Ramayana The Poisonous Tree
Ramayana The Poisonous Tree
Ramayana The Poisonous Tree
Telugu Original
RANGANAYAKAMMA
English Translation
B. R. Bapuji
Professor, Centre for Applied Linguistics & Translation Studies,
University of Hyderabad
R. Venkateswara Rao
Formerly Lecturer in English, Andhra Pradesh
Ari Sitaramayya
Professor, Biomedical Sciences, Oakland University, USA
C. Padmaja
Associate Professor, Department of Journalism & Communication,
Osmania University
Pages: 784
Price: Rs.150
$. 30
N.Raghuramayya
Printed at:
Charita Graphics,
1-16-79/3, Alwal,
Secunderabad- 500 015.
Though there should not be copy right for any book in which people are
genuinely interested, the writer has mentioned this not for commercial
purposes but for certain technical reasons only.
*
CONTENTS
[This volume is in 4 parts]
Part 1
PREFACE
The Story of Rama
The Actual Purpose of this Preface
Once Again on Ramayana
9
10
24
77
Part 2
THE POISONOUS TREE
91
[This part consists of: A prelude, 16 stories,
11 links, 4 essays and 504 Foot-notes.]
PRELUDE: Beginning of Bala kanda
in Valmiki Ramayana
91
4
16. Link-7 ......................................................................... 446
17. The Gift that didn't Cost a Penny! ..... (story-10) ... 458
18. How Great I am!
How many hardships I face! ................. (story-11) ... 479
19. The Third Thief
(Vibhishana) .......................................... .(story-12) .. 495
20. Link-8 .......................................................................... 516
21. Has Rama Passed Away? ..................... (story-13) ... 523
22. Link-9 .......................................................................... 531
23. The Public Trial .................................... (story-14) ... 590
24. Link-10 ........................................................................ 606
25. Rama in the place of Sandals............... (story-15) ... 609
26. Link-11 ........................................................................ 629
27. The Beauty of Ramas Rajya ............... (story-16) ... 643
28. What are the bebefits of reading
or listening to Ramayana? ....................... (essay) ........ 674
29. Valmiki as a Poet .................................... (essay) ........ 677
30. Gods and Devotion .................................. (essay) ........ 689
31. Why should we reject
the culture of theRamayana? .................... (essay) ........ 692
Part 3
SOME CRITICS OF RAMAYANA
[This part has 8 critics]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
694
Part 4
Comments on The Poisonous Tree
[Both Positive and Negative]
770
A Note on Translation
A Note on Translation
A Note on Translation
B.R. Bapuji
J ust
as to the bourgeois,
the disappearance of class property is
the disappearance of production itself, so
the disappearance of class culture is to him
identical with the disappearance of
all culture. That culture, the loss of which
he laments, is, for the enormous majority,
a mere training to act as a machine.
The ruling ideas of each age have
been the ideas of the ruling class.
Marx & Engels
(Manifesto of the Communist Party)
The Vedantists say,
Know Yourself!
Marxists also say so,
Know Yourself!
Know What Your Class is!!
-A Marxist
Preface
PART 1
Preface
A
10
Preface
11
12
Preface
13
14
Preface
beginning.
Thus the changes that I made in these
stories relate to the four points mentioned
so far.
Now let us see Ramas character a
little.
Sri Rama
We need not pay any attention to
Rama if he were a prince in some
Kasimajili travellers stories. Rama is
not a character in such travellers stories. He is the actual incarnation of god!
It is very important to know things like
According to this story, what sort of
person is the Rama whom millions of
people worship daily? How did he live?
How did he behave? What sort of things
did he preach to the world?'
Rama does not possess any semblance of any good qualities with which
the poet has depicted him throughout
the story. The poet flooded Rama with
all kinds of depictions: that he is a warrior; a man with wisdom; a person who
responds uniformly to both happiness
and hardship; Vedantist; a person who
knows every thing; a sage and so on and
so forth. But if we see according to the
poets narration of the story, Rama keeps
doing things, which are contrary to this
depiction. He proves that all the praises
of the poet are utter lies. The real features of Rama are: (1) False practices
that deceive the world. (2) Moralising
others. (3) Hypocritical serenity. (4) Two
faced. (5) Arrogance that he alone is a
knowledgeable person. (6) Arrogance of
suspecting and ridiculing the intimate
persons who serve him. (7) Cruel na-
15
16
vulgar actions.
Here, what we need to understand
clearly is that the values and the morals,
which Rama practised, gave him such a
vulgar character. Every character in the
Ramayana stands as reflections of the
then existing values in the form of kings,
sages, blind followers of fathers and
husbands in accordance with the ideals
and values of the then existing society.
Preface
17
considered wrong after some time. It became an offence that received punishment.
Men did not receive any punishment for a
similar offence. Yet women followed the
old customs occasionally and as a result
of it suffered the punishments. Chastity
was not yet deeply entrenched into the
psychology of women. Under such circumstances, Ahalya had had a sexual relationship willingly with Indra, although she was
afraid of the possible punishment from her
husband. If Gautama had not returned and
seen Indra, Ahalyas act would have remained a secret. No doubt that wives of
many sages as well as ordinary women had
such secret sexual relationships. What is
special in a man not to receive punishment
in such a sexual relationship while a woman
received it? How did man acquire such a
superior position? Why did society accept
his superiority? We are yet to answer these
questions. Knowing the real answers to
these questions means knowing the root
causes of social values. Using examples of
such stories that enable us to know so
much history and questioning what
is cursing? Does it happen this way?'
amounts to questioning the outward form.
Such a criticism alone does not constitute
Rationalism. This is also necessary. But it
is important to grasp social issues.
Another point of the same kind:
There had been no rains for ten years. The
entire universe is burning to ashes.
Anasuya, with her power of chastity, created fruits on the trees and water in the
river Ganga for the sake of the sages. This
is the story. Our common sense showers
18
questions on this point as well: Is it possible for any person to create fruits and
water? Why should that person create
fruits on the trees? Why people take
trouble of climbing the trees? Why didnt
she create fruits in the hands? Should
people go to the Ganga to fetch water?
Why didnt she create water in the pots at
home? If we go on like this, we can
logically argue to any extent. But if our
questions stop here, there wont be anything that we learn from this story. There
are some social issues involved in this story.
They are: women had fully accepted the
value of chastity or devotion to their husbands. It had become respectable in society. For whom did this virtuous woman
create fruits and water? For the sake of
sages! Why should she create them only
for the sages? While the entire universe
is burning, dont all the people face hardships? She should save all people,
shouldnt she? Why didnt the poet say
that she created fruits and water for the
sake of all human being?' It is because the
story tellers didnt need the welfare of all
people. The protection of the sages was
their sole duty. Whoever had whatever
abilities and wherever there were riches,
everything was useful only for sages. Why?
What about other people?
tending as if he is not aware of the reason, Dasaratha tries to appease her saying, Kaikeyi, what troubles you? Tell
me what you want. Tell me, do you want
some one to be killed? For the sake of
your happiness, I will kill him, however
innocent he may be. Tell me, do you
want to save any person? I will revoke
the punishment of that person, however
guilty he may be. Do you want me to
turn any rich person into a pauper? Tell
me quickly. I will send my army, plunder all his money and grain and make
him a pauper overnight. Or do you want
to turn some pauper into a rich person?
I will give him riches and wealth and
make him richThis is how King
Dasarathas prattling goes on. The poet
describes this Dasaratha as a great ideal
king. People too believe it and the light
of kings reputation spreads in all directions. But this is the actual fact!
This means that any king can do
whatever he wants, disregarding the
question of what is just and what is unjust! Anybody can get anything done if
he has the patronage of a king or a
queen. Those who are subjected to their
fury will totally perish without any trace.
Thus, it is a lie that people receive justice
from the rule of a despot. This is true of
any ruler: whether Dasaratha rules, Rama
rules or Pullayya rules.
Preface
Never praise me before him. Except themselves, Kings cannot tolerate others being
praised. They let people live comfortably
only if those people are loyal and serve
them. Otherwise they develop a hatred
against those people even if they are their
own children and see that they are destroyed. Spend your time serving Bharata
and his wives until I return! says Rama.
From these words of Rama it is clear how
just the kings will be, isnt it?
After reaching the bank of the
Ganga in a chariot and while
Sumanthra was about to leave for
Ayodhya, Rama says, Keep serving
Bharata and my father. Kings do not
tolerate defeat and agony. They dream
to rule in order to fulfil their wishes without any obstacle. Tell my mother to serve
Bharata. She should not be careless because he is young. Age has nothing to
do with honouring the king. Due to his
riches and wealth, a king becomes superior to all and is honoured.
At Chitrakuta, Rama tells
Lakshmana, Do you know why I actually wanted to rule? So that all my
brothers live for ever with riches, wealth,
royal luxuries and all kinds of comforts
Thus Rama wanted to rule in order
to fulfil his wishes, to make his friends
and relatives comfortable and to destroy
those who were not obedient to him! Is
this the rule of Rama which people
dream of?
(3) Kausalya, while admonishing
Dasaratha after Rama left Ayodhya:
How much injustice you have done to
Rama! Will Bharata give up the kingdom and treasury when Rama returns
19
20
Certain things
that make us laugh
(1) In response to the boons, which
Kaikeyi asked for, Dasaratha was annoyed thus, Even if the husband tells
the wife to ask for boons, she should
ask for such boons, which make her husband happy; can she demand such boons,
which cause the husband inconvenience? Had his wives asked for saris
or jewels, King Dasaratha would have
immediately ordered for it and thus sent
the rays of his fame in all directions!
Having missed such fame, His Excellency became furious at his wife, You
wicked woman! If I send Rama to live
in the forest because of your boons, I
will die due to that agony. If I die Rama
too will die for my sake. Sita dies,
Lakshmana dies, Bharata dies, Satrughna
dies and all queens die. All the animals will
die. Because of your demands, there will
be such a great loss! This is how
Dasaratha read a long list of people who
would have died following his death.
Lakshmana also says to Guha, We
are leaving for the forests. Well, how can
our father live without us? If you go to
Ayodhya and look there, you will find all
Preface
21
Kaikeyi asked.
Finally, the secret of commitment to
truth is meant for preaching to people
how bad it is to surrender to a woman!
(3) Kausalya scolds Dasaratha, If
my son gets angry? He can fell skies and
the heavens with arrows. He can make
the earth static. How nice it would have
been if Rama had got angry! We could
have seen the skies and heavens if they
had fallen down.
(4) Rama whom sages glorify that
he could fight with 11 thousand enemy
warriors simultaneously and conquer
them while protecting himself, his
chariot driver, chariots and horses as
soon as he put his foot in the forest after
crossing the river Ganga, looks at the
surroundings and says to Lakshamana,
Lakshamana! It would have been a very
difficult task for me to protect Sita if
you had not come. Both of you walk in
front and I will walk behind you. I will
protect you from behind. Does one
walk in front or at the back if he wants
to protect others in the forest.
(5) Rama, here and there, cracked
good jokes.
G "People feel happy watching the
sunrise and sunset; how foolish they are!
They dont have the sense and worry that
they grow in age by one part of the day,
says Rama!
This means people must learn to yell
in alarm as soon as dawn breaks and cry
aloud as soon as it becomes night!
G Of the things that we do, some
bear fruit and some dont. Does this not
mean anything other than destiny?
G People will be comfortable only if
22
Preface
23
24
of their mothers. Even today, law and society are not concerned with a living being
called mother. When a son has to introduce himself, he mentions his father, I am
the son of Mr. Jagannatham (That is, whoever be his mother but he is fortunate to
have Mr. Jagannatham as his father). Looking at that young man who says that with
pride, we are happy and say, Oh, I see.
We dont ask, Who is your mother? The
fact that there is a living being called mother
is not acknowledged by traditional codes,
the governmental laws or even a health
worker in the Malaria department.
(5) While returning to Ayodhya after
the death of Dasaratha, Bharata enters the
city. He looks around from the chariot and
comments, Why are auspicious instruments of music not heard? Earlier the lustful persons used to play sexual games in
the gardens and return to their homes
quickly while the dawn broke. Why are
they not seen now? This is how Bharata
laments, as he does not find debauchees.
Wives and husbands do not have the need
to spend time in gardens at night and go
home quickly as dawn breaks, do they? Is
there any difference between gardens in
Ayodhya of that time and brothels of the
the values that it preaches? Why do others reject those same values? When both
mother and father are responsible for the
birth of a child, why did respect for father alone become a special commitment?
Why is devotion to mother not present as
a commitment? Devotion to wife has not
become the duty of man. Moreover he had
Preface
25
26
Preface
27
28
Preface
29
against the other. There was no male-female prejudice . All would fight for their
tribe.
Administration in the Tribe
Organising the affairs of the Gen is
Gen administration. Organising all Gens
together is the administration of the
tribe!
The main aspects of this administration included gathering of food (by
means of hunting, from the trees in the
forest and cattle rearing), waging battles,
and making truce or friendship with
other tribes. These leaders would always
mingle with all and be part of the tribe.
There would be both men and
women among the leaders of the tribe.
They were part of the tribe. These leaders would not have special rights or
privileges.
In the course of time, it was these
leaders of Gens and tribes who were
worshipped as Lord Ganapathi.)
When war took place between two
tribes, the victorious tribe would either
kill the defeated tribe as a whole, or drive
them away to a far-off territory or some
times merge them into their own tribe
as equal individuals and give the name
of some Gen and thereby recognize them
as members of their Gens.
Marriage between different bands
Relations that were within a Gen in
the past (the relations that did not go
beyond the borders of the band) changed
subsequently. There began a practice
whereby one Gen established relations
with another Gen (that is one band with
another band within the same tribe).
If there were two Gens, Women of
30
Preface
31
32
Preface
33
34
Preface
Exchanges of articles in
the Gen system
Every tribe and every Gen within a
tribe, produced some articles and substances such as implements of hunting,
horns and skin of animals, wool, meat,
fish, honey, milk and grain. If one tribe
gave some of its articles to other tribes
and took in return articles that were necessary for it, it was an exchange of articles. These articles did not have a
price. Giving one article and taking
another article in exchange. That was all.
Exchange of 2 articles implied that every article had some value. Value means,
total labour necessary to produce an ar-
35
36
The fall of the Gen system and forces have to be at that level. If such conthe beginning of the exploitation ditions are absent, (If there was no condition whereby one person could grab from
of labour
Seeds of slavery had fallen gradually within the Gen system.
Now the process had ceased
whereby, in the course of battles between
different tribes, the victorious tribe either killed the defeated and captured
tribesmen or admitted them into their
tribe as equals! There began a practice
of turning the captured enemies into
their slaves and made them work.
In the beginning, development of
productive forces led to this change. This
is how it happened: Let us suppose that
the food gathered by a person, who had
worked throughout the day that is, the
food that he had gathered by roaming
around trees and by hunting would be
enough only for the maintenance of that
person. Let us also suppose that there was
no condition where more food could be
gathered (produced). Under such conditions, it was not possible for a man to keep
another man as his slave. Because, the
master couldnt get any production through
that slave. Suppose the master snatched
away whatever little food the slave had
gathered and did not give anything to
the slave. If this happened, the slave
would soon die without food. If the slave
had to live, he had to eat some food out
of what he produced daily. The master
could take whatever remained. This
meant, one group could keep another
group as its slaves only when there were
conditions where the labour of a person
not only satisfied the necessities of life but
also produced some surplus. Productive
Preface
37
38
Preface
39
sition. If there is incoherence or inconsistency between two things or two situations, it means there is contradiction.
There would be contradiction between
class of slaves and class masters. Contradiction between classes does not
mean conflict or enmity between two
individuals. It is enmity between two
groups. It is enmity between the living
conditions and the interest of those
groups.
If something does good to one class,
it harms another class. A situation which
gives comfort to one, gives discomfort
to another.
Such a contradiction as this would
not be solved by means of conciliation,
negotiations or reforms. It would be
solved only if the conditions become
equal. If contradictions between classes
have to disappear, classes themselves
need to disappear.
Every person ought to do labour. All
people ought to live by their own labour.
Then we will and find master-slave distinction. There will not be exploitation
of labour. Social conditions whereby all
human beings live as equals will form.
But, such a situation is still thousands
of years away! Classes have emerged
recently and they have to change into
other forms. History has yet to pass a
long way before a solution is found.
When we speak of the emergence of
class distinctions in the Gen system, we
have to assume the duration of the Gen
system to be several thousands of years.
We have to assume that exploitation of
Contradiction
labour and hostile classes had gradually
Contradiction means conflict, oppo- emerged. We should also assume that
40
the beginning and the end of the Gen sociRight from the beginning, it appeared
ety were not of the same character.
that only the lower caste people were
extremely poor. Usually we dont find
Caste distinctions
rich people among lower castes. If at
all there are any, such examples are very
in the new society
There was no concept of the caste few. They are almost non-existent.
under the Gen system. Although there
The rich and the poor are found
were differences in the activities (occu- among the higher castes. But the poor
pations), they were part of collective liv- among the higher castes, do not experiing. There was no social hierarchy ence social inferiority. Yet these poor
(higher position or lower position). All also come under the poor class. These
persons were members with equal rec- poor too are subjected to exploitation
ognition in society. The new laws that of labour by the rich class.
defended private property differentiated the rich class as upper class and the Man-woman relations
poor class as the low class. In course of in the new society
time, there occurred division of labour
We have a kind of division of labour
in the lower class depending on their between men and women in the Gen syslong standing occupations: cultivation, tem. In course of time, that division of
handicrafts and the lowest manual jobs. labour led to a system where women were
A further division into Sudras and still involved less in outside activities and more
lower castes also occurred among these in household activities.
lower class people.
As men were involved in hunting, culThis institution of castes is seen only tivation, rearing of cattle, wars with enemy
in India. Although class distinctions, tribes, they got opportunities, which
caused due to exploitation of labour, women did not, to acquire property.
exist throughout the world, what were
When we talk of men, it does not
the specific conditions that led to the
mean that all men were in the same situamanifestation of class distinctions in the
tion. Men who were slaves did not own
form of higher and lower castes? The
their own bodies. Such people did not
historians have not offered any satisfachave any opportunity at all to acquire proptory explanation.
We have to assume that, to the class erty. Here we have to bear in mind only
distinctions in India, some specific con- those men who could earn property.
We have to assume that, after the dividitions were also added and the higherlower castes began. In the beginning, these sion of labour took place between men and
distinctions took the forms of Brahmana, women, men had opportunities to acquire
Kshatriya, Vysya and Sudra castes. These property by their outside activities and
distinctions gradually expanded into hun- women, who were confined to household
activities, had no such opportunities.
dreds of castes.
Preface
41
42
Preface
43
44
We are going to see all these features obedience and subservience. They had
in the Ramayana also, as we proceed to make sons worship not their mothers
further.
but fathers with fear, devotion, obedience and modesty. They had to make the
The Army of Pens
poor feel that their poverty was their
The class of masters did not accom- misfortune and be reconciled that their
plish all the changes required to consoli- birth in lower castes was their bad luck.
date the system of private property only They had to make prostitutes feel that
by means of coercion. Coercion does not their profession is very pious. The folwork on all occasions. A different kind lowing are the wonderful weapons,
of teaching is also necessary in order to which the army of pens created for the
make a slave subservient to his master sake of these mental changes. (1) The
and a wife to her husband. The class of deeds in the past birth. (2) Sin and pimasters has to teach the oppressed in ety. (3) Heaven and hell. (4) Birth and
such a way that they are subservient Rebirth.
voluntarily.
The Gen system had no need of any
It was none other than the poets who one of these things.
shouldered the responsibility of teachThe concepts of past deeds (karma),
ing people modesty and obedience in the rebirth (punarjanma), sin and piety,
interest of the rich class. They were not heaven and hell created new, religious
an army of swords. An army of pens. beliefs - which are totally false and ig(There were no pens at that time. They norant. The class of exploiters want
did not even have needle like pens to people to live in this ignorance and keep
write on palm-leaves. There was no their faces toward heaven and hell. Of
writing system as yet. Every thing was course, the class of exploiters also live
oral propaganda. This was still the stage in ignorance. But this ignorance does not
of Barbarism. The writing system did not harm the rich class as it harms the poor
begin until the stage of civilisation.)
class.
This army of pens consists of indiFor a long time, religion has beviduals belonging to the rich class. They come a wing that serves the rich class.
are mainly priests (in any country) who
These religious preachers acquired
are concerned with religious matters and the knack of teaching whatever there
activities. The stability of the rich class was to teach to the people.
was their interest. Their duty was to
For women If they remain devoted
wipe out the old ideas of the spirit of wives and serve their husbands, they would
collective living of the Gen system from earn piety and go to heaven. Many stories
the minds of the people and to spread were told to teach this! Examples of
and retain the new values. They had to women who had attained this were enumake women hate their own freedom merated in the stories.
and lick the feet of their husbands with
For slaves If they were faithful to
Preface
45
ing births so that they could commit pious acts and take the birth of rich people.
With this all the stages of the Gen
system are over. Hereafter we can forget about it. This Gen system which had
been there until the consolidation of individual private property was Matriarchal. The same was called Primitive
Communism. The Gen system was
born in the middle stage of Savagery,
reached the higher level in the last stage
of Barbarism and ended at the beginning
of Civilisation.
Bow and arrow symbol for the
Savage man.
Sword symbol for the
Barbaric man.
Gun powder symbol for the
Civilized man.
46
Preface
47
48
means, in a position in which they can supWe may call a kingdom a country.
port themselves to some extent. Yet, a poor Whether we call it a kingdom or counwoman is subordinate to her husband. The try, it is an administrative territory.
rich class culture, its ideology influences the
The king had some land as private
minds of the poor class.
property. The slave population that
raised crops in that land and other mulThe Cultural Army
titude of servants would be under his
There exist various kinds of arts in control. In that kingdom, just as the king
society. Music, poetry, acting, painting possesses, other rich people also posand such others. Since all the artists are sessed their own lands and the poor
born and brought up in a society based people would cultivate those lands. The
on exploitation, they too hold the same purpose of the kings rule is to protect
ideas. They express their own ideas the class interests of the rich only.
through their arts. If we consider poets
A king always tried to invade
separately, they are the army of the pens. neighbouring kingdoms (territories),
We may call all the artists cultural waged wars and occupied those kingdoms (lands) also. The rich of the victoarmy.
The cultural army brainwashes the rious country would distribute the ocarmy of swords with cultural ideas. Each cupied lands among themselves and earn
of the morals, which they propagate, is more money from those lands. Next,
sharper than a hundred swords. We can they invade other kingdoms.
The king who was able to occupy
see for some thousands of years in the
future (that is, even now. In the present many territories was called a great
society as well) the wounds and the de- king, great warrior! If he conquered
formity of the soul which these moral many kingdoms, he would be an emswords caused.
peror!
It is the kings who appear as wonThe Emergence of Kings
derful heroes throughout the religious
In the exploitative society, forts and stories! All people (both rich and the
towns arose. Some tribes jointly occu- poor) had a craze for the king! It is a
pied certain territories and all such ter- craze for his official status and the heaps
ritories came under the rule of a single of his riches and wealth.
tribe. Victorious tribes began to make
If you want a story it would be about
the defeated tribes as their subsidiaries. the king! Once upon a time, there lived a
The whole territory under the rule of a king! If there were no king, there would
tribe emerged as a kingdom (State). be no story.
Its head was the king. The kingdom
People go into ecstasy recalling the
might have been very small or big. It was wars which kings waged long long ago.
an administrative territory within certain They narrate the valour and bravery of
borders.
kings as holy stories. But what does
Preface
49
50
Preface
51
52
Preface
53
54
Preface
55
56
Preface
master to the labourer had not yet begun here. The portion that is spent on
the subsistence of the slave out of the
products produced by the labour of the
slave is akin to the wage of the slave.
But that portion does not have the name
wage. After deducting the portion that
goes to the slave in order to keep him
alive, the entire remaining portion of the
products goes to the family of the slave
master.
If we deduct the portion spent on the
slave from his labour, the remaining is
surplus. It is surplus labour. If we see
it in terms of products it is surplus
production. If we see it in terms of
money, it is surplus value (surplus
money).
If we consider the totality of slaves
and the totality of slave masters, the class
of slave masters lives on the surplus
labour of the slaves.
But, no class realised this exploitation of labour at that time. Because at
that time, there were no calculations of
money for any labour or production.
Slaves performed many kinds of labour
beginning from cultivation to the household chores for the sake of families of
masters. What is the value of products
produced by their labour? What portion
did the slaves receive from the total
value? What portion did the slave master get after the slaves received their
share? As there were no such calculations in terms of money at that time, there
was no scope to understand either surplus labour or surplus value.
But, credit, interest and trading commission had begun in slave society. Here
57
Enemy classes
in Feudal society
Here landlords (feudal lords) and
tenant farmers (feudal peasants), who do
labour on the land and raise crops, were
enemy classes. Here, all the properties
of the class of masters over the means
of labour remained as before but some
of their rights over the labouring people
decreased. Here, the term land rent arrived into property relations. The practice
of paying Wage for the labouring person
had not yet begun.
The tenant farmers rented the lands
which the masters owned, grew crop,
paid the rent to the landlords out of the
crop and supported themselves with the
remaining production.
Labourers (tenant farmers) do all the
labour. After deducting a portion necessary for the subsistence of tenant farmers from the total crop out put, the entire remaining portion went to the master
(Landlord).
Here also, none of the classes knew
the fact of exploitation of labour.
Class struggles took place here
as well.
58
Enemy classes
in the Capitalist society
Here a productive capitalist class
emerges afresh. In the society, landlords
and capitalists are different sections
within the exploiting class. Its opponent
class is proletariat (labourers or the
Working Class).
In this society, payment of wage in
the form of money for the labourer begins.
Further, most part of the production
which the capitalist gets produced by
labourers would go into sales. Every
product would have a price.
The capitalist, invests some capital
(on the means of labour and wages), gets
commodities produced by labourers and
sells them. After deducting the initially
spent expenses (capital) from the money
received through sales, there remains
some money as surplus. This is distributed in the form of interest and profit
for the capital and in the form of rent
for the land on which production activities are carried out.
Here, every item has definite money
calculations. What is the value of the
commodity? What is its expenditure?
How much surplus value remains? (This
means, it is possible to calculate the portion that goes to the capitalist from the
labour of the workers).
It became possible to discover the
secret of exploitation of labour only under capitalism wherein the system of
payment of wages to workers began and
calculations for all factors that produce
commodities was possible. Marx accomplished this task.
Preface
59
60
Preface
61
62
Preface
63
64
Preface
Capitalist wars
The terror called war did not leave
the lives of human beings even in the
capitalist society. Capitalists compete
among themselves to sell their commodities throughout the world, invest their
capital throughout the world and secure
labourers and raw materials from different countries cheaply. These competitive attempts lead to wars. One war necessitates another war, more intensive
than the previous one.
If the wars in the past societies were
waged with sticks and swords, the bourgeois wars are waged with civilized
guns and bombs. In this (capitalist) society, just as productive forces develop
to an unimaginable level in all sectors,
the war forces that destroy other countries also develop.
War is a three-letter word only. But
its terror, ugliness and destruction are
beyond description. The quarrels that
began between tribes when human beings were in the stage of animality dont
recede even in the capitalist society.
Moreover, they intensify competition
among capitalists of different countries
to grab surplus value from the world
proletariat which leads to wars.
65
66
Human Relations
in the Communist Society
This new society begins either as
socialism or some other revolutionary
stage that precedes it. It is able to eliminate class distinctions totally after some
more stages.
In such a society, we may imagine
human relations as follows.
(1) All people do labour (work). We
dont find some people as masters and
some as labourers. Master-labourer
relations disappear. Then all people are
producers. There is no exploitation of
labour.
(2) There is no right of exploitative
private property. No one has any right
to receive rent from land, interest and
profit from capital as their income. Each
person has his own labour as a means
for his livelihood. The capitalist individual property transforms into collec-
Preface
67
68
Preface
69
70
Preface
71
Primitive communism
and a higher form of
communism are not the same!
We have seen that the Gen system
is called primitive communism since it
was a society without classes. But we
cannot compare the higher form of society
called communism with the Gen society
of the remote past. Because, except
classlessness, the two are not the same in
all the other aspects.
Human beings did not have any
knowledge about Nature at the time of
the Gen system. The fact that the popu-
72
Preface
73
74
Preface
75
76
Preface
77
78
it?
Some people naively vacillate,
Though it is not possible these days,
perhaps it might have been possible in
those days! The distinction between
these days and those days is relevant
to the social matters but not to laws of
nature.
Begetting children by a monkey and
a human being does not happen during
those days or these days or any day.
This means, Rakshasas, Vanaras,
gods, Nagas, Yakshas, Gandharvas - are
all human beings. We have to assume
that all these people belonged to
different races, tribes or territories. All
the names of these tribes are akin to
those of birds, animals and trees found
in Nature.
There was hostility between Ramas
race and Ravanas race.
There was no such evident hostility
between Ramas race and other races.
The poet of Ramayana (Valmiki)
belonged to Ramas group. He stood on
the side of traditions and social values,
which Rama defended.
The poet of Ramayana depicted the
Rakshasas as ugly and downright
wicked. He depicted the Vanaras as ugly
and made fun of them on some
occasions. It was Ramas dynasty alone
which the poet treated uncritically and
with great respect and reverence.
In these stories of The Poisonous
Tree, all are human beings. This makes
no difference for the story. Because, for
example, human Hanuman plays the
same role in the Poisonous Tree which
Hanuman with a tail plays in Valmikis
Preface
79
80
Preface
81
82
Preface
83
7 kandas (parts).
1) Bala kanda
2) Ayodhya kanda
3) Aranya kanda
4) Kishkindha kanda
5) Sundara kanda
6) Yuddha kanda
7) Uttara kanda
Pundits say that there are 24
thousand slokas as a whole in these 7
kandas. (Anybody can find this out if
they count the slokas. I have not counted
them.)
All the researchers who are devotees
believe that the story of Ramayana
really happened. It is history. They also
believe all the miracles in the story.
In which period this story was
written in the form of a book (writing
on leaves like palm leaves)? There is no
consensus among the researchers on this
question. But all people agree that this
story had been popular among people
much before it was written by anyone.
(Popular in the sense that people used
to tell this story in the form of short stories
and songs.)
Almost all people are of the view that
it was Valmiki who first composed the
story of Ramayana. When we say that
he first composed it, it does not mean
that he just transferred the stories, which
people used to tell or sing as they were
then in vogue. He wrote the entire
story in the form of two line-slokas
following a metre and grammar, using
his poetic abilities.
There are varied opinions about the
period in which it was written. Some
84
Preface
85
86
Preface
87
Some Related Points
88
One night, over the radio, a divinestory teller (Haridas) was depicting with
I knew that the story Ramayana is an
great enthusiasm and joy the valorous ancient religious literature but I was not
scene which Lord Lakshmana, under aware that it had been in circulation with
the instructions of Lord Rama, cuts nose so many hazardously haphazard contents.
Preface
89
90
91
PART
The entire Bala kanda is an Interpolation - This is the opinion of some pundits. But
if we go by the method of writing (of
Ramayana), we can say that the story has begun appropriately with the contents of Bala
kanda.]
Narada, who knows all the worlds, said to
Valmiki in response to his question: Great sage
Valmiki! The qualities that you have mentioned
are very difficult to find. No man may have them.
But there is a man who possesses such good
qualities. There is a man named Rama in the
Ikshavaku dynasty. He has conquered the
1
senses.
He is a great warrior, rich in customs, handsome, wise, knows morals and rules very well,
converses well, causes fear in his enemies. He
has a handsome physique with bones covered
with flesh, has large eyes and wealthy. He is
the protector of the suffering people. He does
good to people. He is full of wisdom, protector
of his own kith and kin, defender of Law, master
of archery, knows all scriptures, is high minded
and never loses courage. He is capable of assessing others strength and ability. He is the
1. Whenever we read some thing, we have to read it with a critical mind. We should not read them
without applying our mind. For example: How can a man get angry once he has conquered anger?
He creates fear even among gods when he gets angry, the poet says! This means, his getting angry
is true and his conquering it is not true! Similarly, the question, is there any man who has no
jealousy? implies that it is impossible not to have jealousy! When a person gets angry after being
described as someone who has conquered anger, cant a person become jealous of others even
after being described as some one who has no jealousy?
Valmiki has described many good qualities and asked, Is there any such a person? Even if
Narada had answered, yes, all those good qualities in one may turn out to be false just as
conquering anger turned to be false.
92
supporter of good men just as the ocean supports all rivers. He is as serene as the ocean, as
firm as the Himalayan Mountain, as valorous
as Vishnu and as pleasing as the moon. In anger, he is like a destructive fire at the end of
creation. He is equal to Mother Earth in patience. He is generous like Kubera, the god of
riches and wealth, in charity. He is god of justice in his lawful rule This sort of a person is
Lord Rama, the eldest son of Dasaratha!
Dasaratha made attempts to crown the eldest son. But as Dasarathas wife Kaikeyi had
been granted boons in the past, she demanded
Ramas exile to the forest and Bharatas coronation as her boons. Dasaratha, who was committed to the truth, sent his dear son Rama to
the forest since he had given boons to his wife
in the past. Although Rama was valorous, he
went in to the forests in the attire of a sage in
order to carry out his fathers command.
Lakshmana also went along with him.
Lakshmana is the son of Sumitra. Sita is Ramas
wife. She is the daughter of King Janaka. Sita is
a very noble woman. Sita too went into the forest along with her husband. The citizens and
Dasaratha followed them for quite some distance and saw them off. Rama reached
Sringaberapura on the bank of the Ganga and
sent the chariot back. Guha was the king of that
city. He was a king of hunter caste. He and
Dasaratha were friends. He helped Rama cross
the river Ganga. Then they crossed forests, visited the hermitage of the sage Bharadwaja, built
a hut near the Chitrakuta Mountain and lived
there comfortably.
Dasaratha died after Rama left. Although
priests and friends tried to crown Bharata king,
he did not agree to become the monarch. He
went to Chitrakuta and requested Rama to accept the crown. Rama did not agree. But he gave
him his sandals. Bharata began to rule the kingdom on behalf of those sandals.
Rama left for Dandakaranya as he thought
people would keep visiting him if he lived at
Chitrakuta. In that great jungle, Rama killed a
Rakshasa named Viradha. He visited sages
Sarabhanaga, Suthishna and Agastya. He received weapons, which Agastya gave him. All
Prelude
Oh! Why not? There is a man called Rama
who is rich in virtues in Ayodhya. He has faced
many hardships, completed his exile in forests
for fourteen years, killed Ravana recently, returned to Ayodhya and is ruling the kingdom
well. He will continue to rule for eleven thousand years more.
Well, then, Valmiki was living in Ramas
kingdom only, wasnt he?
Didnt great sage Valmiki know the fact that
there was a great man called Rama until Narada
told him? King Dasaratha, his sons, Ramas exile into forests for fourteen years, the killing of
Ravana, his return to Ayodhya Didnt
Valmiki know all this? He had not heard the
name of Rama so far!
The story of Ramayana starts strangely
thus!
In the subsequent narration of Narada,
contents of the Uttara kanda do not figure.
We dont find things like leaving Sita in the
forest, the birth of Kusa and Lava etc.)
Narada says further, The country will be
prosperous under Ramas rule. All people will
be happy.
Rama performs hundreds of horse sacrifices, donates millions of cows and gives untold riches. He will establish hundreds of royal
dynasties. He will direct the people belonging
to the four castes to follow their respective
duties. Thus Rama will rule for eleven thousand years and then go to the Brahma loka, the
highest heaven. This story of Rama is most
sacred. It is equal to the Vedas. Those who read
it will enjoy all comforts and also go to heaven.
Naradas narration is not yet over. He further talks about the fruits one will get by reading Ramayana. If a Brahmin reads this
Ramayana, he will become a great scholar. If a
Kshatriya reads it he will rule the entire earth. If
a Vysya reads, he will get profit in trade. If a
Sudra reads it, he will become superior among
Sudras. Thus narrating the story of Rama,
Narada went to heaven.
Later, Valmiki, accompanied by a disciple
named Bharadwaja, went to the river Tamasa,
bathed in it, wrapped himself in his garments
and saw a pair of cranes. The birds were flutter-
93
94
The poet tells some thing briefly at the beginning and tells the same thing in detail later. We
should not understand this as something wrong
or a mistake.]
Then he understood all things connected
with Ramas story. He grasped everything
through his yogic powers and wrote Ramas
story. He wrote about Ramas birth, his strength
and valour, the worlds love for Rama, strange
incidents which had happened during his journey with Viswamitra(Thus, there is a mention
of all the important scenes in Ramayana. Here
there is a reference to Uttara kanda. Thus the
sage Valmiki has depicted the entire Ramas
story in seven parts.
T he sage Valmiki wrote the entire
Ramayana while Rama was ruling the kingdom.
There are 24,000 slokas (poems) in it. The
sargas (Cantos or Chapters) are 500. The num-
2. Singing of the Ramayana by Kusa and Lava does not mean that they sang only the Ramayana.
We have to notice here the very poor life of rural folk who roam around villages, sing many kinds
of stories and live on the alms and old garments which the listeners donated.
3. In the ancient times, when people lived in Gens and tribes, they used to die very often due to
attacks of wild animals and enemies. In such a stage, people used to wish to have more people in
each Gen and tribe. It is necessary to have a large number of people in order to wage wars against
the enemy tribes and conquer them and also to increase production. Having 60,000 sons is a story
form of the desire to have large number of people. Note that the sons accompany the father in wars.
4. A king who was highly skilled in expanding the kingdom! What is that skill? How will a
kingdom expand? Only if he annexes the other kingdoms. Which means, Dasaratha was skilled in
attacking the neighbouring territories, waging wars and occupying them! The poet is describing
invasion as great valour!
Prelude
There is a rampart around Ayodhya just as
women have a golden belt round their waist.
There are war machines. There are canons.
The city was full of multi-storied mansions.
There was no dearth for food in the city even if
drought or long drawn battles took place any
number of times. Kubera-like traders who came
there from different countries carry on trade in
this city. There were many subsidiary kings.
There were many troupes of female dancers.
There were no atheists in the city. There was
none who is not loyal to the king.
In that city, all Brahmins were the best persons. All were like great sages. All the
Kshatriyas were great warriors. They could kill
tigers and lions merely with their hands.
Dasaratha was ruling Ayodhya which was filled
with such Brahmins and Kshatriyas, as Indra
ruled heaven.
In that city all the Kshatriyas followed the
commands of Brahmins. All the Vysyas followed the orders of Kshatriyas. Sudras served
Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vysyas. (Descriptions concerning citizens of Ayodhya related
to the first three varnas (castes) only. Not related to Sudras. Sudras are servants of other
castes.)
There were thousands and millions of
horses and elephants.
Dasaratha had seven ministers. (Sumantra
was one of them). Vasista and Vamadeva were
two priests. They also discharged the duties of
ministers. Jabali is merely a counselor. They also
assisted the king in filling the royal treasury
with money, gold and gems; in disciplining the
four-wings of the army. They were very skilled
in declaring wars and arriving at truce. With
such ministers, Dasaratha ruled Kosala.
King Dasaratha did not have sons. It will
be good if I perform horse-sacrifice to beget
sons, thought Dasaratha. (Did he not perform
sacrifice of a horse (Aswameedha yaaga) until then? The story begins with the sacrifice of a
95
Then Sumantra said to Dasaratha as follows: Oh, King! I have heard this idea of
Vasista for begetting sons in the form of a legend. In the past, sage Sanatkumara narrated a
story to other sages as follows: Kashyapa has
a son named Vibhandaka. A son called
Rishyasringa will be born to Vibhanda. Except
the forest in which he lives, he will not know
that there is a vast world around him. He will
not know that there exist towns and cities and
there will be various kinds of men and things.
He will become an adult without seeing any
5
other human being except his father.
At that time, a king called Romapada ruled
Angadesa. Owing to his unjust behaviour, there
were no rains in his kingdom. (No mention of
the particulars of that unjust behaviour. It
seems, kings also behave in an unjust manner
occasionally; but Brahmins never behave in
an unjust manner). Priests tell the king that rains
would fall if he could bring Rishyasringa to the
country. Romapada feels happy and sends prostitutes (ganika) for Rishyasringa. They meet
Rishyasringa when he is alone, give him various kinds of food stuffs, mislead him and bring
him to Angadesa. As soon as Rishyasringa arrives in Angadesa, rains fall and crops grow.
5. In the ancient, primitive times, human beings used to spend generations without knowing that
there was a vast world away from their place of living. The story of Rishyasringa is a reflection of
such a situation. There is a mention of Rishyasringas father but not of his mother.
96
6.
In these stories, we occasionally notice marriages between sons of sages and daughters of
Kshatriyas and between kings and daughters of Brahmins. We can interpret in such a way that,
before castes emerged in their specific and crystallized form, individuals pursuing one occupation
married those belonging to other occupations. In the period in which a story occurs or in the
period in which a character lives, we find a mixture of customs related to many past periods.
7. Bala kanda, sarga 11, sloka 17: In the context where Romapada told Rishyasringa about
Dasaratha, some translators have translated as if Romapada told that Shantas natural father was
Dasaratha. (Based on the words sakhyam and sambandhakam). There is a belief among people
that Shanta was Dasarathas daughter and Ramas elder sister. But, in the Sanskrit sloka it is not so.
8. With reference to naked ascetics, we may understand as follows: In the primitive days, human
beings lived naked for a long time. In course of wearing leaves, animal skin and bark garments, all
people did not wear any thing. Two ways existed: some people used to wear some thing while some
people remained naked. Roaming nakedly still exists as a holy custom of ancient times.
9. Bala kanda, sarga 14, sloka 12: Kausalya spent that night with that sacrificial horse, along
with other queens No details beyond this are given. We can understand this as a religious
belief. As if Kausalya sat near the horse. But, some critics interpret it as if Kausalya spent that
night with that horse sexually. There isnt anything that one can achieve by such vulgar interpretations.
10. Even though he was a Brahmin, if he was poor, he wouldnt benefit from the sacrifices and
charity except get a bangle or any wrist ornament or a fistful of alms! But the substantial donation
of land, cows and everything went to the priestly class or rich Brahmins. Poor Brahmins didnt get
any such things.
Prelude
After horse-sacrifice was over,
Rishyasringa thought for a while and said to
Dasaratha. O king! There is a sacrifice called
Putra kaameeshti (sacrifice to beget sons).
Rishyasringa started the sacrifice. (Why did he
conduct horse sacrifice before? Now, Putra
kaameeshti? He should have conducted it before. This is a tactic to make the king give donations and charity to all the priests. Even
Rishyasringa who lived in the forest innocently
had become a clever fellow!)
Gods, demigods, singers and musicians
and dancers all came to attend Dasarathas
sacrifice for sons. All of them cried out in the
presence of Brahma who has also come there.
You gave boons to a Rakshasa called Ravana
in the past. That fellow is harassing all the
worlds. Then Brahma said, Dont worry.
Ravana did not ask for a boon that he should
not die at the hands of a human being. Therefore, he will die at the hands of a human being.
At this moment, Lord Vishnu also arrived
with a conch shell and a wheel in the hands. All
the gods prayed to Vishnu. Vishnu gave them
an assurance, Dont worry! Ill take the birth
of a human being, kill Ravana and rule this
earth. He had determined to be born as one of
the four sons of Dasaratha.
A great man, who came out of the altar of
sacrificial fire brought paayasam, a sweet made
of milk and rice in a golden vessel, gave it to
Dasaratha and said, Distribute this among
your wives. You will get sons. Saying so, he
disappeared. (He disappeared immediately,
because, perhaps they might take him to task
if sons are not born.)
97
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
11. Observe Dasarathas distribution. What is the secret behind such a special way of distribution? If he gave the Paayasam (sweet) to all the three wives equally, Rama would have become
equal to others. Then every thing would get upset. Therefore, first half to Kausalya. That is, Rama
is the half part of Vishnu. Dasaratha could have given the remaining Paayasam equally to the other
wives. Then also, things would have got upset. This is how it happened: Sumitra must get two
sons in the story. Kaikeyi would get one son. If he gave the sweet equally to Kaikeyi and Sumitra,
each would have got a quarter. Then Kaikeyis son Bharata would singly represent a quarter of
Vishnu whereas the two sons of Sumitra would together represent a quarter of Vishnu. It seems
that the poet does not like this! It appears that the poet intended to make Lakshmana more
representative of Vishnus essence than Bharata. Hence, he created Bharata with a half quarter and
Lakshmana and Satrughna with a half quarter and half. Other than this, no reason appears here,
according to the story. Here, it appears that Dasaratha had three wives. But, the number of wives
of this king is not this much. Add another 350 to the three. 353 in all! This, we will know in Ayodhya
kanda. (sarga 39, sloka 36). What is this calculation that a king has 353 wives! Think about it!
98
Story-1
This is Ramayana!
This is Ramayana!
happiness, his heart was troubled by the doubt,
why the sage had suddenly come on a visit?
Although he was nodding his head
genially, Viswamitra too had a doubt and
thought, I hope there wont be any hurdle in
achieving the purpose of my visit. Vasista and
the ministers too were indulging in their own
speculation.
As he could not bear the silence, Dasaratha
said, Your arrival has blessed Ayodhya, My
Lord!. He expressed his joy for the tenth time
again.
May you be blessed with all good
fortune, Viswamitra blessed the King for the
tenth time. Alls well, I hope? he moved into
enquiring about the welfare of the king. Have
you occupied any new territories? Have you
defeated all your enemies?, he enquired with a
12
smile.
The King replied with slight
disappointment I am eager to conquer lands,
My Lord, but my age., he hesitated.
Whats age got to do with it, Your
Majesty? Your army with the four arms of
infantry, cavalry, elephants and war chariots are
not old. If your ministers are loyal
I beg forgiveness of the Brahmana Sage!
Sumantra stood up, saluted and submitted in
all humility, There may be some truth in
thinking that the King has neglected the
campaigns caught in the delights of his
children. But Lord of the ascetics must
recognise that the enemy kings are also
powerful.
Viswamitra nodded in agreement, gave up
that topic and enormously pleased the King,
So be it Your Majesty! Your sons are worthy.
They will finish the work which you stopped.
He put another question, Are all your vassals
duly submissive to you?
99
12. Bala kanda, Sarga 19, Sloka 45: Viswamitra makes many enquiries about the well being of
Dasaratha about his riches and wealth; treasury and enemies. I hope all are well in your
kingdom. I think your treasury is full and unspent. Are your chiefs obedient to you? Have all your
enemies been defeated ? I hope the sacrificial and Vedic rites are being conducted without any
problem These are the questions which sages put first whenever they visit a king. That the
king has to conquer enemies, annex others kingdoms and expand his riches and wealth! They
shower blessing and wish them progress in that direction!
100
This is Ramayana!
Are wives worshipping and obeying their
husbands? Are the illiterates happy listening
to the Puranas? Your Majesty must always find
out all these things, cautioned Viswamitra.
Though the sermons which Viswamitra
delivered between the questions on his welfare,
caused discomfort, the old king who all his life
had ruled the kingdom, pretended to be
overwhelmed by happiness and said,
Brahmana sage! Because of your kindness to
me you are asking so many questions about
my welfare. I am blessed! Right from the
beginning I did not have any difficulty in ruling
the kingdom. All my kith and kin hold important
positions in my kingdom and act as my right
hand men. My ministers are trustworthy, loyal
and aid me in my plans for expansion of the
kingdom and management of the vassal
provinces. The four forces of my army always
exude enthusiasm to attack the enemy states.
My treasury is filled with unlimited riches and
grains. The armouries are full of unlimited
weapons and cannons. There are innumerable
chariots, horses, and elephants in my
possession. Having no courage to complain
against anything, people are living obediently
and submissively. On the advice of the priests,
I perform Vedic rites and with the blessing of
the finest Brahmins, I am ruling my kingdom.
The king announced his superiority in
enjoyment.
Viswamitra, nodding his head, poked fun
at him, You are very capable. But then even a
Great king like you, I hope, is giving in to the
commands of the priests.
Lord of ascetics can verify that from any
priest or Vedic scholar in this court, replied
Dasaratha, feeling slightly snubbed.
Vasista, intervened and smilingly said,
Viswamitra! The Great King Dasaratha is
familiar with the finer points of duties, virtues
and law. It is not fair on the part of the Lord of
the sages to test him so much.
With a view to please Dasaratha, Viswamitra
said, O King! I am greatly pleased by your
administration thats prospering, endowed with
all the best qualities. That is why Lord Vishnu
has been born to you. May all good fortune
101
102
to meet you.
Your pleasure! What is your command?
Viswamitra turned away and kept silent.
Why do you hesitate, My Lord ? Am I
not bound by the commands of the Brahmins?
Do you not know that it is not in our lineage to
go back on our promises?
Dont I know, King? Being born in the
Raghu-lineage how can you go back on your
promises? Would you tell a lie even if the sun
were to rise in the west? I am hesitating because
it may alarm you. Please do listen carefully and
understand the issue. Send your eldest son
Rama with me! Thats why I have come.
Everyone was dismayed.
Dasaratha was stunned.
Rama? Should I send Rama to conquer
those Rakshasas? Alas, why are you teasing
an old man, My Lord?
Viswamitra decided to be ruthless right from
the beginning. He said, Have I come all the
way here to joke with you, Your Majesty! Did I
not tell you not to be alarmed right in the
beginning? I have thought this through in
various ways and have come for Rama. If I
myself get into combat with the enemy, I was
disrupting my own sacrificial rites. Moreover, I
will have to face the accusation of the people
that even after becoming a Brahmana sage,
Viswamitra has not given up his anger. O King!
Repose faith in me! Do not hesitate because
Rama is young. He will be safe under my care. I
will teach him all skills. I will give him invincible
weapons. I will stay in the background and get
the work done by him, said Viswamitra, keenly
observing Dasarathas face.
Dasaratha, with increased agony said, Oh,
no! This is not in jest then? Are my ears hearing
the real words being spoken? O great sage! Till
recently the maids would narrate stories about
Rakshasas to put the children to bed. A child
who is scared of the stories, how will he fight
the Rakshasas? He is still at the age of having
fun and playing games. He has still not fully
learnt archery. How will he estimate the
strengths and weaknesses of the enemy? Is
there anything stranger than this? O great sage
Viswamitra! What can you achieve with such a
This is Ramayana!
body from the others. Thank goodness, I
havent started on a battle. He felt pleased.
But the next moment he sighed in a weak voice,
I cannot, indeed, win against Ravana, against
whom even gods and Gandharvas cannot stand
up. But then, between you and me, when
Brahma himself chooses to give boons to him,
who can be victorious against the Rakshasa
king?
Viswamitra rebuked him, Being a great
king, why are you talking like an ignoramus?
Except Lord Vishnu, dont you know that
Brahma and Siva do not have the ability to
completely save anyone even if they themselves
have given the boons?
Vasista with a soft voice intervened and
elucidated the intricacies of virtue, duty, law
etc. Oh Great King! It is Brahma who has given
the boon to Ravana. Again it is the same Brahma
who has given the idea to put an end to him. He
gave the boon out of embarrassment that
Ravana undertook severe penance to please
him, otherwise, why would Brahma have any
friendship and affection towards the Rakshasa
king? Why would Brahma do something that
could cause lasting damage to the gods and
the Brahmins whom gods worship them? There
is nothing wrong if some one with four mouths,
speaks in four ways, isnt it? Even if Ravana is
a great hero, dont think that he will not die.
Encouraged, Viswamitra said, Theres no
immediate need to clash with Ravana, O King!
He is using only his followers carelessly in
disruptive activities against Vedic rites.
Especially, Tataka, Maricha and Subahu are the
most troublesome in the vicinity of our
hermitage. They should be killed first. He
observed the kings face keenly.
The king slid into deep depression once
again. Alas I cannot live away from my Rama
even for a moment! O great sage! I begot Rama
after hankering for an offspring for many years
and after undertaking many religious rituals.
How can I send my dear son to fight with the
Rakshasas? He bent his head and wept.
The kings attitude was like adding fuel to
fire, and Viswamitra flared up, as it was not the
time of performing sacrifice. Your Majesty!
103
104
This is Ramayana!
When every one was eagerly waiting for
Rama, he came in with a smile. Lakshmana, right
behind him! As they arrived, they paid
obeisance to every one humbly and came to
stand by their father. Both the brothers were of
the endearing age of fourteen. Both were
extremely good looking with large eyes, full
cheeks and broad foreheads, curly hair, long
crimson coloured marks on the forehead with
glittering silk clothes! Their body was bedecked
with jewellery made of diamonds and emeralds!
The only difference between them was their
complexion. If Rama was like the blue sky,
Lakshmana was like the morning sun. Since they
had come from a ball game, they were sweating
slightly, breathing hard, as they stood there
innocently, calmly, with a smile.
Dasaratha looked at Rama intently, with
moist eyes he drew him close, kissed his
forehead and said, My dear child! I have called
you here on a royal mission. The great Sage
Viswamitra has come here out of kindness to
you, to take you with him. I have promised him
to send you along with him. You have to go to
his hermitage. He hung his head with a sense
of guilt.
Rama blotted the sweat on his forehead
with his waistcloth. The ball game was going
on with great spirit in the garden. Bharata,
Satrughna and their friends were on the other
side and were ready to win. In the meanwhile,
there was this summons from the father! Ill be
back right away, stop the game Rama had told
his friends and had come to his father thinking
that he could return in a moment, but here
suddenly, his father wanted him to go to the
forest along with some sage on some royal
mission!
Now, into the forest, leaving all his friends.
The garden was full of birds and deer leaving
all of them would be hard!
In the harem, there are mother, aunts, maids
their stories, innumerable songs, dances,
laughter and he would leave all these! Why to
those forests? What had he to do with a royal
mission? Someone else could be sent instead,
he felt!
Lakshmana was also thinking the same and
105
106
13
13. In response to this episode, we should not question, Why should he take such young boys
to kill Rakshasa? In this story, Rakshasas are a myth. Young boys killing Rakshasas is also a myth.
The two myths are congruous. According to this story, the purpose of Ramas incarnation was to
kill Rakshasas. This task begins from Ramas young age. Whereas in the stories of Krishna, an
infant child killed Rakshasas. In the stories of The Poisonous Tree, all are human beings. The
incidents in the story occur among those human beings.
This is Ramayana!
elaborate arrangements after the horse
which was let loose on the provinces
returned a few months later.
Rama had a doubt right away! Revered
teacher! Didnt anyone capture the horse let
loose on the provinces? Were there no heroes
in the neighbouring kingdoms?, he questioned
politely.
Viswamitra smiling a little said, Not
because there were no heroes, my boy! That is
the norm of friendship! When a king lets off a
ritual horse, the others allow it safe passage,
considering it a virtuous deed. Since no one
captured the horse and challenged the king to
a war, the king got the fame as someone who
has conquered many provinces.
Rama asked in surprise, How can fame
achieved in this manner be great fame, Revered
Teacher?
Viswamitra looked hard at Rama and
rebuked him, These are the norms laid out by
the great sages in the Vedas in ancient times.
Till today all the people accept these norms as
a great boon but they dont question them.
Dont you remember the command your father
gave you? Can you argue with your elders?
Rama mortified, looked down and said,
Pardon me, Great Teacher!
Thats all right. You are still a boy. In future
youll learn fear and devotion for elders,
Viswamitra pardoned Rama and resumed the
description of the sacrificial rites that came to a
halt in the beginning itself. Rama! Listen
attentively! It took a whole year for your father
to make arrangements for the sacrificial rites.
Kings and emperors came from many kingdoms
to attend the sacrifice. Great ascetics left the
forests and came in droves. The best of
Brahmins came with groups of their disciples
from far and wide. All the rites were performed
without a hitch under the guidance of the great
sage Rishyasringa. Priests officiating at the rites,
sacrificed hundreds of ritual cattle and sent
them heavenwards. Sages and Brahmins found
salvation after eating the meat cooked on the
holy fire. Rama! As stated in the scriptures, the
sun, moon and other gods were immensely
pleased, came down to the ritual site, accepted
107
108
14
14. Bala kanda, sarga 22, Slokas 12 & 14: Viswamitra tells these spells to Rama alone. He does
not address Lakshmana. Rama! Learn this chain of spells Bala and Atibala. Owing to the power of
these spells, there wont be any one who will be equal to you.
This is Ramayana!
On that moonlit night, all three rested on
the beds of dry leaves under a great tree.
In that milky ocean of moonlight blossomed
in the forest, birds in their nests, animals in the
bushes, insects all round the earth, aquatic
creatures in the water all wallowed
ecstatically in the comfort of nature.
Viswamitra narrated many stories about
devotion to Vishnu. He told him about the lakhs
of monkeys and bears that were born after the
birth of Rama to assist him in killing Ravana. He
narrated stories of all the gods and sages who
begot children piously through their hearts and
souls. Piously, Indra got Vali, Surya (Sun) got
Sugriva, Vayu (God of wind) got Hanuman,
Brihaspati got Taruna only to help Rama.
Brahma yawned and begot Jambavan.
Viswamitra told many stories of many more gods
and Demigods who begot offspring piously by
sneezing, coughing and scratching their backs.
He narrated the instance of Dakshaprajapatis
daughters giving birth to many weapons only
to destroy the Rakshasas. He concluded that
all the weapons in his possession are the very
same ones and they are waiting to serve
15
Rama.
Rama listened to his teachers words with
devotion and diligence. He didnt find any story
unnatural. He did not question any history. His
heart went into ecstasies as he was listening to
more and more about the devotion to gods, the
miracles, the boons, the curses, and those other
worldly things. Having attained divinity, and
lost the ability to think rationally, Rama stopped
thinking and proceeded to go to sleep.
Lakshmana began to think in various ways
as soon as he lay down to sleep. My brother
does not find time to talk to me, being busy
talking to the Great Teacher. There seems no
part in the royal mission for me in this project of
killing the Rakshasas. Back home there are so
many friends. I can learn any skill equally with
Bharata and Satrughna. My mother speaks to
109
15. Why do they need all those weapons? For the sake of wars! Attacking and killing enemies!
Occupying their lands! That is justice! Valour! Where there are no wars, we find sacrifices and
rituals and killing animals and human beings! That is piety!
110
16. In the actual story, reference to Menaka is not made in this context. It will be made in Sarga
63, when we proceed further. I have shifted Menakas reference from there to here. Because, here
there is a mention of Rudra concerning Manmadha, the cupid. A sage, on another occasion, tells
Rama that Manmadha disturbed the penance of Viswamitra. As I shifted that story to this context,
I mentioned about Menaka here. These sages always run after women and throw their misdeeds on
to Manmadha. Even when there is a reference to Menaka (in sarga 63), we do not find a reference
to Menaka giving birth to Sakuntala. We read the story in other books that when Sakuntala was a
child, her parents (Menaka and Viswamitra) abandoned her. But, as the story of Menaka and
Viswamitra is mentioned in Ramayana, I have also mentioned about Sakuntala here. Because the
young Rama should know the fact that Viswamitra had abandoned that child. As he was still
young, he was responding in fair manner to some issues. Practice of giving birth to children and
throwing them near trees or ant hills has been there since a long time.
This is Ramayana!
save her from the curse and abandoned her.
Ramas mind was endlessly confused, went
blank and made him devoid of thought. He
listlessly followed the teacher.
Meanwhile, all the sages surrounded
Viswamitra, welcoming him with reverence.
Later, all of them expressed their sadness, Great
Sage Viswamitra! We are unable to withstand
with the menace of the Rakshasas. When we
do penance with our eyes closed, they suddenly
come down and disperse us saying whats this
penance without doing anything but eating?
The other day they carried a sage up the
mountain and rolled him down. They dug a pit
and buried another sage up to his neck in it.
They sheared the moustaches and beards of
another, gave him an axe and made him chop
wood. Viswamitra! What is this injustice? Have
we ever heard of such things before? Weve
come to the decision that we cannot but leave
this ashram. They lamented. All the sages were
singing the same tune.
Viswamitra, feeling distressed, said, Dont
worry. The time has come for overcoming our
difficulties. You all know that Lord Vishnu has
been born as Lord Rama to destroy the
Rakshasas. We have set forth on the same task.
You need not leave this place and go to any
other place. Viswamitra reassured all the sages
17
in many ways
All the sages paid obeisance to Rama.
Sang the sagas of Vishnus deeds. Rama went
into ecstasy on hearing the praise of Vishnu.
The purpose of his birth clearly dawned on him
all over again. The urge to kill the Rakshasas
and to appease the sufferings of the holy sages
arose in him.
Lakshmana also found in himself a
determination to cooperate as much as he could
in the task of killing the Rakshasas, which his
brother was going to undertake.
Later, Viswamitra, Rama and Lakshmana
111
17. As new people are entering the land in which Rakshasas have been living for a long time,
Rakshasas are making attempts to drive them away. They attack them suddenly and wage wars.
This fact has been turned into something else at the hands of the poet who advocates the other
side. He makes it as a story of Rakshasas, who are wickedly torturing sages who have come to
perform penance peacefully!
112
This is Ramayana!
heroism and occupying gods kingdom? Why
does Lord Vishnu hate the Rakshasas? He is
the saviour of those who worship him! Why
was he keen to destroy Emperor Bali who was
his devotee? He was unable to confront him
and defeat him directly, is it a matter of
celebration to deceive and back-stab someone
who has courageously offered alms? Is it
justifiable to hand over the kingdom of gods
once again to the incompetent Indra? What are
these subtleties of law? He hoped there were
no latent secret truths in these! Who will clear
his doubts?
A doubt arose in Lakshmanas mind as
well, When Vamana put his foot all over the
earth, where were Emperor Bali and his kin? Did
they crawl on to his foot and sit there? Sorry!
Must not doubt irreverently the words
spoken by elders. Lakshmana turned away and
slapped his cheeks in remorse for such doubts.
All the three entered Viswamitras
hermitage. The wide variety of fruit and
flowering trees surrounding the hermitage were
swaying in the breeze enchantingly. An ascetic
was driving away, with stones, the chirping
birds pecking and feasting on the fruits. A few
sages in the distance saw Viswamitra, came
towards him and saluted him.
They lauded Viswamitra for successfully
accomplishing the task he had set forth on of
bringing Rama with him. Viswamitra! We were
expecting you to surely arrive today and were
awaiting you. We have communicated the news
of the sacrificial rites you are going to perform
to the people of the neighbouring villages. All
will contribute money and grain by tonight. The
ascetics from other hermitages will arrive
tonight. You can start the rites without any delay
and hurdle tomorrow, they described the
arrangements made so far.
Viswamitra was very delighted and said,
Rama! Come here! Sit comfortable on this
platform. He called Rama and made him sit
down. Lakshmana also sat down on a step
below the platform with his head bent.
he very next day, Viswamitra began the
sacrifice. Varieties of grain arrived from the
neighbouring villages by the cartloads. Several
rich householders offered money. Milk, curds
113
114
arrow ready.
Far in the distance, under the trees a woman
was walking courageously towards them.
Tataka! Tataka!, the sages terribly
trembled.
Rama stood immobile looking at Tataka in
amazement.
She had no characteristics whatsoever of
Rakshasas. She appeared like a tribal woman
who roamed in the forests always. A person
who was as tall as an upraised arm! Ruffled
hair, a coloured sari tied with a knot, Knives
round her waist, with determined and
indescribable glow in her eyes.
Tataka saw Rama and Lakshmana from a
distance. She guessed the strategy of the sages.
She realised that it was Viswamitras tactic that
she would not consider these youngsters, still
not fully out of childhood as adversaries and
taking advantage of this, Ramas arrow would
kill her. She approached the stunned Rama with
a smile.
Rama looked at her in astonishment.
O Lads! Who are you? You have come
walking into this harsh forest on your delicate
feet? What royal mission are you fulfilling here
you who are still in the glow of childhood,
endearing as little babies? Why do you need
these bows and arrows when you should be
free to play and enjoy yourselves? Why should
you guard these hermitages? Have all the elders
become incapable and cowards and are using
you for this terrible deed like cowards? saying
angrily, she looked at them with compassion.
Rama, looking at Tataka from top to toe with
curiosity, asked, Why do you obstruct these
Vedic rites? Why do you heartlessly harass
these ascetics who are devoted to penance?
Tataka looked mockingly at the hermitages.
She looked at the sacred fire with sarcasm.
Arent these Vedic rites selfish rites, which
allow only Brahmins to exploit the entire wealth
that belongs to mankind. Arent these foolish
rites consigning to fire the nine kinds of grain,
delicious foods, ghee and curds that not only
humans but other living creatures would like to
eat? Arent these lowly rites that not only kill
hundreds of animals but also turn humans into
This is Ramayana!
lowly inhuman people who make fun of us as
Rakshasas for the aim of our fight is to
oppose mindless Vedic rites and defeat these
devious sages in order to achieve
enlightenment, truth and the welfare of all
human beings, Tataka paused for a while and
looked at Rama with a smile.
Stunned by the accusations against sages
which he had never heard before, Rama became
hesitant and bent his head down and asked as
a child would question its mother, If these rites
are not performed, how will the gods be
pleased? He looked surprised.
Gods are none but the sun, the moon and
other natural forces. Can they have any
relationship with the happiness or hardships
of people? Why are you surprised? Even
according to your sages, who are these gods?
What will they gain by these rites? Have you
thought of this? In the view of these sages,
gods are also of their ilk. The sages think that
gods too expect their share in the riches and
wealth just as they do. These gods are
worshipped by name in these rituals and rites.
But those gods do not come to the place of
worship and receive offerings. The sages get
major share of this wealth and grain in the name
of the gods. Why do we need this useless
eagerness to please such gods? Why dont you
please all the people right before your eyes in
this vast world?
Rama! What is this atheistic discussion
with her? Viswamitra became furious and
roared from behind, Shes a Rakshasa. Shes
the despicable one who tortures the sages and
Brahmins and destroys sacred rites. Kill her.
He ordered.
Tataka disappeared like lightning into the
trees and began pelting stones at the
hermitages. The terrified sages running helter
115
18. In the actual story, we dont find Tataka conversing with Rama. But he has some doubts
regarding Tataka. Who is Tataka? How did she get the strength of a thousand elephants?, Rama
asks Viswamitra. Further, Viswamitra repeatedly asks Rama to kill Tataka quickly, Dont hesitate
that she is a woman! Give up kindness and compassion! In the past, great valorous men have also
killed women! Tataka is a wicked woman! Dont be kind to her! thus he cautions Rama repeatedly.
This means that Rama hesitated to throw arrows at Tataka and was somewhat kind to her. Therefore, Rama conversed with Tataka in my story. He asked her some questions.
116
19. Bala kanda, sarga 26: In Valmiki Ramayana, the killing of Tataka takes place in Tatakavanam.
After that sacrifice at Viswamitras hermitages begins. The sacrificial rites last seven days. On the
fifth day Rama fought with Maricha and Subahu. During the ritual period Viswamitra observed
silence not in Tataka vana but at his hermitage. The change I have made : the encounter with
Tataka occurred during the period of sacrifice. Viswamitra was made to break his silence to allow
him to say what he told Rama in the Tatakavanam for killing Tataka. This merely changes the venue
but does not do injustice to the story.
As that Rakshasa was showering rocks, Lord Rama chopped of its armsLakshmana cut off
the nose and ears of Tataka who had her arms cut off and was exhausted. During the times of kings,
cruel punishments such as cutting off noses and ears, chopping of hands and legs were prevalent.
Those cruelties became valorous and holy activities in Ramayana.
117
Link-1
[T
he 1st story ends with Rama killing Tataka. The 2nd story commences with
the incident of Dasaratha intending to crown Rama. Here we see that part of the
Ramayana story that lies between these two stories in brief. This is the link between
those two stories. The comments in brackets and footnotes are mine.
In this link, Viswamitra narrated many stories to young Rama. He said that he had
heard them from his elders. There are many miracles like longevity of thousands of
years, meditations for thousands of years, boons and curses in these stories. These
miracles are to be grasped from the view point of Nature and Society.
For example cursing means abusing and reviling. Granting a boon means blessing
and benediction. Whatever happens among people in society takes the form of miracles
in mythological stories.]
20.From the expression, Forgiving wealthy gods we have to infer the meaning that the actions
of the rich and powerful are not crimes. All rights are for the wealthy!
21. Only from incidents such as these the various stages of history are known. This story
reflects the social stage where a woman can procreate children through any man. Producing a son
with the power of meditation is a garb donned by literature. The actual fact was Somada had a child
by Chuli. We have to also understand here is that such children had good status in the society
of those days.
118
22. Now it is detestable to find all gods standing before a husband and wife in such a situation.
In the period of Savagery, the copulation of human beings used to take place as openly as the
mating of animals and birds. Mr. Tapi Dharmaraos book Why are there obscene images on
Temples? mentions these open copulations with substantial evidence. Long mating was the
story which humans created to actualize an unfulfilled desire through their imagination.
Link-1
That child had six faces. Gods gave the child to
the Krittika stars for rearing. The breasts of the
stars sprouted milk. The child sucked the milk
with six faces and became Kartikeya. The child
drank for a day, grew up and defeated the armies
of Rakshasas. The gods felt happy and made
him their commander. Kartikeya is Kumara
Swamy, he is Skandha. People devoted to him
reach heaven of Skandha, so completed
Viswamitra the story and Rama felt very happy.
Rama! I shall narrate how Ganga descended to the earth, listen, commenced
Viswamitra again Once upon a time there
was a king named Sagara. As he did not have
children, he meditated for a hundred years. The
sage Bhrigu appeared before him (Brahma
might have sent this gentleman, as he himself
was very busy). The sage granted him two
boons. The kings elder wife would beget a son
who would advance the dynasty and the second wife would have sixty thousand sons. All
felt happy. After some time the elder wife gave
birth to Asamanjasa. The second wife gave birth
to a globe, the size of a big ball. It split and sixty
thousand children were born out of it. The maids
keeping all of them in pots of ghee reared them.
All of them lived to come of age. Sagaras elder
wifes son turned out to be extremely wicked.
He used to revel in killing infants by drowning
them in rivers. (This is the effect of the sages
boon that this son would bring fame to the
family!). The king banished him out of his kingdom for being wicked. This wicked fellow had a
son also by name Amsavanta. He was very
good.
Once king Sagara began performing the
horse sacrifice (Aswamedhayaga). Indra came
in disguise as a Rakshasa and stole the horse.23
Sagara asked his sixty thousand sons to
go in search of the horse. The sons of Sagara
searched the entire earth. They made way into
the bottom of the nether world but the horse
119
23. Why did Indra come in the guise of a Rakshasa? To create the impression that some Rakshasa
had stolen the horse! The sages raised a hue and cry that Rakshasas spoil the sacrifices, but you
can count how many sacrifices, penances Indra had spoiled and how many infanticides and deceit
he had carried out! The essence of the matter here is, stealing horse and cattle of other tribes.
