JP GAAP Vs IFRS

www.pwc.
com/jp/ifrs
Similarities and
Differences
A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP
2014
April 2014
Contents
Preface ........................................................................................................ 2
How to use this publication ....................................................................... 3
First-time adoption .................................................................................... 5
Revenue recognition .................................................................................. 9
Expense recognitionshare-based payments ........................................ 23
Expense recognitionemployee benefits ................................................ 31
Assetsnonfinancial assets .................................................................... 41
Assetsfinancial assets ........................................................................... 63
Derivatives and hedge accounting .......................................................... 89
Liabilitiestaxes .................................................................................... 113
Liabilitiesother .................................................................................... 119
Financial liabilities and equity .............................................................. 127
Consolidation ......................................................................................... 137
Business combinations ........................................................................... 151
Other accounting and reporting topics .................................................. 157
Index ...................................................................................................... 169
PwC
Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014
Preface
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is rapidly advancing its global position from a set of accounting
standards used by investment markets in specific geographic areas such as Europe, to one now used commonly in more than
100 countries and territories around the world. Awareness is heightening especially in Asian and Oceanian territories. These
territories have gained a prominent position in the eyes of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) along with
the economic growth in these areas.
In Japan, based on the Tokyo Agreement between the Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ) and the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) signed in August 2007, convergence between Accounting Principles Generally Accepted
in Japan (JP GAAP) and IFRS is under progress. Voluntary application of IFRS started from the fiscal year ended in March
2010. As of the fiscal year ended in March 2014, 25 listed companies have adopted IFRS in Japan.
In addition, as a result of deliberation on various aspects of the use of IFRS, the Business Accounting Council of Japan issued
Report of the Business Accounting Council on the use of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Japan.
The report indicates its policies on issues such as relaxing requirements for voluntary adoption of IFRS, the introduction of
an endorsement process, and specific countermeasures are underway by its members with knowledge and experiences of
corporate accounting from various industries. In particular, the relaxation of requirements for voluntary adoption
significantly expanded the scope of entities which are able to adopt IFRS.
Furthermore, the Asia-Oceania liaison office of the IFRS Foundation that opened in November 2012 in Tokyo is utilized as a
venue for roundtables hosted by the IASB and outreach activities with a variety of stakeholders. The office is expected to
enhance its function as a regional hub to facilitate IASBs support activities for IFRS adoption, studies and factual research.
Hence Japans approach to IFRS assumes an important role in helping both the global activities of Japanese companies as
well as use of IFRS in the Asia-Oceania region.
In light of this trend, the number of entities that voluntarily adopt IFRS will increase as they take account of global business
activities and strategies or mid and long term business plans. Therefore, IFRS is expected to become more and more relevant
not only to practitioners and experts in Japanese accounting and finance but also to the management and investors of
Japanese companies.
Under these circumstances, this publication focuses on and explains the major differences among IFRS and JP GAAP. This
publication does not address all the differences between these standards. However it explains the differences we consider
specifically important. We hope that this publication will be useful in identifying the key differences between the two
standards and help you gain a broad understanding of IFRS.
Hiroyuki Suzuki
Territory Senior Partner
PwC Japan
Note: PwC Japan refers to the member firms in Japan of the PwC global network and their affiliates. Each member firm conducts its activities as an
independent legal entity for which the PwC Japan Territory Senior Partner plays a coordinating role.
PwC
How to use this publication

In each chapter, the first section provides a summary of the similarities and differences between IFRS and JP GAAP. It refers
to the subsequent section of the document where key differences are highlighted and explained in more detail. In addition,
the Recent developments at the last section of each chapter provide the overview of the new standards and exposure drafts.
No summary publication can do justice to the many differences of detail that exist among IFRS and JP GAAP. This
publication focuses on the accounting most commonly found in practice. When using this publication, readers should consult
all the relevant accounting standards and, where applicable, their national law. Listed companies should also follow relevant
securities regulations for example, requirements regulated by the Financial Services Agency in Japan or the US SEC and
local stock exchange listing rules.
This publication takes account of authoritative pronouncements and other developments under IFRS and JP GAAP up to
December 2013. However, it is not all encompassing. We have noted certain recent developments or exposure drafts within
the detailed text; however, not all recent developments or exposure drafts have been included.
PwC
PwC
IFRS first-time adoption

IFRS 1, First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, is the standard that is applied during
preparation of a companys first IFRS-based financial statements. IFRS 1 was created to help companies transition to IFRS
and provides practical accommodations intended to make first-time adoption cost-effective. It also provides application
guidance for addressing difficult conversion topics.
What does IFRS 1 require?

The key principle of IFRS 1 is full retrospective application of all IFRS standards that are effective at the end of reporting
period of the first IFRS financial statements. IFRS 1 requires companies to:
Identify the first IFRS financial statements
Prepare an opening statement of financial position at the date of transition to IFRS
Select accounting policies that comply with IFRS effective at the end of the first IFRS reporting period and apply those
policies retrospectively to all periods presented in the first IFRS financial statements
Consider whether to apply any of the optional exemptions from retrospective application
Apply the mandatory exceptions from retrospective application
Make extensive disclosures to explain the transition to IFRS
IFRS 1 is regularly updated to address first-time adoption issues. There are optional exemptions (IFRS 1.18, Appendix C and
Appendix D) to ease the burden of retrospective application. These exemptions are available to all first-time adopters,
regardless of their date of transition. Additionally, the standard provides for short-term exemptions (IFRS 1.18, Appendix E),
which are temporarily available to preparers and often address transition issues related to new standards. There are also
certain mandatory exceptions (IFRS 1.14-17, Appendix B) for which retrospective application is not permitted.
As referenced above, the exemptions provide limited relief for first-time adopters, mainly in areas where the information
needed to apply IFRS retrospectively might be particularly challenging to obtain. There are, however, few exemptions from
the disclosure requirements of IFRS, and companies may experience challenges in collecting new information and data for
many retrospective footnote disclosures.
Many companies will need to make changes to existing accounting policies to comply with IFRS, including in key areas such
as revenue recognition, inventory accounting, financial instruments and hedging, employee benefit plans, impairment testing,
provisions, and stock-based compensation.
When to apply IFRS 1

Companies will apply IFRS 1 when they transition from their previous generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to
IFRS and prepare their first IFRS financial statements. These are the first financial statements to contain an explicit and
unreserved statement of compliance with IFRS.
PwC
The opening IFRS statement of financial position

The opening IFRS statement of financial position is the starting point for all subsequent accounting under IFRS and is
prepared at the date of transition, which is the beginning of the earliest period for which full comparative information is
presented in accordance with IFRS. For example, preparing IFRS financial statements for the two years ending March 31,
2015, would have a transition date of April 1, 2013. That would also be the date of the opening IFRS statement of financial
position.
IFRS 1 requires that the opening IFRS statement of financial position:
Include all of the assets and liabilities that IFRS requires
Exclude any assets and liabilities that IFRS does not permit
Classify all assets, liabilities, and equity in accordance with IFRS
Measure all items in accordance with IFRS
Be prepared and presented within an entitys first IFRS financial statements
These general principles are followed unless one of the optional exemptions or mandatory exceptions does not require or
permit recognition, classification, and measurement in line with the above.
Important takeaways
The transition to IFRS can be a long and complicated process with many technical and accounting challenges to consider.
Experience with conversions in Europe and Asia indicates that Japanese companies may face some challenges in making the
change to IFRS, including:
Consideration of data gaps Preparation of the opening IFRS statement of financial position may require the calculation or
collection of information that was not previously required under JP GAAP. Companies should plan their transition and
identify the differences between IFRS and JP GAAP early so that all of the information required can be collected and verified
on a timely basis.
Consolidation of additional entities IFRS consolidation principles differ in part from those of JP GAAP, and those
differences might cause some companies to consolidate entities that were not consolidated under JP GAAP. Companies also
will have to consider the data to be collected from investees to comply with IFRS informational and disclosure requirements.
Consideration of accounting policy A number of IFRS standards allow companies to choose between alternative policies.
Companies should select carefully the accounting policies to be applied to the opening statement of financial position and
have a full understanding of the implications to current and future periods. Companies should take this opportunity to
evaluate their IFRS accounting policies with a clean sheet of paper mind-set. Companies should consider the opportunity to
explore alternative IFRS accounting policies that might better reflect the economic substance of their transactions and
enhance their communications with investors.
PwC
Recent developments
Recent releasesIFRS
Annual Improvements 2011-13 cycle
In December 2013, the IASB published the final standard for the 2011-13 cycle of the annual improvements project.
The basis for conclusions on IFRS 1 is amended to clarify that, where a new version of a standard is not yet mandatory but
is available for early adoption; a first-time adopter can use either the old or the new version, provided the same standard is
applied in all periods presented.
Recent proposalsIFRS
In April 2013, the IASB issued an exposure draft (ED) Regulatory Deferral Accounts.
The proposals are only applicable to entities that apply IFRS 1 as a first-time adopter of IFRS and meet certain criteria. The
ED proposes that such entities can continue to apply their previous GAAP accounting policies for the recognition,
measurement and impairment of regulatory deferral accounts when IFRS is adopted. The ED proposes additional
presentation and disclosure requirements.
There is currently no standard that specifically addresses rate-regulated activities. The objective of the interim standard is
to allow entities adopting IFRS to avoid major changes in accounting policy until completion of the IASB project to develop
an IFRS on rate-regulated activities.
Note: In January 2014, the IASB has subsequently issued IFRS 14, Regulatory Deferral Accounts, an interim standard on
the accounting for certain balances that arise from rate-regulated activities (regulatory deferral accounts). IFRS 14 is
effective from 1 January 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
PwC
Revenue recognition
Revenue recognition
Income is defined in the IASBs Conceptual Framework as encompassing both revenue and gains. IFRS defines revenue as
the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of ordinary activities of an entity when those
inflows result in increases in equity, other than increases relating to contributions from equity participants. The standard
provides comprehensive guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue. In addition, revenue is
categorised as (1) the sale of goods, (2) the rendering of services, (3) the use by others of entity assets (including interest,
royalties and dividends) and (4) construction contracts, and is recognised only when specific criteria for each category are
met. The revenue recognition criteria common to each of these categories are the probability that the economic benefits
associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and that the revenue and costs can be measured reliably. Under IFRS
there is guidance for revenue in IAS 18, Revenue, IAS 11, Construction Contracts and four other interpretations, and as IFRS
contains minimal industry-specific guidance, in general, the principles-based approach is applied across all entities and
industries. There is also specific guidance in IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government
Assistance.
On the other hand, under JP GAAP Business Accounting Principles, revenue is recognised upon the sale of goods or
rendering of services based on the Realisation principle and revenue is recognised on a realisation basis. Although there is
specific guidance for software transactions and construction contracts under this principle, there is no general comprehensive
guidance for revenue. According to the Statement of opinion for adjustments between tax law and Business Accounting
Principles published by the subcommittee of Business Accounting Council of Economic Stabilisation Board in 1952, it is
interpreted that completion of transfer of goods or rendering of services and receipt for corresponding consideration (e.g.
in the form of cash or receivables) are criteria for revenue recognition. In addition, the Discussion Paper, Conceptual
Framework of Financial Accounting, published by the ASBJ in 2006 defines revenue as items that result in increases in net
income or minority interests share in earnings, and represents the portion of the amount corresponding to increases in assets
or decreases in liabilities that have occurred as at the end of a particular period and where there is no further investment risk.
The FASB and the IASB jointly released a second exposure draft, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in November,
2011. The proposed model follows the model proposed in the original exposure draft released in June, 2010 by the boards,
and the impact of the new revenue recognition guidance is expected to be significant. As the project addresses revenue arising
from all contracts with customers, except those within the scope of other standards, a wide range of industries and
transactions might be affected extensively. Refer to further discussions in the Recent developments section at the end of this
chapter.
Further details on the foregoing and other selected current differences are described in the following table.
10
PwC
Revenue recognition
Standard
IAS 11
Issue
Revenue recognition
method of construction
contracts
IFRS
JP GAAP
When the outcome of the construction

contract can be estimated reliably, the
percentage-of-completion method is applied.
If the certainty of the outcome of the

construction contracts (the total amount of
construction revenue, total amount of
construction costs and the percentage of
completion for the portion progressed at the
closing date) can be confirmed, the
percentage-of-completion method is applied.
If the above criterion is not met, the
completed contract method is applied.
When the outcome of the construction

contract cannot be estimated reliably,
revenue is only recognised to the extent of
the contract costs incurred that are expected
to be recovered and the rest of the contract
costs are recognised as an expense in the
period in which they are incurred. The
completed contract method is prohibited.
(IAS 11. 22, 32)
IAS 11
Subsequent measurement
of construction contract
revenue when the outcome
of the construction contract
cannot be estimated reliably
When the uncertainties that prevented the

outcome of the contract being estimated
reliably no longer exist, the percentage-of
-completion method is applied.
(IAS 11. 35)
IAS 17
IAS 18
Accounting by an
intermediate lessor when
both the head lease and the
sub-lease are finance leases
There are no specific requirements. Revenue

of an intermediate lessor is accounted for
individually based on the requirements of a
principal and an agent in IAS 18.
(IAS 18. 8)
IAS 18
Accounting for transactions

of trading firms (gross/net)
Depending on whether an entity is acting as a

principal or an agent, revenue is presented
gross or net.
The method cannot be changed from the

completion method to the percentage of
completion method only because the
uncertainties that prevent estimating the
outcome reliably no longer exist.
When the undecided items in the
construction arrangement which is supposed
to be determined at the commencement of
the construction work is subsequently
determined, a change in the measurement
method is required.
Interests paid, sales, cost of sales and other
items are not recorded and the difference
between the lease payment received as a
lessor and lease payment paid as a lessee is
allocated to each period and presented as a
separate line item as the sub lease profit
margin in the income statement.
There are no specific requirements.
Acting as a principal: gross

Acting as an agent: net
Indicators that an entity is a principal
include the following:
The entity has the primary responsibility
for providing the goods or services.
The entity has inventory risk.
The entity has latitude in establishing
prices.
The entity bears the customers credit risk.
(IAS 18. 8, IE21)
PwC
11
Standard
IAS 18
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for consignment

sales in intermediaries such
as department stores and
supermarkets (gross/net)

gross or net.
JP GAAP

prices.
(IAS 18. 8, IE21)
IAS 18
Accounting for indirect taxes

(including excise tax for
liquor, gasoline and
tobacco) (gross/net)

gross or net.
For some indirect taxes (including excise tax

for gasoline and liquor) revenue is presented
at gross but there are no specific
requirements.
Accounting for consumption taxes (Interim
Report) deals with the accounting of
consumption taxes.

prices.
(IAS 18. 8, IE21)
IAS 18
Accounting for sales

incentives
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the

consideration received or receivable taking
into account the amount of any trade
discounts and volume rebates. Sales
incentives are deducted from revenue.
There are no specific requirements. In

practice, sales incentives may be deducted
from revenue or expensed as selling, general
and administrative expenses.
(IAS 18. 9, 10)
12
PwC
Revenue recognition
Standard
IAS 18
Issue
Accounting for cash rebates
IFRS
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the
consideration received or receivable (taking
into account the amount of any discounts
and volume rebates). Cash rebates are
deducted from revenue.
JP GAAP
Cash rebates are accounted for as
non-operating expenses.
(IAS 18. 9, 10)

IAS 18
Accounting for consideration

that is collected over a long
time (more than one year)
When the arrangement effectively constitutes

a financing transaction, the fair value of the
consideration is determined by discounting
all future receipts using an imputed rate of
interest. The difference between the fair
value and the nominal amount of the
consideration is recognised as interest
revenue in accordance with the effective
interest method.
(IAS 18. 11)

IAS 18
Accounting for instalment

sale transactions
When the arrangement effectively constitutes

a financing transaction, the fair value of the
consideration is determined by discounting
all future receipts using an imputed rate of
interest. The difference between the fair
value and the nominal amount of the
consideration is recognised as interest
revenue in accordance with the effective
interest method.

principle, revenue is recognised when goods
are delivered. However, it is permitted to
recognise revenue for instalment sales
transactions when cash is collected or when
payment is due.
(IAS 18. 11, IE8)

IAS 18
Accounting for exchange

transactions
When goods or services are exchanged for

goods or services which are of a similar
nature and value, the exchange is not
regarded as a transaction which generates
revenue. On the other hand, when goods are
sold or services are rendered in exchange for
dissimilar goods or services, the exchange is
regarded as a transaction which generates
revenue. The revenue is measured at the fair
value of the goods or services received,
adjusted by the amount of any cash or cash
equivalents transferred.
There are no specific requirements for

exchange transactions.
(IAS 18. 12)

IAS 18
Accounting for
multiple-element
arrangements
It is necessary to apply the recognition

criteria to the separately identifiable
components of a single transaction in order
to reflect the substance of the transaction. In
addition, the recognition criteria are applied
to two or more transactions together when
they are linked in such a way that the
commercial effect cannot be understood
without reference to the series of
transactions as a whole.
There is no general guidance on

multiple-element arrangements, but for such
transactions related to software, the entity is
required to allocate the transaction price to
separate components of a transaction
appropriately and recognise revenue.
(IAS 18. 13, IFRIC 13. 5)
PwC
13
Standard
IAS 18
Issue
Timing of revenue
recognition for sale of goods
(including export
transactions)
IFRS
Revenue should be recognised when all the
following criteria are met.
The entity has transferred to the buyer the
significant risks and rewards of ownership
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements. Revenue
is recognised in accordance with the
Realisation principle.
The entity does not retain continuing

managerial involvement
The amount of revenue can be measured
reliably
It is probable that the economic benefits
will flow to the entity
The costs incurred can be measured
reliably
(IAS 18. 14)
IAS 18
Timing of revenue
recognition for transactions
with a probability of return
Revenue should be recognised when all the

following criteria are met.
The entity has transferred the significant
risks and rewards of ownership
The entity does not retain continuing
managerial involvement
The amount of revenue can be measured
reliably
In Note 18 of Business Accounting

Principles, an allowance for sales return is
provided but there are no specific
requirements. Allowances are recognised
based on its general principles.
In practice, the amount of gross margins for
returns on and after the end of reporting
periods is commonly recognised as an
allowance.
It is probable that the economic benefits

will flow to the entity
The costs incurred can be measured
reliably
When an entity assesses the probability of
return, the entity should consider that the
entity has transferred the significant risks
and rewards of ownership as stated above. If
the entity retains only insignificant risks of
ownership, revenue is recognised at the time
of sale provided the seller recognises a
liability for returns.
(IAS 18. 14, 16(d), 17)
IAS 18
Revenue recognition
method for the rendering of
services
When the outcome of a transaction can be

estimated reliably, revenue associated with
the transaction is recognised by reference to
the stage of completion of the transaction.
(IAS 18. 20)
14
There are no specific requirements. If the

certainty of outcome for the portion
progressed of a construction contract can be
confirmed, the percentage-of-completion
method is applied.
PwC
Revenue recognition
Standard
IAS 18
IAS 10
IFRIC 17
Issue
Dividends
IFRS
Dividends should be recognised when the
shareholders right to receive payment is
established.
(IAS 18. 30(c)) (IAS 10. 12, 13)
(IFRIC 17. BC18-BC20)
IAS 18
Accounting for bill and hold

sales
Revenue is recognised when the buyer takes

title, provided:
JP GAAP
For shares with a market price, the accrued
dividend is recognised on ex-dividend date
and if there is a difference between the
estimated and the actual dividend paid, the
difference is adjusted in the accounting
period in which it arises. It is also acceptable
for an issuer to account for dividends with
the same procedures as for shares which do
not have market prices. Such accounting
treatment is to recognise a dividend in the
accounting period in which a resolution to
pay the dividend is made by the decision
making body such as a general meeting of the
shareholders, and apply it consistently.
It is probable that delivery will be made

The item is identified and ready for
delivery to the buyer
The buyer specifically acknowledges the
instructions
The usual payment terms apply
(IAS 18. IE1)
IAS 18
Timing of revenue
recognition for a transaction
subject to installation and
inspection
If installation and inspection are important

components of a sales transaction, revenue is
recognised when the installation and
inspection are complete.
(IAS 18. IE2(a))

IAS 18
Timing of revenue
recognition for goods on
approval
If there is uncertainty about the possibility of

return, revenue is recognised when the
shipment has been formally accepted by the
buyer or the goods have been delivered and
the time period for rejection has elapsed.
Revenue is recognised when a customer

makes his intention clear to buy the
shipment.
(IAS 18. IE2(b))

IAS 18
Timing of revenue
recognition on consignment
sales
Revenue is recognised by the shipper when

the goods are sold by the recipient to a third
party.
(IAS 18. IE2(c))
PwC
In principle, similar to IFRS. However if a

sales statement is always sent from the
recipient to the shipper, the shipper can
recognise revenue when the shipper gets the
sales statement.
15
Standard
IAS 18
Issue
Accounting for a sale and
repurchase agreement
IFRS
When the seller agrees to repurchase the
same goods at a later date, or when the seller
has a call option to repurchase, or the buyer
has a put option to require the repurchase of
the goods by the seller and the seller retains
the risks and rewards of ownership, revenue
is not recognised. The seller has to analyse
the terms of the contract and consider
accounting for it as a financing arrangement.
JP GAAP
(IAS 18. IE5)

IAS 18
Accounting for sales to

intermediate parties
When the buyer is acting, in substance, as an

agent, the sale is treated as a consignment
sale.
(IAS 18. IE6)

IAS 18
Accounting for installation

fees
Installation fees are recognised as revenue by

reference to the stage of completion of the
installation. However if they are incidental to
the sale of a product, revenue is recognised
when the goods are sold.
(IAS 18. IE10)

IAS 18
Accounting for
non-refundable initiation and
membership fees
If the fee permits only membership, the

fee is recognised as revenue when no
significant uncertainty as to its
collectability exists.
If the fee entitles the member to various

benefits to be provided during the
membership period, it is recognised on a
basis that reflects the timing, nature and
value of the benefits provided.
(IAS 18. IE17)
IAS 18
Accounting for franchise

fees
Franchise fees cover the supply of initial and

subsequent services, equipment and other
tangible assets, and know-how. Franchise
fees are recognised as revenue on a basis that
reflects the purpose for which the fees were
charged.
In addition, the franchisor does not

recognise revenue on transactions where the
franchisor is acting as an agent for the
franchisee (e.g. the franchisor orders
supplies and arranges for their delivery to the
franchisee at no profit).
(IAS 18. IE18)
16
PwC
Revenue recognition
Standard
IAS 18
Issue
Accounting for fees from the
development of customized
software
IFRS
Fees are recognised as revenue by reference
to the stage of completion of the
development, including completion of
services provided for post-delivery service
support.
(IAS 18. IE19)
IAS 18
Accounting for revenue on

licences
Revenue on licences is recognised at the time

of sale or over the life of the agreement in
accordance with the substance of the
agreement.
JP GAAP
If the certainty of outcome for the portion
progressed based on the contract can be
confirmed, revenue is recognised by the
percentage-of-completion. However if the
criteria are not met, revenue is recognised by
the completed contract method.
(IAS 18. IE20)

IFRIC 13
Accounting for customer

loyalty programmes such as
points (customer award
credits)
Customer loyalty programmes are accounted

for as multiple-element arrangements. The
entity allocates some of the consideration to
the award credits and defers the recognition
of revenue until such award credits are
redeemed or forfeited.
(IFRIC 13. 5, 6)
IFRIC 15
Accounting for the

construction of real estate
percentage-of-completion
method
When the agreement for the construction of

real estate meets the definition of a
construction contract and its outcome can be
estimated reliably, revenue is recognised
with reference to the stage of completion of
the contract activity. If the arrangement does
not meet the definition of a construction
contract and is for the rendering of services
in accordance with IAS 18, the entity
recognises revenue by reference to the stage
of completion; or if the agreement is for the
sale of goods, the entity recognises revenue
in accordance with IAS 18.14.

general, the entity recognises the full amount
of revenue at initial recognition including the
award credits and accounts for the estimated
future cost of supplying the awards at the
end of the reporting period as a provision
and selling, general and administrative
expenses.
When the agreement for the construction of
real estate meets the definition of a
construction contract, Accounting Standard
for Construction Contracts (refer to pg. 11
under Revenue recognition method of
construction contracts) is applied.
There are no other specific requirements.
(IFRIC 15. 10-19)

IAS 20
Accounting for government

grants
A government grant is not recognised until

there is reasonable assurance that the entity
will comply with the conditions attaching to
it, and that the grant will be received.

practice, revenue is recognised at the time
when the entity receives the government
grant.
In addition, the government grant is

recognised in profit or loss (as revenue) on a
systematic basis over the periods in which
the entity recognises as expenses the related
costs for which the grant is intended to
compensate.
(IAS 20. 7, 12)
PwC
17
Standard
IAS 20
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for the benefit of

government loans
The benefit of the government loan at a

below-market rate of interest is treated as a
government grant. The benefit is measured
as the difference between the initial carrying
value of the loan (determined in accordance
with IAS 39 or IFRS 9) and the proceeds
received.
JP GAAP
(IAS 20. 10A)

IAS 20

grants for the purpose of
giving immediate financial
support
A government grant that becomes receivable

as compensation for expenses or losses
already incurred or for the purpose of giving
immediate financial support to the entity
with no future related costs should be
recognised in profit or loss in the period in
which it becomes receivable.

practice, revenue is generally recognised
when a government grant is received.
(IAS 20. 20)

IAS 20

grants related to assets
acquired
The following two methods are permitted

(the reserve fund method is not permitted).
By the direct deduction method or the

reserve fund method.
The grant is recognised as deferred income

and will be recognised in profit or loss on a
systematic basis over the useful life of the
asset.
Under the direct deduction method, the

grant is deducted from the cost of the
asset.
Calculating the carrying amount of the

asset by deducting the grant.
(IAS 20. 24, 25)
IAS 20
Accounting for repayment of

government grants
A government grant that becomes repayable

is accounted for as a change in accounting
estimate.
Under the reserve fund method, the grant

is recognised as a reserve in equity and
recognised systematically over the useful
life of the asset into retained earnings.
(IAS 20. 32)
JP GAAP References:
18
Accounting Standard for Construction Contracts

Guidance on Accounting Standard for Construction Contracts
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions
Accounting for consumption taxes (Interim Report) (JICPA Report)
Business Accounting Principles
Practical Solution on Revenue Recognition of Software Transactions
Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Financial Instruments
Accounting Standards for Research and Development Costs
Audit Treatment for Compressed Entry
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Statement of Changes in Net Assets
PwC
Revenue recognition
Recent developments
Revised exposure draft, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In June 2010, the IASB and FASB jointly released an exposure draft, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, proposing a
model that would have significant impacts on current revenue recognition under both IFRS and US-GAAP. Since then, in
order to address the concerns expressed in the comment letters received, the boards published a revised exposure draft,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in November 2011 reflecting the tentative decisions made during the
redeliberations. Since July 2012, the boards continued to redeliberate the feedback received on the revised exposure draft,
and they substantially completed their redeliberations in October 2013.
In the revised exposure draft, the revenue recognition model proposed in the previous exposure draft was confirmed but
the individual guidance of how the model is applied was revised. Key areas of revisions from the proposals of the previous
exposure draft include identifying separate performance obligations, determining the transaction price, variable
consideration, a goods or services satisfied over time, and licenses and warranties.
The proposed revenue recognition model adopts an asset and liability approach, the cornerstone of the IASBs conceptual
framework. Current revenue recognition guidance focuses on an earnings process but difficulties often arise in
determining when revenue is recognised. The boards believe a more consistent application can be achieved by using a
model where revenue recognition is based on the satisfaction of a performance obligation by transferring a promised good
or service to a customer.
In applying the model, entities would follow the below five-step process:
(1)
Identify the contract with a customer.
(2)
Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract.
(3)
Determine the transaction price.
(4)
Allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations.
(5)
Recognise revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied.
The followings reflect the guidance in the 2011 Exposure Draft and the results of redeliberations up until 31 December
2013. The decisions reached by the boards during redeliberations are tentative and subject to change until a final standard
is issued.
PwC
19
(1)
Identify the contract with a customer
When all criteria (including the evaluation of probability as to whether the entity will collect the consideration to which it
will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer) are met, the entity should
account for the contract with the customer under the revenue recognition model The entity should also evaluate as to
whether it should combine two or more contracts (including contract modifications). That is, if the contracts are entered
into at or near the same time and other criteria are met, two or more contracts would be combined.
(2)
Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract
An entity will be required to identify all performance obligations in a contract. As performance obligations are promises to
transfer a good or services to a customer, the proposal broadens the scope of the performance obligation. Performance
obligations might not only be explicitly stated in the contract but also can be implied by an entitys customary business
practices, published policies or specific statements. This could result in changes in the number of performance obligations
within an arrangement, possibly changing the timing of revenue recognition.
(3)
Determine the transaction price
The transaction price is the amount of consideration an entity expects to receive in exchange for transferring a good or
service to a customer. This amount is measured using either the expected value or the most likely amount; whichever is
more predictive. An entity needs to consider the effects of variable consideration, time value of money (as a practical
expedient, an entity need not adjust the promised amount of consideration when the period between payment and the
transfer of goods or services is less than one year), noncash consideration (generally at fair value) and consideration
payable to customers.
An entity should recognise revenue including variable consideration (discounts, rebates and performance bonuses or other
similar items),as performance obligations are satisfied, up to a minimum amount that should not be subject to significant
reversals in the future.
If the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled includes a variable amount, then the entity should
recognise the amount of variable consideration allocated to a satisfied performance obligation only to the extent that both
of the following requirements are met:
the entity has relevant experience with similar types of performance obligations (or other valid evidence such as
access to experience of other entities) that allows it to estimate the cumulative amount of revenue for a satisfied
performance obligation
the entity has sufficient supporting experience or evidence such that the entity does not expect a significant reversal
in future periods
Judgment will be needed to assess whether the entity has predictive experience about the outcome of a contract. The
following indicators might suggest the entity's experience does not allow it to predict the outcome of a contract:
the amount of consideration is highly susceptible to factors outside the influence of the entity.
the uncertainty about the amount of consideration is not expected to be resolved for a long period of time.
the entity's experience with similar types of contracts is limited.
the contract has a large number and broad range of possible consideration amounts.
An exceptional requirement is applied for a customers sales-based or usage-based royalty for a license of intellectual
property. In such a contract, because the amount of consideration promised by a license that provides a right to use is
determined by the customers subsequent sale or usage, an entity will include the consideration for a sales-based or
usage-based royalty in the transaction price when the uncertainty is resolved on the basis of the occurrence or
non-occurrence of the subsequent customers sale or usage.
20
PwC
Revenue recognition
(4)
Allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations
Once an entity identifies the separate performance obligations in a contract and determines whether to separately account
for them, the transaction price is allocated to these separate performance obligations based on relative standalone selling
prices (the observable price of a good or service at which the entity sells that good or service separately. If a standalone
selling price is not directly observable, the selling price is estimated by some possible estimation methods including (1)
expected cost plus a reasonable margin or (2) evaluation by reference to prices from the entitys competitors for the same
or similar products, if available. If the standalone selling price is highly variable or uncertain, entities may use a residual
approach to estimate the standalone selling price.
(5)
Recognise revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied
An entity recognises revenue when a promised good or service is transferred to the customer. Control of the good or service
can transfer at a point in time or over time.
Performance obligations satisfied over time

If at least one of the following criteria is met, the customer obtains control of an asset (a good or service) over time
and hence, the entity satisfies a performance obligation over time.
(1) the customer receives and consumes the benefits of the entitys performance as the entity performs (i.e., another
entity would not need to substantially re-perform the work completed to date);
(2) the entitys performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or
enhanced; or
(3) the entitys performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the entity, and the entity has a right to
payment for performance completed to date and expects to fulfill the contract.
If control of the asset is transferred over time, the entity should apply consistently a method of measuring progress,
including output methods or input methods that best depict the transfer of goods or services to the customer.
Performance obligations satisfied at a point in time

If the criteria of performance obligations satisfied over time are not met, the performance obligation is satisfied at a
point in time, and an entity should determine the point when a customer obtains control of the goods or services. The
following five indicators may be considered in determining whether the customer has obtained control of the good or
service and the entity has satisfied the performance obligation. As a list of these indicators is not a checklist; or
all-inclusive, relevant facts and circumstances should be considered to determine whether the customer has obtained
control of the good or service.
- the customer has an unconditional obligation to pay
- the customer has legal title
- the customer has physical possession
- the customer has the risks and rewards of ownership of the good or service
- the customer has accepted the asset
PwC
21
(6)
Other considerations
Contract costs
Entities should evaluate whether direct costs incurred in fulfilling a contract are in the scope of other standards (e.g.
inventory). If so, the entity should account for such costs in accordance with those standards. If not, the entity should
capitalise those costs only if the costs relate directly to a contract and future performance (i.e. mobilisation fees or set-up
costs) and are expected to be recovered. Capitalised costs would then be amortised as control of the goods or services to
which the asset relates are transferred to the customer. An entity should recognise as an asset from the incremental costs of
obtaining a contract if the entity expects to recover those costs. An entity can expense the incremental cost of obtaining a
contract if the amortization period would be less than on year.
(7)
Summary
The proposed standard will permit either full or limited retrospective application for an entity that has already adopted
IFRS. As transition provisions to reduce the burden on preparers, an entity should apply this standard by using one of the
following two methods:
full retrospective application: an entity may use one or more of the following three practical expedients of
(1) not requiring the restatement of contracts that begin and end within the same annual reporting period, (2)
allowing the use of hindsight in estimating variable consideration amounts, and (3) not requiring disclosure of the
amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations in comparative periods
limited retrospective application: an entity should apply this standard retrospectively only to contracts that are not
completed contracts at the date of initial application and recognise the cumulative effect of initially applying the new
standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes
the date of initial application. In addition, the entity shall disclose the amount of the effect of applying the new
standard.
On the other hand, first-time adopters of IFRS will need to apply the new standard retrospectively in accordance with IFRS
1 i.e. they are not permitted to apply the transition provision of limited retrospective application not to adjust the
comparative information. However, first-time adopters are not required to restate contracts that were completed before the
date of transition to IFRSs.
The final standard is expected to be issued in 2014 and will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017. Earlier adoption is permitted.
The above commentary is not all inclusive. The impact of the new revenue recognition standard will be extensive and
entities will be required to consider the effects of application for contracts arising in the past, present and future reporting
periods. Entities should continue to evaluate how the model might change current business activities, contract
negotiations, key metrics (including debt covenants), budgeting, controls and processes, information technology
requirements and accounting.
Recent proposalsJP GAAP
Discussion Paper on Revenue Recognition
In September 2009, the ASBJ released a discussion paper on revenue recognition to examine how best to align JP GAAP on
revenue recognition with the IASB and FASB project. The ASBJ will continue its discussion on the topic, including sending
comments to the boards.
22
PwC
Expense recognition
share-based payments
23
Expense recognitionshare-based payments

IFRS 2, Share-based payment, applies to all share-based payment arrangements including share options.
A share-based payment arrangement is defined as an agreement between the entity (or another group entity or any
shareholder of any group entity) and another party (including an employee) that entitles the other party to receive the
following, provided the specific vesting conditions, if any, are met
Cash or other assets of the entity for amounts that are based on the price (or value) of equity instruments (including
shares or share options) of the entity or another group entity, or
Equity instruments (including shares or share options) of the entity or another group entity.
IFRS 2 sets out measurement principles and specific requirements for three types of share-based payment transactions:
(1)
equity-settled share-based payment transactions,
(2)
cash-settled share-based payment transactions, and
(3)
share-based payment transactions with cash alternatives
Under JP GAAP, Accounting Standard for Share-based Payment and Guidance on Accounting Standard for Share-based
Payment specify guidance only for share-based payment transactions in which the entity receives goods or services as
consideration for its own equity shares or share options, which are essentially defined as (1) equity-settled share-based
payment transactions under IFRS 2. There is no guidance on cash-settled share based payment transactions and share-based
payment transactions with a cash alternative. They are accounted for based on individual business practices.
24
PwC
Standard
IFRS 2
Issue
Scope
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 2 is applied to all share-based payment

transactions including: equity-settled
share-based payment transactions,
cash-settled share-based payment
transactions, and share-based payment
transactions with cash alternatives.
Accounting Standard for Share-based

Payment is applicable only to equity-settled
share-based payment transactions. There are
no specific requirements for other
share-based payment transactions.
(IFRS 2. 2)
IFRS 2
Definition of grant date
IFRS 2 defines the grant date of equity

instruments as the date at which the entity
and another party including employees agree
to a share-based payment arrangement.
(IFRS 2. IG2)
IFRS 2
Grant date and service

commencement date
The grant date might occur after the point

where employees to whom the equity
instruments were granted have begun
rendering services. In this situation, the
entity should estimate the grant date fair
value of the equity instruments for the
purposes of recognising the services received
during the period between service
commencement date and grant date. Once
the date of grant has been established, the
entity should revise the earlier estimate so
that the amounts recognised for services
received in respect of the grant are ultimately
based on the grant date fair value of the
equity instruments.
The grant date is defined as the date at which

share options are granted. Under the
Corporate Law, the grant date is referred to
as an allotment date of offered subscription
rights to shares. (Corporate Law, Article 238,
Paragraph 1(4))
(IFRS 2. IG4)
IFRS 2
Accounting for a transaction

in which an entity grants its
own share options to parties
other than employees
For transactions with parties other than

employees, the entity should measure the
goods or services received at the fair value of
the goods or services received at the date the
entity obtains the goods or the counterparty
renders the service. If the entity cannot
estimate reliably the fair value of the goods
or services received, the entity should
measure their value by reference to the fair
value of the share options granted at the date
the entity obtains the goods or the
counterparty renders the service.
The entity should measure the goods or

services at either:
the fair value of the share options used as
consideration or
the fair value of the goods or services
acquired,
whichever is more reliable as at the grant
date.
(IFRS 2. 7, 10, 11, 13)
PwC
25
Standard
IFRS 2
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for a transaction

in which an entity delivers its
own shares to parties other
than employees
For transactions with parties other than

employees, the entity should measure the
goods or services received at the fair value of
the goods or services received at the date the
entity obtains the goods or the counterparty
renders the service. If the entity cannot
estimate reliably the fair value of the goods
or services received, the entity should
measure their value by reference to the fair
value of the equity instruments granted.
JP GAAP
The entity should measure goods or service
received at either:
The fair value of the share used as
consideration or
The fair value of the goods or service
acquired,
whichever is more reliable as at the date of
contract.
(IFRS 2. 7, 10-13)
IFRS 2
Unidentifiable goods or
services
If the identifiable consideration received by

the entity appears to be less than the fair
value of the equity instruments granted or
liability incurred, typically this situation
indicates that unidentifiable goods or
services have been (or will be) received by the
entity. The entity should measure the
unidentifiable goods or services received as
the difference between the fair value of the
share-based payment and the fair value of
any identifiable goods or services received (or
to be received).
(IFRS 2. 13A)
IFRS 2
Subsequent adjustment to
the vested equity
instruments which are
forfeited after the vesting
date
Having recognised the goods or services

received and a corresponding increase in
equity, the entity should make no subsequent
adjustment to total equity after the vesting
date. The entity should not subsequently
reverse the amount recognised for services
received from an employee to the extent that
the vested equity instruments are later
forfeited. However, this requirement does
not preclude the entity from recognising a
transfer within equity.
When vested share options are forfeited after

the vesting date, the corresponding amount
of such share options recorded as
subscription rights is recognised as a gain.
(IFRS 2. 23)
26
PwC
Standard
IFRS 2
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
When the fair value of equity

instruments including share
options cannot be estimated
reliably
In rare cases that the entity may be unable to

estimate reliably the fair value of the equity
instruments granted at the measurement
date, the entity should measure the equity
instruments at their intrinsic value initially at
the date the entity obtains the goods or the
counterparty renders the service.
Subsequently at the end of each reporting
period and at the date of final settlement, any
change in intrinsic value should be
recognised in profit or loss.
Non-public companies may measure share

options at the fair value of the share options,
or the intrinsic value of the share options per
unit measured as at the grant date. The
intrinsic value per unit should not be
subsequently remeasured.
(IFRS 2. 24)
IFRS 2
Accounting for modifications

to the conditions of equity
options
The entity should include the incremental

fair value due to the modification in addition
to the fair value granted in the measurement
of the amount recognised as consideration
for the equity instruments including share
options. The incremental fair value granted is
the difference between the fair value of the
modified equity instrument and that of the
original equity instrument, both estimated as
at the date of the modification.
If the fair value per unit of the share option

at the date of the modification is greater than
that at grant date, the difference between
those two fair values should be recognised as
an incremental expense.
(IFRS 2. 26, B43(a))

