Advances in Chinese Medicine Diagnosis
Advances in Chinese Medicine Diagnosis
Advances in Chinese Medicine Diagnosis
1. Introduction
Ancient Chinese medicine practitioners deduced about 5,000 years ago
that the exterior appearance of the body was closely related to the
functions of the internal organs and viscera. They sought for explanations
for this interior-exterior connection by establishing relationships between
human beings and Nature. Other natural philosophers also applied such
reasoning, e.g. Aristotle [384-322 BC], Leonardo Da Vinci [1452-1519],
and Ren Descartes [1596-1650]. Although it is not possible to say that
Chinese medicine practitioners were unique in this task, they organized those
relationships in a pioneer manner long before their Western counterparts.
Chinese and Western physicians were not distinct in their conceptual
framework, but their respective medical practices evolved on different cultures
and historical contexts. Therefore, it is expected that the advances on
medical knowledge represent this cultural divergence.
Many efforts have been made to integrate the ancient, traditional
knowledge of Chinese medicine into contemporary, Eastern medical practice.
Diagnosis is a key element in this integration of medical systems since it
links the patients needs to the available therapeutic resources. The art of
Chinese medicine diagnosis was enriched throughout history but it main
traditional aspect remains unchanged: the exclusive use of information available
to the naked senses. Clinical information provided by vision, hearing, smelling,
and touching is interpreted
in a framework of Chinese medicine theories of physiology. No equipment or
instrument was
developed with specifc diagnostic purposes or based on Chinese medicine theories.
However, advances in computation and biomedical instruments allowed more
powerful analysis of
clinical data and quantifcation of parameters otherwise assessed only in a
qualitative fashion. As a consequence, computer models for diagnosis in Chinese
medicine were developed and tested in the last few decades and are promising
tools in the clinical environment.
This chapter introduces the traditional methods of diagnosis in Chinese
medicine and
introduces their evolution into computational models. Current methods for
validation of computational model by the assessment of their diagnostic
accuracy and possible sources of errors are also presented. Finally, perspectives
on the issue of computational diagnosis are discussed.
www.intechopen.com
hypothesis,
eliminate
an alternative hypothesis, or discriminate among
competing ones (McSherry, 1999).
Pattern differentiation is performed in a three-stage process, namely: information
gathering, data interpretation, and decision-making:
theories and grouped in two categories (the place where diseases occur; and
the pathological state of the body or possible causes that make disease break
out). As each key element usually exhibits a variable
was provided (Yang et al., 2005). A pattern dataset is used to train and
test the P-SVM model. The test procedure consists of: a) generation of an
expert knowledge dataset; b) description of the expert knowledge as rules
to train the dataset to create the scale of confdence values; c) input data
with confdence values to the Platt's Sequential Minimal Optimization (P-SMO)
algorithm; d) comparison of the accuracy rates under different amount of
training samples. The pattern dataset included the literature from 1978 to
2004 with approximately 400,000
entries and its ontology was organized with the entries: author, origin, title,
subject heading, subheading, key word, and abstract. In the classifcation
system of SVM with prior knowledge, the classifer will learn the traits of
the certain thematic information from the corresponding prior knowledge.
Therefore, based on the prior knowledge, the classifer is able to fnd out the
appropriate literary information from the massive data.
No description of how the cases were simulated is available; thus, it is not
possible to repeat the simulation procedure and to compare accuracy results.
Moreover, the P-SVM theory was not discussed in light of the mode-of-thinking of
Chinese medicine experts.
7.4 Chinese Medical Diagnostic System (CMDS)
Huang and Chen (2007) developed the Chinese Medical Diagnostic System
(CMDS) for pattern differentiation of diseases related to the digestive system. It
uses a Web interface and expert system technology in diagnosing 50 types of
digestive system diseases. The authors compared the diagnosis of 20 simulated
cases made by CMDS and diagnosticians and found the results satisfactory;
however, they did not report either simulation procedures or statistical
validity. The authors also stated that the Four Examinations were
necessary for achieving a correct diagnosis. The authors reported high
reliable and accurate diagnostic capabilities in 95% of 50 simulated cases
without any description of either how cases were simulated or possible sources
and types of error.
