HSB Research Review
HSB Research Review
HSB Research Review
Vol. 2 No. 2
July - December, 2011
Regn. No. : 36595
RESEARCH PAPERS
Perceived Workplace Environment and Mental Health of Medical Professionals in
Public Hospitals
Manisha Agarwal
Occupational Stress and Job Performance
Naresh Kumar and Vandana Singh
Multivariate Profitability Analysis of Indian General Insurance Companies: A
Study of Post Reform Period
Manjit Singh and Rohit Kumar
Corporate Redress System for Insurance Consumers
Deepa Sharma
Patients Satisfaction Measurement: Hype or Hope! A Critique
Parimal H Vyas & Madhusudan N Pandya
Effectiveness of Knowledge Management Systems An Empirical Study of
Textile Industry of Punjab
Radha Kanwal Sharma and Prem Kumar
Day of the Week Effect on Stock Market Return and Volatility of India
Suman and S S Chahal
Causal Relationship Between Economic Development and General Insurance in
India
Mahesh Chand Garg
Students as Responsible Consumers Agents for Social Change
Narendra Singh and Karnika Gupta
Role of Stimulating Packages in Cognitive Development : An Empirical Study
Nidhi Singh and Usha Rani
CASE STUDY
Mahindra Renault JV : Why Its on the end of The Road
Jaskiran Arora and Umashankar Venkatesh
BOOK REVIEW
The Kite Runner
Pooja Bhagwan and Kamalpreet Kaur
Managing Editor
Prof B K Punia, Dean, Haryana School of Business,
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and
Technology, Hisar
Editor-in-Chief
Prof S C Kundu, Director, Haryana School of Business,
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and
Technology, Hisar
Editor
Dr Karam Pal Narwal, Associate Professor, Haryana
School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of
Science and Technology, Hisar
Prof H L Verma
Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar
University of Science and Technology, Hisar
Prof M S Turan
Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar
University of Science and Technology, Hisar
Printed at
M/s Radhey Krishna Offset Press, Katla Ramlila, Hisar 125001 (Haryana) INDIA
Published at
Editor
Dr. Karam Pal, Associate Professor , Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University
of Science& Technology Hisar, Haryana- 125001(Haryana) INDIA
Editor
Contents
Research Papers
PERCEIVED WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT AND MENTAL HEALTH OF MEDICAL
PROFESSIONALS IN PUBLIC HOSPITALS
Manisha Agarwal
Page
1-10
11-16
17-26
27-34
35-45
46-53
DAY OF THE WEEK EFFECT ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND VOLATILITY OF INDIA
Suman and S S Chahal
54-59
60-68
69-75
76-81
CASE STUDY
MAHINDRA RENAULT JV: WHY ITS ON THE END OF THE ROAD
Jaskiran Arora and Umashankar Venkatesh
82-86
BOOK REVIEW
THE KITE RUNNER
Pooja Bhagwan and Kamalpreet Kaur
87-88
Vol. 2 No. 2
PERCEIVED
WORKPLACE
ENVIRONMENT AND
MENTAL HEALTH OF
MEDICAL
PROFESSIONALS IN
PUBLIC HOSPITALS
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
The present study examined the relationship between the
hospital workplace environment in terms of perceived
organizational support, inter-professional support, and
participation in decision making, with the mental health of
medical professionals as indicated by reported levels of
psychological well being and psychological morbidity in
central and state level public hospitals in eastern parts of
Uttar Pradesh. Participants consisted of medical and paramedical professionals employed under the state-level
(N=50) and central-level (N=50) hospitals. Statistical
analysis of the data revealed that the state and central
level hospitals were significantly different on the
dimensions of the perceived work environment and levels
of psychological well-being and psychological morbidity
reported by the participants. Stepwise regression analysis
showed that while participation in decision making failed
to emerge as an antecedent of the mental health status of
employed medical professionals, perceived organizational
support positively predicted mental well-being among
participants working only in the state-government hospitals
and also negatively predicted psychological morbidity
among the participants working in these hospitals. In the
central-government hospitals, inter-professional support
negatively predicted psychological morbidity among the
participants. The study has important implications for Indian
hospitals which are currently facing problems of workforce
retention due to the demands placed on medical
professionals by the perceived inadequacy of the workplace
environment.
Dr Manisha Agarwal
Associate Professor, Department of Psychology,
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.)
E-mail : [email protected]
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
a)
Vol. 2 No. 2
namely, perceived organizational support, interprofessional support and participative climate, would
be higher in central government hospitals.
2.
3.
4.
5.
July-December 2011
RESULTS
Data were statistically analyzed for examining the
differences in the levels of demographic characteristics,
perceived work environment dimensions and levels of
psychological well-being and psychological morbidity
among the medical professionals working in central and
state level hospitals through t-tests. Data were also
analyzed for examining the hypothesized patterns of
relationships between the demographic variables and
participants perceptions of the work environment with the
mental health status dimensions of medical professionals
through correlation and step-wise regression analysis.
METHODOLOGY
Participants: A sample of medical and para-medical staff
(N=100) employed under the state-level medical services
and central-level medical services of the railways, working
in government hospitals, participated in the study. From
the state-level hospitals of Uttar Pradesh, participants
consisted of 50 doctors and para-medical personnel.
Similarly, participants from central government railway
hospitals consisted of 50 doctors and para-medical
personnel. Physicians, surgeons, pathologists, radiologists,
dentists and anesthetists comprised the sample of medical
doctors while the para-medical participants consisted of
members from the nursing staff, lab-technicians, x-ray
technicians and personnel related to hospital care services.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 1. Showing significance of the differences between the means of variables for medical professionals in central and
state hospitals (N=100)
State
Central
Variables
Mean
Std. Deviation
Mean
Std. Deviation
t-test
Salary
2.32
.71
2.92
1.38
2.73**
Years of Service
21.5
9.15
14.98
8.14
-3.76**
Promotions
.96
1.03
1.64
1.17
3.08**
Age
48.92
8.23
44.98
8.26
-2.39**
POS
22.44
4.05
27.76
6.94
4.68**
Participation
29.62
7.11
37.12
6.85
5.37**
Inter Professional Support
12.2
3.40
15.1
2.65
4.75**
Psychological morbidity
32.94
6.16
21.62
6.4
-9.01**
Well-being
49.52
8.69
58.62
7.76
5.53**
* p<.05; **p<.01
Table 2. Showing correlations of variables with the mental health status dimensions of medical professionals in central
and state level hospitals (N=100)
Predictor Variables
Salary
Years of service
Promotion
Age
Participation
Inter-professional support
Perceived Organizational Support
Psychological morbidity
Mental well-being
* p<.05; **p<.01
Table 3. Stepwise regression analysis of the demographic variables with psychological morbidity among medical
professionals working in central and state level hospitals. (N=100)
Central Hospitals
Variables
Salary
R
.42
R sq.
.17
R Square change
.17
State Hospitals
% Variance
17.3
Beta Coefficient
.42
t ratio
3.17
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 4. Stepwise regression analysis of the demographic variables with mental well-being among medical professionals
working in state and central level hospitals. (N=100).
Variables
salary
R
.29
R sq.
.08
Years of service
.36
.13
Central hospitals
R Square change
.08
State hospitals
.13
% Variance
8.2
Beta Coefficient
-.29
t ratio
-2.07
12.6
.36
2.63
* p<.05; **p<.01
Table 5. Stepwise regression analysis of the perceived work environment dimensions with psychological morbidity
among medical professionals working in central and state level hospitals. (N=100)
Variables
Inter professional support
Perceived organizational support
R
.30
.47
.42
Central hospitals
R sq.
R Square change
.09
.09
.22
.13
State hospitals
.18
.18
% variance
9.1
13
Beta Coefficient
-.30
.61
t ratio
-2.21
2.80
17.7
-.42
-3.21
* p<.05; **p<.01
Table 6. Stepwise regression analysis of the perceived work environment dimensions with mental well-being among
medical professionals working in state and central level hospitals. (N=100)
Variables
Perceived organizational support
R
.34
State hospitals
R sq.
R Square change % variance
.12
.12
11.8
Central hospitals
Beta coefficient
.34
t ratio
2.53
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
REFERENCES
CONCLUSION
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
10
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
OCCUPATIONAL
STRESS AND JOB
PERFORMANCE
ABSTRACT
Dr Naresh Kumar
Professor and Chairman, University School of Management,
Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
Email ID : [email protected]
Ms Vandana Singh
Research Scholar, University School of Management,
Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
Email ID : [email protected]
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
2)
3)
4)
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sample: A sample of 400 employees working in various IT
companies based in Northern as well as Southern India
was selected. The present data were collected with the help
of standardized tools such as Job Related Tensions (Kahn
et al 1964), Organizational Role Stress (Udai Pareek 1997)
and Job Performance, (Randell et al. 1990).
The obtained data were processed for the computation of
Mean, Standard Deviation (S.D), & Pearsons Correlation
and Multiple Regression. All the Statistical Analysis was
performed with the help of SPSS.
Scoring Procedure and Organizational Role Stress: The
organizational role stress scale (ORS) by Udai Pareek, (1997)
has been used to measure organizational role stress and its
dimensions such as inter-role distance, role stagnation, role
expectation conflict, role erosion, role overload, role
isolation, personal inadequacy, self role distance, role
ambiguity and resource inadequacy. ORS is a five point
scale, containing five items for each role stress and a total
of 50 statements. The answer sheet is also used for scoring.
