Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 39 views

    Ellis v. Riverside Regional Jail, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alonza Ellis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Riverside Regional Jail. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Ellis v. Riverside Regional Jail, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    39 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alonza Ellis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Riverside Regional Jail. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6572

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alonza Ellis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Riverside Regional Jail. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    39 views2 pages

    Ellis v. Riverside Regional Jail, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alonza Ellis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Riverside Regional Jail. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6572

    ALONZA A. ELLIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00042-JRS)

    Submitted:

    June 24, 2010

    Decided:

    July 1, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alonza A. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alonza

    A.

    Ellis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Ellis v. Riverside Regl Jail, No. 3:10-cv-00042 (E.D.

    Va. Feb. 4, 2010).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like