Scribd
Upload
9K views

Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates

The latent print examination report summarizes the analysis of fingerprints and palm prints from a criminal case. Sixteen partial latent fingerprints and five partial latent palm prints were identified. One latent fingerprint matched Susan Parmalee's right thumb print. Two latent fingerprints matched the victim Elizabeth Andes' right thumb print and left index fingerprint. Seven latent fingerprints matched Robert Young's right thumb, right middle, right ring, left ring and left little fingerprints. Three latent palm prints matched Robert Young's left palm print. The unidentified prints will remain on file for future comparison.

Uploaded by

CincinnatiEnquirer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9K views

Fingerprint Analysis Summary and Duplicates

The latent print examination report summarizes the analysis of fingerprints and palm prints from a criminal case. Sixteen partial latent fingerprints and five partial latent palm prints were identified. One latent fingerprint matched Susan Parmalee's right thumb print. Two latent fingerprints matched the victim Elizabeth Andes' right thumb print and left index fingerprint. Seven latent fingerprints matched Robert Young's right thumb, right middle, right ring, left ring and left little fingerprints. Three latent palm prints matched Robert Young's left palm print. The unidentified prints will remain on file for future comparison.

Uploaded by

CincinnatiEnquirer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

IDENTIF'IED

I DENTS OF

IA 'I'!!:NT

ROBEH.T

PRINTS

BCI

CASE NO.

79-10030

YOUNG :

2 idents - right micdle fin [!e rprint and right ring fingerprint
of Robert Young
marked Door to ;i :Lctims Bedroom.
marked

l ident

Harked living Room

- right thumb print of Hobert Young


next to front door.

Red

i"t~rror.

2 idents - right thumb prinL of Hobert Young

-----

2 idents - l eft ring fingerurint and left little finge rprint of Hobert Your
marked from Hoover Vacu:.1me
3 idents - left pabJ print of Rob ert Young marlced ioTall next to doorway
by light switch.

l
j

I DSNTS

01-'

SUSAl\1

PAHHALEE

1 ident - right thumb print of Susan Parmalee marked

'

.!

..1

red

mirror .

------- -- --- -- ----------------------~----------------------------------- ~- -~


ID~TS

OF

VICTIH

ELEZA.Bb'TH

\JELlS

L ici.e nt - ri ght t.hu1lb print

ANDES

of victim

marked bath r oom hot '\-Tater knob

1 ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaseline jar.

LA1.'i:NT
~-.

PHIN'~~;

\rlHICH

v/EP.J;

NOT

IDI:NTIFH;D.

latent fingerprints---..J.t./all behind door to Victim 1 s BP.droom

3 latent fint_;orprints ----Victims

bedrcom

dres:.;er

water color set tool boxo

1
l

latent palm rrint----Hall behiod door to victim'~ bedroom.


latent palm print----1ht.selcne jar ne~t. to radio in victimt;, bedroom.

IDENTIFIED

IA TENT

PRINTS

BCI

CASE NO.

79-10030

IDENTS OF ROBERT YOUNG:


2 idents - right middle fingerprint and right ring fingerprint
---- --orRooer--c-y oung ------marked ----m>or -t:o Victims-- Beare> om;-
2 idents - right thumb print of Robert Young marked Red Mirror.
l ident - right thumb print of Robert Young Marked Living Room
next to front door.

----

2 idents .. left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint of Robert Young
marked from Hoover Vacuume
3 idents - left palm print of Robert Young marked wall next to doorway
by light switch.

""----------------------------------------------------------------------------!DENTS OF SUSAN PARMALEE


l. ident - right thurn.b print of Susan Parmalee marked

red

mirror.

---------- - ----- - -------- -- --------~ ----- ----~- -~ ---------- - ---- --- ---- - --

!DiNTS

OF

VICTIM

ELEZABErH WELLS

ANDES

L ident ... right thu!llb print of victim marked bath room hot water knob.
1 ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaseline jar.

LA.'l'ENT PRINTS
~

v.JHICH v!ERE

NOT

l atent fingerprints-- - -Wall behind door to Victim1 s Bedroom

3 latent fingerprints ----Victims


1 water color set t ool box.
1
1

IDENTIFIED.

bedroom dres ser

latent palm print----Wall behind door to victim's bedroom.


l at ent palm print----Vaselene jar ne ~t to radio in victim' s bedroom .

