Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Padayhag, Daniel L.
February 29, 2016
TTh 7:00-8:30
Sir Jeruel Ibanez
Position Paper about Euthanasia
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, physician-assisted
suicide (dying), doctor-assisted dying (suicide), and more loosely termed mercy killing, means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable (persistent, unstoppable) suffering. Some interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable suffering.
There are pros and cons in euthanasia or the positive and
negative effect of this practice. Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) contend that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death. They argue that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that guarantee such rights as marriage, procreation, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. Opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide contend that doctors have a moral responsibility to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. They argue there may be a "slippery slope" from euthanasia to murder, and that legalizing euthanasia will unfairly target the poor and disabled and create incentives for insurance companies to terminate lives in order to save money.
For me I agree on having euthanasia in the country because If a
person is terminally ill and is suffering because of pain, His suffering should be stopped immediately. I know that life is very precious but living with pain and suffering is very sad. But of course the patients consent is a must.