 5904

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00004

Fmt 5904

Sfmt 5904

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

THE HOMELAND SECURITY DEPARTMENTS

BUDGET SUBMISSION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2011

U.S. SENATE,
ON HOMELAND SECURITY
AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS,

COMMITTEE

Washington, DC.
The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:39 p.m., in room
SD342, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Joseph I. Lieberman, Chairman of the Committee, presiding.
Present: Senators Lieberman, Akaka, Landrieu, McCaskill, Tester, Collins, McCain, Johnson, and Portman.
OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN LIEBERMAN

Chairman LIEBERMAN. The hearing will come to order. Thank

you all for being here, particularly thanks to Secretary Napolitano.
This is our Committees annual hearing on the Department of
Homeland Securitys budget request, in this case, of course, for fiscal year 2012.
Before we begin, as you know, Madam Secretary, the Department of Homeland Security emerged as a legislative proposal from
this Committee. We feel close to the Department and to everybody
who works for the Department and in the Department. In that
sense, we felt the loss this week of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agent Jaime Zapata, who was shot and killed
Tuesday in an ambush on a Mexican highway, and his colleague
Victor Avila, who was also shot and remains hospitalized. Perhaps
you could give us a report, but he is in our prayers, and I gather
that he is doing better.
This savage attackand, coincidentally, a suicide bombing that
killed a retired Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer in Afghanistan last weekreminds us of the risks assumed every day
on our behalf by the men and women who work at the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS). And so I wanted just at the beginning
to express our thanks to all of them, each of them for their commitment, through you, their leader, and tell them how much we honor
and appreciate their service.
These attacks also remind us of the variety of threats our Nation
faces and, therefore, the Departments equally varied set of responsibilities and missions to protect us from those threats. Clearly one
of the most important missions DHS has is to prevent terrorism
against our homeland. It was the motivating event for the creation
of the Department. As you noted last week, the threat of terrorism
today may be at its most heightened state since the attacks of
(1)

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

2
September 11, 2001, and I would like to talk to you during the
question-and-answer period about that.
But to get to the bottom line here, the Presidents budget request
for fiscal year 2012 asks for $43.2 billion in net discretionary funding. That is an increase of 1.5 percent from the current level of
funding, and it is a decrease of 0.8 percent from the Departments
request for fiscal year 2011.
Given the enormous deficits and national debt that we are struggling with today, it seems to me, generally speaking, that the
Presidents budget request for the Department of Homeland Security is responsible and it is fair. It does not include everything I
would have wanted in the best of times, but I appreciate that we
are not living in the best of times economically, and that the President and you have had to make some tough decisions in putting
the budget together.
I do want to say I was pleased that the budget request does put
additional resources into critical mission areas, such as terrorist
travel security and cybersecurity, and I think those are the right
priorities.
I also want to express my appreciation for the fact that the budget funds these increases and a few other programmatic increases
by cutting administrative costs by $800 million, including a significant and, from my perspective, welcome reduction in personal services contracts. That is just about the best way to fund some of the
critical needs for extra support in the budget, which is to say by
finding economies within your own budget. And you have also identified selected programmatic decreases across the Department, as
you must in tough times.
There are some reductions which I am sure trouble other Members of the Committee, as they do me, and we will undoubtedly talk
about them with you. The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) takes a hit in its operating budget. There are some cuts
in the program of Federal grants for local fire departments, which
have a lot of support here in Congress. But, overall, I repeat what
I said at the beginning, in a tough time for our Federal Government with probably the major focus that all of us have, as you can
see from the day-to-day developments around here: How do we
bring Federal spending back into balance with revenues? I think
this is a fair and responsible budget. I almost said fair and balanced, but I got worried that it would be confused with other activities in Washington.
So I look forward to your testimony and, of course, to continuing
to work with you in this session Congress, as we very productively
in the last one, to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security has the resources and the authority it needs to carry out its
critical mission on our behalf.
Senator Collins.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR COLLINS

Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Chairman, in the interest of time, I am just going to make
a few comments, and I would ask that my full statement be inserted in the record.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Without objection.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00006

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

3
Senator COLLINS. First, Mr. Chairman, let me associate myself
with your comments about the two ICE agents, one of whom was
killed, and the other wounded. It does remind us of the tremendous
risks that law enforcement officials at every level of government
faceparticularly since we are here today with the Department of
Homeland Security, we want to recognize those efforts, law enforcement at every level makes on our behalf of us each and every day.
When Congress and the Administration formulate the budget for
this country, we are in essence establishing our national priorities.
Controlling spending, reducing our ruinous level of debt, and funding highly effective programs to protect our Nation are among
those priorities.
Many of us are disappointed in the Presidents budget. We believe that it does far too little to rein in spending to bring the Federal debt under control. It spends and borrows too much. It will
lead to a record $1.6 trillion deficit in the next fiscal year. It would
double the publicly held debt by the year 2013 and triple it by
2020. That is simply not sustainable and puts our Nation on a ruinous fiscal course.
Today we are gathered to review one component of that budget:
The proposal for the Department of Homeland Security. Protecting
our Nation and our citizens is not just a line item. It has to be a
top priority. In fact, I think most people would agree that the number one responsibility of a government is the protection of its citizens. With tight budgets, we must work together to eliminate
wasteful and unproductive programs and to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of government operations.
The criteria used by the Administration in making these decisions for the Department of Homeland Security, however, seem to
be opaque because some very important programs appear to have
been cut while others remain unscathed.
For example, the homeland security grants that help our local
first responders improve their effectiveness and serve as a force
multiplier for Federal resources have been reduced. That could undermine our State and local partners who are the first on the scene
whenever disaster strikes, whether it is a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.
In testimony before the House last week, Secretary Napolitano
stated that in some ways, the [terrorist] threat facing us is at its
most heightened state since September 11, 2001, and that is why
we have to take a close look at the funding levels.
I am also disappointed that the Administration again has proposed to limit Operation Stonegarden to just the Southwest Border.
This effective program, which relies on partnerships with State and
local law enforcement, should be used to help secure both our
Northern and Southern Borders.
Senator Lieberman and I recently released a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that found, shockingly, that the
Border Patrol has effective control of only 32 miles of the 4,000mile Northern Border and has situational awareness of only about
a quarter of that border. And while the Northern Border does not
have as many problems as the Southern Border, it is vulnerable,
nonetheless, to illegal crossers, including individuals seeking to il-

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

4
legally come to this country, criminals trafficking in humans and
drugs, and, potentially, terrorists.
I have mentioned before that the smuggling of methamphetamine is one example of the growing problem along our Northern
Border, and it is a particular problem in the State of Maine.
The Stonegarden funds have been extremely successful in my
State in allowing local, county, and State law enforcement to work
with the Border Patrol and other Federal officials.
The Chairman has mentioned the fire grant program, a program
that works with a minimum of bureaucracy to ensure that fire departments have the support they need.
Let me just finally mention one area of great concern to me, and
that is the budget for the Coast Guard. The Coast Guards fleet is
among the oldest in the world, yet the men and women of the
Coast Guard continue to perform ever expanding missions with a
high degree of success. They deserve a fleet worthy of their efforts,
but the Presidents budget proposes a 22-percent reduction in the
Coast Guards Deepwater program. That is a cut of $259 million.
Much of this cut is due to the fact that no funding is proposed for
the sixth National Security Cutter. This will push completion of the
eighth, and final, cutter back to 2018. And as we know, the High
Endurance Cutters, of which there are 12, are aging rapidly and
causing a great number of problems for the Coast Guard.
I am, like the Chairman, pleased to see the increases in the cybersecurity budget. I think this is an emerging threat that is getting worse with each passing day.
Finally, I will be pursuing in my questions that I remain disturbed that FEMA has done so little to recoup the improper payments that occurred in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. The investigation we did showed that those improper payments approached
$1 billion, and the inspector general (IG) has identified more than
160,000 applicants that have received improper payments totaling
more than $643 million that have yet to be recouped.
Again, I look forward to discussing these issues with the Secretary. I do want to acknowledge that I appreciate the efficiencies
and business practices that the Secretary has worked very hard to
achieve. Thank you.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Collins.
Secretary Napolitano, it is great to welcome you back. It has
been a real pleasure to work with you the last couple years, and
we look forward to the next two as well.
TESTIMONY OF HON. JANET A. NAPOLITANO,1 SECRETARY,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, thank you, Chairman Lieberman,

Senator Collins, and Members of the Committee, for the opportunity to discuss President Obamas fiscal year 2012 budget for the
Department of Homeland Security.
The demands on DHS have never been greater. This is especially
true as we remember those at the Department who have given
their lives in service to our mission of securing America, including,
as you have noted, most recently Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry,
1 The

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

prepared statement of Secretary Napolitano appears in the Appendix on page 38.