120
Link-1
died, told her husband, Your second wifes
sons have killed my children. I shall do penance to beget a son who will kill Indra. Grant me
the permission! Her husband fondling her
belly said, You will be blessed. Be chaste for a
thousand years. Then you will beget a son by
my grace and went away for meditation. Diti
too felt happy and went away for meditation in
another direction. (Both of them not going in
the same direction! Then how would a son be
born even after a thousand years?)
Indra on learning that Diti was doing penance and to dissuade her from that attempt and
gain her grace began offering her his services.
Diti being pleased, said, I shall see that there
will be no threat to you from my children. In
that way when it was short of ten years for a
thousand years, (Oh! What an accurate calculation!) Diti, once, went asleep with her head
on her feet. Indra felt happy that she was polluted by the touch of hair of her feet. He entered her womb through her vagina and began
chopping up her foetus. The infant in the womb
began to cry. Diti woke up on hearing the cry.
Dont cry, dont cry, Indra warned the infant
and continued chopping. Diti asked Indra not
to kill the infant. Indra honoring the mothers
word came out, having completed his job. (Every body should learn from Indra how to respect a mother). Coming out and bowing to
Diti, Indra said, Your hair touched your feet.
You are polluted. That is why I have done this,
he said. Diti regretted and admitted her lapse,
Yes, I was careless, it is no fault of yours.24
She said, All the pieces of infants in my
womb will become gods. Later Diti and Indra
both went to heaven.
See, here in this place did Indra serve Diti!
Now a king named Sumati rules this country, said Viswamitra recounting the glory of
that place.
Learning that Viswamitra was in that place,
Sumati came there, made enquiries about his
well being and provided hospitality. Spending
that night there, they reached Mithila the fol-
121
lowing day.
There, a sages hermitage was seen deserted. How is it that this hermitage is so deserted? asked Rama. Viswamitra commenced
again, This is sage Gautamas hermitage. His
wife was Ahalya.
Once Indra came in the guise of Gautama
and said, Ahalya, you are charming. I want
you. Ahalya, knowing fully well that he was
Indra, gladly agreed to mate with him. After that,
she told him Indra! I am happy. Get away
quickly. There is need to protect you and myself too! She cautioned Indra. When Indra was
about to leave, Gautama returned and seeing
Indra, he understood the whole thing and
cursed him May your testicles fall off! Indras
testicles fell to the ground. Indra left. Gautama
cursed his wife also, May you turn into dust
and wander about without food or water invisibly, till Dasarathas son Rama comes this way
(By then Rama was not born even!) and when
the dust of his feet touches, you will reach me
after getting rid of your lust and flirtatiousness.
So saying he went away for meditation.
Indra called all the sages, get me new testicles he said. The sages went to a place of
sacrifice, Give him the testicles of a goat. From
now on even if you offer the sacrifice of a goat
without testicles you will benefit said they,
changing the rule. (Society reverses the rules
for the wealthy) Indra felt happy to have the
testicles of a goat. (Can children who grow up
listening to these stories be more intelligent
than Rama?)
Rama, find Ahalya and redeem her from
the curse, save her said Viswamitra entering
the hermitage. Rama pleased at his divinity, saw
Ahalya who was invisible in the form of smoke
in the air, in the hermitage. She appeared before
all, released of the curse. Rama and Lakshmana
bowed at the feet of Ahalya. Then Gautama
also came. He worshipped Rama and went away
for meditation along with Ahalya. (We see in
this story that even though a husband punished his wife for having a relationship with
24. Nowhere is it found that Indra, the chief of gods, is at fault. In all the stories, his crimes are
attributed to the conduct of others.
122
25. We should not understand Ahalyas behaviour in the sense of adultery of later days. The old
ethics changed and chastity came in its place.
26. Kamadhenu is a cow that gives milk in abundance. Kalpavriksha is a tree that bears fruit in
abundance. We have to visualize this as the time when one got yoghourt, butter and ghee from
domesticating cattle and got variety of grain and fruit by nurturing trees. Kamadhenu and
Kalpavriksha were the story form of the desires of possessing a cow that never went dry and a tree
that never withered.
Link-1
the meditation might have got prolonged).
Then Brahma appeared and said, Viswamitra!
You have become a Rajarshi, the Royal sage.
Viswamitra was angry that he had not become a
Brahmarshi and so he again performed penance.
There was a king named Trisanku at that
time. Wishing to reach heaven corporeally, he
called Vasista, Prepare me for performing a sacrifice to go to heaven with this body. Vasista
said, There is no such sacrifice. Trisanku did
not give up. He approached the sons of Vasista.
They were very angry, If you dont give up
that attempt when a great purohit like Vasista
declined, you will become a Chandala, an untouchable, they cursed the king. At once
Trisanku turned dark. His body and hair turned
stiff. His dress turned into leather, his jewels
turned into iron.
The ministers and people accompanying
Trisanku ran away. Trisanku in distress went to
Viswamitra. Viswamitra heard all that happened
and feeling glad that a chance had come for him
to do something against Vasista said, Oh King!
I shall dispatch you in this Chandala form to
heaven. He called his disciples and said, Go
and get all the sages for this sacrifice. If anybody declines, come and tell me what they
said. Many sages came, but Vasista and his
sons did not come. The disciples told Viswamitra
that they heckled them saying, A Chandala
performs the sacrifice and a Kshatriya officiates it! How do the sages and gods attend it ?
Viswamitra flew into a rage. Those who have
abused me will go to hell and eat corpses for
700 births. They will turn into awkward shapes
and wander about this earth eating the meat of
dogs, he cursed. (This curse is confusing.
Scholars should resolve where they had gone:
whether they had gone to hell or they are in
this world and what meat they ate.)
Then Viswamitra commenced the sacrifice.
The sages whispered among themselves and
123
27. In the primitive stage of human history the custom of human sacrifices and cannibalism
existed. The remnant of that is this performance of sacrifice of human beings. Since it was Indra
who had stolen the sacrificial animal and no crime could be attributed to him, it became the
negligence of the king. If the thief had been a Rakshasa, it would not have been called the negligence of the king; it would have been the fault of the Rakshasa!
124
28.
of defying a fathers command? Dont you understand that obeying a fathers word is your
dharma (duty)? May you live for a thousand
years eating canine flesh, he cursed. He said
to Sunassepa, My lad! I shall teach you two
mantras (spell). When you are tied to the sacrificial pole chant them. Do not be afraid. He
instilled courage in him (Would it not suffice if
that was done earlier?)
Sunassepa boarded the chariot boldly.
Later, during the sacrifice, chanting the
mantras taught to him by Viswamitra, he
prayed to Indra. Indra was pleased and granted
Sunassepa longevity and the fruits of the sacrifice to Ambarisha.29
Viswamitra meditated again for a thousand
years more. Brahma came and said, You have
become a sage (rishi). Viswamitra did penance
again. Menaka, the divine damsel, was bathing
in a river. Viswamitra said to her lustfully, Divine damsel! Stay here in my hermitage. Cool
down the heat of my body. Menaka consented.
They spent ten years together. Then again
Viswamitra remembered that he needed to do
meditation and got angry, the gods have ruined my meditation. He asked frightened
Menaka to go away.30
He went in another direction and did fierce
penance for another thousand years. Brahma
appeared saying, You have not yet overcome
your sensuousness and disappeared.
Viswamitra meditated again standing in fire,
the cold and water. Indra was frightened, called
Rambha and ordered, Rambha! Disrupt
Viswamitras meditation and help the gods.
(How the disruption of meditation could help
gods is not revealed.) Rambha said trembling,
We find in this story a state where defying a fathers command and not following it as a
dictum of the Veda. But defying fathers word and getting punished are also prevalent at this stage.
Making sons obedient by force seems to have come at a later stage.
29. If Ruchika of this story is the son of Viswamitras elder sister, Sunassepa becomes the
nephew of Viswamitra. Here we find the maternal uncle taking care of the nephew and the fathers
negligence to sons safety.
30. Bala kanda, sarga 63: The story of Menaka comes in the same scene in which Satananda
narrates Viswamitras history to Rama. I shifted it to Tataka vana. There is no mention of Menaka
giving birth to a child in the narration of Menakas story.
Link-1
Viswamitra is short tempered. I am afraid he
may curse me! Be kind to me. Indra ignored
her request and commanded her, I shall coo
from a tree becoming a cuckoo. Manmadha too
will also come there. You present yourself attracting. Now go. Rambha was helpless and
approached Viswamitra.
Viswamitra perturbed on seeing Rambhas
beauty and became furious. Do you want to
defeat me while I am trying to overcome lust
and anger? Turn into a stone and stay that way
for a thousand years! he cursed her. Some
Brahmin with the power of meditation will redeem you, he granted her the path of release
also.
Rambha turned into a stone. Devendra ran
away.
Viswamitra realized that he had not overcome anger yet. From now on I will stay calm.
I will not take food. Nor even exhale. I will dry
up my body. Subduing sensuousness, I shall
acquire Brahminhood, he decided. (So subduing sensuousness means sitting in a corner
without food and water and becoming thin and
devoid of strength! When there is no strength
in the body how do anger and lust come? If
they are not to occur, one has to conduct oneself justly, and take support from justice.)
Viswamitra went away in another direction
and performed penance for a thousand years.
After completing that penance and by the time
he was setting ready to eat food, Indra came in
the disguise of a Brahmin and asked for food.
Viswamitra gave away food. Again a thousand
more years he meditated without releasing
breath and fumes began to come out of
Viswamitras head. All the worlds were getting
destroyed by those fumes. Brahma feared much
and said, Viswamitra! You have attained
Brahminhood!
Viswamitra was pleased and put a condition, Vasista should accept my Brahminhood.
Vasista came and accepted, All right! You have
become Brahmarshi.
Brahmarshi Viswamitra and Brahmarshi
Vasista became friends. Rama! This is the story
of Viswamitra, so concluded Satananda (the
son of Ahalya).
125
126
spectators fainted.
Janaka said, Viswamitra! I have witnessed
the heroism of Rama with my own eyes! This is
astonishing and incredible, and felt happy. I
intended to offer Sitas hand to a great warrior.
My wish is fulfilled. Sita, thus, becoming
Dasarathas daughter-in-law, will bring fame for
12 generations to the dynasty of Janaka. My
ministers will go to Ayodhya and bring King
Dasaratha after narrating all this to him. I seek
your permission to do so. Viswamitra consented saying, So be it!31
Janakas ministers left for Ayodhya. They
told Dasaratha the whole incident. Dasaratha
said to his ministers, So you have also heard
everything. If you like the wealth of Janakas
good conduct (if they do not like, then?) let us
set out for Mithila tomorrow itself. Let me know
your opinion. All the ministers agreed to it.
Dasaratha reached Mithila along with his
four division army. Janaka was pleased and said,
Our family reputation is enhanced with our
alliance with the Raghu dynasty. Tomorrow
morning, we will have Brahma type of wedding.
Dasaratha agreed to it saying, People who
receive in charity a maid, cow, silver and gold
should accept it as per the wishes of the donor,
so do as you please.
That night passed pleasantly.
The following day Janaka said to the
purohit, My younger brother Kusadhwaja
lives in Sankasyapura. I have to see him, Messengers went there and brought Kusadhwaja.
Janaka sent word to Dasaratha.
Dasaratha came to Janakas place and requested him, Oh, King! Vasista will recount
our lineage. Please, listen.
Vasista began recounting. Brahmas son
was Marichi. Marichis son was Kasyapa.
31. While King Janaka made the decision for the marriage, Rama didnt accept it immediately. He
said he had to get his fathers permission for it. This fact is not mentioned in this sarga. But Sita
mentions this on another occasion when she narrates the glad tidings of her marriage. We will see
it at a different place.
32. It means that these three kingdoms are donated to purohits and sages. In the name of charity
and donation purohits and sages take kingdoms into their hands and again return them to the
kings. This is meant for making the kings to behave in obedience and respect towards sages.
Link-1
Bharata receive Mandakini. Satrughna, receive
Srutakirti he offered all his four daughters
in marriage to the four brothers. Then the marriage ceremonies concluded.33
The night passed and Viswamitra took leave
of all of them and went his way.
Dasaratha also left for Ayodhya. Janaka
presented his daughters millions of cows, gave
them silk garments and ornaments, gave four
fold armies and maids and slaves.
When Dasaratha was on his way to
Ayodhya along with his sons, the daughtersin-law and the retinue, the animals and birds
cooed loudly. Animals crossed from one side
to the other. Seeing that Dasaratha asked
Vasista, Birds signal bad omen and animals
signal good. What is the reason for it? To that
Vasista clarified, This signifies that trouble
comes, but vanishes soon
Then suddenly a heavy wind and darkness
enveloped them. Except the sages and kings,
all the ordinary people fainted.34
Then the ferocious Parasurama appeared.
Parasurama was angry for the killing of his
father, avenged it by killing kings. Now does he
intend us any harm? thinking so, sages offered him water oblation. Receiving it and seeing Rama, Parasurama said, Heard that you
have broken the bow of Siva. This is astonishing. To test your valour I have brought another
great bow. Now shoot an arrow with it and show
me your strength. After that Ill combat with
you in a duel. Shuddering with fear, Dasaratha
said, Parasurama, You promised Indra that you
would not kill Kshatriyas. Having given up all
the earth to Kasyapa you now live in exile in
the forests. Now do you want to ruin me? If
you kill Rama we shall not survive.
Parasurama ignoring him said, Rama!
Viswakarma has made these two bows. Both
127
33. Tomorrow is fixed as auspicious said Janaka. After that the marriages took place on the
third day. So tomorrow means three days!
34. For the chirping of birds, cries of animals, whirlwinds and sounds except great sages and
kings, the ordinary people like chariot drivers, porters, soldiers, cowherds, bearers of palanquins
such low grade commoners faint! We have to notice how poets have always kept the toiling
poor behave in such manner, not the wealthy, privileged and high caste people.
128
[Translation:
R.Venkateswara Rao]
Story-2
A Throne
at the Mercy of the Sandals
K
tingled with a feeling of sitting on the gem studded throne in the place of his father. Amazement accompanied happiness at the promise of
his father. Was it trueWhat he had
heardYoucrownedking of the Kosala
Empire, he stood silently recalling those words.
Everyone in the assembly hall appeared
favourable to the idea and smiled approvingly.
Dasaratha felt relieved of a heavy burden.
He was restless for many years with the dilemma
of whether to give the empire to Bharata or Rama
as his successor. Finally, he declared his decision and felt relieved of the burden.
But, suddenly the past flashed like lightning before him. The heart of His Excellency
palpitated. Here, we need to know certain things
129
so much concern .
The old king had already heard about the
charms and beauty of Kaika. Pushed in that
strain, Your Excellency, it has been proved that
all my wives are devoted to their husband and
virtuous, and there is little chance of anyone
begetting children. So I need to be blessed with
children from your daughter. After me, my whole
empire will come to your grandson, any way,
wont? My virtuous wives will never disobey
me, said he, stroking his moustache. He forgot about the dye applied to the moustache
and regretfully wiped the fingers on the silk
pillows at the back of his seat. Pretending to
have a beat of great musician relieved the fingers of the dye to some extent.
In the meanwhile king Kekaya regained his
composure from his deep reverie and said with
amazement, Who could say, your Excellency?
Gods deeds are inscrutable? Your other wives
too might be blessed with children and he recounted gods miracles.
Ignoring all those miracles King Dasaratha
said with wounded pride, Even if my other
wives beget sons.Will I go back on my promise? He felt like stroking his moustache again,
but refrained at once and began to twist the
pillows instead of the moustache. You talk like
one who is not aware of the prestige and fame
of our Ikshvaku dynasty. Even if the sun rose
in the west, or the oceans dried up and nature
stood still, this great king Dasaratha will never
break his promise. Ill bestow all my empire on
the son of Kaika. So saying, he twisted his
moustache and got his fingers stained with the
dye again.
King Kekayas doubt was resolved. After
completing the formalities, he began the arrangements for the marriage.
Princess Kaika was an embodiment of
beauty. She was brave enough to drive chariots in the battle field. Having learnt about the
efforts of the bridegroom in keeping himself
attractive, the handsomeness of the wrinkles
on his cheeks, the dyeing of his moustache and
his physical trembling through her maids,
Kaikeyi expressed her dissatisfaction of the
match in the presence of her mother angrily.
130
thority over me? Then what is this show of temper to me like human beings? Why should I
have that menace of virtuousness which dependent wretched human women exhibit? I will
not live with a lewd like you since you have
insulted me so much. I am going my own way. I
do not need your glorious family or you. And
the wife ant walked off with the red ant.
Kekaya king heard all this talk and his blood
boiled. He felt like crushing that sinful wretch
under his foot. But by then that infidel ant
slipped into a crack in the wall. As his anger
had not subsided, he clenched his teeth with
anger. Oh! How polluted the world is! said he
with a feeling of sorrow and bitter smile.
Kaikas mother asked him, Why are you
smiling sorrowfully?
King Kekaya was about to relate the whole
affair but suddenly stopped. Thinking that the
arrogant words of the ant would inspire, enlighten and spoil women, he concealed it from
his wife. He never ceased the spiteful smile.
Kaikas mother was worried about his
health and called in the court physicians.
In spite of the kings protests the physicians tied him down to the bed, poured several
cups of yellowish red syrups down his throat,
put salves into his eyes, massaged his head
and left the king roaring, groaning and walked
away with their medical powder kits. With that
incident, hatred between the wife and husband
touched a new peak. Kaika knew that her father
was spending his time with courtesans and had
35
abandoned her mother from then on.
Kaika fell into a reverie with her mothers
sigh. Even if the husband were young, how
long would that fascination last in royal fami-
35. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 35, slokas 16 to 24: When Rama starts for his
131
and Sumitra also showed the signs of conception, along with Kaika. All the three gave birth
to sons. When those four infants appeared
amidst those hundreds of women all their hearts
became oceans of joy as if cool shower of rain
had graced the parched land. Then hatred receded and friendship developed among all.
Months and years rolled by peacefully.
Although the four children were of the same
age, Rama and Bharata received special recognition. In the harems Rama received respect as
the son of the chief queen. Bharata received
honour as the would be king. The priests and
all the queens knew the promise of Dasaratha.
Lakshmana and Satrughna became shadows of Rama and Bharata respectively without
any speciality.
As she was immersed in the fondling by
the old king and became lazy to look after her
only son, Kaika used to keep the child always
with her parents. King Kekaya too was fond of
Bharata and kept the boy with him always.
Satrughna attended on Bharata always to curry
his favour.
Only Rama and Lakshmana grew under the
patronage of Dasaratha from their childhood.
The entire attention of the father was centred
on Rama, who possessed a special character.
Right from his childhood Rama was shrewder
than the other three. He was clever. He knew
how to behave with others. He would show
over obedience to his father. He behaved in
such a way that his father felt happy, What
fulfillment would I have had without a son like
this! He exhibited over obedience in the presence of Brahmins and priests. They would
praise him saying, There is no noble person
who can surpass Rama in all the three worlds.
Rama would treat any woman on whom his
fathers eyes fell, as his mother. The numbers
of such mothers were in hundreds. Rama would
show a lot of respect whenever he came across
his mother, or other related mothers in the harems. He would bow and salute, Salutation,
Mother! Everybody was immensely pleased
to receive the respects of a grown up son like
him and with their eyes moistened they would
bless him Live a thousand years long, my son!
132
36. Ayodhya kanda, Sarga 4 : Here we will know what Dasaratha specifically talked to Rama and
what the inner meaning of those words is!
133
134
royal luxuries as you please. Youll find nothing wanting in my rule. He looked at Lakshmana
solemnly.
Lakshmana was very happy that Rama was
becoming the king and not Bharata. Under the
rule of Bharata, he would not have any special
place. He would have to remain an insignificant
person. Under the rule of Rama, his status would
be very high. His name and fame would spread
widely. Lakshmana felt happy as if he had himself been crowned, as Rama said. He bent his
head in humility and said, Why do I need all
these pleasures, respected brother? Your mercy
itself is a great gift! Serving you is my treasure, He could not but fall obsequiously at his
brothers feet saluting him.
Then Rama turned slightly to Sita and saw
her looking important, Look, you are becoming queen by being my wife? Just as all the
husbands in the world, would look at their
wives, who receive recognition only through
the estates, status, fame, Rama looked at Sita
like those husbands proudly, condescendingly,
sportingly, defiantly with all heroism, kingliness
and like a husband.
Sita felt shy when her husband looked at
her with a downcast glance in the presence of
so many mothers-in-law and bowed her head.
All the maids in waiting gathered round Sita.
Oh! The young queen is so shy! Speak up a
little, madam! Dont go punishing us from tomorrow. They pretended fear and talked playfully with her. Sita hid herself behind her motherin-law. Kausalya scolded the maids in waiting,
saying, Oh, stop your fun, you silly girls!
Kausalyas chamber became a sea of joy with laughter, cries of joys, play, running of
maids in waiting, cries of birds - like the surging sea on a full moon day.
aikas chamber plunged into silence.
Maids were moving about restlessly. It grew
very dark and a lamp here and there was lit. By
the time the king would arrive they had completed their work. They prepared the garlands.
They prepared lavender for a bath. The rooms
were filled with incense. They prepared the eatables for the king. After performing their duties
135
136
37.
arrival. In the absence of these, his love-sickness increased. As directed by the maids he
went to the resting chamber through the flower
garden.
Kaika, who usually spent dusk walking in
the garden, chatting with her maids, was now
alone in the room on the bed sunk in a thought.
The burning lamp alone was her companion.
Dasaratha sensed that Kaika was deeply
saddened. He had got some doubt also. He tried
to be brave and went near her. Kaikeyi! what
happened? Here?Youaloneso lonelyIs
anything wrong with your health? No maid has
told me anything. Do you have a headache with
this incense? Have the petals of flowers poked
your body and hurt it? Do your feet ache because of walking in the garden? Whatever has
happened, there are many physicians! They will
fly here to serve you in no time! Oh! Why dont
you tell me how much you are suffering?, said
he tremblingly, gasping after walking through
the rooms and garden and sat down beside her.
Kaikeyi hardened her heart that was about
to melt on seeing him and remained quiet.
Dasarathas gasping abated. Having
137
138
139
140
Not knowing that you will bring so much infamy to me, I promised you boons unwisely.
.Again he said to Kaika, I know you are very
understanding and sensible. You are just testing me, otherwise who else is as virtuous as
you? Will you hurt your husband? All right,
take away the kingdom for yourself. But give it
again to Rama. That will make my boons granted
and the Kingdom will be spared for Rama. Both
of us get fame and heaven, thus finding short
cut to heaven Dasaratha looked gladly at Kaika.
Kaika, who had loved all the while a husband however old he might be, seeing the meanness in that husband, felt ashamed. Your Excellency, I could never imagine so much meanness even in my dreams. During our marriage,
during the war, even now, you have made so
many promises to me and not fulfilled any and
now you plan to achieve your intention. If it is
to give the kingdom to Rama, why should I
waste my boons asking you, suffering so many
reproaches from you? Your Excellency! Why is
there so much secrecy? Why dont you simply
say you will not grant the boons that you have
promised? Why do you proclaim how abiding
you are to truth to the scriptures, the gods and
the sages? For myself, Ill not give up my right.
I do not want either fame or heaven. I dont
wish for a heaven which all the liars of your ilk
reach.
Not able to tolerate Kaikas recklessness,
Dasarathas anger surged on crossing boundaries. You shameless woman! Stupid woman!
You argue so fearlessly with your husband,
does a spirit possess you? Sinful woman! You
seem unafraid either of sin or piousness. Stupid woman! You are no more my wife from this
moment. Your son is not my son. Who do you
think you are! You or your son are not to perform the obsequies for me after I am gone. Think
well. Do you understand how many calamities
will follow if I give the kingdom to Bharata and
exile Rama to the forests? I will die grieving
deeply for my Rama. Except you, all other
queens will die for me. Kausalya dies. Sumitra
dies. Lakshmana dies. Satrughna dies. Sita dies.
All the people in the kingdom die. Animals die.
Birds die. Then becoming a widow, you and
141
38. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 63, slokas from 14 to the last and also sarga 64, slokas from 1 to 58:
After Rama left for the exile in the forest, Sumantra returned in the chariot and told Dasaratha
about Ramas departure. Then Dasaratha wailed and told Kausalya about the curse on him. Once,
Dasaratha, much before his marriage to Kausalya, was hunting in a forest. He hit Karana, the son
of an ascetic, with an arrow while that boy was collecting water from a river. See what Dasaratha
is saying about how Karana spoke to him. As I was afraid of the consequences of killing a
Brahmana, the son of the sage grasped my inner feelings. The son of the ascetic who was
withering away, who was suffering a lot, who was facing lot of pain, who was losing control of his
hands and legs and who was struggling with death gathered courage, bore the agony and said
to me thus, O King! I am still in my senses. (Lest the readers think that the boy had lost his
senses, the poet is carefully saying that the boy uttered the words while he was still in senses).
O King! Give up the feeling that you will have to face the sin of killing a Brahmana. I am not a
Brahmana. Dont wail! I was born to a Vysya man through a Sudra woman. (This means, perhaps,
all the worry of the son of the ascetic is about Dasarathas sorrow!) Dasaratha narrates to
Kausalya about the death of that ascetics son, his parents agony, the cursing of Dasaratha and
so on. Cursing means wishing ill upon the cursed and is often accompanied by abusing.
142
143
39. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 16: See how specifically Rama is telling about Kaika to Sita. The fear
that Kaika had the right to put hurdle to his coronation reveals itself very clearly in Ramas words.
144
145
146
147
40. Ayodhya kanda, sargas 20 to 23: Lakshmanas desire for the kingdom and defiance of god;
Kausalyas contempt for her husband and remnants of matriarchy; consolidation of patriarchal
traditions in the words of Rama we find all these aspects.
148
ness, justice)?
Lakshmana hesitated for a moment, put
back the sword in the sheath and stood without lowering his head.
Rama might have rebuked Lakshmana, but
consoling himself in answer to the surging turmoil, sorrow and heaping questions within himself, he said, Lakshmana! All is ordained by
Destiny! Divine disposition! Kaikeyi is only
instrumental. Are we not aware of our stepmothers affection? If she demands such boons,
dont you think it is the consequence of Fate?
Somehow God has done this. Some how he
designed this exile. So saying Rama sighed.
Not being able to bear the thought that simply
human beings had done injustice and insult to
them and so fabricating that supra human values for their sorrows and defeats, human beings console themselves. In the same manner,
Rama too made Lakshmana believe that his exile was devised by god for some extraordinary
purpose and tried to make himself believe it.
If that deprivation fell to Bharata or some
other prince, Lakshmana would have believed
strongly the work of Destiny. He felt it very
ignorant at the moment to speculate some other
reason for the loss and the enemies who had
created it, were clearly visible before the eyes.
He, bringing out the logical understanding
which lay hidden in some corner of the brain
and bowing to his elder brother, asked, Pardon me, Brother, sir! Has god appeared before
any body at any time? Pardon me, brother, sir.
Lakshmana asked with hesitation and stood
with a shiver.
Rama was very glad that he had got an
opportunity to preach knowledge to an ignorant man, but the question Lakshmana asked
shivering irked him a lot. Rama had asked many
sages such questions in his childhood, had
many discussions about Divinity with a natural curiosity. Has any one of you seen god?
Have you understood the reason for the creation of this world? If the world is the creation
of god, who created that god? The sages could
not give Rama satisfactory answers.
This is all what we know about god, boy!
We told you what we had heard. We dont know
149
150
amorous activities, the sacrificial altars pleasant with Vedic chants and scholarly discourses,
the temples made auspicious with daily worship and religious vows, the saunters in chariots harnessed to superior breed of horses,
beautiful courtesans (damsels) all over the town
and country this Ayodhya with so many comforts and all royal pleasures to be given up to
live in forests? How foolish it was !
The royal pleasures overcame the Brahma
knowledge preached by Rama and Lakshmana
swung with frenzy, Brother, sir! I do not believe in Destiny. I defy divinity. Paupers and
incapacitated people may have fate, but why
should we, the brave, have fate? Valorous and
efficient people should fulfill their actions with
their capacity and should not yield to god. Your
Excellency, you are our king from now on. You
occupy the kingdom, getting crowned at once,
throwing out Dasaratha from the throne. It
seems you have doubt, can we wage a battle
with the armies of the king? Do we have such
strength. We are heroes. All our friends are
valorous. Why do we need so many, arent I
myself sufficient? Shall I not destroy millions
of armies? Then will it become clear whether
divine dispensation is great or human effort is
great, said Lakshmana, and looked a mighty
force for himself and furiously drew out the
sword suddenly.
Till then, not plucking the courage to cross
the conversation of sons and letting tears gush
down, feeling excessively pleased at
Lakshmanas words, Kausalya turned to Rama
with sympathy. My lad! You have heard your
younger brothers words. Act on what has to
be done! said she, looking hopefully. By imprisoning or killing your father or some how
occupying the kingdom. You must become the
king. I should become the Queen-Mother. All
my fellow wives, including Kaika, should live
under my authority was the feeling that
loomed in Kausalyas anxiety and caution.
Rama was engrossed in deep thought and
stood motionless. He felt something creep up
from his heels to his knees quickly. Lakshmanas
words seemed worth carrying out. Why should
he bend down his head, despite his prowess?
151
41. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 39, sloka 36: In this context, we will know the fact that Dasaratha had
350 wives in addition to the three wives Kausalya, Sumitra and Kaika. Rama reported in detail so
far and looked at his three hundred and fifty mothers. He saluted to the mothers who were wailing
like his mother. The king has 353 wives!
152
153
gry and sorrowful that she had never felt before. Trembling with the heaviness of insult,
Sita looked at Rama raising her eyes. Is it manliness for you to leave your wife in the service
of others and honourable for me to live without
my husband serving others? Like a vile fellow
who leaves his young wife to strange men, is it
fitting for a hero like you to leave me at the
mercy of your brother! Is it for this that my
father gave me in your hands? I have no need
to go on serving your parents abandoning you.
For me, service to you is important and not service to the others, so saying she shed tears,
bowing her head. After some time the anger
subsided and she felt remorseful that she had
accused her god like husband.
Sita had heard the stories of many virtuous women from her childhood, felt ecstatic
with devotion and thought that they were guides
to her. She thought that she would never be
away in any difficult situations from her husband. Had not Savitri brought her husband
back to life pleasing Yama, God of Death, himself? When the world was getting scorched
without rains for ten years, had not the great
virtuous woman Anasuya created water in the
Ganges and fruits on the trees for the sake of
the sages? Had she not received respect by
making ten nights into one night for the Gods?
How many women had earned name and fame
doing service to their husbands! What is the
life of women for if they are not virtuous? How
wasteful! Sita had been ready to serve at the
feet of her husband right from her birth. She
had perennially entertained thoughts of
virtuousness and never had the question of
truth and falsehood entered her mind. Never
had she any doubts about the natural and unnatural.
Sita felt even glad at her husbands exile,
though he did not get the kingdom. She felt
eager to proclaim to the world her virtuousness
in difficult situations. Now that her husband
was thinking of leaving her behind, she talked
so defiantly, but not because her obedience had
abated. Some how her husband was hesitant to
take her along with him. It is not difficult for
such a heroic man to protect her! Or is it that for
154
155
42. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 30, sloka 33: Rama himself revealed the naked truth that god does
not appear to the eye.
43. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 32, slokas 44 & 42: Rama acquired all that wealth without any
connection with his fathers wealth. So, how did he acquire it?
156
44. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 32, sloka 45: Rama distributed gifts to Brahmins, friends, maids and
beggars in a fitting manner (Yathartha sanman!) This means, when a king like Rama distributes all
riches and wealth, what beggars get is a fistful of grains only. Beggars and people who live in dire
poverty dont benefit from the charity and donations of great donors. All the valuable charities
are confined only to a few.
157
158
Some intellectuals regretted a lot. His Excellency has done an unwise thing! He should
have carried out the coronation of Rama by
sending Kaika to her fathers place. What do
you say? they said.
Will king Kekaya tolerate if such an act
were done? Wont he come with armies to attack Dasaratha?
If he were to come, Rama would take care
of it! Is Rama incapable of doing that? After
ruling the kingdom for so many years, why could
not the king realise such a petty thing?
Since Kaika is a woman, he may have
thought that she would not have so much cleverness and daring!
Whatever it may be, when Bharata comes
tomorrow, we have to try to curry his favour
so discussing and again aloud they said, How
worthy Rama is! What an excellent man!
Listening to the praises of people, Rama
with a solemn face, was standing before
Dasaratha he wore just a loin-cloth, no silk
clothes, and no ornaments. Is this Rama the
same Rama who always shines with handsomeness? a doubt arose in the minds of the
people.
Lakshmana also was standing by his elder
brother clad in loin-cloth. Sita covering a loinsari over a silk sari, stood bending head bashfully.
Dasaratha plucked up courage on seeing
his sons in the attire of sages, ready for exile.
He gained the confidence that Rama would not
defy him and occupy the kingdom. That father,
who had not spoken a single word to his sons,
bending his head and shedding tears began to
speak, My lad! I suffer deceit having granted
boons to Kaika. I am bound by truth. Yet, I do
not wish for you to live in the forests. Defy me
and get the coronation done. It will be a great
45. Ayodhya kanda, sargas 34 to 36: See amount of truth and the amount of hypocrisy in the
words of Dasaratha while Rama was leaving the kingdom. He says to Rama, Defy me and
celebrate the coronation. Does he say this with a desire that his son must do so? Will Dasaratha
be happy if Rama really opposes him and occupies the kingdom? He wont be at all happy. Then
why such talk? He talks so because he has to speak for the sake of the world! The whole thing is
self-deception and a deception of the world. There is deception in the norms, the vows of truth
and the ways of life of the people themselves.
159
chants, send riches and grains, arrange everything without any deficiency for Rama in the
forests, he commanded.
Kaika who had been silent till then, intervened, Your Excellency, in the beginning itself
I said that Rama should live the life of a sage in
the forest with a loin-cloth. Not even a farthing
is to be sent with him. If he is made powerful
again by giving armies, heroes and treasures
why should he be sent to the forests? She
objected in a cut and dried way.
Dasaratha bursting with anger said, How
vile you have become! You are causing trouble
to Rama. Is that not enough? Saying so he
looked daggers at her.
It is not I who is causing troubles to Rama.
It is you. He is in trouble as he worships you.
He intrigued with you for the kingdom and made
his own trouble. Have I asked you to send
Lakshmana or Satrughna to the forests? Why
should he be ready to accept the kingdom to
which he had no right? Yet, the sages say that
Rama is a man of self-control, who does not
react to pain or pleasure. That he doesnt feel
joy at comfort and sorrow at hardships, they
praise him! For such a great self-controlled man
what is it if they are royal pleasures or a forest
life? Why do all of you grieve so much for such
a man? said Kaika and saw piercingly.
Rama intending to divert that topic, said
solemnly, Your Excellency! What is the use of
the saddle for a man who has forsaken the
horse? While living a life of meditation, what is
the use of armies or soldiers to me? Dont grieve.
I am giving up all these riches and wealth, and
beautiful towns. I am sacrificing this vast empire for Bharata. Invite Bharata and crown him
king. Rama looked detachedly.
Amen! Amen! shouted the Brahmins, as
was their habit.
Kaika, raising her eye brows, reprimanded
him, Rama, it is not proper for you to say that
you are sacrificing this entire empire for Bharata.
How can you sacrifice that which is not yours?
How can you give up that which you have not
received? The kingdom still belongs to
Dasaratha. There is no scope for your mercy or
charity here.
Dasaratha bowing his head, grumbled,
160
over her body and the head decked with flowers was ready for the journey.
Kausalya, who had suffered all her life with
the indifference of her husband, tired of
virtuousness, feeling a disgust at seeing her
husbands face, drew her daughter-in-law near
and began to preach principles of virtuousness
of women. Dear child! A husband is god for a
woman. There is no life other than the worship
of a husband for a woman. You are still young.
You dont comprehend the intentions of
women. Women do not have steadfast mind. It
is a very bad thing. Women will slight down the
more their husbands love them. If a husband
becomes poor they stop treating him with respect as before and insult him. They raise a hue
and cry without shame about a small mistake of
the husband marrying a second wife if he fancies. Womens mind is a very crooked mind you
know! so saying, she looked with side-glances
every now and then at Kaika to notice whether
Kaika was sensing the taunts meant for her.
Then again, she continued her sermon to her
daughter-in-law. But see that you never allow
such a vile intention to come to you. Dont slight
your husband, since he has lost his kingdom.
You should go on worshipping him, like a god,
you know! so she preached morals and felt
anxious to see if people had perceived the villainy of Kaika and her own virtue.
For any woman of a harem, spending the
entire life in dependence, hate, jealousy, vanity, pomp, empty virtues, repulsive morals, buried in the womb of time devoid of any essence,
at the end in old age, raising eyes without enthusiasm, the one last light that would appear
was that of virtuousness! That lustre of fame!
Sita saluting in reverence to her mother-inlaw who had lowered her face with tears, said,
Dont compare me with the wicked women.
My parents preached me the duty of
virtuousness in my child hood. I shall give up
my life, but not leave the feet of my husband.
46
Saying so, she bowed to the feet of Rama.
Again the harem reverberated with moans.
46. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 39, slokas 20 to 31: In the conversation between Kausalya and Sita,
we can see how women themselves believe that women are inherently bad and so on.
161
162
the forest seems to be wailing, said he, sighing that his suffering had become the suffering
of Nature also.
Sita, looking at two birds couching in a
nest, exulted at the innocence of her husband.
That is not wailing. They have reached their
nests. All birds make noise like this in our garden also every evening, said she laughing.
Rama imagined before his eyes, his garden,
the harem and the town. Lakshmana, all our
relatives may be sad. All the people may be
wailing for our troubles, said he, hung his head
again and sat sorrowfully.
After some time Lakshmana got up, collected all the dry leaves there and made a bed.
Rama had no enthusiasm even to eat fruit. He
drank some water and was ready to go to bed.
Then he saw Sita. A youthful woman, laden
with ornaments from top to toe. She did not
pay heed to his words. He looked around. There
might not be wild animals there but what was
the guarantee that there were no thieves and
lustful men about? She did not mind his words.
How much safety there was in the harems for
women! Where even a male fly could not enter
it. Her sari over the shoulder was slipping down!
Why did not she take care about it? He
looked and cautioned Sita.
Sita smiled.
It may be cold. Take the sari around your
shoulders.
Yes, it is a bit cold, said Sita, wrapping
the sari around the shoulder and couched herself like a bird.
Tears welled up in the eyes of Sumantra.
Lakshmana being unable to watching the
hardships of that couple, bowed his head sadly.
Rama looked around again said,
Lakshmana! Be careful with the bundle of saris. Keep it close to us. Keep watching around
every now and then. He looked at Sita again.
Rama whom the sages praise that he
could fight with 11 thousand enemy heroes
while protecting himself, protecting chariots,
47. Aranya kanda, sarga 46, sloka 9: They had not even crossed the Kosala kingdom and it
had already become a problem for Rama to protect Sita! He gathered courage remembering that
his brother was present to help him.
163
164
wept
Your woman always weeps, what is new
in it? There is a lot of real gossip. Ill tell you,
listen. The kingdom is the right of Bharata originally. While marrying Kaika, the old man had
promised that he would give the kingdom to
her son. Then, do you feel it is right for the
elder king to go back on his word? The same
question Kaika had put to him and demanded a
reply, and he turned pale, they said.
How do you know all these things?
My eldest son went to Ayodhya yesterday. He returned at midnight and told me every
thing.
I see, but even then will she exile Rama to
the forests, he who has been so delicately
brought up? Do you think Rama is a cattle
herder like us who does things like mixing
dung? Why do you talk without sense?
Who does not have sense? When he digs
pits behind the throne, what can they do except banish from the kingdom? She demanded
her boons, what was wrong in it when he had
promised her boons, should he give her the
boons or not?
Another voice: What? Did the old king
give her boons? He is a great king, so he gave
them. A man like me cannot even get a sari for
my wife.
Yeah, he gave great boons!
Men in the fields gathering at a spot started
a discussion and were divided into two parties.
From a distance one farmer angrily scolded
every one, The hell with you! Look at that
side. The sun has gone up in the sky. What is
that gossip without doing work. What does it
matter if Rama becomes king? Or Bharata becomes king? Or Pullayya becomes king? Will
any king let us off without collecting taxes?
Eh, Pullayya! Come hereWhy should we
bother about these big people?
Rama turned his face away and hurried
Sumantra, Drive fast. We have to reach the
shore of the Ganges.
The chariot reached the boundaries of the
Kosala kingdom gaining speed and crossing
villages, towns, small woods and rivers. Rama
had the chariot stopped and looked at the
165
Kshatriyas (Royal families) should give to others and not take anything from others. One
should be in a position to donate and not in a
position of taking charity. Kshatriyas should
gather wealth and riches by their heroism It
seems you have brought many delicious dishes
for us to eat, but I dont eat anything. I have no
attachment for sleep or food. What else is there
for me than to obey my fathers command?
What is the use of wailing? Except meditating
and taking roots and herbs like sages, why do I
need all these delicacies, pleasures and mundane things? Do not worry about me. What is
the news? Are there no turmoils in your kingdom? Are all your kith and kin well? Does your
money increase day by day? A king should
watch first his treasury. Rama, who had not
even touched the crown, preached politics and
subtleties of duty to the old king who had been
ruling for many years. Guha did not pay heed
to any of them. He was grieving not able to
recover from the news of Ramas exile. Eat at
least the fruits, my boy! said he again.
Rama turned his face rejecting the offer and
said, No, I do not want anything. Except the
water of the Ganges I do not touch anything.
Look there! Those horses belong to my father.
Attend to them. That itself is worshipping me,
saying this he looked solemn. It was Ramas
belief that every one would worship him.
Guha felt belittled. When he was affectionately conversing with him, why did Rama say
worshipping? Hey, give milk to those
horses, he ordered his servants.
The fragrance of the dishes which Guha
brought, was wafting in the air around out doing the scents of flowers. The delicious aroma
of the meat dishes were floating in the air.
Rama turned his face to the Ganges, dilated
his nostrils and smacked his lips. For three
nights he touched nothing except plain water.
Never had he suffered so much hunger since
his birth. Where had all that heroism gone?
Weakness was creeping on. Lakshmana! Get
water from the Ganges! he grumbled and leant
against the tree weakly.
Lakshmana brought water in a leaf cup and
gave it to Rama. Brother, Sir, Take rest, he
166
48. In these words, we can observe how greatly and respectfully the lower caste people treat
the higher caste people. Women believe that the mind of women is base, lower castes people
believe that it doesnt matter if the lower caste people suffer. All this indicates how firmly those
beliefs were deep rooted.
167
168
169
170
bravely beside the people who stood not knowing any cant.
In some ancient time primeval human beings, while setting out on journey across water,
might have prayed to the Forces of Nature to
help them succeed in their venture, and that
prayer had become a cant for Rama.
The Boya men pushed the boat into the
water and crawling like fish on the edges, took
the oars into their hands. Within no time the
boat sailed into the middle of the river, away
from them all from the shore.
Guha and Sumantra watched the boat again
and again from the bank and turned back to go
home.
Sumantra, sir! If he becomes the king, he
will rule very well said Guha, unable to bear
his grief that Rama had told him so many times
how to rule his kingdom.
Sumantras face blossomed like a lotus leaf.
Guha, tell me, has my loyalty to the king become known just today? I have been serving
king Dasaratha much before these children were
born. Look, this man says, I am happy at your
devotion to the king! I am so elderly! Is it something which he should mention now? Sumantra
said flinging back his head in protest.
Forget it Sumantra, sir! He is in great
trouble. He is like our child.
Yeah, yeah! I too thought the same. Nay,
he never used to speak so much before.
However much I asked him, he has not
eaten even a single fruit. I dont know what
sort of a vow it is, let that vow go to hell!
49. In the stories that we commonly hear, they say that Guha himself acted as an oarsman. But
it is not true. Guha had only sent his men and he did not go along with Rama.
50. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 52, slokas 86 to 88: What sort of ideas did Rama and Sita had
concerning the kingdom while going to the forest! Based on Sitas promise of worship which she
would fulfil after getting back the kingdom, after completing the exile, it is clear that they started
to the forest with a view that they would get back the kingdom again. What is the basis for their
view? Fourteen years of exile in the forest does this mean that there is any condition that the
kingdom will go to Rama after the completion of exile? No, there was no such condition. The
kingdom always belonged to Bharata. After completing the exile period, Rama can come back and
live in the country. Thats all. But, Sita always prayed, We should get back our kingdom! And
Rama felt happy at her prayers. If he wished to take back the kingdom, how will it mean that he is
obeying his fathers command?
171
that his father at the conclusion of his conversation would say, After return you take the
kingdom. But he had no such intention of that.
Then, Bharata should be the king forever? His
return from exile meant the completion of his
punishment and permission to live his life in
Ayodhya again. Except that, it did not mean
taking the kingdom again. The kingdom belonged to Bharata forever. Then the idea was
that he should live under the grace of Bharata
and his authority? For this much grace, what
was the need to come back? Why be exiled for
fourteen years? A full hundred years there
living in the forests and dying there would be
better.
Rama felt unable to bear this thought and
turned his face to the other side.
Sita was looking agitated whether she
would have the luck of visiting all the holy places
along the bank of the Ganges and fulfilling her
vows. Rama turned this side after some time.
His face became cloudy. Sita! You are a woman!
Why do you need the discussion of justice and
injustice. Things happen as per the directions
of Brahmins and priests, said Rama. The last
words came out involuntarily as if somebody
had preached in his soul. Yes, wont the Brahmins decide justly? Wont the sages stand by
him? He had to live in the forests anyway, so he
should curry the favour of the sages during
this period. Rama bucked up greatly and felt
glad. His face blossomed.
Feeling hurt by the words of her husband,
Sita turned her face towards the river and stood
looking at the waves.
Lakshmana got hold of a stick from somewhere and scratched his neck.
By midday the boat reached the other
shore. The entire shore was flat with sand all
around. The sun was fierce. The sand was glittering brightly like planed gold.
The boatmen carrying all the bundles of
saris, swords, bows, arrows, sheaths, shields,
basket and crow-bars crossed over the sand
and placed them under trees.
Rama, Lakshmana and Sita got off the boat
and gathered under the trees.
Rama said to the boatmen solemnly, I am
172
51. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 52, sloka 94: Rama, without moving at least one step after stepping
off from the boat, handed over valorously the responsibility of protecting him and Sita to
Lakshmana. It is Ramas order that Lakshmana should protect them not only at places where there
are no people but also at places where there are people! See in Ramas orders the same kind of
ordering when a slave-master assigns some work to his slave! The relationship between Rama
and Lakshmana is not like a bond between two brothers but like a Master-Slave relationship. This
fact will become clearer as we proceed.
173
52. Before Rama started on his exile in the forest, Dasaratha had given saris, ornaments and
cosmetics to Sita; shields, weapons, basket, a crow-bar and much more this fact we know. In
the original story, there are details about arranging them in the chariot and shifting them into the
boat while crossing the river Ganga. But, there is no mention in the story how all those articles
reached the forest. The poet cleverly left this point without any mention. Then, who carried those
articles? It is very natural if anybody asks this question. Was there any other way than for
Lakshmana to carry them?
174
53. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 52, slokas 95, 96 &99: See how Rama instructed Lakshmana and
Sita with regard to walking and what reason he gave for his walking behind! It is a matter to be
thought over: whether the person should walk in front or behind if he wants to protect others in
the forest!
54. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 55, sloka 29: Valmiki described Sita, who was walking between Rama
and Lakshmana, as a female elephant walking between two male elephants. Rama might not
have imagined that the poet would ignore the kinship relations and make Lakshmana a male
elephant and Sita a female elephant. What would have happened if he had imagined that? Nay, we
cant even begin to imagine!
175
176
55. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 52, sloka 102: Rama and Lakshmana, for the sake of food, killed a
boar, a bison, a deer, and a spotted deer. The ascetic-life of Rama began with meat - eating. Should
they kill so many animals for food in one part of the day? This is merely cruel joy derived in
killing. Think about another point. In this story, when did poetry first begin from the mouth of
Valmiki? When a hunter shot an arrow at a pair of birds and killed one of them, the second bird
grieved and poetry sprang up as Valmiki was unable then to bear that agony of the bird. The same
poet wrote this story subsequently, didnt he? Rama keeps on killing animals more than needed
for food and gather heaps of them. Does he hunt without separating any pair among birds and
animals? Why should this merciful man Valmiki who wrote this story make Rama kill so many
animals? This is a quality of avarice!
177
178
We can see how clearly, how nakedly Rama expressed his inner
agony and grief; anger at his father and a grudge against Kaika. We can see how Rama felt jealous
of Bharata becoming king, how he got upset at his bad luck and how much he cursed his father
and we are surprised, Is this Sri Rama? We can also examine the extent of truth in what Rama
said to every one, I am not at all feeling sorry for losing the kingdom; how far his filial devotion
to his father is true when he repeatedly declared, I will follow the commands of my father. In this
entire sarga, Rama abuses his father a lot!
179
57. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 53, Sloka 15: Rama used the word arrogance abusing Kaika. The
poet used the expression sowbhagya madamohita, meaning became arrogant with good fortune, intoxicated with wealth, or blinded by pride of good fortune.
180
181
58. Although Rama asked Lakshmana to go home, he would have in fact returned from the shore
of Ganges and fallen at the feet of Kaika if Lakshmana had not accompanied him! If Rama completed the exile period, the entire credit goes to Lakshmana! For the basis of this observation, see
later!
182
183
Viswamitra Bears Monkeys attachments killing of Ravana! How will they help
in battles? he furrowed his brows, in a frown
giving up the attempt of drawing out the arrow
to shoot, he moved ahead.
At the noise of people the bear disappeared
like lightning.
Sita felt assured. Again she was absorbed
in enjoying the beauty of the forest.
The incident of the night before, that of his
conduct before Lakshmana pricked him like a
thorn. He was trying to avoid facing
Lakshmana as far as possible from the time it
had dawned.
Lakshmana spared no effort in melting the
muscles, formed with fat and butter from the
time of his birth, in the service of his brother.
He was sweating profusely.
Birds used to the sight of load carriers did
not stir on seeing Lakshmana.
Birds on the trees, cried frightened on seeing Rama who with sharp looks and who took
into his hand every now and then his bow as
though he was angry with some one and walked
with the gait that quaked the earth under his
59
feet, flew away. Animals too ran away.
Sita as though she were reminded of something asked Rama with disappointment, I was
eager to see lions. They are not present in this
forest?I dont see even tigers. They had said
snakes as big as hills would lie across the path.
Even they are not present here, why?
Rama was absorbed in his thoughts. He
did not reply.
Lakshmana walking with Sita, said respectfully, There are no such fears in this forest,
sister-in-law
Not fears! Why should there be fears when
your brother is here? I have never seen lions. If
not in a forest, where else can we see themTell
me, have you ever seen lions?
No, sister-in-law
Has your brother seen them?
59. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 54, sloka 9: See how the wonderful form of Rama frightens animals
and birds. Why do birds and beasts fear him? They fear only when they see hunters. Or, are they
afraid when they see humans who appear cruel and terrifying. If birds and animals are afraid of
some one, it is an indication of cruelty in looks, actions and walking.
184
No, sister-in-law
Alas! So! she fell into a reverie. When
she had offered to accompany Rama to forest,
he had recounted many strange things, so they
were all recited without his having seen any of
them!He said, Many, many wild animals will
be there, snakes will be there. There will be no
room to place even to place a foot because of
thorns. There will be insects. Would all these
come across some where else? There is so much
beauty all aroundso many treesso many
flowers
Some mendicants belonging to a class of
sooth sayers were passing by, singing songs.
Sita forgot about the lions and began looking at them. Now and then some rustics
might be beggars or wood-cutters went
across with baskets and wickets and yokes.
Their shouts and claps made to drive away
birds, from the bamboo platforms! There were
songs in the air occasionally from people not
seen nearby.
But everything was amazing Sita.
In the harem maids and slave women wore
fair saris. Adorned themselves with ornaments
and decorated themselves. Here these people
both men and women appear half-naked. There
is no grace of dress or ornaments; even the hair
is without oil.
But their countenances!What a variety
of expressions! There is no comparison between
the faces of the people in the harem and these
faces here. That solemnity, that modesty and
that devotion are not here even for a sample!
None exhibit modesty to any other. None salute to any other. None issues commands. None
should awe. No solemnity on any bodys face.
The looks are as natural as the looks of birds
and animals. Clear expressions.
Like young ones taken to a Vanity Fair, Sita
looked at the people sighted upon on the way
closely with a smiling face. Their
songsthough not intelligibleshe listened
to attentively. Those songs with unheard of
wordshave so much melancholy. So many
hardships. Disappointment. Prayers to gods.
Vows. Again satisfaction. While singing like
that, one moment sorrow and the next moment
185
186
187
188
189
60. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 54, sloka 16: Why did Rama, who eats all kinds of meat in the forest
life, say that he would practice Dharma (virtue) by eating roots and fruits? Is eating meat in the
ascetic life Adharma (unvirtue)? If he stops eating meat and lives solely by roots and fruits, he
could say about it specifically. Is there any sense in saying that he would lead an ascetic life by
eating roots and fruits, while actually killing animals and eating their flesh?
190
Bharadwaja who had conquered mundane desires, and saw the surroundings of the hermitage fondly as a householder would see his
riches and belongings.
Rama bowed in humility and asked, Sir, in
that
Chitrakuta
Mountain
will.
tigers.lionsjust to know because Sita may
get frightened being a weak woman saying
so, he folded his hands.
No, my son! Monkeys, baboons and bears
abound. All those creatures are meant for your
service, arent they? There are elephant herds,
and flocks of peacocks. Honey in plenty. There
is no dearth of sweet fruits. There are no people
there..
Young disciple had a desperate desire for
honey but he smacked his lips and kept silent.
Rama liked it very much. There are no lions
there, no illiterate villagers only sages. He decided to go there.
191
61. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 55, slokas 20 & 21: Sita prayed to the river Yamuna. This time, she
did not mention the issue of kingdom. She merely expected to return to Ayodhya.
62. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 55, sloka 25: Sita addressed the Banyan tree as Oh great tree,
Shyama! and prayed to it to show mercy that their exile was completed comfortably. Sita, the wife
of Sri Ramachandra, keeps praying to trees, stones, rivers and the like. This is how, the human
beings in the period of savagery used to worship the oldest trees, hills, rivers, oceans and each
and every thing that was huge in magnitude in Nature and believe that they would fulfil their
desires. The remnants of those beliefs are still present. These blind beliefs will vanish only when
people come to know the scientific knowledge that trees and rivers do not fulfil our desires.
192
193
194
ing here? Can human beings feel more comfortable than these animals in moonlight? Is there a
greater fortune than living in forests dedicated
to this moonshine, these flowers and these
clouds? Is it an ordinary earth? Some incomparable land of beauty Sita is rhapsodic.
Rama looked around with great detachment. Sita! How ignorant you are! Is this
beauty of this world eternal? In a moment all
these flowers drop off. All these clouds will
change. You are exulting with the moon light
but you are not able to understand that a day in
your life is going out. Human beings feel glad
when it is day, so that they can accumulate
money. They feel glad that when it is night they
can satiate their carnal desires. That they dont
comprehend that, as days pass death haunts
and longevity decreases and become aged.
With the change of seasons they feel glad that
trees blossom and yield nuts, fields give harvest, and the rains come. But they dont grieve
that months and years are passing by. Rama
63
sighed.
Sita looked as if not comprehending any
thing. When she suggested that he should see
the moon without even a single cloud hiding it,
her husband was spinning a philosophical note,
which caused some strange melancholy in her.
Hesitantly, but modestly, Sita asked, Lord! I
realise that the sunrise and sun set reduce ones
longevity. However we grieve, it is a natural
process, isnt it? What is the use of grieving
when longevity decreases in spite of grieving?
Sir, is it ignorance trying to fill this span of life
with happiness, attachment, eagerness and
passion for beauty? She looked at him innocently.
Rama with the eagerness of preaching
knowledge to an ignoramus woman said, That
is why man should meditate over his self, Sita!
One should not waste life. In order to get
heaven, endeavour must be made in youth itself, if not what piety can we achieve in old
age? If we immerse ourselves in joy with these
63. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 105, slokas 23 to 27: Rama told her in detail about birth and death
and the way in which human beings have to make arrangements to acquire heavenly pleasures.
Rama expresses the same ideas whenever he engages in discussion on Dharma.
195
64. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 105, slokas 26 & 27: Family is an entanglement, an obstacle, in the
way of mans salvation and heaven! Wife and children are temporary relations that separate after
a while! But these principles do not apply to a woman. A husband and family life are not entanglements in the way of a womans salvation. They are not relations that remain as hurdles. For a
woman, service to the husband is heaven. A woman does not have any other objectives to
achieve. This means, a woman is not a living being connected with the human kind. Therefore, it
is a matter to be discovered by the biologists whether a woman is related to the animal species,
insect species or some other new species.
cept for the birds and animals, any human movement looked strange! The trees are looking humans as if they were trespassers. Let those
humans go quickly. Dont pick up a quarrel with
them! Human beings are heartless and merciless. Let them pass on quickly, as if the forest
commanded them thus, wild animals and poisonous snakes were going away avoiding men.
At a distance the peaks of the Chitrakuta
Mountains appeared like clouds descending on
the horizons covered with fog, like paintings.
They walked on till evening.
In between Sita attempted to show Rama
some picturesque scenes, but kept silent many
times.
The signs that the sage Bharadwaja had
described appeared. At a distance smoke rose
from altar fires in the hermitages. Rama looked
with eyes wide open. Lakshmana! We have
reached our destination!
Yes, brother-sir! By your grace we
reached
The three went to the hermitage of Valmiki.
Saluting sage Valmiki, Rama said, Sage! We
are the sons of king Dasaratha. Our step mother
has sent us cruelly to these dense forests. My
father yielded to a woman and ordered a son
like me into this exile. Since I am obedient to my
father, I have come to live the in forests with
pleasure, Sir! He sighed.
Sage Valmiki regretted and consoled him,
May be it is auspicious for you, my son! Here
you can live with us.
Rama sat leisurely on the earthen platform
of Valmikis hermitage. Paths had formed in the
vicinity. Nearby is the river Mandakini.
Lakshmana! This place is safe. My mind desires to build a house. Cut big trees and build
65
house! so saying Rama leant against a wall.
65. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 66, slokas 19 & 20: While Rama asked Lakshmana to build a house
in one sloka, the poet said in 20th sloka thus, Lakshmana cut the trees and built the hut.
Lakshmana has single handedly built the hut. But Rama did not do any thing he did not even
move a small stick from one place to another! Outwardly, Rama and Lakshmana were brothers.
But the actual relationship between them was that of a master and a slave. All kinds of labour
which slaves do for their masters were seen in the character of Lakshmana. Lakshmana never
thought independently and never took decisions independently. He always acted
>
197
> according to the master. He always told his brother, I am your slave! I cannot act independently and he pleases his master. See how many forms Lakshmanas slavery assumes! It was he
who had prepared ferry. It was he who had carried all the bundles. It was he who had built the hut.
He will do many more things hereafter. According to the practices that appear here, younger
brother is a slave of the older brother. There is no affection in the relationship of these brothers.
66. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 56, slokas 22 & 25: Those who want to live in the house for a long
time, must perform the rite of appeasing the evil spirit connected with the house. Only then the
householder will have stability, thinking thus Rama performed all the rites. But see later how long
Rama lived in this house and how much stability this householder got!
198
67. If Dasaratha was a pious person who had done pious acts, why did it so happen that all his
four sons were not present near the father? The scriptures say that it is piety if one dies in the
arms of ones sons, dont they? Although he had the curse that he would die in the absence of his
sons, it is not necessary that all his sons should have been away. He could have died when only
one son was away and the rest of them were near him, couldnt he? What sort of pious man is he
if all the four sons were away from him during his last days?
199
200
201
202
203
204
turned.
The people who came from Ayodhya did
not tell Bharata about Dasarathas demise. They
did not tell that news even to his grand father
and uncle. Apart from that they carried ornaments and clothes worth 30 crores for Bharatas
68
grandfather Kekaya and uncle Yudhajit.
Bharata enquiring the news of Ayodhya
asked those messengers, Are all well? Respected father, my brothers are they all right?
Are my elder mothers Kausalya and Sumitra,
who are rich in virtues, safe? How is my mother,
69
who is wicked, obstinate and deceitful?
The messengers looked at each others
face.
All are well. Goddess Lakshmi, goddess
of wealth, is selecting you. You have to perform one important task in Ayodhya. Vasishta
has sent us. You have to start immediately,
they hurried him.
Bharata went to his grand father and informed him of his departure for Ayodhya.
King Kekaya felt glad and gave Bharata
many gifts. Diamonds, gems, ornaments,
clothes, horses, elephants, camels, chariots and
70
some heroes also to Bharata.
Bharata started for Ayodhya along with
Satrughna.
Bharata reached Ayodhya on the thirteenth
day of the demise of Dasaratha and proceeded
at once to his mother.
68. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 70, sloka 50: There is no clarity whether those 30 crores are rupees
or any other coins. The messengers ought to have told king Kekaya, at least confidentially, about
Dasarathas death. Guess why they have not told.
69. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 70, sloka 10: Without knowing any thing that had happened in
Ayodhya, Bharata was abusing his mother meanly. That too in front of the messengers. Did all
people have a bad opinion of Kaika in the past? No there was no such thing. Rama himself
acknowledged many a time that Kaika was a great woman and she loved him. Then what was the
basis for the prattling of Bharata? The poet was very hasty in making Bharata abuse Kaika!
Bharata would any way scold Kaika after he reached Ayodhya. But the poet was not able to wait
until then! He initiated the action of abusing here itself! Utter irrelevance!
70. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 70, sloka 21: We can see that, like money, grain, ornaments, clothes,
horses, elephants etc. human beings were also given as gifts or donation. If it is soldiers they are
used in wars. If they are servants, they serve. Bharata could keep those soldiers under his control
or can give them away to others if others need.
205
206
71. Ayodhya kanda, sargas 73 & 74; All the slokas are abuses which Bharata uttered against
his mother in front of ministers and servants! The Raghu dynasty is such a great dynasty which
has the skill to utter so many kinds of abuses against a mother! It is the greatness of the poet of
the Ramayana to create the character of such a son!
72. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 78, slokas 8 to 22: Bharatas words: I would have killed my mother.
But Sri Ramachandra will be angry.
207
73. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 91: When Bharata reached Bharadwajas hermitage, the sage hosted
a big feast for Bharata. The description of that feast goes like this: Bharadwaja chanted mantras
and invoked Viswakarma and gods. I want to arrange hospitality for Bharata tonight. All of you
come and help me. Build houses! Get ready every thing to eat and drink! Let all rivers on this earth
be filled with liquor, drinks, sweets and come here! Let Chandra (Moon) come here and prepare
the food, liquor and garlands of flowers, Bharadwaja called the gods with their individual names.
As soon as Bharadwaja finished his meditation, all the gods arrived individually. A soft breeze
blew. A Rain of flowers began. Godly musical instruments were heard in all directions. Heavenly
nymphs began dancing and singing. The Chaitra Ratha (garden) of Kubera arrived with many
fruit trees. All rivers arrived. Mansions, temples and cabins of worship were ready promptly.
Brahma sent 60 thousand nymphs. Bharata entered a big mansion filled with spacious seats,
palanquins, bath rooms, eatables and everything. There he saw a holy seat, imagined Rama
sitting on it, walked round the seat reverently. Then rivers filled with Paayasam (sweet made of
rice, sugar, ghee) and stood in front of Bharata. There were big mansions on the banks of those
rivers. (Rivers in front of Bharata in a mansion! Mansions on the banks of those rivers!)
>
208
> Singers like Narada and Tumbura came and sang in the presence of Bharata. The most
beautiful nymphs danced. All the flowers in the gods gardens appeared in Bharadwajas hermitage. Some trees turned into players of Mridangas. Some into players of cymbals. Some into
servants. All creepers turned into women and served sweets and food to all. On the banks of the
rivers hot water, fragrant paste for rubbing on the body before bathing, tooth brush sticks,
scents, jugs, new clothes everything was readily available. Seven to eight women surrounded
each man and rubbed his body with fragrant paste, gave head-bath and decorated. There were
wells filled with goat meat, pork, meat of deer, peacock and chicken, liquor, white rice, paayasam;
tanks of date fruit juice, ponds of curds soup; tanks of buttermilk; crores of plates, jugs, long
spoons, wooden-plant seats, chairs everything was ready except soaps! All the soldiers ate
and drank bellyful (heartily), danced with joy and shouted, This is heaven! We wont go back to
Ayodhya. We will not come to Dandakaranya. (Pity, how difficult it was at Ayodhya!) The night
passed happily. Nymphs, gods, mansions and all left before dawn. Bharata started toward
Chitrakuta.
74. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 95, sloka 15: Rama compared Chitrakuta with Ayodhya and the wild
animals with people of Ayodhya. The praises of sages for Rama that he speaks the truth are true
in this regard. He exhibited the attitude of the kings which consider people as animals. Both
people and animals are the same in Ramas view. He derives the same kind of pleasure whether he
rules people or cattle. What, in fact, is the meaning of Ramas imagination that Chitrakuta is
Ayodhya and he was ruling the people of Ayodhya while he ought to lead the life of an ascetic?
Why should he bring in the question of ruling in his life as an ascetic?
209
75. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 94, sloka 15: I will not be satiated even if I live here many thousands
of years. Rama says as if he is very happy with the beauty of Chitrakuta. But in the same sarga,
in sloka 26, he says, I will be satisfied staying here for 14 years. He would have been satisfied
with ten years if the exile had been for ten years. With six years if it were for six years. The desire
to enjoy the beauty of Chitrakuta remains only until he got the reign of the kingdom. It was all
superficial talk that he wouldnt be satiated with even many thousand years stay. See how many
days, let alone years, did Rama, who spoke that he was overwhelmed with joy by the beauty of
Chitrakuta, stays in Chitrakuta!
76. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 61, sloka 5: After Ramas exile, while abusing Dasaratha, Kausalya
says, How can Sita, who enjoyed her meal with pickles, eat wild rice in the forests? Therefore
we can say that Sita likes pickles!
210
77. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 96: See how furious Lakshmana is at Kaika and Bharata!
211
78. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, sloka 12: Rama too does not know why Bharata is coming. Yet, he
is imagining that Bharata may have abused his mother, refused the kingdom and was coming to
give away the kingdom to him. Why shouldnt Rama imagine that Bharata has celebrated his
coronation as per his mothers suggestion and was coming to see his elder brother? Ramas
desire for the kingdom is revealed in his hopes, imagination and words.
79. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, slokas 5 & 6: Rama wanted to rule the kingdom for the sake of
enjoyment of riches and wealth by his brothers, not for his selfishness! But not to make people
happy!
80. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, slokas 17 & 18: Do you want the kingdom? Can even
devotees of Rama tolerate it if Rama asked Lakshmana this? Does Rama not know for whose sake
Lakshmana suspected Bharata? What is the need to defend Bharata and scold Lakshmana? Will
he not be defying his fathers command if he gets the kingdom for Lakshmana, which Bharata
ought to rule?
81. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, sloka 14: Has Bharata ever done any harm to you before? Why
are you suspecting some one who has never done harm? Rama asks Lakshmana. Then why
didnt he ask the same question when his father, about fifteen days ago, had called him to his
chamber, the day before the coronation and said, My son! You cannot trust Bharata. There will
be a threat to you from Bharatas men. You have to get the coronation done before he comes.
Why did Rama not ask his father as he now asked Lakshmana thus, What harm has Bharata
done to you? Why should you suspect him?
212
82. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, sloka 21: Rama, suspecting that Lakshmana felt hurt by his
scolding, talks cleverly.
83. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 97, sloka 16: As the signs connected with Dasaratha are not visible,
Rama doubted whether Dasaratha is alive or not. But, see how much importance Rama gave to
find out about his father when he enquired about his father after Bharatas arrival.
213
84. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 3: Rama took Bharata by the arm, placed him on his lap
and clasped him in his two arms.
85. The comment started to rain questions is not without any basis. In sarga 100 of Ayodhya
kanda, there are 79 slokas in which Rama asked Bharata several hundreds of questions. See what
he asked about! He has simply asked about his father but observe when he heard the answer for
that question! He is not inclined to listen to the answer to any one of those hundreds of questions. He kept on merely raining questions! The rain stopped nowhere. I alone took the initiative
and had to stop the questions for some time intermittently in order to explain the situation. In the
original all these questions rain continuously.
214
ignorant of that?
Rama got very angry. Are you still alive?
When did you come up from the ankle? Isnt
my brothers kingdom as good as being of mine?
By the time I reach tomorrow after completing
my exile, should any thing remain or not? What
will happen if the kingdom is thrown into enemy hands, due to his incompetence and with
misrule? The kingdom will survive only if I suggest some cautions. What do you know as to
how many enemy kings are in ambush in the
surroundings? If the king does not rule properly, if he becomes incompetent, all enemies will
attack at once and occupy the kingdom. Do
you think that I am preaching all these morals
because I am crazy? he reprimanded the inner
voice severely. Ramas inner voice is not as
strong as that of Lakshmana. Shrinking its face,
it kept silent lacking confidence.
Rama with the jubilation that he was able
to convince his inner voice, looked at Bharata
with a smile and resumed, My boy! I have spoken about great achievement with a little effort,
Ill explain this point in detail, listen. For example, if some neighbouring king is unable to
carry on his state affairs being indisposed or
lustful! If the kingdom becomes yours with a
tiny attack then do it at once. You should not
let your tributary kings or outsiders know about
it till it is over. Are there learned people in your
court to tell you all these things? There is no
use gathering a thousand unwise people. One
learned men is enough. He will safe guard the
king in danger. By the by, do you worship
Suyajna, the son of Vasishta? He is a worthy
man, you know!
My boy! The king must follow a procedure in making appointments in the court or
country. People of noble castes should be given
good jobs. Middle caste people should be given
middle order jobs. Low caste people should be
86
given low category jobs.
Rama intended to effect many changes in
the job structure on becoming king. He wanted
86. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 25: Rama is preaching the order in which jobs should be
given. This is politics that tells us to recognize human beings in accordance with the caste
hierarchy.
215
87. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, slokas 32 & 33: Rama is explaining why the king should pay
salaries to soldiers without delay. Not that they can live comfortably without any difficulties.
Because, they may get angry, revolt against the king and harm him! Instead, Rama says, the king
must try to make the army subservient in order to rule smoothly.
216
88. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 34: As Kshatriya is a king, Kshatriyas alone occupy
important position. They occupy a higher position since they belong to a higher caste.
89. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 37: Rama is worried that Bharata may believe his enemies
whom he has chased away earlier but who may have returned to the kingdom after some time
All this in a weeks time since Bharata had returned from his grand fathers place!
217
90. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, slokas 47 & 48: The king has to protect traders specially, says
Rama. Why? So that they support the king! This is the most important aspect of politics of the
kings. They provide privileges to businessmen and the rich in order to secure their support.
91. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 50: Why should a king acquire a large cavalry and army
of elephants? For the sake of waging wars against other kings and the expansion of the kingdom!
To keep other kings always in fear and keep them under their control and as their subsidiaries! Of
all the kings, whoever acquires more economic and physical force will become the lord of the
empire and be able to keep the neighbouring kingdoms in his fist. Rama was preaching to Bharata
do so.
92. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, slokas 56 to 58: Rama is making it clear that it is natural even for
a Kosala king to yield to bribe. This means, either kings or government officials will commit any
kind of injustice for their interest, gain and money. Whatever be the form of bribe, there is nothing
that people benefit from this governance of a king who has become corrupt and has aimed at
retaining his state power intact. It is an absolute falsehood to say that a king treats his people as
his children.
218
93
money, do they?
Alas! All the ministers are present in front
of him! He is asking about their avarice for
money in their presence!
Guha was irritated being unable to catch
the gadfly. Enough of it, stop! Why do you
kill the lad like that? You had told me previously these morals. Any one ascending the
throne will know every thing. Why this pestering like a gadfly he wanted to say. In the meanwhile gadfly went to Sumantra. As Guhas irritation abated, he had not said anything.
If you punish the innocent by yielding to
the temptation of money and if the innocents
eyes shed tears, it will ruin the kings sons;
94
cattle and wealth. Be careful.
My boy! You are a good man. Do the
people of the villages and towns wish you well?
Have all the Brahmin scholars accepted you as
king? Did any body oppose it? Have they castigated you, claiming Rama should have become
the king and you should not be the king? I
know my boy, you are a victorious
manAnother point, my boy
Somebody hissed silently.
Guha almost succeeded in catching the
gadfly but it fluttered in the fingers and escaped.
People sitting on the edge of the pail went
behind the trees, placing their hands on their
bellies, unable to control their laughter.
Lakshmana taking the responsibility of treating them respectfully went out quickly.
Ramas right leg cramped. He shifted on to
the left leg. My boy, Bharata! Are you taking
proper care with regard to the women of the
harem? Never trust women. Never tell them any
95
secrets. I hope you are doing so.
Sita felt so insulted that some one slew her
head?. Before so many men, being the only
women present there, she felt her life full of
shame. Safeguards to be taken to prevent
women from outside men? Who is there in harems? All are mothers! Is it proper to insult mothers and wives like this? Ramas talk until then
was unpleasant to Sita, now with these words
she got vexed with her husband.
My boy!Should not oversleep, you
know. A king should not be lazy. He should rise
early in the morning, attend to the nature-calls,
perform the daily fire sacrifices, take medicines,
get adorned, go to court regularly? A king
should never appear before workers. If a king
appears before them, they behave carelessly
thinking, so this is the king! Workers should
be made fearful of the king and should not behave fearlessly. At times of wars, sacrifices and
on such important occasions a king can appear
before them occasionally and but should talk
with them serenely, in order to pacify
93. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 58: Rama is asking, Are your ministers impartial? Will
they help only the rich? This means, this practice of taking bribes of the ministers is not related
to the present days! So, we need not feel sad about the practice of our ministers. This is a custom
that has been in vogue since Lord Ramas period.
94. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 49: The tears of an innocent person will completely ruin
the king, Rama was acknowledging it. Innocent people shedding tears implies that injustice
and improprieties were taking place in the country. Under such rule, people, unable to bear the
sufferings, will revolt against the king after some time. They will kill the king. They also kill the
sons and heirs of the king. They will completely destroy the luxuries and wealth of the king. The
sufferings of the people will themselves cause such a consciousness among people. This is the
inner meaning of what Rama is saying although he is repeating the moral preaching which he has
read in the scriptures.
95. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 49: See what restrictions Rama ordered with regard to
women. Dont repose faith in women; do not confide secrets to women. This Rama is a worshiped god of millions of women today! As long as they believe in Rama, women will have to sink
alive in the tombs of traditions which Rama preached and die there.
workmen.
He lifted his shoulders, sitting straight with
a serious face and looked solemnly. There is
nothing wrong in appearing before ministers
and priests on business. He shook his head
with approval.
Bharata wanted to say, Oh! I never want
this kingdom, take it yourself and run away
from there. But the gadfly came from Sumantra
and caught him. He got busy avoiding it.
Rama was stroking Bharatas shoulder, back
or head. Another issue, my boy! Are all the
fortresses full with grain and wealth, arms and
97
archers? Is your revenue high?
Dont give more holidays to employees.
There are two kinds of loss from giving holidays. Employees get used to pleasures and
frolic. By more holidays, the working time is
98
reduced and the work gets delayed.
That is not good for the welfare of the king.
Their demands become endless, if one demand
is fulfilled. Bharata felt the need of easing himself. He attempted to get up slowly. Rama pressing his shoulder and caressing it said, Another point, my boy!.. Whenever Rama said
another point Bharata was getting alarmed,
are there still more points?
Ramas inner voice crept near his ear and
219
96. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 52: Workers should have respect for the king based on his
character and behaviour. But Rama advises ornaments, garments, pretended serenity, appearing
like lightning as means of commanding respect from the employees! The king does not try to
secure a place in the hearts of people by ruling well with justice. He tries to exhibit his luxuries,
wealth, army and status; keep people in fear, threaten them with his wealth and riches and thereby
try to make them servile. If all that show were not there, people would realize that the king is also
a human being like us. He does not have in his body more capacity and ability than us. The entire
strength of the king is due to his money and the army. If people realized this, the king could not
sit on the throne any longer. Thats why, the king always tries to perform various feats to appear
as a great and all-powerful person.
97. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 53: How will the income increase? It increases if the king
raises taxes. The king always makes sure that he possesses enough money, weapons and soldiers. All these are not meant for the welfare of the people. They are meant to suppress the
rebellion among people and to wage wars against other kings. A king always makes arrangements
not for the sake of the people but to keep his position intact.
98. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 54: The king should not give extra holidays, says Rama.
It means, he has to give as few as possible and make them do the drudgery always! Well,
shouldnt our employees abide by Lord Ramas command? Why do they demand holidays?
220
99. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 54: Rama said, I hope your wealth is not going to the
undeserving persons (apatreshu). But, all the Telugu scholars who translated this sloka have
elaborated the word apatreshu to include actors, belles, singers and translated thus, I hope
your money is not going to actors, belles and singers If we take this as the meaning of the word
apaatreeshu, then it means that Rama is considering actors and singers are undeserving people.
What, then, our artists, film actors who do not remove the make-up of Rama and the music
scholars who beat their thighs while singing hymns on Rama, would say about it? See another
praise of Rama by Valmiki at another place. In sloka 18 of sarga 1, he said, Rama is well versed in
music, sculpture and such other arts. Will a person who is well versed treat singing a base skill?
100. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 63: since the beginning of his exile to the forest, it does
not appear that this gentleman had gone in the afternoons into the forest and brought roots and
fruits, fetched water from the river or washed the clothes. Why? Why does he sit chitchatting
even during the time when one has to earn his livelihood?
221
your endeavour fruitful with reading the scriptures with good things and good traditions?
My boy! Have your wives become accom102
plished by getting progeny?
Guha got irritated. Anger, which was not
there till then, gripped him. He moved near
Sumantra and spoke into his ear, What is this,
pundit! It is not even a month since he came
here. What is this questioning Have all your
wives had children? Now, they maybe far from
each other, but dont the kings know each
others affairs that much? Doesnt this man
know whether his brother has got children or
not? If one does not know about the others
pain or pleasure, what for all this knowledge?
What is this questioning? Ugh! He never finishes! Just alert him a bit! You are an elderly
man!
Sumantra surveying around said, What
alerting him? Now he is going to become king!
He whispered.
So what? murmured Guha in uncouth
anger.
My brother, another point. Rama said
shifting left leg on to the right one.
Bharata helplessly looked at Guha as if
suggesting, Cant you tell him?
Instead of looking so helpless, why dont
you yourself tell him? You Brothers! You are
equal to one another! Guha looked at Bharata
grumbling. Bharata was afraid and turned his
head aside.
My boy! Are you listening attentively?
You are not entertaining atheists I think, Are
you? They are highly ignorant. They prate like
scholars even though they know nothing.
When scriptures like the Vedas and codes exist, they reject them with wrangle. They create
deficiency of righteousness among people by
preaching bad things and diverting away from
the righteous path. Even if atheists are Brah-
101. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, slokas 68 to 70: Read these slokas if you want the secrets of
crafts of subduing the senses and secrets of Nature.
102. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 72: Have your wives become accomplished by getting
progeny, asking Rama. What about his wife?
222
103. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, slokas 38 & 39: Rama is describing how stupid the atheists
are and how terrible their activities are. Atheists do in fact reject scriptures. Why? Because they
know that scriptures are utter unjust. To say that they divert people from the righteous path
means, atheists explain to people in great detail how mean those scriptures are. They preache to
people that there is no question of god in the evolution of nature, that all the values in human life
have come into existence in the process of social evolution but not ordained by god; that heaven
and hell do not exist and that there is no use in doing sacrifices. Owing to this kind of preaching,
people think independently and attempt to come out of the shackles of scriptures, dont worship
gods and dont believe the concept of rebirth. People, who reconciled with their sufferings in the
name of deeds in the past birth will now realize that the rule of the king is the basis for their
sufferings. As they dont accept hierarchy among people, the lower caste people do not submit
to and serve the upper castes. They will realise the essence of values which dictate privileges for
certain individuals and respect only for certain castes. Women will not live in ignorance whereby
they voluntarily submit to men. Thus, an atheist preaching will be a blow to a rule which is based
on exploitative social values. Atheists, who causes this kind of consciousness among people,
will become a threat to the king and the rich class which lives happily because of the king. Hence,
all scriptures grind their knives against atheism. They try to stop the spread of atheism among
people.
104. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 100, sloka 73: Rama is asking Bharata, Do you have as much
knowledge as I have to rule the kingdom? It is Ramas opinion that Bharata does not have such
knowledge and hence he is ineligible to rule the kingdom.
223
105. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 101, sloka 5: The fact that Rama was prepared for the coronation
even when his father was alive is known to Bharata, isnt it? Then why should Bharata think that
Rama was hesitating to take the kingdom? Bharata had got the opportunity only then to open his
mouth to tell Rama about the death of their father! Rama had merely enquired about father when
Bharata arrived but he had not come to know about the death of the father! Without knowing
about their father he began to talk about engaging spies on ministers, the protection of harems,
rearing of elephants, methods of conquering enemies, privileges for merchants, 14 royal faults, 15
tirthas, skills of subduing senses, secrets of Nature and so on? Knowing about their father only
after giving all these sermons, that too only when Bharata himself, on his own, told him about it!
Ramas devotees praise Valmiki as a great poet, dont they? Is there a sense of context in this?
Should Rama not know about Dasarathas death as soon as Bharata arrived? Poet sir, should the
brothers talk about royal faults and secrets of nature before every thing?
224
106. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 102, sloka 11: I will not return to Ayodhya even after completing
the exile, said Rama. He said it casually while he was in a sorrowful mood, say the devotees of
Rama. This means truthful persons can speak any lie when they are in sorrow! They speak the
truth only when they are not in sorrow, hurry, depression or restlessness and when they are very
comfortable!
107. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 102, sloka 12: As every body may conclude that he would not
really return to Ayodhya after the exile, Rama thinking that it is better to twist his words is
cleverly revealing his intention to return to the kingdom after the exile.
108. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 102, sloka 21: Women should walk in the front, says Rama. Rama
might not have done anything contrary to the scriptures!
225
109. Ayodhya kanda, sargas 103, 104 and 112 : Here a question arises whether Kaika too had
come to see Rama along with others. But there was no mention of Kaikas presence. We find
expressions like wives of Dasaratha, wives of the king, mothers of Rama, mothers-in-law of
Sita. However there is mention of Kausalya and Sumitra.
110. Though Lakshmana saluted hundreds of people, but he has not asked any one thus, How
is Urmila? If he salutes, they would say, Live for a thousand years, but they dont say so if he
asked, how is Urmila?
226
There is no need for us to grieve, so saying he consoled Bharata stroking his back. Every body felt relieved on seeing Rama who had
wailed rolling till then, begin consoling his
brothers.
Rama consoled Bharata for some time and
came down to the actual business directly, My
boy! What these loin cloths are? Why these
matted locks without oil? What is this rejection
of ruling kingdom? What is your opinion?
Bharata, whose hands were not free to salute, because of his being in the embrace of
Rama, moved back a bit, saluted and said,
Brother, sir! Our father has done this infamous
action listening to the word of a woman. My
mother who made my father resort to this sinful
act will go to hell. I will never accept the wicked
deed of my mother. I felt terribly sorry. Dont I
know our family tradition, name, and fame? I
thought that I should not accept the kingdom.
Yes, my boy!, Rama caught the thread in
the middle, You are one born in a noble family.
You are rich in good qualities, having performed
many rituals and worships. Son of Dasaratha,
how can such an excellent man like you resort
to this kind of sinful act for the sake of a base
112
kingdom?
I guessed in the beginning itself that you
would not accept the kingdom that is due to
me! And then, tell me what happened next?
He again tried to seat Bharata in his lap.
Bharata, just moving a little bit further,
What happened, brother, sir! Wailing, blaring
111. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 105, sloka 37: Dasaratha is in Brahmas world! In slokas 34 to 36,
Rama said, Our father is in heaven. Are heaven and Brahmas world the same? Does Rama know
about it? Did Rama see what happened to Dasaratha after his death? He did not know about his
fathers death until others had told him, did he? Then, how does Rama know in which world his
father is? His words are based on his assumption, where will he go if not to heaven since he had
done so many pious acts? If a beggar dies, do people say, He is strolling in heaven? No, they
dont say that. They say, He fell into hell since he did not do any pious act. Heaven and hell are
created by those who talk about them. Nobody has seen them. Upper caste people, the rich, great
devout wives go to heaven. The remaining people will definitely land in hell! He make Rama say
that his father is in a particular world. As if he was a great knowledgeable person!
112. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 104, sloka 16: How will a good man like you commit such a sinful
act for the sake of a kingdom? says Rama. Then, how did he commit that sinful act for the sake
of the same kingdom (in order to grab the kingdom which he knew did not belong to him)? He also
belongs to the same noble family, didnt he?
227
113. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 104, sloka 11: End the widowhood of earth as her husband, said
Bharata. Before crossing the Ganges, Lakshmana also said to Guha, If Dasaratha passes away,
the earth will become a widow. This means, the Kosala kingdom is first Dasarathas wife! That is
Ramas mother! She became a widow, having lost her husband. Now Rama has to take her hand as
a husband and end her widowhood. How horrible and how disgusting a comparison! After
Dasaratha died, it was not earth alone that became a widow. All the 353 wives became widows,
didnt they? Can Rama end their widowhood also? Those who put this question will become
base, wicked, atheists or all combined. Is there any sense if the scriptures which do not accept
the remarriage of a woman describe coronation as ending widowhood? Is earth wife of both
father as well as son? What sort of prattle is this? Does the poet of Ramayana have so little
sense?
114. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 107, sloka 3: The entire Valmiki Ramayana is based on this
single sloka. Rama himself is telling Bharata. Your mother has not unjustly done this. >
228
> Our father promised your grand father that he would give kingdom to you only, Rama
himself acknowledged the fact. Then why did Rama prepare for coronation in spite of knowing
this fact? Moreover, why does he abuse Kaika? Are there qualities of a good man in Ramas
words or actions? He revealed the secret now because it wont create any problem and Bharata
has said he would give kingdom to Rama! Is this Purushottama (noblest man) our
worshipping god!
229
115. Bharata gave up the kingdom for the sake of fame. As we proceed in the story, we will find
a scene when Bharata himself expresses the same.
230
231
232
jecting the offer to return to Ayodhya. He became more anxious to take back with him such a
good natured man! He asked the people sitting
around to move aside, prostrated at the feet of
his brother saluting and touching the feet with
his head, again sat and saluted. Brother! You
are competent to rule all the worlds. Who else
can rule the Kosala kingdom except you? Am I
aware of the political codes and worldly customs as you are! When you, the eldest is
present, is it proper for me to rule? I am like a
donkey. Can a donkey and horse be the same?
Can an eagle and Garuda be the same? I am an
ignoramus. A fool inferior to you. How can I
117
rule the kingdom?
Is not the duty of ruling a kingdom fulfilling the debts of gods, Brahmins and ancestors, conquering enemies, giving pleasure to
friends, protecting Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaisya
and Sudra castes without violation of their
caste duties greater than the duty of meditation? For that matter who knows what benefit
accrues from meditation? Whether it accrues
or not is doubtful. Is it not difficult to establish
that will be such and such a benefit? The benefit that may come later on has no valid proof.
So, please bid goodbye to this meditative life,
and bestowing grace on us, start and come to
Ayodhya. Please rule us orphans without a
118
king, Bharata looked hopefully at Rama.
116. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 103, sloka 7: Kausalya is making Sumitra feel happy that Lakshmana
will also enjoy royal pleasures after Rama becomes king. "Don't worry that your son is doing
drudgery", says Kausalya.
117. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 105, sloka 6 and sarga 106, sloka 24: Bharata is describing himself
as donkey, an ordinary bird and stupid. But if we can read the mind of a donkey, it will have self
-respect. Whereas Bharata does not have it. The poet, in order to sit Rama in a palanquin and
glorify him, makes every other character seems inferior. Every other character admits, I am the
more inferior creature compared to Rama. Will Ramas greatness decrease if Bharata were also
capable? Rama may become a great valorous person if all others are scoundrels! Just as a castor
oil plant is like a huge tree when there is no other tree present!
118. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 106, sloka 20: To convince Rama, Bharata is speaking of atheism.
Who knows what benefit or no benefit accrues from meditation? says Bharata! They twist their
arguments in whatever way they want. Those who meditate also think that nothing will result
from meditation. There isnt anybody who has observed its result. They simply believe what
their elders said, you get piety, you get heaven if you meditate. Even those elders do not know
any thing. If abandoning comforts is such a piety, how much piety should millions of poor who
do not have desire for comforts get?
233
more!
We had thought so earlier, but dont know
the reason, he is obstinate.
Let us go and see, Guha rose.
People parted side ways and left the royal
path free for Guha. Guha straight away went
and sat before Rama.
By then, Jabali was preaching Rama some
119
thing.
My boy, you yourself said that the bonds
of wife and offspring are transitory. If a fathers
bonds to offspring an ephemeral so is the bond
of children to father. When each floats his way
in the current of life, one performing rituals,
worships for another is a waste, is it not so
clear? Rama, there are no other worlds. There is
only one world. All these meditations are futile.
A man doing meditation forsaking earthly comforts will lose both opportunities. There is no
binding on you to follow Dasarathas order. He
was a king, you are a king. It is utter delusion
that your father is in the other world. Your father has become the same that dead objects
become. That is the nature of living creatures.
All these funeral ceremonies, oblations to the
deceased ancestors are utter waste. If the food
and water offered here reach the other world,
the food offered in our house should also reach
people on a visit to other villages. But it does
not happen. All these codes are fabricated by
some out of selfish motives. So my boy! Bharata
offers you the kingdom. He entreats you so
deeply to rule. Take it with out hesitation. Enjoy the pleasures of becoming a king, Jabali
said with a smile.
There rose a commotion among people.
Everybody was plunged into an unbearable
wonder and tension.
Some performers of daily worship got angry.
The whispering people waited for Ramas
reply without batting their eyelids.
Rama was distressed by various thoughts.
What is this atheistic stink! All his limbs
shrank. His mind was calmly struggling, Jabali
is a Brahmin. Scholar. His argument is a bit reasonable. He has never said any of these words
even once in Ayodhya!
234
120. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 109, sloka 29: Rama is saying what has happened due to meditation and sacrifices. He is insisting on believing them since they have written in the Vedas.
Without answering Jabalis questions, Rama is resorting to skipping and threatening.
121. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 109, sloka 16: Kings who rule the world become rulers merely
because they speak the truth, thus spake Rama! It follows that the rich are the ones who speak
the truth. The poor tell lies and hence in such a sorry plight! It also means, the reason for the
existence of Masters and Servants is also the speaking of truth and untruth!
122. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 109, sloka 34: Rama is accusing Buddha. According to the ages of
Ramayana and Buddha, Rama belongs to a much older period than Buddha. How, then, did
Rama know about Buddha? How could Rama mention Buddhas name?
It is strange to note Rama talking about Buddha. The fact that poets subsequent to Valmiki have
added many things to the original is proved by such incidents as these. Aversion to sacrifices
and meditation might have begun among people owing to the influence of Buddhism. We have to
assume that people might show interest in rationalism. The poets who defend the Vedic values, in
order to attack atheism and to abuse Buddha through the character of Rama, must have added
this reference to Buddha.
235
123
123. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 109, slokas 38 & 39: Jabalis atheism flew away within five
minutes for fear of the sword. In this scene, the poet inserts some atheism and dismisses it
through the character of Jabali as: whatever I said is false. I am not at all an atheist, more over I
hate atheistic logic vehemently. I know pretty well that there are other worlds. This is an attempt
to prevent the dissemination of atheism among people. It is the poets expectation that people will
reject atheism if he makes the same character who talked of atheism say, atheism is not
worth practising. But what happened in this scene is not that Jabali lost his case by means of
logic. If Rama had put some great question and Jabali, unable to answer, put a blank face, then
we can conclude that he has lost his case. But Rama had not given clear-cut answers to any of
Jabalis questions. Whatever scriptures Jabali had dismissed, Rama had showed the same scriptures as standard. Whatever values (dharmas) Jabali had dismissed as futile, Rama had furiously
insisted on their practice. Does this mean defeating atheism by means of logic? To Jabalis
question, Will the balls of rice that you offer reach the dead, Rama should answer directly.
Instead, if he said, What is this defiance of scriptures? They wrote this way in the Vedas. Thats
all. Shut up!, will this be an answer to that question? Here it is not atheism that is defeated. If the
atheist shuts his mouth due to fear of death, will this amount to defeating him?
But, this scene outwardly gives an impression to ordinary people that there occurred a debate
between Jabali and Rama; that Jabali lost his case and admitted that atheism was wrong; that
Vedic values are worth following and that there is no truth beyond what Rama said. If Rama did
not have the authority to tell Bharata to punish Jabali, Jabali would have won the case in this
debate and Rama would have shut his mouth and kept quiet.
As the conditions in society change, the capacity to think among people increases due to many
experiences. They incline toward rationalism. The ruling class does not like this trend because it
will benefit if people hold superstitious beliefs. Hence, newer and newer scenes attacking rationalists creep into the old religious texts. Or, the priests, scholars and such like who preach the
religious texts keep opposing new knowledge during their sermonizing to people.
Subsequent to the emergence of Buddhism and after it attracted people, some sargas had newly
appeared in Valmikis Ramayana in order to prevent the disease of atheism. Likewise, now, there
is a need for some more sargas to intrude in order to prevent the disease of socialism. This time,
there will be a heated discussion between Rama and a revolutionary pundit on the question of
class distinctions, class consciousness, and Russia-China differences. Dont say that Marx was
not present during Ramas time! Buddha was also not there during Ramas time, for that matter! It
is not necessary. Rama can say anything. If a discussion on Socialism is held, Rama would say,
What is this stink of classes? Vedas did not say anything about this? Marx is a thief. How did
king Dasaratha believe and appoint you who is propagating the teachings of Marx like a
revolutionary in his court? I will no longer tolerate this terrible thing. Then he would look at
Bharata with a warning, This man is a class enemy. Send him away quickly from this world. The
poet will write that our revolutionary pundit got frightened and changed his views. Our scholar
would really be frightened since he has been addicted to the luxuries of the royal court. My boy
Rama! I talked so, to make you come back to the kingdom. I too do not have any belief in class
struggle. I have a lot of hatred for those who talk of class consciousness. The Vedic values alone
are undoubtedly worth practising. Karma (deeds in the previous birth) alone regulates human
beings. The other worlds alone is truth.., our scholar will become a revisionist and save his
life. Therefore, all our bourgeois poets have the responsibility to interpolate such a scene as soon
as possible in order to divert people from socialism.
236
124. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 110, slokas 1 & 2: Vasishta is convincing Rama that Jabali is
innocent and not an atheist.
125. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 110, sloka 3: According to Vasishta, god (Brahma) was born when
water and earth were ready! Will the god not feel angry with Vasishta since he put him at the end!
237
126. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 4: All the sages are very particular that Rama must kill
Ravana. Plans with regard to killing Ravana had been going on much before and even without
reference to the incident of Surpanakha. This is the actual plan!
238
Ayodhya. If the boons given to Kaika are nullified Dasaratha can not be at peace in heaven,
you know! They cautioned.
Everybody was silent.
Rama thought deeply. Definitely my reputation will die, if I go to Ayodhya now, after so
much restraint. Here.not having an iota of
difficulty with Lakshmanas serviceSitas
obedienceEvery thing is all right. Moreover,
with the deliberations made with the sages
means of killing Ravana are known. By violating fathers command, it is inevitable to move
far from truthful worlds. It will happen not just
in my fathers but in my case too. The forest life
seems to be the best by all means. After all,
how long is fourteen years?
Ramas heart felt somewhat relieved. Saluting Vasishta, Rama said, Sage! Pardon me! I
cannot violate my fathers command. I can not
come to Ayodhya abandoning this forest life.
Let the worlds go topsy-turvy, let oceans dry
up, let air be stand still, let light leave moon, I
am not a son who will disobey my fathers command, he stated clearly and remained silent.
Everybody heaved a sigh of relief.
Every body began talking aloud, praising
Rama.
We have known Rama from the beginning
Where can one find a son like Rama in
this world?
There will not be such a one even in future
Did my son ever listen to my word?
Between us, tell me have you ever obeyed
your father?
Why sinful words, I have not obeyed him
Then what more is there left to say? Such
is your family tradition!
Guha felt remorse for not having understood Rama properly till then. You are a worthy son of that father! He had tears in his eyes.
All sages in one voice praised Rama and
Bharata. Ah! Both are duty bound. Both are
truthful. Dasaratha has two excellent sons.
127
They looked at them with beaming faces.
Lakshmana felt slighted. Satrughna bowed
his head, unable to see Lakshmanas face.
Rama felt very satisfied. Would he get so
much fame if he had gone back to kingdom?
Would his paternal obedience have got so much
publicity? If he went, he too would have been
on a par with the other kings in the world.
Kaikeyi had done him good. That is why his
greatness was becoming so popular in the
world.
That night passed with every body prais128
ing Rama.
Kausalya sat in the darkness and wept continuously.
127. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 3: All the sages said that Dasaratha had attained piety
by giving birth to Rama and Bharata. Thus they praised only Rama and Bharata because they are
would be kings. There was no one who looked at the faces of Lakshmana and Satrughna.
128. It would have been appropriate if Rama had given all those royal sermons which he began
as soon as Bharata had stepped into the hut during the night or the next day, wouldnt it have?
When he first met Bharata, he should have enquired about his father. He should have talked
about the kingdom after wailing, bathing and offering food to the dead father. He should have
finished telling Bharata that he wouldnt come to Ayodhya. Then he should have given all those
royal sermons for the safety of Bharata since it was Bharata who had to rule the kingdom. Had he
said it in this order, it would have been appropriate in the context. Rama caught hold of Bharata
cleverly thinking that Bharata would perhaps go to sleep! Poor felow, Bharata!
239
Whhat! Whom?
Us. Who else?
Enough! I better leave the country, instead
of living there shamelessly when shoes rule
Dont call them shoes. Call them Padukas
(holy sandals)
What? If they are mentioned in Sanskrit
do they cease to be shoes?
Even if they are Padukas will any body
hang them from their neck instead of wearing
them on the feet? Tell me if you will not go
away? Well go to Guhas kingdom
I wont. You too wont go. Home and
hearth, cattle and chattel where can we go
leaving them all! What if Rama sits on the throne
or his shoes sit there, or they place a boulder
on it? All is the same. Nothing will come to us.
Well said. It is also true. By the by where
will Bharata sit?
I dont know. Let us see
At another place the people whispering
were discussing. How, in fact, did Rama agree
to give up his shoes? He said fathers command,
fathers command. What does it mean? What is
the difference if he ascends the throne or places
his article on it keeping it under his control?
Are both not the same? He should not in fact
give his shoes to Bharata.
Does it mean he has kept the kingdom
under his control?
What is that? Does his consent not mean
keeping it under his control? Should he not
bluntly tell his brother you are the king. You
have to rule. I wont accept anything of mine to
rule the kingdom?
Then, come on, you may ask Rama.
The emotional man retraced and scratched
his head. If he asks Rama that his head wont
remain in its place, will it?
Bharata placed the sandals on a golden
platter, sprinkled flowers on them, placed it on
129. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, slokas 21 & 24: Bharata is saying how these sandals protect
the people.
130. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 22: Rama, without any opposition to putting his sandals
on the throne, put his feet in the sandals and removed them.
240
hand over the entire kingdom to these holy sandals, so saying he was about to bow his head,
but restrained lest the platter fall down.
Rama with a serious smile said, Well my
boy! You will be blessed. Your fraternal devotion is great. There is no brother in all the worlds
to out do you. You will get fame for the Raghu
dynasty (by carrying shoes!). Ruling a kingdom is very difficult, you know! Rule the kingdom carefully with the assistance of the ministers and priests. None should have it in his mind
that your mother has done such a wicked thing
owing to her selfishness, lowering his tone,
Be careful with the kingdom! Just keep a watch
on the ministers. Appoint three spies on each.
Every time treasuries, mints, army.
Jerking with fear Bharata said, Yes sir, yes
sir! Every thing you have preached I remember, this time holding the platter firmly, he saluted. I shall wait for 14 years for your return.
If you dont return on the next day after the
completion of this exile I shall jump into fire and
132
sacrifice myself.
Rama shook his head solemnly.
131. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 19: Why should Rama, who tells Bharata to pardon
Kaika, describe her deed as some thing done due to greed or affection or bad thought. The actual
intention is to tell him, Dont forget! But it appears to the world as if he has pardoned Kaika!
132. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 25: Bharata was crazy not just a little as a neem seed but
on a large scale.
133. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 112, sloka 29: Bharata kept those shoes on the head of an
excellent elephant. Sarga 113, sloka 1: Placing the pair of wooden sandals of Rama on his
head, Bharata accompanied by Satrughna, ascended the chariot. The poet is not able to decide
where to keep those sandals either on the head of the elephant or Bharatas head or separate
the two and keep one on the elephant and another on Bharata. He wrote in two ways!
241
242
243
134. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 116, all slokas: The leaving of sages making signs, Rama doubting
Sita and Lakshmana, an old sage reporting about Kharas arrival, finally the departure of sages
from that place These are the incidents in this sarga. Especially, sages say (in slokas 10 and
13), the Rakshasas are harassing us because of you. Their harassment has increased after your
arrival here! In sloka 22, they say, You are with your wife. However valorous you may be, it will
be difficult for you to protect your wife. You also leave this hermitage! In sloka 23: Rama, with
counter-arguments, could not stop the sages who were talking so and leaving! This means, the
sages had no faith that Rama could protect them from the Rakshasas. Is this single incident not
enough for Rama not to be able to lift his head because of the shame?
244
house.
Rama grasped the facial expressions of
Lakshmana and said, Lakshmana! All these
surroundings are spoiled with the dung of
horses and elephants when Bharata came, you
see! It is not good to live in a place like this.
Apart from that, Bharata and my mothers continuously remind me of their visit here. Thinking of their visit and squatting in the hut, their
sorrow ringing in my ears cause me pain. So
saying that self-controlled man had tears in his
eyes.
Lakshmana could not bear his brothers
agony. Brother, sir! Dont feel sad. Today we
can go some where, leaving this place. I can
make arrangements anywhere within moments
as long as I have energy. We shall start now.
Lakshmana went inside the hut and placed the
bundle of saris, wicket and basket out.
Journey again! Sita was surprised. It
caused a lot of despair to Sita. There is a Ponna
tree at the landing place on the shore of the
river, which Lakshmana planted recently. That
is very charming, dense and looks like a doll.
Sita would bathe in that place, dry her hair under the tree and return home. Near the hut, at
the foot of the mountain were flowering plants.
Sita knew at once whenever a new flower blossomed. The trees were familiar to Sita like the
faces of people. The birds that built nests in
the mango tree near the hut were quite familiar
to Sita. The evenings when they made a noise
with their cries, Sita felt happy all through. During the afternoon a fawn would come jumping
from the trees, skip in the yard, and slip away
when she tried to catch it.
Sita would throw some blades of grass at
the porch and stand watching, that fawn had
been coming for four days jumping and roaming about in the rooms also. Once the fawn
moved behind Sita and chomped the sari ends
wetting the sari. From tomorrow it would search
these rooms!
135. So long as a man lives in Chitrakuta, he devotes himself entirely to virtuous acts and
never sets his mind on sin, said Bharadwaja, didnt he? But, while in Chitrakuta, Rama entertained the sinful thought that Lakshmana was anxious to get the Kosala kingdom. Instead of
spending time on meditation just as all the sages did there, Rama began his attempts to kill
Ravana from there!
245
136. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 115, sloka 21: See Bharata himself is giving the reason why he has
given away his kingdom to Rama! I will get fourfold more fame than the kingdom, says Bharata!
This is the essence of the matter!
137. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 115, sloka 27, the last sloka: Whenever there is any matter
concerning the State which comes up or whenever the tributary kings bring great gifts, Bharata
reports the matter to the sandals and deals with it.
247
Link-2
he 2nd story ended with Bharata performing the coronation for the sandals of Rama and
ruling the kingdom. The 3rd story will begin with Surpanakhas arrival to Panchavati where Rama
started living after his departure from Chitrakuta and roaming here and there for ten years. This
link contains the story that lies between the 2nd and 3rd stories. In this link, we find Ayodhya
kanda to some extent and then Aranya kanda begins.
There are many incidents of myths in this link. We have to understand them by means of
knowledge concerning nature as well as society.
140. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 117, slokas from 5 to 13: Anasuya is said to have produced fruits
on the trees and water in the Ganges during a drought. All right, she produced it! But for whose
sake? For the sake of the gods! So, the power of meditation of any person should be in the service
of gods or sages or kings! Will not the common people suffer from drought? Why should it not
be written that Anasuya created fruits and water for all humanity? Since the poet is not concerned
with the comfort of all mankind, he would never have had that view point.
#
141. Ayodhya kanda, sarga 117, slokas 23 to 27: All devoted wives abuse other women.
Kausalya speaks the same words, Sita speaks the same words and Anasuya speaks the
>
248
some independent souls did not become devoted wives, got prepared to go to hell! Surprising! )
Feeling glad for Sitas humility, Anasuya
said, Sita! I have accumulated much penance
with me. Wish whatever you want. I shall fulfil
it.
I wish for nothing, your kindness is
enough, said Sita. (Sita who prayed to the trees
and mounds for boons, does not desire anything! It seems she does not have the idea
that Rama would be irritated if she did not ask
for any thing!)
Anasuya felt glad again. Sita! Even if you
dont ask for anything I shall grant it by myself.
I have with me a divine flower garland, ornaments, a cosmetic for smearing on the body
(Angaraga), perfume sandal. They will never
perish or wane. If you wear all these your beauty
will shine divinely. Smearing this cosmetic on
your body will give your husband pleasure,
so saying she presented them all. (Then what
about her husband? Does sage Atri enjoy that
flour basket like head with gray hair? Having
all the material that would preserve youthfulness eternally with her, having the power of
performing supra-mundane activities with her,
why did not she overcome old age?)
Sita took those articles.
Then Anasuya asked, Tell me about how
you chose your husband (swayamvara)! I wish
to hear about it.
Sita narrated in this manner: King Janaka
was ruling the city of Mithila as per the rules
ordained. Once when the king was ploughing
in the field in the course of his sacrificial act
(yagna), I was found. (When asked to narrate
about groom selection, Sita took it up from
her birth!) Then a heavenly voice said, Oh,
King Janaka! She is your daughter! She is your
daughter! Since king Janaka was childless, he
> same words. These women did not know that devotion to their husbands meant slavery to
men. Right from the cradle and their mothers lullabies they are injected with the poison of this
virtuousness. Growing up in interior chambers, their bodies became weak and minds polluted
with slavery. They remain chaste and again inject that poison into their infants along with a
mixture of castor oil and breast milk, lullabies and morals. A chaste wife is one who, being a
#
living corpse herself, moulds more such living corpses.
Link-2
took me gladly home and gave her to his first
wife.
(Still how many more wives! We may estimate upto 300. Because, he was a king to compete with Dasaratha. Dasaratha too did not
have any offspring for a long time, in spite of
having had so many wives. The same was the
case with this king too. So great were their
pious actions!)
She reared me like a mother. Then I attained puberty. Even if it were the Lord of the
gods (Indra), if he is the father of a girl child, he
will get the scorn of near and dear and outsiders. (See how mean it is to beget a girl! Then
how much meaner it is for a girl to feel that her
birth is base!) My father felt like a rudderless
canoe in the sea of sorrow and then thought of
announcing for the selection of a groom
(swayamvara). There were a bow and quivers
with countless arrows which Varuna had given
to my father. It was very heavy. (The bow came
from Devarata, they had said earlier. Now Sita
tells differently.)
My father invited all the kings and announced, I shall give my daughter in marriage
to the archer who can lift this bow. (Then this
becomes the demonstration of a persons
strength; how can it be called the selection of
Sita of her own accord?)
All the kings failed to lift it and returned.
Later, after a long time Rama and Lakshmana
249
(With this ends Ayodhya kanda in Valmikis Ramayana. For that matter, Aranyas (forests) came into the scene long ago. Then what is this Ayodhya kanda so far?)
them looked at Sita crazily and in the meanwhile remembered we are sages and looked
at Rama and Lakshmana.
Sages! We are king Dasarathas. began Lakshmana reciting the same account. Hearing all that, the sages looked at Rama with pleasure! (Thinking that, even though not now, after 14 years he will become the king, anyway!)
Rama! King means a one fourth part of
Indra! (What an exact calculation!) A king is
powerful, either in the forest or on the throne.
You alone have to protect us. The Rakshasas
are harassing us in many ways. We have the
ability to curse the Rakshasas (Lest it should
250
142. Aranya kanda, sarga 2, slokas 21, 22: While talking to his father Rama said, I will leave
Sita for your sake. Now he says, I did not feel so sad when my father died. This is nothing but
prattling. Whatever characteristic society has, this ideal man too has it! See Rama weeping with
tears flowing and Lakshmana chiding him! They knew well, before setting out on the exile, that
Rakshasas, tigers, lions, snakes would throw them into danger, did not they? Why are they
kicking up a rumpus now as if some thing unforeseen has happened? When the Rakshasa was
abducting Sita, he should have saved her at once. Was it the time and situation to revile Kaika
and praise himself? For that matter, if the Rakshasa lifted Sita up even in the presence of Rama,
wouldnt that be a situation ridiculing Ramas heroism? A Rakshasa might have pounced on Sita
when she was bathing alone in a river, or at night when the three of them were tired and asleep.
Then he could have walked off with Sita. Rama, seeing the Rakshasa from a distance, should run
behind him.
#
Link-2
Oh! He has put his arm round her waist,
Rama, the hero of heroes, bewailed in a benumbed manner, helpless. (So it was the touch
of an outsider, even if a terrible and fearful
Rakshasa had carried away her! It might be a
hue and cry even if a male lion had dragged
her.)
On seeing his brothers grief Lakshmana
got indignation. Frowning with some vexation,
Brother, sir, why do you get so much perplexed? You are a very great hero, not an ordinary man! Arent I with you? When danger
envelops, why bewail like a coward? I shall see
the end of this Rakshasa. My grudge against
Bharata who demanded the kingdom is still
there. I shall show all that vengeance on this
143
Rakshasa.
(Lakshmana had always been angry with
Bharata. That his brother treats Bharata superior to himself. For that he should be angry
with Rama, why should he be angry at
Bharata?)
Lakshmana threw the baggage angrily afar
and looked at the Rakshasa mockingly and
roared loudly, Who are you, Rakshasa? (As if
he could find no way to do any thing, unless
the identity is not known!)
Who are you, first tell me that, Viradha
roared like a thunder.
Rama obediently narrated the details.
Ours is the Ikshvaku dynasty! We are
Kshatriyas! (Why all these details instead of
fighting with the Rakshasa. If a tiger pounces
on him, would he tell, we are Kshatriyas!)
Who are you and why do you roam in these
Dandakaranya junglesIf you tell us a bit.
Rama was mumbling, in front of that Rakshasa.
(For that matter the Rakshasa should have
asked Rama, Why do you wander in these forests?)
Viradha said carelessly, I have already told
251
143. Aranya kanda, sarga 2, sloka 25: I shall throw my anger on Bharata who demanded the
kingdom on Viradha, says Lakshmana. They did not believe that Bharata had not demanded the
kingdom! They still had wrath against Bharata who had sacrificed all his empire and sat beside the
throne in a lion cloth, renouncing all pleasures! Even after taking away the sandals with reverence, Rama is reviling Kaika and Lakshmana is reviling Bharata. How is it justified? Did not the
poet have the sense that it would demean those characters?
#
252
144. Aranya kanda, sarga 3, slokas 14 & 24: On receiving those wounds, Viradha loosed his
hold on Sita and brandishing his spear in fury hurled himself on Rama and Lakshmana. Viradha
was carrying away those brothers. Sita is crying aloud from behind. Rama is saying thus,
Lakshmana! Let the Rakshasa carry us along the path as far as he wishes! Allow this Rakshasa
to bear us according to his whim, since he is proceeding along our way. It seems that Rama is
willing to leave Sita behind!
#
Link-2
lost the eye as the saying goes!). We heard
that sage Sarabhangas hermitage is nearby. We
shall go to that place, come on! Walk ahead. I
shall protect from the rear, he adjusted his
sword and bow.
Lakshamana went back and collected the
bundle of saris, basket and all baggage and
marched ahead.
They reached the hermitage of Sarabhanga.
This was the strange scene that appeared there:
a man of great brilliance radiating eye blinding
light rays, with silk attire, ornaments and surrounded by gods, was standing afloat in the air
without touching the ground. He was
Devendra. The chariot harnessed with horses
was also stationary being afloat in the air. Round
umbrella shining brightly also afloat in the sky
and was casting shade on Devendra. Maids
were fanning Devendra, themselves being
afloat. All around, gods were obediently worshipping him, they too being afloat. (The poet
writes this situation floating in imagination).
Thus, floating in air, Indra was talking to
Sarabhanga.
Rama had only heard about Devendra until then, but had never seen him. Lakshmana!
Both of you wait here. I shall go ahead and see
whats there, so saying Rama started.
On seeing Rama coming towards him,
Devendra said to Sarabhanga, Rama is coming here. I will not talk with him now. After killing Ravana, after his job is over, he can talk to
me, he hastily boarded the chariot afloat and
went away. (Being afloat, why is this boarding
of chariot!)
Rama approached Sarabhanga.
Sita and Lakshmana followed. (What is this
following behind when ordered to wait there?
The poet forgot that they were not to come till
Rama sent word to or called them.)
The three saluted sage Sarabhanga. Rama
with curiosity asked, Great sage! Why has
Indra come? (He was not indignant at Indra
going away on seeing him and not standing
while he (Rama) was coming.)
Shaking his beard, Sarabhanga said, My
lad! Unless one is endowed with tremendous
power of meditation, one does not get self-
253
254
145. Aranya kanda, sarga 6, sloka 24: This exile will yield great results says Rama. What
kind of results? Occupying the kingdoms of Rakshasas killing them, making them his subordinates or keeping them subdued? That is the result.
#
146. Aranya kanda, sarga 7, sloka 5: Mala panka jatadharam thrills the poet, seeing the
dust on the pate of the sage. May be it was a sort of meditation that did not experience the sight
of water at any time. So the more the dirt piles on the hair, the greater will be the punya! Is it sin
if the hair is clean?
#
Link-2
has to earn piety on his own good actions, but
can he take it if others give it to him. The poet
collects piety from all and piles them up for
Rama, obviously for victory in the coming
battle.)
This hermitage is very good, my lad! You
get fruits in all seasons. There are many sages
here. But there is some menace of wild animals.
They frequently come and disturb the meditation, for none is there to frighten them. But for
this, there is no other problem.
Rama did not like the fact that there were
wild animals in that place. Who could encounter them day in and day out? Great sage, I do
not like this place If I go on killing wild animals
with the string of my bow resounding fiercely,
the peace of this place will be disturbed. That is
not to my liking, so saying, he wound up the
conversation.
That night they spent there. At day break
Rama said, We shall visit the hermitages of
other sages also and set off. Some sages accompanied them too.
Sita got a chance of talking to her husband.
She had been displeased with her husbands
attitude for a long time. With some boldness,
she said, My lord! The great sins of this world
are lying, being amorous of other women, doing violence without enmity. You never lie, so
the first sin does not touch you. (Sita was a
witness to Rama telling many a lie. For example, saying that he eats roots and herbs only,
though taking meat). You are not enamoured
of other women, so the second sin too does
not touch you. (Fearing that her husband may
take interest in other women, Sita resolutely
says, You will never do that sin!) Now, the
third sin why injure without enmity? Sages
praise you greatly that you are superior to
Lakshmana in respect of detachment. Then it
is not proper to swear to kill Rakshasas, who
have not harmed you. This does not seem to
me proper. The ignorant and foolish people practise violence donning the garb of fierceness as
a vice. It is not justifiable even to enter a forest
147. Aranya kanda, the whole of sarga 9, especially slokas, 9, 13, 27:
We can see what Sita asked Rama.
255
256
gladly whatever rule of conduct I follow without any hesitation. Do you understand that?
148
He saw cautiously rebuking her.
All the points raised by Sita are logical.
Rama answered none. Sita questioned, What
is this Kshatriya duty, when you came prepared
to live the life of a sage? Rama did not answer
that. Rama says, I have given my word to the
sages. But why should that assurance be
given at all in the first place? is Sitas question. His Kshatriya commitment lapsed when
he promised his father that he would live for
14 years as a sage. Was it not only later that
he gave an assurance to the sages? Kill
Rakshasas and protect us - would any sage
ask of another sage? Even if asked him would
that other sage agree to do that? Rama too is
also claiming that he is a sage, isnt he? I have
promised my father. I have to lead the life of a
sage. I have no right to follow the Kshatriya
duty. - Rama ought to tell them, oughtnt he?
Moreover he is bullying Sita, Shall I ever back
out my promise? Shall I ever cross the path of
Truth? Sita argues, Meditation on the one
hand and the duty of a Kshatriya on the other.
These two are contradictory. This contradiction will not disappear just because Rama bullied.
The poet made Sita ask critical questions
that would possibly be raised against Ramas
character. But finally the poet dismissed her
reasoning by making Rama say, You are my
dutiful companion. You have to accept whatever I do. Since Sita is his dutiful companion
she is fated to accept whatever Rama did, but if
some one else had asked the same questions?
Someone like Guha asks, You say you are a
sage, your father has commanded you to lead
the life of a sage. Then why do you agree to
fight with the Rakshasas? Why dream about
killing Ravana? What would Rama say?
Then there would be no chance to escape saying, You are my dutiful wife, conduct yourself
as per my will and shut their mouths. Then
148. Aranya kanda, sarga 10, slokas 9 & 12: Rama might leave Sita even! Might leave Lakshmana
even! But never would abandon truth! It was known what might happen if he had abandoned
Lakshmana for a day! What would his Lordship have eaten?
#
Link-2
ing the music playing drums, lyres and cymbals. That is this music now. (So all of them
are in the lake now, like frogs in water!)
Rama widened his eyes and wondered, So,
there may be such things too.
After that they went to the hermitage of
sages nearby. They stayed there for a long
time. From there they visited the hermitages of
sages they were acquainted with --- for ten
149
years.
(Lakshmanas bundle became ligh during
that ten year period.)
Again they returned to the hermitage of
Sutikshana. After spending some time there
Rama asked Sutikshana, I have heard that sage
Agastya lives here some where in this forest. I
do not know that place, where is he? I shall
offer my obeisance to him also. (For 10 long
years Rama did not know the hermitage of
Agastya! Shame! Shame! Nobody told him
about it! Rama had that much influence!)
Sutikshana is pleased and said, Rama! I
myself wanted to tell you! You have asked yourself. Go south a distance of four coss (yojanas).
There you will find the hermitage of Agastyas
younger brother sage Sudarshana. From there
you can reach the hermitage of Agastya. Now,
hurry up. He hastened Rama. (So sages also
find it embarrassing, if relations stay on for
long, without anything to do. That is why he
hastened them to start at once!)
Rama set off again. On the way he narrated
the story of Agastya to Laskshmana.
Lakshmana! Once upon a time two Rakshasa
brothers lived in this area. They were called
Ilvala and Vatapi. Ilvala used to invite Brahmins for the ancestral annual ceremonies in the
guise of a Brahmin, speaking in Sanskrit. He
used to serve a meal to the Brahmins, killing
Vatapi who he would transform into a goat (So
257
149. Aranya kanda, sarga 11, slokas 25, 26: Ten years time of exile was over in two slokas. The
period spent in hermitages is counted as a month, month and a half, year, eleven months, four
months, three months because in each line of the sloka words suitable for rhyme should be
used, Masa, dasama masa, charuto masa, teen masa, shadzamasa and so on. 10 years rolled
by, concluded the poet. Rama had been carrying out the task of ending the menace of the
Rakshasas.
#
258
150. Aranya kanda, sarga 11, sloka 88: Rama says that he will spend the remaining exile period
in the hermitage of Agastya. But see, where he spent that period.
#
Link-2
friend of your father.
Rama came forward by a step, bowed to
the bird hesitantly and said, Reveal your caste
and gotra clearly. (We are far better. We ask
the castes of humans only!)
The bird narrated the origins of all kinds of
animals, besides revealing to him its own caste
in this way. Rama there were many Prajapatis
(creators) once upon a time. Among them
Daksha prajapati had 6 daughters. From among
them Kasyapa married 8 and said, Procreate
heroes like me (Give birth to offspring is also
a command). Among those women Aditi, Diti,
Kalika and Danu obeyed the command of their
husband more. Aditi gave birth to twelve
Adityas, eight Vasus, eleven Rudras and Aswini
gods. Diti had Rakshasas. Danu produced a
son Aswagriva. Kalika gave birth to sons called
Naraka and Kalika. These four were concerned
about the husbands dictum.
The remaining four were not bothered and
gave birth to swans, hawks, lions and tigers.
They procreated monkeys, baboons, cows,
horses and serpents. One wife gave birth to a
daughter called Nata. Natas daughter was
Vinata. Another wife called Manu gave birth to
the human race like Brahmana, Kshatriya,
Vaisya and Sudra. (Oh! So Brahmins and Sudras
are brothers born of the same womb!) One wife
gave birth to fruiting trees. One gave birth to
Adisesha (Primeval serpent). (If the listener is
Rama, stories are of this fashion!) Rama! Vinata
had sons named Garuda and Aruna. Aruna is
my father. (Vinatas mother had no respect for
her husbands word. That is, this birds grandmother was not a devoted wife!) I am known
as Jatayu. If you trust my words, I shall come
along with you. This forest is ferocious. When
you and Lakshmana go hunting I shall protect
Sita, said Jatayu.
Rama felt greatly relieved. Embraced Jatayu
and asked him to come along.
Rama entered Panchavati with the determined intention of killing Rakshasas.
259
260
261
Story-3
itting in the hut, Rama was telling stories to Sita. Surpanakha, who had seen the handsome personality of Rama on an earlier occasion, was enamoured of him and has now come
to his hut.
Her appearance: an ugly face, disgusting
gaze, a huge stomach, copper coloured hair, terrifyingly hoarse voice, old age, distorted
speech and crooked limbs!
Ramas appearance: most handsome face,
long arms, narrow waist, wide eyes, serene voice
and traditional mannerisms.
Looking at Rama, Surpanakha came closer
to him. Who are you? You are in the attire of a
sage. Carrying bow and arrows. (He carries bow
and arrows even he was home narrating stories!) Why have you come here?, she asked.
Being an honest man, he narrated everything: about his birth, Sitas birth, his exile to
forest due to the treachery of his step-mother.
(He told everything but concealed the fact that
he had come to Panchavati for the purpose of
killing the Rakshasas and of his plans to kill
Ravana! Honest man, indeed!)
After telling her about himself, Rama asked
her, You look ugly. You appear to be a
Rakshasa. Who are you? Which tribe do you
belong to? Who are your parents? (He asked
her for ten times more than what he had told
her. Leisurely conversation with a Rakshasa!
What, then, is frightening in that Rakshasa!
This means, one need not spring into action
immediately and shoot arrows at the sight of
Rakshasas to kill them as one would lions or
snakes. It also means, one could allow them to
sit beside him and engage in an easy conversation!)
The Rakshasa said, Rama! I am a Rakshasa
262
154. To examine the point whether Rama had wives other than Sita, we have seen in the episode
in which Manthara appeared. Here Rama tells Surpanakha, My wife is with me. This means, he
does not have other wives. Lakshmana also says to Surpanakha, Be a younger wife of Rama.
This means, Rama had no wife other than Sita. Therefore, there is no evidence even in this context
to infer that Rama had other wives besides Sita.
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
Link-3
he rd story ends with the cutting off of the nose and ears of Surpanakha by Lakshmana
at the orders of Rama. The th story begins with Surpanakha going to Ravana. This link
represents that part which connects stories 3 and 4.
156. We will find Surpanakhas past in Uttara kanda. sarga 23, slokas 18,19; sarga 24, slokas
35 to 44: Khara is the son of Surpanakhas mothers younger sister. In the past, Ravana had
conquered many territories and kept Khara, with some army, as his royal representative at a place
called Janasthan in Dandakaranya. Ravana, in a war he had waged in the past, had intentionally
killed Vidyujihwa, husband of Surpanakha. Later, when Surpanakha was grieving, Ravana had
consoled her that he would take care of her without any dearth for anything and had asked her to
live in Janasthan. Since then Surpanakha had been living in Janasthan. Khara had been looking
after her with affection. Surpanakha was destroyed by both Ravana and Rama. Ravana had killed
her husband; Rama had had her limbs severed.
157. Aranya kanda, sarga 19, slokas 14 to 16; sarga 34, sloka 11: Whatever she reported to
Khara, Surpanakha said it praising Rama and Lakshmana. Richly endowed with
comelinesshaving large lotus-like eyesself-controlled, practising austerities and continence,
there are two brothers, Rama and Lakshmana. I was spared, after disgracing me, by the highsouled Rama, who hesitated to kill a woman. Ravana, even while he is angry at Rama, also says,
I will kill that great man! This is the poets talent of portraying a character. The poet does not at
all pay attention to things like how a character ought to speak and when one should praise or
abuse his enemy. The poet may have devotion for Rama. Even his readers may have it. But,
enemies have hatred and will be zealous to abuse, slay and kill Rama. The poet ought to show
things like that.
Another point: According to Valmiki, Surpanakha did not tell either Khara or Ravana that she
had asked Rama to marry her. But, while the battle was taking place between Rama and Ravana
and when people fighting on behalf of Ravana were being killed, women in Lanka lamented thus,
Alas! Why should Surpanakha at all have had infatuation for Rama? Why did she create all
these difficulties for us? (Yuddha kanda, sarga 95, slokas 7 to 9). It is clear from this that all
people in Lanka knew that Surpanakha had asked Rama to marry her. I, therefore, have written
here that Surpanakha had narrated everything to her brothers without concealing any thing from
them.
276
158. In religious literature, it is a custom to describe some good or bad omens depending on the
nature of the scene. As it was a period when humans had not acquired scientific knowledge
concerning nature, people in the feudal society believed in omens every moment. In literature, the
poet depicts good omens in the case of the characters that he defends and bad omens in the case
of characters that he opposes. On certain occasions, he describes a good omen if the future
action might yield a good result and a bad omen if it will yield a bad result.
159. Aranya kanda, sarga 24, sloka 13: It would have been alright, had Rama said, I am
ordering you! Instead, he says, My feet are ordering you! Ramas feet are worthy of worship
even for Rama himself. Rama thinks, Aha! These are the feet of Sri Ramachandra! Self-praise
like this is like saluting ones own feet!
Link-3
Lakshmana, accompanied by Sita, went into
a cave and was guarding the entrance. Rama
wore a shield, tied his sword to his waist and
was ready to use his bow. (Aha! Sage!)
Kharas army sprang into action. A fierce
battle began. Although fourteen thousand
Rakshasas surrounded him from all sides and
dumped swords, large axes, wheels, iron cabbed
heavy clubs and pestles on Rama, he felled them
very easily. Moreover, he slew the entire
Rakshasa army cutting into pieces their
horses and warriors on the horses, elephants
and the warriors on their backs, the elephant
drivers, chariots, the commanders and the
chariot drivers breaking their shoulders,
thighs, backs, waists, necks and heads into
pieces and fought the battle.
He threw a hundred arrows on a group of
hundred enemies, a thousand arrows on a group
of thousand and five thousand arrows on a
group of five thousand and killed them. (That
is, first he counts the number of enemies and
then counts the arrows!)
Gods and the best among Brahmins
watched the battle with great joy from the sky.
(It would be nice if the Rakshasas had thrown
a couple of swords up into the sky!)
Rama was fighting with a sword in one hand
and throwing arrows with the other! (Dont believe, dirty lies!)
277
160. Aranya kanda, sarga 25, slokas 29 to 31: See fleeing away of soldiers, good words of
the commander, soldiers springing into battle again with enthusiasm! Good words mean charging
their emotions: We have to be really courageous at this moment. The king will give rewards to
those who fight well. Even if you lay down your life in this battle, you will get martyrdom. Come
on, move! Victory or martyrdom! Though the methods of war change according to the times, this
is what they always teach the soldiers.
278
Now only Khara remained. Though he hesitated for a while, he jumped into the battle. Soon,
he lost his chariot, chariot driver, weapons and
stood on the battle ground.
Rama said with pride, By the kings order
I came down here to kill vile and base fellows
like you who torture great sages and innocent
people. You will also follow the path of your
army. Saying so, he began to fight using the
Vaishnava bow which sage Agasthya had given
161
him.
Khara routed a big tree and fought with it.
Rama destroyed that tree into small pieces.
Now, you are finished. All your wives are now
deprived of pleasures. When you die, all the
Brahmins will be safe. Saying so, he showered arrows on him again.
Khara also died. (When the poet, gods and
the best of the Brahmins are on the side of
Rama, can Rama die?)
All those in the sky were overwhelmed with
joy showered a rain of flowers eulogizing Rama.
They played on heavenly drums. Rama! Once
Indra had come to Sarabhangas hermitage to
discuss with the sages plans for killing these
Rakshasas. We called you to this place with an
intention to make you do this job. Bravo! You
162
[Translation: B. R. Bapuji]
161. Aranya kanda, sarga 29, sloka 10: Rama says he is on the mission to establish dharma
(justice) in the world by the orders of Bharata, the king. This he tells more clearly before Vali.
Whereas Bharata, on the other hand, says that Rama is the king and he rules the kingdom as
Ramas representative. Here, this gentleman says he is acting as per Bharatas instructions.
Ramas sword is double edged!
162. Aranya kanda, sarga 30, slokas 30, 31: Rama came to this place only to fight against
Rakshasas. It is only because of Surpanakhas visit, that this battle began, isnt it? This means,
Rama made use of Surpanakhas visit as a pretext while he was waiting for the battle with the
Rakshasas.
279
Story-4
280
Plan? Are you still thinking of a plan instead of waging a battle to kill Rama? A king
who does not accomplish things hastening to
the situation will forego his kingdom and become worthless like a blade of grass, they say.
A blade of grass, dust and rubble too might be
of use, but a king losing his kingdom will come
to nothing however great a hero and efficient
he might be, they say. Knowing fully the damage Rama has done to you and the humiliation
he has caused your sister, are you still thinking
of a plan? Are you faltering to fight and kill
163
him?
Dont be hasty! You yourself say that he
is a hero.
Are you not a hero who excels him?
Brother, my heart burns for revenge against
Rama. Go at once and kill that vile man.
Dont be hasty. I shall make Rama one
equal to a dead man, alright?
No, that wicked fellow must die.
Right, leave that to me. Dont worry!
I stop worrying only when you tell me that
you have killed Rama and his brother.
O dear innocent sister! You seem to doubt
my valour! See how the whole of my body is
shaped with scars and bumps, because of many
battles and fights! See how hard these hands
have become by the perfect show of strength!
Ravana showed his palms, thighs and shoulders, which were like rocks.
Then, why do you work out plans instead
of fighting with Rama heroically?
You innocent girl! Plans are also part of
the fight. Do you think war is clashing with
swords alone? Any act that deceives the enemy is also battle? Ravana was immersed in
thought.
Surpanakha looked at him displeased and
163. Aranya kanda, sarga 33, slokas 17 to 19: Surpanakha cautions Ravana. A kings power
does not lie in his individual heroism and individual ability. It is in the wealth called kingdom. It
lies in the power that comes from his position. This is the essence of the matter.
164. Aranya kanda, sarga 36, slokas 18, 19: We have to convert the myth that Maricha turned
into a deer into reality. I have, however, retained certain of these myths. If we convert this into
reality, it means Maricha helped Ravana in some way to abduct Sita.
281
165. Aranya kanda, sarga 40, sloka 5: Ravana is deriding Ramas coming to the forests at the
word of a woman as unmanly. Ravana also had a poor view of women, as Rama had. Obeying ones
fathers command or another mans order was not objectionable to either. The entire humiliation
was studded in following a womans word.
166. Aranya kanda, sarga 40, sloka 12: Ravana also holds the idea that a king has the qualities
of a god, as Rama does. This is a propaganda which preaches people that a king is great, to be
worshipped and not to be defied and this makes the people obedient to the king in their minds
voluntarily. Any king of any country does the same.
282
167. Aranya kanda, sarga 40, slokas 23, 25: Ravana offered Maricha half of the kingdom. He
said he would kill him if he did not do the job he had asked. Will he give a half of the kingdom to a
servant? From this we can understand how kings get their things done being so vile, tyrannical
and by making false promises.
283
168. Aranya kanda, sarga 43, sloka 4: Lakshmana says, Maricha himself came in the guise of
a deer. But Rama does not know that. It is surprising that a half god does not know the thing
which half-quarter and half god knows!
169. Aranya kanda, sarga 43, slokas 9, 15, 16:
I shall play with that deer. We can take it to Ayodhya says Sita. Bharata will also appreciate
it, she said. They remember Bharata for everything since he is the royal representative and is in
high position. None mentions Satrughna any where.
284
Sita mused.
It seemed her desire displeased her husband. It was clear that he could not catch it alive.
If she asked, Get the deer without shooting it
with an arrow. Otherwise I do not want it and if
the deer escapes? A situation might develop
when her husband might feel disgraced. If she
said, be it so, I do not want that deer? Then it
might suggest a different meaning. All the while
I was eager for it, exultant for it but now I am
giving up my desire because you can not get
it. So, it is neither possible to give up her desire nor to ask to get the deer without injuring it.
In fact, it is a fault on the part of loyal women to
make such requests to their husbands. Then is
not wishing for impracticable things much more
so? She should never do such a thing. She
should request her husband to get in whatever
way he can. Then a situation when he cannot
fulfil her desire will never arise, will it?
Pointing out the deer with great desire, Sita
said See it has come into the sun. Look, how
bright its hide is shining! All my longing is for
its hide. If it cannot be caught alive, it is
enoughif you get its hide. It will be very nice
if we put it on dharmasanam, an elevated seat
and sit on it. Sages visiting our hermitage every
171
day will appreciate it, she said smiling.
Lakshmana looked at Sita with amazement.
Many a time, Sitas attitude was beyond comprehension to Lakshmana in many aspects.
285
172. For Rama, who finds good or bad omens every now and then, there was no omen when he
set out for this deceitful deer. Why? Because if they had appeared, should they not have been ill
omens? If it had happened that way, Rama should not have gone out, should he? Then the story
will not proceed, will it? So the esteemed poet avoided describing omens here. But, while Rama was
returning all omens appeared. (Because, by then, the abduction of Sita was over.) When do, in fact,
omens appear? Prior to an action or later?
286
173. Aranya kanda, sarga 59, sloka 11: Will Rama, who protects even the gods, ever do a
thing, which is never done by one born in a great family, of asking a woman to save him? says
Lakshmana. Then Rama, who protects the gods, should not call Lakshmana also crying out
Lakshmana! Save me!, should he? If Lakshmana says, Will Rama ask even me to protect him, we
may conclude all that is Ramas greatness. But what Lakshmana says is, Will a man ask a woman
to save him! It is a man who has to protect the woman always!
Here the affair of a great family also is present. If it is a man from an ordinary family (that is one,
not a royal family), he may ask a woman to protect him, by a slip of the tongue! A man from a high
family should never do such a thing!
174. Aranya kanda, sarga 45, slokas 24, 25: Sita is abusing Lakshmana and Bharata. In fact, ten
years earlier, Rama had assigned to Lakshmana the duty of getting a flower or a nut or anything
else which Sita asked for. Since then, Lakshmana had been attending to all those things. Lakshmana
alone had been doing many things. Then why did Lakshmana not go for that deer? What would
have happened, if Lakshmana had gone instead of Rama?
287
175. Aranya kanda, sarga 45, slokas 36, 37: Sita was saying how she would die in the absence
of Rama. See later, how long Sita lived without her husband after she said, I will not live even for
a moment without my lord
176. Aranya kanda, sarga 45, slokas 28, 29: The poet skilfully describes how base, stupid, low
and villainous women are and what terrible deeds they do. It is only to attack women that Sita was
made to utter so many words. It is to make men folk feel, Yes! What, then, is this rebuking of
Lakshmana? In the past, Rama also had abused Lakshmana many a time. You are trying to kill
Bharata; You are prattling like a base fellow! He said many things many times. Then this
esteemed poet did not make Lakshmana say a single word against Rama. Did the poet write even
once that Lakshmana had made a comment, You talk without knowing what is good and bad. You
suspect me even when I do so much drudgery! No, he did not. Now he could have kept silent at
the words of sister-in-law also. No, he did not do so. She is a woman, isnt it? Women are wicked,
arent they? That is why the poet made Lakshmana curse women.
That Lakshmana drew lines in front of the house, that he asked Sita not to cross those lines
these things are not found in Valmikis Ramayana.
288
177. Aranya kanda, sarga 46, sloka 2: Ravana came in the garb of a sage. Rama also is playing
politics in the garb of a sage. This means, the attire of a sage alone is the best suited attire either to
deceive or to conduct affairs secretly! This practice of fake sages has been a part of our great
tradition!
178. Aranya kanda, sarga 46, slokas 17 to 22: I cannot but write here how Ravana describes
the body parts of Sita because we have to discuss this point. After describing teeth, eyes and
cheeks, he continued: Beauty! You shine like the goddess Lakshmi. Your buttocks are high like
sand dunes. Your lower belly is wide and high. Your waist fits in a fist. Your thighs are like the
trunks of a fatty elephant. Your breasts are round, high and with big nipples, rubbing each other
and swing heavily like Palmyra fruits. Your breasts, covered with fine hair, shake enchantingly and
attract my mind immensely. This description stopped with this much in this scene. It is not
Ravana who beholds Sita in this disrobed fashion, it is the esteemed poet himself. Poets while
calling devoted wives every minute, Goddess Lakshmi, Goddess Parvati penetrate through
their gem necklaces, silk garments, embroidered jackets, with X-ray eyes, seeing their breasts,
shoulders, lower bellies, thighs, waists and buttocks and describe them attractively and narrate
the same to all and please them. So this is what they call a poet sees what the sun cannot!
One cannot argue that since Ravana was lustful, the poet had described Sita in this manner.
The readers do not know that there are such descriptions from the beginning of the story, since I
have left out such descriptions from these stories. It may be Lakshmana, Hanuman or even sages
who talked to Sita, the form of address would invariably be: O woman with good buttocks!
(Susroni!); O woman with good waist! (Sumadhye!).
Since this epic is written in verses, for the sake of suitability of prosody and filling in the gaps
in the peg of the verse if words like Sundari! (O beauty!), Manini! (O honorable!),
Sukesini! (O woman with good hair!) are used depending upon the context and the relationship between the characters we can understand the point to some extent. But if Lakshmana
describes Sitas thighs and Hanuman her waist we need not hesitate to call the poet names! (We
can call him with any name!)
Your thighs are fat! Your buttocks are fat! Your breasts are fat! Always this is the kind of
poetry! The body parts of women should be fat. While smacking their tongues against the palate,
making imaginary flights around the body parts of women in such forms of poetry as Kavyas and
Prabandhas, the poets and scholars prate outwardly, that great devoted wife!, that goddess
Lakshmi!. Moreover, they gave it a fake name sringar (romance)! These feudal poets grow fat
like street pigs and write this fat poetry. This is the characteristic of feudal culture. This culture
ordains women to be dependent on men and serve them by way of sex and drudgery. Hence, feudal
culture depicts women as devoted wives, objects of enjoyment and slaves engaged in
>
289
spectfully.
Ravana was in a hurry to finish the work for
which he had come. He looked at Sita seriously
and poured out smiles and said, O beautiful
woman! Your beauty is extremely enticing to me.
A delicate woman like you must saunter in cities and gardens. You must enjoy the comforts
and riches there. Ravana stood up from the
grass seat and again said with a smile, O beautiful woman! Have you ever heard of the Lord of
Lanka, Ravana? I am that Ravana! I am the one
who has conquered all the gods! I have heard
about your beauty earlier. Enchanted with that,
I have come in this guise to take you along with
me. I have abducted many beautiful women and
made them my wives. But on seeing you I have
lost my fondness for all of them. I shall take you
as my dearest wife. Come away with me at once.
Ravana walked toward Sita.
When Sita heard Ravanas words, she was
thunder struck. She could at once comprehend
the real danger even in that astonishment. She
realized that, in the absence of her husband and
when she was alone, a stranger is desirous of
her, who is a great devoted wife!
She went behind the door trembling with
fear raging with anger. You wicked fellow! You
have come in the guise of a sage and received
my hospitality. How can you talk in such a vile
manner with a woman who is alone? Who do
> drudgery. But it depicts men as heroes, capable and brave people. Though it describes
their physical features a little, it describes their qualities, abilities and strength to a great extent.
