Unit 4 Impediments To Problem Solving: Structure
Unit 4 Impediments To Problem Solving: Structure
SOLVING
Theoretical Approaches to
Problem Solving
Structure
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
Introduction
Objectives
Effective Problem Solving
Other Methods for Problem Solving
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
Einstellung
Understanding the Problem
Perceptual Blocks
Emotional Blocks
Intellectual Blocks
Expressive Blocks
Environmental Blocks
Cultural Blocks
4.10 Teaching and Learning Strategies that Enhance Problem Solving Skills
4.10.1 Pedagogical Stuff
4.10.2 Promoting Transfer
4.10.3 Dialogue
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.0
Functional Fixedness
Using Complete or Incorrect Representations
Lack of Problem Specific Knowledge or Expertise
Let Us Sum Up
Unit End Questions
Suggested Readings
INTRODUCTION
You might have come across many situations when your attempts at problem
solving may have failed. This is largely because the problem space is not
adequately searched or because it is not represented well in the first place. There
are numerous factors that are influential impediments to problem solving.
Einstellung (or set or mental set) and functional fixedness are classic obstacles
to both proper representation and search identified by the Gestalt psychologists.
However, there are other impediments to problem solving also. In this chapter
we will study some of these impediments to problem solving.
41
Problem Solving
4.1
OBJECTIVES
Define probles;
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
It is the term used by the Gestaltists to describe the tendency to set the mind into
a routine approach to problem solving. When we considered Wertheimers
laboratory problems, we noted that sometimes previous experience can blind a
person to simple solutions. The experiments of Luchins (1942; Luchins &
Luchins, 1950, 1994a, 1994b) are among the most interesting demonstrations of
the way in which repeating a particular problemsolving method can make a person
blind to alternative ways of solving the problem.
42
Luchins (1942) discovered set or Einstellung effects with the water jar problems.
In this problem it is required to measure out a desired quantity of water using
three jars with different capacities. Jars used have no gradations on them so they
have to be filled up to the top to measure amounts that result in the desired
quantity.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
Goal
Problem 1
21
127
100
Problem 2
14
163
25
99
Problem 3
18
43
10
Problem 4
42
21
Problem 5
20
59
31
Problem 6
23
49
20
For instance, suppose the desired quantity was 5 cups and Jar A held 10 cups, Jar
B held 4 cups, and Jar C held 1 cup, the solution would be to fill A first. Next
from A pour into B once, and then pour from B into C once (A-B-C). Try all six
problems in above Table before proceeding.
Luchins found that problem solvers adopt a set in solving these problems. After
solving the first two or three, they automatically try the solution B-A-2C without
searching the problem space for an alternative solution. Take a look at problem
6 again. Although B-A-2C works fine, it entails much more effort than A-C. Yet
because of Einstellung, people typically overlook the obvious, easy solution.
Langer (1989) saw that Einstellung effects are one type of mindlessness that
characterises human behaviour, particularly in our dealings with other people.
All too often we act from a single perspective or rule that has worked in the past.
Instead of exploring our environment carefully to seek out alternative courses of
action, we sample just enough features to recognise that our set approach seems
to be on track.
Einstellung also constrains how we represent problems as well as how we search
them.
Self Assessment Questions
1)
Problem Solving
2)
3)
4)
4.3.2
1) Interpretation
Develop a relatively clearer understanding of the problem before attempting
to solve it.
Devote more time and effort to the initial formulation of ill structured
problems.
Look at the immediate problem in its relation to the broader mission and
problems of the organisation.
2) Goals
Adopt a broader range of goals for problem solving
When solving problems in groups, have less personal stake in any
preconceived solution. Because their aim is to arrive at the best solution the
group can produce.
4.4
The problem solver must adequately anticipate many of the constraints likely to
arise during problem solving.
44
They must show a greater tendency to plan, in advance, for how to address
anticipated constraints.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
They must respond more adaptively and flexibly to constraints that arise
unexpectedly.
They should not view the constraints as major impediments to problem solving.
4.4.1
Develop an explicit plan for solving the problem, which often includes many
steps.