The CMDs departed from an ontology-based model, in which the proposed
ontology was
derived from the traditional one but focused on digestive diseases and patterns.
The whole system is composed by three main components: a) Java Expert
System Shell (JESS); b) Database set; and c) knowledge extractor. The routine
for pattern differentiation in depicted
in the inference engine modulus of the JESS and automatically matches facts
(users entries) against patterns and concludes which rules are fred in CMDS.
Two databases (general and knowledge databases) are used to store all
information and rules necessary for pattern differentiation, respectively.
7.5 Pattern Differentiation Algorithm (PDA)
Ferreira (2008) proposed the pattern differentiation algorithm (PDA) based on
an objective criterion developed to account for pattern holism (Guang,
2001). A second criterion was proposed and provided a signifcant increase in
diagnostic accuracy of the model, being up
to 94.7%(sensitivity = 89.8%; specificity = 99.5%) with the Four
Examinations for Zangfu
patterns (Ferreira, 2009). This method allowed testing the impact of different
combinations
of the Four Examinations and the amount of available information presented by
patients on PDAs statistical performance. Also, its associated method of model
validation uncovered types of diagnostic errors otherwise not assessed by other
computational models (Ferreira,
2011).
Clinically,
PDA
was
applied
to
patients
with
arterial
hypertension and help understand that Zangfu patterns associated to this
disease are indeed evidence of the progression of target-organ damage (Luiz
et al., 2011).
PDA works in a three-stage schema and its pseudo-code was provided elsewhere
(Ferreira,
2009). The first stage data collection and dataset search uses the data entry
from patients exam to search for free terms and quoted phrases, e.g.,
headache and headache. The former term recalls patterns with headache
within its manifestations profle (ocular headache, occipital headache, etc.); the
latter term recalls patterns with the exact term. Combinatorial procedure (Zuzek
et al., 2000) was used after data collection because the diagnosis does not
depend on
the sequence of the results obtained during the exam (Wolff, 2006).
Manifestations were
described as specifically as possible including onset (palpitation in the
morning, palpitation in the evening), duration (acute headache, chronic
headache), location
(occipital headache, ocular headache) and severity (dry tongue,
slight moist tongue, moist tongue), as well as any other characteristic that
may be necessary to allow the pattern differentiation. Manifestations that cooccur in two or more patterns were assigned with the same term to increase
the accuracy of string search algorithm.
At the second stage selection of candidate patterns a pattern is
considered as a
candidate if it presents at least one manifestation collected at the exam.
Patterns with no manifestations recognized were not used for further
analysis. The strength of such indication of the candidate pattern is
calculated as an objective criterion F%,K. This is an important stage since it
recalls any possibility (F%,K>0) within the dataset and increases the sensitivity
of the algorithm. Since patterns maybe described by different quantities
of manifestations, the available information must be normalized to allow
comparison among them and hence was used as a second objective
criterion, N%,K,. It is expected that the occurrence of a successful pattern
differentiation increases with decreasing F%,K. It is also expected that the
occurrence of a successful pattern differentiation increases with increasing N%,K.
However, as the accuracy of a diagnostic test is expected to decrease with
either lower
or higher cutoff values, it is appropriate to subtract a cutoff values from N%,K to
dislocate the
accuracy curve to its optimum operating point. As such, the maximum
accuracy is
associated with the minimum N%-cutoff,K. Hence, the candidate patterns
simultaneously ranked in descending order of F%,K and ascending order of
N%-cutoff,K represent a list of diagnostic hypotheses.