IFRS 2
Accounting for cancellations

and settlements of equity
options
The entity should account for the

cancellation or settlement as an acceleration
of vesting, and should therefore recognise
immediately the amount that otherwise
would have been recognised for services
received over the remainder of the vesting
period. Any payment made to the employee
on the cancellation or settlement of the grant
should be accounted for as the repurchase of
an equity interest, i.e. as a deduction from
equity. If the payment exceeds the fair value
of the equity instruments granted, measured
at the repurchase date, such excess should be
recognised as an expense.
There are no specific requirements. Under JP

GAAP, cancellations and settlements would
not be accounted for as an acceleration of
vesting. In practice, they are accounted for as
modifications to share options as stated
above.
(IFRS 2. 28)
JP GAAP References:
PwC
Accounting Standard for Share-based Payment
27
Recent developments
IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) discussed the following four issues and recommended to the IASB in November
2013 that it should amend IFRS 2 in a narrow scope amendment project by adding specific guidance. The key proposals are
as follows:
(1) Accounting for share-based payment awards settled net of tax withholdings
To clarify that a share-based payment transaction in which the entity settles the share-based payment arrangement net
by withholding a specified portion of the equity instruments to meet its minimum statutory tax withholding
requirements would be classified as equity-settled in its entirety.
(2) Accounting for modification of a share-based payment from cash-settled to equity-settled
To clarify that:
the share-based payment should be classified as either cash-settled or equity-settled in its entirety depending on
which settlement method is probable; and
the change in classification should be accounted for by recording a cumulative adjustment at the point in time that
the change in classification occurred in such a way that the cumulative cost will be the same as if the change in
classification had occurred at the inception of the arrangement.
(3) Accounting for share-based transactions in which the manner of settlement is contingent on a future event
Share-based payment transactions in which the manner of settlement is contingent on a future event that is outside the
control of both the entity and the counterparties should be classified as either cash-settled or equity-settled in its
entirety, depending on which settlement method is probable.
(4) Accounting for cash-settled share-based payments which include a performance condition
To clarify that vesting conditions (other than market conditions) should be taken into account in the measurement of
liability incurred by adjusting the number of awards that are expected to vest rather than in estimating the fair value of
the cash-settled shared-based payments.
28
PwC
Recent changesIFRS
Application of IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement. The new guidance is a new standard creating a definition
of fair value. The new fair value guidance specifically indicates, however, that it does not apply to share-based payment
transactions. Because IFRS 2 includes a definition of fair value that is specifically applied to share-based payment
transactions, this definition has not been affected by the issuance of the new fair value guidance. For a discussion of the
new general fair value guidance refer to the Recent developments section of the chapter Assetsfinancial assets.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle
In December 2013, IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 2 as part of its Annual Improvements project. The amendment
makes the definition of vesting conditions clearer by separating the definitions of performance condition and service
condition from the definition of vesting condition in IFRS 2. The amended definitions of service and performance
conditions clarify that the counterparty (under a share-based payment arrangement) should complete a specified period of
service to earn the awards and that a performance target may relate either to the performance of the entity as a whole or to
some part of the entity, such as a division or an individual employee. Consequently, conditions that do not relate to the
performance of the entity or do not require the entity to render the service for at least the period during which the
performance target is being measured would be nonvesting conditions. Performance targets that are achieved after the
requisite service period would not be accounted for as performance conditions, and would be accounted for instead as
non-vesting conditions. Nonvesting conditions are taken into account when determining the grant date fair value of the
award.
This amendment is to be applied to a share-based payment transaction on and after the grant date is 1 July 2014.
PwC
29
30
PwC
Expense recognition
employee benets
31
Expense recognitionemployee benefits

IAS 19, Employee benefits, applies to the accounting for all employee benefits. Employee benefits are defined as all forms of
consideration given by an entity in exchange for services rendered by employees or in exchange for the termination of
employment. These benefits include salary-related benefits (such as wages, salaries, profit-sharing, bonuses and compensated
absences, such as paid holiday and long-service leave), termination benefits and post-employment benefits. IFRIC 14, IAS 19
The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements and their interaction, provides guidance on assessing
the amount that can be recognised as a defined benefit asset. Share-based payments which are not in the scope of IAS 19 are
addressed in IFRS 2.
Under JP GAAP, there is no comprehensive guidance for employee benefits which are paid during the term of employment.
However there is no significant difference in the accounting for this area between JP GAAP and IFRS because costs are
practically recognised on an accrual basis. Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits and Practical Guidance on
Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits are applied to post-employment benefits such as pensions and other
post-employment benefits. Although the accounting for post-employee benefits under JP GAAP is based on a framework
similar to that of IFRS, there are some material differences.
In June 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 that significantly changed the recognition, presentation, and disclosures
of defined benefit plans, which became effective from the annual periods beginning on and after January 1, 2013. In May
2012, the ASBJ issued the Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits and the Guidance on Accounting Standard for
Retirement Benefits from the viewpoint of improvements to financial reporting and international convergence. For further
discussion, refer to the Recent developments section at the end of this chapter.
32
PwC
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Recognition of obligation for
compensated absences
IFRS
An entity should recognise an obligation for
compensated absences in accordance with
the requirements in IAS 19.
JP GAAP
Current JP GAAP and new accounting
standard issued by ASBJ in May 2012
(IAS 19. 13-18)

IAS 19
IFRIC 14
Defined benefit plans

Asset ceiling
IAS 19 limits the measurement of a net

defined benefit asset to the present value of
any economic benefits available in the form
of refunds from the plan or reductions in
future contributions to the plan.
(IAS 19. 64, 65) (IFRIC 14. 11-17)
Current JP GAAP
All prepaid pension expenses are recognised
as an asset.
New accounting standard issued by ASBJ in
May 2012
An excess of plan assets over retirement
benefit obligations (surplus in retirement
benefit plan) is recognised as an asset.
IAS 19
IFRIC 14

Additional liability in
respect of minimum
funding requirements
Minimum funding requirements normally

stipulate a minimum amount or level of
contributions that must be made to a plan
over a given period. A minimum funding
requirement may give rise to an additional
liability under certain circumstances.

There is no concept of minimum funding
requirements.
(IAS 19. 64-65) (IFRIC 14. 18-24)

IAS 19

Attributing benefit to
periods of service
As a general rule, an entity should attribute

benefit to periods of service under the plans
benefit formula. However, if an employees
service in later years will lead to a materially
higher level of benefit than in earlier years,
an entity should attribute benefit on a
straight-line basis from the date when service
by the employee first leads to benefits under
the plan until the date when further service
by the employee will lead to no material
amount of further benefits under the plan.
(IAS 19. 70)
Current JP GAAP
The service-period approach (that is, the
amount of retirement benefits to accrue in
each period is estimated on the basis of the
employees service period) is adopted in
principle.
However the ratio of the amount of salary or
other factors like age and job grade, and the
retirement benefit multiplier might be
allowed in some cases.
May 2012
The Accounting Standard allows a choice to
use either the straight-line basis or the
benefit formula basis. If an entity elects the
benefit formula basis and an employees
service in later years will lead to a materially
higher level of benefit than in earlier years,
an entity should attribute benefit on a
straight-line basis from the date when service
by the employee first leads to benefits under
the plan until the date when further service
by the employee leads to no material amount
of further benefits under the plan
PwC
33
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Criteria to determine the
discount rate
IFRS
The rate used to discount post-employment
benefit obligations is determined by
reference to market yields on high quality
corporate bonds. In countries where there is
no deep market in such bonds, the market
yields on government bonds are used.
(IAS 19. 83)
JP GAAP
The yield on extremely low-risk long-term
debt securities, such as the yield on
long-term government bonds, debt securities
issued by governmental agencies or bonds of
blue-chip corporations, are used as a basis
for determining the discount rate.
In addition, it is explicitly permitted not to
change the discount rate at year end if the
effect of the change is less than a certain
materiality threshold.
IAS 19

Term assessed to
determine the discount
rate
The discount rate should reflect the

estimated timing of benefit payments. In
practice, an entity often applies a single
weighted average discount rate that reflects
the estimated timing and amount of benefit
payments and the currency in which the
benefits are to be paid.
(IAS 19. 85)
Current JP GAAP
In principle, the average term to expected
dates of payment of retirement benefits is
used to determine the discount rate.
However, in practice, the remaining service
period can be used as an approximate period.
May 2012
The above-mentioned difference from IFRS
is resolved by the amendment issued in May
2012.
IAS 19

Actuarial assumptions:
estimated future salary
increases
Post-employment benefit obligations should

be measured on a basis that reflects
estimated future salary increases.
Estimates of future salary increases take
account of inflation, seniority, promotion and
other relevant factors, such as supply and
demand in the employment market.
(IAS 19. 87, 90)
Current JP GAAP
Variable factors that can reasonably be
expected are included in projecting
retirement benefits. These include increases
in salary that are definitely expected to take
place.
Such future salary increases should not be
reflected in the measurement of retirement
benefits unless they are highly probable and
can be reliably measured.
May 2012
The above-mention differences from IFRS
are resolved by the amendment issued in
May 2012.
34
PwC
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Accounting for actuarial
gains and losses
IFRS
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit
liability (asset) including actuarial gains and
losses should be recognised in other
comprehensive income in the period that
they accrue and should not be reclassified to
profit or loss in a subsequent period.
(IAS 19. 122, 128)
JP GAAP
Current JP GAAP
Actuarial gains and losses are not recognised
in other comprehensive income. They are
recognised over an appropriate number of
years within the average of the remaining
service periods as expenses in each period.
Actuarial gains and losses that have accrued
during a period may be deferred and
recognised as expenses from the beginning of
the following period onwards.
May 2012
Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in
profit or loss over a certain period not longer
than the expected average remaining service
periods of the employees.
Actuarial gains and losses that are yet to be
recognised in profit or loss are recognised in
net assets through other comprehensive
income, after adjusting for tax effects.
Recognising in the current periods profit or
loss actuarial gains and losses that were
recognised in net assets in prior periods
would be treated as a reclassification
adjustment (recycling). It is also permitted to
recognise in profit or loss from the annual
period after the entity recognises actuarial
gains and losses in net assets.
In non-consolidated financial statements, the
new requirements as described above would
not be applied for the time being, with the
previous requirements remaining applicable.
PwC
35
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Accounting for past
service cost (past service
liabilities)
IFRS
An entity should recognise both vested and
unvested past service cost as an expense at
the earlier of the following dates:
When the plan amendment or curtailment
occurs; and
When the entity recognises related
restructuring costs or termination benefits.
(IAS 19. 102, 103)
JP GAAP
Current JP GAAP
Past service liabilities that accrue in a period
should be recognised over an appropriate
number of years within the average of the
remaining service periods as expenses in
each period.
May 2012
Past service costs are recognised in profit or
loss over a certain period not longer than the
average remaining service periods of the
employees.
Past service costs that are yet to be
recognised in profit or loss are recognised in
net assets through other comprehensive
income, after adjusting for tax effects.
Recognising in the current periods profit or
loss past service costs that were recognised in
net assets in prior periods would be treated
as a reclassification adjustment (recycling).
In non-consolidated financial statements, the
new requirements as described above would
not be applied for the time being, with the
previous requirements remaining applicable.
IAS 19

Expected rate of return
The concept of expected return on plan assets

is no longer applicable. Net interest expense
or income is calculated by applying the
discount rate to the defined benefit asset or
liability of the plan
(IAS 19. 123)
36

The expected return on pension assets
should be calculated by multiplying the
opening balance of pension assets by a
reasonably-estimated rate of return
(expected rate of return). There are no
specific requirements for the treatment of
administration cost.
PwC
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Costs of managing the
plan assets
IFRS
An entity deducts the costs of managing the
plan assets and any tax payable by the plan
itself, other than tax included in the actuarial
assumptions used to measure the defined
benefit obligation, from the return on plan
assets.
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements for the
treatment of administration cost.
(IAS 19. 130)

IAS 19

Accounting for
curtailments and
settlements (the transfer
between retirement
benefits plans)
Gains and losses arising from curtailment

included in past service costs should be
recognised as a component of service costs
when they occur.
Gains and losses on a settlement should be
recognised as a component of service costs
when they occur.
(IAS 19. 102, 103, 109, 110)

When a retirement benefit plan terminates or
a mass retrenchment occurs, the difference
between (a) the retirement benefit
obligations pertaining to the terminated
portion, and (b) the corresponding payment
actually made, is accounted for as gains or
losses.
Any increase or decrease in the retirement
benefit obligations is regarded as past service
liabilities. The amount of any increase or
decrease is to be divided by an appropriate
number of years and accounted for as an
expense in each of those years.
IAS 19
Accounting for other

long-term employee benefits
Employee benefits that are not expected to be

settled wholly before twelve months after the
end of the annual reporting period in which
the employees render the related service may
be accounted for as a liability for other
long-term employee benefits. An entity
should apply the same requirements to other
long-term employee benefits as the entity
measures defined benefit plans. However,
remeasurements are not recognised in other
comprehensive income unlike the accounting
required for post-employment benefits.

(IAS 19. 153-156)

IAS 19
Recognition and
measurement of termination
benefits
Termination benefits result from either an

entitys decision to terminate the
employment or an employees decision to
accept an entitys offer of benefits in
exchange for termination of employment.

An entity should recognise a liability and

expense for termination benefits at the
earlier of the following dates:
When the entity can no longer withdraw
the offer of those benefits; and
When the entity recognises costs for a
restructuring.
(IAS 19. 159, 165)
PwC
37
Standard
IAS 19
Issue
Application of a simplified
method
IFRS
There is no explicit guidance of simplified
method. However, estimates, averages and
computational short cuts may provide a
reliable approximation of the detailed
computations, depending on the companys
pension plan and other circumstances.
JP GAAP
Small companies are allowed to apply a
simplified method whereby an actuarial
valuation method is not used.
(IAS 19. 60)

IAS 19
IAS 19
Treatment of
post-retirement benefits
trust
As there are no specific requirements for the

treatment of post-retirement benefits trust,
an entity assesses if the definition of plan
assets is met.

Defined benefit plans that

share risks between various
entities under common
control
Multi-employer plans are defined

contribution plans or defined benefit plans
that:
Current JP GAAP
Pool the assets contributed by various

entities that are not under common
control; and
Use those assets to provide benefits to
employees of more than one entity, on the
basis that contribution and benefit levels
are determined without regard to the
identity of the entity that employs the
employees concerned.
Defined benefit plans that share risks
between entities under common control, e.g.
a parent and its subsidiaries, are not
multi-employer plans.
(IAS 19. 8, 40)
Post-retirement benefits trust is treated as

pension assets when certain criteria are met.
Multi-employer pension plans refer to

corporate pension plans established by a
group of employers. Association-type welfare
pension funds, combined-type employees
pension funds, tax-qualified pension funds
by joint contracts and defined benefit
corporate pension plans established jointly
are deemed to be multi-employer pension
plans in Japan.
May 2012
Multi-employer pension plans refer to
corporate pension plans established by a
group of employers. Association-type welfare
pension funds, combined-type employees
pension funds, and defined benefit corporate
pension plans established jointly are deemed
to be multi-employer pension plans in Japan.
JP GAAP References:
38
Accounting Standards for Retirement Benefits

Practical Guidelines of Accounting Standards for Retirement Benefits
Guidance on Accounting for the Transfer between Retirement Benefits Plans
PwC
Recent developments
IFRS IC current agenda
IFRS IC is currently reconsidering the accounting for employee benefit plans with a promised return on contributions or
notional contributions. The Committee has previously considered this issue in 2002-2006. In 2004 it published IFRIC
Draft Interpretation D9. In November 2006 it decided to refer the issue to the Board to be included in the Boards project
on post-employment benefits. Although the Board initially intended to address contribution-based promises in its project,
it later decided to defer this work to a future broader project on employee benefits. In the light of the Boards decision not
to address the accounting for contribution-based promises at present and the ongoing concerns about how to account for
such pension arrangements, the Committee decided to revisit the issues. Accordingly, the Committee started its discussions
in July 2012.
IFRS annual improvements project 2012-2014 cycle
In December 2013, IASB published an exposure draft on annual improvements project proposing amendments of IFRS.
IASB will publish a final standard which is effective for annual periods beginning on or after I January 2016, after
considering comments in response to the exposure draft. IASB proposed to clarify that when determining the discount rate
for post employment benefit obligations, it is important in which currency the liabilities are denominated rather than the
currency of the country where they arise. Whether or not there is a deep market in high-quality corporate bonds is assessed
at a currency level not at a country level. Similarly, where there is no deep market in high-quality corporate bonds in that
currency, government bonds in the relevant currency should be used.
Recent changesIFRS
IAS 19 Contributions from employees or third parties
In November 2013, IASB issued an amendment to IAS 19 to clarify the accounting for contributions from employees or
third parties set out in the formal terms of the plan. The amendment allows contributions that are linked to service, where
the amount of the contributions does not vary by the number of years of service, to be reduced from the service cost in the
period in which the related service is rendered. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July
2014, with earlier application permitted.
Recent changesJP GAAP
Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits and Implementation Guidance on the Accounting
Standard for Retirement Benefits
In May 2012, the ASBJ issued Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits (ASBJ Statement No.26) and Implementation
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits (ASBJ Guidance No.25). They will replace the current
standards and guidelines, namely the Standard for Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASBJ Statement No.25),
released in June 2009. The issuance corresponds to Step 1, one of the two steps of the project for Retirement Benefit that
the ASBJ is working on currently. The key amendments are as follows:
Unrecognised actuarial gains and losses and unrecognised past service liabilities are required to be recognised in net assets
on the balance sheet (that is, in accumulated other comprehensive income) after deferred tax is recognised. The amount of
the defined benefit liability (asset) presented on the balance sheet shows the current funded status. However, the
accounting for unrecognised actuarial gains and losses and unrecognised past service liabilities will not be changed (that is,
in principle, unrecognised past service liabilities and unrecognised actuarial gains and losses that accrue in a period should
be recognised over an appropriate number of years within the average of remaining service periods as expenses in each
period.) In non-consolidated financial statements, the new requirements as described above are not applied for the time
being, with the previous requirements remaining applicable.
PwC
39
The standards permit an entity to attribute projected retirement benefits to periods of service on a straight-line-basis or
under the benefit formula. In principle, the discount rate applied in the calculation of retirement benefit obligations should
be determined by considering a number of rates that match the estimated maturity of all benefit payments. In practice, a
single weighted average discount rate that reflects the estimated timing and amount of benefit payments can be used.
The changes extend disclosure requirements, including reconciliations for each of the retirement benefit obligation and
pension asset which are equivalent to the disclosure requirements under IFRS.
Other major changes by the abovementioned standards and guidance are shown in the table below. These standards and
guidance were effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2013, though an entity may
apply also from the first day of the fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2013. However, for items listed in (2) in the
table below, an entity may apply in phases because application of those changes may be difficult in practice in a short
period of time.
Changes
Schedule for application

(for companies with fiscal year ending on March 31)
FY March 2014
Beginning
of the
year
End of
the year
FY March 2015
Beginning
of the
year
End of
the year
FY March 2016
Beginning
of the
year
End of
the year
(1) other than items listed in (2)
Accounting treatment of unrecognised actuarial gains

and losses and unrecognised past service cost
Enhanced disclosure
Name changes of line items
Early
adoption
Mandatory adoption
(2) items with specific applicable period
attribution of expected retirement benefit over

reporting periods
calculation basis of discount rate and expected rates

of salary increase
presentation of past service cost in extra-ordinary

gains/losses
treatment of multi-employer plans
Early adoption
Mandatory adoption*
* An entity may apply the abovementioned changes from the first day of fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2015 given that certain
disclosure is provided in notes, if it is impracticable for the company to apply from fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2014.
40
PwC
Assetsnonnancial assets
41
Assetsnonfinancial assets
With regard to nonfinancial assets (e.g., inventories, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, leased assets and
investment property), IFRS and JP GAAP have differences in the detailed application resulting in potentially significant
differences.
Historical cost is the primary basis of accounting for nonfinancial assets under JP GAAP which is similar to IFRS. However,
IFRS permits the revaluation of certain nonfinancial assets (property plant and equipment, intangible assets, investment
property and inventories in certain industries such as commodity brokers or dealers) while JP GAAP does not permit
revaluation of assets, except for certain financial instruments and inventories for trading purposes.
With regard to inventories, IFRS and JP GAAP are generally similar. However, there are some differences in the scope
(inventories under JP GAAP is broader to some extent) and the accounting for the write-down of inventories.
JP GAAP and IFRS are generally similar in their treatment of the impairment of fixed assets - assets are grouped into the
smallest group that generate cash inflows largely independent from other asset or group of assets, and when there is an
indication that an identifiable asset or group of assets may be impaired, impairment is tested and an impairment loss is
measured. However there are differences in the recognition of an impairment loss and reversal of the impairment loss.
There is no comprehensive guidance on intangible assets under JP GAAP and the recognition and measurement of intangible
assets in practice could differ from the treatments under IFRS in certain areas. Internally generated research and
development costs are generally expensed under JP GAAP (under the accounting standard for research and development
costs), which is different from IFRS that requires the capitalisation of development costs when certain criteria are met. Under
JP GAAP, certain production costs of software for external sales and internal use are capitalised. As mentioned above, there
are also differences in the recognition of impairment loss, reversal of impairment loss, amortisation of goodwill and others.
The classification concept for leases is similar between JP GAAP and IFRS, however the criteria are different. There are also
some differences such as the treatment of a lease of land. There is no guidance for contingent rent, sale and leaseback
transactions, lease incentives and others under JP GAAP, which may cause differences to IFRS in practice.
As further discussed in the Recent developments section, the FASB and IASB are carrying out a joint project on lease
accounting and issued a revised exposure draft in May 2013. Various topics have been discussed in their redeliberation based
on feedback received.
42
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 2, Inventories
IAS 2
Scope of inventories
Goods consumed within a short period of

time through sales and administrative
activities are not included in inventory.
Goods consumed within a short period of

time through sales and administrative
activities are included in inventory.
(IAS 2. 6)
IAS 2
Items included in the cost of

inventories
Production overheads are included in the cost

of inventories.
Production overheads are included in the cost

of inventories.
Abnormal waste, storage cost and

administrative overheads that do not
contribute to bringing inventories to their
present location and condition are excluded
from the cost of inventories and are usually
expensed in the period incurred.
Decreases in value due to abnormal

conditions are not treated as cost of
inventories. Administrative overheads and
storage costs may be included in cost.
(IAS 2. 10-18)
IAS 23
Borrowing cost of
inventories
Borrowing costs attributable to the

acquisition (or construction or production) of
inventories which are qualifying assets under
IAS 23 are capitalised. Unlike JP GAAP,
capitalisation under IFRS is not limited to
costs for real estate development. Other
differences between IFRS and JP GAAP
relating to borrowing costs are explained in
the IAS 23 discussion in the PPE section
below.
In principle, borrowing costs attributable to

the acquisition (or construction or
production) of inventories are expensed.
However, when interest payments are related
to real estate development and certain
criteria are met, they may be capitalised.
(IAS 23. 5-9)

IAS 2
Trade discounts
Trade discounts are deducted from the costs

of purchase.
Trade discounts are treated as non-operating

profit.
(IAS 2. 11)
IAS 2
Allocation of production
overheads
The allocation of fixed production overheads

to the costs of conversion is based on the
normal capacity of the production facilities.
Normal capacity is the production expected
to be achieved on average over a number of
periods or seasons under normal
circumstances.
In principle, production overheads are

allocated by the planned allocation rate based
on the planned level of production under the
actual cost accounting method.
(IAS 2. 13)
IAS 2
Allocation of variances of
production overheads
Adverse variances due to low production or

idle plant are recognised as an expense in the
period incurred.
(IAS 2. 13)
Variances of fixed production overhead under

the actual cost accounting method are, in
principle, allocated to the cost of sales of the
current period.
Significant variances are allocated to both the
cost of sales and inventory when such
variances are caused by use of an
inappropriate estimated cost rate.
PwC
43
Standard
IAS 2
Issue
Cost formula
(usage of last purchased
price method)
IFRS
The cost of inventories is assigned using the
FIFO or weighted average cost method.
Specific identification formula is used for
certain specific items. Last purchased price
method is not allowed.
(IAS 2. 23, 25)
IAS 2
IAS 2
Uniformity of cost formula
Retail method
JP GAAP
The cost of inventories is assigned using the
Specific identification formula, FIFO,
average cost method and others. Last
purchased price method is permitted only in
certain cases, e.g. when the year-end balance
of inventory is immaterial.
The same cost formula should be used for all

inventories having a similar nature and use
to the entity.
The same cost formula should be used

consistently for inventories having a similar
class, nature, and use to the entity.
(IAS 2. 25)
It is required that uniform accounting

standards are used for companies within the
group; however, with regard to the valuation
of inventories, use of a different cost formula
is permitted.
The retail method may be used for

convenience if the results approximate to the
cost.
The retail method may be used for certain

industries.
(IAS 2. 21)
IAS 2
Write down of raw materials
When a decline in the price of materials

indicates that the cost of finished products
exceeds net realizable value, the materials are
written down to the net realizable value. In
such circumstances, the replacement cost of
the materials may be the best available
measure.
Similar to IFRS.
However, long-outstanding materials which
are no longer used in the normal operating
cycle or materials to be disposed may be
written down systematically.
The alternative method allowed under JP

GAAP (systematic write down) is not
permitted.
(IAS 2. 32)
IAS 2
Unit write down of inventory
In principle, inventories are written down

item by item.
In principle, inventories are written down

item by item.
However, there may be cases when it is

appropriate to group similar or related items.
However, there may be cases when it is

appropriate to group items.
There is no specific treatment for items

which are supplemental to each other.
JP GAAP allows, under certain cases, for the

grouping of items which are supplemental to
each other.
(IAS 2. 29)
IAS 2
Accounting for the reversal

of a write down
Reversal of a previously recognised

write-down is required when there is a
subsequent increase in the value of the
inventory (only the reversal method under
JP GAAP is permitted under IFRS).
Either the reversal method or the

non-reversal method (in which the
write-down is not reversed) may be applied
consistently.
(IAS 2. 33)
44
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 16, Property Plant and Equipment; IAS 23, Borrowing Costs; IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent
Assets; IFRIC 1, Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities
IAS 16
Capitalisation of assets
Generally, PPE is recognised as an asset if it

is probable that future economic benefits
associated with the item will flow to the entity
and the cost can be measured reliably.
(IAS 16. 7)
IAS 16
Spare parts and servicing

equipment recognised as
property, plant and
equipment (PPE)
Items such as spare parts, stand-by

equipment and servicing equipment are
recognised as PPE in accordance with IAS 16
when they meet the definition of PPE.
Otherwise, they are classified as inventory.
PPE are defined as tangible items that:
(a)
are held for use in the production or

supply of goods or services, for rental to
others, or for administrative purposes;
and
(b)
are expected to be used during more

than one period.
There is no specific guidance. In practice, the

tax basis is often used.
Tools, equipment and fixtures with a useful
life of 1 year or more and above a certain
amount are recognised as property, plant and
equipment (PPE).
life of less than 1 year, and those with a useful
life of one year or more but below a certain
amount may be accounted for as inventories
(supplies).
life of one year or more and above a certain
amount are accounted for as PPE.
(IAS 16. 6, 8)
IAS 16
Replacement cost of PPE
Replacement cost is recognised as PPE if the

recognition criteria are met. The carrying
amount of the replaced parts is derecognised.
(IAS 16. 12,13)
IAS 16
Accounting for major repairs
The cost of a regular major inspection may be

included in the cost of PPE.
(IAS 16. 14)
IAS 16
PwC
Accounting for purchase

taxes related to the
acquisition of PPE
Import duties and non-refundable purchase

taxes are included in the cost of PPE.
(IAS 16. 16, 22)

practice, subsequent costs are often
accounted for based on the tax basis and are
capitalised when they qualify as capital
expenditures. However, it is permitted to
expense the replacement cost instead of
depreciating PPE. IFRS does not permit
expensing such costs.
When the recognition criteria for
provisioning are met, allowances are
recognised for the cost of repairs or for the
cost of special repairs.
Attributable costs are included in the cost of
PPE. However, there is no specific guidance
with regard to purchase taxes. In some cases,
import duties and real estate acquisition
taxes are expensed. In practice, the tax
treatment is often used.
45
Standard
IAS 16
Issue
Scope of directly attributable
costs related to the
acquisition of PPE
IFRS
The following are directly attributable costs
which are included in the cost of PPE:
Costs of employee benefits
Costs of site preparation
Initial delivery and handling costs
JP GAAP
Attributable costs such as purchase charges,
delivery and handling costs, installation costs
and testing costs are included in the cost of
PPE. However, some or all of these costs are
permitted to be excluded when there is a
valid reason.
Installation and assembly costs

Costs of testing (after deducting net
proceeds from selling the samples
produced)
Professional fees
(IAS 16. 16, 17)
IAS 16
IAS 37
Discount rate used to

calculate an asset
retirement obligation (ARO)
The discount rate used should be a pre-tax

rate that reflects the current market
assessment of the time value of money at the
reporting date and risks specific to the
liability. Credit risk is not reflected in the
discount rate.
The discount rate used should be a pre-tax

risk free rate that reflects the time value of
money at the time the related liability is
recognised.
(IAS 16. 16, 18) (IAS 37. 47)

IAS 16
IAS 37
IFRIC 1
Frequency of ARO
reassessment
(1) Changes in estimated future cash flows
(1) Future cash flow is reassessed when there

is a major change in estimate. The change
is adjusted to the cost of the related PPE,
similar to the treatment of IFRS.
(2) Changes in the market-based discount

rate at the end of the reporting period
(2) Unlike IFRS, the discount rate is not

reassessed once a liability is recognized.
(3) Passage of time
(3) The increase of ARO due to passage of

time is expensed when incurred, similar
to IFRS. However, it is recognized under
the same classification as the
depreciation expense (i.e. operating cost)
and not recognized as a financial cost.
An ARO is reassessed each period. The

following items may impact the ARO:
The changes of ARO due to (1) and (2) are

adjusted to the cost of related PPE and the
increase of ARO due to (3) is expensed as a
financial cost.
(IAS 16. 16, 18) (IAS 37. 59) (IFRIC 1. 3, 5, 8)
IAS 16
IAS 37
IFRIC 1
ARO and rental deposit

related to the asset
Unlike JP GAAP, there are no specific

requirements on the treatment of the rental
deposit relating to the asset with an ARO.
It is permitted to expense a certain portion of

the rental deposit attributable to the current
period instead of recognizing ARO. The
amount expensed is the estimated amount of
which recovery is not expected.
IAS 16
IAS 23
Identification of qualifying
assets for which the
borrowing costs are
capitalised
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable

to the acquisition, construction or production
of a qualifying asset which takes a substantial
period of time to get ready for its intended
use or sale are capitalised as part of the cost
of that asset.
Borrowing costs that are attributable to selfconstruction of fixed asset and relate to the
period before the asset starts running may be
capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
(IAS 16. 22) (IAS 23. 5, 8)
46
However, capitalisation is rare in practice

except for certain industries (such as the
power and railway industries).
PwC
Standard
IAS 23
Issue
Capitalisation of borrowing
costs
general borrowings
IFRS
For general purpose borrowings, borrowing
costs are determined by applying the
capitalisation rate (borrowing costs divided
by the weighted average outstanding
borrowing balance) to the expenditures on
the qualified asset.
JP GAAP
general or specific borrowings.
Borrowing costs include the following:

Interest expense calculated using effective
interest method
Finance charges of finance leases
Exchange differences arising from foreign
currency borrowings regarded as an
adjustment to interest costs
(IAS 23. 6, 14)
IAS 23
Capitalisation of borrowing
costs
specific borrowings
For specific borrowings, investment income

earned from the temporary investment of
specific borrowings is deducted against
actual borrowing costs.

general or specific borrowings.
(IAS 23. 12)

IAS 16
Cost of a fixed asset

acquired in exchange for a
non-monetary asset.
In general, the fair value of the asset given up

should be the cost of the asset acquired.
However, if the exchange transaction lacks
commercial substance (e.g. the future cash
flows do not change), or if the fair value of
neither the asset received nor the asset given
up is measureable, the cost of the asset
acquired is measured at the carrying amount
of the asset given up.
When a fixed asset of the same type and for

the same use is exchanged, the cost of the
asset acquired is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset transferred.
When different types of assets are
exchanged, the cost of the asset acquired is
generally measured at the fair market value
of the asset transferred or asset acquired.
(IAS 16. 24-26)

IAS 16
Measurement of property,
plant and equipment
Either the cost model or revaluation model

may be chosen and applied to an entire class
of PPE.
Only the cost model is permitted.
(IAS 16. 29)

IAS 16
Unit of depreciation
An item of PPE with a cost that is significant

in relation to the total cost of the PPE is
depreciated separately (component
approach). However, parts that have the
same useful life and the same depreciation
method may be grouped in determining the
depreciation.

practice, the tax treatment is often used.
(IAS 16. 43, 45)
PwC
47
Standard
IAS 16
Issue
Residual value
IFRS
The residual value is the estimated amount
that an entity would obtain from the disposal
of the asset, after deducting the estimated
costs of disposal at the end of its useful life.
(IAS 16. 6)
IAS 16
Useful life
Useful life is either

The period expected to be available for use
or
The number of production or similar units
expected to be obtained from the asset
IAS 16
Depreciation method
JP GAAP
The residual value is the sales value or
remaining value of the asset at the end of its
useful life.
The residual value based on tax laws may be
used unless it is unreasonable to do so in
light of an individual entitys situation. Such
tax based residual value is often applied in
practice.
If value of the asset decreases due to the
passage of time, the useful life is determined
based on the expected period available for
economic use. If the value decreases due to
the usage of the asset, it is determined by the
number of units of production.
(IAS 16. 6)
The useful life based on tax laws may be used

unless it is unreasonable to do so in light of
an individual entitys situation. Such tax
based useful life is often applied in practice.
The depreciation method used reflects the

pattern in which the assets future economic
benefits are expected to be consumed. A
change in the depreciation method is
accounted for as a change in an estimate and
is reflected prospectively.
The straight-line method, diminishing

balance method,
sum-of-the-years-digits-method and units of
production method are all permitted as
deprecation methods. An entitys
depreciation method is an accounting policy,
however, a change in depreciation method is
treated similarly to a change in accounting
estimate and is reflected prospectively.
(IAS 16. 60-62) (IAS 8. 36, 38)
A valid reason is required when changing the

depreciation method subsequently; however
there is no strict requirement when initially
selecting the depreciation method.
IAS 16
Frequency of review of
residual value, useful life
and depreciation method
The residual value, useful life and

depreciation method are reviewed at least at
each financial year-end.
(IAS 16. 51, 61)
48

frequency of review. Unlike IFRS, a periodic
review is not required. In practice, when the
tax based useful life and residual value are
used, review is not required unless, given an
individual entitys situation, there is later
indication that their continued use may be
clearly unreasonable.
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 17, Leases, SIC 15, Operating Leases Incentives, IFRIC 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease
IAS 17
Classification of leases
A lease is classified as a finance lease if it

transfers substantially all the risks and
rewards incidental to ownership (there is no
numerical criteria).
(IAS 17. 8, 10)
IAS 17
Leases involving land and

buildings
In principle, in order to classify and account

for a lease of land and buildings, the
minimum lease payments are allocated
between the land and the building elements
in proportion to the relative fair values of the
leasehold interests at the inception of the
lease.
A lease is classified as a finance lease if it

transfers substantially all the risks and
rewards incidental to ownership
Detailed guidance exists for the classification
of finance leases. A lease is a finance lease
when the present value of the total lease
payments represents approximately 90% or
more of the estimated cash purchase price, or
when the lease term is approximately equal
to or greater than 75% of the assets
economic life.
In principle, in order to classify and account
for a lease of land and buildings, the total
lease payments is allocated between the land
and the building elements on a reasonable
basis (e.g. the amount of lease payments for
land under the lease contract).
(IAS 17. 16)

IAS 17
Classification of leases of
land
A lease of land is classified similarly to other

leases.
A lease of land is assumed to be an operating

lease, except in specific cases.
(IAS 17. 15A)