Even in bourgeois (capitalist) society, a woman does not have a respectable status. The
capitalist society, whose sole aim is commodity production, exhibits the bodies of women and
makes use of them as means of advertising for selling its commodities. That is why there is no
scope to depict women characters in bourgeois literature as characters with self-respect and
individuality.
When an awareness to detest feudal and bourgeois culture is attained, no attention should be
paid to the body parts of men and women. Women should not be viewed as sex objects. One
should recognize her individuality based on her views and way of thinking.
When a man says, You are so beautiful. Your eyesyour cheeksyour waistyour gait
and so on, women should not feel exultant. A woman should feel insulted when a man recognizes
only her body parts and physical features. When a boy says to a girl, You are very beautiful, she
should realise that he is looking at her from the sex-point of view and give him a big slap on his
cheek. If the sandal is used, it is better still!
290
thing even if you desire his wife but my husband will not let you live if you desire me.
Sita stepped back a little.
Ravana looked defiantly. You have not yet
grasped the extent of my heroism. I shall lift the
earth on my shoulder. I shall suck the oceans. I
shall kill even the goddess of death. I shall stop
even the journey of the Sun. Even if you search
all the worlds, you will find only me as a suitable
husband, so saying he put his arms around
179
Sita and held her tightly.
Sita howled in fear. She did not have even
an iota of faith in Ravanas heroism. It was her
belief that heroism of any body was equal to a
blade of grass, compared to the heroism of her
husband. But, all of a sudden she could not but
believe the violence of this stranger. Sita
wriggled to get free from him with fear and spite.
With ferocious determination, Ravana
caught hold of Sitas locks, kept his right hand
under her thighs and lifted her like a young deer.
Kicking away the grass seats and articles of
worship that were on the passage and walking
in strides, Ravana went toward the chariot, sta180
tioned behind the trees.
Realising the situation, Sita howled in fear,
Alas! Alas! Save me! Save me!
On seating himself in the chariot, Ravana
sat Sita on his thigh. The chariot moved on. Sita
wriggled to jump out of the chariot, crying without stop like one maddened.
Such a great devoted wife, who ought to
have burnt to ashes any man other than her
husband as soon as he touched her, unable to
escape from the demonic grip of a stranger, is
crying helplessly, Save me, save me! Alas! Is
there none to save me?
Some birds, which were familiar with Sita,
flew to some distance along with her, landed on
trees and looked confused.
291
Link-4
off. The 5th story begins with Rama bewailing for Sita as per tradition. This
is the link between the two stories.]
should tell him about this! (This time suspicion on Godavari also!) Sita looked around in
fear. (May be with a feeling whether these
would really inform!) Oh, birds! I am dearer
than life to my husband. If my husband comes
to know of it, he will over power this base man
and save me even though Ravana places me in
182
heaven or hell.
Bemoaning in this manner, Sita with good
buttocks (Susroni) saw Jatayu asleep on a tree
at a distance (She might have seen with her
buttocks, it appears. To see some one at a distance good buttocks are required, it seems! It
would be another thing if the poet had de183
scribed, Sita with good eyes)
Oh, Jatayu bird! This wicked Ravana is
carrying me away. Even if you pity me, there is
no use. It is not possible for you to intercept
him. This base fellow has all sorts of weapons
with him. Tell my husband this much, she cried.
(Sita says, you can not release me! It is not
possible for you! It seems, Sita fears that Jatayu
may release her! May be She is comfortable on
184
the thigh of Ravana!)
292
185. Aranya kanda, sarga 50, sloka 3: Jatayu says, I am in the duty of traditional servile
code. Duty of servility! That too traditional! What is that traditional duty of servitude? That
belongs to the system of slavery this is the point one has to understand. We can infer the past
history from such expressions in the religious stories.
186. Aranya kanda, sarga 50, slokas 6 to 8: Why does a man protect his wife? It is because of
the threat of other men. If all men desist from doing any harm to other women, there will be no
need at all to protect their wives, in the first place. It is said that a king should protect other
women, chiefly royal women. It does not matter much if others are not protected. All those
women belong to lower castes, dont they? Thus, these morals are full of contradictions in every
aspect.
187. Aranya kanda, sarga 51, sloka 18: Even in the chariot, a king has an umbrella carrier and
fanning! These attendants seem to be utter stupid, other wise should they not take to their heels
throwing away the umbrellas and fans, jumping off the chariot? Servants do not act like that.
Fanning, fanning, fanning and in that fanning (service) alone, they die for the sake of the king.
The intention here is to say that servants should perform their duty in that manner!
Link-4
lap only! Even if you fall.cant say!)
Jatayu angrily pursued him. You wicked!
Ravana! Stop there, stand there! (Unfold the
squatting posture!) Who do you think Sri
Ramachandra is? He is of the Kakutsa dynasty.
If you are a hero, fight with me and then go! so
crying Jatayu flew behind Ravana and sat on
Ravanas back with a thud. (Ugh! Too rough!)
Like a mahout, hitting a defiant elephant
with an elephant-goad, Jatayu tore Ravanas
back piercing it with his beak. (It seems Jatayu
is about to finish Ravana, leaving nothing to
Rama to kill! Are you not afraid that the story
will finish here itself?)
Jatayu tried to pluck the hair on the ten
heads of Ravana (It may be all right if the
chariot is broken, it may be all right if the
back is torn but will it look nice if the hair
are dishevelled? Wouldnt it irritate terribly?
Moreover Sita is there by his side!)
Ravana got infuriated by then (for making
the hair dishevelled! Yes, havent I said so!),
turned back to fight with Jatayu. (Jatayu was
there on his back).
Ravana, holding Sita pressed under his left
shoulder ten hands, started fighting with Jatayu
on his back with his right hands.
Jatayu, pricked the left shoulder of Ravana
with his beak again and again and removed all
the ten arms like a bunch. (Alas! Alas! Sita is
under that shoulder! What have you done
Jatayu?) The moment the bunch of arms fell
off, ten more arms came there springing like hissing snakes from a snake pit. (If it goes in this
manner, who can fight? One should die in a
battle soon. If all the limbs cut off so spring up
again, wont the other fellow feel disgraced
and helpless?)
Seeing it futile to go on like that, Ravana
placed Sita down and began fighting with
Jatayu with his legs and hands. He cut off
Jatayus wings and feet with a sword. Jatayu
fell to the ground.
293
294
189.
Aranya kanda, sarga 52, slokas 25: Sita, attached to Ravanas limbs, shone like a
golden girdle studded with sapphires so, that is the matter! Ravanas hand circling round
Sitas waist against her will what sort of a thing is this? It is a matter that her body should boil
with hatred. Even for onlookers it appears so abhorrent. The description should be, Sita shivered
in fear as if a black cobra had gripped round her waist or some other thing. But what is this
shining description? This means, when men molest women, it appears pleasing and nice to our
esteemed poet! If Sita shines beautifully because she is attached to Ravanas limbs, the sheen
should continue to be so, shouldnt it? For Sita, Ramas hand is one sapphire studded girdle;
Ravanas hand is another sapphire studded girdle! Will any one question, Why there should be
two girdles for Sita? Why only two? There is nothing wrong in any number of girdles, is it?
Link-4
attempt to kill Rama. (What are these killings,
sir? Every one has to kill his enemy himself! If
some one else kills somebodys enemies, how
190
will the story be good?)
Ravana praised the soldiers, You are great
warriors. I know about your valour from many
battles. That is why I am sending you to
Janasthana. Dont fear! Be brave! You can show
your valour, so he praised them. (So, he puffed
them up! Heroes have this puffing up besides
flying and jumping!)
The warriors left, puffed up. Ravana went
again to Sita and laughed. Sita is weeping.
Ravana, took the weeping Sita with him,
went round his chambers to exhibit his wealth
and riches. (Why did Sita accompany him? Yes,
would Ravana leave her if she had declined?
Again he would place girdle round her waist
and take her, any way!)
Thousands of women were there in the harems. (All of them have been abducted in this
fashion!) All the harems glittering brilliantly
with silver pillars, golden thresholds and steps.
The whole compound is full with big aircrafts,
small aircrafts and they had windows made of
gold. (Having so many aircrafts, will any body
board a chariot of mules, unless he is a mad
fellow?) The entire floor is paved with the powder of pearls and gems. (How will it be nice?
Wont the soles of the feet hurt while walking?)
295
190. Aranya kanda, sarga 53, slokas 22, 23: Ravana summoned soldiers said, Rama killed my
army which I had placed in Janasthana. He does not say, Rama killed our army. Rama is our
enemy. Whatever the battles may be, it is an exclusive affair of the king. They say, such and
such a king won. Such and such a king is defeated. Even if thousands of soldiers die, it is a
singular affair of the king. This is the characteristic of the feudal system.
If it is bourgeois system, this fraud will not be so open. They put on masks like our nation
and our country. They inject defence of the country to the soldiers. Soldiers do not benefit
even from bourgeois wars. It is the ruling classes that gain. Soldiers, however, have to die for the
sake of the countries and races!
191. Youth is transitory. Enjoy pleasures with me in this house, says Ravana. Some Haridasus,
devotees of god who narrate the stories of god, give false interpretations saying that Ravana
treated Sita as his mother and considered her as goddess of the earth.
192. Aranya kanda, sarga 55, slokas 34 & 35: The meaning of the words, There is nothing
wrong in it. God has ordained it is that there is nothing wrong for men to get women showing
their heroism. Such customs and traditions were prevalent in many races.
193. Aranya kanda, sarga 55, slokas 26, 27: Be the head of all my other wives says Rama.
How long? Until next week when he brings another Sita!
296
297
Story-5
298
198. Aranya kanda, sarga 57, sloka 9: Enmity arose with Rakshasas because I was living in
Janasthana, assumed Rama. This means, the enmity of Rakshasas with Rama is not because he
had tortured Surpanakha. This is as if he has nothing to do with Surpanakhas episode.
199. Aranya kanda, sarga 57, slokas 5 & 6: If Sita and Lakshmana heard Marichas cries, then
Lakshmana, sent by Sita, would come to me quickly, thinking that it was my voice. - This is what
Rama thought. Sitas fear on hearing screams similar to his voice and Lakshmana coming for him
appear very natural to Rama. But later, he didnt want that to happen. See what he did when it
happened so.
299
200. Aranya kanda, sarga 44, sloka 27: Sri Rama killed Maricha, and killed another animal,
took its flesh and went away quickly towards Janasthana. On hearing Marichas cries, Rama was
afraid that some danger might befall Sita. Yet he again chased, hunted and killed another deer, cut
it, took its flesh and set out. Elders say that the goodness of a good fellow is revealed in the
matter of meat. Is it because of this? If he sees birds or animals he must kill them! In the
beginning of Ramayana, it was said that when a hunter killed a bird in a pair of birds, the other
bird grieved and poetry emerged out of Valmiki since he heard the grief of that bird. Whenever
Rama hunted, had he not separated any pair of birds or animals? If what the hunter did was
vileness what would be the nature of Ramas action?
201. Aranya kanda, sarga 57, slokas 18 & 19: As soon as Lakshmana came to him, Rama said,
Alas! You have come leaving the cottage! See when Lakshmana answered Rama. See how
Rama is lamenting on the basis of the cries of the fox much before Lakshmana opened his mouth
and replied! Of course, Ramas attitude is not new to us!
300
202. This left eye has always been twitching since Rama was ready for coronation! Not on one
or two days but for fourteen years! It would be nice if some sage treats it a little. Pity, it twitches
even for sages - either shoulders or knees!
203. Aranya kanda, sarga 58, sloka 5: Lakshmana! Leaving Sita, I wont wish lordship over
gods and earth, says Rama. Every body knows whether he will abandon Sita for the sake of
lordship over land (kingship).
301
204. Aranya kanda, sarga 58, sloka 9: I will go to the cottage only if Sita is alive. Otherwise
I will give up my life, says Rama. Lakshmana has not yet opened his mouth. Rama has not yet
heard what has happened. He says he will die right there!
302
inner self.
Rama looked at Lakshmana angrily.
Frightened by the screams of the Rakshasa,
Sita might have sent you. Is that it? What else
205
can you say, after all?
What a bad thing you have done! Direct
enmity between me and the Rakshasas began
since I killed Khara. You have created a beautiful
opportunity for my enemies to strike back at
206
me.
Alas! The left part of my heart is quivering.
I am drowned in so many worries! What can I
do now? The whole thing has gone awry. I just
have to suffer it? He looked at Lakshmana
complainingly, turned his face and resumed
walking.
On seeing his brothers pathetic situation,
Lakshmana was convinced that he had made a
mistake. He could not control his grief over
there, his sister-in-law had uttered unbearable
words as if burning stakes had been applied
to his ears. You base fellow! You wish for your
brothers death. You have your eyes on me.
That is why you have come with us with your
evil plans - Already his heart was aggrieved
by these words, now his brothers accusation,
205. Aranya kanda, sarga 58, slokas 13 & 14: Rama is saying to Lakshmana, On hearing
Marichas screams, Sita might have been frightened. Perhaps she had sent you. Perhaps, you
came. - This is what I am imagining. The man who imagined so much, why couldnt he imagine
as to what had happened to Sita? Perhaps he might not know. Rama is very enthusiastic to grieve
over the separation from his wife. As it would not be possible to wail if Sita were safe by the time
he reached the cottage, he wailed in various ways.
206. Aranya kanda, sarga 58, sloka 15: You created an opportunity for the sinful Rakshasas
to harm me in return, says Rama. It is Ramas opinion that Khara came to war since he lived in
Janasthana and they would harm him by killing Sita because he had killed Khara. This enmity is
between the Rakshasas and himself. It has nothing to do with Lakshmana! He is a slave. Whatever
happens is something to do with the master. Thats why Rama says, harm me; he doesnt say,
us.
207. Aranya kanda, sarga 59, slokas 5 & 6: Aggrieved by hearing Sitas words a while ago and
having felt extremely sorry because Sri Rama has now accused him that he had done a bad thing,
Lakshmana said to Rama as follows: I have not come here leaving Sita on my own. The
question here is, whether Lakshmana had acted independently or followed his brothers order.
Lakshmana is appealing that he has not acted independently. This is an important aspect of
feudal culture. Every moment is an alarming moment that wives, children, younger brothers and
servants may act independently! There is anxiety to tie up their feet, hands and mouths with
duties, morals and vows!
303
208. Aranya kanda, sarga 59, slokas 23 & 24: Even after Lakshmana explained the whole
thing, Rama says, I am not happy with you! Influenced by Sitas words, you got angry and
violated my orders. You have done injustice in every way. This means, the poet concluded that
Lakshmana had made a mistake. It was Sitas mistake to blame Lakshmana. It was Lakshmanas
mistake to violate his brothers order even if Sita had blamed him. But Rama is never wrong.
Rama was very frightened when he heard screams of Maricha. Rama also naturally felt that
Sita would also get frightened and send Lakshmana for him. When it happened so, it became a
violation of his order. If Lakshmana had not come, Rama would have scolded him, You dont
bother to come even if I had died? You dont bother even if Rakshasas cut me up into piecesYou
wouldnt have moved from there even if I had cried for help. Well, we cant say anything! As his
mentality is revealing itself, Rama is turning into Ravana, my good ness! Just as some one wrote
the play, Battle between Rama and Hanuman, one can write a beautiful play based on this scene
wherein Rama and Lakshmana are angry at each other, under the title, Battle between Rama and
Lakshmana.
304
209. Aranya kanda, sarga 60, slokas 8 & 9: Ramas doubts: Has Sita gone to pluck flowers?
Has she gone to fetch water? Has she gone to bathe?....Has she hidden somewhere out of fear?
This is how he wondered. Then why should he raise a cry that Rakshasas had eaten away her, or
cut her up into pieces?
210. Beginning from sarga 57 of Aranya kanda through Kishkindha kanda, Sundara kanda,
Yuddha kanda and until Rama attained mental peace after his coronation, we will see abundantly
scenes in which he experiences the romance of separation for the company of Sita.
Separation or romantic separation means, both man and woman separate temporarily. Both
should know where the other person is. There should be a scope for their reunion. There should
be confidence that danger has befallen none. Then, they can experience the romance of separation
though it is difficult. But, the situation here is not like that. Rama does not know what has
happened to Sita; Sita does not know what has happened to Rama. (He, who left to get the deer,
has not yet come back. Moreover, there were screams of death from the forest, Save me! Save
me!) It was Ramas strong belief that Rakshasas had killed Sitaeaten her away and digested. Is
such a situation a context for enjoying romantic separation? The poet is describing as if Rama
is awaiting Sita with romantic separation. We dont find appropriateness of the context in any
scene.
305
211. Aranya kanda, sarga 60, last slokas: Sri Rama repeatedly searched for Sita in the forests,
rivers, hills, streams and places where it is impossible to enter. If he had searched all places so
carefully why did he not, at the beginning, find Jatayu who was lying in the vicinity of his cottage
itself?
See the last sloka in sarga 61: Ignoring Lakshmanas words, Rama was calling out in a loud
voice, Oh, beloved! Neither had he heard what Lakshmana said nor did he search for Sita.
306
307
212. Aranya kanda, sarga 62, sloka 9: This herd of deer seem to say that the night-wanderers
(the Rakshasas) have eaten Sita, says Rama. Rama thinks that birds, animals, trees, ant hills and
every thing is expressing his views. If he were happy, all of them would say, Amen to Rama! If
he lost the kingdom, they would say, Forest life to Rama?
If at all deer can think anything after Ravana had abducted Sita, they will think, Alas!
Ravana has abducted Sita! But they wont think, Rakshasas have eaten Sita, will they? This
means, Rama cannot grasp what the deer are thinking. Rama always assumes that animals and
birds think in his favour only.
308
213. Why doesnt Rama ask the sages about Sita? - At least the animals raise this question
and not the devotees of Rama. That Dandakaranya is full of sages. Moreover they saw Ravana
carrying away Sita. No fellow says any thing while Rama is wailing. Stranger than this is: Rama
ignores the fact that Jatayu must be sitting on a tree near the cottage. If he is concerned with all
that, then how to enact a sexual separation? The entire story goes as per the whims and fancy of
the poet. While writing the stories of autocratic kings, the poets too become autocrats! Whereas
the readers become worms or insect. They believe whatever the poets say. There is no question
of questioning!
309
214. Aranya kanda, sarga 58, sloka 19: Pity, that poet esquire has rightly understood the
hunger of Rama. The poet described Ramas hardships as follows: Severely reproaching
LakshmanaSri Rama, whose mouth was parched from hunger, fatigue and thirst, grew
despondent
310
311
brave. If any body causes any harm to sisterin-law, you can tear apart those wicked fellows.
You are a great valorous person! Let us search
for sister-in-law through out the whole forest.
Sita! Sita! Alas! Why do I need these
kingdomsthese luxuries and wealth? Rama
stood up with cries that terrified the birds.
215. Aranya kanda, sarga 63, sloka 4: Rama is also feeling sorry that he has committed sins in
the previous births. We will see in detail in another foot note about these sins.
216. Aranya kanda, sarga 63, sloka 8: Mr. Gattupalli Sesha Charyulu did not write the summary
of only this sloka. He simply wrote: The meaning of this sloka is obvious. May be he did not like
to talk about it. This is the honesty of the pundits! The translation of Mr. Sripada Subrahmanya
Sastry gave the meaning of this sloka as follows: Fit to be smeared with sandal wood paste mixed
with Kunkuma (red) flower and round breasts wet with her bloodsome Rakshasa must be
eating them.
The poet is unable to leave Sitas breasts alone even in such grief. He has to see breasts
even when she is in danger!
217. Rama is imagining Sita in terms of pieces. It is Rama, not Rakshasas, who cuts all the limbs
of Sita.
218. Aranya kanda, sarga 6, slokas 54 & 55: Rama declared himself how good he is, how
noble he is and how merciful he is!
312
219. Aranya kanda, sarga 64, sloka 70 & 71: Rama is saying to Lakshmana: If the lords of the
world wont get back my Sita to me who has been abducted or Sita who is killed.such a beautiful
Sita.my love Sitaif they dont bring me Sita, I will destroy the world filled with animate or
inanimate beings. - It is okay! But what does he mean by such a beautiful Sita? What sort of
beauty is it? High buttocks, breasts like palm fruits etc- such a beauty! Poor Sita, if she becomes
thin after some time due to worry and fear and if she is brought to Rama, Rama seems to quarrel
with them, No, no. I wont accept her. Get me Sita with high buttocks! This Sita is not my Sita. My
Sita should possess breasts like palm fruits. Devendra, the king of Gods, will save his face only
if Sita doesnt become thin!
313
220. Aranya kanda, sarga 66, slokas 7 & 16: Lakshmana keeps eulogizing Rama. We cannot
see directly the actions of the previous birth; they manifest in the form of happiness and grief. It
is not possible to confirm whether we did these actions unless we get fruits of those actions in the
form of happiness and grief - According to this, human beings get happiness and grief because
of their previous birth. People dont know that they committed a particular wrong. The results are
in the form of happiness and sorrow. This means, if we possess a lot of money and are happy, we
have to assume, Oh, we must have done pious deeds. If we come across people who have no
money, no food, no shelter and no health, then we have to assume, they have done sinful
deeds. They too should realise, We have done sinful deeds.
Thus, the story of Sri Rama preaches knowledge to human beings. If anybody is hungry his
hunger is not satisfied and he cries, he has to tell himself thus, Didnt Sri Ramachandra face
hardships during those days? Thus he has to remember the story of Rama and lie down with his
legs tucked in and bear the pangs of hunger.
314
221. Aranya kanda, sarga 67, sloka 11: Rama does not remember the fact that Jatayu was
present to protect Sita. Instead of feeling sorry for wailing with out asking Jatayu about Sita as
soon as he appeared, he suspected that he was not Jatayu and he must be a Rakshasa! He is
suspicious of every body and every thing!
222. Aranya kanda, sarga 68, slokas 5 & 7: Rama is asking Jatayu. Seeing what offence of
mine did Ravana abduct Sita? He knows that Ravana is the king of Rakshasas. He knows that
hostility between him and the Rakshasas is going on. He is asking innocently as if he
>
315
> does not know any thing. What did I do? When Surpanakha talked to Ravana, she had
given him all the details: that Ravana was the king of Rakshasas, that he was the son of
Vipravasu, that he was her brother and so on. But, Rama is now asking, Where does Ravana
live? Have all the sages been yelling all these days about killing Ravana! Killing Ravana
without knowing what the country of Ravana is?
223. Aranya kanda, sarga 68, sloka 18: This means, if Rama gets back Sita, it would be the
greatness of Vinda time and there is nothing great about Rama! If an article is lost during the
Vinda time, it will any way come back, wont it?
224. Aranya kanda, sarga 68, sloka 18: While Ravana was abducting, how did that soulcaptivating, moon-like face appear? - While Sri Rama was asking Jatayu with salutation, Tell
me! Tell me!. Jatayu gave up his mortal coil.
Rama should assume that Sita must have been grieving a lot, shouldnt he? Why should he
have any doubt, How was Sita? This means, he suspects whether she was grieving or not.
316
317
Link-5
he th story ended with the passing away of Jatayu after informing Rama that Ravana
had abducted Sita. The th story begins with the description of Sri Ramas manmadhaavastha,
the state of cupidity. This is the link between those two stories.]
226. Some people said, both yoojana and aamadaa (eight miles) are identical. Others said,
They are not identical. Yoojana is yoojana, aamada is aamada. Yet others said, yoojana means
800 miles. As I thought it was some thing that we couldnt ascertain, I gave up the task of
explaining the number of miles per yoojana!)
318
227. Aranya kanda, sarga 69, sloka 47: Listening to the words of wicked Kabandha, Sri Rama
with his withered face, said to Lakshmana thus. Why withered face in the case of a hero? How
long can a gathered courage remain? At the beginning of this story, when sage Valmiki asked, Is
there any great man in this world?, sage Narada, in his description of Rama, said, He (Rama)
never loses courage. But, this quality is found reversed. We never find courage in Ramas
behaviour.
228. Aranya kanda, sarga 70, sloka 2: You the best Kshatriyas, you need not be afraid of me.
God himself gave you - who are going to give up your bodies - to me as food. Look, Kabandha
is a logician! Yes, Kabandha! God has given you these two people. Eat both of them. They kill
every body. But, if you find Sita, you should not kill her. She does not kill any one. Sit her carefully
on your shoulder, take her to her country and deliver her to her mother.
Link-5
very handsome like Indra and the moon. (We
cant believe, you see!) Me, who was so
handsome, used to frighten sages with this ugly
appearance. (What fun is there in playing with
sages? If he wants, he should play with lions!)
When a sage named Sthuula sirassu was
gathering fruits, I frightened him and grabbed
the fruits from him. (Finally, what he did was
grab fruits! Does frightening mean this
much?) Then that sage got angry and cursed
me, All right! You will have this ugly
appearance forever. I was frightened and asked
him for some relief from the curse. Then the
sage said, You will get back your handsome
appearance again when Sri Rama cuts off your
shoulders and cremates you. (But, Rama cut
off only one hand, didnt he?)
Kabandha, after narrating this, told them
another kind of story immediately. Rama! The
name of my father is Danu. I performed great
penance, acquired longevity due to Brahmas
boon and then waged a battle against Indra,
due to my arrogance. (It seems all Rakshasas
studied in the same school! All fellows attack
only Indra, we dont know why!) Indra hit me
on my navel with his thunderbolt. My head and
legs pressed into my body and I became like a
lump. Indra did not kill me since Brahma had
granted me long life. Then I asked Indra, I have
turned into this shape. How can I gather my
food? If I dont live longer, Brahmas boon will
become a lie, wont it? (Great Logic!) Indra
gave me hands which are about one yojana
length, gave an eye in the belly and also needle
like teeth. (Oh, all acts of Indra are like this!)
You will go to heaven when Sri Rama cuts off
your shoulders! said Indra and went away to
229
Since then, I have been grabbing
heaven.
319
229. Aranya kanda, sarga 71: The first story is up to 7 slokas. From the next sloka, the second
story begins. It is irrelevant to us how two stories have come there. In both the stories, we find
glorification of Sri Rama and the sages while there is a degradation of the Rakshasas. This is
important for us.
230. Aranya kanda, sarga 71, sloka 24: Please be merciful to us - who are interested in
helping others, who are stricken with grief, who have no protectors and who are thus searching
for Sita. Who would keep quiet if the poet maligned his character - It was only Rama who kept
quiet because he is a god.
320
231.
Aranya kanda, sarga 72, sloka 21: Sugriva is the son of Riksharajas. (Riksharajas
putraha). He was Aurasa putra of the Sun. (bhaaskarasyaurasyaputroo).
Sloka 11 in this sarga: Vali, who is the son of Indra and the older brother of Sugriva exiled
Sugriva from the kingdom.
Vali and Sugriva are brothers. There is no clarity whether they are sons of the same mother or
not. Let us suppose both have the same mother and father is not the same. Riksharajas was the
man (husband) whom the mother of these sons had married. He was a Vanara. These sons,
however, were not born due to this father. Vali was born due to Indra and Sugriva due to the Sun.
These were not secret relationships. This was the practice in the system of pairing marriage
before the emergence of the rule of loyalty or conjugal fidelity to the husband. Since this
woman was the wife of Riksharajas, he would be the father of the children to whom she gave birth.
Children whom a woman conceived were her own children irrespective of the nature of the
relationship (either due to the husband or some other man) out of which the children were born.
Kshetraja putra = A son of a man born to his wife due to another man. Kshetra = wife.
Children born to that wife are Kshetrajas. Vali and Sugriva were Kshetraja sons of Rikshajarajas.
Aurasa putra = A son of a man born to his wife or any woman other than the wife due to him. Vali
and Sugriva wee Aurasa putras of Indra and the Sun respectively. Although the actual fathers of
Vali and Sugriva were gods, the brothers became Vanaras like their mother.
Link-5
king and if Sugriva doesnt get the army under
his control, how will he help in searching for
Sita? He will help you even if your action
fails says Kabandha! - After wearing those
jewels and garments, Kabandha had turned
into a blatant liar!) Rama! Dont grieve!
Whatever is destined to will happen. It is not
possible to change destiny. (Oh, finally, this is
what he concluded!) Now, listen, I will tell you
the way to go the Rishyamuka Mountain.
You have to pass all the trees towards the
North. (Wont there be trees after that?) There
you will find another forest. There you will find
fruits on all the trees. After crossing that forest
as well, you will see the Pampa Lake. That lake
looks very beautiful with various kinds of
flowers. The swans and Krowncha birds (crane)
which gambol in that lake do not know what
fear is. They wont be afraid of you. They look
like lumps of ghee. Shoot them with arrows and
eat them! (At least then they will know what
fear is and learn to hide themselves.) There
will be very good fish and prawns in that lake.
Lakshmana will shoot them with arrows, prick
them with an iron stake, cook them on fire and
232
give them to you. Rama! Eat well.
(Why wont he eat? Thats all right! This
321
322
herself.
Sabari folded her hands with reverence.
Rama! My penance is fulfilled after seeing you.
Only now, all my worship to the spiritual teacher
is fulfilled. My life is blessed with fortune. With
your kindness and mercy I will attain heaven
without rebirth. Rama! When you were at
Chitrakuta all the spiritual teachers whom I
served went to heaven in airplanes. My teachers
told me, Sabari! Sri Rama will come to this
hermitage. Serve him. With his visit (darshan)
you will attain imperishable heaven. (So, all this
devotion of Sabari is for the sake of heaven!
Oh, I see!) Rama! I have gathered and stored all
the fruits available in these surroundings for
you. (Rama lived in Chitrakuta at least about
thirteen years ago. So she had been storing
the fruits since then!)
Unconcerned with the fruits bundle, (the
poet did not write that he ate the fruits), Rama
said Sabari! I have heard of the miracles of
sage Matanga through Kabandha. Now, I would
like to see them.
Sabari took Lakshmana and Rama to
Matangas hermitage. Rama! Sage Matanga
performed sacrifices here only. As he was
unable to go to the rivers due to old age, he
called the rivers and oceans to this place. Since
then they have been here. (He could call rivers
and oceans but could not overcome old age!)
Look, those oceans and rivers over there!
(Rivers and oceans in the backyard of the
hermitage!)
Look at my spiritual teachers upper
garments are still wet on the trees. (So much
oily muck!) Rama! You have seen the entire
hermitage. I am thinking of going to serve my
spiritual teacher, leaving this worn out body.
235. Aranya kanda, sarga 73, slokas 32 & 33: Rama! If a man got money in his dream while
he was sleeping on that mountain, he will get it after he wakes up. Lives of sages and pious
people too revolve around money! Why do these fellows want money? A Gandharva, who
flies in the sky, too talks about money!)
236. Of course Kabandha got jewels and all, along with his new appearance but what new
knowledge did he gain? He had told Rama about Sugriva in the beginning. The same he told him
again later. He didnt tell him a single word about Ravana. Drowning Rama in the dreams of fish,
he escaped tactfully.
Link-5
She saluted Rama with reverence.
Rama serenely approved. You have
worshipped with devotion. Go to the world that
you want!
The old Sabari jumped into the fire pit,
immediately rose out of the pyre with ornaments
and silk garments and went into the skies. (The
result of penance of all these years is ornaments, silk garments and heaven! There
again, serve the spiritual teachers!)
Rama and Lakshmana resumed walking.
Rama said to Lakshmana, Lakshmana! We
have seen the great miraculous hermitage of
sage Matanga. We have witnessed deer and
237
lions living without enmity.
We took a bath
in the seven seas located in the hermitage and
offered water to the reverend forefathers. Now,
harm will vanish and good things will happen.
Now my heart is very happy. We have to quickly
323
324
Story-6
325
326
the trees became cuckoos and are cooing. Fragrance of sandal wood is floating in the air.
Humble bees are going round the bushes humming. Abundantly blossomed trees appeared
like men decorated with silk clothes and ornaments. On the Gurivinda bushes around
Pampa, seeds in bunches are dangling.
Lakshmana! Sita used to feel glad when forests
blossomed. These crimson tender shoots remind me of the lips of SitaThose lovely eyelids. smooth cheeks.soft locks
AlasThe spring teases me reminding me of
all those.
If Sita were present and went about in these
forests, she would have really been glad to see
Pampa. She would have gone round all those
Guruvinda bushes and plucked all those
seeds, and collect them in her lap. She would
have put those yellow stem flowers into her
month and suck out the honey. She would have
tied all the fresh flowers with a creeper vine and
put that round the neck of Rama.
Sita is a bit afraid of Mogali bushes! She
once said, They say black cobras lurk in the
Mogali bushes!
Why only in Mogali bushes? They lurk
even in harems, said Rama, with the thoughts
about Kaika.
Sita was a bit surprised and said, In harems too?
Rama would correct himself and said serenely, May be or may not be. Sita would
laugh.
Rama sighed and said, Lakshamana! How
cruel the spring season is! My darling too is
cruel! He sighed once again!
Brother, sir!.The path upto the top of
the mountainNowhere
Oh, I am in despair as it isLook
thereHow that cuckoo mocks me!
Lakshmana looked that side annoyed.
The cuckoo stretched its neck and cooed
in some direction. It is not mocking you,
brother-sir! It is in rapture on the arrival of
spring! Lakshmana turned a bit poetic in the
breeze of spring.
Is it so, Lakshmana?
Yes, it is so! Brother! It is so!
Oh!See that peacock under the sandal
tree frolicking with male passionHaving its
mate by its side, it is heckling me, who has no
wife. No body has carried away its wife as some
240
man has carried away my wife, hasnt he?
Oh! Sita! I am unable to bear your
absence!The fire of your separation is scorch241
ing me!
Lakshmana frightened the peacock pair
with his bow. The peacock contained its enthusiasm, wound up its frolicking, folded its feather
tail, swung it and ran after the peahen.
The peahen said to the peacock, with wonder, Darling! Those animals wander without
mates! That dark animal looks at us enviously.
The peacock unfolding its feather tail again
240. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 40: Rama is saying with a sigh, No Rakshasa abducted the mate of this peacock. That is why he is dancing with his mate in this lovely forest.
Though seemingly happy that others are enjoying themselves, the underlying sense is not that.
It is envious lamentation that they do not face troubles as we do! They are happy! We alone
suffer like this! Why should a feeling that all happy people mock us, be there? This means, if
he were happy and others face distress, he too would do the same! Rama is imputing his own
temperament to others. The poet moulds the temperament and nature of the characters under the
influence of society. Ramas character is not beyond that. A noteworthy point is that there is no
difference between Ramas psychology and thinking and those of today.
241. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 41: It is utterly unbearable to be separated from Sita
in the spring It is very difficult for Rama to be without Sita in spring! In the hot summer, the
surroundings do not excite lust, so it would not matter if Sita were not there with him. What
more proof is required to show why wives are needed?
327
242. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, slokas 47 & 48: If the splendour of this spring is the same
in the place where my darling is, she may be afflicted by cupid and bewailing like me, it is true!
Spring will be absent in the place where Sita is. It is true. If it is present how can she bear the
separation from me and be alive? Rama is caught in a dilemma whether the spring is the same
where Sita is. If it is the same, Sita would experience the desire for sex. Then how can she live
without me?, Rama wonders. Then, how is he able to live without Sita!
328
the waves of the wind. Humble bees are coming out humming from the flowers. Flowers are
turning silent after shaking, shivering and sinking into sweet memories. Buds from behind the
leaves, about to blossom in a moment or soon,
are listening to the humming of humble bees
with innocent happiness.
Alas! These flowers... these scents the
humble bees if all these do not torment me so
much, I would have borne this separation this
243
lust
Oh! This spring season reminds me of my
wife repeatedly, said Rama and sighed like a
volcano. Lakshmana! If virtuous Sita were by
my side in the surroundings of Pampa and the
splendour of the forest.I would not wish for
even heaven. I would not return to Ayodhya
even! so saying, he sighed like the hot
244
wind.
Rama who could forget his wife if the
trees had not bloomedif cuckoos had not
cooed...if humble bees had not flown forgot
that Ayodhya would become more important
for him than Sita when the Pampa lake went dry
in the scorching hot summer, creepers fade,
trees become dry and the spring loses its
splendour.
Alas! The fire of this spring burns me cruelly and mercilessly!Lakshmana, get Pampa
water, my boy!
Lakshmana, hastily trampling the flowers
on the bank of Pampa, stepping in and pluck-
243. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 69: If this month of spring with blossomed trees does
not torment me, I would have borne this lust generated now so Rama proclaims his specific
greatness. This is his control of the senses! If the trees do not blossom, he would be an outstanding one subduing passions! But trees blossom, any way! He doesnt know whether his wife is
alive or dead! He has no concern about her safety. He is only repeatedly howling about affliction
of lust ! Affliction of lust! In this scene, it becomes very clear, without any concealment, how
a man employs a woman and why he wishes her to be with him. All the need Rama has with Sita
is only physical. There is nothing more than his desiring her.
244. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka: 95:
If chaste Sita appears hereif an opportunity to spend time here with her comesI do not
desire the position of Indra and return to Ayodhya Sita should appear in a state of being
chaste. If she appears in a state of molestation and abandonment by Ravana, she will be unacceptable. This idea has been there since the beginning. We have to notice this point.
329
330
331
246. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 84: Like fat noble women, creepers embrace these
trees In feudal literature noble women means fat women! That fattening also should not be
disorderly. Breasts should be fat. Waist should be narrow. Thighs and buttocks should be heavy.
Lips and cheeks should be thin like leaves. In this way, if a woman with thin cheeks, big breasts,
narrow waist and heavy thighs twists like a creeper she is a noble woman! She belongs to
an excellent class of women! A woman belonging to the Padmini category! Man desires this type
of a woman. If the physique of the woman fails to offer happiness to man, she belongs to the
Senkhini category! The lowest of the low! There are no such rules for the physique of a man!
247. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 110:
My mind feels greatly distressed at not finding Sitas face which is endowed with eyes of
fine eyelids, perfumes, brightness and are faultless Prior to the abduction of Sita by Ravana,
this word faultless never came in the description of Sita. Now what does this word faultless
indicate? This is the answer for the conflict in Ramas mind, Has she committed any fault or
not? Rama assures himself with the argument, She has not gone with Ravana willingly. If not,
what is the need of repeating faultless Sita, faultless Sita again and again.
>
332
with me, who lost his kingdom and was mentally upset. Such a chaste wife is away from me!
If King Janaka asks me in the assembly after
returning to Ayodhya, Is Sita safe? Where is
she?, what answer can I give him? If my mother
asks where her daughter-in-law is, what can I
say? As it is, I am distressed that Bharata
leads a life of a sage giving up all comforts and
luxuries. In the meanwhile, this separation from
my wife! Apart from that, this torment of cupid, which is scorching my life totally!. Now
how can I live? Lakshmana! Go back to
Ayodhya, my lad! Bharata is a highly worthy
person. He has affection for his brothers. Be
happy in his presence. I shall give up my mortal
coil in this forest. I can hardly live a moment
> A wife should be young. Should be the embodiment of beauty. Should be faultless. If a wife
of such type is missing, the husband wails out of romantic separation for a while in spring season.
If it is not spring, this will be absent.
This sort of erotic urge according to seasons is natural only among animals, especially. Even
though the influence of seasons is seen on human bodies, here (in the case of human beings) it
is not of prime importance. Here mutual affection and love among men and women are of prime
importance. For them seasons are not of much importance.
When an enemy abducted his wife, when she was in great danger this gem of a man, husband, cries out of lust! Moreover in the presence of his younger brother who has forgotten the
touch of a woman for thirteen years and who is not worried about it! Pouring out his sexual
suffering to the same younger brother!
Feudal poets are utter block heads! They are not aware of even an elementary thing that
descriptions and incidents should be in accordance with the context. They think that the entire
world should shed tears at the torment of the lust of the hero.
The description of the erotic urge and such in the spring are stupid actions that are ignorant
of the distinction between animal relations and human relations!
248. Sita has much affection for me. I too showed affection towards her in every possible
way This is not simply some description of a person or a lake. Rama is recounting the sort of
relationship between him and his wife. He is analysing if there is any possibility of her committing
a fault. She loved him, all right! He too loved her well! Never did he trouble her. If he troubled her,
there would have been some meaning if she had showed interest in another man and transgress
morality. But he had never done such a thing! This is the conflict in his mind. The basis for this
is the thought, Sita may commit a mistake. Whatever thoughts and doubts that a husband gets
when his wife is in the possession of another man, all those may enter the mind of the poet. He
depicts the same. Outwardly, there may be any number of veils like ideal married life and love
and however poetically one may describe them, when we critically examine the relationship
between Sita and Rama, it was merely like any other relationship that exists between a wife and
husband in a feudal society.
249.
333
Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, sloka 104: The spring season torments me, when I am
already in sorrow that Bharata lives outside the city and spends his time in vows and fasts and for
Sitas abduction. So far, we have not noticed Ramas sorrow for Bharata. He might be wailing
secretly even without the knowledge of the poet! He does not at all feel sorry for Satrughna and
Lakshmana. Rama says, Lakshmana! Go back to Ayodhya. Does he intend it really? It is because Lakshmana would not go anyway! He knows pretty well that he wont go and hence he
said it casually. The whole thing is a pretension! Deception!Will Rama become noble, just
because he casually asked his brother who has been living with him and bearing hardships
Go away, my lad! How nice it have been if Lakshmana had turned back saying, All right,
brother, I shall go! But it does not happen so. It is contrary to his behaviour. Just as ordinary
men in society say things for the sake of a formality, pretension and to keep face, Rama also
speaks the same way. The poet does not know any ideal life beyond the influence of that
society.
250. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 1, slokas 116 to 128: See how Lakshmana whets the courage of
Rama Give up sorrow. Give up lustYou have not realised yourself. How good hearted.
How brave you are? says Lakshmana.
Lakshmana - who loves Rama unswerving and who is courageous - explained Rama the
politics and pointed to his strength and removed Ramas grief Lakshmana explaining Rama what
his strength was!
334
There is no link
between the 6th story
and the 7th story.
335
Story-7
The Accomplices
(Rama and Sugriva)
336
337
252. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 2, slokas 17 & 18: See Hanuman is reprimanding Sugriva.
Your generic beastliness finds expression since you lack good thinking and you are fickle
minded. Sir, one has to conduct affairs, considering all aspects. A king who lacks cleverness,
knowledge and commonsense cannot protect his people.
Of course Sugriva gave a boastful reply to this. Who will not get frightened at the sight of
such heroes, tell me? So, that was all for the greatness of those heroes and not his own cowardice!
338
serenely.
How brightly you people glitter!... Alas!...
There is no iota of gold on your body. How
bare you are! If you are decorated all over
with gems, diamonds and jewels even a
thousand eyes will not be enough to look at
you.
Ramas shoulders got elated, reminded of
the jewels.
What if jewels are not there? The very
complexion of your body itself is like gold!
Rama looked Lakshmana skew eyed as if
he asked, Is he not ridiculing us?
Oh, look around. How these mountains
and hills are glittering in the reflection of your
complexion on them!...Water in the Pampa
appears as if it is mixed with gold! It is strange!
For that matter, even your bows? Studded with
goldwhat a beauty! What a beauty! They are
creating terror in the hearts of the onlookers.
These arrows are not arrows! They are verily
hissing cobra snakes out of their pits!...Now,
what to say about your swords?...Oh! No! We
253
need not talk about them
Going into ecstasy, Rama looked
somewhere with half closed eyes.
After showering all sorts of praise and
describing the brightness of their body, faces,
bows and swords, Hanuman found nothing to
do. Sirs, whoever you are, you are very great,
said he and stood there mumbling.
Rama did not come out of ecstasy even to
say, No, not both of us! I alone am great
Thinking that he should not take the
initiative, Lakshmana kept quiet without
interfering.
The secret in Hanumans thoughts that he
will be exposed is gushing out. Unable to
contain it any further, Hanuman said, Sir!
253. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 3, slokas 5 to 8: Laudatory words of Hanuman are only this
much: You seem to be great warriors. You seem to be great kings. You seem fit to rule the entire
world. Your physiques have to be decorated with gold and gems. Not even a single word here
depicts the greatness of sages. Praising a sage, You seem to be great kings means that those
sages feel more happiness by a kingship than by the life of a sage. The attention of the sages is
always focused on power, riches and wealth. This clamouring finds expression on the face of
every sage. More clearly so on Ramas face.
339
verbosely.
Hanuman lowered his head shyly and
stood. He looked at Rama in reverence. He
confirmed in his mind that this gentleman was
more intelligent and greater than the other.
Ramas praise for Hanuman is not yet over.
He looked at Hanuman serenely. It seems you
have read all the Vedas well. You have studied
Rig-Veda, Yajur-Veda and Sama-Veda. Yes, you
must have studied them. Yes, otherwise will it
be possible for any body to talk so perfectly? I
think you might have also learnt grammar with
a lot of interest. How many times have you read
it? It seems you have read it many times. Will
any one remember it so well if he reads only
once?...I think you talk with others as per the
code remembering well Vedasgrammar
lessons and every thing. When you utter each
word.
When Rama praised Hanuman that he spoke
correctly, he thought differently. But now when
the matter entered scriptures and grammar, fear
caught him. If asked to recite a verse or line
from some Veda? If asked suddenly to explain a
conjugation in grammar?...Thank godIn
boyhood the teacher broke my back into a
thousand pieces but the stomach did not learn
even a single letter. Except jumping and leaping
over walls and streets no question of
explaining any conjugation.
Ignorant people who dont have the
knowledge of grammar exhibit vulgar
expressions on their faces while uttering each
word. You have not done that. One must be
familiar with six qualities to talk pleasantly. It
seems you know all of them pretty well.
Hanuman had a blank face. He felt like
crying aloud, I dont know any thing! What
is this? Finally I have landed in grammar! If I
kept silent as if knew them and if he asks me to
254. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 2, slokas 24 & 25; sarga 3, slokas 20 to 23:
Sugriva sent hanuman advising him, You have to find out about them through mutual
conversation. Through their talk, find out their ins and outs. But Hanuman told about Sugriva
before others opened their mouth and uttered even a single word and before knowing who they
are and what they are! If they were enemies whom Vali in fact sent? Hanuman said every thing,
Sugriva is around here. I am so and so. Sugriva has rivalry with Vali. Nowhere do we find such
a stupid envoy as Hanuman. This will become more and more evident hereafter.
340
255. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 3, slokas 34 & 35: If a king has such a messenger with good
qualities to achieve things he will fulfil all affairs, Rama praised. Praising some one who has told
a stranger everything without knowing about the others means that Rama is also the same kind of
fellow as this messenger. The poet is praising Hanuman with special attention. The praise has no
basis. He is only dumping words, This great, that great, read Vedas, read scriptures, knowledgeable
person, good messenger. He is creating an atmosphere so that readers will begin to develop
great respect for Hanuman. Hereafter we shall see the greatness of this great man also.
256. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 3, sloka 27: Rama has all the while been talking about scriptures
under the pretext of praising Hanuman. But Lakshmana has to talk about the actual business! It
is a disgrace to say it himself. A slave should accompany him and tell about him to the other
person. This is a characteristic feature of Masters who exhibit feudal pride.
341
257. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 4, slokas 5 to 13: See what Lakshmana is saying about Rama.
Hearing the question of Hanuman and prodded by Rama, Lakshmana said that Rama is a very
great manAndRama is known to ordinary people also. He is a protector of all creatures. He is
the most virtuous among all the sons of Dasaratha (See, these words are uttered by another son!)
Fit to enjoy pleasures. (This means, except the great people, all are unfit)Cultivated by his
virtues, I am his slave. (Lakshmana himself is saying that he is Ramas slave!)
342
258. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 4, slokas 17 to 25: Hear, Lakshmanas words to Hanuman.
This lord of all people, Rama, who gives wealth to those who desire it, is willing to accept
Sugriva as his lord. Rama who offers refuge to all worlds seeks the refuge of Sugriva. He trusts
Sugriva as his saviour. He is seeking the mercy of Sugriva. Sugriva has to show mercy on Rama
who is afflicted with grief - Thus Lakshmana spoke with tears, arousing sympathy.
One who saves the worlds is praying to be saved.
One who protects the worlds is praying to be protected.
One who shows mercy to the worlds is seeking mercy for himself. By saying so, the poet
minds his poetic skill only, but has ignored how it belittles Ramas character. Lakshmana is
begging Hanuman continuously.
343
344
arrows?
Sugriva laughed sarcastically. With those
arrow sticks will he kill Vali?...Look! Why all
this talkthis is not something that will happen
at all. Tell him to search for his wife himself! Tell
him quickly. Have you brought them along with
you?...First ask them to leave. Tell them to find
somebody else to help them. I cant search for
his wife, you see Tell him that. So saying
he hurried up Hanuman.
Hanuman puffed his cheeks up and looked
at the king angrily. Let me ask you, were we
not frightened to death at the sight of those
arrow sticks?
Sugriva turned pale and looked as if he were
saying, Yes, so what?
Looking for an opportunity, Hanuman took
the initiative and said, King! If you first make
friends with Rama, later on we can talk of other
things with him. Hanuman looked around for
a while and whispered in a low tone. Dont be
naive!...Will we help him for nothing? If he kills
Vali for our sake, we will search for his wife.
Isnt it so? Give and take! So heed my advice
Well, Ill heedbut can he really kill Vali
for our sake?
First make friends with Rama
I shall! But what is the use? Perhaps, later,
he may say, Why should I kill your
enemy?...Will it not be sinful for me?
Oh, no! He is well versed in all codes. He
knows perfectly well the anti-dotes for sins. We
dont know whether he would say so or not.
Why should we have such doubt? Let us see
when he says so. When he says so, we shall
stop searching for his wife.
Yes, king! What Hanuman says is right. It
is better if you make friends with the king of
Kosala, said the ministers who were around.
Sugriva could not say, No. Perhaps Sri
Rama might really kill Vali! Well, who can say?
Who knows? Who can say, what sort of a
snake there is in a given hole! All right! As
you wish. When all the ministers have advised
, lets go. Have you enquired well who they
are? There will be no problem, will there be?
They are not Valis men, are they? We have
nothing to fear, have we?.... so saying, he put
345
346
347
another person?
There arent such morals but.it seems
there are some good morals in Manus Law. I
remember two slokas that will be useful to us in
this context. In fact, Manus law is our own law,
isnt it?
So, is it decided to kill Vali?
Cant help. What can I do? May be he is
destined so, that is why I get that thought! How
will my action be wrong?... All is Fate I am
only instrumental! I shall tell the world so.
Otherwise, would you ask me to live serving
Vali as a refugee all my life? How much foresight
should we have before doing anything! We
should not think that it is enough if something
is finished now. We should be able to reap the
benefit in future also by our present action.
Then what about this serving fathers by
sons and elder brothers by younger ones in
reverence? Is Lakshmana not serving you? In
the same manner, should not Sugriva too serve
you with reverence? If the younger brother
plans to get the elder brother killed, how horrible
it will be? How sinful!
See, the horrors and sins apply only to
the civilized Raghu dynasty and not to
uncivilized Vanaras (monkey tribe). Why do
you bother me as if I dont know what is just
and what is unjust?
Yes, yes! Not that you are not aware of all
these things. Actually, what morals are there
unknown to you in this world? ButLet it be
soIf we bring both the brothers together? If
you send Lakshmana to Vali and talk to him,
Vali may heed?...Then both of them will help us
anyway. There may be no need to kill any one.
Ill get angry if you give such
suggestions. If both of them join together their
strength will increase. Even then I will have to
be obedient to Vali for his help? I cannot bear
the idea of being obedient to another king. How
foolish it will be to forego the chance when a
kingdom is about to fall in our hands? Whatever
I do, I do it thoughtfully. I am the one who has
read all Sastras! Why do you doubt me at every
point?
Oh, no!...Just
Tell me correctly. Is not my thinking just?
348
349
261. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 5, sloka 27: Rama to Sugriva: Ill kill Vali who abducted your
wife. I shall see you get back your wife.
Sarga 6, slokas 5 to 8: Sugriva to Rama: Rama! I shall get back your wife. You will cast off
the agony of separation from your wife. Even if she is in the nether world or in the skies, I shall get
back your wife.
Neither of the fellows can rescue his own wife. But boast of protecting the others wives!
262. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 6, sloka 22: I do not know Sitas shoulder ornaments. Nor
have I seen her ear rings. I know well her anklets, says Lakshmana. Lakshmana is talking as if he
has not seen Sitas face. But Lakshmana describes the beauty and glamour of Sita on many
occasions. For example, in Aranya kanda, sarga 45, sloka 34, Lakshmana says, The lady with
beautiful face! The lady with beautiful eyes! This is how he speaks at many more places. This
means, he has seen her nose and face but not ears and shoulders!
>
350
> It is wrong on the part of a brother-in-law to see a sister-in-laws face was the view point
of the poet, so he attempted to depict Lakshmana as an ideal brother-in-law who has never seen
the nose or face of his sister-in-law. All right. But, can the poet make the same brother-in-law utter,
Lady with a beautiful face? But, Lakshmana has been searching for Sita even when he used to
go to fetch water or fruits and also when he was alone, hadnt he? How can he recognize her even
if she appears? Never had he seen her face and that! Perhaps he may recognize her looking at her
feet!
263. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 6, slokas 8 to 10: Sugriva tells Rama, I saw a woman shining
luminantly in the lap of Ravana crying, Rama! Lakshmana!, abducted by sinner RavanaSeeing
me with others on the mountain, she dropped the ornaments in a bundle - So, everybody saw
Ravana carrying away a woman and that woman was crying. But they did not care for it as if it
were not their business. This Sugriva, Hanuman and everybody could fly like Ravana. Moreover
they are great heroes too. But remained indifferent! They did not attempt even a bit to rescue a
woman. Now Sugriva is boasting, I shall rescue Sita and bring her back wherever she may be.
Why did he not go forward to save a crying woman? Because there would have been no benefit
for him by saving people who were not his concern.
351
352
264. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 7, sloka 22: Rama had a doubt that Sugriva might think his
words are lies. That is why he says, I have never uttered a lie. Nor will I utter and in future. I
swear to you on truth. He is eager to convince Sugriva.
353
265. Mandodari is Ravanas wife, isnt she? Her father is this Maya. Her brothers are these
Mayavi and Dundubhi. This we will come to know in Uttara kanda (sarga 12, slokas 13 & 19).
Battle means nothing but beating one another. These were fights that began in the primitive
times. At a time when there were no weapons, human bodies themselves were weapons.
354
266. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 9, sloka 18: The sound of the Rakshasa making a roar like that
of a lion reached my ears. The sound of my brother crying in the face of defeat reached my ears,
says Sugriva. He heard as if the Rakshasa had shouted with joy and his brother cried out in
agony, he says! The whole value of the character of Sugriva is dependent on whether Sugriva
spoke the truth or lies in this respect. Rama got ready to help Sugriva in the belief that Sugriva
was right, didnt he? So, Ramas honesty too is dependent on the truth and untruth of this
incident. Sugriva would hear only if Vali cried in defeat, wouldnt he? If it is proved that Vali did
not at all cry and what Sugriva said was a lie, Sugriva will be a cheat. Then Rama will also be a
cheat since he stood in support of Sugriva even after knowing the deception of Sugriva. - See
later the truth and untruth in what Sugriva said.
355
356
267. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 9, sloka 24: Thinking that others may not consider him a hero,
Sugriva says, Though I have strength to oppose that sinner, I do not have the inclination since
I have respect for him as my elder brother. He says he did not oppose Vali and defeat him
because of his respect for his brother. But he could get that brother killed by a conspiracy. He
would not kill but get him killed. What a shameful talk!
357
358
359
360
268. The entire Vanara race (monkey race) in Ramayana reflects the situation in which they
lived like animals among animals in a stage when human beings had not yet invented any weapon.
During that stage, human beings had no other weapon except physical strength. During that
period human beings used to protect themselves with stones and branches of trees from animals
and enemies. The first powerful weapon invented in human societies was the Bow! It gave
immense power to human beings over animals. The Bow got a holy place in society.
Vali had no weapons except his physical might. He did not have even a sword. Rama had
weapons. That was his strength. Physically Rama was not stronger than Vali. Sugriva did not
concede to his strength being greater than Valis. Because of the power of the weapon Rama was
more powerful than Vali.
Kishkindha kanda, sarga 12, slokas 3 & 4: The arrow of Rama dashes through breaking
great trees and felling the mountains that were at the back and goes into the ground and springs
back at once and enters the quiver on the shoulder of Rama. Though this is a myth, we have to
infer from this scene that the bow a very powerful weapon.
Though Rama had the sword also, it did not have the holy status of the bow. So, if Vali
performed certain heroic deeds, Rama exhibited greater heroic deeds with his weapons!
361
362
363
to him.
Sugriva frowned. I would forget. But what
about this left shoulder?
He spoke in disgust harshly to the
ministers, but he hoped that Vali might really
die this time. If I set out with confidence? If that
wicked fellow dies today, by evening royal
physicians can warmly treat this shoulder
fomentation massages throne crown
kingdom of Kishkindha for ever! He tried to
rise, groaning. But his back failed him. It showed
opposition to fighting. Oh! NoNo! It is
inevitable for you to accompany me, said
Sugriva to his back and stretched it. Rama also
extended a helping hand along with his
ministers to Sugriva to get up.
Oh, Mother!The joint of the left
shoulderHell with you! hissed Sugriva.
Dont put your hand on the left shoulderLife
is draining out Sugriva rose somehow.
Sugrivas feet are obstinate saying, We
wont come to the battle. When Sugriva tried
to step forward his legs swayed to sideways
and backwards. With legs and shoulders
reluctant to come to battle, Sugriva walked
unsteadily for some time and then straightened
his back.
Lakshmana came near him with the flower
creeper.
Have you checked if there are insects in
it? They may bite me to death, exploded
Sugriva again.
Lakshmana ground his teeth in anger but
said with smiling face, There are no insects,
my friend!
Check if any touch me not leaves are there.
My work will end up in scratching myself
instead of fighting, said he and put his neck
forward. Lakshmana put the flower creeper
round Sugrivas neck and tied the knots tightly.
Rama observed Sugriva from top to toe and
said, Ah! How handsome you are Sugriva! You
are shining like Indra among gods. You shine
like the Sun during the destruction period. He
bestowed smiles on him.
Spare this talkthis time at least
Really?
Trust my words, Sugriva! I never speak
364
time.
By then Sugriva has descended the
mountain slowly. He is allowing only Hanuman
to help him a bit.
Rama was struggling for some time to cool
Sugriva down by engaging him in conversation.
By the by Sugriva! I have heard that whatever
you dream on Rishyamuka will come true. Have
you dreamt of any thing? He asked.
Have I ever had a wink of sleep to have
dreams? Growled Sugriva.
Rama remained silent.
Nila dozed off some time ago. He might
have had some dreams, said Nala.
Sugriva remembered the crime of sleeping
of Nila. Looking angrily at Nila, he asked, By
the by, you are a minister! What is this snoozing
at will? Has my father-in-law told you that I was
angry?
Nila was perplexed. Yes, your Excellency!
Though I closed my eyes, I saw everything
Rama shooting an arrow and all thatEvery
thing I watched, he said humbly rubbing his
own hands.
Dont tell me all that! Admit your fault! If
it were any other king, he would have ordered a
death sentence by hanging, you know! Admit
your fault!
Yes sir!...I have made a mistake by
snoozing, your Excellency!
It is not enough to admit a mistake!...One
should never repeat it.
Yes sir! Never shall I repeat the mistake of
sleeping!
Nala whispered into the ear of Hanuman
and asked hesitantly, Will the king never allow
us to sleep?
Not just any time, I think. Let us ask him
later. Now he is angry.
Well, how do I know? May be till Vali
dies?
Ugh! Keep quiet! What more do we want
if we already know it?
Sugriva asked Nila, All right, you may have
sleptHave you had any dream? He saw again
angrily.
YesIt seems soyour Excellency!
What? You hadThen why dont you tell
365
366
271. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 13: It was only while going the second time to kill Vali, Rama,
Sugriva and his ministers come across the great gardens, lakes, trees and mountains. They went
along the same path when they had gone to Kishkindha even the first time. Yet, the poet did not
mention any thing then. Any way they have to go again a second time; so let me depict it then
- this is how the poet may have remained silent. Let us suppose, the poet had described the
hermitage of the seven sages during the first visit. Then Rama prays to the sages (that is, banana
trees) doesnt he? If he does not succeed in his task, even after praying to the sages, it wouldnt
be nice, would it be?...then the poet could write that Rama killed Vali in the first attempt. But the
poet does not like to write that. Not because he wants Vali to give blows to Sugriva. But, the poet
does not like to miss the joy of depicting the dramatic scene in which there arises confusion as to
whom to kill between two persons who have a close resemblance while they are fighting. Except
for this reason, there is no need for the poet to write that Rama could not kill Vali in the first
instance. The poet was already declaring that Rama was the incarnation of Vishnu, that he did
many great deeds and he gave salvation to some people. If such a Rama failed to distinguish
between two men or animals - moreover while acknowledging that there was a necklace in Valis
neck and not in Sugrivas neck and yet he was unable to distinguish them - then it would be a
matter of shame to both Rama as well as the poet who supported Rama. Of course, both of them
had given up that sense of shame long ago!
272. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 14, sloka 12: When Sugriva was afraid of going to Kishkindha
for a second time for combat, Rama said leisurely, If Vali survives and returns, then you can make
me feel guilty and blame me. There is no guarantee if he will kill Vali even the second time. If he
cannot kill Vali the second time, Sugriva can blame him. If this time too, it happens so, that will
be the end of not only Sugriva but also of Rama.
367
368
273. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 16, slokas 5, 7 & 8: Vali says to Tara, Dont grieve that Rama
will do anything to me. Because, will Rama commit the sin of killing an innocent one?...I shall not
kill Sugriva in battle. I shall suppress his arrogance. I shall send him felicitating him with blows,
Vali abided by the rules of a just fight. His view was that none will fight unjust battles.
369
370
371
372
275. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 17, slokas 13 to 52; Also, sarga 18. All the 68 slokas: In these
two sargas we can see the conversation between Vali and Rama. To understand Ramas character,
killing of Vali is one of the episodes that we have to chiefly discuss. We have to look at it in
detail. The manner in which the poet describes is that even those who suffered due to Rama
praise Rama. It is so at every place!
Vali falling to the ground felt glad, Oh! How well Rama shot his arrow!, the poet says.
Lauding Rama, the hero of the battle, that he shot the arrow well, Vali looked with great effort to
see where Rama was.
When Rama came near him, Vali uttered stern words in humility. Though stern, he uttered
them in humility!
Vali abused Rama a lot, but in humility! This is how he abused: Till now, I was not aware that
you call your self a virtuous man but in reality you are an unjust man and a sinner. You are a man
who commits base deeds. You dont show it but do harm. You are of a bad temper. You dont have
any courtesy. You simply carry a bow. Being lustful, you behave as your senses drag you - Thus
he abused Rama a lot. But all those abuses are not out of anger but in humility, says the poet!
Amidst so many abuses Vali asked only two questions. Why did you hit me? Why did you hit
me deceptively? Rama who was defied by Vali spoke noble words filled with Dharma and Artha,
this is how Rama responded to Vali.
Those words are: .Because of the inconsistency of your apishness (Vanara mentality)
you blamed me. (Sugriva and Hanuman also are Vanaras. Yet they do not have apishness. They
are virtuous! Moreover, they study all scripturesgrammars! But Vanarahood for Vali!) This
land filled with mountains and forests belongs to the Ikshvaku kings. It is their duty to control or
show mercy to animals, birds and humans. At the command of the virtuous Bharata, some other
kings and I roam about the entire land seeking the development of Dharma. Will there be a
blatant lie worse than this? While Bharata sits under the shoes of this gentleman, why does he
say that Bharata commands him? Who are these some other kings? Whom are they killing?
Rama who says that he is in exile as per the command of his father twisted the story and says, I
am roaming the land for development of Dharma. Thus, Rama is an imperialist who occupies the
whole world! The essence of this story is occupation of other kingdoms!
Scriptures ordain that those who commit incest with their own daughter, sister or wife of the
brother should be punished. (This means, before the scriptures were written, there was the
practice of sexual relations with daughters, sisters and brothers wives. Scriptures forbade it
after some time. This means that some were still practising the old social customs.)
You are enjoying sex with your brothers wife. If sinners obey the punishment of kings, they
become pious, says the code of Manu. We are ready to punish those like you who give
>
373
> up the customs in the world. (In regard to punishing people unjustly in the name of
justice, the present situation is akin to Ramas period - We have Ramas successors instead of
Rama; guns instead of Ramas arrows. There is no difference.)
My friendship with Sugriva is like my friendship with Lakshmana. For the sake of Sugriva,
who knows the nature of Dharma, I avowed that I would kill youI am not of the sort to go back
on an oath.
What shameless arguments! What justification is there in swearing like that? He says he
wont violate his oath. In the past, when Sita asked him once, You dont have any hostility with
Rakshasas, do you?...then why talk of killing Rakshasas?, Rama said, I have avowed to the
sages. I am not the one who violates the promise. Shut up your mouth! The devotees of Sri Rama
alone should know whether there is justice or violence in these vows.
You are blaming me for I hit you secretly. Humans kill animals in many deceitful ways. There
is no sin in it. Since you are a Vanara (ape), I hit you secretly.
(Valmiki wrote about Vali as an animal only. But it is not possible to argue that Rama
killed Vali because he was an animal and he would not have killed Vali if he were human
being. Whether they are birds, animals, or humans, it is the same for Sri Ramas rule of justice.
Any way, Rama says that the Raghu dynasty has all the rights over humans as well, doesnt he?)
Kings are the incarnation of gods. None should trouble them, blame them, nor defy their
orders. You are stupid since you are associated with Vanaras who are fickle minded and without
knowledge of the soul. (Treating another race with ridicule! Arrogance that his own race is
superior!) Your sin is gone by my punishment. You understand that it is Dharma that has punished
you - In this manner, Rama answered Vali. From this, one can understand how autocratic a king
is and how kings rule would be.
Even after Rama said, Since you are an animal, I killed you secretly, Vali did not question
him, what kinship code do the animals have? Or, Sugriva is also an animal, how could he become
your brother? For that matter, in the actual story (in what Valmiki wrote), why Vali, who hurled
so many abuses on Rama, did not ask such important questions? The poet did not make Vali ask
those questions. If he had, then there would have been no answers to those questions. Hence, he
made Rama give a bullying lecture and silenced Vali. Just because the poet sided Rama and shut
up Valis mouth, it does not mean that Rama succeeded in the discussion of Dharma (justice).
Argument means, it should continue till the other person has no question to ask. Even if Vali did
not ask, Do the animals have kinship codes?...What is it that an animal commits a fault?, what
answer does Rama have if some other person had asked him later? What justice is there in killing
for the simple reason that an animal does not observe the code of kinship? Though Ramas
actions and words are so crooked, see what Vali says finally (or what the poet makes Vali utter),
that too with salutation!
Vali with folded hands said this. Supreme Being! What you have said is good. (Beating me
to death is nice). There is no doubt about it. (If the poet does not make Vali say so, it wont look
nice!) You are very wise. You do good for people. You know the appropriateness of the punishment
for a given sin. I am vile. A sinner. (The poet thought that there would be no conflict if Vali
conceded like this). Though Tara had warned me, I have come to battle to die at your hands.
(Then why did he abuse Rama in the beginning? Expecting such a question, the poet makes him
answer. See what kind of answer it is!) Hit by the arrow, I swooned and abused you in the
beginning. That was not right. (So, now it is right!)
See how Vali concedes the imperial hegemony of Rama! If Sugriva secures your favour, be
under your control and follows your wishes, he could rule the kingdom (If Rama makes
>
> Vali accept that Sugriva must be under his control, it will add more strength to Rama,
wont it?)
After being hit by Ramas arrow, if Vali did not say anything and laud Rama, You have done
a good thing, it would not have looked nice. So the poet made Vali abuse Rama for a while in the
beginning. He made Vali ask only two questions. The poet made Rama give stupid answers to
those questions, show heaven to Vali and please him.
Finally Vali prayed to Rama, Sri Rama! Pardon me for abusing you. Tell me that you have
excused me, as I have done sinful acts. He conceded, It is my fortune to be hit by your arrow!
When we read this scene, will we be convinced that the poet wrote this in a fair manner? Readers
must think for themselves about this.
In this story Accomplices, Vali deplored Ramas words and not accepted any thing. Since
Rama had a weapon in his hand, his violence triumphed.
276. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 19, slokas 14 & 17:
As soon as Rama killed Vali, will the people who stand on the side of Vali keep quiet without
making any attempts? Will they accept Sugrivas authority? Because such questions arise, the
poet also has showed such things. He is writing that some heroes got angry on Sugriva. Some
warriors said to Tara, The main gate of the city should be protected, Angada should be crowned,
and the Vanaras will serve Angada who will rule in place of Vali.
But, those who said like that are not noble, the poet says. They are mean! Tara heard the
words of those who got a chance to talk and who were mean!
If those warriors had joined the side of Sugriva, if they tell Tara to crown Sugriva, they would
have become noble and wise!
375
277. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 21, slokas 1 to 10: Hanuman consoles Tara, reciting Vedanta
philosophy. These bodies are unstable like water bubbles. (Yes, ministerial positions alone
are stable and eternal!) One has to wail for ones soul and there is no use in wailing for others.
(Yes, one has to be anxious about his own position and there is no use in thinking about
others.) Because he had assimilated the essence of Vedanta well, Hanuman left Vali and took the
refuge of Sugriva for the sake of a ministership.
Who is responsible for the fate of others, mother?
These expressions turn the actual thing upside down. Hanuman knows that it was unjust to
get Vali killed. Yet he speaks Vedanta philosophy. Vedanta transforms any and every unjust thing
into fate. One has to think that with regards to Vali, It is his fate. Sugriva does not think his
exile as his fate. Rama does not think that the separation from his wife is his fate. Vedanta always
silences those who lose and sides those who gain. It creates spiritual wealth favourable only to
a few. We may note this on many occasions.
376
377
378
379
There is no link
between the 7th story
and the 8th story.
380
Story-8
381
382
383
384
385
279. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 27, slokas 34 to 40, sarga 28, slokas 18 &19:
See how Rama is thinking about Sugriva, Ravana and himself. Conquering the enemy and
living with his wife and in a great kingdom, Sugriva is enjoying great pleasures. Whereas I left my
kingdom, lost my wife and am wailing as if the bank of a river is collapsed. My grief is great. The
rainy season is difficult to bear. Ravana is a very powerful enemy. It seems it is not possible to
conquer this fellow. Rama is afraid of battle with Ravana. He is grieving.
Lakshmanas consolation: Rama! In this world you are a man of action, devoted to god and
a theist. You have power to upturn the earth filled with seas and hills. Tackling Ravana is not
difficult. - Rama is devoted to god. Theist. This means, Rama believes in god. Worships him with
devotion. It means Rama is not a god. God is somebody else!