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00008

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

5
ICE Special Agent Jaime Zapata, and our retired CBP agent in
Kandahar this past week.
Now, Mexico is leading the criminal investigation into the death
of Agent Zapata, and we are supporting them through a joint Department of Justice (DOJ)-DHS task force that the Attorney General and I announced yesterday. I can speak for the entire Administration when I say we are not only saddened by the loss of an
agent, but we are outraged by this act of violence against an officer
of the United States. And make no mistake, justice will be brought
to those involved. We owe nothing less to the memory of Agent Zapata and to those who are still on the job in Mexico.
We remain relentless in our efforts to keep our borders secure
and to assist Mexico in breaking up the cartels that are plaguing
that country. The loss of these brave agents is a stark reminder of
the sacrifices made by the men and women of the Department of
Homeland Security every day. It also strengthens our resolve to do
everything we can in our power to protect against, mitigate, and
respond to threats and to make our Nation more resilient for years
to come.
It is also a reminder of the solemn duty of the Congress and this
Committee to support and oversee the Department. And I want to
thank you, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, for the
support you have shown to the men and women who carry out our
many missions.
Todays threat picture features adversaries who evolve quickly
and are determined to strike us here at homefrom the aviation
system and the global supply chain to surface transportation systems, critical infrastructure, and cyber networks. We are leading
the Administrations unprecedented effort to strengthen Southwest
Border security coupled with a smart and effective approach to enforcing immigration laws in the interior of our country. And we
continue to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters of
all types.
President Obamas fiscal year 2012 budget for the Department
allows us to continue to meet these evolving threats and challenges
by prioritizing our essential operational requirements, while reflecting an unprecedented commitment to fiscal discipline that
maximizes the effectiveness of every security dollar that we receive.
Reflecting the current fiscal environment and building the fiscal
year 2012 budget, all DHS components identified savings associated with the Departments 33 efficiency review initiatives, and we
cut Administration and overhead, including my own offices budget,
by over $800 million. Savings were realized through efficiencies in
acquisition, asset and real property management, as well as employment vetting and credentialing, hiring and on-boarding of personnel, and information technology. And we cut professional services contracts, travel, and non-mission-critical training.
We also delayed construction of FEMA at the new DHS headquarters at St. Elizabeths and deferred numerous office collocations
as well as building maintenance and enhancements that would
have furthered our mission.
My written statement includes a comprehensive list of the operational priorities in our budget request, and today I would like to
highlight a few of them for you here.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

6
As you mentioned, Mr. Chairman, our first priority is preventing
terrorism and enhancing security. This was the founding mission
of the Department and remains our top priority today.
The budget safeguards transportation modes through a layered
detection system, including the deployment of additional transportation security officers, behavioral detection officers, canine teams,
and advanced imaging technology machines at domestic airports.
While expanding watchlist vetting through the Secure Flight Program and enhancing screening and targeting of international travelers before they board U.S.-bound flights through the Immigration
Advisory Program.
The budget also strengthens surface transportation security by
supporting 12 new multi-modal Visible Intermodal Prevention and
Response (VIPR) teams which conduct operations throughout the
transportation sector to prevent potential terrorist activity.
The request also provides funding for the Securing the Cities
Program to protect our highest risk cities from a radiological or nuclear attack, and it makes a significant investment in the National
Bio and Agro Defense Facility (NBAF), which will provide enhanced diagnostic capabilities to protect our country from foreign
animal and emerging diseases.
The request expands support for the national network of State
and local fusion centers to enhance baseline capabilities and provide local law enforcement with the tools to address threats in
their own communities.
Our second mission is to secure and manage our borders. The request continues the Administrations historic border security efforts
by supporting 21,370 Border Patrol agents and 21,186 U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officers, both all-time highs. The budget includes $242 million for the continued deployment of proven effective surveillance technology along the highest trafficked areas of
the Southwest Border to better meet the operational requirements
of our agents on the front lines.
For the Northern Border, the budget request supports investments in technology tailored to the maritime and cold weather environment, including proven stand-alone technology to provide immediate operational benefits.
And for our Nations maritime borders, this budget includes
funding to continue the essential National Security Cutter program
and makes historic investments to recapitalize the Coast Guards
aging assets, including six fast response cutters, 40 response boats,
as well as a sizable investment in the renovation and restoration
of shore facilities. I look forward to talking about that part of the
budget with you, Senator Collins.
The budget request also continues the Departments focus on
smart and effective enforcement of our countrys immigration laws,
while streamlining and facilitating the legal immigration process.
Building on our record over the past 2 years, the Department will
continue to prioritize the identification and removal of criminal
aliens who pose a threat to public safety, and we will target employers who knowingly and repeatedly break the law. This request
enables U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement to fund 33,400
detention beds, remove over 200,000 criminal aliens, and deploy secure communities to 96 percent of all jurisdictions nationally in fis-

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

7
cal year 2012, while promoting compliance with worksite-related
laws through criminal prosecution of egregious employers, Form I
9 inspections, and continued expansion and enhancement of EVerify.
The request also funds immigrant integration efforts, including
programs supporting English language and citizenship education
and continues detention reform efforts currently underway.
To safeguard and secure cyberspace, the budget increases resources to identify and reduce vulnerabilities in our Nations key
cyber networks. The request includes significant investments to expedite the deployment of EINSTEIN 3 to prevent and detect intrusions on government computer systems, increase Federal network
security of large and small agencies, and continue to develop a robust cybersecurity workforce to protect against and respond to cybersecurity threats. The budget also focuses on combating cyber
crime and preventing attacks against our critical infrastructure.
To ensure resilience to disasters, our next mission area, the
budget request focuses on moving resources out of
Washington, DC, and into the hands of State and local responders who are often best positioned to detect and respond to terrorism, natural disasters, and other threats by sustaining Federal
funding for State and local preparedness grants, providing over
$3.8 billion in fiscal year 2012.
The funding includes $670 million for assistance to firefighter
grants, including $420 million to rehire an estimated 2,300 laid-off
firefighters and retain veteran first responders. And to lead and
support essential national and economic security efforts, the budget
expands the Coast Guards operational capacity by funding 50,682
military and civilian positions and establishing the Coast Guards
first Incident Management Assistance Team, which will be deployed rapidly to support incidents of national significance.
The request also continues to support ICE and CBPs enforcement and investigative efforts to protect U.S. intellectual property
rights as well as the Secret Services state-of-the-art forensic support to several missions, including the National Center for Missing
and Exploited Children.
This budget is the culmination of a major first-of-its-kind effort
by the Department through the Quadrennial Homeland Security
Review and the Bottom-Up Review to align our resources with a
comprehensive strategy to ensure a safe, secure, and resilient
homeland, while making an unprecedented commitment to fiscal
discipline.
I would be remiss, however, if I did not note that all of this
progress is at risk in the continuing resolution currently being debated in the House. It is somewhat of a moving target, as we know,
but the current proposal cuts technology investments and security
improvements on the Southwest and Northern Borders, aviation security measures including new technology, funding to sustain the
progress that has been made in enforcing our immigration laws,
critical cybersecurity tools and operations, intelligence personnel,
and State and local fusion centers, Coast Guard funding to support
the war efforts abroad, and grants that support counterterrorism
and disaster response at the local level. I would be happy to answer some of those questions as well.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00011

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

8
Chairman Lieberman, Senator Collins, and Members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to testify. I ask that my full
statement be included in your record, and I am happy to answer
your questions.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Madam Secretary, and, of course,
we will include the full statement in the record without objection.
Let me ask you to begin by focusing on, in a sense, the catalyzing
mission of the Department after September 11, 2001, which is the
terrorist threat, and the statement you made last week that the
terrorist threat may be at its most heightened state since the attacks nearly 10 years ago.
Talk a little bit, if you would, about why you said that, what you
had in mind.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I said that because, in addition to core alQaeda, we now have spin-off groups of al-Qaeda, including, I think
importantly, Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), who have
demonstrated their intent to attack the West and to attack the
United States. They continue to focus on transportation modes,
particularly aviation security, which is why the aviation part of
this budget is so important. But combined with that, we now are
seeing the rise in the so-called homegrown terrorism, which is, I
think, accelerated by a connection with the Internet. So we are
dealing with more dissipated sources abroad, but also from within
the country. That means that we have to be working both things
at the same time. That is why the fusion centers are so important
here in the country and our effort to push information and intelligence analysis out to States and to cities, but it is also why we
are so focused on aviation security at domestic airports and internationally, as well as adding support to surface and other transportation. As we know from the Najibullah Zazi case, for example, just
a very recent one with the attempt to attack surface transportation.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Right. Let me ask you outcome about the
threat of homegrown radicalization. As I am sure you know, Senator Collins and I recently released a bipartisan staff investigation
into the murders at Fort Hood in November 2009, and in addition
to specific recommendations to the Department of Defense, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), etc., we recommended that
there be a review done, preferably under the auspices of the White
House, probably by John Brennan, which would include DHS, to
determine what we can do to better, with a whole-of-government
approach, counter homegrown radicalization. We had a hearing on
our report this week with a group of excellent witnesses. One of
them, Phil Mudd, who as you know was with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for a long time and was almost with DHS,
was with the FBI, said this is a needle-in-the-haystack problem.
And Charlie Allen, your former Director of Intelligence and Analysis, was here and he quotedI do not remember exactly, but from
September 11, 2001, to 2009, there was something like 46 or 48
cases of homegrown radicalization, 13 of them in 2009. So there
was an increasing pace. Obviously, 46 or 48 over a 9-year period
is a very small percentage of the Muslim-American population,
though an individual, as we saw with Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

