Stages of Psychosocial Development

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Erik Erikson (1950, 1963) does not talk about psychosexual Stages, he discusses

psychosocial stages. His ideas were greatly influenced by Freud, going along with
Freuds (1923) theory regarding the structure and topography of personality.
However, whereas Freud was an id psychologist, Erikson was an ego psychologist. He
emphasized the role of culture and society and the conflicts that can take place within
the ego itself, whereas Freud emphasized the conflict between the id and the superego.
According to Erikson, the ego develops as it successfully resolves crises that are
distinctly social in nature. These involve establishing a sense of trust in others,
developing a sense of identity in society, and helping the next generation prepare for
the future.
Erikson extends on Freudian thoughts by focusing on the adaptive and creative
characteristic of the ego, and expanding the notion of the stages ofpersonality
development to include the entire lifespan.
Erikson proposed a lifespan model of development, taking in five stages up to the age
of 18 years and three further stages beyond, well into adulthood. Erikson suggests that
there is still plenty of room for continued growth and development throughout ones
life. Erikson puts a great deal of emphasis on the adolescent period, feeling it was a
crucial stage for developing a persons identity.
Like Freud and many others, Erik Erikson maintained that personality develops in a
predetermined order, and builds upon each previous stage. This is called the epigenic
principle.
The outcome of this 'maturation timetable' is a wide and integrated set of life skills
and abilities that function together within the autonomous individual. However,
instead of focusing on sexual development (like Freud), he was interested in how
children socialize and how this affects their sense of self.

Psychosocial Stages

Eriksons (1959) theory of psychosocial development has eight distinct stages. Like
Freud, Erikson assumes that a crisis occurs at each stage of development. For Erikson
(1963), these crises are of a psychosocial nature because they involve psychological
needs of the individual (i.e. psycho) conflicting with the needs of society (i.e. social).
According to the theory, successful completion of each stage results in a healthy
personality and the acquisition of basic virtues. Basic virtues are characteristic
strengths which the ego can use to resolve subsequent crises.
Failure to successfully complete a stage can result in a reduced ability to complete
further stages and therefore a more unhealthy personality and sense of self. These
stages, however, can be resolved successfully at a later time.

1. Trust vs. Mistrust


Is the world a safe place or is it full of unpredictable events and accidents waiting to
happen? Erikson's first psychosocial crisis occurs during the first year or so of life
(like Freud's oral stage of psychosexual development). The crisis is one of trust vs.
mistrust.

During this stage the infant is uncertain about the world in which they live. To resolve
these feelings of uncertainty the infant looks towards their primary caregiver for
stability and consistency of care.
If the care the infant receives is consistent, predictable and reliable, they will develop
a sense of trust which will carry with them to other relationships, and they will be able
to feel secure even when threatened.
Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of hope. By developing a sense of trust, the
infant can have hope that as new crises arise, there is a real possibility that other
people will be there are a source of support. Failing to acquire the virtue of hope will
lead to the development of fear.
For example, if the care has been harsh or inconsistent, unpredictable and unreliable,
then the infant will develop a sense of mistrust and will not have confidence in the
world around them or in their abilities to influence events.
This infant will carry the basic sense of mistrust with them to other relationships. It
may result in anxiety, heightened insecurities, and an over feeling of mistrust in the
world around them.
Consistent with Erikson's views on the importance of trust, research
byBowlby and Ainsworth has outlined how the quality of the early experience
of attachment can affect relationships with others in later life.

2. Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt


The child is developing physically and becoming more mobile. Between the ages of
18 months and three, children begin to assert their independence, by walking away
from their mother, picking which toy to play with, and making choices about what
they like to wear, to eat, etc.
The child is discovering that he or she has many skills and abilities, such as putting on
clothes and shoes, playing with toys, etc. Such skills illustrate the child's growing
sense of independence and autonomy. Erikson states it is critical that parents allow

their children to explore the limits of their abilities within an encouraging


environment which is tolerant of failure.
For example, rather than put on a child's clothes a supportive parent should have the
patience to allow the child to try until they succeed or ask for assistance. So, the
parents need to encourage the child to becoming more independent whilst at the same
time protecting the child so that constant failure is avoided.
A delicate balance is required from the parent. They must try not to do everything for
the child but if the child fails at a particular task they must not criticize the child for
failures and accidents (particularly when toilet training). The aim has to be self
control without a loss of self-esteem (Gross, 1992). Success in this stage will lead to
the virtue of will.
If children in this stage are encouraged and supported in their increased independence,
they become more confident and secure in their own ability to survive in the world.
If children are criticized, overly controlled, or not given the opportunity to assert
themselves, they begin to feel inadequate in their ability to survive, and may then
become overly dependent upon others, lack self-esteem, and feel a sense of shame or
doubt in their own abilities.

3. Initiative vs. Guilt


Around age three and continuing to age five, children assert themselves more
frequently. These are particularly lively, rapid-developing years in a childs life.
According to Bee (1992) it is a time of vigor of action and of behaviors that the
parents may see as aggressive".
During this period the primary feature involves the child regularly interacting with
other children at school. Central to this stage is play, as it provides children with the
opportunity to explore their interpersonal skills through initiating activities.

