Stages of Psychosocial Development
Stages of Psychosocial Development
Stages of Psychosocial Development
psychosocial stages. His ideas were greatly influenced by Freud, going along with
Freuds (1923) theory regarding the structure and topography of personality.
However, whereas Freud was an id psychologist, Erikson was an ego psychologist. He
emphasized the role of culture and society and the conflicts that can take place within
the ego itself, whereas Freud emphasized the conflict between the id and the superego.
According to Erikson, the ego develops as it successfully resolves crises that are
distinctly social in nature. These involve establishing a sense of trust in others,
developing a sense of identity in society, and helping the next generation prepare for
the future.
Erikson extends on Freudian thoughts by focusing on the adaptive and creative
characteristic of the ego, and expanding the notion of the stages ofpersonality
development to include the entire lifespan.
Erikson proposed a lifespan model of development, taking in five stages up to the age
of 18 years and three further stages beyond, well into adulthood. Erikson suggests that
there is still plenty of room for continued growth and development throughout ones
life. Erikson puts a great deal of emphasis on the adolescent period, feeling it was a
crucial stage for developing a persons identity.
Like Freud and many others, Erik Erikson maintained that personality develops in a
predetermined order, and builds upon each previous stage. This is called the epigenic
principle.
The outcome of this 'maturation timetable' is a wide and integrated set of life skills
and abilities that function together within the autonomous individual. However,
instead of focusing on sexual development (like Freud), he was interested in how
children socialize and how this affects their sense of self.
Psychosocial Stages
Eriksons (1959) theory of psychosocial development has eight distinct stages. Like
Freud, Erikson assumes that a crisis occurs at each stage of development. For Erikson
(1963), these crises are of a psychosocial nature because they involve psychological
needs of the individual (i.e. psycho) conflicting with the needs of society (i.e. social).
According to the theory, successful completion of each stage results in a healthy
personality and the acquisition of basic virtues. Basic virtues are characteristic
strengths which the ego can use to resolve subsequent crises.
Failure to successfully complete a stage can result in a reduced ability to complete
further stages and therefore a more unhealthy personality and sense of self. These
stages, however, can be resolved successfully at a later time.
During this stage the infant is uncertain about the world in which they live. To resolve
these feelings of uncertainty the infant looks towards their primary caregiver for
stability and consistency of care.
If the care the infant receives is consistent, predictable and reliable, they will develop
a sense of trust which will carry with them to other relationships, and they will be able
to feel secure even when threatened.
Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of hope. By developing a sense of trust, the
infant can have hope that as new crises arise, there is a real possibility that other
people will be there are a source of support. Failing to acquire the virtue of hope will
lead to the development of fear.
For example, if the care has been harsh or inconsistent, unpredictable and unreliable,
then the infant will develop a sense of mistrust and will not have confidence in the
world around them or in their abilities to influence events.
This infant will carry the basic sense of mistrust with them to other relationships. It
may result in anxiety, heightened insecurities, and an over feeling of mistrust in the
world around them.
Consistent with Erikson's views on the importance of trust, research
byBowlby and Ainsworth has outlined how the quality of the early experience
of attachment can affect relationships with others in later life.
Children begin to plan activities, make up games, and initiate activities with others. If
given this opportunity, children develop a sense of initiative, and feel secure in their
ability to lead others and make decisions.
Conversely, if this tendency is squelched, either through criticism or control, children
develop a sense of guilt. They may feel like a nuisance to others and will therefore
remain followers, lacking in self-initiative.
The child takes initiatives which the parents will often try to stop in order to protect
the child. The child will often overstep the mark in his forcefulness and the danger is
that the parents will tend to punish the child and restrict his initiatives too much.
It is at this stage that the child will begin to ask many questions as his thirst for
knowledge grows. If the parents treat the childs questions as trivial, a nuisance or
embarrassing or other aspects of their behavior as threatening then the child may have
feelings of guilt for being a nuisance.
Too much guilt can make the child slow to interact with others and may inhibit their
creativity. Some guilt is, of course, necessary, otherwise the child would not know
how to exercise self control or have a conscience.
A healthy balance between initiative and guilt is important. Success in this stage will
lead to the virtue of purpose.
If children are encouraged and reinforced for their initiative, they begin to feel
industrious and feel confident in their ability to achieve goals. If this initiative is not
encouraged, if it is restricted by parents or teacher, then the child begins to feel
inferior, doubting his own abilities and therefore may not reach his or her potential.
If the child cannot develop the specific skill they feel society is demanding (e.g. being
athletic) then they may develop a sense of inferiority. Some failure may be necessary
so that the child can develop some modesty. Yet again, a balance between competence
and modesty is necessary. Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of competence.
within society ("I dont know what I want to be when I grow up") can lead to role
confusion. Role confusion involves the individual not being sure about themselves or
their place in society.
In response to role confusion or identity crisis an adolescent may begin to experiment
with different lifestyles (e.g. work, education or political activities). Also pressuring
someone into an identity can result in rebellion in the form of establishing a negative
identity, and in addition to this feeling of unhappiness.
Critical Evaluation
Eriksons theory has good face validity. Many people find that they can relate to his
theories about various stagesof the life cycle through their own experiences.
However, Erikson is rather vague about the causes of development. What kinds of
experiences must people have in order to successfully resolve various psychosocial
conflicts and move from one stage to another? The theory does not have a universal
mechanism for crisis resolution.
Indeed, Erikson (1964) acknowledges his theory is more a descriptive overview of
human social and emotional development that does not adequately explain how or
why this development occurs. For example, Erikson does not explicitly explain how
the outcome of one psychosocial stage influences personality at a later stage.
However, Eriskon stressed his work was a tool to think with rather than a factual
analysis. Its purpose then is to provide aframework within which development can be
considered rather than testable theory.
One of the strengths of Erikson's theory is its ability to tie together important
psychosocial development across the entire lifespan.
Although support for Erikson's stages of personality development exists (McAdams,
1999), critics of his theory provide evidence suggesting a lack of discrete stages of
personality development (McCrae & Costa, 1997).