The last stage pattern differentiation identifes the diagnosis. The
diagnostic algorithm receives the manifestation profle and outputs for each
tested profle: a) the identifed diagnosis; b) the list of diagnostic
hypotheses. Pattern differentiation is considered successful in either of two
situations: 1) if PDA founds a unique diagnostic hypothesis that explains
simultaneously all collected manifestations, i.e. F%,K=100%; or 2) if there is
one pattern among all diagnostic hypotheses with a highest, unique F%,K
value and lowest, unique N%-cutoff,K value. Otherwise, if multiple diagnostic
hypothesis were found with equal values of F%,K and not unique values of N%,K
the procedure is considered unsuccessful since differentiation
among
competing patterns was not possible. In this case, physicians have access
to the diagnostic hypotheses list and may want to revise the collected
manifestations, continue examination of the patient to search for other
manifestations, replace the collected symptoms/signs with more specifc ones, or
even subjectively chose a pattern.
PDAs average time for pattern differentiation of each case with the Four
Examinations is estimated in less than 0.1s, which is suitable for clinical
applications. There is no need to train PDA, which is a mathematical process
already subject to bias. PDAs method is simple, and both criteria can be
calculated even manually by a Chinese medicine practitioner (for a low number
of candidate patterns). Its reasoning is entirely based on the actual
process executed by Chinese medicine experts and thus reduces the error
in data collection and analysis. PDA is more stable than other learning
algorithms because the fnal diagnosis does not depend on the initial guess
or sequence of manifestations used during the learning phase (Ferreira,
2009).
However, PDA is dependent on the pattern dataset. PDAs dataset was built in a
form of open base, in which new information can be added (or modifed) to the
knowledge database
with the model being tested. The gold-standard method for diagnosis is the one
that provides the true health status of a person while the reference-standard
method for diagnosis is the one that provide the health status closest to the
true one. Obviously, gold-standard methods are preferred for model validation
and assessment of a models diagnostic accuracy. However, it is almost
impossible to test clinical diagnostic models with gold-standard methods
since the true
process must be applied to patients. In this case, the diagnostic model must
recognize the underlying pattern (or patterns) and not the healthy or ill statuses.
8.3 Sample sizes, participant recruitment and sampling
A important issue in diagnostic accuracy studies is the sample sizes
determination, which can be estimated based on equations derived for
detecting differences in accuracy tests
29
30
a. Accuracy:
proportion
of
successful
pattern
differentiation
(true
results) in the population (equation 1). Diagnostic accuracy indicates
the total sum of corrected assigned cases.
TP TN
Accuracy
TP FN TN
FP
100% ;
(1)
(2)
100%;
TP
FN
c. Specificity: proportion of successful pattern differentiations correctly predicted
by PDA
in controls (equation 3);
Specificity TN 100%;
(3)
TN
FP
d. Negative predictive values: proportion of unsuccessful pattern differentiation
correctly predicted by PDA (equation 4).
Negative
predictive
(4)
value 100%;
TN
TN
FN
predictive
value 100% .
TP
(5)
TP
FP
ROC plots are used to visualize and estimate accuracy of the models
classification. Those estimators
are
readily
available
from
2x2
crosstabs
obtained
from
simultaneous classification of the results
regarding the gold-standard and the new model under evaluation. In
ROC plots, the smallest cutoff value is the minimum observed test value
minus 1, and the largest cutoff value is the maximum observed test value
plus 1. All the other tested cutoff values were the averages of two consecutive
ordered observed test values (Hanley & McNeil, 1982; Hanley & McNeil, 1983;
Altman & Bland, 1994c).
8.5 Comparing diagnostic accuracy of two computational models
Consider now the situation where two computational models can be used. It is of
interest to select the best model in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Such a
comparison can be performed
based on a pair of 22 confusion matrices (Table 2) made from classification of
simulated
and identifed diagnosis simultaneously by the two computational models.
