Proposal For Improving Primary Health Care and Health Education in Rural India
Proposal For Improving Primary Health Care and Health Education in Rural India
Proposal For Improving Primary Health Care and Health Education in Rural India
OBJECTIVES
The objective is to improve and enhance the services offered by Primary Health Centers
(PHCs) in the rural communities of India. We propose to do this by applying novel
solutions that take advantage of developments in harnessing solar power, computers, and
information technology. Our strategy is to use technology to provide effective early
medical intervention, deliver expert health care, and minimize the inconvenience caused
to patients and health-workers from poor logistics and long travel time. An equally
important role of PHCs is to provide health education emphasizing family planning,
hygiene, sanitation, and prevention of communicable diseases. A final step in this process
will happen through video consulting and examination, a technology we anticipate
becoming available in rural areas by year 2010.
OVERVIEW
The long-term goal of the Indian government and international funding agencies has been
to provide health care to rural communities through PHCs. However, even with large
funding, these centers have not been successful for a variety of reasons that include lack
of decent facilities, equipment for performing even simple laboratory tests, etc. Even
more important is a social reality: there just are not enough trained and qualified doctors
to adequately serve the entire urban and rural populations of India even if we could
provide financial incentives for them to work in rural areas. Since we believe that the
dearth of doctors willing to practice in rural areas and their reluctance to travel to, let
alone live in, remote areas will continue to exist for a long time to come, we have
incorporated this reality into our planning from the start as described in this proposal. Our
plan, therefore, is to increase the effectiveness of doctors who are willing to work in rural
areas by a large factor. This can be accomplished by reducing the need for doctors in the
initial screening of patients, and by allocating one physician for every five PHCs.
Simultaneously; we plan to make working at PHCs more attractive and satisfying.
The result of non-functioning PHCs has been that, in many cases, diseases are not
diagnosed in their early stages nor treated. The rural population has to often travel to
urban areas when they can no longer bear the suffering caused by the disease, thus
increasing the load on hospitals in urban areas and ending up with serious complications
that, in many cases, could have easily been treated at their early stages. The need to
rectify this problem has become critical especially given the fact that over 650 million
people live in rural areas across the country with poor awareness of health issues. This
ignorance, coupled with the increased mobility between rural and urban areas, has led to
an explosive increase in the spread of diseases like HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis B and C.
We envisage PHCs functioning as the first level in a hierarchical system of health care
facilities. At this primary level, PHCs will play two equally important roles: First,
diagnosis of diseases based on symptoms and simple laboratory tests, and their treatment
either at the centers or through referral. Second, health education leading to family
planning, better hygiene and sanitation, and prevention of communicable diseases,
especially sexually transmitted diseases.
The government has shown keen interest in finding private partners to revitalize the
PHCs. To this end The George Foundation, in collaboration with the Government of
Tamil Nadu, has initiated a pilot project involving one PHC covering some 79,000 people
in the Dharamapuri District. Five more PHCs will soon be included in the pilot project.
The goal is to build on the existing infrastructure at these PHCs, make them functional
and enhance their capability. The George Foundation will coordinate and manage this
proposed project.
STEPS IN THE PROCESS OF ENHANCING THE CAPABILITIES OF THE PHC
The first step is to furbish the existing PHCs (land, building, equipment, and supplies)
already set up by the government. We anticipate each PHC to consist of an initial
screening room with a computer, an examination room for the doctor, a laboratory for
medical tests and supplies, and toilets. The furnishing will be simple, comfortable, and
durable.
The most critical infrastructure element is electricity. We propose to use either solar
panels or diesel generators (depending on a cost-benefit analysis) connected to batteries
for uninterrupted electric power for computers and laboratory equipment. Such units have
already been field tested by The George Foundation at its boarding school for
economically disadvantaged children, Shanti Bhawan, and will assure the operation of
equipment for much of the day even when conventional electric power is unavailable.
Each PHC will have a full time staff consisting of a paramedic individual to perform
initial screening with the computer, a trained nurse or physicians assistant, and a
laboratory technician. We anticipate that a qualified medical doctor will be shared
between 3-5 PHCs in a given area. Training of this staff in the novel technology and in
the holistic approach we are proposing will be extensive and continuous, and their
performance will be monitored constantly as described in Appendices B and C.
