Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 147 views

    Sakima El Bey v. Margaret Seymour, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sakima Iban El Bey appealed a district court order that denied his civil complaint seeking the return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that El Bey did not show he was entitled to the return of the real property. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Sakima El Bey v. Margaret Seymour, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    147 views2 pages
    Sakima Iban El Bey appealed a district court order that denied his civil complaint seeking the return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that El Bey did not show he was entitled to the return of the real property. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2318

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Sakima Iban El Bey appealed a district court order that denied his civil complaint seeking the return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that El Bey did not show he was entitled to the return of the real property. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    147 views2 pages

    Sakima El Bey v. Margaret Seymour, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sakima Iban El Bey appealed a district court order that denied his civil complaint seeking the return of real property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that El Bey did not show he was entitled to the return of the real property. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2318

    SAKIMA IBAN EL BEY, a/k/a Sakima Bey, a/k/a Sakima Iban


    Salih El Bey, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MARGARET SEYMOUR, Senior Judge; BEATTIE B. ASHMORE; L. WALTER
    TOLLISON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (3:14-cv-02858-SB)

    Submitted:

    February 12, 2015

    Decided:

    February 18, 2015

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sakima Iban El Bey appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his civil complaint in which he seeks the return of
    real

    property.

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    El Bey v. Seymour, No. 3:14-cv-02858-SB

    (D.S.C. Nov. 6, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like