The total scores on each role stress range from 0 to 20. To
get the total score for each role stress, the ratings given are
totaled horizontally as shown in table below. Retest
reliability coefficients were calculated for a group of about
500 employees from three banks. The scale has acceptable
reliability (as mentioned by author)
Statement number
1 11 21 31 41
2 12 22 32 42
3 13 23 33 43
4 14 24 34 44
5 15 25 35 45
6 16 26 36 46
7 17 27 37 47
8 18 28 38 48
9 19 29 39 49
10 20 30 40 - 50
July-December 2011
RESULTS
Descriptive Analysis: The collected data was analyzed with
the help of descriptive statistics. Skew ness and kurtosis
describes the pattern of scores distribution.
The scores of employees on 13 variables including 1 of Job
Performance, and 12 of Occupational Stress Viz. Inter Role
Distance, Role Stagnation, Role Expectation Conflict, Role
Erosion, Role Overload, Role Isolation, Personal
inadequacy, Self-Role Distance, Role Ambiguity, Resource
Inadequacy, Overall organizational role Stress and Job
Related Tensions have been shown in table 1. All the
measures of occupational stress barring overall
organizational role stress and self-role distance are
positively skewed and the measure Job Performance is
negatively skewed.
Dimension
Inter Role Distance
Role Stagnation
Role Expectation Conflict
Role Erosion
Role Overload
Role Isolation
Personal Inadequacy
Self Role Distance
Role Ambiguity
Resource Inadequacy
Vol. 2 No. 2
greater than 8 (i.e. the standard mean) for all the measures
of organizational role stress. IT professionals also perceive
moderate level of job related tensions as it is clear from
their mean score (40.58) on the measure of job related
tensions (standard mean = 35)
Variables
Mean
1
2
3
4
40.57
9.50
9.96
9.87
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Std.
kewness Kurtosis
Deviation
7.01
1.60
3.40
2.55
0.22
-0.53
2.61
0.13
-0.60
2.54
0.19
-0.12
10.03
9.68
9.39
9.67
9.45
9.55
9.61
96.75
2.63
2.72
2.73
2.70
2.43
2.50
2.64
14.98
0.16
0.18
0.15
0.14
0.07
0.11
0.2
-0.28
-0.34
-0.26
-0.75
-0.59
-0.38
-0.40
-0.48
-0.72
57.78
3.35
-0.46
-0.52
Job related
tensions
Inter Role
Distance
Role
Stagnation
Role
Expectation
Conflict
Role
Erosion
Role
Overload
Role
Isolation
Job
Inter
Role
related Role
Stagnatensions Distance tion
Role
Role
expectation Erosion
Comflict
July-December 2011
Role
Role
Personal
Self
Role
Resource Overall
Job
Overload Isolation Inadequacy Role
abiguity Inadequacy Organizational Performance
Distance
Role Stress
-0.051
-0.093
-.127(*)
-.161(**) -.157(**)
-.205(**) -.105(*)
-.125(*)
-.108(*) -.168(**)
-.228(**)
-0.005
.223(**)
.258(**)
197(**)
.262(**)
.165(**)
.293(**)
.233(**)
.202(**) .234(**)
.531(**)
-.349(**)
.278(**)
.253(**)
.227(**)
.200(**)
.219(**)
.277(**)
.158(**) .220(**)
.532(**)
-.290(**)
.371(**)
.281(**)
.311(**)
.299(**)
.276(**)
.269(**) .260(**)
.625(**)
-.374(**)
.300(**)
.207(**)
.143(**)
.232(**)
.145(**) .225(**)
.536(**)
-.295(**)
.245(**)
.267(**)
.234(**)
.212(**) .292(**)
.584(**)
-.327(**)
.269(**)
.291(**)
.244(**) .311(**)
.570(**)
-.267(**)
.338(**)
.261(**) .268(**)
.588(**)
-.327(**)
.368(**) .363(**)
.621(**)
-.356(**)
.315(**)
.546(**)
-.297(**)
.608(**)
-.306(**)
-.555(**)
Personal
Inadequacy
Self Role
Distance
Role
Ambiguity
Resource
Inadequacy
Overall
Organizational
Role Stress
Job
Performance
14
Vol. 2 No. 2
DISCUSSION
Regression
Coefficients b
(Constant)
40.651
1 Job Related Tensions
-.145
2 Inter Role Distance
-.407
3 Role Stagnation
-.382
4 Role Expectation Conflict
-.412
5 Role Erosion
-.445
6 Role Overload
-.491
7 Role Isolation
-.568
8 Personal Inadequacy
-.479
9 Self Role Distance
-.509
10 Role Ambiguity
-.442
11 Resource Inadequacy
-.595
12 Overall Organizational role Stress -.594
40.57
9.50
9.96
9.87
10.03
9.68
9.39
9.67
9.45
9.55
9.61
96.75
57.78
Multiple R = .526
Standard Error of Measurement
F=12.318
July-December 2011
Mean
R2= .28
3.255
DF=12 and 387
REFERENCES
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
an empirical assessment in two countries,
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
Vol.33, pp.121
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoeks, P.S. & Rosenthal,
R.A. (1964), Organizational stress: Studies in role
conflict and role ambiguity, New York: Wiley Pub, 26.
Beehr, T.A. and Franz, T.M. (1986), The current debate about
the meaning of job stress, Journal of Organizational
Behavior & Management, Vol. 8, pp. 5118
Gilboa, S.; Shirom, A.; Fried Y. & Cooper, C. (2008), A MetaAnalysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job
Performance: Examining Main and Moderating
Effects, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 61(2), pp. 227 271
Vol. 2 No. 2
MULTIVARIATE
PROFITABILITY
ANALYSIS OF INDIAN
GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANIES: A STUDY
OF POST REFORM
PERIOD
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
The contours of insurance business have been changing
across the globe and the rippling effect of the same can be
observed in the Indian market as well. The insurance
industry of India has started to reveal the potential after
the process of reforms which resulted in to liberalization,
privatization and globalization of insurance industry in
India. Now it has become quite tough for the companies to
work in a competitive environment and there is uncertainty
regarding the effect of these reforms on the profitability of
these companies which is important for the safety and
soundness of insurance industry. The present study is an
endeavor to examine the effect of reforms on the profitability
performance of the various public sector and private sector
general insurance companies, and identifies the gap in the
performance so as to make suggestions thereof. The study
brings out that public sector has exhibited higher
underwriting losses in the post-reform period and the higher
investment return of the public sector general insurance
companies has compensated their underwriting losses. The
higher investment income of the public sector general
insurance companies is due to their aggressive investment
portfolio policy and better performance of share market in
the recent past. But the prospects for a rapid improvement
in investment return are currently uncertain. Given these
uncertain prospects of investment return, the public sector
general insurance companies must focus on sustainable
profitability business model by emphasizing on
improvement in the underwriting results to achieve greater
profitability and to achieve better underwriting results.
Dr Manjit Singh
Associate Professor, School of Applied Management,
Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab
Email id: [email protected]
Dr Rohit Kumar
Assistant Professor, Punjabi University College, Moonak,
Sangroor, Punjab
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 1. Combined Ratio of General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform Period
Name of the
Company
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
National
106.40
116.18
113.03
143.63
116.05
New India
113.28
117.71
114.28
122.39
109.16
Oriental
110.93
119.79
123.29
120.73
111.56
United India
119.89
124.40
133.91
138.53
122.72
Mean
112.62
119.52
121.13
131.32
114.87
Median
112.10
118.75
118.78
130.46
113.80
S.D.
5.62
3.57
9.67
11.48
5.960
Royal Sundaram 92.04
90.84
89.92
87.67
87.07
Reliance
89.47
91.84
85.54
86.32
54.50
IFFCO-Tokio
60.97
75.78
72.91
74.55
96.71
TATA AIG
84.69
82.15
86.80
84.95
93.39
Bajaj Allianz
87.33
80.14
69.58
80.64
79.09
ICICI Lombard 95.44
47.02
66.35
76.55
77.35
Cholaman Dalam 262.67
94.27
95.28
105.86
81.07
HDFC CHUBB 153.83
83.09
101.24
101.08
111.80
Mean
115.81
80.64
83.45
87.20
85.12
Median
90.75
82.62
86.17
85.63
84.07
S.D.
64.88
15.01
12.59
11.10
16.77
Source: Compiled from IRDA Annual Reports from 2002-03 to 2007-08.
2007-08
Mean
123.60
115.09
123.57
123.42
121.42
123.49
4.22
91.69
92.27
95.13
90.42
82.53
92.87
82.56
110.01
92.18
91.98
8.58
119.82
115.32
118.31
127.14
120.15
119.84
8.89
89.87
83.32
79.34
87.07
79.89
75.93
120.28
110.18
90.74
87.2
29.94
(Percentage)
Median
S.D.
116.12
114.69
120.26
123.91
119.84
12.92
4.45
5.67
7.33
8.89
90.38
87.90
75.17
85.88
80.39
76.95
94.78
105.63
87.20
2.08
14.39
13.90
4.14
5.83
17.87
70.35
23.68
29.95
Test of Significance
Test
Mann- Whitney Test
Ratio
Combined Ratio
Z-value
-6.236
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 2. Underwriting Results Ratio of General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform Period
Name of the
Company
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Mean
National
New India
Oriental
United India
Mean
Median
S.D.
Royal Sundaram
Reliance
IFFCO-Tokio
TATA AIG
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Lombard
Cholamandalam
HDFC CHUBB
Mean
Median
S.D.