IAS 17
The amount recognised as

assets and liabilities of
finance leases
Recognise the assets and liabilities at fair

value or, if lower, the present value of the
minimum lease payments.
When the purchase price by the lessor is

determinable, the following amount is
recognised:
(IAS 17. 20)
Finance leases with the transfer of

ownership the purchase price by the
lessor
Finance leases without the transfer of
ownership the lower of the purchase
price by the lessor or the present value of
the total lease payments
When the purchase price by the lessor is not
determinable, the following amount is
recognized:
The lower of the present value of the total
lease payments or the estimated cash
purchase price
IAS 17
PwC
Accounting for low valued

finance lease assets
There is no simplified treatment like JP

GAAP.
When finance leases without the transfer of

ownership are immaterial in light of the
nature of operations and the total of lease
payments for the leases from a lease contract
is not more than 3 million Japanese yen, they
may be accounted for in a manner similar to
operating leases.
49
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 17
Accounting for short term

finance leases
There is no simplified treatment like JP

GAAP.
Lease transactions with a lease term of no

more than one year may be accounted for in
a manner similar to operating leases.
IAS 17
Accounting for maintenance

expenses (lessee)
Maintenance expense is deducted from the

total minimum lease payments.
Maintenance expense is deducted from the

total lease payments similar to IFRS.
However, when the proportion of the
maintenance expense is immaterial to the
lease payments, the maintenance expense is
not required to be deducted from the total
lease payments.
(IAS 17. 4)
IAS 17
Depreciation method of
(lessee)
The depreciation method is consistent with

that of other depreciable assets owned by the
lessee.
(IAS 17. 27)
The depreciation method of finance lease

assets without the transfer of ownership may
be different from other fixed assets owned by
the lessee, depending on the circumstances
of the lessee.
The depreciation method of finance lease
assets with the transfer of ownership is
consistent with other assets owned by the
lessee.
IAS 17
Period of expected use of

(lessee)
When there is no reasonable certainty of the

transfer of ownership, the period of expected
use of the lease asset is the shorter of the
lease term and its useful life.
When there is reasonable certainty, the
period of expected use is its useful life.
(IAS 17. 27, 28)
IAS 17
50
Accounting for operating

lease payments when the
lease payments are not
made on a straight-line
basis (lessee)
Lease payments under an operating lease are

recognised as expenses generally on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
(IAS 17. 33)
When there is no transfer of ownership, the

useful life of the lease asset is generally the
lease term. However, there are some cases
when the re-lease period is included in the
lease term.
When there is transfer of ownership, the
useful life of leases asset is the estimated
economically usable period.
The general guidance for operating leases is
applied. There are no specific requirements
for operating lease payments when lease
payments are not made on a straight-line
basis.
PwC
Standard
IAS 17
Issue
Accounting for a finance
lease (lessor)
IFRS
A lessor of a finance lease recognises a lease
receivable at the commencement of the lease.
Finance income is recognized over the lease
term on a systematic and rational bases
(IAS 17. 36, 40)
JP GAAP
A lessor of a finance lease recognises lease
receivable (lease investment asset) at the
commencement of the lease.
The interest portion is allocated by either of
the following methods consistently:
Recognise sales and cost of sales at the
inception of the lease.
Recognise sales and cost of sales when the
lease payment is received
Do not recognise sales and only recognise
interest over the lease term.
IAS 17
Accounting for a finance

lease (lessor)
when the lessor is a
manufacturer or a dealer
A lessor who is a manufacturer or a dealer

recognises selling profit or loss in the period
in accordance with the general accounting for
sales. However, whether to recognise revenue
at the net amount or gross amount requires
consideration of IAS 18.
A lessor who is a manufacturer or a dealer

recognises selling profit or loss in the period
or by instalment in accordance with the
general accounting for sales.
(IAS 17. 42)

IAS 17
Calculation of finance
income on finance leases
(lessor)
Finance income is recognised based on a

pattern reflecting a constant periodic rate of
return on the lessors net investment in the
finance lease. There is no simplified
treatment similar to JP GAAP.
(IAS 17. 39)
IAS 17
Accounting for maintenance

expense (lessor)
The maintenance expense is deducted from

the total minimum lease payments.
(IAS 17. 4)
IAS 17
IAS 17
PwC
Review of estimated
unguaranteed residual
values related to a finance
lease (lessor)
Estimated unguaranteed residual values used

in computing the lessors gross investment in
the lease are reviewed regularly.
Accounting for operating

lease income when the
lease payments are not
made on a straight-line
basis (lessor)
Lease income from operating leases is

generally recognised on a straight-line basis
over the lease term.
Generally, the effective interest method is

used. However, if a lessor is not mainly
engaged in lease transactions business, and
its finance lease transactions without transfer
of ownership are immaterial, the
straight-line method may be used.
Same as IFRS; however, when the proportion

of maintenance expense is immaterial to the
total lease payments, the maintenance
expense is not required to be deducted from
the total lease payments.
(IAS 17. 41)
(IAS 17. 50)
The general guidance for operating leases is

applied. There are no specific requirements
for operating lease income when lease
payments are not made on a straight-line
basis.
51
Standard
IAS 17
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for a sale and

leaseback transaction that is
an operating lease
Sale and operating leaseback transactions

transfer substantially all the risks and
rewards and therefore are accounted for as a
disposal of assets. The amount recognised in
profit or loss differs according to the sales
price.
JP GAAP
Sales price is at fair value recognise

profit or loss immediately.
Sales price is below fair value recognise
profit or loss immediately. However when
the loss is incurred and compensated for
by future lease payments at below market
price, the loss is amortised over the period
for which the asset is expected to be used
Sales price is above fair value the excess
over fair value is deferred and amortised
over the period for which the asset is
expected to be used.
(IAS 17. 61)
SIC 15
Accounting for lease

incentives (lessee)
Lease incentives provided from the lessor

(such as relocation costs and leasehold
improvements) are recognised as a reduction
of rental expense over the lease term
generally on a straight-line basis.
(SIC 15. 5)
SIC 15
Accounting for lease

incentives (lessor)
Lease incentives provided to the lessee (such

as relocation costs and leasehold
improvements) are recognised as a reduction
of rental income over the lease term generally
on a straight-line basis.
(SIC 15. 4)
IFRIC 4
Assessment of whether an
arrangement contains a
lease
Arrangements which convey rights to use an

asset, regardless of its legal form, are
accounted for in accordance with IAS 17.
There is guidance in assessing whether the
arrangement conveys a right to use the asset
or not.
Assessed by whether an arrangement meets

the definition of a lease arrangement,
however, there is no detailed guidance
similar to that provided under IFRS.
(IFRIC 4. 1, 5, 6)
IAS 17
Determination of the lease

term
The lease term is the non-cancellable period

for which the lessee has contracted to lease
the asset together with any further terms for
which it is reasonably certain that, at the
inception of the lease, the lessee will exercise
the option to continue to lease the asset.
(IAS 17. 4)
52
The lease term is the non-cancellable lease

period together with any renewal period
when the lessee has a clear intention to
continue to lease the asset.
When the renewal period is not included in
the lease term, payments during the renewed
period are generally expensed when
incurred.
PwC
Standard
IAS 17
Issue
Accounting for contingent
rents
IFRS
JP GAAP
Contingent rents are expensed when incurred

and not included in the minimum lease
payments.
There are no specific requirements and

contingent rents are accounted for depending
on the substance of the transaction.
(IAS 17. 4, 25)

IAS 17
Accounting for purchase

options
When it is reasonably certain that the

purchase option (option to purchase at a
price sufficiently lower than fair value at the
date the option becomes exercisable) will be
exercised, the exercise price of the purchase
option is included in the minimum lease
payments.
When it is certain that the purchase option

will be exercised, the exercise price of the
purchase option is included in the total lease
payment.
This is the case for a finance lease with
transfer of ownership.
(IAS 17. 4)
IAS 17
IAS 18
Accounting by the
intermediate lessor when
both the head lease and the
sub lease are finance leases
There are no specific requirements. The

recognition of profit and loss of an
intermediate lessor follows the guidance of
an agency relationship in IAS 18 on a case by
case basis.
(IAS 18. 8)
The intermediate lessor does not recognise

any interest expense, revenue or cost of sales.
The difference between the lease income as a
lessor and the lease payment as a lessee is
allocated to each period and presented in the
statement of profit and loss as a line item,
e.g. as a gain on sublease.
IAS 36, Impairment of Assets

IAS 36
Scope
IAS 36 should be applied to all assets other

than assets scoped out of the standard (such
as investment property measured at fair
value (IAS 40), non-current assets classified
as held for sale (IFRS 5) and financial assets
(IAS 39 or IFRS 9)).
The standard for impairment of fixed assets

is applied to all fixed assets other than fixed
assets scoped out of the standard because
other impairment guidance exists (such as
financial assets and tax assets).
(IAS 36. 2, 3)
IAS 36
IAS 38
Frequency of impairment
testing for intangible assets
with indefinite useful life or
intangible assets not yet
available for use;
Frequency of impairment
testing for goodwill
Annual impairment testing is required

irrespective of whether there is any
indication of impairment or not. It may be
performed at any time during an annual
period, provided it is performed at the same
time every year. Different assets may be
tested at different times.
There is no concept of intangible assets with

an indefinite useful life or intangible assets
not yet available for use.
All intangible assets, including goodwill, are
tested for impairment when there is
indication of impairment. Annual
impairment testing is not required.
Goodwill acquired in a business combination

is tested annually.
(IAS 38. 108) (IAS 36. 10)
PwC
53
Standard
IAS 36
Issue
Indicators of impairment
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS provides a list of impairment

indicators.
JP GAAP also provides a list of impairment

indicators.
Below are the indicators in IFRS that are not

in JP GAAP:
Below are the indicators in JP GAAP that are

not in IFRS:
When market interest rates or other

market rates of return on investments
have increased and those increases are
likely to affect the discount rate and
consequently decrease the recoverable
amount of the asset materially
When the profit or loss or cash flows from

operating activities are continuously
negative for 2 years
A significant decrease in market value is
defined as a 50% or so decrease
When the carrying amount of the net

assets of the entity is more than its market
capitalisation
(IAS 36. 12)
IAS 36
Impairment test
An impairment loss is recognised when there

is an indication of impairment and when the
recoverable amount of an asset is below its
carrying amount. (1 step method)
An impairment loss is recognised when there

is an indication of impairment and
(IAS 36. 59)
(2) The recoverable amount of an asset is

below its carrying amount.
(1) The undiscounted total future cash flow

is below its carrying amount; then
(2 step method)
IAS 36
The length of period used to

estimate future cash flows to
calculate the value in use for
impairment testing
The cash flow projections to calculate the

value in use should be estimated over the
remaining useful life of the asset.
The cash flow projections to calculate the

value in use should be estimated over the
remaining useful life of the asset.
The cash flow projections based on the

budgets/forecasts approved by management
should cover basically a maximum period of
5 years. Projections beyond the period
covered by managements budget/forecast
should be estimated in principle using a
steady or declining growth rate (unless
justified otherwise, the growth rate should
not exceed the long-term average growth rate
for the industries in which the entity operates
or for the markets in which the asset is used).
The cash flow projections should be based on

the mid to long budgets/forecasts approved
by management. Projections beyond the
period covered by managements mid to long
term budget/forecast should be estimated
using, a steady or declining growth rate.
(IAS 36. 33)

IAS 36
Assessment of the
reasonableness of the
assumptions used for the
future cash flows
IFRS requires an assessment on the

reasonableness of the assumptions on which
current cash flow projections are based by
examining and comparing past cash flow
projections and past actual cash flows.
(IAS 36. 34)

IAS 36
Recognition of an
impairment loss
An impairment loss for assets measured by

the cost model is recognised in profit or loss.
An impairment loss for assets measured by
the revaluation model should first reduce the
revaluation surplus with any residual
An impairment loss is recognised in profit or

loss in the period incurred.
(IAS 36. 60, 61)
54
PwC
Standard
IAS 36
Issue
Method of allocating
goodwill for impairment
testing
IFRS
JP GAAP
Goodwill is allocated to each cash-generating

unit or groups of cash-generating units that
is expected to benefit from the synergies of
the business combination.
As a general rule, goodwill is considered by

business units, and is not required but
permitted to be allocated to each asset group
for assessing impairment.
Each unit should be the lowest level within

the entity at which the goodwill is monitored
for internal management purposes; and
should not be larger than an operating
segment.
(IAS 36. 80)
IAS 36
Method of allocating
impairment loss
An impairment loss recognised at a cash

generating unit level is allocated first to
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill
allocated to the cash-generating unit; and
then to the other assets of the unit pro rata
on the basis of the carrying amount of each
asset in the unit.
The carrying amount of such assets shall not
be reduced below the highest of its fair value
less costs of disposal (when measureable), its
value in use and zero.
(IAS 36. 104, 105)
IAS 36
Impairment testing of partial

goodwill
When non-controlling interests are measured

at its proportionate interest in the net
identifiable assets of the acquiree (partial
goodwill), goodwill attributable to the
non-controlling interests should be included
in the carrying amount (grossed up) of the
cash generating unit when comparing with
its recoverable amount.
The increased portion of an impairment loss,

resulting from the addition of goodwill to a
multiple asset group, is allocated first to
reduce the carrying amount of goodwill; and
then allocated on a systematic basis using
methods similar to those based on the
recoverable amount or pro rata carrying
amount of each asset group.
An impairment loss recognised for each asset
group is allocated on a systematic basis such
as a method based on pro rata of the carrying
amount of each component or a method
based on the market value each component.
The amount of impairment loss for the

grossed up goodwill should be allocated to
both the parent and the non-controlling
interest using their proportionate interest
and only the portion related to the parent is
recognised as an impairment loss.
When non-controlling interests are measured
at fair value (full goodwill), the process
described above is not necessary.
(IAS 36. C4, C8)
PwC
55
Standard
IAS 36
Issue
Reversal of an impairment
loss
IFRS
For the assets within the scope of IAS 36
(except for goodwill) the recoverable amount
should be estimated when there is any
indication that an impairment loss previously
recognised may no longer exist or may have
decreased.
JP GAAP
Reversal of impairment is not permitted for
all assets including goodwill.
If there has been a change in the estimates

used to determine the assets recoverable
amount since the recognition of the last
impairment loss, such an impairment loss
should be reversed.
(IAS 36. 110, 114)
IAS 36
Allocation of corporate
assets
As a general rule, all corporate assets are

allocated to each related cash-generating
unit.
(IAS 36. 102)
As a general rule, corporate assets are not

allocated to each asset or group of assets.
However, it is permitted to assess
impairment after allocating corporate assets
to each asset or group of assets.
IAS 38, Intangible Assets

IAS 38
Definition and recognition

criteria of intangible assets
The definition of intangible assets includes

the following components.
Identifiability
Control over an asset
There is no general definition of intangible

assets. Examples of intangible assets, such as
leasehold rights, goodwill, patents, rights
above ground and trademarks are listed in
the standard.
Future economic benefits

The recognition criteria is as follows:
It is probable that the expected future
economic benefits that are attributable to
the asset will flow to the entity; and
the cost of the asset can be measured
reliably
When both the definition and recognition
criteria are met, an item is recognised as an
intangible asset.
(IAS 38. 10-17, 21)
56
PwC
Standard
IAS 38
Issue
Accounting for deferred
assets
IFRS
There is no corresponding concept under
IFRS to what JP GAAP defines as deferred
assets.
Stock issue costs, net of any income tax
benefit, are deducted from equity. Bond issue
costs are deducted from the fair value of the
liability and is reflected in the effective
interest rate and amortised.
JP GAAP
There is a list of deferred assets (i.e. stock
issue cost, bond issue cost, founding
expenses, start-up costs and development
costs) in the standard.
These deferred assets are expensed in
principle, however it is also permitted to
capitalize and amortise over a certain period.
The definition and recognition criteria in IAS

38 should be applied for development costs.
Start-up costs (legal and secretarial costs
incurred in establishing a legal entity,
pre-opening costs and pre-operating costs)
are recognised as expenses.
(IAS 38. 10-17, 21, 69(a)) (IAS 32. 37) (IAS
39. 43) (IFRS 9. 5.1.1)
IAS 38
Accounting for taxes on the

purchase of intangible
assets
Import duties, non-refundable purchase

taxes and any directly attributable cost of
preparing the asset for its intended use are
included in the cost of the intangible asset.
Acquisition costs are included in the cost of

the intangible asset. However, there is no
specific requirement on purchase taxes.
(IAS 38. 27, 28)

IAS 38
Expense recognition of an
interest expense included in
cost
If payment for an intangible asset is deferred

beyond normal credit terms, its cost is the
cash price equivalent (the amount discounted
to present value). The difference between this
amount and the total payments is recognised
as an interest expense over the period of
credit unless capitalised in accordance with
IAS 23.
(IAS 38. 32)

IAS 38
IFRS 3
Identification of intangible
assets acquired in a
business combination
An intangible asset acquired in a business

combination which is separable or arises
from contractual or other legal rights is
recognised separately from goodwill even if it
had not been recognised as an intangible
asset by the acquiree.
It is presumed that the fair value of an
identifiable intangible asset acquired in a
business combination can be measured
reliably (i.e. brand names, patents and
customer list may be recognised as intangible
assets).
(IAS 38. 11-12, 34-37) (IFRS 3. 13)
PwC
An intangible asset which is separately

transferrable (such as a legal right) is
recognised separately from goodwill even if it
had not been recognised as an asset by the
acquiree.
An asset is separately transferrable when it
can be purchased and sold separately from
the entity or business and an independent
price can be reliably measured (i.e., patents
may be recognised as intangible assets.
Corporate brands are generally not
considered as intangible assets since they are
closely related to the business).
57
Standard
IAS 38
Issue
Cost of an intangible asset
acquired in exchange for a
non-monetary asset
IFRS
JP GAAP
In general, the fair value of the intangible

asset given up should be the cost of the
intangible asset acquired. However, if the
exchange transaction lacks commercial
substance (e.g. the future cash flows do not
change) or if the fair value of neither the
asset received nor the asset given up is
measurable, the cost of the asset acquired is
measured at the carrying amount of the asset
given up.
When an intangible asset of the same type

and for the same use is exchanged, the cost of
the asset acquired is measured at the
carrying amount of the asset transferred.
When different types of assets are
exchanged, the cost of the asset acquired is
generally measured at the fair market value
of the asset transferred or asset acquired.
(IAS 38. 45-47)

IAS 38
Accounting for internally

generated research and
development cost
Expenditure incurred during the research

phase is expensed when incurred.
Expenditure incurred during the
development phase is capitalised from the
point when the recognition criteria of an
intangible asset are met.
Research and development cost is generally

expensed.
(IAS 38. 52-64)

IAS 38
Identification of internally
generated intangible assets
An internally generated intangible asset is

recognised if the recognition criteria of IAS
38.21, 22, 57 are met. Internally generated
software, website costs, and patents may be
capitalised if the criteria are met.
Software which meets certain criteria is

capitalised. However, the recognition criteria
are different from IFRS.
(IAS 38. 48-67) (SIC 32. 8)

IAS 16
Recognition of machinery
and equipment used only for
the purpose of a specific
research and development
project.
Machinery and equipment acquired for the

purpose of a specific research and
development project are recognised as PPE if
they meet the definition and recognition
criteria of PPE.
(IAS 16. 6-7)
IAS 38
Capitalisation of the cost of

software developed for the
purpose of sale in a market
or for internal use
The software cost incurred (such as costs of

materials and services, costs of employee
benefits, fees to register a legal right, and
amortisation of patents and licenses) are
capitalised once the recognition criteria for
internally generated intangible assets are
met.
(IAS 38. 65, 66)
58
The acquisition cost of machinery and

equipment used solely for the purpose of a
specific research and development project
which cannot be used for any other purpose
is expensed as research and development
cost when acquired.
Software developed for the purpose of a

sale in a market Capitalise the prototype
cost incurred, except for costs incurred
during the research and development
phase.
Software for internal use Capitalise the
software cost incurred if revenue or cost
reduction is certain.
PwC
Standard
IAS 38
Issue
Examples of expenditure
expensed when incurred
IFRS
JP GAAP
Expenditure on advertising and promotional

activities including mail order catalogues are
expensed when incurred.
In practice, there are cases in which

expenditure on advertising and promotional
activities, such as catalogues are capitalised
as supplies until they are actually used for
advertising and promotional activities.
(IAS 38. 69, 69A)

SIC 32
Capitalisation of internal
expenditure incurred for
development of an entitys
own web site
Internal expenditure incurred for

development of an entitys own web site for
internal or external access should be
accounted for under IAS 38 if the recognition
criteria for internally generated intangible
assets are met.
Apply the same accounting treatment as

software cost.
(SIC 32. 8, 9)
IAS 38
Measurement of intangible
assets
Either the cost model or revaluation model

may be chosen as the accounting policy.
Only the cost model is permitted.
(IAS 38. 72)

IAS 38
Useful life
An entity should assess whether the useful

life is finite or indefinite. If finite, the useful
life is the expected period available for use or
the number of production or similar units
expected to be obtained from the asset.
There is no concept of an intangible asset

with indefinite useful life.
In practice, the useful life under tax law is
often used.
(IAS 38. 8, 88)

IAS 38
Amortisation method
The depreciable amount is allocated by a

systematic method that reflects the pattern in
which the assets future economic benefits
are expected to be consumed (e.g.
straight-line method, diminishing balance
method and unit of production method). If
the pattern cannot be determined reliably,
the straight-line method should be used.
In practice, the amortisation method under

the tax law, generally the straight line
method is often used.
(IAS 38. 97, 98)
PwC
59
Standard
IAS 38
Issue
Residual value
IFRS
The residual value is assumed to be zero
unless:
There is a commitment by a third party to
purchase the asset at the end of its useful
life; or
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements. It is
considered reasonable to assume that the
residual value of an intangible asset is zero,
since it is rare that an intangible asset, unlike
a tangible asset, is sold for proceeds at the
end of its useful life.
There is an active market for the asset and

certain criteria are met
(IAS 38. 100)
IAS 38
Frequency of review of
amortisation period and
amortisation method
The amortisation period and amortisation

method for an intangible asset with a finite
useful life should be reviewed at each
financial year-end.
(IAS 38. 104)
IAS 38
Identification of an intangible
asset with an indefinite
useful life and its
amortisation
An intangible asset with an indefinite useful

life (such as broadcasting license, airline
route, and trademark) is not amortised. Its
useful life is reviewed each period as
indefinite does not mean infinite. If there is a
change in circumstances, the asset should be
changed to one with a finite life.

frequency of review. Unlike IFRS, a review at
each financial year-end is not required. In
practice, when the tax law is followed, a
review is not required unless it is
unreasonable to use useful life or residual
value in light of the entitys situation.
There is no concept of an intangible asset
with indefinite useful life.
(IAS 38. 89, 91, 107, 109)

IAS 38
Expensing subsequent
expenditure
Subsequent expenditure on brands,

mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists
and items similar in substance is always
recognised in profit or loss as incurred.

However, subsequent expenditure for
research and development acquired through
a business combination is expensed.
Subsequent expenditure on the development

of a research and development project
acquired in a business combination is
capitalised if the recognition criteria for
internally generated intangible assets are
met.
(IAS 38. 20, 43, 63)
IAS 40, Investment property

IAS 40
Subsequent measurement
An entity should choose either the fair value

model or the cost model as its accounting
policy for an investment property held to
earn rentals or for capital appreciation or
both. An entity should apply that policy to all
of its investment properties, except for
certain cases.
Investment and rental property should be

measured at cost (cost less any accumulated
depreciation) and certain information on its
fair value should be disclosed.
When the cost model is applied, disclosure of

certain information on its fair value is
required.
(IAS 40. 30, 79)
60
PwC
Standard
IAS 40
Issue
Scope
IFRS
Property occupied by employees is not
investment property (whether or not the
employees pay rent at market rates).
JP GAAP
A property occupied by employees is not an
investment and rental property if it is for
managerial use.
(IAS 40. 9)
IAS 40
Property held for multiple

use
When a property comprises a portion that is

held to earn rentals or for capital
appreciation and another portion that is held
for use in the production or supply of goods
or services or for administrative purposes, if
these portions could be sold separately (or
leased out separately under a finance lease),
the portions are accounted for separately,
and the portion that is held to earn rentals or
for capital appreciation is accounted as an
investment property.
When a property comprises both a portion

used as an investment and rental property
and a portion used in the production or
supply of goods or services or for others, the
portion used as an investment and rental
property is accounted for separately.
However, if the portion used as an
investment and rental property is
insignificant, it is permitted not to account
for that portion as an investment and rental
property.
If the portions could not be sold separately

and only an insignificant portion is held for
its own use, such property is treated as
investment property as a whole. If a
significant portion is held for its own use,
such property is treated as an
owner-occupied property as a whole.
(IAS 40. 10)
IAS 40
Property held for supply of

services
If an entity provides ancillary services to the

occupants of a property it holds, the level of
significance of the services should be
considered; when it is insignificant, the
property is treated as an investment property
and when it is significant, the property is
treated as an owner-occupied property.
A rental property is accounted for as an

investment and rental property regardless of
the significance of the ancillary services
provided.
(IAS 40. 11-12)
IAS 41, Agriculture

IAS 41
Scope
There is a specific standard for biological

assets and agricultural produce at the point
of harvest.
(IAS 41. 1)
IAS 41
Recognition and
measurement
Biological assets and agricultural produce are

measured at their fair value less cost to sell
on initial recognition and at the end of each
reporting period (or at the point of harvest
for agricultural produce).
There are no specific requirements; such

assets are usually measured at cost.
(IAS 41. 12, 13)
PwC
61
JP GAAP References:
Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Presentation Methods of Financial Statements, etc.
Cost Accounting Standard
Audit Treatment for Borrowing Costs Related to Real Estate Developments Business.
Accounting Standard for Measurement of Inventories
Accounting Standard for Consolidated Financial Statements
Business Accounting Principle
Practical Solution on Unification of Accounting Policies Applied to Foreign Subsidiaries for Consolidated Financial Statements
Guidelines on Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Presentation Methods of Financial Statements, etc.
Accounting Standard for Asset Retirement Obligations
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Asset Retirement Obligations
Audit Treatment for Compressed Entry
Tentative Auditing Treatment for Depreciation Expenses
Accounting Standard for Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions
Accounting Standard for Impairment of Fixed Assets
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Impairment of Fixed Assets
Tentative Solution on Accounting for Deferred Assets
Accounting Standard for Business Combinations
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Business Combinations and Accounting Standard for Business Divestitures
Accounting Standard for Research and Development Costs
Discussion Paper on Intangible Assets
Accounting Standard for Disclosures about Fair Value of Investment and Rental Property
Guidance on Accounting Standard for Disclosures about Fair Value of Investment and Rental Property
Recent developments
Lease project by the IASB and FASB
The IASB and FASB are carrying out a joint project with the objective of recording assets and liabilities arising from leasing
transactions on the balance sheet. This project comprehensively reconsiders the guidance in IAS 17, Leases, along with
related interpretations. The boards issued a first exposure draft in August 2010. In May 2013, the boards issued a second
exposure draft. Based on the feedback received, the boards have been redeliberating the key topics proposed in the second
exposure draft since November 2013.and will continue their redeliberations toward issuing a final standard.
Amendments to IAS 36 and IAS 38
Clarification of deprecation methods and amortisation methods
In December 2012, the IASB released an Exposure Draft of proposed amendments to IAS 16, Property, Plant and
Equipment and IAS 38, Intangible Assets. The exposure draft proposes that the depreciation or amortisation methods
should generally be based on the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset, as
opposed to being based on revenue.
Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41
Agriculture: Bearer Plants
In June 2013, the IASB released an Exposure Draft of proposed amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41 in relation to bearer
plants. IAS 41 requires all biological assets that are related to agricultural activity to be measured at fair value less costs to
sell. However, once mature, bearer plants no longer undergo significant biological transformation. Furthermore, their
operation is similar to that of manufacturing. Consequently, the exposure draft proposes that bearer plants are accounted
for by IAS 16 instead of IAS 41.
62
PwC
Assetsnancial assets
63
Assetsfinancial assets
The FASB and IASB are working on a joint project on financial instruments. Once finalised, the new guidance will replace all
of the FASBs and IASBs respective financial instrument guidance. The two boards have, however, been working on different
timetables.
The IASB has been conducting its work in three separate phases (that is, classification and measurement, impairment and
hedge accounting), the first of which resulted in the November 2009 issuance of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, on
requirements on financial assets followed in 2010 with classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities.
In January 2012, the FASB and the IASB decided to jointly redeliberate selected aspects of the classification and
measurement model for financial instruments to reduce key differences between their respective models. After the joint
redeliberations, IASB released an exposure draft Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendment to IFRS 9 in
November 2012. In this ED, requirements related to equity instruments and financial liabilities were not changed, however, a
third category of fair value through other comprehensive income for debt instruments was introduced. The FASB also
released its exposure draft in February 2013. For details, please refer to the Recent developments section.
While in Japan, the ASBJ issued Discussion Paper on Revision of Accounting Standards for Financial Instruments
(Classification and Measurement for Financial Assets) in August 2010 as part of its convergence project based on the Tokyo
Agreement with the IASB, and is undertaking a full review of the ASBJ Statement No. 10, Accounting Standards for
Financial Instruments, with the goal of converging with IFRS 9. Deliberations, however, are currently on hold.
Although existing IFRS (before IFRS 9 is applied) and JP GAAP are basically similar, key differences in classification,
measurement and derecognition are as follows:
Firstly, under IAS 39, financial instruments are classified into one of four categories: assets held for trading or
designated at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in earnings; held-to-maturity investments; loans and
receivables; and available-for-sale financial assets. Under JP GAAP, in principle, financial assets are classified based on
their legal form, such as securities (securities held for trading, bonds held to maturity, investments in subsidiary and
affiliates and other securities), bonds, money trust, derivatives etc. The classification could result in different accounting
because classification can drive differences in measurement subsequent to initial recognition.
As to the measurement of financial assets, with regards to equity investments, fair value is the general rule under IFRS
and cost is an exception. While under JP GAAP, unlisted financial instruments are measured at cost. There are more
cases under JP GAAP where financial instruments are measured at cost.
Under IFRS and JP GAAP, fundamental differences exist in how to assess derecognition of financial assets. These
differences may have an impact on many transactions including securitisations. IFRS requires the assessment to be
based on whether or not the risks and rewards are transferred. In addition, when it is unclear whether substantially all
the risks and rewards have been transferred or retained, assessment is made on whether control over the asset is
retained. JP GAAP focuses on whether control (including legal and substantial control) is relinquished over the asset.
64
PwC
IFRS 9 is more simplified with respect to the categories of classification of financial assets. The current multiple categories
under IAS 39 have been narrowed down to two; amortised cost and fair value. Debt securities may be measured at amortised
cost provided certain conditions are met, otherwise at fair value through profit or loss. On the other hand, equity investments
are required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss, however, at initial recognition, an entity may make an
irrevocable election to present subsequent changes in the fair value in other comprehensive income. With regards to financial
liabilities, similar to IAS 39, financial liabilities are measured at fair value through profit or loss (held for trading or
designated under the fair value option) or amortised cost.
Further details on the foregoing and other selected current differences are described in the following table. In addition, the
differences with JP GAAP related to the changes from current requirements to IFRS 9 are also included.
PwC
65
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

IAS 39
Classification of financial
assets
Classification of financial assets is

determined not based on their legal form but
according to the definitions of: fair value
through profit or loss (held for trading or
designated under the fair value option),
held-to-maturity investments, loans and
receivables and available-for-sale assets.
(IAS 39. 9)
Financial assets are classified to securities,

receivables, money held in trust, derivatives
etc., based on their legal form in principle.
Furthermore, securities are classified into
securities held for trading, securities held to
maturity, equity investment in subsidiaries
and affiliates, and other securities (similar
to available-for-sale category under IFRS).
Both IFRS and JP GAAP specify the method
of measurement subsequent to initial
recognition for each category. Therefore, the
differences in classification result in
differences in the accounting.
For example, debt securities classified as
other securities under JP GAAP may meet
the definition of loans and receivable under
IFRS. Financial assets classified as
held-to-maturity under JP GAAP may not be
classified the same under IFRS unless there is
an active market for the asset and hence
require a different classification under IFRS.
IAS 39
Designation under the fair

value option
The fair value option is available under IFRS.

The fair value option is to allow, only at initial
recognition, a one-time election to designate
a financial instrument to be measured at fair
value through profit or loss when:
There is no concept of the fair value option.
It eliminates or significantly reduces an

accounting mismatch,
A group of financial liabilities and/or
financial assets is managed and evaluated
on a fair value basis in accordance with a
documented risk management policy, or
One or more embedded derivatives are
contained in a hybrid instrument and an
entity designates the entire instrument as
at fair value through profit or loss (unless
the embedded derivative(s) does not
significantly modify the cash flows that
otherwise would be required by the
contract or it is clear with little or no
analysis when a similar hybrid instrument
is first considered that separation of the
embedded derivative(s) is prohibited).
(IAS 39. 9, 11A)
66
PwC
Standard
IFRS 5
IFRS 11
IAS 39
IAS 27
IAS 28
Issue
Subsidiaries, affiliates and
joint arrangements
IFRS
JP GAAP
In separate financial statements, interests in

subsidiaries, affiliates and joint
arrangements are measured at cost or in
accordance with IAS 39. However, an
interest in a subsidiary classified as
held-for-sale under IFRS 5 is measured at
the lower of its carrying amount and fair
value less cost to sell. Interests in associates
or joint arrangements held by a venture
capital entity (which are designated under
the fair value option or classified as held for
sale) may be measured at fair value through
profit or loss.
In separate financial statements, interests in

subsidiaries and affiliates are measured at
cost. There are no specific requirements on
interests in joint arrangements.
(IAS 11. 24-27) (IAS 27. 10) (IAS 28. 18)

(IFRS 5. 6-8A)
IAS 39
Initial recognition of financial

instruments (assets)
An entity should recognise a financial

instrument (asset) when, and only when, the
entity becomes a party to the contractual
provisions of the instrument. IFRS specifies
that normal sale/purchase transactions
involving financial assets should be
recognised or derecognised on the
transaction date or the settlement date. In
addition, there is no such additional
requirement for financial liabilities.
(IAS 39. 14, 38)
In principle, sales/purchase transactions

involving securities are recognised or
derecognised on the transaction date, if the
period between the transaction date and the
delivery date is considered a normal length
of period in accordance with market rules or
regular practice. In addition, instead of this
transaction date basis, a modified delivery
date basis may be applied in which a buyer
may recognise only the changes in fair value
between the transaction date and the
delivery date, by each category based on the
objectives of holding the securities; and a
seller may only recognise the gain/loss on
sale on the transaction date.
Loans should be recognised on the date of
borrowing, and derecognised on the
maturity date.
IAS 39
Held-to-maturity
investments
An entity should not classify any financial

assets as held-to-maturity if the entity has,
during the current financial year or during
the two preceding financial years, sold or
reclassified held-to-maturity investments
(tainting rule).
(IAS 39. 9, 52)
PwC
An entity should not classify any financial

assets as held-to-maturity if the entity has
changed the objective of holding
held-to-maturity financial assets (e.g. to
disposal) in the current or prior fiscal year.
Therefore, the applicable period for the
tainting rule under JP GAAP is 1 year
shorter than IFRS.
67
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Derecognition of financial
assets
IFRS
An entity should evaluate whether or not the
risks and rewards of ownership of a financial
asset has transferred. If it is not clear, the
entity should further evaluate whether
control over the asset has transferred.
The derecognition of a financial asset in its
entirety is achieved when an entity has
transferred substantially all the risks and
rewards of ownership or the entity neither
transfers nor retains substantially all the
risks and rewards but the transferee has the
practical ability to sell the asset.
In addition, when an entity neither transfers
nor retains substantially all the risks and
rewards and the transferee does not have the
practical ability to sell the asset, the entity
should continue to recognise the asset to the
extent of its continuing involvement.
(IAS 39. 15-37, AG36 (flowchart))
IAS 39
Partial derecognition of
financial assets
Derecognition is appropriate for a part of a

financial asset if the part comprises
specifically identified or a proportionate
share of cash flows from the asset. In all
other cases, derecognition should be
evaluated for a financial asset in its entirety.
JP GAAP
In accordance with the Financial
component approach, a financial asset
should be derecognised when, and only
when, all of the following criteria are met:
The contractual rights of the transferee
over the transferred financial assets are
secured legally from the transferors and
their creditors;
The transferee can enjoy contractual rights
on the transferred financial assets in an
ordinary manner, directly or indirectly.
For example, the transferee must be
entitled to recover all, or almost all of the
funds invested by means of repayments of
the principal, payments of interest or
dividends; and
The transferor does not substantially have
the right or the obligation to repurchase
the transferred financial assets before
their maturity date.
There are no specific requirements on the
unit to apply the derecognition requirements
for financial assets.
(IAS 39. 16)

IAS 39
Accounting for loan

participations
IFRS does not provide a special treatment for

loan participations like JP GAAP and
financial assets are derecognised only when
the pass through requirements under IAS
39.19 are satisfied.
Loan participations, which do not meet

derecognition criteria, may be kept
off-balance sheet as a transitional treatment
until a further pronouncement is issued.
(IAS 39. 19)

IAS 39
Derecognition of notes
receivable (promissory
notes) under JP GAAP
When notes receivable are transferred to a

third party at a discount or by means of an
endorsement in Japan, they do not satisfy the
derecognition criteria as they generally have
full recourse (unless they are endorsed with a
declaration of non-recourse).
Notes receivable are extinguished when

transferred to a third party at a discount or by
means of an endorsement in Japan.
(IAS 39. 20)
68
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Amortised cost of
held-to-maturity
investments
IFRS
Held-to-maturity investments should be
measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method. The
straight-line method is not permitted.
When calculating the effective interest rate
method, an entity generally takes into
account any fees, transaction costs and the
premium or discount to adjust the coupon
rate. Unlike JP GAAP, items which should be
considered in the effective interest rate
calculation are not limited to the interest rate
element within the difference between the
cost and face value of an investment. In
addition, the amortisation period for these
adjustment items is the expected remaining
period of the investment or a shorter period
to which the adjustment items relate to (if the
premium or discount is reset until it is
repriced to the market rate).
JP GAAP
Held-to-maturity bonds are measured at
amortised cost using the interest method
in principle. However, the straight-line
method is also permitted if applied
consistently.
To calculate the effective interest rate, the
coupon rate will be adjusted with the interest
rate element within the difference between
the cost and face value of the bond. As to the
classification of held-to-maturity bonds,
IFRS specifies that the difference between
the cost and face value may be generally
considered as the difference arising from
different interest rates (i.e. there is no risk
factor) because such bonds are expected to
be redeemed at face value and have lower
credit risks.
(IAS 39. 9, 46, AG6)

IAS 39
Amortised cost of loans and

receivables
Similar to the measurement of

held-to-maturity investments after initial
recognition described above.
(IAS 39. 9, 46, AG6)
Receivables are measured at amortised cost

using the interest method in principle.
However, the straight-line method is
permitted if the principal and interest are
repaid as a lump sum on maturity or on the
due date, or in accordance with the payment
schedule.
Effective interest rate is calculated to align
the future cash flows reflecting credit risk
with the cost.
IAS 39
Amortised cost method for

available-for-sale assets
(debt securities)
Similar to held-to-maturity investments with

regard to the calculation of the effective
interest rate. The difference between the fair
value and amortised cost calculated based on
the effective interest rate will be recorded in
other comprehensive income.
Similar to held-to-maturity bonds with

regard to the calculation of the effective
interest rate. The difference between the fair
value and amortised cost calculated based on
the effective interest rate will be recorded in
valuation difference of other securities.
(IAS 39. 9, 46, AG6)

