General Principles of Harmony

by Alan Belkin
Presentation
The following is the table of contents of my book: General Principles of Harmony. Its aim is
to discuss some general principles of harmony in concise, practical terms, and to provide
guidance for student composers. This will not be a "theory" text, nor an analysis treatise, but
rather a guide to some of the basic tools of the trade.
This book is the last in a series. The others are: Form, Counterpoint, and Orchestration.
This series is dedicated to the memory of my teacher and friend Marvin Duchow , one of the
rare true scholars, a musician of immense depth and sensitivity, and a man of unsurpassed
kindness and generosity.

Table of Contents
Why this book
Discussion of other approaches
Limits of our discussion
A new approach to understanding harmony
Basics
A definition of harmony
Intervals
Chords
Progressions
Principles of coherence and continuity
Pitch and interval limitations
Linear aspects: melody and bass lines; voice leading
An aside: open vs. closed harmonic systems
Hierarchy, landmarks
Principles of movement, interest and of variety

General aspects of harmonic accent

Creating momentum and renewing interest on various structural levels
Locally
Higher Levels
Harmonic rhythm
Modulation and Harmonic Transition
Transitions between various types of Harmony
Harmony and Texture; Orchestration and Harmony
Spacing and register
Doubling
Timbre
Harmony with multiple planes of tone
Criteria for evaluating harmony
Pedagogy

Many thanks to my friend Guillaume Jodoin for his careful proofreading and useful
comments.

N.B. All this material (text and all musical examples) Alan Belkin, 2003. It may not be
quoted or used without the giving full credit to the author. Legal proof of copyright exists.
To contact the author: [email protected]
Web site: alanbelkinmusic.com

General Principles of Harmony

Why this book
Of all musical disciplines, harmony is probably the most written about. Textbooks abound,
from the summary to the encyclopedic. Why add to the existing plethora of resources? While
we will survey some of this material below, one thing is lacking in all of them: None
convincingly connects traditional harmony to contemporary practice. Although some of these
books contain a chapter or two about more recent techniques, these are usually described in
summary or superficial ways, and few or no connections are made with older practice.
Harmonic relationships can be divided into three categories: those which are immediately
audible; those which become audible through attentive listening, and those which can never
be heard, given the limitations of the human ear and memory. In this book we will explore the
first two types, and systematically exclude the third. It cannot be sufficiently emphasized that
not all harmonic relationships are equally important: Their location in the piece, and,
especially, their relative salience must be considered in the light of the limits of human
perception in order to judge their importance
As in the other books in this series, our approach here will be to focus on principles rather
than on styles. We contend that there are common principles in operation across various
harmonic styles, and that understanding these principles - which arise more from how we hear
than from stylistic conventions - can help the composer of today to find a personal harmonic
language which makes audible sense.
Finally, we make no pretense here of explaining all harmonic languages. Our goal is more
modest: we wish to outline some powerful concepts which are relevant to both classical and
more recent harmony.

Discussion of other approaches

Before starting our search for such general principles of harmony, let us list and briefly
comment on the most common traditional pedagogical methods.

Stylistic approaches: Such methods make no claim to universality, but simply aim to
define "normal" harmonic practice within a given period. The best example of this
approach is Walter Piston's well known textbook. By definition, such methods remain
within relatively narrow stylistic confines, and make no attempt to generalize the
principles therein. However, while not all principles of classical harmony are
applicable outside the common practice period, the contrary notion - all harmonic
thinking can be reduced to stylistic convention - leads to an absurdity: Can recent
composers really have discovered entirely new ways of hearing? (I say "discovered"
because they can hardly have invented new neurological structures and functions.) The

human brain's highly evolved capacities for making sense of auditory experience have
surely not changed over the past few centuries.
Another, related method, consists of intensive drill with harmonic formulas. Based on
the notion that harmony, like language, uses many idioms, the goal here is to learn as
many of them as possible, often by rote. While this approach does have some value in
learning classical tonal harmony, the formulas learned are not generalizable outside of
the source repertoire.
Piston's method and the formula both use Rameau's theory of chord roots and
inversions. The problem with this theory is that the root of an inverted chord is a
theoretical concept, and not a directly audible one. While there is some truth to the
notion that all inversions of a given chord can be heard as part of the same "family",
there are important exceptions, as we shall see below. Worse, obvious audible facts,
like the actual, heard bass line, the spacing chosen for a given chord, and its linear
context, tend to be minimized by this approach.
Approaches based on the insights of Heinrich Schenker have the advantage that they
are more directly based on hearing. Schenkerian "foreground" relationships are
especially useful in understanding many harmonic situations. In particular, the notions
that not all chords are of equal structural importance, and that harmonic meaning
changes according to linear context, are critical insights. While the Schenkerian
approach was originally intended for tonal music, certain notions of harmonic
elaboration can be easily applied in other contexts as well, and we shall do so, below.
Less convincing are some of the more far-flung conclusions of Schenkerian analysis:
As the connections posited become more abstract and far flung, they become simply
inaudible, in any normal mode of listening.
The traditional French conservatory method of teaching harmony, using mainly given
basses with elaborate figures, is an outcome of continuo practice. However whereas
the latter used figures as a shortcut, the pedagogical extensions of this method are
extremely cumbersome, with the result that the student spends a great deal of time and
effort becoming familiar with an elaborate and, finally, fairly useless numeric code.
This code supplies very little insight into the way harmony and form interact, and thus
provides no help in teaching the student to think harmonically for himself, or to
transfer what he knows outside of the realm of tonal music.
Schoenberg's writings on harmony deserve special mention here. As in all his
theoretical writings, Schoenberg has many provocative ideas, and his teaching is based
on a profound knowledge of the repertoire. A few of his ideas have influenced our
approach here - notably his notion of the structural role of harmony. The main
drawbacks of Schoenberg's writings are: his philosophy of historical necessity, his
sometimes obscure formulations (e.g. his pseudo-Darwinian distinction between weak,
strong, and super-strong progressions), and his frequent aesthetic diatribes, which
today are simply very dated.
Alan Forte's set theory, like Schenkerian theory, was originally formulated with a
specific repertoire in mind, in this case non-serial, so-called "atonal" music. Also like
Schenkerian theory, when carried beyond basics, it leaves the ordinary listener's
capacities far behind. But within limits, it can be a useful way of creating and
recognizing families of pitches (again, see below), which can help the composer give
coherence to his harmonic language. Forte's main weakness is the almost complete
absence of any discussion of (or even, it would seem, any interest in) what is or is not
audible. For example, hearing the presence of a given three note harmonic cell through
a short passage is a very different matter from hearing an eight note set through a long
piece.