-14.14
-13.82
-13.21
-19.08
-15.06
-13.98
2.70
-21.59
-41.10
-4.57
-19.27
-2.07
-34.05
-237.78
-147.39
-63.48
-27.82
84.29
-21.00
-18.96
-22.77
-25.09
-21.95
-21.88
2.60
-6.24
-15.63
-0.61
-6.02
0.39
13.90
-44.95
-38.15
-12.17
-6.13
20.01
-18.96
-17.57
-27.56
-34.37
-24.62
-23.26
7.86
-3.98
-8.02
1.79
0.79
7.81
0.84
-15.88
-12.42
-3.63
-1.595
7.98
-40.64
-27.50
-26.52
-39.94
-33.65
-33.72
7.68
-3.65
10.86
-2.21
-0.15
3.29
-4.65
-16.17
-4.77
-2.18
-2.93
7.69
-19.13
-13.72
-18.12
-28.90
-19.97
-18.62
6.40
-1.43
-6.07
-2.39
-1.61
1.55
-3.82
-1.15
-6.41
-2.67
-2
2.66
-28.92
-17.18
-23.65
-29.62
-24.84
-26.28
5.76
-8.05
-20.49
-8.43
-4.46
-1.77
-4.82
-5.06
-20.47
-9.19
-6.55
7.27
-23.80
-18.12
-21.97
-29.50
-23.35
-21.88
7.78
-7.49
-13.41
-2.74
-5.12
1.53
-5.43
-53.50
-38.27
-15.55
-4.71
40.34
(Percentage)
Median
S.D.
-20.07
-17.38
-23.21
-29.26
-21.89
9.55
5.05
5.42
7.23
7.79
-5.11
-11.83
-2.30
-3.04
0.97
-4.24
-16.03
-16.45
-4.71
7.27
17.28
3.50
7.39
3.68
15.72
91.57
54.83
40.35
Ratio
Z-value
Underwriting Results Ratio -4.539
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 3. Investment Income Ratio of General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform Period
Name of the
Company
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Mean
National
New India
Oriental
United India
Mean
Median
S.D.
Royal Sundaram
Reliance
IFFCO-Tokio
TATA AIG
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Lombard
Cholamandalam
HDFC CHUBB
Mean
Median
S.D.
22.80
25.05
25.38
32.07
26.33
25.21
3.99
17.48
121.80
18.25
12.31
11.47
33.45
168.67
42.94
53.30
25.85
59.09
26.42
34.85
46.39
43.95
37.90
39.40
9.12
11.45
47.02
11.26
11.18
10.68
19.62
32.16
14.05
19.68
12.75
13.23
24.19
38.32
48.79
49.26
40.14
43.55
11.77
6.67
22.58
8.01
9.92
8.11
16.01
12.03
8.48
11.48
9.20
5.37
37.64
47.96
44.69
62.92
48.30
46.32
10.65
7.10
27.06
7.49
8.94
7.45
12.12
13.19
9.36
11.59
9.15
6.63
36.94
47.46
40.29
51.96
44.16
43.87
6.80
8.44
6.34
9.83
9.13
8.55
9.37
9.88
10.99
9.07
9.25
1.36
37.04
47.74
39.71
54.75
44.81
43.72
8.03
9.01
7.78
9.97
9.54
10.64
12.61
8.23
8.59
9.55
9.275
1.54
30.84
40.23
40.88
49.15
40.27
40.00
10.60
10.03
38.76
10.80
10.17
9.48
17.20
40.69
15.74
19.11
10.66
28.44
(Percentage)
Median
S.D.
31.68
42.89
42.49
50.61
40.00
7.08
9.29
8.36
10.47
10.61
8.73
24.82
9.90
9.73
9.60
14.31
12.61
10.18
10.66
4.02
43.30
3.90
1.32
1.65
8.71
63.30
13.49
28.44
Ratio
Z-value
-5.758
0.00
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 4. Return on Equity Ratio of General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform Period
Name of the
Company
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Mean
National
New India
Oriental
United India
Mean
Median
S.D.
Royal Sundaram
Reliance
IFFCO-Tokio
TATA AIG
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Lombard
Cholamandalam
HDFC CHUBB
Mean
Median
S.D.
12.58
7.52
7.59
11.83
9.88
9.71
2.70
-3.54
15.64
5.94
-10.46
8.77
3.11
-2.96
-6.32
1.27
0.07
8.65
6.39
14.97
28.20
21.22
17.69
18.09
9.27
6.17
6.79
8.66
12.39
16.52
14.07
-4.33
-18.58
5.21
7.72
11.52
10.78
9.32
23.30
15.16
14.64
12.97
6.28
3.85
4.21
12.42
9.79
26.36
19.38
-2.35
-6.68
8.37
7.00
10.97
-9.57
14.90
17.25
18.04
10.15
16.07
13.21
6.17
9.40
5.22
6.98
19.31
13.49
-2.20
3.54
7.74
6.57
6.49
29.39
24.25
24.55
19.16
24.34
24.4
4.17
14.88
0.63
9.14
8.85
18.68
8.62
8.80
1.60
8.90
8.82
6.01
10.49
20.09
0.46
19.46
12.62
14.97
9.21
2.66
-27.27
2.36
6.22
18.29
9.56
4.96
-11.33
0.68
3.81
13.99
10.01
15.17
16.89
17.48
14.89
15.06
8.91
5.03
1.57
7.29
5.63
17.99
11.37
0.32
-6.30
5.36
6.19
10.04
(Percentage)
Median
S.D.
10.64
14.94
20.28
18.60
15.07
12.49
6.32
10.81
3.42
8.92
5.01
5.50
7.30
7.92
18.49
11.53
-2.28
-6.50
6.20
6.00
15.01
3.52
8.18
5.65
5.57
5.28
8.19
10.05
Test of Significance
Ratio
Z-value
Return on Equity Ratio
-3.93
Table 5. Spearmans Correlation of Public Sector General Insurance Companies during Post-reform Period
Return on Claim
Expense
Underwriting Investment Net
Growth
Equity
Results
Income
Retention Rate
Return on Equity
1
Claim
-0.111
1
Expense
0.07
0.081
1
Underwriting Results -0.024
-0.762(**) -0.551(**) 1
Investment Income
0.532(**)
0.410(*)
0.482(*)
-0.588(**)
1
Net Retention
-0.077
-0.019
-0.152
0.023
0.05
1
Growth Rate
-0.098
-0.362
-0.438(*)
0.333
-0.357
-0.231
1
* Significant at 5 per cent level (2- tailed)
** Significant at 10 per cent level (2-tailed)
Table 6. Spearmans Correlations of Private Sector General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform Period
Return on Claim
Expense
Underwriting Investment Net
Growth Rate
Equity
Results
Income
Retention
Return on Equity
1
Claim
0.051
1
Expense
-0.585(**) -0.294(*)
1
Underwriting Results 0.793(**)
-0.017
-0.497(**) 1
Investment Income
-0.101
-0.001
0.082
-0.408(**)
1
Net Retention
-0.352(*)
0.078
0.385(**) -0.168
-0.417(**) 1
Growth Rate
-0.051
-0.450(**) -0.157
-0.124
0.075
-0.134
1
* Significant at 5 per cent level (2- tailed)
** Significant at 10 per cent level (2-tailed)
23
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 7. Multiple Regression Analysis of the Public Sector General Insurance Companies during the Post-reform
Period (2002-03 to 2007-08).
Step Intercept
Unstandardized Co-efficient (b)
R2
Adjusted R2
F- Change
Sig. F(Constant a)
Investment
Underwriting
Change
Income Ratio (x1)
(x2)
I
II
-0.704(-0.106)
3.6(0.698)
0.387(2.433)*
0.781(5.041)*
.864(4.093)*
0.212
0.562
0.176
0.520
5.922
16.754
0.024
0.001
Intercept
(Constant a)
9.605(6.795)*
Income (x2)
-
II
6.543(5.137)*
0.723(5.135)*
0.322(8.050)
Note: The figures given in parentheses represent the t-values.
R2
Adjusted R2
F-Change
Sig. FChange
0.364
0.35
25.2
0.00
0.606
0.588
26.37
0.00
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
REFERENCES
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
26
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
CORPORATE REDRESS
SYSTEM FOR
INSURANCE
CONSUMERS
ABSTRACT
Dr Deepa Sharma
Assistant Professor in Commerce
Maharaja Agrasen College, University of Delhi, New Delhi
Email: [email protected]
27
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
LITERATURE REVIEW
The growth of consumer movement has prompted
companies to set up a consumer grievance-redress
mechanism. According to Buskirk and Rothe (1970),
business firms need to establish a separate corporate
division for consumer affairs, change corporate practices
that were perceived as deceptive, and to educate channel
members about the need for consumerist effort, in their
response to consumerism. Kendall and Russ (1975)
examined the complaint handling in consumer packaged
goods industries (CPGMs) of the US. With regard to
corporate responses to consumer complaints, the study,
inter alia, revealed: (a) all companies responded
promptlythree quarters of them had definite policies with
respect to a given time period, at most a week; (c) all the
companies responded in the form of a personal letter along
with the offer of product replacement (87 per cent) or moneyback (64 per cent); (d) in half of the companies a public
relations or consumer affairs department was entrusted with
the responsibility of handling consumer complaints. In 20
per cent of the companies, the sales and marketing
department was given the responsibility while in another
20 per cent, the science or research department was
entrusted with the task.
