Shoulder Disocation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

A New Modified Kockers Method

for Reduction of Shoulder


Dislocations.
L.Prakash
M.S. (orth) M.Ch. (orth) (Liverpool)

Institute for Special Orthopaedics Chennai, India.


Background:
Several methods of reducing an acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder
have been described.
Around ten years back, the author introduced a different method, in which the
shoulder was reduced painlessly, and without anaesthesia in 87 consecutive
cases over a ten year period, including delayed and neglected dislocations of
up to three months duration.
The method was announced and described by an internet video in May
2016, and since then hundreds of shoulders have been reduced in various
centres of the world with ease, without anaesthesia, and with reproducible
success in every case, if it was done exactly the same way as described by
the author.
This paper describes the method, and analyses the results of the first
hundred and seventy cases reduced by this method.
Methods: A hundred and forty seven consecutive shoulder dislocations, from
immediate to three months old, including sixteen with associated fractures,
were reduced by the author, by this method without anaesthesia or analgesia.
There were no failures.
The average reduction time was four and a half minutes, with a minimum of
three and maximum of six minutes.
Page 1 of 16

Subsequent efforts by other surgeons in other centres also produced identical


results, confirming the fact that this is very useful tool in the armoury of those
dealing with this type of injuries.
Results:
1, The method worked in every case without any complications.
2, The time of reduction is significantly longer than traditional methods, as the
procedure involves maintaining the limb in certain positions for two minutes or
more before reduction.
3, No pre medication, anaesthesia or analgesia are required.
4, The method is extremely easy and reproducible.
5, This method can be done single handedly and no assistant is needed.
Conclusions: The Modified Kockers method for the reduction of an acute
anterior dislocation of the shoulder is a reproducible, easy, safe and reliable
method that can be performed relatively painlessly for all anterior dislocations
of the shoulder joint.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Evidence level 4.
Traditional techniques to reduce the dislocated gleno-humeral joint are painful
to the patient, usually require anaesthesia, need assstance and may be
associated with iatrogenic complications .
The Modified Kockers method is safe, comfortable, and reliable reproducible
and works every time.
Materials and Methods
This is a prospective study conducted among convict prisoners and staff
members of Madras Central Prison between 2003 to 2014.
Eighty seven prisoners and thirteen prison guards and officers, who
dislocated their shoulders over a ten year period were treated by this method.

Page 2 of 16

Data recorded included duration since dislocation, mode of injury, the time
needed to complete the reduction from the start of the procedure and the
number of attempts at reduction.
The patient rated the pain during the reduction as none, mild, moderate, or
severe, and these ratings were given a score on a 4-point scale with 1
indicating no pain and 4, severe pain.
Complications, if any, were also noted.
Modified Kockers method for reduction of shoulder dislocations:
Technique
The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical examination and X-Ray findings
using an anteroposterior radiograph.
A neurovascular examination of the extremity and a thorough examination for
coexisting injuries were carried out.
The principle of this method is that traction has no role in reduction of
shoulder dislocations. These are purely rational and lateral translation
injuries and the reduction too is performed by rotations and lateral
translations.
The patient either Stands with his back to the wall to fix his scapula. Else he
Sits on a chair with a back rest and pushes his back against the chair to fix
his scapula. This procedure does not work as effectively in supine or prone
positions.
No assistant is needed and the surgeon easily and single handedly performs
this procedure.
The forearm is held by the elbow and wrist and the following sequence is
deployed.
1, Slow abuction with gentle external rotation until the arm is fully externally
rotated. This step is performed very gently and slowly, often taking up to a
minute. The forearm acts as a long lever arm to achieve the external rotation.
Page 3 of 16

2, The limb is kept in external rotation for two to three minutes by the clock.
The patient is engaged in conversation so that his attention is diverted during
this step, as this is the painful part. This is the most important step, and
performing it properly is essential for this method.
3, The limb is now slowly adducted in external rotation till the elbow comes
over the body.
4, The limb is now slowly internally rotated so that the fingers touch the
opposite shoulder.
The shoulder glides in majestically without any audible clicks, clunks or
sounds.
The average time taken for the procedure is there to four minutes.

Sitting or standing with scapula stabilised at back

Slow gentle abduction and external rotation

Page 4 of 16

Holding it in external rotation for two to three minutes.

Gentle adduction and internal rotation.

The Shoulder is reduced without clicks or clucks.