Probably the best teaching work for traditional harmony is Roger Sessions' Harmonic
Practice. Written by a composer, it explains things in psychological terms more than in
terms of convention. For example, Sessions' notion of harmonic "accent" will be very
useful here. Also, his exercises are the most varied and challenging for a young
composer. The limits of his book are: he does not discuss the important differences
between vocal and instrumental harmony, and his discussion of contemporary practice
is very summary.
Finally, Persichetti's "Twentieth Century Harmony" is an excellent compendium of
many twentieth century techniques. Written by an eminent composer/teacher, it is
practical in its approach and down to earth in its explanations. However, it does not
contain much in the way of general principles which are also applicable to classical
harmony, and it contains little reference to long range harmonic organization - that is,
to musical form.

To summarize, what is missing in all these methods are links between tonal and other
approaches. And yet such links abound. For example, while some of the specific methods of
creating direction and coherence in tonal harmony cannot be transferred intact to other
harmonic styles, often the principles underlying these specific solutions can be generalized.
For example, as we shall see below, the principles of voice-leading are strongly grounded in
the way human hearing works, and therefore, appropriately formulated, remain relevant to any
harmonic style.
A final inadequacy of most current approaches to harmony is that they often ignore the
interaction of harmony, counterpoint, orchestration and form. However, these categories are
mere pedagogical conveniences, and not realistic descriptions of the way the musical ear
breaks down information. For example, voice leading cannot be separated from counterpoint,
and detailed examination of the way a chord is spaced quickly leads to questions of
orchestration. For this reason, in our discussions of musical examples, often we will need to
refer to several different aspects of the music in order to adequately explain what is
happening. (This also underlines the importance of these examples, since they show the
interconnection between various notions in ways that may not always be evident in the text.)

Limits of our discussion

This book is not a harmony textbook. Both the specifics of classical tonal harmony
and of many twentieth century techniques are well treated elsewhere; there is no need
to cover the same ground here. What is needed is more general, unifying principles.
To the extent that we will be using traditional principles in broader contexts, we shall
assume that reader is already familiar with their conventional applications. Where
principles are not familiar, we will explain them in more detail. To get the most out of
this discussion, the reader should have a solid grounding in tonal harmony, and should
also be familiar with the material in Persichetti's "Twentieth Century Harmony".
(N.B.: Where a twentieth century technique is well covered in Persichetti, we will not
supply examples of it unless we have some extra insight to add.) Knowledge of the
elementary notions of Forte's set theory (in particular: "interval class", "set", "normal
form", and "interval vector") will also be useful.
This book is not a comprehensive method of analysis. The goals of analysis are
systematic in a way ours are not here; therefore an analytical method would require a
very different approach. As in the other books in this series, our aim here is practical:
We are simply trying to propose some basic principles about how (harmonic) hearing

works, especially those which cross stylistic boundaries, and which can therefore be
useful to composers today. This is especially important given that in the recent past,
systems like total serialism and aleatoric music, where the methods used to produce
the music have no demonstrable relation to what any normal human can reasonably
decipher by ear, were actually taken seriously. (Indeed, in some academic quarters, the
preceding sentence is still "politically incorrect".) Unfortunately, anyone who spends
most of their effort during composition on what cannot be heard, risks not using
audible resources to the full, and consequently producing a work whose effect on the
listener can only be tepid at best. While a composer may perhaps explore such systems
to break out of stale habits, if the results are not at some point severely filtered through
a realistic knowledge of what can be expected from a normal listener, how can the
music communicate significantly?
One final caveat: in this work we will limit our discussion to the tempered scale only.
This is not to deny the interest or the musical potential of non-tempered and microtonal systems. Quite possibly, some of the principles mentioned here also apply to
non-tempered harmony, but a thorough discussion of such harmony would require
expertise I do not possess. In addition, the tempered scale is so ingrained in our
notation, performance practice, and instrumental construction, that serious attempts to
work outside it require groundwork in these areas which goes far beyond the scope of
this book. Similarly we will not address harmony which makes significant use of
portamento effects.

A new approach to understanding harmony

Since mankind's evolutionary capacities and limitations for hearing and understanding
relationships between tones have clearly not changed in a very long time, it follows that there
must be connections in the way we hear "old" and "new" music. Recent works by Bergman
(Auditory Scene Analysis), Deutsch (Ear and Brain), and Snyder (Music and Memory), shed
significant, new light on these basic auditory/cognitive systems. Combined with what
musicians already know and intuit about how music works, they provide a useful starting
point for a more general understanding of harmony and other musical disciplines.
The main theories which will prove useful to us are those which refer to the most easily heard
phenomena. (Incidentally, the aspects of cognition we take for granted are often the most
complex.) The disdain with which "salience" is referred to in some current (music) theoretical
literature is entirely at odds with the practical needs of the composer.
For example, some of the assumptions behind current ideas of pitch structure need to be
reexamined. Recent psycho-acoustical research, as well as practical experience, lead to the
conclusion that some of these notions are conventions with only limited usefulness, focussing
on connections that are often quite obscure to the ear. Worse, they often do not explain what
is actually heard, by even the most trained and attentive listener, and can thus lead the analyst
or the aspiring composer to ignore factors much more relevant to the sonic result.
We may draw a parallel here to the exaggerated attention to chord roots which characterized
harmonic theory before Schenker's ideas became widely known. Schenker`s thinking
engendered a corrective attention to the fact that in most situations the sounding bass line has
more effect on the sense of harmonic direction than any theoretical root. Here a widely
accepted theory (that of chord roots and inversions) often led to ignoring or undervaluing
direct musical experience.

Similarly, the vast literature about pitch class sets and series often veers into the musical
equivalent of numerology. Overemphasis on the importance of subtle intervallic relationships,
especially over long stretches of time, where their aural perception is often impossible, easily
leads to inadequate emphasis on relationships that are audible even to the uninitiated , and
consequent misjudgment of the work's effect. Salient events are always the best pillars
supporting musical architecture.
An example of a common basic assumption that needs to be mitigated is that of octave
equivalence. While in the middle register C3 and C4 are clearly in some sense equivalent,
comparing C1 and C7 is quite another matter. In the extreme registers, pitch discrimination is
very inexact and dependant on many factors, including orchestration, duration, etc.

h.book.eg's

N.B.: unless otherwise indicated, all the musical examples are for piano solo.

The two chords in this example include

the same four
pitch

classes. However, in terms

of perception,
what does it meanto

"identical"?
in the first
The exact pitches
speak of them as being
chord are quite difficult to distinguish due to their extreme

register, and their short duration makesthis

harder
still. Most

in register
and spacing between the
important, the differences

two chords have the effect of thrusting the common pitches into

the perceptual background. Even if we concede that, played one

right after the other, careful listening might recognize these
common pitches, what if the chords are separated by several
bars of other music? In this case the similarity between the two
chords is a surely at best a refinement, compared to their
surface contrast. Except in the case where the two are placed
side by side for comparison or otherwise "pointed out" to the
listener, the pitch similarity between them is thus relatively
unimportant. Note that to make the listener's job easier I have
used the same pitch classes. Imagine if I had also transposed
the chords (at an interval other than the octave), requiring the
listener to compare intervals rather than just pitch classes.