The poet always says Ravana is a powerful king. He says so because Rama is going to
conquer such a great man soon. But the poet keeps saying how difficult it appears to Rama - who
has no support whatsoever - to fight with Ravana. Again, he makes Lakshmana tom-tom about
Ramas valour every moment since it wont look nice if Rama is afraid of Ravana. Lakshmana
praises Rama a lot and at the end, he says, Rama! I am waking up your valour from slumber. It
is to say, Rama has valour, you see! He has valour but it always sleeps. But his fear is always
awake. It wont fall asleep!
Kishkindha kanda, sarga 28, slokas 62 to 66: After the coronation of Sugriva and since he
started living on Rishyamuka, Rama has been doubting whether Sugriva would help him or not.
It is not that he had confidence for some time and then begun doubting. Doubting right from the
beginning. Trying to suppress his doubts, Rama is convincing himself. Sugriva is a good man!...
He is not a person who does not break his promise!
Sugriva will realize the scheduled time and try to reciprocate help. No doubt. (It means, there
is doubt!) A valorous person who receives help will surely help reciprocally. (Fearing that he
may not help!) Good people blame the person who forgets others help and does not do help
reciprocally. (It is his confidence that he will help him at least due to fear that others blame him.)
Lakshmanas consolation to his brother, the Vanara king will fulfill all your wishes soon. Be
brave until autumn approaches.
386
387
280. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 30, slokas 48 & 51: Roaming of cowherds around Rishyamuka
is not contrary to Valmiki. The poet himself mentioned farmers and cattle breeders. While depicting
autumn, Rama describes the fields with crops and the flute music as follows: Eating the fully ripe
paddy and carrying away the ears of corn with their beaks, the beautiful herd of cranes is going
on like a garland of flowers..The sounds of the flutes of cowherds.increased and spread by
the morning breezethe sounds of pots, cows and bulls.increased one another.
388
389
390
391
392
393
281. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 30, slokas 14 to 18: See Lakshmanas service to his brother
and also consoling his brother every time. Lakshmana came back after collecting fruits from the
mountain-peaks.saw his brother who was alone and fainted with griefand said, Reverend
Brother! It is not proper to insult your valour by constant thoughts of lust. Once in a while you
have to reconcile your mind. Oh, brave man! Your attempts, mental stability, brave ideas, help of
Sugriva and others..all these are the bases for the fulfilment of your task.This you should
realize!
Lakshmana knows very clearly about Ramas doubt regarding Sita. It is not Ramas fear
whether Sita will be found or not. But, Sita may be spoilt. To remove that fear, see what Lakshmana
is saying. Another man can never win Sita, who had you as her husband. Will there be any man
who will not get burnt in the blazing flame?
The job of Lakshmana includes not only doing drudgery for his brother but also giving him
courage every part of the day.
394
395
282. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 30, slokas 66 to 85 and sarga 31, up to 8 slokas:
Ramas grief that Sugriva is not helping him, his abusing of Sugriva, criticizing Lakshmana
when Lakshmana said the same thing which he said - Now see all these things.
Ramas grief: King Sugriva is not kind to me - who has been exiled, who lost his wife and who
is grieving. The wicked Sugriva does not care for me thinking, This Rama is deprived of his
kingdom. He has no refuge. Insulted by Ravana, he is in a pathetic condition. Leaving his house,
he has come a long distance, become lustful and sought my refuge. He set the deadline after four
months to search for Sita, got his work done, became wicked and not minded the scheduled time.
(Rama talks of searching for Sita but does not talk much about help for the battle because it
wont look nice if he always asks help for battle!). Turning wicked, interested in base pleasures,
sauntering with women of the harem, drinking intoxicants along with the relatives, Sugriva did
not show mercy on me.
What he asked Lakshmana is this: I killed Vali in order to search for Sita. (Vali committing a
mistake, Ramas attempt to establish justice - what happened to these arguments? Since Sugriva
knows the actual secret, Rama is reminding him the same!) Sugriva! The other world to which
your brother has gone is not yet destroyed. You too will follow the path of Vali. I killed only Vali.
I will kill you - who has abandoned truth - along with your relatives and friends. (Including
Hanuman!) So saying for some time, again at another place Rama says, Tell Sugriva that he need
not fear that I will kill him since he has violated the time limit. (Then, why did he say first that he
would kill him? It is only to threaten him! If he has enmity, how will the remaining affairs
continue? Rama knows all that. Not killing Sugriva is not out of compassion for him. Because
it was not possible.)
Lakshmanas anger at Sugriva: Sugriva is an ungrateful man. Such a characterless fellow
should not have the kingdom. Now I will kill Sugriva who has abandoned justice. Valis son
Angada will help us search and find Sita.
It was Rama who said that he would kill Sugriva, wasnt it? But see how Rama becomes wild at
these words. A person like you should not commit the sin of killing a friend. You should not even
entertain the thought of killing your friend. (I alone should entertain it!)
Always finding faults with others, preaching morals to others, thinking that he is a great
knowledgeable and noble person - all these features constitute a feudal mentality.
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
283. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 37, slokas 9 to 13: Sugriva is telling Hanuman. Send many
Vanaras to call crores of Vanaras. Some Vanaras pass their time in sexual pleasures. Send messengers
to call Vanaras quickly by means of samadanadi upaya (samadanadi upaya means controlling
people by various means: by pacifying them (sama), by giving them money (dana), by splitting
them (bheda) or by punishing them (danda). See what that Dandopaya is!) Sentence to death
those wicked Vanaras who violate the kings order and do not turn up within ten days as per my
orders
Before Lakshmana arrived in Kishkindha, Sugriva raised his head from his deep sleep, ordered
to mobilize army and fell asleep again.
Kishkindha kanda, sarga 29, slokas 30 to 34: Looking at Nila, Sugriva ordered Nila to
mobilize the entire army from all sides.
You have to impose the death sentence on those Vanaras who do not join the army in fifteen
days. In this matter, you need not hesitate - This means, the fact that Sugriva had to impose
death sentences in order to mobilize the army implies that participation in the battle was not at all
a matter of interest to the people. This means not even a single person would come if there was no
threat of the death penalty. This, Sugriva knew pretty well. Vanaras were indifferent to Ramas
task. If they had come willingly why would the need of the death penalty arise?
403
404
284. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 38, slokas 16 to 24 and also sarga 39, slokas up to 7:
Sugriva came to Rama in a palanquin.
Since Sugriva had become a king the poet did not like to make a king walk amidst rocks and
boulders - even though it was to see Sri Ramachandra! Here for the poet, Sugriva is greater than
Sri Rama! Because Sugriva is in a great position and has riches and wealth.
Sugriva who has great lustre (what colour did he smear? Earlier he did not have this luster),
reached the best place where Sri Rama was staying and climbed down from the palanquin along
with Lakshmana.
Without putting any question concerning the welfare of the person who had just got down
from the palanquin, Rama caught hold of him and began to preach sermons. See! King of Vanara!
A king ought to divide dharma (duty), artha (wealth), kama (sexual pleasure) depending on the
appropriate time. One who abandons dharma and artha but is preoccupied with sexual pleasures
will be like a man who sleeps at the edge of a tree and wakes up only when he falls down. A dutiful
king is one who kills his enemies and makes friends and enjoys dharma, artha and kama according
to their appropriate time. (It does not matter whatever Sugriva does, after killing Ravana and
protecting Rama). The time has come to locate Sita and wage a battle against Ravana. You have
to discuss this matter with your ministers. (The real essence of his sermon is: that he has to wage
a battle!)
Sugrivas reply: Owing to your grace, I have acquired the Vanara kingdom, which is
permanent. Crores of Vanaras - who will kill Ravana including his relatives and get Sita - are
approaching you.
On hearing Sugrivas efforts in searching for Sita, Ramas face turned into a blossomed blue
lotus out of joy.
See, how Rama then praises Sugriva: There is no wonder if the sun dispels darkness in the
sky, if the moon makes the earth cool with his rays and if you reciprocally help your friend. (Also
if Rama changes his words!).You are gentle. A hero!....You alone are a good hearted friend of
mine. (Rama could not get a better friend than Sugriva despite roaming around for so many
years!) You alone are suitable to help me (This is the actual fact.) I know that you always speak
good words. (I know but I abused you a while ago just for fun!)
405
406
Link-6
he th story ended with Sugrivas preparations for the battle. The th story begins
with Hanuman going to Lanka and meeting Sita. This link connects the two stories. In this link, we
see largely myths. Amidst these myths, we find a primitive way of life consisting of many
aspects such as protecting fruit trees from the enemies, living in the groves and bushes, delivering
the children in caves, using articles like shields of animal skins and clubs.
Link-6
Immediately Sugriva called a commander
named Vinata and ordered him, You take with
you a lakh Vanaras and go toward the East side.
He gave details as to how to go about doing
this. Sugriva knows what is what on the globe.
I will tell you everything about that path, listen!
All of you should carefully search for Sita and
Ravana. (Both of them will be found at the same
place.) Throughout the path search the
mountains, forests, villages, towns, rivers and
lakes. (Searching rivers and lakes for Sita!) If
you go a little farther you will find the Mandara
mountain. People who live on it dont have ears.
Some have lips as their hands. Some have only
one leg. After searching there, you will come
across Kirata Island. There people always live
in the water. Search well in those rivers. (Well, is
it for Sita or fish?) There, some people appear
half in the form of humans and half in the form
407
> wanted to be carried out. Further, he says, Thereafter, I will work with you depending on the
time. (This means, he is saying, I will consult you what to do later once we know about Sita and
Ravana. It follows, it is Rama alone who will decide everything.)
He has told so clearly, hasnt he? Again, he says, Lakshmana and I are not masters of this
task. (Of course, Lakshmana is not, any way!) You know the nature of my task. You order them. It
is you who have to complete the task. You are the lord. You are capable. You are interested in doing
me good. You have already done good things. You know economics. This is how Rama eulogized
him.
Rama did not command the Vanara army on his own. This means, he is not directly exercising
hegemony over the Kishkindha kingdom. The Imperial heads do not directly exercise their hegemony
over subsidiary kingdoms. They hold the subsidiary kings in their fist and exercise hegemony
through them indirectly.
We have to search for Sita! is Ramas order. But he wont call the Vanara army and tell them,
You search for Sita! If he does so, it will become clear to all that Rama himself is ruling the
Kishkindha kingdom. Then, the Vanara army will not like to be under the authority of a foreign king.
We have to wage a battle against Ravana is also Ramas order. But, its implementation will take
place in the form of Sugrivas order.
If Kishkindha is not under the control of Rama, people there would have only Sugrivas
domination over them. They need not sacrifice their comforts and lives by participating in battles
for the sake of Imperial heads. Their hardships will be limited.
Rama converted Kishkindha which was an independent kingdom under Vali - into his indirect
subsidiary. If Kishkindha has to become an independent kingdom again, people of Kishkindha
have to wage a battle against Rama (Ayodhyas army and win).
We can compare a subsidiary kingdom of the past times with a colony in a sense - although
there are many differences between the two conditions economically and politically. The interests
of Emperors keeping subsidiaries under their control and the Imperialists forming colonies are the
same.
408
287. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 42, slokas 12 & 13: It was the poet who wrote these names. You
have to search for Sita in Godavari area in Dandakaranya and similarly in Andhra, Pundra, Chola,
Pandya and Kerala countries.
288. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 41, slokas 24 & 26: All this clamour is because they dont know
so far where Ravana is, do they? Sugriva is sending his men to find out where Ravana is, isnt he?
But now, he is telling us about the whereabouts of Ravana! In the (southern) sea, there is an
island which is hundred yojanas wide and which is not possible for humans to enter. That is where
Ravana lives - a wicked fellow, a sinner, one who has the aura akin to that of Indra and one who is
fit to be killed.
If Sugriva knew so clearly where Ravana was, why should he send Vanaras in all directions?
See what the same Sugriva said at the beginning when he made friendship with Rama.
In Kishkindha kanda, sarga 7, sloka 2: I do not know the place of residence, capacity,
valour and caste of that man, who was born in a wicked family and is a sinner.
Now, even after Sugriva told Rama about, Rama did not ask him, Then why have you said all these
days that you did not know Ravanas whereabouts.
409
Link-6
Search the whole island carefully! In the
southern sea there is a female Rakshasa called
Angaraka. She catches the shadows of living
beings and drags them. Search that entire area.
There is a mountain called Pushpitam far away
from the island Lanka. Above its peaks the sun
saunters on one peak and the moon on the other.
But that mountain isnt visible to ungrateful
people, sinners and atheists. (How lucky!)
Search those peaks if Sita appears. There is
another mountain called Kunjara. On the top of
it, Viswakarma constructed a house for sage
Agasthya. (Perhaps, sage Agasthya moves
from the Malaya mountain to the Kunjara
mountain after this house was ready!) Gems
are found in huge heaps. (Oh, this is the reason
for moving!) There is a town called Bhogavati.
It is a place for all snakes. King of snakes, Vasuki
lives there. Search there also for Sita and Ravana!
(Why search in all the directions, once Ravanas
place of residence is known!)
Next, you will come across Rishabha
mountain. There too, gems are in huge heaps.
(Only gems or bags as well? How can one bring
those gems if there were no bags?) All over
that mountain, there are fruit bearing trees and
sandal wood trees. You should not touch them,
you see! Gandharvas keep a watch over them.
(Why trees, touch Gandharvas!) Those who
have done pious acts assume the forms of the
sun and the moon and live on that mountain.
(All of you also will die in the battle and go
there, so choose your places!) Dont go beyond
that point! Beyond it, it is the world of ancestors.
The kingdom of Yama. Utter darkness. A big
ditch. You will fall into it. whoever returns
within a month and reports that they have seen
Sita, can make any number of mistakes. - All of
you are great warriors! Born in good families!
Rich in tradition! Somehow or the other, locate
Sita and Ravana.
289. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 42, slokas 27 & 28: There is a hill called Chakravanta in the salt
sea.In that Chakravanta, Vishnu killed a Rakshasa called Hayagriva who used to protect the
wheel and acquired it. He also killed a Rakshasa called Panchajana and acquired his conch called
Panchajana. - These two weapons belonged to others. Vishnu acquired them. Valour means
strength of taking anything from others by force. (Weapons, women or kingdoms) that belong to
others. It is a matter of great fame if one takes things like that. Great men and gods are those
people who always harass others and grab all the belongings of others!
410
411
Link-6
Search there for Sita! Do not go further!....All of
you are great warriors! Loyal! If you accomplish
Ramas task, you will receive my grace and
immerse in all kinds of pleasures. (Otherwise,
you will hang at gallows. It is up to you!)
[T
412
Link-6
all the other soldiers and then scolding Angada.
He began as if he was preaching him with great
affection. Angada! Prince! You are under the
illusion that all these Vanaras will abide by your
word. They wont do so for long. (They will
happily abide by it. Because they too fear for
their life to go to Kishkindha!) This Jambavan,
Nila, Suhotra - all these people will not follow
your advice. Not only they. Even I too wont.
Nobody can take me away from Sugriva. (Not
from Sugriva, from the ministership!) The
stronger can have enmity with the weaker. This
is politics (What a nice politics!) But, the weaker
must not have enmity with the stronger. You
should be subservient to Sugriva for your own
safety. May be you are thinking that no danger
will befall you if you remain in Swayamprabhas
cave. To tear that cave like a leafy dune by
shooting only one arrow, why Rama.
Lakshmana is enoughHeed my advice and
change your opinion about remaining
hereSugriva is not so harsh as you think. He
will never have you killed. He has lot of
infatuation for your mother. Other than you, he
does not have any sons, does he? If you are
loyal to the commands of Sugriva, he will give
the kingdom to you after he became old. Your
younger-father is a man of justice. Noble. Kind.
(Hanuman knows pretty well that he wont get
the death penalty.) If you dont heed my advice
and still remain here, then death will be
413
290. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 53, from sloka 27 till the end. Also sargas 54 and 55 wholly: See
the kind of opinion Angada has about his younger father. Sugriva is a cruel man by birth. Sugriva
- who had utter hatred and who wished to punish me - will impose a severe punishment on me.
Instead of falling into his hands and being tortured, it is better to give up my ghost here.
Just as he had anger for Sugriva, Angada should have had anger for Rama as well, shouldnt
he? He should have had more anger. But, the poet made Angada abuse Sugriva but did not make
him utter a single word against Rama. Moreover, he made him praise Rama. Angada praised Rama,
Sugriva did not at all crown me prince. Sri Rama - who has pure behaviour and who is the best
among human beings - himself crowned me.
Seeing Angada who spoke thus, Hanuman realized that Angada had the ability to rule the
kingdom. Having realized this, what did Hanuman do? Of the four tactics [speaking gently(sama),
giving money or charity(dana), creating dissensions (bheda) and threatening with punishment
or force(danda)], used the tactic of creating dissensions and created dissension among the Vanaras.
While Vanaras were differing with each other, Hanuman created fear in Angada by speaking many
terrifying words of the tactic of punishment.
>
414
task!)
Hearing the entire story, Sampati said, I
have seen Ravana abducting Sita. Sita was
crying and throwing her ornaments. Ravana is
the younger brother of Kubera. He lives in
Lanka. Lanka is hundred yojanas away from
here. Look over there, I am able to see Sita from
here itself. Crows and falcons cannot see such
a long distance but birds of our species can see
up to hundred yojanas. (Then why didnt you
see your brother, my lad?) If you kill Ravana,
my grudge against Ravana will also be satisfied.
In fact, I would have done Ramas task myself
but I have become old. Now I cannot do
anything. Take me to the sea. I will offer water
oblation etcetera to my brother.
The Vanaras carried Sampati near the sea
and brought him back after the business of the
offerings was over.
Jambavan went to Sampati and asked, Oh,
king of the birds! Where is Sita? Who stole her?
Save us by telling us all that information. (Pity,
> The words of Hanuman: If you antagonize Sugriva and remain in the cave, all the Vanaras
will leave you. You will become like grass without friends and well wishers. If you enter Kishkindha
with humility, Sugriva will gradually establish you in the kingdom.
It was always very dangerous to Sugriva if Angada had remained there with some army and
lived separately with a sense of hostility towards Sugriva, wasnt it? It was better to make Angada
by means of persuasion or threats in favour of Sugriva. This was something that would do good
for Sugriva and Rama. Therefore, the poet glorifies the threat to and criticism of Angada by
Hanuman as a great thing and that Hanuman was a noble and well mannered man.
Angadas reply to Hanumans reprimand: Sugriva does not have a stable mind, purity of soul,
mercy, honesty, valour and serenity. One who took his elder brothers wife, who was like his
mother, as his wife, when his brother was still alive is condemned by the world. How can a man be
just who closed the entrance of the cave when his brother had entered the cave? Sugriva - who did
unpleasant things secretly, who was harsh and who was base - will imprison me and punish me, out
of his avarice for the kingdom - thus Angada wailed.
A question may arise. The poet is siding Sugriva, isnt he? Why, then, did he make Angada
abuse Sugriva? Why did he expose Sugrivas bad qualities? This is the question. This poet uses
whatever argument that serves him in a given context. Some of the wrongs of Sugriva are clearly
seen. Therefore, the poet is very eager to make a character ask this. There is nothing unpleasant for
him in reprimanding that character. But he never made any character abuse Rama any where - as he
made Angada abuse Sugriva. He has not criticized Ramas behaviour anywhere.
Well, after Angada thus lay down weeping, All Vanaras looked at Angada and wept, abused
Sugriva, praised Vali, surrounded Angada and were ready to fast unto death. Vanaras had anger
on Sugriva but not on Rama. On the other hand, they had devotion for him! They eulogized Ramas
qualities.
Link-6
this gentleman has lost his mind fully. He is
asking about who carried away Sita! Yeah,
people talk like this when they are in the midst
291
of life and death!)
Sampati: I will tell you how I came to know
about Sita and from whom I heard about it. Listen!
(A while ago, he said that he had himself seen
her, didnt he?) Since my wings had got burnt,
I have been staying on the mountain for a long
time. My son gets me food. One day he came
without food. When I asked him the reason, he
narrated the whole thing. Father! While going
in search of animals I stood upside down over
the sea. Meanwhile, a man carrying a woman
asked me to give way. I gave way. After that,
Siddhas told me that Ravana was abducting Sita
and Sita was crying. As that happened, I could
not get food for you. Although I was very angry
at Ravana, I could not do anything as I did not
have wings. (I could have shown valour!)
I will also tell you how I lost my wings,
listen! (All right, carry on! Can we avoid
listening to you?) In the past, Jatayu and I took
a bet and we started towards the sun. After we
went some distance, my brother, unable to
withstand the heat, lost consciousness.
Immediately, I covered my brother with my
wings. Due to the heat, my wings got burnt and
I fell down on the Vindhya mountain. After I
regained consciousness, I went to the hermitage
of sage Nisakara, crawling slowly. By the time I
reached there, the sage was returning from the
forest. Big tigers, lions, elephants and great
snakes followed him up to his hermitage, bid
him farewell with respect and returned. (This
gentleman could qualify for a circus job.)
415
291. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 59, up to 5 slokas: Sampatis reporting - that Sita is in Lanka and
he was able to see her - was over. Yet Jambavan asked, Where is Sita? Who abducted her?
292. Kishkindha kanda, sarga 62, slokas 7 & 10: This is what sage Nisakara told Sampati.
Sampati is reporting it to the Vanaras. Drowned in grief, the devoted wife Sita will not eat. Having
come to know about her not-eating the food, Indra sends her holy food. Having come to know that
Indra has sent that food which even gods cannot secure, Sita receives it, allots the first part to Sri
Rama, puts it on the floor and says, Let this rice satisfy my lord and husband whether he is alive
with Lakshmana or has attained godliness.
416
Link-6
bring Lanka here along with Sita. Hanuman felt
flattered.
So flattered and flattered, he climbed
Mahendra hill. As he climbed, that mountain
got pressed into the ground like a soft wick and
water gushed out from beneath the earth. All
creatures were pressed in the mountain and
cried terribly. The snakes raised their hilts with
417
418
Link-6
come here. Then how will the task be done? He
felt worried for some time. All right! First I will
search for Sita. I will not spoil the actual work.
Some stupid messengers destroy the assigned
tasks completely. I will not do so like that. I will
enter Lanka during the night. Seeing the city
from a distance, he spent his time roaming about
on the mountain.
It is night. Hanuman turned himself into a
small size like that of a cat and landed on the
streets of Lanka. Very wide royal paths.
(Otherwise Rakshasas cant fit into that width!)
Very high mansions! Seven storied and even
eight storied. All are golden. (The poet isnt
partial. He is building the enemies houses also
in gold. Because all of them will come under
Ramas possession, wont they?) Plat forms in
front of the houses and paths.every thing of
gold. (I will not say every time. Whether it is
house, platform, tree or wall - you assume it is
of gold. Not simply gold. It must also be studded
with diamonds. Sometimes with gems! As you
please! You stud them with whatever you want!)
Throughout Lanka, people decorated their
houses with garlands of pearls and gold
festoons. (Have you seen this? This is how they
did!)
Hanuman remembered Sri Ramas valour
and felt happy that Sri Rama could occupy
Lanka. He thought, Kumuda, Angada, Mainda,
Dwividha, Ruksha, Kusaparva, Ketumala,
293
Sugriva and I can enter this Lanka.
The moon rose! The moon is white and
charming like a royal swan.
The city of Lanka assumed the form of a
419
293. Sundara kanda, sarga 2, sloka 30: See what Hanuman is thinking about who can go to
Lanka. Among the valorous Vanaras, Angada the son of Vali, Nila, courageous Sugriva and I only these four of us are capable of coming to Lanka.
Sarga 3, slokas 15 & 16: See how many people are going to Lanka this time. This is also what
Hanuman thought. Kumuda, Angada, Mainda, Dwividha, Sushena, Sugriva, Kusaparva, Ruksha,
Ketumala and I can enter and see Lanka which is impossible for others. Ten people in all. Of course,
Sushena said he can leap up to 80 yojanas, when Angada asked him. Nila who was in the first list
is not there in the second list. When the poet sits to write this sloka, who ever comes to his
memory, all of them can go to Lanka. Others cannot go. This is the secret of going to Lanka.
420
Link-6
if enemies abduct any number of wives. Still
there remain many wives. Look at Rama!
Because he has only one wife, see how spring
and other seasons harassed him!)
Among them, some were those whom
Ravana had married. Ravana abducted some
women not out of infatuation for them but due
to his enmity with their relatives. (What sort of
justice is this? If he has enmity with relatives,
he ought to abduct those relatives!)
Thousands of beautiful damsels were
sleeping on blankets studded with gems. All of
them drank intoxicants, played, sang, were tired
and looked like flowers in a lake. Their
ornaments, garments, garlands were scattered
here and there. Their naked thighs, waists and
breasts looked like sand dunes found in the
rivers. All the women held their hands in one
anothers hands, intertwined with each other
and looked like garlands. (Thousand of women
for one man! How much beauty does the poet
see in their lives!) Among those women, there
were Rakshasas as well. (So Rakshasas also
look beautiful! Somehow Surpanakha
appeared very ugly to the poet!) There are
human women, Gandharva women. (If Sita too
had accepted Ravana, she would have slept
here in a corner!) Ravana had brought all those
women when they were yet unmarried. Ravana
brought none of the women forcibly. (Again
forgetfulness of the poet!) All had come attracted
by Ravanas handsomeness. (Although Ravana
is a wicked character, when it is a question of
women, the poet glorifies Ravana more than
those women. In order to say that Sita had
rejected such a handsome man!) None of them
is ugly. None of them have failed to serve the
husband (Ravana). All are devoted wives. All
are beautiful. All are young. (High family,
beauty, youth, devotion to the husband - only
these are the features which women ought to
have!) None of those women violate the morals.
They dont love men other than their husband.
(But the husband desires thousands of women
except the wife! That is great morality!) Among
the women whom Ravana had brought, none
421
422
Link-6
garden of Indra, Kuberas garden and Gandha
Madana mountain. (If it is so beautiful, why do
you want to come back from there, Sita? Why
dont you stay there!)
Hanuman climbed on a Simsupa tree and
looked around. He saw a mansion at a distance.
(All right! Its platformswindows are made of
gold werent they? Oh! The mention of gold is
making my stomach turn.. Isnt there the smell
of earth?)
A beautiful woman is sitting in that mansion.
She is very weak. (Alas! Is she so weak? Will,
then, Rama accept her? He wants her to be
very strong!) Yet she is like the crescent moon.
(Oh, so, she is beautiful!) She is unkempt without
bath and adornment. Yet she is bright like a flower
in the mud. (Because she is a devoted wife, she
ought not to take a bath and be comfortable.
But she must look beautiful!)
Her head bent, that woman was grieving.
She is Sita, thought Hanuman. He
remembered her appearance which he had seen
from Rishyamuka when Ravana was carrying
her away. She was still wearing the same yellow
sari which she had worn at that time. She
appeared incomplete as she did not have some
ornaments.
Rakshasa women were around her and
guarded her with weapons. They were very ugly.
Some had flat noses. Some had bulbous noses.
Some didnt have noses at all. Some had ears
like winnowing fans. Some had no ears at all.
Some had the feet of an elephant. Some had no
feet at all. Some were very short and stout. Some
were very tall and thin. Some had bare heads.
Some had bushy hair. While some were like
423
[Translation: B. R. Bapuji]
295. Sundara kanda, sarga 15, sloka 53: Sri Ram is efficient in controlling the elephants and
horses and ruling the kingdom but he has not understood he should love his wife.
Sundara kanda, sarga 16, sloka 14: If ruling the three worlds is compared with Sita, ruling
the three worlds cannot be equal to one-sixteenth part of Sita.
Because Hanuman thought like this, we should not assume that Hanuman misunderstood Rama.
This amounts to highlighting Sitas speciality.
424
Story-9
[A
n important point before reading this story. Sita stayed at Ravanas place for a very long
time. A question arises, Whether Ravana molested Sita or not?
In Valmikis Ramayana, Ravana did not molest Sita.
As Sita was a great-devoted wife and she ought to be a chaste woman, the poet had created
a curse for Ravana. In sarga 13 of Yuddha kanda and sarga 26 of Uttara kanda, there is a mention
of this curse.
In Yuddha kanda, when he came to know that Sita did not accept Ravana, Ravanas minister
Mahaparva tells Ravana, Seduce her following the kukkuta nyaya (justice of cock); dont
hesitate. Then Ravana reveals the actual fact, I have a curse. It is a secret. Once Ravana had
molested a nymph called Punjakasthala. She went to Brahma and told him about it. Then Brahma
cursed Ravana, If you molest a woman who does not desire you, your head will break into a
thousand pieces.
In Uttara kanda, while narrating the entire story of Ravana, the sages tell Rama, When
Ravana molested Rambha, Nalakubara cursed Ravana. On the whole, the essence of the matter
is the same. The poet created a curse for Ravana and protected Sitas chastity.
While examining this story from the viewpoint of reality, Ravana need not have bothered
about this curse. Just as a debauchee abducts a woman and behaves with her in a particular
manner, Ravana also could have behaved with Sita in the same manner.
In fact molestation is not only connected with the relationship between the bodies of men
and women. Abducting a woman against her will is also molestation. Abduction itself is
molestation. Just as it is no fault of hers when some one abducted hers, it is no fault of her when
that man behaves with her in any manner. Therefore, we should not think that we have to specifically
conclude whether Ravana seduced Sita or not.
The story of ..Poisonous Tree also proceeds in accordance with Valmiki. As the aim of
this book is not to change the theme of the story of Valmiki, in this story also, we dont find any
physical relationship between Ravana and Sita, except that Ravana brings her to Lanka forcibly.
This story tells us the fact that Ravana is compelling Sita to accept him.]
425
426
296. Sundara kanda, sarga 28, slokas 12 to 15: See, what Sita in Asoka vana thinks about
Ravana. Thinking that Sri Rama is god, that Sri Rama is the saviour, fasting, sleeping on the
floor, believing that husband alone is god. All these are futile. Rama! I being depressed,
having lost my charm, I have no hope of meeting you. My punya has gone waste. Rama! As per
the command of your father you have completed the exile, reached Ayodhya, without any fear
(without any fear that he would lose the kingdom this time), you will enjoy beautiful women. I,
who am grieving, will give up my life soon either by consuming poison or by cutting my throat
with a knife. But here there is no one who will give me the knife. What can I do? This was the
line of Sitas thoughts. Sita had no unperturbed confidence in her husband. She doubted her
husband. She grieves that he would forget her, go to Ayodhya and live happily with other women.
While Sita is in this state here, there Rama also doubts Sita similarly, Is Sita chaste or not?
Sita has no confidence in Ramas vow of commitment to one wife. Rama has no confidence
in Sitas devotion to husband. The beauty of the married life of Sita and Rama is also like the
beauty of the married lives of all other people in society. While describing the married life of Sita
and Rama as an ideal married life, the poet has shown here an ordinary married life. Why? The
poet observes the society that is around him. He sees the values that are present in the social
climate. He does not know any ideal beyond the society. It is not possible even for the poet to see
ideal married life that does not exist in society. The poet thinks within the scope of society and
within its limits. That is why, however much a poet describes the ideal married life, the reality
existing in society reveals itself in his writings.
The married life of Sita and Rama was not ideal. They were also like other wives and husbands
in society. Superiority and inferiority, anger, desires, doubts. They too had all these qualities.
If the poet had written that Sita did not doubt her husband at all or she did not feel sad even
though he had not protected her, it would have looked very unnatural. Hence, the poet rightly
depicted the grief and doubts of Sita. But, at the end, Sita consoles herself saying that it was her
bad luck. This is also something, which all people in the world do.
Rama! Although I placed my hope in you for a long time and did penance and religious
rituals, you could not rescue me as I did not have the punya in the previous birth and am unlucky.
This is my sin. No doubt about it Everything is Sitas sin. There is no inefficiency on the part
of Rama! The poet always takes care to defend Rama. Here the theory of past deeds is saving
Rama from Sitas doubts. Though she has many doubts about the miracle of her devotion to her
husband and on the miracles of her husband, she suppressed those doubts. She tries to convince
herself.
With regard to the question whether Rama had wives other than Sita, the critics consider
this context in which Sita talked with dejection. As Sita said, You will go to Ayodhya and live
happily with beautiful women, the critics infer that Rama had many wives. But, based on Sitas
words which she uttered due to depression and grief, if they infer like this, it cannot be a fair
criticism.
427
stared at Sita.
Sita trembled. She shrank. She would have
liked to disappear at once if she had the power
297
to do it.
O beautiful lady! Dont fear! Dont hide
your beauty. Let me see and enjoy your round
breasts your smooth thighs your wide
hips all your limbs! All your limbs are places
of beauty. Your lotus-like eyes, pearls-like
eyelids, fine cheeks. thin waist beautiful
buttocks. Ah! Whatever limb I look at, my
attention remains fixed. Can any man be
undesirous of such a beautiful mass like you?
It is amazing how Brahma left you after creating
you! I have never seen such an all-worldly
beautiful woman like you, you know?
Whenever he came to see Sita, Ravana
extremely praised Sitas beauty. He knew that
his praise regarding her beauty made Sita happy.
While Ravana praised Sitas beauty, his
wives looked at each others face sarcastically.
They whispered among themselves. Later they
talked to each other about it.
Sister! Compared to whom in the world is
Sita beautiful?
She is the most beautiful of all the women
in the eyes of the king. Hasnt our beauty
become old?.... Likewise, her beauty too will
become old by tomorrow.
His infatuation for us cooled down since
we yielded to him. But Sita will not yield, will
she?
Yes, I dont think she will accept him.
297. Sundara kanda, sarga 19, sloka 3. Also sarga 20, sloka 2: Seeing him Sita Devi covered her abdomen with her thighs, breasts with hands and sat wailing. Seeing Sita in such a
posture, Ravana said, Oh, woman with thighs like elephants trunk! Frightened on seeing at me,
you are not showing me your body by covering your breasts and belly. If Ravana had uttered
such words or spoken in some such manner, it would suit his character. Ravana ought to talk like
this. But, if the poet too speaks the same way even in his own descriptions? The poet himself is
unable to restrain himself from seeing Sitas breasts!
The poet is expressing Sitas grief as follows: Wetting her big breasts with tears, thinking of
her husband, Sita grieved a lot. Breasts that are big, round and that touched each other are
trembling and Sita is frightened. The poet shows the entire fear of Sita in her breasts. This is not
addressing Sita as Susroni! Sumadhye! in the middle of a sloka. The actual description relates
specifically to Sitas breasts. Enthusiasm to describe Sitas limbs overwhelms poets. Whether it
is Sita or Sri Maha Lakshmi, both are the same. If it is a happy scene, the breasts of that woman
move with joy. If it is grief, they move with sadness.
428
429
298. Sundara kanda, sarga 20, sloka 5: It is the custom of Rakshasas to move with other
women and to steal other women forcibly.
Regarding abducting unmarried girls, there are episodes in the past history that appear as
customs of some races. Carrying away of Rukmini by Krishna with her consent. Bhishma carries
away Amba, Ambika and Ambalika by waging battles without knowing their views and wishes.
These stories are familiar to all.
430
299. Born due to a boon We have to compare these words with the present day words like
vow and religious ritual. If a woman becomes pregnant after a vow to some god or religious
ritual, all people believe that the child was born due to the grace of god. This is nothing but birth
due to boon.
300.Enemies insult each others women. Rama had insulted a woman of Ravanas group. Ravana
insulted a woman of Ramas group.
431
301. Sundara kanda, sarga 22, sloka 20: Sita is a devoted wife, isnt she? Does she not have
the power to curse Ravana? Then why doesnt she curse him? Such questions as these arise,
dont they? In response to such possible questions, the poet argues in this manner, Well, why
not? Although Sita has the power to curse Ravana, she has kept quiet because she had no permission from her husband! Moreover, if she had cursed him, Sitas power would be exhausted
and she would not have the power to protect her chastity. This is the poets answer. If she had
cursed Ravana, his menace would be over, isnt it? Later, there would not be any danger to her
chastity. What need would be there to protect it?
See Sitas words: You ought to be burnt into ashes! I have not burnt you into ashes since I
do not have Ramas command to curse a man who has committed wrong and since I have to
protect my chastity (devotion or conjugal fidelity to the husband)
Suppose a lion comes near a devoted wife. Then she needs to ask her husband, Oh, sir! I can
kill this. Do you want me to kill it or not?..... And she has to get her husbands permission.
Suppose the husband is not in town. She has to keep quiet if the lion eats her up. Likewise, when
a man abducts her, she has to let that man abduct her even though she has miracles to escape from
him because she has no permission from the husband! To defend a lie that devoted wives have
miracles, many more lies follow!
There is another aspect of this issue. What is the secret in exhausting this power?
Accumulating punya by doing penance and donating some piety once in a while to others! The
basis for this imagination is Money! In society, money has great power with it. Can secure
respect as well. One can give money to others and receive it from others. Some times a balance
remains. These aspects of money enter spiritual thoughts as well. One can derive great miraculous
powers from penance and devotion to husbands. One can give and take such miracles. Sometimes
they get exhausted, sometimes a balance remains. All miracles are like money!
302. Sundara kanda, sarga 22, sloka 10 to 12: On seeing Ravanas threats to Sita, the young
women of the gods and Gandharvas felt sad. Some women consoled Sita with signs of their lips,
some with their faces and some with their eyes. Sita, who was thus consoled by them, felt proud
due to the strength of her chastity.
Does this mean that young women of gods and Gandharvas are always in the sky? We have
to assume that among Ravanas wives, there were women belonging to the gods and Gandharvas
and it was they who consoled Sita with secret signs and gestures.
432
303. Uttara kanda, sarga 24: [As there is no Telugu translation of Uttara kanda by Mr.
Gattupalli Seshacharyulu, the following are from the Telugu translation of Mr. Sripada
Subrahmanya Sastry.]
See how Ravana, after conquering the gods and returning to Lanka, carried away women.
While retuning home, the wicked Ravana captured many girls of gods, kings, sages, Rakshasas
and humans and placed them into the air plane. If he saw a beautiful woman whether
unmarried or married he killed her relatives and put her into the airplane.
433
One woman among them cried, What will happen to my infant-child in my absence?
434
304. Uttara kanda. From the beginning to sarga 15: The summary of Ravanas background as
part of history of the Rakshasas Sumali was a Rakshasa. He built Lanka along with his brothers
and lived there for some time. Enemies (that is other than Rakshasas) had occupied Lanka. All the
Rakshasas left their country and took shelter here and there.
Visravasu not a Rakshasa. Devavarnini is his wife. Kubera is his son. After the Rakshasas
left Lanka Visravasu kept his son (Kubera) in Lanka. This means Visravasu belonged to the
enemy camp of Rakshasas.
Sumali had a daughter called Kaikasi. Kaikasi married Visravasu with an intention to give
birth to a great hero like Kubera. (She could have married Kubera, couldnt she? .... Maybe she
thought the old man would fondle her!) Ravana was born to Kaikasi. Ravana and Kubera were
brothers. The mothers were different. But Ravana became a Rakshasa. Why? Because his mothers
belonged to the Rakshasa race. Kubera did not become Rakshasa. (Again, Ravanas lineage was
also that of his father!)
After Rama grew up, Sumali (his mothers father) told his grand son, Lanka is ours. Occupy
it! Ravana sent a word to Kubera, Lanka belonged to the ancestors of my mother. Leave it and
go away. Visravasu also told Kubera, Ravana is a stupid fellow, a strong man. Leave Lanka.
Kubera left Lanka. Since then Lanka has become the home for Rakshasas. [All these are fights
for places of residence!]
By the time Ravana abducted Sita, Ravanas sons had also got married.
435
436
437
305. Sundara kanda, sarga 27: Though Trijata was an attendant of Ravana, we can assume
that she belonged to Vibhishanas group.
306.Sundara kanda, sarga 36, sloka 20 and sarga 26, sloka 18: As I am away in a different
country, has Rama given up his love for me? Sita.
Rama who has great valour cannot rescue his wife. What must the reason for this be?
I doubt that Rama does not know that I am here. If he knew, will Rama who is illustrious
keep quiet? He will get angry and see that no Rakshasa survives in this world by using his arrows.
He will destroy the city of Lanka. He will dry up the seas Sita.
307. Sundara kanda, sarga 30, sloka 12 and sarga 33, sloka 2: Hanuman came at night and
sat on the tree, hadnt he?.... Ravana came early in the morning, didnt he? But, Hanuman thinks
as if the same night continued. If I dont talk to Sita before sunrise and convince her, she will
sacrifice her life, thinks Hanuman. Further, He found time to speak to Sita while the Rakshasawomen were sleeping. One can think that he waited till the second night. But such logic does not
find place in religious literature. The logic keeps changing as the situation in the story demands!
Hanuman had to search for Asoka vana so it is night.
Ravana had to talk to Sita so it is day.
If Hanuman wants to talk to Sita, all the maidservants had to go to sleep so it is again
night. If necessary it will be after noon.
438
such people.
Hanuman has already got down from the
tree and is in front of Sita obediently.
Mother! Your husband is anxiously
waiting for you.
Sita is unable to believe her ears. Is my
husband anxiously looking for me? She looked
in all sides eagerly.
My name is Hanuman, mother!...We are
Vanaras. Our country is Kishkindha. I am
working as a minister under king Sugriva. Our
king is a good friend of your husband. Listen
to my words completely. Dont grieve. These
wicked fellows will get their due
punishmentYour husband has not come here.
He is in our kingdom.
As soon as I return and tell him about you,
he will come here with a great army and fight a
battle against these wicked people
With the army?.... Where is the army? Can
I believe your words?
Alas! Please believe me, mother!...Your
husband came to Kishkindha and made friends
with our king. Our king is a very good man. He
will give his army to your husband and help
him. Sri Rama will definitely come here, fight
the battle, kill all these vile fellows and take
you back
308. Sundara kanda, sarga 32, sloka 11: On seeing Hanuman, Sita could not believe it and
thought very logically. I always think of Rama. Thats why I may be hearing about him, she
thought. She says, Meditating about Rama at all times and in all conditions, I recite Ramas
name. Now I am hearing the story in the concrete form in conformity with the recitation of
Ramas name. I am able to see it. Now, I am concentrating all my thoughts on Rama, meditating
about him and seeing him (Here it is Rama whom she sees!) The point here is that one can see
the shape of a person if she concentrates on that person only. Then all the devotees who see
god are also of this type, arent they?
Again, Sitas doubt. The wish of the heart does not have any shape, doesnt it? How scientific
is this? This is connected with rationalism! Why is the poet resorting to such rationalism?
Because it is necessary here. Because, Sita has to believe that Hanuman is a real human being.
If she simply thinks, It is my hallucination that I see Hanuman, things wont work. Therefore
she has to think, How is it that I see my hallucination It is not a hallucination that I see. It is
a fact. See another point. She is thinking, Is this an illusion that is caused due to a delirium due
to my fasting? The poet admits the fact that fasting results in delirium. Will he accept this point
at any other time? When he talks about some sage, the poet would say, This gentleman gave up
sleep and food for ten years and he attained great miraculous power. Then, delirium puts a
blank face as it could not catch that sage. An argument that suits the poets need!
439
309. Why doesnt he show that ring?.... He might have lost it somewhere! Shouldnt he show
it as soon as he came? Alas! What sort of man he is! Guess why he had not shown as soon as he
arrived.
440
310. Sundara kanda, sarga 33, slokas 6, 9 & 11: See Hanumans words while addressing Sita.
O woman with beautiful buttocks! (vararohe); O woman with beautiful waist! (sumadhyame);
Based on the features of your breasts and buttocks etc. (vyanjananichate yani lakshanani)
This is how it went on. Here also the poet struggled for rhyme in poetry. True, that there ought
to be rhyme and rhythm in poetry. Otherwise, it cannot be called poetry. But, the words used must
be appropriate to the nature of the given characters and the contexts. If Hanuman also addresses
Sita, O woman with beautiful buttocks! O woman with beautiful breasts! then where is the
appropriateness in the portrayal of characters? He could have used the words like sushile,
gunavate or some such words, couldnt he? The poet possesses adequate diction, doesnt he?
But, we find breasts and buttocks even when Hanuman describes Sita!
441
311. Sundara kanda, sarga 35, slokas 9 to 22: In the context where Hanuman describes Rama
in the presence of Sita, Hanuman made an extraordinary description. In this description, the poet
did not make things clear. A man who possessed three stiff limbs, three reddish, three long and
fourteen of equal size. This is the way he described. Three red limbs mean what are they?
Palms, soles of the feet and rims of his eyes. Three stiff limbs mean? Chest, arm and fist. A man
who had four kinds of gait means, Gait of a lion, a tiger, an elephant and a bull! Thus, the
translators elaborated what the poet had said vaguely. However, the translators expressed the
same view.
All scholars have identical views with regard to Sapta Rishi (seven sages), Nava graha (nine
planets), Ekadasa Rudrulu (Eleven Rudras), havent they? Similarly, with regard to the features
of Rama also. In the elaborated descriptions, there are some strange things.
Rama has four parts that are of equal size: ends of hair, knees, and testicles. He has feet that
do not show sweat and nerves. He has only one hair in one pore of the skin. He has three curlings
in his head. He has four large teeth on each side. He is eight feet long. He has a lingam (penis)not
very long. This is how the description went on! How did Hanuman see Ramas penis and
testicles? Moreover, he is telling about them to Sita!
312. Sundara kanda, sarga 35m sloka 89: See, for what reason Hanuman was born to
Vayudeva. When my father Kesari went out of the country after killing a Rakshasa called
Sambanana on the command of celestial sages, I was born by the grace of Vayudeva. (When
Vayudeva came here, who was born to Vayus wife and by whose grace?)
313. The reason for Hanuman not giving the ring to Sita as soon as he saw her is not that he had
forgotten about the ring. If he had given the ring at the beginning itself and if Sita had believed
him, there would not be an opportunity to narrate in several sargas about Sitas fear and
doubts, beautiful scenes of Hanumans description of Sri Ramachandra. That is why the poet did
not make Hanuman give the ring at the beginning itself. However, Sita could have asked Hanuman
to tell about her husband, even if he had given the ring at the beginning.
442
314. Sundara kanda, sarga 36, sloka 42: Drowned in the grief over Sita, Rama does not pay
any attention even if snakes crawl on his body. Concentrating his mind on you, Sri Rama does
not drive away forest flies, mosquitoes, insects and snakes even if they trouble him. This is a
kind of cupid state of mind, they say! Cupid-state of mind or stupid-state of mind!
443
315. Sundara kanda, sarga 36, slokas 22 to 24: Kausalya, Sumitra, Bharata. Does my
husband enquire about the welfare of these people? She never asked about Kaika. All right!
However, she did not ask about Satrughna either. Always the name of Bharata. She refers to
Lakshmana only because he does the drudgery. What was the reason for paying special attention
to Bharata which she had not shown to Satrughna?.... Because he had power. Will Bharata who
loves his brother send the army for my sake? asked Sita. Whether he will send or not let us see
at the time of the battle.
444
316. Sundara kanda, sarga 37, sloka 29: In Valmiki Ramayana, Hanuman is a monkey, isnt
he? He says he would carry Sita on his back. Then Sita ridicules him, How can you carry me for
such a long distance? I think this is your monkeys mentality. Receiving help from that monkey,
making it do things for them and ridiculing! Then how does a Vanara who does heroic acts
have a monkeys mentality? This is an attitude of a society that treats servants carelessly and
contemptuously. For Sitas sake, who ridiculed him, Hanuman expands his body in Asoka vana
and exhibits a gigantic form. How bold the poet is!
How will Rama and Lakshmana come to Lanka? asks Sita. Sitting on my back, the best
among men Rama and Lakshmana will come to you! said Hanuman.
Sita did not say, How can you get them? It is your monkey mentality. Because their arrival
was very necessary; wasnt it? (Or, she might have thought, If they fall in the sea, let them!)
317. Sundara kanda, sarga 38, slokas 15 to 40:
This is the episode of Kakasura, which Sita asked Hanuman to tell Rama. In the forest, I was
relaxing on the thigh of Rama. Then a crow, desirous of my flesh, pecked in the middle of my
breasts. (Where did it peck, Mr. poet-sir? In the middle of breasts? Yes sir. It is the only place,
which you see.) I threw a small earth stone at it. But, it continued to peck at my breasts, hiding.
Then, I tried to take out my cestus. My upper garment slipped. Rama laughed. I felt shy and got
annoyed. Later, I continued my annoyance, lying on Sri Ramas thigh. Again, Sri Ram slept on my
thigh. Again, that crow pecked in the middle of my breasts. It flew high and pecked me repeatedly.
(The poet himself assumed the form of a crow and does not let go off the breasts of Sita!) Drops
of blood trickled from my breasts and Ramas body got wet. Due to the torture of the crow, I woke
Sri Rama up from his sleep. Sri Rama woke up and was infuriated and hissed, Oh, lady with thighs
that resemble the trunk of an elephant! Which wicked fellow pecked you in the middle of your
breasts? Seeing the crow that stood with nails wet with blood, Rama angrily took some blades of
sacred grass, chanted the mantra and threw Brahma weapon. It chased the crow in all the three
worlds. The crow roamed the three worlds for nine times and finally fell on the feet of Rama as it
did not find any one who could save it. The Brahma weapon, due to the mercy of Rama, destroyed
only the right eye of the crow and saved its life Sita asked Hanuman to remind him of this
sweet memory. People say Brahma weapon on a sparrow! So, Brahma weapon on a crow! Why
didnt he throw it on Ravana?
445
446
Link-7
The 10th story begins with Hanuman going to Rishyamuka and telling Rama about
Sita. This is the Link between the two stories.]
319. Sundara kanda, sarga 30, slokas 20 to 40: Hanuman met Sita. Talked to her. The job for
which he came was done. Now he was thinking of fighting with the people in Lanka. Before this
thought of fighting, what were his thoughts? This we should know. Before he entered Asoka
vana, he hid on the tree and talked to Sita, he thought about how to behave in Lanka, what care he
had to take and how to avoid certain risks. These Rakshasa-women will catch me or kill me if
they see me. If Rakshasas corner me and if I have to fight with them, I will not be able to cross the
sea later due to that exertion. Then Sri Rama will not get any information about Sita. The Rakshasas
may kill Sita. If they kill me or take me as hostage, there will be no one who can cross the sea and
carry on the task of Sri Rama. However much I think, I do not see any other Vanara who can cross
this sea, if I die. Success and failures in battle will be uncertain. A sensible person does not get
involved in doubtful activities. Arrogant messengers spoil good tasks. Hanuman, who wanted
to be a sensible messenger, now wants to pick up a quarrel.
Sarga 37, slokas 47 to 57: See what Sita told Hanuman when he said, I will sit you on my
back and carry you. Sita tells him what dangers will befall if their attempts to escape reveal
themselves. On seeing me, the Rakshasas will chase us. Danger may befall you while rescuing
me. There is no doubt about it. Rakshasas will take me to Ravana. Or slay me. Or take me to a
secret place which Vanaras, Rama and Lakshmana will not know about it. Then all the attempts
of Sri Rama will be wasted. Success and failures are doubtful. It is not possible to assure success
and failure before hand. The poet argued so in these two contexts. Now, see how he is
arguing in favour of fighting with the Rakshasas and burning Lanka.
Sarga 41, up to sloka 13: When a messenger who had been sent to do a job attempts
to do several jobs, he must see that the first task is not spoiled. (Can Hanuman assure before
hand that because of the present proposed action, his first action will not get spoiled and Ravana
will not get Sita killed?) An efficient man is one who accomplishes a task through several means.
In the case of finding out the strength and weakness of these Rakshasas, the tactic of use of force
alone is the means. In a battle, if some warriors die, the remaining will surrender. Hence, I will
confront Ravana who is accompanied by his ministers and armies and find out his strength and
travel from here comfortably. I, who possess valour that is impossible to defeat, will confront the
Rakshasas who possess terrifying valour kill their armies go to Kishkindha. This is
Link-7
After thinking so, Hanuman began to
uproot all the trees in Asoka vana. He uprooted
great trees. He pounded the rocks into powder.
He tore away wells and lakes. He bulldozed all
the mansions.
Birds covered the entire sky and cried for
help. Big lions ran out of the caves. Hearing
sounds of destruction from Asoka vana, all the
people in Lanka trembled with fear.
Except the place where Sita was, Hanuman
destroyed every thing and sat on the wall near
the main entrance. The Rakshasa-women
sleeping near Sita woke up. (Oh! What a rocky
sleep!) They saw the destroyed Asoka vana.
They saw the monkey that sat on the gate. They
gathered round Sita and asked her, Who is that
Vanara? Why did you talk to him?
What do I know? I also fear him like you
do. You know about your Rakshasas.
Some maidservants went to Ravana. Some
Vanara came, talked to Sita and he is still there.
He has destroyed the entire garden except where
Sita is. Though we asked Sita about him, she
does not tell us anything, they said.
Ravana got infuriated and sent 80 thousand
warriors. All of them picked up iron pestles,
broad swords, spears, clubs and arrows,
surrounded Hanuman and began to throw the
weapons at him.
Expanding his body, Hanuman roared
frightfully. Victory to Sri Rama and
447
how Hanumans argument has changed! First he thought, if he fought, his strength would
diminish and he would not be able to go back. In such an event, he thought the Rakshasas would
either kill Sita, hide somewhere else or he himself might get defeated. where have these
arguments gone? See, as you go further in the story! See how many things he did that cause risk
to Sita. This poet uses logic that suits a given scene! One kind of logic there, one here! With his
logic of convenience, the poet can hold a particular parasol to a particular kind of sun!
320. Mr. Gattupalli Seshacharyulu translated Chaitya prasada as temple. Some scholars call
it a mansion.
321. In fact, Hanuman had come as a spy. He was expected to move about secretly and if had
wanted to do any other thing after he had finished the original task, he ought to have done it
secretly. If he was not a spy but a messenger, he ought to have met Ravana directly. Hanuman did
not fall under any of these categories. He claimed himself to be the messenger of Rama. Without
any secrecy, he said that he had spoken to Sita. Then why did Sita conceal this fact when the
woman-guards asked her? This means, Sita viewed it as some thing that should be kept a
448
secret and it should not be revealed, didnt she? Therefore, we cant say that the poet does
not know how messengers and spies ought to behave. Subsequently also, a messenger came from
Sugriva to Ravana before the battle. That messenger behaved like a messenger. Then why didnt
Hanuman behave like that? By the by, what is Hanuman? Is he a messenger or spy? Neither. He
was a big ruffian! A ruffian of Rama!
322. Sundara kanda, sarga 46, slokas 9 to 12: Ravana describes how strong Hanuman is. I
had seen Vali earlier, a very strong man, Jambavan, Nila, Dvivida and other Vanaras. Their lustre
and valour were not of this kind. Therefore, Hanuman has more strength than those men did!
Well, then, poet, why the hell couldnt this Hanuman defeat Vali but sat on Rishyamuka wailing
and looked for those who could help Sugriva?
449
Link-7
heroes! I know. You can destroy all the three
worlds. (These are praises to push people into
battle!) Dont feel proud that in a battle, you
will attain only victory. You have to fight while
protecting yourselves. (Okay, we will see how
well you fight in the battle). Take care! Ravana
sent them with caution.
Commanders started the battle with
weapons and armies.
Battle again!
Hanuman expanded his body like a hill,
flew into the sky and jumped on to the chariot
of a commander. That chariot pressed itself into
the ground along with the horses.
The remaining commanders intensified
their fight in anger. Hanuman beat two of them
with a big tree and killed them.
The remaining two threw spears and broad
swords. Hanuman threw the peak of a big
mountain and killed them.
After all the commanders had died,
Hanuman destroyed the entire army. Hitting one
elephant with another, he killed all the
elephants. Hitting a horse with another horse,
he killed all the horses. Hitting a soldier with
another soldier, he killed all the soldiers. (So,
he did every thing in accordance with the metre
of the poetry!)
The battlefield was filled with the heaps of
dead bodies, broken chariots, sliced heads and
abdomens. Hanuman climbed up the gate and
sat there again.
450
323. Sundara kanda, sarga 48, slokas 56 & 57: Who is this fellow? Whose man is he?
Where did he come from? What has to do in Lanka? Who gave him shelter? The Rakshasawarriors present there were questioning each other. Among them, some very angry Rakshasas
said to each other, Kill this fellow. Burn him. Eat him
Link-7
if those women were not beautiful and young?)
Ravana sat in the royal court surrounded by
many ministers and commanders.
Seeing Ravana, Hanuman thought,
Ravana is a man of lustre with great royal
qualities. But what is the use? He is an utterly
vile man. If he gets angry he will burn all the
worlds into ashes and drown them in the sea.
Otherwise, he could have become as great as
324
Indra!
Twirling his moustache, Ravana looked at
his ministers and ordered them, Decide about
this fellow!
A minister called Prahasta looked at
Hanuman and asked, Who are you? Why have
325
you come here?
Hanuman narrated every thing. I am the
messenger of Sri Rama. I am the minister of
Sugriva. My name is Hanuman. I spoiled Asoka
vana in order to get an opportunity to talk to
Ravana. When your soldiers came to fight, I
fought the battle only for my self-protection. I
dont yield to any weapon. I yielded to Brahmas
weapon only with a view to see Ravana. Then,
seeing Ravana, Hanuman said, Ravana!
Sugriva is like your brother. (Sugriva is a
brother of Rama on the one hand and also a
brother of Ravana on the other!) Sugriva has
enquired about your welfare. Sugriva himself
sent me. (Then why does he say that he is
451
324. Hanuman had already seen Ravana in Asoka vana. Then he was not surprised. The poet
had forgotten that Hanuman had seen Ravana once. He is describing it as if this was the first time.
Or, does he appear to Hanuman with so much brightness because he sees him while he is sitting
on the throne? This must be the reason. Ravanas brightness had come since he was on the throne
(because of his power!) Whoever sits on that throne will glow with brightness. The poet praises
Ravana at every place. He describes him as a great valorous man. This is because he is going to
say that such a valorous man too was defeated and died at the hands of Rama. He praised Vali in
the same way. He has to attribute the greatness of having conquered great men to Rama later,
doesnt he?
325. Sundara kanda, sarga 50, slokas 6 to 8: Ask where did this wicked fellow come from
and why? said Ravana. See how Prahasta, a minister, asked Hanuman: Oh, Vanara! Be relaxed! Many good things will happen to you! Dont fear. If Indra has sent you, tell us the truth. I
will release you. What was this appeasement of Hanuman? What was this assurance of a minister, (I will release you!) without the permission of the king? This minister says he will release
a man who has terrorized so much and killed so many people!
452
thus.
Kill this fellow at once! Ravana shouted
furiously. (Ah! What a nice fury!)
326. Sundara kanda, sarga 52, sloka 12: The poet cannot write that Ravana did not get angry
at Hanuman, can he? Therefore, he is obliged to show that anger. It is unavoidable for him to
write that Ravana said he would kill Hanuman. However, the poet feels it is wrong on the part of
Ravana to say so. See what the poet says: Hearing Ravanas words which are unjust, full of
fault and about which base men feel happy Vibhishana, best among good men, spoke in a
better and meaningful way. The poet was glorifying Vibhishana.
If Hanuman were a messenger he ought to have come to Ravana at the beginning itself,
oughtnt he? Ravanas questioning, Is a messenger expected to do this? is unjust! Fault! Baseness!
According to the poet, in the whole of Lanka, Vibhishana alone appears to be a very good man.
Even in the dream of Trijata. while all the warriors in Lanka go to hell, Vibhishana alone goes
to heaven on an elephant!
In fact, Ravana, Kumbhakarna and Surpanakha were very ugly when they were born but
Vibhishana was not like that!
Uttara kanda, sargas 9 & 10: The last son of Kaikasi was Vibhishana. He was a man of
justice. When he was born, it rained flowers. The musical instruments of gods were heard in the
sky.
When Brahma asked Vibhishana, What do you want? Vibhishana did not ask for any bad
things. He asked, my mind should never abandon justice. We will see later what sort of justice
this man has and why the poet glorifies him.
Link-7
among the best. There is no equal to you in this
world Heed my appeal and spare the
messenger.
Ravana was lost in thought. (Nay, he was
lost in praises.)
All right! Give him some severe
punishment. Burn that tail. Let us see how he
will show his face to his people! Set fire to the
tail and parade him in all the streets, the king
ordered.
The soldiers covered Hanumans tail with
cloth, poured oil on it and lit the fire.
The procession started with shouts,
drumbeats, screams and laughter.
While the soldiers kicked, hit and paraded
him in the streets, Hanuman felt happy, Last
night I did not see all the streets clearly. I can
see them clearly in the day now.
The procession was going on with the big
tumult. Women, aged and the young people
every one came out of their houses, abused
Hanuman and were happy.
What sort of a messenger are you? Rascal!
(Let your face be burnt!), all the people abused
327
him with enthusiasm.
(All people in Lanka seemed to have a
political consciousness, didnt they?)
Hanuman also saw new kinds of airplanes
and secret underground houses.
The maidservants in Asoka vana went to
Sita and told her with joy, That monkey faced
fellow, who came for you, is fixed. They set
fire to his tail and parading him in the streets.
Sita felt great sorrow and prayed to the god
of fire. Oh, god of fire! If I get the fruits of
devoted wives, dont burn Hanuman. Cool
down! If I have the good luck of living with my
husband again, dont burn Hanuman, cool
down! If Sugriva was capable of making me
453
454
328. Sundara kanda, sarga 54, slokas 18 to 44: See the description of burning Lanka. The fire
which is equivalent to a crore suns like a lightning with various kinds of frightening sounds,
as if tearing the entire globe surrounded all Lanka and glowed.
Oh, Father! Oh, Child! Oh, my husband! Oh, my life! Every thing is ruined! Some Rakshasas
made many kinds of sounds.
Some women, spreading their hair, carrying the infant children, fell quickly from the burning
upstairs and glowed like lightning in the sky.
The fire is not satisfied with wood or grass. The earth is not satisfied with the dead bodies
of Rakshasas. Hanuman, the best man among Vanaras, is not satisfied, though he lit the fire.
The flames of the fire glowed like Modugu flowers at some place, like Burugu flowers at
some places and like Kunkuma flowers at some place.
At some places, while the fire was cooling down, the clouds of smoke glowed like black
lotuses.
All the best Rakshasas of Lanka gathered and talked in this manner.
All gods, best sages, Gandharvas and Vidyadharas felt indescribable joy.
Thus, Sundara kanda (Beautiful kanda) is nothing but the beauty of the burning of Lanka
filled with the cries of infant children, the wailing of people and cries for help with fear for their
lives! If we recite this Sundara kanda rains fall! Droughts disappear! We get good fortune!
If any king of a foreign country invades our country, plunders our riches and wealth, demolishes
our temples, causes loss of life and property. our history will be filled with the atrocities of that
king. What, then, did Ramas ruffian messenger do in Lanka?
Link-7
Hanuman dipped his tail in the sea and
cooled it down. He thought of Sita. Alas! Sita
must have been burnt down. What a great
blunder I committed! That is why people say
anger is the cause of ruin. Angry people kill
even their teachers. I have killed Sri Ramas wife.
Alas! I could not think of Sitas safety!.... If Sita
has died, what is the use of my going to
Kishkindha?..... Hearing the news of Sitas
death, Rama and Lakshmana will die. Seeing
the death of his dear friend, Sugriva will die.
Bharata and Satrughna will die in Ayodhya.
(They bring in Satrughna in the matter of
deaths!) If the Raghu dynasty perishes, all the
people will wail loudly Oh! All this has
happened due to my monkey mentality. I will
not go to Kishkindha at all. I will sacrifice my
life here itself. Though I suspect this, can fire
burn Sri Ramas wife? It has not burnt me, hasnt
it? Hanuman was lost in thoughts and felt sorry.
He heard what the gods were talking in the
sky.
Aha! Though all Lanka has burnt down,
the place where Sita was staying is safe!
Though all the people of Lanka are wailing, Sita
Devi is safe! Hanuman has done a great job
worthy of praise.
Learning about Sitas safety, Hanuman felt
happy. I myself will go to see her, he thought,
he went into Asoka vana and stood in front of
Sita.
Mother! You are alive due to gods grace.
I could see you again.
Sita felt very happy about what Hanuman
had done and praised him. You are the
annihilator of the enemies. Your strength alone
will fetch you glory. You alone are capable of
killing all these people. You alone will get the
fame of bringing the entire Vanara army here.
When Sri Rama comes here, he will destroy
455
456
Link-7
Hanuman has accomplished a great task.
You follow what he says, said Angada.
The atrocities of the Vanaras increased.
The guards of the garden went to
Dadhimukha and cried. Unable to control his
anger, Dadhimukha took a tree and proceeded
to beat up the soldiers.
Angada felled Dadhimukha to the ground,
hit him with his knees and beat him until he lost
consciousness.
Dadhimukha fainted for some time and got
up. I will report this to the king. He will surely
get Angada beaten with canes. He flew swiftly
and went to Sugriva.
Sugriva was with Rama and Lakshmana.
(Dadhimukha might have gone first to the
kings palace and again came back swiftly to
Rishyamuka, if Sugriva were not there. It was
only flying, wasnt it!)
Dadhimukha told Sugriva, Angada came
along with the army and completely destroyed
Madhuvana. When I tried to prevent him, he
beat me up until my whole body bled. They
beat me all our guards in the garden.
Lakshmana asked Sugriva, What is this
guardian of the garden saying? Why is he
grieving? (Perhaps, he didnt know the
language!)
Sugriva told him about what happened and
said, If all those who went towards the South
are so happy, they must have accomplished the
task. They must have seen Sita. Hanuman alone
457
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
329. Sundara kanda, sarga 64, sloka 38: The Vanaras felt very happy and descended near Sri
Rama. Then, a great shouldered Hanuman bowed his head and informed him that Sita was safe
with her vow of devotion to her husband.
It is not enough if he said, Sita is safe. He has to say, Sita is safe, being a loyal wife. This
is real welfare! This is the news, which Rama wanted!
458
Story-10
The Gift
that didnt Cost a Penny!
R
459
460
461
462
463
464
Then..............
That wicked man began to abuse you,
Ramayya!
Rama startled. What? Me?
Yes, my lord! You He said, That Rama
is without a kingdom. He is useless before me.
He cannot equal me in penance, wealth, valour
or in any other thing. You might have committed
some sin in the past birth. That is why you have
lived in a forest for so long. How can you be
happy with a man who has lost his kingdom?
Hereafter, enjoy all the royal pleasures.
All the logicians there were fascinated at
the logic of Ravana. One scholar argued with
another scholar. Yes. Each word of Ravana is
true. Rama is inferior to Ravana in penance.
Inferior also in wealth What about in valour?
Well, we have to wait and see. However,
Hanuman said that Ravana was great in archery,
isnt he? What is untrue in it when Ravana said
that Rama is a fallen man? A king who has
lost his kingdom is a fallen man, isnt he? Rama
is dreaming of getting back that kingdom and
enjoy royal pleasures, isnt he? It is true that
Sita has had no royal pleasures for the past
fourteen years, isnt it? Rama is waiting for all
this, isnt he? Ravana has also said the same
thing. We cannot dismiss his words.
Hanuman! Did Sita not say anything even
then? asked Rama calmly but with anger.
Alas! Why not my lord! Though she kept
quiet at the beginning, later she retorted angrily
to every word of his. She abused that wicked
man a lot. You should love your wives. Do not
desire me. I do not even glance at any man other
than my husband. Take me and hand me over
to my husband. Otherwise my husband will
destroy you completely. But that wicked man
did not fear!... Did not change his heart.
Then, what did he say? somebody asked
curiously
Thats what I was about to say. He sticks
to his word. You are very beautiful. Your
beauty is making me lose my mind and go mad.
Manmadha is chasing me towards you with his
flowery arrows. Be kind! Be merciful! and in
465
466
467
469
470
471
472
473
474
330. We will know, as we proceed further, how Rama suspects Bharata and keeps a vigilant eye
on him in respect of property.
475
331. In case Hanuman had brought Sita from Lanka....How will be Ramas thoughts?...Will he
get angry at Sita or not? Will he get angry at Hanuman or not. Think about it.
476
477
333. Yuddha kanda, sarga 1, slokas 8 to 10: See how Rama is classifying servants into different
categories. A servant is called the best servant if he accomplishes a difficult task assigned by his
master. A servant is called mediocre if he accomplishes only the assigned task but does not do
the work, which the master had not assigned even though he is capable of doing it, and is aware
that his master will be happy if he did it. A servant is called base if he does not accomplish any
task which his master assigns him even though he is capable of doing it. Thus, there are three
categories among the servants! What will a servant gain if he is given the title best servant? His
life will never be free from that servitude. It will immensely benefit only the master. The master will
thus find a servant who remains loyal like a dog and do the drudgery like a beast of burden. As it
is not always possible to make servants work by punishing, threatening and subduing them,
there must be a system whereby servants willingly do the work. This is a principle that makes the
servants do more labour in order to be called the best servants. This is the secret of the best
servants. If poor people listen to some puranic recital about Sri Ramas praises for Hanuman that
you are the best servant. All those people are the best people if they do more service to their
master loyally, then they form a view that they ought to serve their masters more faithfully.
478
[Translation: B. R. Bapuji]
There is no Link between the 10th Story and the 11th Story.
Now, the 11th Story begins at once.
It means, this exploitative principle has fulfilled its function.
Rama talked only about the service of the servants but he did not talk any thing about the
remuneration that masters ought to give to their servants. There are no distinctions like best,
mediocre and base among masters. Masters are always the best. All of them belong to the first
category.
479
Story-11
480
481
482
483
Tut! Stop!
You are also a younger brother of that
elder brother, arent you?
Lakshmana turned his face towards
Sugriva.
Sugriva was also worried. Though he had
just spoken out somehow. But building a
bridge over the sea reaching Lanka Battle
with Ravana. Will all this happen?
He looked around with hesitation and fear.
Hundreds of commanders were around him.
They were so capable of controlling the
armies, fighting big battles and accomplishing
great tasks. While I have many capable men
under me..
Adjusting his jewels and looking at Rama
proudly Sugriva said, Why is it not possible?
Dont we have commanders of the Vanara
army? He sparkled a smile.
All the army commanders staggered and
looked at each others face.
Building a bridge over the sea? Is it
possible for us? Why has the king assigned this
job to us? Will he ask us to build it? They
looked in all directions worriedly.
People! People all around!
Crowds of people. Crowds of people!
On trees, on hills, on mounds. In all the
houses villages. throughout the kingdom.
Their courage their strength and
capabilities their innocence. their sacrifice
for kings their martyrdom when there are
many such people.
The fear of the commanders abated. They
looked at the king with smiling faces.
The king turned to another side.
The commanders who were at that side too
showed their smiling faces.
