Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    United States v. Wilford, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Wilford appealed a district court's order granting the government's motion for summary judgment and final decree of forfeiture for $42,304 in U.S. currency. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinions and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the rulings based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding civil forfeiture.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Wilford, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views3 pages
    Richard Wilford appealed a district court's order granting the government's motion for summary judgment and final decree of forfeiture for $42,304 in U.S. currency. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinions and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the rulings based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding civil forfeiture.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 94-2455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Richard Wilford appealed a district court's order granting the government's motion for summary judgment and final decree of forfeiture for $42,304 in U.S. currency. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinions and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the rulings based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding civil forfeiture.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views3 pages

    United States v. Wilford, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Wilford appealed a district court's order granting the government's motion for summary judgment and final decree of forfeiture for $42,304 in U.S. currency. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinions and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the rulings based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding civil forfeiture.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 94-2455

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD ANTHONY WILFORD,
    Claimant - Appellant,
    and
    $42,304.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-94-932-JFM)
    Submitted:

    July 23, 1996

    Decided:

    August 5, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Anthony Wilford, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the
    government's summary judgment motion and from the court's final
    decree of forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm. See United States v. Ursery, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565
    (U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like