In this example, the first chord is the same as the second one
from the previous example. The second chord here contains two
new pitches, and different intervals as well. And yet the two
chords seem much more similar than the pair in the previous
example, because they are in the same register, share two
common tones, and each contains a sharp dissonance in the
middle, with richer intervals surrounding it.

These examples raise two critical issues: how can a composer make pitch identity elationships

clear to the listener, and when should other types of relationship (as in the second example) be
considered more important? These questions are largely ignored in the literature, despite their
vital importance for understanding musical form - which, after all, works mainly through
association and memory, both of which strongly depend on surface salience. A good deal of
our discussion here will therefore focus on the ways composers can create and differentiate
realistically audible harmonic relationships, to fulfill various formal functions.

Basics
A definition of harmony
An exploration of harmony should encompass the following elements:

Examination of the salient characteristics of chords.

Discussion of how chords are connected.
Discussion of the formal need for harmonic contrasts, and of how gradations of such
contrasts can be accomplished.
A realistic discussion of long range tonal relationships. Here we do not refer just to socalled "tonal" music, but also to all far flung relationships between tones.

h.book.eg's

Intervals

has a distinct acoustic character. These
First, whatever the harmonic style, each interval

differences are an important basis for harmonic character:

for example, a chord built in 5ths

will always sound more open and clear than a cluster of minor 2nds. In any style, the

Chords are traditionally considered the basic units of harmony. We need to say a few words
about them to start.

Second, assuming unity of timbre, i.e. one plane of tone, when several
intervals are combined
into a chord, multiple intervallic relations are formed, of which some
are more important than
others. Here are some guidelines for how the ear prioritizes intervalperception:
traditional classification of intervals into sharp dissonances, mild dissonances, rich
consonances, and open consonances remains valid, simply because it is audible.

The farther apart the notes of a given interval are in a chord, and the more other notes
between them, the less the character of that interval imposes itself.

Note how the "crunch" between the G and the F# becomes

progressively less important as the two notes get farther apart.

If an interval is present more than once, placing instances of it adjacent to one another
in the chord will emphasize the character of that interval.

Although both chords contain two perfect 4ths and a minor 3rd,
the quartal character is more obvious in the first example.

The more different intervals there are, especially in adjacent positions, the more
complex the intervallic character of the chord, since the various intervals compete for
the listener's attention. (Too much intervallic variety is the cause of the harmonic
grayness common in badly written serial music.)
Finally, as Persichetti points out, multiple minor seconds within one chord have a
"clotting" effect: They tend to obscure the sense of direction, since there are multiple
harsh dissonances competing for the listener's attention.

h.book.eg's

Chords

Harmony is traditionally defined
asthe study of chords, where a chord is a group of notes

chord

In unfamiliar styles the only way the listener

can
distinguish
tones
from
non-harmonic

are established
very clearly,
early
in the piece.

tones is if straightforward harmonic norms

This requires limiting the harmonic world, in some clearly audible way. All other things being
the harder it is to sense non-chord tones. While
equal, the more complex the basic harmony,
perceived as a unit, either due to simultaneous attack, or arpeggiation. This definition needs
some elaboration if it is to be generalized.

there is no absolute reason for requiring non-harmonic tones, they allow for more subtle
gradation and variety of harmonic effect, and allow the composer to follow his melodic
impulses more easily.

In classical homophonic textures such as this one, there are

three possible situations involving notes not attacked
simultaneously: arpeggiation, non-harmonic tones which

10

often 7th chords), and

suggest sub-metrical harmonies (most

non-harmonic tones which are extraneous to any chord in the

classical vocabulary. The above example illustrates each of
these three cases. What is notable here is the varying degrees of
"distance" from the underlying chord vocabulary made possible
by these three options.

In this example, we see something analogous: The clear quartal character of

the whole renders the Gb definitely a non-harmonic tone, while the Bb sounds
like an arpeggiation, creating less tension.

In this final example, the same two notes (in the same melodic line) are
roughly equal in tension, since there is no simple harmonic norm in evidence.
There is no distinction here between tones which define chords and those
which don't. While not an insurmountable problem, this makes for a certain
heaviness of harmonic effect.

Another problem in defining what constitutes a chord occurs in stratified harmony, where
various degrees of orchestral blend influence perceptual fusion. We will return to this point
later.

Progressions

Progression implies a series of harmonic changes, in the same plane of tone, and presumes a
clear sense of which groups of notes are chords (see above). Progression is an important
notion, because on it depend such critical aspects of musical movement as harmonic rhythm,
and certain gradations of harmonic contrast. Psychologically, progression is a function of the
amount of information (novelty) the listener faces with each event, and how successive events
are related.

11

However, outside of familiar triadic contexts, progression is not always simple to define.
However, we can point to two aspects of classical progressions which will help us to
generalize the concept: gradation and direction.
By gradation we mean the degree of perceived change. If we compare the following two
examples, it is clear that the first communicates a more vigorous sense of harmonic movement
than the second

There are more successive harmonic contrasts in the first example than in the
second. In both examples, the rhythmic grouping suggests three chords. In the
first, none of the adjacent chords contains a common tone in the same octave.
Further, as indicated by the lines connecting non-adjacent notes, there is
stepwise voice leading between the chords. The lack of common tones in the
same register, and the multiple conjunct inner lines create a vigorous sense of
harmonic action.
By contrast, in the second example, the multiple outer and inner voice common
tones make the changes (again indicated by the straight lines) less prominent.
The point here is the clear difference between the two examples. This kind of
gradation of harmonic effect is very important to avoiding harmonic
monotony.
As for direction, this requires enough harmonic events for the listener to develop expectations
about subsequent events. For example, a rising bass line suggests continuation in the same
direction. Of course, the composer may not necessarily fulfill the expectation evoked, but it
does become part of the music's perceived structure.
Here is a discussion of a more complex situation.

12

clarinets
bassoons


strings

horn

strings

The first chord here appears in stages: first in the strings, followed by the
bassoons and the clarinets: Each timbre adds new notes, until all are sustained
together. The horn then adds a melodic fragment, which finishes on the same
note as the top of the bassoon chord, thus creating a (partial) sense of
resolution. However, the overall sense here is not so much one of progression
but rather of gradually filling out a harmonic mass.
strings
After the rest, there is a clearer sense
of progression, both because each chord
introduces completely different notes from the preceding one, and also because
the chromatic
rising bass has a simple, rising direction. Once again,
B
strings the
important thing here is the use of various degrees of harmonic change
(progression) to vary the sense of musical movement.

clarinets

horn


Principlesof coherence
and bassoons
continuity

practice
period center
coherence
in the common
tonality.

on
Most discussions of harmonic

Outside this period, explanations emphasize relationships of chordal identity or similarity.

This is a significant - and usually unnoticed - distinction. Tonality helps create musical
motion, since it defines goals. A tonal progression cannot be scrambled and maintain its
integrity. In the absence
flute of tonality, analysis based only on relationships of identity or of
similarity overemphasizes the "what", as opposed to the "when". Pointing out pitch cells or
algorithms which give rise to all the pitch material in a work can never adequately explain
why a work's harmonic construction is convincing, since music is a temporal art: The
clarinet is essential to its meaning. Even in music without a clear tonic, context
sequence of events
radically changes musical meaning. A chord at the climax of a phrase is not equivalent to the
same chord at the start of another phrase, since much of its meaning derives from how it is
oboe
approached and left.