Monitor progress with the plan and refine it when outcomes are not
satisfactory.
4.5
45
Problem Solving
2)
What are the ways in which the constraints in regard to problem solving
could be overcome?
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
3)
4)
4.6
Let us first consider what is required for productive problem solving. The
following provides the requirements
A clear description of the problem.
A description of the limiting (or negative) factors involved in the problem.
A description of the constructive (or positive) factors involved in the problem.
46
Impediments to Problem
Solving
A clear description of the scope of the problem: How extensive a problem is it?
How long has this problem existed? How many people are affected? What else
is affected by this problem?
A clear description of the consequences if the problem were not solved: What is
the possible impact on my family, job, marriage, school performance, life in this
community, etc., if this problem isnt solved? What is the worst possible thing
that could happen if this problem isnt solved?
A list of brainstormed solutions to the problem, with each alternative analysed
as to its reality, its benefits and the consequences for following each one.
A system of ranking each solution to finalise the decision-making process. A
rating system for analysing each solution is developed, e.g., 100 percent chance
of success, 75 percent chance of success, 50 percent chance of success.
It is always ideal to brainstorm the problem and to do this one should follow the
rules given below:
1) Express all ideas.
2) Deem no idea too wild to be considered.
3) Quantity is important; every idea that comes to mind should be included.
4) Getting together with others to brainstorm is desirable.
5) Criticism or negative evaluation regarding any idea is forbidden until
brainstorming is completed.
Some of the questions one should ask of oneself in order to achieve effective
problem solving are:
Am I procrastinating?
Am I in denial?
4.6.1
47
Problem Solving
Believing that ones emotions and feelings about a problem are wrong
and should be discounted in problem solving.
Resentment about having to solve the problem and blaming others for causing
the Problem.
Believing that problems are the concerns of others, why waste time in trying
to solving them.
Mental and/or physical fatigue from trying to cope with problems and finding
no fruitful solutions.
Getting so angry about the problem that all energy and attention is drawn to
the anger rather than to the problem.
Feeling sorry for oneself so much that the self-pity overwhelms and
obstructs all creative thinking on the matter.
2)
What are the essential pre requisites for productive problem solving?
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
48
3)
Impediments to Problem
Solving
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
4)
4.7
There are many things that make a group or team fail to solve a problem. Some
of the barriers in this regard include the following:
1) Lack of structure.
When there is no structure group members lose focus and direction.
2) Poor communication.
This is a barrier that can wreak havoc for every group member that is involved.
Poor communication can lead to misunderstanding of the problem. Further
poor communication itself can be caused by inattentiveness and dominance
that can be made by one or more group members. Ineffective communication
will definitely be a negative against any discussion or meeting.
3) No communication
This would be a problem solving killer.
4) Negative attitude
This is a barrier to problem solving in small groups. If members are not
flexible and open minded during a discussion or meeting, then a balanced
opinion can not be produced.
5) No goal or agenda
When having a team or small group meet for problem solving, it is very
important to have a goal or agenda. This in turn will help to avoid most
barriers and keep the group focused and organised.
6) Lack of participation
It is important in a small group or team every member should participate in
the problem solving process. They must all have clear idea as to what the
49
Problem Solving
group is trying to achieve and give all members time to participate and give
their views and feelings. This path, in the end, will help to keep focus,
structure, and communication open for all members.
In addition to the above other problems that may affect the problem solving
processes are:
Emotions
Learning styles
Gender
Cognitive barriers
4.8
It is a wholly negative process it tears down ideas and puts nothing in their
place
Irrelevant reason.
