A Study of Heavy Metals Adsorption by Natural & Low-Cost Adsorbents

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

M.SC.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

A STUDY OF HEAVY METALS ADSORPTION BY NATURAL &


LOW-COST ADSORBENTS

SUPERVISOR
Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq
By
Syed Muhammad Sibtain (2015-MS-EN-03)
FULL TIME
DATE OF REGISTERATION
January 2015

______________________________________________________________________

INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING & RESEARCH


UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, LAHORE

A STUDY OF HEAVY METALS ADSORPTION BY NATURAL &


LOW-COST ADSORBENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Problem statement......................................................................................................3

Objective.....................................................................................................................4

Literature review..........................................................................................................4

Materials and methods................................................................................................6


4.1

Experimental setup...............................................................................................6

4.2

Experimentation....................................................................................................6

4.3

Method of analysis...............................................................................................7

Utilization of the results...............................................................................................7

Work schedule............................................................................................................7

References..................................................................................................................8

Problem statement

With increased technological advancements in industries, water pollution continues to


be of great concern. Increased generation of heavy metals from industries is on the rise,
although this industrialization has brought development and prosperity but in hindsight
has disturbed the ecosystem, with many aquatic environments facing metal
concentrations that exceed water quality criteria designed to protect the environment,
animals and humans. Water pollution is of the greatest concern in the world. Extensive
pollution of water bodies is causing effect on human and ecological environment.
Among these, the spreading of water-related diseases and hindrance in the intended
uses of these water bodies are the most important(Jadhav and Mahajan 2013).
Heavy metals are associated with myriad adverse health effects, including allergic
reactions (e.g., beryllium, chromium), neurotoxicity (e.g., lead), nephrotoxicity (e.g.,

mercuric chloride, cadmium chloride), and cancer (e.g. arsenic, hexavalent chromium).
Humans are often exposed to heavy metals in various waysmainly through the
inhalation of metals in the workplace or polluted neighborhoods, or through the
ingestion of food (particularly seafood) that contains high levels of heavy metals or paint
chips that contain lead (Jarup,2003).It is therefore essential to remove heavy metals
rom industrial wastewaters and drinking water.
Several technologies have been used to treat metal containing aqueous solution, for the
last few decades (Wang et al., 2004). These include membrane process (reverse
osmosis), precipitation and clarification techniques, activated carbon process and ion
exchange process. All of which having a major drawback of being costly to operate and
maintain. On the other hand, adsorption has emerged as a promising technique for
metal removal. The processes can occur at an interface between any two phases, such
as, liquid-liquid, gas-liquid, or liquid-solid interfaces (Barakat, 2011).
Plant materials are mainly comprised of cellulose materials that can adsorb heavy metal
cations in aqueous solution. Numerous waste biomass sources are available in nature
in which adsorption properties have been reported e.g. rice husk, saw dust, tea and
coffee waste, orange peel peanut shells, activated carbon, dry tree leaves and barks
(Asma et al., 2005; Ferda and Selen, 2012; Kishore et al., 2008;; Nuria et al., 2010).
This research aims to check the potential of mango, banana and lemon peels as natural
low-cost adosrobents for removal of heavy metals from water. These natural materials
can be easily processed and used for metal removal, and hence can offer an
economical solution to the problem of heavy metal pollution.

Objective

The objective of this study is:

To evaluate the adsorption capacity of three different adsorbents namely mango


peel, lemon peel and banana peel in the removal of three heavy metals copper,
zinc and lead ions in batch system.
To determine the kinetic parameters using model equations available in literature
on adsorption.
To evaluate isotherm modelling studies for establishing adsorption equilibria.
To establish recovery and reuse of the adsorbents using different regenerants.
To determine the effects of different experimental parameters like initial
concentration, biomass dose, pH of the solution on metal uptake in batch system
3 LITERATURE REVIEW