13

Here the chord marked "x" is identical in both examples.

However, in the first example it is clearly a subsidiary, passing
chord: It is rhythmically weak, introduces no new pitches, and
helps to fill in the space between the chords under the slur. The
real accent here is on the last chord, which no longer stays in
the D major scale, and has a richer interval (a 6th) on the
bottom.
In the second example, the same chord is now the climax of the
phrase. Not only is it rhythmically accented and longer in
duration, but it culminates a progression of rising harmonic
tension. The preceding chords alternate between gentler
sonorities, without semitone dissonances, and harsher ones,
each containing one such dissonance. The last chord contains
two semitone relationships, making it, in this context, a stronger
accent.
A more useful way to think about harmonic coherence is as one aspect of a leading thread for
the listener to follow as the piece progresses. This formulation encompasses both music based
on classical tonal relationships, and music without them. It also links the notions of coherence
and flow, which, in a temporal art, are profoundly connected. The deeper question becomes:
How does the harmony engage the listener in the music's flow in compelling ways?
Harmonic coherence, seen in this way, has several aspects, which we will explore below.

Pitch and interval limitations

An important aspect of harmonic coherence is limiting the work's pitch content. Establishing
such harmonic limits, which engender norms, makes it easier to create harmonic expectations,
which direct and intensify the listener's experience of musical time.
Such harmonic norms generally involve creating "families" of chords. A family is any group
of chords with clearly audible resemblances. To carry the analogy farther, a family can
include many members, who share some obvious characteristics, but who are also more or
less individual. Thus, this notion has the advantage of allowing for many degrees of
relationship.
To give only a few examples, families could be organized by:

basing the music on scales or modes.

Common tones, especially in the same octave: This generates the simplest kind of
audible coherence. It corresponds to the classical pedal point.

14

 horn

flute

clarinet


oboe

bassoons

In this example, the 1st clarinet tremolo, E-G#, acts like a

classical pedal point, providing clear registral, rhythmic, and
harmonic unity. However the outer parts also contribute to
coherence. The flute part starts the first two phrases with the

same three notes, and the final cadence

note, A#, sounds like a
lower neighbor to the B which starts each flute phrase.
Similarly, the highest note in the first bar, A#, leads stepwise to
the highest note in the second bar, C. The 2nd clarinet part is
homorhythmic with and has similar voice leading to the flute
part: the D# in the first bar leads to the D natural in the
second; the C is a common tone, the E of the first bar is
"ornamented" by the F# in the second, and the A# and the C in
the last bar seem to rise out of the previous A#.
The last bar sounds cadential because of the less animated
rhythm, the on-the-beat accent, and the softer harmony, which
avoids semitone conflicts.
While the common tones certainly help to hold the phrase
together, we can see that these various other relationships - in
rhythm, voice leading, and interval tension - also help the
listener to make sense of the whole. Identity relationships are
thus only one aspect of a more complex coherence.

Allowing octave related pitches: In themselves, octave relations are not especially
useful for creating harmonic coherence, probably because they are so common.
However, allowing them makes possible interval and chord inversions. Since every
interval has some similarity of character with its inversion, this allows for more
spacious handling of the texture, while excluding drastic changes of harmonic
character.
Intervallic harmony: Transposed intervals are much less easily identified than simple
common tones: The common element is a relationship . However, limiting the
intervals used in a given passage to one interval plus its inversion nonetheless can
define a clear, audible, character. Similarly, limiting a passage or a piece to material
derived from small unordered cells ("unordered sets" in the literature) can also create
fairly strong character. (Note that the larger the cell, the more intervals it contains, and
therefore the less distinctive it becomes. If the total number of intervals involved is
more than three or four, the cell will usually contain all the chromatic intervals, since,
being unordered, non-adjacent intervals must be counted as well. This is where Forte's

15



oboe

notion of "interval vector", i.e. the total number of

times a given interval appears
Xvery
distributions of intervals
within a given set as a whole, is useful.Sets with
uneven

for
be applied quite rigorously

tend to have clearer characters.)
These techniques can
short passages, or more flexibly over larger stretches (see below for examples
and

more discussion about this important distinction). Flexible applications usually

involve either melodic movements which create other intervals as secondary "nonharmonic tones", or vertical stacking, which necessarily results in richer chords. Since
stacks of any one interval almost always produce additional, new intervals between
non-adjacent notes, this technique allows for harmonic "shading" - moving between
sonorities which are highly saturated with the main interval to others where its effect
is less prominent.

In this example, the first chord is a simple quartal sonority. The
outer notes, however, form a 3rd. Thus it is easy to move from
the first chord to the second one, which is triadic, via the the
smooth stepwise movement from the A to the G. The second
chord could subsequently either return to the first, acting like a
neighbor chord in a generally quartal passage, or else lead into
a passage of tertian harmony.

Since intervals have distinct tension characteristics, using chords with

common tension configurations (e.g. one harsh dissonance plus one rich
consonance) can unify a passage. Likewise, progressions of tension, e.g.
from rich consonance to sharp dissonance, are easily followed by the

16

listener.

Adagio

muted violons, divisi

cresc.

dim.

10

11

This example illustrates a gradual progression from gentle,

open intervals to an intense climax on a major 7th (m. 6), and
then back. The dynamics and registral evolution reinforce this
progression.
Note that the progression is not simplistically linear: Overly
obvious progressions tend to be boring. The best strategy is for
the overall direction to be well defined, while the details remain
somewhat unpredictable: The general direction of the
progression allows the listener to develop expectations, but the
inability to predict the exact next note maintains interest.

Linear aspects: melody and bass lines; voice leading

We have pointed out above how pitch and intervals limitations help define and unify
harmonic character.
Two other traditional concepts contribute significantly to harmonic coherence: leading lines,
and voice leading.
Even in contrapuntal textures, all parts are never equally important simultaneously: Interest
migrates from one part to another. In simpler, homophonic textures, normally outer parts are
easier to follow than inner parts. Thus, clear linear progressions in the outer parts can clarify
the music's sense of direction. For example, a melodic line which gradually attains higher and
higher local peaks, leading to a sectional climax, helps give coherent shape to a musical
paragraph. In the same way, the combination of stepwise motion in the bass with occasional
angular passages - often at cadences - clarifies harmonic direction.
Voice leading also remains a very audible force, both for harmonic continuity and for
articulation. The basic principles of voice leading arise from two fundamental facts (for
17

experimental documentation, see Albert Bergman's Auditory Scene Analysis) : the tendency
of the ear to separate musical strands by register, and the fact that voices (and most
instruments) are most at ease moving by fairly small intervals. Since these are facts about
human hearing, they go beyond specific styles. Constantly leaping lines are very demanding
to follow and to sing. By contrast, registral continuity, as expressed by common tones,
conjunct movement, and higher level stepwise outlines, is easier to follow and provides the
"glue" which connects one harmony to the next.
An important consequence of the importance of registral continuity is that ornamental (nonharmonic) tones arise from the nature of hearing, since they are virtually always stepwise.
They are therefore not just a stylistic peculiarity of tonal music. The fact that many systems
for controlling pitch in non-tonal situations do not allow for them is a very serious limitation,
both because it dampens the composer's melodic impulses, and deprives him of an effective
means of weaving convincing leading lines.

