Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

IDENTIF'IED

I DENTS OF

IA 'I'!!:NT

ROBEH.T

PRINTS

BCI

CASE NO.

79-10030

YOUNG :

2 idents - right micdle fin [!e rprint and right ring fingerprint
of Robert Young
marked Door to ;i :Lctims Bedroom.
marked

l ident

Harked living Room

- right thumb print of Hobert Young


next to front door.

Red

i"t~rror.

2 idents - right thumb prinL of Hobert Young

-----

2 idents - l eft ring fingerurint and left little finge rprint of Hobert Your
marked from Hoover Vacu:.1me
3 idents - left pabJ print of Rob ert Young marlced ioTall next to doorway
by light switch.

l
j

I DSNTS

01-'

SUSAl\1

PAHHALEE

1 ident - right thumb print of Susan Parmalee marked

'

.!

..1

red

mirror .

------- -- --- -- ----------------------~----------------------------------- ~- -~


ID~TS

OF

VICTIH

ELEZA.Bb'TH

\JELlS

L ici.e nt - ri ght t.hu1lb print

ANDES

of victim

marked bath r oom hot '\-Tater knob

1 ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaseline jar.

LA1.'i:NT
~-.

PHIN'~~;

\rlHICH

v/EP.J;

NOT

IDI:NTIFH;D.

latent fingerprints---..J.t./all behind door to Victim 1 s BP.droom

3 latent fint_;orprints ----Victims

bedrcom

dres:.;er

water color set tool boxo

1
l

latent palm rrint----Hall behiod door to victim'~ bedroom.


latent palm print----1ht.selcne jar ne~t. to radio in victimt;, bedroom.

IDENTIFIED

IA TENT

PRINTS

BCI

CASE NO.

79-10030

IDENTS OF ROBERT YOUNG:


2 idents - right middle fingerprint and right ring fingerprint
---- --orRooer--c-y oung ------marked ----m>or -t:o Victims-- Beare> om;-
2 idents - right thumb print of Robert Young marked Red Mirror.
l ident - right thumb print of Robert Young Marked Living Room
next to front door.

----

2 idents .. left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint of Robert Young
marked from Hoover Vacuume
3 idents - left palm print of Robert Young marked wall next to doorway
by light switch.

""----------------------------------------------------------------------------!DENTS OF SUSAN PARMALEE


l. ident - right thurn.b print of Susan Parmalee marked

red

mirror.

---------- - ----- - -------- -- --------~ ----- ----~- -~ ---------- - ---- --- ---- - --

!DiNTS

OF

VICTIM

ELEZABErH WELLS

ANDES

L ident ... right thu!llb print of victim marked bath room hot water knob.
1 ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaseline jar.

LA.'l'ENT PRINTS
~

v.JHICH v!ERE

NOT

l atent fingerprints-- - -Wall behind door to Victim1 s Bedroom

3 latent fingerprints ----Victims


1 water color set t ool box.
1
1

IDENTIFIED.

bedroom dres ser

latent palm print----Wall behind door to victim's bedroom.


l at ent palm print----Vaselene jar ne ~t to radio in victim' s bedroom .

IDENTIFIED

1A TENT

PRIMTS

BOI CASE tiO.

7910030

IDEN!S OF ROBERT YOUNG:


2 idents - right middle fingerprint and right ring fingerprint
of Robert Young marked Door to Vi utima !edroom.
2 idents right thwnb print of Robert Young

maricecl Red Mirror.


1 ident ... right tnulllb print of Robert Young M~ecl LiVing RooDl
next to front doer.

---

2 idents left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint o! Robert Younc
~arked from Hoover Vaouume
3 identa left palm print of Robert. Young marked wall neat to dGONq
by light ewitah.
--~-~~~-----~-------------~---------------~-~~~---~~~~~~----~----~----~-----

IDEN7S

OF SUSAN

PARMALEE

J. ident - right thumb print of Suaan Parmalee marked red mirrctr

...... ..------..--..... ..---------------------------------------.----...


~--

IDmTS

OF

,.

VICTIM

ELEZABF:l'H WELlS

~--~--

-----

...

ANDES

J. ident - right thumb print o! victim 1118l"ked bath room hot water knob.
l ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaaeline jar.

Q~i)

,. .
LA'l'ENT PRIN':'S
~:

l atent

irJHICH

VTEHE

NOT

fingerprint~; --- ~ial l

ID~N1'IF'Il:D .

behind door to Victim s Bedroom

3 latent fingerprints ----Victims bedroom dres3cr


1

Hat.er color set tool box.

1
1

latent palm print ----Hall behind door to victim' fj bedroom .


latent palm print ----lfaselcne jar ne~. to radio i.n victim 1 s bedrocm .

BCI-29(1'1 -78)

'

LATENT PRINTS ROUGH DRAFT REPORT

CASENO.

POSITIVE

----~7~9~-1~0~0~3~0__________

Iterns to be listed: _ __:#:___2_2-L,--.:#~3..:..


6L.,...::#~L.::.LL.,...::#:....-=L..:..tl__:a:.:.: .n:.:. :.d....:#~L:.:.9-=--------------XXXXX The above evidence has been examined. As a result of this examination, we found __ sixte e n (16)

partial latent fingerp rint(s} and/ or

five (5) partial latent palm print(s} with sufficient ridge detail

to.be used for.a la.t e.nt print comparison.


XXXX

The latent prints were compared with the inked -~X~XXX~- fingerprints and/or -~XX=XX~-- palm
prints of the above subject(s). The results revealed

the ~dentific ation of one (l) latent

fingerprint with the right thumb print of Susan Parmalee , the identific at i on of
two (2) latent fingerprints with t he right thumb print and left i ndex finger print
of

Elizabeth W. Andes , Victim and the identification of seven latent fingerprints

with the right thumb print, right middle firlgerprint, right ring fingerprint, l eft rir
fingerprint and l eft little fingerprint of
Three (3) latent pamm prints

~nth

Robert Young and the identification of

the left palm print of Robert Young.

_ _ _ The unidentified latent prints will be placed in SCI's files for comparison with any

subject(~)

your

department might submit.


_ _ _ A search of our master name file by the Record Section failed to reveal any fingerprints o n - - - - -

____ No inked palm print(s) of - - - - - - - - - - were available for comparison with the above
impressions.
_ _ _ The evidence will be retained by BCI pending notification of disposition.
The evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - on - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ The evidence will be turned over to t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section for further examination.

David Nibert
Technician

1/ 22/79
Date

BCI -29( 11 -78)

LATENT PRINTS ROUGH DRAFT REPORT

NEGATIVE

CASE NO.

Items to be listed : - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - -

_ _ _ An examinat io n of the above evidence failed t o reveal any latent prints t hat contained sufficient ridge
detail to be used f or a latent print comparison.
_ _ _ The latent print(s) in the above case were compared with the i n k e d - - - - - fingerprints and/or
- - - - - - - p a l m prints of the named subject(s). The results did not reveal an identification.
_ _ _ The above evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - on

No inked palm prints o f - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - were available f or


comparison with the above impressions.

_ _ _ The evidence may be p icked up by your department, preferably withi n 30 days.

_ _ _ The evidence wi ll be t urned ove r to t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section for further examination.


A search of our master name file by the Record Section failed to reveal any fingerprints o n - - - --

Technician

Date

You might also like