The fear of the king fully abated. He looked
at Rama with a smile. All my ministers and
commanders are very enthusiastic. They will
336. Yuddha kanda, sarga 2, slokas 9 to 12: Finally, Sugriva himself gives the idea of how to
cross the sea. It had not occurred to Rama. Sri Rama! Think about building a bridge over the sea
and conquer the city of Ravana, the king of Rakshasas. Without building a bridge on the sea, it is
not possible even for Indra to destroy Lanka. Realise that this entire Vanara army can cross the
sea and conquer the enemy only when we build a bridge over the sea. Thus, it was Sugriva
who gave the idea of building a bridge over the sea.
484
337. Yuddha kanda, sarga 2, slokas 7 & 8: On whom did Sugriva lay his hopes of building a
bridge? On his commanders. That is, on those who lead the armies. See what Sugriva says to
Rama. Rama! All these Vanara commanders are enthusiastic to do good for you. By the
blossoming of their faces it is clear that these Vanara commanders have enthusiasm. (It is clear
from their faces that they are in good spirits!) In this respect, my assessment is sound.
Rama was dependent on Sugriva.
Sugriva was dependent on his commanders.
The commanders on the armies.
That is on ordinary people!
This is the secret of the heroic deeds of great kings.
Heroism is always not of the rulers but of the people!
338. Yuddha kanda, sarga 3, slokas 2 & 3:
Rama wailed for a while as to how to cross the sea. Sugriva reprimanded him in a friendly
manner. He consoled him. Gave him an idea. After all this, look at what Rama says, I have the
power to cross the sea either by the impact of my penance, or building a bridge or drying up the
sea and by various means. How many fortifications of land, water and hill are there in
Lanka? I want to know them as if I have seen them myself.
Fearing about some thing in the beginning and saying (after another person gave him an
idea), All right! I know about it. I can do that job some how or the other Tell me other things
is this a feature of honesty? Is this kind of character and behaviour an ideal to be cherished?
485
339. Yuddha kanda, sarga 3, sloka 20: Hanuman narrated Ravanas qualities. Rama! Ravana
is without vices like gambling. (The Telugu translators have translated the poets original word
prakritim as character without vices), he is always cautious of every thing, he reviews daily
four types of armed forces and is interested in fighting a battle himself.
340. Building walls and houses with gold, studding them with diamonds and precious stones
we have to understand these things as things presented in mythical form. In a story where
Ravana is a Rakshasa with ten heads and Hanuman is a monkey with a tail, this myth of golden
walls fits. But, in The Poisonous Tree we are treating Rama and Hanuman as human beings. In
such a situation, the description of golden walls does not fit. But the reason for my inclusion of
those descriptions in these stories is to say how ridiculous it is to believe the myths verbatim.
Some people believe every myth and description found in the epics and puranas. Such people
believe that there were golden walls in Lanka.
From the point of view of reality, we have to understand this golden wall as a stonewall.
Hanuman saw the enemies area. Surrounding that area there is a big wall. He tells us about it
with amazement. We have to understand golden walls only in this manner.
Hanuman said that the wall around Lanka was studded with gems and diamonds perhaps
the people in that village might have pasted cow dung on the walls to use as a fuel cake after it
dried.
486
341. Yuddha kanda, sarga 3, sloka 24: Trenches, canons (the poet used the word satagni) and
various kinds of machines (yantrani) are protecting.
Were there different kinds of war machines at the time when Ramayana was composed? Very
primitive kind of weapons might have been there. On seeing them, the poet might have imagined
bigger weapons.
Just as Pushpak airplane is a creation of the mere imagination, all these machines were also
created in the imagination.
Believing verbatim these cannon, golden walls, platforms studded with precious stones,
Pushpak planes and all these myths, admirers of Lanka argue that the civilization of Lanka was
greater than that of Kosala. But at the beginning of Ramayana, while describing Dasarathas
kingdom, the poet depicted as if all these machines were present in Kosala kingdom also.
487
342
488
they are the words used for the sake of rhyme in poetry. We should not believe such things
as facts. The point more important point than this is that Ramas strength is dependent on the
Vanara army and Ravanas strength on the Rakshasa-army. Their valour is dependent on the
strength of the people. This is what we should note.
489
343. Yuddha kanda, sarga 4, sloka 2: Rama says he will destroy Lanka quickly. He says to
Hanuman, I will quickly destroy Lanka, which you say is terrible. I am telling you the truth.
He says he is speaking seriously. All right! Let us see, how quickly he will destroy it!
490
344. Nila should walk this side. Jambavan should walk that side. Sushena that side, Vegadarshi
this side. This kind of assignment has nothing to do with the speciality of those characters. It
is merely taking some important characters and arranging them prosodically to various sides. Just
because Rama asked, we should not think that Nila was skilful or efficient. All are great warriors.
All are heroes among great warriors. Whomsoever the poet remembered first will walk in the front.
If the poetry, rhythm, or grammar does not permit them, they will walk behind.
345. Yuddha kanda, sarga 4, sloka 19 & 20: Since Vanaras in Valmikis Ramayana are monkeys, Rama and Lakshmana sit on Vanaras instead of walking.
Rama says, Just as Indra sits on Iravata, I will sit on Hanuman and make the army happy.
Just as Kubera, the Yaksha king, sat on the elephant called Sarvabhowma, Lakshmana should sit
on Angada.
He chose Hanuman. Perhaps he will carry him without dropping him down. He doesnt know
how Angada carries, does he? That is why, he asked Lakshmana to sit on Angada.
491
492
female or male?
You are crazy! You may say female or
whatever you like?
If he is a male, can he touch Sita Devi?
Rama asked Vayudeva to touch Sita first and
then touch him.
The other man, without paying attention,
looked at Ramas heat of romantic separation
with surprise.
. How have I lived all these days!
Whenever I see the moon in the sky, I feel happy
that I see Sita through the moon since Sita also
sees the same moon.. Lakshmana! the fire of
this romantic separation is burning me. I cannot
bear this any longer. I will lie down in the sea.
That flowery archer cannot do any thing to me
But all the water in the sea may evaporate due
to the heat of my romantic separation!
It is nice! Then we can happily cross the
sea, said Lakshmanas commonsense quickly.
Lakshmana startled and turned his head to
the other side.
What kind of a talk is this?
When your brother behaves so vulgar,
cant the people around however tribal they
may be understand what is good and what
is bad?
Enough! Stop it! Dont think you know
more than my brother does! He is feeling so
sad because he is unable to forget his wife even
for a moment..
You and your brother are made for each
other! Any way, you always find fault with me.
The commonsense felt slighted and
disappeared with tears.
It is better if Sri Rama lies down in the sea.
The sea will dry up, some one said.
Lakshmana had not looked at that side.
People at the back hit those in the front on
their shoulders and asked them, What is
happening in the front?
Lakshmana! When that wicked man was
abducting her, my dutiful wife cried, My
husband! My husband! The same cry is
346
piercing my heart! It is echoing in my ears.
Lakshmana turned pale. What is that call?
When did he hear it? Is brother entering the
state of madness? Brother-sir!....Be
courag.
493
346. Yuddha kanda, sarga 5, sloka 7: While Ravana was abducting, my love called, Oh, my
husband! That call is burning my body like poison, says Rama. This is not saying, Sita might
have called like that. Might have cried so. Rama says it as if he himself had heard it. This
madness may not diminish until they get an idea of how to build that bridge over the sea!
347. Yuddha kanda, sarga 5, sloka 5:
Now the reason for Ramas grief has changed. When he has the strength and capacity to
rescue his wife, it doesnt look nice if he wails, Shall I see Sita? Shall I get Sita? So, the poet
discovered another great reason. I am not feeling sad because my love is away. I am not feeling
sad because the enemy had stolen her. I am feeling sad because Sitas age is being wasted, says
Rama. So, Ramas sorrow is that Sitas age is going waste without enjoying sex!
Well, what about the age of Lakshmana who was there having left his wife behind?
Let the age of his wife be like that! What about Lakshmanas wife? Why dont Lakshmana
and his wife come to Ramas mind?
348. Yuddha kanda, sarga 5, slokas 12 to 14: While there is a task of crossing the sea and
surrounded by Vanara army, see how leisurely this gentleman is enjoying the heat of sexual
separation (Viraha tapa)! When can I see Sita, who has large eyes! When can I lift Sitas face,
which is like a lotus, and drink her lips, which are like the Donda fruit just as a patient drinks
medicine? When will the breasts of Sita which are strong like palm fruits, which are close to
each other and which tremble gently when they touch me get me? This is poetry!
This is the occasion for the heat of sexual separation!
Description of Sita Devis breasts amidst so many people! Well, this is the sex of Sri Rama!
The poet does not have a thought whether what he is narrating is proper or not; appropriate to the
context or not. In feudal poetry, the hero must always enjoy the heat of sexual separation. He
must always describe breasts and thighs of women. It will be great poetry if they are constantly
mentioned. Such holy poetry!
Notice another point. All this feeling of sexual separation is for Rama only. Sita does not
have it. Nowhere does she talk of the feeling of sexual separation, sexual desire, Manmadha,
his arrows etc. Sita had protected the honour of women!
494
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
There is no Link between the 11th Story and the 12th Story.
Now, the 12th Story begins at once.
349. It seems he was frightened for he practised the vow of one wife in the birth of Rama
hence kept so many thousands of wives in the birth of Krishna.
and
495
Story-12
497
352. Yuddha kanda, sarga 6, slokas 13 to 15: (1) It is the best idea if we think in accordance
with what elders say traditionally. (This is totally good.) (2) It is mediocre if everybody thinks in
his own way but arrives at a consensus after discussion and argument. (This is turning towards a
wrong thing from a good thing.) (3) It is base if everybody considers his own thought important
and finds no use in consensus. (This is totally a bad thought.)
See how these morals turn upside down. (1) If people accept uncritically whatever the elders
have been saying since long, where is the scope for a thought there? What remains there is to
recall whatever elders have said. This method which does not allow ones own thinking and
willingness is in fact a base method. (Totally bad.) (2) Arguments and discussions are essential.
They lead to progress. But, if we insist that all people must finally abide by a single view after
many discussions, does it not mean compromise on the part of some? In this method, we find
compromise instead of determination. Yet, this method is somewhat better because there is some
scope for arguments and discussions here. (A change toward good from complete badness.) (3)
It is better to hold ones own view if we think consensus is not good. (The poet used the word
sreeyah). Is consensus possible when there are different kinds of views and mutually contradictory
opinions?... Will it be consensus? This is not a compromise with which people agree against their
will. It is the best method to hold ones own views, thoughts and theory when they realise that
499
501
355. Yuddha kanda, sarga 9, slokas 13 & 14: See how Vibhishana defends Rama! ..What
harm did Sri Rama do to Ravana, the king of Rakshasas. As Khara himself transgressed and tried
to attack him, Rama killed Khara in order to protect himself. Everybody in the world ought to
protect their life in accordance with their strength? Vibhishana argues that Rama killed Khara
since Khara himself went to fight him. So, it is not Ramas fault. He is not bothered why Khara
went to fight in the first place.
503
358. Yuddha kanda, sarga 15, slokas 10 to 12: See how Vibhishana is abusing Indrajit! You
must be killed. Or a bad minded man who called a hasty boy like you to a place where people
discuss politics should be killed (Vibhishana means that Ravana should be killed.)
You are a fool who does not know what to do and what not to do; you have not been
reprimanded by elders, you have a cruel nature, you are a base fellow, you are vile and you are
stupid. Because of your youth you talk like this. You call your self a son of Ravana, appear to
be his friend but in fact you are his enemy! this is how the stream of abuses of Vibhishana went
on. Is Indrajit a fool as Vibhishana has described? Is he incompetent to talk politics? Is it stupidity
to call a person to discuss about battles though he participated in great battles and been victorious?
Is there any single justifiable word in what Vibhishana has spoken? Indrajit must be killed! Even
the person who has called Indrajit to the assembly too must be killed! It is such a blunder to call
Indrajit to the assembly! The reason for the unjustified nature of Vibhishanas words is that
his thoughts are hypocritical. The poet is struggling a lot to project Vibhishana as a very good
man. Let us suppose that Vibhishana is a very good man and he took liberty and abused Ravana
and Indrajit out of his anxiety that he does not want Lanka to face the threat of a battle. Then why
should Vibhishana have so much reverence and respect for Rama who is their enemy? What is
the need for him to argue that Rama is not at fault? Is it necessary to show reverence and respect
toward the enemy, in order to argue against the battle? The hypocrisy of Vibhishana is revealed
505
The first time: He tells in the assembly not to go for a battle and give back Sita to Rama
(Kumbhakarna was not present in the assembly). The second time: He goes to Ravanas chamber, tells him how bad omens are seen across the country and preaches to him. The third time:
Again, in the assembly, he resumes abuses, morals and warnings. (Kumbhakarna is present this
time in the assembly). In this assembly, Ravana tells Kumbhakarna, You woke up after being
asleep for six months. Hence you were not aware that I have brought Sita. (It was ten months
since he had brought Sita. This means that Kumbhakarna was awake when Ravana had brought
Sita).
In this assembly, Vibhishana abuses Prahasta, Indrajit and the king and preaches to them.
(Abuses are all right but he bored every one a lot with his morals). By then the king had become
furious and banished Vibhishana. I have depicted all the incidents of these three scenes in one
scene.
In Valmikis Ramayana, after the king had asked him to go away, Vibhishana swiftly flew
into the sky along with his followers, hovered in the sky for a while, abused Ravana and then flew
away.
362. Yuddha kanda, sarga 17, slokas 2 to 5: Vibhishana paused in the sky along with four
followers. Stationed on the ground the Vanara commanders looked at Vibhishana, who looked
like a peak of Mount Meru and stood in the air like a dazzling flash of lightning.
See, what Sugriva said on seeing Vibhishana. Vanaras! A Rakshasa that has all weapons is
coming with four Rakshasas to kill us. Look at him. There is no doubt! Seeing the enemies, this
great Valorous king Sugriva keeping crores of warriors round him shivered valorously!
507
Aatavika balam (Jungle/Irregular army): When a king is compelled to increase his army, he
mobilises those who do not have military discipline and who are not well versed in military skill.
Such forces are Aatavika balam.
These categories apply not only to the armies of the kings but also the present day military.
Every government has a regular army, which we can call muula balam. The governments import
armies from other countries just as they buy arms. These armies come from one country to another
simply on some economic conditions. These are Mercenaries who work temporarily. We can
compare them with bhrutyu balam.
Even today, a government sends forces to another government whenever there is a need,
depending upon its political character. Such forces are mitra balam.
During an emergency and for certain tasks, a government may engage goons, pickpockets,
beggars, prostitutes (the so-called Lumpen or Ruined proletariat) in the military and police.
In addition, it releases murderers and bandits from prisons and uses them in certain specific
activities. Such masses as these do not possess training or skill concerning the military. We can
compare these people with Atavi balam.
The different categories among the armies, which Sugriva has mentioned, have been there
from the days of ancient kings to the present. The reason for this is that the societies of the past
and the present are based on exploitative private property.
All the soldiers belong to the working classes. They pursue this occupation merely for the
sake of their livelihood and give up their lives.
509
364. Yuddha kanda, sarga 17, sloka 27 and sarga18, slokas 5 & 6: See Sugrivas opinion of
Vibhishana! Because he is the brother of Ravana, the sinner, we have to punish and kill this
Vibhishana along with his ministers.We have to abandon this Rakshasa and should not admit
him. This Vibhishana left his brother who is in danger. Such a man as this, whom will he follow
at a time of danger? says Sugriva. What did he (Sugriva) do to his brother (Vali)? While his
brother was fighting with the enemy (Dundubhi), did he not abandon his brother in danger, by
placing a boulder so that he would not come out of the cave?... Those who do wrong are anxious
to make the world forget their wrongs. They want to be considered as very good persons by
saying. Ugh! See what they have done? If I were in their position, I wouldnt do that, you
know!
Sugriva too had the same anxiety. But it was not the intention of the poet to say, See how
hypocritical Sugriva is! The poet says Sugriva is a very good man and hence he had thought
about the welfare of Rama and argued against admitting Vibhishana into their camp.
Sarga 18, slokas 6 to 8: See Ramas comments on what Sugriva said: Laughing, Sri Rama
said to Lakshmana as follows: One who has not read scriptures and not grasped the specialised
meanings by serving elders speaks as the Vanara king Sugriva has spoken. Because Sugriva did
not want to admit Vibhishana, Rama ridiculed Sugriva out of annoyance. It is like saying, You
are an illiterate! What do you know! Yet you are rejecting my words.
511
In the same context, see how Rama says how great Bharata and he are! Sarga 18, sloka 16:
All younger brothers are not like Bharata. There isnt a son like me, a friend like you (Sugriva)
and a younger brother like Bharata. When he wanted to recognize a good brother, he recognized
Bharata. Why not Lakshmana? Lakshmana had come with him abandoning his wife and all comforts, hadnt he? Why didnt Rama recognise his service? The reason for praising Bharata is that
he had given away the kingdom to his brother though he himself was entitled to it.
Compared to riches and wealth, love and service have no value. That is why, Rama had not
recognized Lakshmana who had served him with devotion but considered Bharata as the best
brother.
In Ramas view, his younger brothers ought to be obedient and be good brothers. But, in the
case of others, younger brothers must deceive their elder brothers! Sugriva deceive Vali! Vibhishana
ought to deceive Ravana! Those younger brothers who deceive their elder brothers are great!
366. Yuddha kanda, sarga 18, sloka 38: After Rama autocratically (without caring anybodys
opinion) declared that it was a must to admit Vibhishana, Sugriva gave up his demand. Even to
me who has asked you to kill Vibhishana, it appears that he is pure. Because of his facial expressions, it is very clear to me that he is pure both inside and outside. (Vibhishana has already
become a pure man!) Rama! You are aware of the principles of justice. What is surprising if you
513
What should Rama remember first as soon as he heard that Vibhishana had come from
Lanka? He must remember Sita. He should have asked about the welfare of Sita. Although he did
not ask at the beginning, did he ask even at the end? Even after enquiring about the strength of
Lanka and its politics, did he ask even in passing, How is Sita? Do you know any thing about
her? Where was that memory?
515
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
368. Yuddha kanda, sarga 20, slokas 32 to 36: Suka came as a messenger. What did they do to
a man who came as a messenger? Later, on the orders of Sugriva, Vanaras caught Suka who
flew into the sky and crying like an orphan and tied him up. When the efficient Vanaras caught
and tortured him a lot, Suka called Rama loudly, the great man, and cried. Rama! These people are
cutting my arms and hitting my eyes!
As it would not look nice if Rama had ordered the Vanaras to catch Suka, the poet put the
blame on Sugriva. He depicted as if Sugriva himself had ordered them. Sugriva was also a great
politician, wasnt it? A great man of justice, wasnt he? Is he a fool who does not know how to act
in the case of a messenger. Has Suka done any of the wicked acts, which Hanuman did in Lanka?
Then why punish him? Why shouldnt the poet write as if Vanaras did not catch Suka and let him
off? It is the poets wish to thrash Suka since he was the messenger of the Rakshasas! And the
Vanaras (the mob of monkeys) are ready to bear the blame, arent they? He made Sugriva (not
Rama) order to catch Suka and thrash him until his (poets) grudge was satisfied.
If the question, Is it not wrong to hit the messenger arises, the poet will answer thus, It is
Sugriva who had it done. He is a Vanara, isnt he? What does that fellow know? If it were Rama,
would he have had such thing done? Moreover he had rescued Suka! It does not matter even if
Sugriva is blamed, it is enough if Rama is not blamed. Moreover, the reputation of Rama was that
he had rescued Suka!
Suka was a loyal messenger. He had acted totally in accordance with the wishes of his king.
He had come to tell Sugriva. Will such a person praise Rama? Does he think Rama is a virtuous
and pious man? Making even enemies praise Rama! The poet does not care how a given character
ought to speak in what manner! He does not care even if he gets an idea about it. Not satisfied
with his own sycophancy and that of the sages for Rama, he turns the enemies too into sycophants
of Rama. He has depicted that Sugriva tied Suka up out of stupidity and Sri Rama had him released
out of his sense of justice! Thus the poet gathered a basketful of fame for Rama. The poet
maligns anybody in order to bring fame for Rama. It could be Lakshmana, Bharata or Sugriva!
On the one hand, he receives help from Sugriva and on the other hand ridicules him! Except
slavery to Rama, the poet has no morality!
Link-8
371
517
Link-8
never have had such experience before. (Do
something and cross the sea!) I will see that all
the water crosses beyond banks and overflows.
(Then, you will also be washed away!) Now, I
will not keep quiet! Rama took out the bow
and threw arrows into the sea. They went
burning brightly and fell into the middle of the
sea.
Smoke rose over the entire sea. The waves
filled with crocodiles and serpents and rose as
high as the Vindhya mountain. Nagas and
Rakshasas in the nether world were scared. The
entire sea boiled and became disorderly. (Rama!
You have done what you vowed!) Not satisfied
with his anger, Rama is about to throw another
arrow, Lakshmana prevented him, Dont
throw! Dont throw!
Rama said furiously. Oh Samudra! I will
see that you sink to the level of nether world!
All your waters will burn, evaporate and
diminish. All the living creatures will lose
consciousness and die. I will build a bridge with
the rain of my arrows and make the Vanaras
cross the sea. Do you understand? Again, he
aimed his bow and got ready to throw Brahmas
arrow. (Lakshmana asked him not to throw it.
But who will listen him?)
The earth and sky broke with a great sound.
The sun, moon and stars lost their movements.
The peaks of mountains fell down like pebbles.
The entire world filled with smoke blocking all
the directions and paths. Lightening fell from
the sky. Bright fire rained. Rivers and lakes
became disorderly and upset. All the living
creatures cried out of fear. All the living beings
lost their consciousness and fainted.
The sea filled with ghosts, serpents and
Rakshasas and ran away crossing its shore.
(Poet-sir! All that you have described how
all the worlds turned upside down as soon as
Rama lifted his bow is beautiful. but I think
our readers will not believe it!)
Seeing Samudra frightened, Rama stood
519
374. Yuddha kanda, sarga 22, slokas 32 to 42: When Rama asked, Where do you want me to
throw this arrow, see how Samudra is confiding his difficulties. Dasyas who have furious
looks and cruelty are drinking my water. (The word Dasyas has many meanings like: enemies to gods, base, ugly, wicked, outcasts.)
Samudras words: paapaaha piibanti salilam mama = Sinners are drinking my water.
Link-8
All right! Build the bridge! Rama
commanded.
All the Vanaras went into the forest,
uprooted many kinds of trees: Maddi, Tati,
Marri, Maredu, Kobbari, Vepa, Chandra and
many more. They dragged them and began to
throw them into the sea. Some Vanaras went up
to the mountains, brought elephant-sized
boulders with the help of machines. (Poet-sir!
You are not yet in Lanka! You can see machines
when you go there. Why the hurry?)
Some Vanaras held straight bamboos and
ropes and took measurements every now and
then so that the bridge under construction had
no twists and turns.
Thus, all the Vanaras worked only during
the day time (The poet says this because a
question arises, Is it not dark during the
nights?) and built a bridge of 14 yojanas length
on the first day, 20 on the second day, 21 on the
third day, 22 on the fourth day and 23 on the
376
fifth day, with a width of 10 yojanas.
The bridge was ready and it touched the
Mountain Suvela on the other shore of the sea.
To see that bridge which was like the
parting of the hair on the forehead of the sea,
521
376. Have you noticed how practically they built the bridge? They cut the trees; broke the
stones and dragged them with difficulty. They did the usual kind of masonry. They took the
correct measurements. They worked only during the daytime. They built the bridge so realistically that they brought all the things that are necessary to build a bridge and built it as per the
procedure, over water for five days to an extent of 800 miles. The bridge was not ready in a
single moment with either miracles or chants, you know? It took five days in real time!
Yuddha kanda, sarga 25, slokas 2 & 3:
Ravana was surprised when he heard about the construction of the bridge. Rama built a
bridge which I have never heard of before at any time. I cant believe in any way the fact that he
built a bridge across the sea.
The primitive human beings had a big wish of crossing rivers and reaching the locations on
the other side of the rivers. It was a routine activity for them to easily cross small streams and
channels. It was also usual to cross somewhat wider water ponds by keeping big boulders and
trunks of trees horizontally. If we can cross great rivers in the same manner? If we can cross big
seas? In fact, these are necessary. Essential aspects in daily life crop up as intense wishes. Out of
anxiety to achieve them, people resort to their imagination. Whatever human beings wanted in
the primitive society, the same incidents became part of their stories. Today, whatever we want
523
Story-13
525
383
Ravana had sent spies in order to collect secrets of the enemies, hadnt he? They came in
disguise. If a party does not lose anything if its enemies have gathered its secrets, then how will
that information be useful to the enemies?
See, what Rama says further: You need not worry about your life since Vibhishana has
caught you. Unarmed messengers should not be killed. (The poet used the word duutau ).
Rama does not know the distinction between a spy and a messenger! Are the enemies who
came in disguise to gather secrets messengers or emissaries? Only Suka who came earlier was a
messenger. The two people who came now are spies and not messengers. (Even Hanuman was
not a messenger when he went to Lanka.)
One who passes on a message is a messenger.
There is a difference between the activities of messengers and spies. In the case of messengers,
kings observe certain rules, namely, that they should not be insulted or killed.
It is the poets anxiety to say, Sri Rama is a very noble man, you know! He is a man of
justice, you know! He did not have any one killed, you know! Whenever the poet wanted to
gather fame and reputation for Rama, it turns into disrepute or pure stupidity. They tortured Suka
and held him captive even though he had come as a messenger and behaved very obediently.
They respected those who had come as spies and gathered secret information. Moreover, while
seeing them off, they said, Do you want more secrets? Our people will tell you any number of
secrets you want. When they captured the spies who had gathered secrets, they should not let
them off and hold them in their custody, shouldnt they? But Sri Rama is sea of mercy. He does
not know how a sea of mercy behaves!
383. Yuddha kanda, sarga 25, slokas 29 to 34: See how Suka and Sarana are talking to
Ravana. Four noble men (that is Rama, Lakshmana, Sugriva and Vibhishana) are: equal to the
guardians of the world, warriors, well versed in archery, valorous and united. These four.. are
so capable that they can rout out Lanka along with its fort and place it elsewhere. (This means,
the rest of the army is not necessary!) If we see the form of Rama and his weapons, he seems to
destroy Lanka single-handedly. (This means the remaining three are also not necessary! If they
talk further, the job will be done even without the need of Rama!) Do not have hostility with
Rama. Be peaceful. Present Sita to Rama.
The poet makes spies and messengers of the enemy camp eulogise Rama.
384. Yuddha kanda, sarga 29, slokas 5 to 12: It is the intention of the poet to tell how and
why it is wrong on the part of the messengers, spies and ministers to oppose the king without
being loyal to him. To preach all those political ethics, the poet made Ravanas spies oppose
527
529
quarrelsome character, have destroyed the entire Raghu dynasty.. O Rama! People say
that death of the husband is the main danger to a woman. Seeing your final stage, I have become
a widow. (The poet used the word vidhava!) Rama! Brahmins had said that you would live for
a long time. The words of Brahmins have turned false. (This means, Brahmins words have not
turned to be false and they will never turn to be false since Rama did not die!) Even though you
are a man of scholarship and good nature, you have not escaped death. You are in heaven along
with the revered ancestors. It is true. (Perhaps, she has little doubt whether he went to heaven or
not). As a star in space, you are looking. (This is a belief that great people become stars after
their death!)
Rama married me who is a destroyer of the family. Ramas wife herself turned to be death
to him. In my previous birth, I prevented people, who were giving their daughters in marriage.
Hence, I am suffering now. (This is a talk about past deeds and past births!)
Yuddha kanda, sarga 48, up to sloka 21: The wise men who said that I would beget sons
and I would not become a widow have turned out to be liars. Women who have the marks of a
lotus will be consecrated on the throne along with their husbands. I have such lotus marks under
my feet. I do not find on my body those features because of which women are unfortunate and are
widowed. My locks of hair are fine, of even length and dark. My eyebrows are not joined. My
shanks are round and hairless. My teeth are closely set without any cavities. My eyes, eyebrows,
hands, feet, ankles and thighs are fleshy. The fingers of my hands and their nails are round and
evenly matched. My breasts are large, fully developed and touching each other. (So far, only men
used to describe the breasts of Sita. Now, Sita herself is describing her own breasts. It seems the
poet has lost his mind totally. He has no contextual sense at all as how one character ought
to speak or ought not to speak. See further, how Sita speaks about the nipples of her breasts!)
The nipples of my breasts are sunken in (magna chuchukau = with nipples that sank). This
means, however much women grieve, the poets eyes will be on their breasts! What baseness!
My navel is deep and the surrounding region is elevated while my flanks and bosom are fleshy.
My complexion is shining. The hair is soft. My feet touch the ground evenly. But all my good
features are a waste. It is not possible to conquer the god. This is how Sita felt depressed.
(The cause for her husbands death is the sin, which women commit. Their body marks are
the cause. Women are either noble or base depending on their bodily features. None of these
features applies to men.)
Here it is the intention of the poet to tells how women should cry if their husbands die.
Further, the poet has described in the subsequent part of the story, how one should lament on
various occasions: when wives, brothers or friends pass away!
Ramas grief if Lakshmana passed away; Lakshmanas grief if Rama passes away, Ramas
grief over Sugriva, Sugrivas grief over Rama thus the poet exhibited all their affection in
531
Link-9
The 14th story begins when Hanuman goes once again to Asoka vana. Between
these two stories, the battle took place. It us called Rama-Ravana Yuddham
(Battle between Rama and Ravana).The entire battle comes in this link.]
Link-9
Later, Ravana made safety arrangements for
Lanka. At the east gate Prahasta. At the south
gate Mahaparshva and Mahodara. In the west
Indrajit. In the north Suka and Sarana.
(The poet has already forgotten the fact that the
king had banished Suka and Sarana.)
Ravana said he too would come to the north
gate. In the middle of the city Virupaksha.
Making arrangements thus, Ravana thought
there would be no danger to Lanka.
533
390. Yuddha kanda, sarga 37, slokas 23 & 24: Vibhishanas words: These Rakshasas are akin
to wicked Ravana in respect of valour, virility, lustre, courage and arrogance. At this moment,
Rama! Do not feel annoyed! I am rousing your wrath. I am not trying to terrify you. You are
capable of packing off even gods with your valour.
Since Rama is a great warrior, his enemy too should be a great warrior. Rama had to defeat
such a great warrior. Hence, the poet depicts Ravana too as a great warrior.
391. Yuddha kanda, sarga 37, slokas 34 to 36: In this context, Rama said another thing as
follows: We, the seven of us, will fight in the form of human beings, he said. Who are these
seven? First, he mentioned Lakshmana and himself. Why should he specifically say, Both of us
will be in human form? Can they change into other form? Then, who are the remaining five?
aatmaa pancha maschayam sakhamama vibhiishanaha. Mama = My; sakha = friend;
aatmanaa = by him; panchamaha = the fifth one; ayam = this; vibhiishanascha = Vibhishana.
Vibhishana is the fifth one! Then, who are the other four? We have to assume that they are his
ministers.
This means Rama is saying, With Vibhishana, they are five people plus Lakshmana and I
the seven of us will be in human form.
Some translators interpreted this as follows: Me, Lakshmana, Vibhishana, who is like my
fifth brother, Sugriva, Hanuman, Angada, Jambavan seven of us will be in human form. But,
there are no names of Vanaras in Ramas words.
Link-9
telling me! Kings should never be hasty. (I was
not hasty since I am a king!) If some danger
had befallen you, why do I need Sita? Why
Lakshmana? Why Bharata? Why Satrughna?
Why should I live? I thought you would not
return. Had you not returned, I would have
fought the battle and crowned Vibhishana in
Lanka and Bharata in Ayodhya and given up my
life.
Sugriva felt excited and said with pride, I
know how great my valour is and what my
strength is! Thats why I went there. When I saw
the wicked man that abducted your wife, could
I restrain myself? As soon as I saw him, I got
393
angry. (Though you did not get angry!)
Appreciating Sugriva, Rama said to
Lakshamana, Lakshmana! Select a place where
fruit and water are available, we will plan a
strategy. (How many times do you plan?) None
of the omens is safe. The wind is blowing
harshly. The earth is trembling with fear. The
peaks of mountains are shaking. (Alas! It seems
his head is reeling!) Huge trees are falling down.
It is raining. There is lightning.(Thus, the
same old description continued here!) A black
dot is appearing on the sun. Stars do not seem
as usual. The world is going to be destroyed.
We have to start for the battle now itself. Saying
so, he descended Suvela mountain and started
toward Lanka.The Vanara army and the bear
army followed Rama, with lion-like roaring. On
hearing their roaring, lions and elephants ran
hither and thither.
All the Vanaras routed trees and hills, held
535
537
Link-9
They fought fiercely at every place. They
killed each other with one stroke.
The earth was drenched in blood.
Vibhishana and his followers furiously
fought with the army of the Rakshasas.
Duels went on at every spot on the
battlefield.
Indrajit with Angada.
Sugriva with Praghana.
Lakshmana with Virupaksha.
Vibhishana with Mitraghuna.
Nala with Pratapana.
Rama with Agniketu and Rashmiketu.
(So, Rama was not fighting with Ravana!)
Hanuman with Jambumali.
Nila with Nikumbha.
Sushena with Vidyunmali.
Two people in pairs thrashing each other.
Heads fell to the ground with one stroke. (Heads
of Rakshasas only.) Horses and elephants
collapsed. Chariots broke. Wheels rolled.
Shields, swords and clubs broke. Blood flowed
in streams. Cries for help and life touched the
sky.
The sun set.
Darkness enveloped all sides.
The battle continued.
Kill! Slay! Cut his head off! Why
do you let him go? Stab from the back! You
fellow, stay there! Why do you run away?
such shouts pierced the darkness from all sides.
Ramas arrows flew across the whole battle
field. They annihilated Rakshasas in large
numbers. Indrajit hit Angada with a rock-like
club. (First, only Rakshasas hit. People of
Ramas camp behaved in a very fair way. Notice
this at every point!) Angada destroyed the
chariot, horses and the charioteer of Indrajit.
Indrajit disappeared flying. Sages and gods
stood in the sky and praised Angada in thousand
voices. (It will be nice if Indrajit slaps on their
back!)
Jambumali hit Hanuman with a great
weapon on his chest. Hanuman hit the chariot
394. If Sri Ramachandra the incarnation of Sri Maha Vishnu and who has learnt skills of using
all kinds of weapons faints, will it look proper? At the beginning of the battle the fainting of the
Link-9
The Pushpak plane returned to Asoka vana.
539
Link-9
Then, seeing Sushena, Sugriva said in a
loud voice, Look! Sushena ! After these two
brothers get up, take them and all our troops
and go back to Kishkindha. I will singlehandedly destroy Ravana, his relatives, sons,
armies and every body and bring Sita back. (It
397
seems he has lost his brain out of fear!)
Then Sushena had an idea. In the past
when battles took place between Devas (gods)
and Asuras (Rakshasas) the Rakshasas who
knew arms and weapons in the battle hit gods
with weapons. When gods were dying in large
numbers, Brihaspati chanted Mantra Sanjivani
and healed them. Later, gods took creepers of
those medicines and kept them on hills called
Chandra and Drona in the sea of milk. Some one
who can go quickly has to go the sea of milk
and bring those medicines. It is better if
Hanuman goes there.
Meanwhile the wind blew fiercely. The earth
trembled a lot. Huge trees fell down. The sea
became turbulent. Coming like a flying flame of
fire, Garutmanta appeared to all people.
Serpents, which until then troubled Rama
and Lakshmana in the form of arrows, ran away
as soon as they saw Garutmanta.
Seeing Rama and Lakshmana, Garuda felt
541
valour of Rama and Lakshmana. Now, they are close to death. Now, I am almost dead, though
living. My desire for the kingdom has turned futile. The wish of Ravana is fulfilled. Hugging
Vibhishana who was wailing in this manner Sugriva consoled him, Virtuous man! You will
get the kingdom in Lanka. No doubt about it!
Thus, the poet keeps telling us very clearly, why Vibhishana had joined Rama. He does not
conceal this fact, with a view that it was not wrong to join Rama.
397. Lakshmanas wailing for Rama and Ramas wailing for Lakshmana, Sugrivas wailing for
Rama and Ramas wailing for Sugriva (asking Sugriva to stop the battle and go away); Vibhishanas
wailing for Rama and Ramas wailing for Vibhishana (that he could not give him the kingdom of
Lanka); Sitas wailing for Rama and Ramas wailing for Sita; Sugriva consoling Vibhishana and
Vibhishanas consoling Sugriva scenes in this story move with these kinds of ideal love and
sacrifice.
398. Rescuing from snake-like arrows we have to understand this as: A gentleman called
Garuda came, treated, talked in a friendly way and left. This is what happens in reality. Healing a
patient is something connected with human society. The hostility between eagles and snakes is
something connected with nature. Myths (Mythology) are created on the basis of the realities of
Link-9
was like a violently disturbed sea.
The Vanara army became ferocious and
caused harm to the Rakshasas.
Vajradamshtra pounced upon the Vanara
army like Yama, the god of death.
Angada burnt like a flame of fire, took up a
huge tree and thrashed the Rakshasas as a lion
thrashes base animals. As Vajradamshtra was
watching, all the Rakshasas perished.
Unable to control his anger, Vajradamshtra
(What can you do even if you are angry? Is the
poet on your side?) rained the arrows on
Vanaras. He hit Angada on his vital parts.
Angada brought a huge tree and threw it on
Vajradamshtra.
Vajradamshtra broke it into pieces with his
arrows.
This time, Angada brought a big hill and
threw it on the chariot of Vajradamshtra. Then
Vajradamshtra (we know it. He jumped from the
chariot skilfully)..took a big club, jumped
from the chariot and pounced on Angada. (well
done!)
Angada snatched that club, threw it away,
brought a big boulder and threw it on
Vajradamshtra.
Vajradamshtra fainted, recovered after a
while , took another club, hit Angada with it
and started boxing.
After boxing for a while, Angada took out
his sword from the sheath, fought for a while
and finally cut off Vajradamshtras head.
That head fell down and broke into two
pieces. (The poets anger is not satisfied even if
he cut the head. Some thing more should be
done to it.) The remaining Rakshasas fled into
Lanka.
543
Link-9
is making noise like a donkey! He is Mahodara.
(Look here! The one who stood like a dog, he
is Vibhishana!) The one who is on the horse this
side is Pisacha. The one on the bull is Trisirassu.
See the flag with the picture of the king of
serpents, he is Kumbha! Thus, describing every
body, Vibhishana said, Look, over there! There
are fellows with tiger-faces, camel-faces,
elephant-faces! The one who is in their midst is
Ravana! See, he is shining like Rudra and Indra.
(Rama had seen Ravana before when
Sugriva pounced upon Ravana. Yet, he talks as
if he is seeing him for the first time.)
Rama looked in surprise. Ravana is very
valorous. He is glittering like the sun which we
cannot see with our eyes. Even gods do not have
so much shine. It is very amazing! (Then, what
do you think? Do you think that the entire glitter
is your fathers property?) By the grace of god,
this wicked fellow has come to my view. I will
satisfy all my anger now, thinking so, Rama
kept his bow ready and stood for the battle along
with Lakshmana. (It seems the poet is afraid of
sending Rama alone against Ravana. Rama
does not take even a single step without
Lakshmana!)
Ravana said to his troops, All of you go
back to Lanka. If the Vanaras come to know that
I am not there, they will spoil the whole Lanka.
You go and protect Lanka.
The entire army of Ravana went back. Like
a big fish struggling in the sea, Ravana pounced
399
upon the Vanara army.
545
399. Yuddha kanda, sarga 59, slokas 33 to 35: Ravana first started with his troops. After coming
to the battle ground, he sent back his troops asking them, Protect Lanka! He entered the battle
alone! It seems this guy has really lost his brain.
Very great heroes in Ravanas camp died. It would not look proper if Ravana did not go to the
battle. Therefore, Ravana had to go to the battle field. But he can not die yet. If Ravana dies now,
all the fascinating things will cease. Hence, Ravana has to face defeat and return humiliated but
not die. It is the poets view that his troops should not be present if Ravana has to face the defeat.
(Who will refute if the poet says that Ravana faced defeat in spite of the presence of troops? Can
the troops withstand Sri Ramachandra?) As the absence of troops is better than their presence,
the poet has to ensure that the troops were absent. For this, a pretext were needed. If these troops
were not there in Lanka, the Vanaras will spoil Lanka! Why should Ravana first bring the troops
and then ask them to return? The poet describes Ravana in such a way that we feel, How foolish
Ravana is! But by saying so, the poet is proving himself a fool.
Link-9
Sri Mahavishnu not worked?)
Ravana tried to lift Lakshmana to take him
along with him. But could not lift him.
One may lift great mountains and the three
worlds filled with great seas but it is not possible
for any one to lift Lakshmana in the battle field!
Meanwhile Hanuman came running and hit
him on the chest. (Oh, what a rude fellow this
Hanuman is! He does not at all think about how
painful it is to others.)
Vomiting blood, Ravana fell to the ground.
(bhuumau = on the ground).
Ravana was shocked and fell in the chariot.
(radhoopasthee =In the centre of the chariot.
In one sloka, he fell on the ground. In the next
sloka, he fell in the chariot. We do not know on
what work the poet got up after finishing the
first sloka. By the time he returned and sat to
write, he forgot where Ravana fell down!)
Though he regained consciousness, Ravana
could not dare to attack as he had previously.
(Oh! Ravana! Why these battles? Why do you
eat blows of Hanuman? Send back Sita!)
The sages and gods felt very happy that
Ravana had lost his strength. (It seems these
fellows have the same job!)
Meanwhile Hanuman lifted Lakshmana and
laid down near Rama. (Is it not surprising? Did
the poet not say that none could lift Lakshmana
in the battle field, didnt he? But he forgot to
put forward a point only enemies cannot lift
him; friends can! that would shut the mouths
of foolish critics.)
The Shakti, which Ravana had thrown, left
from the body of Lakshmana. By then Ravana
gathered courage and took up the bow again.
On seeing Ravana getting up, the Vanaras
were afraid and began to run away.
547
400. By the time Rama started to fight with Ravana, Ravana had already fought with some
warriors. He fought with Hanuman. Fought with Nila. Fought with Lakshmana. Again, he fought
with Hanuman. By then Ravanas energies were exhausted. He fainted for some time. Even after
getting up, he was so tired that he could not fight with Hanuman. In such a situation our great
warrior, Rama, took a lot of rest and then came to fight with Ravana.
Have you noticed how shrewdly (how cowardly) the poet brought Rama into the battle!
When two persons fight each other, usually a person who is more exhausted will be defeated,
549
Link-9
and shouted at the top of their voices. Even
that was of no use. They held the hair of
Kumbhakarna and pulled it. They bit his ears
and nose. Poured several pots of water on him.
Even that didnt work. They began to beat him
with stones, trees, pestles, poles and clubs. They
got exhausted while beating him and they found
that useless. Kumbhakarna continued snoring
very comfortably. All the Rakshasas thought
together and drove horses, camels and elephants
over Kumbhakarna.
A thousand elephants ran over him.
By then Kumbhakarna turned on the other
side and opened his eyes with great effort. (On
seeing elephants in his bed, he might have
thought them to be bugs!)
As soon as he woke up, he pounced on the
food. He ate pigs and male buffaloes. He drank
toddy and blood.
All the Rakshasas who had hidden came out
and saluted Kumbhakarna.
Why have you woken up me ? What is the
matter? Has any danger befallen the king?
Otherwise, my brother would not wake me up!
Even by punishing gods, I will remove my
brothers fear, said Kumbhakarna. (Very nice,
my lad! You have uttered a happy word! Come
on, get up quickly! There is lot of work for you!)
Yelapaksha came forward and submitted.
We have never had any threat from the gods.
(Because there is no god!) We are going to face
harm due to human beings. The Vanara army
has besieged Lanka. Rama of the Raghu dynasty
(This is like saying, That boy from so and so
family!), has insulted Ravana horribly.
Kumbhakarna got uncontrollable anger.
Oh, I see! Is that man from the Raghu dynasty
so great? All right? I will go to my brother only
after I see his end, he rose up. (Yes! Manliness
must be like this!)
Dont be hasty, Kumbhakarna! You have
to think what is good and what is bad and then
start.
All right, Kumbhakarna agreed. He took
a bath, decorated himself, drank two thousand
pots of toddy. (The size of the pots is that of
those pots at poets house!) and set out.
While Kumbhakarna was walking along the
Link-9
grieving over the death of their relatives in the
battle will feel happy on seeing Ramas death!
Dont you know my valour? I will fell down
the sun along with stars. I will swallow the fire.
I will drink up the seas. (Alas! Kumbhakarna!
Why all this boasting? You also talk like Rama?)
See how I troubled that Sugriva who came
to help Rama and Hanuman who burnt Lanka!
Dont worry. You stay relaxed and enjoy
pleasures. You will get Sita, he gave courage
to his brother.
On hearing Kumbhakarnas words,
Mahodara began his scathing criticism against
Kumbhakarna. (The words of this Mahodara are
very confusing. We do not know on whose side
he is advocating. He praises Rama, he praises
Ravana. Every thing is confusing! All characters
are confusing but this character is more
confusing!)
Mahodara became furious at Kumbhakarna
and began to talk like this: Kumbhakarna! You
were born in a good race but your character is
base. You are very arrogant. You are talking as
if you alone know morals and the king does not
know them. What scriptural knowledge have you
more than the king does? The king has thought
out every thing. You said one would get good
results if he were engaged in duty, earning, sex
at different times. How do you know about this?
(You are always obsessed with sleeping). What
sort of result will they be? (This means,
Mahodara is saying that nothing will befall and
there will not be negative results even if one is
not engaged in Dharma, Artha and Kama.
While he said so, see what he says later!)
We get good results for bad deeds. If people
do bad things, they get grief but some times
people get comfort as well. (Then why should
he say at the beginning itself, Happiness if we
551
404. Yuddha kanda, sarga 64, up to 108 slokas: Doubting the scriptural regulations, Mahodara
is speaking. All these doubts are in the mind of the poet.
Scriptures simply say that We face pleasures and grief in accordance with the deeds that we
do. But it does not occur so. The fact that there is no connection between what the Scriptures say
and what happens in life is confusing the poet a lot. It is the poets doubt that It is not happening
in the world as they have said in scriptures? He makes wicked characters talk these doubts here
Link-9
(A while earlier, had he not said, I will
kill Sugriva, I will kill Hanuman. Did Vanaras
not do any harm? What about the burning of
Lanka by Hanuman? Whose forgetfulness is this
Kumbhakaranas or the poets?)
Foxes cried on his way. The Sun light
diminished. The wind blew harshly.
Kumbhakarnas left hand trembled. An eagle sat
on his head. A comet fell near his feet.
Yet Kumbhakarna went to the battle boldly.
On seeing Kumbhakarna, the Vanaras
began to flee.
While the Vanaras were running away,
Angada shouted angrily. Forgetting how
valorous you are and how great your dynasties
are, you are behaving like ordinary monkeys?
(You stupid, monkey manners!) Do you run away
to save your life? (What do you want them to
do? You also run. If you are alive, you can at
least eat wretched Balusu leaves!) That tall
figure is not a Rakshasa who is fighting a battle.
It is only a frightening toy. We can destroy it
with our valour. Come on! Come back! (No, dont
come! Angada became a stooge of Rama and is
telling you lies. Dont believe him. Go away!)
All the Vanaras came back. They threw hills
and trees on to Kumbhakarna.
It was like a shower of flowers for
Kumbhakarna. He began to beat the Vanara
bands to death. (Have you realised the fact of
Angadas lies?)
The Vanaras began to run away again.
Angada began to shout again. Stay there!
Dont go! Come back! (Stop it, Shut up! You
553
anaaryaha.)
Link-9
and began to put them one by one into his
mouth and swallowed them like jidis (small,
round shaped Telugu chocolates).
(Kumbhakarna! If you simply put them in the
mouth they will run away through your ears
and nose. Sipping is an intelligent thing!)
Sugriva angrily said, Why do you show
your valour on ordinary people? (Show it on
this extra-ordinary man!) Look, I am throwing
a hill. Watch out. He threw a hill at him and hid
himself (Lest it comes back and fallen on him!)
Oh! I see, you are Sugriva? Why are you
roaring like a bull? saying so he crushed that
hill into powder, put another jidi into the mouth
and threw the spear on to Sugriva.
That spear was made of a thousand weights.
Hanuman jumped up with one jerk, took that
spear, broke it with his knees and threw it away.
Kumbhakarna angrily brought a big hill and
threw it on to Sugriva.
Sugriva fainted and fell down. (Now, the
battle is interesting!)
Kumbhakarna lifted him, put him under his
armpit and ran into Lanka.
Gods in the sky felt upset. (Are you still
there? Why dont you catch hold of
Kumbhakarna and release Sugriva? Is it not
possible for you? What sort of gods are you?
Stupid gods! Get out! Your faces are
disgusting!)
I can save Sugriva but it will be an insult
to Sugriva if I save him? He can save himself,
thinking so, Hanuman remained silent.
While Kumbhakarna was walking in Lanka,
people there sprinkled fragrant water on his back.
The water fell on Sugriva and he woke up. (Alas!
What a foolish thing that people in Lanka did?
Doesnt matter. Sugriva will faint again if he
sees Kumbhakarnas armpit when he wakes up!)
Sugriva thought for a while, pinched
555
407. See, when Rama began fighting after a long time after Kumbhakarna entered the battlefield! By then Kumbhakarna had fought with so many warriors.
He fought with Hanuman. With Nila, with Sarabha, with Gavaksha, with Gandhamadhana, with
Angada, with Sugriva, with Hanuman, with Lakshmana. Besides so many warriors, he also fought
with thousands of soldiers. After so much battle had taken place and Kumbhakarna lost his ears
and nose and fainted, our hero entered the battle field. See how quickly Kumbhakarna gets defeated!
After Sri Rama entered the battle, the enemy should not be alive for a long time, isnt it?
Link-9
Nila threw a big mountain and killed
Mahodara along with the elephant.
Hanuman tore the horses of Trisiras with
nails and killed them. Later, he got hold of the
sword of Trisiras and slayed all the three heads
of Trisiras.
Gods in the sky felt happy. (Whenever some
thing favourable to Ramas group happens,
assume that the gang in the sky enjoys it,
otherwise it remains silent! I cannot repeat
whatever I saidwhatever I said)
Hitting with the club, Rishabha killed Matta.
Slapping him with his palm, Gavaksha
killed Unmatta.
The Rakshasa troops began to flee.
Atikaya angrily turned his chariot this way
and came. (Where was he roaming about all
this while?)
Surprised on seeing him, Rama asked
Vibhishana. He is coming on a chariot with
thousand horses. There are four charioteers.
There are twenty quivers at one place, ten at
another place and eight at the other place in the
chariot. There are two swords of ten arms length,
with golden handles of four arms length each.
He is shining like the Sun and Moon! Who is
he?
This man is the son of Ravana who is a
man of great lustre, man of great enthusiasm,
brother of Kubera and who is a Rakshasa king.
He was born to Dhanyamalini. His name is
Atikaya. He is as valorous as his father. He is
acquainted with all skills in using arrows and
weapons. He got a boon from Brahma that he
would not die at the hands of gods. That chariot
and shield had been given by Brahma. Even
Indras Vajraayudha will be ineffective before
his arrows. (Indra! Why do you live?) It is better
to kill this man quickly without any delay, said
Vibhishana. (The sooner you kill this man, the
sooner I get the kingdom!)
All Vanaras attacked Atikaya. Battle again!
Mountains and trees flew again and again.
They jumped. powder. powder. powder!
Atikaya felt vexed with this job of pounding
mountains into powder. How long should I fight
with these dirty faces? Come on, if there are
some noble men!, he shouted. (Rama! Why
557
Link-9
Rama fainted. If the battle ceases, we can go
home.) As they are obliged to worship Brahmas
arrow, Rama and Lakshmana have fainted not
because they are incapable, you know!
In order to respect Brahma, Hanuman
fainted for a while and rose up. (Thinking it was
enough to respect for a while!) He said to
Vibhishana, We have to console the survivors.
Holding lighted wisps (torch) Hanuman and
Vibhishana are roaming around the battle field
in the darkness. All the soldiers are found dead
with their feet, hands, flanks, lips, tails and heads
cut. Sugriva, Nila, Nala, Angada and many more
409
people are lying dead.
In a short while, during that day time,
Indrajit shot arrows and killed 67 crores of
Vanara warriors.
Vibhishana and Hanuman roamed about
searching Jambavan. Finally they found him.
Seeing Jambavan, Vibhishana asked, You
have not lost your life, have you? (Perhaps, he
would say I have lost!)
Suffering with pain, Jambavan asked
moaning, Are you Vibhishana? I can not see
you. Some arrows struck my eyes. Is Hanuman
alive?
Why are you asking about Hanuman
without enquiring about Rama? Do you love
Hanuman more than Rama and Sugriva?
Vibhishana expressed surprise.
I asked so because (It is neither love nor
hell!), if Hanuman is alive, it means all are alive.
If he is not alive there is no way for any one to
live. (This means, there is no way for Rama to
recover from his faint!) This is why I asked,
said Jambavan.
Hanuman touched Jambavans feet, saluted
him (why salutation. It is a wasteful exercise.
Jambavan cant see it!) and said, It is me
Jambavan said with joy, Come my lad! You
559
Link-9
mountain back in its original place, returned and
stood obediently in front of Rama!
(The war is not yet over, isnt it? Will there
be no need of that medicinal mountain again?
Why couldnt they keep it here?...Even if a need
arises, how great task it is! Hanuman will jump
up once again and get it.)
561
countries?)
The fire burnt down all the people in Lanka:
those who wore good garments and garlands of
flowers; those who were swinging in the
intoxication of liquor and meat; those who were
immersed in sex with their loves. (However
terrible the situation may be, the poet does not
forget sex. His head is full of that dirt!), those
women who were running with their infant
children the fire burnt down every body and
shone very brightly.
Noble women who lay down in airplanes
wailed.
As soon as animal houses caught fire, the
caretakers of horses and elephants untied all the
animals. The elephants began to run on seeing
the horses and the horses ran on seeing elephants
in all directions. The houses burning with
flames, looked like fully blossomed Modugu
trees. The voices of the women who were crying
amidst fire and smoke were heard ten yojanas
411
away. (Except to Rama!)
With burning houses and gates, Lanka is
glittering like shining sky. The light of Lanka
reflected in the surrounded sea and the sea
became a red sea.
Vanaras jumped on Rakshasas who were
burning with fire.
Rama, the great, shot arrows at the peak of
Lanka and broke it into pieces. (How many
attempts to destroy Lanka!)
Rakshasas are resisting. They are still
fighting the battle. In that fierce battle, that might
become the might of death. (As it does not look
nice if he said that Rakshasas had not resisted,
the poet says Rakshasas also fought fiercely.
What is the use of fighting a battle fiercely! The
poet sir will not allow them win, will he?)
Sugriva called Vanara warriors and ordered,
411. When Indrajit tied Rama and Lakshmana with Naga paasa (snake-like arrows), what did
Garutman who came to treat them say to Rama? Leaving infant children and aged people,
destroy al the enemies, did he not say this? Who, then, saved the aged and the children from the
flames. The moral, which the Dharma Saastra, moral science, says, is, Dont torture or kill infant
children, women and the aged. But no body practises this moral. Even in the present day wars as
well.
Link-9
Angada. Dividha came and caught hold of
Yupaksha. Sonitaksha came and hit on the chest
of Dvividha with a club. Dvividha removed that
club. Meanwhile Mainda came and hit
Yupaksha.
Two eyes are not enough to watch the battle
between Sonitaksha Yupaksha and Mainda
Dvividha. (All bunkum! Always kickingblowing, hitting-beating, shouting-slapping..
every thing is like this! If you do not believe
watch it now!)
Dvividha scratched Sobhitaksha with nails,
felled him down, stamped him with his feet and
killed him.
Mainda pressed Yupaksha with his hands
and killed him. The Rakshasa army fled to
Kumbha.
Kumbha rained arrows on Dvividha.
Dvividha fainted. Mainda brought a huge
mountain and threw it on Kumbha. Kumbha
threw fire arrows and crushed it into powder
and hit Mainda on his vital parts with an arrow.
Mainda too fell down. Immediately, Angada
brought a huge mountain. Again a fierce battle
took place between the arrows and the
mountains.
Kumbha hit on Angadas forehead with
great arrows. Blood surged like a water fall and
Angadas eyes closed.
Closing his eyes with one hand, Angada
routed a Sala tree and threw it on Kumbha.
(To demonstrate Angadas valour and to
make him drag a tree with one hand, it is enough
if one hand is injured, isnt it? He could drag
the tree with the other hand. Instead of this
injury to the eyes, closing eyes with one hand
and he had to drag the tree with the other hand
why this entire round about way?) After all
this, when Angada threw a tree with such a great
effort, Kumbha crushed it into powder.
Moreover he hit Angada so much that he lost
consciousness.
Angada lay without regaining
consciousness for a while. (Look, Hanuman! You
kept that mountain of medicines back there. Now
what should we do? You always do things
hastily!)
The Vanaras told Rama that Angada had
563
565
Link-9
father. On seeing you, my anger is boundless. I
have got you after so long a time. Now you will
go to Yamas world and meet those whom you
have killed. Why so many words? Whether you
fight with swords, arrows or box. Do what you
like! Come on for the battle! All will watch how
each of us fight said Makaraksha to Rama.
(Why dont we see? Go ahead!)
In response to Makarakshas words, Rama
laughed ironically. (Does Rama also know
laughing? We have never seen it before!) Why
do you prattle? Does battle take place merely
with words? What do you think of me? (He does
not know what you are. He is thinking that you
are a great warrior.) I killed 14 thousand people
in Dandakaranya, do you know? Wicked fellow!
See, I will cut your flesh into many pieces and
throw it to crows and eagles! Rama roared.
Makarakshas body burnt with anger. (Yes,
if it does not burn, it cannot be a body at all.)
He shot arrow after arrow at Rama. (Rakshasas
alone paw the ground for quarrel. It is a pity
that people in Ramas group do not know about
any sin.)
Do you have to say that Sri Rama broke
and retaliated all the arrows of Makaraksha? The
sounds of bows echoed like thunders. Rama and
Makaraksha fought excelling each other. They
broke each others arrows.
With a view to watch this battle gods,
sages, Kinnaras, Kimpurushas, Uragas, Nagas
every body gathered in groups in the sky. (It
seems people there do not wage battles! They
always watch battles as if their face is swelled
with desire to see the battles.)
Due to the rain of arrows which Rama and
Makaraksha were showering on each other, all
directions, corners, ups, downs and every thing
is closed. (Pity! How can those in the sky see
all that?)
Rama could break the bow of Makaraksha
and felled his charioteer with eight arrows.(Oh,
I see! Not with one arrow? He had to shoot eight
arrows?) Shooting some more arrows, he could
kill the chariot and horses.
Jumping from the chariot, Makaraksha
threw a spear on to Rama.
All right! As Rama hit it with arrows, it
Link-9
Hanuman shouted at them from behind.
Are you fleeing from the battle field? Are you
not ashamed? Dont you have a mans courage?
He inspired manliness, called them back and
attacked Indrajit.
Again a fierce battle took place. Hanuman
threw a huge mountain on Indrajit.
Though the charioteer of Indrajit skilfully
saved the chariot but many Rakshasas fell under
that mountain and died.
After fighting for some time, Hanuman said
to Vanaras. Let us tell Rama and Sugriva about
Sitas death and do as per their instructions. Let
us suspend fighting for the present. He stopped
fighting and started for the spot where Rama
was.
After Vanaras stopped the battle and left,
Indrajit went to the temple Nikumbhila to
perform fire offering. (Homam)
There he performed a sacrifice. The fire,
which was satisfied with the offering, shone with
flames. Some Rakshasas were carefully
supervising the smooth performance of all the
steps in the sacrifice.
Before Hanuman stopped the battle, Rama
heard the clamour from the battle field and called
Jambavan. Hanuman is fighting very
courageously. Go with troops and help him (I
will relax here!)
While Jambavan was coming to the west
gate along with the army of bears, Hanuman
came that way, diverted them back to the north
gate. He went to Rama and narrated the whole
thing sadly. Rama! While we were fighting,
Indrajit brought Sita and killed her. We came
here to tell you this sad news.
Rama at once fell down and fainted.
Lakshmana sat grieving near his brother and
began a discourse on what is Dharma
(righteousness, virtue, justice, goodness and so
on) and what is Adharma (opposite of Dharma).
Alas! What difficulty has befallen you! You
have always followed Dharma. You have always
treated pleasure and pain equally. Your Dharma
could not prevent difficulties for you. Though
people always talk of Dharma, where is it? If at
all there is Dharma, would difficulty befall you
who followed Dharma? (Lakshmana!
567
Link-9
Therefore, we have to prevent Indrajit from
doing oblation to fire. If Indrajit dies, you can
assume that Ravana is dead. Rama! If you grieve,
I too will grieve. (Okay, you too grieve! Assist
Rama in grieving!) First we have to prevent
Indrajits sacrifice and then kill him. Do not
delay anymore. Tell Lakshmana to come with
me. (Every time, Vibhishana tells secrets such
as these to Rama. Had Vibhishana not joined
Ramas camp and remained in Lanka, could
Rama have conquered Lanka?)
After hearing what Vibhishana said, Rama
slowly got up from Lakshmanas thigh.
Vibhishana! Indrajit is a great valorous man.
(It seems he realised this fact!) He knows how
to use the Brahmaastra. He knows all the
miracles (You too know them, dont you?
Scaring seas, threatening mountains and so on!)
If he flies in the sky, we do not know where he
flies. (Perhaps he ought to tell you where he
flies, before he begins to fly!) Lakshmana! Go
at once along with Hanuman, Jambavan and the
troops! Vibhishana will take you. Go and kill
Indrajit. (Sugriva and I will sit here chatting!),
Rama ordered Lakshmana.
(Lakshmana must be feeling relieved as
Rama got up from his thigh which was numb!)
Lakshmana bowed at the feet of Rama. My
great arrows will hit Indrajit, pierce him and will
fall on Lanka, saying so he started off. (After
hearing that Indrajit had killed Sita, Rama had
fainted, hadnt he? But after regaining
consciousness, he lay down listening to
Lakshmanas sermons of wealth not grieving
for Sita. Why had Rama, who wailed every
moment for Sita romantically, had kept quiet
even after hearing that Sita had died.)
Vibhishana took every one to the spot where
Indrajit was.
The battle between the Rakshasas and
Vanaras began again.
Hanuman was at the height of his valour
and began to kill the Rakshasas.
Indrajit got up from the sacrificial altar
before the ritual was completed. He asked his
charioteer to drive the chariot towards Hanuman.
He began fighting by throwing swords, axes and
many kinds of weapons at him.
569
Link-9
that they will get ministership tomorrow!)
Roaming amidst Vanara troops, Vibhishana
shouted so much that the troops went mad with
the battle frenzy. Except this Indrajit, Ravana
does not have any strength. If we kill him, it is
like defeating Ravana. You have killed many
warriors like Prahasta, Kumbhakarna,
Dhumraksha, Jambumalini, Kumbha,
Nikumbha, Naranta and Devanta. What is great
about Indrajit? You have to show your valour
now. If you kill him, it will be the end of this
battle. I would have killed Indrajit but I am
hesitating that it may not look nice if I kill him
since I am his paternal uncle. But, I will do any
thing for the sake of Sri Rama. I feel sad if I
think of killing Indrajit. That is why I will not
kill him. Lakshmana will kill him. All of you
must show more enthusiasm! The Vanara army
swung with battle cry while Vibhishana was
417
encouraging them.
Again fierce battle took place. People of
both sides fought equally well. It is difficult to
know who will be victorious. All the corners
are closing with the rain of arrows.
Rivers of blood are flowing. Gods in the
sky were scared and stood at a distance. (Is it
because arrows will hit them?)
After some time Lakshmana cut off the head
of the charioteer of Indrajit. Driving his chariot
for himself, Indrajit fought . This, Sri Rama
alone can do.
Four Vanaras flew into the sky, pounced on
the horses of Indrajits chariot and broke the
chariot.
Indrajit came out of the chariot and said to
the Rakshasas, I will go to Lanka and get
another chariot. Without letting the enemies
know that I am not here, stop the enemies from
advancing. And he started for Lanka. (Do you
have to go yourself and get a chariot? Stay
417.
571
Yuddha kanda, sarga 90, slokas 17 to 19: ..Inspiring Vanaras, the noble
Vibhishana..said as follows at an apt moment. Vanaras! Why have you kept quiet? After this
sinner Indrajit dies, Ravana will not have strength. All the strong Rakshasas came to the battle and
died. Only this task (of killing Indrajit) is left. It is not proper on my part as a father to kill the son.
(Morals!) Yet, for the sake of Rama I will kill my brothers son. Tears are obstructing my eyes,
which wish to kill Indrajit. Lakshmana, who has strong shoulders, will kill him.
Link-9
who dies for the sake of his lord will go to
419
heaven.
All your enemies will sleep peacefully as
you are no more. But, for me, all the three worlds
without you are empty. All women in the harem
will wail for you. Where have you gone my
child, leaving your parents, wife and Lanka? I
should have passed away first and you ought to
have performed the funeral rites for me. Now
every thing has been reversed. While your
enemy Rama is still alive, have you left me
without protecting me? Along with grief, Ravana
became furious. He wanted to kill Sita at once.
Indrajit created a magical illusion as if he had
killed Sita; but I will really kill her, saying so
Ravana took a sword and went to Asoka vana
along with his wives and ministers.
On seeing Ravana who was coming to kill
her with a sword, Sita began to wail. Alas! This
wicked man will kill me. He asked me to marry
him and have sex with him. (ramasya = have
sex. However sad scene it may be, the poet drags
it either to having sex or breasts!) I refused. As
I did not yield to him, he is now ready to kill
me. He might have killed Rama and Lakshmana!
Or, as he was unable to kill them, he is going to
kill me out of a grudge. Alas! I did not agree
when Hanuman wanted to take me with him. I
could not think properly what was right and what
was wrong. Had I gone on the back of Hanuman,
I would have been happy with my husband now,
wouldnt I? (It is all empty talk that you would
573
575
Link-9
Apart from the dead, the surviving
Rakshasas fled the battle field.
The battle field turned into a dancing place
of Rudra.
Gods and sages in the sky praised Sri Rama,
Well done! Well done!
To Sugriva, Vibhishana, Hanuman,
Jambavan and others, Sri Rama said, Only
Rudra and I possess such a great power of
weapons. None else has it. He said the actual
truth. (Why do you include Rudra? Rama, it
will be nice if you alone have that power! Who
chaturdasa sahasraani vaajiinaam
any calculation!
Link-9
swords, horizontal swords, spears, clubs,
wheels, Shaktis, pestles, iron rods, thorny sticks,
bamboo sticks, axes, Mudgaras, Pattasas,
Bandivalas and many more weapons.
Ravana got into a chariot with eight horses.
The troops moved forward with great
enthusiasm.
All the bad omens appeared on their way
without fail. The sun diminished in his light. All
the horizons became dark. All the birds cried
out unpleasantly. The animals moved in reverse
order. All the horses hesitated to move forward.
A vulture sat on Ravanas chariot. Ravanas left
eye and left shoulder trembled. The gleam on
his face diminished. A comet fell down. Blood
rained from the sky. Many bad omens indicating
Ravanas death appeared. Yet Ravana ignored
them. (Otherwise, will he be upset like Rama?
No!) and moved forward.
Again a great battle began. Come on!
Come on! The Vanaras and Rakshasas called
out to each other for the battle. They fought hard.
Due to Ravanas rain of arrows the Vanara
troops fell to the ground in large numbers. The
heaps of dead bodies increased: with hands, feet,
necks, heads and hearts broken.
Holding a huge tree, Sugriva acted
ferociously in the battle field. He rained
mountains on the enemy.
On seeing the ruin of the Rakshasa troops,
Virupaksha got down from the chariot, climbed
an elephant and said, Do you know who I am?
I am Virupaksha! Saying so, he began to fight
with Sugriva and drowned him with rain of
arrows.
Sugriva brought a huge tree and hit it on
the head of the elephant on which Virupaksha
sat. It cried, went back, fell on the ground and
died. When Virupaksha picked up a sword and
a shield and was about to attack Sugriva, Sugriva
routed a big mountain and threw it on
Virupaksha. Virupaksha escaped from it and hit
Sugriva with the sword. Sugriva fainted for a
while, got up and hit Virupaksha with his fist.
Virupaksha tore the shield of Sugriva with his
sword, kicked Sugriva at once and threw him
up. (This warrior is excellent. I like him. Sugriva
got at least one kick!)
577
Link-9
Ravana used an arrow called Asura. Along
with it he used a lion-faced arrows, tiger faced
arrows and arrows with faces of all kinds of
animals like crows, vultures, eagles, foxes, hens,
wolves, pigs, snakes, donkeys and also arrows
that resembled faces of birds. (So, carpenters
in Lanka made arrows in so many designs!
Good workmen!)
Rama threw an arrow called Aagneeya.
Along with it he threw arrows that resembled
faces of the sun, the moon, the half-moon, stars,
nine planets, comets and other such powerful
arrows. (Did carpenters in Ayodhya carve
moons and suns?)
Unable to withstand the face of Ramas
arrows, all the arrows of Ravana scattered. The
Vanaras shouted in joy.
On seeing all his arrows being wasted,
Ravana angrily threw Roudrastra, which Maya
had made. (As this does not belong to Brahma,
let us see whether this may work.) As he threw
the Roudrastra, swords, spears, clubs, pestles,
Pattasas and many more arrows came out of
Ravanas bow and began to swiftly dart in
various directions. (This arrow seems to work
well!)
Meanwhile Rama threw the Gandharvastra
and destroyed the Roudraastra.
Unable to control his anger, Ravana threw
Sowraastra. Immediately, wheel-shaped
weapons, that resembled gold plates came out
glittering like the sun and the moon from Ramas
bow in thousands and swiftly darted across the
battle field.
Rama threw another great arrow. (It has no
name. Perhaps it did not strike to the poet as to
what name he should give it!) and it destroyed
Sowra astra.
Ravana angrily hit at the vital organs of
Rama with ten arrows. (Nay, how can ten be
enough?)
Rama too hit at Ravanas entire body with
arrows.
Meanwhile, Lakshmana shot down
Ravanas flag with sharp arrows. (Lakshmana!
Why should you go in the middle while Ravana
and Rama are fighting? Did Hanuman not say
that while two persons fight, a third person
must not interfere?)