Environmental pollution due to development in modern industrial practice is one of


the most significant problems of this century. Of this the contamination of water
resources by hazardous pollutants has attracted much serious attention in the last
few decades. This is particularly due to their toxic, acute and chronic health effects.
There are several different options currently available for the removal of heavy
metals from industrial wastewaters. The most common treatment is chemical
precipitation with lime or caustic soda where recovery of metals or water is not a
consideration. This technique has certain major disadvantages such as residual
solubility of the metals, large requirement of chemicals and generation of a large
volume of sludge which requires careful disposal in further steps (Spearot and
Peck,1984;Peters et al.,1985; Brierley et al.,1986 ). Other available treatments such
as ion-exchange, reverse osmosis and electro dialysis require high capital
investment and running cost (Aderhold et al.,1996). Adsorption is by far the most
versatile and widely used technique for the removal of metal ions. Activated carbon
has been the standard for industrial wastewater treatment for almost three decades
(Fornwalt and Hutchins, 1966). Despite its widespread use, activated carbon still
remains an expensive material. In recent years, the research interest in to the lowcost alternatives to activated carbon has grown.
Adsorption can be a potential alternative to traditional treatment processes of metal
ions removal (Ayhan, 2008; Mckat et al., 2000; Mohsen,2007). The phenomenon of
adsorption has been described in a wide range of non-living biomass like potato
peel waste (Mohammed and Devi, 2009), untreated Cocos Nucifara (Prasad and
Satya, 2010), orange peel (Ferda and Selen, 2012), crab shell ( Vijayaraghavan et
al,, 2005), untreated coffee grounds( Azouaou et al., 2010), as well as of living
biomass like, microbial cell (Gopal et al., 2002), moss (Lee and Low,1989),yeast
(Can and Jianlong, 2008), fungi (Sudha and Emilia, 2002), algae (Dumitru and
Laura, 2012; Gupta and Rastogi, 2008; Mohammad Mehdi et al., 2011) orange peel
(Ferda and Selen, 2012).
Adsorption has been proved to be an excellent way to treat industrial waste
effluents, offering significant advantages like the low-cost, availability, profitability,
ease of operation and efficiency (Demirbas, 2008).
In the last few decades, alternative sorbents for the treatment of heavy metal
contamination have been investigated (Abdelwahab, 2007; Amany, 2007; Bayat,
2002; Cetin and Pehlivan, 2007; Mustafa, 2008; Nuria et al., 2010; Srinivasan and
Viraraghavan, 2010;Wan and Hanfiah, 2007). There is a large volume of literature
relating to the performance of different biosorbents for the removal of variety of
heavy metals (Larous et al., 2005; Uysal and Ar, 2007; Qi. and Aldrich, 2008; Atalay
et al., 2010).The agricultural residues seem to be preferred (Pollard et al.,1992;

Nasernejad et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2002; Horsfall et al., 2006) and green
coconut shells are a most appropriate example for the adsorption removal of and
organics (Crisafully et al.,2007). In literatures, studies were conducted using banana
peel for As(III) (Suantak et al., 2012) and watermelon rind for Ni(II) and Co(II)
(Lakshmipathy and sarada, 2013).
Azouaou et al. (2010) studied the effect of various parameters on adsorption
capacity using untreated coffee grounds as adsorbent. They found that the
adsorption process is a function of the adsorbent concentration, pH, metal ion
concentration and temperature.
Mishra and Pate (2009) examined the role of low cost adsorbents on lead and zinc
ions removal from waste water.
Venkateswarlu et al. (2006) carried out investigations on Azadirachta indica (neem)
leaf powder as an adsorbent on chromium removal from aqueous solution. The
results indicated that the adsorption capacity is strongly depends on equilibrium pH.
Waleska et al. (2008) used the untreated coffee husks as adsorbents for the
removal of heavy metal ions such as Cd(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution.
The results indicated that the highest adsorption capacity occurred at distinct pH
values for each metal ion.
Ashraf et al., 2011 carried out batch adsorption studies using mango biomass for
Pb(II), Zn(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) ions.
Murugan et al., (2010) investigated the potential of mango leaves powder for
removal of Grey BL dye from aqueous solution. The comparison of adsorption
capacities of guava and mango leaves powder for adsorption of Methylene Blue dye
was studied by Patel and Vashi (2009).
Mango peel waste was evaluated as a new sorbent for adsorption of Cd(II) and
Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by Iqbal et al., (2008). FTIR analysis revealed that
carboxyl and hydroxyl groups were the principle functional sites taking part in the
adsorption process.
The work aims in checking the removal efficiency of natural adsorbents for heavy
metals. It also intends to check the effect of other parameters for example the
optimization of contact time, pH, biomass dose and initial concentration to achieve
the highest possible treatment.
4

materials and methods

4.1 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP


Proposed experimental setup that will be used for the research, consists of:
i.
ii.
iii.

Collection of fruit peels from local juice shops and later will be processed in
order to prepare adsorption ready material (powder form).
Preparation of stock solutions of lead, zinc and copper in distilled water from
which required concentrations will be obtained by dilution.
Metal concentrations before and after adsorption, to be determined through
Atomic Adsorption Spectrophotometer.

