Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates
Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates
Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates
I DENTS OF
IA 'I'!!:NT
ROBEH.T
PRINTS
BCI
CASE NO.
79-10030
YOUNG :
2 idents - right micdle fin [!e rprint and right ring fingerprint
of Robert Young
marked Door to ;i :Lctims Bedroom.
marked
l ident
Red
i"t~rror.
-----
2 idents - l eft ring fingerurint and left little finge rprint of Hobert Your
marked from Hoover Vacu:.1me
3 idents - left pabJ print of Rob ert Young marlced ioTall next to doorway
by light switch.
l
j
I DSNTS
01-'
SUSAl\1
PAHHALEE
'
.!
..1
red
mirror .
OF
VICTIH
ELEZA.Bb'TH
\JELlS
ANDES
of victim
LA1.'i:NT
~-.
PHIN'~~;
\rlHICH
v/EP.J;
NOT
IDI:NTIFH;D.
bedrcom
dres:.;er
1
l
IDENTIFIED
IA TENT
PRINTS
BCI
CASE NO.
79-10030
----
2 idents .. left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint of Robert Young
marked from Hoover Vacuume
3 idents - left palm print of Robert Young marked wall next to doorway
by light switch.
red
mirror.
---------- - ----- - -------- -- --------~ ----- ----~- -~ ---------- - ---- --- ---- - --
!DiNTS
OF
VICTIM
ELEZABErH WELLS
ANDES
L ident ... right thu!llb print of victim marked bath room hot water knob.
1 ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaseline jar.
LA.'l'ENT PRINTS
~
v.JHICH v!ERE
NOT
IDENTIFIED.
IDENTIFIED
1A TENT
PRIMTS
7910030
---
2 idents left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint o! Robert Younc
~arked from Hoover Vaouume
3 identa left palm print of Robert. Young marked wall neat to dGONq
by light ewitah.
--~-~~~-----~-------------~---------------~-~~~---~~~~~~----~----~----~-----
IDEN7S
OF SUSAN
PARMALEE
IDmTS
OF
,.
VICTIM
ELEZABF:l'H WELlS
~--~--
-----
...
ANDES
J. ident - right thumb print o! victim 1118l"ked bath room hot water knob.
l ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaaeline jar.
Q~i)
,. .
LA'l'ENT PRIN':'S
~:
l atent
irJHICH
VTEHE
NOT
ID~N1'IF'Il:D .
1
1
BCI-29(1'1 -78)
'
CASENO.
POSITIVE
----~7~9~-1~0~0~3~0__________
five (5) partial latent palm print(s} with sufficient ridge detail
The latent prints were compared with the inked -~X~XXX~- fingerprints and/or -~XX=XX~-- palm
prints of the above subject(s). The results revealed
fingerprint with the right thumb print of Susan Parmalee , the identific at i on of
two (2) latent fingerprints with t he right thumb print and left i ndex finger print
of
with the right thumb print, right middle firlgerprint, right ring fingerprint, l eft rir
fingerprint and l eft little fingerprint of
Three (3) latent pamm prints
~nth
_ _ _ The unidentified latent prints will be placed in SCI's files for comparison with any
subject(~)
your
____ No inked palm print(s) of - - - - - - - - - - were available for comparison with the above
impressions.
_ _ _ The evidence will be retained by BCI pending notification of disposition.
The evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - on - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ The evidence will be turned over to t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section for further examination.
David Nibert
Technician
1/ 22/79
Date
NEGATIVE
CASE NO.
Items to be listed : - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - -
_ _ _ An examinat io n of the above evidence failed t o reveal any latent prints t hat contained sufficient ridge
detail to be used f or a latent print comparison.
_ _ _ The latent print(s) in the above case were compared with the i n k e d - - - - - fingerprints and/or
- - - - - - - p a l m prints of the named subject(s). The results did not reveal an identification.
_ _ _ The above evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - on
Technician
Date