IAS 39
Financial instruments
measured at cost
investments in equity
instruments
If investments in equity instruments do not

have a quoted market price in an active
market and cannot be measured reliably, it
shall be measured at cost. Fair value is not
reliably measurable when it can be estimated
but the range of the fair value estimates is
significant and the probabilities of the
various estimates within the range cannot be
reasonably assessed. Unlike JP GAAP,
measurement of equity instruments at cost
solely on the grounds of being unlisted is not
permitted.
Unlisted shares are treated as securities

whose fair values are extremely difficult to
obtain and are measured at cost.
(IAS 39. 46(c), AG80, AG81)
PwC
69
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
measured at cost
derivative instruments
IFRS
JP GAAP
Derivatives that are linked to and must be

settled by delivery of equity instruments
measured at cost shall also be measured at
cost. The only derivatives that should be
measured at cost are those that are linked to
equity instruments measured at cost.
Unlisted derivative instruments may be

measured at cost if it is extremely difficult to
calculate the fair value, such as weather
derivatives or certain derivatives with no
prevalent method to measure the fair value
because the market for such instruments is
not developed.
(IAS 39. 46(c), AG 80, AG 81)

IAS 39
measured at cost
investments in debt
instruments
IFRS 13
Fair value
An entity cannot justify the measurement of

investments in debt instruments at cost
because the fair value cannot be measured
reliably.
(IAS 39. 46)
When financial instruments are traded in an
exchange market, closing prices are both
readily available and generally representative
of fair valueIn a market such as a dealer
market, bid and ask prices are typically more
readily available than closing prices. The
price within the bid-ask spread that is most
representative of fair value in the
circumstances is used to measure fair value.
However, the use of mid-market pricing or
other pricing conventions that are used by
market participants as a practical expedient
for fair value measurements are not
precluded.
A security classified as other securities

(similar to the available-for-sale category
under IFRS) may be measured similar to
receivables (i.e. at amortised cost) when its
fair value is difficult to obtain.
For fair value measurement of receivables or

payables arising from securities and
derivatives transactions, closing quotes by
security exchanges and OTC markets are
preferred. If such closing quotes are not
available, bid and asking prices will be used.
The lowest of the asking price or the highest
of the bid price is considered as the indicative
price, however, the mid price of the two will
be used when both are available.
(IFRS 13, 70, 71, B34)

IFRS 13
Fair value of financial

instruments without market
prices
Valuation techniques are required to be used

to estimate the price at which an orderly
transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the
liability would take place between market
participants at the measurement date under
current market conditions.
(IFRS 13. 62)
70
When a financial asset does not have a

market price and if an entity can reasonably
calculate a price that can be considered as a
quasi-quoted price, such price may be used
for that financial asset as a market price. The
reasonably calculated price represents,
basically, the price based on reasonable
estimates by management.
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Transaction costs
IFRS
Transaction costs are incremental costs that
are directly attributable to transactions such
as an acquisition of a financial asset. Except
for financial instruments measured at fair
value through profit or loss (such as those
held for trading and derivatives), transaction
costs are included in the acquisition cost.
JP GAAP
Ancillary costs incurred at acquisition of
financial assets (excluding derivatives) are
included in the cost of the acquired asset.
However, an ancillary cost may be excluded
from the cost if it is recurring and its
attribution to individual financial asset is
unclear.
(IAS 39. 9, 43)

IFRS 13
Fair value measurement of

financial assets/liabilities
with offsetting positions in
market risks or counterparty
credit risk
When an entity manages a group of financial

assets and financial liabilities on the basis of
its net exposure, if certain conditions are
met, the entity is permitted to measure the
fair value of a group of financial assets and
financial liabilities on the basis of the price to
sell or transfer a net exposure for a particular
risk between market participants.
Annual improvements to IFRSs 20112013

cycle clarified that the scope exception for
measuring the fair value of a group of
financial assets and financial liabilities on a
net basis (the portfolio exception) includes
all contracts (including contracts to buy or
sell non-financial instruments which are
settled net) that are within the scope of IAS
39 or IFRS 9 even if they do not meet the
definitions of financial assets or financial
liabilities in IAS 32. An entity should apply
that amendment for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 July 2014. The early
application is permitted.
(IFRS 13. 48-56)
IAS 39
Day 1 gain/ loss
The best evidence of the fair value of a

financial instrument at initial recognition is
the transaction price unless the fair value of
that instrument is evidenced by comparison
with other observable current market
transactions in the same instrument or based
on a valuation technique whose variables
include only data from observable markets.
If this type of market information is
available, the financial instrument is
measured at the fair value and the difference
between the valuation technique and the
transaction price will be recognised as a day 1
gain/ loss. Therefore, any difference between
the valuation technique that does not satisfy
the conditions described above and the
transaction price will not be recognised as a
day 1 gain/ loss and the financial instrument
is measured at the transaction price.
There are no specific requirements. Day 1

gain/ loss should be accounted for depending
on the substance of the transaction.
(IAS 39. AG76, AG76A)
PwC
71
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Reclassification
IFRS
JP GAAP
Provided certain criteria are met, an entity

should or may reclassify its financial
instruments in the following ways.
In principle, reclassification is not permitted

under JP GAAP except in limited
circumstances.
If a financial asset meets the definition of

loans and receivables and the entity has
the intention and ability to hold it for the
foreseeable future or until maturity, it may
be reclassified out of the fair value through
profit or loss category to loans and
receivables. For other financial assets, if
they are no longer held for the purpose of
selling or repurchasing in the near term,
they may be reclassified out of the fair
value through profit or loss category only
in rare circumstances. However, a
derivative asset or a financial asset that is
designated at fair value through profit or
loss at initial recognition cannot be
subsequently reclassified to the loans and
receivables category, held-to-maturity
category or available-for-sale category.
(IAS 39. 50(c), 50B, 50D)
As described in Held-to-maturity
investments on p.65, the classification of
bonds as held-to-maturity is prohibited if the
entity has changed the objective of holding
held-to-maturity financial assets (e.g. to
disposal) in the current or prior fiscal year.
There are no specific requirements in IAS

39 on the reclassification from the loans
and receivables category to the
available-for-sale category.
Reclassification from the held-to-maturity
category to the available-for-sale category
is required if as a result of a change in
intention or ability, the classification as
held-to-maturity is no longer appropriate
or whenever there are sales or
reclassification of more than an
insignificant amount of held-to-maturity
investments, the remaining
held-to-maturity investments should be
reclassified as available-for-sale.
(IAS 39. 51- 52)
An entity may reclassify all of its

held-for-trading securities to other
securities (similar to the available-for-sale
category under IFRS) when the entity
decides to discontinue the trading activity
due to changes in the entitys funds
management policy, revision or application
of applicable laws or accounting standards.
On the contrary, an entity should reclassify
its securities as held-for-trading when it
decides to commence security trading or
when the entitys frequent trading of
securities is objectively observed.
In addition, reclassification due only to a
change in fund management policy is not
permitted under IAS 39.
Reclassification from available-for-sale

category to loans and receivables category
is possible when the financial asset meets
the definition of loans and receivables and
the entity has the intention and ability to
hold the financial asset for the foreseeable
future or until maturity. If, as a result of a
change in intention or ability or in the rare
circumstance that a reliable measure of
fair value is no longer available or because
the two preceding financial years under
the tainting rule have passed, an
available-for-sale financial instrument
may be reclassified to the held-to-maturity
category.
(IAS 39. 50E, 54)
(IAS 39. 50-54)
72
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Reclassification due to a
change in reliability of
measurement
IFRS
If a reliable measure becomes available for
an equity instrument or a derivative indexed
to an equity instrument whose fair value was
not reliably measurable, they should be
remeasured at fair value.
JP GAAP
(IAS 39. 53)

IAS 39
Accounting for foreign

exchange differences on
available-for-sale financial
assets
With regard to foreign exchange differences

of a monetary available-for-sale financial
asset denominated in a foreign currency, the
foreign exchange differences arising from
changes in amortised cost are recognised in
profit or loss, and other changes are
recognised in other comprehensive income.
(IAS 39. AG83)
IAS 39
Fair value gain or loss on

available-for-sale financial
assets
The gain or loss from the change in fair value

of an available for sale financial asset (except
impairment loss) should be recognised in
other comprehensive income until the
financial asset is derecognised.
(IAS 39. 55(b))
IAS 39
Recognition of impairment of
financial assets
If there is objective evidence that a financial

asset measured at amortised cost (i.e. loans
and receivables and held-to-maturity
investments) or an available-for-sale asset is
impaired, an entity should measure the
amount of impairment loss.
IAS 39. 59 provides guidance on objective
evidence of impairment. For investments in
equity instruments, a significant or
prolonged continuous decline in fair value
below cost (not the cost after impairment)
should also be considered as an objective
evidence of impairment, i.e. an impairment
loss should be recognised if there is a
significant or prolonged continuous decline
in value. In addition, once there has been a
significant decline in value and any further
decline follows, a further impairment loss
should also be recognised regardless of the
extent of the decline. Market conditions or
forecasts after the reporting date should not
be taken into account.
(IAS 39. 58-70)
PwC
Foreign currency denominated bonds are, in

principle, accounted for in accordance with
the requirements on foreign exchange
differences in the Accounting Standards for
Financial Instruments. However, an entity
may use the foreign exchange differences
arising from the changes of fair value in the
foreign currency (the difference in the
foreign currency amount translated by the
spot rate at the date of closing) as the
valuation difference, and account for the
remainder as a foreign exchange gain/ loss.
The total amount of valuation differences is
recognised directly in equity in principle (the
entire method). However, provided
consistent application, an entity may
recognise only the gain directly in equity but
treat the loss as a loss for the period in the
profit and loss account (the partial
method).
If the fair value of a security (other than a
trading security) for which there is a market
price has significantly declined, an
impairment loss should be recognised unless
the fair value is expected to be recovered.
Guidance on the definition of a significant
decline is provided (i.e. a decline of more
than approximately 50%). In addition, JP
GAAP states that, in the case of equity
securities, fair value can be deemed to be
recovered when it can be expected with
reasonable evidence that the decline is
temporary and the fair value will nearly, or
fully, recover to the level of the acquisition
cost approximately within one year after the
closing date.
For an equity security whose quoted price is
extremely difficult to obtain, an impairment
loss should be recognised when the real value
(as calculated by multiplying the net asset
per share by the number of shares owned) of
such equity security significantly declines
due to a deterioration in the financial
condition of the issuer. JP GAAP provides
guidance on the definition of a significant
decline (i.e. a decline of more than
approximately 50% in the real value).
73
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Measurement of impairment
IFRS
The amount of impairment loss on a
financial asset carried at amortised cost is
measured as the difference between the
carrying amount of the financial asset and
the present value of estimated future cash
flows discounted at the asset's original
effective interest rate.
The amount of impairment loss on
investments in equity instruments carried at
cost is measured as the difference between
the carrying amount of the financial asset
and the present value of estimated future
cash flows discounted at the current market
rate of return for a similar financial asset.
(IAS 39. 58-70)
IAS 39
Unwinding the effect of

discounting on impaired
financial assets
When a financial asset measured at

amortised cost has been impaired, interest
income is thereafter recognised using the
rate of interest used to discount the future
cash flows for the purpose of measuring the
impairment loss.
(IAS 39. AG93)
74
JP GAAP
For a bond whose quoted price is extremely
difficult to obtain, any unredeemable amount
corresponding to credit risk should be
estimated with reference to the requirements
on receivables.
Receivables are separated into three
categories according to the financial
condition and business performance of the
debtor, namely: normal receivables, doubtful
receivables and uncollectible receivables.
Uncollectible amounts should be estimated
based on the above categories.
For an equity security whose market value is
considered to be extremely difficult to obtain,
an impairment amount should be based on
differences between the acquisition cost and
a real value. The real value is a net asset
value per share multiplied by the number of
shares held. The net asset value per share is
derived based on financial statements
prepared under generally accepted financial
principles and is by considering, in principle,
reflective of valuation differences. Excess
earning power or controlling interests could
be reflected in the real value.
The effect of discounting will not be
unwound even when the future cash flows of
a financial asset is remeasured by its
discounted present value. In addition, an
entity should not recognise interest income
on receivables with significantly delayed
payment and those in bankruptcy.
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Bifurcation criteria for
embedded derivatives
IFRS
An embedded derivative should be separated
from the host contract and measured at fair
value if, and only if
The economic characteristics and risks of
the embedded derivative are not closely
related to the economic characteristics
and risks of the host contract;
IAS 39
When a non-financial
instrument is a host contract
JP GAAP
An embedded derivative included in a
compound instrument should be bifurcated
value if, and only if:
The risks of the embedded derivative could
affect the host financial asset and/ or host
financial liability;
A separate instrument with the same

terms as the embedded derivative would
meet the definition of a derivative; and

terms as the embedded derivative has
characteristics of a derivative; and
The hybrid instrument is not measured at

fair value with changes in fair value
The compound instrument is not

measured at fair value with changes in fair
value recognised in profit or loss.
(IAS 39. 11)
However, even when the conditions above

are not satisfied, a derivative may be
separated from the host contract and
accounted for as a derivative if it is managed
separately for management purposes.
If a non-financial instrument includes an

embedded derivative, an entity should
consider whether or not the embedded
derivative needs to be separated.

embedded derivatives with a non-financial
host.
(IAS 39. 11)
PwC
75
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments

IFRS 9
assets
Investments in debt instruments

Investments in debt instruments are
measured at amortised cost if both of the
following conditions are met; otherwise,
they are measured at fair value:
the asset is held within a business
model whose objective is to hold assets
in order to collect contractual cash
flows
the contractual cash flows are solely
payments of principal and interest
where interest is defined as
compensation for time value of money
and credit risk
Investments in equity instruments
Investments in equity instruments should
be measured at fair value through profit or
loss. However, at initial recognition, an
entity may irrevocably elect to present
changes in fair value of an equity
instrument not held for trading in other
comprehensive income. It is prohibited to
subsequently reclassify the amount
presented in other comprehensive income
to profit or loss. However the entity may
reclassify the cumulative gain/loss within
equity.
Financial assets are classified to securities,

receivables, money held in trust, derivatives
etc., based on their legal form in principle.
Furthermore, securities are classified into
securities held for trading, securities held to
maturity, equity investment in subsidiaries
and affiliates, and other securities (similar
to available-for-sale category under IFRS).
Both IFRS and JP GAAP specify the method
of measurement subsequent to initial
recognition for each category. Therefore, the
differences in classification result in
differences in the accounting.
For example, debt securities classified as
other securities under JP GAAP may meet
the definition of loans and receivables under
IFRS. Financial assets classified as
held-to-maturity under JP GAAP may not be
classified the same under IFRS unless there
is an active market for the asset and hence
require a different classification under IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 4.1.1-4.1.4, 5.7.5, B.5.7.1)

IFRS 9
Measurement of
investments in equity
instruments at cost
Investments in equity instruments and

derivative instruments that were measured
at cost under IAS 39 are required to be
measured at fair value. However, IFRS
indicates that cost may be an appropriate
estimate of fair value in limited
circumstances.
Unlisted securities are defined as securities

whose fair value is difficult to obtain and are
measured at cost.
(IFRS 9. 4.1.4, B5.4.14-B5.4.17)

IFRS 9
Reclassification
An entity should reclassify all affected

financial assets when and only when it
changes its business model for managing
financial assets.
Such reclassification should be applied
prospectively from the reclassification date.
Classification according to an entitys

objective to hold securities should be based
on the entitys original intent and should not
be changed without reasonable grounds.
Please refer to Reclassification under IAS 39.
(IFRS 9. 4.4.1, 5.6.1)
76
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Fair value option
IFRS
Financial assets
JP GAAP
IFRS 9 permits designation of a financial

asset as measured at fair value through
profit or loss only if doing so eliminates or
significantly reduces a measurement or
recognition inconsistency.
Non-financial instruments
A non-financial instrument may apply the
fair value option if it contains an embedded
derivative (unless the embedded
derivative(s) does not significantly modify
the cash flows or it is clear with little or no
analysis when a similar hybrid instrument
is first considered that separation of the
embedded derivative(s) is prohibited).
(IFRS 9. 4.1.5, 4.2.2, 4.3.5)
IFRS 9
Bifurcation criteria for

Financial assets
When the host contract is a financial asset
within the scope of IFRS 9, an entity should
determine the classification of the hybrid
instruments in their entirety without
separating their embedded derivatives.
Non-financial assets
Similar to IAS 39, i.e. an embedded
derivative included in a hybrid instrument
should be separated and measured at fair
value separately from the host contract if,
and only if:
The economic characteristics and risks
of the embedded derivative are not
closely related to the economic
characteristics and risks of the host;
The hybrid instrument is not measured
at fair value with changes in fair value

compound instrument should be separated
value if, and only if:
The risks related to the embedded
derivatives could affect individual
financial assets and/or financial liabilities;
The compound instrument is not
measured at fair value with changes in fair
value recognised in profit or loss.
However, even when the conditions above
are not satisfied, an embedded derivative
may be separated from the host contract and
embedded derivatives with a non-financial
host.
(IFRS 9. 4.3.2-4.3.3)
Industry-specific guidance
PwC
There is no industry-specific accounting

guidance under IFRS.
There is industry-specific guidance, such as

guidance for the banking and insurance
industry issued by the audit committee of the
Japanese Institute of Certified Public
Accountants that specifies accounting and audit
treatments when applying the Accounting
Standards for Financial Instruments.
77
JP GAAP References:
Accounting Standards for Financial Instruments
Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Foreign Currency Transactions
Audit Treatment for Accounting and Presentation of Debt Guarantee and Similar Guarantee Obligations
Guidance on Accounting for Other Compound Financial Instruments (Compound Financial Instruments Other than Those with an
Option to increase Paid-in Capital)
Recent developments
Recent changesIFRS
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39)
In November 2013, the IASB has published IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9,
IFRS 7 and IAS 39), the third phase of its replacement of IAS 39. The new requirements align hedge accounting more closely
with risk management, and so should result in more decision-useful information to users of financial statements. The
revised standard also establishes a more principles-based approach to hedge accounting and addresses inconsistencies and
weaknesses in the current model in IAS 39.
Hedge effectiveness tests and eligibility for hedge accounting
IFRS 9 relaxes the requirements for hedge effectiveness and, consequently to apply hedge accounting. Under IAS 39, a
hedge must be highly effective, both going forward and in the past (that is, a prospective and retrospective test, with results
in the range of 80%-125%). IFRS 9 replaces this bright line with a requirement for an economic relationship between the
hedged item and hedging instrument, and for the hedged ratio to be the same as the one that the entity actually uses for
risk management purposes. Hedge ineffectiveness will continue to be reported in profit or loss (P&L). An entity is still
required to prepare contemporaneous documentation; however, the information to be documented under IFRS 9 will differ
from the one required under IAS 39.
Hedged items
The new requirements change what qualifies as a hedged item, primarily removing restrictions that currently prevent some
economically rational hedging strategies from qualifying for hedge accounting. For example:
Risk components of non-financial items can be designated as hedged items, provided they are separately identifiable and
reliably measurable.
Aggregated exposures (that is, exposures that include derivatives) can be hedged items.
IFRS 9 makes the hedging of groups of items more flexible. IFRS 9 permits a hedge of a net position if it is consistent
with an entitys risk management strategy. However, if the hedged net position consists of forecast transactions, hedge
accounting on a net basis is only available for foreign currency hedges.
IFRS 9 allows hedge accounting for equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
(OCI), even though there will be no impact on P&L from these investments.
78
PwC
Hedging instruments
IFRS 9 relaxes the rules on the use of some hedging instruments as follows:
IFRS 9 views a purchased option as similar to an insurance contract, such that the initial time value must be recognised
in P&L, either over the period of the hedge (if the hedge item is time related, such as a fair value hedge of inventory for
six months), or when the hedged transaction affects P&L (if the hedge item is transaction related, such as a hedge of a
forecast purchase transaction). Any changes in the options fair value associated with time value will be recognised in
OCI.
A similar accounting treatment to options can also be applied to the forward element of forward contracts and to foreign
currency basis spreads of financial instruments.
Non-derivative financial items can be used as hedging instruments, provided they are accounted for at fair value through
P&L, unless they are hedging foreign currency (FX) risk.
Accounting, presentation and disclosure

The accounting and presentation requirements for hedge accounting in IAS 39 remain largely unchanged in IFRS 9.
However, entities will now be required to reclassify the gains and losses accumulated in equity on a cash flow hedge to the
carrying amount of a non-financial hedged item when it is initially recognised. This was permitted under IAS 39, but entities
could also choose to accumulate gains and losses in equity. This choice is not allowed under IFRS 9.
Own credit risk in financial liabilities
Although not related to hedge accounting, the IASB has also amended IFRS 9 to allow entities to early adopt the
requirement to recognise in OCI the changes in fair value attributable to changes in an entitys own credit risk (from
financial liabilities that are designated under the fair value option). This can be applied without having to adopt the
remainder of IFRS 9.
Mandatory effective date
Amendments to IFRS 9 have removed the previous mandatory effective date of 1 January 2015, but the standard is available
for immediate application. The standard provides an accounting policy choice for an entity to continue to apply hedge
accounting (and hedge accounting only) under IAS 39 instead of IFRS 9 until the IASB completes its separate macro
hedging project.
Entities can elect to apply IFRS 9 for any of the following:
The own credit risk requirements for financial liabilities.
Classification and measurement (C&M) requirements for financial assets.
C&M requirements for financial assets and financial liabilities.
The full current version of IFRS 9 (that is, C&M requirements for financial assets and financial liabilities and hedge
accounting).
The transitional provisions described above are likely to change once the IASB completes all phases of IFRS 9.
IFRS 9 applies retrospectively; however, hedge accounting is to be applied prospectively (with some exceptions).
PwC
79
Amendments to IAS 32 and IFRS 7, DisclosuresOffsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The IASB has issued an amendment to the application guidance in IAS 32, Financial instruments: Presentation, to clarify
some of the requirements for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities on the statement of financial position.
However, the clarified offsetting requirements for amounts presented in the statement of financial position continue to be
different from US GAAP. As a result, the IASB has also published an amendment to IFRS 7, Financial instruments:
Disclosures, reflecting the joint requirements with the FASB to enhance current offsetting disclosures. These new
disclosures are intended to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare IFRS financial statements and those
that prepare financial statements in accordance with US GAAP.
The amendments do not change the current offsetting model in IAS 32, which requires an entity to offset a financial asset
and financial liability in the statement of financial position only when the entity currently has a legally enforceable right of
set-off and intends either to settle the asset and liability on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability
simultaneously.
The amendments clarify that the right of set-off must be available today that is, it is not contingent on a future event. It
also must be legally enforceable for all counterparties in the normal course of business, as well as in the event of default,
insolvency or bankruptcy. The amendments also clarify that gross settlement mechanisms (such as through a clearing
house) with features that both (i) eliminate credit and liquidity risk and (ii) process receivables and payables in a single
settlement process, are effectively equivalent to net settlement; they would therefore satisfy the IAS 32 criterion in these
instances. Master netting agreements where the legal right of offset is only enforceable on the occurrence of some future
event, such as default of the counterparty, continue not to meet the offsetting requirements.
The converged offsetting disclosures in IFRS 7 are to be retrospectively applied, with an effective date of annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2013. However, the clarifications to the application guidance in IAS 32 are to be
retrospectively applied, with an effective date of annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.
80
PwC
IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement

The IASB completed the joint project with the FASB on fair value measurement and issued IFRS 13, Fair Value
Measurement. IFRS 13 explains how to measure fair value and aims to enhance fair value disclosures; it does not say when
to measure fair value or require additional fair value measurements. The project converges IFRS and US GAAP
requirements on how to measure fair value, although there will continue to be differences in certain respects, including
when fair value measurements are required and when day 1 gains and losses can be recognised. IFRS 13 is effective for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). Fair value is measured using the same assumptions and taking
into account the same characteristics of the asset or liability as market participants would. Fair value is a market-based, not
entity-specific measurement. The fair value of a liability reflects non-performance risk (that is, own credit risk).
A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place in the principal
market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. The principal market is the market with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability that can
be accessed by the entity. For non-financial assets only, fair value is determined based on the highest and best use of the
asset as determined by a market participant.
Fair value measurements are categorised into a three-level hierarchy, based on the type of inputs to the valuation
techniques used, as follows:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for items identical to the asset or liability being measured. Consistent
with current IFRS, if there is a quoted price in an active market (that is, a Level 1 input), an entity uses that price
without adjustment when measuring fair value;
Level 2 inputs are other observable inputs; and
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that nevertheless must be developed to reflect the assumptions that market
participants would use when determining an appropriate price for the asset or liability.
These requirements are similar to those in IFRS 7, Financial instruments: Disclosures, but enhance those requirements
and apply to all assets and liabilities measured at fair value and not just financial assets and liabilities (including footnotes).
PwC
81
Joint FASB/IASB Financial Instruments Project
Overview
The FASB and the IASB are working on a joint project on financial instruments. Once finalised, the new guidance will
replace the FASBs and IASBs respective financial instrument guidance. Although the project is a joint project, the FASB
and IASB have been working on different timetables. The IASB has been conducting its work in separate phases: (1)
classification and measurement of financial instruments, (2) impairment, and (3) hedge accounting. The FASB elected to
issue one comprehensive exposure draft on financial instruments.
Phase 1: Classification and measurement (IFRS 9, Financial Instruments)
IFRS 9 replaces the multiple classification and measurement bases in IAS 39 with a simplified model that has two
classification categories: amortised cost and fair value. Classification under IFRS 9 is driven by the entitys business model
for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The reclassification
between categories is prohibited except in circumstances where the entitys business model changes.
Financial assets are measured at amortised cost if the objective of the business model is to hold the financial asset for the
collection of the contractual cash flows and such contractual cash flows solely represent payments of principal and interest;
otherwise the financial asset is measured at fair value.
The new standard further indicates that all equity investments should be measured at fair value. IFRS 9 removes the cost
exemption for equities at cost whose fair value cannot be reliably measured and derivatives on such equities but provides
guidance on when cost may be an appropriate estimate of fair value. Management may elect the option to designate equity
investments at fair value through OCI. Such designation is available on initial recognition on an instrument-by-instrument
basis and is irrevocable. There is no recycling of subsequent changes in fair value to profit or loss; however, dividends from
such investments should be recognised in profit or loss if they represent a return on investment.
Under the new model, management may still designate a financial asset at fair value through profit or loss on initial
recognition but only if this significantly reduces an accounting mismatch. The new standard removes the requirement to
separate embedded derivatives from financial asset hosts. It requires a hybrid contract whose host is an asset to be classified
in its entirety at either amortised cost or fair value.
82
PwC
Financial liabilities are classified into two measurement categories: fair value through profit or loss (held for trading or
designated under the fair value option) and amortised cost. If a financial liability is designated under the fair value option,
changes in fair value related to changes in an entitys own credit risk are presented in OCI unless it creates an accounting
mismatch. This is in response to feedback from financial statements users that changes in own credit risk of a financial
liability should not affect profit or loss unless the financial liability is held for trading. In addition, the new requirements
prohibit any recycling through profit or loss of amounts recognised in OCI. The above accounting will not be applied to
financial guarantees and loan commitments designated under the fair value option. All fair value movements are recognised
in profit or loss.
November 2012, the IASB published its exposure draft proposing limited amendments to IFRS 9. The reasons for the
proposed amendments are to address issues that have arisen in practice since the issuance of IFRS 9, to consider the
interaction with the insurance project and to reduce differences with the FASBs classification and measurement model. The
significant changes from IFRS 9 in the ED include the introduction of a third classification category for debt instruments
(fair value through other comprehensive income), clarification of the business model for the existing amortised cost
category, clarification of the contractual cash flow test, consequential changes as a result of the limited amendments and
revised transition guidance. Other areas of IFRS 9 remain unchanged such as scope, the classification and measurement
model for equity instruments held as financial assets, financial liabilities and the model for hybrid financial assets (that is,
those instruments that contain an embedded derivative). The comment period was until March 28, 2013 and the final
standard is expected to be published in the second quarter of 2014.
On the other hand, the FASB also published its exposure draft on classification and measurements titled Recognition and
Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities in February 2013. Proposed accounting treatment for debt
instruments under the FASBs exposure draft was substantially converged with the IASBs exposure draft for the limited
amendments to IFRS 9. However, the FASB tentatively decided not to continue to pursue the solely payment of principal
and interest model as well as the business model, in December 2013 and January 2014, respectively. It is expected that the
FASB will discuss a different model to the FASBs model for classification and measurement of debt instruments going
forward.
PwC
83
Phase 2: Impairment methodology

In November 2009, the IASB issued an exposure draft that proposed fundamental changes to the current impairment
guidance for financial assets accounted for at amortised cost. The proposed model was built upon the premise that interest
charged on financial instruments includes a premium for expected losses, which should not be included as part of interest
revenue/income. This resulted in an allocation of the initial estimate of expected credit losses over the expected life of the
financial asset. This IASB model was different from the FASBs exposure draft in May 2010, Accounting for Financial
Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Subsequently, for
convergence purposes, the boards jointly deliberated and issued a joint supplementary document to gather feedback on new
impairment approaches in January 2011.
Since then, the boards have deliberated on a new impairment approach and the IASB issued in March 2013 an exposure
draft, Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses. The proposed guidance introduces an expected loss impairment
model that will replace the incurred loss model used today. The IASBs model, now known as the credit deterioration
model, has the following key elements.
General model
Under the proposed model, an entity will recognize an impairment loss at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit
loss. If the credit risk on the financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, it should recognize an
impairment loss at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit loss.
The 12-month expected credit loss measurement represents all cash flows not expected to be received (cash shortfalls)
over the life of the financial instrument that result from those default events that are possible within 12 months after the
reporting date. Lifetime expected credit loss represents cash shortfalls that result from all possible default events over the
life of the financial instrument.
Scope
The proposed guidance will apply to: (a) financial assets measured at amortized cost under IFRS 9, Financial Instruments;
(b) financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income under the exposure draft, Classification and
Measurement: Limited amendments to IFRS 9; (c) loan commitments when there is a present contractual obligation to
extend credit (except for loan commitments accounted for at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL) under IFRS 9); (d)
financial guarantee contracts within the scope of IFRS 9 that are not accounted for at FVPL; and (e) lease receivables within
the scope of IAS 17, Leases.
Calculation of the impairment
Expected credit losses are determined using an unbiased and probability-weighted approach and should reflect the time
value of money. The calculation is not a best-case or worst-case estimate. Rather, it should incorporate at least the
probability that a credit loss occurs and the probability that no credit loss occurs.
Assessment of credit deterioration
When determining whether lifetime expected losses should be recognized, an entity should consider the best information
available, including actual and expected changes in external market indicators, internal factors, and borrower-specific
information. Where more forward-looking information is not available, delinquency data can be used as a basis for the
assessment.
Under the proposed model, there is a rebuttable presumption that lifetime expected losses should be provided for if
contractual cash flows are 30 days past due. An entity does not recognize lifetime expected credit losses for financial
instruments that are equivalent to investment grade.
84
PwC
Interest income
Interest income is calculated using the effective interest method on the gross carrying amount of the asset. When there is
objective evidence of impairment (that is, the asset is impaired under the current rules of IAS 39, Financial instruments:
Recognition and Measurement), interest is calculated on the net carrying amount after impairment.
Purchased or originated credit impaired assets
Impairment is determined based on full lifetime expected credit losses for assets where there is objective evidence of
impairment on initial recognition. Lifetime expected credit losses are included in the estimated cash flows when calculating
the assets effective interest rate (credit-adjusted effective interest rate), rather than being recognized in profit or loss.
Any later changes in lifetime expected credit losses will be recognize immediately in profit or loss.
Trade and lease receivables
The exposure draft includes a simplified approach for trade and lease receivables. An entity should measure impairment
losses at an amount equal to lifetime expected losses for short-term trade receivables resulting from transactions within the
scope of IAS 18, Revenue. For long-term trade receivables and for lease receivables under IAS 17, an entity has an
accounting policy choice between the general model and the model applicable for short-term trade receivables. The use of a
provision matrix is allowed, if appropriately adjusted to reflect current events and forecast future conditions.
Disclosures
Extensive disclosures are proposed, including reconciliations of opening to closing amounts and disclosure of assumptions
and inputs.
On the other hand, during the summer of 2012, the FASB decided to develop a different model to the three-bucket model.
This decision was taken as a result of feedback received by the FASB. The FASB issued its ED on the Current Expected
Credit Loss (CECL) model in December 2012, which recognizes allowance for credit losses based on the current estimate of
the amount of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected. Both the IASB and the FASBs models are based on the
concept of expected losses, however, the FASB model does not include a threshold that must be met prior to recognizing a
credit loss. That is, the IASBs model is a dual measurement model and the FASBs model is a single measurement model.
Therefore, convergence is not expected to be achieved as each board is exposing different models.
Phase 3: General hedge accounting
Hedge accounting under current IAS 39 is prescribed in detail and entities are not always able to reflect their risk
management activities on the financial statements appropriately. Therefore, in December 2010, an exposure draft that
addresses general hedge accounting (not including macro hedge accounting) was issued to improve the decision-usefulness
of financial statements for users by eliminating the rule-based requirements and to reflect an entitys risk management
practices. The IASB continued redeliberations based on comments received on the exposure draft and its outreach activities
which were completed in September 2011. The IASB issued a review draft on general hedge accounting in September 2012
and a final standard in November 2013. Please refer to Recent changesIFRS above for the summary of the final standard.
Macro hedge accounting which has been continuing its discussion based on the interest rate risk management protocols
used at financial institutions is now considered to be a separate project and a discussion paper is expected to be released in
the first half of 2014.
PwC
85

As part of the convergence project, the Issue Paper on Improvements to the Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments
(Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets) was issued in August 2010. The Exposure Draft of the Accounting
Standard for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures was also issued in July 2010 and deliberations soon followed.
Issue Paper on Improvements to the Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments (Classification and
Measurement of Financial Assets)
In August 2010, the ASBJ issued Issue Paper on Improvements to the Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments
(Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets). The issue paper is a result of a comprehensive review of the ASBJ
Statement No.10, Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments, which is part of the convergence project based on the
Tokyo Agreement between the IASB and the ASBJ in order to converge with IFRS 9. The ASBJ sought comments from
interested parties on the definition of derivative instruments and classification and measurement of financial assets.
The Issue Paper not only followed IFRS 9 in general but also identified issues arising from specific accounting rules in
Japan, such as the measurement of unquoted equity instruments at cost and recycling valuation differences in other
comprehensive income to profit or loss upon the sale of the instrument.
86
PwC
Exposure Draft of the Accounting Standard for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In July 2010, the ASBJ issued an Exposure Draft, Accounting Standard for Measurement and Disclosure of Fair Value (the
ED).
This is also an ongoing project that is part of the convergence project based on the Tokyo Agreement between the IASB and
the ASBJ. The purpose of this ED was to set out the concept of fair value and provide guidance on fair value disclosure in
the note of financial statements.
The ED basically contains similar guidance as IFRS 13, a summary of the ED is provided below:
The ED defines fair value, in conformity with IFRS and US GAAP, as the price that market participants would receive by
selling assets or the price they would pay for transferring liabilities in an orderly transaction between them, and clarifies
that fair values are exit prices.
When fair value is measured, it is clarified that selection of a valuation technique should be based on the appropriateness
for the transaction and whether sufficient data is available. Inputs used for fair value measurement are categorized into 3
levels and the order of preference is from Level 1 to Level 3.
The ED clearly indicates points to consider in the calculation of fair value when it is determined that the volume and
frequency of transactions for the asset or liability has decreased or when the transaction is not orderly.
the ED proposes to enhance disclosure regarding fair value. Key disclosures in the footnotes that are proposed for assets
and liabilities recorded at fair value on the balance sheet at every reporting date include the following:
The calculation method of fair value: valuation technique used for calculating fair value; inputs and information used
to set those inputs; any changes in valuation techniques and the effect on fair value at the measurement date
Breakdown of fair value by fair value levels
Detailed information on Level 3 fair value in the notes to the financial statements
PwC
87
88
PwC
Derivatives and hedge accounting
89

Derivatives and hedge accounting represents one of the most complex areas within both JP GAAP and IFRS. Although IFRS
is often considered to be principles-based and short on detailed rules, the guidance provided in this area includes a relatively
high degree of application guidelines.
In the area of derivatives, there are differences in the definitions and the bifurcation criteria for embedded derivatives. In
addition, IFRS sets out requirements whether day one gains and losses can be recognised at initial recognition. Under JP
GAAP, there are no specific requirements on day one gains and losses.
Under IFRS, hedging relationships are classified into three types: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, and hedges of a net
investment in a foreign operation, and specifies the accounting model of each hedging relationship. JP GAAP states that the
purpose of hedging is to manage risks of changes in fair value and cash flows. JP GAAP requires deferral hedge accounting for
both hedges against risks of changes in fair value and cash flows in principle, and allows fair value hedge accounting as an
exception. Therefore, hedge accounting model is fundamentally different.
In addition, JP GAAP allows more flexibility than IFRS in respect of hedge designation and the effectiveness test. In addition,
JP GAAP includes guidance from the Audit Committee Reports by industry (bank, insurance etc.) which takes into account
specific requirements of each industry and specify accounting and audit treatments on the application of the Accounting
Standards for Financial Instruments.
In November 2013, the IASB published IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS
7, IAS 39), which introduces new standards for general hedge accounting that replace the current hedge accounting in IAS 39.
For a detailed discussion, refer to the Recent developments section at the end of the chapter Assets financial assets.
Further details on the foregoing and other selected differences are described in the following table. Issues related to IFRS 9
are listed after those related to IAS 39.
90
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Definition of a derivative
IFRS
JP GAAP
A derivative is a financial instrument with all

three of the following characteristics:
A derivative is a financial instrument with all

three of the following characteristics:
Its value changes in response to the

change in a basic index such as interest
rates, provided in the case of a
non-financial variable that the variable is
not specific to a party to the contract;
It refers to a basic index such as interest

rates and the contract has either notional
value or a fixed or determinable
settlement amount or both a notional and
settlement amount.
It requires no initial net investment or an

initial net investment that is smaller than
would be required for other types of
contracts that would be expected to have a
similar response to changes in market
factors; and
It requires no initial net investment or an

initial net investment that is smaller than
would be required for other types of
contracts that would be expected to have a
similar response to changes in market
factors; and
It is settled at a future date (net settlement

feature is not required).
It requires or permits net settlement and

can be settled net easily by means that are
not specified in the contract or the effect is
substantially the same as net settlement.
(IAS 39. 9)
Because JP GAAP requires a net settlement

feature, the scope of derivative is considered
narrower than IFRS.
IAS 39
Own use exception
Contracts to purchase or sell a non-financial

item that are settled net are treated as
derivatives; however, they are treated as
normal purchase/sales transactions if they
qualify for the own use exception.
Guidance on net settlement is provided (IAS
39. 6) and use of the own use exception
should not be applied to cases where there is
a practice of settling similar contracts net in
cash or another financial instrument or the
entity has a purpose of generating short term
profit.
Contracts related to future purchase, future

sale or usage requirements for which the
physical delivery is apparent at inception and
where the objective of such transaction is not
for trading purposes, are scoped out of the
Accounting Standard for Financial
Instruments.
(IAS 39. 5)
PwC
91
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Types of hedging
relationships
IFRS
JP GAAP
Hedge relationships are classified into three

types based on the purpose of the hedge: fair
value hedge, cash flow hedge and net
investment hedge in a foreign operation.
The objective of hedge accounting is to

manage exposures to fluctuation in fair value
and cash flows. In principle, a deferred hedge
is applied, and a fair value hedge is allowed
as an exception.
Fair value hedge