28
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
10 (16.7)
(37.2)*
6 (10.0)
9 (15.0)
6 (10.0)
14(23.3)
(58.3)*
4 (6.7)
24 (40.0)*
8 (13.3)
2 (3.3)
3 (5.0)
11 (18.3)
3 (5.0)
5 (8.3)
9 (15.0)
8 (13.3)
1(1.7)
1 (1.7)
10 (16.7)
3 (5.0)
2 (3.3)
1(1.7)
1(1.7)
3 (5.0)
3 (5.0)
1 (1.7)
9 (15.0)
3 (5.0)
11 (18.3)
2 (3.3)
1 (1.7)
1 (1.7)
1(1.7)
1(1.7)
-
1 (1.7)
2 (3.3)
5 (8.3)
2 (3.3)
1(1.7)
4 (6.7)
- -
2 (3.3)
27 (45.0)*
6(10.0)
(66.7)*
b) Consumer Forums
3 (5.0)
Total (a + b)
9 (15.0)*
3. Frequently-occurring complaints
9 (15.0)
4. Complaints relating to equity plans
2 (3.3)
5. Claim-related complaints and those involving large amounts
3 (5.0)
6. Complaints pertaining to delayed response
3 (5.0)
7. Complaints related to mis-selling
2 (3.3)
8. Complaints which might affect the image of the company
1(1.7)
9. Complaints involving high premium
1(1.7)
10.Complaints involving frauds & heavy financial burden
1(1.7)
11. Complaints involving small amounts
1(1.7)
12. RTI applications deemed as complaints
1(1.7)
13. Complaints received from general public
14. No demarcation among complaints (All complaints are significant to us)
Note: Percentages are in parentheses
Table 2: Types of Complaints Handled at Various Levels
S. Insurance Executives
No. Particulars
Public-Sector Cos.
(N=37)
Private-Sector Cos.
(N=23)
Total(N=60)
1.
23 (62.6)
11 (47.8)
34 (56.7)
2.
2 (8.6)
2 (3.3)
3.
5 (13.5)
4 (17.39)
9 (15.0)
4.
5 (13.5)
4 (17.39)
9 (15.0)
5.
4 (10.8)
2 (8.6)
6 (10.0)
Vol. 2 No. 2
summarised in Table 2.
July-December 2011
Rank
Total
19 (31.7)
18 (30.0)
14 (23.3)
51 (85)
2.
19 (31.7)
11 (18.3)
11 (18.3)
41(68.3)
3.
11 (18.3)
6 (10.0)
4 (6.7)
21(35.0)
4.
3 (5.0)
14 (23.3)
4 (6.7)
21(35.0)
5.
2 (3.3)
7 (11.7)
11 (18.3)
20(33.3)
6.
Letter of regret/apology
3 (5.0)
2 (3.3)
6 (10.0)
11(18.3)
7.
1 (1.7)
8 (13.3)
9(15.0)
8.
1 (1.7)
2 (3.3)
1 (1.7)
4 (6.7)
9.
Substitute policy
1 (1.7)
1 (1.7)
2 (3.3)
Vol. 2 No. 2
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
Extent of severity;
Complexity of the case; and
Need for immediate action.
July-December 2011
Basis of complaint-resolution
Public Sector
(N=37)
Private Sector
(N=23)
Total
(N=60)
1. Firstcome, first-serve
11 (29.7)
11 (47.8)
22 (36.7)
11 (29.7)
4 (17.4)
15 (25.0)
3. Extent of severity
8 (21.6)
5 (21.7)
13 (21.7)
4. Complexity of case
5 (13.5)
3 (13.0)
8 (13.3)
1 (2.7)
1 (1.7)
1 (2.7)
1 (1.7)
Vol. 2 No. 2
2.
3.
July-December 2011
REFERENCES
Buskirk, Richard H., and James T. Rothe (1970),
Consumerism: An Interpretation, Journal of
Marketing, 34(4), 61-65
Etzel, Michael J., Bruce J. Walker, William J. Stanton and
Ajay Pandit (2008), Marketing: Concepts and
Cases, 14th ed. (New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill)
Fornell, Claes, and Robert A.Westbrook (1984), The
Vicious Circle of Consumer Complaints, Journal
of Marketing, 48(3), 68
Gruber, Thorsten, Isabella Szmigin, and Roediger Voss
(2009), Developing a Deeper Understanding of
the Attributes of Effective Customer Contact
Employees in Personal Complaint-handling
Encounters, Journal of Services Marketing ,
23(6), 422-435
Homburg, Christian, and Andreas Furst (2005), How
Organisational Complaint Handling Drives
Customer Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic
and the Organic Approach Journal of Marketing,
69(3) , 95-114
The findings of the study have important policyimplications for both the policy-makers and the policyholders of insurance companies. The insurance companies
need to revamp their consumer complaint handling system,
in terms of the measures, such as developing a positive
attitude and redress-oriented approach of the company
executives towards consumer complaints, ensuring a strict
enforcement of the code of conduct for complaint-handling,
imparting of adequate training to redress officers in handling
of consumers grievances, which will lead to reduction in
escalated complaints. Moreover, the consumers expect
companies to be fair in interactive and procedural justice.
The inherent complexity of a financial product, like
insurance, calls for an effective CGR mechanism, wherein
the consumer gives another chance to the organisation to
satisfy him.
34
Vol. 2 No. 2
PATIENTS
SATISFACTION
MEASUREMENT HYPE OR HOPE : A
CRITIQUE
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
Patients satisfaction measurement stands to play a crucial
role amongst the health care providers. As physicians and
hospitals have begun to experience increased pressure for
the delivery of quality of hospital or medical services as
well as enhancement of the patients safety at an affordable
cost which calls for greater attention and accountability
amongst the health care professionals. The concept,
philosophy and application of the patients satisfaction
measurement need to be further integrated into an overall
measure of its clinical quality. Variation in Patients
satisfaction measurement tools, however, is an obstacle
considering aspect of instruments reliability part of the
quality equation. At present, data on patients satisfaction
is gathered by various entities, for different purposes and
at different levels in the health care system for designing
of health plans, hospitals and medical practices. The most
commonly and largely used method for patients
satisfaction measurement is conducting of customized
surveys to assess and improve its hotel-motel functions
for ensuring delivery of a better medical or hospital service
to maintain an apt stance in competitive health care market.
The patients satisfaction measurement is mainly based on
improvement services, and use of available patients
discharge information for selection of a sample supported
with use of focus group in few cases used to develop better
insight on it. In few cases, a consultant division also keeps
abreast of any changes in the medical or healthcare industry
that might warrant alterations as data on patients
satisfaction measurement can play crucial role in the
strategy formulation and in application of business tactics
by the medico professionals and hospitals in designing
and delivering of medical or hospital services to patients.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
1951
40.8
1981
33.9
1991
29.5
25.1
12.5
9.8
6.0
4.5
3.6
NA
NA
146
(1951-1961)
57.3
(1972)
10.4
(1971)
37.2
110
437
(1992-1993) NFHS
80
41.2
26.5
22.8
44.1
55.4
(1981-1985)
54.7
59.0
(1991-1995)
59.7
(1991-95)
36.2
Source: The Economic Survey 2006 2007, 2007-2008 & 2008 2009.
NFHS: National Family Health Survey; NA: Not Available.
36
Current level
23.1
(2007)
7.4
(2007)
2.8
(2006)
254
(2001-2004)
55
(2007)
17.3
(2006)
48.2
(1998-1999)NFHS
62.6
(2002 2006)
64.2
Vol. 2 No. 2
1951
1981
2005
01
SC/PHC/CHC
725
57,353
1,71,608
02
Dispensaries and
Hospitals (All)
9,209
23,555
27,770
03
04
Nursing Personnel
18,054
1,43,687 8,65,135
05
Doctors (Modern
System)
61,800
2,68,700 6,56,111
July-December 2011
Source: Ibid.
Further, one can also find significant improvement also in
Health Care Infrastructure as shown in Table Number 02.
One can find consistent increase in the total number of
Dispensaries and Hospitals as well as Total Number of Beds
in the Hospitals as well as Doctors & Nursing Staff (Ibid).
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
An attempt has been made by the researchers to offer a
comprehensive review of literature on measurement of
Patients Satisfaction as follows.
Period
Amount
First
Second
Third
Annual
Fourth
Fifth
1951-1956
1956-1961
1661-1966
1966-1969
1969-1974
1974-1979
1979-1980
1980-1985
1980-1985
1985-1990
1985-1990
1990-1991
1991-1992
1992-1997
1997-2002
2002-2007
2007-2012
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Outlay
Actual
Outlay
Actual
Actual
Actual
Outlay
Outlay
Outlay
Outlay
1,960
4,672
8,576.5
6,625.4
15,778.8
39,426.2
12,176.5
97,500
1,09,291.7
1,80,000
2,18,729
61,518
65,855
4,34,100
8,59,200
14,84,131.3
36,44 ,718
Sixth
Sixth
Seventh
Seventh
Eighth
Ninth
Tenth
Eleventh
37
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
38
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
Factor analysis yielded three factors comprising of a staffpatients alliance; doctor and treatment issue, and an
environmental component. The in-patients evaluation of
service questionnaire addressed many of the shortcomings
of existing satisfaction measures. It was developed through
extensive consumer involvement, it is simply worded, easy
to score and appears to perform well with acute and
rehabilitation inpatients (Thomas Meehan et. al., 2002).
July-December 2011
DISCUSSION
Patients Satisfaction: An attempt has been made to reflect
on various issues and its implications concerning
40
Vol. 2 No. 2
Source: http://mdrf-eprints.in/
To illustrate, there are plethora of laboratories in and around
many hospitals giving varied results for the same sample.