An aside: open vs. closed harmonic systems

This leads us to an important distinction, arising from much twentieth century music: open
systems vs. closed systems. An open system imposes audible, but not rigid, constraints,
providing aural coherence, while still allowing the composer's ear reasonable freedom. Closed
systems are much more mechanical, limiting the composer's options at any given moment in
quite rigid ways. The distinction is largely one of degree.
Advantages of open systems include:

Because most of them came about through evolution, rather than invention, they have
usually been "survival-tested" by ear: Evolution tends to filter out approaches which
are not effective.
They are flexible. Contrary to many invented twentieth century systems, they require
only a reasonable preponderance of their normative sonorities, rather than 100%
saturation. They thus allow the composer's ear to work in more intuitive ways and do
not automatically constrain basic linear impulses, such as conjunct lines. Contrary to
popular belief, there is no inherent contradiction between non-harmonic tones and
coherent, non-tonal music. For example, a piece using a core harmonic cell at key
points could allow for non-harmonic tones between them. As long as the rhythm and
phrasing make it clear which sonorities are the structural "pillars", and as long as there
are enough such pillars (reference points) to stimulate the memory reasonably
frequently, there is no more need for such harmony to derive every note from the basic
cell than for classical harmony to insist that every non-harmonic tone be part of a
triad.

18

Allegro

6
X
X
X
X





6

example is based on a three note cell: a semitone plus a

This
minor 3rd (B, C, Eb). The places marked "x" contain intervals

not in the cell. However, the cell is still very prominent overall,
exceptional places are not strongly highlighted, and these
most important - the notes in questions are easily heard as
simple passing or other ornamental movements.
Apart from the flexible kind of cellular harmony seen in the example above, other examples
of open systems include:

Families of chords, as defined above.

Added note chords, as defined in Persichetti.

Polyharmony,
as defined in Persichetti.
Stratified harmony. By "stratified harmony" we mean harmonic textures where
richness is achieved by simultaneous, but clearly differentiated harmonic strands. A
fuller discussion of this technique will be found below, under the heading " Harmony
with multiple planes of tone ". (Note that polyharmony can itself be considered a kind
of stratified harmony, if the layers are timbrally and or rhythmically well
distinguished.)

All of these techniques create recognizable harmonic worlds, while allowing the composer a
great deal of local choice.
Closed systems, by contrast, severely limit the choice of notes available. Worse, they often do
so to the extent that the expressive intentions of the composer cannot be fulfilled while
respecting the limits of the system.
Examples of closed systems include most algorithmic, total serial, and rigid mirror
procedures. The key feature of such systems is that they do not allow the composer's ear to
follow its own impulses at every point. While an open system imposes just enough limitation
to create a coherent sound world, the 100% saturation imposed by a closed system makes for
neat, analytical unity, but usually has very little to do with how people actually hear. If,
19

however, the ear is to remain paramount for both composer and listener, why waste effort
creating inaudible connections, and limiting audible ones which do not weaken coherence?
Much serial technique has long created problems of this sort, since the "order" in question
usually has nothing whatsoever to do with what can be reliably heard even by an experienced,
attentive listener. Further, chords in serial music inevitably create interval combinations not
part of the row. And in any case, what is the meaning of "ordering" in a chord whose notes are
heard simultaneously? (N.B.: These comments do not imply that no serial music is of any
value, but just that serial procedures easily lead to unmusical thinking.)

Hierarchy, landmarks
Apart from family resemblances, classical tonality provides an example of another important
principle of harmonic coherence: hierarchy. The idea of "leading lines", already discussed
above , provides a simple application of this notion to simultaneous strands of the musical
texture. Applied to successive phrases, sections, etc., hierarchy likewise makes the listener's
task much easier, by organizing larger spans into sub-sections, whose limits and relationships
to each other are easier to grasp. Hierarchy, in short, allows for richer, and more complex
musical structures.
We will first discuss the hierarchical functions of tonality, and then discuss how similar
effects can be achieved without it.
Hierarchy applies on several levels. First, tonality itself must be based on scales with unequal
intervals: If all the intervals are equal, there is no harmonic reason why one note will sound
more final than any other. Within unequal scales, differences in intervals create points of
relative stability and attraction. For example, in major and minor scales, the semitones are
points of attraction; the leading tone is a familiar example.
On a higher level, as Schoenberg frequently points out, to remain comprehensible, music
requires articulation into units that can be assimilated by the memory - phrases, sections, etc. .
Such articulation is the function of cadences. Therefore, in any harmonic language, cadence is
one the most important formal requirements which harmony must fulfill.
If the listener is to follow music of any length, he requires gradations of cadence. Such variety
of punctuation makes phrases easier to perceive, and clarifies their relation to each other:
Hierarchical tonal cadences tell the listener how far away he is from "home", i.e. the tonic. In
tonal music, this hierarchy of cadences is well known, and need not be listed here.
On a yet higher level, not only does a tonal center provide a useful point of reference, but it
also allows for the creation of secondary centers, allowing for more degrees of punctuation,
and thus making large scale coherence easier to grasp.
This points out the necessity of audibly underlining important notes and chords, in effect
treating what happens between them as ornamentation (or, to use the Schenkerian term,
prolongation). This kind of underlining makes it easier for the listener to parse large forms by
ensuring that landmarks are easily noticed, and memorable.
These distinctions between harmonic reference points and harmonic ornamentation, and the
way reference points are approached and left - in other words the way they are pointed out to

20

the listener - are critical for understanding the interaction between harmony and form. Even in
relatively simple tonal harmony, the tonic will often not be recognizable after substantial
harmonic digression, unless it is thus pointed out, through coordination with other aspects of
the music. (How many people notice that many classical operas - for example, Mozart's
Magic Flute - do not end in the same key in which they start?) Such pointing out is achieved
by methods like:

accent: extremes of pitch, strong contrast of duration or orchestration;

building up to such important moments, with crescendi, rising lines,
gradual tempo change;
repetition, for emphasis;
directed cadential progressions;
isolation (silence on both sides).