9
Hood, can do terrible damage: 13 people killed, 32 injured, some seriously.
Do you have any ideas about what the Department can do, along
with other Federal agencies, to better identify, counter, and prevent the existence, certainly the spread of homegrown radicalization of Muslim-Americans into Islamist terrorists?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, first of all, I read your report even
though it was about the Department of Defense (DOD), FBI, and
the Hasan matter, but I thought it was a very important report to
review. So I thank you for having that review done. It was very
well written, well done. I do not know if the actual scripter was
you wrote it yourselves. [Laughter.]
I thought you did a very nice job.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Here is where we have been focused. We
looked at this, and we had the Homeland Security Advisory Committee, which is chaired by William Webster, the former head of
the FBI, especially look at this whole issue of homegrown and
countering violent extremism. And we decided that the most effective way from the homeland security perspective was to focus on
local police departments and techniques that have been shown to
work in the past, neighborhood and community policing, where you
have police who are specially trained, but who really are located in
a particular area all the time. They get to know the people. The
people get to know them. You begin to build trust. That is how information can flow.
So just this past week at the Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center (FLETC), we test drove a training curriculum on this kind
of homegrown violent extremism, and we had representatives there
from a number of different police and sheriffs organizations to give
us their comments so that we can rule that out. But this homeland
security architecture that we are building, I think one of the things
we have to recognize is that the Federal Government alone is not
going to be the only player here. The folks who are really front
lines are State and local police, sheriffs, medical personnel, the people who are in the detention facilities who work as guards in our
jails and our prisons, these are all people who need to be woven
into what we are doing.
We also met this past week with the FBI and have joined efforts
with them on the detention populations and their potential when
they are released for radicalization. So there are a whole number
of efforts underway there, but our key focus, Mr. Chairman, is on
what we can do to support State and local law enforcement from
a community-oriented policing strategy to identify tactics and techniques and behaviors that could be a real tip-off to a terrorist.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. I think that is a very significant conclusion. It makes a lot of sense to me. We know in a couple of cases,
as in the New York City Police Department (NYPD), they are operating something like that quite effectively. We also know, just from
years of local law enforcement experience, that the cop-on-the-beat
programs in previous years dealing with crime have a very positive
effect. So I am actually heartened to hear that.
I guess the final question, bottom line, is: Are there resources in
this budget that will allow you to begin to move forward on assist-

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00013

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

10
ing local police departments that do not have that kind of program
going now?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Mr. Chairman, a few things. One, there
are resources in this budget for the fusion centers, and we have
been, first of all, upgrading the quality of the fusion centers. It is
a nascent kind of development. We looked at all 72 of them this
last year, and identified which ones were meeting certain baseline
standards, which needed to come up. We are making sure that they
all have access to classified information, networks, and we are moving intelligence analysts from Washington, DC, to the fusion centers in the country not only to help with intel analysis, but to train
State and locals on intel analysis. So there is money in the budget
for fusion centers.
There is money in the budget to support grant programs that can
be used by State and local police and first responders, and when
I get to Senator Collins, I think we can have a colloquy perhaps
about how the grant money is actually budgeted in the Presidents
budget.
The third part of this, however is the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program. That, of course, is not in our budget.
That is in DOJs. And so that part I do not have.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. That is great. I take you to say you are
going to be driving training, at least, of local police departments in
a counter-homegrown radicalization program.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. That is true.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. That is great. Senator Collins.
Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Before I get to the Coast Guard and the grant money, there are
two other issues that I want to bring up with you. First is the improper payment problem at FEMA. Hurricane Katrina was back in
2005, and the American people were very generous in responding,
as I know Senator Landrieu would attest. But they are also very
frustrated when they see improper payments. It was disheartening
to see the latest IG report which indicatesand here we are 6
years after Hurricane Katrinathat there is still outstanding at
least $643 million in improper payments related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita.
Now, I know there were some court developments which slowed
the recoupment process, but the fact is, according to the IG, FEMA
has yet to implement a new process to recoup those payments.
We just cannot afford to have $643 million in improper payments
at a time when the budget is under such pressure. We cannot afford it at any time. It is unacceptable.
Why arent we recouping that money or prosecuting the cases of
fraud that exist within those 160,000 cases?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, Senator Collins, this is an area that
I think we need to work with the Congress on, and you and I may
have a respectful difference of opinion here. But, first of all, one of
the problems is an IG report that comes out so many years after
the fact, and there are, I must say, some disagreements with their
conclusions on some of the payments.
Second, it is not as if one, two, three, or four entities received
that money. It is spread over literally thousands and thousands of
beneficiaries, most of whom are spread across the country now.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00014

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

11
And I am informed by FEMA that the average overpayment, even
accepting the IGs conclusions, would be about $2,500. So it is a lot
of money when you add it all together, and believe me, I respect
the value of a dollar. But this is now going back years and years
after the fact to try to find people to recoup relatively small
amounts of money.
We may want to look at this whole recoupment process as it affects Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. It was such an unusual disaster
with such unusual requirements that I do not think it should be
the pattern. So I really would like the opportunity to meet and talk
with you more about that as we move along in this budget process.
Senator COLLINS. I would be glad to, but let me suggest that I
have talked to the IG just within the past week about this, and he
has told me that the discouraging part of his report is that the
same problems and lack of internal controls that allowed these improper payments to occur have been evident for decades, literally,
and they have just never been remedied.
I think to most people who are struggling right now, $2,500 is
a lot of money.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. It is a lot of money.
Senator COLLINS. And in the aggregate, it is a huge amount of
money.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Agreed.
Senator COLLINS. I would be glad to work with you, but FEMA
needs to actually start recovering this money and making sure that
the controls are in place so that when the next disaster strikes
and inevitably it willthe same thing does not happen again. In
talking to Inspector General Richard Skinner, he said he could go
back to 1993 and show me the same kinds of problems. I held hearings prior to Hurricane Katrina that showed improper payments
with Florida hurricanes.
So this seems to be a systemic problem in FEMA, and it is one
that we need to correct once and for all.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. And it may beand, again, I do not
knowthat it merits a more substantial conversation, particularly
with the Hurricanes Katrina and Rita victims or survivors are concerned. But there is a real tension between getting money out
quickly to people who immediately need monies to get a home, to
get re-established and so forth and the controls on that, versus 4
or 5 years after the fact going back and saying, well, it should have
been this much, not this much, that sort of thing.
That is different from actual cases of fraud. Fraud should be
prosecuted.
Senator COLLINS. Of which there were many. I remember in our
investigation that we discovered prisoners who were applying for
housing assistance after Hurricane Katrina and received checks in
jail for housing assistance. I mean, there really were some blatant
fraudulent schemes.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Indeed.
Senator COLLINS. Let me switch to another issue. I was surprised
to see that the Presidents budget includes a proposal to begin imposing a $5.50 inspection fee on travelers entering the United
States by air or sea from Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. Now,
as you know, Canada is our biggest trading partner. There is $1.5

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

12
billion in commerce transacted between the two nations on a daily
basis. People are flying and arriving by ferry back and forth all the
time.
What is the rationale for this fee? My concern, for example, is
that it will discourage cruise ships from coming to the State of
Maine from Canada. That is a popular route right now. But if there
is going to be this additional inspection fee on the thousands of
people who may be on a cruise ship, that may discourage the cruise
ship from even stopping here. And I am also concerned about the
impact on tourism and families going back and forth in general.
What is the rationale? And did the Department look and assess
what the impact would be on commerce and tourism?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, the rationale is fairness. We charge
that fee for travelers from every other country except Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. It has always, in my understanding, been
the intent to implement that fee. It is not for land. It is just for
the air and sea. We thought and looked at potential impacts, but
to give you an example, if you have a traveler coming from London
to the United States, they fly direct, they pay that fee. But if their
plane stops in Canada, so they are coming from Canada, they do
not pay the fee. So you have some real discrepancies in the system.
In terms of effects on tourism and travel, I think we can look at
the Electronic System For Travel Authorization (ESTA) fee, which
went into effect. These are things that get added to the ticket price,
and so that the travelers from other parts of the world are not essentially underwriting travelers who are from Canada or Mexico.
Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Collins.
In order of both arrival and seniority at the gavel, Senator
Landrieu, Senator McCain, Senator Johnson, and Senator Tester.
I asked about that, and I was reminded that when the gavel falls,
it goes whoever is here by seniority on the Committee. It is the
Armed Services rule.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR LANDRIEU

Senator LANDRIEU. Thank you.

Madam Secretary, thank you for being here today, and I look forward to having you before my new Appropriations Subcommittee
very soon, March 2, as I am taking the chairmanship of that subcommittee. I have to say I want to commend you. This has been
a very tough year for the Department. The Coast Guard has fought
to contain the largest oil spill in American history. The Department
has responded to terrorist attacks at Fort Hood and Times Square.
ICE and Border Patrol agents mobilized to quell unprecedented violence along the Southwest Border. The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) learned of a terrorist plot to detonate air
cargo. FEMA has responded to 106 separate incidents this year. So
I want to say I appreciate your leadership of this Department.
I also appreciate your willingness to cut, reduce, and modify
based on the challenges before us. But I do want to say that we
have to be very careful about how we go about that exercise so that
we can continue to provide the security that our Nation needs and
has come to depend on under your leadership and with this Department.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00016

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

13
My first question has to do with disaster relief, and it is concerning because it is a big number. The Senator from Maine was
just referring to a number associated with failure to recover in
large measure $2,000 payments equaling about $640 million. That
is a lot of money, and I want to comment on that in a minute. But
there is an issue over $1.6 billion in this years budget, and I think
you are aware that in the House continuing resolution that is being
debated and in the Presidents proposal, they are both recommending that we basically fund disaster recovery out of the base
budget of homeland security, which in my mind is a radical departure from the past and will absolutely, if left unchecked, undermine
your Departments ability to respond to all the threats that I just
mentioned and that have been pointed out.
Could you comment? And what is your position on that? And are
you prepared to work with us and the President to fund known recovery costs for previous disasters on an emergency basis?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Thank you, Senator, and I do look forward to appearing before you at the Appropriations Subcommittee
hearing.
Yes, what is going on, this is the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF),
and the way we budget the DRF is to take a 5-year rolling average
of what is basically the emergency response cost. But added to
that, then, you have so-called catastrophic disasters, and those are
disasters that are over $500 million. And, it is difficult to predict
when you are going to have those, how many you will have in a
given year, or if you will have any. And so historically what the
Congress has done is approve the 5-year rolling average, and then
via supplemental when we know what we are looking at, then they
appropriate the rest.
By not proceeding in that fashion, you have two challenges. One
is it requires us to have perfect crystal balls to tell how many disasters of a catastrophic type we will have in any given year. And
our crystal balls are not that clear.
Second, we have to pay for disaster response. It is really non-negotiable. So what that means is that if you do not have a mechanism to fund them, it is just a hidden cut to FEMA, and it is a substantial one, as you have noted.
Senator LANDRIEU. Well, I just want to bring this to the Committees attention. Of course, as the Appropriations subommittee chair,
I will be focusing on it, but I really want the Members to fully appreciate the numbers here. It is $1.56 billion in fiscal year 2011
that is missing from this years budget. But for fiscal year 2012
through 2014, FEMA is estimating $6.7 billion. Those are outlying
bills from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav, Ike, and flooding in
the Midwest, Rhode Island, and Tennessee. These costs are not accounted for in the Presidents budget request. And it most certainly
cannot come out of the basic homeland security budget. We have
to designate this funding as the emergency that it is so that this
Department can adequately support its other components, including the Border Patrol, the Coast Guard, etc. So I just really wanted
to bring that up.
The National Disaster Recovery Framework is very important,
Madam Secretary, and I understand that it is not yet fully operational. And it gets a little bit back to what Senator Collins was