In addition to the testing capability of the on-site medical laboratory, a crucial tool for
diagnosis will be the computer. A software program called EDPS2000 shall assist the
technician in maintaining, in a protected and confidential manner, the medical history of
all patients, in suggesting tests to perform, and to evaluate possible causes based on the
symptoms displayed or the description given by the patient. It will also incorporate the
medical history in making the probable diagnosis. In addition, based on this diagnosis, it
will also prescribe medicines for minor illnesses, which will be sold at cost by the PHC.
In cases of probable major illnesses or when the diagnosis is not clear, the computer
output will propose a future course of actionfurther tests and possibly a visit to a
specialist. In the latter case, the computer will print out the patients relevant/essential
history that can be taken to the specialist. We anticipate that the majority of cases will be
2
handled at the level of PHCs, thus drastically cutting down the burden placed on hospitals
and doctors. A brief description of the EDPS2000 software is given later and in Appendix
D.
Patients visiting PHCs will also be provided health education by the staff through posters
and through audiovisual demonstrations. Providing information and help with family
planning, and awareness on communicable diseases, will be a key role of the staff.
Community programs for which we shall form collaborations with Non-Governmental
Agencies (NGOs) and social workers will supplement these activities.
At present we envisage each PHC to be an isolated unit. All software updates and sharing
of information would have to be uploaded/downloaded periodically by a person traveling
from center to center. We plan to connect each PHC to its assigned doctor through
wireless communications and a palm computer. Over a three-year time frame we propose
to connect the computers at different PHCs through standard telephone and/or cell phone
link to a central coordination/support center. The central facility will then be able to
collect and update the data from all PHCs within its jurisdiction, and perform pattern
detection and epidemiological analysis, thereby predicting epidemics and exposing
widespread health problems in their early stages. In addition to simplifying the
uploading/downloading of data onto the central computer, this enhancement will allow
on-line access to specialists via e-mail, further reducing patient's travel time and cost and
the load on urban health care facilities.
As a final step, we anticipate enhancing the diagnostic capability of PHCs through video
consultations wherein the patient (through the PHC) will access a physician (and even a
specialist) via a two-way video camera and screen. We anticipate that this technology and
the required transmission rate using cellular connections will become a reality in rural
India in 5-10 years.
HEALTH EDUCATION AND DISEASE PREVENTION
Rural India faces many very serious problems. Notable amongst them are potable water,
emerging pandemics, population control, good hygiene and sanitation practices, basic
education, and simple techniques for improving their crops and lives (see Appendix C).
One cannot expect to upgrade the peoples health without simultaneously making an
impact on these issues, and vice versa. We will, therefore, train and empower the staff at
the PHCs to spread awareness on some of these issues, build trust within the community,
and to take a holistic approach to health care.
Using the telephone link to the central facility, relevant training and educational material
and specific health instructions will be periodically transmitted to the computers at all
PHCs, and the status of various educational programs will be monitored.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
For the PHCs to be effective, people have to believe that the PHCs are there to serve
them and to provide value. To facilitate this we plan to involve the local population in
the operation and in the community outreach programs. We also plan to encourage
cultural activities, self-help programs, and health education through the PHCs. The
monitoring role of The George Foundation will be to evaluate the performance of PHCs
and to provide guidance. Evaluation will be based on one simple criterion whether the
PHCs have significantly improved the health and well being of the community.
DESCRIPTION OF EDPS2000
The Early Detection & Prevention System (EDPS2000) is a software system developed
by Dr. Abraham George, the founder of The George Foundation, a non-profit trust. It can
provide early diagnosis of patients health status. EDPS2000 screens patients and
identifies those who need prompt attention by qualified physicians, while recommending
treatment for others with minor illnesses.
It provides a probable diagnosis of disease conditions based on the complaints narrated
by the patient along with the results of a few relevant laboratory tests and the patients
medical history. It must be understood that this software does not aim to give a
confirmatory diagnosis in most cases, but only a probable diagnosis. Several conditions
are supported by laboratory tests, which in turn, may enable the user to make a
confirmatory diagnosis. It should, therefore, be seen only as a first line of intervention
whereby the patient, equipped with a probable diagnosis, can then go on to the next level,
like referral to a specialist, when required. Several minor or common illnesses will be
treated at this level on instructions given by the software.