Without such cues, one must assume that listeners somehow memorize the absolute pitch of a
work's tonic, and remember it despite all intervening harmonic activity. This is patent
nonsense. (Incidentally, such a more realistic view of tonality also sheds light on what Robert
Simpson, in his book Carl Nielsen, Symphonist, calls "progressive tonality", seen in
composers like Nielsen and Mahler, where a movement finishes in a different key from where
it began. The interesting point about such forms is not the simple observation that they do not
end where they begin, but that they may dramatize the search for a tonic. As Simpson points
out, the first movement in Nielsen's 5th Symphony is a particularly good example of this
procedure.)
How can the composer create cadences and cadential hierarchy in the absence of classical
tonality? First, all cadences, in any style, require coordination with rhythmic resolution and
accent. Even in classical tonal harmony the only difference between V-I progressions within a
phrase from those at the cadence is often rhythmic. Strong cadences combine pitch resolution
with rhythmic resolution. While it is harder to achieve a sense of cadence without a regular
beat, cadence still will coincide with a sense of rhythmic arrival, or at least break or dilute the
rhythmic flow.
Here are some other aspects of the notion of cadence which can be generalized:

A cadence always represents a change in the tension level, most commonly a

reduction: The Latin "cadere" means "to fall". Falling lines usually sound like endings,
perhaps by analogy with the tendency of the human voice to fall at the end of
sentences.

21

Adagio

muted violons, divisi

cresc.

7 8

9
10
11

Here cadence is created by the combination

of a falling line, a reduction in

interval tension, and the arrival of a long note on a strong beat.

apart, cadence is signaled by doing

setting something
Since "articulation"
means

something different from what precedes it, i.e. deviating from some regular harmonic
aphrase
astepwise
bass may become more angular, or vice
pattern. For example,

with

versa. Likewise,
often changes at the cadence. Both of
established harmonic rhythm
these techniques
require
some
harmonic
regularity
and predictability during the

phrase. (Incidentally, such changes can also be used to indicate climaxes; however the

increasing
intensity
rather than reduced tension. A cadence
latter areassociated
with

climactic.)

can also sometimes be

dim.

In this example, cadence is achieved by the arrival of a fresh

note (E), as well as by an accented leap into a new, lower
register. Also, the many repetitions in the preceding measures
create a rather slow harmonic rhythm, so that the final change
is even more marked. Note how drive to the last note is also
reinforced by a crescendo.
22

trumpets

strings
provides resolution
or culmination- at least Xlocally
A cadence
- of directional
forces.
within

established

Progressions (using theterm as defined earlier)

the phrase
are

culminated ordissipated.

Andante

Andante

two
scale on which
theme
is based (E-F-G#-B-C#-D#)
The
this
provides

makes
thecadence's
direction

semitone relationships,
above
and
below
E.
This

especially since thesetwo semitones

are prominently
placed

especially clear,
clarinet

right before it.

are
create
an effect analogous
used, the smallest intervals can
to
If unequal scales
leading tones.
Andante
The main elements
making the last chord here sound
final are
strings
its rhythmicallybrass
accented position and its duration, and the fact
that it contains a cluster, for the first time including a semitone,
which creates greater tension (accent): There is thus a
progression in the level of dissonance.

An acoustically clear interval, like a 5th or an 8ve in the bass can help establish
stability at the cadence.

Allegro

23

brass

low fifth
its longer
the
in the finalchord, combined
with

Here
duration, and the
fact
that
it
culminates
a
falling
gesture,
make

for a clear sense of resolution.

Andante

strings

establishment of secondary centers

As for hierarchy clarinet
in non-tonal contexts, tonal polarity - the
stopping, and the use of
rhythmic
- can fill this structural function,
varying
degreesof
ascan

the
elision,

anticipation

during cadences (e.g. motivic

mitigating factors
of
etc.).
next phrase,

gradations.
for easily
here is that the technique chosen must
The important thing
audible
allow
Allegro

Andante

Compare the two cadences for the following phrase:

Moderato

(piano solo)

Moderato

(piano solo)

Phrases "A" and "B" differ only in their final chord. Phrase "B"
sounds more final than phrase "A" because the final chord
contains more common tones in the two hands, reducing
harmonic tension in the generally polychordal context.

24

Principles of movement, interest and of variety

General aspects of harmonic accent
Obviously music whose only virtue is coherence is simply boring. If the "thread" mentioned
in the previous chapter is to hold the listener's attention through a whole piece, it requires both
continuity and contrasts. These contrasts come in varying degrees, normally in proportion to
the length of the piece: The longer the piece, the more novelty is needed. Varying the music's
contour thus contributes to the sense that the music breathes, contributing to an organic
feeling of tension and release.
Renewal of interest operates on all time scales. It always involves novelty: something
different from the preceding norm. Novelty creates musical "questions" and thus becomes
propulsive: first it attracts the listener's attention, and then calls his previous expectations into
question.
In general terms, such questions, or accents, involve one or more the following:

rhythmic stress
change in the level of harmonic tension (e.g. dissonance, in a classical context)
different density of texture
change in register
new timbre(s)

Creating momentum and renewing interest on various structural levels

Locally
On a local level, the following elements are propulsive:

Active tones: as mentioned previously, in any unequal scale some notes are more
active than others. These notes create instability, pushing the music forward. (This is
one reason why music which relentlessly exploits the total chromatic scale, especially
with no particular focus, quickly becomes gray and uninteresting.) Active tones
change the level of harmonic tension.
Unequal intervals within a chord: If all the intervals in a chord are equidistant, the
effect is static or ambiguous. Classical examples include the diminished 7th chord and
the augmented triad (both of which, incidentally, are extreme cases, since even when
continued outside a single octave they introduce no new notes, unlike, say, a stack of
4ths). Unequal intervals create tension and momentum. Note however, that if the
number of different intervals becomes too great, and especially if the spacing includes
multiple, adjacent sharp dissonances, the chord will tend to "clot" (Persichetti's term),
bogging down the harmony, since no clear focus of tension can be discerned to
suggest subsequent direction.

25

The first chord here is neutral in direction, due to the stacked

perfect 4ths. The second chord is much less stable, due to one
single different note (B natural), which engenders a variety of
stronger intervallic tensions.

Leaps: Since conjunct motion is the norm for both singing and hearing, a leap is a
special event. Even in situations where leaps abound, larger leaps will stick out,
perhaps because the physical effort required to produce them on most instruments
subtly inflects the rhythm.
Compound lines (lines which leap regularly between two or more registers,
compressing into one continuous line multiple strands of voice-leading): Such lines
keep the listener is a constant state of tension, because there is usually at least one
strand unresolved.

Higher Levels
On higher levels, the following (harmonic) elements contribute to interest and momentum:
variety of harmonic rhythm, and modulation. We will discuss these individually.
Harmonic rhythm
By "harmonic rhythm" we mean the rate at which chords change, especially when the outer
voices move (this is independent of the surface rhythmic values, which may include
harmonically static repeated notes and trills). Harmonic rhythm determines how much new
(harmonic) information the brain must process in a given time. Even in textures where there is
no simple harmonic norm, the rate of arrival of new pitches powerfully affects the music's
momentum.
Harmonic rhythm is always felt in relation to a norm; once this norm is established, all other
things being equal, faster changes "raise the temperature", while slower changes calm the
atmosphere. Of course arbitrary changes are also possible, but they quickly lose their novelty,
since the listener cannot develop meaningful expectations about them. However a change
from irregular harmonic rhythm to more regular harmonic rhythm can create a sense of
structural stability, and vice versa.