Being service oriented does these service providers do not
have a major responsibility to ensure that the results
generated by them are absolutely precise and reproducible.
These standards can be developed and achieved by
ensuring that equipment should be systematically inspected
and regularly calibrated to obtain accurate and reliable
results. periodical validation of results to avoid Inter and
Intra observer variations, and avoiding breakdown costs
through regular preventive maintenance supported with
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Source: www.iapindia.org
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Given the push toward increased provider accountability
and health care quality improvement initiatives, there is no
question that the attention and weight given to patient
satisfaction is going to increase. Patients satisfaction data
represents real events that transpire between providers and
patients, and that it needs to be seen as equivalent to clinical
indicators as a parameter of quality of care. The patient is
the final arbiter of what the experience of care has been,
and if healthcare service provider does not pay attention
to it at some level, they will not understand how their
processes can be improved so that the patient can walk
away with an experience that is multidimensionally okay.
Satisfaction is related to the overall effectiveness of
communication between physician and patient, which is
necessary for achieving good outcomes, while ineffective
communication can lead to poor quality. Satisfying the
patient and addressing their concerns is an outcome of it
as the patient is the best judge of whether their needs are
being met. The changing philosophy of medicine has led
to an increased sensitivity to patient satisfaction, and it
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
of Surgical Care International Journal of Health
Care Quality Assurance, MCB University Press
Limited, Vol. No.7, No. 3, 1994, PP. 27-32.
References
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Questionnaire; Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Psychiatry; Vol. No.36, 2002, PP., 807811.
www.iapindia.org/iapfiles/ASPP/Patient_Satisfaction.ppt,
Retrieved on 26/12/2009.
Susan Michie, Che Rosebert (1994); Developing an Outpatients Satisfaction Survey; Journal of
Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press,
Vol. No. 9 No. 1, 1994, PP. 26-31.
45
Vol. 2 No. 2
EFFECTIVENESS OF
KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS AN
EMPIRICAL STUDY OF
TEXTILE INDUSTRY OF
PUNJAB
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
Knowledge management systems are generally computer
based systems which are primarily designed to support the
implementation of knowledge management within the firm.
This includes various activities namely knowledge creation,
transfer and sharing. This paper aims to find effectiveness
of km systems in textile industry of Punjab. The study finds
that km systems need to be reviewed in majority of the
units to make these more effective.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 1. Best techniques for knowledge creation in different sized categories of textile industry
Best techniques for
knowledge creation
Environmental scanning
Data mining/Text mining
Business simulation
Content analysis
Total
G1
Mean
4.31
3.85
3.31
2.85
14.32
SD
0.72
0.87
0.61
0.62
1.23
G2
Mean
3.86
3.86
3.57
2.81
14.10
SD
1.00
0.84
0.73
0.67
0.98
G3
Mean
4.25
3.75
3.50
3.30
14.80
SD
0.84
0.84
0.51
1.09
1.29
Overall
Mean
SD
4.17
0.85
3.83
0.85
3.42
0.64
2.92
0.75
14.33
1.19
F-ratio
1.08
0.19
0.61
1.30
1.45
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
G1
Mean
4.38
SD
0.74
G2
Mean
SD
4.29
0.70
G3
Mean
SD
4.75
0.44
Overall
Mean
SD
4.42
0.70
F-ratio
1.17
3.68
1.03
3.69
0.73
3.35
0.86
3.63
0.93
1.24
Communities of practice
3.08
0.79
2.96
0.20
3.20
0.85
3.07
0.69
0.97
Story telling
2.85
0.54
3.23
0.49
3.83
1.24
3.12
0.77
2.39*
White pages
2.92
0.48
2.93
0.97
3.00
0.96
2.94
0.74
0.42
Total
16.92
1.45
17.09
1.61
18.13
2.00
17.17
1.65
3.61**
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 3. Best techniques of organizing and managing knowledge in different sized categories of textile industry
Best techniques for organizing
G1
and managing knowledge
Mean
Knowledge audit
3.56
SD
1.11
G2
Mean
SD
3.51
0.94
G3
Mean
SD
3.45
1.22
Overall
Mean
SD
3.53
1.08
F-ratio
0.27
Knowledge mapping
3.13
0.84
3.20
0.67
3.03
0.16
3.12
0.74
0.34
Knowledge harvesting
3.78
0.89
3.69
0.47
3.53
0.51
3.71
0.74
0.46
Intranet
3.26
0.75
3.29
0.46
3.40
0.88
3.31
0.70
0.52
Total
14.24
1.99
13.69
1.29
13.50
1.62
13.95
1.77
1.04
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
G1
Mean
2.02
SD
1.10
G2
Mean
SD
1.81
0.95
G3
Mean
SD
1.65
0.74
Overall
Mean
SD
1.90
1.01
F-ratio
2.19
Resistance to change
2.38
1.08
3.14
1.47
2.50
1.52
2.63
1.32
3.61**
2.69
0.91
2.71
1.29
1.73
0.45
2.54
1.05
3.17**
2.46
1.01
2.90
1.12
2.25
1.10
2.55
1.08
1.67
3.88
0.53
4.26
0.74
2.85
1.33
3.82
0.90
5.11***
Insufficient information
technology
2.16
0.79
2.06
0.48
1.55
0.50
2.03
0.70
1.84
2.77
1.12
2.57
0.91
2.55
1.15
2.68
1.07
0.73
Total
18.36
3.71
19.46
2.81
15.08
5.06
18.13
4.00
6.98***
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 5. Characteristics of existing knowledge system in different sized categories of textile industry
Characteristics of
existing KM system
It fits into culture of the
organization
Small
Mean
SD
3.42
1.05
Medium
Mean
SD
3.33
1.26
Large
Mean
SD
2.73
1.09
Overall
Mean
SD
3.28
1.14
F-ratio
2.41*
It is appropriate and
needs no improvement
2.08
0.64
2.26
0.81
2.13
0.79
2.14
0.72
0.87
2.92
1.43
2.81
1.44
3.65
1.61
3.01
1.49
1.11
2.97
1.21
3.06
0.84
3.25
1.32
3.19
1.20
2.51*
1.18
3.43
1.21
2.88
1.18
3.49
1.22
2.63*
3.46
1.08
3.49
0.83
2.40
0.81
3.29
1.05
4.71***
1.24
3.00
1.22
2.50
0.78
3.21
1.23
3.65**
It needs to be reviewed
4.15
0.54
4.20
0.73
4.10
0.84
4.16
0.65
0.56
Total
26.24
2.70
26.37
3.76
23.63
2.63
25.84
3.18
5.67***
Vol. 2 No. 2
It can be seen from table 5 that overall mean score for need
for improvement in existing knowledge system is 4.16 which
is significantly high. All the three groups seem to agree
unanimously to this fact that existing knowledge system
needs to be reviewed.
2.
3.
4.
5.
July-December 2011
REFERENCES
Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), Knowledge
Management and Knowledge Management
Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research
Issues, MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, pp107136.
Anthes, G.H. (1998), Learning how to share,
Computerworld, Vol. 32 No. 8, pp. 75-7.
Baron, J. And D. Kreps (1999), Strategic Human Resources,
Framework for General Managers, John Wiley & Sons.
Beijerse, R.P. (1999), Questions in knowledge management:
defining and conceptualising a phenomenon,
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 ,No. 2,
pp.94 - 110
Cole-Gomolski, B. (1997), Chase Uses New Apps to Id
Best Customers, Computerworld, Vol.31, No. 35,
Pp. 49-50.
Dougherty, V. (1999), Knowledge is about people, not
databases, Industrial and Commercial Training,
31(7), pp262-266.
Folorunso, O. and Ogunde, A. O. (2004), Data mining as a
technique for knowledge management in business
process redesign. The Electronic Journal of
Knowledge Management, 2 (1), pp 33-44.
52
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Nature and Their Relationship to Performance.
Management International Review, Vol 33, No.3,
pp. 271-286.
53
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Ms Suman
PhD Scholar, Department of Commerce, M D University,
Rohtak, Haryana
Prof S S Chahal
Former Dean, Faculty of Commerce, M D University, Rohtak,
Haryana
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
DATA COLLECTION
The data comprises daily closing values of Indian stock
market BSE Sensex from January1, 1999 to May31, 2010.
The secondary data for this study consist of daily return,
which have been obtained from www.allstocks.com,
www.bseindia.com The time period for determining the day
of the week effect on stock return is around 12 years ranging
from 1st January, 1999 to 31st May, 2010.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Where,
H = Kruskal-Wallis Test
Where
Where, x is the average return for each day of the week
from Monday to Friday, is hypothetical mean which equal
to zero, is the standard deviation of the each days return
from Monday to Friday, n is the number of observations of
each week day from Monday to Friday and
is the
Yij is the value of the jth sample from the ith group,
standard error.
where
Where s2 is the unbiased estimator of the variance of the
two samples, n = number of observations, 1 = group one, 2
= group two.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Hypothesis 1
H0: The average daily return of every working day of the
week is not statistically different from zero.
H1: The average daily return of every working day of the
week is statistically different from zero.
Hypothesis 2
H0: The average daily return of every working day of the
week is not statistically different from the rest of the days
of the week.
This table 3.4 represents Kruskal Wallis table for BSE Sensex
It is obvious from the table that at 5% significance level
our null hypothesis is accepted, so we can infer that the
average daily return of every working day of the week is
equal which supports that there is no day of the week effect
in BSE Sensex.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
REFERENCES
Balaban, Evean (1994), Day of the Week Effects: New
Evidence from an Emergency Stock Market, Central
Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research Department,
Discussion Paper no. 9410.