4.2 EXPERIMENTATION
1) Samples of varying initial metal concentration will be prepared.
2) Adsorption experiments will be carried out by adding dried adsorbent per 100ml
metal solutions.
3) Samples will be shaken in a temperature controlled incubator shaker at 30 oC with
200 rpm speed. After 2 hours the samples will filtered and analyzed using Atomic
Adsorption Spectrophotometer.
4) Same metal concentration analysis will be conducted by varying the controlling
factors such as pH, temperature, initial metal concentration and biomass dose.

4.3 METHOD OF ANALYSIS


All tests on the samples (pH, Cupper, Lead, Zinc and Temperature.) will be carried
out according to the procedures laid down in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater.
5

UTILIZATION OF THE RESULTS


The study will accomplish to determine the effectiveness of natural adsorbents for
heavy metal removal and will also help in determining the optimum conditions (i.e.
pH, temperature, initial concentration) for most effective removal and highest
efficiencies. This research will provide confirmation regarding heavy metal removal
from water through the utilization of natural low-cost adsorbents.

WORK SCHEDULE

A tentative work schedule for the research work is given below.


Activities
Literature Review
Experimentation and Analysis

May

Jun.

Jul.

Month, Year 2016


Aug.
Sep.
Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Preparation of Thesis
Thesis Review by Supervisor
Incorporation of Comments
Submission of Final Thesis
7

References
1) Jadhav, M. V. and Y. S. Mahajan (2013). "Investigation of the performance of
chitosan as a coagulant for flocculation of local clay suspensions of different
turbidities." KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 17(2): 328-334.
2) Jarup.L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination British medical bulletin,
Vol. 68, pp. 167-182.
3) Wang.L.K,Hung.Y.T and Shammas.N.K (2004) Physicochemical Treatment
Processes Hamana Press, New Jersey, Vol. 3, pp. 141-198.
4) Barakat. M.A (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial
wastewater Arabian Journal Chemistry, Vol. 4, pp. 361-377.
5) Asma.S, Muhammed.I, and Akhtar.M.W (2005) Removal and recovery of lead(II)
from single and multimetal (Cd,Cu,Ni,Zn) solutions by crop milling waste (black
gram husk),. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. B117,pp. 65-73.
6) Ferda.G and Selen.S.D (2012) Adsorption study on orange peel: Removal of
Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol.11,
pp.1250-1258.
7) Kishore.K.K,Xiaoguang.M,Christodoulatos.C and Veera.M.B (2008) Biosorption
mechanism of nine different heavy metals onto biomatrix from rice husk Journal
of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 53, pp.1222-1234.
8) Nuria.M,Cesar.V,Ignasi.C,Maria.M and Antonio.F (2010) Cadmium and lead
Removal from Aqueous Solution by Grape Stalk Wastes: Modeling of a Fixed
Bed Column Journal of Chemical Engineering Data, Vol.55, pp. 3548-3554.
9) Spearot.R.M and Peck.J.R (1984) Recovery process for complexed copper
bearing rinse waters Environmental Progress, Vol.3, pp. 124-129.
10)Peters.R.W,Young.K and Bhattacharya.D (1985) Evaluation of recent treatment
techniques for removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters AICHE
Symposium,Vol. 81, pp. 1605-1703.
11) Brierley.J.A and Goyak.G.M (1986) A new wastewater treatment and metal
recovery technology Fundamental and Applied Biohydromettallurgy, pp. 291-303.
12)Aderhold.D,Williams.C.J and Edyvean.R.G.J (1966) Removal of heavy metal
ions by seaweeds and their derivatives Bioresource Technology, Vol. 58, pp.1-6.
13)Fornwalt.H.J and Hutchins.R.A (1966) Purifying liquids with activated carbon
Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol.73, pp. 179-184.
14)Ayhan.D (2008) Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: A
review Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.157, pp. 220-229.