26

(piano solo)

This variant of a previous example plays with the listener's

expectations of harmonic rhythm. The first three repeated
measures create a sense of stability, which is disrupted by the
new notes in the fourth measure. The return to the opening
pattern suggests a repeat of the process but there quickly
follows even more novelty. Finally, the return of stability with
the repeated C#'s makes the sudden arrival of the final E more
dramatic.

Finally, consistency of harmonic rhythm can help unify the music within a section, while
change in
harmonic rhythm can help to define differences between sections.
Modulation
and Harmonic Transition

In music with clear tonal centers, moving to new tonal regions for contrast is an obvious way
to underline structural articulations. It is also a very sensitive means of creating contrast, since
it allows for everything from mild local changes to strong long term shifts.
In music without clear tonal centers, modulation acts like a simple extension of harmonic
rhythm: the arrival of new pitches is easily noticed, and the rate of their arrival influences the
sense of musical momentum. Even in non-tonal situations one can create gradations of
modulation, simply by controlling the number of new notes which arrive within a given span
of time.

27

Again, note the way the varying rate of arrival of new pitches in
this example creates temporary tonal stability and varying
degrees of contrast. The final E is more contrasting than the
previous changes since it does not reuse any previously
explored pitches.
Technically, the process of modulation is essentially the harmonic aspect of the art of
transition. As in musical form in general, transitions can be sudden or gradual, and can lead to
closer or more remote contrasts.
A useful technique for planning modulation is:

determine the appropriate degree of contrast for where one is in the form;
determine whether a gradual or a more abrupt change is required (abrupt changes
occur more rarely than gradual ones, since they are more disruptive to the music's
flow);
bring in new notes in ways which attract the ear (as accented notes, peaks, resolutions
of suspensions, etc.). Create momentum towards the new notes with melodic,
rhythmic, or textural progressions.
the more gradual the change required, the more important it is to create a neutral area,
often containing elements of both tonal zones, and to arrange the arrival of the notes
gradually.

Note that the changing the rate of modulation (an extension of the notion of harmonic rhythm)
can also create effects of increased or decreased musical movement. As discussed in our book
on musical form , incremental progressions - e.g. in the rate of modulation - allow the
composer to create expectations. Such expectations, both fulfilled and unfulfilled, connect the
musical present and future to remembered events in the past in a pseudo-causal way, thereby
unifying larger stretches of music, through suspense.
Also, where the music uses such progressions, whether in the rate of modulation or in other
aspects of the music, a sense of direction will result. Where there is direction, there is also
climax, i.e. a sense of culmination and arrival. Such climaxes are outstanding moments, which
the listener will easily remember.
28

Transitions between various types of Harmony

We have discussed various techniques above which aim to solve an important problem:
creating clear, audible, and coherent harmonic character. But it is not necessary or even
always desirable to use just one harmonic technique over a whole piece. Provided the
transition is smooth, it is quite easy to move from one harmonic technique to another. The
main way to achieve this is via common elements. (Persichetti has an excellent discussion of
this subject on p. 271-5; there is no need to cover the same material here.)
Of course, some procedures can be more easily linked than others, given the desirability of
some common ground between the starting point and the ending point. For example, added
notes can easily link up to polyharmony or vice versa, and intervallic harmony can easily lead
to cellular harmony using the same interval(s). On the other hand, certain other techniques are
harder to connect, for example diatonic modal harmony is not easily transformed into cellular
harmony.
Changes in harmonic technique can be applied locally or over larger stretches. The main
difference in making such transitions between sections is that they need stronger emphasis, to
make clear to the listener that the change marks an important formal joint. Various means for
achieving such emphasis have already been discussed above .
Here is an analysis of changes in harmonic technique within one small piece.

29

80

18

19

24

13
14

25

10

21

12

17

28

23

29

This example shows various types of harmony combined in the

same piece. The piece begins with small, three note clusters,
which arrive on a more openly spaced secundal chord (m. 3).
The second phrase is identical to the first, except for the
cadence chord (m. 5). The only difference between the two
cadences is the new middle note, A. This note is conjunct with
the corresponding note in m. 3 (B->A), creating a voice leading
connection. In m. 5 it introduces a more open sound, made up
of a sixth under a perfect 4th. The next phrase (m. 6-7)
alternates three note clusters with chords containing a more
open 5th sound, aurally prepared by the 4th in m. 5. The
alternation is a simple neighbor note movement. M. 8-9 pick up
the bottom two notes of the cadence in m. 7, and begin a new,

30

22

27

26

11

15
16

20

mirror harmony, which lasts until m. 10. Note that the left hand
has the middle note omitted, to lighten the texture. This mirror
harmony leads to a slightly freer, polychordal texture in m. 1112. Note how the degree of harmonic tension between the hands
diminishes into the cadence at m. 12, which is just a plain 7th
chord. M. 13-16 echo the piece's beginning, but with 3rds
instead of 2nds, and with clusters only at the cadences. M. 6 is
similarly echoed in m. 17; the chords on the offbeats are simple
neighbor chords. M. 18-19 pick up the quartal/quintal sound
from the on-the-beat chords in m. 17, and move, with increasing
harmonic tension, via conjunct voice leading, to the climax of
the piece, the dense polychords in m. 20-21. The outer voices
continue conjunctly into m. 22-23; the spacing however opens
up somewhat with the 5th chords on the first beats of m. 22-23.
M. 24-25 echo m. 8-9, but with freer polychords, guided by
contrary motion in the outer parts into the cadence in m. 25. M.
26-27 echo the opening phrase, however here 3rds are
interspersed with the clusters. The cadence chord in m. 27
contains both a 5th and a minor 2nd (which recalls the previous
clusters). The bottom note of the 5th in turn acts as a leading
tone into the bass of the final phrase: a simple neighbor note
motion starting on C. The 7th chord flavor in m. 27 also
prepares the 7th chords of m. 28. Final resolution takes place
with the C minor chord with an added Ab in the last bar.
Note how all the harmonic transitions occur through common
tones, simple, stepwise voice leading, or clear intervallic
associations between successive harmonies. Motivic elements
help to hold the piece together as well.

31

Harmony and Texture; Orchestration

and Harmony


textures for
One unsettling aspect of most books on harmony is that, in reducing harmonic
A

analytical purposes, they dilute or remove some of the most salient harmonic effects: the way
the notes are disposed in musical (registral) space, and the composer's choices of doubling
and timbre. Any pedagogical or analytical
regime which doesBnot thoroughly discuss what is
A
most audible - and these dimensions of sound are not just details - istrumpets
bound to remain
musically feeble.

Spacing and register

strings
{strings
The overtone series remains a good overall guide to harmonic clarity. Generally, the more a
chord is laid out like the overtone series - spacing with wider intervals on the bottom and the
smaller intervals above - the more it will favor blended resonance. Clear acoustic intervals,
like 8ves and 5ths, on the bottom tend to "ground" the harmony, regardless of what is above.