579
Link-9
(Ravana fled from the battle, didnt he?
Now the story goes backwards again and
things happen in a different way.)
Rama was talking to Sushena while fighting.
Sushena! The great warrior Lakshmana fell
down with the stroke of Ravanas arrow Shakti,
rolling on the ground like a serpent and causing
me agony. While my brother who is more
important than my own life is suffering like
this, how can I fight the battle? Why do I need
the kingdom? Why do I need Sita? Why this
battle? Why the comforts? My valour feels
ashamed. My bow is slipping down. Arrows are
missing their target. I am not able to see due to
tears. All my limbs are light as if I am walking
in a dream. Grief envelopes me. I wish I die. In
any country, wives are available, relatives are
available but how can we get such a brother?
So saying, Rama fell to the ground and rolled in
grief. (By the time he began to talk with Sushena,
Rama was shooting arrows, but by the time he
stopped talking he was rolling on the ground.)
Sushena tried to console Rama. Rama!
Lakshmana is the enhancer of prosperity. His
face has not turned black. The gleam is not
disturbed. His eyes are peaceful. If he had lost
his life, he wouldnt have looked like this. His
chest is moving. Dont grieve!
After consoling Rama, Sushena hurried
Hanuman, Start soon and go to Himavadgiri!
Earlier Jambavan had mentioned those
medicines hadnt he? Get all of them. You have
to return quickly. Otherwise, we cannot save
Lakshmana. You have to come back as soon as
if you never left!
(Hanuman! Look, without thinking that we
need that mountain again, you took it back and
put it there. All right! Start quickly!)
Hanuman at once went for the medicinal
mountain.
He was not aware of what medicines to
bring. All right! I will carry the entire hill. Every
thing will be on it, thinking so, he routed that
mountain which is filled with trees, lifted it like
a ball and landed on Trikuta mountain as if he
were carrying a cloud!
Putting the mountain down, taking a
breather for a while (Why dont you have few
581
Link-9
Unable to withstand the rain of stones by
the Vanaras and the rain of arrows by Rama,
Ravana became helpless with a broken heart.
The charioteer grasped Ravanas condition
and drove away the chariot from the battle field.
Ravana felt very angry at the charioteers
act. He felt ashamed. Charioteer! You have
done even in my case as you do in the case of a
man who does not have valour and manliness.
Why have you diverted me from the battle field
without my permission and without knowing my
opinion. You have caused tremendous insult to
me in front of the enemy. You have ruined all
the fame that Ravana does not show his back in
the battle. You have wished my enemys good.
Would you have done this, had you wished my
good? He abused him angrily.
The charioteer said with great humility. I
never wish the enemys good, Your Excellency!
It is not my intention to insult you. You are very
tired. Your face is withered away with exertion.
The horses too are tired and breathing hard. Bad
omens are appearing all around. The charioteer
must always grasp: What is the condition of the
person sitting in the chariot, what is the strength
of enemies, whether the battle ground on which
the chariot is moving is flat, when we should go
directly towards the enemy and when we should
583
424. Yuddha kanda, entire sarga 106: Ravana is reprimanding the charioteer for taking him
away from the battle field. You have insulted me and acted as you wish. You have destroyed the
belief that Ravana does not turn back while fighting.
It is the poet who says that Ravana had fled from the battle field. Also, it is the poet who says
that Ravana felt humiliated for the charioteer took him away from the battle field. What is this
fleeing away of a person who does not turn back from the battle field? The man who flees how
can he talk with such self-respect? It is the enthusiasm of the poet to talk about the precautions,
which a charioteer must take, and how he should drive the chariot in the battle field. Although
there is no coherence between what he is saying now and what he has said earlier that Ravana
Rama reciting it three times Should Ravana wait all the while? Okay!
Link-9
obstructed the sight of Ravana. Quarrelling
among themselves, the cruel birds came and fell
on Ravanas chariot.
Tears from the eyes and the sparks of fire
from the waist of Ravanas horses suddenly fell
down. Thus, bad omens for Ravana and good
omens for Sri Rama appeared.
Rama felt happy (owing to the courage that
bad omens gave him) that Ravanas death was
inevitable.
The battle of Rama and Ravana was going
on fiercely, terribly and surprisingly! (We dont
believe your descriptions. We will decide
ourselves how the battle takes place!)
The Rakshasa troops and Vanara troops
stopped fighting, stood side by side and watched
the battle between Rama and Ravana. (How nice
it would have been if you had this sense and
unity right from the beginning? How nice it
would have been, had you told your kings, Why
should we fight among ourselves for your sake?
You fight among yourselves and die!)
Rama and Ravana fought out of a
longstanding hatred for each other!
Rama was sure of his victory. Ravana was
426
also sure of his defeat.
In order to fell down the flag on Ramas
chariot, Ravana angrily shot an arrow. But it fell
down without hitting the flag.
But Ramas arrow dislodged Ravanas flag,
which fell to the ground.
Unable to control the anger, Ravana hit
Ramas horses. The horses were unperturbed.
They were not afraid. Ignoring the shower of
the arrows as if they had been hit with lotus
twigs, they stood happily. (Are they horses or
male buffaloes!)
Ravana realised that Ramas horses were
unperturbed and thought it was no use to rely
on horses. So, he turned towards Rama. He
threw all kinds of weapons: clubs, parighas,
wheels, spears and arrows on to Rama. The
585
426. Yuddha kanda, sarga 109, sloka 7: kaakutsthaha = Rama; jeetasyamiti = that victory is
sure; Ravanah = Ravana; martavyamiti = that death is sure; dhrutau = determine. They demonstrated their valour in the battle. This means, Rama had strong confidence that he would win the
battle. Ravana too realized very clearly that he would face the defeat.
Right from the beginning, Ravana has been thinking, that he would surely lose the battle.
587
Link-9
best beds! Have you died and lie on the ground
now? Alas! I had told you at the beginning itself.
You did not relish my words. You are facing the
consequence now. A man who knew all
morals has passed away. The real form of
goddess of Dharma has vanished. A great
revered man has perished. The falling of a great
hero Ravana means the falling of the sun to the
ground! It is like the moon drowning in darkness.
The god of fire has become cool along with
Ravana. Enthusiasm has become shelter less.
If the Rakshasa king has left his body, what
remains in these worlds? (You have remained,
havent you?) A great wind called Rama routed
a great tree called Ravana. A lion called Rama
killed a fat elephant called Ravana. A great cloud
called Rama watered down a great fire called
Ravana. Thus Vibhishana wailed according
to the scriptures and poetry.
Rama tried to console Vibhishana,
Vibhishana! Why do you wail? Ravana did not
die like a coward without valour. He died
fighting with great valour. Those who wish the
welfare of the other world die in the battle field.
It is not necessary to wail for them. This man
was an intelligent (dhiimata) man who had
conquered the three worlds. (Surprising! What
is this the qualities, which were bad when he
was alive, have now become good?) Once we
begin the battle, we do not know who will win
and who lose! One can win or lose. Therefore,
give up wailing. Think about what to do next.
(Come on, let us occupy Lanka!)
Vibhishana looked reverently at Rama and
said, Rama! Ravana had given many charities.
He worshipped teachers. He rescued those who
sought refuge in him. He enjoyed many
pleasures. He had the great power of penance.
He knew the nature of Brahma. I would like to
perform all his funeral rites with your mercy
On hearing the merciful words of
Vibhishana, Rama agreed with him. Hostility
should be as long as one is alive. After one
passes away, why should we have hatred for the
deceased? Our task is fulfilled. (Now, Lanka is
ours!) Perform all the rites and seek Ravanas
good in the other world.
Link-9
On hearing Vibhishanas words, Rama felt
delighted. (parama priitaha). Yes, as you said,
Ravana is a wicked fellow. An unjust man. A
liar. He harassed all the worlds. But now he is
dead. We showed our hatred for him until he
died. You will get fame that the younger brother
performed rites even though the elder brother
was a wicked man. You must perform the rites,
said Rama.
Vibhishana agreed. All arrangements were
428
made for the funeral rites.
The pyre with good sandal wood was
arranged. Fragrant roots and skin of an antelope
were spread on the pyre. Ravana was placed
there. A cart (sakata) was placed on his feet and
a grinding stone (uluukhilam) on his thighs. A
holy cattle (The translators used the word,
kapila goovu) was killed, its skin was dipped
in ghee and placed it on Ravana. Sandal paste
and flowers were sprinkled. Wailing, Vibhishana
lit the pyre.
All the funeral rites ended as per Vedic rules.
(Veda vihitam = As imposed by Vedas, Brahmya
= As per Vedas.)
After the cremation, Vibhishana took a bath,
sent the women to the harems and stood humbly
near Rama.
All the gods in the sky left the place,
narrating Ramas story.
By the order of Rama, Matali too went back
to heaven along with the chariot.
Rama said to Lakshmana, Lakshmana! I
589
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
428. Yuddha kanda, sarga 101, slokas up to 24: In these slokas, Vibhishana wailed for his
brother, praised him a lot and sought Ramas permission to perform rites. Rama agreed. In sarga
114, slokas 95 to 97: Vibhishana abused his brother and refused to perform rites.
429. Yuddha kanda, sarga 115, slokas 17 & 18: On seeing Vibhishana, the Rakshasa king,
whose coronation was celebrated, his ministers and Rakshasas who had reverence for him felt
happy. When Vibhishana came to power, people of his group alone felt happy.
430. Yuddha kanda, sarga 115, sloka 25:
While sending Hanuman to Sita, Rama said, You are fit to go to tell this happy news to Sita
and to get her message. This means, bring her reply to me.
590
Story-14
ita is happy!
She has been hearing the news of the battle
continuously.
Ravanas death.
End of the battle with Sri Ramas victory.
Recollecting the entire past, Sita is
wondering. Attempts to coronate her husband,
the scheming of that wicked woman, unbearable
forest life, sexual desire of another man toward
her beauty, her rejection, her husbands
enthusiasm for the battle, annihilation of the
enemy every thing is past. The entire period
of hardship has passed away like a dream
vaguely.
Now, reunion with her husband Happy
life!
Sita is sighing with extreme joy.
Recollecting the past repeatedly, she is
wondering.
My husband has killed the enemy for my
sake.
He waged a deadly battle only out of love
for me.
I too have waited with restraint for my
husband.
Which woman except me can live
without yielding to pleasures, without
distraction and concentrate her entire life on
her husband for a long time? Except great
devoted wives?
Had I agreed, I would have become the
empress of Ravanas empire. All the wives of
Ravana would have surrendered at my feet!
Except devoted wives, can ordinary women
reject such a high position and wealth? For
great-devoted wives like me, desire for
pleasures and desire for other men are
condemnable.
Only due to my rejection, Ravana has now
hugged the goddess of death to his utmost
satisfaction.
Will my good character and devotion to my
husband be not known to my husband, relatives
and the public..?
Sitas heart is turning into a sea of joy.
Only in the stories of antiquity, I have heard
about the sacrifice of devoted wives and their
character!
How much admiration they have in the
world!
Now, for me too. in the entire world.
Mother Sita! Are you well?
Sita looked at Hanuman with wonder.
It is me, mother! Have you recognised
me?... Your husband is safe and well!
At once tears welled up in her eyes.
Every thing has gone off smoothly. You
too might have heard. That wicked man has
been ruined. Your husband is victorious. Finally,
all your hardships are over. You have borne it
all for such a long time. A patient cow will get
clean water. Your husband is overwhelmed with
joy because you are alive unharmed by that
wicked fellow. He asked me to tell you the same.
Fortunately you are alive. It is like ten
thousands for me. I fought this battle with great
effort and valour only to rescue you from the
enemy. Now, think that Lanka is under my
possession. Now, be happy and without fear that
you are in Ravanas kingdom. This is how
he has asked me to tell you. This is true. Now,
dont worry. You should not shed tears any
more. Hanuman reprimanded Sita with
431
affection.
431. Yuddha kanda, sarga 116, slokas 9 to 14: When Rama asked Hanuman to go to Sita, he
simply said, Inform Sita about my victory and that I am safe. Bring Sitas message. But Hanuman
said to Sita even those words which Rama had not said. We will find a lot of difference between
what Hanuman said and what Rama will subsequently say. Therefore, we have to carefully
591
notice the words of Hanuman. Hanuman is telling her the following as Ramas words: O
lady of godliness! I am telling you happy news. O virtuous woman! (The poet used the word
dharmagyne!: one who knows what is right or virtuous. What does this mean? This means one
who is like a devoted wife. Hence, the translators translated it as O lady who knows the duty of
a devoted wife! When Rama addressed so, it means that Rama is conceding that Sita remained
a devoted wife.) Luckily you are alive I have attained victory due to my valour. Now, this
Lanka has come under my control. (Vasee = under the control; sthitaa =is. Whose control? The
poet did not say whether it was under the control of Rama or Vibhishana. As it is Rama who is
saying this, and as he is claiming that his own valour gave him victory, we can interpret that
Rama is saying that Lanka is under his control. The translators too gave the same interpretation.)
In order to get you from the clutches of the enemy, I gave up sleep with strong determination
and fulfilled the vow of killing the enemy. (Hanuman is telling Sita as if Rama has said, I killed
the enemy only for your sake to rescue you.)
This entire Lanka is kept under the control of Vibhishana. (This means, first Lanka is
mine. I have kept it under Vibhishanas control!)
You are at your own house. Do not worry. (swagruhe = at the own house; parivartasee = is
present. Lanka itself is Sitas own house! According to Ramas Dharma, the house of the husband
is a womans home. Even a parental home is not her own, is it? For Sita, Ramas house is her own
house and Vibhishanas house is also her own house.
If Rama wanted to give courage to Sita, he ought to have said: Vibhishana is our friend.
There is no harm from a friend. As you are in the house of a friend, dont worry. Is it not wrong
to say, Think of Vibhishanas house as your house. Hanuman said all these words to Sita as if
they were Ramas words. Did Rama really ask Hanuman say those words?
Moreover, all these words will become totally opposite to what Rama himself said to Sita
later.
If Hanuman wanted to say words that would give happiness to Sita, he could have said,
Mother! Your husband fought and killed the enemy for your sake. Now, you need not worry.
But, it was wrong to say, Rama said so. Because, the words which Rama says later will be
different.
592
593
594
595
432. Yuddha kanda, sarga 117, sloka 20: See how the corps were dispersing the people.
Veetra jarghara paanaa yaha = those who have harsh hands holding canes. (Those who were
beating angrily with canes); tatra = there; samantaat = then; parichakrayaha = Roamed. Is
there any difference between this corps in Lanka and the present day police who hold canes in
their hands? Beating people with canes and controlling them with threats of thrashing is the
duty of the protection force then and now as well.
433. Yuddha kanda, sarga 117, sloka 26: Ramas words about women: Veils, curtains, houses,
compound walls and clothes are not their protection. Their character is their protection.
What did Rama say with regard to women in his sermons when Bharata came to Chitrakuta?
What did he say about harems? He said all those things must be tight and they protect women!
596
597
598
599
434
434. Yuddha kanda, the whole of sarga 118: See, in this sarga, everything that happened since
Sita came to Rama.
Ramas words and Sitas words do not appear in the form of dialogues.
As per the method, which the poet follows, first Rama talks completely. Later, Sita says
whatever she wants to say. The same views, I wrote in the form of dialogues. (I have not changed
the content. I have changed the manner of saying things.)
See, what the poet is saying about Rama. Seeing Sita who stood beside him with shyness,
Sri Ramachandra with anger in his heart (hridayantargata kroodha = one who has anger
in the heart) began to say as follows:
Bhadre! (O auspicious lady!) Defeating the enemy in the battle, I have possessed you. I
have done as per my manliness.. I have annihilated both the enemy and the insult that he
caused me simultaneously. Everybody should know that I have not taken so much trouble for
your sake.. With regard to your good conduct, it is doubtful in the view of the world and you
are standing before me as my enemy just as a light before a man who has eye-ache. Which man
who has manliness and who belongs to a noble family will accept with great interest and love
a woman who has stayed in another mans house?..... You have come off the thigh of Ravana
only now. You have been looked at by the wicked looks of Ravana. Such a woman as you are
how can I who was born in a great family and who ought to bring fame to my family accept
you?.... Seeing your beautiful form in his house, Ravana would not keep quiet for long, would
he?.... I am not at all interested in you. Go wherever you want to go. I permit you. I am telling you
this after thinking about properly. O auspicious lady! I have nothing to do with you. Twam = you;
lakshmaneena = either with Lakshmana; bharateenaa = either with Bharata; yadhaa sukham =
as it is comfortable; kuru = do it; Sugriva = either with Sugriva; Vibhishanee =either with
Vibhishana; aatmanaha = to you; sukhaha = happiness; yadaaha = as you like; manah = mind;
nivee saya = keep.
(If Rama accepts his wife who lived in the house of another man and came back; the Raghu
dynasty will be defamed. But, Lakshmana and Bharata too belong to Raghu dynasty, dont they?
Will the dynasty not be spoiled if they keep their impure sister-in-law with them? If driving away
a spoiled wife is a Dharma, they ought to drive away the defiled sister-in-law, shouldnt it? May
be only wives must be driven away! This means, Rama does not accept his wife but he will keep
Lakshmana or Bharatas wife if they were defiled!
If Ramas wife is spoiled, she will be with Bharata!
If Bharatas wife is spoiled, she will be with Rama!
Lakshmanas wife .. with Rama!
Ramas wife with Lakshmana!
Satrughnas wife with Rama!
Ramas wife ..with Satrughna!
If this happens, it will fetche great fame! No defamation!
Perhaps, those who are born in Raghu dynasty talk crazily and they do not know how to talk
even a word sensibly!)
While Rama was talking like this, Sita who has eyes that resemble an antelopes wet
eyes. (The beauty of those eyes is for the sake of crying!)
Now, Sitas words: (Yuddha kanda, sarga 119, up to sloka 19): As her body shrunk due to
her husbands words which were like sharp points of an arrow, Sita wailed. Wiping her face wet
with tears and looking at her husband, Sita said as follows:
Warrior! Why are you uttering harsh words which are not appropriate for you to
600
speak and for me to hear? Why are you talking as if a foolish man talks to a foolish woman?
I did not behave as you doubt. I swear! You have to believe me.. Seeing ordinary women you
suspect the entire womankind. An outside man touched me when I was powerless and could
not control myself. It was not an act that happened out of my willingness. The fault lies on the
god.
Yat =which; madiidhiinam = my control; tat = such; mee = my; hridayantu = mind; twayi = in
you; vartatee = is present; aniiswaraa = (I was) not free; paradhiineeshu = under the control of
others; gaatreeshu = concerning limbs; kim = what; karishyaami = can do.
(Even if it were true that Ravana had molested Sita, this is what Sita should say. If Sita had
been molested, it was not her fault. She desires her husband and does not like Ravana. But,
according to the values of this society, people do not see whether the relationship with another
man had taken place with the willingness of the woman or not. A woman becomes impure even
if she is not willing for such relationship. Therefore, Sitas argument I was not under my
control will have no weight.)
You sent the warrior Hanuman to see me in Lanka. Why didnt you abandon me then? I
would have given up my life then.
O lion among men! Like a petty man, you followed anger and acted like a woman
(striitwameeva puraskritam).
(This means, a foolish man does not think sensibly. He exhibits anger. Women also do not
think sensibly. They exhibit anger. Like women, you are also exhibiting only anger. You are not
showing any sense or knowledge. Only womanliness is revealed in you. This is like saying, you
are womanish! You are womanly. Addressing him as nara saarduula (lion among men!).
Again, saying, You are acting like a base man, woman. There is nothing horrible in Sita
blaming Rama but it is very horrible to degrade women! The poet makes women speak words
that degrade women!)
O man of justice! You have not realized my good conduct This is how Sita argued to the
best of her ability in order to show herself as faultless. I have not done anything wrong. Believe
me! Dont you know my qualities? Do you talk without knowing good and bad? Dont you have
mercy? Accept me! In this manner, Sita talked grieving and requesting the husband to believe
her, to show mercy on her, and she is faultless. We should not understand as if she talked with
anger, self-respect and carelessness. Such way of talking does not suit the nature of that character.
A woman who refutes will not be ready for a fire ordeal or death.
As conditions that enable women to live with self-respect do not exist in feudal society, such
features do not form in the nature of women. Such features do not appear even in writings. Sita
prays to Rama but does not exhibit self-respect. It is natural to that character.
601
435. Yuddha kanda, sarga 119, slokas 21 & 22: After Sita asked Lakshmana to arrange the
pyre, Lakshmana looked at Ramas face. Therefore, warrior Lakshmana grasped the acceptance
of Rama as indicated by his form and arranged a pyre as per his wish.
Sita jumping into the pyre was acceptable to Rama!
436. Yuddha kanda, sarga 119, slokas from 22 to the end. Whole of sargas 120 & 121: Coming
closer to the pyre, Sita said, If it is true that my heart has never left Rama and roamed else where,
the fire should save me! Saying so, she jumped into the fire.
All people felt sad.
Then Kubera, Rudra, Yama, Indra and Brahma came to Rama by airplanes from their worlds.
(By then Sita had fallen into the pyre. What will they do, coming now?)
All of them waved their hands and said, You are the maker of every thing in this world. You
are the most knowledgeable person. Such a man as you why are you ignoring her when Sita is
jumping into the fire? (Why have you people ignored so far?)
Ignoring all that Rama said, I am Rama. Son of Dasaratha. I am realising that I am a human
being. (I am still thinking I am a human being. So, it is not true!) Who am I? Whose man I
602
am? For what purpose did I come? (What else? Upliftment of the worlds!) Brahma must tell
me all these things. (Perhaps, he will not believe if any other person tells. Sita is in the fire over
there!)
Brahma began to say. (O my goodness! How long will he say now!) Rama! You are
Narayana. You are a sportsman who created the worlds and rule.. You assumed the Avatar
(form) of Varaha (pig) with one horn. (Horns for pigs!) In the past, you had conquered all t h e
enemies. Hereafter also, you will conquer them. You are Brahma. You are Vishvaksena. (One who
has armies all over!) Man. Best among men! Holder of the sword.Holder of the bow.
Holder of the wheel. (Even god has armies, weapons and enemies! Assuming human needs as
gods needs and imagining a god!) You have no destruction. You have four shoulders.. You
are Upendra. (Perhaps, he is the elder brother of Indra! No use. If he is not Indra, what does it
matter whether he is younger brother or elder brother?) You are Padmanabha. (one who has
lotus in the navel). You are Jagannatha. (Lord of the universe!) You were one of the Prajapatis in
the past. (One of them? Rama should have been all Prajapatis taken together. So, now, the
remaining Prajapatis are as equal as Rama!) You are the eighth one among Rudras! (Alas! After
seven people? What is great in it?).You are the first maker who created the three worlds. You
are Swayamprabhu (self-constituted lord). Vedatma (one who knows the spirit of Vedas)
You are Omkar (mystic syllable Om). You appear everywhere: in hills, rivers, forests, the entire
universe, especially in Brahmans and cows. You are carrying the earth filled with all beings. When
the destruction approaches the earth, you are seen lying on a huge serpent Sesha on the waters
and bear the three worlds. (How many times has the earth disappeared so far? The earth disappeared and water remained! Where did water stand?)You are the universe with many heads,
tongues, eyes and feet. You are the carrier of the world. Sita is Lakshmi. You are Lord Vishnu. You
are going to assume the form of Krishna. (Krishna avatara). (Then what sort of gentleman would
that Krishna be?)
Rama! I am (Brahma) your heart. My wife Saraswati is your tongue. (Brahma! Are you not
angry if your wife stays in Ramas mouth?) All the gods are hair on your body. Aswani gods
are your ears. The Sun and the moon are your eyes. Your vision is day. The closure of your
eyes is night. (It is the imagination of human beings who did not have the knowledge of nature:
that it is night when god closes his eyes and it is day when he opens his eyes!) Your sighs are
Vedas! The entire world is your body. Your harshness is the earth. Your anger is fire. Your softness
is moon.. While describing this, Brahma says at one place, Sages say that you are this sort of
person (one who possessed all those features narrated so far!)
At another place, he says, Nobody knows about your birth and destruction. Nobody knows
who you are.
Brahma is saying, Nobody knows what is god, how he was born and how he creates. He
also says that though we do not know about him, god will save us and the sages suggested to us
to seek refuge in god. So Brahma does not know about that god. All are imagining this about god.
They believe because the elders have told them.
Again, Brahmas words: Rama! You were born on earth in the form of human being for the
sake of killing Ravana. That task is over. Now, come to Vaikuntha. (What? Without ruling the
kingdom? What happened to Sita who jumped into the fire? By now she must have reached
Vaikuntha before Rama!) Your sight (people seeing you), your eulogy (people praising you) are
not waste. There is no loss and defeat for those who eulogise in the form of ancient epic (those
who sing the oldest ignorant song). Your devotees will get luxuries not only in this world but also
in the other world. (In any world, it is luxuries that are needed. In this world , we need not
603
give up luxuries. There are crores of devotees who do not get even a little loaf of bread. All
604
Sita.
Ramas face blossomed with smiles,
gradually.
His heart was overwhelmed with the pride
of success.
There was no one who would say, Sita is
not pure. Do not accept her! Then why should
I have any objection.
Rama saluted all the elders. However great
I may be, I must be afraid of the world, mustnt
I?.... Can I do something which is not good for
the world? He submitted with humility.
Rama! What a noble man you are! It is
good for the world if you accept your dutiful
wife. If you live happily with your wife, the world
will be happy and not..
I know always that my dutiful wife is a
noble woman. I too believe that Sita would not
desire Ravanas riches and wealth. Another man
cannot do any thing to my dutiful wife. If any
man thinks of her in a vile manner even in his
mind, he would be ruined. My wife is like a
flame! I know. But I hesitated that the world
may think otherwise. If I accepted Sita in a hurry,
the world would say, Having been born in a
great family, what a base thing Rama has done!
The world would say that I brought back a
defiled wife. It will call me a fool, a lustful man.
Thats why, I hesitated and was ready to
abandon my wife. After elders like you have
accepted that Sita is faultless, can I defy your
words as my duty? I will surely follow your
advice. I will accept my wife. Rama said and
looked at Sita from the corners of his eyes.
Sita was listening to all the words of Rama
in wonder. She was pleasantly surprised. I
thought my husband had not grasped my
character but that great man has understood
every thing. It is not that my husband was
not aware of my conjugal fidelity. but he was
afraid of the world. However righteous a man
may be, he should fear the world, shouldnt
he?
It is nice that my husband showed restraint
605
606
Link-10
Link-10
seeing your sons coronation. Your son alone
will be blessed on seeing his own coronation!)
Rama! You have to meet Bharata who is
affectionate, valorous, clean and virtuous. You
have faced many hardships having lived in the
forest for fourteen years. (Why didnt you come
and express your sympathy when he was facing
hardships? You have come now with excitement
because he is going to be the king!) Rule the
kingdom for long, Dasaratha blessed Rama.
(Just as you ruled, this gentleman also will
rule!)
Saluting his father, Rama bowed
respectfully. Out of anger for Kaika, you said
you would abandon Kaika and his son. But you
have to be merciful in respect of Kaika and her
son. Your terrible curse must not affect them,
437
(Then what about
he requested Dasaratha.
your curses? Didnt you ever talk anything bad
about Kaika?)
Dasaratha said, Okay to Ramas advice
and hugged Lakshmana. (Sitting Rama on the
thigh! As it wont look nice if he does not do
any thing in the case of Lakshmana, he hugged
him now for a while!) Lakshmana! On seeing
you doing service to Rama, I feel very happy.
By the grace of Sri Rama, you will get fame in
this world and heaven in the other world. (Those
607
608
[Translation: B. R. Bapuji]
438. Yuddha kanda, sarga 123, sloka 8: akaaleebaapi = during the dry reason; muulaanicha
= roots; phalaanicha = fruits, nadyuscha = rivers, tisteeyaha = be present.
Fruits and water must be available always. Such places are needed These are the wishes of
primitive human beings. These are great boons in the imagination.
At the time when he was shooting an arrow at the sea, Rama himself gave the boon to Samudra
that good fruits and water would be available in Marukaantaaram, didnt he? Now, he is asking
Indra a boon for the same!
439. Yuddha kanda, sarga 123, sloka 16: All are surprised because all the dead persons
regained life. vaanaram = Vanaras; vismitaaha = surprised; babhuuvuha = are.
Dead persons regaining life is unnatural. This is a matter that should evince surprise. But
when there are gods and goddesses who can do many miracles right in front of their eyes, why
should people wonder? Gods come from the sky and leave. The god of fire came out of the pyre
and talked. When such things happened daily, people should take it as a natural thing and should
not wonder, should they? Even if dead persons regain their life, it must be as if a doctor treated a
disease. Why should the people wonder?
Though the poet is writing about miracles, he himself is wondering a lot. Similarly, he was
astonished at the building of a bridge across the sea. To him, any miracle is strange. This means,
all miracles, in fact, are written from the imagination of the poet and they are not actually known
facts of life. Dead persons regaining life does not happen in nature. The poet also knows that it
does not happen. Hence the fancy of dead persons regaining life. And this is a surprising thing.
He expresses the same surprise every time.
Miracles, gods, heavens, flying every thing is the poets imagination. Though he himself
imagined and wrote stories on miracles, the poet himself is wondering at the miracles that happen
in the stories.
609
Story-15
440
happened so?
Lowering his head restlessly, Rama sighed.
Lord Rama! Vibhishana bowed
obediently and saluted him. All the elders
including your father have agreed that your
forest life is over and you can enter the city.
There is nothing wrong about it. Every thing is
ready for your adornment. Silk garments,
ornaments, scents, garlands. every thing is
ready. Many beautiful women are waiting for
the fortune of serving at your feet. Your arrival
into the city alone is late! Vibhishana
submitted.
Rama serenely raised his head and looked.
Vibhishana! Since you are a knowledgeable
fellow, you well understand as to when and how
to respect me. I am happy at your devotion.
But., he sighed. There in Ayodhya
Bharata will be waiting for me treating each
moment as an age! My brother is a very great
man. One who ought to have immersed himself
in pleasures is leading the most difficult life of
a sage. Leaving such a brother, how can I adorn
myself?... Spare me! Make arrangements for the
bathing of all important persons like Sugriva,
Angada and Hanuman. They should be adorned
well. Whereas I will do it only in Ayodhya. Now
I must start off quickly. It takes lot of time to
travel. Make travel arrangements at once! He
hurried the travel on.
Vibhishana again with humility said, Lord!
You need not worry about the travel. The
Pushpaka plane, which will take you to any long
distance in a few seconds, is ready for you. The
moment you start here, it will take you to
Ayodhya the next moment. Do not be in a hurry
about your departure. Be merciful on me, stay
here for some time happily and accept my
440. For the basis to say that these kinds of thoughts about Bharata are going on in Ramas
mind, see in the subsequent part of this story!
610
441. Yuddha kanda, sarga 124, slokas 5 to 7, 19 & 20: See, what Rama says about Bharata
while talking to Vibhishana here and what he says later while talking to Hanuman.
What he said here: That young man who is righteous, worthy to be happy, delicate and
truthful is troubling himself for my sake.
Following the Dharma, I am not interested in bathing, garments and ornaments while leaving
such Bharata. My heart is in a hurry to see Bharata who came from Ayodhya to Chitrakuta to take
me back. Bharata begged me sincerely to take me back. I did not heed his words.... Pray to
important persons like Sugriva (Sugriva mukhyaan) to take a bath. (Bathing and hospitality are
only for big people, not for all Vanaras!)
Here, Rama is talking as if he has a good opinion of Bharata. See how he speaks later in
another context!
611
442. Yuddha kanda, sarga 125, slokas 4 to 8: Rama preached his responsibility to Vibhishana.
The invincible Lanka has been conquered since these Vanaras fought without fear for their life
and without turning their backs in the battle. Felicitate them by giving gems, money and ornaments. (This does not mean that all may be felicitated. See whom should Vibhishana felicitate.)
Those who are eligible for respect (sanmaarham) and those who rule Vanaras will be happy,
after you felicitate them. (Rama is suggesting to felicitate the king, his ministers and such other
administrators. They alone are eligible for felicitation.)
It seems Vibhishana is not happy about all this expenditure on felicitations. So Rama is
trying to convince him, All will realise that you are merciful, charitable and famous. Rama
says, You will get fame!
443.There is nothing wrong if the Pushpak airplane flew in Valmikis Ramayana since it is
fiction. (Mythology). But in a story which we understand from a realistic point of view, Pushpak
plane should not be present. We have to simply understand that Rama returned from Lanka in a
boat, bullock-cart or horse carriage. As there is some story connected with Pushpaka airplane, I
am retaining it here as it is. This does not mean that we too need believe that Rama went in the
Pushpaka airplane.
Notice the route along which the Pushpak plane travelled!
612
444. Yuddha kanda, sarga 125, slokas 13 to 17: Rama sat in the plane and said to great
valorous Sugriva and Vibhishana as follows: Best among Vanaras! You have completed the task
of your friend. Take my permission, you may leave for the places you like. Sugriva! You who
is afraid of Adharma have completed the task which a friend ought to. You will reach Kishkindha
soon along with your troops. Vibhishana! Live in Lanka, which I have given you. Even gods who
come along with Indra cannot deny you.
It was Ramas opinion that Vibhishana ought to give gifts to Vanaras but he need not give
those who had helped him. Because, he had helped Sugriva first. Now, Sugriva has reciprocated
and helped him in return. He has discharged his duty. So, Rama need not give him gifts.
It is not the case with Vibhishana. He did not give any help to Sugriva first. Sugriva alone
helped Vibhishana and conquered Lanka for him. Therefore, Vibhishana ought to have given
gifts to Sugriva.
Rama is reminding him of the agreement between Sugriva and himself, You have kept your
word! This is as if Rama was saying to Sugriva, You helped me since I first helped you! You
have not given me any help without reciprocity.
Now, Rama asks everybody to go their own way. The airplane will go via Kishkindha, wouldnt
it? Why doesnt he drop off Sugriva there? He knows all morals. Why doesnt he know this
moral?
613
up in the air.
614
447. The plane is going along the route in which Rama and others killed the enemies in the
battle field.
448. The subsequent story is the basis for the argument that Rama is still suspecting Sita.
615
449. Have you noticed the route along which the plane flew? The place also came in the same
route along which Rama had gone to Lanka. Do devotees of Rama say, Rama brought the plane
on that route to show all those places to Sita. If it is so, they could have come on that route up to
Panchavati and could have directly gone to Kosala, couldnt they? Sita already knew the entire
route from Ayodhya to Panchavati, didnt she? Just as people on the ground walk along a short
route, that has twists and turns, does an airplane in the sky also go with twists and turns? Although the poet was not aware of how an airplane goes, he failed to imagine it (even by observing
birds!)
Why did Rama, who was anxious to see Bharata quickly and who did not stop at Agastya,
Atri or any other sage, stop at sage Bharadwaja? He could have gone directly to Bharata? See
later!
616
617
what he says to Hanuman (Yuddha kanda, sarga 128, slokas 1 to 20): Hanuman! Go
618
to Sringaberapura.... inform Guha that I am fine Guha will happily tell you the route to go
to Ayodhya and also about Bharatas nature. (pravruttiha is the word, which the poet used.
That is, how is the nature of Bharata!)
Tell Bharata that I have finished carrying out the command of my father and have returned.
Inform me what expression that Bharata wears on his face on hearing about me. (This means,
observe how he reacts when he hears about my arrival!)
Truly ascertain all the reactions of Bharata and his gestures through the colour of his face,
glances and speech. (This means, observe him keenly and let me know his attitude!) Tell him
that, having conquered the enemies and won glory, Rama is coming back with friends endowed
with extraordinary might.
Thus Rama suspects Bharata and sends a warning with threats.
As it does not look nice if he suspects Bharata so obviously, Rama is giving a reason for his
suspicion. Whose mind will a kingdom which is exceedingly rich in all coveted enjoyments,
teeming with elephants, horses and chariots and which is inherited from ones father and grand
father not actually be attracted to it? (This means, Rama says, whose mind will not change if
he looks at such a kingdom? But Bharata had given up the kingdom a long time ago, hadnt
he?)
It is Ramas opinion that Bharata will surely yield to royal pleasures and luxuries and desire
to retain the kingdom for himself. Rama does not believe that Bharata was leading an ascetic life
and had abandoned all the pleasures!
Then why did he say to Vibhishana thus, My virtuous brother is perishing with grief for
me. This is merely outward show!
With an intention that nobody should misunderstand him, see what Rama says. If through
this long association, Bharata himself wishes to rule the kingdom, he can rule the entire globe.
This means, if Bharata would like to retain the kingdom for himself, Rama says that he has no
objection and he would not come in Bharatas way. If he had no objection for Bharata retaining
the kingdom, why should he threaten him that he was coming with friends who are endowed with
great might? Why should he ask Hanuman to find out Bharatas attitude towards him with knack?
Rama should not suspect Bharata. If he had a doubt it should be with good intention. He
should say to Bharata as follows: Bharata! Fourteen years ago you told me you would give back
the kingdom to me. Do you still have the same opinion or has it changed? Long back, when you
were inexperienced and young, you said, knowingly or unknowingly, you would give me the
kingdom. I do not insist that you give it now. I do not ask that it must happen as per your promise.
If you want to retain the kingdom, keep it with you. I am not sad about it.
If Rama wanted to send Hanuman, what Rama ought to say was: Hanuman! Bharata might
be ready to give me the kingdom irrespective of whether or not he is willing. I will not take the
kingdom if he gives it to me unwillingly. I will not ask him for the kingdom since he said long
back that he would give it. But if you ask him whether or not he is willing to give the kingdom, he
may say yes even though he is not willing. But, we can notice sorrow on the face of a person
who gives things unwillingly. You observe that! If he feels sad, I will not take the kingdom even
if he is ready to give it. That is why, I am asking you to observe his feelings.
If this was Ramas opinion, why does he try to threaten Bharata thus, Tell him I have come
with armies! Tell him I have friends who will give up their lives for me.
Rama is very worried whether Bharata will give him back the kingdom or not. He says any
sort of person will yield to the pleasures of the kingdom! As he yields to such pleasures,
619
he suspects that everybody yields to it. He has no confidence in Bharata even though many
people have told him positively. He stopped at Bharadwajas hermitage, only in order to find out
Bharatas attitude to him.
It did not strike the poet that Rama would be defamed if he suspects Bharata despite positive
comments of many elderly people about Bharata. It was the poets self-confidence, Who will
find fault with Sri Rama?
After saying all what he wanted to say, Rama said, You ought to return quickly before we
have gone far. (This means, before we go a little far from here, you have to return to us and tell
us the news!)
When Rama commanded so, Hanuman, the son of the wind god, assumed human form and
began to travel toward Ayodhya.
Hanuman changed from the form of a Vanara into human form, hasnt he? Now see, how
beautifully he flies! After that Hanuman flew upwards swiftly as if Garuda bird had swiftly gone
to catch a serpent. Does a human being walk or fly? Hanuman flew over the river Ganga, crossed
it and reached Sringaberipura!
452.Yuddha kanda, sarga 128, slokas 22 & 23: Hanuman said to Guha, Guha! Rama has
asked me to enquire about your well-being. You will see Sri Rama at this very place today when
sage Bharadwaja permits him after spending the night of the fifth lunar day. (No attempt of
enquiring about Bharata!) Again, Hanuman flew up.
620
453. Yuddha kanda, sarga 128, slokas 32 & 33: Hanuman saw Bharata who was served by
the ministers, priests and commanders who wore yellow clothes.
If necessary, Bharata can have the attire of a sage, why do all people in the royal court have
it? If Rama is not comfortable, should none else have comforts. Should none else be happy.
Perhaps, Bharata is worried that if ministers and others around him wear ornaments etc, his
mind will also drag him to ornaments. That is why, he must have ordered everybody to wear
yellow clothes.
To make Bharata faultless, see what the poet is saying. The ministers and the citizens were
not inclined to wear and enjoy appropriate garments and ornaments ignoring virtuous Bharata
who wore the bark of trees and the skin of black antelope. What detachment! To please the king!
But none has detachment from the ruling of the kingdom!
454. Yuddha kanda, sarga 128, slokas 42 to 44:
As soon as Hanuman came to Bharata and said that Rama was coming, Bharata said he would
give some gifts to Hanuman. Later, he asked about Rama in detail.
See what the gifts are, which Bharata wanted to give. Bharatas words: O gentle one! Are
you a god who has come out of compassion or a human being? In return for the pleasant news, I
will give you a hundred thousand cows, a hundred excellent villages and sixteen golden complexion
virgin girls (as wives) of good conduct, adorned with earrings decked with all kinds of jewels and
who possess a shapely nose and things, moon-like faces and rich in lineage and birth.
Sixteen wives for Hanuman! This is according to Valmikis Ramayana!
Are these wives human women or Vanara women? Do Vanara women stay with Bharata?
Human wives for Hanuman? So, there will be innumerable slave women in the hands of the king
to give away to any one!
What will our elders who project Hanuman as a bachelor say now?
621
455. Yuddha kanda, sarga 129, sloka 5: If he wanted to tell Bharata about Rama, Hanuman
could start from the time when Bharata returned from Chitrakuta, couldnt he? Owing to the
boons of your mother, Sri Rama started from Ayodhya for the forest, thus Hanuman started from
Kaikas boons to see whether Bharata remembered the incident properly or not. This is to say,
Rama suffered so much due to your mother! It is an attempt to set right Bharatas mind if it
vacillates in respect of giving the kingdom!
456.Yuddha kanda, sarga 130, slokas 6 & 10: Level all the ditches and the low lying areas
as also the elevated grounds from Nandigrama to outside.
Even today, they repair roads here and there before ministers come on a given route. So, this
is a farce that has been going on since Sri Ramas days!
Royal women, ministers, army, ordinary women, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, people of various
castes should go in groups to receive Rama.
People should go at their own interest to receive Rama. Will it amount to respect if people
are dragged by commands like, All of you come here! There is no difference between this and
dragging people in lorries from various villages to attend the meetings of the ministers. This
fraudulent practice has been there since the past.
622
623
459. We do not find the incident of Hanuman meeting Rama and telling him about Bharata. The
poet, either forgot what he had written earlier or left it aside carelessly!
460. Yuddha kanda, sarga 130, slokas 40 & 48: Notice Ramas attitude towards Bharata and
Satrughna! Lifting Bharata (from his feet) whom he had seen after a long time, sitting him on his
thigh, Rama felt happy and embraced him.
Satrughna (first) saluted Rama and Lakshmana and then saluted the feet of Sita Devi with
humility.
There is no mention of Rama talking to Satrughna or embracing him.
It did not strike the poet that Rama ought to talk to Satrughna.
All the property related dealings are with Bharata only, arent they? So, why should he sit
Satrughna who has no value on his thigh? It will be just carrying weight!
624
463.Yuddha kanda, sarga 131, sloka 12: The poet too hesitates and feels it will be inappropriate if Rama just takes away the kingdom from Bharata. Thats why, he is preparing a great
reason, Rama accepts because Bharata is incapable. Otherwise why will he accept it?
Bharata is describing himself as an inefficient person. King! Just as a calf cannot carry the
same weight, which a fat bull carries, I am not eligible to carry the weight of this kingdom. Just
as a donkey cannot run like a horse and a crow cannot fly like a swan, I am not capable of
carrying the weight of this kingdom.. Thus Bharata said many words.
Rama, who had conquered the cities of the enemies, heard Bharatas words and said yes.
(He said, Yes, you are incapable and I am capable) and sat on the auspicious throne. (At
625
last he climbed the throne!) If Rama has to become a horse, all others have to become
donkeys!
If Rama has to become a swan, all others have to become crows!
Is it necessary to make Bharata seem useless in order to hand over the kingdom to Rama?
How did such an incapable (Bharata) increase the wealth of the kingdom ten folds? Perhaps
Rama would have increased a thousand times! From this point of view, Yes, Bharata is incapable!
Why all these troubles? Why should Bharata make himself a donkey and a dog? Mr. Poet! Is
it not enough if Bharata gave up the kingdom saying, Brother! I have ruled the kingdom so far
as per my promise. Now you take it. I will assist you.
Do you say, It is enough but how to glorify Rama compared to Bharata?
Even now, has Rama become greater than Bharata? Only your mentality of a slave of Rama
is evident once again!
626
464. Yuddha kanda, sarga 131, slokas 29 & 31: ..(to Rama who sat in the chariot) Vibhishana,
the Rakshasa king was fanning him with a white whisk.
Sugriva, best among Vanaras, climbed on a hill-like elephant called Satrunjayam.
Rama has been describing Sugriva as his brother. Bharata also said to Sugriva, You are one
of our brothers. They have established this kind of relationship of brothers with Sugriva. So,
only Sugriva must be in the chariot along with Rama, Lakshmana, Bharata and Satrughna.
Vibhishana must be separately elsewhere. Does the poet not know this point?
627
465. Yuddha kanda, sarga 131, slokas 86 to 88: Appointment of a prince by Rama did not
take place during Ramas coronation. Ramas coronation ends grandly. Rama gave gifts to the
Vanaras and the Rakshasas. Everybody returned to their respective countries.
Thereafter, Rama rules the kingdom. Then he appoints the prince. Rama who has no
enemies, who is very generous, rules the entire kingdom with extreme joy. (Thank god! Ruling
the kingdom after so long a time!)
Virtuous Rama said to virtuous Lakshmana as follows: Virtuous man! You also rule along
with me this earth that was ruled by former kings with might. Be a prince and along with me, you
too carry on the burden of this kingdom, which our forefathers ruled.
When Lakshmana did not give his consent even though being repeatedly entreated. Rama
then consecrated Bharata as the prince.
Lakshmana did not agree however much Rama asked him. Then Rama appointed Bharata as
prince.
This means, Rama does not have the sense and dharma, which Lakshmana has. The poet has
more confidence in Lakshmana than in Bharata because there is no threat to Rama from
Lakshmana. Again he has some hesitation that it may not look nice if he gives the position of
prince to Lakshmana. This is the conflict.
Here the actual question which we ought to think about is: Was Bharata crowned?
What about Rama following the orders of his father? Were boons given to Kaika fulfilled?
Think about these questions.
628
[Translation: B. R. Bapuji]
629
Link-11
467. Uttara kanda begins with this link. For this, I read the Telugu translation
of Srimadraamaayanee Uttara kandaha published by Vavilla Ramasastrulu
and Sons in 1925. The translator is not seen in the book. He is torn. I could not
get his name through libraries. Since Mr. Chadaluvada Sundara Rama Sastrulu
prepared the Telugu translations of Valmikis Ramayana, which Vavilla and Sons
published, I presume this translation of Uttara kanda is also by him. I have yet to
confirm this. Until then I use his name only wherever necessary.
There are 124 sargas on the whole in Uttara kanda. Out of these, 13 sargas are wholly
Interpolations according to Mr. Sundara Rama Sastrulu. They are: 5 sargas from 24 to 28. 5
sargas from 43 to 47 and 3 sargas from 70 to 72.
Apart from these, he has identified by means of brackets those slokas, which are interpolations
in other sargas.
He has translated serially even these 13 sargas, which he has identified as Interpolations. But
he has not given them numbers. For example, as sargas from 24 to 28 are Interpolations, he has
assigned the number 24 to the 29th sarga. Thus, as he discounted 13 sargas, there are numbers
for 111 sargas only. But, when I had to mention the numbers of sargas in my foot notes, I took
those sargas for which Mr. Sundara Rama Sastrulu has not given numbers and gave them serial
numbers.
In fact there is an argument that the entire Uttara Kanda is an Interpolation, isnt it?
Not the entire kanda is an Interpolation. Only 13 sargas are Interpolations. This is the
argument of the translator.
Interpolations are also part of Ramayana. What everybody knows is that Ramayana which
includes Interpolations. As this is my view, I have given serial numbers to those sargas as
well which Mr. Sundara Rama Sastrulu left out. As per this calculation, I have given sarga numbers
while mentioning them in the footnotes. For example, when I cite sarga 40, it must be sarga 35
in Mr. Sundara Rama Sastrulus translation. Readers have to notice this difference in the sargas
that I have cited.
630
468. This means a situation arose in society that pregnancy without marriage was considered a
curse. Whenever they come across a girl, this is the gift that the sages give!
Link-11
thinking of a fourth ruler. All right! You be the
ruler. Look! Take this Pushpaka airplane also.
This is very great. He narrated its greatness. It
is neither very hot nor very cold in it. This is
one of its great qualities. Thus, Brahma gave
him boons and left.
Kubera went to his father and asked,
Brahma did not tell me where I should live .
You tell me! (He does not know where to live.
But he will rule all the worlds! Brahma gave
away the boon to rule the world!)
My Lad! Viswakarma has built the city of
Lanka on Trikuta mountain in the south sea for
Rakshasas. Rakshasas have lived there for some
time, but left that city out of fear of Vishnu and
gone to the nether world. Now, Lanka is vacant.
Stay there (Rule in that corner!), said Kuberas
father. Kubera occupied Lanka.
On hearing so far, Rama wondered and
asked, Did the Rakshasas also live in Lanka
in the past? Who was their ancestor? Why did
Vishnu chase them away from Lanka?
Agastya resumed with a smile. First
Brahma created water. (Sir! Who did create
Brahma first?) Brahma created some living
beings to protect that water. They suffered from
lack of food. Some of them were ready to eat
water (bhakshaamaha). Others said,
rakshamaha (We will protect!)
Those who said bhakshaamaha became
Yakshas and those who said rakshaamaha
became Rakshasas. (Those who follow
Brahmas instructions became Rakshasas!
How strange it is?)
469
Thus Rakshasas were first born.
Among them there wee two brothers named
631
632
470. Ravanas father was Visravasu. He was a Brahmin. A great sage. Mother, a Rakshasa
woman of Rakshasa race. Rakshasas were enemies of Brahmins and sages. Ravana became a
Rakshasa like his mother, while the dynasty (family) was that of his father and grand father.
Pulastya family.
Link-11
Whereas Vibhishana studied the Vedas (one
will come to know all kinds of tricks only by
reading them, isnt it?) and became a noble man.
Once Kubera came to his father (Visravasu)
on an aeroplane.
Pointing towards Kubera, Kaikasi said to
her son Ravana, My child! See how great your
elder brother is! You too should become such a
great man!
All right, mother! I will become a great
man, said Ravana to his mother. (Alas! It would
have been better if he had gone to study!)
Kumbhakarna performed a terrible penance
for ten thousand years.
Vibhishana performed a terrible penance
for five thousand years standing on a single leg
and five thousand years standing on both the
legs. (Perhaps standing on one leg might have
hurt him.)
Ravana performed penance for a thousand
years and cut off one of his heads and dropped
it in the fire (sacrifice). Again he performed
penance for a thousand years and cut off the
second head and offered it to fire. (Alas! How
filthy these stories are! We are compelled to
read such filth!) In this manner, after offering
nine heads to the fire and when he was about to
cut off the tenth head Brahma appeared.
Give me a boon so that I live for ever
without death!, said Ravana.
Not possible, said Brahma. It is not
possible for any living being to live without
death. Ask for any other boon.
All right! Then, make it possible that I will
not face death from gods and Gandharvas,
asked Ravana.
All right! You will get back all your heads.
I will also give you power that enables you to
change into whatever form you want, saying
so, Brahma thus, gave him one more boon.
Then, Brahma went to Vibhishana.
Vibhishana asked with humility, I wish to
always possess a virtuous mentality. (He knew
that his mentality would not be stable if he did
not have a boon). I should know how to use
Brahmas arrow without having to learn it. (Is
this virtuous mentality!)
All right! You were always a virtuous man!
633
634
Link-11
Who is your husband? (Did he cause so much
depression that you do this penance?), Ravana
asked her.
She said, I am the grand daughter of
Brihaspati. My father always reads the Vedas.
I was born a literary girl. (Vaangmaya kanya).
Hence I am Vedavati. Many men have tried to
marry me. But my father did not agree to give
me to any one except Vishnu. (How much dowry
will your father give to Vishnu? Vishnu will take
a lot, you know!) A Rakshasa king named
Dambhu killed my father while he was sleeping
since my father did not give me to him. My
mother entered the fire along with the body of
my father. As my father had always wished to
give me to Vishnu, I concentrated my mind on
Vishnu only. I am doing penance to marry
Vishnu. I know every thing about you. You are
Ravana. Head of Lanka.
Hearing every thing Ravana said, It is all
right. But Vishnu does not stand in comparison
to me. Marry me.
Dont say that. Its wrong. Vishnu is the
head of all the three worlds, said Vedavati.
Ravana held Vedavatis hair out of sexual
desire.
Vedavati at once became furious and cut
her hair off with the hand. Wicked fellow!
Touching my hair, you have insulted me. I will
die before your eyes and will be born again as
Ayonija (not born of womb) to kill you. I am
hesitating to curse you because my penance will
go waste, saying so, she jumped into the fire.
Immediately she was born in a lotus.
Ravana brought Vedavati along with the
lotus into Lanka. His minister said, It will be a
danger to you if she is in your house.
Ravana threw that lotus into the sea. That
flower was carried away by the waves of the
sea, fell in the sacrificial ground of king Janaka
and was hidden under the soil. Vedavati who
had been covered under the soil in Krita Yuga
635
471. Unaware of the reasons for many things in nature, humans fabricate various kinds of
stories with various kinds of imagination. Unaware of the reason why so many colours are present
in the peacocks tail, we have a story that Indra gave it a boon! Each country has a story about
the tail of the peacock. We have to understand that such stories are created because of lack of
knowledge about nature.
636
472. All the tortures, which people allegedly suffer in Yamas world are nothing but the tortures, which enemies inflict on their enemies! Whatever tortures enemies inflict are the tortures
of Yamas world! To understand these things more exactly, all these tortures were those, which
slave masters inflicted on the slaves at the emergence of the slave-owning society.
Link-11
(This is the boon that I have given him!) You
make friends with Ravana. (Should Brahma
have to run after those whom he has given
boons?)
Later Ravana fought a battle with
Kalakeyas. In that battle he killed Surpanakhas
husband.
Later he went to Varunaalaya. There he saw
Kaama Dheenu. (A cow). It gives milk at all
times in all seasons. The sea of milk was born
out of its milk. The moon came out of that sea
of milk. (So, moon means lump of butter?)
When Ravana went to Varunaalaya, Varuna
was not there. He came to know that Varuna
had gone to Brahmas world to listen to music.
(Instead of going for sacrifices, he went to a
music recital. Good taste!)
Ravana fought with Varunas sons, defeated
them and left that place.
Then he went to the city of Asna. At the
door of a big mansion, he saw a big form of a
male. That form said to Ravana, If you want
to fight with me do it here. If you want to fight
with the Emperor Bali, go inside.
Ravana went inside. Bali looked at Ravana,
showed him a wheel-like thing at a distance and
asked him, Get that Kundala (ear ring) here.
Though Ravana tried to lift it, he could not lift
it.
Then Bali said, It is my grand fathers
earring. His name is Hiranyakasipu. When he
was fighting at that time, this ear ring had fallen
down here. Sri Mahavishnu killed such a great
warrior. The one who was guarding at the door
is that Maha Vishnu. You also worship Maha
Vishnu! (Like Vibhishana, Emperor Bali is
also a renegade? This man is Hiranyakasipas
grand son, isnt he? Which means, is he the
son of Prahlada?)
Ravana angrily ran outside to quarrel with
Vishnu.
Grasping that Ravana was coming, Vishnu
disappeared without fighting with him since
Ravana had Brahmas boon. As Vishnu was not
visible, Ravana left that place.
Later Ravana went to the world of the sun.
He sent a word to the Sun through Prahasta.
Will you come for a fight or admit your
637
defeat?
The sun wore red garments, garlands and
golden jewels. On hearing Prahastas words, he
called his gate keeper and said, Dandi! I do
not have time. I cannot waste my time. (Sun!
What a nice word you said!) You go to the
battle. Otherwise admit that you have lost the
battle. (Yes, one has to be very clear.)
Dandi said to Ravana, My master has
asked me to fight with you
Ravana laughed and left. Then Ravana
started for the world of the moon. On his way,
while going in his chariot, he saw a man
fondling a woman. Then Ravana called a
passer-by named Parvata and asked him, Who
is that gentleman in that chariot? Parvata said,
He has done great penance. Thats why he is
going to heaven.
Meanwhile, Apsarasas (celestial nymphs)
were dancing and taking another gentleman in
another chariot.
This gentleman fought without turning his
back in the battle. That is why he is going to
heaven.
In this manner, Ravana saw many people.
Whosoever he called out refused to fight with
him. All were going to heaven.
The king of Ayodhya, Mandhata too was
going to heaven. Ravana called Mandhata also
for fighting. Mandhata began to fight. Ravanas
grand father was Pulastya. He came to know
about this through his divine sight, rushed
immediately, reprimanded his grandson, made
Mandhata and Ravana friends and stopped the
battle.
Ravana went higher and higher above the
sky, crossed the sphere of Vayu, (Vayu
mandala) reached the Moons sphere (Chandra
mandala) and began to fight with Indra. (Alas!
Moon! Why do you fight with that stupid fellow?
Admit your defeat, you see! You will be free
from his menace. Shed light happily!)
Brahma came running. Ravana! Dont
shoot arrows at the moon. He does good for
the world. I will tell you a mantra (spell) that
will make you fearless while you are in danger,
Brahma told him a very long mantra.
It had the names of all gods!
638
Link-11
must come for me. If I fight from that chariot, I
should not face death. If I do not complete fire
oblation, the mistake will be mine. If I get death
then, it is not your fault.
All right! said Brahma. He took Indra
with him.
Feeling very shy, Indra sat. (Indra! Do you
still have sense of shame? All your shame might
have been exhausted, isnt it?)
Brahma reprimanded Indra and said, This
is the consequence of your sin. When I created
Ahalya as the most beautiful woman, you
thought I would give her to you. But I gave her
to Gautama since he was a good man. (Indra!
Your mentality has been like this since the
beginning!) Unable to control your anger, you
molested Ahalya. Because of that sin now you
face this humiliation. Your son Jayanta is safe
in the sea. Perform Vaishnava sacrifice. You will
be free of all sins. Devendra performed that
sacrifice and became pious and famous again.
Agastya narrated to Rama the story so far
and resumed the eulogy of Ramas valour again,
Indrajit is the one who conquered Indra. Such
a man has fallen in front of your valour!
Rama said, Every thing is all right. But,
how could the Rakshasas behave as they like
on this earth so far? Were there no capable kings
to suppress the Rakshasas? (Rama wanted
others say, Who else is there except you?)
Agastya resumed his narration. Ravana
went to fight with Karta Viryarjuna. Arjuna had
a thousand hands. Then he was sporting with
all his wives in the river Narmada. To show his
heroism he put his hands to stop the flow. The
river surged backwards. (All great acts are in
front of wives!)
Then all the flowers which Ravana had kept
for the worship of Siva were scattered in the
water. Then Ravana looked at that river like a
473
wife who has defied (her husband)
He sent his ministers to find out the reason.
639
473. Uttara kanda, sarga 37, sloka 8: On seeing his half-finished worship of Siva, he looked
at River Narmada as if he looked at the wife who has defied the custom.
Just as the flowing back of a river is very unnatural, defying of rules (customs) by a woman
is such an unnatural thing. This means, women had been defying customs there!
But defiance by the wife is a major reason for the anger of man.
640
475. After the story of Hanuman at the end of sarga 43, all the sages (including Agastya) took
permission from Rama and went back to their respective hermitages.
In sarga 42, A day passed after Sri Ramas coronation. He slept that night happily and woke
up next day with eulogies, Rama! Your form, your lustre, your handsomeness, your family,
your.., your.. He adorned himself and sat in the assembly for the first time.
Ascetics narrated stories again. In sarga 43, Rama talks to Agastya once again.
Of course, devotees of Valmiki dismiss this as an interpolation. All right, Valmiki did not
write this. Then, why did Gilmiki write? When he wrote at one place that Agastya has left, why
did he write that Rama talked to Agastya again?
641
Link-11
This is the story of the birth of Vali and Sugriva.
Whoever listens to this story, all their desires
will be fulfilled. (If they did not listen to this
filthy story, their heart would be free. That is
better!)
I will also narrate why Ravana abducted
Sita. Listen, Agastya started again. (When will
you leave him, sir!)
In Krita yuga, Ravana once asked sage
Sanat kumara, Who is the next powerful among
gods? Sanat kumara said, Narayana is
powerful. If some one dies in the hand of
Narayana, he will have no rebirths. In Treta
yuga, Narayana alone will be born as Rama.
Ravana wanted to die at your hands in order to
avoid rebirth. Thats why he was hostile to
you. (Then, why dont sages and devotees die
at the hands of Narayana?)
Once Ravana asked Narada, You have seen
all the worlds. In which world there are strong
people?
In Sweta island, said Narada.
Ravana went to Sweta island. Women there
held Ravana like a child, held him tightly, threw
him here and there, played with him like a ball
and finally threw him into the sea.
Ravana came out of the sea and asked
Sanat kumara, All right!....Who created these
worlds?
Who can create them? It was Vishnu. We
do not know about his birth. Learned people
say that he fulfils the lives of all people. (Well
said! Without claiming that you alone know
about Vishnu!) Women who were born from
the exhalation of Vishnu threw you into the sea.
How will that god appear? When can we
reach him?
He is present every where. Those who
believe him to be their refuge and worship him
will be able to see him. After the twenty eight
epoch arrived, you will worship in Vaivaswata
manvantaram and reach an imperishable
world, said Sanat kumara.
Rama! You are Narayana. Ravana abducted
642
me to go back to you!
All right! Come to me whenever I call you.
Until then go somewhere, said Rama.
(It seems Rama is tired of a lot with
relatives. He is asking every body to go away!)
The Pushpaka flew away on its wings.
Rama is happy in Ayodhya.
To King Janaka: O Ruler of the Earth! Take gems and return to your city?
To Bharatas maternal uncle: O Ruler of the Earth! The king (Kaikas father) is very old.
He will feel sorry for if you have not returned. So, it is proper for you to start today.
To king of Kasi: O Ruler of the Earth! Return to the city of Kasi, which is ruled by you well.
and which is beautiful.
After bidding farewell to the king of Kasi, Rama looked at the three hundred kings with a
smile and said, Because of your kindness and valour, the wicked Ravana has died. Bharata
brought you having heard that Ravana had abducted the daughter of king Janaka. It has been a
great delay for all of you who came for the battle. So, I think it is proper if all of you go back to
your respective kingdoms.
Bharata, he says, had mobilized all these kings. (They must be subsidiary kings) came to
Lanka with their armies and killed Ravana.
Now, all of you go back, says Rama. (It seems he has lost his sense due to extreme joy of
sitting on the throne!)
Mr. Sundara Rama Sastrulu, who identified some sargas/slokas as Interpolations in Uttara
kanda, did not consider these as Interpolations. So, Bharata mobilizing subsidiary kings and
coming to Lanka is true! ..Of course this is an Interpolation. How could that Gilmiki write
this?
It would be better if Bharata took some army, went to Lanka and fight. It is a mistake that the
story did not proceed so. The poet (Valmiki or Gilmiki) realised this mistake and wrote this way
Any way he never thinks whether the earlier narration and the subsequent narration are coherent.
The poet made Rama say that Bharata had come to Lanka with his troops.
See what Rama was saying to Sugriva. (Uttara kanda, sarga 50, up to sloka 7).
O gentle one! Sugriva! Go to Kishkindha which is invincible to Devas and Asuras!
To Vibhishana: Vibhishana! Rule Lanka with justice. Go to Lanka!
In this manner, Rama himself said to every body, Now, go back! Go back! It would be nice
if those who came said, Rama! Now we will go back Does it look nice if Rama himself told
them to go back? Sugriva and Vibhishana themselves asked Rama then, We will come to your
country. It is wrong not to call them at that time and also it is wrong to ask them to go back now.
Well, does the poet not know such things?
643
Story-16
644
with himself.
If he looked at Sita, all thoughts of Rama
begin to travel into the past into Lanka.
Lord!
Rama moved a little bit and looked afresh
at Sita keenly. Rama always feels that form of
address as a feast to his ears. Now, there is more
humility in Sitas behaviour. More obedience
and modesty are seen. This Sita is not the Sita
of forest life. Rama looked at Sita thoughtfully.
Have I disturbed your thoughts?
Rama nodded and kept silent with a smile
as if he had pardoned his wife.
Are you tired of your duties, my Lord?
Please accept this wine!
He took the goblet.
Looking at the moon sliding into the lake,
Sita said, This garden has changed so much
that I doubt if this were our garden. Have you
noticed it, my Lord? Even after many days when
I look at it, I still feel strange. This Ponna tree
beside these steps. when it first grew, how
huge it had become! It appears as if somebody
has brought all these huge trees and planted
them here.
By the time when we left, these bushes of
red flowers were not there on the bank of this
lake. Even this Sandal tree was a small plant at
that time. Now?.... It has become a huge tree.
By the time they started for the forest life,
Ramas doubt about Sita too was a small sprout.
But now?
My Lord! Look over there! Those Vegisas,
Loddugus, Saptaparnas all of them how
they have grown with age! Even the birds all
over the garden how many new kinds they
are! I feel as if they ask me, Sita! Have you
come? Have you noticed us? What should I
tell them?.... I laugh at them.
Raising her head, Sita talked with smiles.
Her cheeks shone in the moon light. The
shadows of her hair moved on her cheeks.
Such a beautiful woman That wicked
man. Frowning, Rama put the goblet down.
As something struck in her mind, Sita
looked happy.
In annihilating the enemy about your
valour all our relatives
645
646
477.
Ramas sermons to Bharata in Chitrakuta are the basis for this kind of presentation of
Ramas rule.
479. Yuddha kanda, sarga 131, slokas 93 to 101: The following passage that describes the
nature of Ramas kingdom is from the Yuddha kanda. The poet describes Ramas kingdom as
follows, after Ramas coronation. While Rama was ruling, the grief of widows was not heard. (In
Ramas kingdom, women, perhaps, were so vexed that they felt very happy and relieved when
their husbands passed away! That is why even the widows might not have grieved.)
Snakes and diseases did not harass people. (They had the king to harassing them! Then, is
647
There were no thieves in the world. (lookaha = the world; nirdasyuha = without thieves;
abhavat = became. It was the poets hope that Rama should rule the entire world! The poet
excelled Rama in hopes!)
While Rama was ruling, the entire universe was full of Rama. People told stories of Rama
reciting, Rama! Rama! Rama! (The poets were creating tons of lies!)
Prosperous Rama, along with his brothers, ruled the kingdom for eleven thousand years.
(Alas! Were people entangled in Ramas kingdom for eleven thousand years?)
480. Uttara kanda, sarga 53, sloka 5 to 11: Rama asked the spies as follows: My citizens and
villagers What do they talk about me? What do they speak about Sita? What do they think of
Bharata? What do they say about Lakshmana and Satrughna? What do they utter about my mother
Kaika? They talk about the new government and the king, dont they?
In response to this the spies said, All the people are full of praise for your victory that you
killed the ten-headed fellow. (dasagriva, that is Ravana).
Again Rama asked, Report to me in detail without leaving anything out The good and the
bad the citizens talk about. I will hear all that and do good things. I will give up bad things.
Also, inform me what the sinners in the villages say.
Have you noticed what Rama wanted to know? He can find out what people talk about him.
But why does he want to know about Sita, Bharata and Kaika? What do people think about them,
according to Rama? What does Rama want to know about them?
Is it Ramas apprehension to find out whether people were thinking that Sita is a chaste woman
or not!
It is also his fear that people might not have anger for Kaika and appreciate her. That is why
he is anxious to know the peoples opinion of Kaika.
Rama knew that people would any way appreciate Bharata since he had given up the kingdom.
But this is not enough. He would like to know what they talk about secretly in private. He suspects
that people may be thinking why Bharata had to give up the kingdom.
A king who ought to know about people must know how people are and what their difficulties
are. Will people benefit if the king comes to know what people think about his wife, brothers and
step mother?
Tell me what city people talk and the sinners in the villages talk, says Rama. This means,
those who live in cities are very good people. They know what is good and what is bad. Rama
says he will follow whatever the city people say right. He will abandon whatever they say
bad. Who are those good people who live in the cities? The rich. They are business people.
Therefore, Rama will act in accordance with them.
Now, the people who live in villages are sinners! A poor opinion of the village folk!
Carelessness! They do not know what is good. All that they talk about is bad. If they are sinners
and fools, why should he care to listen to their views?
649
650
akshmana!
What is your order, your Excellency?
Have you heard the public opinion?
Slander against Sita? Accusations against me?
Ramas cheeks were wet with tears.
Who are those wicked people? Which
villagers? I will destroy all of them right now,
Lakshmana took out his sword swiftly.
It is wrong, my lad! The king ought to
respect the peoples opinion. In this situation
coercion is not the solution.
So?
Listen carefully! I called you with the
confidence that you will not defy my order.
Tomorrow morning, take Sita in a chariot, cross
Ganga and drop her near sage Valmikis
hermitage. There is no other way except
abandoning Sita
My Lord!
Even then I had wondered about this
slander. I wanted to abandon her permanently
then. However, all the elders persuaded and
convinced me. I agreed that it was no fault of
Sitas. But again this slander. is making
me feel extremely shameful. I cannot bear the
ridicule of people
Your Excellency! Kindly, pardon me and
be patient. The king commands people; does
he have to follow the peoples words? The king
has no need at all to care about the peoples
words, does he?
Lakshmana! Do not oppose my order. I
will no longer bear the defamation that I have
accepted my wife who stayed in another mans
house. As long as there is disrepute, that human
being will fall in hell and struggle. This is why,
noble men are anxious for fame.
482. Kaikas wish is not fulfilled since Bharatas coronation has not taken place. This report
of the spies about peoples opinion was not there in Valmiki Ramayana. In the original, there is
merely a mention of what people said about Sita.
Rama had asked the spies to find out what people talk about Bharata and Kaika also, hadnt
he? If the spies had not reported these things, what would have happened to Ramas command?
Therefore, a mention must be made that the spies reported about Bharata and Kaika also.
What do people think about Bharata? They think, He gave away the kingdom to his elder
brother. He is a very good man. The spies have to tell this to Rama. Similarly, the spies have to
report about Kaika and the others also.
651
652
484. Uttara kanda, sarga 55, slokas 3 to 17: Sitas grief: Lakshmana! Did Brahma give me this
birth for the sake of grieving?...... I do not know what sort of a sin I had committed in the past birth!
Whom did I separate from his wife!..... I followed the foot steps of Rama and lived in the forests.
Now whom can I confide my grief? What reply should I give if the sages ask me, what wrong did
you do, why did Rama leave you? I will right now jump into the Ganga and give up my life..
