Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Patricia F. Applegate, R.N. v. John Michael Fray, Phd. Robert S. Boyd, Reverend The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, which granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissed the plaintiff's action, and denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in the case of Applegate v. Fray et al. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also granted the plaintiff in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's reasoning for its rulings in the case. The court determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Patricia F. Applegate, R.N. v. John Michael Fray, Phd. Robert S. Boyd, Reverend The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, which granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissed the plaintiff's action, and denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in the case of Applegate v. Fray et al. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also granted the plaintiff in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's reasoning for its rulings in the case. The court determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 98 F.3d 1334 Docket: 96-1710

    Original Title

    Patricia F. Applegate, R.N. v. John Michael Fray, Phd. Robert S. Boyd, Reverend the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, which granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissed the plaintiff's action, and denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in the case of Applegate v. Fray et al. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also granted the plaintiff in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's reasoning for its rulings in the case. The court determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Patricia F. Applegate, R.N. v. John Michael Fray, Phd. Robert S. Boyd, Reverend The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, 98 F.3d 1334, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, which granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissed the plaintiff's action, and denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in the case of Applegate v. Fray et al. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also granted the plaintiff in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's reasoning for its rulings in the case. The court determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    98 F.

    3d 1334

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Patricia F. APPLEGATE, R.N., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John Michael FRAY, Phd.; Robert S. Boyd, Reverend; The
    Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-1710.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 3, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 9, 1996.

    Patricia F. Applegate, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Morris Holleran,


    MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond,
    Virginia; Roger Louis Williams, WILLIAMS, BUTLER & PIERCE,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting Defendants' motions
    for summary judgment, dismissing her action, and denying her motion for
    reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status and
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Applegate v. Fray, No. CA-95-814
    (E.D. Va. Apr. 19 & May 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like