Concon V Con Ass
Concon V Con Ass
Concon V Con Ass
23
acidcowart
collective
sanpablo
pa r t
modes of
constitutional change
I P E R
24
modes
The
1987
Constitution
restricted
this
part four
25
of Congress, voting separately, can convene put forward the following arguments: 1) that
a constituent assembly. However, Congress, Congress has the necessary experience,
upon a vote of three-fourths of all its intellectual capacity, resources, and available
members, may propose amendment to, or time to do it; 2) that it would conserve
revision of, the Constitution.
registered voters, of which every legislative constitutional convention mode for the
district must be represented by at least three following reasons: 1) convention delegates
per cent of the registered voters therein. may not have enough expertise and
However, there is as yet no Congressional experience for the work; 2) it would be
enabling act for this to occur.
Whatever the way, any amendment or the whole constitution; and 4) it would take
revision shall only be valid when ratified by too long.
a majority of the votes cast by voters in a
plebiscite.
Proponents of a constitutional
convention, for their part, argue for the
I P E R
26
There are three ways to
change the constitution,
through a constitutional
convention, a
constituent assembly,
and peoples initiative.
The last mode,
however, has no
enabling law yet.
process.
They criticize the constituent
assembly mode for the following reasons: 1) positioning on the question of mode of
the influence of traditional politicians with change, there is now a growing consensus
vested interests remains heavy in Congress; for a constitutional convention. Hopefully,
2) legislators did not have the specific the incoming 13 th congress will agree. After
mandate to revise the constitution when they all, the First Political Party conference, the
were elected; 3) constitutional work will Senate, and the President have held for that
aggravate the problem of too little legislation very position.