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

14
saying about we know Hurricane Katrina was an exception. It was
not blanket fraud, but it was just mismanagement of distribution
of monies, of $2,000 on average per family. We did not have the
right software to verify addresses. We double-paid some families. It
is going to be difficult. But we can find a better way, a more accurate way to make sure we are making appropriate payments. But
for this National Recovery Framework, I understand that it is still
not in place.
So do you know what the status of that initiative is? Does this
budget include sufficient funding to complete it? Because it is very
important that we get it completed before we have an earthquake
in Memphis or some other catastrophic event.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, Senator. But it also crosses many
lines and many agencies, and it also crosses State and local. So
there has been, as you might imagine, a lot of consultation that has
gone into drafting recovery framework responses. The immediate
stuff you do right away. Recovery is how you restore communities,
housing, small businesses, and the like.
In terms of the departments that are impacted, we have made
a strong recommendation to the White House about how this
should appear and be organized. We are waiting now for the White
House to agree, concur, amend, or disagree. And my understanding
is at that point we may need to make some adjustments. But under
the current practice with what we have now, the budget request is
adequate.
Senator LANDRIEU. Thank you.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you, Senator Landrieu. Senator
McCain.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR MCCAIN

Senator MCCAIN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and Madam Secretary, for being here. Thank you for your hard work. Thank you
for the frank and very candid conversations we have concerning the
issue of border security. And I also want to appreciate the time and
effort you take to keep me and the other Members from the Border
States informed as to the efforts you are making on border security. And I think it is important that we continue the conversation,
and I appreciate the briefing that you gave me just the other day.
As you know, there is a February 15, GAO report that contains
some very interesting information, and in that report it says, As
of February 2011, CBP did not have an estimate of the time and
efforts that are needed to secure the Southwest Border as it transitions to a new methodology for measuring border security.
I think this is part of our problem and our dialogue, because you,
I think very appropriately, point out that there has been an increase in assets, an increase in apprehensions, certainly increases
in efficiencies. And yet at the same time, if you look at the same
situation from another viewpoint, we have seen the violence in
Mexico grow dramatically. As I predicted to you, an American was
just killed and another one injured, and I am convinced, tragically,
that if the status quo remains, that violence will continue to spill
over onto our side of the border.
Everyone knows that these drug cartels have become more aggressive, better armed, better equipped, more efficient, and the

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

15
level of violence in Mexico continues to go up dramatically. Some
30,000 Mexican citizens or more, have been killed during President
Felipe Calderons presidency. So you can look at it from one viewpoint that we have made some significant improvements and investments. But I also find, when I go to the Southern part of my
State, as you have on numerous occasions, one, they do not feel
safe; two, they are still subject to home invasions; three, in the
Tucson sector, 91,000 illegal aliens were apprehended on Federal
lands, and the estimates are by almost every objective observer
that three times as many get through. Well, if you do the math on
that, you still have over 200,000 people crossing through the Tucson sector illegally and not being apprehended. I do not think that
is acceptable.
And then last week I had a meeting with the High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program office, friends of yours,
in factthe great U.S. Attorney, a former assistant of yours, was
thereand they said that there is anywhere from 100 to 200 spotters positioned in mountain ranges of Arizona using two-way radios
to communicate with marijuana load drivers or human smugglers.
Now, it does not give my constituents a feeling of confidence if
there are 200 spotters in Arizona living on mountaintops directing
drug smugglers. And they maintain that Arizona has become the
funnel from Nogales up through Pinal County into Maricopa County and then all over the country because the Sinaloa cartel is a
major distributor to the entire country of these drugs.
Again, I have had the privilege of visiting with your people and
knowing them. They are outstanding, hard-working, and dedicated.
Those that are working in the forward operating bases on our border, it is a hardship duty. And obviously we have seen cases where
it is not without danger.
I am sorry for the long opening comment. We have to agree on
certain criteria on what is successful securing of our border. Senator Jon Kyl and I have a 10-point plan. We think that secures the
border. I think it would be very helpful to all of us if you could lay
out what assets need to be devoted and what statistics would show
us that the border is being secured. And at that time, I think we
could move forward with comprehensive immigration reform.
Thank you.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, thank you, and there is no one
more committed to securing that border than I am. I have spent
the greater part of my professional life on border-related issues. I
used to chair the HIDTA to which you refer, and a number of the
same members are there. And I know the men and women that we
have working for us and that you have helped supply for us are so
committed as well.
We can talk about and arrive at some common metrics, and that
also merits probably a different and longer conversation. But I
think, of the metrics we do have, they are all going in the right direction. The problem is they are not going in the right direction
fast enough in the Tucson sector, and that is the sector to which
you refer.
And so our plan is to increase and to be pouring even more resources into that sector from supplying monies for State and locals
down therethis is the Operation Stonegarden issue to which Sen-

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

16
ator Collins referredto radios, to other technology that they can
actually work.
When we get to discussing SBInet, as we might during another
round of questions, I would be happy to explain how some of those
monies have been redeployed on the ground for front-line detection.
I will say that it is a system. You have to have troops or boots
on the ground at or near the border, you have to have checkpoints,
and you have to have interior enforcement. And, it is a three-legged
stool. And so it is boots, it is technology, it is that infrastructure
that gives us security. And at a certain pointand I do not know
if it is subject to an actual absolute number, because these numbers jump around all the time. But at a certain point, we have to
be able to agree that the Tucson sector has become akin to, say,
El Paso, for example, and at that point proceed with the other discussion to which you refer.
Senator MCCAIN. Well, thank you. I would like for you to think
about certain benchmarks and certain criteria that we could use to
gauge success or failure that both of us could agree, all of us, and
we could say we have achieved X amount of apprehensions, a certain amount of fencing, whatever it is, which obviously the results
would be obvious from that.
Mr. Chairman, I have overstayed my time. I just wanted to say
one word about SBInet. It is a colossal failure, a waste of over $1
billion, and that cannot be fixed. I still think that the contractor
ought to be held responsible, but maybe that is a subject for a conversation another day. But I would urge you to look at what the
Armed Services Committee has passed legislation which helps us
track better the progress or lack of progress of weapons systems
that we purchase, such as the Nunn-McCurdy trigger that Congress has to be notified once there is a certain cost overrun. There
are certain benchmarks and criteria which the Congress has to be
informed of and participate in decisionmaking. So I would like for
you to look at what we do as regards to weapons procurement in
DOD because I think maybe it would be very useful and helpful to
us in tracking these situations.
I thank you, Mr. Chairman. I thank you, Madam Secretary, for
your hard work.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you, Senator McCain.
Madam Secretary, as we discussed the other day, we did announce at our organization meeting the other morning that border
security is going to be one of our priorities this year, and we are
going to start a series of hearings, hopefully in Marchthat is, we
will start in March. And the point that Senator McCain raises is
an important one, which is whether we can find a metric, a set of
standards we can agree on where we can say we are doing as much
as we all agree together we can do to secure our border. And that
will not only achieve security, it may also here in a broader context
enable us to deal with the possibility of comprehensive immigration
reform, which I know you are also interested in.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Very good.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you. Nest is Senator Johnson, then
Senator Tester, and then Senator Portman.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

17
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHNSON

Senator JOHNSON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Madam Secretary,

it was nice meeting you earlier and welcome to our hearing.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Thank you, Senator.
Senator JOHNSON. Are you aware or have you been watching
what has been happening in my home State of Wisconsin in terms
of public sector employees?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, I have seen a few clips.
Senator JOHNSON. Does that give you any pause in terms of the
announcement to allow the TSA employees to collectively bargain?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. No. I think this is a totally different situation. First of all, we were ordered by the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (FLRA) to conduct such an election, and I think the way
the administrator, who is the former Deputy Director of the FBI,
has gone about it is the right way, which is to say we will have
an election, but issues that affect security are off the table from a
collective bargaining standpoint.
As you know, a number of collective bargaining units are in law
enforcement already, including some that are within the private
airports that have been discussed. I want to say San Francisco and
Kansas City have privatized the security, which have collective
bargaining units in those companies. So I did not find that argument particularly persuasive, and I think the way we are going
about it is legally mandated and the right way.
Senator JOHNSON. I would hope it would never get to this point,
but TSA Administrator Pistole was asked, I believe last week, if
work stoppages or slowdowns occurred, would he be willing to fire
TSA screeners en masse, and he answered yes.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes.
Senator JOHNSON. If it got to that point, would you support that
decision?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes. This is a security organization, and
the bargaining will take place in that context. It will also take
place in the context of the need to be able to move people around
quickly when we need to to supplement particular areas of the
country.
Senator JOHNSON. Well, I appreciate that answer.
Let us go back to border security. I am a new kid on the block
here, so these may be some basic questions. But I am interested
in metrics. What metrics are we currently using?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, we the number of apprehensions of
illegals. We use seizures of drugs. We use seizures of guns. We use
seizures of what we call bulk cash, which is normally associated
with drug smuggling. So those are four of the major metrics that
are used.
Senator JOHNSON. Do you estimate number of crossings? Do you
use any type of
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, it is hard. As Senator McCain said,
for every one we pick up, there are two or three who get through.
There is a difference of opinion in the law enforcement world. They
actually think we are picking up a greater percentage than that
now. The one-in-three metric is an outdated metric. But when we
look at where the high point was in illegal immigration, particularly over the Southwest Border, we see now that apprehensions