Page 5 of 16

Age
The age distribution was between 18 and 78.
Patient's age and numbers

Sex
All patients were males.
Side
Right shoulder was dislocated in 110 and left in 37, indicating the
preponderance of dominant hand involvement.
Mechanism of injury.
In all cases it was rotation lateral translation injury.
Duration since dislocation
Minimum ten minutes to maximum 89 days.
Time taken for reduction.
Three to six minutes with an average of four and a half minutes.
Pain during manipulation.
Page 6 of 16

Grade one (no pain) in 116 patients, Grade 2 and 3 in 30 patients and grade
4 in one patient, the oldest in the group.The patient selection might also be a
cause for this finding, as all patients were prisoners or prison staff with high
pain threshold.
Complications and failures.
None
Results:
This prospective study has been performed in Madras Central Prison, for over
ten years where about a hundred patients were managed successfully, and
subsequently 47 patients were managed in one year of clinical practice.
With extremely restricted medical facilities, and complete lack of aesthetic
drugs this procedure was developed under duress 58, 59. The first patient to be
reduced had dislocated his shoulder 19 days prior. The second dislocation
was 11 days old and the third one was 89 days later. Almost three months
old. In each case the reduction was almost automatic, painless and effortless
both for the surgeon and patient.
Since the video publication of the method about 63 successful procedures
have been reported from the world over within two months, and many more
are being reported or communicated each day 50 -57.
Discussion
More than 50-60% of dislocations of large joints involve the shoulder
(glenohumeral).1-5 Up to 90-96% of shoulder dislocations are anteroinferior.6,7
Most dislocations can be reduced in the emergency department using simple
methods. The ideal method should be simple, easy, quick, effective,
atraumatic, pain-free, require little assistance or medication, and cause no
additional injury to the shoulder joint, musculoskeletal or neurovascular
structures.8,9 Till date there is no standard procedure for reduction of shoulder
dislocation.
Page 7 of 16

Numerous methods and procedures have been described 2, 3-6, 26-30, and most
of these require a general anaesthesia, muscle relaxation, pre medication or
sedatives.
Success rates for the various described procedures varies between 70-90%
regardless of technique.9 Literature states that more than one method may be
needed in some cases, while 5-10% of cases can not be reduced in the
Emergency Room.10
It is often wrongly mentioned that traction is the first and most important step
of reduction. Shoulder dislocations are primarily rotation/lateral shift injuries,
and there is no role or traction, push, pull, counter traction, tapes or heel in
the axilla, in their reduction.11
It is often erroneously stated that some shoulders are tricky and the
practitioner must be familiar with more than one method so that if one fails,
the other can be deployed.9
All methods deploy traction in some form or the other, and this is combined
with rotations, translations, scapular movements, counter tractions, direct
pushing in of the head, etc.11, 12
The methods described include traction-counter-traction in adduction
(Hippocrates)13, in forward flexion( Stimson and Spaso), in lateral elevation
exemplified(Eskimos), with leverage (Kocher and Milch),scapular
manipulation, or other methods using direct pressure or pushes.
The existence of plethora of method spells the fact that not one method is fool
proof or guaranteed to work all the time.
Other methods are fist in axilla 12, direct knee pressure14, 15, sheets or straps
to pull out the axilla16, pulling the arm over the back of a chair 17, 18, Simpsons
hanging arm method 8,9,10, 20, 21,reverse Spaso 22-25, painful self reduction
method of Boss-Holzach 26, Milch and its variants 28-40, Leidelmeyers external

Page 8 of 16

Table 1
Reduction method

Year Author (references in


superscript)

No. of patients Success no.


(rate)

Traction-Counetrtraction

1984 Boger et al"

47

43 (92%)

Snowbird looped technique

1995 Westin et al17

118

114 (97%)

Chair

1992 Noordeen et al"

32 2

3 (72%)

Spaso

2001 Yuen et al22

16

14 (88%)

Eskimo

1988 Poulsen27

23

17 (74%)

Auto-reduction

1997 Ceroni et al'

100

60 (60%)

Mulch

1981 Russel et a13

76

68 (89%)

Mulch

1982 Janecki et a128

50

50 (100%)

Mulch

1986 Beattie et a131

56

39 (70%)

Mulch

1992 Johnson et al29

142

122 (86%)

Modified Milch

1989 Canales Cortes et a132

128

107 (84%)

Modified Milch

1992 Garnavos35

75

71 (95%)

Kocher

1973 Royle48

39

37 (95%)

Kocher

1986 Beattie et alm

55

40 (73%)

Kocher without traction

2000 Berkenblit et a139

28

23 (82%)

External rotation

1977 Leidelmeyer41

50

50 (100%)

External rotation

1979 Mirick et al49

85

68 (80%)

External rotation

1986 Danzl et a142

100

78 (78%)

External rotation

1990 Thakur et all'

14

14 (100%)

External rotation

1991

42

40 (95%)

External rotation with traction

1990 Banerjee5

44

38 (86%)

Scapular manipulation

1982 Anderson et a144

51

47 (92)

Scapular manipulation

1992 Kothari et a12

48

46 (96)

Scapular manipulation-seated

1993

61

48 (79%)

Pulsion & traction elderly

1980 Manes47

39

35 (90%)

