Walter Stevenson, a British citizen, died in California in 1951. His will left his estate, including shares in a Philippine mining company, to his wife Beatrice. The estate administrator claimed an exemption from Philippine estate and inheritance taxes on the shares, citing a reciprocity provision. However, the court ruled against the exemption. While California only imposed inheritance taxes, the Philippines imposed both estate and inheritance taxes. Additionally, U.S. federal law did not grant exemptions based on reciprocity. As a result, reciprocity was not total as required between the two jurisdictions, so the estate could not claim the tax exemption.
Walter Stevenson, a British citizen, died in California in 1951. His will left his estate, including shares in a Philippine mining company, to his wife Beatrice. The estate administrator claimed an exemption from Philippine estate and inheritance taxes on the shares, citing a reciprocity provision. However, the court ruled against the exemption. While California only imposed inheritance taxes, the Philippines imposed both estate and inheritance taxes. Additionally, U.S. federal law did not grant exemptions based on reciprocity. As a result, reciprocity was not total as required between the two jurisdictions, so the estate could not claim the tax exemption.
Walter Stevenson, a British citizen, died in California in 1951. His will left his estate, including shares in a Philippine mining company, to his wife Beatrice. The estate administrator claimed an exemption from Philippine estate and inheritance taxes on the shares, citing a reciprocity provision. However, the court ruled against the exemption. While California only imposed inheritance taxes, the Philippines imposed both estate and inheritance taxes. Additionally, U.S. federal law did not grant exemptions based on reciprocity. As a result, reciprocity was not total as required between the two jurisdictions, so the estate could not claim the tax exemption.
Walter Stevenson, a British citizen, died in California in 1951. His will left his estate, including shares in a Philippine mining company, to his wife Beatrice. The estate administrator claimed an exemption from Philippine estate and inheritance taxes on the shares, citing a reciprocity provision. However, the court ruled against the exemption. While California only imposed inheritance taxes, the Philippines imposed both estate and inheritance taxes. Additionally, U.S. federal law did not grant exemptions based on reciprocity. As a result, reciprocity was not total as required between the two jurisdictions, so the estate could not claim the tax exemption.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
Collector of Internal Revenue vs.
Fisher GR. No. L-11622 January 28, 1961 DOCTRINE: Reciprocity must be total. If any of the two states collects or imposes or
does not exempt any transfer, death, legacy or succession tax of any character, the reciprocity does not work. FACTS:
Walter G. Stevenson was born in the Philippines of British parents, married in
Manila to another British subject, Beatrice. He died in 1951 in California where he and his wife moved to. In his will, he instituted Beatrice as his sole heiress to certain real and personal properties, among which are 210,000 shares of stocks in Mindanao Mother Lode Mines (Mines). Ian Murray Statt (Statt), the appointed ancillary administrator of his estate filed an estate and inheritance tax return. He made a preliminary return to secure the waiver of the CIR on the inheritance of the Mines shares of stock. In 1952, Beatrice assigned all her rights and interests in the estate to the spouses Fisher. Statt filed an amended estate and inheritance tax return claiming ADDITIOANL EXEMPTIONS, one of which is the estate and inheritance tax on the Mines shares of stock pursuant to a reciprocity proviso in the NIRC, hence, warranting a refund from what he initially paid. The collector denied the claim. He then filed in the CFI of Manila for the said amount. CFI ruled that (a) the share of Beatrice should be deducted from the net estate of Walter, (b) the intangible personal property belonging to the estate of Walter is exempt from inheritance tax pursuant to the reciprocity proviso in NIRC. ISSUE/S: Whether or not the estate can avail itself of the reciprocity proviso in the NIRC granting exemption from the payment of taxes for the Mines shares of stock. RULING: NO.
Reciprocity must be total. If any of the two states collects or imposes or does not exempt any transfer, death, legacy or succession tax of any character, the reciprocity does not work. In the Philippines, upon the death of any citizen or resident, or nonresident with properties, there are imposed upon his estate, both an estate and an inheritance tax. But, under the laws of California, only inheritance tax is imposed. Also, although the Federal Internal Revenue Code imposes an estate tax, it does not grant exemption on the basis of reciprocity. Thus, a Filipino citizen shall always be at a disadvantage. This is not what the legislators intended. SPECIFICALLY: Section122 of the NIRC provides that No tax shall be collected under this Title in respect of intangible personal property (a) if the decedent at the time of his death was a resident of a foreign country which at the time of his death did not impose a transfer of tax or death tax of any character in respect of intangible personal property of citizens of the Philippines not residing in that foreign country, or (b) if the laws of the foreign country of which the decedent was a resident at the time of his death allow a similar exemption from transfer taxes or death taxes of every character in respect of intangible personal property owned by citizens of the Philippines not residing in that foreign country." On the other hand, Section 13851 of the California Inheritance Tax Law provides that intangible personal property is exempt from tax if the decedent at the time of his death was a resident of a territory or another State of the United States or of a foreign state or country which then imposed a legacy, succession, or death tax in respect to intangible personal property of its own residents, but either:. Did not impose a legacy, succession, or death tax of any character in respect to intangible personal property of residents of this State, or Had in its laws a reciprocal provision under which intangible personal property of a non-resident was exempt from legacy, succession, or death taxes of every character if the Territory or other State of the United States or foreign state or country in which the nonresident resided allowed a similar exemption in respect to intangible personal property of residents of the Territory or State of the United States or foreign state or country of residence of the decedent."