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

18
are at their lowest point in decades. And so as apprehensions go
down, we extrapolate that illegal crossings have gone down as well.
Senator JOHNSON. What would that number be then based on the
current extrapolation? What is your estimate of current crossings?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, I can give you those actual numbers, let me see if I have it right here. The apprehension number
is around 196,000 in the Tucson sector of the Border Patrol, which
is the most heavily trafficked. The others are much smaller.
Senator JOHNSON. In your estimation
Secretary NAPOLITANO. So you have to assume that the Tucson
sector represents about 45 percent of the apprehensions. So take
195,000 and then do the math.
Senator JOHNSON. Now, I will say at the onset I realize it is not
an easy problem, but we have been talking about securing our borders for years. I would just like to ask your opinion. What is the
number one problem preventing us from doing that?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, you have to look at borders not just
as the physical line on the map, but what needs to be done before
people get to that border and then after they get into the interior
of our country. So we absolutely need to be working with Mexico
to prevent, detect illegal immigration, drug smuggling, human
smuggling, and money laundering. A number of efforts are underway in that regard.
At the border itself, you need manpower, you need technology,
you need infrastructure. Some of the things in the Presidents
budget will really assist in this regard because they will allow us
to complete some interoperability projects in terms of communications along the border. And also we put more into technology and
boots on the ground nearer the border than at sector stations, for
example. So we have increased the number of forward-operating
camps. We have an agreement from the Tohono Oodham Nation
that we can put more camps on their lands, those sorts of things.
And then you have to deal realistically and very firmly with creating a culture of immigration compliance among employers in the
United States. That is why we support E-Verify. That is why we
are doing more and more audits. That is why we are referring more
companies for debarment and for prosecution because that is the
incentive for much illegal immigration. It is narcotics, but the big
numbers are people coming in search of work.
Senator JOHNSON. So those are three different issues. One of
those would be resources, correct?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Sure, yes.
Senator JOHNSON. How much do you think it would cost to secure the border?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, I think the Presidents budget gives
us the resources we need to fit into the plan we have for the Southwest Border. That is our part. The budget for the DOJ part in
terms of what you do by way of prosecution, detention, and so
forth, that is in the DOJ budget. But I think the Presidents budget
is adequate to meet our plan. I would not go below that, that is
for sure.
Senator JOHNSON. Well, thank you.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Johnson. Next is Senator
Tester.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

19
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR TESTER

Senator TESTER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Madam Secretary, it is good to see you again. I think the last
time I saw you, we were enjoying a steak in Great Falls, Montana.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. No; I was dropping you off in your pasture by helicopter.
Senator TESTER. That is true. I forgot about that. Yes, that is
right. [Laughter.]
And I appreciate that, too.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I was giving you a ride.
Senator TESTER. That is right, you were. And I appreciate Commissioner Alan Bersin coming in. I know that his nomination is
still hung up, and I would hope that gets throughyesterday, as
a matter of fact, because I think he has done a great job, and I
think a reappointment with a different person would not help you
and your position at all. So hopefully we can get that moving.
We recently had some issuesand this might seem parochial,
but I do not think it is, actuallywith the CBP policy that would
prohibit airports from processing planes that had international
flights with over 20 or more passengers. They have been doing it
for years and years and years. I arrived in Great Falls last week,
and they informed me that the airport there in Great Falls was not
going to be able to process those international flights anymore. It
saved a lot of time, a lot of headaches for folks to avoid some of
the larger, busier airports. It generated revenue. And quite honestly, as I think about it, a plane flying and landing on a place further south does not make a lot of sense from my perspective. So
it is not just parochial. I think it is a homeland security issue.
I do not know if the decision was made locally or if it was made
above the chain, but it was made somewhere in the chain where
they found a rule that said we cannot do this anymore, and so they
decided not to do it. I am a little upset with that. That is the bad
part. The good part is that your staff helped clear a flight for us,
but we need to work on a long-term solution.
What further compounds the fact that I was a little upset with
itand it is the second time this has happenedthe person in Customs declined to make a meeting with my staff in Great Falls. And,
quite frankly, when they declined a meeting with one of my staff
members, they have declined a meeting with me. So we will take
it to a higher person, you being the one.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. That will not happen again.
Senator TESTER. That would be really good. Quite frankly, I have
zero tolerance for that personally.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I understand.
Senator TESTER. Could I get a commitment from youI mean,
this needs to be solved. I think from a homeland security standpoint there are a lot of small airports along the Northern tier that
have done this in the past, and if this is just in the sector in Great
Falls, that is not good. And if it is all the way across the Northern
Border, I do not think it is good either. I think these stations that
have been doing this work need to continue to do it, and all I am
asking for is your ability to work with us to make sure that happens and continues. You got the drift on the whole thing?

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

20
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I will look into it, and we will respond to
you directly.
Senator TESTER. Thank you.
I recently sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and
you on the increased rate of drug smuggling across the Northern
Border by low-flying aircraft. Low-flying aircraft is a real problem.
We have heard from folks on the ground that you can hear them
but you cannot see them. And we have been working for low-level
radar for some time now. It is something that I think that you need
to work with the DOD. I think it is the same report that Senator
McCain talked about. It talked about the Northern Border not
being as secure as we wanted by a long shot. So we need technology as a comprehensive part of that.
The National Guard in Montana has done a pilot project up
there. I think they have done some good work. I really think that
if a low level of radar was implemented, it may save some manpower and may make that border more secure. I do not know how
you move forward on it, but I think we need to get started on it.
Any thoughts on this at all, on the low-level radar?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. There is actually money in the Presidents budget for a low-level radar project, and we have that in
mind for both borders.
Senator TESTER. Good. And I was going to ask you, you talked
about the Presidents budget as applied to the Southern Border.
What about the Presidents budget as it applies to the Northern
Border and getting it secured?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, the Presidents budget actually has
a lot of enhancements for the Northern Border, but it is a different
border, so we need different types of equipment.
Senator TESTER. Absolutely.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. We need equipment that can survive extreme cold. We need more maritime equipment up there. And so
that is where you will see the enhancements, is in that sort of
thing. It does recognize and provide agents at the Northern Border
but it meets all of Congress requirements there. It is not just the
agents. It is really the technology and the maritime assets that we
need to augment that agent support.
Senator TESTER. I could not agree more. In fact, I think that if
we were to get some more technology up there, in the long haul I
think it is going to make the border more secure. And I think that
it really would not have to cost us more money. In fact, it could
save us more money in manpower. I really believe that. You are
the professional in that area, and I respect your perspective. But
I am just saying that from my perspective I think if we could get
some of that technology implemented, it could really save us some
money and make the border more secure in the process.
The next question is one that you and I have visited about a
number of times. No one is more firmly aware of our Nations responsibility to protect animal agriculture and public health from biological threats and foreign animal diseases, but I still have some
major concerns about the $150 million that is included in the Presidents budget for the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility to be
built in the middle of Tornado Alley, where I think about 10 percent of this Nations cattle are within 200 miles of it. And I think

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

21
food security is critically important. The economic harm that could
happen if there were to be an exposure is incredible. We received
a risk assessment, and one of the things it found was that there
was a 70-percent chance that a release of foot-and-mouth disease
would result during this 50-year lifetime. That would be catastrophic. Whether it happened next year or 25 years from now, it
would be catastrophic.
It is a lot of money. I would ask you to reconsider the proposal.
And I was just wondering if you have looked at the report, if there
was any redesign that was done, or if you are going to move forward.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, I read the report. You are talking
about the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report?
Senator TESTER. Yes, I am.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I reviewed it. Actually, we responded to
it. I think you have to view it, Senator, as a preliminary report
based on a preliminary design. And that allowed us or enables us
to make adjustments or changes in the design to deal with some
of the issues that were raised. It has not caused us, however, to
revisit the basic decision of that, Tornado Alley aside. I do not
make light of that except to say that was already taken into account when this project was peer reviewed up the wazoo when it
was originally awarded. Then we have re-reviewed it and re-looked
at it compared to the alternatives, and now we have the NAS report, which we will be very responsive to as this project moves forward.
But we think overall this is the best place to host such a facility,
these three and four labs, and so we do intend to proceed, and the
Presidents budget has finances in there for that.
Senator TESTER. My time has run out. I have said this before.
And I have to say it again. I very much respect the job you are
doing. I think you have a very difficult job, and I think you have
done a remarkable job. There is always room for improvement. You
know that. And I think you are working hard on doing that. But
as far as the animal defense, as a farmer I cannot figure it out. I
would not want it at Bozeman, Montana. I think where it is at on
Plum Island is rightand the New Yorkers might be unhappy with
me, but it is off the shore of the mainland. And I know it is hard
to get researchers out there, but there is a bigger issue than even
that here. I mean, these are highly contagious diseases, and if they
have an outbreak, it couldthe economic and the food security
issues that revolve around that are huge, and I cannot get that off
of my front burner, to be honest with you. I cannot get the assurances, and then compound it by being someplace where they have
some pretty doggone wicked weather patterns. Anyway, the decision has been made, but I really wish it would be revisited.
With that, I want to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you,
Madam Secretary. I appreciate your work.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Thank you, Senator.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Tester.
I want to share with both of you that I have a vision, after one
of your exchanges, that your helicopter has picked up that recalcitrant Customs employee official, and he is now being dropped on

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

22
the roof of the building in which Senator Tester has his office. The
meeting is about to begin. [Laughter.]
Secretary NAPOLITANO. From a very high height. We will deal
with that particular issue. You know what, Senator? That one I can
deal with.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. I am going to stop myself from suggesting
he may be dropped onto Plum Island. [Laughter.]
Senator Portman.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR PORTMAN

Senator PORTMAN. That poor person.