A hedge of the exposure to changes in fair
value of a recognised asset or liability or a
firm commitment. Both the hedging
instrument and the hedged item are
recognised at fair value through profit or
loss, and the carrying amount of the
hedged item is adjusted.
Cash flow hedge
A hedge of the exposure to variability in
cash flows associated with a recognised
asset or liability or a highly probable
forecast transaction. The effective portion
of the changes in fair value of the hedging
instrument is recorded in other
comprehensive income and when it is
subsequently recycled to profit or loss
depends on the hedged item. The
ineffectiveness is recorded in profit or loss.
Net investment hedge in a foreign
operation
A hedge of foreign exchange risk arising
from the translation of a foreign operation,
such as a foreign subsidiary or associate,
from its functional currency to the
presentation currency. The accounting
treatment is similar to cash flow hedges.
(IAS 39. 86, 89, 95, 102)
IAS 39
Documentation of hedging
relationships
At the inception of the hedge, formal

designation and documentation of the
hedging relationship, the entitys risk
management objective and the strategy for
undertaking the hedge are required.
Omission of such documentation is not
permitted.
(IAS 39. 88)
92
Deferred hedge
Gain or loss on the hedging instrument is
not recognised when occurred but
presented in equity and reclassified to
profit or loss when a gain or loss on the
hedged item is recognised.
Fair value hedge
Both the hedged item and the hedging
instrument are measured at fair value and
their gain or loss is recognised in profit or
loss. The fair value hedge is permitted only
for other securities (similar to
available-for-sale category under IFRS)
under existing rules.
Hedge in equity interests in a foreign
subsidiary
If the interest in a foreign subsidiary or
associate is designated as a hedged item,
the gain or loss on the exchange difference
on the hedging instrument may be
accounted for in the cumulative
translation adjustment account. In
addition, the criteria set forth in the
Accounting Standard for Financial
Instruments should be met when applying
hedge accounting. In addition, the
assessment of hedge effectiveness may be
omitted if the hedged item and the
hedging instrument are denominated in
the same currency.
If specific documentation of the relationship
between an individual hedge transaction and
the risk management policy is difficult
because the entity undertakes many hedge
transactions, it is permitted to omit
individual documentation of the hedge
transactions. However, the entity should
have in place internal rules and internal
control systems to account for such hedge
transactions appropriately.
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Hedging instruments
non-derivative financial
instruments
IFRS
A non-derivative financial asset or
non-derivative financial liability may be
designated as a hedging instrument only for
a hedge of a foreign currency risk.
(IAS 39. 72)
IAS 39
Hedging instruments
hedge designation for a
portion of a time period
A hedging relationship may not be

designated for only a portion of the time
period during which a hedging instrument
remains outstanding.
JP GAAP
An entity may designate receivables and
payables denominated in foreign currencies
and securities as hedging instruments for
hedging the entitys exposure to foreign
currency risk on forecast transactions, other
securities and investments in foreign
subsidiaries. In addition, an entity may
designate margin sales or short-selling of
securities as hedging instruments to hedge
the fair value change of other securities held.
(IAS 39. 75)

IAS 39
Hedging instruments
exception to exclude the
time value of an option
and the forward element of
a forward contract
Specific components of a hedging instrument

may not be designated as a hedging
instrument (needs to be designated in its
entirety); however, an exception is permitted
for the time value of an option contract and
premium or discount of a forward contract
(e.g. forward element etc.) may be excluded
from hedged risks.
Similar to IFRS. However, no specific

requirements on one-sided risks of an option
or dynamic hedges.
For a hedge of a one-sided risk (a hedge of

changes in cash flow risk or fair value risk of
a hedged item above or below a specified
price), time value of an option contract
should not be included as a hedged risk since
the intrinsic value of a purchased option, but
not its time value, reflects a one-sided risk in
a hedged item.
A dynamic hedging strategy (e.g. delta
neutral) that assesses both the intrinsic value
and time value of an option contract can
qualify for hedge accounting.
(IAS 39. 74, AG99BA, IG.F.1.9)
PwC
93
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Hedging instruments
hedging of more than one
type of risk
IAS 39
Hedged item
held to maturity investment
IFRS
A single hedging instrument may be
designated as a hedge of more than one type
of risk.
For a held-to-maturity investment under IAS

39, an exposure to interest rate risk or early
redemption risk may not be designated as a
hedged risk.
(IAS 39. 79)
Hedged item
(IAS 39. 76)
(IFRS 9 does not have a held-to-maturity

classification)
IAS 39
JP GAAP
Foreign exchange risk of a firm commitment

to acquire a business in a business
combination can be designated as a hedged
item (other risks cannot be hedged).
An exposure to interest rate risk (fair value

risk and cash flow risk) in a held-to-maturity
bond may be a hedged item if it qualifies for
the criteria to apply the special treatment for
interest rate swaps upon acquisition. Under
the special treatment for interest rate swaps,
the interest rate swap is not fair valued and
the interest rate swap and the relevant asset
or liability is combined and treated as a
single item, and the net amount received or
paid from the interest rate swap is added to,
or deducted from, the interest on the
relevant asset or liability.
(IAS 39. AG98)

IAS 39
Hedged item
designation of a specific
risk component of a
financial instrument
Provided that the effectiveness can be

measured, the risks associated with only a
portion of the cash flows or fair value may be
a hedged item (e.g. a portion of the interest
rate exposure of a financial instrument such
as a risk-free interest rate or benchmark
interest rate).
However, the cash flows of those hedged
risks (a portion of the cash flows) may not be
designated as a hedge item if they exceed the
total cash flows of the entire financial
instrument.
When applying the fair value hedge and the

objective of the hedge is to address certain
risk components (interest rate, foreign
currency exchange, credit, etc.) of the hedged
item, subsequent to the inception of the
hedge transaction, an entity should record
the portion of changes in fair value
attributable to a hedged risk component in
profit or loss and the remaining portion that
is attributable to other risk components
should be recorded in equity.
(IAS 39. 81, AG99C)
94
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Hedged item
risk component of a
non-financial instrument
IFRS
If the hedged item is a non-financial asset or
a non-financial liability, a specific risk, other
than foreign currency risk, may not be
designated as a hedged risk. All risks should
be designated as a hedged item in its
entirety.
JP GAAP
(IAS 39. 82)

IAS 39
Hedge of the foreign

currency risk of a firm
commitment
If a hedged item is a firm commitment, the

hedge relationship should be accounted for
as a fair value hedge. It can also be accounted
for as a cash flow hedge if the foreign
currency risk in the firm commitment is
designated as a hedged item.
A firm commitment that is outstanding

should be included in a forecast transaction
and accounted for as a deferred hedge.
(IAS 39. 87)

IAS 39
Effectiveness testing
IFRS requires a prospective test of

effectiveness (whether the hedge is expected
to be effective for future hedging periods) at
the inception of the hedge, as well as a
prospective test and retrospective test
(whether hedge effectiveness was ensured
during the past hedging period) to be
undertaken on a qualitative and quantitative
basis in subsequent periods.
For the prospective test, a qualitative test
only may be sufficient in the case where
critical terms between the hedged item and
hedging instrument are met.
An entity is required to forecast the hedge to

be effective for future hedging periods at
inception and also test effectiveness on an
ongoing basis in subsequent periods (no
explicit requirements on prospective testing
in subsequent periods).
However, in general, an entity may omit the
effectiveness test when the critical terms and
conditions are identical in the hedging
instruments and hedged items which are
recognised assets and liabilities or forecast
transactions.
(IAS 39. 88, AG105, AG108, IG.F.4.7)

IAS 39
Determination of
effectiveness
If the changes in the hedged item and

hedging instrument are compared in
assessing hedge effectiveness, evaluation
based on a cumulative basis or separately by
each reporting period is permitted.
When the hedge is not expected to be highly
effective and consistent with the originally
documented risk management strategy at
inception, the hedge accounting should be
discontinued.
(IAS 39. 88, IG.F4.2)
PwC
Hedge effectiveness is determined by

comparing the changes in fair value or cash
flows of both the hedged item and the
hedging instrument, in principle, during the
period from the inception of the hedge to the
date of the effectiveness test.
As long as the result of the prospective test at
the inception of the hedge is highly effective,
an entity may continue applying the hedge
accounting even when the changes do not
show a high level of correlation if they are
temporary and the fluctuation is narrow.
95
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Accounting for
ineffectiveness
IFRS
JP GAAP
The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on

the hedging instrument should be recognised
in profit or loss.
When a hedge is determined as effective in

its entirety and criteria for hedge accounting
are met, the portion of the gain or loss on the
hedging instrument that resulted from the
ineffectiveness may also be deferred as a part
of the hedge accounting.
(IAS 39. 89, 95, 102)
IAS 39
Basis adjustment
If a forecast transaction involving a

non-financial asset or a non-financial
liability actually occurred and results in the
recognition; or the forecast transaction
becomes a firm commitment, the entity
should adopt one of the following
treatments:
A basis adjustment for an asset acquisition is

not an option; it is a requirement. There are
no specific requirements in cases where a
forecast transaction results in a non-financial
liability.
Reclassify the associated changes on the

hedging instrument recorded in other
comprehensive income to profit or loss in
the same period or periods during which
the hedged item affects profit or loss.
Reclassify the associated changes on the
hedging instrument recorded in other
comprehensive income as an adjustment
to the carrying amount (basis adjustment).
(IAS 39. 98)
IAS 39
Criteria for discontinuation or

termination of hedge
accounting
A hedge accounting should be discontinued

prospectively if the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised,
the hedge no longer meets the criteria for
hedge accounting, or the entity revokes the
designation. For cash flow hedges, a hedge
accounting will also be discontinued
prospectively if the forecast transaction is no
longer expected to occur.
(IAS 39. 91, 92, 101, AG113)
When a hedging instrument has been

extinguished due to its maturity, sale,
termination or execution or when the hedge
relationship no longer meets the hedge
accounting effectiveness criteria, hedge
accounting should be discontinued. Also,
hedge accounting should be ceased when a
hedged item has expired or it is clear that the
forecast transaction is no longer expected to
occur.
voluntary discontinuation.
96
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Requirements for
discontinuation or
termination of a hedge
accounting
IFRS
JP GAAP
When an entity discontinues the hedge

accounting, it should discontinue
prospectively the hedge accounting from the
last date on which compliance with hedge
effectiveness was demonstrated as follows:
When a hedge is discontinued, the gain or

loss that was deferred on the hedging
instrument while the hedge was effective will
continue to be deferred until a gain or loss on
the hedged item is recognised, and the
subsequent changes on the hedging
instrument will be recorded in profit or loss.
If the hedged item is an interest-bearing
financial instrument, the deferred gain or
loss on the hedging instrument will be
recognised in profit or loss up to maturity of
the hedged item.
Fair value hedge

The measurement of the hedging
instrument would be kept at fair value
through profit or loss and the adjustment
to the carrying amount of the hedged item
for the changes in fair value would be
discontinued. The adjusted amount would
be amortised if the hedged item is a debt
instrument; if not, it would be included in
the carrying amount until the recognition
of the hedged item is discontinued (e.g.
when the item is sold).
If the hedge accounting is ceased, the

deferred gain or loss on the hedging
instrument will be recognised as a profit or
loss in the current period.
Cash flow hedge

If the hedging instrument expires or is
sold, terminated or exercised, hedge
accounting will be discontinued
prospectively and the the cumulative gain
or loss on the hedging instrument that has
been recognised in other comprehensive
income when the hedge was effective will
remain in equity until the forecast
transaction occurs.
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria
for hedge accounting and the entity
revokes the designation, it shall be
accounted for as above.
If a requirement in paragraph 88(c) of IAS
39 that a forecast transaction is highly
probable is no longer met, it shall be
accounted for as above. However, if the
forecast transaction is no longer expected
to occur, any related cumulative gain or
loss on the hedging instrument should be
reclassified from equity to profit or loss.
Hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation
It shall be accounted for similarly to cash
flow hedges. The gain or loss on the
hedging instrument that has been
recognised (deferred) in other
comprehensive income shall be
reclassified from equity to profit or loss on
the disposal or partial disposal of the
foreign operation.
(IAS 39. 91, 92, 101, 102, AG113)
PwC
97
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 39
Special accounting
treatment provided for
interest-rate swaps
IFRS does not permit an accounting

treatment that does not measure a derivative
designated as a hedging instrument at fair
value.
Provided that certain conditions are met, a

special accounting treatment for interest rate
swaps is allowed under which an entity may
omit the assessment of hedge effectiveness
and fair value measurement of the interest
rate swap as the hedging instrument. See
Hedged item held to maturity investment
on p.90 for additional explanation on the
special accounting treatment for interest rate
swaps.
IAS 39
Allocation of the exchange

differences arising from a
foreign exchange forward
contract among accounting
periods
IFRS does not permit an accounting

treatment that does not measure a derivative
designated as a hedging instrument at fair
value.
Receivables and payables denominated in

foreign currencies hedged with foreign
exchange forward contracts to fix the future
cash flows can be translated by using the
forward rate. Under this method, an entity
can omit evaluation of hedge effectiveness
and fair value measurement of the hedging
instrument. In addition, the exchange
differences arising from the change in the
spot rates between the transaction date and
the date of the forward contract will be
allocated to the period in which the forward
contract was made. The remaining exchange
differences arising from the difference
between the spot rate and the forward rate at
the date of the forward contract will be
allocated to the period of the settlement.
98
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Drivative and hedge accounting in accordance IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9,
IFRS 7 and IAS 39), published in 2013
IFRS 9
Definition of a derivative
Same as the issue described in IAS 39

Definition of derivative.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9, Appendix A)
IFRS 9
Types of hedging
relationships
Hedge relationships are classified into three

types based on the purpose of the hedge: fair
value hedge, cash flow hedge and net
investment hedge in a foreign operation.
Fair value hedge
A hedge of the exposure to changes in fair
value of a recognised asset or liability or a
firm commitment. Both the hedging
instrument and the hedged item are
recognised at fair value through profit or
loss, and the carrying amount of the
hedged item is adjusted. If the hedged item
is an equity instrument for which an entity
has elected to present changes in fair value
in other comprehensive income (OCI
option), the gain or loss on the hedging
instrument should be recognised in other
comprehensive income.
Cash flow hedge
A hedge of the exposure to variability in
cash flows associated with a recognised
asset or liability or a highly probable
forecast transaction. The effective portion
of the changes in fair value of the hedging
instrument is recorded in other
comprehensive income and when it is
subsequently recycled to profit or loss
depends on the hedged item. The
ineffectiveness is recorded in profit or loss.
Net investment hedge in a foreign
operation
A hedge of foreign exchange risk arising
from the translation of a foreign operation,
such as a foreign subsidiary or associate,
from its functional currency to the
presentation currency. The accounting
treatment is similar to cash flow hedges.
The objective of hedge accounting is to

manage exposures to fluctuation in fair
value and cash flows. In principle, a deferred
hedge is applied, and a fair value hedge is
allowed as an exception.
Deferred hedge
Gain or loss on the hedging instrument is
not recognised when it occurs but
presented in equity and reclassified to
profit or loss when a gain or loss on the
hedged item is recognised.
Fair value hedge
Both the hedged item and the hedging
instrument are measured at fair value and
their gain or loss is recognised in profit or
loss. The fair value hedge is permitted
only for other securities (similar to
available-for-sale category under IFRS)
under existing rules.
Hedge in equity interests in a foreign
subsidiary
If the interest in a foreign
subsidiary/affiliate is designated as a
hedged item, the gain or loss on the
exchange difference on the hedging
instrument may be accounted for in the
cumulative translation adjustment
account. In addition, the criteria set forth
in the Accounting Standard for Financial
Instruments should be met when applying
hedge accounting. In addition, the
assessment of hedge effectiveness may be
omitted if the hedged item and the
hedging instrument are denominated in
the same currency.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.2, 6.5.3, 6.5.8, 6.5.11, 6.5.13)
PwC
99
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Documentation of hedging
relationships
IFRS
Documentation of hedging relationships
JP GAAP
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 6.4.1)
IFRS 9
Hedging instruments
non-derivative financial
instruments
IAS 39 permits to designate a non-derivative

financial instrument as a hedging instrument
only for a hedge of a foreign currency risk.
Under IFRS 9, non-derivative financial asset
or non-derivative financial liability measured
at fair value through profit or loss may be
designated as a hedging instrument even for
risk other than foreign currency risk.
However, a financial liability designated as at
fair value through profit or loss for which the
amount of its change in fair value that is
attributable to changes in the credit risk of
that liability is presented in other
comprehensive income could not be
designated as a hedging instrument.
An entity may designate receivables and

payables denominated in foreign currencies
and securities as hedging instruments for
hedging the entitys exposure to foreign
currency risk on forecast transactions, other
securities and investments in foreign
subsidiaries. In addition, an entity may
designate margin sales or short-selling of
securities as hedging instruments to hedge
the fair value change of other securities held.
For a hedge of foreign currency risk, the

foreign currency risk component of a
non-derivative financial asset or a
non-derivative financial liability may be
designated as a hedging instrument provided
that it is not an investment in an equity
instrument for which an entity has elected to
present changes in fair value in other
(IFRS 9. 6.2.2)
IFRS 9
Hedging instruments
hedge designation for a
portion of a time period

Hedging instruments hedge designation
for a portion of a time period.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 6.2.4)
100
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedging instruments
the time value of an option
IFRS
JP GAAP
Similar to IAS 39, when an entity designates

a purchased option as the hedging
instrument, it can designate the option in its
entirety as a hedging instrument, or it can
separate the intrinsic value and time value of
an option contract and designate as the
hedging instrument only the change in
intrinsic value of an option.
Similar to IFRS, only the intrinsic value of an

option contract may be designated as a
hedging instrument. However, the change in
fair value of the time value of an option is
recognized in profit or loss.
When an entity designates as the hedging

instrument only the change in intrinsic value
of the option, the change in the time value
was recognised in profit or loss under IAS 39.
Under IFRS 9, the change in fair value of the
time value of an option shall be recognised in
other comprehensive income and the
cumulative change accumulated in other
comprehensive income (a separate
component of equity (the amount)) shall be
removed from the separate component of
equity in a different manner depending on
the type of hedged items as follows:
Transaction related hedged item - if the
hedged item subsequently results in the
recognition of a non-financial asset or a
non-financial liability, or a firm commitment
for which fair value hedge accounting is
applied, the entity should include the
amount directly in the initial cost. For
hedging relationships other than this, the
amount should be reclassified to profit or
loss in the same period or periods during
which the hedged expected future cash flows
affect profit or loss.
Time-period related hedged item if the
hedged item relates to a time-period, such as
hedging a commodity inventory for six
months using a commodity option with a
corresponding life, the initial time value of
the option shall be amortised on a systematic
and rational basis over the hedged period
and recognized in profit or loss.
(IFRS 9. 6.2.4(a), 6.5.15, B6.5.29-B6.5.33)
PwC
101
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedging instruments
the forward element of a
forward contract
IFRS
JP GAAP
Similar to IAS 39, when an entity designates

a forward contract as the hedging instrument
under IFRS 9, it may designate the forward
contract in its entirety, or it may separate the
forward element and the spot element and
designate as the hedging instrument only the
change in the value of the spot element
(under IAS 39, this change was recognized in
profit or loss).
Similar to IFRS, only the spot element of a

forward contract may be designated as a
hedging instrument. However, the change in
fair value of the forward element of a forward
contract is recognized in profit or loss.
Under IFRS 9, when an entity designates as

the hedging instrument only the change in
the value of the spot element of the forward
contract, the entity may elect to account for
the forward element of the forward contract
in the same manner as it is applied to the
time value of an option (refer to the
paragraph above).
(IFRS 9. 6.2.4(b), 6.5.16, B6.5.34-B6.5.38)
IFRS 9
Hedging instruments
the foreign currency basis
spread
IFRS 9
Hedging instruments
hedging of more than one
type of risk
Same accounting treatment for the forward

element of a forward contract is permitted
(refer to the paragraph above).
(IFRS 9. 6.2.4(b), 6.5.16, B6.5.39)

Hedging instruments hedging of more
than one type of risk.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. B6.2.6)
IFRS 9
Hedged item

Hedged item business combination.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. B6.3.1)
IFRS 9
Hedged item
risk component of a
financial instrument
102

Hedged item designation of a specific risk
component of a financial instrument.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 6.3.7(a), B6.3.21)
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedged item
risk component of a
non-financial instrument
IFRS
Under IAS 39, if a hedged item is a
non-financial instrument, all risks, other
than foreign currency risk, had to be
designated as a hedged item in its entirety.
JP GAAP
Except for foreign currency risk, there is no
specific guidance to designate a specific risk
as a hedged risk.
Under IFRS 9, if the risk component is

separately identifiable and reliably
measurable, an entity may designate the
specific risk component of a non-financial
instrument, (i.e. not in its entirety), as a
hedged item.
(IFRS 9. 6.3.7, B6.3.8-B6.3.15)
IFRS 9
Hedge of the foreign

currency risk of a firm
commitment

Hedge of the foreign currency risk of a firm
commitment.
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.4)
IFRS 9
Hedged item
hedges of a group of items
Under IAS 39, if the individual items within

a group shared the risk exposure that was
designated as being hedged and the change
in the fair value was approximately
proportional to the overall change in the fair
value of the group for the hedged risk,
hedges of a group of items are permitted.
If the individual assets or liabilities are

exposed to potential losses, and it is expected
that their changes to market volatility or
others are similar (within 10% range),
comprehensive hedges are permitted.
Under IFRS 9, if the group consists of items,

that are individually eligible hedged items,
and the items in the group are managed
together on a group basis for risk
management purposes, hedges of a group of
items are permitted.
(IFRS 9. 6.6.1)
IFRS 9
Hedged item
designation of a net
position
Under IAS 39, a net position was not eligible

for hedge accounting. Under IFRS 9, a hedge
of a net position is permitted if the same
criteria for hedges of a group of items are
met.
In the case of a cash flow hedge, however, the
hedge of net position is permitted only if it is
a hedge of foreign currency risk, and the
designation of that net position specifies the
reporting period in which the forecast
transactions are expected to affect profit or
loss, as well as their nature and volume.
An identified hedged item and an identified

hedging instrument should be tagged
through hedge designation when they are
initially transacted and be managed
separately for effectiveness testing and
hedging gain or loss accounting until the end
of hedge accounting. As it is stated that the
tagging should be conducted in a manner in
which the hedged item and the hedging
instrument is directly tagged, it is believed
that hedges of a net position hedges are not
permitted.
(IFRS 9. 6.6.1, B6.6.1-B6.6.4)
PwC
103
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedged item
a layer component
IFRS
Under IAS 39, a hedge of a layer component
of an overall group of items was permitted
under very limited situations (such as under
a specific cash flow hedge).
JP GAAP
Under IFRS 9, a layer component of forecast

transactions and existing transactions may
be designated as a hedged item if all of the
following conditions are met;
it is separately identifiable and reliably
measurable;
the risk management objective is to hedge
a layer component;
the items in the overall group from which
the layer is identified are exposed to the
same hedged risk;
for a hedge of existing items an entity can
identify and track the overall group of
items from which the hedged layer is
defined; and
any items in the group that contain
prepayment options meet the
requirements for components of a nominal
amount.
(IFRS 9. 6.6.3, B6.3.16, B6.3.18-B6.3.20)
IFRS 9
Hedged item
an aggregated exposure
including derivatives
Under IAS 39, derivatives were not

permitted to designate as hedged items
except for a purchased option which was
offset by a written option.
Under IFRS 9, an aggregated exposure that is
a combination of an exposure that could
qualify as a hedged item and a derivative
may be designated as a hedged item.
A combined position, such as an aggregate

position of a variable interest rate debt with
an interest rate swap for fixing the interest
rate of the debt, is not eligible as a hedged
item.
(IFRS 9. 6.3.4, B6.3.3, B6.3.4)
104
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedged item
an equity instrument for
which an entity has
elected to present
changes in fair value in
other comprehensive
income
IFRS
JP GAAP
An equity instrument for which an entity has

elected to present changes in fair value in
other comprehensive income (OCI option)
may be designated as a hedged item. In this
case, changes in fair value of the hedging
instrument are presented in other
comprehensive income and not transferred
to profit or loss.
For a hedge of other securities, an entity can

elect either a deferred hedge or fair value
hedge. Refer to the issue Types of hedging
relationship for the detail of a deferred
hedge and fair value hedge under IAS 39.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.3, 6.5.8)

IFRS 9
Hedged item
inflation risk of a financial
instrument
Under IAS 39, the inflation risk of a financial

instrument was not permitted to be
designated as a risk component of the
financial instrument unless it was
contractually specified because it was not
separately identifiable and reliably
measurable.
There are no specific requirements to

designate only a specific risk as a hedged
risk, except for risks of interest rates, foreign
currency or credit when applying a fair value
hedge.
Under IFRS 9, in limited cases, when it is

possible to identify a risk component for
inflation risk that is separately identifiable
and reliably measurable, the inflation risk
may be designated as a hedged item.
(IFRS 9. B6.3.13)
IFRS 9
Hedged item
nil net positions
When the hedged item is a group that is a nil

net position (i.e. the hedged items among
themselves fully offset the risk that is
managed on a group basis), an entity is
permitted to designate it in a hedging
relationship that does not include a hedging
instrument, provided that specific criteria
are met.
(IFRS 9. 6.6.6)
PwC
105
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Designation of credit
exposures as measured at
fair value through profit or
loss
IFRS
If an entity uses a credit derivative that is
measured at fair value through profit or loss
to manage the credit risk of a financial
instrument, it may designate that financial
instrument to the extent that it is so
managed as measured at fair value through
profit or loss if:
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements
the name of the credit exposure matches

the reference entity of the credit
derivative; and
the seniority of the financial instrument
matches that of the instruments that can
be delivered in accordance with the credit
derivative.
The entity may designate that financial
instrument at, or subsequent to, initial
recognition, or while it is unrecognised (such
as loan commitments) (it is not irrevocable).
(Under IAS 39, there were no such
requirements.)
(IFRS 9. 6.7.1)
IFRS 9
Hedge effectiveness
effectiveness requirements
Under IAS 39, the hedge was expected to be

highly effective (the prospective assessment)
and proved actually to have been highly
effective (retrospective assessment), and to
be regarded as highly effective, an actual
result within a range of 80-125% on the
quantitative effectiveness assessment was
generally required.
An entity is required to forecast the hedge to

be effective for future hedging periods at
inception and also test effectiveness on an
ongoing basis in subsequent periods (no
explicit requirements on prospective testing
in subsequent periods).
Under IFRS 9, the hedge effectiveness

requirement has been relaxed IFRS 9
requires the hedge relationship to meet all of
the following requirements: (i) there is an
economic relationship between the hedged
item and the hedging instrument; (ii) the
effect of credit risk does not dominate the
value changes that result from that economic
relationship; and (iii) the hedge ratio of the
hedging relationship is the same as that
resulting from the quantity of the hedged
item that the entity actually hedges and the
quantity of the hedging instrument that the
entity actually uses to hedge that quantity of
hedged item.
Upon the change in the effectiveness
requirement, the quantitative criteria of the
80-125% range has been removed, the
retrospective assessment is not required
anymore and only the prospective test is
required under IFRS 9.
(IFRS 9. 6.4.1(c), B6.4.1-B6.4.11)
106
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Hedge effectiveness
methods of the
effectiveness assessment
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 9 does not specify a method for

assessing the hedge effectiveness. However,
an entity should use a method that captures
the relevant characteristics of the hedging
relationship including the potential sources
of hedge ineffectiveness. Depending on those
factors, the method could be a qualitative or
a quantitative assessment.
Hedge effectiveness is determined by

comparing the changes in fair value or cash
flows of both the hedged item and the
hedging instrument, in principle, during the
period from the inception of the hedge to the
date of the effectiveness test.
Same as IAS 39, when critical terms between

the hedged item and hedging instrument are
met, an entity might be able to conclude the
assessment on the basis of a qualitative
assessment.
Same as IAS 39, hedge ineffectiveness should
be recognised in profit or loss.
(IFRS 9. B6.4.13-B6.4.19, B6.5.11)
IFRS 9
Measurement of hedge
ineffectiveness
When measuring hedge ineffectiveness for a

cash flow hedge, an entity shall consider the
time value of money. Consequently, the
entity determines the value of the hedged
item on a present value basis and therefore
the change in the value of the hedged item
also includes the effect of the time value of
money.
As long as the result of the prospective test at

the inception of the hedge is highly effective,
an entity may continue applying the hedge
accounting even when the changes do not
show a high level of correlation if they are
temporary and the fluctuation is narrow.
In general, an entity may omit the
effectiveness test when the critical terms and
conditions are identical in the hedging
instruments and hedged items which are
recognised assets and liabilities or forecast
transactions.
There are no specific requirements since the
measurement of hedge ineffectiveness is not
required.
To calculate the change in the value of the

hedged item for the purpose of measuring
hedge ineffectiveness, an entity may use a
derivative that would have terms that match
the critical terms of the hedged item (this is
commonly referred to as a hypothetical
derivative). Using a hypothetical
derivative is a mathematical expedient that
can only be used to calculate the value of the
hedged item. Consequently, a hypothetical
derivative cannot be used to include
features in the value of the hedged item that
only exist in the hedging instrument (but not
in the hedged item).
(IFRS 9. B6.5.4, B6.5.5)
PwC
107
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
Accounting for hedge
ineffectiveness
IFRS
Hedge ineffectiveness should be recognised
in profit or loss.
If the hedged item is an equity instrument
for which an entity has elected to present
changes in fair value in other comprehensive
income, the recognised hedge ineffectiveness
is presented in other comprehensive income
and is not reclassified to profit or loss.
JP GAAP
When a hedge is determined as effective in
its entirety and criteria for hedge accounting
are met, the portion of the gain or loss on the
hedging instrument that resulted from the
ineffectiveness may also be deferred as a part
of the hedge accounting.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.3, 6.5.11(c))

IFRS 9
Hedge effectiveness
rebalancing
IAS 39 did not allow adjustments that were

not envisaged at the inception of the hedge to
be treated as adjustments to a continuing
hedging relationship and treated them as a
discontinuation of the original hedging
relationship and the start of a new one.
There is no concept of rebalancing. If a

hedging relationship ceases to meet the
hedge effectiveness requirement, the
application of hedge accounting should be
discontinued.
Under IFRS 9, if a hedging relationship

ceases to meet the hedge effectiveness
requirement relating to the hedge ratio but
the risk management objective for that
designated hedging relationship remains the
same, an entity should adjust the hedge ratio
of the hedging relationship so that it meets
the qualifying criteria again (rebalancing).
(IFRS 9. 6.5.5, B6.5.7-B6.5.21)
IFRS 9
Basis adjustment
For a cash flow hedge of non-financial

instruments, if a hedged forecast transaction
subsequently results in the recognition of a
non-financial instrument, or a hedged
forecast transaction for a non-financial
instrument becomes a firm commitment for
which fair value hedge accounting is applied,
the entity should reclassify the amount of
associated changes on the hedging
instrument recorded in the other
comprehensive income and include it
directly in the initial cost or other carrying
amount of the hedged item (basis
adjustment).
A basis adjustment for an asset acquisition is

not an option; it is a requirement. There are
no specific requirements in cases where a
forecast transaction results in a non-financial
liability.
Under IAS 39, in addition to a basis

adjustment, an entity could elect to reclassify
the associated changes on the hedging
instrument recorded in other comprehensive
income to profit or loss in the same period or
periods during which the hedged item affects
profit or loss (Refer to the issue Basis
adjustment under IAS 39).
(IFRS 9. 6.5.11(d)(i))
108
PwC
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Criteria for discontinuation or

accounting
Under IFRS 9, after taking into account any

rebalancing of the hedging relationship, an
entity should discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively when the hedging relationship
ceases to meet the qualifying criteria.
Discontinuing hedge accounting can either
affect a hedging relationship in its entirety or
only a part of it. A part of a hedging
relationship is discontinued and hedge
accounting continues for its remainder when
only a part of the hedging relationship ceases
to meet the qualifying criteria.
Hedge accounting for an item should be

discontinued at the time when a hedging
instrument has been extinguished due to its
maturity, sale, termination or execution or
when the hedge relationship no longer meets
the hedge accounting effectiveness criteria
(the hedge no longer meets the hedge
accounting criteria). In addition to that,
hedge accounting should be terminated when
the hedged item expires or it is clear that the
forecast transaction is no longer expected to
occur.
Under IAS 39, an entity had a free choice to

voluntarily discontinue hedge accounting by
simply revoking the designation of the
hedging relationship irrespective of any
reason.
There is no specific requirement for

voluntary discontinuation.
Under IFRS 9, an entity shall not voluntarily

discontinue a hedging relationship that still
meets the risk management objective and
continues to meet all other qualifying
criteria.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.6, B6.5.22-B6.5.27)
IFRS 9
Accounting for
discontinuation and
Same as the issue Accounting for

discontinuation and termination of a hedge
accounting under IAS 39
Same as IFRS.
(IFRS 9. 6.5.6, 6.5.7, 6.5.10, 6.5.12, B6.5.22)

IFRS 9
Special accounting
treatment provided for
interest-rate swaps
Same as the issue Special accounting

treatment provided for interest-rate swaps
under IAS 39.
Same as IFRS.
IFRS 9
Allocation of the exchange

differences arising from a
foreign exchange forward
contract among accounting
periods
Same as the issue Allocation of the exchange

differences arising from a foreign exchange
forward contract among accounting periods
under IAS 39
Same as IFRS.
PwC
109
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Guidance in IAS 39 which is applicable when an entity applies IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and
amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39), published in 2013
IAS 39
Own use exception
Same as the issue Own use exception under

IAS 39
Same as IFRS.
(IAS 39. 5)
IAS 39
Fair value option for Own

use exception
If a derivative is used to hedge changes in fair

value arising from the contracts treated as
normal purchase/sales transactions as they
qualify for the own use exception, an
accounting mismatch arises. Such a contract
for non-financial item may be irrevocably
designated as measured at fair value through
profit or loss if it eliminates or significantly
reduces a recognition inconsistency (this
designation is available only at inception of
the contract).
This option is applicable when an entity

applies IFRS 9 published in November 2013.
(IAS 39. 5A, 103S)
JP GAAP References:
110
Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments

Accounting Standard for Foreign Currency Transactions
PwC
Recent developments
Recent changesIFRS
IASB final standards, General hedge accounting
See Recent developments section at the end of the chapter Assetsfinancial assets for details.
Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (Amendments to IAS 39)
In June 2013 the IASB published amendments to IAS 39 on novation of derivatives; such amendments will also be
incorporated in IFRS 9. These are the result of recent legislative changes requiring entities to novate Over the Counter
derivative contracts to central counterparties (CCPs) in an effort to reduce counterparty credit risk. The IASB was
concerned about the financial reporting effects that would arise from these novations (discontinuation of hedge accounting)
under current guidance and therefore, the amendments clarify that changes to a contract will not result in the expiration or
termination of the hedging instrument (and therefore will not result in the termination of any related hedge designation) if:
as a consequence of laws or regulations, the parties to the hedging instrument agree that a CCP, or an entity (or entities)
acting as a counterparty in order to effect clearing by a CCP (`the clearing counterparty), replaces their original
counterparty; and
other changes, if any, to the hedging instrument are limited to those that are necessary to effect such replacement of the
counterparty. These changes include changes in the contractual collateral requirements, rights to offset receivables and
payables balances, and charges levied.
The amendments will apply for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Earlier application is permitted.
In the United States, the SEC staff provided similar relief. In a letter to the International Swaps and Derivative Association
(ISDA) dated May 2012, the SEC staff agreed that it would not object to the continuation of an existing hedging relationship
where there is a novation of a derivative contract under specific circumstances. However, those specific circumstances
differ somewhat from those proposed by the IASB and therefore, could lead to application differences.
Issue Paper on improvements of Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments
See Recent developments section at the end of the chapter Assetsfinancial assets for details.
PwC
111
112
PwC
Liabilitiestaxes
113
Liabilitiestaxes
Under IFRS, IAS 12, Income Taxes, applies to the accounting for current tax liabilities and current tax assets, and deferred
tax liabilities and deferred tax assets. The assets-liabilities method is applied to the accounting for deferred tax liabilities and
deferred tax assets. Deferred tax is recognised for temporary differences that are differences between the carrying amount of
an asset or liability and its tax base.
The current tax expense for a period is determined based on the taxable and deductible amounts that are filed in the tax
return for the current year. In respect of the current tax expense for the current and prior periods, an entity recognises a
liability on the balance sheet to the extent unpaid and if current tax has been overpaid, it recognises an asset. Current tax
assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to (or recovered from)
tax authorities, using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting
period. Under IFRS, deferred tax is recognised for all temporary differences between the carrying amount of an asset or
liability and its tax base, except for some exceptions of temporary differences (e.g. goodwill arising on a business
combination). A deferred tax asset for deductible temporary differences is recognised only to the extent that it is probable
that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
Under JP GAAP, Guidance on Accounting, Presentation and Audit Treatment related to Taxes and the Accounting Standard
for Tax Effect Accounting applies to the accounting for current tax and deferred tax respectively. The accounting for current
tax and deferred tax under JP GAAP is not fundamentally different from that under IFRS. However, with respect to the
accounting for deferred tax, JP GAAP provides detailed guidance on assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Such
guidance is provided in the Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Tax Effect Accounting in Non-Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Tax Effect Accounting in Consolidated
Financial Statements and Audit Treatment for Judgment of Recoverability of Deferred Assets, whereby an entity is classified
into a certain category by its profitability and the extent of the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the length of estimated
future periods to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets are determined by such category. On the other hand, IFRS
requires substantial judgment as there is no specific guidance.
114
PwC
Liabilitiestaxes
Standard
IAS 12
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Recognition of deferred tax

liability
A deferred tax liability should be recognised

for all taxable temporary differences, except
to the extent that the deferred tax liability
arises from the initial recognition of goodwill
or the initial recognition of an asset or
liability in a transaction which is not a
business combination, and at the time of the
transaction, affects neither accounting profit
nor taxable profit (tax loss).
Deferred tax liabilities should be recognised

for all temporary differences unless the
temporary differences arise from the initial
recognition of goodwill or the amount of
income taxes that are not expected to be paid
in future accounting periods.
(IAS 12. 15)