True negative
Model 1
Model
2
True positive
+
B
Model
2
Model 1
+
+
a
The 95% confdence interval (95%CI) for the binomial proportions p (accuracy,
sensitivity,
specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value; equations 15) can be calculated with Wilsons method (Agresti & Coull, 1998). If both models
are to be evaluated
on the same samples of TP and TN cases, an adaptation of McNemars test for
correlated proportions is applied (Linnet & Brandt, 1986). The TP and the TN
profles are divided into four parts according to their test responses (Table
2). Estimations related to ROC curves (AUC and respective 95%CI) can be
obtained with the nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic (Hanley & McNeil, 1982;
Hanley & McNeil, 1983).
Since the Four Examinations provide the basic ontology for pattern
differentiation, it is of interest to study the partial contribution of each
Examination as well as their cumulative, sequential application. Hence, the
diagnostic accuracy may be studied in terms of the following sets of the
Four Examinations:
1. Inspection;
2. Auscultation & Olfaction;
3. Inquiry;
4. Palpation;
5. Inspection, Auscultation & Olfaction;
6. Inspection, Auscultation & Olfaction, Inquiry;
7. Inspection, Auscultation & Olfaction, Inquiry, Palpation.
Indeed, as manifestations are closely related to the interdependent
internal organs,
combined Examination methods are preferable since they cover several
forms of presentation of the same pattern.
8.6 Recognition of diagnostic errors in pattern differentiation
All models have a certain domain of validity. This may determine how exactly they
are able
to describe the systems behavior. It is hazardous to use a model outside the area
it has been
validated for. Reports of errors for Chinese medicine practitioners are available
from ancient
literature (Yang & Li, 1993; Luo, 1995; Yang, 2003; Flaws, 2004; Yang &
Chase, 2004)
including non-skilled practice, misdiagnosis and mistreatment; however, little
contemporary literature is available on this subject. Evidence shows that
subjectivity of
manifestations or limited detection of clinical features is the major causes of
unreliable
pattern differentiation made by Chinese medicine practitioners (Kim et al., 2008;
OBrien et
al., 2009). While diagnostic errors can never be eliminated, they can be
minimised through
understanding factors related to the pattern differentiation process.
Recognition of factors related to the performance of diagnostic methods is
relevant to the development of reliable methods that can be implemented
for clinical and research
purposes. The frst limitation to pattern differentiation algorithms is that
the user must possess a certain level of knowledge to discriminate or
interpret the patients complains (Harding, 1996). Therefore, an implicit
assumption to all current computational models is that the patients are
New test
result
Identified pattern
Other pattern
No pattern identifed
9. Future directions
Although validated diagnostic models are available, several issues limit their
application in patient care. For instance, almost all computational models
deal with single patterns a condition rarely seen in clinical practice or a
single disease. Complex and multiple patterns present additional difficulties in
the diagnostic task since there are several combinations of two
or
more
patterns that could result in the same diagnosis. Multiple patterns
decomposition is then an open feld of research with direct clinical applications
and should
be investigated.
Standardization of treatment prescription is possible since well-defined,
consistent diagnosis can be achieved with computational models. Current
trends focus in computer-aid to perform diagnosis and treatment. It is
believed that the combination of traditional methods and modern resources may
improve the efficacy of Chinese medicine intervention.
Suggested topics for future research on computational models for pattern
differentiation:
Construction of an internationally available Chinese medicine ontology and
web-based
knowledge dataset with patterns and manifestations.
Use of qualitative, fuzzy-like scales developed in Eastern medicine. Ex.:
tongue fur.
Discovery of which subsets of manifestations lead to a more accurate
diagnosis
Determination of the distribution of manifestations in each pattern (and
10. References
Agresti, A.; & Coull, B.A. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval
estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, Vol. 52,
No. 2, (May 1998), (119126), ISSN 0003-1305.
Altman, D.G.; & Bland, J.M. Diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity and Specifcity.
British Medical
Journal, Vol. 308, (June 1994a), (1552), ISSN 0959-535X.