Madam Secretary, thank you for appearing before the Committee
and for your willingness to go through some of the tough issues
that you face every day. We talked a lot about border security, the
Northern and Southern Borders, and I appreciate the fact that you
have asked for an increase in funding for Border Patrol again. And
I think there is a consensus that border protection is important
here, not just for immigration but, of course, for drug smuggling,
guns, and particularly with the violence that we have seen on the
Southern Border.
But having said that, I continue to believe that money is better
spent on trying to avoid the magnet, which is getting at what I
think is the fundamental cause, which is primarily jobs, and, therefore, employer sanctions and, therefore, some kind of verifiable
identification. And I think the more effort and time we put against
that, the more success we will have ultimately in dealing with our
immigration problem.
I think in a sense you have seen the proof of that with our economic downturn and the reduction in the number of people even
attempting to cross. Much of it is, of course, economically driven.
So my question to you is about E-Verify. It expires next year, and
I am told that only 11 percent of the 7.7 million employers in the
country participate in E-Verify. And I would ask you today two
things: One, do you support a permanent reauthorization of EVerify? And, second, how can we improve the participation rate? Do
you think it is the right program?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, indeed, Senator. We are adding companies to E-Verify at approximately 1,300 per week. When I was
Governor of Arizona, I think I was the first governor in the country
to require our contractors to use E-Verify. And I think one of the
things we want to be looking at is not only its permanent reauthorization but, as I said earlier, a culture of compliance in the employer community, that this is something that they need to do
they do not like it, but they have to pay their taxes. I mean, it is
just part and parcel of being in this country. You have to make
sure that your employees are legally residing in the United States.
Senator PORTMAN. Different than taxes, though, because having
that verifiable identification is a challenge, particularly for smaller
employers.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes.
Senator PORTMAN. People are showing a Social Security card and
showing a drivers license, and it is fraudulent, and they accept it
on its face.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

23
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, and so there are a couple of things
to consider.
First of all, E-Verify itself, the system is being improved to be
less susceptible to identity theft, for example, if somebody is using
a Social Security number that has also appeared somewhere else,
it will be able to pick something like that up.
Second, I think in its early iterations there were some false entries into the system or inaccurate entries. The accuracy of the system now is very high. We have also wanted to make it easy for
small businesses to have and to operate, and I have seen it and
used it myself. As people who work with me know, I am not exactly
the worlds best computer person, and it is pretty easy to operate.
So that is part of it.
And if and whenand we hope it is sooner rather than later
the Congress takes up immigration reform, one of the things we
would like to work with Congress on are the actual charges that
can be brought against employers and the elements of the burden
of proof because the way the statutes are written now, even when
we have somebody that everybody knows very well that has been
hiring illegal labor, actually proving that under the elements of the
current statute is very difficult. Therefore, it is difficult to get U.S.
Attorneys to take those cases and so forth. So we look forward to
working with the Congress on improving those statutes.
Senator PORTMAN. Likewise, and it takes resources and it takes
focus in coming up with a system that is, as you say, easy to use
and relatively low cost for the employer. Given our economy, we do
not want to burden employers more, but we do need, I think, to get
at the issue where it is most effective, and that is going to be
through the employer and through the interior enforcement.
I was involved in the Department of Homeland Security organization, consolidating 20 or so agencies and departments when you
were still governor, and I cannot say that I am proud of everything
that has happened in the interim period. There have been some
management challenges, obviously, including with the way FEMA
was brought in, including with just some of the different cultures
I will use that word againthat had to mesh together.
Now I am in the position with Senator McCaskill to be on the
Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight which deals with
acquisitions. I have noticed in the budget proposal we have before
us that you have made a request to provide more funds, $24 million more, to strengthen your acquisition workforce, 150 new positions throughout the Department.
First, I guess I would ask you, Why are you asking for those additional resources? And what can we do to ensure that those additions, should they be approved, actually promote efficiency, transparency, avoid some of the management breakdowns we have seen
and, therefore, save taxpayer dollars? If you can talk a little about
that.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, Senator. Actually, this is part of creating the department, having that internal management structure
and the assets with which to do that. It is a big department. We
do a lot of acquisitions, and we are often criticized for some of those
acquisitions. There have been different standards used by different
elements of the Department, different requirements employed, dif-

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00027

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

24
ferent oversight done. But what we want to do is create a professionalized acquisition workforce that knows the DHS missions, that
understands how things fit together. So part of bringing the additional workforce in is also training into the department and consistency of training so that anybody who is working in the acquisitions area isthere is some consistency. It is a real part of the professional development of the department.
I think you can tell by the money we have already saved through
the efficiency review process, where part of that has been acquisitions reform and also some comments made in some recenteven
I think the GAO has made some comments about improvements
they have already seen in the way that we do acquisitions and acquisition oversight.
Senator PORTMAN. We look forward to working with you. Our job
is to look at, of course, all agencies and departments, but because
this is the Homeland Security Committee, DHS may get special attention, which I am sure you are looking forward to. But I look forward to having you or your representative before the Subcommittee
at the appropriate time to talk more about that.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Very good.
Senator PORTMAN. Thank you, Madam Secretary.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Portman. It is great to
have you and all the experience you have had on our Committee.
Thank you very much.
Senator Akaka.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR AKAKA

Senator AKAKA. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I would

like to welcome Secretary Napolitano to this hearing today.
Before I begin, I want to express my deepest sympathy and condolences to the families of the ICE special agent who was tragically
killed and his colleague who was wounded in the line of duty this
past Tuesday. Our thoughts and prayers are with them.
I am pleased that, despite budget constraints, DHS is making investments in the workers who are critical to protecting the Nation.
DHS is taking positive steps to develop its acquisition workforce,
recognize collective bargaining rights for Transportation Security
officers, and create a wellness program.
Madam Secretary, TSA proposes to remove the statutory cap on
airline security fees so it can raise them without Congress acting.
As an initial increase, TSA would lift airline security fees by 60
percent to raise more than $1 billion annually. I understand that
TSA needs substantial funding to address very real air security
threats, but that is quite a large increase.
Has the Department analyzed what effect an airfare tax increase
of $1 billion a year would have on the airline and tourism industries?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, I think, Senator, the request is for
$1.5 per enplanement. That fee has not been increased since 2002,
and I think we all recognize that the security of aviation, international and domestic, is absolutely key. And given the kind of
threats that we have seen just in the past 2 years, we know it remains a concern, and it requires constant evolution of technology,

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00028

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

25
manpower, and the like. So the fee is associated, the $1.50 per
enplanement is associated directly with the threat we confront.
With respect to impact on the industry, we already have, as I
mentioned earlier, the ESTA fee, which has already migrated, and
we did not see any impact that I could see on that.
The way I looked at it, Senator, was when the airlines charge
fees for checking a bag or for buying a Coke, we can certainly have
a fee to protect the safety and security of the passengers. And that
is what this is about. Or Pepsi. I did not mean to pick.
Senator AKAKA. Madam Secretary, the Departments budget requests $7.3 million for security costs for the Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) summit. This national security special event
will take place in November in my home State of Hawaii and includes earlier events in Montana and California as well. The summit requires extensive coordination between Federal, State, and
local officials to protect President Obama and other world leaders
attending. Please discuss why these funds are necessary to enable
the Secret Service to fulfill its responsibilities.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, thank you, Senator Akaka. We requested those monies because of the importance of the summit, because of the protection issues that it entails. The money is based
on estimates from other similar type events where you have groups
of international leaders combining in one place. We want to make
sure safety and security is taken care of and is done very smoothly,
is done in cooperation with the State and local entities, and that
everybody can rest assured that that part of the summit has been
taken care of, as I said. So the actual money request is based in
part on our experience with other similar events.
Senator AKAKA. Madam Secretary, in its budget submission, the
Department proposed pay and retirement changes for certain CBP
employees. However, draft language to make these changes has not
been provided to this Committee. I have focused on pay and retirement issues as Chairman of the Federal Workforce Subcommittee.
In the months ahead, will you pledge to work closely with your authorizing committees on your proposal?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Absolutely, Senator, and part of this is
our process, and it goes to something Senator Portman referenced,
is from a management perspective, how you unit all these disparate pay systems that we have as well. And one of the big
changes that the Congress approved last year was the conversion
or the eligibility to journeyman pay in CBP. And so part of what
you are seeing is that conversion over and now streamlining how
we are organizing pay, whereas, before ICE and CBP were treated
very differently, trying to harmonize all those systems. So we will
look to working with your Committee on that. But that is the underlying purpose.
Senator AKAKA. Madam Secretary, our focus today is, of course,
the fiscal year 2012 budget, but I want to ask you about the fiscal
year 2011 continuing resolution (CR) the House is considering.
While I support responsible and targeted reductions to address our
budget deficit, I am troubled by draconian cuts that would harm
job growth and may hamper the governments ability to keep this
country safe.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00029