These second chord here is simply an "inversion" of the first.

(This example once again points out the meaninglessness of
"inversion" in chords with many different chromatic notes.)
Note the enormous difference in effect between the two chords.
The first chord sounds like a colorful elaboration of an A minor
harmony, due to the octave A in the bass and the supportive
fifth above it. The second chord sounds rootless, since the only
acoustically strong interval is the 5th C-G, hidden in the middle
parts.
Of course a composer may legitimately want expressive effects like dark, close chords in the
bass, to suggest confusion or heaviness of spirit. But these are special effects, and should not
result inadvertently.
Another point: As we have seen previously, harmonic tension is always softened by registral
separation: The ear is less inclined to associate widely spaced dissonant notes with each other.
At the most extreme, such gaps create separate planes of tone.
One last point about register, referred to earlier because of the way it mitigates the principle of
8ve equivalence, is its relationship to clarity and character. Pitch clarity is always greatest in
the middle register, where human hearing has evolved to make the most precise distinctions.

32

Doubling

Apart from spacing and register, choice of doubling is important as well.One problem with
A

Harmonic character changes dramatically according to register. (In teaching composition, it is

often useful to suggest to students that they try harmonic effects in various registers before
settling on the "default" middle range.)

classical serial writing is its rigid avoidance of 8ve doubling. Not only does this make clarity
in the extreme registers of the orchestra almost impossible, but it also closes off many
interesting harmonic effects, which use
A doublings to color a chord
B in particular ways. In other
words, although octave doublings do indeed change the flavor
of the harmony, that is no
trumpets
reason always to avoid them; a better goal is to use them in ways that are intentional and
expressive.

Doubling of notes in individual chords emphasizes whatever character the doubled

note participates in. Doublings of bass
notes add more solidity than doublings of

middle notes, and adjacent doublings (unseparated by other notes) are more noticeable

Doublings are not all equivalent in effect;{strings

here are some guidelines
stringsto their use.

than non-adjacent ones.

Notice the effects of different doublings in these three chords. In
the first chord, doubling the A on the bottom gives it the feeling
of a root, as does the fifth above it. In the second chord,
doubling the D#, in semitone conflict with the E, creates more
tension, and a heavier sound. In the third chord, doubling the
C, consonant with both the G# and the E, gives the chord a
richer sound.

Doubling of entire lines within one plane of tone is more a question of orchestration
than of harmony, and thus need not be discussed here. However doubling between
planes of tone, unless very transient, helps to encourage aural fusion.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that organ registration, with its use of "timbral" doublings,
including doublings at pitches other than the octave (mutation stops), can provide interesting
testing ground for artificial timbres. The classic example of this technique is in Ravel's
Bolero.

Timbre
33




harmony
study
is the difference
ineffect between

Another element often ignored
in traditional
instrumental and vocal writing. Suspensions written for the piano are very different when
difficult for voices, are easierfor strings.
dissonances,
played by the organ; attacked

In fact, even comparing instruments,

timbre
influences
the sound
of any
interval.
Clusters
are

quite aggressive on the organ, but soften enormously when played by strings (possibly
of pitch in the latter
provide some
inner
mobility).
because slight, continuous fluctuations
8ves and 5ths in brass instruments have a richness and fullness unequaled by the same
intervals played by woodwinds. Low, closely spaced chords in trombones have a richness
which is very different from
A their (relative) heaviness when Bplayed by horns. In short, once C
beyond the most elementary work, harmony cannot and should not be separated from
orchestration.

Harmony with multiple

of tone
planes

("planes"),

A chord is normally perceived as a unit. However

it can also include subgroups

through registral and/or timbral

particularly if the orchestration encourages such "streaming",
separation. Here is an example.
A

trumpets

strings

{strings

In "A", when a homogenous family (strings here) plays the

chord, the highest two notes are heard as enriching and
blending with the overall mass. The same chord, orchestrated
as in "B" , presents two separate timbral layers: a background
string chord, and a foreground dissonance in the trumpets. Our
hearing of the harmony will now focus much more acutely on
the dissonance G/Ab, leading to different expectations about the
music to follow.

The point here is that virtually all harmony books assume complete and continuous unity of
tone. In real life, however, there is a world of expressive potential to be explored in multilayered harmonic textures, and in various degrees of blend between planes of tone. Further,
such stratification is an effective means of exploring harmonic complexity without creating
heaviness and inertia. This is especially true if the various layers are distinguished by distinct
interval characters, timbral and/or registral separation, and rhythmic independence.

34

Criteria for evaluating harmony

Following our discussion of harmonic principles, we can now specify what poor harmonic
construction - in any style - sounds like. Signs of inadequate harmonic sensitivity include:

unmotivated inconsistency of harmonic worlds;

simultaneous, contradictory characters (lack of clear expressive intentions);
inappropriate or seemingly random accents;
inappropriate or seemingly random holes or dead spots;
greyness, lack of contour (not enough variety of texture, no sense of breathing);
lack of momentum;
lack of formal articulation, or badly placed articulations.

Pedagogy
Here are a few suggestions for teaching harmony:

Usually the "rules" of harmony are presented as black and white: avoid parallel
octaves, false relations, etc. . This primitive guidance is only useful for a rank
beginner. In practice, harmonic effects depend on context, and the real issue is that the
composer must be very sensitive to consistency . For example, in Debussy's La
Cathdrale Engloutie, parallel fifths and octaves are part of a consistent sound world,
and therefore do not stand out inappropriately. In teaching, a better approach is to
"grade" harmonic situations on a scale according to aural prominence. Such a focus on
gradations (scales of dissonance, accent, modulatory distance, etc.) develops the
student's ear for finer distinctions, and encourages more refined musical judgement,
which is transferable to other situations in a way that rigid rules are not. Here is an
example:

In "A" , in a normal four part polyphonic context, the parallel

5ths between outer voices are flagrant. However in "B", the
parallel 5ths are much more subtle. They are in the inner parts,
and the soprano distracts attention away from them through
activity. In a homogeneous timbre, the (correct) voice leading in
"C" is virtually indistinguishable from that in "B".

35

Sing and play: Harmony is ear training. The student should regularly sing individual
parts while playing the others.
Try alternatives: Often a fictitious recomposition of a harmonic passage with different
voice leading or a different cadence will prove enlightening.
Look for the leading part(s) at any given time: Harmony is not a democracy. In most
harmonic situations, certain notes contribute more to the overall effect than others. For
example, cultivate the habit of searching for which intervals in a chord most influence
its character.
While it is useful to begin harmonic study with four part vocal textures (since a texture
of four homogeneous parts is a good compromise between fullness and linear
independence, and everyone has a voice!) harmonic study eventually include writing,
in various numbers of real parts, for piano, as well as composing for various small
ensembles, to explore the interrelation of harmony and orchestration in more detail.

Alan Belkin, 2003 for all text and musical examples. Legal proof of copyright exists

36