Altman, D.G.; & Bland, J.M. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. British Medical
Journal, Vol.
309 (July 1994b), (102), ISSN 0959-535X.
Altman, D.G.; & Bland, J.M. Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic
plots. British
Medical Journal, Vol. 309 (July 1994c), (188), ISSN 0959-535X.
Auteroche, B.; Navailh, P. (1992). O Diagnstico na Medicina Chinesa.
Andrei, ISBN 978-85747-6070-6, So Paulo, Brazil.
Bossuyt, P.M.; Reitsma. J.B.; Bruns, D.E.; Gatsonis, C.A.; Glasziou, P.P.; Irwig,
L.M.; Moher, D.; Rennie, D.; de Vet, H.C.W.; & Lijmer, J.G. The STARD
statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation
and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 138, No 1, (January
2003), (W1-W12), ISSN 0003-4819.
Dodd, M.; Janson, S.; Facione, N.; Faucett, J.; Froelicher, E.S.; Humphreys,
J.; Lee, K.; Miaskowski, C.; Puntillo, K.; Rankin, S.; & Taylor, D.
Advancing
the
science
of symptom
management.
Journal of
Advanced Nursing, Vol. 33, No. 5, (March 2001), (668-676), ISSN
0309-2402.
Ferreira, Ade. S. Statistical validation of strategies for Zang-Fu single pattern
differentiation.
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao, Vol. 6, No. 11, (November 2008), (1109-1116),
ISSN 16721977.
Ferreira, A.S. Diagnostic accuracy of pattern differentiation algorithm based on
traditional Chinese medicine theory: a stochastic simulation study.
Chinese Medicine, Vol. 4, (December 2009), (24), ISSN 1749-8546.
Ferreira, A.S. Misdiagnosis and undiagnosis due to pattern similarity in Chinese
medicine: a
stochastic simulation study using pattern differentiation algorithm.
Chinese
Medicine, Vol. 6, (January 2011), (1), ISSN 1749-8546.
Flaws, B. (translator). (2004) Nn Jng (The Classic of Difficulties). Blue Poppy
Press, ISBN 1891845-07-1, Denver, United States of America.
Guang, J.Y. The mode of thinking in Chinese clinical medicine: characteristics,
steps and forms. Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Vol. 2, No.
1, (March 2001), (2328), ISSN 1461-1449.
Hanley, J.A.; & McNeil, B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, Vol. 143,
(April 1982), (29-36), ISSN 00338419.
Hanley, J.A.; & McNeil, B.J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver
Huang,
Association, Vol 44, No. 247, (September 1949), (335-341), ISSN 01621459.
OBrien, K.A.; Abbas, E.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Z.X.; Luo, R.; Bensoussan, A.; &
Komesaroff, P.A.
Understanding the reliability of diagnostic variables in a Chinese
medicine
Yang S.Z. (translator). (2003). Zhng Zng Jng (Master Huas Classic of the
Central Viscera),
Blue Poppy, ISBN 0-936185-43-0, Denver, United States of America.
Yang, S.Z.; & Chace, C. (translators). (2004). Zhn Ji Ji Y Jng (The
Systematic Classic of
Acupuncture & Moxibustion), Blue Poppy, ISBN 0-936185-29-5, Denver,
United States of America.
Yang, X.B.; Liang, Z.H.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y.J.; & Yin, J. (2005). A classification
algorithm for
TCM syndromes based on P-SVM. Proceedings of 2005 International
Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pp. 3692-3697,
ISBN 0-7803-9091-1, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, August 18-21, 2005.
Zaslawki C. Clinical reasoning in traditional Chinese medicine: implications
for clinical research. Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Vol. 4,
No. 2-3, (2003), (94-101), ISSN 1461-1449.
Zhang, G.G.; Lee, W.; Bausell, B.; Lao, L.; Handwerger, B.; & Berman, B.