50
2)
Impediments to Problem
Solving
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
3)
4)
4.9
Problem Solving
4.9.2
Emotional Blocks
Emotional blocks exist when we perceive a threat to our emotional needs. These
needs differ in type and strength from person to person but include needs for
achievement, recognition, order, belonging and self-esteem. The emotional blocks
include:
a) Fear of making mistakes or looking foolish
This is the most significant emotional block because it affects most of us and is
difficult to overcome. As a result of traditional schooling, the expected reaction
when we make a mistake or suggest radically different ideas is laughter and
ridicule. No one likes being laughed at and as a result we learn to fear making
mistakes and to avoid suggesting ideas which are different. This block becomes
more severe in the presence of colleagues of a different rank to our own. With
those who are more senior we imagine that we will be thought inexperienced or
immature. With those more junior we want to protect our image as being
knowledgeable and experienced.
b) Impatience
Being impatient to solve a problem may be due either to a desire to succeed
quickly or to end the discomfort or loss caused by the problem. This has two
major consequences. We tend to grab the first solution which comes along, without
adequate analysis of the problem, and we evaluate ideas. too fast, almost
instinctively rejecting unusual ideas. Either way, our solution is unlikely to be
the most effective available.
c) Avoiding anxiety
52
This is another common block. Some of- us are more susceptible to anxiety and
also find it more unpleasant than others. Many factors can cause anxiety, including
high risk, disorder and ambiguity, long-term stress, and fear for our security. The
effects on problem solving include avoiding risks, indecision in situations which
are not black and white, excessive reliance on others judgement, and avoiding
challenging the status quo.
.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
This leads to the avoidance of situations where the outcome is uncertain or could
be unpleasant. A major cause is our desire for security. The consequences include
setting objectives within easy reach, so that there is no risk of failure, and accepting
known solutions in preference to the unusual because their value is certain. A
liking for taking risks and over-confidence in being able to avoid unpleasant,
consequences are more dangerous blocks.
e)
This is related to avoiding anxiety. It can lead to an inability to cope with the
frustration of situations which are not clear cut or where ambiguities exist.
f)
Lack of challenge
This may arise when the problem is routine or the benefits/losses are not
significant to us. The result is that either we dont tackle the problem or we take
the easiest, quickest route to solution.
4.9.3
Intellectual Blocks
Intellectual blocks exist when we dont have the necessary thinking skills to find
a successful solution, or are unable to use them effectively. They include:
a)
This is one of the most common blocks. It includes: inadequate skills in analytical
and creative thinking; an inflexible strategy, using one approach for every type
of problem; the inability to use the various problem solving techniques. They
can all lead to ineffective solutions.
b) Lack of creative thinking
This is always caused by an inability to use the skills rather than their absence,
resulting from the dominance of analytical thinking in our day-to-day lives and
a lack of practice.
c)
Inflexible thinking
This is a difficulty in switching from one type of thinking skill to another, such
as from analysis to idea generation or from verbal to visual thinking.
d) Not being methodical
This is perhaps the most common block. A step-by-step approach is essential to
solving problems effectively.
e) Lack of knowledge or skill in using the Language of the problem
If a problem involves a language that we cannot understand or cannot use, such
as specialist jargon or statistical analysis, we will not be able to tackle the problem
effectively. Similarly, we may use an inappropriate language, such as trying to
find an error in accounts by describing the situation verbally rather than analysing
it mathematically.
f) Using inadequate information
This happens when we do not make sufficient effort to collect the relevant
information, or do not understand what information is relevant, where to find it,
53
Problem Solving
or how it relates to the problem. Similarly, using inaccurate information can lead
us to the wrong conclusions.
4.9.4
Expressive Blocks
Expressive blocks arise when we are unable to communicate in the way required
to produce an effective solution, e.g. not being able to express our ideas effectively
to those who have to implement the solution.
.
Expressive blocks exist when we do not have the knowledge or skills necessary
to communicate or record ideas in the ways required. They are caused by an
inability to use languages effectively, such as words, drawings, mathematics,
scientific symbols, and so on. They include:
a) Using the wrong language
Some problems are more effectively solved or communicated using one language
rather than another. For example, we are unlikely to get very far if we record data
only verbally when the problem requires quantitative analysis. Similarly, people
may find it hard to grasp our meaning if we try to explain our feelings about a
situation using mathematics instead of words.
b) Unfamiliarity with a particular application of a language
The most obvious example is the difficulty many people have making a speech,
even though they can write their ideas effectively on paper.