The present method

2016 Prakash L.

147

147 (100%)

Jeyarajan et a138

McNamara3

Page 9 of 16

rotation method 41, 42, Scapular manipulations 43-45, and other miscellaneous
methods 46.
Many of these have been called easy, revolutionary, new or simple by their
inventors and proponents. 16-22, 26-30.
However the success with all these procedures and methods varies
tremendously and the success rate has been variously reported from 14%
(external rotation) to 97% (Milch). 51.
The above table modified from CH Chungs 51 publications lists the success
rate of various procedures.
This method is different from the others hitherto published, because the exact
combination of movements to be performed in an erect position, without any
traction, anaesthesia or analgesia, leading to a hundred percent successful
reduction, has not been previously described.
Not a day passes without emails, messages, phone calls, or texts, praising
this method.

Page 10 of 16

References:
1. Kocher T. Eine neue Reductionsmethode fur Schuiterverrenkung. Berlin
Klin Wehnschr. 1870;7:101-5.
2. Kothari RU, Dronen SC. Prospective evaluation of the scapular
manipulation technique in reducing anterior shoulder dislocations. Ann Emerg
Med 1992;21(11): 1349-52.

3. Ceroni D, Sadri H, Leuenberger A. Anteroinferior shoulder dislocation: an


auto-reduction method without analgesia. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11(6):
399-404.
4. Villarin LA Jr, Belk KE, Freid R. Emergency department evaluation and
treatment of elbow and forearm injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am
1999;17(4):843-58, vi.
5. Plummer D, Clinton J. The external rotation method for reduction of acute
anterior shoulder dislocation. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1989;7(1):165-75.
6. McNamara RM. Reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations by scapular
manipulation. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22(7):1140-4.
Page 11 of 16

7. Daya M. Shoulder. In: Rosen P, editor-in-chief. Emergency medicine:


concepts and clinical practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 728-9.
8. Gleeson AP. Anterior glenohumeral dislocations: what to do and how to do
it. J Accid Emerg Med 1998;15 (1):7-12.
9. Uehara DT, Rudzinski JP. Injuries to the shoulder complex and humerus.
In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen DG, Stapczynski JS, editors. Emergency Medicine: a
comprehensive study guide. 5th ed. New York: Mcgraw- Hill; 2000. p.
1783-91.
10. Riebel GD, McCabe JB. Anterior shoulder dislocation: a review of
reduction techniques. Am J Emerg Med 1991;9(2):180-8.
11. Nicola T. Acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Am
1949;31:351.
12. Mattick A, Wyatt JP. From Hippocrates to the Eskimo- -a history of
techniques used to reduce anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J R Coll Surg
Edinb 2000; 45(5):312-6.
13. Adams F. The Internet Classics Archive: Instruments of reduction by
Hippocrates. [cited 2003 Oct 18]. Available from: http://classics.mit.edu/
Hippocrates/ reduct.5.5.html
14. Boger D, Sipsey J, Anderson G. New traction devices to aid reduction
of shoulder dislocations. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13(6):423-5.
15. White AD. Dislocated shoulder--a simple method of reduction. Med J
Aust 1976;2(19):726-7.
16.Westin CD, Gill EA, Noyes ME, Hubbard M. Anterior shoulder
dislocation. A simple and rapid method for reduction. Am J Sports Med
1995;23(3):369-71.
17. Noordeen MH, Bacarese-Hamilton IH, Belham GJ, Kirwan EO.
Anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a simple method of reduction. Injury
1992;23(7):479- 80.
Page 12 of 16

18. Lippert FG 3rd. A modification of the gravity method of reducing anterior


shoulder dislocations. Clin Orthop 1982;(165):259-60.
19. Pick RY. Treatment of the dislocated shoulder. Clin Orthop 1977;(123):
76-7.
20. Yuen MC, Yap PG, Chan YT, Tung WK. An easy method to reduce
anterior shoulder dislocation: The Spaso technique. Emerg Med J 2001;18(5):
370-2.
21. Yuen MC, Yap PG, Chan YT, Tung WK. The Spaso technique in
reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation in the Accident and Emergency
Department of Kwong Wah Hospital (Hong Kong) [Abstract]. Prehosp
Disaster Med 1999;14:S78.
22. Yuen MC, Tung WK. Reducing anterior shoulder dislocation by the
Spaso technique. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2001;8:96-100.
23. Yuen MC, Tung WK. The use of the Spaso technique in a patient with
bilateral dislocations of shoulder. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19(1):64-6.
24. Joy EA, Roberts WO. Self-reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation. The
Physician and Sportsmedicine 2000 Nov [cited 2003 May 10];28(11):[about 3
p.]. Available from: http://www.physsportsmed.com/issues/ 2000/1100/
joy.htmi.
25. Poulsen SR. Reduction of acute shoulder dislocations using the Eskimo
technique: a study of 23 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1988;28(9):1382-3.
26. Janecki CJ, Shahcheragh GH. The forward elevation maneuver for
reduction of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1982;(164):
177-80.
27. Johnson G, Hulse W, McGowan A. The Milch technique for reduction of
anterior shoulder dislocations in an accident and emergency department.
Arch Emerg Med 1992;9(1):40-3.