As of now, the diseases covered by EDPS2000 are based on the common disease patterns
seen in South India. This list of approximately 300 diseases presently covered by the
software is given in Appendix E. A special team from both India and the United States
has designed this software over the past two years, and The George Foundation has
exclusive license to use in selected areas in rural India. The system is being maintained
and enhanced under license by eMedexOnline LLC, a U.S. based company. It has been
extensively tested with over 10,000 patients in three leading hospitals in Bangalore for
accuracy and acceptance by both the user and the patient. Appendix D summarizes the
results of the tests, and the comments from the hospitals.
Another aspect of the EDPS software is maintaining a database of doctors and
hospitals/clinics to whom referrals are made. By prior arrangements made by The George
Foundation with doctors and hospitals/clinics, we hope to cut down on the cost and
hardship incurred by the patients.
WHO CAN USE THE EDPS2000 SOFTWARE?
The EDPS2000 software has been designed to be extremely user friendly. Persons
involved in primary health care in remote, rural and backward areas will be able to use it
easily. The basic qualifications expected of a person who will use this software are
knowledge of English, a simple understanding of computers, and a strong motivation and
aptitude for primary health care. It does not require someone with a medical degree or
even formally trained health workers and nurses. Users will undergo specific training to
use the software, and will have extensive hands-on training before they are allowed to use
it in the field.
There are two main persons involved in the use of this software: the patient and the
interviewer (computer user). The software will prompt the interviewer with the questions
to ask. The software will keep on evaluating the answers and posing new questions until
it has narrowed the list of possibilities down to a probable diagnosis or a future course of
action. The interviewer is, therefore, passive in this process. This feature has been
incorporated by design to minimize the medical knowledge expected of the interviewer.
For cases referred to specialists or hospitals, the interviewer is responsible for following
up and making sure that the paperwork, diagnosis, and results of lab tests are entered into
the computer to maintain the full and up to date medical history.
COST BREAKDOWN
The following 3 types of costs are associated with the project:
(1) EDPS2000 Development Cost: The George Foundation has already invested Rs.90
Million ($2.2 Million) in the design, development, and enhancement of EDPS2000.
Further development/enhancement costs are also likely to be substantial. We are not
including these development costs in our estimates and in the funding request.
(2) Pre-operating costs per PHC:
a. Improvement of PHCs
: Rs. 250,000
:
:
:
:
:
:
Rs. 300,000
Rs. 50,000
Rs. 50,000
Rs. 50,000
Rs. 20,000
Rs. 720,000 ($14,800)
: Rs. 60000
: Rs. 72000
: Rs. 84000
: Rs. 72000
: Rs. 30000
: Rs. 32000
: Rs. 50000
: Rs. 400,000 ($8,200)
TOTAL COSTS
We propose to amortize the pre-operating costs over five years. Based on this, we expect
an expenditure of Rs 544,000 per annum ($11,200) per PHC in the initial year. To our
above estimates we add a 8% per annum increase in cost due to inflation, and a 20% for
expenses towards a) maintaining Support and Training Centers (see Appendix B), b)
coordination and monitoring of PHCs, c) enhancement of EDPS2000 (see Appendix D),
d) development and distribution of health education materials, and e) administration and
fiscal management of the project (see Appendix A). The total then amounts to Rs.
4,880,000 (about $100,000) per PHC over a five-year period.
PROJECT GOAL
Our goal is to incorporate 1000 PHCs into the program in the first phase spanning 5
years: 2001-2005. Initially, PHCs will be selected in the southern states of Andhra
Pradesh, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu; subsequently, additional PHCs will be selected
throughout India. While the entire 1000 PHCs will become operational within the initial
24 months, they will require another 2-3 years to achieve their desired full and effective
capabilities. This will be accomplished in coordination with State agencies and NGOs.
Based on the calculations presented above, we anticipate a total outlay of Rs 4,880
Million (about $100 Million) toward this. Since each PHC reaches between 20,00060,000 people, this modest start will address issues of primary health care and health
education for about 40 million Indians (6% of the total) in rural areas. It is hard to believe
that investing Rs 24.00 ($0.50) per person per year will make such a BIG difference in
the lives of so many. We feel confident that it will.
COST RECOVERY FOR SUSTAINABLE OPERATION IN THE FUTURE
In the first phase, while we build trust in the PHCs, patients will be asked to pay a good
faith fee of Rs. 10 - 15 per visit to the PHC, and the community will be asked to provide
volunteer labor for upkeep and upgrades on the building. We anticipate using the money
collected by the PHCs from the patients for community services and for future
development. The idea being that anything we collect from them, we reinvest in the
project and for their immediate welfare.