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

26
How would the proposed cuts in the continuing resolution put
forth by House Republicans affect the Departments mission?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, it is not good, and, of course, it is
a moving target. So changes are being made even as we speak. But
it cuts technology investments that we need for both borders,
Southern and Northern. It cuts new technology for airports that we
need to make sure that individuals who are trying to move explosives onto planes are not able to do that. It cuts cybersecurity,
which is a very important area that we have large responsibilities
for. It cuts the intelligence personnel for the fusion centers and for
State and locals that I referenced earlier as part of the architecture
that we need to have. And it cuts grants to state and locals. Now,
one amendment restored some of those grants this morning, I understand, but not the bulk of them. So that is just a few of the
things that the House CR would do.
Senator AKAKA. Thank you very much for your responses. Thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thanks, Senator Akaka.
If your time allows, we will do one more round of a couple of
questions each. We will do it with a maximum of 7 minutes.
Let me ask you about two items relating to DHS that were on
the GAOs high-risk list yesterday. One was what I would describe
as cybersecurity, governments efforts to protect Federal systems
and critical infrastructure. As you know, cybersecurity legislation
is a top priority for this Committee. Senator Harry Reid has made
it a top priority. Senator Collins and I are working on reintroducing the bill that we introduced last year.
It is very important to note, as you have, that the Presidents
budget before us now proposes increasing the Departments, your
Departments cybersecurity funding by 17 percent, a very sizable
increase in these times, but in my opinion definitely a necessary increase. And to the extent that you can in open session, I wanted
to ask you to spend a minute or two just describing what that increase in funding will enable the Department to do that you are
not doing now to protect our cyber systems.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, it will enable us to deploy EINSTEIN 3, which is the name for the new protection and prevention
of intrusion technology across the Federal family, including the medium and smaller sized agencies. Without the money, we will not
be able to do that. That is probably the most important thing.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. OK.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I think the second thing is that it will enable us to continue to expand the cybersecurity workforce. We are
pretty bare bones on that now. It is difficult to bring cyber experts
into the Federal Government, much less into a new Department.
But we have been given direct hiring authority by the Office of Personnel Management, and we are making some headway there. But
we want to make sure we have the resources for that full time
equivalent employee.
Then the third thing is that it will enable us to strengthen the
obligations we have undertaken pursuant to the memorandum of
understanding we forged with the Department of Defense this summer on how we each can use the technological resources of the National Security Agency (NSA).

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00030

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

27
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Well, we will follow that. Obviously, this
Committee, Senator Collins, and I are very focused on strengthening the Departments role as the lead agency for protecting Federal Government non-defense Web sites and the critical private infrastructure.
I received a note that you have to leave at 4:30, so let me
ask
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I think I have a meeting at the White
House with
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Do you think that is more important?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. No, never.
Senator COLLINS. The old White House excuse. [Laughter.]
Secretary NAPOLITANO. And I will be glad to come back.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. That is OK. So you have a number of programs focusing on assisting critical infrastructure owners in identifying and remediating cybersecurity risks. But they proportionally
receive a lot less funding, those programs, than the ones focused
on protecting the Federal Government Web sites in cyber space.
Do you have enough to do what you need to do in that area since
so much of our critical infrastructure is in private hands?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. It is, but it also is getting resources from
the private sector. The operators, for example, of the grids know
the operators of our financial institutions, the big critical infrastructure institutions, as we all know, are so important to us and
potentially subject to cyber attack. They are putting resources into
this as well. We are working closely with them. But this is going
to be a multi-year and it is probably going to be an ongoing type
of expenditure that we have. And I think where we were
prioritizing is where we think we need to start and where we have
the greatest need, and that is, making sure that the Federal Government itself is protected.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. And the note has now been amended to
say you have to be at the White House at 4:30. I am going to wrap
up and give my colleagues
Secretary NAPOLITANO. We have to leave at 4:30.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Well, I am much relieved.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I will try to keep my answers shorter.
Chairman LIEBERMAN Rather than ask you another question, I
am going to end with an appeal. The second item on the GAO I
was going to talk about, the high-risk report, is implementing and
transforming the Department of Homeland Security. It has been on
the high-risk list since the beginning, since 2003, remains there in
this new report, although GAO says the Department has made
progress in the last years toward an improvement in the management and integration of the Department. I want to set a joint goal
with you that, as we approach the 10th anniversary of at least September 11, 2001, that we work together to see if we can get you
off the list next year.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I am with you.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you. Senator Collins.
Senator COLLINS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am mindful of the
fact that Senator McCaskill is here and undoubtedly has very
tough questions, so I am going to submit most of mine for the
record, but I do want to ask you one question about the Coast

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00031

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

28
Guard, which, as you know from our conversations, I am very concerned about whether the Coast Guard has the assets for its very
important maritime security role which has been so critical since
September 11, 2001. And the plan is to replace 12 high endurance
cutters with only eight National Security Cutters. And the problem
is that, as I understand the budget request, it provides no funding
for the sixth National Security Cutter and pushes the completion
date for all eight from 2016 to 2018.
I am told that every 1-year delay in the acquisition program increases the cost per cutter by $45 to $60 million. So if this plan
goes through, it is going to cost $180 million more than it would
if you stayed on schedule. And we see this in navy shipbuilding all
the time, that when you push off the acquisition, you end up paying more.
It strikes me that this was a short-term decision that buys you
some budget relief this year but ends up costing more in the long
run.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. I would disagree, Senator, and I will tell
you what we did. The budget does pay for some of the after-acquisition costs associated with number five, and so that is all paid for
by 2012.
What we did not do was set aside for 2012 what are called the
long lead time expenses for number six, and the reason we did not
do that is because, while we fully intend to build them and we fully
intend to build them on the current scheduleand the schedule
has been pushed back not by money as much as it is just taking
longer to build these things than was originally predicted. But the
reason we did not set aside the long lead material is that there was
no way it was going to be spent in fiscal year 2012. So rather than
spending it on long lead material and just parking it, we decided
we would rather buy more response boats and smaller boats, as I
described in my opening statement.
So we put the money there. OMB has issued a letter saying that
we intend to fund number six, so if there is any hesitancy by the
contractor, they have us and OMB all saying we intend to fund
number six, but we are not going to simply park that precious fiscal year 2012 dollar. So you have extra assurance that we are going
to do that.
Senator COLLINS. Well, I am glad to hear that. I still think a 2year delay in the overall acquisition is going to end up costing us
more, but that is a discussion we can continue.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, and if I might Senator?
Senator COLLINS. Yes.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. It is not a delay caused by this. It is that
the construction of these cutters has becometheir missions have
expanded, and so their actual construction is taking longer than
was originally predicted.
Senator COLLINS. Thank you. I am going to submit the rest of my
questions.
I regret we did not get into air cargo security given the Yemen
package plot. There are so many issues. But I do want to allow
time for questions.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Thank you, Senator Collins. Senator
McCaskill.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00032

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

29
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR MCCASKILL

Senator MCCASKILL. Thank you both, Chairman Lieberman and

Ranking Member Collins.
Let me start with how excited I get when I see an Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) machine.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Or when it sees you?
Senator MCCASKILL. Yes, because that means I get to go through
fairly quickly because I have an artificial knee, and so I have to
be patted down everywhere there is not an AIT machine. So I am
always disappointed when I see it approaching in an airportand
I have been in four different major airports in the last 6 weeks,
and then I see the little tape in front of it, and I realize it is not
operable. And so I have now started asking every time as these
machines are sitting idle, and without fail, Madam Secretary, I ask
for the supervisor. I am always very polite and tell them what a
great job they are doing and how friendly they are and how efficient they are. But why isnt the machine operating? And they always say, We do not have the personnel.
In fact, the supervisor in Miami actually said to me, Can you
help us? We never have personnel to operate it because it takes too
many people, and we just do not have enough people here.
One supervisor told me it took seven people to operate it. Another one said it took five. I am confused why we would be spending money on deploying these machines, and I look and there
seems to be an inconsistency in the numbers, because at one point
it says 6.25 people to operate one of them, and then in your budget
request it looks like it is 2.5. So I am confused as to how many people it takes to operate the AITs, and we should not deploy them
if we cannot run them, right?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, first of all, it does not take two. It
takes more than six because it is not just the machine. It is the
people who are reviewing the screens. Sometimes they are not operable because the machines are installed while they are still building out the area for where the actual images are going to be
screened, and a lot of this differs airport by airport.
I will get for you the list because typically when they are installed, it comes with it, the training for the personnel in how to
operate and screen via the AIT. And, quite frankly, you are the
first person that has ever raised this with me. So I think overall
the transition has been going very well. So we are going to have
to follow up with you on the specifics.
Senator MCCASKILL. That would be great. I assumed it was an
isolated event because it happened to me a couple times in St.
Louis in the Southwest terminal because we do not have them in
the concourse. My typical concourse is American in the other terminal. And so a couple of times I went out of my way, and they
said, No, it is not that they are not trained. They just do not have
enough manpower on the floor at any given moment. And none of
these had a problem with operability in terms of buildout. They all
just said, We do not have enough people on shifts to operate
them.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, that may be a different issue, so let
us look into that.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00033

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

30
Senator MCCASKILL. Yes. I think that is the theme I am hearing
from people, that they are not able to manage the shift power to
make them work. So we will stay with that and talk and figure
that out.
I know you have made a real effort about the contractors. I know
you have. And I know that you identified 3,500 contractor positions
last year that you are converting to Federal positions. Can you tell
us if there has been cost savings from the conversions from contractor personnel to Federal personnel?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, and we can give you some numbers,
but there have been cost savings, and we are this year accelerating
that conversion because as contracts come up, we can review and
not renew. So I will get you some actual numbers, but when this
Department was established, just because of the various mission
sets it had and just the business of standing up a department, it
had to rely a lot on outsiders to help. But as we mature, then we
can start reducing that, and we are being very aggressive about
that effort.
Senator MCCASKILL. Well, the cost savings is really important,
frankly, I do not have anything against contractors. I just want to
make sure that they are saving us money if we are using them.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Right.
Senator MCCASKILL. So if we are saving money by converting, I
would be thrilled to hear about that. And I bet we are.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, we are, and in someit is not just
saving money. It is, Are they doing work that we can do with our
own folks?
Senator MCCASKILL. Right. I know you also did an efficiency review that you initiated in March 2009. My staff has attended many
if not all of the budget briefings that you presented this week about
the various components. It is clear from those presentations that
your 2012 budget request, that cuts were made. Can you identify
the areas where the efficiency review has provided the savings to
the Department? Because I would like to carry this message to
other departments and tell them that there really is savings that
can be realized by this kind of effort.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Contracting, acquisition, procurement,
on-boardingi.e., vetting and identifyingalso simple office expenses that when you extrapolate to a large department save a lot
of money. There are several others. We have a whole briefing just
on this that we can provide for you. The contractor conversion
saves money and will save more money over time.
Senator MCCASKILL. Right.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. So we have identified in this budget $800
million or so, and that is a lot.
Senator MCCASKILL. That is a lot; $800 million is a lot.
Finally, I know you have to go, but I wanted to ask youlast
year, Senator Chuck Schumer and I were successful in getting
some legislation passed that provided for additional Border Patrol
personnel. It is my understanding that the House in its action yesterday on the CR, or the day before, has cut a lot of that money
that we identified as additional resources to be brought to the border.