Grieving thus for some time, finally Sita said, Lakshmana! Follow the orders of the king. Leave me
and go.. Convey my regards to all and inform them about my safety. (Safety! In a dense forest!). Tell my husband as my words: I have a lot of respect for you. I will serve you always..
You have abandoned me out of fear for disrepute. I am also obliged to remove that disrepute that
you have got due to malice in the world. For me, my husband alone is god.
653
do whatever my husband wishes me to do, even at the cost of my life. Sita spoke in this manner.
Is Sita not sad as her husband had abandoned her? She is very sad. So sad that she wanted to
die. Yet, remembering the duties of devoted wives, she is trying to suppress her grief.
Is it a characteristic of a truthful man not to tell the truth before they started and leave her in
the forest with a false statement that they would come back after visiting the hermitage of the
sages?
Could not Rama call Lakshmana and say, Lakshmana! Keep Sita separately and take care of
her safety! Even if he wanted to abandon her, couldnt he have made other arrangements for her?
It so happens in society that husbands leave their wives like orphans. They do not make any
arrangements for the abandoned wives. Nowhere does such arrangements are made. Those orphans
go somewhere and live at the mercy of others.
With this commonsense only, the poet left Sita in the forests as a destitute. As there were no
other means in society, the poet too couldnt imagine another solution. Even if it were Sri Rama
Chandra, he had to send away his wife without any support. The poet too had to write the same.
While Rama was going to the forests, Valmikis hermitage was in Chitrakuta. Now it is after
the river Ganga. May be he shifted to this forest as he did not like Chitrakuta!
485.Uttara kanda, sarga 58, sloka 23: .Sita, a devoted wife, not finding her husband,
buried in grief, cried in the forest which resounded with the sounds of peacocks.
654
486. Uttara kanda, sarga 59, slokas 21 to 24: Taking Sita to the wives of the ascetics, Valmiki
said, This is Sita. She is the wife of a good man Rama. You have to treat her with extreme care
and with a sense of respect that she is the wife of a king.
Consoling Sita Devi repeatedly, sage Valmiki returned to his hermitage.
Sita was pregnant. She was going to have a child soon. Therefore, the poet kept her in the
hermitage of the wives of the ascetics. Why would all the wives of ascetics stay at one place?....
Perhaps, great sages too might have abandoned their wives like Sri Rama.
Sargas 60 & 61: Lakshmana crossed the Ganga and went back. He boarded the chariot after
seeing from the other bank of the river that Valmiki had come and taken Sita with him. While
Lakshmana was feeling sad, Sumantra who was driving the chariot told him the following: In the
past, Asuras who were defeated at the hands of gods, sought refuge in the wife of sage Bhrugu.
Vishnu came to know that she gave them assurance and so he slayed her. Then sage Bhrugu cursed
Vishnu, You will be born in the human world. You will be separated from your wife. Hence,
Vishnu was born as Rama. He got separation from his wife due to that curse. I heard this when
sage Durvasa told Dasaratha this story in the past. I am telling you this secret after such a long
time. Do not worry. Whatever had to happen has happened. Sumantra consoled Lakshmana.
In the past stories (society), women seem to have done the same kind of acts, which men did.
Asuras seeking refuge in a woman, that woman taking the responsibility of protecting them, a man
becoming vengeful towards that woman from these incidents we have to note that at one point
of time men and women lived in an identical social condition.
655
656
487. Changing the myth of dog speaking into reality, we have to understand that a person came
to the king and spoke to him.
488. Uttara kanda, sarga 71, slokas 27 to 30: Sarvarthasiddhis words: While I was roaming
for alms (the poet said bhikshartham) and when I was angry in search of alms, I hit it once.
When this dog was in my way, I asked it to move aside. It rose up and still stood as an obstacle at
a spot. As I was provoked by anger and hunger, I hit it once, O king! Punish me for this!
Aha! A hungry beggar in Ramas kingdom! He is roaming around every house and begging
for alms. He was not getting alms. Angry, unable to withstand hunger!
There were beggars in Ramas kingdom. The fact that alms were not available however much
one roamed implies that people were not in a position to give alms!
It is not possible to argue that all the Brahmins in Ramas kingdom were happy. Sarvarthasiddhi
was also a Brahmin. But, a very poor beggar. Unable to get alms, he was starving for food.
Did Sarvarthasiddhi hit the dog unjustifiably? Why did the dog stand in the way? Though he
asked it to move aside, why did it move just a little and again come in his way? While walking
along the path, was the dog in Rama Rajya not expected to behave in such a manner that it should
not cause inconvenience to another living being?
Sarvarthasiddhi knows that it was not his fault. On the one hand, he was putting forward an
argument in his defence. Yet, he admitted his mistake.
657
658
490. It seems there are only dogs, foxes, eagles and cats in Ramas kingdom. Human beings and
their problems do not strike the poet.
491. Uttara kanda, sarga 86, slokas 15; sarga 87, sloka 4: The old Brahmin said, Owing to the
offences of the kings, people become victims of injustice and met untimely death!
Is this premature death to all? Or only to Brahmins?
Among the Brahmins whom Rama called for discussing justice, Narada was also present.
There was an argument that Narada was not a Brahmin but a Devamuni. It was Narada, who
suggested the death penalty, and Brahmins had nothing to do with it. However, the poet had
clearly mentioned Narada as a Brahmin.
When asked to tell the reason for the death of a Brahmin boy, all the moralists debated and
said, A Sudra is doing penance.
659
660
492. Uttara kanda, sarga 88, slokas 16 to 19; sarga 89, slokas up to 6: Rama is asking Sambuka.
O Old performer of penances! In which vagina (yoonyaam) were you born?... I am Rama, son of
Dasaratha. What do you desire? Heaven? Then what else?.... If you are a Brahmin, you will
benefit. Are you a Kshatriya? Vysya? Sudra? Speak the truth
Sambukas reply: Sri Rama! I was born from a Sudras vagina. I desire heaven along with the
body. I will not speak lies. Know that I am a Sudra!
While that Sudra was speaking so, Raghava (Rama) took out a dazzling sword from his sheath
and chopped off the head of that Sudra.
Then all gods praised Rama.
Drums were beaten. A rain of flowers showered on him. In Valmikis Ramayana, Rama did
not argue with Sambuka. As soon as he heard the word Sudra, he chopped off Sambukas head
and protected Dharma (justice). The fact that Sambuka was a Sudra and being aware of the rule
that one should not violate rules of the caste system in Ramas kingdom -- undertook an activity
for which only Brahmin and Kshatriyas alone are qualified implies that he undertook it with a
view to defy the rules of caste system. Without fearing the punishment of the king, Sambuka
demanded a right, which his caste did not have.
As soon as Rama slayed Sambuka, the gods praised Rama, (Uttara kanda, sarga 89,
sloka 8): Raghunandana! Because of you, this Sudra will not attain heaven. (This means, this
Sudra was trying to go to heaven by doing penance. Now because of you the danger of this fellow
going to heaven is averted. Therefore, the poet has concluded that it is an utter lie that those who
die saying the words of Rama will go to heaven!)
Gods praised Rama and asked him, Take whatever boon you want. (For killing a Sudra!)
Make the Brahmin boy alive. I gave the word to make him alive, said Rama.
As Sambukas head was chopped off, the boy got up at once. He was happy. Later the gods
talked among themselves, Sage Agastya got up after having stayed on the bed of water. Let us see
him and they left. (Agastya had lain down in water for twelve years, they say! Yes, one must see
such a person how rotten, how mossy and how infested he is with itch!)
661
493. Uttara kanda, 6 sargas, from 89 to 94: By the time Rama reached, Agastya got up from his
twelve-year sleep in water. Agastya was about to give Rama an ornament. Rama said, The king
ought to give ornaments to others, he ought not to receive them.
Agastya said, In the past people did not have the king in Krita yuga. (This relates to a
period in which there was no ruler in human society). People asked Brahma for a king. Taking
some element each from all the gods, he created the king. Since the king was born with the element
of god, you can take this.
How did you get this? asked Rama.
Agastya narrated the story of Sveta.
Sveta was a king. He did penance and went to Brahmas world. Even there, he felt hungry.
People dont feel hungry in Brahmas world. Why I am feeling hungry here? he asked
Brahma. (Sveta! It means it is not Brahmas world. It is a world where we feel very hungry!)
Brahma said, As long as you have performed penance, you did not work hard, you did not
sow any seed, you did not give even a fistful of alms to the beggar and you did penance protecting
your body well. That is why you have this pain for hunger. Live, eating your own corpse. After
some time, Agastya will elevate you!
Since then, Sveta used to come from the sky in an airplane, eat his dead body in the lake
completely and leave. The dead body used to be ready again for the next day. After this had
happened for some time, Agastya came to this forest. Sveta asked Agastya to remove his pain for
hunger. Agastya gave an ornament. As soon as he took that ornament, Sveta got rid of his hunger.
This is that ornament. (Agastya himself says, Agastya came, Agastya gave!)
Later, he narrated another story. Danda was a king. His priest was Sukracharya. Once Danda
saw Araja, the eldest daughter of Sukra, desired her sexually and asked her. Arasa told him to ask
her father. Without heeding her advice, he molested her. Sukra heard about it and cursed him,
Dust and rain will become one and Dandas kingdom should be destroyed. All people left Dandas
kingdom. Sukra scolded his daughter and left leaving his daughter in the hermitage itself. Later,
dust and rain fell and Dandas kingdom became Dandakaranya.
Rama heard these stories and left for Ayodhya.
662
495
Ramas story.
Later he went to Ayodhya, stayed there for
some time and went back to his kingdom.
R ama
663
496. Uttara kanda, sarga 91, sloka 25: Asking Lakshmana to make arrangements for a sacrifice,
Rama says, Get a gold statue of my life (kaanchaniim mama paniim). If Rama had wives other
than Sita, he would have had another wife to sit beside him, wouldnt he?
664
497. Uttara kanda, sarga 108, sloka 2: After Kusa and Lava finished singing the history of
Rama, realised that the two singers were Sita Devis sons.
Only then, Rama understood that Kusa and Lava were his sons.
Now, Kusa and Lava sang up to Yuddha kanda only. Telling about Ramayana to Rama,
Kusa and Lava said, Apart from Uttara kanda, it has six kandas. (Uttara kanda, sarga 107,
sloka 27). Kusa and Lava stopped the horses, which Rama released while doing Aswamedha
sacrifice is not there in Valmiki original.
665
swears?
Why doesnt he believe her? The other day
my co-brother (wifes sisters husband) bluffed
that he had returned the beam of a yoke which
he had borrowed. Moreover, he swore in the
name of his wife as if his wife was dead if
contrary happened. What could we do
except believe him?
Why talk about your experience. Rama
will not believe her if she simply swears!
Then, how will she prove it?
I dont know! She will have to do
something or the other. They say she is a great
devoted wife. Cant she do this much?
Look! You claim you are a great devotee?
Can you prove it? We will throw you into a fire
pit. Can you come out?
Well, I am stupid! What sort of a devotee
am I?
498. Uttara kanda, sarga 108, slokas 4 & 6: While sending messengers to Valmiki, Rama said,
If Sita has pure character and she is faultless, she can purify herself after taking sage Valmikis
consent. To demonstrate her chastity and devotion to her husband let her swear (sapadhaha =
oath) before this assembly and me tomorrow morning.
Let her purify herself, Let her swear! what do these expressions mean?
What does Rama expect Sita to do?
Should she swear orally thus, I am a devoted wife. I am chaste. I swear? Or should she
demonstrate a miracle?
If we observe Ramas words to his messengers, this is not clear.
After bringing Sita into the assembly, Valmiki said to Rama, (Uttara kanda, sarga 109,
sloka 17): Now, Sita will create confidence in you.
Then, Rama said to Valmiki. (Uttara kanda, sarga 110, sloka 3): In the past, Sita had sworn
in the presence of gods and hence I brought her home. Now, if it is evident in the presence of
people that Sita is chaste, love emerges from me.
In what manner did Sita create confidence in Lanka? She jumped into the fire and came out of
it. Only when she demonstrated a miracle Rama had confidence in her purity. Now, if she has to
create confidence in Rama and the assembly once again, she has to do something, miraculous
again.
When Rama said, Let Sita prove her chastity and swear, it does not mean that she has to
swear orally. It meant that she has to show some miracle!
Accordingly, Sita calls the goddess of earth and shows her miracle.
However, while we understand this scene from a realistic perspective, we dont think that Sita
called the goddess of earth.
Where as people, either innocently or foolishly believe in miracles, it is natural that they
expect that Sita might show a miracle and Rama may believe her if she performs a miracle.
666
14 & 15:
Sages felt happy for Rama said that Sita must swear in the assembly. On hearing the words of
Rama, the great warrior, all the sages shouted loudly, Good! Good! They said, O Raghava! This
is appropriate for you. We dont see this kind of justice anywhere.
667
668
tradition.
Rama! Do not grieve. Sitas time was over
and she has left comfortably. When the duration
of your life is over, you will meet Sita in heaven.
This is gods decision. Aged people consoled
him.
Unable to control his grief. Rama is still
wailing out of love for his wife. Sita! My
500
beloved!
Four or five subsidiary kings gathered at a
corner and thought. Will it look nice if we ask
him now?
These four kings had daughters of a
marriageable age. They were unable to
500. Uttara kanda, sarga 110, slokas 13 to 21: See what sort of miracle Sita showed! All people
who came from all countries. waited eagerly to see what would happen now.
Sita, who wore saffron garments looked at all those who had come to the assembly, folded her
hands, bowed her head, and said with downward looks. I have not thought of any man other than
Rama even in my mind. To me, who is the wife of Vishnu, let Bhuudeevi, the goddess of earth give
me a place if I have worshipped only Rama. If my words that I do not know any man other than
Rama are true, let Goddess Earth take me away!
When Sita swore like that, a divine throne rose up from the crest of the earth. Goddess Earth
appeared, embraced Sita and sat her on that throne. While Sita was going into the nether world,
rain of flowers fell from the sky.
In this manner, Sita went into the earth. She went away from Rama forever!
See how Rama shouts at the earth out of extreme love for his wife (sarga 111, slokas up to
16). Out of grief, Rama said: My heart is grieving so much as never before. While I was watching,
Sita has disappeared. O Goddess Earth! Get my Sita back! If you do not give her back to me, you
will see my anger, which will tell about me. Give my Sita to me! Or make way for me. I will live
with Sita in either the nether world or heaven. If you do not give Sita, I will destroy you along with
the mountains and forests. I will destroy the entire earth. I will make it full of water. (Then will you
board a boat? Where will you stay?) Get my bow and arrows! Now itself I will find out what this
earth thinks about me and break it.
While Sri Rama was upset with anger and grief, Brahma accompanied by gods said to Rama:
Rama! Do not grieve. You are the incarnation of Vishnu, arent you? I am not so great that I have
to remind you of this. If you think a while, you will realise it. Sita will reach the heaven. In heaven,
you will meet Sita. This is true. (Which means, this is false!)
Later Rama heard these words from the crest of the earth: Rama! You will not find Sita here.
She is in heaven. (Perhaps, one has to go to heaven through the earth!)
We have to understand the point that Sita went to heaven in the presence of Rama, as Sita
died in front of Rama.
To Rama who was wailing for Sita, Brahma said, Listen to Uttara kanda with a sense of
fairness.
Next day, Kusa and Lava sang Uttara Ramayana also before Rama. (Uttara kanda, sarga
112, sloka 2).
669
670
502. Uttara kanda, sarga 113, slokas 10 to 13: All that Rama did in the name of ruling was to
occupy other countries one after another! And killed those kings!
The news, which Yudhajit sent: Gandharva country is the one that lies on both the sides of
the river Sindhu. Filled with fruits and roots, extremely beautiful Defend your city. bring that
Gandharva country under your control. That is extremely good.
Hearing this news, Rama was overwhelmed with joy, agreed to it and said to sage Gargya, O
sage! The two sons of Bharata will live in that country. Keeping Bharata in the forefront, Taksha
and Pushpaka will kill the sons of Gandharva and separate the two cities. Bharata will appoint his
sons there and come back to me, said Rama and permitted Bharata to go along with the army and
crown his sons.
According to this story, the Gandharvas were not Ramas enemies. They were not wicked
like Rakshasas!
Rama was a virtuous man, wasnt he? Instead of ruling his own kingdom, why should he
invade another country unjustly? This means, Rama was a kind of king who plundered other
kingdoms!
671
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
503. Uttara kanda, sarga 115, up to 10 slokas: See what Rama says after conquering Gandharva country. Lakshmana! Your sons both Angada and Chandraketu
are well versed in morals. They can rule the country. They are highly valorous. I will
crown the two.Select a beautiful place. That place should be comfortable for kings. It
must be such that it is not an obstacle to others.
When Rama said so, Bharata said as follows: There is a country called Karupadha.
It is very beautiful healthy. Hearing these words of Bharata, Rama agreed to this and
occupied it first, then crowned Lakshmanas sons in that country. The poet is anxious to
say, Rama gave kingdoms to his brothers. See how noble he is! The poet did not think
that invading and occupying countries, which are not hostile to one, would bring a lot of
disrepute to Rama. Disrepute not only from the present day perspective. Also from
the perspective of those days as well. Those invasions were unjust even from the per
spective of those days.
504.Uttara kanda, sargas 116 to 123: While Rama ruled following the path of Dharma,
Yama came to Rama in the guise of a sage. Rama! I want to speak to you confidentially.
If you promise me that you will kill any one who interrupts us while we talk, I will say
whatever I want, said Yama. (In the mouths of these guys, we do not found other
word except killing and slaying!)
Rama agreed, called Lakshmana, told him about it and sent him out.
Yama began to talk. I am Yama. In the past birth, I was your son. (Thank god, you
have not said, in this birth! I had to give you Ayodhya!) Brahma has sent me to you.
He wanted me to say to you thus, Rama! When you united the entire world and lay in the
sea, you gave birth to me. (In which birth? Tell us about it first!) You had given me the
responsibility of creation. (Yes. Rama must have given it. He is very lazy to do work.)
You have been helping the gods whenever it is necessary for protecting the world. You
were born as Rama for the sake of killing Ravana. You had decided to live on the earth
for ten thousand, ten hundred years and assumed human form. (Why dont you say
eleven thousand years Mr. Poet? Dont you know arithmetic? Does metre not suit
it?) Would you like to remain on the earth still or would you like to return? This is what
Brahma has asked me to find out from you, said Yama. (This is a great secret!)
Rama said, Yes, I was born to fulfil the task of the three worlds. I have finished my
work! I am thinking of coming.
Meanwhile sage Durvasa came to the entrance and said to Lakshmana, I want to
see Rama immediately.
Lakshmana bowed obediently and said, The king is engaged in some important
672
work. We cannot call him now. Tell me what your work is. I will do it.
It is not possible. If you do not tell Rama at once that I had come, I will curse all of
you, your family and the kingdom, the sage danced with anger.
Lakshmana was unable to decide what to do. Shall I go inside and call Rama? He
will impose the death penalty on me. All right, I will die. If I do not call Rama, the entire
kingdom will be destroyed. Lakshmana went to Rama and told him about the leaps of
anger of Durvasa.
Ravana got worried, sent Yama away and came running to Durvasa and asked him,
What do you want?
I have done penance for a thousand years. I have finished it just now. I am so
hungry that I cannot tell you how hungry I am. I want food at once, said Durvasa. (Why
the hell did the man not tell Lakshmana? Having done penance for thousand
years, had he not acquired that much sense? Stupid fellow! What do you get from
penance, except arrogance?)
Feeling very happy at the words of Durvasa, Sri Rama offered him food.
Durvasa ate the food and left.
Then Rama remembered his promise to Yama and sat sorrowfully. Consoling his
brother, Lakshmana said, Your Excellency! Is this sorrow for my sake? No. Do not
grieve. One who goes back on his word will fall into hell. For my sake, do not fall into hell.
Kill me and keep your promise. Protect Dharma.
Rama called all the ministers and asked them to think about it.
All of them suggested abandoning Lakshmana. (They are the ministers of the same
king, arent they?) Otherwise, the promise will be broken and the three worlds will
perish, they said. They also said, Did your father not abandon you for the sake of Dharma?
Rama decided to abandon Lakshmana.
Lakshmana! I give you up. When it is obligatory to punish a good man, it is the same
whether one kills or abandons him. Go away, Rama said.
(It is the poets intention to say, Rama abandons even his brothers in order to
protect morality. To gather heaps of fame for Rama, the poet makes him do any vile
act. According to him, one gets fame if he commits wicked acts!)
Lakshmana went to the bank of the river Sarayu with tears, closed all the nine
apertures of the body and sat there without inhaling.
Devendra came and took Lakshmana to heaven along with his body. (Lakshmana
lost his life by committing suicide. This is the result of his lifelong service to Rama!)
Rama said to his ministers, I will give Kosala to Bharata and go away to the forests.
I will also follow Lakshmana. Make all the arrangements for Bharatas coronation.
Bharata said, Abandoning you, Can I rule the kingdom? Give the kingdom to Kusa
and Lava. As we are going to heaven, call Satrughna as well.
Rama divided Kosala into two parts, created different cities as capital cities, crowned
Kusa and Lava.
All the people fell before Rama and wailed, We too will come along with you. Take
us along as well.
673
Some messengers went to Satrughna, informed him every thing and said, All the
people in Ayodhya are leaving for heaven along with Rama (ayoodhyaam vijanaan
kritvaa = Making Ayodhya without people). He asked us to bring you too.
Satrughna gave away the kingdom to his sons and came back to Rama.
Sugriva too gave Kishkindha kingdom to Angada and came to Rama. (Sugriva!
Relying on heaven, have you given up beautiful kingdom? There will not be Rambha
in heaven, you know!)
Vibhishana too came along.
Rama said to Vibhishana, You live forever. As long as people live on the earth (as
long as they remain fools). As long as the sun and the moon stay, your kingdom will
remain. (So, even now Vibhishana must be there! If we catch Vibhishana now, we
will know all the details of Rama.) The god of Ikshvakus is Jagannatha. Worship that
god! Rama ordered Vibhishana to stay back in Lanka.
Then, Rama said to Hanuman, You too live for ever! As long as my story is circulated
in the world, you will stay alive. (As he will be alive as long as Ramas story is alive, it
is an obligation on the part of Hanuman to keep Ramas story alive!)
That night passed. Next day, at dawn, while Brahmins were walking in the front
along with fire, Rama, wearing silk garments, holding sacred grass, reciting the Gayatri
mantra started for Mahaprasthanam (a great journey).
Riches, wealth, agriculture, Ramas weapons, bow and every thing followed Rama in
human forms. Vedas, Gayatri, Omkar also followed Rama. Sages, Brahmins, maidservants,
children, aged, women in the harem, Vanaras, ministers, all people, worms, insects, animals,
birds, and all animate and inanimate beings followed Rama. Ayodhya became vacant. (If
Rama is not there, the nature itself must perish! Nothing should remain!)
Rama reached the bank of the river Sarayu and started stepping into the water. To
invite Rama, Brahma came in an airplane and he was ready. Rama! Welcome to you!
Enter into whatever body you want!, said Brahma.
Hearing Brahmas words, Rama, the great wise man entered the light of Vishnu
along with his brothers. (This means, Rama entered the river, lost his life and became
Vishnu).
Vishnu said to Brahma, All these people are my devotees. They have come with me.
Give all of them pious worlds. (As if saying, Give water to all these people!)
All your devotees will stay in Saantaanika world beyond Brahmas world. (Why?
Why cant they stay in Brahmas world?)
All the people drowned in the river Sarayu, gave up their lives smilingly and went to
pious worlds. All the Vanaras joined those gods from whom they had originally descended.
Sugriva went to the sun. (Sugriva! When will you come again? Remember the throne
of Kishkindha!)
Keeping all the devotees in heaven, Vishnu went back to Vaikuntha.
674
675
676
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
677
Valmiki as a Poet
V
678
Valmiki as a Poet
However, there would not be Ramas exile to
forests and the killing of Ravana. There would
not be a Ramayana.
It is not possible for any poet in the world
to describe Dasaratha and Rama as noble
characters while retaining the story in the
present form. Even if any poet other than Valmiki
writes the same story more shrewdly, he might
avoid certain minor mistakes but he cannot
create coherence between falsity and nobility.
If you ask, Is Rama not noble in the present
story, the answer is No. It is the poets over
anxiety to throw all the wrongs of Rama on to
others and make Rama a good man. Rama and
Dasaratha are very noble persons. I am saying
this, believe me! The entire fault lies with Kaika.
In fact, it is not even Kaikas. It is of Manthara.
In fact, it is not even Mantharas. It is destiny!
Who can overcome the decision of the
destiny? says the poet as if it is a brilliant
answer.
Another point: Janasthana belongs to the
Rakshasas. It is Ravanas territory. Why did
Rama go to Janasthana? To live in the forests,
says the poet. This is a big lie even according
to the story. Why did Rama not spend the
remaining period of exile in the same forest
where he initially lived for ten years? He stopped
neither at Chitrakuta nor at Agastyas place.
He moved further and entered the land of
Rakshasas. According to this story, what was
Ramas attempt? To occupy the land of the
Rakshasas!
Rama is leading the life of a sage, says
the poet. However, we do not at all find the life
of a sage in the behaviour of Rama. Sages do
not hunt. They do not fight battles. However,
Rama hunts. He fights battles.
The poet argues as if great injustice has
been done to Rama since his coronation was
stopped; as if somebody deprived him of his
right, as if he went to Janasthana for the sake of
living in the forest, as if he was leading the life
of a sage through fighting battles and so on.
However, none of these arguments stands.
679
680
Valmiki as a Poet
assume that Valmiki too did the same thing for
the same reason?
Do you remember how the poet had
described while Rama, Sita and Lakshmana were
going through the forest after crossing the river
Ganga? He described Sita as a female elephant
between two male elephants! In the same
manner, he described Ravanas hand around
Sitas waist as an ornament around her waist.
These are the descriptions that have no
reference to the context. Descriptions for
description sake!
Because of unhesitating words of Kaika,
Dasaratha was not capable of coming out of
the bondage of truth just as Emperor Bali could
not do in respect of Vamana. (indrakritam
yadha, said the poet. The translators are
presenting Indra as Vamana). This means,
just as Emperor Bali promised Vamana to give
three feet of space and could not come out of
that bondage of promise when he realized
Vamanas intention, similarly Dasaratha too
promised boons to Kaika but could not come
out of that bondage of boons. The poet has
compared Dasaratha, who is a good person in
his view, with Bali and compared Kaika, who is
a wicked person in his view, with Vamana! If
Vamana was a wicked man Kaika too will be a
wicked person. Do you say that the meaning of
Indra is not Vamana? Even if Indra was Indra,
Indra is also a good character in the view of the
poet. Even then, this comparison is wrong.
Dasaratha entered that building in which
Rama, Sita and Lakshmana are not present now
and which was like a water pond that was
originally difficult to enter due to the presence
of great serpents, which Garuda had killed
subsequently. This means Rama, Sita and
Lakshmana used to be a menace to that building
just as snakes used to be a menace to the water
pond! The snakes in the water pond had an
enemy that would kill them. Garuda is that
enemy. Do we have to acknowledge that Rama
too had such an enemy? This is comparing
Rama with the snake and Ramas enemy with
681
682
Valmiki as a Poet
readers feel that Rama is feeling sad? Does one
depict breasts in a tragic scene in which one
has to feel sad and suffer agony? If the poet
wishes to handle the story in such a way that
Rama talks to flowers and birds, it ought to be a
very happy scene. Suppose Rama and Sita were
playing the game of hide and seek in the garden.
Sita hid somewhere. Rama has to search for her.
Then it would be nice if he asked flowers, birds
or ants. Then there will not be a contradiction
between the content and the form (manner of
telling the story).
A description of romantic separation in a
context where one is expected to be upset with
grief implies that there is no coherence
between the content and the form (of narration)!
However, the same thing happens in feudal
literature. Because there is no place for logic in
that literature. There are not any questions.
In reality, even in such a society, human
beings surely feel sad when they face hardships.
However, mythological stories do not depend
on naturalness. The predominant feature of this
literature is to describe gods, kings, riches,
wealth, weapons and the body parts of women.
The poet has to insert those descriptions
somewhere or other in the stories. He will not
care whether there is coherence between the
context and the description.
The Vanara army reaches the sea. Then all
important people ought to think about the
battle. However, Rama, amidst so many people,
begins to express his romantic separation and
grief thus, When will I embrace the breasts of
my Sita!
All those soldiers had also left their wives
and children behind and come here risking their
lives. In such a context, this enlightened Rama
prattles like this! On seeing his sexual pain, all
people have to shed tears!
These contradictions are found not only
in major scenes. If there are only two words, we
find a contradiction between them! When
Vibhishana came to join Ramas camp, Sugrivas
words: This good (buddhiman) Rakshasa will
683
684
Valmiki as a Poet
genuine sage, Rama should not have carried
weapons with him from his house while leaving
for the exile. He should not have accepted any
weapons which the gods gave him. He must
not hunt and fight battles. No such scenes are
relevant to sage hood.
If the poet wanted to show Rama as a
truthful man, he should not accept the
suggestion to have his coronation at the
beginning. He should not have given his
sandals to Bharata at Chitrakuta. He should ask
Bharata to rule the kingdom. Even after the
forest life, he should not accept the kingdom.
In this manner, if the poet wants to show
that values like reverence to the father,
commitment to truth and devotion to husband
give pleasure, the story should not include
behaviour that is contrary to those values.
Then, only the names of those values will be
meaningful. There will not be any story. If he
wants the same story, it must proceed with these
contradictory aspects and inconsistencies. It
is an utter ignorance to assume that Valmiki
wrote correctly before the poets of
Interpolations.
All the problems of Rama are social.
Property right, chastity of his wife, comforts in
life, honour and reputation, glory of the dynasty,
battles for the kingdom everything is social!
Even the sages do penances and pray to the
god for riches, wealth, weapons, devoted wives
and authority over the world All are of the
same sort.
Examine serially every scene beginning
from Ramas readiness for the coronation until
he sent Hanuman to threaten Bharata! Have
you found nobility any where in him? While
talking about following fathers order, he
abused his father in several ways. Every now
and then, he suspected Lakshmana who had
served him day and night! He suspected
Sugriva! He suspected Sita! He subjected her
to the test of fire. He suspected Bharata who
had given up the kingdom for his sake. He
believed that Bharata was not qualified to be a
685
686
Valmiki as a Poet
life, Sita says, Do not worry that I will look at
other men. I am not of that sort. I serve you
alone. Keeping in view the usual suspicion
which a husband might have toward his wife,
Sita tries to dispel the fear of her husband.
Further, she also criticises Rama, My father
married me to an incapable fellow like you.
Ignoring the responsibility to your wife you
intend to hand her over to others. Thus, Sita
speaks as carelessly as a woman who speaks
to her husband who ignores her difficulties.
While you are in the attire of a sage, why
do you have these weapons? Why do you take
vows to kill those who are not hostile to you?
Sita questions the deeds of her husband.
You are a woman, shut up, Rama
dismisses Sitas questions.
What will happen to my husband if I die?
He will live happily with other women without
any dearth. She says so since she knew about
men who live happily with other women after
the death of their wives.
Are all the virtues that I have practised so
far to be in vain? She thinks in retrospection
during troubled times.
Alas! You doubt me. Have you not
recognized my character?, Sita asks
complainingly. She submerges in deep
depression as her sufferings and sacrifices have
turned futile.
This sort of hostility, disbelief, jealousy,
anger and conflict are inevitable between wives
and husbands who have no opportunity to
attain equal status.
It is the same whether it is Enki (common
name of an illiterate, low caste woman in Telugu)
and Enkadu (common name of an illiterate, low
caste man).
It is the same whether it is Sita and Rama.
That characteristic feature is not present
in Individuals.
The relationship that makes a husband
superior and wife inferior itself has the nature
that creates conflict.
In such a relationship as this, the wife
cannot be happy. Even the husband cannot be
happy in a relationship that gives scope to a
conflict with the wife. This sort of contradictory
687
688
689
690
691
know anything by putting the head below and feet above and leap like a cat.
Theory that grasped the phenomenon
of exploitation of labour and thoughts that
are more developed than capitalism have
arrived in the world. If we are still in a situation whereby we stand in a remote temple
or sit under the feet of god-men and beg,
Will our son get a job? Wi ll we get a
good crop in our field? Will the in-laws of
our daughter take back our daughter to
their home at least this month? this means,
neither natural sciences nor social sciences
have reached us.
If poets trumpet that Lord Rama is the
direct incarnation of Lord Vishnu and if we
believe all that, and if we still eagerly wait
for the Rama Rajya (Ramas kind of Rule)
it is our ignorance.
Even the devotees do not know why
we need this devotion and how it is useful
to life.
Rama himself said in Ramayana that
god is never seen.
Bharata also said, When we dont
know whether there is any result from penance or not, why should we waste our life
like this?
Many characters on many occasions
in Ramayana have expressed many doubts
concerning Rama. They have not found
answers.
Sita and Rama keep worshipping
trees and suchlike with a request to
fulfill their wishes! Such are our gods!
It is them we are worshipping to fulfill
our wishes!
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
692
693
what had happened to Surpanakha at
the hands of Rama? How could she get
back her limbs? Was a man the
greatest of all if he tortured a woman
of a hostile tribe? Was Rama who
had become furious at Jabali when he
uttered rational ideas and cooled
down only when Jabali admitted that
he was not an atheist was such
Rama a highly learned man?
What are the values and knowledge
which people could learn from such a
story as this?
What people ought to realise from
this story is the following: Both Rama
and Ravana were kings. Both were the
representatives of the rich classes of
those times. Both were autocratic.
Both invaded other kingdoms and
expanded their empires. There were
class distinctions in their kingdoms.
There were rich-poor distinctions.
There were male domination and
female subordination. There were
prostitution, beggary, battles, killings
and every thing. There was no
difference in the nature of their rule.
Therefore, the working classes need
not praise either Rama or Ravana. For
that matter, they need not praise any
king.
Today the feudal culture and the
capitalist culture have merged into
one. Making money is the objective
of capitalist culture. Both the cultures
are essentially the same (exploitative
in nature) with few minor differences.
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
694
Part 3
Some Critics of Ramayana
[There are
any people have criticised Valmikis Ramayana from many angels. I think it
is necessary to bring some of the important critiques to the notice of the readers. Here
I take critiques of eight authors.
Some aspects of these critiques are progressive and some are reactionary. Some
are biased with castes and some with races. Some are rational and some are antirational. Some do not have any connection with the original.
In order to ascertain what we should accept and on what aspects we should
concentrate in these critiques, it is necessary to understand the nature of these critiques.
We ought to receive with gratitude those aspects of these critiques, which contribute
to make people think and give them proper knowledge. We have to reject unhesitatingly
those aspects which outwardly appear to be questioning the original but in spirit
favourable to it.
By examining these various kinds of critiques, we have to learn how to understand
a given kind of criticism. If a criticism is wrong, we should be able to grasp at once what
is wrong in it.
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
I n Adbhutottara (wonderful)
Ramayana: While Rama rules the kingdom
after killing Ravana, Rama goes to fight with
another Rakshasa and is killed there! (This is
really wonderful!) Then Sita fights and kills
that Rakshasa. Meanwhile Brahma arrives and
makes Rama regain life.
There have been many such changes and
additions in hundreds of versions of Ramayana
that appeared so far. After Interpolations
stopped entering Valmiki Ramayana, these new
versions of Ramayana began to emerge.
There are many myths not only in the texts,
which great poets composed, but also among
people. On the whole, all have the same
objective. To glorify Rama! Glorifying the
Dharmas (values) which Rama observed.
From these modifications and new versions
of Ramayana, it is possible to know the
changing conditions in society.
Let us suppose that the episode of
breaking Sivas bow is an Interpolation. Here
why the poet used the term Sivas bow but
not Vishnus bow? What do we know about
this Interpolation? We have to imagine that
there was hostility between the devotees of
Vishnu and the devotees of Siva. Rama is the
incarnation of Vishnu. Sivas bow is broken in
the hands of Rama. This incident tells that
Vishnu is greater than Siva.
Similarly, from the Interpolated portion in
which Rama abuses Buddha, we can infer that
atheistic ideas were prevalent among people
due the influence of Buddhism and a
propaganda suppressing atheism took place
through Ramayana.
There may be many interpolations, which
may not reveal the facts so explicitly. Yet, we do
not lose any thing even if we do not gain from
such Interpolations that do not reveal things
so explicitly. Suppose we are unaware of an
Interpolation and criticise Valmiki thus, Why
did Valmiki write so inconsistently and
incoherently? Then we are criticising only the
content and the individual poet. Our criticism
applies to the poet whoever is responsible for
that wrong (Interpolation). Even if we
specifically refer to Valmiki as the author of
704
705
A short story:
Holy Ramayana
S
706
707
708
not in a hurry!
No Please tell me
As I have some work with you, I came to
see you. Only last night, I finished Holy
Ramayana. I thought of reading it to you.
Why not? I will listen surely. Please sit
down. What Interpolations have you
deleted?
As he does not want to say at the very first
moment, Subbayya said with shrewdness, Lot
of husk has gone. Unless they want to defame
Valmiki, every fellow puts his finger in
Ramayana. In fact three fourths are
Interpolations.
I see! You have done a good thing. You
may start after drinking water. First read, Rama
Rajya (Ramas Rule) once. Later I will listen to
the whole thing from the beginning.
Thunder fell on Subbayyas heart. Sir!
Entire Uttara kanda is an interpolation. I have
not included any Interpolations, sir!
Have you also deleted Rama Rajya?
Subbayya smiled with fear and hesitation.
How can we avoid deleting it sir?
What? Deleting Rama Rajya?
Subbayya swallowed his own saliva.
Adiseshayya became excited with emotion.
What did Mr. Gandhi teach us? Did he
not want to establish Ramas rule in India?...If
you say Ramas rule is also an Interpolation..
You have to forgive me. It is an
Interpolation, sir! I am not the only person who
is saying so. All the pundits have unanimously
agreed
So what? How does it affect Ramas
story? How can Ramayana become a holy text
if it does not include Rama Rajya? Why did
not Valmiki write about Rama ruling the
kingdom? I cannot pardon Valmiki in this matter.
If you. coolly hear. Subbayya
looked from side to side, lowered his voice and
said, Between you and me. We should not talk
in public There is nothing great in Ramas
rule Its absence in Ramayana is very for
Ramas fame..
What? Isnt there anything great in
Ramas rule? Rama had ruled so well that even
a dog got justice..
709
710
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
711
2. Kodavatiganti Kutumbaraos
'Another Ramayana'
Is Ramayana not literature?
When the first volume of Ramayana
Vishavruksham came out, Mr. Kodavatiganti
Kutumbarao (hereafter Kutumbarao) wrote a
review. (Andhra Jyoti weekly, dated 27-121974). In that review, he commented, To study
Social Anthropology, Ramayana is not an
appropriate text. In my view, it is useless not
only as literature but also for sociological
analysis.
This means, in Kutumbaraos view,
Ramayana is not at all literature. For this he
showed three reasons. (1) There are many
Interpolations in it. (2) Many contexts in it are
not coherent with each other due to either
Interpolations or inconsistencies in the original
text. (3) Portrayal of characters in Ramayana is
not at all good. These are the reasons.
I gave a rejoinder (in Andhra Jyoti weekly,
dated 24-1-1975) to his review.
In response to my rejoinder, Kutumbarao
wrote a reply (31-1-1975), in which he said, I
still feel that Ramayana is not useful to analyse
evolution of society.
Here we need to arrive at an understanding.
Is Ramayana literature or not? Is it of any use
to understand society of that time? My views
on this question are briefly as follows:
Ramayana is literature. It is literature of the
past. In that story, relations and characteristics
of human beings of past society certainly
appear. Based on that, we can understand
things to whatever extent possible.
Now, let us see these views in detail.
What exactly does social analysis mean?
It is examining society. If we are able to see
economic, political and cultural relations in the
Kutumbarao, Kodavatiganti. 1974. Maro Ramayanam. (A review), Andhra Jyoti weekly, dated
27-12-1974.
712
713
714
715
716
process of evolution.
The society, which acquired knowledge of
science, will not return to the primitive stage.
The literature that reached a higher level will
not go back to mythology. After people came
to know that moon is a planet like earth, the
moon will no longer sit on the matted locks of
Sivas head. When cars, trains and planes
entered into human life, horse riding and
travelling in palanquins will not find place in
society as well as literature. After guns began
to be used as weapons, an archer cannot
become the hero in the stories. (Here, we are
not talking about re-writing the old stories. An
archer-hero will not be created afresh.)
Is Achilles possible when powder and shot
have been invented? (Marx in the same book
mentioned above. P. 216)
Achilles is a great archer in Greek
mythology. He is like our Rama and Arjuna.
Once gun has been invented, it is not possible
to create characters that exhibit their strength
and abilities by means of bow.
However, even if a person becomes an
adult and attains lot of knowledge, whenever
he recollects his childhood, (Childhood with
qualities of naughty behaviour, ignorance,
innocence, rudeness), he gets a strange feeling.
Similarly, a grown up society too gets a strange
feeling when it observes the childhood stage
of human society (also of literature). Marx calls
that feeling eternal charm.
An adult cannot become a child again, or
he becomes childish. However, does the naivet
of the child not give him pleasure, and does not
he himself endeavour to reproduce the childs
veracity on a higher level? Does not the child
in every epoch represent the character of the
period in its natural veracity? Why should not
the historical childhood of humanity, where it
attained its most beautiful form, exert an
eternal charm because it is a stage that will
never recur? (Marx in the same book
mentioned above. P. 217).
Does society not appear in Ramayana?
To see a society in a given writing at any
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
730
'Specialities of 'Ramayana
Pratapa Reddy, Suravaram. 1943. Ramayana Viseshalu. (Reprinted from Vibhuti). Hyderabad:
Golconda Patrika Kaaryaalayam.
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
738
5.Tripuraneni RamaswamyChowdarys
Murder of Sambuka
Ramaswamy Chowdary, Tripuraneni. 1920. Sambuka Vadha. Tenali: Sarala publications, 1971.
739
740
741
742
you?
Rama returned to the beginning of the
argument again.
Vasista became furious and shouted at
Rama, Do you disobey your teacher?
Sri Ramachandra is not perturbed.
Moreover he gave a long lecture on how to
love non-Aryans. Will it be politics to keep
another race in slavery and ignorance for the
sake of prosperity of one race?, he asked
angrily.
In which furnace did Ramaswamy forge this
noble Rama? According to Ramayana story,
after killing Sambuka, Rama wages battles
against some kingdoms and present them to
his brothers. The story of Sambuka as well as
the battles are from Uttara kanda. Whereas
Ramaswamy turned Rama noblest human being
in the episode of Sambuka! He makes Rama
deliver great speeches on ruling people fairly,
on equal rights and on the unity of races. But
according to Valmikis story, Rama invades
Gandharvas subsequently, destroys them and
seizes their country. He seizes some more
countries.
When Rama was going to behave like this
in future, why should Ramaswamy, make Rama
give lectures on loving other races? Why, in
fact, did Angada think negatively about Rama
in the beginning itself? To occupy Vanara
empire. he is taking away our freedom daily
and gradually, says Angada. In this play
Angada is not a bad character. He is a good
character. He is a good character siding
Sambuka. The writer made such a good
character say that Sri Rama was attempting to
occupy other kingdoms. After narrating the
story like this, he made Sri Rama a noble person
and said he loved all races.
Vasista felt irritated at the lecture on Dharma
by Sri Rama. (Why does not one get irritation
at Ramas boastful words?)
Will it be politics to give equal rights to a
defeated race. (Dravidian race)? Vasista got
angry.
Even then Rama, without heeding to
743
744
745
746
747
6. Muddukrishnas Asokam
Mr.
Muddukrishna (hereafter
Muddukrishna) made critical comments of
Valmiki Ramayana in his article Simhaavalookam (Retrospection) and presented his
new approach in a play titled Asokam. These
two are in the same book titled Asokam.
Muddukrishnas views in his essay
While Valmiki portrayed Rama as a human
being, some great men corrected Valmikis text
and inserted extraordinary fiction into it.
This is how he proclaimed his reverence for
Valmiki. (Is this the beginning of wrong steps?)
Dasaratha yielded to his fond wife. Hence
Rama was deprived of the kingdom, thus he
agreed with Valmikis opinion. Yet, he defied
Valmiki by presenting Rama as an unkind and
wicked man and Ravana as noble and lovable
man.
His views on Lanka are as follows:
Making the city of Lanka as his capital, Ravana
was ruling southern countries. His tribesmen
built many machines and airplanes with their
scientific practice, became powerful and
enjoyed them. (p. 89). It is Muddukrishnas
opinion that science developed in Lanka during
Ravanas time and the planes et cetera were the
products of that science.
(Until recently there were no airplanes
anywhere in the world. This man is treating
airplanes in a mythology called Ramayana
as scientific airplanes. What should we call
this kind of Modernists? Should we call them
traditional modernists or modern
traditionalists?)
Muddukrishna says that it was not wrong
on the part of Ravana to take away Sita and he
did so since carrying away a woman of his wish
was the Dharma (a custom, a norm) of Rakshasa
race.
748
749
750
751
752
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
753
Chalam. 1930s. Sita Agni Preveesam. In Chalam Naatakaalu-1. Vijayawada: Desi Kavita
Mandali, 1962.
754
755
756
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
757
8.Periyar E.V.Ramaswamys
Ramayana: A True Reading
[Mr.
Ramaswamy, Periyar E.V. 1935/1959. The Ramayana: A True Reading. (Translation from
Tamil). Trichi: Periyar Self-Respect Propaganda Institution Publications, 1972.
(Second Edition)
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
Part 4
Comments on The Poisonous Tree
(Both Positive and Negative)
[W
hen the first volume of the Telugu version of The Poisonous Tree appeared
in 1974, some people liked the book very much. Some people criticised it severely.
Some magazines welcomed it and published favourable reviews. Couple of magazines
got wild and opposed the book. Some big newspapers swallowed the review copies
and kept quiet. Radio reviewers also maintained silence. The letters that I received
were also of various kinds. Some were very happy, some opposed vehemently. Some
were moderately happy while some were moderately opposed. Irony, ridicule, individual
abuses, individual praise I received all sorts of reactions. Comments that I heard
through individuals were also of two types.
I am giving here some such comments and my answers. At the end, I will also quote
some comments of the reviewers and individual readers.]
Comment: Is it not more useful to pay
attention to the contemporary problems rather
than taking an ancient text like Ramayana as
an object of criticism?
Answer: Are religion and devotion to god
not contemporary problems? The criticism of
Ramayana is a criticism of superstitions. It is a
criticism of feudal culture; a criticism of the rule
of the rich. A criticism of not only Ramayana
but any religious text implies criticism of
contemporary problems. An attempt which
opens the eyes of the people who are deep in
slavish ideas and traditions and who extol them
to be great truths and ideas such an attempt,
however little it may be is not futile.
You said that Ramayana propagates feudal
culture. You can express this view in the form
of essays. Why do you rewrite the entire story?
To tell something, one can write a story or
an essay. One can write in any form: a song,
play or poetry. However, it is appropriate to
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
[Readers who oppose this book must also know how readers who agree with this book feel.
With this intention, I am giving here some positive comments on my book. However, one must
not misunderstand me that I am giving these comments as they contain some sort of praise.]
..Very much revealing. Unless we make
a serious class analysis as to why the same
Ramayana is repeatedly written, we cannot
uproot the Poisonous Tree.
There are very few people who know the
real face of Rama which a particular class
considers as the most holy book that should
be recited daily. This book will be useful to those
young and old people who would like to know
the truth genuinely with an impartial mind.
779
[Translation: B.R.Bapuji]
THE END
780
Index
Adbhutottara Ramayana 702
Adhyatma Ramayana 701
Adiseshu 408
Aditi 120, 251
Agastya 111, 257, 630
Agneeyastra 565
Agni 118
Ahalya 121
Ajumukhi 433
Akampana 278, 543
Akasavani 657
Akshakumara 449
Ambarisha 123
Amsumanta 119
Anaranya 548
Anasuya: her boon and sermons to Sita 247
Andhradesa 408
Angada (a son of Lakshmana) 375, 670
Angadesa 95
Angaraka 409
Angirasa 657
Anjana 416
Apsarasas 630
Aranya kanda 249-323
Arattaka 410
Army of pens: its composition,
its role and functions 44
Aruna 259
Arundhati 429
Asaniprabhu 537
Ashtavakra 606
Asokam 745
Asokavana 422
Astagiri 410
Asurastra 571
Asvayuja 412
Aswamedha yaga 96
Atikaya 544, 556
Atri 247
Ayodhya 94
Ayodhya kanda 128-249
Ayomukhi 317
Bala and Atibala 116
Bala kanda: 91- 128, is it an interpolation? 698
Bali 112, 416
Balilika 409
Barbarism 28
Benefits of reading or
listening to Ramayana 674
Bhadra 648
Bhagiratha 120
Bharadwaja: his suggestion to Rama to go to
Chitrakuta 189
Bharata: his abuse of his mother 294; his journey
to Chitrakuta 208
Bhaskara Ramayana 701
Bhogavati 496
Bhrugu 657
Bow of Siva 125
Brahma 118, 127, 631, 633
Bridge across the sea 521
Brihaspati 541
Capitalist society: 58
Capitalist wars 65
Caste: its origin in India 40
Chadraketu 670
Chakravanta (hill) 409
Chalam 751
Chandodari 436
Chandra (hill) 541
China 410
Chudamani 445
Chuli 117
Chyavana 430
Comments: on Ramayana, the Poisonous Tree 768
Critics: on Ramayana 693
Cultural army: its composition and functions 48
Dadhimukha 406, 456
Daivastra 582
Daksha prajapati 124
Daksha prajapati 259
Damayanti and Nala 425
Dandakaranya 249
Dandi 637
Danu 319
Darada 410
Darimukha 406
Dasaratha: about his ministers and the rule 95,
his decision to crown Rama 128, his marriage
with Kaika 129, his secret conversation with
Rama about coronation 132, his death 198
Devantaka 556
Devarata 125
Devasakha (mountain) 410
Devavarni 630
Devayani 655
Dhanurveda 122
Dhanyamalini 433, 557
Dhumra 502
Dhumraksha 542
Dhumru 406
Dilip 119
Diti 120, 259
Dog: seeking justice from Rama 656
Index
Drona (hill) 541
Dundubhi 353, 357
Durmukha 406
Durmukhi 433
Dushyanta 636
Dwividhu 406
Ekajata 433
Ekapada 606
Exchange: in the gen system 35
Exploitation of labour: its beginning 36,
its meaning, its relation to economic,
political and social spheres 46
Feudal society: enemy classes in it 57
Gadhi 118
Gaj 489
Gandhamadana 406, 490
Gandharva country 669
Gandharvastra 574
Ganga 118
Ganges (river): crossing Ganges by Rama,
Sita and Lakshmana 170
Gargya 669
Garuda 259
Garutmanta 416, 541
Gautama 121
Gavaksha 406, 490
Gavayu 489
Gaya 636
Gen system: property rights under the
gen system 30, its fall 36
Gen: its relation with other gens,
Phratry and tribe 29
God: discussions in Ramayana 688
Godavari 259
Group marriage 30
Guha 165
Hanuman: his conversation with Sita in
Asoka vana of Lanka 439,
an account of his birth 441
Harijata 433
Hayagriva 409
Hema 412
Hemagiri 409
Himavanta 118, 357
Holy Ramayana (a short story) 703
Hrasva Roma 126
Human kind: in the early days 26
Human relations: in the Communist society 66
Ideas: Ruling ideas and Peoples ideas 47
Ila 663
Ilvala 257
Indra 121, 417, 640
Indra januvu 406
Indrajit 449, 502
Indrastra 572
781
782
Krowncharanya 317
Kshira sagara 408
Kubera 290, 630
Kumbha 563
Kumbhakarna 497, 548
Kumbhinasi 496
Kumuda 419, 536
Kunjara (mountain) 409
Kuru land 410
Kusa & Lava 661
Kusadhwaja 126
Kusanabha 117
Kusaparva 419
Kutumbarao, Kodavatiganti 709
Labour: under gen system 34
Lakshmana: his opposition to Kaika
and Bharata 210, Is he married? 694
Lakshmi Devi 638
Lanka: its burning by Hanuman 453, is burning of
Lanka an interpolation? 696
Lava & Kusa 661
Lavanasura 661
Lopamudra 429
Love and marriage 63
Lunacharsky 710
Maandakarni 256
Madayanti 430
Madhupura 662
Madhuvana 456
Madhuvu 496
Maha Shakti 579
Mahaparshva 533, 576
Maheswarastra 571
Mahidhara 576
Mahodara 533, 545
Mainaka (mountain) 410
Mainaka 417, 419
Makaraksha 565
Malaya (mountain) 408, 559
Mali 631
Malyavan 531
Mandakini 127
Mandara (mountain) 416
Mandaragiri 572
Mandodari 421
Manmatha 110
Manorama 118
Manthara: her conversation with Kaika about
the proposed coronation of Rama 135
Mantra sanjivani 541
Manu 259
Man-woman relations: after gen system 40
Maricha 116, 278, 280, 298
Marichi 126
Marriage and love 63
Index
Pariyatra (mountain) 409
Parvati 109, 118
Periyar 755
Phala Sruti 628, 674
Phratry: its relation with Gen and tribe 29
Prahasta 498
Prajkala 410
Prasravana Mountain 291
Pratapa Reddy, Suravaram 728
Primitive Communism 71
Private property: its consequences 43
Production: under gen system 32
Progress: its nature and goal 69
Property rights: under gen system 30,
Prophets 73
Prostitution 42
Pulastya 630
Pulinda 410
Puranic literature 52
Pururava 636
Pushpitam (mountain) 409
Rama: his story 10-12, 15, his comments on
Kaika to Sita 143, his sermons to Guha about
ruling 169, hunting of animals for food 176, his
abuse of Kaika while in forests 179,
his sermons to Bharata at Chitrakuta 213,
the portrayal of his character by Valmiki 684
Ramas sandals: their coronation at
Nandigram 245
Ramaswamy Chowdary, Tripuraneni 736
Ramaswamy, E.V. Periyar 755
Ramayana Kalpavruksham 775
Ramayana: A True Reading 755
Ramayana: its values then and now 23-24,
the beginning of the actual story 94,
is it a beautiful poem? 688, Did not Valmiki
write Ramayana? 700, its other versions
in Telugu 701, is not a literature? 709,
Does society not appear in Ramayana? 714
Rambha 110, 124
Rambhu 406
Rati & Manmadha 434
Ravana: his abduction of Sita 288,
his mansions 420, his portrayal by Valmiki 684
Reformism 73
Religion: in the gen system 31
Religious literature 50
Riksharajas 320
Rishabha (mountain) 409
Rishabha 490
Rishyamuka Mountain 343
Rishyasringa 95
Romapada 95
Roudrastra 571
Ruchika 124
783
Rudra 109
Rudra and Vishnu: rift between them 127
Ruksha 419
Ruma 379
Sabari 322
Sachi Devi 429
Sagara 119
Sahya (mountain) 408
Sailoda 410
Salt sea 410
Sambuka 659, his portrayal by Ramaswamy 738
Sampati 414
Samudra 519
Sandals: placing of them by Bharata before
Rama at Chitrakuta 238
Sankasyapura 126
Sarabhanga 253
Sarama 524
Sarana 524
Saraswati 633
Saravana vana 634
Sarvabhowma 410
Sarvarthasiddhi 656
Satananda 122
Satavali 406, 410
Satyanarayana Chowdary, Kotta 719
Satyanarayana, Viswanatha 775
Satyavanta 430
Savagery 27
Savitri 425
Scientific knowledge 79
Secrets of Ramayana 719
Shakti 579
Shankha 496
Shone (river) 407
Siddhasramam 410
Simhika 418
Sindhu (river) 669
Sisira (Mountain) 407
Sita: her birth 125, her prayer to the Banyan tree
191, her prayer to Ganges 170, the portrayal
by Valmiki 684, her entry into Fire 751
Slave society: enemy classes in it 56
Social Reformers 73
Somada 117
Somagiri 410
Sonitaksha 562
Sowdama 430
Sowrashtra 409
Sowrastra 571
Specialities of Ramayana 728
Sri Krishna Ramayana 701
Srimati Devi 430
Sringaberipura 616
Srutakirti 127
784
785
786
Some portions from the essay IMPARTIAL READER
in the forest.
These two orders have not
been fulfilled in the story.
The first order: What should
Rama say when Bharata visited
him in the forest and asked him
to return? He should say, First,
your coronation must take place.
Without your coronation, if I
accept the kingdom, it does not
amount to my obeying the orders
of our father. Therefore, first
celebrate your coronation and
then ask me.
Bharata should celebrate his
coronation, come again to Rama,
take his sandals (paadukaas)
and crown them. In fact, even
then, it would be wrong on the
part of Rama to give his
sandals. As per the order of his
father, the kingdom would
belong to Bharata forever. Once
Bharata acquires the right over
the kingdom, he could give it to
any one as he wishes. But Rama
should not agree to take it. If
Rama ought to follow the orders
of his father, he should never
accept the kingdom. Only in such
a case, it would mean that Rama
has followed his fathers orders.
But Rama has not followed this
first order. The devotees have not
787
realized this mistake of the poet.
The second order: Rama did
not lead the life of a sage while
he was in the forest. The sages do
not hunt. They dont arm
themselves with arrows. They
dont wage wars. But Rama did
all those things. If only the poet
had a little sense, he could have
avoided even this mistake. He
could have depicted Kaikeyi as
giving an exemption to Rama.
The poet could have depicted
Kaikeyi as generously giving
Rama an opportunity: Though
you ought to lead the life of a
sage during your stay in the
*
HUMAN BEINGS OUGHT TO THINK,
NOT GET ANNOYED!
We are aware that there are 3 You too come under the second
categories of devotees and category of devotees like
Nirmala Prabhavathy comes Prabhavathy.
Now, Mr. Ramarao, a devotee
under the second category. We
have seen that she, though a of the first category appeared in
staunch devotee, demonstrated a the magazine and resorted to the
sense
of
tolerance:
'She same old arguments in new
(Ranganayakamma) wrote in her words, How mock heroic
Ramayana is for
own way. It is her wish'.
Ranganayakamma?
After I wrote the essay on
Mr. Ramarao, it is not
Prabhavathy, some devotees,
recalling what they read, said, mockery, it is logic! If you
Not only she (Prabhavathy), we think it is mockery, then it is a
too have read the book. We could text that deserves mockery.
will
inevitably
not restrain ourselves from Mockery
laughing in splits. Then I said, emerge wherever it is necessary.
788
When some guy abducted his
wife, if Rama, instead of running
around with anxiety and tension
in search of Sita, stops at a plant,
or pauses at a flower, or looks at a
bird and enquires about his wife,
will it be appropriate to the
context? He asks the bird, Have
you seen my Sita who has breasts
that resemble palm fruits? Have
you seen my Sita whose thighs
resemble the trunks of banana
trees? Wont this outpouring of
erotic poetry be branded as
ridiculous,
Mr.
Ramarao?
(Aranyakanda,theentire
61stsarga).
Will it qualify for anything
other than ridicule if Hanuman
sits in front of Sita and describes
how the purushaanga (penis)
of
Rama
looks
like?
(Sundarakanda, sarga 35, slokas
9 to 22.)*
When Sri Rama reaches the
seashore along with the Vaanara
789
crowned, goes to his elder
brother and asks him to return to
the kingdom. It shows his
devotion for his brother. It is also
appropriate that the elder brother
refuses to return to the kingdom.
When Bharata asks for Ramas
sandals, Rama does not refuse.
Rama ought to have said: If you
keep my sandals on the throne
and rule the kingdom in my
name, it means that coronation
has been done to me. You should
be crowned and not I. I cannot
decide for you if you dont want
to be coronated. It is not my
responsibility. But I will not
commit the mistake of giving
you my sandals.
On the other hand, Rama
promptly gets up, places his feet
in the sandals and leaves them.
(Ayodhyakanda, sarga 112, sloka
22).This means, Rama had
agreed for the coronation in his
name and hence given away his
sandals. But Rama should refuse
to give his sandals. Bharata
should have gone back and kept
either a picture or a statue of his
brother on the throne and
coronate it. If Bharata had done
so, Rama would not be
responsible for that act. It would
not beRamas fault. Nor would it
amount to Ramas violation of
790
Mr. Ramarao is thinking that
he has the sole right over
Ramayana. He is thinking that it
is his property. He expects that
no atheist should talk about
Ramayana or any religious text.
But, even assuming that all the
religious texts are the personal
writings of Mr. Ramarao, others
too have the right to talk about
them.
If a writer writes something
and keeps it in his safe, it is a
different matter. But once that
something is made public,
anyone can talk about it. When
people talk,they would talk from
their respective perspectives.
Mr. Ramarao! The entire
world is not the property of
devotees! There are devotees as
well as atheists among human
beings. Both you and we are
there. If devotees say, The entire
universe is the creation of God!
Creation of Rama!, the atheists
would say, No, the entire
universe is physical nature! All
gods and Ramas are the
imagination of the poets! They
are part of literature and fine
arts.
If devotees refer to the
writings of the atheists as mean
and cheap, the atheists can also
double their rebuttals. Cant
791
responsible for Sitas jumping
into fire! They defend hunting by
Rama while he was expected to
lead the life of an ascetic!
Defense for everything!
Rama had the right to return to
Ayodhya
after
completing
fourteen-year stay in the forest.
But even then he would not have
the right to rule the kingdom. His
fathers order was that the right
over the kingdom would always
be with Bharata. Rama was
expected to follow his fathers
orders. He could live in Ayodhya,
cooperating with Bharata.
But Rama was too anxious to
sit on the throne during those
fourteen-year stay in the forests.
Recall once a scene in which
Rama doubts Bharata just before
he returns to Ayodhya.
Bharata had been wearing the
dress of a sage, all those fourteen
years and eagerly waiting for the
happy arrival of his brother with
utmost dedication. Yet, Rama
had a hundred thousand doubts
about such a brother: Would
Bharata really give the kingdom
or not?
Rama sends his most loyal
servant Hanuman to Bharata in
order to find out Bharatas
disposition.
Hanuman
was
supposed to go to Bharata and
792
secured lot of value had the poet
depicted Rama as saying, I will
accept the kingdom only if
Bharata hands it over to me
happily. If he doesnt, I will not
feel sorry. I will cooperate with
Bharata in his rule, to the best of
my capacity.
Devotees do not follow logic
in any incident. They dont treat
any text as a story. They dont
think as to how the poet wrote
and how the characters are
portrayed. Human beings, in fact,
793
his wife too should go along with
him, shouldnt she? We know
how the story has proceeded now
with one wife. But if there were
four wives? Or, if this gentleman
too had more than 300 wives just
as his father had? All of them
should leave for forest, shouldnt
they?
In case only one wife went
and others didnt, the one who
accompanies her husband would
be a great loyal wife (pativrata),
while the others couldnt be such
loyal wives. If it had happened
that way, it would be a matter of
shame to those wives as well as
Rama for having so many wives
who were not loyal. In this
manner, if there were several
wives, a huge problem could
arise in the scene where Rama
leaves for the forest. If there were
only one wife, she could
accompany her husband gaining
the reputation of a great loyal
wife.
Let us, however, suppose that
Rama had ten wives, that all were
great loyal wives, that all of them
were Sitas, that all Sitas
accompanied Rama to the forest.
Thereafter all the scenes that
follow would have to undergo
lots of changes.
Out of the ten wives, whom
794
Lakshmana by depicting the
breasts and thighs of wives in ten
different ways. If the breasts of
one wife are described as palm
fruits, the breasts of another wife
are described as coconuts. The
beauties of the ten wives ought to
be described as ten different
fruits. (His majesty, the Poet,
would know all those names
thoroughly). As it is about
breasts, he could describe them
in ten different ways with great
joy. After that, it is about thighs!
Again in ten different ways!
Narrating the inner beauties
of his wives in front of
Lakshmana; asking flowers and
birds about his wives; running
around the trees and anthills in
search of Sita; roaming around
the hermitage in search of ten
Sitas for ten times, Rama has to
wander there till all the slokas
which the poet composed are
recited. Here men would get an
opportunity to know ten tactical
slokas to describe the private
parts of ten different women, if
Rama had ten wives!
All ten women whom Ravana
abducted would gather under the
trees in Asokavana. There again
Ravana has to describe the
breasts and thighs of those ten
795
prestige?) If Rama had ten wives,
all of them must be banished to
the forest.
In that case, who should give
birth to Kusa and Lava? Why
doubt? All ten Sitas must give
birth to them. Each Sita must
give birth to twins and in total 20
Kusas and Lavas must take birth.
This aspect of birth of
children will cause lot of
humiliation to Rama if he had ten
wives. This is how it happens:
Sita gave birth to children only
after 14 years of forest life. By
that time some years had elapsed
since the marriage of Rama and
Sita. Perhaps 20 years had passed
since the time of their marriage.
If Rama had only one wife and if
children were not born for a long
time, the defect or the ill health
may be attributed either to the
wife or the husband. There
would be no means to prove that
it was the defect of the husband.
(Of course, it is nobodys fault
even if it were the defect of the
husband or the wife. That is a
totally different issue).
But, if that man had ten loyal
wives and none of the wives had
given birth to children, it would
be seen as the defect of the man.
Though Ramas father had 300
wives, he did not beget children
796
MORE SPITTLE THAN MANTRAS!
One category of devotees lead the life of an ascetic? Those
chant mantras whenever they who are interested in these
open their mouth. If it were questions must discuss them.
simply mantras, there wont be a Those who do not like the
problem. Mantras will simply questions must overlook them.
fade into the winds. But these Instead of doing either of the two
devotees pollute the surround- things, they indulge in irrelevant
ings with their spittle. One nonsense: Ranganayakamma is
devotee occasionally cites a doing all this in order to sell her
humorous saying: more spittle books. She is making use of
than mantras.
Prabhavathy who is ailing. Can
The devotees who recite Ranganayakamma write on Bible
mantras with spittle do not or Quran? They think that they
bother to wipe their lips. Averse could make the actual questions
to rational thinking, they are not disappear by means of such
conscious of their mannerisms at prattle.
any given time.
Whenever we examine any
These devotees of spittle story, we raise such questions as,
think that all the religious stories What is the story? How the
are the property of their characters are portrayed? How
ancestors. They dont have has the writer/poet depicted
minimum common sense that given scenes/incidents?
anyone can talk about any story.
Similar questions arise even
It does not occur to their mind on the story of Ramayana. One
that human beings can apply need to search for answers to
their thought to any issue. They those questions. Otherwise, one
indulge in slander at those who ought to ignore them.
apply thought and believe that
What the devotees of spittle
they could succeed in arguments ought to realize again and again
by means of invective.
is that religious stories are not
What did I write about the the property of their fathers,
story of Ramayana in my essay, grandfathers or great grandImpartial Reader? I raised only fathers! They are not their private
two questions! Did coronation of property! They are public texts!
Bharata take place? Did Rama Anyone can talk about them,
797
discuss them and question them.
It is nothing but analyzing
literature! Literary criticism!
Those who jump on others, being
unaware of such a basic premise,
ought to learn some common
sense.
I am talking not about that
Rama who resides in your souls
but Rama who is portrayed in
Valmikis story. Not about your
beliefs, but about a story! I shall
talk about it based on my
understanding. Answer my
questions, if you can. Otherwise,
keep your distance!
I have raised 2 questions but
have not discredited you. You
have no right to demean me. So,
learn to behave like human
beings and not like humanbeasts.
There are hundreds of
questions based on the story of
Ramayana. Read them if you like
and dont read them if you dont.
It is up to you. But if you jump on
those who raise questions, no
god will protect you!
Rama knew very clearly that
Bharata had the right over the
kingdom after Dasarathas death.
Rama himself tells this fact.
After Rama has gone to the
forest, Bharata goes to Rama and
asks him to come back to the
798
calling Bharata who was already
married and equal to Rama in
age. The devotees of spittle dont
find any weirdness in this aspect.
The question, what is this
coronation
without
calling
Bharata does not arise. The poet
does not think that Ramas
character would turn into a
wicked one. Instead, he portrays
that character with contradictory
behavior and false pretenses.
While leaving for forest,
Rama declares that he would
lead the life of a sage by eating
roots and fruits (Ayodhyakanda,
sarga 37). But as soon as he
enters the forest, goes berserk
and kills four animals including
male buffaloes and antelopes in a
single instance. (Ayodhyakanda,
sarga 52, sloka 102).Then why
such talk of leading the life of a
sage, eating roots and fruits?
In fact, at the very beginning
of the story, we come across a
description: a hunter aims his
arrow at a bird-pair and kills one
of them, and when the other bird
laments with sorrow, poetry
springs from the poets heart who
observed all that. Well, did Rama
himself not indulge in separating
pairs of birds or antelopes? If a
hunter does the same thing for
the sake of his livelihood, how
799
always get excited that great
emphasis has been placed on
devotion to a single wife in the
story of Rama. Even though
Rama had only one wife, it was
not meant for devotion to one
wife. The poet has not mentioned
it anywhere in the text. Moreover
he praised a lot those men who
had many wives. Not only
Dasaratha but also Ravana, the
enemy of Rama. While referring
to Ravana who slept in the midst
of several women the poet
depicted him as moon in the
midst of stars. This means it was
not the intention of the poet to
glorify commitment to only one
wife as a great value. But he
showed only one wife because it
is necessary for handling the
story. While Rama was going to
the forest, Sita too ought to
accompany her husband. If there
were ten Sitas, all of them ought
to go. There, if Ravana were to
abduct Sita whom should he
abduct? He should abduct all ten
Sitas.
The poet has to make Sri
Rama depict the breasts, the
waists and thighs in ten different
ways in order to satisfy the dirty
desires of the spitting devotees
who would like to see the breasts
of loyal wives. If description of
800
unjust scenes as killing of Vali.
In Ramas kingdom (Rama
Rajya) there was so much
poverty that even Brahmins did
not have food (Uttarakanda,
sarga 71). While Sambuka, a
low
caste
person,
was
performing prayers sitting in the
forest, Rama sliced him with his
sword and exhibited his
meanness. At the end, Rama
organizes wars against tribal
kingdoms, gets those people
killed
and
assigns
those
kingdoms to the sons of his
brothers (Uttarakanda, sarga
113 &115). At every step we
come across a million traits of
meanness! Is Rama a great god?
Will this story of Rama develop
human values and uplift the
human kind to a higher level?
When I read the play
kanyasulkam (Bride Price) in
my young age, I was initially
shocked to see the character of
Girisam. What is this? Usually
the principal character is a good
person. Why is this character
so? I wondered. Gradually I
understood the fact that the
writer was depicting a bad
character.
Similarly, when I started
[Navya, weekly,
dt. 27-10-2010]