Inadequate explanations
These can result from a real lack of information about what you are trying to
convey, or from assuming that your audience already has some of the information
when, they dont.
c) A passive management style
A situation where we are reluctant to or find it difficult to exert influence may
prevent us communicating our ideas effectively. This is particularly important
when people need to be convinced of the validity of ideas.
d) A dominant management style
This is when we exert oppressive control, either deliberately or unconsciously,
and can make those we are communicating with automatically reluctant to accept
what we say or hostile to our ideas.
4.9.5
Environmental Blocks
Management style
The way in which we are managed can influence both our attitude to problem
solving and the freedom we have to create and implement ideas. For example, if
54
our ideas are dismissed constantly with comments such as No, it wouldnt work
because ..., or No, weve tried it before and it didnt work, we soon give up
trying.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
ii) Distractions
Due to excessive noise and interruptions, these affect some people more than
others, but in general they have a detrimental effect on problem solving.
iii) Physical discomfort
This can create a distraction as well as resulting in stress or lethargy depending
on the circumstances. For example, poorly designed chairs may create a distraction
by giving us backache which, in turn, can make us irritable and less interested in
any type of work.
iv) Lack of support
This comes in many forms. For example, we may need specialist information,
advice, skills or other resources, or authority to take action. A more pervasive
aspect of this block is a lack of encouragement and the necessary organisational
structure to support and exploit peoples ideas.
v) Stress
Stress due to pressure of work and deadlines, affects people differently. For those
who are susceptible to stress it can be a powerful block, hindering creative thinking
in particular.
vi) Lack of communication
This has a number of effects, including inability to get the information you require
and a lack of encouragement.
vii) Monotonous work
This can dull enthusiasm for solving problems and put us onto automatic pilot,
making us blind to problems when they occur.
viii) Expectations of others
These can influence both our general performance in problem solving and the
objectives we set ourselves. For example, if our peers and superiors are happy
with a regular solution to a problem we may feel that its a waste of time looking
for a new; more effective solution. On the other hand, if we are expected to find
an innovative solution we are likely to make a greater effort.
4.9.6
Cultural Blocks
Cultural blocks result from our conditioning to accept what is expected or normal
in a given situation, e.g. when the work ethic says that we must be seriousminded, but finding an effective solution requires some playful fantasy.
Cultural blocks exist when our problem solving is hindrance by accepting that
some things are good or right and are done, while others are bad or wrong and
are not done, So that we become bound by custom. They include:
55
Problem Solving
Taboos
Some actions and ideas are excluded from problem solving because they are
regarded as distasteful, or are harmful, or contravene accepted moral codes. For
example, in a test of creativity a group of students were given a problem to solve
using calculus. They had to follow certain rules and the objective was to see who
produced the largest number of different routes to the correct solution. A few
students produced a lot more than the others because they chose to break the
rules they were told to follow.
Although eventually we may not decide to break a taboo, there is no harm in
breaking them in thought. This can often lead to new perspectives on a problem.
56
Impediments to Problem
Solving
2)
3)
4)
5)
57
Problem Solving
Other barriers
Learning styles: Other barriers to problem solving include Learning styles or
how persons learn to solve problems. Some people learn primarily visually,
others aurally; some learn step-by-step, others employ an all-or-nothing process;
some cogitate on a problem introspectively, while others find they work problems
best when they can discuss them.
There is also evidence that some thinking styles that affect the ability to solve
problems are gender-linked. For instance it has been found that females organise
and relate data more efficiently than males.
Cognitive barriers: to mastering problem-solving is another important factor.
The primary difficulty is the inability to identify and use concepts and procedures
in analogous but novel situations.
The lack of transfer of structure: between problems is a significant cognitive
difficulty, not only for inexperienced problem-solvers but also for experts.
Successful transfer rests on the ability to recognise analogies, but even when
given an analogy, students often fail to see how to employ it.
A lack of transfer skills: is frequently marked by functional fixedness, the
perception that a particular object or concept has only one use. Another problem
is superficial transference, where persons identify and link words or variables
between problems instead of linking deeper, more meaningful structures.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
4.10.3 Dialogue
This can also be useful in promoting transfer by highlighting the differences
between the problem-solving techniques used by experts and novices. In order
to solve a problem, both experts and novices do follow the same pattern, that is,
they read and analyse, plan a strategy, act on that strategy to produce a solution,
and then try to verify it.
