Christopher Marlowe Tamburlaine
Christopher Marlowe Tamburlaine
Christopher Marlowe Tamburlaine
Christopher Marlowe
Tamburlaine the Great
Two Plays/Parts with 5 acts each with each part having a prologue
1587-88 (year of Elizabeths victory over Spanish Armada)
performed at the Rose theatre
Second part released later due to popularity and demand
Structure:
- Prologue (of the first part):
it informs us about Tamburlaine, his victories but also his racial origin - namely a
Sythian shepherd, so typically Marlowian = modest hero, not royal descent.
BUT surprisingly Tamburlaine personifies military and extraordinary linguistic
excellence.
We as audience are invited to view his picture in this tragic glass (theatre stage) and
then applaud his fortunes of his victories. The whole play functions as a mirror. We
follow him along his path from very humble origins.
After the prologue 5 clearly marked stages (in part 1)
-
Act 1: Content:
Mycetes, King of Persia sends Theridamas to kill Tamburlaine. Cosroe, the Kings
brother, wants to be king. Tamburlaine captures the Egyptian princess Zenocrate,
falls in love with her. Theridamas has an army twice as large as Tamburlaines but
he joins him and so does Cosroe, who hopes to overthrow his brother.
Tamburlaine comes in when Mycetes tries to hide his crown, but instead of taking
it at this moment, Tamburlaine waits until Mycetes is really defeated which does
happen. Later Tamburlaine also overthrows Crosroe.
Contrast: Tamburlaines greatness in comparison to Persian Kings. Like
Tamburlaine, Marlowe was very ambitious coming from simple background.
Act 3:
Tamburlaine conquers Turkey, whos king is Bazajeth
Act 4:
After defeating Bazajeth and capturing him, Zenocrates father (who is the sultan
of Egypt remember) vows to stop Tamburlaine with the help of the Arabian King.
Act 5:
Tamburlaine conquers Damascus where he condemns the virgins to death (who
were send to deceive him).
Critic: Marlowes structure in this play is not weak but also not really sophisticated. Each act
is a step in his conquest, each step is a victory. Not properly balanced! But then again, this is
exactly how Marlowe is seen he doesnt care for traditional conventions.
English merchants report of the burning of a negroes town, authentic expedition that
really took place.
Negroes portrayed as strange/unfamiliar
Unexplained (unbegrndet) fierceness/brutality, burning of the town, cruelty
NO REASON for the burning- it is completely neglected not mentioned at all! which is
similar to what Tamburlaine does.
Greenblatt argues that there are distinct parallels between real voyages and the fictional
expansion of Tamburlaines conquest.
Tamburlaine does not show mercy or gives a reason for his violence
Rejects any other form of authority (doesnt care whether a King or a Sultan), he thinks
that he is God himself.
Part 2
The most striking difference:
In the first part there is victory after victory/ second part nearly everything falling apart!
Each of the scenes are a variation of the scenes in Part 1 BUT we begin to feel the
decline of Tamburlaine!
This decline is announced in the prologue:
o Death cuts off the progress of his we know already that he will die BUT
we dont know how. (Similarity to Romeo & Juliets prologue?)
Victories are still won BUT this time by OTHERS, not so much by Tamburlaine.
Things begin to go wrong his beloved wifes death / information that one of his sons
is not like him, etc.
Critics: Structurally speaking Part 2 is a tragedy (in the conservative sense) fall of
the hero (after the initial rise) and ultimately the hero dies.
Image of sun/fire:
- destruction, similar to Tamburlaines character portrayed as the sun active
Image of moon:
- portrayed by his wife passive
Together they represent the principles of life
Tamburlaines parents are not really mentioned, which is striking because in the
Elizabethan era it seems that family and heritage is really important again we can
see that Marlowe regularly breaks with the conventions of his time (pioneer)