IAS 12
Recognition of deferred tax

asset
A deferred tax asset should be recognised for

all deductible temporary differences to the
extent that it is probable that taxable profit
will be available against which the deductible
temporary difference can be utilised, unless
the deferred tax asset arises from the initial
recognition of an asset or liability in a
transaction that is not a business
combination, and at the time of the
transaction, affects neither accounting profit
nor taxable profit (tax loss).
Deferred tax assets should be recognised for

all temporary differences unless the
temporary differences arise from the initial
recognition of goodwill or the amount of
income taxes that are not expected to be
recoverable in future accounting periods.
(Refer to row below on Tax effects on

goodwill)
(IAS 12. 24)
IAS 12
Tax effects on goodwill
If the carrying amount of goodwill is less

than its tax base, the difference between the
carrying amount and its tax base gives rise to
a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is
probable that taxable profit will be available
against which the deductible temporary
difference could be utilised.
A deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability is

recognised on goodwill for Japanese tax
purposes in a non-qualified business
combination (i.e. asset adjustment account
or differential liability adjustment
account). This is because temporary
differences exist.
There is a debate whether goodwill for

Japanese tax purposes (asset adjustment
account) is regarded as the tax base of
goodwill under IFRS 3, Business
combinations.
In this case, upon acquisition, the difference

between the consideration and net assets
(inclusive of the deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities recognised on
goodwill for Japanese tax purposes) is
accounted for as goodwill for accounting
purposes.
(IAS 12. 32A)
PwC
115
Standard
IAS 12
Issue
Recoverability of deferred
tax assets
IFRS
JP GAAP
There is no detailed guidance like JP GAAP

on the recoverability of deferred tax assets.
An entity recognises deferred tax assets for
all deductible temporary differences to the
extent that it is probable that taxable profits
will be available against which the deductible
temporary differences can be utilised.
Based on guidance from Audit Treatment for

Judgment of Recoverability of Deferred
Assets, entities are classified into five
categories mainly based on past performance
to determine the recoverability of the
deferred tax assets.
(IAS 12. 27-31)
Specifically, an entity in the third category

would have variable performance and
insufficient taxable income against which
deductible temporary differences can be
utilised. Such entities are required to
estimate taxable income generally for the
next five years.
In the fourth category, entities have
significant tax losses and such entities are
only able to recognise deferred tax assets
which can be recovered based on an estimate
of the taxable income for the next year (one
year).
IAS 12
Tax effects of eliminating

unrealised profit from
intercompany transactions
Under the assets-liabilities method, the tax

rate applied to temporary differences of
unrealised gains or losses is the tax rate that
is expected to apply in the period when the
temporary differences reverse in the
standalone financial statements of a buyer.
In addition, an entity should remeasure
deferred taxes at the amended tax rate when
there is a subsequent change in the tax rate.
The deferral method is applied on the

unrealised profit from intercompany
transactions. Under the deferral method, the
tax rate applied to temporary differences of
unrealised gains or losses is the statutory
effective tax rate applied to the sellers
taxable income in the year of sale. Therefore,
a subsequent change in the tax rate does not
affect the tax effects.
There are no requirements that deferred tax

assets are limited to the sellers taxable
income for the year when the assets are sold
to the buyer, and similar to other deferred
tax assets, an entity is required to assess at
the end of every period whether it is probable
that taxable profits will be available against
which the deductible temporary differences
can be utilised.
There is a requirement that deferred tax

assets are limited to the sellers taxable
income in the year of sale. However, an entity
is not required to assess the recoverability of
the deferred tax assets for the unrealised
gains that are eliminated as part of
consolidation.
(IAS 12. 47)

IAS 12
The treatment of the value

added component of
enterprise tax that is
included in the pro forma
standard taxation.
The value added component is considered by

some as an income tax and presented within
income tax expense in the statement of
comprehensive income. It is included in the
calculation of the effective tax rate used for
deferred tax assets and liabilities since the
value added component has characteristics of
an income tax.
(IAS 12. 47)
116
Given the fact that JP GAAP views the value

added component as not having
characteristics of an income tax, it is
accounted for as a sales administrative
expense (or cost of sales).
Furthermore, the value added component of
enterprise tax is the tax calculated based on
amounts of revenue and some items other
than income. It is not included within the
scope of income tax accounting. Therefore it
is not included in the calculation of the
effective tax rate used for deferred tax assets
and liabilities.
PwC
Liabilitiestaxes
Standard
IAS 12
Issue
Timing of reflecting a
change in tax rates
IFRS
JP GAAP
In some jurisdictions, announcements of tax

rates (and tax laws) by the government have
the same effect as a substantive enactment
and tax assets and liabilities are measured
using the revised tax rate. With regard to
Japanese tax laws, tax rates (and tax laws)
are substantively enacted when the Diet
passes the revised legislation.
If an amended tax law has been promulgated

as of the closing date and a new tax rate for
the future is finalised, the new tax rate is to
be used. Therefore, if an amended tax law is
promulgated after the closing date, the tax
rate to be used is the tax rate specified by the
tax laws effective as of the closing date and
the effect of the change in tax rate for the
subsequent periods is disclosed separately in
the notes.
(IAS 12. 48)

IAS 12
Deferred taxes of
investment properties
measured at fair value
Deferred tax assets or liabilities arising from

investment property that is measured using
the fair value model are measured based on
the rebuttable presumption that its carrying
amount will be recovered entirely through
sale.
Under JP GAAP, there are no special

requirements as there are no differences in
tax rates applied to the profits generated
from using and selling an asset in Japan.
(IAS 12. 51C)
JP GAAP References:
Accounting Standards for Tax Effect Accounting
Audit Treatment for Judgment of Recoverability of Deferred Assets
Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Tax Effect Accounting in Consolidated Financial Statements
Practical Guidelines on Accounting Standards for Tax Effect Accounting in Non-Consolidated Financial Statements
Practical Solution on Presentation of Pro Forma Standard Taxation of Corporate Enterprise Taxes on the Income Statement
Recent developments
Recent proposalIFRS
In March 2009, the IASB released an exposure draft that proposes changes to its income tax accounting standard. After
reviewing comments received on the exposure draft, and giving further consideration to income tax guidance as a whole, the
IASB abandoned the exposure draft and indicated that a fundamental review of the scope of the current project on
accounting for income taxes should be considered. Subsequently, the IASB took on a limited scope project to amend IAS 12s
certain specific issues such as uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances, and allocation of taxes within a group filing a
consolidated tax return.
PwC
117
118
PwC
Liabilitiesother
119
Liabilitiesother
IAS 37, Provision, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, prescribes the accounting for provisions. The Conceptual
Framework defines a liability as a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is
expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits. IAS 37 defines a provision as a
liability of uncertain timing or amount. IFRS requires the probable outflow of resources embodying economic benefits. IAS 37
interprets probable as more likely than not. The best estimate of a liability is measured by expected value in which the
obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities where the provision being
measured involves a large population of items. The midpoint of the range is used when several outcomes are equally likely,
whereas the individual most likely outcome is used where a single obligation is being measured.
With regard to restructuring provisions, IAS 37 provides detailed guidance. The IFRS guidance on termination benefits in
relation to restructuring provisions was amended in June 2011, and it is applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2013. Refer to the chapter Expense recognition employee benefit.
Under JP GAAP, a provision should be recognised when an expense or loss will probably be incurred as a result of past events,
and a reliable estimate can be reasonably made. However there is no common practice or specific guidance. The recognition
criteria for a provision under JP GAAP are similar to that of IFRS, although the present obligation criterion is not required
under JP GAAP.
In January 2010, the IASB issued an exposure draft titled Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37. Then in February 2010, the
IASB published a working draft of a proposed new IFRS titled Liabilities. The working draft incorporated the measurement
changes discussed within the January 2010 exposure draft as well as the recognition and disclosure changes from a 2005
exposure draft (and related subsequent deliberations). Redeliberations on the new exposure draft have been postponed as
part of the agenda consultation project. Refer to the Recent developments section of this chapter for additional discussion.
120
PwC
Liabilitiesother
Standard
IAS 16
IAS 37
Issue
Discount rate used to
calculate an asset
retirement obligation (ARO)
IFRS
Refer to the issue Discount rate used to
calculate an asset retirement obligation
(ARO) in the chapter Assets nonfinancial
assets.
JP GAAP
Refer to the issue Discount rate used to
calculate an asset retirement obligation
(ARO) in the chapter Assets nonfinancial
assets.
(IAS 16. 16, 18) (IAS 37. 47)

IAS 16
IAS 37
IFRIC 1
Frequency of ARO
assessment
Refer to the issue Frequency of ARO

assessment in the chapter Assets
nonfinancial assets.
Refer to the issue Frequency of ARO

assessment in the chapter Assets
nonfinancial assets
(IAS 16. 16, 18) (IAS 37. 59) (IFRIC 1. 3, 8)

IAS 16
IAS 37
IFRIC 1
ARO and rental deposit

related to the asset
Refer to the issue ARO and rental deposit

related to the asset in the chapter Assets
Refer to the issue ARO and rental deposit

related to the asset in the chapter Assets
IAS 37
Requirements for
recognition of provisions
A provision should be recognised when:

(1) An entity has a present obligation as a
result of a past event;
A provision should be recognised when an

expense or loss will probably be incurred as a
result of a past event and a reliable estimate
can be reasonably made.
(2) It is probable that an outflow of resources

embodying economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation; and
However, no common practice or definition

exists for the likelihood of occurrence.
(3) A reliable estimate can be made of the

amount of the obligation.
Probable is interpreted as more likely than
not in IAS 37.
(IAS 37. 14, 23)
IAS 37
Present obligation and

constructive obligation
A present obligation includes not only a legal

obligation but also a constructive obligation.
A constructive obligation is an obligation that
derives from an entitys action where, by an
established pattern of past practice,
published policies or a sufficiently specific
current statement, the entity has indicated to
other parties that it will accept certain
responsibilities, and where, as a result, the
entity has created a valid expectation on the
part of those other parties that it will
discharge those responsibilities.
(IAS 37. 10, 14)
PwC
121
Standard
IAS 37
Issue
When there is no present
obligation
IFRS
An entity does not recognise a provision
when there is no present obligation.
(IAS 37. 15, 16)
IAS 37
Best estimate
Where the provision being measured involves

a large population of items, the obligation is
estimated by calculating the expected
value, which is weighting all possible
outcomes by their associated probabilities.
JP GAAP
An entity recognises a provision when
requirements for the recognition criteria are
satisfied even though there is no present
obligation.
Where there is a continuous range of possible

outcomes, and each point in that range is as
likely as any other, the mid-point of the range
is used.
Where a single obligation is being measured,
the individual most likely outcome may be
the best estimate of the liability.
(IAS 37. 39, 40)
IAS 37
IAS 37
Necessity for discounting

provisions such as
warranties
Provisions are discounted, where the effect of

the time value of money is material.
Discount rate
The discount rate should be a pre-tax rate

that reflects current market assessments of
the time value of money and the risks specific
to the liability. The discount rate should not
reflect risks for which future cash flow
estimates have been adjusted.
(IAS 37. 45)

Liabilities are generally not discounted;
however discounting is required for asset
retirement obligations.
A discount rate for liabilities, except for ARO,
is not specified under JP GAAP.
It is generally interpreted that the risk in the

context of the provision does not include an
entitys own credit risk.
(IAS 37. 47)
122
PwC
Liabilitiesother
Standard
IAS 37
Issue
Gains from the expected
disposal of assets
IFRS
Gains from the expected disposal of assets
should not be taken into account in
measuring a provision.
JP GAAP
(IAS 37. 51)

IAS 37
Reimbursements (such as
through insurance
contracts)
Where some or all of the expenditure

required to settle a provision is expected to
be reimbursed by another party, the
reimbursement should be recognised as a
separate asset when, and only when, it is
virtually certain that reimbursement will be
received. The expense relating to a provision
may be presented net of the amount
recognised for a reimbursement in profit or
loss.
There are no specific requirements. However

the asset should be recognised when it is
virtually certain that the reimbursement will
be received.
(IAS 37. 53, 54)

IAS 37
Onerous contracts
If an entity has a contract that is onerous, the

present obligation under the contract should
be recognised as a provision.
(IAS 37. 66-69)
IAS 37
Recognition of a
restructuring provision
Only when an entity has a detailed formal

plan and has raised a valid expectation in
those affected that it will carry out the
restructuring by starting to implement that
plan or announcing its main features to those
affected by it, a provision is recognised.
There are no specific requirements except for

the Accounting Standard for Construction
Contracts (ASBJ Statement No. 15). In
practice, a loss provision might be recognised
in some cases.
There are no specific requirements for a
restructuring provision. A provision is
recognised in accordance with the general
requirements for a provision. In practice a
restructuring provision might be recognised.
(IAS 37. 71, 72)

IAS 37
Costs of restructuring
A restructuring provision should include only

the direct expenditures arising from the
restructuring, which are those that are both
necessarily entailed by the restructuring and
not associated with the ongoing activities of
the entity. Identifiable future operating
losses up to the date of a restructuring are
not included in a provision unless they relate
to onerous contracts.
There are no specific requirements for a

restructuring provision. In practice, various
expenditures arising from a restructuring
might be included in a provision. Gains on
the expected disposal of assets might be
offset with losses in measuring a provision.
Gains on the expected disposal of assets are

not taken into account in measuring a
restructuring provision, even if the sale of
assets is envisaged as part of the
restructuring.
(IAS 37. 80-83)
PwC
123
Standard
IAS 37
Issue
Accounting for provision for
sales returns
IFRS
When a retail store has a policy of refunding
purchases by dissatisfied customers even
though it is under no legal obligation to do
so, its policy of making refunds is generally
known and this gives rise to a constructive
obligation. A provision is recognised for the
best estimate of the costs of refunds.
(IAS 37 C Example 4)
IAS 37
Accounting for a guarantee

contract
Refer to the issues Measurement of financial

guarantee contracts at initial recognition
and Measurement of financial guarantee
contracts after initial recognition in the
chapter Financial liabilities and equity.
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements except
that a provision for sales returns is
exemplified in the Company Accounting
Ordinance and the Business Accounting
Principles. It is recognised in accordance
with the general requirements for a
provision. In practice the amount of profit
margin corresponding to sales returns after
the period end would be recognised as a
provision.
Refer to the issues Measurement of financial
guarantee contracts at initial recognition
and Measurement of financial guarantee
contracts after initial recognition in the
chapter Financial liabilities and equity.
IAS 37
Timing of recognition of a
provision for a court case
and disclosure requirements
as a contingent liability
When there is no obligation as a result of past

obligating events at the end of the reporting
period, a provision for a court case should
not be recognised. An entity discloses a
contingent liability unless the possibility of
an outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits is remote. A provision is recognised
when it subsequently becomes clear that
there is a present obligation.
There are no specific requirements. A

provision is recognised in accordance with
the general requirements for a provision.
JP GAAP References:
124
Accounting Standard for Asset Retirement Obligations

Guidance on Accounting Standard for Asset Retirement Obligations
Business Accounting Principles
Accounting Standard for Construction Contracts
Company Accounting Ordinance
PwC
Liabilitiesother
Recent developments
Recent issueIFRS
IFRIC 21, Levies
In May 2013, the IASB issued IFRIC 21, Levies, which is an Interpretation on the accounting for levies imposed by
governments. A levy is defined as an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits that is imposed by governments on
entities in accordance with legislation (i.e. laws and/or regulations), other than those outflows of resources that are within
the scope of other Standards (such as IAS 12) and fines or other penalties that are imposed for breaches of the legislation.
IFRIC 21 is an interpretation of IAS 37 and mainly clarifies the following points:
(1) The obligating event that gives rise to a liability to pay a levy is the activity described in the relevant legislation that
triggers the payment of the levy.
(2) The fact that the entity is economically compelled to continue operating in a future period or prepares its financial
statements under the going concern principle, does not create an obligation to pay a levy that will arise from operating
in the future.
(3) A liability to pay a levy is recognised when the obligating event occurs, at a point in time or progressively over time.
(4) An obligation to pay a levy triggered by a minimum threshold is recognised when the threshold is reached.
IFRIC 21 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after I January 2014, and should be applied retrospectively.
IASB Exposure Draft, Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37, and Working Draft, IFRS X, Liabilities
In January 2010, the IASB issued an exposure draft titled Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37. Then in February 2010, the
IASB published a working draft of a proposed new IFRS titled Liabilities. The working draft incorporated the measurement
changes discussed within the January 2010 exposure draft as well as recognition and disclosure changes from a 2005
exposure draft (and related subsequent deliberations). The working draft proposals would affect the recognition and/or
measurement of most provisions and would be relevant to almost every entity reporting under IFRS.
After receiving more than 200 comment letters on its proposals, the IASB began considering the feedback in September
2010. Soon after beginning redeliberations, the IASB decided in November 2010 to postpone further discussion and
analysis on the project. The delay was attributed to the ongoing joint priority projects and the IASBs desire to give proper
consideration to the matters raised by respondents. The IASB tentatively decided that if it reaches decisions on all aspects
of the proposals, it will re-expose any proposed revised IFRS in its entirety for further comment. The timing of any new
guidance in this area is unclear, since the project has been put on hold until the conclusion of the IASBs ongoing
deliberations about its future work plan as part of the agenda consultation project.
PwC
125
126
PwC
Financial liabilities and equity
127

As discussed in the Recent developments section later on in this chapter, the FASB and the IASB are working jointly on the
financial instruments with characteristics of equity project. However, the boards are currently placing higher priority on other
projects and the future plan for this project will be determined based on the prioritisation of other standard setting projects
and the agenda for the next 3 years. In addition, the FASB and the IASB are working on a joint project on financial
instruments. The IASB has been conducting its work in three phases (Classification and measurement, impairment and
hedging), the first of which resulted in the November 2009 issuance of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, on requirements on
financial assets and in 2010 added classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities. In November 2013,
the IASB published IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39) which
introduced new standards for general hedge accounting. The details are discussed in the chapter Assetsfinancial assets.
While in Japan, the ASBJ issued a Discussion Paper on Revision of the Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments
(Classification and Measurement for Financial Liabilities) in February 2011.
IFRS requires the classification of financial instruments based on the definitions of financial liabilities, financial assets and
equity. Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss (liabilities held for
trading and designated under the fair value option) or those measured at amortised cost. On the other hand, JP GAAP does
not have specific requirements which provide clear differences between equity and financial liabilities but classifies them
based on their legal form. In addition, financial liabilities are measured at the amount borrowed or at amortised cost.
Therefore, differences exist not only in their classification but also in measurement after initial recognition. There are also
differences between IFRS and JP GAAP in the derecognition of financial liabilities for debt assumptions, accounting for
transactions exchanging financial liabilities with substantially different terms, substantial modifications of financial liabilities
and the presentation of offsetting financial instruments.
In addition, under IFRS 9, similar to IAS 39, financial liabilities are classified into financial liabilities measured at fair value
through profit or loss (liabilities held for trading or designated under the fair value option) or those measured at amortised
cost. If a financial liability is designated under the fair value option, fair value changes that are attributable to changes in an
entity's own credit risk are recorded in other comprehensive income, unless it creates an accounting mismatch. IFRS 9
published in November 2013 permits entities that are still applying IAS 39 to early apply their own credit provisions without
applying the other requirements of IFRS 9.
Further details on the foregoing and other selected current differences are described in the following table. In addition,
differences on the changes from current requirements to IFRS 9 are also included.
128
PwC
Standard
IAS 32
Issue
liabilities and equity
IFRS
JP GAAP
To determine whether a financial instrument

is an equity instrument rather than a
financial liability, the instrument is an equity
instrument if, and only if, both conditions
below are met; otherwise it is a financial
liability:
Financial liabilities are defined as monetary

payables and net obligations arising from
derivative transactions. In principle, they are
classified based on their legal form.
The instrument includes no contractual

obligation:
The amount of the legal capital should be

presented in the share capital category.
To deliver cash or another financial

asset, or
To exchange financial assets or
financial liabilities with another entity
under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable
The instrument will or may be settled in
the issuers own equity instrument and is
A non-derivative that includes no
contractual obligation for the issuer to
deliver a variable number of its own
equity instruments
A derivative that will be settled only by
the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of
cash or another financial asset for a
fixed number of its own equity
instruments. In addition, a financial
liability is treated as an equity
instrument if it meets the conditions
described in IAS 32.16A-16D. Further, a
contractual obligation to deliver a fixed
number of its equity instruments for a
fixed amount of cash or another
financial asset is also classified as an
equity instrument.
(IAS 32. 11,16)
PwC
129
Standard
IAS 32
Issue
Exception for puttable
financial instruments
IFRS
A puttable financial instrument (a financial
instrument that includes a contractual
obligation for the issuer to repurchase or
redeem that instrument) is classified as an
equity instrument if it meets certain
conditions. Otherwise, it is treated as a
financial liability. Contractual obligations
that entitle the holder to a pro rata share of
the entitys net assets in the event of the
entitys liquidation is classified as an equity
instrument if it meets certain conditions.
Otherwise, it is treated as a financial liability.
JP GAAP
principle, classification is based on the legal
form of the instruments.
(IAS 32. 16A16D)

IAS 39
liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as financial

liabilities measured at fair value through
profit or loss (held for trading and designated
using the fair value option) or those
measured at amortised cost.
The fair value option is to allow, only at initial
recognition, a one-time election to designate a
financial instrument to be measured at fair
value through profit or loss when:
Monetary payables such as notes payable and

accounts payable should be measured and
recorded at the face amounts outstanding.
Bonds should be measured at amortised cost
if they are issued at amounts which are
higher or lower than their face amounts.

accounting mismatch,
contained in a contract and an entity
designates the entire contract as at fair
value through profit or loss
(IAS 39. 9, 11A)
IAS 39
Initial recognition of a
financial liability
An entity should recognise a financial

liability when, and only when, it becomes a
party to the contractual provision of the
instrument.
Borrowings are recognised on the date when

the funds are borrowed and extinguished on
the date of repayment.
(IAS 39. 14)

IAS 39
Derecognition of a financial
liability
A financial liability is derecognised when,

and only when, the obligation specified in the
contract is discharged, cancelled or expires.
These criteria can be satisfied with the
discharge or legal release from primary
responsibility for the liability. In general, an
in-substance defeasance does not meet the
derecognition criteria because the debtor
continues to assume its legal obligation to the
liability.
The derecognition criteria for a financial

liability are the same as under IFRS. A debt
assumption is a type of in-substance
defeasance and does not meet the criteria for
an extinguishment of a financial liability.
However, an extinguishment of a debt
assumption is permitted when certain
conditions are met as a transitional measure
until a further pronouncement is issued.
(IAS 39. 39, AG57, AG59)
130
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for an exchange

of financial liabilities or a
substantial modification of
the terms of a financial
liability
An exchange between an existing borrower

and a lender of debt instruments with
substantially different terms, or a substantial
modification of the terms of an existing
financial liability should be accounted for as
an extinguishment of the original financial
liability and the recognition of a new
financial liability. The difference between the
carrying amount of the financial liabilities
should be recognised in profit or loss. IFRS
provides a quantitative threshold as a
guidance to determine whether the terms are
substantially different: if the difference
between the present value of the cash flows
under the new terms discounted using the
original effective interest rate and the current
carrying amount is at least 10%.
JP GAAP
(IAS 39. 40, 41, AG62)

IAS 39
Transaction costs for an

exchange of financial
liabilities or substantial
modification of the terms of
a financial liability
The costs directly related to the modification

mentioned above are recognised in profit or
loss if the modification is accounted for as an
extinguishment. When the modification is
accounted for as a modification (i.e. not as an
extinguishment), the costs adjust the
carrying amount of the liability and are
included in the effective interest rate.
(IAS 39. 40, 41, AG62)

IAS 39
Accounting for a repurchase

of a part of a financial
liability
If an entity repurchases a part of a financial

liability, the entity should allocate the
previous carrying amount of the financial
liability proportionately based on the relative
fair value of the derecognised part and the
part that continues to be recognised.
(IAS 39. 42)

IFRIC 19
Extinguishment of a
financial liability by issuing
own equity shares
When an entity issues its own equity

instruments to extinguish a financial liability,
the difference between the carrying amount
of the financial liability and the consideration
paid should be recognised in profit or loss
and disclosed as a separate line in profit or
loss or in the notes. The consideration is
typically the fair value of the equity
instruments issued. If the fair value of the
equity instrument cannot be reliably
measured, then the equity instrument should
be measured to reflect the fair value of the
financial liability extinguished (this is not
applicable to financial liabilities with a
demand feature (IAS 39. 49)).
For debt equity swap transactions, the equity

instruments issued may be measured at the
carrying amount of the financial liability
extinguished (i.e. the face value approach), as
well as at fair value. This approach is similar
to IFRIC 19.
(IFRIC 19)
PwC
131
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Measurement of financial
guarantee contracts at initial
recognition
Financial guarantee contracts are measured

at fair value at initial recognition. Such fair
value is assumed to be equal to the guarantee
premium received. However, if an issuer of
financial guarantee contracts has previously
asserted explicitly that it regards such
contracts as insurance contracts and has
used accounting applicable to insurance
contracts, the issuer may elect to account for
it either as a financial instrument or as an
insurance contract. The issuer may make that
election contract by contract, but the election
for each contract is irrevocable.
Financial guarantee contracts are not

measured at fair value, unless they are
related to a derecognition of a financial asset
or a financial liability (which includes the
financial guarantee contract) based on the
financial component approach.
(IAS 39. 2(e), AG4(a))

IAS 39
IAS 37
Measurement of financial
guarantee contracts after
initial recognition
Financial guarantee contracts are measured at

fair value if they are designated under the fair
value option or they meet the definition of a
derivative. Except for the above (fair value
through profit or loss) or when financial
contracts are accounted for as insurance
contracts, an issuer of such a contract should
measure it at the higher of: (i) the amount
determined in accordance with IAS 37; and (ii)
the amount initially recognised less the
cumulative amortisation recognised. The
amount determined in accordance with IAS 37
is based on the best estimate of the expenditure
required to settle the financial guarantee
contract at the end of the reporting period.
An allowance should be recorded when it is

probable that a loss will occur and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Guarantee premiums would be accounted for
on an accrual basis.
(IAS 39. 2, 47, AG 4(a), IAS 37. 36, IAS 37C

Example 9)
IAS 39
IAS 37
Measurement of loan
commitments at initial
recognition
At initial recognition, loan commitments are

measured at fair value if they are designated
under the fair value option, meet the
definition of a derivative, or the loan is
provided at a below-market interest rate.
Other than the above, the loan commitments
would be measured based on the best
estimate of the expenditure required to settle
the commitments at the end of the reporting
period in accordance with IAS 37.
Loan commitments are recorded off-balance

sheet. As to agreements for overdrafts
(including contracts of similar nature) and
loan commitments, financial institutions and
the lenders should disclose the facts and the
limit or committed amounts less outstanding
balance of executed loans to the debtor.
(IAS 39. 4, IAS 37. 36 )

IAS 39
IAS 37
Measurement of loan
commitments after initial
recognition
Subsequent to initial recognition, loan

commitments are measured at fair value through
profit or loss if they are designated under the fair
value option or they meet the definition of a
derivative. When the loan is provided at a
below-market interest rate, an issuer of such a
contract should measure it at the higher of: (i) the
amount determined in accordance with IAS 37;
and (ii) the amount initially recognised less
cumulative amortisation recognised. Other than
the above, the loan commitments would be
measured based on the best estimate of the
expenditure required to settle the commitments
at the end of the reporting period in accordance
with IAS 37.
See Measurement of loan commitments at

initial recognition above.
(IAS 39. 47, IAS 37. 36)
132
PwC
Standard
IAS 39
Issue
Fair value of a financial
liability with a demand
feature
IFRS
The fair value of a financial liability with a
demand feature is not less than the amount
payable on demand, discounted from the
first date that the amount could be required
to be paid.
JP GAAP
There are no specific requirements. However,
liabilities are required to be recorded at the
face amount of the entitys obligation.
(IAS 39. 49)

IAS 32
Presentation of interest,
dividends, losses and gains
Transaction costs of an equity transaction are

accounted for as a deduction from equity net
of any related income tax benefit.
equity transaction
Income taxes related to distributions to

holders of an equity instrument and its
transaction costs should be accounted for in
accordance with IAS 12, following the
amendment to IAS 32 in the Annual
Improvements to IFRS 2009 2011 cycle
which is applied retrospectively for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
Ancillary costs of an equity transaction are in

principle, accounted for as expenses
(non-operating expenses). However, the
costs may be deferred if they are incurred on
financing activities for the purposes of
business expansion, and be amortised over
the period during which the expenditure is
effective, up to 3 years.
(IAS 32. 35, 37)

IAS 32
Presentation of interest,
dividends, losses and gains
compound instruments
with equity components
IAS 32
Presentation of off-setting
financial assets and
financial liabilities
Issuance costs of a compound financial

instrument are allocated to the liability and
equity components of the instrument in
proportion to the allocation of the proceeds.
(IAS 32. 38)
A financial asset and a financial liability
should be offset and presented as a net
amount when, and only when, an entity
currently has a legally enforceable right to
offset and intends either to settle on a net
basis or to settle the asset and the liability
simultaneously. Generally, a master netting
agreement may not be presented net because
there is no legally enforceable right to offset
other than on default.
(IAS 32. 42-50)
IAS 39
IFRS 9
Bifurcation criteria of
An embedded derivative included in a hybrid

instrument should be separated and
measured at fair value separately from the
host contract if, and only if:
The economic characteristics and risks of
the embedded derivative are not closely
related to the economic characteristics and
risks of the host;
Net presentation of financial assets and

financial liabilities is permitted if the
following criteria are met:
(1) They are monetary receivables and
payables to the same counter party
(2) The entity has a legally enforceable right
and the ability to offset.
(3) The entity intends to settle on a net basis.
In addition, net presentation of a master
netting agreement is permitted even when
the entity does not intend to settle on a net
basis other than on default.
compound instrument should be bifurcated
and measured at fair value separately from
the host contract provided that all of the
following conditions are met:
(1) The risks related to the embedded
derivative could affect the host financial
asset and/ or host financial liability;

(2) A separate instrument with the same

The hybrid instrument is not measured at

fair value with changes in fair value
(3) The compound instrument is not

measured at fair value with changes in
fair value recognised in profit or loss.
In addition, IFRS 9 requires the same

accounting treatment as under IAS 39.
(IAS 39. 11, 11A, 12, 13) (IFRS 9. 4.3.3-4.3.6)
PwC
However, even when (1) and (3) are not

satisfied, an embedded derivative may be
separated from the host contract and
133
Standard
IFRS 9
Issue
liabilities
IFRS
Similar to IAS 39, financial liabilities are
classified as financial liabilities measured at
fair value through profit or loss (liabilities
held for trading and designated under the
fair value option) or financial liabilities
measured at amortised cost.
JP GAAP
Monetary payables such as notes and
accounts payable should be measured and
recorded at the face amounts outstanding.
Bonds should be measured at amortised cost
if they are issued at an amount higher or
lower than their face value.
(IFRS 9. 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 5.7.7)

IFRS 9
Fair value option
Similar to IAS 39, designation under the fair

value options is permitted if:

accounting mismatch;
contained in a hybrid instrument and an
entity designates the entire instrument as
at fair value through profit or loss (unless
the embedded derivative(s) does not
significantly modify the cash flows, or, it is
clear with little or no analysis when a
similar hybrid instrument is first
considered that separation of the
embedded derivative(s) is prohibited.)
When a financial liability is designated as the
fair value options, changes in fair value
attributable to changes in the credit risk
should be presented in other comprehensive
income, unless this treatment would create
or enlarge an accounting mismatch-- in
which case, all gains or losses should be
presented in profit or loss.
(An entity may elect to apply the
requirements for the presentation of gains
and losses on financial liabilities designated
as at fair value through profit loss without
applying the other requirements of IFRS 9.)
(IFRS 9. 4.2.2, 4.3.5, 5.7.7, 5.7.8)
JP GAAP References:
134
Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments

PwC
Recent developments
Joint IASB/FASB project on Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity
The FASB and the IASB are working jointly to develop a comprehensive standard that will simplify and improve financial
reporting requirements for financial instruments with characteristics of equity. In November 2007 and February 2008, the
FASB and the IASB, respectively, issued their Preliminary Views, Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity, as
a first major step toward convergence. However, the boards acknowledged that they do not have the capacity currently to
devote the time necessary to deliberate the project issues. Consequently, the boards decided not to issue an exposure draft
in the near term as originally planned.
In July 2011, the IASB launched an agenda consultation to seek input from stakeholders on the strategic direction of the
IASBs future work plan which includes this project. After a number of public debates, extensive and focused discussion
with investors, consideration of over 240 comment letters and online discussion forums across more than 80 countries, the
IASB released a Feedback Statement in December 2012. The Feedback Statement summarises the responses received
across key themes and outlines three initiatives by the IASB to address the issues highlighted in the responses. The three
initiatives consist of (1) Implementation and Maintenance (including Post-implementation Reviews), (2) The Conceptual
Framework and (3) Major IFRS Projects. The IASB identified nine priority projects that it will explore over the next three
years and Financial Instruments with the Characteristics of Equity is included in those projects. The IASB intends to
investing significant effort to define the problem and establish a path toward achieving an adequate solution.
See Joint IASB/FASB project on Financial Instruments in the Recent developments section of the chapter
Assetsfinancial assets for the details.
While as part of the convergence project with IFRS, an Issue Paper on Improvements to the Accounting Standard for
Financial Instruments (Classification and Measurement of Financial Liabilities) was released in February 2011,
deliberations on this issue are currently on hold. The following is a summary of the issue paper.
Issue Paper on improvements to the Accounting Standard for Financial Instruments (Classification and
Measurement of Financial Liabilities)
The issue paper relates to a comprehensive review of the ASBJ Statement No.10, Accounting for Financial Instruments
which is part of the convergence project based on the Tokyo Agreement between the IASB and the ASBJ. The ASBJ started
a review based on IFRS 9 in light of convergence with IFRS on financial liabilities as well as financial assets and sought
comments from the interested parties.
The issue paper proposes to measure financial liabilities at fair value at initial recognition, and subsequently measure them
at amortised cost in principle, and also to permit a fair value option. Those proposals are in line with guidance under IFRS
9. On the other hand, under IFRS 9, when the fair value option is applied to a financial liability and the portion of the
changes in fair value of the financial liability that is attributable to the changes in the credit risk will be presented in other
comprehensive income. Recycling of the amount recognised in accumulated other comprehensive income when the
financial liability is extinguished before its maturity is prohibited. This prohibition of recycling is treated as an issue to be
considered.
PwC
135
136
PwC
Consolidation
137
Consolidation
IFRS is a principles-based framework and the approach to consolidation reflects that framework. Indicators of control are
provided, some of which individually require the need to consolidate. However, where control is not apparent, consolidation
is based on an overall assessment of all relevant facts. The indicators provided under IFRS help the reporting entity in making
that assessment. Consolidation is required under IFRS when an entity has the ability to govern the financial and operating
policies of another entity to obtain benefits.
JP GAAP is similar to IFRS in that the scope of consolidation is based on the concept of control (substance over form);
however, there are more precise criteria compared to IFRS which may cause a difference in the scope of consolidation in
practice.
Differences in consolidation under JP GAAP and IFRS may arise when a subsidiarys accounting policies differs from that of
the parent. While JP GAAP permits the use of financial statements applying US GAAP or IFRS of foreign subsidiaries with
certain exceptions, IFRS does not permit the use of different GAAP within a group and requires a consolidated group to
consistently apply the same accounting policies.
In addition, the treatment may differ in situations where a parent company has a fiscal year-end different from that of a
consolidated subsidiary. Under JP GAAP, use of the recent financial statement of a subsidiary with a different year-end provided
the difference is no more than three months is permitted. Under IFRS, such recent financial statement is only used when it is
impracticable that the subsidiary prepares, for consolidation purposes, additional financial information as of the same date as
the financial statements. When using the recent financial statement of the subsidiary, JP GAAP requires adjustments on
significant differences relating to intra-group transactions which occurred between the ends of the reporting periods are required,
whereas IFRS requires adjustments of significant transactions, not limited to significant differences relating to intra-group
transactions, which occurred between the ends of the reporting periods in the consolidated financial statements.
The new standards of IFRS, IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11, Joint arrangements and IFRS 12,
Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, have been applied for annual period beginning on or after 1 January 2013.
IFRS 10 has changed the definition of control such that the same consolidation criteria are applied to all entities. This
definition is supported by application guidance that addresses the different ways in which a reporting entity (investor) might
control another entity (investee). The changed definition and application guidance could result in a significant change in the
consolidation conclusions for some entities, such as for certain structured entities.
IFRS 11 has reduced the types of joint arrangements to two: joint operations and joint ventures. Entities that participate in
joint operations will recognise in relation to their interest in the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses resulting from the
joint operation. Equity accounting will be mandatory for participants in joint ventures, as the proportionate consolidation
method was withdrawn.
IFRS 12 has set out the required disclosures for entities reporting under IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IAS 28 and unconsolidated
structured entities. The standard requires an entity to disclose information that helps financial statement readers to evaluate
the nature, risks, and financial effects associated with the entitys interests in subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements, and
unconsolidated structured entities.
Furthermore, the standard for Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27) has been applied for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. That standard provides an exception to the consolidation requirements
in IFRS 10 for certain controlled investments held by an investment entity, and instead requires the investment entity to
measure those investments at fair value through profit or loss.
138
PwC
Consolidation
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
In general, if 20% or more of the voting power

is held directly or indirectly, it is presumed
that significant influence exists, in the absence
of evidence which indicates otherwise.
The judgement criteria for significant

influence are similar to IFRS; however, more
detailed criteria are provided compared to
IFRS.
IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures

IAS 28
Significant influence
(IAS 28. 5, 6)
IAS 28
Changes in other net assets

of the investee

accounting treatment for the changes in net
assets of the investee that are not recognised
in profit or loss or other comprehensive
income, or that are not distributions
received.
(IAS 28. 10)
IAS 28
Exception of applying the

equity method to
investments in associates
(remeasurement at fair
value)
Investments in associates held by venture

capital organisations, mutual funds, unit
trusts and similar entities may be measured
at fair value through profit or loss in
accordance with IFRS 9 if designated as such
on initial recognition.
Changes in net assets of the investee due to a

capital increase are recognised as goodwill
(or negative goodwill) when it results in an
increase of the investors proportionate
share. When it results in a decrease of the
investors proportionate share, these changes
are recognised in extraordinary profit or
losses. However, it is permitted for an entity
to recognise the change directly in retained
earnings when the recognition in profit or
loss may lead interested parties to
inappropriate decision.
Investments held by venture capital
organisations and similar investment
companies are not treated as associates when
certain criteria are met.
(IAS 28. 18, 19)