Variability in the
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Diagnoses and Herbal Prescriptions
Provided by Three TCM Practitioners for 40 Patients with Rheumatoid
Arthritis. The Journal
of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 3, (July 2005),
(415-421), ISSN
1075-5535.
Zhang, G.G.; Singh, B.; Lee, W.; Handwerger, B.; Lao, L.; & Berman, B.
Improvement
of Agreement
in
TCM
Diagnosis
Among
TCM
Practitioners
for
Persons
with
the Conventional Diagnosis of
Rheumatoid Arthritis: Effect of Training. The Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 4, (May 2008), (381-386), ISSN
1075-5535.
Zhang, N.L.; Yuan, S.; Chen, T.; & Wang, Y. Statistical Validation of
Traditional Chinese Medicine Theories. The Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 5, (June 2008), (583-587), ISSN
1075-5535.
Zheng, N.; & Wu, Z. (2004). TCM-SIRD: an integrated aided system for
traditional Chinese medicine Sizheng. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 38643868, ISBN 0-7803-8566-7, The Hague, The Netherlands, October 1013, 2004.
Zhou, C.L; & Zhang, Z.F. Progress and prospects of research on
information processing techniques for intelligent diagnosis of traditional
Chinese medicine. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao, Vol. 4, No. 6, (November
2006), (560-566), ISSN 1672-1977.
Zhou, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, B.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; &
Yan, X.
Development of traditional Chinese medicine clinical data warehouse for
medical knowledge discovery and decision support. Artificial
Intelligence in Medicine, Vol.
48, No. 2-3, (February-March 2010), (139-152), ISSN 0933-3657.
Zhou, X.Z.; Wu, Z.H.; Yin, A.N.; Wu, L.C.; & Fan, W.Y.; Zhang, R.
Ontology development for unifed traditional Chinese medical
language system. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 1,
(September 2004), (15-27), ISSN 09333657.
Zhu, W.F.; Yan, J.F.; & Huang, B.Q. Application of Bayesian network
in
syndrome differentiation system of traditional Chinese medicine.
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao, Vol. 4, No. 6, (November 2006), (567-571),
ISSN 1672-1977.
ISBN 978-953-307-903-5
Hard cover, 504 pages
Publisher InTech
Published online 18, January, 2012
Published in print edition January, 2012
During the recent years, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has attracted the attention of researchers all over
the world. It is looked upon not only as a bright pearl, but also a treasure house of ancient Chinese culture.
Nowadays, TCM has become a subject area with high potential and the possibility for original innovation. This
book titled Recent Advances in Theories and Practice of Chinese Medicine provides an authoritative and
cutting-edge insight into TCM research, including its basic theories, diagnostic approach, current clinical
applications, latest advances, and more. It discusses many often neglected important issues, such as the theory
of TCM property, and how to carry out TCM research in the direction of TCM property theory using modern
scientific technology. The authors of this book comprise an international group of recognized researchers who
possess abundant clinical knowledge and research background due to their years of practicing TCM. Hopefully,
this book will help our readers gain a deeper understanding of the unique characteristics of Chinese medicine.
How to reference
In order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:
Arthur de Sa Ferreira (2012). Advances in Chinese Medicine Diagnosis: From Traditional Methods to
Computational Models, Recent Advances in Theories and Practice of Chinese Medicine, Prof. Haixue Kuang (Ed.),
ISBN: 978-953-307-903-5, InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advancesin-theories-and-practice-of-chinese-medicine/advances-in-chinese-medicine-diagnosis-from-traditionalmethods-to-computational-models
InTech Europe
University Campus STeP Ri
Slavka Krautzeka 83/A
51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Phone: +385 (51) 770 447
Fax: +385 (51) 686 166
www.intechopen.com
InTech China
Unit 405, Office Block, Hotel Equatorial Shanghai
No.65, Yan An Road (West), Shanghai, 200040, China
Phone: +86-21-62489820
Fax: +86-21-62489821