Berument, Hakan and Kiymaz, Halil (2001), The Day of the
Week Effect on Stock Market Volatility, Journal of
Economic and Finance Vol. 25, PP 181-193.
CONCLUSION
The present paper confirm that Monday return have highest
volatility. The phenomenon that Monday has higher
volatility because of Monday is preceded by two holidays.
There is no definite pattern in the returns across the
weekdays but in the case of volatility as the week progress
the volatility decreases. It is found that the market is more
volatile at the beginning and less at the end of the week.
Average daily return is highest on Wednesday.It is found
from the GARCH (1,1) model that impact of Tuesday and
Thursday is negative which leads to decrease in volatility
of the BSE sensex and the past volatility has more impact
on current volatility as compared to that of recent past
58
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
APPENDIX-TABLES
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
N
Mean
Median
Std. Deviation
Skewness
Kurtosis
K-S Statistic
Minimum
Maximum
563
0.000649827
0.002037796
0.021043212
0.257056619
8.49306702
2.169 (.000)
-0.11809177
0.159899845
563
0.000638524
0.001084932
0.016256812
-0.291796269
3.603636742
1.798 (.003)
-0.074226417
0.079310971
569
0.001162519
0.001005729
0.016248412
-0.098444598
1.850831075
1.370 (.047)
-0.075230678
0.057722153
567
0.000309313
0.001542667
0.015965355
-0.160517685
1.846562363
1.225 (.100)
-0.070033405
0.06667006
556
0.000232498
0.001203819
0.018845032
-0.449226278
4.201762424
1.798 (.003)
-0.116044446
0.079005332
TABLE 3.2
Day of the week
Mean return
T value
P value
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
0.00065
0.000639
0.001163
0.000309
0.000232
.733
.932
.707
.461
.291
.464
.352
.088
.645
.771
TABLE 3.3
Days of the
Week
SENSEX
Average
Index T - Value P Value
Daily Return
All Days
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
0.0005986
0.00065
0.000639
0.001163
0.000309
0.000232
100
108.59
106.75
194.29
51.62
38.76
0.065
0.061
0.845
-0.436
-0.545
TABLE - 3.6
SENSEX
Unit Root Test
Augmented Dickey Fuller Test(ADF)
Phillip Perron Test (PP)
* Significant at 1 per cent.
P value
.950
TABLE 3.5
BSE(SENSEX)
Levenes statistic
5.834
P value
.000
TABLE 3.7
Days of the
Week
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
0.948
0.951
0.398
0.663
0.586
With Intercept
-37.69513*
-49.39980*
TABLE 3.4
BSE(SENSEX)
Chi-Square value
.710
TABLE 3.8
DAYS
MONDAY
C
Coefficient
0.0000102
P value
0.5871
ARCH
Coefficient P value
0.133659
0.0000
GARCH
Coefficient
0.846738
P value
0.0000
DUMMY
Coefficient
0.000334
P value
0.0002
TUESDAY
0.000178
0.0000
0.126052
0.0000
0.854253
0.0000
-0.000521
0.0000
WEDNESDAY
0.0000418
0.0614
0.131495
0.0000
0.851842
0.0000
0.000143
0.1542
THURSDAY
0.0000789
0.0008
0.132633
0.0000
0.850044
0.0000
-0.0000344
0.7370
FRIDAY
0.0000617
0.0011
0.132177
0.0000
0.850295
0.0000
0.0000527
0.5362
59
Vol. 2 No. 2
CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND
GENERAL INSURANCE
IN INDIA
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
The present study discerns the relationship between GDP
and the general insurance premium in India by employing
Johansen Co-integration Test, Granger Causality Test and
Vector Auto Regression (VAR) for the period 1970-71 to
2008-09. The Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) have also
been used to investigate the effect of an impulse shock of
one of the innovation on the current and future values of
the same or other time series variable. Johansen Cointegration Test results do not provide evidence of a long
run causal relationship between GDP and general insurance
premium in India. Granger test established unidirectional
causality from general insurance premium to GDP
confirming the indisputable significance of general
insurance in nations growth. VAR results indicate that
growth in GDP cause general insurance premium to increase
in short term period. Further, the effect of the increase in
general insurance premium can been seen to effect the GDP
positively only after a lag of one year. IRF graphs show
that there is a transient response immediately or after some
lag on the application of a positive shock (impulse) which
gradually dies out.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Y ( t ) = A21, j X ( t j ) + A22, jY (t j ) + E y ( t )
j =1
j =1
j =1
j =1
X ( t ) = A11, j X ( t j ) + A12, jY (t j ) + Ex ( t )
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A21 = 0 .
A12 = 0 .
A12 = A21 = 0 .
It is in principle to predict a variable in a time series from
the past values of another time series in addition to the
past values of same series . This essentially means that the
two time series needs to be stationary to allow such
prediction. However, in case the two are not stationary,
they are made so by inserting appropriate level of
differencing before applying the test. Augmented DickeyFuller (ADF) test is used to establish the order of integration
and the degree of differencing to establish the stationarity.
The lag is chosen at minimum Akaike Information Criteria
(AIC) value. Co-integration means some linear combination
of the two series must be stationary. This can be tested by
using Johansen Co-integration test. To satisfy this test the
probability likelihood value should be lesser than that of
critical value. The lag value calculated from ADF test is
used for determining co-integration in Johansen test.
Vol. 2 No. 2
yt = A1 yt 1 + + Ap yt p + Bxt + t
where, yt is vector of endogenous variables, while xt is
exogenous variable vector.
is innovation vector
uncorrelated with and lagged values of itself and yt . A 1------- Ap and B are matrices of coefficient to be estimated.
The Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) have also been
employed to investigate the effect of an impulse (shock) of
one of the innovation on the current and future values of
the same or other time series variable.
The following are the hypotheses of the present research
paper:
1.
2.
3.
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Fire
Premium
Industrial
Production
Mediclaim
Premium
Human
Motor
Development Premium
Index
Motor
Vechiles
Marine
Premium
Exports
GDP
General
Insurance
Investment
1991-92
795
121918
9632
0.381
2136
23380
634
44042
594168
6335
1992-93
932
142566
11200
0.401
2210
25718
771
53688
681517
7640
1993-94
1096
165663
15204
0.447
2498
29922
832
69751
792150
9030
1994-95
1248
202888
17998
0.468
2513
31033
827
82674
925239
10486
1995-96
1501
248450
21030
0.489
2714
33786
961
106353
1083289
12833
1996-97
1719
280247
24568
0.514
2954
37332
991
118817
1260710
14893
1997-98
1916
300389
27489
0.426
3246
41368
1126
130101
1401934
17276
1998-99
2087
332464
31254
0.552
3412
44875
1023
139753
1616082
19739
1999-00
2299
350233
37583
0.571
3521
48857
977
159561
1786526
22659
2000-01
2057
392138
51898
0.577
3811
54991
1054
203571
1925415
24009
2001-02
2667
410667
74204
0.59
4001
58924
1048
209018
2097726
19574
2002-03
2950
463302
99955
0.595
5441
67007
1089
255137
2261415
21859
2003-04
3150
509106
112926
0.602
6457
72718
1134
293367
2538170
24227
2004-05
3331
598674
132117
0.611
7504
81715
1189
375340
2877701
26519
2005-06
3774
676207
163442
0.619
8702
90621
1243
456418
3402316
29803
2006-07
4185
745891
182547
0.678
9146
96808
1268
435896
3941865
32615
2007-08
4937
865924
225879
0.719
14341
106591
1341
476895
4540987
34718
2008-09
5479
938271
256431
0.756
25413
139112
1387
465892
5228650
39510
Correlation
0.968
0.989
0.923
0.954
0.968
Source: RBI Annual Reports various issues, Annual Reports of general insurers, data from Department of Road Transport
and Highways, GOI and Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), Human Development Index Report, IRDA
Annual Reports various issues, IRDA Journal
Note: Mediclaim premium represents the premium of public insurers only.
0.954 among the exports and marine insurance premium.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 2: ADF Test Statistic for Unit Root at Various Differences (Lag 0)
Difference
ADF Test
LGDP
LGIP
Critical Value at
1%
5%
Level
Statistics
Null Hypothesis
0.420662
Accept
-0.234050
Accept
-3.621023
-2.948404
1st Difference
Statistics
Null Hypothesis
-3.647332
Reject
-4.035767
Reject
-3.626784
-2.945842
AIC
Critical value
Null Hypothesis
1%
5%
-4.617332
-4.058116
-3.626784
-2.945842
Reject
-4.632902
-4.905352
-3.632900
-2.948404
Reject
-2.847576
-4.822044
-3.639407
-2.951125
Accept
Table 4: ADF Test Statistics for LGIP at 1st Difference (Various Lags)
Lag
AIC
Critical value
Null Hypothesis
1%
5%
-4.035767
-3.099706
-3.626784
-2.945842
Reject
-3.865475
-3.948873
-3.632900
-2.948404
Reject
-3.734260
-3.588852
-3.639407
-2.951125
Reject
-3.940820
-3.887887
-3.646342
-2.954021
Reject
Johansen Co-integration test is applied on and LGIP series for testing long-term relationship at the lagged values computed
from ADF test.
Table 5: Johansen Co-integration Test
r
Trace Statistics
5% Critical Value
1% Critical Value
4.95
15.49
19.93
0.11
3.84
6.63
Acceptance of null hypothesis of no co-integration (r=0) and one co-integrating vector (r=1) provides the evidence that
and LGIP are the set of non co-integrated time series (Table 5).