Children begin to plan activities, make up games, and initiate activities with others. If
given this opportunity, children develop a sense of initiative, and feel secure in their
ability to lead others and make decisions.
Conversely, if this tendency is squelched, either through criticism or control, children
develop a sense of guilt. They may feel like a nuisance to others and will therefore
remain followers, lacking in self-initiative.
The child takes initiatives which the parents will often try to stop in order to protect
the child. The child will often overstep the mark in his forcefulness and the danger is
that the parents will tend to punish the child and restrict his initiatives too much.
It is at this stage that the child will begin to ask many questions as his thirst for
knowledge grows. If the parents treat the childs questions as trivial, a nuisance or
embarrassing or other aspects of their behavior as threatening then the child may have
feelings of guilt for being a nuisance.
Too much guilt can make the child slow to interact with others and may inhibit their
creativity. Some guilt is, of course, necessary, otherwise the child would not know
how to exercise self control or have a conscience.
A healthy balance between initiative and guilt is important. Success in this stage will
lead to the virtue of purpose.

4. Industry (competence) vs. Inferiority


Children are at the stage (aged 5 to 12 yrs) where they will be learning to read and
write, to do sums, to do things on their own. Teachers begin to take an important role
in the childs life as they teach the child specific skills.
It is at this stage that the childs peer group will gain greater significance and will
become a major source of the childs self esteem. The child now feels the need to win
approval by demonstrating specific competencies that are valued by society, and begin
to develop a sense of pride in their accomplishments.

If children are encouraged and reinforced for their initiative, they begin to feel
industrious and feel confident in their ability to achieve goals. If this initiative is not
encouraged, if it is restricted by parents or teacher, then the child begins to feel
inferior, doubting his own abilities and therefore may not reach his or her potential.
If the child cannot develop the specific skill they feel society is demanding (e.g. being
athletic) then they may develop a sense of inferiority. Some failure may be necessary
so that the child can develop some modesty. Yet again, a balance between competence
and modesty is necessary. Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of competence.

5. Identity vs. Role Confusion


During adolescence (age 12 to 18 yrs), the transition from childhood to adulthood is
most important. Children are becoming more independent, and begin to look at the
future in terms of career, relationships, families, housing, etc. The individual wants to
belong to a society and fit in.
This is a major stage in development where the child has to learn the roleshe will
occupy as an adult. It is during this stage that the adolescent will re-examine his
identity and try to find out exactly who he or she is. Erikson suggests that two
identities are involved: the sexual and the occupational.
According to Bee (1992), what should happen at the end of this stage is a
reintegrated sense of self, of what one wants to do or be, and of ones appropriate sex
role. During this stage the body image of the adolescent changes.
Erikson claims that the adolescent may feel uncomfortable about their body for a
while until they can adapt and grow into the changes. Success in this stage will lead
to the virtue of fidelity.
Fidelity involves being able to commit one's self to others on the basis of accepting
others, even when there may be ideological differences.
During this period, they explore possibilities and begin to form their own identity
based upon the outcome of their explorations. Failure to establish a sense of identity

within society ("I dont know what I want to be when I grow up") can lead to role
confusion. Role confusion involves the individual not being sure about themselves or
their place in society.
In response to role confusion or identity crisis an adolescent may begin to experiment
with different lifestyles (e.g. work, education or political activities). Also pressuring
someone into an identity can result in rebellion in the form of establishing a negative
identity, and in addition to this feeling of unhappiness.

6. Intimacy vs. Isolation


Occurring in young adulthood (ages 18 to 40 yrs), we begin to share ourselves more
intimately with others. We explore relationships leading toward longer term
commitments with someone other than a family member.
Successful completion of this stage can lead to comfortable relationships and a sense
of commitment, safety, and care within a relationship. Avoiding intimacy, fearing
commitment and relationships can lead to isolation, loneliness, and sometimes
depression. Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of love.

7. Generativity vs. Stagnation


During middle adulthood (ages 40 to 65 yrs), we establish our careers, settle down
within a relationship, begin our own families and develop a sense of being a part of
the bigger picture.
We give back to society through raising our children, being productive at work, and
becoming involved in community activities and organizations.
By failing to achieve these objectives, we become stagnant and feel unproductive.
Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of care.

8. Ego Integrity vs. Despair


As we grow older (65+ yrs) and become senior citizens, we tend to slow down our
productivity, and explore life as a retired person. It is during this time that we
contemplate our accomplishments and are able to develop integrity if we see ourselves
as leading a successful life.
Erik Erikson believed if we see our lives as unproductive, feel guilt about our past, or
feel that we did not accomplish our life goals, we become dissatisfied with life and
develop despair, often leading to depression and hopelessness.
Success in this stage will lead to the virtue of wisdom. Wisdom enables a person to
look back on their life with a sense of closure and completeness, and also accept death
without fear.

Critical Evaluation
Eriksons theory has good face validity. Many people find that they can relate to his
theories about various stagesof the life cycle through their own experiences.
However, Erikson is rather vague about the causes of development. What kinds of
experiences must people have in order to successfully resolve various psychosocial
conflicts and move from one stage to another? The theory does not have a universal
mechanism for crisis resolution.
Indeed, Erikson (1964) acknowledges his theory is more a descriptive overview of
human social and emotional development that does not adequately explain how or
why this development occurs. For example, Erikson does not explicitly explain how
the outcome of one psychosocial stage influences personality at a later stage.
However, Eriskon stressed his work was a tool to think with rather than a factual
analysis. Its purpose then is to provide aframework within which development can be
considered rather than testable theory.

One of the strengths of Erikson's theory is its ability to tie together important
psychosocial development across the entire lifespan.
Although support for Erikson's stages of personality development exists (McAdams,
1999), critics of his theory provide evidence suggesting a lack of discrete stages of
personality development (McCrae & Costa, 1997).

You might also like