Encouraging people to talk through the differences between problems that have
similar superficial structures but different deep structures decreases the risk of
incorrect transfer.
Having students work on numerous problems individually and in groups also
facilitates transfer.
Choosing problems which evolve from simple and well-defined to complex and
ill-defined will help people to develop transfer skills.
To develop better problem-solvers, persons should be helped to overcome both
emotional and cognitive barriers to learning effective problem-solving skills.
By first creating a comfortable environment and helping people to overcome
their fears and anxieties related to problem-solving, one lays the necessary
foundation for successful learning.
59
Problem Solving
Discuss the other barriers related to the person that affect the problem
solving adversely.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
2)
3)
4)
60
Duncker in his experiment led an individual into a room with a table holding
several small objects. They included three cardboard boxes filled with candles,
tacks and matches, respectively and an ashtray, paper, paper clips, string, pencils,
and tinfoil. The individual was instructed to mount the candles at eye level on
the wall, ostensibly to prepare the room for a vision experiment. Can you think
of a way to put the candles on the wall using these materials?
Impediments to Problem
Solving
Duncker found that only 43% of his participants could develop a solution to the
problem. He hypothesised that they fixated on the common function of a box,
namely, to serve as a container.
To help break their functional fixedness, he repeated the experiment but this
time emptied the candles, tacks, and matches on the table, leaving the boxes
empty. Under these circumstances, all participants solved the problem by first
mounting the boxes on the wall using the tacks, which then served as platforms
for the candles.
Here is another example of functional fixedness, called the coin problem (Simmel,
1953). Suppose you have eight coins and a balance. One of the coins is a
counterfeit coin and therefore lighter than the others. The problem is to find the
counterfeit coin by using the balance only twice?
Most people initially think of dividing the coins into two groups of four coins
each. One of the groups of four will be lighter and so must contain the counterfeit
coin. Then you can take the four coins from that group, and weigh them two
against two. Of course, one of the groups of two will be lighter. However, you
cannot determine which of the two remaining coins is counterfeit, because you
have already used the balance twice.
Before we consider how to approach this problem correctly, let us analyse the
previous solution attempt. Why do we initially divide the coins into two groups
of four? One reason is that we know that eight things can be evenly divided into
two groups of four. One of the functions of the number eight is that it can be so
divided.
The fact that 4 + 4 = 8 is a highly available bit of knowledge for us. Because this
property of the number eight is so available, it is the first thing we think of. In
fact, when people try to solve this problem, they often keep coming back to the
four versus four divisions. When the obvious way of using things keeps us from
seeing the correct way of using them, then we are functionally fixed.
In Simmels coin problem, the solution is often very difficult to see. You need to
divide the coins in a way that is far from obvious at first. Suppose you divide
them into three groups of three, three and two coins. Then weigh three versus
three. If they balance, then the counterfeit coin must be in the group of two
coins. Your second weighing, then, is to take the group of two coins, and weigh
one versus one. Alternatively, suppose on your first weighing one group of three
coins is lighter: Then on your second weighing, take any two of the three coins
and weigh one against the other. If they balance, then the third (unweighed) coin
must be the counterfeit one. If they do not balance, then lighter one is counterfeit.
This procedure is guaranteed to find the solution. However, it is much more
complex and unfamiliar than the wrong procedure.
61
Problem Solving
62
Notice that, depicted this way, the difficult numbers game is actually the game
of tic tac toe in disguise. Represented this way the game is easy but without this
representation the problem is much harder to solve.
Impediments to Problem
Solving
2)
3)
4)
Problem Solving
64
4.15
Impediments to Problem
Solving
1) What is a mental set? Think of the few problem situations where you think
your mental set hampered effective problem solving.
2) Describe some novice expert differences in problem solving.
3) Critically evaluate the concept of functional fixedness.
4) Compare and contrast with the help of examples the concept of Einstellung
with the concept of functional fixedness.
5) How does lack of problem specific knowledge or experience affect problem
solving?
65