Page 13 of 16

28.Russell JA, Holmes EM 3rd, Keller DJ, Vargas JH 3rd. Reduction of


acute anterior shoulder dislocations using the Milch technique: a study of ski
injuries. J Trauma 1981;21(9):802-4.
29.Beattie TF, Steedman DJ, McGowan A, Robertson CE. A comparison of
the Milch and Kocher techniques for acute anterior dislocation of the
shoulder. Injury 1986; 17(5):349-52.
30. Milch H. Treatment of dislocation of the shoulder. Surg
1938;3:732-40.
31. Garnavos C. Technical note: modifications and improvements of the
Milch technique for the reduction of anterior dislocation of the shoulder
without premedication. J Trauma 1992;32(6):801-3.
32. Kothari RU, Dronen SC. The scapular manipulation technique for the
reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. J Emerg Med 1990;8(5):
625-8.
33. McMurray TB. Recurrent dislocation of shoulder [Proceedings]. J Bone
Joint Surg 1961;43B:402.
34. Saha AK. The classic. Mechanism of shoulder movements and a plea for
the recognition of "zero position" of glenohumeral joint. Clin Orthop 1983;
(173):3-10.
35. Berkenblit SI, Hand MB, MacAusland WR. Reduction of skiing-related
anterior shoulder dislocation using Kocher's method without traction. Am J
Orthop 2000; 29(10):811-4.
36. Thakur AJ, Narayan R. Painless reduction of shoulder dislocation by
Kocher's method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72(3):524.
37. Hussein MK. Kocher's method is 3,000 years old. J Bone Joint Surg Br
1968;50(3):669-71

Page 14 of 16

38. Danzl DF, Vicario SJ, Gleis GL, Yates JR, Parks DL. Closed reduction
of anterior subcoracoid shoulder dislocation. Evaluation of an external
rotation method. Orthop Rev 1986;15(5):311-5.
39. Jeyarajan R, Cope AR. Anaesthesia for reduction of anterior dislocations
of the shoulder. Arch Emerg Med 1992;9(1):71.
40. Kothari RU, Dronen SC. The scapular manipulation technique for the
reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. J Emerg Med 1990;8(5):
625-8.
41. te Slaa RL, Wijffels MP, Marti RK. Questionnaire reveals variations in
the management of acute first time shoulder dislocations in the Netherlands.
Eur J Emerg Med 2003;10(1):58-61.
42. Janecki CJ, Shahcheragh GH. The forward elevation maneuver for
reduction of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Clin Orthop.
1982;164:177-80.
43. Manes HR. A new method of shoulder reduction in the elderly. Clin
Orthop. 1980;147:200-2.

44. Anderson D, Zvirbulis R, Ciullo J. Scapular manipulation for reduction


of anterior shoulder
dislocations. Clin Orthop 1982;(164):181-3.
45. Doyle WL, Ragar T. Use of the scapular manipulation method to reduce
an anterior shoulder dislocation in the supine position. Ann Emerg Med
1996;27(1): 92-4.
46. McNair TJ. A clinical trial of the hanging arm reduction
of dislocation of the shoulder. J R Coll Surg Edinb 957;3(1):47-53.
47. Krishna Kiran Eachempati, Aman Dua, Rajesh Malhotra, Surya Bhan,
And John Ranjan Bera. The External Rotation Method for Reduction of
Acute Anterior Dislocations and Fracture- Dislocations of the Shoulder
Page 15 of 16

J.B.J.S. 81-A. 2004


48. Royle G. Treatment of acute anterior dislocation of the
shoulder. Br J Clin Pract 1973;27(11):403-4.
49. Mirick MJ, Clinton JE, Ruiz E. External rotation method of shoulder
dislocation reduction. JACEP 1979; 8(12):528-31.
50. Banerjee A. Is anaesthesia necessary for reducing shoulder dislocation?
Arch Emerg Med 1990;7(3):240.
51, Prakash L. Thirteen years in prison, orthopaedics and a little more.
www.praklay.com/prison
52, Prakash L. Modified Kockers method for reduction of shoulder
dislocations. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?
story_fbid=771984796276548&id=556319117843118
53, Prakash L. Biomechanics and Pathophysiology of fractures and
dislocations. www.praklay.com/fracture
54. Prakash L. A new method for dislocation of shoulder dislocations. https://
www.facebook.com/permalink.php?
story_fbid=760566014085093&id=556319117843118

Page 16 of 16

You might also like