65
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
F-Statistics
Probability
AIC
0.59
0.4470
68
3.26
0.0801
48
1.31
0.0455
56
At Lag 1
At Lag 2
DLGIP does not Granger Cause DLGDP
DLGDP does not Granger Cause DLGIP
3.42
innovations on the time series. Since ADF test and cointegration test states that the time series are neither
stationary nor co-integrated, first difference of time series
is used in analyzing VAR. VAR behavior between general
insurance premium (LGIP) and GDP (LGDP) is described by
the following relationship:
0.2849
45
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
68
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
STUDENTS AS
RESPONSIBLE
CONSUMERS AGENTS
FOR SOCIAL CHANGE
ABSTRACT
The study presents the findings of socially responsible
consumption behaviour assessed on a regional sample of
one hundred student-respondents; using Socially
Responsible Consumption Behaviour (SRCB) Scale;
developed from literature, modified to suit Indian
conditions. In the article, statistical techniques of Meancomparison, Regression Analysis and ANOVA are applied
to find the determinants of socially responsible
consumption behaviour and socially responsible
consumers. The study attempts Academic Intelligence and
Civic Sense as SRCB determinants; thus fills the knowledge
gap in literature as no study in the past has utilized the two
as behavioural determinants. The results for Place of Living,
Academic Intelligence and Civic Sense are found to be
significant.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
LITERATURE REVIEW
A number of research papers and articles provide a detailed
insight about the factors that affect consumer responsible
behaviour. The researches in this area provide linkages
between environment, society and consumer behaviour.
The findings about behavioural determinants from literature
are presented below:
PROBLEM STATEMENT
In marketing literature, it is often to find that demographic
characteristics of consumers are commonly studied feature
to guide stakeholders. The present paper, in addition to
demography, is an endeavor to explore new dimensions of
consumer behaviour relationship with social responsibility.
The young consumers are the future of the nation therefore,
constitute the study population; the elaboration on them
is a unique feature. The study also searches for the link
between Academic Intelligence, Civic Sense and SRCB.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
More specifically, the study addresses itself to the following
objectives:
1.
2.
3.
4.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study is based on primary data, collected through a
standardized scale on Socially Responsible Consumption
Behaviour (SRCB) developed by Antil and Bennet (1979),
Antil (1984). The scale is introduced upon a sample of 100
students of Ambala District with slightly modified questions
according to Indian conditions. The sample is
representative of the population as the students of different,
age, gender, educational and family income levels are
Vol. 2 No. 2
Table 2
Support
and Contradiction
DETERMINANTS OF SRCB
The determinants are implicit from the results of regression
analysis, shown below in Table 1.
Determinants of SRCB
Standardized
Coefficients
S. E.
beta
(Constant)
122.56
16.025
7.65
.000
Gender
1.22
3.19
.035
.38
.703
3.62
-.191
-2.01
.047
Educational
-.38
Qualifications
3.37
-.013
-.112
.911
2.14
-.158
-1.66
.100
Academic
Intelligence
-1.17
1.82
-.061
-.65
.520
Family Size
-2.58
3.34
-.072
-.77
.441
2.36
-.076
-.81
.423
Age
.139
3.90
-.004
.04
.972
Civic Sense
1.62
.27
.534
6.01
.000
R
Square
Adjusted
R-Square
Std. Error
of Estimate
Sig.
.57
.33
.26
14.68
4.841
.000
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Table 1
Description
July-December 2011
sig.
Table 3
Age Groups
Mean
Std. Deviation
15 - 18
144.10
41
16.38
19 - 24
141.34
59
17.55
Total
142.47
100
17.05
Vol. 2 No. 2
Gender
Boys
Girls
Total
Mean
141.08
143.40
142.47
N
40
60
100
Std. Deviation
17.59
16.76
17.05
Table 6
Mean
146.33
141.04
142.47
N
27
73
100
Std. Deviation
12.01
18.44
17.05
Table 7
-12.05
-16.24
-20.34
12.05
-4.19
-8.29
16.24
4.19
-4.10
20.34
8.29
4.10
N
37
56
7
100
Std. Deviation
18.09
16.54
17.99
17.05
6.84
6.78
7.79
6.84
3.72
5.34
6.79
3.72
5.28
7.79
5.34
5.28
72
Intelligence
Mean
Std. Deviation
Poor
128.43
19.90
Fair
140.47
38
15.78
Good
144.67
42
17.61
Excellent
148.77
13
13.61
Total
142.47
100
17.05
Table 9
Post Hoc Multiple Comparison of Academic Intelligence
Academic Intelligence
Mean
Std.
(A)
(B)
Difference
Error
(A B)
Fair records
Good records
Excellent records
Fair Records
Poor records
Good records
Excellent records
Good Records
Poor records
Fair records
Excellent records
Excellent Records Poor records
Fair records
Good records
Mean
142.90
142.25
142.00
142.47
Poor Records
Education
Up to 10+2
Graduation
PG and above
Total
July-December 2011
Sig.
.38
.13
.08
.38
.74
.50
.13
.74
.89
.08
.49
.89
95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
-31.50
7.41
-35.55
3.07
-42.51
1.83
-7.41
31.50
-14.78
6.40
-23.49
6.90
-3.07
35.55
-6.40
14.78
-19.11
10.91
-1.83
42.51
-6.90
23.49
-10.91
19.11
Vol. 2 No. 2
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
Between Groups
2250.08
750.03
2.72
.049
Within Groups
26520.83
96
276.26
Total
28770.91
99
July-December 2011
Table 11
Study Field
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Commerce and
Management
144.73
48
13.94
Science and
Engineering
137.85
34
18.54
Humanities
145.17
18
20.56
Total
142.47
100
17.05
Table 12
Family Income
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Low Income
142.78
45
16.90
Middle Income
142.67
43
17.26
High Income
140.58
12
18.20
Total
142.47
100
17.05
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Family Size
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Small Families
145.50
18.40
142.26
77
17.47
Table 14
Large Families
141.93
15
14.93
Mean
Std. Deviation
Total
142.47
100
17.05
131.83
29
18.21
142.28
39
14.99
152.34
32
12.10
Total
142.47
100
17.047
Table 13
Table 15
3202.828
Within Groups
22365.25
97 230.570
Total
28770.91
99
Sig.
13.891 .000
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
Std.Error
Sig.
95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
-10.45
3.72
.023
-19.71
-1.198
-20.52
3.89
.000
-30.19
-10.84
10.45
3.72
.023
1.198
19.71
-10.06
3.62
.024
-19.07
-1.06
20.52
3.89
.000
10.84
30.19
10.06
3.62
.024
1.058
19.07
CONCLUSION
The study confirms that demographic factors influence
socially responsible behaviour of students and also
concludes that Place of Living and Civic Sense are the two
significant determinants of their SRCB. The mean
comparison of different categories confers that; teenagers,
girls, residents of rural areas, students with excellent
academic scores, having humanities and commerce as study
background and with high civic sense are responding to be
more socially responsible; whereas, those belonging to large
size and high income families are less responsible in their
consumption behaviour. Among these determinants, mean
differences are found statistically reliable for Academic
Intelligence and Civic Sense but Educational Qualifications
say little about social responsibility.
REFERENCES
Alibeli, Madalla A. and Johnson, Chris (2009),
Environmental Concern: A Cross National
Analysis, Journal of International and CrossCultural Studies, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 1 8.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
(Footnotes)
1
75
Vol. 2 No. 2
ROLE OF STIMULATING
PACKAGES IN
COGNITIVE
DEVELOPMENT: AN
EMPIRICAL STUDY
July-December 2011
ABSTRACT
The present paper discusses that stimulation packages
comprising of group of activities, plans and subjects
adopted to understand new concepts, would have a positive
impact on the cognitive development of the children. This
study involves manipulating anganwadi programme as
the independent variable and cognitive development status
of children as dependent variable. The special activity
programme based on selected concepts (verbal, perception,
quantitative, memory and spatial relations) and operations
was administered to 4-6 years children of experimental
groups I & II to assess the impact on their cognitive
development. The results show that there was improvement
in performance of all the three study groups, including
control group and two experimental groups, but there were
significant differences in post intervention scores of control
and experimental group children. The hypothesis stands
accepted, implying that stimulating packages do pay to
enhance the cognitive development of the children.
Dr Nidhi Singh
Assistant Professer, DAV Institute of Management,
Faridabad, Haryana
Dr Usha Rani
Associate Professor and Principal (Officiating), CIS Kanya
Mahavidyalaya, Fatehpur Pundri, Kaithal, Haryana.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The present work was designed as an experimental study
to develop a programme for enhancing cognitive
development in 4-6 years old pre-school children attending
angnwadis. This study involved manipulated anganwadi
activity programme as the independent variable and
cognitive development status of children as dependent
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
78
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Cognitive Aspects
General cognition
83.83
6.05
83.83
6.06
83.83
6.05
Verbal
41.93
3.43
42.23
3.56
41.73
3.41
Perception
40.57
4.49
41.30
3.92
40.60
3.78
Quantitative
41.20
3.82
41.47
3.91
41.40
3.70
Memory
42.20
3.87
42.40
3.87
42.47
3.56
Spatial relations
7.40
2.01
7.41
2.00
7.46
2.00
4 - 5 yrs.
Boys
Girls
+
5 - 6 yrs.
Boys
Girls
4 - 6 yrs.