IAS 28
Potential voting rights
Potential voting rights are considered when

assessing significant influence.
(IAS 28. 7, 8)
IAS 28
Accounting for an associate

held for sale
For an entire investment or a portion of an

investment in an associate classified as held
for sale, use of the equity method is
discontinued and the investment is
accounted for under IFRS 5.

consider potential voting rights when
assessing significant influence.
There are no specific requirements for an
associate held for sale. Certain associates are
excluded from the scope of the equity
method, e.g. if the influence is temporary.
(IAS 28. 20, BC26, BC27)
PwC
139
Standard
IAS 28
Issue
IFRS
Accounting for the changes

in ownership interest in an
associate which do not
result in a loss of significant
influence
There are no specific requirements. However,

the following treatment is applied in practice.
When additional interest is acquired, the
difference between the additional interest in
the associate and the investment cost of the
additional interest is accounted for as
goodwill (or negative goodwill).
When interest is sold, the difference between
the carrying amount of the decrease in interest
and the proceeds from the sales of interest is
The proportionate share of the gain or loss
previously recognised in other comprehensive
income, such as currency translation
differences and change in value of
available-for-sale financial assets, relating to
the reduction in interest is reclassified to profit
or loss. However, other comprehensive
income recognised as non-recycling items,
such as revaluation gain or loss of fixed
assets applying the revaluation model under
IAS 16 and changes in the fair value of an
investment in an equity instrument in
accordance with IFRS 9 if designated as such
on initial recognition are not recycled.
JP GAAP
Similar to IFRS in the treatment of an
increase (acquisition of additional interest)
and decrease (disposal) of interest.

previously recognised in other comprehensive
income relating to the reduction in interest is
reclassified to profit or loss.
There is no concept of items in other
comprehensive income which would never be
recycled to profit or loss.
(IAS 28. 25)

IAS 28
Accounting for the changes

in ownership interest in an
associate which result in a
loss of significant influence
An investor should measure the retained

investment in the former associate at fair
value and recognise any difference in profit
or loss.
A gain or loss previously recognised in other
comprehensive income is reclassified to
profit or loss except for non-recycling items.
(IAS 28. 22, 23)
IAS 28
Amortisation of goodwill
relating to an associate
Goodwill relating to an associate is not

amortised.
An investor measures the retained

investment in the former associate at the
carrying amount in the separate financial
statements and directly reduces the gain or
loss previously recognised in other
comprehensive income as well as retained
earnings.
previously recognised in other
comprehensive income relating to the
reduction in interest is reclassified to profit or
loss .There is no concept of items in other
Positive goodwill relating to an associate is
amortised over a period of 20 years or less.
(IAS 28. 32)
140
PwC
Consolidation
Standard
IAS 28
Issue
Uniform reporting dates for
the associate and the
investor
IFRS
When the reporting dates are different, the
associate prepares the financial statements as
of the same date as the financial statements
of the investor unless it is impracticable.
JP GAAP
When the reporting dates are different, it is
permitted to use the recent financial
statements of the associate.
(IAS 28. 33, 34)

IAS 28
Transactions for which the

adjustments are required
due to the difference in the
reporting date
When it is impracticable to prepare the

financial statements as of the same date, the
difference should be no more than three
months. Adjustments are made for the effects
of significant transactions or events that
occur between the end of the reporting
period of the investor and that of the
associate.
Adjustments or disclosures are made as

appropriate when significant transactions or
events occurred between the different
reporting dates of the investor and the
associate.
(IAS 28. 34)

IAS 28
Uniform accounting policies

for the associate and the
investor
The investors financial statements are

prepared using uniform accounting policies
for like transactions and events in similar
circumstances. The same accounting policies
are used for the associate.
(IAS 28. 35, 36)
IAS 28
Impairment of investments
in associates (equity method
investments)
Assess whether there is any indication of

impairment loss following the requirements
in IAS 39 for the entire carrying amount of
investments in associates including goodwill
and test for impairment following the
requirements in IAS 36. An impairment loss
can be reversed.
(IAS 28. 41, 42)
PwC
In general, uniform accounting policies are

used.
However, when it is confirmed that obtaining
necessary information to apply uniform
accounting policies is extremely difficult, it is
permitted not to use a uniform accounting
principle. It is also permitted to use
accounting policies following IFRS or US
GAAP for foreign associates, except for five
specific items.
Assess whether there is any indication of
impairment loss for the entire carrying
amount of investments in associates
including goodwill and test for impairment.
An impairment loss cannot be reversed.
Furthermore, when the carrying amount of
investment at cost in the separate financial
statements is impaired, the carrying amount
in the consolidated financial statements is
reduced to the carrying amount in the
separate financial statements by recognising
in profit or loss the amortisation of goodwill
included in the carrying amount of the
consolidated financial statements. An
impairment loss cannot be reversed.
141
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS 10
Unconsolidated subsidiaries
All subsidiaries are included in the scope of

consolidation (including a subsidiary over
which control is temporary).
(IFRS 10. BCZ20)
IFRS 10
Concept of control
Apply the same control criteria for all entities

including SPEs.
(IFRS 10. 4, 7)
IFRS 10
Application of control
An investor who has less than a majority of

the voting rights may meet the control
criteria depending on other facts and
circumstances such as the size and dispersion
of holdings and the voting patterns at
previous shareholders meetings.
All subsidiaries are included in the scope of

consolidation in principle. However, certain
investees are excluded from the scope of
consolidation, including those where control
is temporary and small-sized investees. For
unconsolidated but controlled investees, the
equity method is generally applied.
Similar to IFRS in the concept of control,
however, there are many differences in
specific guidance. Unlike IFRS, there is a
bright line rule that depends on whether or
not an investor has 40% or more of voting
rights, which may cause different results in
the assessment of control.
It is permitted (but not required) to consider
the size and dispersion of holdings.
(IFRS 10. B41, B42)

IFRS 10
Investments in a trust
Depending on the substance, a trust may be

required to be consolidated.
(IFRS 10. 4, 7)
Generally, a trust is considered as a

mechanism to manage trust assets and is not
considered as an entity that is required to
assess consolidation (and therefore, in many
cases, it is not subject to consolidation).
However, for some trusts including a money
trust with multiple beneficiaries, it may be
treated as a subsidiary or an associate if it
meets certain criteria.
142
PwC
Consolidation
Standard
IFRS 10
Issue
Investments in an
investment partnership
IFRS
Those who hold the decision making rights
over operations of an investment partnership
should consider certain factors such as the
scope of its decision-making authority, the
rights held by other parties, remuneration
and the exposure to variability of returns
from other interests in determining whether
it is an agent. Therefore, in some cases, those
who hold the execution rights may not be
required to consolidate an investment
partnership.
JP GAAP
In general, the entity which holds decision
making authority over operations of an
investment partnership (i.e. a general
partner) would consolidate that partnership
except for certain circumstances.
(IFRS 10. B60)

IFRS 10
Potential voting rights
Potential voting rights are considered when

assessing control.
(IFRS 10. 10, B15, B47-B50)
IFRS 10
Judgement on whether to
consolidate an SPE
The general concept of control that is applied

to normal operating entities is also applied to
SPEs.

consider potential voting rights when
assessing control.
An investor or a transferor of an SPE is not

required to consolidate the SPE when certain
criteria are met.
An entity should consider the purpose and

design of an SPE, identify its relevant
activities and assess how decisions about
those activities are made. Agency
relationships should also be considered.
(IFRS 10. 4, 7, B3)
IFRS 10
Exception to consolidation
(Investment entities)
Entities which meet the definition of

investment entities do not consolidate their
subsidiaries and instead measure those
investments at fair value with changes
recognised in profit or loss in accordance
with IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, except
for those subsidiaries which provide services
that relate to investment entitys investment
activities to the parent.
Investees by an investment company (for

example, a venture capital organisation) are
not treated as subsidiaries if certain criteria
are met.
In such cases, the investment companys
investments in those investees are treated as
financial instruments, but not necessarily
required to be measured at fair value when
no quoted market price exists.
(IFRS 10. 31, 32)
PwC
143
Standard
IFRS 10
Issue
Control of specified assets
IFRS
An investor should consolidate a portion of
an investee (specified assets) as a deemed
separate entity when certain criteria are met.
JP GAAP
(IFRS 10. B76)

IFRS 10
Uniform reporting dates for

the subsidiary and the
parent
The reporting dates should be the same for

the subsidiary and the parent.
When the reporting dates are different, the
subsidiary prepares the financial statements
as of the same date as the reporting date of
the parent unless it is impracticable.
It is permitted to use a different reporting

date provided the difference is no more than
three months.
(IFRS 10. B92, B93)

IFRS 10
Transactions that require

adjustments due to a
difference in the reporting
dates
When it is impracticable to prepare the

financial statements as of the same date, the
difference should be no more than three
months. Adjustments are made for the effects
of significant transactions or events that
occur between the end of the reporting
period of the parent and that of the
subsidiary.
Adjustments are required only for significant

differences relating to intra-group
transactions that occur between the end of
the reporting period of the parent and that of
the subsidiary.
(IFRS 10. B93)

IFRS 10
Uniform accounting policies

for the subsidiary and the
parent
Applying uniform accounting policies is

required for like transactions and other
events in similar circumstances.
(IFRS 10. B87)
IFRS 3
IFRS 10
Deemed acquisition date,

deemed date of loss of
control
The acquisition date is the date when control

is obtained. Consolidation should commence
at the acquisition date and cease at the date
of loss of control.
In general, uniform accounting policies are

required to be applied for the same
transactions in the same circumstances.
However, tentatively it is permitted to use US
GAAP or IFRS for foreign subsidiaries,
except for five specific items.
The preceding or following reporting date
(including interim reporting date) of the
subsidiary from the actual acquisition date or
the actual date of loss of control may be used.
Unlike JP GAAP, no specific requirements

exist on the deemed acquisition date or the
deemed date of loss of control. However,
IFRS 3.BC110 mentions the use of a
convenience date, unless events between
the convenience date and the actual
acquisition date result in material changes in
the amounts recognised.
(IFRS 3. 8, BC110) (IFRS 10. 20)
144
PwC
Consolidation
Standard
IFRS 10
Issue
Presentation of
non-controlling interest
IFRS
Presented within equity as non-controlling
interests.
(IFRS 10. 22)
JP GAAP
Current JP GAAP
Presented within the section of net assets as
minority interests.
September 2013
Presented within equity as non-controlling
interests.
IFRS 10
Attribution of losses of a
subsidiary to non-controlling
interests (resulting in a
deficit balance)
Losses are attributed to the owners of the

parent and to the non-controlling interests
even if it results in the non-controlling
interests having a deficit balance.
Losses are attributed only to the parent

unless otherwise arranged.
(IFRS 10. B94)

IFRS 10
Changes in a parents
ownership interest which do
not result in a loss of control
Changes in a parents ownership interest in a

subsidiary which do not result in a loss of
control are accounted for as equity
transactions. Goodwill or a gain/loss is not
recognised when an additional interest is
acquired or a part of the interest is sold.
(IFRS 10. B96)
Current JP GAAP
When an additional ownership interest is
acquired, the difference is recognised as
goodwill. When an ownership interest is
reduced, the difference is recognised in profit
or loss on sales.
September 2013
Changes in a parents ownership interest in a
subsidiary which do not result in a loss of
control are accounted for as an adjustment of
equity. Goodwill or a gain/loss is not
recognised when an additional interest is
acquired or a part of the interest is sold.
IFRS 10
Changes in a parents
ownership interest which
result in a loss of control
When a parent loses control of a subsidiary,

any investment retained in the former
subsidiary is remeasured at its fair value with
any gain or loss recognised in profit or loss.
When a subsidiary ceases to be a subsidiary

and it becomes an associate, the parent
measures the retained interest in the former
subsidiary at the carrying amount in the
consolidated financial statements at the time
of loss of control.
Gain or loss previously recognised in other

comprehensive income, such as currency
translation differences and change in value of
available-for-sale financial assets, is
reclassified to profit or loss. However, other
comprehensive income recognised as
non-recycling items, such as a revaluation
gain or loss of fixed assets applying the
revaluation model under IAS 16 and changes
in the fair value of an investment in an equity
instrument in accordance with IFRS 9 if
designated as such on initial recognition are
not recycled.
When a subsidiary ceases to be a subsidiary

and it does not become an associate, the
parent measures the retained interest at the
carrying amount at cost in the separate
balance sheet and directly reduces the gain or
loss previously recognised in other
comprehensive income as well as retained
earnings.
(IFRS 10. 25, B98, B99)
PwC

previously recognised in other
reduction in interest is reclassified to profit or
loss .There is no concept of items in other
145
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
A joint arrangement is classified as a joint

venture or a joint operation depending on the
substance of the arrangement. A joint
arrangement may be classified as a joint
operation even when the joint arrangement is
structured through a separate vehicle.
Concept of a joint venture structured under

an arrangement which is jointly controlled by
independent multiple entities exists.
However, there is no concept of joint
operation like IFRS.
IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements

IFRS 11
Classification of joint
arrangements
(IFRS 11. 4, 14, 15, 16, 17)

IFRS 11
Accounting for joint

operations
An entity that has joint control of a joint

operation should recognise, in relation to its
interest, its assets, its liabilities, its revenue
and its expenses from the joint operation.
There are no specific requirements
(IFRS 11. 20)

IFRS 11
Assessment of investment
in a joint operation without
having joint control
Entities which participate in joint operation

but do not have joint control of the joint
operation, although have rights to assets and
have obligations to liabilities of the joint
operation, should recognise the related
assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses from
the joint operation.
(IFRS 11. 23)

IFRS 11
Accounting for an interest in

a joint venture
An interest in a joint venture is accounted for

using the equity method. An investment in a
joint venture held by a venture capital
organisation, a mutual fund, unit trust and
similar entities may elect to measure
investments in those joint ventures at fair
value through profit or loss in accordance
with IFRS 9.
In general, the equity method is applied.
(IFRS 11. 24, IAS 28. 18)

IFRS 11
Assessment of investment
in a joint venture without
having joint control
When an entity does not have joint control of

an investee and the investee is not a
subsidiary or an associate of the entity, it
accounts for its interest in the investee at fair
value when control is lost.

practice, such investment is accounted for in
accordance with the accounting for
associates.
(IFRS 11. 25)
JP GAAP References:
146

Accounting Standard for Equity Method of Accounting for Investments
Guidance on Determining a Subsidiary and an Affiliate
Guidance on Disclosures about Certain Special Purpose Entities
Practical Solution on Unification of Accounting Policies Applied to Foreign Subsidiaries for Consolidated Financial Statements
Practical guidelines on Accounting for Capital Consolidation Procedures in Preparing consolidated Financial Statements
Practical guidelines on Accounting under the Equity Method
Accounting Standard for Presentation of Comprehensive Income
Practical Solution on Accounting for Trusts
Practical Solution on Application of the Control Criteria and Influence Criteria to Investment Associations
PwC
Consolidation
Recent developments
Recent releasesIFRS
(applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013)
IFRS 10 issued by IASB in May 2011, changes the definition of control, such that the same consolidation criteria will apply
to all entities. The revised definition of control and associated guidance in IFRS 10 replaces not only the definition and
guidance in IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, but also the indicators of control in SIC 12,
ConsolidationSpecial Purpose Entities. IAS 27 (Amended) is renamed Separate Financial Statements and guidance on
consolidation is now removed from this standard. The existing guidance for separate financial statements in IAS 27 remains
unchanged.
The new definition of control under IFRS 10 states that an investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to
variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
investee. The new definition of control within IFRS 10 is supported by application guidance that addresses the different
ways in which a reporting entity (investor) might control another entity (investee).
IFRS 10 could change previous consolidation conclusions for structured entities. An investor with variable returns and
power over an investee that previously concluded it did not consolidate because it had less than the majority of the risks
and rewards may now have to consolidate the investee as a SPE. Similarly, an investor that previously concluded it had to
consolidate an SPE on the basis that the investor is exposed to substantially all the risks incident to the SPEs activities and
that it obtains all the benefits from the SPEs activities may now have to deconsolidate the SPE if it does not have control as
defined under the new guidance.
The revised definition of control focuses on the need to have both power and variable returns for control to be present.
Power is the current ability to direct the activities that significantly influence returns. Returns must vary and can be only
positive, only negative, or both.
The determination of power is continuously assessed based on facts and circumstances (including substantive potential
voting rights). The fact that control is intended to be temporary over any controlled investee does not lead to the conclusion
that it does not need to be consolidated by the investor with control. Voting rights or contractual rights may be evidence of
power, or a combination of the two may give an investor power. Power does not have to be exercised in order to exist. An
investor with more than half of the voting rights would meet the power criteria in the absence of restrictions or other
circumstances.
The application guidance includes examples illustrating when an investor may have control with less than half of the voting
rights. When assessing if it controls the investee, an investor should consider potential voting rights, rights from other
contractual arrangements, and the size of its shareholding in comparison to other holdings, together with other facts and
circumstances such as voting patterns at shareholder meetings. The notion of de facto control is clarified within the
consolidation standard.
IFRS 10 also includes guidance on substantive and protective rights. Substantive rights give an investor the ability to direct
the activities of an investee that significantly affect the returns. Protective rights (often known as veto rights) may restrict
an investors ability to control if the rights apply to decisions in the ordinary course of business.
The new standard includes guidance on agent/principal relationships. An investor (the agent) may be engaged to act on
behalf of a single party or a group of parties (the principals). Certain power is delegated to the agentfor example, to
manage investments.
The investor may or may not have control over the pooled investment funds. IFRS 10 includes a number of factors to
consider when determining whether the investor has control or is acting as an agent. If an investor acts as an agent, it might
not be required to consolidate the investee.
PwC
147

The IASB issued IFRS 11 in May 2011, which supersedes IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures. IFRS 11 defines a joint
arrangement as an arrangement where two or more parties contractually agree to share control. Joint control exists only
when the decisions about activities that significantly affect the returns of an arrangement require the unanimous consent of
the parties sharing control. All parties to a joint arrangement must recognise their rights and obligations arising from the
arrangement. The focus is no longer on the legal structure of joint arrangements, but rather on how the rights and
obligations are shared by the parties to the joint arrangement.
IFRS 11 eliminates the existing policy choice of proportionate consolidation for jointly controlled entities. In addition, the
standard categorises joint arrangements as one of the following:
Joint operationsParties to the arrangement have direct rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities. A joint
operator will recognise its interest based on its involvement in the joint operation (i.e. based on its direct rights and
obligations) rather than on the participation interest it has in the joint arrangement. A joint operator in a joint operation
will therefore recognise in its own financial statements its:
-
Assets, including its share of any assets held jointly
Liabilities, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly
Revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation
share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation
Expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly
Joint venturesParties to the arrangement have rights to the net assets or outcome of the arrangement. A joint venturer
does not have rights to individual assets or obligations for individual liabilities of the joint venture. Instead, joint
venturers share the net assets and, in turn, the outcome (profit or loss) of the activity undertaken by the joint venture.
Equity accounting is required for joint venturers.
IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

IFRS 12 issued by IASB in May 2011, sets out the required disclosures for entities reporting under IFRS 10, IFRS 11, and
IAS 28 and unconsolidated structured entities. It replaces the disclosure requirements currently found in IAS 28,
Investments in Associates. The new standard requires entities to disclose information that helps financial statement
readers to evaluate the nature, risks, and financial effects associated with the entitys interests in subsidiaries, associates,
joint arrangements, and unconsolidated structured entities.
To meet this objective, disclosures are required for significant judgments and assumptions as well as interests in
subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates, and unconsolidated structured entities.
IAS 28 (Amended), Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
The fundamental approach to the equity method of accounting has not been changed, but IAS 28(Amended) incorporates
joint ventures and provides more specific provisions. It clarifies, for example, that when a portion of an investment in an
associate or a joint venture meets the held for sale criteria in accordance with IFRS 5, any retained portion of the
investment is not classified as held for sale.
148
PwC
Consolidation
Investment entities - Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27

The IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 regarding investment entities in October 2012. The
amendment introduces the definition of an investment entity and requires the investment entity to measure its controlled
investments at fair value with changes recognised in profit or loss rather than to consolidate those investees. However, the
parent of the investment entity (if the parent is not an investment entity itself) is required to consolidate the controlled
investments of the investment entity.
An entity is required to assess whether the entity meets (after considering all typical characteristics) the definition of an
investment entity.
Definition of an investment entity:
(a) Obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those investors with investment management
services
(b) Commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment
income, or both; and
(c) Measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
Typical characteristics of an investment entity include the following. However, the absence of any of these typical characteristic
does not necessarily disqualify an entity from being classified as an investment entity.
it has more than one investment;
it has more than one investor;
it has investors that are not related parties of the entity; and
it has ownership interests in the form of equity or similar interests
PwC
149
Amendments to IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures Equity method: Share of other
net asset changes
In November 2012, the IASB issued an exposure draft of amendments to IAS 28 Equity method: Share of other net asset
changes with proposals to amend IAS 28 (2011), Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.
The exposure draft proposes that an investors share of certain net asset changes in the investee (other net asset changes of
the investee that are not recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income of the investee, or that are not
distributions received (other net asset changes)) is recognised in the investors equity with recycling of the amount
recognised when equity accounting ceases.
Amendments to IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements
In December 2012, the IASB issued an exposure draft of amendments to IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements with proposals to
amend the accounting for the acquisition of interests in joint operations.
The exposure draft clarifies that an acquisition of an interest in a joint operation that meets the definition of a business in
IFRS 3, Business Combination is not a business combination (as the acquiring party does not obtain control), however, it
proposes that business combination accounting should be applied to such an acquisition.
Amendments to IAS 28 (2011), Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures and IFRS 10, Consolidated
Financial Statements Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint
Venture
In December 2012, the IASB issued an exposure draft Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its
Associate or Joint Venture with proposals to amend IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements and IAS 28 (2011),
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.
The exposure draft proposes that if the non-monetary assets sold or contributed to an associate or joint venture constitute a
business (as defined in IFRS 3, Business Combination) the full gain or loss is recognised by the investor, while the gain or
loss on assets that do not meet the definition of a business is recognised by the investor to the extent of the other investors
interest in the associate or joint venture.
Amendments to IAS 27, Separate Financial Statements Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements
In December 2013, the IASB issued an exposure draft of Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements with proposals
to amend IAS 27, Separate Financial Statements.
The exposure draft allows entities to use the equity method to account for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and
associates in their separate (parent only) financial statements.
In September 2013, the ASBJ issued the Revised Accounting Standard for Consolidated Financial Statements, the Revised
Accounting Standard for Business Combinations and its Revised Implementation Guidance to change some of the current
requirements regarding business combination and consolidation, including accounting for minority interests
(non-controlling interests), acquisition cost and provisional accounting.
The Standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 April 2015 and early adoption is permitted for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 April 2014 (with exceptions for some items).
150
PwC
Business combinations
151
IFRS and JP GAAP are largely converged in this area, including the acquisition method for business combinations and
accounting treatment for step acquisitions. However, certain differences still remain, these include the accounting for
non-controlling interest and amortisation of goodwill.
152
PwC
Standard
IFRS 3
Issue
Scope of IFRS 3
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 3 does not apply to the formation of a

joint venture, the acquisition of an asset or a
group of assets that does not constitute a
business and a combination of entities or
businesses under common control.
The formation of a jointly controlled entity

and a combination of entities or businesses
under common control are included in the
scope of the accounting standard for business
combinations although the accounting
requirements are different from that for
other business combinations.
(IFRS 3. 2, 4, 5, Appendix A, B7-B12)

IFRS 3
IFRS 3
Accounting for business

combinations
The acquisition method is applied.
Amortisation of goodwill
Goodwill is not amortised.
(IFRS 3. 4)
(IAS 36. BC131A)
IFRS 3
Remeasurement of
previously held interest in
the acquiree in a business
combination achieved in
stages
The acquirer remeasures its previously held

equity interest in the acquiree at its
acquisition-date fair value and recognises the
resulting gain or loss in profit or loss or other
comprehensive income as appropriate.
The acquisition method is applied. However,

in the formation of a jointly controlled entity,
assets and liabilities are recognised and
measured at the appropriate carrying
amounts of the investors share of the jointly
controlled entity immediately before the
transfer. In a combination of entities or
businesses under common control, assets
and liabilities are recognised and measured
at the previous carrying amounts.
Goodwill is recognised as an asset and
amortised on a systematic basis over a period
in which effects are expected occur, not to
exceed 20 years.
Similar to IFRS. However, there are no items
that are presented as other comprehensive
income that would never be recycled to profit
or loss.
The amount the acquirer recognised in other

previous interest in the acquiree (equity
method investments), such as currency
translation differences and change in value of
available-for-sale financial assets, are
recycled to profit or loss. However, other
comprehensive income recognised as
non-recycling items, such as revaluation gain
or loss of fixed assets applying the
revaluation model under IAS 16 and changes
in the fair value of an investment in an equity
instrument under IFRS 9 if designated as
such on initial recognition, are not recycled.
(IFRS 3. 42)
PwC
153
Standard
IFRS 3
Issue
Determining a business
combination transaction
IFRS
There is guidance on the determination of
whether the transaction is part of a business
combination (whether it is part of an
exchange transaction for the acquiree), or
whether the transaction is separate from a
business combination (whether it is a
transaction which in effect settles
pre-existing relationships that existed before
the business combination, for example).
Factors to consider include (1) the reason for
the transaction, (2) who initiated the
transaction and (3) the timing of the
transaction.
JP GAAP
determination of what is part of a business
combination transaction.
(IFRS 3. 51, 52, B50-B62B)

IFRS 3
Accounting for
acquisition-related costs
In general, acquisition-related costs are

expensed. However, the cost to issue equity
securities is deducted from equity and the
cost to issue a financial liability (debt) is
reflected in the effective interest rate and
amortised.
(IFRS 3. 53)
Current JP GAAP
Acquisition-related costs such as fees and
charges paid to external advisors and others
are included in the acquisition cost. Other
expenditures are expensed in the period
incurred.
September 2013
Acquisition-related costs such as fees and
charges paid to external advisors and others
are expensed in the period incurred.
IFRS 3
Recognition and
measurement of contingent
consideration
Contingent consideration is measured at

acquisition-date fair value and included in
the consideration for the business
combination. The consideration and goodwill
are not subsequently adjusted except for
changes that result from additional
information obtained by the acquirer during
the measurement period about facts and
circumstances that existed at the acquisition
date.
Contingent consideration is included in the

consideration (and in certain cases, goodwill
may be adjusted) when its issuance or
delivery is certain and its fair value is
reasonably determinable. Such adjustment is
not limited to the tentative measurement
period.
(IFRS 3. 39, 58)
154
PwC
Standard
IFRS 3
Issue
Accounting for
non-controlling interest
IFRS
For each business combination, the acquirer
measures non-controlling interests at either
(a) fair value (full goodwill) or (b) the present
ownership instruments proportionate share
of the acquirees identifiable net assets
(partial goodwill).
JP GAAP
Partial goodwill is recognised. The
recognition of full goodwill is not allowed.
(IFRS 3. 10, 19)

IFRS 3
Allocation of goodwill
The per-share value attributable to the

non-controlling interest may be different
from that of the parents when the
non-controlling interest is measured at fair
value since for example the control premium
is included in the parents goodwill.

allocation of goodwill since non-controlling
interests are measured at the present
ownership instruments proportionate share
of the acquirees identifiable net assets.
(IFRS 3. B45)
IFRS 3
IAS 38
Identification of intangible
assets acquired in business
combinations
Refer to the issue Identification of intangible

assets acquired in a business combination in
the chapter Assets-Nonfinancial assets.
Refer to the issue Identification of intangible

assets acquired in a business combination in
the chapter Assets-Nonfinancial assets.
(IAS 38. 11-12, 34-37) (IFRS 3. 13)

IFRS 3
Reacquired rights
When an acquirer reacquires a right that it

had previously granted to the acquiree, as a
part of a business combination, it measures
the value of the reacquired right recognised
as an intangible asset (an identifiable
intangible asset recognised separately from
goodwill) on the basis of the remaining
contractual term of the related contract.
Examples of such reacquired rights include a
right to use the acquirers trade name under
a franchise agreement or technology license.
(IFRS 3. 29, B35)

IFRS 3
Accounting for costs

expected to be incurred
after the acquisition
Costs which the acquirer expects but is not

obliged to incur are not recognised as
identifiable liabilities at the acquisition date.
Therefore, the acquirer does not recognise
those costs as part of applying the acquisition
method. Instead, these costs are recognised
in the acquirers post-combination financial
statements.
(IFRS 3. 11)
PwC
An expense or loss expected to be incurred

after the acquisition relating to specified
circumstances is recognised as a liability
(special account relating to business
combinations) if its probability of
occurrence is reflected in the determination
of the consideration for the acquisition, even
if the recognition criteria of provisions are
not met.
155
Standard
IFRS 3
Issue
Recognition criteria of
contingent liabilities
IFRS
A contingent liability assumed in a business
combination is recognised as an identifiable
liability if it is a present obligation that arises
from past events and its fair value can be
measured reliably, even if the probability
criterion in IAS 37 is not met.
JP GAAP
A contingent liability is recognised as a
liability if the recognition criteria of
provisions are met.
(IFRS 3. 23)
IFRS 3
Measurement period
adjustments
(Provisional accounting)
During the measurement period (within one

year from the acquisition date), the
provisional amounts recognised at the
acquisition date are adjusted retrospectively
to reflect new information obtained about
facts and circumstances that existed as of the
acquisition date. Additional assets or
liabilities are also recognised and goodwill is
adjusted.
(IFRS 3. 45)
Current JP GAAP
Allocation of the acquisition cost is made
within one year from the acquisition date.
When the allocation of the acquisition cost is
modified in the following fiscal year after the
business combination, generally, the effect of
change (such as amortisation of goodwill) is
presented as an extraordinary profit or loss
(adjustment of profit or loss of the previous
period) and not retrospectively adjusted.
September 2013
Allocation of the acquisition cost is made
within one year from the acquisition date.
When the allocation of the acquisition cost is
modified in the following fiscal year after the
business combination, it is adjusted
retrospectively, as if the allocation was
completed in the year when business
combination occurred.
IFRS 3
Measurement of identifiable
assets classified as assets
held for sale
An acquired non-current asset or disposal

group classified as held for sale at the
acquisition date is measured at fair value less
costs to sell in accordance with IFRS 5.
(IFRS 3. 31)
JP GAAP References:
Recent developments
In September 2013, the ASBJ issued the Revised Accounting Standard for Consolidated Financial Statements, the Revised
Accounting Standard for Business Combinations and its Revised Implementation Guidance to change some of current
requirements regarding business combination and consolidation, including accounting for minority interests
(non-controlling interests), acquisition cost and provisional accounting.
The Standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 April 2015 and early adoption is permitted for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 April 2014 (with exceptions for some items).
156
PwC
Other accounting
and reporting topics
157
Other accounting and reporting topics

In addition to the issues discussed in previous chapters, there still exist several other differences between JP GAAP and IFRS,
including presentation and disclosure of annual financial statements, accounting for discontinued operations, translations of
foreign currency transactions, and calculation of earnings per share.
Under JP GAAP, the Accounting Standard for Presentation of Comprehensive Income became effective for consolidated
financial statements so as to converge with IFRS. However, JP GAAP requires special gains/losses to be presented in the
income statement, resulting in a difference with IFRS. In addition, in the consolidated income statement, the profit or loss
under JP GAAP refers to the profit or loss after deducting the portion attributable to minority interests whereas under IFRS,
it refers to that attributable to both the non-controlling interests and owners of the parent.
Furthermore, JP GAAP does not provide accounting standards for discontinued operations. There is no specific accounting
for non-current assets held for sale or specific disclosures required for discontinued operations. However, the requirements
for impairment of fixed assets are applied.
As to the translation of foreign currency transactions, JP GAAP specifies procedures for translating financial statements of
subsidiaries and branches located in a foreign country into Japanese yen but there is no concept of functional currency or
presentation currency. The determination of the functional currency of a foreign operation under IFRS may result in
differences in accounting for foreign exchange differences between IFRS and JP GAAP.
In Japan, the Accounting Standard for Earnings per Share is effective for annual periods starting on and after April 1, 2011.
This accounting standard was revised with the implementation of the Accounting Standard for Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections, with the objective of convergence with IFRS. In addition, JP GAAP does not provide specific guidance for
cases where an entity has the option to settle with equity or cash like IFRS.
158
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Consolidated financial statements comprise:
Consolidated financial statements comprise:
A consolidated statement of financial

position
A consolidated balance sheet
IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements

IAS 1
Components of
consolidated financial
statements
A consolidated statement of profit or loss

and other comprehensive income (a
consolidated statement of comprehensive
income)
A consolidated statement of changes in
equity
A consolidated statement of cash flows
Notes
Comparative information in respect of the
preceding period
An entity may present either a single
statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income or two separate, but
consecutive statements of profit or loss and
of comprehensive income, which shall begin
with profit or loss.
A consolidated statement of income

A consolidated statement of
comprehensive income
A consolidated statement of changes in net
assets
A consolidated statement of cash flows
A consolidated schedule (a consolidated
table for detailed statement)
An entity may present two separate
statements of income and of comprehensive
income (two-statement format), or a single
statement of comprehensive income
(one-statement format).
An entity may use titles for the statements

other than those stated above.
(IAS 1. 10, 10A, 81A)
IAS 1
Statement of financial
position (balance sheet)
There are certain minimum line items which

should be presented separately in the
statement of financial position.
The presentation of a classified balance sheet
is required, except when a liquidity
presentation is more relevant.
(IAS 1. 54, 60)
IAS 1
Statement of
(income statement)
Classification and
presentation of expenses
An entity should present an analysis of

expenses recognised in profit or loss using a
classification based on either their nature or
their function within the entity. An entity
classifying expenses by function should
disclose additional information on the nature
of the expenses including depreciation and
amortization expense and employee benefit
expense.
Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and

Preparation Methods of Financial
Statements, etc. and guidelines under the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act
require items to be presented in more detail
compared to IFRS.
The presentation of a classified balance sheet
is required.
Expenses are in principle classified and
presented by function, such as cost of sales,
selling, general and administrative expenses,
non-operating expense and extraordinary
loss.
Financial statements regulations and
guidelines under the Financial Instruments
and Exchange Act have more detailed rules
for the presentation of the income statement.
While certain minimum line items are

required, no prescribed statement of
comprehensive income format exists. An
entity should not mix functional and nature
classifications of expenses by excluding
certain expenses from the functional
classifications to which they relate.
(IAS 1. 102, 103, 104)
PwC
159
Standard
IAS 1
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
The income statement must include the
following items:
Statement of
(income statement)
The statement of comprehensive income

should present the following items:
Profit or loss
Gross profit or loss
Presentation of profit and

loss
Total other comprehensive income
Operating profit or loss
Comprehensive income for the period,

being the total of profit or loss and other
Profit or loss from ordinary activities
There is no further requirement to disclose

additional line items.
Pre-tax profit or loss

Net profit or loss
(IAS 1. 81A)
IAS 1
Statement of
(income statement)
Presentation of
non-controlling interests in
profit or loss and
The statement of comprehensive income

should present the following items:
Profit or loss for the period attributable to
non-controlling interests and owners of
the parent.
While net profit or loss for the period should

be presented after adjusting minority
interest, comprehensive income for the
period should be presented before adjusting
minority interest on the statement of
Comprehensive income for the period

attributable to non-controlling interests
and owners of the parent.
(IAS 1. 81B)
IAS 1
Statement of
(income statement)
OCI items (those that
might be reclassified and
those that will not be
reclassified)
An entity is required to group items

presented in OCI on the basis of whether
they will be reclassified subsequently to
profit or loss when specific conditions are
met or they will not be reclassified
subsequently to profit or loss.
An entity is not required to group items

presented in OCI on the basis of whether they
are potentially reclassifiable to profit or loss
subsequently.
If an entity elects to present items of OCI

before related tax effects with one amount
shown for the aggregate amount of income
tax relating to those items, it shall allocate
the tax between the items that might be
reclassified subsequently to the profit or loss
section and those that will not be reclassified
subsequently to the profit or loss section.
(IAS 1. 82A, 91)
IAS 1
Statement of
(income statement)
Exceptional (significant)
items and extraordinary
items
The term exceptional items is not used or

defined. However, separate disclosure is
required (either on the face of the
comprehensive income statement or in the
notes) when it is necessary for an entity to
explain its performance for the period due to
the size, nature or incidence of certain items
of income and expense.
Exceptional items are required to be

presented as special gains and losses on the
face of the income statement. The definition
of special is broader compared to IFRS and
includes some extraordinary items.
Extraordinary items are prohibited to be

presented.
(IAS 1. 85, 87, 97)
160
PwC
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

IFRS 5
Measurement of non-current
assets held for sale
Assets should be classified as held for sale

when certain criteria are met and measured
at the lower of their carrying amount and fair
value less costs to sell. Assets should not be
depreciated while classified as held for sale.
There is no particular requirement for

non-current assets held for sale. General
impairment rules for fixed assets are applied
to such assets.
(IFRS 5. 1, 6, 15, 25)

IFRS 5
Carrying amount of an asset

on initial classification as
held for sale
Assets should be measured in accordance

with applicable IFRS (e.g. IAS 36)
immediately before the initial classification
as held for sale.

non-current assets held for sale.
(IFRS 5. 18)
IFRS 5
Reversal of impairment loss
Any subsequent increase in fair value less

costs to sell should be recognised as a gain
but not in excess of the cumulative
impairment loss previously recognised. The
cumulative impairment loss should take into
account the depreciation had no impairment
loss been recognised for the asset in the prior
years.

impairment rules for fixed assets are applied
to such assets. Reversal of impairment loss is
prohibited.
(IFRS 5. 21)
IFRS 5
Presentation of non-current
assets held for sale
Non-current assets and disposal groups

(including liabilities) held for sale are
presented separately from other assets and
liabilities in the statement of financial
position.

presentation rules for fixed assets are applied
to such assets.
(IFRS 5. 1(b), 38)

IFRS 5
Presentation of
discontinued operations
An operation which meets certain criteria is

classified as a discontinued operation and its
results should be presented separately from
continuing operations.

presentation rules for fixed assets are applied
to such assets.
(IFRS 5. 1(b), 32, 33, 33A)

IFRS 5
Subsidiary over which the

control is temporary
When an entity is committed to a sale plan of

a subsidiary involving loss of control and the
control is temporary, the subsidiary should
not be excluded from the scope of
consolidation and be accounted for under
IFRS 5.
A subsidiary over which the control is

temporary is not included in the scope of
consolidation.
The results of the subsidiary should be

presented as a discontinued operation,
separately from continuing operations in the
statement of comprehensive income. Assets
and liabilities of the subsidiary should be
measured at the lower of the carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell and
should be presented as those held for sale.
(IFRS 5. 1(b),8A, 32, 33, 33A, 38)
PwC
161
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates

IAS 21
General
The results and financial positions of foreign

operations that are included in the financial
statements of the entity by consolidation or
the equity method are translated into the
entitys functional currency. The entitys
results and financial position in functional
currency is translated into a presentation
currency.
JP GAAP prescribes the process of

translating financial statements of a foreign
subsidiary operating in a foreign currency
into Japanese yen; however, there is no
concept of functional currency or
presentation currency.
(IAS 21. 3)
IAS 21
Definition of the closing rate

used for translation
The closing rate is the spot exchange rate at

the end of the reporting period.
(IAS 21. 8)
IAS 21
Definition of foreign
currency
The foreign currency is a currency other than

the functional currency of the entity.
Other than the spot exchange rate at the end

of the reporting period, an entity may use the
average exchange rate calculated based on
the spot rates during a certain period before
and/or after the end of the reporting period
under certain conditions.
The foreign currency is a currency other than
Japanese yen.
(IAS 21. 8)
IAS 21
operation
A foreign operation is an entity that is a

subsidiary, associate, joint arrangement or
branch of a reporting entity, the activities of
which are based or conducted in a country or
currency other than those of the reporting
entity.
There is no concept of foreign operation.