We anticipate that by the second phase, 2006-2010, the community served by a given
PHC would have learned its value to them. We anticipate that they will be willing to pay
Rs. 20 per visit by then. Assuming that on average 30 patients visit a given
PHC per day, this fee would aggregate to over Rs. 200,000 per year (about 50% of its
annual operating cost).
MANAGEMENT OF OPERATIONS
A Steering Committee consisting of representatives from the donors, The George
Foundation, government officials, and local communities will oversee the project. An
International Advisory Board will assist this committee in setting priorities and policies.
Day-to-day operations will be carried out by a management team under the supervision of
The George Foundation. Funds received will be credited to a Trust account in a bank(s),
and will be operated by The George Foundation. The George Foundation will have the
overall responsibility for executing the project, and will coordinate its activities with
government agencies and other NGOs participating in the program.
CONTACTS
This proposal is being submitted by The George Foundation for funding toward US$100
million required for the project over a five-year period. Since the project involves the
participation of non-governmental organizations, central and state governments,
international institutions and private citizens, it is anticipated that several donors will
contribute toward the necessary funds. For further information, please contact Abraham
George or Rajan Gupta at addresses noted below.
___________________________
__________________________
Abraham George
Founder, The George Foundation
2 Penny lane, Boonton Township
New Jersey, 07005
Tel.: 973-575-8333 Ext. 3521
Rajan Gupta
Sr. Advisor, The George Foundation
231 Maple Drive
Los Alamos, NM 87544
Tel.: 505-667-7664
Foundation Address:
The George Foundation
1155, 6th Main Road
4th Block, 1st Stage, HBR Layout
Bangalore, India 560 084
Tel.: 011-91-80-5440164
Email: [email protected]
Web-sites: www.tgfworld.org
www.leadpoison.net
10
11
TYPE OF DISEASE
MALNUTRITION
CORRECT
DIAGNOSIS
BLANK
DIAGNOSIS
WRONG
DIAGNOSIS
TOTAL
CASE
S
611(90.3%)
24(3.5)
42(6.2)
677
199(76.53)
34(13.1)
27(10.4)
260
ANEMIA
VITAMIN DEFICIENCY
MUSCULOSKELETAL
PROBLEMS
VIRAL FEVER
COMMON COLD
MALARIA
OTHER INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
1106(85.88)
54(4.19)
128(9.94)
1288
SORE THROAT
105(80.77)
9(6.92)
16(12.30)
130
PREGNANCY
277(92.95)
13(4.36)
8(2.68)
298
CHEST PAIN
220(81.48)
20(7.47)
30(11.01)
270
STOMACH PROBLEMS
GASTROENTERITIS
ACID PEPTIC DISEASE
1025(87.08)
72(6.12)
80(6.80)
1177
BACK PROBLEM
CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS
199(89.64)
5(2.52)
18(8.11)
222
GENITAL PROBLEM
221(96.51)
4(1.75)
4(1.75)
229
10
EYE PROBLEM
193(94.15)
2(.98)
10(4.88)
205
11
WOUND
FRACTURE
DOG BITE
447(92.74)
14(2.90)
21(4.36)
482
12
EAR PROBLEM
183(93.37)
3(1.53)
10(5.10)
196
13
HYPERTENSION
DIABETES
256(100)
256
14
105(90.52)
5(4.31)
6(5.17)
116
15
JAUNDICE
51(100)
51
16
96(88.07)
4(3.67)
9(8.26)
109
17
URINARY PROBLEM
209(85.65)
15(6.15)
20(9.08)
244
18
TOOTH PROBLEM
21(95.45)
1(4.54)
22
19
HEADACHE
295(84.29)
28(8.0)
27(7.71)
350
20
RESPIRATORY PROBLEMS
ASTHMA
BRONCHITIS
PULMONARY KOCHS
SKIN DISEASES
1949(97.55)
2(0.1)
47(2.35)
1998
1202(84.64)
90(6. 34
128(9.O1)
1420
TOTAL
8970(89.7)
398 (3.98)
632(6.32)
10000
21
12
Notes:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
13
NUTRITION RELATED
2.