Boys
Girls
Total
Control
Group
N=32
8
8
Experimental Experimental
GroupGroupIn=32
IIn=32
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
16
16
32
16
16
32
16
16
32
General cognition
86.20
6.07
94.53
7.25
92.80
6.87
Verbal
43.33
3.42
47.10
3.99
45.63
3.55
Perception
41.24
3.90
44.63
4.28
43.50
3.86
Quantitative
41.47
3.90
44.00
4.28
43.60
3.86
Memory
42.70
3.74
46.13
4.05
44.97
3.69
Spatial relations
7.61
2.31
9.61
3.11
9.47
3.01
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Table 4. Pre and Post Intervention Paired t Values for Cognitive Aspects of Study Groups
Cognitive Aspects
Pre
Intervention
Mean
Post
Intervention
Mean
Mean
difference
t value
General cognition
83.83
86.20
2.37
10.19**
Verbal
41.93
43.33
1.40
9.96**
Perception
40.57
41.24
0.67
4.82**
Quantitative
41.20
41.47
0.27
2.80**
Memory
42.20
42.70
0.50
4.76**
Spatial relations
07.40
07.61
0.21
2.50**
General cognition
83.83
94.53
10.70
29.52***
Verbal
42.23
47.10
4.87
26.67***
Perception
41.30
44.63
3.33
17.23***
Quantitative
41.47
44.00
2.53
19.75***
Memory
42.40
46.13
3.73
29.52***
Spatial relations
07.41
09.61
2.20
11.36**
General cognition
83.83
92.80
8.97
24.73***
Verbal
41.73
45.63
3.90
25.60***
Perception
40.60
43.50
2.90
15.43***
Quantitative
41.40
43.60
2.20
13.17***
Memory
42.47
44.97
2.50
16.70***
Spatial relations
07.46
9.47
2.01
10.00**
Control Group
Experimental Group-I
Experimental Group-II
Control
Group
Experimental
Group-I
Experimental
Group-II
General cognition
86.20
94.53
92.80
11.29***
Verbal
43.33
47.10
45.63
7.60**
Perception
41.24
44.63
43.50
4.73**
Quantitative
41.47
44.00
43.60
3.25*
Memory
42.70
46.13
44.97
5.65**
Spatial relations
7.61
9.61
9.47
3.35*
80
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Group
Experimental-I
Experimental-II
General cognition
gain
2.37a
1.27
10.70c
1.99
8.97b
1.10
237.23***
Verbal gain
1.40a
.70
4.87c
.90
3.90b
.80
143.11***
Perception gain
0.67a
76
3.33c
.71
2.90b
.92
96.49***
Quantitative gain
0.27a
52
2.53b
.90
2.20b
.61
96.01***
Memory gain
0.50a
57
3.73c
1.55
2.50b
82
65.95***
0.21a
.51
2.20b
.81
2.01b
.78
50.01***
REFERENCES
th
Craig, Grace J.(1986). Human Development (4 Ed.) PrenticeHall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. pp 27-54.
81
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Case Study
MAHINDRA RENAULT
JV: WHY ITS ON THE
END OF THE ROAD ?
INTRODUCTION
Summers of 2007 saw the automotive sector reporting the
super-success of the Mahindra Renaults -Logan. With
the product of Joint Venture (JV) signed in 2005 between
Mahindra & Mahindra (India) and Renault (France) and
the formal launch of the car in April 2007, Logan had
become the largest selling car in its category the C
segment sedan amongst its competitors like Tata Indigo,
Honda City and Maruti SX4.
Dr Jaskiran Arora
Associate Professor, G D Goenka World Institute, Gurgaon,
Haryana
E-mail : [email protected]
Prof Umashankar Venkatesh
Dean, G D Goenka World Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
2006 the first road trials of the car in making, were done
when the trial vehicles were put through thorough durability
testing on Indian roads, besides accelerated tests on the
Renault test tracks. By September 2006, the JV went full
swing with the beginning of the trial production of Logan.
The vendor development and the quality assurance team
were busy carrying assessments of all the suppliers in order
to provide the market with a world class product. The
euphoria was reflected in Mahindra and Renaults decision
to extend their strategic alliance and sign another MOU to
set up a Greenfield facility with a capacity of 500,000 units
per year with the 50:50 partnership among M&M and
Renault Nissan.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
The deal was that M&M would buy Renaults 49% equity
and gain full control. Renault will continue to support
Mahindra and the Logan car through five-year license
agreement to supply purchasing engines, transmission and
key components. M&M will continue with the Renault name
and logo on the Logan till the end of 2010 and over the
period of 18 months, it will rename the car and use only
M&Ms logo. Renault would now be paid royalty fee on
the sale of the car.
The new agreement will give us the opportunity to chart
out a new strategy to help drive the Logan brand in India
which will also include engineering changes, in keeping
with customer requirements,10 M&Ms automotive sector
84
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
And by April 25th 2011, just over one year since the breakup of the JV, Mahindra & Mahindra renamed the Logan
sedan as Verito, thus dropping all the affiliations with
Renault.
TEACHING NOTE
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault
5.
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/mahindrarenault-logan-receives-great-response-_283053.html
7
http://www.livemint.com/2008/11/07220514/MahindraRenault-halves-Logan.html
8
http://www.driveinside.com/News/Headlines/7NYXVE/
Mahindra-Renault-partnership-unstable-thanks-to-theLogan%E2%80%99s-falling-sales.aspx
(Footnotes)
1
http://www.driveinside.com/News/Headlines/7NYXVE/
Mahindra-Renault-partnership-unstable-thanks-to-theLogan%E2%80%99s-falling-sales.aspx
Sourced from
http://www.mahindra.com/OurGroup/Overview.html
and the press release during the signing of the MOU
between Mahindra, Renault and Nissan for setting their
10
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/biz/india-business/
Renault-to-exit-Logan-JV-with-Mahindra/articleshow/
5823117.cms
86
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Book Review
Ms Pooja Bhagwan
Assistant Professor of Commerce
Sri Guru Gobind Singh College, Chandigarh
Ms Kamalpreet Kaur
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce
Govt. College of Commerce and Business Administration,
Chandigarh
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
88
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
Vol. 2 No. 2
July-December 2011
10. Italicization and use of diacriticals is left to the contributors, but must be consistent, when not using diacriticals,
English spelling should be followed. Capitalization should be kept to the minimum and should be consistent.
11. Place the references at the end of the manuscript following the endnotes. The list should mention only those
sources which have been actually cited in the text or notes. References should be complete in all respects and
alphabetically arranged. Author/s name should be the same as in the original source. You should cite publications
in the text: (Adams, 2006) using the first named authors name or (Adams and Brown, 2006) citing both names of
two, or (Adams et al., 2006), when there are three or more authors. At the end of the paper a reference list in
alphabetical order should be supplied:
a) For books: Surname, Initials (year), Title of Book, Publisher, Place of publication.
e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), No Place to Hide, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
b) For book chapters: Surname, Initials (year), Chapter title, Editors Surname, Initials, Title of Book,
Publisher, Place of publication, pages. e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), The early pathways: theory to practice
a continuum, in Stankosky, M. (Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management, Elsevier,
New York, NY, pp. 15-20.
c) For journals: Surname, Initials (year), Title of article, Journal Name, volume, number, pages.
e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century, Journal of
Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 72-80.
d) For published conference proceedings: Surname, Initials (year of publication), Title of paper, in
Surname, Initials (Ed.), Title of published proceeding which may include place and date(s) held, Publisher,
Place of publication, Page numbers. e.g. Jakkilinki, R., Georgievski, M. and Sharda, N. (2007), Connecting
destinations with an ontology-based e-tourism planner, in Information and communication technologies
in tourism 2007 proceedings of the international conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2007, SpringerVerlag, Vienna, pp. 12-32.
e) For unpublished conference proceedings: Surname, Initials (year), Title of paper, paper presented at
Name of Conference, date of conference, place of conference, available at: URL if freely available on the
internet (accessed date). e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki,
paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete,
available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed 20 February 2007).
f) For working papers: Surname, Initials (year), Title of article, working paper [number if available],
Institution or organization, Place of organization, date. e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), How published academic
research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments, working
paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.
g) For encyclopedia entries (with no author or editor): Title of Encyclopedia (year) Title of entry,
volume, edition, Title of Encyclopedia, Publisher, Place of publication, pages. e.g. Encyclopaedia
Britannica (1926) Psychology of culture contact, Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London
and New York, NY, pp. 765-71.
h) For newspaper articles (authored): Surname, Initials (year), Article title, Newspaper, date, pages. e.g.
Smith, A. (2008), Money for old rope, Daily News, 21 January, pp. 1, 3-4.
i) For newspaper articles (non-authored): Newspaper (year), Article title, date, pages. e.g. Daily News
(2008), Small change, 2 February, p. 7.
j) For electronic sources: if available online the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as
well as a date that the resource was accessed. e.g. Castle, B. (2005), Introduction to web services for
remote portlets, available at: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-wsrp/ (accessed 12
November 2007).
In case of more than one publication by the same author, list them in chronological order, with the older item
appearing first. For more than one publication in one year by the same author, use small (lower case) letters to
distinguish them (e.g. 1980a, 1980b), do not number the references.
Editor
HSB Rresearch Review
90
Registration No.
HARENG/2010/36595
ISSN No.
0976-1179
Periodicity
Bi-Annual
Language
English
Owner
Editor
Place of Publication
Hisar (Haryana)
I, Prof S C Kundu, hereby declare that the particulars given above are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
S C Kundu
Publisher & Printer
Subscription Fee