15)Mckay.G,Ho.Y.S,Wase.D.A.J and Forster.C.F (2000) Study of the sorption of


divalent metal ions on to peat, Adsorption Science and Technology, Vol. 18(7),
pp.637-650.
16)Mohsen.A and Hashem (2007) Adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solution by
okra waste Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 2 (7), pp. 178-184.
17)Mohammed.A,Abdullah and Devi.P.A.G (2009) Kinetic and Equilibrium studies
for the Biosorption of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solutions by Potato Peel Waste
Journal of Chemical Engineering research, Vol.1 pp. 51-62.
18)Prasad.A and Satya Sagar.P (2010) Adsorption Kinetics for Zinc Removal from
Aqueous Solution by Untreated Coco Nucifara.L International Journal of
Chemical Engineering research, Vol.2, pp. 253-258.
19)Vijayaraghavan.K, Palanivelu.K and Velan.M (2005) Crab based biosorption
technology for the treatment of nickel bearing electroplating industrial effluents
Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.B119, pp. 251-254.
20)Azouaou.N,Sadaoui.Z,Djaafri.A and Mokaddem.H (2010) Adsorption of cadmium
from aqueous solution onto untreated coffee grounds: Equilibrium,kinetics and
thermodynamics Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.184, pp.126-134.
21)Gopal.M,Pakshirajan and Swaminathan.T (2002) Heavy metal removal by
Biosorption using Phanerochaete chrysosporium Applied Biochemistry and
Biotechnology, Vol. 102, pp. 227-236.
22)Lee.C.K and Low.K.S (1989) Removal of copper from solution using moss
Journal of Environmental Technology, Vol.10, pp.395-404.
23)Can.C and Jianlong.W (2007) Removal of Pb2+ , Ag+,Cs+ and Sr2+ from
aqueous solution by brewerys waste biomass Journal of Hazardous Materials,
Vol.151, pp. 65-70.
24)Sudha Bai.R and Emilia.A (2003) Studies on chromium (VI) adsorption
desorption using immobilized fungal biomass Bioresourse Technology, Vol. 87,
pp. 17-26.
25)Dumitru.B and Laura.B (2012) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of heavy metal
ions biosorption on green algae waste biomass Journal of Bioresource
Technology,Vol. 103, pp. 489-493.
26)Gupta.V.K and Rastogi.A (2007) Biosorption of lead from aqueous solutions by
green algae Spirogyra species: Kinetic and equilibrium studies Journal of
Hazardous Materials, Vol.152, pp. 407-414.
27)Mohammad.M.M.R,Parisa.R,Atefeh.A and Ali.R.K (2011) Kinetics and
equilibrium studies on biosorption of cadmium,lead, and nickel ions from
aqueous solutions by intact and chemically modified brown algae Journal of
Hazardous Materials, Vol. 185, pp. 401-407.
28)Demirbas.A (2008) Heavy metal adsorption onto agro based waste mterials: a
review Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.157, pp. 220-229.
29) Abdelwahab.O (2007) Kinetics and isotherm studies of copper (II) removal from
wastewater using various adsorbents, Egyptian Journal of Aquatic
Research,Vol.33, pp.125-143.
30)Amany.E.S,Ahmed.E.N,Azza.K and Ola.A (2007) Removal of toxic chromium
from wastewater using green alga Ulva lactuca and its activated carbon Journal
of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 148, pp.216-228.

31)Bayat.B (2002) Comparative study of adsorption properties of Turkish fly ashes:


II. The case of chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) Journal of Hazardous Materials,
Vol. 95, pp. 276-290.
32)Cetin.S and Pehlivan.E (2007) The use of fly ash as a low cost, environmentally
friendly alternative to activated carbon for the removal of heavy metals from
aqueous solutions Journal of Colloids Surfactants, Vol. 298, pp.83-87.
33)Mustafa.Y,Gode.F,Pehlivan.E,Ozmert.S and Sharma.Y.C (2008) An economic
removal of Cu 2+ and Cr3+ on the new adsorbents:Pumice and polyacrylonitrile/
pumice composite Chemical Engineering Journal,Vol.137, pp. 453-461.
34)Srinivasan.A and Viraraghavan.T (2010) Decolorization of dye wastewaters by
biosorbents: A review Journal of Environ. Manage., Vol.91, pp.1915-1929.
35)Wan.W.S.N and Hanfiah.M.A.K.M (2008) Removal of heavy metal ions from
wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review,
Bioresourse Technology, Vol. 99, pp. 3935-3948.
36)Larous.S ,Meniai.A.H and Lehocine.M.B (2005) Experimental study of the
removal of copper from aqueous solution by adsorption using sawdust
Desalination, Vol.185, pp.483-490.
37)Uysal.M and Ar.I (2007) Removal of Cr(VI) from industrial waste waters by
adsorption : partI: Determination of optimum conditions Journal of Hazardous
Materials, Vol.149, pp. 482-491.
38)Qi.B.C and Aldrich.C (2008) Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions
with tobacco dust Journal of Bioresource Technology, Vol.99, pp. 5595-5601.
39)Atalay.E,Gode.F and Sharma.Y.C (2010) Removal of selected toxic metals by a
modified adsorbent, Practice periodical of hazardous toxic and radioactive waste
management, Vol.14, pp.132-138.
40)Pollard.S.J.T,Fowler.G.D,Sollars.C.J and Perry.R (1992) Low cost adsorbents for
waste and wastewater treatment: a review Journal of Science of the total
environment, Vol.116, pp. 31-52.
41)Nasernejad.B,Zadeh.T.E,Pour.B.B,Bygi.M.E and Zamani.A (2005) Comparison
for biosorption modeling of heavy metals (Cr(III),Cu(II),Zn(II)) adsorption from
wastewater by carrot residue Journal of Process Biochemistry, Vol.40, pp. 13191322.
42)Johnson.P.D,Watson.M.A,Brown.J and Jefcoat.I.A (2002) Peanut hull pellets as
a single use sorbent for the capture of Cu(II) from wastewater Journal of Waste
Management, Vol.22, pp. 471-480.
43)Horsfall.M.J,Abia.A.A and Spiff.A.I (2006) Kinetic studies on the adsorption of
Cd2+,Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions from aqueous solutions by cassava (Manihot sculenta
cranz)tuber bark waste Journal of Bioresource Technology, Vol. 97, pp. 283-291.
44)Crisafully.R, Milhome.M.A.L, Cavalcante.R.M, Selveira.E.R, Keukeleire.D and
Nascimento.R.F (2008) Removal of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from
petrochemical wastewater using low-cost adsorbents of natural origin Journal of
Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, pp. 4515-4519.
45)Suantak.K,Chandrajit.B and Shrichand (2012) APotential of biosorbent derived
from banana peel for removal of As(III) from contaminated water International
Journal of Chemical Sciences and Applications, Vol.3, pp. 269-275.

46)Lakshmipathy.R and Sarada.N.C (2013) Application of watermelon rind as


sorbent for removal of nickel and cobalt from aqueous solution International
Journal of Mineral Processing.
47)Azouaou.N,Sadaoui.Z,Djaafri.A and Mokaddem.H (2010) Adsorption of cadmium
from aqueous solution onto untreated coffee grounds: Equilibrium, kinetics and
thermodynamics Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.184, pp.126-134.
48)Mishra.P.C and Patel.R.K (2009) Removal of lead and zinc ions from water by
low cost adsorbents Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 168, pp.319-325.
49)Venkateswarlu.P,Venkata Ratnam.M, Subha Rao.D and Venkateswara Rao.M
(2007) Removal of chromium from an aqueous solution using Azadirachta indica
(neem) leaf powder as an adsorbent International Journal of Physical
Sciences ,Vol.2 ,pp.188-195.
50)Waleska.E,Oliveira,Adriana.S,Franca,Leandro.S,Oliveira and Sonia.D.R (2008)
Untreated coffee husks as biosorbents for the removal of heavy metals from
aqueous solutions Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 152, pp. 1073-1081.
51)Ashraf.M.A,Wajid.A,Mahmood.K,Jamil.M.M and Yusoff.I (2011) Removal of
heavy metals from aqueous solution by using mango biomass African Journal of
Biotechnology, Vol.10 (11), pp. 2163-2177.
52)Murugan.T,Ganapathi,.A and Valliappan.R (2010) Removal of dyes from
aqueous solution by adsorption on biomass mango (Magifera Indica) leaves EJournal of Chemistry, Vol. 7(3), pp. 669-676.
53)Mishra.P.C and Patel.R.K (2009) Removal of lead and zinc ions from water by
low cost adsorbents Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 168, pp.319-325.
54)Iqbal, M,Saeed.A, and Zafar.S.I (2008). FTIR spectrophotometry, kinetics and
adsorption isotherm modeling, ion exchange, and EDX analysis for
understanding the mechanism of Cd2+ and Pb2+ removal by mango peel waste.
Journal of Hazardous Material, 164, 161-171.
8 Comments of Supervisor
9
10
11
12
13

14 Signature of Supervisor
Student

Signature of

15
16 Endst. No. univ/________________

Dated:_____________

17
18

The above proposal duly recommended by the Departmental board of


Studies/Committee of Post-graduate Studies in its meeting held on
__________ is forwarded to the Director of Research for obtaining the
approval of the Vice-Chancellor.

19
20
21
22

Director

23

Institute of Environmental

24

Engineering & Research


25

UET, Lahore.

You might also like