However, a foreign branch and foreign
subsidiary (i.e. subsidiary or associate
located in a foreign country) generally
correspond to the term.
(IAS 21. 8)
IAS 21
Functional currency
The functional currency is the currency of the

primary economic environment in which the
entity operates. Once determined, the
functional currency is not changed unless
there is a change in those underlying
transactions, events and conditions.
There is no concept of functional currency.
(IAS 21. 8, 13)

IAS 21
currency transaction
A foreign currency transaction is a

transaction that is denominated or requires
settlement in a foreign currency.
(IAS 21. 20)
162
Only transactions denominated in a foreign

currency are foreign currency transactions.
Exchange differences arising from export and
import transactions typically with trading
companies that are borne by the entity also
meet the definition of foreign currency
transactions.
PwC
Standard
IAS 21
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
Exchange rate used on

initial recognition of a
foreign currency transaction
A foreign currency transaction should be

recorded, on initial recognition in the
functional currency, by applying to the
foreign currency amount the spot exchange
rate between the functional currency and the
foreign currency at the date of the
transaction.
In principle, a foreign currency transaction

should be recorded in Japanese yen by
applying to the foreign currency amount the
spot exchange rate between the foreign
currency and Japanese yen at the date of the
transaction.
(IAS 21. 21)

IAS 21
Translation at the end of

each reporting period
subsequent to initial
recognition
Monetary item
Translated using the closing rate at the
end of each reporting period.
Non-monetary item
Non-monetary items that are recorded at
historical cost in a foreign currency should
be translated using the exchange rate at
the date of the transaction. Those
measured at fair value in a foreign
currency should be translated using the
exchange rate at the date when the fair
value was measured.
(IAS 21. 23)
IAS 21
When several exchange

rates are available/
temporary lack of
exchangeability
When several exchange rates are available,

the rate used is that at which the future cash
flows represented by the transaction or
balance could have been settled if those cash
flows had occurred at the measurement date.
In principle, financial instruments are

recorded in Japanese yen by applying the
spot exchange rate at the end of the reporting
period.
However, the entitys own convertible debt
securities that have not expired should be
translated at the rate on the date of issuance.
The carrying amounts of the equity shares of
subsidiaries and affiliates in the individual
financial statements of the parent should be
translated at the rate on the date of
acquisition.
In addition, if the monthly average market
price before the end of a reporting period is
used to evaluate the market price of other
securities (under the condition of consistent
application), such securities are translated at
the monthly average rate before the end of
the reporting period as a general rule.
However, translation at the exchange rate at
the end of the reporting period is also
permitted under the condition of consistent
application.
If exchangeability between two currencies is

temporarily lacking, the rate used is the first
subsequent rate at which exchanges could be
made.
(IAS 21. 26)
PwC
163
Standard
IAS 21
Issue
Recognition of exchange
differences
IFRS
JP GAAP
When a monetary item is settled or

translated, the resulting exchange difference
should be recognised in profit or loss.
As a general rule, the exchange difference

arising from translation of foreign currency
dominated receivables/payables at the period
closing should be recorded as an exchange
gain/loss for the current period in profit or
loss. In addition, foreign currency bonds
classified as other securities under JP
GAAP are, in principle, accounted for in
accordance with the requirements on
exchange differences in the Accounting
Standard for Financial Instruments.
When a gain or loss on a non-monetary item

is recognised in other comprehensive
income, any exchange component of that
gain or loss should be recognised in other
comprehensive income. Conversely, when a
gain or loss on a non-monetary item is
recognised in profit or loss, any exchange
component of that gain or loss should be
(IAS 21. 28, 30)
IAS 21
Exchange differences
arising on a monetary item
that forms part of the net
investment in a foreign
operation
When a monetary item that is receivable

from or payable to a foreign operation is
neither planned nor likely to be settled in the
foreseeable future, it is treated as a part of
the entitys net investment in that foreign
operation.
However, an entity may use the exchange

differences arising from the changes of fair
value in the foreign currency (the difference
between the carrying amount and the fair
value in the foreign currency amount
translated by the spot rate at the date of
closing) as the valuation difference, and
account for the exchange difference of the
carrying amount due to the change in the
exchange rate as an exchange gain/ loss.
There is no concept of exchange differences
arising on a monetary item that forms part of
the net investment in a foreign operation.
Exchange differences arising on a monetary

item that forms part of a reporting entitys
net investment in a foreign operation should
be recognised initially in other
comprehensive income and reclassified from
equity to profit or loss on disposal of the net
investment.
(IAS 21. 15, 32)
IAS 21
Gain/loss on disposal of a
foreign operation
subsidiary
Accounting for the cumulative amount of the

exchange differences on a foreign subsidiary
is different depending on whether the
disposal transaction is a disposal or a partial
disposal.
The decrease in the cumulative amount of the

exchange differences resulting from the
change (decrease) in equity interest in
foreign subsidiaries is recognised in profit or
loss.
When the entity retains control over the

subsidiary (partial disposal):
Re-attribute the proportionate share of the
cumulative amount of the exchange
differences recognised in other comprehensive
income to the non-controlling interests in the
foreign operation.
When the disposal involves the loss of
control of the subsidiary (disposal)
Reclassify the full cumulative amount of
the exchange differences recognised in
other comprehensive income to profit or
loss.
(IAS 21. 48-49)
164
PwC
Standard
IAS 21
Issue
Gain/loss on disposal of a
foreign operation
associates
IFRS
JP GAAP
Accounting for the cumulative amount of the

exchange differences on a foreign associate is
different depending on whether the disposal
transaction is a disposal or a partial disposal.
The decrease in the cumulative amount of the

exchange differences resulting from the
change (decrease) in equity interest in
foreign associates is recognised in profit or
loss.
When the entity retains significant

influence over the associate (partial
disposal)
Reclassify the proportionate share of the
differences recognised in other
comprehensive income to profit or loss.
When the disposal involves the loss of
significant influence over the associate
(disposal)
Reclassify the full amount of the
differences recognised in other
comprehensive income to profit or loss.
(IAS 21. 48-49)
IAS 21
Functional currency of a
hyperinflationary economy
Translation of the results and financial

position of an entity whose functional
currency is the currency of a
hyperinflationary economy should be
restated in accordance with IAS 29.
There is no concept of functional currency of

a hyperinflationary economy.
(IAS 21. 42, 43)
Treatment of debt securities

in foreign currency upon
acquisition of a
non-monetary asset
When an entity holds the proceeds from

foreign currency bonds without changing to
Japanese yen for reinvestment (such as
properties in foreign currency), the entity
may defer the exchange differences on such
bonds to adjust the cost of a non-monetary
asset acquired in the foreign currency,
provided the following conditions are met:
Reinvestment has been planned since the
time of acquisition of the foreign currency
bonds and the plan is clearly stated in a
formal document
The reinvestment transaction is
denominated in the same foreign currency
PwC
165
Standard
Issue
IFRS
JP GAAP
IAS 33, Earnings per Share

IAS 33
When ordinary shares are

issued but not fully paid
Where ordinary shares are issued but not

fully paid, they are treated in the calculation
of basic earnings per share as a fraction of an
ordinary share to the extent that they were
entitled to participate in dividends during the
period relative to a fully paid ordinary share.
If they are not entitled to participate in
dividends during the period they are treated
as the equivalent of warrants or options in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
There are no specific requirements. (Under

the Companies Act of Japan, an acquirer of
shares should pay in full the amount due to
the issuer).
(IAS 33. A15, A16)

IAS 33
Options to settle in ordinary

shares or in cash
If the options to settle in ordinary shares or

in cash reside with the issuing entity, the
entity should presume that the contract will
be settled in ordinary shares and the
resulting potential ordinary shares should be
included in diluted earnings per share. If the
settlement choice is at the holders option,
the more dilutive of cash settlement or share
settlement should be used in calculating
diluted earnings per share.
(IAS 33. 58-61)

IAS 33
Purchased options
Purchased put options and purchased call

options held by the entity on its own ordinary
shares are not included in the calculation of
diluted earnings per share because they are
antidilutive.
(IAS 33. 62)

IAS 33
Written put options
Written put options on the entitys own shares

are reflected in the calculation of diluted
earnings per share if the effect is dilutive.
(IAS 33. 63)

IAS 33
Presentation
Basic earnings per share and diluted earnings

per share should be presented in the statement
of comprehensive income. If basic and diluted
earnings per share are equal, dual presentation
can be accomplished in one line item, such as
basic and diluted earnings per share.
Instead of presenting earnings per share in

the statement of profit and loss, it should be
disclosed as footnote information.
(IAS 33. 66, 67)
JP GAAP References:
166
Accounting Standard for Foreign Currency Transactions

Accounting Standard for Earning Per Share
Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Preparation Methods of Financial Statements, etc.
Guideline for Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Preparation Methods of Financial Statements, etc.
Guideline for Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Preparation Methods of Consolidated Financial Statements
Ordinance on Terminology, Forms and Preparation Methods of Consolidated Financial Statements
Accounting Standard for Presentation of Comprehensive Income
PwC
Index
167
Index
What does IFRS 1 require? .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
When to apply IFRS 1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
The opening IFRS statement of financial position ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Important takeaways ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Revenue recognition
Revenue recognition method of construction contracts ................................................................................................................................ 11
Subsequent measurement of construction contract revenue when the outcome of the construction contract cannot be
estimated reliably ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Accounting by an intermediate lessor when both the head lease and the sub-lease are finance leases ....................................................... 11
Accounting for transactions of trading firms (gross/net) .............................................................................................................................. 11
Accounting for consignment sales in intermediaries such as department stores and supermarkets (gross/net) ....................................... 12
Accounting for indirect taxes (including excise tax for liquor, gasoline and tobacco) (gross/net) .............................................................. 12
Accounting for sales incentives ...................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Accounting for cash rebates ............................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Accounting for consideration that is collected over a long time (more than one year) ................................................................................ 13
Accounting for installment sale transactions ................................................................................................................................................. 13
Accounting for exchange transactions ........................................................................................................................................................... 13
Accounting for multiple-element arrangements ............................................................................................................................................ 13
Timing of revenue recognition for sale of goods (including export transactions) ........................................................................................ 14
Timing of revenue recognition for transactions with a probability of return ................................................................................................ 14
Revenue recognition method for the rendering of services ........................................................................................................................... 14
Dividends ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15
Accounting for bill and hold sales .................................................................................................................................................................. 15
Timing of revenue recognition for a transaction subject to installation and inspection .............................................................................. 15
Timing of revenue recognition for goods on approval ................................................................................................................................... 15
Timing of revenue recognition on consignment sales ................................................................................................................................... 15
Accounting for a sale and repurchase agreement .......................................................................................................................................... 16
Accounting for sales to intermediate parties .................................................................................................................................................. 16
Accounting for installation fees ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Accounting for non-refundable initiation and membership fees .................................................................................................................. 16
Accounting for franchise fees ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Accounting for fees from the development of customized software .............................................................................................................. 17
Accounting for revenue on licences ................................................................................................................................................................ 17
Accounting for customer loyalty programmes such as points (customer award credits) ............................................................................. 17
Accounting for the construction of real estate the percentage-of-completion method ............................................................................. 17
Accounting for government grants ................................................................................................................................................................. 17
Accounting for the benefit of government loans ............................................................................................................................................ 18
168
PwC
Index
Accounting for government grants for the purpose of giving immediate financial support ......................................................................... 18
Accounting for government grants related to assets acquired ...................................................................................................................... 18
Accounting for repayment of government grants .......................................................................................................................................... 18

Scope .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25
Definition of grant date ................................................................................................................................................................................. 25
Grant date and service commencement date ................................................................................................................................................ 25
Accounting for a transaction in which an entity grants its own share options to parties other than employees ........................................ 25
Accounting for a transaction in which an entity delivers its own shares to parties other than employees ................................................. 26
Unidentifiable goods or services ................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Subsequent adjustment to the vested equity instruments which are forfeited after the vesting date ......................................................... 26
When the fair value of equity instruments including share options cannot be estimated reliably ...............................................................27
Accounting for modifications to the conditions of equity instruments including share options ..................................................................27
Accounting for cancellations and settlements of equity instruments including share options ....................................................................27

Recognition of obligation for compensated absences ................................................................................................................................... 33
Defined benefit plans Asset ceiling ............................................................................................................................................................ 33
Defined benefit plans Additional liability in respect of minimum funding requirements ....................................................................... 33
Defined benefit plans Attributing benefit to periods of service ................................................................................................................ 33
Defined benefit plans Criteria to determine the discount rate .................................................................................................................. 34
Defined benefit plans Term assessed to determine the discount rate ....................................................................................................... 34
Defined benefit plans Actuarial assumptions: estimated future salary increases .................................................................................... 34
Defined benefit plans Accounting for actuarial gains and losses ...............................................................................................................35
Defined benefit plans Accounting for past service cost (past service liabilities) ...................................................................................... 36
Defined benefit plans Expected rate of return ........................................................................................................................................... 36
Defined benefit plans Costs of managing the plan assets ...........................................................................................................................37
Defined benefit plans Accounting for curtailments and settlements (the transfer between retirement benefits plans) ..........................37
Accounting for other long-term employee benefits .......................................................................................................................................37
Recognition and measurement of termination benefits ................................................................................................................................37
Application of a simplified method ............................................................................................................................................................... 38
Treatment of post-retirement benefits trust ................................................................................................................................................. 38
Defined benefit plans that share risks between various entities under common control ............................................................................ 38
IAS 2, Inventories
Scope of inventories ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Items included in the cost of inventories ...................................................................................................................................................... 43
Borrowing cost of inventories ........................................................................................................................................................................ 43
Trade discounts .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Allocation of production overheads .............................................................................................................................................................. 43
Allocation of variances of production overheads .......................................................................................................................................... 43
PwC
169
Cost formula (usage of last purchased price method) .................................................................................................................................. 44

Uniformity of cost formula ............................................................................................................................................................................ 44
Retail method ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 44
Write down of raw materials ......................................................................................................................................................................... 44
Unit write down of inventory ......................................................................................................................................................................... 44
Accounting for the reversal of a write down .................................................................................................................................................. 44
IAS 16, Property Plant and Equipment; IAS 23, Borrowing Costs; IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets;
IFRIC 1, Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities
Capitalisation of assets .................................................................................................................................................................................. 45
Spare parts and servicing equipment recognised as property, plant and equipment (PPE) ....................................................................... 45
Replacement cost of PPE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Accounting for major repairs ......................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Accounting for purchase taxes related to the acquisition of PPE ................................................................................................................. 45
Scope of directly attributable costs related to the acquisition of PPE .......................................................................................................... 46
Discount rate used to calculate an asset retirement obligation (ARO) ........................................................................................................ 46
Frequency of ARO reassessment ................................................................................................................................................................... 46
ARO and rental deposit related to the asset .................................................................................................................................................. 46
Identification of qualifying assets for which the borrowing costs are capitalised ........................................................................................ 46
Capitalisation of borrowing costs general borrowings ...............................................................................................................................47
Capitalisation of borrowing costs specific borrowings ...............................................................................................................................47
Cost of a fixed asset acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset ...........................................................................................................47
Measurement of property, plant and equipment ...........................................................................................................................................47
Unit of depreciation ........................................................................................................................................................................................47
Residual value ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 48
Useful life ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Depreciation method ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Frequency of review of residual value, useful life and depreciation method ............................................................................................... 48
IAS 17, Leases, SIC 15, Operating Leases Incentives, IFRIC 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease
Classification of leases ................................................................................................................................................................................... 49
Leases involving land and buildings .............................................................................................................................................................. 49
Classification of leases of land ....................................................................................................................................................................... 49
The amount recognised as assets and liabilities of finance leases ................................................................................................................ 49
Accounting for low valued finance lease assets ............................................................................................................................................. 49
Accounting for short term finance leases ...................................................................................................................................................... 50
Accounting for maintenance expenses (lessee) ............................................................................................................................................. 50
Depreciation method of finance lease assets (lessee) ................................................................................................................................... 50
Period of expected use of finance lease assets (lessee) ................................................................................................................................. 50
Accounting for operating lease payments when the lease payments are not made on a straight-line basis (lessee) .................................. 50
Accounting for a finance lease (lessor) ........................................................................................................................................................... 51
Accounting for a finance lease (lessor) when the lessor is a manufacturer or a dealer ............................................................................. 51
Calculation of finance income on finance leases (lessor) .............................................................................................................................. 51
Accounting for maintenance expense (lessor) ............................................................................................................................................... 51
170
PwC
Index
Review of estimated unguaranteed residual values related to a finance lease (lessor) ................................................................................. 51
Accounting for operating lease income when the lease payments are not made on a straight-line basis (lessor) ....................................... 51
Accounting for a sale and leaseback transaction that is an operating lease ................................................................................................. 52
Accounting for lease incentives (lessee) ........................................................................................................................................................ 52
Accounting for lease incentives (lessor) ........................................................................................................................................................ 52
Assessment of whether an arrangement contains a lease ............................................................................................................................. 52
Determination of the lease term .................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Accounting for contingent rents .....................................................................................................................................................................53
Accounting for purchase options ....................................................................................................................................................................53
Accounting by the intermediate lessor when both the head lease and the sub lease are finance leases ......................................................53
IAS 36, Impairment of Assets
Scope ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................53
Frequency of impairment testing for intangible assets with indefinite useful life or intangible assets not yet available for use;
Frequency of impairment testing for goodwill ...........................................................................................................................................53
Indicators of impairment ............................................................................................................................................................................... 54
Impairment test ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
The length of period used to estimate future cash flows to calculate the value in use for impairment testing ........................................... 54
Assessment of the reasonableness of the assumptions used for the future cash flows ................................................................................ 54
Recognition of an impairment loss ............................................................................................................................................................... 54
Method of allocating goodwill for impairment testing ..................................................................................................................................55
Method of allocating impairment loss ............................................................................................................................................................55
Impairment testing of partial goodwill ..........................................................................................................................................................55
Reversal of an impairment loss ..................................................................................................................................................................... 56
Allocation of corporate assets ........................................................................................................................................................................ 56
IAS 38, Intangible Assets
Definition and recognition criteria of intangible assets ................................................................................................................................ 56
Accounting for deferred assets ......................................................................................................................................................................... 57
Accounting for taxes on the purchase of intangible assets ............................................................................................................................ 57
Expense recognition of an interest expense included in cost ........................................................................................................................ 57
Identification of intangible assets acquired in a business combination ........................................................................................................ 57
Cost of an intangible asset acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset ................................................................................................ 58
Accounting for internally generated research and development cost .......................................................................................................... 58
Identification of internally generated intangible assets ................................................................................................................................ 58
Recognition of machinery and equipment used only for the purpose of a specific research and development project ............................. 58
Capitalisation of the cost of software developed for the purpose of sale in a market or for internal use .................................................... 58
Examples of expenditure expensed when incurred ...................................................................................................................................... 59
Capitalisation of internal expenditure incurred for development of an entitys own web site .................................................................... 59
Measurement of intangible assets ................................................................................................................................................................. 59
Useful life ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Amortisation method ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Residual value ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60
Frequency of review of amortisation period and amortisation method ....................................................................................................... 60
PwC
171
Identification of an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life and its amortisation .............................................................................. 60
Expensing subsequent expenditure ............................................................................................................................................................... 60
IAS 40, Investment Property
Subsequent measurement ............................................................................................................................................................................. 60
Scope ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61
Property held for multiple use ........................................................................................................................................................................ 61
Property held for supply of services ............................................................................................................................................................... 61
IAS 41, Agriculture
Scope ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61
Recognition and measurement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 61
Assetfinancial assets
IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
Classification of financial assets .................................................................................................................................................................... 66
Designation under the fair value option ........................................................................................................................................................ 66
Subsidiaries, affiliates and joint arrangements ..............................................................................................................................................67
Initial recognition of financial instruments (assets) ......................................................................................................................................67
Held-to-maturity investments ........................................................................................................................................................................67
Derecognition of financial assets ................................................................................................................................................................... 68
Partial derecognition of financial assets ........................................................................................................................................................ 68
Accounting for loan participations ................................................................................................................................................................ 68
Derecognition of notes receivable (promissory notes) under JP GAAP ....................................................................................................... 68
Amortised cost of held-to-maturity investments .......................................................................................................................................... 69
Amortised cost of loans and receivables ....................................................................................................................................................... 69
Amortised cost method for available-for-sale assets (debt securities) ......................................................................................................... 69
Financial instruments measured at cost investments in equity instruments ........................................................................................... 69
Financial instruments measured at cost derivative instruments .............................................................................................................. 70
Financial instruments measured at cost investments in debt instruments .............................................................................................. 70
Fair value ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 70
Fair value of financial instruments without market prices ........................................................................................................................... 70
Transaction costs ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 71
Fair value measurement of financial assets/liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk ..................... 71
Day 1 gain/ loss ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 71
Reclassification ...............................................................................................................................................................................................72
Reclassification due to a change in reliability of measurement .....................................................................................................................73
Accounting for foreign exchange differences on available-for-sale financial assets .....................................................................................73
Fair value gain or loss on available-for-sale financial assets .........................................................................................................................73
Recognition of impairment of financial assets ...............................................................................................................................................73
Measurement of impairment ..........................................................................................................................................................................74
Unwinding the effect of discounting on impaired financial assets ................................................................................................................74
Bifurcation criteria for embedded derivatives ............................................................................................................................................... 75
172
PwC
Index
When a non-financial instrument is a host contract ...................................................................................................................................... 75

Classification of financial assets .....................................................................................................................................................................76
Measurement of investments in equity instruments at cost ..........................................................................................................................76
Reclassification ...............................................................................................................................................................................................76
Fair value option ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 77
Bifurcation criteria for embedded derivatives ............................................................................................................................................... 77
Industry-specific guidance ............................................................................................................................................................................. 77

Definition of a derivative ................................................................................................................................................................................ 91
Own use exception ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 91
Types of Hedging relationships ..................................................................................................................................................................... 92
Documentation of hedging relationships ...................................................................................................................................................... 92
Hedging instruments non-derivative financial instruments ..................................................................................................................... 93
Hedging instruments hedge designation for a portion of a time period ................................................................................................... 93
Hedging instruments exception to exclude the time value of an option and the forward element of a forward contract ....................... 93
Hedging instruments hedging of more than one type of risk .................................................................................................................... 94
Hedged item held to maturity investment ................................................................................................................................................. 94
Hedged item business combination ........................................................................................................................................................... 94
Hedged item designation of a specific risk component of a financial instrument .................................................................................... 94
Hedged item designation of a specific risk component of a non-financial instrument ............................................................................ 95
Hedge of the foreign currency risk of a firm commitment ........................................................................................................................... 95
Effectiveness testing ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 95
Determination of effectiveness ...................................................................................................................................................................... 95
Accounting for ineffectiveness ....................................................................................................................................................................... 96
Basis adjustment ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 96
Criteria for discontinuation or termination of a hedge accounting .............................................................................................................. 96
Requirements for discontinuation or termination of a hedge accounting ....................................................................................................97
Special accounting treatment provided for interest-rate swaps ................................................................................................................... 98
Allocation of the exchange differences arising from a foreign exchange forward contract among accounting periods ............................. 98
Derivative and hedge accounting in accordance with IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendment to IFRS 9,
IFRS 7 and IAS 39), published in 2013
Definition of a derivative ............................................................................................................................................................................... 99
Types of hedging relationships ...................................................................................................................................................................... 99
Documentation of hedging relationships .................................................................................................................................................... 100
Hedging instruments non-derivative financial instruments ................................................................................................................... 100
Hedging instruments hedge designation for a portion of a time period ................................................................................................. 100
Hedging instruments the time value of an option .................................................................................................................................... 101
Hedging instruments the forward element of a forward contract ............................................................................................................102
PwC
173
Hedging instruments the foreign currency basis spread ..........................................................................................................................102

Hedging instruments hedging of more than one type of risk ...................................................................................................................102
Hedged item business combination ..........................................................................................................................................................102
Hedged item designation of a specific risk component of a financial instrument ...................................................................................102
Hedged item designation of a specific risk component of a non-financial instrument ...........................................................................103
Hedge of the foreign currency risk of a firm commitment ..........................................................................................................................103
Hedged item hedges of a group of items ...................................................................................................................................................103
Hedged item designation of a net position ...............................................................................................................................................103
Hedged item a layer components ..............................................................................................................................................................104
Hedged item an aggregated exposure including derivatives ....................................................................................................................104
Hedged item an equity instrument for which an entity has elected to present changes in fair value in other comprehensive income ...... 105
Hedged item inflation of a financial instrument ...................................................................................................................................... 105
Hedged item nil net positions ................................................................................................................................................................... 105
Designation of credit exposures as measured at fair value through profit or loss ......................................................................................106
Hedge effectiveness effectiveness requirements .......................................................................................................................................106
Hedge effectiveness methods of the effectiveness assessment ................................................................................................................. 107
Measurement of hedge ineffectiveness ........................................................................................................................................................ 107
Accounting for hedge ineffectiveness .......................................................................................................................................................... 108
Hedge effectiveness rebalancing .............................................................................................................................................................. 108
Basis adjustment .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 108
Criteria for discontinuation or termination of a hedge accounting .............................................................................................................109
Accounting for discontinuation and termination of a hedge accounting ....................................................................................................109
Special accounting treatment provided for interest-rate swaps ..................................................................................................................109
Allocation of the exchange differences arising from a foreign exchange forward contract among accounting periods ............................109
Guidance in IAS 39 which is applicable when an entity applies IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendment to
IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39), published in 2013
Own use exception ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 110
Fair value option for Own use exception ................................................................................................................................................... 110
LiabilitiesTaxes
Recognition of deferred tax liability ............................................................................................................................................................. 115
Recognition of deferred tax asset ................................................................................................................................................................. 115
Tax effects on goodwill ................................................................................................................................................................................. 115
Recoverability of deferred tax assets ............................................................................................................................................................ 116
Tax effects of eliminating unrealised profit from intercompany transactions ............................................................................................ 116
The treatment of the value added component of enterprise tax that is included in the pro forma standard taxation .............................. 116
Timing of reflecting a change in tax rates .................................................................................................................................................... 117
Deferred taxes of investment properties measured at fair value ................................................................................................................. 117
Liabilitiesother
Discount rate used to calculate an asset retirement obligation (ARO) ....................................................................................................... 121
Frequency of ARO assessment ..................................................................................................................................................................... 121
174
PwC
Index
ARO and rental deposit related to the asset ................................................................................................................................................. 121

Requirements for recognition of provisions ................................................................................................................................................. 121
Present obligation and constructive obligation ............................................................................................................................................ 121
When there is no present obligation ............................................................................................................................................................ 122
Best estimate ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 122
Necessity for discounting provisions such as warranties ............................................................................................................................ 122
Discount rate ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 122
Gains from the expected disposal of assets .................................................................................................................................................. 123
Reimbursements (such as through insurance contracts) ............................................................................................................................ 123
Onerous contracts ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 123
Recognition of a restructuring provision ..................................................................................................................................................... 123
Costs of restructuring ................................................................................................................................................................................... 123
Accounting for provision for sales returns ................................................................................................................................................... 124
Accounting for a guarantee contract ............................................................................................................................................................ 124
Timing of recognition of a provision for a court case and disclosure requirements as a contingent liability ............................................ 124

Classification of financial liabilities and equity ........................................................................................................................................... 129
Exception for puttable financial instruments ..............................................................................................................................................130
Classification of financial liabilities ..............................................................................................................................................................130
Initial recognition of a financial liability ......................................................................................................................................................130
Derecognition of a financial liability ............................................................................................................................................................130
Accounting for an exchange of financial liabilities or a substantial modification of the terms of a financial liability ............................... 131
Transaction costs for an exchange of financial liabilities or substantial modification of the terms of a financial liability ....................... 131
Accounting for a repurchase of a part of a financial liability ....................................................................................................................... 131
Extinguishment of a financial liability by issuing equity shares .................................................................................................................. 131
Measurement of financial guarantee contracts at initial recognition .......................................................................................................... 132
Measurement of financial guarantee contracts after initial recognition ..................................................................................................... 132
Measurement of loan commitments at initial recognition .......................................................................................................................... 132
Measurement of loan commitments after initial recognition ...................................................................................................................... 132
Fair value of a financial liability with a demand feature .............................................................................................................................. 133
Presentation of interest, dividends, losses and gains equity transaction ................................................................................................. 133
Presentation of interest, dividends, losses and gains compound instruments with equity components ................................................ 133
Presentation of off-setting financial assets and financial liabilities ............................................................................................................ 133
Bifurcation criteria of embedded derivatives ............................................................................................................................................... 133
Classification of financial liabilities .............................................................................................................................................................. 134
Fair value option ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 134
Consolidation
IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
Significant influence ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 139
Changes in other net assets of the investee .................................................................................................................................................. 139
Exception of applying the equity method to investments in associates (remeasurement at fair value) ..................................................... 139
PwC
175
Potential voting rights .................................................................................................................................................................................. 139

Accounting for an associate held for sale ..................................................................................................................................................... 139
Accounting for the changes in ownership interest in an associate which do not result in a loss of significant influence .........................140
Accounting for the changes in ownership interest in an associate which result in a loss of significant influence .....................................140
Amortisation of goodwill relating to an associate ........................................................................................................................................140
Uniform reporting dates for the associate and the investor ........................................................................................................................ 141
Transactions for which the adjustments are required due to the difference in the reporting date ............................................................ 141
Uniform accounting policies for the associate and the investor .................................................................................................................. 141
Impairment of investments in associates (equity method investments) ..................................................................................................... 141
Unconsolidated subsidiaries ......................................................................................................................................................................... 142
Concept of control ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 142
Application of control ................................................................................................................................................................................... 142
Investment in a trust ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 142
Investment in an investment partnership .................................................................................................................................................... 143
Potential voting rights .................................................................................................................................................................................. 143
Judgment on whether to consolidate a SPE ................................................................................................................................................. 143
Exception to consolidation (Investment entities) ........................................................................................................................................ 143
Control of specified assets ............................................................................................................................................................................ 144
Uniform reporting dates for the subsidiary and the parent ......................................................................................................................... 144
Transactions that require adjustments due to a difference in the reporting dates ..................................................................................... 144
Uniform accounting policies for the subsidiary and the parent .................................................................................................................. 144
Deemed acquisition date, deemed date of loss of control ............................................................................................................................ 144
Presentation of non-controlling interest ...................................................................................................................................................... 145
Attribution of losses of a subsidiary to non-controlling interests (resulting in a deficit balance) .............................................................. 145
Changes in a parents ownership interest which do not result in a loss of control ..................................................................................... 145
Changes in a parents ownership interest which result in a loss of control ................................................................................................. 145
Classification of joint arrangements ............................................................................................................................................................. 146
Accounting for joint operations .................................................................................................................................................................... 146
Assessment of investment in a joint operation without having joint control .............................................................................................. 146
Accounting for an interest in a joint venture ............................................................................................................................................... 146
Assessment of investment in a joint venture without having joint control ................................................................................................. 146
Scope of IFRS 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 153
Accounting for business combinations ........................................................................................................................................................ 153
Amortisation of goodwill .............................................................................................................................................................................. 153
Remeasurement of previously held interest in the acquiree in a business combination achieved in stages .............................................. 153
Determining a business combination transaction ....................................................................................................................................... 154
Accounting for acquisition-related costs ...................................................................................................................................................... 154
176
PwC
Index
Recognition and measurement of contingent consideration ....................................................................................................................... 154

Accounting for non-controlling interest ....................................................................................................................................................... 155
Allocation of goodwill ................................................................................................................................................................................... 155
Identification of intangible assets acquired in business combinations ....................................................................................................... 155
Reacquired rights .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 155
Accounting for costs expected to be incurred after the acquisition ............................................................................................................. 155
Recognition criteria of contingent liabilities ................................................................................................................................................ 156
Measurement period adjustments (Provisional accounting) ...................................................................................................................... 156
Measurement of identifiable assets classified as assets held for sale .......................................................................................................... 156

IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
Components of consolidated financial statements ...................................................................................................................................... 159
Statement of financial position (balance sheet) ........................................................................................................................................... 159
Statement of comprehensive income (income statement) Classification and presentation of expenses ................................................ 159
Statement of comprehensive income (income statement) Presentation of profit and loss .....................................................................160
Statement of comprehensive income (income statement) Presentation of non-controlling interests in profit or loss and
comprehensive income .................................................................................................................................................................................160
Statement of comprehensive income (income statement) OCI items (those that might be reclassified and those that will not
be reclassified) ..............................................................................................................................................................................................160
Statement of comprehensive income (income statement) Exceptional (significant) items and extraordinary items ............................160
IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Measurement of non-current assets held for sale ........................................................................................................................................ 161
Carrying amount of an asset on initial classification as held for sale .......................................................................................................... 161
Reversal of impairment loss ......................................................................................................................................................................... 161
Presentation of non-current assets held for sale .......................................................................................................................................... 161
Presentation of discontinued operations ..................................................................................................................................................... 161
Subsidiary over which the control is temporary .......................................................................................................................................... 161
IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
General .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 162
Definition of the closing rate used for translation ....................................................................................................................................... 162
Definition of foreign currency ...................................................................................................................................................................... 162
Definition of foreign operation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 162
Functional currency ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 162
Definition of foreign currency transaction ................................................................................................................................................... 162
Exchange rate used on initial recognition of a foreign currency transaction .............................................................................................. 163
Translation at the end of each reporting period subsequent to initial recognition ..................................................................................... 163
When several exchange rates are available/temporary lack of exchangeability ......................................................................................... 163
Recognition of exchange differences ............................................................................................................................................................ 164
Exchange differences arising on a monetary item that forms part of the net investment in a foreign operation ...................................... 164
Gain/loss on disposal of a foreign operation subsidiary .......................................................................................................................... 164
Gain/loss on disposal of a foreign operation associates ........................................................................................................................... 165
PwC
177
Functional currency of a hyperinflationary economy .................................................................................................................................. 165

Treatment of debt securities in foreign currency upon acquisition of a non-monetary asset .................................................................... 165
IAS 33, Earnings per Share
When ordinary shares are issued but not fully paid .................................................................................................................................... 166
Options to settle in ordinary shares or in cash ............................................................................................................................................. 166
Purchased options ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 166
Written put options ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 166
Presentation .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 166
178
PwC
PwC Japan
In addition to audit related services, PwC Japan provides advice to clients wishing to transition to IFRS as well as
advisory services on the implementation of new or amended Japanese accounting standards as they converge with IFRS.
IFRS technical team has been established within Accounting Consulting Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers
Aarata to technically support high quality IFRS services to our clients leveraging the PwC network.
For more information on IFRS, please visit website below:
www.pwc.com/jp/ifrs
Contact:
[email protected]
www.pwc.com/jp
PwC firms help organisations and individuals create the value they're looking for. We're a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 184,000 people who are committed to delivering
quality in assurance, tax and advisory services. Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.com.
PwC Japan represents PricewaterhouseCoopers Aarata, PricewaterhouseCoopers Kyoto, PricewaterhouseCoopers Co., Ltd., Zeirishi-Hojin PricewaterhouseCoopers and their subsidiaries.
Each entity is a member firm of the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network in Japan, or their specified subsidiary, operating as a separate legal entity.
Publication: April 2014
2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers Aarata, PricewaterhouseCoopers Kyoto, PricewaterhouseCoopers Co., Ltd., Zeirishi-Hojin PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved.
PwC refers to the PwC Network member firms in Japan and/or their specified subsidiaries, and may sometimes refer to the PwC Network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity.
Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.

JP GAAP Vs IFRS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JP GAAP Vs IFRS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

JP GAAP Vs IFRS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

www.pwc.

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

How to use this publication

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

IFRS first-time adoption

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

IFRS first-time adoption

What does IFRS 1 require?

Identify the first IFRS financial statements

Prepare an opening statement of financial position at the date of transition to IFRS

Apply the mandatory exceptions from retrospective application

Make extensive disclosures to explain the transition to IFRS

When to apply IFRS 1

IFRS first-time adoption

The opening IFRS statement of financial position

Include all of the assets and liabilities that IFRS requires

Classify all assets, liabilities, and equity in accordance with IFRS

Measure all items in accordance with IFRS

Be prepared and presented within an entitys first IFRS financial statements

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

When the outcome of the construction

If the certainty of the outcome of the

When the outcome of the construction

When the uncertainties that prevented the

There are no specific requirements. Revenue

Accounting for transactions

Depending on whether an entity is acting as a

The method cannot be changed from the

Acting as a principal: gross

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014

Accounting for consignment

Depending on whether an entity is acting as a

Acting as a principal: gross

Accounting for indirect taxes

Depending on whether an entity is acting as a

For some indirect taxes (including excise tax

The entity has the primary responsibility

Accounting for sales

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the

There are no specific requirements. In

(IAS 18. 9, 10)

(IAS 18. 9, 10)

Accounting for consideration

When the arrangement effectively constitutes

There are no specific requirements.

(IAS 18. 11)

Accounting for instalment

When the arrangement effectively constitutes

There are no specific requirements. In

(IAS 18. 11, IE8)

Accounting for exchange

When goods or services are exchanged for

There are no specific requirements for

(IAS 18. 12)

It is necessary to apply the recognition

There is no general guidance on

(IAS 18. 13, IFRIC 13. 5)

Similarities and Differences - A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2014