IDENTIFIED

1A TENT

PRIMTS

BOI CASE tiO.

7910030

IDEN!S OF ROBERT YOUNG:


2 idents - right middle fingerprint and right ring fingerprint
of Robert Young marked Door to Vi utima !edroom.
2 idents right thwnb print of Robert Young

maricecl Red Mirror.


1 ident ... right tnulllb print of Robert Young M~ecl LiVing RooDl
next to front doer.

---

2 idents left ring fingerprint and left little fingerprint o! Robert Younc
~arked from Hoover Vaouume
3 identa left palm print of Robert. Young marked wall neat to dGONq
by light ewitah.
--~-~~~-----~-------------~---------------~-~~~---~~~~~~----~----~----~-----

IDEN7S

OF SUSAN

PARMALEE

J. ident - right thumb print of Suaan Parmalee marked red mirrctr

...... ..------..--..... ..---------------------------------------.----...


~--

IDmTS

OF

,.

VICTIM

ELEZABF:l'H WELlS

~--~--

-----

...

ANDES

J. ident - right thumb print o! victim 1118l"ked bath room hot water knob.
l ident - left index fingerprint of victim marked vaaeline jar.

Q~i)

,. .
LA'l'ENT PRIN':'S
~:

l atent

irJHICH

VTEHE

NOT

fingerprint~; --- ~ial l

ID~N1'IF'Il:D .

behind door to Victim s Bedroom

3 latent fingerprints ----Victims bedroom dres3cr


1

Hat.er color set tool box.

1
1

latent palm print ----Hall behind door to victim' fj bedroom .


latent palm print ----lfaselcne jar ne~. to radio i.n victim 1 s bedrocm .

BCI-29(1'1 -78)

'

LATENT PRINTS ROUGH DRAFT REPORT

CASENO.

POSITIVE

----~7~9~-1~0~0~3~0__________

Iterns to be listed: _ __:#:___2_2-L,--.:#~3..:..


6L.,...::#~L.::.LL.,...::#:....-=L..:..tl__:a:.:.: .n:.:. :.d....:#~L:.:.9-=--------------XXXXX The above evidence has been examined. As a result of this examination, we found __ sixte e n (16)

partial latent fingerp rint(s} and/ or

five (5) partial latent palm print(s} with sufficient ridge detail

to.be used for.a la.t e.nt print comparison.


XXXX

The latent prints were compared with the inked -~X~XXX~- fingerprints and/or -~XX=XX~-- palm
prints of the above subject(s). The results revealed

the ~dentific ation of one (l) latent

fingerprint with the right thumb print of Susan Parmalee , the identific at i on of
two (2) latent fingerprints with t he right thumb print and left i ndex finger print
of

Elizabeth W. Andes , Victim and the identification of seven latent fingerprints

with the right thumb print, right middle firlgerprint, right ring fingerprint, l eft rir
fingerprint and l eft little fingerprint of
Three (3) latent pamm prints

~nth

Robert Young and the identification of

the left palm print of Robert Young.

_ _ _ The unidentified latent prints will be placed in SCI's files for comparison with any

subject(~)

your

department might submit.


_ _ _ A search of our master name file by the Record Section failed to reveal any fingerprints o n - - - - -

____ No inked palm print(s) of - - - - - - - - - - were available for comparison with the above
impressions.
_ _ _ The evidence will be retained by BCI pending notification of disposition.
The evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - on - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ The evidence will be turned over to t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section for further examination.

David Nibert
Technician

1/ 22/79
Date

BCI -29( 11 -78)

LATENT PRINTS ROUGH DRAFT REPORT

NEGATIVE

CASE NO.

Items to be listed : - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - -

_ _ _ An examinat io n of the above evidence failed t o reveal any latent prints t hat contained sufficient ridge
detail to be used f or a latent print comparison.
_ _ _ The latent print(s) in the above case were compared with the i n k e d - - - - - fingerprints and/or
- - - - - - - p a l m prints of the named subject(s). The results did not reveal an identification.
_ _ _ The above evidence was returned to - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - on

No inked palm prints o f - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - were available f or


comparison with the above impressions.

_ _ _ The evidence may be p icked up by your department, preferably withi n 30 days.

_ _ _ The evidence wi ll be t urned ove r to t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section for further examination.


A search of our master name file by the Record Section failed to reveal any fingerprints o n - - - --

Technician

Date

You might also like