Malnutrition
Kwashiorkor
Marasmus
Vitamin A deficiency
Vit.B Complex deficiency
Scurvy (Vit. C def)
Rickets (Vitamin D Deficiency)
Iron deficiency anemia
Iodine deficiency thyroid problem
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Viral
HIV
*
Viral Encephalitis
Measles
*
Dengue fever
Mumps
*
Poliomyelitis
Rubella
*
Hepatitis A
Chicken pox
*
Hepatitis B
Influenza (Flu) *
Gastroenteritis
Rabies
*
Herpes Zoster
Rubella (German Measles)
Bacterial
Diphtheria
Anthrax
Whooping Cough
Strep. Throat
Staph. Skin
Typhoid/paratyphoid
*
*
*
*
*
*
Tuberculosis
Food poisoning
Tetanus
Leprosy
Dysentery
Cholera
*
*
Malaria
Filaria
Protozoal
Amebiasis
Giardiasis
Worm infestations
STDs
Syphilis
Gonorrhea
Trichomonas
Chlamydia
14
Fungal
Candiadiasis
15
3.
HEART DISEASES
Angina
Cardiac failure
Rheumatic fever
Hypertension
Pericarditis
TAO
4.
RESPIRATORY DISEASES
Common cold
*
Laryngitis
*
Sore Throat
*
Allergic Rhinitis
*
Tuberculosis
*
Emphysema
*
Laryngotracheo bronchitis *
Cystic Fibrosis
4.
GASTRO-INTESTINAL DISEASES
Hiatus hernia
*
Appendicitis
*
Cirrhosis
*
Hernia
*
Dyspepsia
*
5.
RENAL SYSTEM
Nephrotic syndrome
Renal stones
Prostrate hypertrophy
6.
TEETH
Caries
Gum problems
7.
EYE
Flu/influenza
Sinusitis
Bronchitis
Pneumonia
Asthma
Pleural effusion
Bronchiectasis
Cataract
Conjunctivitis
Refractive errors
Glaucoma
Blindness
Squinr
16
8.
EAR/NOSE/THROAT
Deafness
Wax in ears
Earache
Nose Bleeds
Tonsillitis
9.
ENDOCRINE
Diabetes Mellitus
10.
BLOOD
Anemia
Aplastic anemia
Thallasemia
Leukemia
Hemophilia
11.
12.
13.
*
*
*
*
*
Neutropenia
Lymphomas
Bleeding disorders
Megaloblastic anemia
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM
Rheumatoid arthritis
*
Ankylosing spondylitis
*
Osteoarthritis
*
Cervical spondylosis
*
Sciatica
*
Costochondritis-ribs
Osteoporosis
Gout
Osteomyelitis
Lumbar disc herniation
Muscle sprain
Frozen shoulder
Epilepsy
Parkinsons
Brain tumors
Febrile convulsions
SKIN
Eczema
*
Urticaria
*
Scabies
*
Fungal infections *
Moles
*
Acne vulgaris
*
Vitiligo
*
Sebaceous cyst *
*
*
*
*
*
*
Psoriasis
Rash
Burns
Warts
Molluscum contagiosum
Neurofibromatosis
Milaria Rubra
Corns
17
Encephalitis
Migraine
Stroke
Herpes Zoster
Bells Palsy
Cerebral palsy
14.
PSYCHIATRIC
Depression
Schizophrenia
Hysteria
15.
SURGICAL CONDITIONS
Wounds/ Injuries
Head injuries
Abscess
Lipoma
Ulcers
Fractures
Piles (Hemorrhoids)
Anal fissure
Pilonidal sinus
Varicose veins
Breast lump
Cleft lip/palate
Mass abdomen
Acute abdomen
16.
GENITAL
Pregnancy related:
Normal pregnancy
Anemia in pregnancy
Toxemia of pregnancy
Diabetes in pregnancy
Short stature
Bleeding in pregnancy
Abortions
Cancer cervix
Menstrual disorders
Dysmenorrhea
Uterine prolapse
Polycystic ovarian disease
Vaginal discharge
Genital warts
Infertility
Hydrocele
Phimosis
Hernia
Penile ulcers
Penile swelling
18
17.
POISONING/BITES/STINGS
18.
Organophosphorus poisoning
Iron poisoning
Kerosene
Sleeping pills
Lead poisoning
Snake bite
Insect bites
Dog bite
Rat bite
OTHERS
Downs syndrome
Gynecomastia
Heat stroke
19
20
21
22
23