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00034

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

31
I have to tell you, I get whiplash sometimes around here. I listen
to sanctimonious speeches about more resources for border security
that is the only thing that we must focus on, securing our border
as it relates to all the immigration issues in our country. And then
5 minutes later, the same people that are giving the sanctimonious
speeches are yanking out the money in the budget that we need to
secure the border.
I assume that what they did yesterday basically wiped out what
we were able to add to this effort last year?
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Yes, it was an experience in whiplash.
Senator MCCASKILL. Yes. I just think we have to call folks on
this. I am sick of hearing lectures about border security and people
not being willing to put the resources behind it. This is nobodys
responsibility but the Federal Governments. We could probably afford to pull back a little bit of the big checks we are writing to the
oil companies to secure our borders. And I would like someone to
get that set of priorities straight and say, maybe we give a billion
less to the oil companies this year. Maybe they will not be the most
profitable corporations on the planet, but almost the most profitable corporations on the planet, and we actually put real resources
into securing the border.
But I for one am sick of hearing them talk about it if they are
not going to put their money where their mouth is, and I wanted
to get that out of my system, and I knew that you would let me.
Thank you, as always, for the great work you are doing. I think
you are a shining star in the Administration and doing very good
work. And I want you to stay on those contractors.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. All right. Thank you.
Senator MCCASKILL. Thank you, Madam Secretary.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. I cannot top shining star. [Laughter.]
I think you are good. Anyway, thanks, Secretary Napolitano.
What we have tried to do after these hearings is to sit and reason
ourselves, we will talk to you and your folks, and then make recommendations to the Budget Committee and the Appropriations
Committee as we go through the process. But thanks for your time,
and good luck on the trip to the White House.
Secretary NAPOLITANO. Well, thank you, and I think the Appropriations Subcommittee hearing is March 2, so we have some time
to work together.
Chairman LIEBERMAN. Excellent. We will keep the record of the
hearing open for 15 days for additional questions and statements.
The hearing is adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 4:30 p.m., the Committee was adjourned.]

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00035

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 6633

Sfmt 6633

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

APPENDIX

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.001

(33)

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.002

34

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.003

35

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.004

36

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.005

37

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.006

38

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00043

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.007

39

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00044

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.008

40

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.009

41

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00046

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.010

42

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00047

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.011

43

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00048

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.012

44

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.013

45

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.014

46

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.015

47

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.016

48

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00053

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.017

49

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00054

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.018

50

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00055

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.019

51

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00056

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.020

52

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.021

53

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.022

54

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.023

55

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.024

56

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00061

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.025

57

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00062

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.026

58

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00063

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.027

59

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.028

60

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.029

61

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00066

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.030

62

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00067

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.031

63

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00068

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.032

64

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00069

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.033

65

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00070

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.034

66

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00071

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.035

67

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00072

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.036

68

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00073

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.037

69

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00074

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.038

70

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00075

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.039

71

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00076

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.040

72

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00077

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.041

73

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00078

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.042

74

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00079

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.043

75

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00080

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.044

76

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00081

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.045

77

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00082

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.046

78

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.047

79

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.048

80

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00085

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.049

81

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00086

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.050

82

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00087

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.051

83

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00088

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.052

84

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00089

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.053

85

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00090

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.054

86

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00091

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.055

87

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00092

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.056

88

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00093

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.057

89

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00094

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.058

90

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00095

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.059

91

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00096

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.060

92

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00097

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.061

93

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00098

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.062

94

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00099

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.063

95

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00100

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.064

96

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00101

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.065

97

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00102

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.066

98

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00103

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.067

99

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00104

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.068

100

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00105

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.069

101

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00106

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.070

102

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00107

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.071

103

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00108

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.072

104

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00109

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.073

105

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00110

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.074

106

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00111

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.075

107

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00112

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.076

108

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00113

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.077

109

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00114

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.078

110

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00115

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.079

111

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00116

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.080

112

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00117

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.081

113

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00118

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.082

114

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00119

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.083

115

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00120

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.084

116

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00121

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.085

117

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00122

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.086

118

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00123

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.087

119

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00124

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.088

120

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00125

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.089

121

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00126

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.090

122

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00127

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.091

123

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00128

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.092

124

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00129

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.093

125

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00130

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.094

126

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00131

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.095

127

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00132

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.096

128

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00133

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.097

129

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00134

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.098

130

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00135

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.099

131

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00136

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.100

132

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00137

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.101

133

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00138

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.102

134

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00139

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.103

135

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00140

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.104

136

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00141

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.105

137

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00142

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.106

138

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00143

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.107

139

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00144

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.108

140

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00145

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.109

141

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00146

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.110

142

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00147

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.111

143

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00148

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.112

144

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00149

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.113

145

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00150

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.114

146

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00151

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.115

147

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00152

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.116

148

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00153

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.117

149

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00154

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.118

150

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00155

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.119

151

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00156

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.120

152

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00157

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.121

153

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00158

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.122

154

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00159

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.123

155

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00160

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.124

156

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00161

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.125

157

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00162

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.126

158

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00163

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.127

159

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00164

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.128

160

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00165

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.129

161

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00166

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.130

162

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00167

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.131

163

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00168

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.132

164

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00169

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.133

165

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00170

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.134

166

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00171

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.135

167

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00172

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.136

168

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00173

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.137

169

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00174

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.138

170

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00175

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.139

171

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00176

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.140

172

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00177

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.141

173

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00178

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.142

174

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00179

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.143

175

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00180

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.144

176

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00181

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.145

177

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00182

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.146

178

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00183

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.147

179

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00184

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.148

180

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00185

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.149

181

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00186

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.150

182

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00187

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.151

183

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00188

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.152

184

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00189

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.153

185

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00190

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.154

186

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00191

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.155

187

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00192

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.156

188

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00193

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.157

189

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00194

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.158

190

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00195

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.159

191

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00196

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.160

192

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00197

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.161

193

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00198

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.162

194

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00199

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.163

195

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00200

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.164

196

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00201

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.165

197

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00202

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.166

198

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00203

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.167

199

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00204

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.168

200

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00205

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.169

201

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00206

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.170

202

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00207

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.171

203

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00208

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.172

204

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00209

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.173

205

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00210

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.174

206

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00211

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.175

207

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00212

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.176

208

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00213

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.177

209

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00214

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.178

210

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00215

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.179

211

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00216

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.180

212

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00217

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.181

213

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00218

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.182

214

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00219

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.183

215

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00220

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.184

216

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00221

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.185

217

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00222

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.186

218

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00223

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.187

219

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00224

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.188

220

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00225

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.189

221

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00226

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.190

222

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00227

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.191

223

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00228

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.192

224

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00229

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.193

225

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00230

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.194

226

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00231

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.195

227

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00232

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.196

228

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00233

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.197

229

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00234

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.198

230

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00235

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.199

231

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00236

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.200

232

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00237

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.201

233

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00238

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.202

234

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00239

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.203

235

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00240

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.204

236

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00241

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.205

237

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00242

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.206

238

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00243

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.207

239

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00244

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.208

240

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00245

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.209

241

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00246

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.210

242

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00247

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.211

243

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00248

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.212

244

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00249

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.213

245

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00250

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.214

246

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00251

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.215

247

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00252

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.216

248

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00253

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.217

249

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00254

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.218

250

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00255

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.219

251

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00256

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.220

252

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00257

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.221

253

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00258

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.222

254

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00259

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.223

255

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00260

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.224

256

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00261

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.225

257

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00262

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.226

258

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00263

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.227

259

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00264

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.228

260

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00265

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.229

261

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00266

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.230

262

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00267

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.231

263

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00268

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.232

264

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00269

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.233

265

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00270

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.234

266

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00271

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.235

267

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00272

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.236

268

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00273

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.237

269

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00274

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.238

270

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00275

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.239

271

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00276

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.240

272

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00277

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.241

273

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00278

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.242

274

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00279

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.243

275

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00280

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.244

276

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00281

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.245

277

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00282

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.246

278

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00283

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.247

279

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00284

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.248

280

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00285

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.249

281

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00286

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.250

282

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00287

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.251

283

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00288

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.252

284

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00289

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.253

285

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00290

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.254

286

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00291

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.255

287

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00292

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.256

288

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00293

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.257

289

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00294

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.258

290

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00295

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6601

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.259

291

292

VerDate Nov 24 2008

13:42 Jan 24, 2012

Jkt 066623

PO 00000

Frm 00296

Fmt 6601

Sfmt 6011

P:\DOCS\66623.TXT

SAFFAIRS

PsN: PAT

66623.260